Tokenized ETFs just crossed a milestone that would have sounded absurd two years ago. The total market cap of exchange-traded funds living on blockchains hit $526.4 million, an all-time high, with Ethereum hosting 62.2% of those assets.
That’s a jump from roughly $430 million in mid-May, meaning the sector added nearly $100 million in market cap in about two months.
Ondo Finance is running the show When one player controls roughly 66.4% of an entire market, they’re not just a participant. They’re the market. That player is Ondo Finance, whose Ondo Global Markets platform launched in September 2025 and now offers more than 440 tokenized US stocks and ETFs.
The platform’s cumulative trading volume has exceeded $9 billion, attracting tens of thousands of holders, primarily non-US individuals. People outside the United States are using blockchain rails to access American financial products around the clock, something traditional brokerages still can’t offer.
Advertisement
Ondo rolled out a 24/7 mint and redeem feature in June 2026. Users can create or cash out tokenized ETF positions at any hour, any day, with continuous access to financial instruments that traditionally operate on a 9:30-to-4 schedule, Monday through Friday.
One of Ondo’s specific offerings, IVVon, posted gains of approximately 150% in a single month. The product essentially mirrors BlackRock’s iShares Core S&P 500 ETF but lives on-chain, which means it can be composed into DeFi protocols, used as collateral, or traded without the friction of traditional settlement.
Why Ethereum and not somewhere else Ethereum’s 62.2% dominance in tokenized ETFs isn’t accidental. When BlackRock launched its BUIDL tokenized fund, it chose Ethereum. When Franklin Templeton moved its money market fund on-chain, same choice.
Ondo Finance is expanding beyond Ethereum to Solana and BBN Chain, which signals that the market may not stay so concentrated forever.
What this means for investors $526.4 million sounds impressive until you remember that traditional ETFs manage trillions of dollars globally. The tokenized version represents a rounding error in the broader ETF universe.
Ondo Finance filed for SEC registration in February 2026, which suggests the company is positioning for a future where US investors can legally participate. Right now, the user base skews heavily toward non-US holders, but regulatory clarity could open the floodgates to American capital.
The 24/7 trading capability eliminates the gaps created when traditional markets close for weekends, holidays, and overnight hours, which matters most during periods of volatility when the ability to exit a position at 2 AM on a Sunday could be the difference between a manageable loss and a catastrophic one.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Retail od Etherea ustoupil, zatímco banky dál budují na jeho síti. ETH přesto zůstává kolem 1 800 USD, protože trh sleduje klesající poplatkové příjmy.
Ethereum chatter has collapsed to 2020 levels while banks build on the chain and a nonprofit teaches institutions to buy it. The token trades as if neither audience exists. Three groups are pricing three different assets, and only one of them is right.
Summary
Retail attention on Ethereum has collapsed: tweet volume is at 12-month lows near 40,000 mentions, levels last seen in 2020, NFT activity has gone quiet, and daily active addresses have fallen from above 1.5 million in January toward 544,000. Institutional commitment is moving the opposite way: a dedicated nonprofit launched to onboard institutions, tokenization is a headline topic in traditional finance, ETF flows turned positive again in July, and BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Robinhood all build on Ethereum rails. The price has ignored both signals, trading near $1,800, down roughly 42% this year and about 64% from its August peak near $5,000, while network fee revenue sits near cycle lows. The loudest defection came from inside: Bankless co-founder David Hoffman sold his remaining ETH in May, arguing the money thesis has run its course, and doubled down this month on the fee problem behind it. The divergence resolves through one question, value accrual: whether the activity institutions bring ever becomes fees the token captures. Retail priced a story that died. Institutions price rails that work. The token prices cash flows that keep falling. Three different groups of people are currently looking at Ethereum, and they are not seeing the same asset. The first group, crypto-native retail, has mostly stopped looking: social mentions of Ethereum have fallen to roughly 40,000, a level last recorded in 2020 when Wall Street did not know the chain existed, and the loud consumer corners of the ecosystem, NFTs above all, have gone quiet enough to hear the servers hum. The second group, institutional finance, is arriving in the opposite direction, with a purpose-built nonprofit teaching banks how to hold ETH, tokenization on every conference agenda, and the largest asset managers in the world settling real products on Ethereum rails. And the third participant, the market itself, is pricing the token as if neither group matters: ETH trades near $1,800, down about 42% on the year and nearly two-thirds below its August peak, while the chain’s fee revenue scrapes along at cycle lows. In May, the divergence produced its emblematic moment, when one of Ethereum’s most committed public advocates announced he had sold every coin he owned while insisting he still believed in the network. All three groups are behaving rationally. They are simply pricing three different things, and working out which of the three the token actually is has become the most consequential question in crypto’s second-largest asset.
The retail exit, measured The evidence that ordinary crypto users have checked out of Ethereum is not anecdotal; it shows up in every proxy for attention and grassroots usage at once.
The cleanest measure is the crudest: how much people talk about it. Tweet volume for Ethereum has fallen to fresh 12-month lows around 40,000 mentions, with Bitcoin near 130,000, and the comparison point is what makes the number land, because attention this low was last seen in 2020, before the ETFs, before the Merge, before the institutional era the industry spent a decade demanding. Social chatter is a rough instrument, but it has historically tracked retail capital and marked cycle temperature, and its collapse while institutional adoption sets records is precisely the inversion that makes this moment strange. Rising mentions once meant rising retail inflows; now the crowd that generates mentions has left the theater.
On-chain, the story repeats with better instrumentation. Daily active addresses, above 1.5 million in January, have trended down toward 544,000, a fall of nearly two-thirds that tracks the price drawdown from above $3,400 in December to under $2,000. The consumer economy that once made Ethereum a cultural object, NFT trading, consumer mints, the speculative long tail, has thinned to the point where daily NFT volumes measure in the hundreds of thousands of dollars against a $41 billion DeFi treasury sitting largely still. The capital stayed; the crowd left. Total value locked has barely budged through the attention collapse, which tells you who remains: professional and semi-professional capital that thinks in quarters, parked in lending markets and liquid staking, indifferent to vibes.
The generous reading of the exit is rotation, that retail attention went to memecoins on faster chains and to the AI trade, and rotations reverse. The harsher reading is that Ethereum’s retail base was loyal to a story, the ultrasound money, world-computer, ETH-is-money story, and stories do not survive a 64% drawdown from peak while the supply inflates and the burn sits idle. Either way, the measurable fact stands: the audience that carried Ethereum through every previous cycle is not currently in the building.
The institutional entry, measured Run the same exercise on institutions and every needle points the other way, which is what makes this a divergence, not a decline.
The most explicit signal is organizational: the launch of Ethereum Institutional, a nonprofit created specifically to educate banks, asset managers, and corporates on adopting Ethereum, with contributors drawn from the ecosystem’s core. Institutions do not get dedicated onboarding bodies for networks in decline; the entity exists because inbound demand outgrew the ecosystem’s capacity to answer it. Around it sits a thickening layer of professional evangelism, Etherealize pitching Wall Street directly, with its leadership publicly arguing that institutional engagement has moved past pilots into production, and a restructured Ethereum Foundation spinning out ETH Systems as a for-profit focused on institutional privacy tooling, funded by trading firms and treasuries. The ecosystem is visibly reorganizing itself around the client it now serves.
The client, meanwhile, keeps shipping. The tokenization wave that dominates traditional-finance conferences runs disproportionately on Ethereum and its L2s: BlackRock’s tokenized fund complex, JPMorgan’s settlement infrastructure reaching public rails, Robinhood building its chain as an Ethereum L2, stablecoin issuance concentrating on the network that hosts the deepest collateral markets. For more context on the institutional product driving adoption, crypto.news has explained how tokenized money market funds are moving regulated cash instruments on-chain. Even the flow data, the weakest leg of the institutional case, has stopped arguing against it: after a heavy second quarter of net outflows, US spot ETH ETFs turned positive again in July, with inflow days in the tens of millions, uneven but real. And the treasury bid persists through the drawdown, with corporate and fund vehicles continuing to accumulate at prices the retail cycle would have considered a catastrophe.
Institutions, in short, are doing exactly what the industry spent years saying it wanted: adopting the infrastructure, at scale, without asking permission from the price. Which sharpens the puzzle instead of resolving it, because their arrival has coincided with the asset’s worst sustained underperformance of the modern era.
The defection that named the problem The reason the price ignores both audiences was articulated most clearly by the person whose exit hurt the narrative most.
David Hoffman spent years as one of Ethereum’s most effective advocates, co-founding Bankless and popularizing the ETH-is-money thesis, the argument that Ethereum’s token would become the internet’s base money, scarce, productive, and re-rated accordingly. On May 21 he sold the last of his personal ETH, and his explanation was more damaging than the sale: the thesis, he argued, has largely run its course, with ETH unlikely to be re-rated meaningfully higher or lower from here, money to some degree, but not the maximally successful version the ecosystem set out to build. Former core developer Eric Connor’s response compounded it, noting ETH has grossly underperformed the broader crypto market for years and attributing the lag to relentless supply from early millionaires, not protocol failure, an explanation that manages to be reassuring about the technology and damning about the asset simultaneously.
Hoffman has kept pressing the underlying point since, arguing this month that Ethereum faces a false choice between maximizing fees and being money, and that while it hesitates, distribution-rich competitors, Robinhood’s chain among them, are positioned to eat the revenue base out from under it. That is the distribution rival eating the revenue base. Strip the personalities away and his case reduces to an arithmetic claim: layer-one tokens are ultimately priced on the fees their block space earns, Ethereum deliberately pushed activity to L2s that pay almost nothing back, mainnet fee revenue has fallen from roughly $40 million a day in early 2025 toward $10 million, and no amount of institutional construction on top of the network changes the token’s cash flows if the construction happens where the token does not collect rent. It is the value-accrual critique, delivered by someone who spent five years selling the opposite conclusion, which is exactly why it landed.
Three prices for three assets Here is the resolution of the divergence, and it requires taking all three groups seriously at once, because each is pricing a real thing.
Retail priced the story, and the story died. The asset retail owned was ultrasound money: a supply that shrinks with use, a burn that turns adoption into scarcity, a meme that fit on a sticker and compounded reflexively. That asset genuinely existed for a stretch after the Merge and genuinely does not now, with the burn collapsed, supply mildly inflating, and the December blob-fee floor a patch on the leak, not a restoration. That is the monetary mechanics under this divergence. Attention followed the story out. Retail is not wrong to be gone; the thing it bought is gone.
Institutions price the rails, and the rails work. The asset institutions are adopting is not the token’s monetary narrative but the network’s properties: the deepest liquidity, the most battle-tested settlement, the compliance tooling, the credible neutrality that lets BlackRock and a DeFi protocol share infrastructure. That asset is thriving, and nothing in the price contradicts it, because most institutional use, tokenized funds, L2 settlement, stablecoin rails, consumes Ethereum’s security while paying trivially for it. Institutions are not wrong to build; the thing they are buying works regardless of what ETH costs.
The market prices the cash flows, and the cash flows are falling. The token, stripped of both stories, is a claim on fees plus a staking yield plus a monetary premium the market is currently revoking. Fee revenue down roughly three-quarters from early 2025, activity migrated to venues that remit almost nothing, and a persistent seller overhang from the early-holder class Connor described: the price is not ignoring the fundamentals, it is agreeing with them, and its verdict is that until institutional construction becomes token revenue, construction is not a bull case.
Which means the entire divergence compresses into one testable question: does the institutional economy on Ethereum ever start paying Ethereum? The mechanisms are known and partly shipped, the blob-fee floor reconnecting L2 growth to burn, mainnet settlement of high-value tokenized assets that does pay real fees, staking demand from treasuries and ETFs that locks supply. If tokenization scales and its settlement gravity pulls value to mainnet, the fee line inflects, and the market re-rates the token toward what institutions already believe about the network. If the activity stays where the rent is lowest, Ethereum becomes magnificent public infrastructure attached to a stagnant asset, the outcome Hoffman priced when he sold. Both futures are live. The tape, for now, is voting with him, and the burden of proof sits, for the first time in Ethereum’s history, on the bulls’ arithmetic rather than their story.
One more actor deserves a paragraph before the watchlist, because the divergence is reorganizing Ethereum’s own institutions in real time. The Ethereum Foundation, historically the ecosystem’s ambivalent center, has spent the year restructuring around exactly the split this piece describes: research and protocol work continuing in the nonprofit core, a new institutional-outreach apparatus forming at arm’s length, and ETH Systems spinning out as a for-profit, funded by trading firms and corporate treasuries, to build the privacy and compliance tooling institutional users keep requesting. Longtime contributors have scattered across the new entities, and the ecosystem’s own commentators describe the reorganization with a candor that borders on gallows humor. The institutional turn, in other words, is not something happening to Ethereum from outside; it is something Ethereum’s leadership has chosen, budgeted, and staffed, accepting the retail exit as a completed fact and reallocating toward the audience that stayed. That choice has consequences for the token question this piece turns on. An ecosystem organized around institutional settlement will prioritize exactly the upgrades, privacy, compliance hooks, high-value mainnet settlement, most likely to make institutional activity pay mainnet fees, which is the bull path. It will also, inevitably, deprioritize the consumer-facing culture that once generated the monetary meme, which forecloses the old path back. The foundation has effectively placed the ecosystem’s bet for it: that the second audience can be converted into revenue before the absence of the first audience becomes terminal for the asset’s premium. The fee line, again, will grade the wager.
