Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

The SEC has approved a NYSE Arca rule change that raises position and exercise limits for options on BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, giving institutional traders more room to hedge and express larger views around the spot Bitcoin ETF market.

The change increases limits for IBIT options from 250,000 contracts to 1,000,000 contracts, according to the SEC release. That is a fourfold increase, and it reflects how quickly Bitcoin ETF options have become part of the market’s trading infrastructure.

This is not the kind of update that grabs attention like a new ETF launch. But for market structure, it matters.

Options limits decide how large positions can become. Larger limits can support deeper institutional trading, more complex hedging, and better liquidity around ETF-linked Bitcoin exposure.

Reference: SEC

TL;DR The SEC approved a NYSE Arca rule change raising IBIT options limits. Position and exercise limits move from 250,000 to 1,000,000 contracts. The change gives larger traders more room to hedge Bitcoin ETF exposure. Bitcoin ETFs Are Becoming Trading Infrastructure The first phase of the spot Bitcoin ETF story was access.

Investors wanted to know whether they could buy Bitcoin exposure through ordinary brokerage accounts. Asset managers wanted products that could fit inside existing portfolios. Advisers wanted a structure that did not involve exchanges, wallets, private keys, or direct custody.

That phase is now maturing.

The next phase is market structure. Once an ETF becomes liquid, traders want options, hedging tools, arbitrage routes, and larger position limits. Those pieces make the product more useful for institutions that manage risk actively rather than simply buying and holding.

IBIT has become one of the most important Bitcoin ETF products in the market, so options activity around it matters. If traders can hold larger options positions, they can manage larger underlying exposures, hedge portfolio risk more efficiently, or build more sophisticated volatility strategies.

That does not mean the change is automatically bullish for Bitcoin. Options can be used for bullish, bearish, and neutral strategies. But it does mean the market around Bitcoin ETFs is becoming deeper.

Why Position Limits Matter Position limits exist to prevent excessive concentration and reduce market-manipulation risk.

If limits are too low, large institutions may find the product less useful. If limits are too high, regulators may worry about market integrity. Raising the limit suggests the exchange and regulator believe the product can support larger activity without creating unacceptable risk.

For IBIT options, moving from 250,000 to 1,000,000 contracts is a meaningful shift.

It allows larger traders to operate with more flexibility. A fund with substantial Bitcoin ETF exposure may need options to hedge downside. A market maker may need room to support liquidity. A volatility trader may want to build positions that were previously constrained by the lower cap.

The result can be a more efficient options market.

Better options liquidity can also improve the underlying ETF market because traders have more ways to manage risk. In mature asset classes, options are a normal part of the ecosystem. Bitcoin ETFs are now moving closer to that model.

A Sign Of Institutional Normalisation The larger point is that Bitcoin is increasingly being absorbed into traditional market infrastructure.

Spot ETFs brought Bitcoin into regulated fund wrappers. Options brought a derivatives layer around those wrappers. Higher position limits now give larger institutions more operational room.

This is exactly how financial markets mature. First comes access, then liquidity, then hedging, then more complex institutional strategies.

For Bitcoin, that is a major shift from earlier cycles, when much of the market was concentrated on offshore exchanges, spot exchanges, and crypto-native derivatives venues. Those venues still matter, but the ETF market has changed the balance.

More regulated options activity could also affect volatility. In some cases, deeper options markets help smooth risk because traders can hedge more efficiently. In other cases, options positioning can create sharp moves around expiries, strikes, and dealer hedging flows.

Either way, Bitcoin traders will increasingly need to watch ETF options data alongside spot flows.

The SEC approval does not guarantee higher Bitcoin prices. It does not remove volatility. It does not change the underlying supply schedule. But it does make the institutional Bitcoin market more functional.

That may be the most important takeaway. Bitcoin ETFs are no longer just products people buy for exposure. They are becoming part of a larger trading and risk-management system.

This article is based on SEC release SR-NYSEARCA-2026-76 and Federal Register materials.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Japan has taken a decisive step in cryptocurrency regulation by approving a new framework that reclassifies XRP and other digital assets as financial instruments. This move contrasts with ongoing debates in the United States over the proposed CLARITY Act, which aims to provide regulatory clarity for digital assets.

Japan’s new crypto classification sets stage for XRP ETFX Finance Bull, a well-known cryptocurrency commentator active on social media, described the development as a meaningful shift for XRP and the wider crypto market. He stated that Japan’s action illustrates progress beyond mere legislative debate and demonstrates a concrete commitment to integrating cryptocurrencies within the nation’s financial system.

According to X Finance Bull, the updated regulatory treatment of digital assets creates a legal foundation for the launch of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to XRP and potentially other cryptocurrencies. He described this milestone as a transition from long-discussed ambitions to tangible implementation, especially given Japan’s status as the world’s third-largest economy.

Japan has approved its own framework reclassifying $XRP and other digital assets as financial instruments, marking a clear shift from theory to action. An XRP ETF now moves from an aspiration to an imminent reality in Asia’s leading market.

This shift stands in contrast to the United States, where policymakers continue to debate digital asset legislation. While the CLARITY Act remains under discussion in Congress, Japan’s financial authorities have moved forward with a completed and actionable regulatory model.

ETF filings progressing with support from SBI GroupOne of the central points in X Finance Bull’s analysis concerns the preparations underway for cryptocurrency ETFs in Japan. He pointed to SBI Group, one of the country’s largest financial conglomerates and a longstanding partner of Ripple, as the organization leading these efforts.

SBI Group’s early preparations for an XRP ETF reportedly began well before the latest government approval. The commentator noted that this indicates strategic, long-term planning and confidence in the regulatory trajectory. SBI Group’s collaboration with Ripple over several years may have given it the head start needed to introduce new investment products as soon as policy allowed.

This approach sets the current situation apart from prior announcements or speculative headlines, as institutions like SBI appear positioned to capitalize on regulatory changes swiftly.

Mini dictionary: SBI Group, headquartered in Tokyo, is a major Japanese financial services company engaged in banking, asset management, and fintech, and has been a key partner of Ripple in promoting blockchain adoption throughout Japan and Asia.

Potential impact on XRP adoptionX Finance Bull also emphasized the potential advantages of an XRP ETF for Japanese investors. He explained that by offering regulated financial products, such as ETFs, investors could gain exposure to XRP using familiar brokerage accounts or retirement plans.

Citing the experience of spot cryptocurrency ETFs in the United States, he claimed that XRP funds there have attracted approximately $1.48 billion in investments, even during challenging market periods. This, according to the commentator, demonstrates how structured ETF offerings can broaden participation in the cryptocurrency sector.

Japan’s tax structure may further support market growth. The current flat 20% tax rate on crypto gains stands out as a more straightforward regime compared to other jurisdictions, simplifying the process for investors.

CountryCrypto Tax RateStatus of XRP ETFJapan20% flat ratePreparations underwayUnited StatesVaries (up to 37% for capital gains)No XRP ETF approvedRipple’s close ties with Japanese institutionsThe commentator underscored the significance of Ripple’s relationship with SBI Group. He mentioned that RLUSD, a stablecoin, is already available via SBI VC Trade, and SBI Ripple Asia operates technical infrastructure on the XRP Ledger. These initiatives reflect ongoing efforts to support token issuance and digital asset integration in Japan.

Overall, these developments suggest Japan is prioritizing infrastructure for institutional-grade digital asset products, rather than simply adjusting existing regulations. Analysts suggest the combination of governmental support, ETF readiness, and established partnerships positions Japan as a notable environment for crypto adoption, with XRP poised to benefit from the country’s proactive approach.

SBI has been working with Ripple to build digital finance platforms in Japan for years, providing a robust foundation as the country moves toward institutional crypto adoption.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

XRP withdrawal activity on Binance has climbed to its highest level in at least two years.

According to a new on-chain analysis by CryptoQuant contributor Amr Taha, the exchange is now recording a significantly larger share of withdrawal transactions than of deposits.

Taha said Binance’s share of XRP withdrawal transactions reached 54.5% on July 17, the highest level since July 2024. Meanwhile, deposit transactions fell to 45.4%, the lowest reading since the same period and below the previous low of 46.7% recorded on June 20, 2025.

XRP Deposit/Withdrawal chart The widening gap between withdrawals and deposits has expanded to 9.1 percentage points, up from 6.5 points on June 20, 2025. According to Taha, this makes the current imbalance roughly 40% wider than the previous comparison.

Binance Outpaces Broader Exchange Trend The broader centralized exchange market is showing a similar pattern, though Binance’s shift is more pronounced.

Across all centralized exchanges, withdrawal transactions accounted for 53.01%, nearly matching the 53.09% recorded on June 20, 2025, while deposit transactions stood at approximately 46.9%.

Binance’s withdrawal share is now 1.49 percentage points higher than the all-exchange average. Its 9.1-point withdrawal-deposit gap is also nearly 49% wider than the roughly 6.1-point gap observed across all centralized exchanges.

The figures suggest Binance users are moving XRP off the exchange at a faster rate than the broader market, although the data reflects the number of transactions rather than the size or value of transferred funds.

Previous Pattern Preceded 66% XRP Rally Taha pointed to a historical parallel that has drawn attention from market participants.

After similar transaction levels were recorded on June 20, 2025, XRP’s price climbed from approximately $2.11 to $3.50 by July 21, delivering a gain of nearly 66% in about one month.

At the time of the analysis, XRP was trading near $1.09, around 48% below its June 2025 comparison price and nearly 69% below the subsequent $3.50 peak.