What to watch Three lines on three charts settle this faster than any debate.
The fee line. Daily network fee revenue near $10 million is the bear case in one number; a sustained inflection, driven by blob-fee floors under growing L2 volume or high-value mainnet settlement, is the single cleanest signal the value-accrual gap is closing. Watch the trend through the fall, not any single week. That is where the fee line actually comes from.
The flow composition. ETF inflows resumed in July after a negative quarter; whether they compound, and whether staking-enabled vehicles and treasuries keep locking supply through price weakness, tests whether the institutional bid extends from the network to the token. Uneven, headline-driven flows extend the stalemate; a durable streak changes the supply math. Crypto.news has also explained how the flow machinery works.
The attention floor. Retail metrics this depressed have historically marked accumulation zones as often as terminal decline, and tweet volume at 2020 levels with institutional adoption at record highs is a configuration crypto has simply never printed before. If price ever starts responding to the institutional story, the crowd’s return would be the accelerant. Its continued absence is the cheapest real-time measure of how dead the old narrative remains.
Ethereum’s strange summer is best understood as an estate in probate. The old asset, the retail money-meme, has died, and its heirs have left. The new asset, institutional settlement infrastructure, is thriving but pays no rent to the name on the deed. And the token is the estate itself, valued daily by a market that only counts income. The network has never been more used or less loved, and the gap between those two facts is either the buying opportunity of the cycle or the proof that usage was never the same thing as value. Three audiences have placed their bets. The fee line will grade them.
Frequently asked questions What does the retail exit from Ethereum look like? Tweet volume for Ethereum has fallen to roughly 40,000 mentions, a 12-month low last seen in 2020, while Bitcoin sits near 130,000. Daily active addresses have declined from above 1.5 million in January toward 544,000, NFT activity has thinned to daily volumes in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, and the consumer-speculative corners of the ecosystem have gone broadly quiet, even as DeFi’s roughly $41 billion in locked value stays put.
What is the evidence institutions are moving in? A dedicated nonprofit, Ethereum Institutional, launched to onboard banks and asset managers, alongside Etherealize’s direct Wall Street outreach and the Ethereum Foundation spinning out a for-profit institutional tooling arm. BlackRock’s tokenized funds, JPMorgan’s settlement rails, and Robinhood’s L2 all build on Ethereum, tokenization dominates traditional-finance agendas, ETH ETF flows turned positive again in July, and treasury vehicles kept accumulating through the drawdown.
Why did David Hoffman sell his ETH? The Bankless co-founder sold his remaining ETH on May 21, arguing the ETH-is-money thesis has largely run its course and that he does not expect the market to re-rate the asset meaningfully in either direction. He has since pressed the structural point: layer-one tokens are priced on fees, Ethereum’s activity moved to L2s that pay almost nothing back, and competitors with distribution are positioned to erode the remaining revenue base.
Why is the ETH price ignoring institutional adoption? Because most institutional use pays the token almost nothing. Tokenized funds, L2 settlement, and stablecoin rails consume Ethereum’s security while generating minimal mainnet fees, and daily fee revenue has fallen from roughly $40 million in early 2025 toward $10 million. The market prices the token on cash flows plus monetary premium, and with the premium fading and fees falling, the price tracks the arithmetic, not the adoption headlines.
Is this different from the ultrasound money problem? It is the same root with a different face. The ultrasound story broke because cheap L2 data ended the fee burn that made ETH deflationary, which is monetary mechanics. This divergence is about audiences: retail owned the monetary story and left when it died, institutions own the infrastructure story and keep building, and the token’s price follows fees rather than either narrative. The December blob-fee floor addresses both by reconnecting L2 growth to mainnet revenue, at a baseline level.
What would make the price start responding? A durable inflection in fee revenue is the cleanest trigger: growing L2 volume paying meaningful blob fees under the December floor, high-value tokenized-asset settlement on mainnet, and staking demand locking supply through ETFs and treasuries. If institutional activity starts converting into token cash flows, the market has something to re-rate. Without that conversion, adoption and price can stay decoupled indefinitely.
Could retail attention at 2020 levels be a buy signal? Historically, deeply depressed attention has coincided with accumulation zones as often as with terminal decline, and the current configuration, record institutional adoption against 2020-level retail interest, has no precedent to price from. Low attention removes a reflexive bid but also exhausts sellers. It is a condition, not a signal, and its resolution depends on the fee and flow lines rather than on sentiment itself. This is not investment advice.
What are the key numbers to track from here? Daily network fee revenue against the roughly $10 million cycle low, the persistence of ETH ETF inflows after July’s turn positive, staking and treasury accumulation as a share of supply, active addresses against the 544,000 area, and the growth of tokenized-asset settlement that pays mainnet fees. Together they answer the only question that closes the divergence: whether use of Ethereum ever becomes revenue for ETH.
Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. It describes market conditions and network metrics that change quickly, and past patterns do not guarantee future outcomes. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of July 21, 2026.
Cardano (ADA) za posledních 24 hodin vzrostlo o 7 %, ale data z derivátů naznačují spíše short squeeze než nákupy velryb. Open interest stoupl o 11,5 % a objem o 71 %.
Cardano (CRYPTO: ADA) surges 7% in the past 24 hours, but derivatives data shows the move is being driven by a leveraged short squeeze rather than whale-backed accumulation.
What Is The Van Rossem Hard Fork And Why Does It Matter?
Cardano activated the Van Rossem hard fork on Saturday, moving the mainnet to protocol version 11, according to CoinDesk.
The upgrade lowers smart contract execution costs and lays the groundwork for Ouroboros Leios, a scaling upgrade expected later in 2026 that aims to sharply increase the number of transactions Cardano can process.
The more consequential change is who approved it. For the first time in Cardano’s history, the upgrade was initiated, debated, and ratified entirely through the network’s on-chain governance system rather than directed by Input Output, the engineering firm that built the blockchain.
Delegated representatives voted 78.97% in favor, clearing the 60% threshold required for passage.
For ADA holders, the shift means owning a token on a network where holders have a formal vote in its direction rather than taking what the founders decide to ship.
Is The Rally Built On Solid Ground?Retail traders are aggressively long on ADA, with account ratios on Binance and OKX both sitting above 2.0, meaning more than twice as many retail accounts are betting on the upside than the downside.
However, larger players are not as convinced. Top trader accounts lean bullish but their position ratio of 0.96 puts them close to neutral, suggesting whales are not driving this move with conviction.
Open interest climbed 11.5% and volume surged 71% according to Coinglass, with short positions dominating the liquidations. That combination points to a short squeeze pushing price higher rather than fresh capital flowing in from bigger buyers.
Cardano Price Breakout Targets $0.20 After Triangle BreakADA breaks above a symmetrical triangle that compressed price since the June low.
The RSI bullish divergence that printed in June has now activated, with RSI at 55.95, its strongest reading since April.
ADA reclaimed the 20-day EMA at $0.1671 and now faces the 50-day EMA at $0.1772 as the next resistance.
A confirmed daily close above $0.175 with the candle body outside the triangle validates the breakout, with the measured move targeting $0.2 to $0.2045. Losing $0.1671 flips the breakout into a fakeout.
Key levels for ADA: $0.1772 — 50-day EMA, immediate resistance to clear $0.2045 — 100-day EMA and measured move target on confirmed breakout $0.1671 — 20-day EMA, support that must hold $0.1650 to $0.1700 — triangle breakout retest zone on any pullback Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Cardano po aktivaci hard forku Van Rossem vzrostlo o 9,3 % na intradenní maximum 0,176 USD. Na 4hodinovém grafu se tvoří rounding bottom, který při průrazu nad 0,18 USD míří na 0,20 USD.
Cardano price has surged 9.3% to an intraday high of $0.176 after the Van Rossem hard fork activated Protocol Version 11, while improving risk appetite and whale accumulation have supported bullish sentiment.
Summary
Cardano price surged 9.3% after the Van Rossem hard fork activated Protocol Version 11. A 4-hour rounding bottom places $0.20 within reach if ADA clears $0.18 resistance. Whale accumulation supports the recovery, but weak DeFi activity and geopolitical risks remain. According to data from crypto.news, Cardano (ADA) price traded near $0.1745 at press time on July 21 after briefly giving back part of the advance. The token cleared the $0.166 resistance that had capped several recovery attempts during July, while daily trading volume rose as buyers returned after the weekend upgrade.
Cardano activated Van Rossem on July 18 after delegated representatives, stake pool operators, and the Constitutional Committee approved the proposal through the Voltaire governance system. As crypto.news reported, the vote secured 77.63% DRep approval, 52.7% support from stake pool operators, and six affirmative Constitutional Committee votes.
Protocol Version 11 introduced new Plutus functions, revised smart contract cost models, zero-knowledge proof support, and tighter node-security requirements. The event became Cardano’s first major protocol upgrade to complete the full proposal, debate, and ratification process through on-chain governance.
Commenting on the upgrade, Cardano delegated representative Jason Appleton described the governance process as a key part of the event.
“The best part: it was ratified on-chain by delegated community reps before activation. Upgrades by governance, not decree.”
A sustained break above $0.18 would put $0.20 within reach ADA’s 4-hour chart has developed a rounding-bottom structure from the July 13 low near $0.155. Price has since formed progressively higher lows and pushed through the pattern’s first resistance area between $0.170 and $0.173.
Cardano price has formed a rounding bottom pattern on the 4-hour chart — July 21 | Source: crypto.news The structure places its neckline at $0.20, where ADA reached a local high in early July. Before testing that level, bulls must overcome resistance around $0.177 and the three-day liquidation cluster near $0.180. A move from the current price to $0.20 would produce a further gain of roughly 14.6%.
Buying pressure has also strengthened on the 4-hour timeframe. The MACD line stands at 0.0022, above its 0.0012 signal line, while the positive histogram has expanded to 0.0010. Chaikin Money Flow remains above zero at 0.11, which confirms that net capital has entered ADA during the recovery.
Daily indicators offer a less decisive picture. The Stochastic RSI has climbed to 81.38, above its signal line at 60.13, after rebounding from neutral territory. However, the reading has entered the overbought zone and could produce a short consolidation before another attempt at $0.18.
Cardano price daily chart — July 21 | Source: crypto.news ADX sits at only 15.24 on the daily chart. Such a low reading shows that ADA has not yet established a powerful directional trend despite the sharp intraday gain. A daily close above $0.18, followed by rising ADX, would give the rounding-bottom setup firmer confirmation.
Fibonacci levels drawn from the May peak at $0.2889 to the June low at $0.1388 place immediate support at the 78.6% retracement near $0.1709. The next major resistance rests at the 61.8% level of $0.1962, just below the rounding bottom’s $0.20 neckline. A breakout there could open $0.2139 and $0.2316.
Large holders had accumulated before the hard fork. Santiment data showed that wallets with 100,000 to 100 million ADA held 25.6 billion tokens, their largest balance since February 2023. Smaller wallets holding fewer than 100 ADA reduced their combined balance by about 0.7% over four months.
Derivatives traders also increased exposure before the upgrade. Cardano futures open interest rose from $385 million to $445 million between Monday and Thursday, while the funding rate turned positive at 0.0042%, according to CoinGlass data. Positive funding means long traders are paying shorts, though excessive leverage could increase liquidation risk.
The three-day liquidation heatmap places the nearest large short cluster between $0.179 and $0.180. A break through that area could force bearish positions to close and accelerate the move toward $0.196. Below the market, concentrated long liquidations sit near $0.172, $0.169, $0.165, and $0.160.
Cardano liquidation heatmap | Source: CoinGlass Global markets supplied another tailwind. South Korea’s Kospi gained 3.6%, Japan’s Nikkei rose 3.3%, and Taiwan’s Taiex advanced 4.2% as semiconductor shares recovered from last week’s sell-off, according to the Associated Press. Bitcoin’s return above $66,000 also directed fresh demand toward high-beta altcoins.
Loss of $0.169 would weaken the recovery setup Cardano’s bullish case depends first on the $0.170 Fibonacci level and the former breakout zone around $0.169. A daily close below that region would place ADA back inside its July range and expose the 4-hour rounding bottom to invalidation.
Further selling could pull the token toward $0.165, followed by $0.160 and the pattern floor near $0.155. A break below $0.155 would erase the sequence of higher lows, while the June bottom at $0.138 would become the next major support.
Cardano’s fundamentals still present a separate risk. DeFiLlama data places network total value locked near $86 million, far below the capital held by competing layer-1 networks. Van Rossem must lead to measurable growth in users, transactions, and locked capital for the upgrade’s price impact to last.
Security concerns have also returned after a Wanchain-linked Cardano bridge exploit drained about 515 million NIGHT tokens worth roughly $9 million, crypto.news reported. Although the incident did not compromise Cardano’s base layer, further ecosystem losses could hurt developer and investor confidence.
Oil prices and the U.S.-Iran conflict remain the primary macro threats. Renewed strikes or disruption around the Strait of Hormuz could lift energy costs, revive inflation fears, and reduce demand for speculative assets. Under those conditions, ADA could lose $0.169 before the rounding bottom reaches its $0.20 neckline.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Tržní kapitalizace USDT za 60 dní klesla zhruba o 5,4 miliardy USD na asi 184,14 miliardy USD. Tether přesto vykázal v 1. čtvrtletí 2026 zisk 1,04 miliardy USD a drží rezervní polštář ve výši 8,23 miliardy USD.
USDT, the stablecoin that essentially functions as crypto’s version of the US dollar, just got a lot lighter. Tether’s flagship token has seen its market capitalization drop by approximately $5.4 billion over the past 60 days, falling from a peak near $190 billion in May 2026 to roughly $184 billion as of late July.
The numbers behind the decline As of July 21, 2026, Tether reports USDT net circulation at approximately $184.14 billion, a figure corroborated by analytics platforms including CoinGecko and DeFiLlama. The token peaked near $190 billion in May, meaning the total drawdown is closer to $6 billion when measured from that high-water mark.
The broader stablecoin market has contracted by roughly $10 billion since its May peak, with a $7.7 billion decline logged in June alone. That means USDT and its closest competitor USDC account for a significant chunk of the overall pullback.
Advertisement
Earlier this year, USDT experienced a comparatively modest $1.5 billion supply drop in February. The current multi-month trend represents one of the most significant sustained pullbacks since the turbulent 2022-2023 period.
Tether’s financial health tells a different story Tether posted a Q1 2026 profit of $1.04 billion and maintains a reserve buffer of $8.23 billion above and beyond its token obligations.
The company still commands roughly 58% of the total stablecoin market, which stood at around $321 billion as of April 2026 data. Even after shedding billions in supply, USDT remains the undisputed heavyweight of the stablecoin world.
What this means for investors A $5.4 billion decline in USDT supply over 60 days is worth monitoring but not necessarily alarming in isolation. The broader stablecoin market still sits well above $300 billion, and Tether’s financial position remains robust by any reasonable measure.
For traders actively positioning in crypto markets, the practical takeaway is straightforward: watch stablecoin flows as closely as you watch price charts. The $184 billion figure for USDT is still enormous by any historical standard.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Plánované trojstranné sloučení Tether-backed Twenty One Capital, Strike a Elektron Energy bylo zrušeno. Strike zůstane samostatnou firmou, zatímco Twenty One a Elektron dál jednají.
Strike will remain a standalone company after the proposed three-way merger was scrapped, while Twenty One Capital and Elektron continue discussions, Bloomberg reported.
A proposed merger involving Tether-backed crypto companies Twenty One Capital, Strike and Elektron Energy has reportedly been scrapped.
Jack Mallers will step down as CEO of Twenty One Capital while remaining CEO of Strike, according to Bloomberg. Elektron Energy CEO Raphael Zagury has been appointed to succeed Mallers.
Strike will continue operating as a standalone company instead of combining with Twenty One Capital. Discussions between Twenty One and Elektron are continuing, Bloomberg reported. Tether holds majority stakes in both companies.
Twenty One’s (XXI) NYSE-traded shares were little changed in Tuesday’s premarket activity.
As Cointelegraph reported in April, Tether said it planned to vote in favor of a proposed merger between Twenty One Capital and Mallers’ Bitcoin payments company, Strike. The proposal also envisioned merging the combined company with Bitcoin miner Elektron Energy.
Twenty One Capital launched in 2025 with backing from Tether, Cantor Fitzgerald and SoftBank. Tether bought SoftBank’s stake in the company in May.
Twenty One held 43,514 Bitcoin at the time of writing, making it the world’s second-largest corporate BTC holder behind Michael Saylor’s Strategy, according to tracking website BitcoinTreasuries.
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
Americké ministerstvo financí zmrazilo přes 130 milionů USD v kryptoměnách na čtyřech peněženkách na síti Tron napojených na íránskou IRGC. Tether na základě pokynu OFAC zablokoval zhruba 131 milionů USD v USDT.
The US Treasury just proved, again, that stablecoins on public blockchains are not exactly the untraceable getaway vehicle some sanctioned regimes hoped they’d be. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned four Tron blockchain wallets linked to Iran’s Central Bank, Bank Markazi, freezing over $130 million in digital assets, primarily USDT.
The wallets were tied to financial activities associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Tether, the company behind USDT, coordinated directly with OFAC to freeze approximately $131 million across the four addresses, which had cumulatively received more than $165 million in stablecoins before the hammer dropped.
A pattern of escalating financial pressure Back in April 2026, OFAC froze $344.2 million in two separate wallets also linked to the Central Bank of Iran. Then in June 2026, the US imposed sanctions on major Iranian digital asset exchanges, including Nobitex and Bitpin. Now this latest action in mid-July adds another $131 million to the frozen pile.
Advertisement
In roughly three months, US authorities have immobilized nearly half a billion dollars in crypto assets connected to Iranian state financial infrastructure.
Iran has built a digital asset ecosystem estimated at around $7.8 billion, with Nobitex alone handling more than 50% of the country’s crypto inflows in 2025.
Why Tron and USDT keep showing up Tron offers low transaction fees and fast settlement times. USDT provides dollar-denominated stability without needing a US bank account. For entities under sanctions, that combination is irresistible.
USDT has a built-in kill switch. Tether, as the centralized issuer, has the technical capability to freeze any USDT held at a specific wallet address. When OFAC designates an address, Tether can and does blacklist it, rendering the tokens unmovable. This is fundamentally different from, say, holding Bitcoin or Ether, where no single entity can freeze your funds.
What this means for investors The immediate market impact of freezing $131 million is negligible in the context of USDT’s total supply, which sits well north of $100 billion.
For exchanges, the June 2026 sanctions against Nobitex and Bitpin were a message to every exchange in every jurisdiction: know your customer, or become the next target.
Traders and investors holding USDT should understand the trade-off they’re making. Centralized stablecoins offer stability and liquidity, but they also offer a single point of regulatory control. USDT is fundamentally a permissioned asset, not a permissionless one, regardless of which blockchain it sits on.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
STON.fi spustilo v aplikaci cross-chain swapy, které umožňují přesun stablecoinů mezi sítěmi TON, TRON a EVM v jednom self-custodial rozhraní. Většina swapů má být dokončena za 15–40 sekund.
Road Town, British Virgin Islands, July 21st, 2026, Chainwire
STON.fi, the leading AMM protocol on The Open Network (TON), today announced the launch of cross-chain swaps in the STON.fi app, giving users a direct way to move stablecoins between TON, TRON, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, and Robinhood Chain through a unified, self-custodial interface.
The launch connects TON to major liquidity and application ecosystems across crypto. As a result, users can move capital between stablecoin markets, TON-native assets, DeFi protocols, and Telegram-native applications without relying on centralized exchanges, bridges, or wrapped assets.
Stablecoins have become one of crypto’s most important markets, with more than $300 billion in total market capitalization, led by TRON and Ethereum as the two largest stablecoin networks. Through cross-chain swaps, STON.fi connects TON with major stablecoin ecosystems in both directions: TON users gain access to liquidity across networks, while TRON and EVM users get a more direct path into TON-native assets, wallets, DeFi protocols, and Telegram-native applications — all through one self-custodial experience without managing bridges, wrapped assets, routing decisions, or settlement uncertainty.
Omniston, the execution layer developed by STON.fi, coordinates the full swap process between source and destination chains. More than a routing or liquidity aggregation system, it is designed to help cross-chain stablecoin flows complete predictably, from pricing to settlement.
"People don't think in terms of blockchains — they think in terms of what they want to do," said Slavik Baranov, CEO of STON.fi Dev. "Our goal is to make moving between ecosystems feel as simple as swapping within one network. Omniston handles the complexity so users can focus on the outcome, not the infrastructure."
For users, the key benefits are speed and predictability. Most swaps complete in 15–40 seconds, allowing users to swap assets between any supported chains without the longer wait times often associated with cross-chain transactions. When a swap is confirmed, Omniston connects the order with independent liquidity providers, known as resolvers, that supply the asset on the destination chain. The transaction is executed through linked Hashed Timelock Contracts (HTLCs) — smart-contract escrows on both chains that use the same cryptographic condition — so both sides of the swap complete together or the transaction does not complete at all. Before confirming, users see the asset and amount they are expected to receive. If the swap cannot be completed, funds are returned instead of being left stuck, partially executed, or unclear.
With cross-chain swaps now live, STON.fi is moving beyond a chain-specific DeFi protocol toward a product built around user intent. As stablecoin liquidity, consumer applications, and DeFi markets spread across networks, users need easier ways to move value without giving up self-custody or managing the infrastructure behind each transaction. For TON and the broader crypto market, the launch introduces a more practical access layer between major liquidity networks, application ecosystems, and the wider onchain economy.
For more information, users can visit STON.fi's cross-chain swap interface: app.ston.fi/cross-chain
About STON.fi
STON.fi is a cross-chain decentralized application for token swaps across TON, TRON, and major EVM-compatible blockchains. Originally established as the leading AMM protocol and one of the most widely used DeFi applications on The Open Network (TON), STON.fi helps users swap assets, access DeFi opportunities, and move value across blockchains through a simple cross-chain experience. Its cross-chain capabilities are powered by Omniston, the execution layer developed by STON.fi to support reliable and predictable swaps across multiple networks. Backed by leading investors including CoinFund, Delphi Ventures, The Open Platform, Karatage, TON Ventures, and others, STON.fi is building the infrastructure that connects users, liquidity, and applications across the onchain economy.
ContactHead of Communications
Ekaterina
STON.fi Dev [email protected]
Disclaimer: Press release sponsored by our commercial partners.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
This is a general announcement. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region. Fellow Binancians, Starting at approximately 2026-07-28 12:00 (UTC), Binance will suspend the deposits and withdrawals of token(s) on the Zcash (ZEC) network to support its network upgrade and hard fork to ensure the best user experience. The network upgrade and hard fork will take place at the block height of 3,428,143, or approximately at 2026-07-28 13:00 (UTC). Please note: The trading of token(s) on the aforementioned network will not be impacted.Binance will handle all technical requirements involved for all users.Deposits and withdrawals for token(s) on the aforementioned network will be reopened once the upgraded network is deemed to be stable. No further announcement will be posted.There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise. For more information, please refer to the announcement from the project team. Thank you for your support! Binance Team 2026-07-21
Zcash po nasazení Ironwood na testnet vzrostl téměř o 37 % a aktualizace nyní míří na mainnet. Zároveň začne ukončení podpory starého uzlu zcashd a ZEC naráží na resistance kolem 560 USD.
Zcash [ZEC] has rallied nearly 37% since developers deployed the Ironwood [NU6.3] upgrade to testnet earlier this month, with the privacy-focused cryptocurrency outperforming many of its peers ahead of the protocol’s next major network upgrade.
As the community prepares for Ironwood’s mainnet activation, the upgrade also marks the beginning of the end for zcashd. This is the network’s long-running reference node, making this one of the most significant transitions in Zcash’s history.
Ironwood aims to strengthen confidence in Zcash’s supply The Zcash Open Development Lab deployed the Ironwood [NU6.3] upgrade to testnet on July 2, with activation following on July 4. The milestone serves as the final testing phase before the planned mainnet rollout later this month.
Ironwood was introduced following the disclosure of an Orchard protocol vulnerability in June. While developers said there was no evidence the issue had been exploited or that user funds were at risk, the flaw highlighted a limitation in proving the integrity of Zcash’s shielded supply.
To address that, Ironwood introduces a new shielded pool alongside a “turnstile” mechanism that enables the network to verify the amount of ZEC migrating into the new pool without compromising transaction privacy.
The upgrade is designed to strengthen confidence in Zcash’s circulating supply while preserving the privacy guarantees that distinguish the network from other cryptocurrencies.
Legacy zcashd node heads for retirement Ironwood also marks a major infrastructure shift for the ecosystem.
The long-running zcashd reference implementation will not support NU6.3. It is being phased out as the network transitions to a Rust-based architecture built around Zebra, Zaino, and Zallet.
Developers have urged node operators to migrate before Ironwood activates on mainnet, as legacy zcashd nodes are approaching their automatic end-of-life shutdown. It will no longer participate in the upgraded network.
The transition represents one of the largest architectural changes since Zcash launched. It replaces the software that has underpinned the blockchain for years.
ZEC price prediction: Bulls pause after 37% advance At press time, ZEC traded around $546, up roughly 37.4% from its early July lows.
The rally has since slowed into a period of consolidation, with buyers attempting to establish support after reaching the recent highs.
The daily RSI stood at around 58, indicating bullish momentum remained intact without entering overbought territory. That suggests buyers still hold a modest advantage. However, the strong upside momentum seen earlier in the month has begun to moderate.
Source: TradingView The immediate resistance lies around $560, where recent advances have repeatedly stalled.
A decisive breakout above that level could pave the way for another attempt at $600, a price zone that acted as resistance earlier this year.
On the downside, the $500 region has emerged as the first meaningful support. Holding above that level would preserve the current higher-low structure. At the same time, a break below it could trigger a deeper pullback before buyers attempt another advance.
Final Summary Zcash’s Ironwood upgrade has entered its final testing phase, introducing a new shielded pool while paving the way for the retirement of the legacy zcashd node. ZEC has gained nearly 37% since Ironwood entered testnet, with bulls now attempting to break above the $560 resistance to target $600.