However, Taha cautioned against interpreting the data as a direct bullish signal. The metrics track the proportion of deposit and withdrawal transactions, not the volume of XRP being transferred or net exchange flows.

As a result, the shift reflects a change in transaction composition rather than definitive evidence of capital leaving exchanges or a guarantee that price will follow the same trajectory.

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

Ethereum (ETH) price is up slightly by 1.82% today, July 18, after the Chair of the US House Administration Committee, Bryan Steil, opined that the CLARITY Act bill could pass in the coming week. The bill’s passage will see ETH being classified as a digital commodity, a move that could bolster retail and institutional demand for the biggest altcoin.

ETH price traded at $1,845 at the time of writing. It is currently testing the support at the 50-day EMA, but bulls remain in control as this support holds.

US House Chair Eyes CLARITY Act Passage Next Week While speaking in an interview with FOX Business, U.S. Representative Steil has said that the Senate could pass the CLARITY Act bill in the week between June 20 and June 24.

Steil says that this will be the week when the bill will go to the Senate floor for voting, and if senators vote in favor of it, the US might “set the gold standard” for regulating crypto assets like Ethereum and potentially drive price gains.

Steil’s remarks come shortly after reports that the final text for the CLARITY bill will also be released next week. This new text might include changes on ethics and stablecoin yields.

Steil’s remarks have increased the likelihood of the bill passing. Data from Polymarket shows that the odds that the CLARITY Act will pass in 2026 have increased from 30% on July 17 to 42% at the time of writing.

Ethereum Price Prediction as Bears Test Key Support Level Ethereum price is testing the 50-day EMA support of $1,812 ahead of the crucial vote on the CLARITY Act bill that could officially classify ETH as a digital commodity if it passes.

If ETH price remains above this support, it could draw buyers that might push it to the 100-day EMA of $1,939. The buying pressure might come from the Senate passing the CLARITY Act.

The RSI reading of 57 also supports a bullish long-term Ethereum price prediction. This RSI is also making higher highs, suggesting that bulls are tightening their grip.

This bullish momentum might not only push ETH to the 100-day EMA of $1,939, but it could also trigger a move to $2,244. This is according to a previous Coingape Ethereum price analysis that detected a bullish double-bottom pattern forming on ETH’s daily chart.

ETH/USDT: 1-day chart (Source: TradingView) But if ETH closes below this support of $1,812, the price might drop to the 20-day EMA of $1,791. That drop might be caused by the US Senate failing to get enough votes to push the CLARITY Act forward, a move that may trigger a bearish Ethereum price prediction.

Ethereum ETFs Post Highest Weekly Inflows Since April Data from SoSovalue shows that there were $105 million inflows to spot Ethereum ETFs in the week between July 13 and July 17. This $105 million is the highest inflow that the ETFs have seen since April 2026.

Ethereum ETF Flow Data (Source: SoSoValue) The inflows suggest that institutions are getting more exposure to Ethereum price ahead of the CLARITY Act vote that would increase the regulatory clarity around ETH.

If the CLARITY Act passes, these spot ETF inflows could increase as institutions that were shying away because of regulatory uncertainty start buying ETH.

The institutional demand also comes amid an increase in Ethereum’s DeFi TVL that has increased from $36 billion on July 1 to $40 billion on July 17, per DeFiLlama.

This marks the first time that the TVL on Ethereum has gone above $40 billion since May 2026.

Ethereum has regained an upward trajectory for the first time in a year, coinciding with rising institutional adoption in tokenized finance. The network registered $327.3 million in tokenized exchange-traded fund (ETF) inflows over the past 12 months, securing a dominant lead over rival blockchains.

Ethereum’s upward price trendAnalyst Michaël van de Poppe highlighted that Ethereum has entered a new uptrend following nearly a year of sideways movement. He assessed the current market pullback as a relatively normal correction within this structure and expressed optimism about Ethereum’s potential for further gains if buyers defend key support levels.

$ETH is ready for another move higher, and the current consolidation appears to be a routine correction rather than a bearish phase. Michaël van de Poppe emphasized that he does not see a convincing reason for a bearish outlook on Ethereum, stating the asset has now entered an uptrend for the first time in twelve months.

According to van de Poppe, Ethereum’s correction does not alter the underlying positive momentum. Market observers are now watching whether ETH can stabilize and build the foundation for a fresh rally. The continued recovery phase remains in focus as analysts monitor price stability after volatility.

Record tokenized ETF inflows boost Ethereum’s dominanceValidation provider Everstake reported that Ethereum recorded the largest inflows into tokenized ETFs in the last year, adding $327.3 million to its total market capitalization. This amount was nearly four times that of Solana and more than five times that of BNB Chain over the same period.

Everstake stated that Ethereum is becoming the home of tokenized finance, supported by significant inflows into tokenized ETFs. The network’s $327.3 million in ETF inflows outpaces Solana’s and BNB Chain’s combined total, underlining Ethereum’s leading role in this sector.

Tokenized ETFs are blockchain-based representations of traditional exchange-traded funds, offering market participants access to ETF exposure using decentralized infrastructure. Their growing popularity reflects increasing institutional attention to tokenized asset markets, with liquidity and network maturity influencing the choice of blockchain platforms.

NetworkTokenized ETF Inflows (12 months)Ethereum$327.3 millionSolanaApprox. $82 millionBNB ChainApprox. $65 millionMini dictionary: Everstake is a blockchain infrastructure company specializing in staking and validation services across multiple proof-of-stake networks, supporting both institutional and retail clients.

Institutional interest centers on Ethereum’s infrastructureEverstake noted that institutional investors consistently prioritize deep liquidity, robust infrastructure, and established developer activity when choosing blockchain networks. Ethereum offers all three, contributing to its continued appeal as a platform for tokenized finance products, stablecoins, and on-chain markets.

Analysts say these fundamentals have kept Ethereum at the center of institutional blockchain strategies. As the uptrend continues, traders are also closely monitoring developments in tokenized ETF inflows among the major chains.

Ongoing growth in tokenized assets and decentralized finance may help reinforce Ethereum’s network role, especially as competition with Solana and BNB Chain intensifies.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

[PRESS RELEASE – San Francisco, CA, July 17th, 2026]

Crowdsourced Hedge Fund Completes Third Open-Market Purchase as Contributor Network and Assets Continue to Grow

Numerai, the decentralized hedge fund powered by crowdsourced machine learning, today announced the completion of a third strategic purchase of Numeraire (NMR), acquiring an additional $1.2 million of the token from the open market. The purchase brings Numerai’s total NMR buybacks to $3.2 million within one year.

The buyback reflects Numerai’s continued investment in the staking system that aligns thousands of independent data scientists toward improving the firm’s Stake-Weighted Meta Model, the machine learning model that powers Numerai’s hedge fund. Contributors stake NMR on their models, earning additional NMR when their predictions perform well on future market data and losing it when they do not. The resulting Stake-Weighted Meta Model continues to outperform Numerai’s internal benchmark models, demonstrating the value of aligning incentives with predictive performance.

Since announcing its first strategic buyback in July 2025, Numerai’s network has expanded significantly. Active accounts have more than doubled over the past year, submissions continue to increase, and the platform has introduced new infrastructure including Numerai Skills, Numerai Model Context Protocol (MCP), and Atomic Blockchain Staking, enabling increasingly autonomous participation by AI systems.

The underlying hedge fund has also continued to grow. According to the company, Numerai now manages approximately $700 million in assets, up from approximately $560 million at the end of 2025.

Numeraire is a fixed-supply Ethereum token capped at 11 million NMR. Because tournament rewards and staking incentives are distributed from Numerai’s treasury, the company is replenishing its holdings through open-market purchases. Before this buyback, approximately 3.1 million NMR remained in Numerai’s treasury.

Unlike the previous two announcements, this buyback had already been completed before today’s announcement. As with prior purchases, the transaction was executed on the open market through Coinbase Institutional at or near the bid price over several weeks to minimize market impact.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. This content does not represent an offer to purchase or sell any security or the interests of any account managed by Numerai GP, LLC or its affiliates. Such an offer may only be made to persons who qualify to invest and in jurisdictions in which such an offer is legal.

About Numerai

Numerai is a San Francisco-based hedge fund and data science platform founded in 2015. Through a global competition and open API, thousands of data scientists submit stock market signals that are aggregated into a single Meta Model used to trade global equities. Numeraire (NMR) is used to stake and reward models that improve the fund. Numerai’s mission is to build the world’s last hedge fund through open, competitive machine intelligence.

Discord | X | Docs

https://web3.bitget.com/en/academy/what-is-hype-hyperliquid-token-crypto-price-prediction

Hyperliquid, a decentralized perpetuals exchange and Layer 1 blockchain, has achieved a significant milestone by surpassing $1.2 billion in cumulative fees since its launch in 2024. This figure has been reported by Grayscale and highlights the substantial revenue generated by the protocol. Hyperliquid employs a buy-back-and-burn model, directing the majority of its fees to an Assistance Fund that reduces the supply of HYPE, its native token, through buybacks. This approach has created a deflationary pressure on the token, potentially increasing its market value.

The HYPE token currently trades near $60 and plays a crucial role in securing the network and facilitating transactions on the HyperEVM platform. With over 45 million tokens, or approximately 14.5% of the initial supply, removed from circulation, the buy-back-and-burn mechanism is seen as a major factor driving the token’s value. This strategy aligns the token’s value with the protocol’s revenue, making the tokenomics of Hyperliquid a subject of interest among market participants.