Internet Computer ($ICP) chystá cloudové enginy s tamper-proof architekturou, které mají udržet služby v provozu i při výpadku uzlů nebo datacenter. DFINITY je cílí na firmy a vlády jako odolnější alternativu ke centralizovanému cloudu.
A Resilient Alternative to Centralized Cloud@Dfinity's Internet Computer ($ICP) is preparing to roll out a new class of infrastructure called cloud engines, designed to address growing physical and cyber threats against centralized data centers. According to the ICP CEO, cloud engines use a tamper-proof architecture that keeps hosted services running even when individual nodes or entire data centers are taken offline.
The timing is deliberate. Data centers have faced increasing exposure to geopolitical conflict and targeted cyberattacks, making the reliability of centralized cloud infrastructure a pressing concern for enterprises and governments alike. Over 90% of cloud compute is controlled by providers governed by foreign intelligence laws , a concentration that DFINITY argues creates systemic risk for anyone running mission-critical applications on traditional infrastructure.
Software hosted on the Internet Computer is tamperproof, immune to infrastructure hacks, always-on, and capable of auto-scaling , according to the project's official documentation. The cloud engines concept extends this principle by giving enterprises the ability to select specific node configurations, by region or compliance requirement, while retaining the network's core resilience guarantees.
Zero-Trust Architecture for the Autonomous Economy DFINITY Foundation founder Dominic Williams has described cloud engines as a major Internet Computer innovation that lets enterprises own and configure their own corner of the cloud network, while maintaining tamper-proof hosting guarantees. The model supports running ICP on Amazon, Google, or sovereign hardware, with the ability to migrate between them and scale horizontally by adding nodes without changing application code.
The push into enterprise cloud comes alongside a broader productization effort. Sovereign, private subnets for regulated enterprise and government AI workloads are part of ICP's 2026 roadmap. Real-world adoption is already visible: in early 2026, ICP launched the first national sovereign subnet in Switzerland at World Computer Day in Davos, with a dedicated Pakistan Subnet partnership announced shortly after.
DFINITY frames cloud engines as foundational infrastructure for what it calls the 2026 autonomous economy, an environment where downtime is not an acceptable outcome for applications that run without human intervention. The DFINITY Foundation positions the Internet Computer as a sovereign frontier cloud designed to run web-scale applications and AI workloads in a tamperproof, always-on environment.
Sources:
Internet Computer official site, internetcomputer.org
Bitget News: Internet Computer Launches First National Subnet in Switzerland
ICP Informer: The Rise of the Decentralized Cloud
NEAR Protocol aktivoval na mainnetu kvantově bezpečné podepisování v rámci upgradu 2.13. Patří tak mezi první Layer-1 blockchainy s NIST-schváleným postkvantovým podpisovým schématem v produkci.
NEAR Protocol Deploys NIST-Approved Post-Quantum SigningNEAR Protocol has activated quantum-safe signing on mainnet as part of network upgrade 2.13, making it one of the first Layer-1 blockchains to ship a NIST-approved post-quantum signature scheme in a live production environment. The upgrade adds quantum-safe signing through the NIST-approved FIPS-204 (ML-DSA) scheme alongside dynamic resharding, a scalability enhancement that enables the protocol to automatically scale as network demand grows.
The team chose FIPS-204 (ML-DSA, formerly known as CRYSTALS-Dilithium), a lattice-based digital signature algorithm formally standardized by NIST in August 2024 as part of the agency's first batch of post-quantum cryptography standards. The upgrade allows account holders to migrate to post-quantum cryptography through a single on-chain transaction without transferring assets or changing account addresses.
The urgency behind the move is hard to ignore. Google's Quantum AI team has published research on the risk to cryptocurrency directly, with an estimated $470 billion of Bitcoin at risk. A U.S. executive order issued in June 2026 also requires federal agencies to transition high-value systems to post-quantum cryptography by the end of the decade, with digital signature migration scheduled for completion by 2031.
Automatic Resharding Removes a Key BottleneckThe second major component of the 2.13 upgrade addresses scalability. NEAR's sharded architecture previously scaled horizontally by adding shards, but each addition required a full protocol upgrade involving weeks of validator coordination, a vote, and a staged rollout. Dynamic resharding now enables the network to automatically scale by splitting shards without validator votes or manual upgrades.
On blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum, addresses are derived from keypairs tied to breakable cryptography, so migrating to a new signing scheme means migrating the address itself. NEAR accounts are decoupled from cryptography: since mainnet launched in 2020, NEAR has used human-readable account IDs controlled through rotatable access keys, not bound to a single keypair. This architectural choice is what makes the migration comparatively straightforward for NEAR users.
NEAR is also actively working with hardware and software wallet builders, including Ledger, on bringing post-quantum support to the market.
Sources:
NEAR Protocol Official Press Release via PR Newswire
Crypto Times: NEAR Launches Quantum-Safe Mainnet Upgrade With Resharding
CoinTrust: NEAR Activates Quantum-Resistant Security
PancakeSwap just crossed $1 billion in cumulative trading volume for tokenized assets on its decentralized exchange. To put that growth rate in perspective, the platform reported $100 million in tokenized asset volume during its mid-year recap on July 17. Four days later, that number was ten times larger.
The numbers behind the milestone PancakeSwap’s tokenized asset volume is impressive on its own, but it looks even more interesting when you zoom out. The platform has accumulated $4.2 trillion in total lifetime trading volume across all asset types, with a user base of 190 million.
The BNB Chain, where PancakeSwap does the bulk of its work, now hosts over 709 tokenized stocks and ETFs. The chain’s cumulative volume for tokenized stocks alone has surpassed $5 billion, making it the dominant blockchain for this particular flavor of on-chain trading.
Advertisement
Among the standout products, the tokenized Nasdaq-100 (QQQB) exceeded $100 million in 24-hour volume. PancakeSwap also facilitates trading in Binance’s bStocks, which include tokenized versions of household names like NVIDIA and Tesla.
Why tokenized assets are gaining traction Traditional stock markets operate roughly 6.5 hours per day, five days per week. Crypto markets never close. Tokenized assets bridge that gap, letting traders access equity exposure with the same 24/7 availability they expect from Bitcoin or Ethereum.
The 56 million CAKE tokens burned during the reporting period leading up to the July 21 announcement also suggest healthy protocol economics. Token burns reduce circulating supply, and when they’re funded by genuine trading activity rather than artificial mechanisms, they indicate sustainable demand.
Context and competitive landscape There’s an important distinction between institutional RWA tokenization and what PancakeSwap is doing. Institutional efforts tend to focus on bonds, treasuries, and private credit. PancakeSwap is bringing retail-friendly products like individual stocks and popular ETFs to a decentralized trading environment.
The BNB Chain’s dominance in this space, with over 709 tokenized products and $5 billion in cumulative stock volume, gives PancakeSwap a structural advantage.
What this means for investors Regulatory risk remains the elephant in the room. Tokenized stocks exist in a gray area in many jurisdictions. Whether they’re classified as securities, derivatives, or something else entirely varies by country, and enforcement actions could reshape this market overnight.
For CAKE holders specifically, the combination of growing volume and ongoing token burns creates a potentially favorable supply-demand dynamic. PancakeSwap has found a product-market fit that extends beyond memecoins and DeFi-native tokens, and that diversification of revenue streams is exactly what a mature DEX needs to stay relevant in an increasingly competitive landscape.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
21 July 2026 | 09:38 Solana ended the second quarter with two very different stories. Trading in tokenized assets on the network more than doubled to a record $5.8 billion in quarterly volume, but overall decentralized exchange activity, lending and revenue generated from network use all declined.
Key Takeaways Tokenized-asset trading volume on Solana reached $5.8 billion in Q2, rising 114% and led by tokenized equities. Solana retained 32% of spot DEX volume despite a sharp decline in overall trading. Network revenue fell 43%, showing that trading growth did not translate directly into greater fee demand. SOL investment products attracted capital while staking income remained heavily dependent on token issuance. The contrast is not necessarily contradictory. Tokenized-asset volume measures how much tokenized financial exposure changed hands on Solana’s exchanges, while total DEX volume, lending and Real Economic Value show how much of the network’s activity converted into fees and borrowing demand.
Together, the figures suggest that Solana’s capital-markets ecosystem expanded faster than the revenue the network earns from it.
Tokenized Equities Became Solana’s Main Growth Story Tokenized-asset trading volume increased by 114% quarter over quarter and set a record for a sixth consecutive quarter, according to Blockworks Advisory’s Q2 2026 Solana Tokenholder Report. The report was commissioned by the Solana Foundation, which may provide input on its content, although Blockworks Advisory states that it retains editorial control. That funding relationship is worth keeping in mind when weighing the report’s framing, even where the underlying data is verifiable.
Solana tokenized asset volume by category. The $5.8 billion figure describes trading volume, not the market value of assets held on Solana and not revenue earned by the network. It measures how much tokenized exposure was bought and sold through Solana’s decentralized exchanges during the quarter.
Tokenized equities dominated that activity with $4.8 billion, or 84% of the total, roughly four times their Q1 volume. The report estimates that Solana now processes approximately 97% of tokenized-equity trading across all blockchains. June alone contributed $3.3 billion of equity volume, a surge catalyzed by the tokenized listing of SpaceX following its June 12 public offering. Private credit added $803 million, with smaller contributions from commodities and collectibles.
The market continued expanding after the quarter ended. On July 10, 2026, tokenized exposure to SK Hynix went live on Solana through Backpack Securities, xStocks and Ondo Finance.
Those products provide similar economic exposure through different legal, custody and redemption structures. That distinction matters because tokenized assets are not a single standardized product category. As our guide to RWA tokenization platforms explains in detail, investors still need to examine who issued each token, what backs it, whether it can be redeemed and which users are eligible to hold it.
Solana Kept Its DEX Lead as Trading Slowed Solana decentralized exchanges processed $160.8 billion in spot volume during Q2. That was down 44% from $288.5 billion in the previous quarter, but the network still handled approximately 32% of spot DEX volume across the blockchains measured.
Spot DEX volume share by blockchain. Ethereum followed with 25%, while Base and BNB Chain accounted for 16% and 12%, respectively. Q2 was the eighth consecutive quarter in which Solana controlled more than 30% of the measured spot market.
This combination requires context. Solana did not lose its relative position against competing networks, but the overall market became less active. Maintaining market share in a contracting market is different from generating absolute growth. The monthly path was more constructive than the quarterly total: volume fell from $52.3 billion in April to $48.0 billion in May, then rebounded 26% to $60.5 billion in June as tokenized-asset activity accelerated.
Application revenue also fell 31% to $228.4 million. Perpetual futures presented a different picture, with notional volume increasing 60% quarter over quarter to $183 billion, but that recovery did not offset weaker activity across the rest of the ecosystem.
The composition of that revenue also complicates the diversification story. Pumpfun, the memecoin launchpad, remained the ecosystem’s largest business with $90.1 million, or 39% of all application revenue, and accounted for 97% of launchpad revenue. Tokenized equities may be the growth story, but the single biggest earner on Solana is still the speculative category the network is described as moving beyond. That concentration reached a new high in Q2 precisely because the rest of the market shrank faster.
Network Revenue Fell Faster Than Market Share Solana’s Real Economic Value, or REV, totaled $51 million in Q2, down 43% from the previous quarter. REV measures transaction fees and out-of-protocol tips paid by users while excluding inflationary token issuance.
Solana quarterly network revenue breakdown. Monthly REV declined from $18.6 million in April to $18.1 million in May and $14.3 million in June. Priority fees fell 45% to $30.8 million, while Jito tips dropped 50% to $9.9 million. Base and vote fees contributed another $10.3 million.
The decline also cost Solana relative position among blockchains. The report ranks Solana fourth in quarterly network revenue with a 12% share, behind Hyperliquid at 33% with $141.4 million, Tron at 21% and Ethereum at 15%, down from Solana’s 18% share in Q1. Hyperliquid’s lead rests on the trading-fee engine we examined in our analysis of the platform’s $1.2 billion in cumulative fees. The comparison is uncomfortable for Solana’s economics: a network processing billions of transactions earned roughly a third of what a single derivatives-focused chain collected in the same quarter.
Solana still processed 9.8 billion non-vote transactions during the quarter, with a median transaction fee near $0.0004. However, 27% of those transactions reverted, a share the report attributes to automated arbitrage strategies and describes as a feature rather than a bug. That characterization is the report’s reading, not a settled fact. Daily active addresses also fell from 2.4 million in Q1 to 2.0 million, meaning the network processed nearly as many transactions from a noticeably smaller user base. The network remained heavily used, but high transaction counts did not automatically produce high revenue because individual transactions remained extremely inexpensive.
Lending Has Not Followed Tokenization Higher Deposits across Kamino and Jup Lend ended the quarter near $4.1 billion, while outstanding loans stood at approximately $1.6 billion. Deposits declined 8.3%, and loans fell 7.9%.
The pullback was more pronounced in real-world asset lending. Deposits connected to RWA markets dropped from $1.23 billion in Q1 to $640 million in Q2, a decline of 48%.
This exposes an important gap in the tokenization narrative. Solana can host record trading in stocks, credit products and funds without those assets immediately becoming widely used as collateral or generating substantial borrowing demand.
A stronger confirmation of adoption would involve tokenized-asset growth occurring alongside expanding collateral use, higher borrowing demand and deeper secondary-market liquidity. Q2 delivered the first part, but not the others.
Staker Income Still Came Mostly From Inflation SOL’s nominal staking yield ended the quarter near 5.5%, down from 5.8% at the end of Q1. With inflation around 3.8%, the estimated real staking yield was approximately 1.7%.
Stakers earned $487 million during Q2, down 23% from $630 million in the previous quarter. More than 98% of that revenue came from token issuance, while Jito tips contributed roughly $8.2 million.
This means staking rewards continued to depend primarily on newly issued SOL rather than fees generated by network activity. For long-term token economics, the balance between issuance, fee income and token burning is more informative than the headline staking percentage alone.
The Proposed Burn Increase Is Not Yet Active The report estimated that SIMD-553 could burn between 7,500 and 9,000 SOL per day under current activity assumptions, roughly ten times the existing rate and equivalent to around 12% to 15% of daily issuance.
That is a modeled scenario, not the current burn rate or a guaranteed outcome. SIMD-553 remains a proposal and would need to pass the necessary governance and implementation stages before changing SOL’s supply dynamics.
Under Solana’s current fee structure, 50% of the base transaction fee is burned. The remaining half and all priority fees are paid to the validator producing the block.
A larger burn could strengthen the connection between network activity and SOL demand, but it would not automatically make the token deflationary. Even the report’s estimated burn remains below total daily issuance.
Investment Products Attracted Capital Through the Downturn SOL spot investment products recorded approximately $120 million in net inflows during Q2, extending positive flows for a third consecutive quarter. Over the same period, Blockworks data showed $3.7 billion of outflows from Bitcoin products and $500 million from Ethereum products.
Solana quarterly ETP flows. The comparison should be treated carefully because the products differ substantially in size, age and investor base. Still, the direction of flows suggests that some investors continued building regulated Solana exposure despite weaker onchain revenue and lower market activity.
Official SEC filings confirm the expansion of that investment infrastructure. The Grayscale Solana Staking ETF trades on NYSE Arca under GSOL, while the 21Shares Solana ETF trades on Cboe BZX under TSOL. The pipeline is still growing: Morgan Stanley filed a third round of SEC amendments on July 14 for spot Ethereum and Solana ETFs expected to trade under MSSE and MSOL. Traditional financial institutions are building similar infrastructure on other networks as well, as we covered in out report on JPMorgan’s tokenized money market fund.
Positive fund flows do not guarantee higher SOL prices or stronger network revenue. They show demand for regulated exposure, which is separate from activity taking place inside Solana applications.
What Solana’s Q2 Results Actually Show Q2 was not simply strong or weak. Solana gained ground as infrastructure for trading tokenized assets and retained its lead in decentralized spot trading, but the network generated less revenue and experienced weaker lending demand.
The constructive interpretation is that Solana is broadening beyond the speculative activity that powered its earlier revenue peaks. The more cautious interpretation is that tokenized-asset growth has not yet translated into enough borrowing, trading intensity or fee generation to strengthen the network’s underlying economics, that the user base contracted during the quarter, and that the largest single source of application revenue remains a memecoin launchpad.
The next confirmation would come from several metrics improving together: continued tokenized-asset growth, recovering REV, greater use of tokenized securities as collateral, sustained investment-product inflows and a larger share of staking rewards funded by actual fees instead of issuance.
Until then, Solana’s institutional expansion is real, but the economic value captured by the network remains the part that still needs to catch up.
Source review: Q2 figures were checked against Blockworks Advisory’s Q2 2026 Solana Tokenholder Report, which was commissioned and funded by the Solana Foundation, with Blockworks Advisory stating it retains editorial control. Recent developments were reviewed against Solana Foundation publications, Solana’s technical documentation and SEC filings as of July 21, 2026. Coindoo has no commercial relationship with any entity mentioned.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.
Author
Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.
JTX, the trading platform designed by the architects of Solana’s execution infrastructure, is now live, bringing a professional-standard trading experience to the onchain economy.
The launch comes as Solana solidifies its position as crypto’s leading venue for high-performance spot trading, dominating DEX volumes and outperforming CEX execution to give traders the best possible fills.
Dedicating 80% of protocol revenue to $JTO value accrual, JTX could represent one of the biggest catalysts for the growth of Jito’s native token.
Over 100,000 Waitlisted Users Gain Full Access to JTX After many weeks of eager anticipation, Jito has opened the floodgates to JTX, giving Solana’s onchain traders access to the network’s first institutional-standard professional trading venue.
Initially supporting the full breadth of Solana’s spot markets, including its flourishing RWA sector, JTX is expected to enable support for perpetual futures trading and prediction markets in the near future.
"Over the past four years, Jito has powered the Solana ecosystem, building the execution infrastructure that the network's trading activity runs on. JTX takes that same infrastructure and puts it directly in the hands of traders for the first time. It combines self-custody with execution tools that have typically only been available through more advanced trading platforms. Users hold their own keys, settlement happens onchain, and there are no custody tradeoffs,” - Lucas Bruder, Jito Labs Co-Founder and CEO
From launch, JTX offers traders a comprehensive suite of professional order types, from basics like resting limit orders to more sophisticated tools like TWAPs and conditional orders. Meanwhile, exclusive features like JTX Smart Fills break large orders into a burst of smaller orders to mitigate price impact and improve execution.
In parallel, JTX runs simulated execution comparisons against the industry’s leading centralized exchanges, informing traders of how much they save on each trade to Solana’s innate outperformance.
The Trading Venue Solana Deserves Solana has emerged as crypto’s most performant network for global-scale trading. Beyond dominating all blockchains in spot DEX volume since Q4 2024, recent improvements to Solana’s onchain market structure, like Jito’s BAM Maker Plugin, have elevated trade execution on the network to unprecedented levels.
According to a recent Blockworks report, traders consistently get better fills trading on Solana than on exchanges like Binance. Research from Jump Crypto has reinforced this thesis, claiming that Solana’s onchain execution outperforms Binance in 99.3% or retail-sized swaps.
With demand for 24/7 RWA and tokenized asset trading in DeFi exploding in 2026, Solana has successfully captured the vast majority of spot flows.
Boasting one of crypto’s most vibrant and diverse RWA economies, Solana recorded $5.8B in quarterly tokenized asset volume. Onchain data indicates that over 300,000 wallets on Solana hold RWAs, highlighting strong demand among market participants.
But despite Solana’s traders embracing traditional asset classes like tokenized stocks and commodities, the network itself has been lacking an institutional-grade trading venue. JTX promises to fill that void, giving professional traders the tools they need to effectively navigate Solana’s market layer.
"Demand for tokenized assets and a professionalized interface on Solana has grown considerably, driven by deeper liquidity and a maturing set of onchain products. JTX gives traders a platform built specifically for that environment, offering execution quality that matches what they expect on centralized exchanges, without giving up self-custody." - Kevin Beardsley, JTX Head of Product
80% of JTX Revenue to $JTO Following the approval of an upcoming governance proposal, JIP-38, Jito DAO is expected to route 80% of all JTX revenue directly to $JTO value accrual, with the remaining 20% being reinvested into ongoing protocol development.
If passed, JIP-38 will introduce programmatic $JTO buybacks and burns for at least one year, subject to re-appraisal in Q4 2027.
Having designed the architecture of the network’s best-in-class market layer and powering the bulk of Solana’s 250M+ daily transactions, JTX joins Jito’s growing suite as the Solana infrastructure giant’s flagship consumer product.
Alongside network staples like the Jito Block Engine, $jitoSOL, and BAM, JTX represents Jito’s full-stack commitment to making Solana the world’s leading decentralized trading environment, capable of competing with centralized exchanges and setting a new standard for Internet Capital Markets
Disclaimer: SolanaFloor is a subsidiary of the Jito Network
Read More on SolanaFloor Welcome to the tradingFloor
Introducing tradingFloor: A Thesis-Driven Livestream for Solana’s Onchain Traders
1inch nově podporuje Maple tokeny syrupUSDC a syrupUSDT, takže je lze obchodovat přes Swap, Trade i Terminal. syrupUSDC je na Ethereum, Arbitrum a Base, syrupUSDT na Ethereum a BNB Chain.
Maple’s syrupUSDC and syrupUSDT bring tokenized lending positions closer to everyday DeFi trading.
Stablecoins are useful. But they can also sit still. Hold USDC or USDT in a wallet, and you hold a dollar-pegged asset. That is simple. But in institutional credit markets, stablecoins can also become productive capital. That is the idea behind Maple.
Maple is an on-chain lending platform for institutions. Trading firms can borrow stablecoins through Maple and post crypto assets, such as BTC or ETH, as overcollateralized security. Lenders provide stablecoins and receive tokens that represent their position.
Now, Maple’s syrupUSDC and syrupUSDT are available through 1inch.
That gives users and builders another way to access assets across DeFi, with 1inch providing routing and swap infrastructure.
What Maple doesMaple connects lenders and institutional borrowers on-chain.
In simple terms, borrowers receive stablecoin loans. They post crypto collateral. They pay interest on those loans. Lenders provide USDC or USDT and receive a token that represents their deposit.
For USDC, the flow looks like this:
USDC → deposit into Maple → receive syrupUSDC
For USDT, it works the same way:
USDT → deposit into Maple → receive syrupUSDT
But these tokens are not the same as plain stablecoins. USDC is a dollar-pegged stablecoin, not creating any earning opportunity. By contrast, syrupUSDC represents USDC that has been deployed through Maple’s lending system. Its value can increase as, while remaining subject to the risks of the underlying lending strategy.
That is where the RWA angle comes in. These are on-chain tokens connected to institutional credit activity, not just crypto-native trading pairs.
Tokenized credit as part of DeFi infrastructureRWAs are not only tokenized stocks or funds. Tokenized credit is also becoming part of the on-chain economy.
In traditional finance, credit positions are typically difficult to transfer and integrate with other financial infrastructure. Tokenization changes that. It allows credit positions to be represented, tracked and moved as on-chain assets.
For DeFi, that matters because it expands the range of assets that can move through decentralized infrastructure.
Stablecoins become more than settlement assets. Credit positions can become tokens. And those tokens can move through the same routing, swapping and wallet infrastructure that people already use across DeFi.
This does not remove risk. Lending markets still depend on borrower quality, collateral management, liquidity, protocol design and market conditions.
But it does make tokenized credit more portable and interoperable, allowing it to participate in the broader DeFi ecosystem alongside other on-chain assets.
What 1inch supports1inch now supports Maple tokens:
syrupUSDC - on Ethereum, Arbitrum and BasesyrupUSDT - on Ethereum and BNB ChainThese tokens are available across the 1inch ecosystem.
On 1inch.com, users can access them through Swap, Trade or Terminal. In Portfolio, users can track prices, balances and bundles.
For builders and institutional teams, Maple token swaps are supported through APIs available on 1inch Business.
1inch’s role1inch does not run Maple’s lending strategy. Minting, redeeming and lending remain on Maple’s side. Maple manages the credit product and the underlying lending mechanics.
1inch’s role is different: it helps users move into and out of these tokens through swap infrastructure. That distinction matters.
If you want to lend directly through Maple, you use Maple. If you want to trade syrupUSDC or syrupUSDT through available liquidity, 1inch can help route the swap.
This makes access simpler without turning 1inch into the issuer or manager of the asset.
Why routing matters for RWA tokensRWA tokens need more than issuance. They need liquidity. A token can be well designed, but if users cannot enter or exit efficiently, the market remains hard to use. Liquidity may be spread across venues, chains and pools. Prices may differ. A direct route may not always be the best route.
That is where 1inch intent-based swaps are useful.Instead of manually checking routes, users can express the trade they want.
For Maple tokens, this helps make trading more flexible. A user can move between stablecoins and syrup tokens through 1inch, while the routing layer searches for efficient execution across available liquidity.
Why this matters for stablecoin usersMany users understand USDC and USDT. They are simple, liquid and widely used across DeFi.
Maple tokens introduce a different question: what if a stablecoin position could also represent access to institutional lending activity?
That is the difference between holding a plain dollar stablecoin and holding a tokenized credit position linked to that stablecoin.
USDC is idle unless you do something with it. syrupUSDC is designed to represent USDC deployed through Maple’s lending system. USDT works the same way with syrupUSDT.
This makes Maple tokens part of a broader shift in DeFi: stablecoins are increasingly becoming the base layer for more advanced on-chain financial products.
Explore Maple tokens on 1inch.
Disclaimer: This content is for general information purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax or legal advice. Not available in the US and other restricted jurisdictions.
Etherscan vyřadil Gnosis Chain z bezplatné API vrstvy, takže plný přístup k indexaci a datům je nyní dostupný jen v placených plánech. Gnosisscan má být navíc zrušen 11. srpna 2026.
If you’ve ever used Etherscan to check a transaction, verify a contract, or build a dApp that pulls on-chain data, you’ve relied on infrastructure that most people treat like tap water: always available, always free. That assumption is starting to crack.
Etherscan has moved Gnosis Chain out of its free API tier, pushing developers who need full indexing and API functionality toward paid plans. And by August 11, 2026, the dedicated Gnosisscan platform itself faces deprecation, meaning the shift to Pro-tier access isn’t a temporary inconvenience. It’s the new default.