Advertisement

Markets are currently assessing the impact of these developments on the likelihood of Hyperliquid reaching a $100 price target by the end of 2026. As of now, the odds are priced at 30% for this scenario, suggesting that while there is optimism, significant growth is still required to reach this target.

Key Takeaways The milestone of $1.2 billion in fees suggests strong growth and sustainability for Hyperliquid, consistent with positive sentiment around its future potential. The buy-back-and-burn model appears to create deflationary pressure on the HYPE token, which may support a rise in its price. Current market pricing indicates a 30% probability for Hyperliquid to reach $100 by December 31, 2026, reflecting cautious optimism. What to Watch Observers should monitor Hyperliquid’s ongoing fee generation and the effectiveness of its buy-back-and-burn model in enhancing token value. Key developments, such as major partnerships or listings on prominent exchanges, could drive sentiment and pricing. Conversely, any security issues or negative regulatory news might impact the market’s outlook. The evolving performance of Hyperliquid and its tokenomics will be crucial in shaping market expectations and pricing consistency with the $100 target scenario.

Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.

Term Structure

Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31 30% — — View market → January 1 2027 6.2% — — View market → January 1 2027 4% — — View market → January 1 2027 65.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 9.1% — — View market → January 1 2027 3.6% — — View market →

Michael Saylor built his reputation on a simple thesis: buy Bitcoin, keep buying Bitcoin, never sell. CryptoQuant thinks it’s time to complicate that playbook.

On June 23, the on-chain analytics firm published a report urging Strategy, the company formerly known as MicroStrategy, to pump the brakes on its aggressive accumulation strategy. The core argument is less about Bitcoin and more about basic financial hygiene: the company’s liquidity position has deteriorated to a point where buying more Bitcoin before shoring up cash reserves is a meaningful risk.

The numbers that are making analysts nervous Strategy’s USD cash reserves dropped 38% in 2026, falling to roughly $1.1 billion by mid-June. At the same time, annual dividend obligations on its STRC preferred shares have quadrupled to approximately $1.2 billion per year.

The dividend coverage ratio tells the story most clearly. Strategy went from having over seven years of dividend runway to just 14 months, essentially in the span of one market cycle. CryptoQuant’s head of research, Julio Moreno, specifically recommended that the company rebuild reserves to around $2.8 billion, which would represent 24 months of coverage, before resuming any Bitcoin purchases.

Advertisement

STRC preferred shares were trading around $82.50 in mid-June, roughly 17.5% below par value.

CryptoQuant estimates that Strategy is sitting on approximately $10.6 billion in aggregate unrealized Bitcoin losses, with every purchase made between 2024 and 2026 currently underwater relative to prevailing market prices.

847,000 Bitcoin and a structural dilemma Strategy currently holds roughly 847,000 Bitcoin, a position that makes it the dominant force in corporate treasury Bitcoin ownership. CryptoQuant pegs Strategy’s share at approximately 76% of all Bitcoin held by corporate treasury entities globally.

CryptoQuant explicitly advised against selling to improve cash reserves, noting that divesting at current loss levels would simply crystallize the damage rather than fix the underlying problem. The firm’s preferred solution is to focus on raising capital through dividends or new share issuance rather than liquidating Bitcoin holdings.

The recommendation to develop a model for potential sales during future market rallies is the sharpest departure from Saylor’s public doctrine. Saylor has been categorical about never selling Bitcoin. CryptoQuant is suggesting the company needs at least a contingency plan, a set of conditions under which selling would be the rational move, even if that plan is never triggered.

What this means for the broader market CryptoQuant’s warning is partly about Strategy specifically and partly about the model it represents. A number of companies have followed Saylor’s playbook, adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets as a treasury reserve asset. If the originator of that strategy runs into a liquidity wall, it raises questions about whether smaller imitators have stress-tested their own positions.

The risk of intermediate Bitcoin cycle peaks is a specific concern Moreno flagged. If Bitcoin rallies hard and then corrects before Strategy has rebuilt its cash position, the company could find itself caught between the need to service preferred dividends and a Bitcoin treasury worth less than the peak valuations it was carried on.

Strategy’s ability to issue new equity or preferred shares at favorable terms depends heavily on market confidence. If that confidence erodes, the capital raise option that CryptoQuant sees as the cleanest solution becomes more expensive precisely when the company needs it most.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

A new proposal, Solstice, aims to make one of the most significant changes to Filecoin’s reward system since the network launched. It would reshape how storage providers earn rewards and how the network supports services that bring paying customers and data to Filecoin.

The basic idea is straightforward: instead of requiring providers to complete a special approval process to earn higher rewards, network consensus providers would receive full rewards automatically. At the same time, a portion of block rewards would be programmatically directed toward the services that attract customers, onboard data, and work directly with storage providers.

The Filecoin Improvement Proposal (FIP) 0118 is still a draft and is open for community feedback at: Create fip 0118-solstice.md by irenegia · Pull Request #1270 · filecoin-project/FIPs

Background on the Current System Today, Filecoin uses a program called Filecoin Plus, or Fil+. The original goal was to reward storage providers for storing useful, verified data rather than simply adding empty capacity to the network.

In practice, Fil+ has introduced a significant amount of operational overhead. To qualify for enhanced rewards, clients need to apply for datacap, which acts as a credit confirming that their data is legitimate. That process involves reviews, approvals, and compliance checks.

Over time, this has made the onboarding sectors pipeline slower and more complex. It has also created opportunities for gaming. The FIP 0118 argues that Fil+ verification has become a weak signal of useful data, so rewards do not always reach the storage providers creating the most value for the network.

Solstice builds on what Fil+ set out to do, rewarding useful storage, and replaces the verification step with a direct signal of customer activity: onchain payment volume. It supports both sides of the marketplace. Storage providers keep earning block rewards for securing and supplying storage, while a share of rewards goes to the services bringing paying customers to the network.

What Would Change The proposal introduces two major changes.

First, the Fil+ system would be removed. Every new sector onboards on equal footing, earning consensus rewards in proportion to the storage it commits, with no verified and unverified tiers. Existing sectors keep their current power and terms.

Second, a portion of Filecoin's block rewards would automatically be redirected to fund services that help drive paid network usage. Today, block rewards go entirely to the storage provider that wins the block. Under Solstice, part of that reward would instead go to a new role in the network, Service Orchestrators, who are responsible for bringing paying customers to the Filecoin network.

In simple terms, miners continue earning rewards for providing consensus and securing the storage network, while a portion of rewards would also fund the sales, service, and integration layer that brings more paying customers to the network. More demand means more value flowing to the providers already serving it.

The Opportunity for Storage Providers The timing of this proposal matters as much as the mechanics. Several forces are converging in the broader market right now, that point toward exactly the kind of infrastructure Filecoin storage providers have already built.

Data growth is outpacing centralized infrastructure. AI, enterprise, and machine-generated workloads are driving demand beyond available cloud capacity and into new geographies, while power grid constraints delay roughly one fifth of planned data center development. The same AI adoption is also shifting what buyers need from storage: verifiability, provenance, and durability, not capacity alone. Filecoin answers both. Its global network of independent providers added more than 59 PiB of raw storage in a single day, and its cryptographic proofs verify what is stored and that it stays stored.

These trends are already producing real deals. Aurora, an SP, is deploying Filecoin-powered storage across 100 megawatt AI compute data centers in Europe, built for multi-petabyte workloads. 375ai and Akave, another SP using Filecoin, with edge infrastructure across more than 40,000 retail, industrial, and logistics locations in the United States, is using Filecoin backed storage as the durability layer for its verifiable AI data pipeline.

What Solstice does is give the network, for the first time, a protocol level mechanism to reward the service layer that captures this demand. The service stream creates funding that rewards one measurable thing: bringing paying customers to Filecoin and routing their workloads to storage providers. For storage providers, that means the go-to-market work gets done by specialists at scale, keeping them focused on operating their infrastructure, and subsidized by the block reward.

For more on the macro tailwinds shaping this moment, see: Why Macro Trends Are Moving in Filecoin's Favor.

Governance Tiers and Functions Solstice introduces two new governed contracts, the Stream Weights Actor and the Service Rewards Actor, that parameterize the built-in reward actor (f02), which does the actual splitting.

Stream Weights Actor (SWA). The SWA controls how each block reward is divided among streams. At launch there are two: the consensus stream, paid to the winning miner each epoch, and the service stream, paid to registered Orchestrators. The SWA manages the weight schedule: consensus share ramps from 95% down to a 50% floor, and service share steps up from 5% in 5 percentage point increments, but only when quarterly on-chain Filecoin Pay volume clears a verifiable USD target. Whatever share leaves consensus but has not been earned by the service stream is burned. Every discretionary SWA change requires a published FIP, sign-off from both Safes operating the first decision-making surface, and a seven day hold enforced at the L1. f02 itself queues and delays the write, so no weight can shift without the community having time to see and object. Gate step-ups are mechanism-executed and not cancellable.

Service Rewards Actor (SRA). The SRA determines how the service stream is split among registered Orchestrators. Each quarter it computes each Orchestrator's share from their verified Filecoin Pay volume and writes the wallet-to-share map directly into f02, which pays each Orchestrator wallet every epoch. The SRA never holds funds and is never on the value path. It also maintains the Orchestrator registry: which entities are admitted, which (payer, operator) pairs are attributed to each Orchestrator, and which stablecoin and Filecoin Pay contract addresses count toward volume. Registry changes require both Safes operating the second decision-making surface and a cancellation hold, but no FIP.

Service Orchestrators. Orchestrators are the registered entities whose on-chain payment activity drives the service stream. Their protocol interaction is narrow: they register the (payer, operator) pairs whose Filecoin Pay volume counts toward them, post their quarterly volume figure to the SRA in stablecoin and FIL components recomputable by anyone from public settlement events, and receive their share of the service stream each epoch directly from f02. They are not a decision-making surface. At launch a single Orchestrator is registered; the second decision-making surface can admit more over time, with permissionless registration as the Phase 2 goal.

Together: f02 splits every block reward by the current weights; the SWA sets those weights and governs when the service share can grow; the SRA determines how that share is divided based on measured volume; and Orchestrators generate the client demand that justifies the funding increasing over time.

What This Means for Storage Providers Storage providers are the direct beneficiaries as Filecoin’s service economy grows. The shift Solstice makes is about accelerating the demand side of the network that makes providing storage capacity on the network highly attractive.

The most significant community-advocated change is that the Fil+ system goes away. No more datacap applications, allocator reviews, or compliance overhead. Every sector onboards on equal footing with full rewards from day one. For providers who have spent years navigating that pipeline, this alone is a meaningful operational improvement.

The bigger opportunity is what the service stream funds. As that client pipeline grows, so do the deals and direct revenue storage providers earn from serving real customers. Revenue for storage providers increases because paying customers are coming to the network.

For providers running newer storage proof systems; such as Proof of Data Possession (PDP) for hot data and retrieval workloads; Solstice removes a meaningful barrier. Service funding is not tied to any specific proof system. Whether a storage provider runs PoRep, PDP, or whatever the market demands, the incentive structure accommodates it.

At launch the service portion is 5% of each block reward, with 95% flowing directly to miners as the consensus share. Over roughly nine quarters the consensus share steps down on a published schedule toward a 50% floor, opening up more room for service funding. That room does not fill automatically: the service portion steps up only when payment volume flowing through Filecoin Pay clears a verifiable on-chain target for that quarter. When the target is met the step-up executes automatically, no governance approval required. When it is not, the service portion holds and the gap is burned, permanently removing those tokens from supply.

This means the burn rate is directly tied to revenue: as the network wins more real paying business, more of the issuance flows to service funding and less is burned. Every step up is therefore evidence that the revenue opportunity for SPs is growing alongside it, and every missed step tightens supply instead of distributing funds the network has not yet earned.

Read the full proposal at Create fip 0118-solstice.md by irenegia · Pull Request #1270 · filecoin-project/FIPs. The discussion is open until later this month. After the feedback period, the authors will incorporate community input into the draft and progress through the FIP process.

Fluxers! Welcome back to another ecosystem update! On Wednesday, July 15, we had an AMA, and in today’s blog, we are going to recap everything, so let’s dive in. 

High-Level Ecosystem Shifts To start off, Flux is restructuring its operations around a leaner, more community-driven model. The core team remains in place, but the project expects less direct corporate involvement from InFlux, greater community participation, and a transition of its corporate focus from the United Kingdom to the United States. 

Next up, we will soon be sending notifications to FluxNode operators still running legacy nodes, stating that if they do not update to PoUW v2, they will be brought offline. Essentially, operators running legacy nodes will be given a deadline to migrate to the currently supported node environment. Nodes that remain on the legacy system after that deadline will be banned from FluxCloud. 

Additionally, we plan to implement community referral codes and profit sharing. For example, if a Fluxer helps bring 30 new machines to the network, they would receive a portion of that revenue by entering their personal code on any deployments they make. 

Expanding further on revenue sharing, Flux is exploring partnerships in which it supplies infrastructure and development support in exchange for a share of the participating company’s revenue or business. The community would be asked to approve how proceeds from these arrangements are incorporated into PNR. 

FluxAI Developments Flux is building its own Large Language Model (LLM), and we will train it on FluxEdge GPUs. Our aim is not to compete with ChatGPT or Claude; we want to build an LLM that is highly specific to Flux and does not train on user data. 

This specialized LLM will operate for particular FluxAI and customer applications. The team emphasized that FluxAI is designed around business privacy and does not harvest customer data in the manner associated with many mainstream AI platforms. 

PNR Update Next, Progressive Node Rewards (PNR) are almost ready. With PNR, there will be an allocation specifically for node operators for what we refer to as “flex time,” where if your machine runs workloads at a higher rate, you will be compensated accordingly. 

PNR differs from conventional mining economics. In a proof-of-work system, increasing competition can reduce an individual miner’s share of a largely fixed block-reward pool. Under the proposed PNR model, increased paid workload demand would instead expand the amount distributed to eligible node operators. 

For PNR, as demand increases, payouts rise; conversely, when demand wanes, payouts decrease. When PNRs are implemented, node operators will be paid in proportion to their machines’ runtime depending on whether assigned workloads scale up or down.

Building out a PNR pay structure that dynamically adjusts to network demand requires extensive development. The team has largely finalized its proposed approach to PNR and hopes to introduce it during Q4 2026, subject to development progress, publication of a governance proposal and community approval.

Flux Foundation Update The Flux Foundation will adopt a bounty-payout feature that operates like a job marketplace. Flux community members can post a job they need completed with a bounty, and other community members can complete it to earn FLUX. Part of the Foundation’s yield-generating infrastructure will be allocated to fund the bounty program. 

Conclusion This AMA reinforced that Flux is entering its next phase with a sharper focus on sustainability, community participation, and real-world adoption. 

From restructuring operations and strengthening FluxAI to developing Progressive Node Rewards, referral incentives, and community bounties, the goal is to create an ecosystem in which contributors, operators, developers, and community members can all benefit from the network’s growth.

Many of these initiatives are still being developed and will require further technical work, governance proposals, and community approval before they are fully implemented. 

However, the direction is clear: Flux is working toward a leaner, more decentralized ecosystem that rewards meaningful participation and ties node-operator earnings more closely to genuine platform demand. The future runs on Flux. 

Circle’s euro-backed stablecoin EURC has roughly doubled in market capitalization since the start of the year, climbing from approximately $205 million to around $430 million. The token’s circulation now sits at approximately €378 million as of mid-July, with its share of the euro stablecoin market ballooning from about 17% a year ago to north of 40%.

MiCA did the heavy lifting MiCA’s full enforcement in late 2024 and early 2025 created a compliance gauntlet that most euro stablecoin issuers couldn’t survive. The most notable casualty was Tether’s EURT, which exited the market rather than meet the new regulatory requirements.

Advertisement

Circle secured a French Electronic Money Institution license back in 2024, giving it a single regulatory passport to operate across the entire EU and European Economic Area. The supply numbers tell the story cleanly. EURC’s token supply grew from roughly 309 million at the end of 2025 to approximately 390 million in early 2026, nearly tripling in a compressed timeframe.

Multi-chain expansion and Base launch Circle has been deploying EURC across multiple blockchain networks, including Ethereum and Solana. The most recent expansion landed on July 9, when EURC went live on Coinbase’s Base network.

Daily active addresses for EURC hit an all-time high of 1,760 shortly after the Base launch. The broader euro stablecoin market has reached record highs approaching $900 million as of mid-2026, with EURC commanding roughly 40–50% of that total.

What this means for investors The institutional character of this growth is worth noting. The supply expansion and market cap gains appear driven by enterprise-level integrations rather than grassroots consumer adoption. The company has reportedly been building payment integrations with partners like Visa and exploring point-of-sale terminal support through Ingenico, which would push EURC into physical retail environments.

With the overall euro stablecoin market still under $1 billion, it remains a fraction of the dollar stablecoin market, which is measured in the hundreds of billions.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

HSBC wins Bank of England approval to enter Digital Securities SandboxThe Bank of England approved HSBC Orion to go live in its Digital Securities Sandbox, with the first Digital Gilt Instrument transaction expected in the first quarter of 2027.

HSBC, one of the world’s largest banks, has received approval to operate in the United Kingdom’s Digital Securities Sandbox (DSS), allowing its digital assets platform, HSBC Orion, to support the issuance, servicing and settlement of digital securities.

The bank announced Tuesday that HSBC Orion will operate as a digital securities depository within the DSS, a regulatory environment designed to test new technology for securities markets. HSBC said it is the first company approved by the Bank of England to go live in the sandbox.

HSBC’s platform will support digitally native bond issuance, including the UK’s planned digital sovereign bond — Digital Gilt Instrument (DIGIT) — and corporate bonds. HSBC said HSBC Orion has enabled more than $5 billion in digital bond issuances globally.

HM Treasury said Thursday that the first DIGIT transaction is expected by Q1 2027, adding that HSBC and London Stock Exchange Group also signed a memorandum of understanding to develop connectivity that supports investor access to the pilot issuance.

Launched in 2024, the DSS is operated by the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority to test distributed ledger technology for issuing, trading and settling securities in a live regulatory environment.

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Foundry Digital, a prominent Bitcoin mining pool operator based in Rochester, New York, announced it will allow its mining clients to determine the pool’s signaling stance on the controversial BIP-110 proposal. Clients will cast their votes using their respective hashrate, directly influencing the pool’s action regarding the upgrade.

BIP-110: Restricting non-monetary dataBIP-110, short for Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110, aims to address the rising volume of arbitrary and non-monetary data being stored on the Bitcoin network. If implemented, the proposal would initiate a soft fork, resulting in backward-compatible rule changes that cap the amount of such data included in transactions.

The proposal is also known as the “reduced data temporary soft fork.” Key rules include limiting most new outputs to 34 bytes, reestablishing an 83-byte limit on OP_RETURN outputs, and prohibiting data pushes above 256 bytes.