What changed and why it matters As of November 22, 2025, Etherscan reduced its free API tier coverage to roughly 90% of previously supported chains. The reason is straightforward: higher transaction speeds, growing TPS rates, and sheer transaction volume across networks have pushed operational costs to a point where free universal coverage is no longer sustainable.
Gnosis Chain, identified as chain ID 100, is one of the networks that fell outside that 90% cutoff. Developers and applications that previously queried Gnosis data through Etherscan’s free endpoints now need to upgrade to a paid tier for continued access.
Advertisement
Verified contract endpoints, including source code and ABI data, remain free across all chains, Gnosis included. But if your application relies on transaction history, token transfers, event logs, or any of the heavier indexing work, that’s now behind a paywall.
To soften the blow, Etherscan introduced a new Lite plan priced at approximately 25% of the cost of its previous lowest paid tier.
The Gnosisscan deprecation timeline Etherscan plans to deprecate Gnosisscan entirely on August 11, 2026. After that date, any remaining free-tier access points specific to Gnosis will redirect users toward Pro-tier subscriptions.
This creates a clear decision point for any project built on Gnosis Chain. Either budget for Etherscan’s paid plans, or migrate to an alternative indexer before the deadline arrives.
Alternatives and the competitive landscape Blockscout, an open-source blockchain explorer, has been positioning itself as an alternative for multichain indexing. It already supports a wide range of EVM-compatible networks, and the Gnosis community has historically maintained its own Blockscout instance.
What this means for developers and investors For developers, the immediate action item is auditing any application that calls Etherscan’s API for Gnosis Chain data. If your dApp, dashboard, or analytics tool relies on those endpoints, you need to either subscribe to the Lite or Pro plan, or begin integrating with an alternative indexer like Blockscout before the deprecation deadline.
The Lite plan at 25% of the prior lowest tier’s cost offers a middle ground, but teams should evaluate whether that tier includes the specific endpoints and rate limits their applications require.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Bridge Wanchainu mezi Cardanem a BNB Chainem byl zneužit a z trezoru zmizelo asi 515,2 milionu NIGHT za zhruba 13 milionů USD. Wanchain bridge odpojil a vyšetřuje incident.
515 Million NIGHT Tokens Drained in Bridge AttackWanchain's bridge connecting Cardano to BNB Chain was exploited on July 21, 2026, with approximately 515.2 million $NIGHT tokens drained from the bridge treasury. The stolen tokens were worth roughly $13 million at pre-exploit prices. CoinGecko data showed the token trading near $0.0186 after the incident, placing the value of 515 million NIGHT closer to $9 million to $10 million at prevailing prices.
The incident unfolded in just four rapid transactions over an eight-minute window. BlockSec Phalcon traced the attacker's redeemer back to a legitimate BSC transaction that authorized only around 3,110 NIGHT, with the same signature then reused on Cardano to extract more than 203 million NIGHT through field-boundary ambiguity in the raw-concatenated hash. The attacker funneled stolen tokens into a primary wallet on Cardano before aggressively liquidating roughly 90% of the haul through DEX swaps and DeFi protocols.
Validator Flaw at the Root of the ExploitBlockSec's monitoring revealed that the attack exploited a vulnerability in the TreasuryCheck validator's signature message encoding. The issue arose from the raw concatenation of 14 variable-length redemption fields without delimiters, allowing different field combinations to produce identical byte strings and reuse the same hash and signature. BlockSec confirmed the vulnerability by analyzing on-chain Plutus V2 bytecode and decoding the attack transaction's redemption data, noting that use of Sha3_256(SerialiseData(...)) could have prevented this by providing clear CBOR-encoded field boundaries.
Wanchain confirmed it was aware of an incident affecting the Cardano BNB Chain bridge, resulting in the withdrawal of NIGHT tokens from the bridge contract on Cardano, and said the bridge was taken offline while the team investigates. Midnight said its core network remained secure, describing the incident as isolated to bridge infrastructure.
NIGHT is Midnight's native governance token and also generates DUST, the network resource used for transactions and smart contract execution. Midnight operates as a privacy-focused Cardano partner chain with a dual-token economic model, and launched its mainnet in March 2026. NIGHT sold off sharply as reports of the bridge incident spread, falling more than 30% within 24 hours to a record low near $0.016.
Wanchain originally launched cross-chain support for NIGHT between Cardano and BNB Chain in December 2025. The latest bridge incident has brought renewed attention to the risks created when native assets move through third-party infrastructure.
Jito [JTO] za 24 hodin vzrostl o 11,59 % na 0,6087 USD po návrhu JIP-38, který má 100 % podílu na příjmech Jito DAO z JTX Trade směrovat na programové zpětné odkupy a burny JTO po dobu alespoň jednoho roku. Nejbližší resistance je 0,6500 USD.
Jito [JTO] climbed 11.59% over the previous 24 hours to $0.6087 as of writing, while its market capitalization reached $304.67 million as investor interest strengthened. Trading activity also accelerated, with daily volume surging 142.17%, indicating that buyers returned aggressively after recent weakness.
The rally followed growing optimism surrounding JIP-38, a proposal that established Jito as a token-centric network by directing 100% of the Jito DAO’s revenue share from JTX Trade toward programmatic JTO buybacks and burns for at least one year.
Positive sentiment surrounding Solana’s [SOL] institutional adoption and capital rotation into Solana ecosystem tokens further supported the move. As a result, market participants increasingly viewed the proposal as a long-term value driver rather than a short-lived catalyst.
JTO’s leveraged traders return Derivatives traders also increased their exposure as Open Interest (OI) rose 14.53% to $52.05 million at press time, during the rally. The increase suggested that fresh positions entered the market instead of existing contracts simply closing.
Rising OI alongside double-digit price gains often reflected stronger market conviction because both spot and futures participants committed additional capital.
Unlike rallies driven by declining derivatives exposure, JTO‘s advance attracted broader participation across multiple trading segments. The combination suggested traders expected the bullish narrative surrounding JIP-38 to continue influencing price action.
However, expanding leveraged exposure also increased the probability of sharper volatility should sentiment reverse or profit-taking accelerate after the recent advance.
Source: CoinGlass Buyers maintained control across spot markets Spot market activity also favored buyers throughout the latest recovery.
At the time of writing, the 90-day Futures Taker CVD remained buy dominant, showing that aggressive market buyers consistently absorbed available sell orders. The behavior aligned with the sharp increase in trading volume, which expanded 142.17% over the previous day.
Stronger buying pressure supported the price recovery instead of allowing sellers to regain control after recent weakness.
In addition, the sustained demand complemented improving sentiment surrounding Jito’s revised tokenomics and the broader Solana ecosystem. Although buyers held the advantage, continued demand would remain necessary to absorb future profit-taking as speculative participation increased across both spot and derivatives markets.
Source: CryptoQuant Can JTO reclaim $0.80 next? JTO rebounded from the $0.5332 support area after breaking below its broader ascending channel earlier.
Buyers pushed the token back toward $0.6500, which now represented the nearest resistance before a possible move toward $0.8000. The Directional Movement Index (DMI) also reflected improving conditions.
At press time, the +DI stood at 21.23, remaining above the -DI at 20.56, while the ADX measured 19.43, suggesting bullish strength had started improving but remained below the threshold associated with a strong trend.
If buyers reclaimed $0.6500, the chart suggested a retest of $0.8000 could follow. However, failure to hold above $0.5332 would likely expose JTO to another test of the $0.4054 support level.
Source: TradingView Conclusively, JTO’s rally reflected improving fundamentals, stronger buying pressure, and increasing trader participation rather than a purely speculative bounce.
If buyers continue defending support and overcome the $0.6500 barrier, the token could challenge $0.8000 in the sessions ahead. However, weakening demand would likely delay that recovery and shift attention back toward the $0.5332 support zone.
Final Summary JTO’s rally gained support from stronger buying activity and growing confidence after the JIP-38 proposal. Rising Open Interest and steady spot demand kept bullish pressure intact, though $0.6500 remains the next key hurdle.
Validator XRPL Vet odmítá další snížení rezerv, protože podle něj chrání síť před spamem a zneužitím. Debata v komunitě se tak láme mezi snazším onboardingem a bezpečností.
Vet argues that reserve requirements serve as an important defense against spam attacks and excessive network resource usage.
An XRPL validator has said that he will not vote for another reduction in its account reserves, sparking a community debate over whether lower costs would help adoption or weaken network protections.
The dispute has split community members between those who see lower reserves as necessary for easier onboarding and those who argue that it could strip out a security buffer that the network still needs.
XRPL Reserve Debate Revisits Network Costs and Spam Protection In a July 20 post on X, Hussein Zangana, the XRP Ledger Foundation’s director of community, told his nearly 57,000 followers that the network’s account reserves have already fallen significantly since the network launched.
In 2012, activating an account required 1,000 XRP in base reserves, with Jed McCaleb later reducing the requirement to 200 XRP. From there, reserves came down gradually through validator votes rather than formal amendments, landing at today’s figures: a 1 XRP base reserve to activate an account, plus a 0.2 XRP owner reserve for each token held, including RLUSD or USDC, or for each of up to 32 NFTs.
He said that he’d backed earlier reductions himself, and at the time, the cuts had made sense given XRP’s rising price and XRPL’s beefier server capacity. However, as things stand, he’s drawing a different line.
“We have to be very careful in arbitrarily lowering reserves,” Vet wrote. “There’s a clear reason for its existence and security comes first. The debate should start there.”
According to him, reserves were designed to protect network resources, including storage and memory, by making it more expensive to create a large number of accounts that could be used for spam or DDoS attacks.
The dUNL validator added that he would only vote to lower reserves if the lower requirements could provide the same level of protection the current one does. He further confirmed that he would definitely not vote for higher transaction fees, which he claimed many community members had been using “as an argument to compensate for lower reserves.”
You may also like: XRP Has Stayed in Crypto’s Top 10 for 13 Straight Years – No Other Altcoin Has Done This Binance XRP Reserves at Lowest Since February as Ripple Price Defends Key Support Ripple, Coinbase, Circle Join Linux x402 Foundation to Help Shape AI Payments Where the Rest of the Community Landed Vet did face some pushback, especially from community member Daniel Keller, who argued that lower reserves could help the project attract more users who are unfamiliar with crypto.
According to him, the focus should be on onboarding people outside the existing crypto audience, where sponsors might want to activate accounts on their behalf while keeping down acquisition costs.
Keller also questioned whether Vet’s concerns about spam were overstated and pointed out that the ledger had handled periods of high activity in the past without lower reserves causing any issues.
Meanwhile, another community member, Chris Thompson, raised a different worry: that lowering reserves could make it easier to create more easily disposable wallets, which could increase the surface area for possible exploitation.
Recent XRPL updates have also seen uneven adoption, with only 43% of nodes moving to its v3.2.0 upgrade. The update introduced changes such as reduced memory usage for nodes of between 30% and 40%, as well as improvements tied to network operations.
TRONDAO přidal za poslední rok 9,7 miliardy USD ke stablecoinové tržní kapitalizaci a v objemu stablecoinů ze všech blockchainů skončil druhý za Ethereum. Na síti nejvíc dominuje USDT.
TRONDAO has cemented its position as one of the leading blockchain networks for stablecoin settlements in 2026, securing $9.7 billion in added stablecoin market capitalization over the past year. This surge places the network second only to Ethereum in terms of total stablecoin volume handled among blockchains.
TRONDAO rises as stablecoin settlement hubThe recent influx into the TRON network is widely attributed to its low transaction fees and significant processing capacity, making it an attractive destination for digital dollar transfers globally. According to data provided by on-chain analytics platforms such as DefiLlama and CoinMarketCap, TRON has consistently reported the highest stablecoin transaction volume outside of Ethereum.
USDT, or Tether, represents the largest portion of stablecoins circulating on TRON, fueling cross-border payment solutions and acting as a bridge for international exchanges. The network’s ability to process transactions at costs amounting to fractions of a cent while maintaining instant settlement further enhances its appeal to both institutions and retail users.
Mini dictionary: TRONDAO is the autonomous decentralized organization that governs the TRON blockchain protocol, overseeing network upgrades and ecosystem growth.
The growing popularity of TRON is particularly evident in markets where Ethereum’s mainnet fees have become prohibitive, allowing TRON to capture users and transactional volume that require affordable, efficient, and reliable settlement options.
BlockchainStablecoin Market Cap Added (1 Year)Main StablecoinKey AdvantageEthereumHigher than $9.7 billionUSDT, USDC, DAIWidest DeFi ecosystemTRON$9.7 billionUSDTLow fees, fast settlementsRegulatory focus and future directionsThe sharp rise in stablecoin activity conducted via TRON has attracted the attention of regulatory bodies, with a significant share of transactions now occurring on a single chain. This trend highlights the ongoing competition among Layer-1 blockchains for dominance in stablecoin liquidity—a critical indicator of ecosystem utility and adoption.
TRONDAO’s next steps reportedly include deepening partnerships with compliant stablecoin issuers and supporting decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, aiming to enable broader possibilities for stablecoin utilization within the network beyond basic settlements.
Market observers have pointed out that the strong demand for on-chain dollar assets during times of global financial uncertainty has contributed to TRON’s expanding role, especially within enterprise blockchain use cases.