Mini dictionary: OP_RETURN, a script opcode in Bitcoin transactions, allows users to store small amounts of arbitrary data on the blockchain, often used for metadata or simple messages.

Supporters contend that these measures would reinforce Bitcoin’s design as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Conversely, critics argue the proposal transforms a policy debate into a technical consensus change and could lead to the exclusion of transactions that pay network fees.

“It’s one of the more actively debated proposals in Bitcoin right now, and miners play a direct role in whether it activates,” Foundry stated, stressing the importance of miner participation in network governance.

Among the high-profile opponents are MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor and Blockstream co-founder Adam Back, who have publicly raised concerns about the implications for transaction validation.

How voting will workFoundry outlined that each participating miner’s vote will be weighted according to their average hashrate on the pool over a 10-day period from July 6 to July 15. The company expects the voting window to remain open until the blockchain reaches block 961,632, projected for early August. At this point, the soft fork’s fate is likely to be decided.

Initially, Foundry’s default position is to signal “No” for BIP-110. However, should “Yes” votes exceed 51% of the hashrate during the voting window, Foundry will shift to signaling “Yes” on all of its future blocks. Any accounts that do not participate are automatically considered “No” votes. Meanwhile, miners retain the right to change their vote as long as the window remains open, with individual choices remaining confidential and only overall results shared.

Market observers note the significance of Foundry’s decision, as the company currently controls roughly one-third of the network’s total hashrate. Analysts at BGeometrics have suggested that the combined actions of leading pools like Foundry and Antpool could decisively move daily signaling metrics into a range capable of determining the soft fork’s fate.

Supporters believe BIP-110 can help Bitcoin function as true peer-to-peer money, while critics worry it may introduce contentious network changes and prevent certain fee-paying transactions from confirming.

ProposalMain Rule ChangeAdvocatesOpponentsBIP-110Limits arbitrary data in transactions; caps OP_RETURN at 83 bytesBitcoin developers, some minersMichael Saylor, Adam BackA final signaling window near block 961,632 will require Foundry to declare its majority-supported position before the activation timeline closes. The outcome will depend on where the majority of hashrate-weighted votes fall at the end of the period.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

While federal lawmakers continue to argue over the finer points of digital asset legislation, US states have quietly started putting real money into Bitcoin. Texas executed its first purchase of roughly $5 million in Bitcoin through the BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) ETF in late November 2025, making it the first state to actually fund and buy Bitcoin for a strategic reserve.

The purchase came from a $10 million allocation approved under SB 21, which Governor Greg Abbott signed into law in June 2025. Texas acquired its Bitcoin at prices ranging between roughly $87,000 and $91,000 per coin. New Hampshire and Arizona both enacted their own strategic reserve laws months earlier, and over 30 additional states have introduced similar bills as of mid-2026.

The state-level Bitcoin land grab New Hampshire got its law on the books first. HB 302, signed in May 2025, authorized investments in Bitcoin and qualifying digital assets up to certain portfolio limits. Arizona followed almost immediately with HB 2749, also signed in May 2025, which took a slightly different approach by leveraging unclaimed property and seized assets to build its digital holdings.

Texas’s approach of routing the purchase through BlackRock’s IBIT ETF is notable. Rather than setting up custodial infrastructure from scratch, Texas went with the most liquid and institutionally familiar wrapper available.

Advertisement

More than 30 states have introduced Bitcoin reserve-style bills, reflecting bipartisan interest in treating Bitcoin as a reserve asset alongside traditional holdings like gold and bonds.

California’s Digital Financial Assets Law became operative on July 1, 2026, imposing licensing requirements on crypto businesses operating in the state. New York continues refining its BitLicense standards.

Washington’s half-finished homework In March 2025, the Trump administration established a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve through executive order, funded with forfeited Bitcoin already held by government agencies.

In July 2025, the GENIUS Act was signed into law, creating a comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. The legislation included reserve requirements, audit mandates, and supervisory guidelines.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, commonly called the CLARITY Act, has advanced through various stages but still hasn’t become law as of mid-2026.

What this means for investors When state treasuries start buying Bitcoin, it changes the asset’s narrative in ways that matter for every market participant. These aren’t hedge funds chasing alpha or retail traders following social media hype. These are government entities making deliberate allocations through regulated vehicles, framed as fiduciary decisions about public funds.

Texas’s $10 million is a rounding error in a state budget that runs into the hundreds of billions. These are test cases, designed to establish legal precedent and operational frameworks that can scale.

Investors watching this space should pay attention to three things: which states move from legislation to actual purchases, whether the CLARITY Act reaches the president’s desk before year-end, and how state-level reserves perform relative to traditional holdings in their first full reporting cycles.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Evernorth, a crypto treasury company, has assembled more than 470 million XRP as part of an ambitious plan to list on the Nasdaq under the ticker “XRPN” through a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) merger. Dr. Kamilah Stevenson, a wealth educator with expertise in digital assets, highlighted the company’s growing XRP holdings as a signal of increasing institutional conviction in the cryptocurrency.

Institutional strategy behind EvernorthEvernorth’s core model centers on holding XRP on its balance sheet for shareholders, essentially transforming the company into a corporate vault for the digital asset. Once the company is publicly listed, purchasing its shares would give investors indirect exposure to the XRP pool, similar to how some public companies have structured their balance sheets around Bitcoin holdings.

Unlike firms that simply speculate on crypto prices, Evernorth’s stated mission is to remove XRP from circulation and warehouse it for the long term. Dr. Stevenson emphasized that this is a balance-sheet allocation, not a short-term trading play, with all transactions and holdings disclosed in public regulatory filings.

Stevenson noted the distinctive nature of Evernorth’s approach, drawing a comparison to similar strategies used by companies that focus exclusively on Bitcoin. Her analysis pointed out that Evernorth’s model offers institutional investors a new avenue to gain exposure to XRP through equity markets.

Backing and regulatory processMajor industry names have committed to Evernorth, including Ripple—the company behind the XRP Ledger—SBI, Pantera Capital, Kraken, and Arrington Capital. These backers have reportedly pledged more than $1 billion in capital to support the corporate structure.

Evernorth’s proposed Nasdaq listing remains incomplete, as the process still requires regulatory approval and consent from shareholders. Stevenson underlined that the plans are currently in the filing stage with relevant authorities and that no trading of XRPN shares can take place until permissions are secured.

Publicly available filings are being used to transparently document Evernorth’s operations, a process designed to provide both investors and regulators with confidence in the company’s strategy.

Mini dictionary: Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) – A SPAC is a publicly listed company created for the purpose of acquiring or merging with another company to facilitate taking that company public without a traditional initial public offering (IPO).

Company/BackerRole/ContributionRippleStrategy backer, technology providerSBI (Japan)Strategic investment, capital providerPantera CapitalInstitutional investorKrakenExchange support, possible liquidity partnerArrington CapitalVenture backer, capital commitmentImplications for individual investorsDr. Stevenson, who has significant experience educating on wealth strategies in crypto markets, cautions that Evernorth’s strategy is not directly instructive for retail investors. She distinguishes between the financial engineering available to corporations and the personal risk that comes from borrowing heavily to invest in volatile assets like XRP.

She urges smaller investors to focus on tax-efficient structures, such as maintaining digital assets in tax-advantaged accounts like Roth IRAs. This approach, Stevenson argues, enhances wealth preservation and asset protection without resorting to high leverage or risky borrowing practices.

The goal for individuals, according to Stevenson, should be disciplined asset accumulation and risk management, rather than attempts to mimic sophisticated corporate treasury operations. She also highlights the importance of regulatory compliance and prudent financial planning in the context of crypto wealth management.

Evernorth’s approach to XRP is structured for long-term balance-sheet strength rather than speculative trading, reflecting a conviction-based corporate strategy that public investors will soon be able to access if the listing moves forward.

In summary, while Evernorth’s trajectory may offer institutions and investors a unique channel into XRP exposure, Stevenson makes clear that regulatory processes remain ongoing and retail strategies should prioritize sustainable wealth management over aggressive financial engineering.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

A Colorado-based wealth manager has disclosed a new investment in the Canary XRP ETF. 

It is yet another institutional firm that has gained exposure to XRP through recently launched exchange-traded funds.

According to a Form 13F-HR filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, Gallacher Capital Management LLC reported holding 86,744 shares of the Canary XRP ETF ($961,126 as of June 30).

HOT Stories

Institutional XRP ETF holdings keep growingGallacher's disclosure follows several other recent 13F filings showing fresh institutional exposure to XRP-linked investment products.

On July 16, registered financial advisor Vista Finance reported owning 129,958 shares of the Franklin XRP Trust ETF, with a market value of roughly $11.45 million at the end of the second quarter. 

You Might Also Like

A day earlier, CPR Investments, a Michigan-based registered investment adviser, disclosed a new position in the ProShares Ultra XRP ETF. According to its SEC filing, the firm held 36,619 shares valued at approximately $363,627.

T. Rowe Price launches ETF with XRP exposureIn the meantime, yet another product with XRP exposure was recently launched in the US. 

Earlier this week, Wall Street giant T. Rowe Price, which oversees roughly $7 trillion in assets under management, rolled out its first actively managed cryptocurrency ETF.

Trading under the TKNZ ticker, the fund provides diversified exposure to several major digital assets, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and XRP. The ETF debuted with approximately $15 million in assets and carries a 0.75% management fee.

The entry of the financial giant into the ETF space is viewed as yet another sign of growing mainstream adoption. 