At the same time, observers have expressed concerns about the network’s reliance on a single stablecoin and the corresponding risks of centralization, which may create compliance vulnerabilities as institutional participation grows.
Outlook for TRON in emerging marketsCost efficiency continues to benefit both retail users and institutions operating in emerging economies, where affordable USDT transfers are crucial. In many cases, withdrawal fees from exchanges have dropped as more transactions shift to the TRON network.
Layer-1 competition in the stablecoin sector, as reflected in TRON’s performance, is expected to remain a key metric for assessing blockchain utility and overall network health.
As TRONDAO moves forward, its commitment to infrastructure development and regulatory compliance is expected to shape the evolving landscape of stablecoin settlements and DeFi activity.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Tržní kapitalizace RWA na Stellar vzrostla na 3,10 miliardy USD a počet držitelů přesáhl 12 500, což znamená 300% růst letos. Mezi hlavními hráči jsou Spiko a chystaný vstup DTCC.
Allium Labs has launched a real-time data tracking platform dedicated to Stellar Lumens (XLM), providing open access to live on-chain statistics. Users can now monitor smart contract activity, transaction fees, and active address counts for the Stellar network.
RWA Adoption on Stellar Reaches New MilestonesA major focus of Allium Labs’ platform is its deep analysis of Real World Assets (RWAs) on Stellar. Current data shows that the number of RWA holders has surpassed 12,538, while the total market capitalization for tokenized real assets on the network has climbed to $3.10 billion. This marks a dual milestone for Stellar, which has registered a 300% increase in RWA market value this year.
Spiko, a key player in the ecosystem, leads custody handling with $1.2 billion under management. This figure includes substantial holdings of government debt and Euro-denominated Treasury bills. The majority of Spiko’s portfolio consists of tokenized near-term European government securities and a fund tracking short-term Euro rates.
Franklin Templeton, an American asset management firm, and the German company Bitbond Finance GmbH are also active in Stellar’s RWA segment, with growing participation. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has reportedly announced plans to integrate part of its $114 trillion traditional securities market into the Stellar network by the first quarter of 2027.
Mini dictionary: The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is a leading US financial market infrastructure provider that handles settlement and clearance of securities worth trillions of dollars annually, playing a vital role in global capital markets.
EntityRoleAssets on StellarSpikoCustody handler$1.2 billionFranklin TempletonAsset managementGrowing presenceBitbond Finance GmbHFinance/TokenizationGrowing presenceDTCCSecurities infrastructureTo be deployed in 2027Trading Metrics Reflect Cautious MomentumInstitutional interest in Stellar is rising, leading some long-term investors to hope for an upward breakout in XLM’s price. Such moves are often accompanied by price consolidation after a drop and visible support from high-volume traders, commonly referred to as crypto whales. On the 4-hour chart, Stellar’s price appears to be gaining strength, with the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) currently at 0.12.
In contrast, the one-hour price chart for XLM recently signaled a short-term sell-off, while the daily chart remains flat, with the CMF indicator showing a neutral reading of zero. Market analysts have connected this uncertainty to broader geopolitical tensions and the general sideways movement in commodity assets such as gas and gold.
Still, further growth in Stellar’s RWA sector could set XLM apart from the broader market, where caution persists even as Bitcoin (BTC) has returned above $65,600. Over the past two months, BTC has shown a tendency to fall back to $60,000 after brief rallies.
AssetRecent PeakKey SupportBTC$65,600$60,000XLM$0.19 (barrier)$0.19Stellar’s Role in On-Chain FinanceStellar’s network has gained attention for transforming traditional assets, such as money market funds and Treasury bills, into digital tokens that can be traded around the clock. Spiko’s $1.2 billion contribution has positioned the network among the top platforms for tokenized real assets, especially in Europe-focused funds.
Real-world yield products, including European treasury exposure and overnight funds, are now available as digital tokens with low fees and high accessibility. Increased adoption of on-chain assets boosts network activity and demand for XLM, which serves as Stellar’s native token and main transaction bridge.
These developments suggest strong fundamental momentum, but a broader rally for XLM remains dependent on sustained volume and overall market support.
Stellar’s RWA market cap hit $3.10 billion, with over 12,500 holders—a 300% increase this year, fueled by major players like Spiko and incoming participants such as the DTCC.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Morgan Stanley podal žádost o spotové ETF navázané na Solanu s nejnižším poplatkem v USA, 0,14 %. Současně SBI spustila v Japonsku první tokenizovaný akciový fond na blockchainu Solana.
Morgan Stanley, Wall Street’s largest wealth manager, has filed for a Solana spot ETF with the lowest sponsor fee in the U.S., at 0.14%. Concurrently, SBI Global Asset Management has launched Japan’s first tokenized equity fund on the Solana blockchain. Despite these significant institutional developments, Solana’s native token, SOL, remains at a 2.5-year low, within the $68–$77 range.
The Morgan Stanley ETF filing includes prominent service providers such as Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure, and Coinbase Canada, passing 95% of yield rewards to fund holders. Meanwhile, the SBI-JX fund offers institutional and accredited investors on-chain access to a high-dividend Japanese equity strategy. These moves mark a notable increase in institutional infrastructure around Solana, suggesting a growing adoption of blockchain technology in traditional financial markets.
Advertisement
Despite these advances, market pricing suggests limited immediate impact on Solana’s price, with a consistent risk-off sentiment prevailing. Current market data indicates only a 9% likelihood that Solana will reach $90 by August 1, 2026, reflecting cautious optimism amid broader market conditions.
Key Takeaways Morgan Stanley’s filing of a low-fee Solana ETF and SBI’s launch of a tokenized equity fund on Solana suggest increased institutional interest in the blockchain. Solana’s price remains near multi-year lows, indicating a disconnect between institutional adoption and current market sentiment. Market pricing suggests a low probability of significant short-term price increases for Solana, with a 9% chance of reaching $90 by early August. What to Watch Investors and analysts will be closely monitoring the response of the SEC to Morgan Stanley’s ETF filing, as approval could indicate increased institutional adoption. Additionally, the performance and adoption of the SBI-JX fund in Japan may provide further insights into the viability of tokenized equity products. Market participants will also watch for broader macroeconomic factors and regulatory developments that could impact Solana’s price trajectory.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h August 1 2026 9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.2% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.7% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → August 1 2026 1.9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → August 1 2026 3.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 21% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market →
Tokenizovaná aktiva na Solaně dosáhla ve 2. čtvrtletí 5,8 miliardy USD, což je o 114 % více než v předchozím čtvrtletí. Tahounem byly tokenizované akcie s objemem zhruba 4,8 miliardy USD.
Tokenized assets on the Solana blockchain have reached a new pinnacle, totaling $5.8 billion in the second quarter of 2026. This figure marks a 114% increase from the previous quarter, continuing a trend of six consecutive quarterly all-time highs. The surge is largely driven by tokenized stocks, which accounted for roughly $4.8 billion of the network’s total tokenized equity activity. Solana’s dominance in institutional real-world asset settlement is further cemented, as it manages over 96% of all tokenized stock trades on blockchain networks. This growth occurs despite a decline in broader decentralized exchange (DEX) spot volume.
Advertisement
Key Takeaways The record-setting $5.8 billion in tokenized assets on Solana suggests robust institutional demand and strengthens its competitive position as a leading blockchain for tokenized stocks. The market pricing for Solana reaching $90 in July reflects an increase in confidence, with YES outcomes rising from 6% to 9% over the past 24 hours. The continuous quarterly growth in tokenized assets on Solana is consistent with scenarios where increased adoption and confidence in Solana’s capabilities could drive further interest and value. What to Watch Watch for any further increases in tokenized asset volumes on Solana, as these could indicate sustained institutional interest. Key developments to monitor include potential regulatory changes or new financial product approvals that could impact Solana’s market positioning. Additionally, movements in Solana’s price, especially if it approaches the $90 mark, could suggest shifts in market confidence and demand dynamics.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h August 1 2026 9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.2% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.7% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → August 1 2026 1.8% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → August 1 2026 2.7% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.9% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 23% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → August 1 2026 0.1% — — View market →
Solana spustila dashboard pro tokenizované akcie s on-chain analytikou napříč řetězci. Nabízí přehled podílu na trhu, data na úrovni emitenta i aktiva.
Solana has unveiled a new platform that provides detailed, on-chain analytics for tokenized stocks, positioning itself prominently in the evolving landscape of digital asset management. Unlike early tokenized equity pilots, this development transforms tokenized stocks into quantifiable and transparent operations directly recorded on the blockchain.
New analytics platform emergesThe new Solana-based dashboard allows users to explore, filter, and compare tokenized equity market share across various blockchains. Investors and other stakeholders can analyze data by company, asset type, or token issuer, offering a level of insight that has rarely been available in the sector. Visualization tools include stacked horizontal bar charts, doughnut charts, and line graphs.
Users are able to drill down by metric, issuer, and underlying asset, providing customizable views of the tokenized equities ecosystem. This setup contrasts with typical total value locked (TVL) dashboards, offering nuanced analytics that track growth rates of individual issuers in relation to the broader development of digital assets.
The platform’s design responds to growing calls for transparency as more physical financial assets transition to digital forms. This increased openness seeks to reduce knowledge gaps between participants, benefiting institutional investors, funds, and exchanges through reduced informational asymmetry.
Institutions can now assess differences in liquidity, distribution mechanisms, and custody models among issuing platforms more efficiently. Developers are equipped to benchmark issuance activity and monitor evolving trends, while exchanges gain access to comparative data across multiple chains.
Mini dictionary: Tokenized equity, also known as tokenized stocks, refers to digital tokens that represent ownership in traditional company shares but are settled and tracked on a blockchain network, enabling fractional investment and transparent transfer of equity assets.
Solana’s focus on issuer-level and asset-level analytics offers a mature framework that provides not only visibility for traders, but also robust benchmarking and comparison capabilities for institutional market players.
Competitive environment among blockchainsSolana’s launch arrives at a time when other major blockchain networks, including Ethereum, Base, and some Layer 2 solutions, are expanding their own real-world asset (RWA) tokenization offerings. This environment of heightened competition drives innovations in analytics, transparency, and settlement technology.
The dashboard’s ability to compare Solana’s market share directly with rival chains is seen as a key differentiator. Analysts report that issuer- and asset-level data may help set industry standards as tokenized equities gain broader adoption.
The ongoing development of settlement systems, compliance mechanisms, and collaboration with broker-dealers is anticipated to shape the next phase of growth for digital securities. Reliable, standardized data feeds are expected to become vital infrastructure for exchanges and financial institutions in this space.
BlockchainFocus AreaKey Analytics AvailableSolanaTokenized equity, on-chain analyticsIssuer-level, asset-level, market shareEthereumRWA tokenization, DeFi integrationTVL, asset distributionBaseLayer 2 scaling, RWA initiativesTokenization metrics, scaling statsWith customizable data filters and multiple visualization formats, the Solana dashboard provides investors and developers with deeper insights into the growth and distribution of tokenized stocks across competing chains.
Industry strategies evolveSolana is reinforcing its position by providing market participants with actionable data for evaluating the performance and structure of tokenized asset issuers. The transition from basic experiments to measurable, on-chain operations marks a shift toward greater institutional adoption as transparency and comparability become industry standards.
As asset tokenization expands, future performance is expected to rely not only on market interest but also on enhancements to exchange features, compliance infrastructure, and settlement solutions. Collaborative initiatives involving broker-dealers are increasingly becoming integral to advancing digital equity trading.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Grayscale filed with the SEC on July 20 for a spot Worldcoin (WLD) exchange-traded fund. The fund would trade on Nasdaq under the ticker GWLD.
Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart confirmed the filing on X. The twist is that Grayscale’s own paperwork spells out why WLD is such a risky bet.
What the Grayscale Worldcoin ETF Filing SaysThe SEC filing shows Grayscale moved fast. It formed the trust on July 10 and filed just 10 days later. BitGo will hold the WLD, and BNY Mellon will run the fund’s books.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Grayscale knows this path well. Its Bitcoin Trust became a spot ETF in January 2024 after the firm beat the SEC in court. Solana and Dogecoin funds followed in late 2025.
Some details are still missing. The fee is blank, and no trading partners are named yet.
The Risks Grayscale Itself ListsWorldcoin verifies humans by scanning their eyes with a device called the Orb. The filing admits regulators pushed back hard. Spain, Portugal, Germany, Hong Kong, Brazil, Kenya, and Indonesia all took action between 2024 and 2025.
The token math looks rough too. The 100 largest wallets hold about 90% of circulating WLD. Team and investor tokens keep unlocking until around July 2028.
Then there is the price. WLD trades near $0.375, up 3.3% on the day. That is still about 97% below its March 2024 peak of $11.74.
Worldcoin (WLD) Price Performance. Source: BeInCryptoA June treasury purchase gave the token a brief lift. Meanwhile, Tools for Humanity layoffs at the project’s lead developer dragged it back down.
GWLD cannot trade until the SEC signs off and Nasdaq clears the listing. Easier access may help, but WLD’s path forward likely hinges on those token unlocks.
Hyperliquid se chce stát výchozí vrstvou likvidity pro AI obchodní agenty. Open interest na platformě překročil 10 miliard USD a trhy HIP-3 dosáhly zhruba 3,69 miliardy USD objemu obchodů.