Ethereum outsourced scaling to L2s. Now native proof verification and fast finality can bring them back into the fold.

Listen

0

0:00 0:00

Subscribe to Bankless or sign in

One of the critiques of Ethereum's rollup era is that Layer 2s were supposed to be extensions of Ethereum, but they've drifted into being de facto chains that just buy data availability from the L1.

It's a fair critique, even if there's room for nuance.

Yet over the past 18 months, two research arcs have been maturing that could dissolve this argument entirely. The first arc is native rollups, i.e. packaging L2 blocks as proof-carrying transactions that Ethereum verifies directly.

How Native Rollups Scale Ethereum | Uma Roy & Justin Drake on Bankless

The Final Piece of Ethereum

BanklessBankless

This concept has bounced around the Ethereum community in recent years (originally known as "enshrined rollups"), and then the EIP-8079 draft formalized an initial approach in November 2025. To understand why it matters, consider how things work now.

Today, every rollup deploys and maintains its own verifier contracts on L1, i.e. bespoke stacks of code that prove the L2's blocks are valid. These verifiers are complex, gas-heavy, and risky to upgrade. For example, Taiko's stack alone spans six contracts.

In contrast, L2BEAT's Head of Research Luca Donno has estimated that major rollups could shed in the ballpark of ~39% of their onchain verifier code under a native approach:

Specifically native rollups would delete that extra load by making Ethereum the verifier, and L2s built this way would inherit L1 security and every future EVM upgrade automatically, with no migration scrambles required. And this architecture is no longer just theory, either.

Earlier this year, the ethrex client team released a full demo of an L2 settling to L1 via re-execution and with working deposits and withdrawals. And per L2BEAT's new dedicated Native Rollups tracker page, ecosystem-wide development milestones are slated through 2027, including a devnet targeted for this December.

All that said, the second key arc here is fast finality. Right now, Ethereum blocks arrive every ~12 seconds, though finality, i.e. the point where a block becomes practically irreversible, takes roughly 15 minutes. That lag caps how "final" any L2 settling to Ethereum can feel.

Ensuring that we have an expressive proof verification interface, native to the Ethereum protocol, should be one of our highest design goals.

Paired with fast finality, it will be a powerful force in the world. https://t.co/kYTpTAwcIm

— punk5736 (@punk5736) July 16, 2026 The fix has long been on the roadmap in the form of single slot finality research, and breakthroughs are nearing.

Enjoying this article?

Subscribe to Bankless or sign in

For instance, researcher Francesco D'Amato, one of the minds behind Ethereum's SSF and PeerDAS work, just announced his move from the Ethereum Foundation to Ethlabs with a stated mission of making Ethereum "finalize much faster, as soon as possible."

This vision is also not a distant dream. D'Amato's fast confirmation rule, already running on Glamsterdam's devnets, was replayed against a full year of mainnet data and produced zero false confirmations while delivering 1-slot confirmation more than 95% of the time.

Goal is fast *finality* asap, but in the meantime fast confirmation (https://t.co/vFVtjqULOa) is already here and gives a *very strong* confirmation in seconds, 98% faster than finality! Now on Glamsterdam devnets https://t.co/o3cez3gQ6s pic.twitter.com/5LYQgBSWcI

— Francesco (@fradamt) July 16, 2026 In other words, near-instant strong assurances are demonstrably achievable without sacrificing safety.

Now, of course, native rollups and fast finality are great in their own rights, but combined they're transformative. Native verification makes L2 blocks something Ethereum personally checks, and fast finality will make these checks land in seconds rather than minutes.

In this paradigm, an L2's state could finalize with full L1 security almost immediately, i.e. not like a separate chain posting data to Ethereum but more like Ethereum simply having more blockspace.

Ethereum researcher Barnabé Monnot recently pushed this framing even further, noting that the L1 itself will likely eventually verify its own blocks via proofs, effectively becoming "a rollup of itself." If this pans out, the L1-vs-L2 distinction will blur into a matter of how composable everyone's state is, and more composability on Ethereum should accrue more value to Ethereum.

Riffing on this, many analogies collapse when you consider that L1 is likely to eventually turn into a rollup/L2 of itself.

So it's not the fundamental nature of a rollup to not be "value accretive" to ETH or Ethereum.

And the right lens to think about it is state, and one's… https://t.co/OBXRkXvXIH

— Barnabé Monnot | barnabé.eth (@barnabemonnot) July 15, 2026 To be sure, it will take time for these advances to actualize and synergize. EIP-8079 is still just a draft, and so on. The earliest this full meld could come together is likely late 2027. And there's also the sovereignty angle to consider. Today's major L2s differentiate partly through their custom stacks, so some may simply decline tighter integration.

Overall, then, the big open question is how much tighter technical coupling will translate into how much economic flowback for Ethereum. For his part, Monnot summed up the optimistic case well:

"The more external domains/sequencers have the ability to compose with L1 state, e.g., leveraging its liquidity, the more value accrues to it, vs 'islands of state' bootstrapping their own economies without Ethereum's added value."So Ethereum may have spent years outsourcing its scaling, yes, but now it's definitively building the machinery to bring its offspring back into the fold, faster and more unified than ever before. Keep these arcs and their potential on your radar accordingly.

0

Jul 17, 2026, 4:23 p.m.

2 min read

Charles Hoskinson said the last stage of the Voltaire era is full decentralization of node and reference blueprint development. (CoinDesk)Summary

Cardano developer Input Output will begin handing control of key blockchain components, including its Haskell node, Plutus platform and Daedalus wallet, to external specialist teams starting in August as part of a multi-year decentralization push.Independent companies such as Se7en Labs and Teragone will assume responsibility for parts of the core infrastructure, while at least three Cardano implementations in Haskell, Rust and Go will be maintained under community oversight and formal specifications.The shift comes as Cardano grapples with weak network activity and a steep drop in its ADA token price, with founder Charles Hoskinson framing the restructuring and broader ecosystem setbacks as necessary “growing pains” on the path to full decentralization.Cardano developer Input Output is handing control of core blockchain infrastructure to outside teams, reducing the network’s dependence on the company that built it, Input Output announced Friday.

Input Output said the handover is the next phase of Cardano’s decentralization. It covers Cardano’s Haskell node, Plutus smart-contract platform, Daedalus wallet, Hydra scaling technology and developer relations.

Specialist companies include Se7en Labs, a development agency specializing in Solana blockchain infrastructure, and Teragone, a specialist software development and cryptographic research team that leads the development of Mithril, a stake-based signature protocol for the Cardano blockchain. Both will take responsibility for some of the components. The handover will begin in August and continue into 2027.

Cardano has already moved protocol decisions and governance to its community. Input Output said the next step is to spread responsibility for developing and maintaining the software.

“The last stage of the Voltaire era is full decentralization of node and reference blueprint development,” Input Output CEO and Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson said in the statement.

The plan calls for independent teams to maintain at least three Cardano implementations written in Haskell, Rust and Go. Member organizations including Intersect and Pragma will oversee formal specifications, with development subject to community review and voting.

Input Output will focus more of its work on research and new ventures through IO Labs and IO Ventures.

The announcement comes as Cardano faces weak network activity, with just $70 million in TVL compared to rival chains like Tron and Solana that boast more than $4 billion respectively. There has also been a sharp decline in the value of its native token. ADA was trading at about 16 cents Friday, almost 95% below its September 2021 record of $3.10.

Hoskinson recently acknowledged the problems facing the network and said further setbacks would be part of its development. The Cardano founder said he had warned earlier this year that the deteriorating market conditions would see many projects shuttering.

“Even Cardano has to go through growing pains that are very uncomfortable,” he said in a video. “Bones have to be broken. Growth spurts have to happen. Exits and entrances. Failures have to occur to build confidence in the system.”

Hoskinson said Cardano needs more specialized teams to set targets and direct resources. He also acknowledged that the network has stopped expanding.

Moving core development to several companies could reduce Cardano’s reliance on Input Output, the statement on Friday said. It will also test whether independent teams can maintain the software without slowing development or creating coordination problems.

“I’m extremely proud that we have arrived at the final stage with IO Labs spinning out the Haskell node to community curation and control,” Hoskinson said. “Our partners are ready and the ecosystem now has many diverse options.”

12345678910

Benji Reaches $1.5 Billion on BNB Chain@FTDA_US Franklin Templeton's proprietary Benji investment platform has accumulated approximately $1.5 billion on @BNBChain, positioning the network as the leading blockchain ecosystem for the firm's tokenized products.

The Benji platform is Franklin Templeton's proprietary tokenization platform designed to facilitate trading, management, and administration of token-based investments. It was used to launch the world's first U.S.-registered mutual fund onchain in 2021 and now underpins several tokenized products that the firm says serve retail and institutional clients.

Franklin Templeton's broader BENJI tokenized treasury fund has surpassed $2.5 billion in assets under management overall, with growth exceeding 100% year-to-date in 2026. The $1.5 billion milestone on BNB Chain alone signals how dominant the network has become within that footprint.

Why BNB Chain?BNB Chain has positioned itself as a hub for real-world asset tokenization, including money market funds, equities, and credit products, offering scalability, low fees, and real-time settlement. The move amplifies Benji's institutional-grade tokenization expertise by leveraging BNB Chain's technological strengths, including its scalable, low-cost infrastructure and high transaction throughput, to create a new class of on-chain financial assets.

A key differentiator of the Benji platform is its Intraday Yield feature, which enables yield to be calculated and distributed with second-by-second precision, meaning investors no longer need to hold an asset for a full day to accrue interest. Yield is computed pro rata based on exact holding duration, making tokenized securities more liquid and composable in DeFi workflows.

Tokenization is increasingly becoming concrete in traditional finance, with institutions embracing blockchain to accelerate settlement, boost accessibility, and inject transparency into previously opaque markets. Franklin Templeton's growing position on BNB Chain reflects that broader shift, with the asset manager overseeing $1.74 trillion in total firm assets as of April 30, 2026.

Sources:
Franklin Templeton BENJI Fund Surpasses $2.5B AUM – Crypto Briefing
Franklin Templeton Brings Benji to BNB Chain – The Block
Franklin Templeton Expands Benji Tokenization Platform to BNB Chain – Blockworks

Chainlink (LINK), a decentralized oracle network focused on providing secure data feeds to blockchains, is drawing renewed attention as it deepens its integration in the evolving tokenized asset sector. With financial institutions seeking greater exposure to blockchain-based finance, Chainlink has emphasized its expanding role in accelerating tokenization trends.

Spotlight on tokenization initiativesChainlink recently highlighted its position as a central force in the “multi-trillion-dollar tokenization megatrend,” naming ecosystem participants such as Ondo, Robinhood, Maple, Centrifuge, OpenEden, and Securitize who are collaborating on tokenized finance solutions. This initiative underscores the network’s focus on supporting tokenized stocks, funds, and other real-world assets, underscoring Chainlink’s growing influence among institutions exploring blockchain finance.

Chainlink described itself as “the center of the multi-trillion-dollar tokenization megatrend” as it showcased partners participating in the project, including both DeFi-native companies and regulated financial firms.

The protocol’s infrastructure connects various blockchains and traditional systems, enabling interoperability that is essential for the evolving tokenization landscape. As institutions aim to bridge legacy assets to blockchain networks, Chainlink’s suite of oracle services and cross-chain tools continue to see increased adoption.

Mini dictionary: Tokenization is the process of converting real-world assets such as stocks, bonds, or property into digital tokens that can be traded and managed on blockchains. It enables increased liquidity, faster settlements, and wider access to financial instruments.

Price action finds support amid technical signalsLINK is trading at $8.16, reflecting a decline of 2.16% over the past 24 hours. The price remains below the immediate resistance at $8.58, which coincides with the upper Bollinger Band and acts as a ceiling for further gains in the near term. However, LINK has recovered above the middle Bollinger Band, suggesting a moderation in recent selling pressure.

Technical data from TradingView points to a stable On-Balance Volume (OBV) near 895 million, indicating buyers are maintaining positions rather than exiting, despite the recent price drop. Analysts note that a close above $8.58 could reinforce a bullish trend, potentially targeting higher resistance levels. Conversely, a close below $7.98 could put the next key support at $7.48 in focus.

Price LevelTypeSignificance$8.58ResistanceUpper Bollinger Band$8.16Current priceSpot rate$7.98SupportPotential breakdown point$7.48SupportNext lower supportDerivatives market signals rising interestCoinGlass data shows LINK’s open interest has grown to roughly $450 million—one of its highest recent readings. This surge in open interest comes as LINK’s price consolidates, often interpreted by traders as an influx of new capital readying the token for a significant move. While increased open interest is not a definitive indicator of future direction, it often points to heightened market engagement.

Rising open interest alongside stable prices suggests traders are positioning for potential volatility, indicating that LINK may soon break above or below its established range.

Investors continue to watch whether Chainlink’s strategic position in tokenized finance, supported by growing institutional adoption, can help the asset gain momentum above key resistance levels. Recent developments position the protocol as a key enabler for the broader adoption of blockchain technology by established financial entities.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Dash, a digital payments-focused cryptocurrency launched in 2014, has rolled out a new privacy system called Orchard designed to strengthen user anonymity and transaction confidentiality. The system leverages Zcash’s zero-knowledge proof technology, enabling users to send Dash while shielding the sender, recipient, and amount from public view.

Mainnet launch and transaction improvementsThe Dash Core team announced on X that Orchard pools were activated immediately, emphasizing faster confirmation speeds. According to the developers, transactions on Orchard can be confirmed in approximately one second, while wallet synchronization now takes roughly 20 seconds.

Previously, Dash depended on its PrivateSend feature, which mixed user coins through CoinJoin to obscure transaction trails. PrivateSend provided a degree of fungibility, but required pooling multiple user transactions to make tracing more difficult.

With Orchard, Dash transitions to a cryptographically advanced approach. The system implements zero-knowledge proofs, allowing the network to confirm transaction validity without revealing any participant details or transaction amounts. This represents a significant privacy upgrade compared to the older, mixing-based model.

Dash’s mainnet activation marks the beginning of a new era for privacy on its network, with the team reporting that users can now send funds with the details fully hidden from the public ledger.

Samuel Westrich, chief technology officer of Dash Core Group, described Orchard’s open-source code as mature and relatively straightforward to integrate. The upgrade has been deployed on Dash Evolution, the project’s updated chain introduced in 2024 to deliver faster transaction times and support for token-based applications.

Currently, Orchard covers standard Dash transfers. The team has announced plans to extend privacy features to stablecoins and other digital assets in the future.

Mini dictionary: Zero-knowledge proof — A cryptographic method allowing one party to prove to another that a statement is true without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself. This is often used in privacy coins to keep sensitive transaction data confidential.

Zcash bug and market responseOrchard’s implementation on Dash arrives at a turbulent time for Zcash, the privacy-focused cryptocurrency that originally developed the Orchard system. On May 29, 2026, security researcher Taylor Hornby discovered a flaw in Zcash’s Orchard circuit. The bug had existed since Orchard’s activation in May 2022, raising concerns about Zcash’s total supply integrity.

This vulnerability could have allowed the creation of counterfeit Zcash tokens in complete secrecy due to Orchard’s privacy features. Following disclosure on June 4, Zcash (ZEC) experienced a steep price decline, falling from about $602 to around $299, marking a drop of more than 50%.

Zcash developers rapidly addressed the bug through an emergency update and have stated they found no evidence of the flaw being exploited.

The upcoming Ironwood update, scheduled for July 28 at block height 3,428,143, introduces a “turnstile” accounting system to cap total supply and enable verification in case counterfeit coins were created.

Dash’s new privacy system uses Orchard technology but operates independently from Zcash’s network. Despite technical similarities, no part of the bug discovered in Zcash affects Dash directly. However, the timing of Dash’s adoption of Orchard comes only weeks after Zcash’s critical incident.

CoinOrchard ActivationRecent Security BugMarket ImpactDashJune 2026No+0.2% daily increaseZcashMay 2022Yes, May 2026-50% after bug disclosureThe Dash market showed little reaction to the Orchard integration. On the day of the announcement, Dash edged up by just 0.2%, maintaining a market capitalization near $431 million and ranking 84th among cryptocurrencies by market value.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

BitGo Adds Qualified Custody and Off-Exchange Settlement for USDM1@BitGo has launched institutional-grade qualified custody and off-exchange settlement for USDM1, described as the world's first natively issued onchain secured sovereign bond. The deployment spans @StellarOrg, @Ethereum, and @Solana, giving professional firms a regulated path to hold dollar-denominated sovereign debt with 24/7 liquidity and near-instant finality.

USDM1 is issued by the Republic of the Marshall Islands and is backed 1:1 by short-duration U.S. Treasury instruments held in bankruptcy-remote custody. Structured in the style of a fully collateralized Brady bond under New York law and advised by Cleary Gottlieb, the instrument gives holders a perfected first-priority security interest in the underlying collateral under the UCC. It is regulated and supervised by the Marshall Islands Monetary Authority.

Unlike tokenized or wrapped instruments, USDM1 is issued directly on public blockchains against segregated Treasury reserves, with minting and burning corresponding to bond issuance and redemption. The instrument pays a sovereign coupon and is compatible with standard derivatives, repo, and securities lending frameworks, making it viable as institutional collateral alongside existing legal netting structures.

Go Network Integration Targets Real-Time Collateral and SettlementBitGo's move integrates USDM1 into the Go Network to support real-time collateralization and settlement. The architecture is designed to cut the multi-day settlement cycles typical of traditional fixed-income markets, replacing them with T+0 finality and programmable transfer across three major public blockchains.

The institutional case for USDM1 has been building for some time. M1X Global, the sovereign financial infrastructure company behind USDM1's development, closed an oversubscribed seed round led by Paradigm in July 2026, bringing total funding to $8.5 million. Paradigm partner Arjun Balaji noted that "24/7 markets require collateral that can move 24/7," citing USDM1 as a reference model for natively issued sovereign debt.

Beyond institutional markets, USDM1 also serves as the disbursement rail for the Marshall Islands' ENRA universal basic income program, described as the world's first nationwide on-chain UBI initiative, launched in November 2025.

Sources:
USDM1 Official Site: Sovereign USD-Denominated Financial Instrument
PR Newswire: USDM1 Now Available on Anchorage Digital
PR Newswire: M1X Global Announces Further Funding Led by Paradigm

Today, Injective is introducing Injective Mint, a new platform that lets anyone create and manage compliance-ready assets without writing code.

For the first time, the controls required by tokenized treasuries, stablecoins, funds, and other regulated instruments are available through a simple interface. Institutions, users and even AI agents can issue any asset at scale while also customizing every parameter.

Injective Mint is now live in private beta.

Institutional Tokenization, Without the Institutional OverheadCreating a token takes minutes. Creating one that can operate within the rules of regulated finance has traditionally required custom contracts, manual scripts, and a technical team to maintain them.

That complexity has kept tokenization out of reach for most issuers. Even a basic launch can involve separate systems for issuance, investor permissions, custody, compliance, and ongoing administration. Once the asset is live, changing a role or freezing an address often sends the issuer back to an engineer.

Injective Mint brings those functions into one place.

An issuer can create an asset, configure its permissions, assign administrative roles, and manage it from a single interface. The underlying controls use Injective’s native Tokenfactory and Permissions modules, the same protocol-level infrastructure already designed for institutional assets.

No custom contract is required. No command line is required. The issuer remains in control.

Compliance Is Built Into the AssetWith Injective Mint, an issuer can configure:

Holder restrictions: Limit who can receive and hold the asset using an approved-address list.Approved jurisdictions: Select which regions can access an asset to comply with global legal frameworks.Issuance and redemption: Assign minting and burning authority to specific entities while keeping those powers separate from ordinary holders.Freeze controls: Stop a compromised or restricted address from transacting.Global pauses: Halt all transfers when an operational, compliance, or security event requires immediate action.Administrative roles: Give each party only the authority it needs without transferring control of the entire asset.These are not policies stored in a document or checked after settlement. They are part of the asset itself. If a transfer falls outside the rules, the chain rejects it.

That distinction matters. Regulated assets do not become viable onchain simply because ownership is represented by a token. They become viable when the rules governing ownership and transfer can be applied reliably every time the asset moves.

From Setup to Issuance in One FlowMint guides the issuer through the full creation process.

Enter the asset name, ticker, and type. Select the jurisdictions in which it can trade. Set the supply, identify the issuing entity, and add the custodians supporting the asset. Then configure the addresses and roles authorized to hold, transfer, issue, redeem, or administer it.

Once confirmed, Injective writes the asset and its rules to the network in real time. The new asset appears immediately on InjScan, where its onchain activity can be verified.

A process that once required a bespoke technical implementation can now be completed through a repeatable interface.

Issued Into a Live Financial NetworkMany tokenization products stop once the asset reaches a wallet. That creates a digital representation, but not a functioning market.

Assets created through Injective Mint enter an ecosystem already built for trading, lending, derivatives, and other financial applications. Subject to the permissions set by the issuer and the integrations available for the asset, an RWA can move into secondary markets, support a lending market, or serve as collateral for new products.

The asset does not need to wait for a separate chain, liquidity layer, or financial stack to be built around it. The infrastructure is already there.

Mint combines simple issuance with enforceable controls and a direct route to onchain utility.

A Platform for Every IssuerUntil now, institutional tokenization has mostly been a custom service for organizations with large budgets and dedicated engineering teams.

Mint makes the same infrastructure accessible to a much broader group. A bank can issue a permissioned deposit token. A fund can tokenize an investment product for approved participants. A fintech can launch a stablecoin with separate issuance, redemption, and compliance roles. An asset manager can bring a new product onchain without building its tokenization stack from scratch.

The institution defines the asset. Injective handles the onchain machinery.

That is how RWAs move beyond isolated pilots. Issuance has to become simple enough to repeat, strict enough for regulated markets, and connected to infrastructure that can make the asset useful after launch.

Creating a Regulated Path for Securities OnchainInjective has also filed for transfer agent registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. If approved, the registration would create a regulated path for Injective to maintain securities ownership records onchain in the United States.

A transfer agent maintains the authoritative record of who owns a security. That record determines who receives distributions, who can vote, and who is entitled to sell or transfer the asset. Today, these records are generally kept offchain and updated across multiple institutions as trades settle.

Moving that function onchain would allow the ownership record to update with settlement, remain open to verification, and operate alongside the asset’s transfer rules.

Mint and the proposed transfer agent capability address two connected parts of the same market. Mint creates the asset and encodes its permissions. The transfer agent would maintain its official ownership record. Both would operate on Injective.

The result would be a more complete foundation for securities issued, administered, and settled onchain.

The RWA Stack Comes TogetherInjective Mint adds a new issuance layer to the institutional infrastructure already forming across the network.

Pineapple is bringing mortgage records onchain. INJ has a published MiCA white paper in Europe. Coinbase is supporting the migration to native INJ. The Injective AI Agent SDK lets developers build autonomous agents capable of operating across Injective.

Each development solves a different part of the same problem: how to move real financial activity onchain without giving up the controls, records, liquidity, and infrastructure that markets require.

Mint makes it possible to create those assets at scale.

Live in Private Beta TodayInjective Mint is live in private beta, with support for additional asset types, issuers, and compliance controls planned as the platform expands.

The goal is simple: make institutional-grade tokenization accessible to anyone ready to build the next generation of financial products.

Create the asset. Set the rules. Bring it onchain.

Much more news coming soon.

About InjectiveInjective is a lightning fast interoperable layer one blockchain optimized for building premier Web3 finance applications. Injective provides developers with powerful plug-and-play modules for creating unmatched dApps. INJ is the native asset that powers Injective and its rapidly growing ecosystem. Injective is incubated by Binance and is backed by prominent investors such as Jump Crypto, Pantera and Mark Cuban.

Website | Telegram | Discord | Blog | Twitter | Youtube | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Instagram | Orbit Newsletter

On April 21, 2026, Coinbase’s Quantum Advisory Council released a position paper naming Aptos and Algorand as the two blockchain networks best positioned to handle the cryptographic challenges that quantum computers will eventually bring. Its advisory group includes Scott Aaronson from UT Austin and Dan Boneh from Stanford University, two of the most cited names in cryptography and quantum computing research.

What makes Aptos different here Most networks today secure wallets using elliptic curve cryptography. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could, in theory, reverse-engineer private keys from public ones.

Aptos was built with this transition in mind from day one. Launched in 2022, it runs on the Move programming language and uses a modular cryptographic infrastructure. If Aptos needs to swap out its signature scheme, it can do that in a single transaction without asking users to create new accounts or move their assets anywhere.

Advertisement

The Coinbase council’s paper specifically highlighted this crypto-agility as Aptos’s central advantage. Crypto-agility means a system’s ability to swap cryptographic primitives without disrupting the broader network.

In December 2025, the network proposed integrating SLH-DSA, a post-quantum signature scheme that has been formally standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Algorand’s approach and why the council cited both Algorand earned its spot in the paper through a different but complementary set of choices. The network has implemented Falcon signatures within its State Proofs, and it offers native key rotation as a built-in feature. Falcon is a lattice-based cryptographic scheme, which is one of the algorithm families that NIST has identified as resistant to quantum attacks.

Researchers from the Ethereum Foundation were also listed among the advisory council’s contributors.

What this means for the market The council’s paper is explicit that immediate threats are not imminent. The point is about preparation time horizons, specifically that the window between “quantum computers become theoretically capable” and “quantum computers become practically deployable” may be shorter than the time required to retrofit major blockchain networks.

Being named in a paper co-authored by cryptographers from Stanford and UT Austin, distributed under Coinbase’s advisory brand, is a different category of validation than a marketing announcement or a partnership press release.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Across Protocol, one of the largest cross-chain bridge platforms in crypto, confirmed on July 17 that its Solana bridge deployment was hit by an attack. The good news: user funds appear untouched. The less good news: it’s another reminder that bridges remain crypto’s favorite punching bag for exploiters.

The incident was detected at approximately 5:30 AM UTC, and the team moved quickly to disable Solana deposits as a precautionary measure. All transactions completed before the attack were secured, and the protocol continues to function normally on other supported chains like Ethereum and Base.

What happened and who’s exposed Here’s the thing about this attack: the potential losses appear limited to a very specific bucket. Only funds associated with the relayer operated by Risk Labs, the foundation that supports Across Protocol, are considered at risk. That’s an important distinction. In the world of bridge exploits, where users often wake up to find their deposits evaporated, this outcome is about as contained as it gets.

Advertisement

Across uses what’s called an intent-based architecture. Think of it like placing an order at a restaurant: you state what you want (move tokens from Chain A to Chain B), and a relayer fills that order using their own capital, getting reimbursed later. The relayer takes on the risk, not the user. In this case, Risk Labs was operating that relayer on the Solana side, which is why their funds, not users’ funds, are the ones in the crosshairs.

The protocol employs an optimistic verification model powered by the UMA oracle. Transactions are assumed valid unless someone challenges them within a dispute window.

Across has stated that a full post-mortem analysis will be published in the coming days. The team is also working with SEAL_911, a well-known crypto security response group, to monitor addresses linked to the attack.

A $35 billion track record, now with an asterisk Before this incident, Across Protocol had processed over $35 billion in transaction volume without a single exploit. Its intent-based model was specifically designed to reduce the attack surface by keeping user funds out of vulnerable smart contract pools. That design philosophy appears to have held up here: users weren’t exposed.

What this means for investors If you had funds moving through Across’s Solana bridge, they appear safe. If you’re planning to bridge assets to or from Solana via Across, you’ll need to wait. Deposits on that chain are disabled until further notice.

The bigger question is what the post-mortem reveals. Was this a smart contract vulnerability specific to the Solana deployment? A relayer configuration issue? Something in how the UMA oracle interacted with Solana’s architecture? The answer matters, because it determines whether this was a one-off implementation bug or something that could theoretically affect other chains in the Across ecosystem.

Traders and liquidity providers who interact with Across on other chains should monitor the post-mortem closely. If the vulnerability turns out to be Solana-specific, operations on Ethereum, Base, and other supported networks should remain unaffected. But if the root cause touches shared infrastructure, the calculus changes fast.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.