Hyperliquid is positioning itself as the default liquidity layer for AI agents and algorithmic systems. The play is simple on the surface: offer a single, unified feed of funding rates, open interest, and cross-venue exposure, so agents can make sharper risk assessments without stitching together data from a dozen different sources.
The platform computes funding rates hourly, capped at 4% per hour, with a 0.01% interest component factored in every 8 hours. That level of granularity matters for algorithmic systems that need precise, time-stamped inputs to model carry costs and position risk.
Advertisement
The infrastructure upgrade that makes this practical is the introduction of agent wallets, sometimes called API wallets. These allow bots and AI systems to execute trades directly without requiring withdrawal permissions. A trading agent can operate on Hyperliquid with meaningful autonomy without holding the keys to the full treasury. Hyperliquid’s architecture is also optimized for sub-second transaction finality, which for high-frequency or reactive trading strategies is the difference between a profitable trade and a missed one.
Hyperliquid’s open interest crossed $10 billion by mid-2026. HIP-3 markets, which allow permissionless deployment of new trading pairs including tokenized assets and pre-IPO exposure products, recorded roughly $3.69 billion in volume during the same mid-2026 period. The platform also points to trillions in cumulative trading volume as evidence that liquidity depth is genuine rather than manufactured.
Senpi launched what it described as personal trading agents for Hyperliquid in February 2026, integrating a suite of 31 tools. Those agents come with persistent memory, meaning they retain context across trading sessions rather than starting from scratch each time.
For traders and investors watching this space, the concentration of open interest above $10 billion on a single venue introduces a specific kind of risk worth tracking. When automated systems cluster on one platform and share similar data inputs, their behavior during stress events can become correlated. A sharp move that triggers liquidations across multiple agent-managed positions simultaneously is not a theoretical scenario.
Agents with access to unified cross-venue exposure data can manage portfolio risk more holistically than traders watching fragmented dashboards. Funding rate arbitrage, delta-neutral hedging, and cross-market basis trades all become more tractable when the data infrastructure supports them cleanly.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Strategy prodala 2 732 318 akcií MSTR za čistý výnos 263,5 milionu USD a druhý týden po sobě nekoupila žádný Bitcoin. Hotovostní rezerva firmy vzrostla na 3,225 miliardy USD.
The bitcoin treasury company lifted its cash reserve to a $3.225 billion as its 843,775 BTC stack sits about $9 billion underwater.
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: MSTR) sold 2,732,318 shares of its Class A common stock between July 13 and July 19, generating net proceeds of $263.5 million under its at-the-market offering program, according to an 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20.
The company made no bitcoin (BTC) purchases during the period, the second consecutive week without an acquisition. Its holdings remain at 843,775 BTC, bought for an aggregate $63.69 billion at an average price of $75,476 per coin.
No Preferred Sales, No BuybacksThe filing showed no sales under any of Strategy's four preferred-stock ATM programs — STRF, STRC, STRK and STRD — during the week, and no repurchases under its share buyback programs. The common-stock sale was the sole capital-markets activity.
Strategy said $23.53 billion remains available under its MSTR common-stock offering, which reflects combined capacity including a $21 billion increase announced in March. Its US dollar reserve, held to cover preferred dividends and debt interest, stood at $3.225 billion as of July 19.
Holdings Sit Below Cost BasisStrategy's average purchase price of $75,476 per bitcoin is above the token's recent trading level. Bitcoin was changing hands near $64,200, according to CoinGecko, which puts the position's market value around $54 billion — below the roughly $63.7 billion the company has paid. MSTR shares edged about 0.5% higher in pre-market trading Monday.
The second straight week without a bitcoin purchase, funded entirely by equity sales rather than preferred issuance, suggests Strategy is prioritizing liquidity over accumulation at current price levels.
Rusko má do roku 2026 dokončit zákon o digitálních měnách, který legalizuje kryptoměny prostřednictvím licencovaných zprostředkovatelů pro mezinárodní vypořádání. Domácí platby za zboží a služby ale zakáže.
Russia is set to finalize its crypto regulation bill, “On Digital Currency and Digital Rights,” which will create a legal framework for crypto and cross-border settlements. The legislation, expected to be enacted on September 1, 2026, legalizes crypto through licensed intermediaries under the oversight of the Central Bank of Russia. It also bans domestic crypto payments for goods and services, while allowing crypto use for international trade settlements. This development comes as the United States still lacks clear regulation guidance, potentially positioning Russia as a significant player in the international crypto market.
The introduction of this regulatory framework appears to have implications for Bitcoin’s future price predictions. Current market data suggest a low probability of Bitcoin reaching significant price thresholds by the end of 2026, with only a 2% YES probability for reaching $200,000. However, the move by Russia to facilitate international crypto transactions might influence future market confidence and pricing scenarios.
Advertisement
Market participants seem attentive to geopolitical and regulatory shifts, as these factors could shape the landscape for cryptocurrency globally. The Russian bill could serve as a model for other countries, potentially impacting international adoption and regulatory approaches.
Key Takeaways Russia’s upcoming crypto regulation bill suggests a shift towards establishing a legal framework supportive of international crypto transactions. Market pricing currently reflects a low probability of Bitcoin reaching $200,000 by the end of 2026, with a 2% YES probability. The finalization of the Russian bill may indicate potential adjustments in global crypto market dynamics and regulatory standards. What to Watch As Russia finalizes its bill, market observers will likely monitor the impact on global crypto markets and Bitcoin pricing. Key indicators include how other nations might respond with their regulatory frameworks and whether this influences institutional adoption. Additionally, any developments in U.S. regulatory policies or significant announcements from entities like the Federal Reserve could further shape market expectations for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31 2.2% — — View market → December 31 2% — — View market → December 31 2.6% — — View market → December 31 3.5% — — View market → December 31 5% — — View market → January 1 2027 8% — — View market → January 1 2027 21.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 4.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.2% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.1% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 4% — — View market → January 1 2027 6.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 45.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 10.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 31.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 16.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 9.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 4.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 1% — — View market → January 1 2027 11.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 22.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 33.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 52.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 76% — — View market →
Ruská Státní duma má 21. července dokončit závěrečné čtení zákona o digitální měně, který zavádí licence pro burzy a brokery pod dohledem Bank of Russia. Zákon zároveň omezuje domácí platby v kryptoměnách a může dlouhodobě tlumit poptávku po Bitcoinu.
Russia’s State Duma is poised to conduct final readings on the “On Digital Currency and Digital Rights” bill, a significant piece of legislation that seeks to regulate the country’s cryptocurrency sector. Scheduled for July 21, the bill focuses on licensing exchanges and brokers under the oversight of the Bank of Russia. It classifies cryptocurrency as property and permits crypto use for cross-border settlements while maintaining restrictions on domestic payments. The legislation introduces purchase caps and risk-awareness tests for non-qualified retail investors, allowing them to engage only with highly liquid assets such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and USDT. Market participants appear to interpret these measures as limiting long-term BTC demand, suggesting a potential impact on future price predictions.
Advertisement
Key Takeaways Russia’s crypto bill appears to limit long-term Bitcoin demand by focusing on licensed turnover and restricting domestic crypto use. The bill introduces regulatory measures such as purchase caps and risk tests for retail investors, suggesting a controlled market environment. Market pricing suggests a moderate decrease in the likelihood of Bitcoin reaching $200,000 by the end of 2026. What to Watch Observers will be closely monitoring the Duma’s final readings and any amendments that might affect the bill’s provisions. The potential impact on global Bitcoin markets could become clearer as the bill moves closer to implementation, expected on September 1, 2026. Watch for any shifts in pricing that might indicate changing sentiment towards Bitcoin’s long-term prospects, especially in light of regulatory developments in other countries.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31 2.2% — — View market → December 31 2% — — View market → December 31 2.6% — — View market → December 31 3.5% — — View market → December 31 5% — — View market → January 1 2027 8% — — View market → January 1 2027 21.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 4.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.2% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.1% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 4% — — View market → January 1 2027 6.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 45.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 10.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 31.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 16.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 9.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 4.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 1.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 1% — — View market → January 1 2027 11.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 22.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 33.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 52.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 76% — — View market →
1alt HD: ETF Turnaround Proves Insufficient to Trigger True Macro Bullish Turnaround for Bitcoin Traders
Bitcoin [BTC] was struggling to scale the $65k local supply zone. Since July 14, the spot Bitcoin ETF inflows have been positive. The injection of capital has not been enough to substantially elevate prices yet.
Source: CryptoQuant Crypto analyst ScenarioX noted a steady drop-off in the 30-day Bitcoin spot demand. The metric recovered to -80k BTC in early July, but has since deteriorated to -170k BTC, the analyst explained in a post on CryptoQuant Insights.
Despite decreased demand, prices have stayed relatively stable around $65k because of short-covering in the derivatives market. Easing short-term holder sell pressure was also a contributing factor.
AMBCrypto reported that the turnaround in ETF flows was not enough to confirm a bullish reversal. A reading of the short-term price structure highlighted the importance of the $67.3k local swing high.
Lack of new investors growth signals stabilization, not reversal Source: Axel Adler Jr. The Bitcoin New Investors metric remained near its yearly lows. It measures the share of capitalization concentrated among coins younger than 1 month [not moved in a month or less].
Crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr. used this metric to gauge new capital activity and short-term demand. The analyst observed a reading of 8.1, with the lower boundary at 7 and the upper at 50.
This meant an increase in new capital, but not in enough strength to point toward a BTC trend reversal.
Source: Axel Adler Jr. Further evidence of a local stabilization instead of a reversal came from the short-term holder spent output profit ratio [STH SOPR]. The metric measures the average profitability of short-term Bitcoin holders.
Its 7-day moving average was at 0.99, below the 1.0 mark that separates profitability from realized losses.
A sustained recovery in the metric above 1.0 would signal market sentiment has shifted. As things stand, the lack of significant participation from new capital and short-term holders realizing losses meant that bears were still in control.
Final Summary Bitcoin has not yet found the momentum to take prices above the $65k-$67k local supply zone. The bounce toward $65k was only a brief respite from selling, and not the beginning of a bullish recovery, the metrics showed.
Bitcoin Japan uzavřela financování na nákup Bitcoinu do firemní pokladny a z konvertibilních dluhopisů získá 9,66 miliardy jenů. Na první transakci plánuje přes 662 milionů jenů.
Bitcoin Japan, a subsidiary of Asia’s answer to Strategy, Metaplanet, has announced it entered into a financing agreement to start buying the leading cryptocurrency for its treasury.
The Tokyo-based, publicly-listed company said Thursday that it had approved a convertible bond deal with EVO Fund to raise 9.66 billion yen ($59.5 million). The deal will see the company spend over 662 million yen — or over $4 million — on its first Bitcoin transaction.
Bitcoin Japan works on Bitcoin-related media, data platforms and events to promote the understanding of the leading cryptocurrency in Japan and “contribute to the development of its ecosystem globally,” according to its website.
Its parent company, Metaplanet, is a publicly-traded company following in the footsteps of Nasdaq-listed Strategy — formerly MicroStrategy — by buying and holding Bitcoin on its balance sheet. It first started buying the asset in 2024.
Metaplanet is one of the biggest Bitcoin treasuries in the world, with 43,000 digital coins worth over $2.8 billion in its coffers. Its stock is currently down over 50% year-to-date.
JUST IN: 🇯🇵 Japan Public company Bitcoin Japan Corporation has raised $60 million through convertible bonds, allocating $4.08 million to make its first buy for their BTC treasury 👀
BULLISH 🚀 pic.twitter.com/gn7hihxJ68
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) July 17, 2026 Treasury woes Bitcoin Japan’s announcement comes as treasury companies see their stock slide. Last year, the business model of buying and holding Bitcoin and other digital assets with spare cash suffered with a plunge in crypto prices.
Strategy, the biggest and oldest Bitcoin treasury, has seen its Nasdaq-listed stock nosedive by nearly 80% over the past year.
Little known publicly traded companies in 2025 rushed to announce they were buying digital assets in a hope to boost their stock prices. The strategy worked but since the market downturn, a number of firms in the space have had to sell a portion of their holdings as the price of Bitcoin has slumped.
But companies are still accumulating during the downturn — and firms like Bitcoin Japan are seeing the current market price of the leading asset as an opportunity to start a crypto treasury.
Regulatory push While Japan has long been a hub for crypto enthusiasts — former major Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox was based in Tokyo before a 2014 hack and its subsequent closure — lawmakers are now working on regulating the asset class.
Japan’s parliament last week passed a law amendment to designate cryptocurrency assets as “financial assets,” making the assets subject to stricter regulations, eventually paving the way for products like Bitcoin exchange-traded funds to debut in the Asian nation.
The regulation is likely to come into effect within a year, Reuters reported, citing NHK news.
Mathew Di Salvo
Mathew is a reporter who's covered the space since 2019, reporting on everything from Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele's Bitcoin bet to crypto exchange FTX's bankruptcy.
Litecoin byl zařazen do aktivně spravovaného krypto ETF T. Rowe Price, což posílilo jeho pozici mezi institucionálními investory. LTC za posledních 24 hodin přidal 1,04 %.
Litecoin (LTC) has entered a period of sustained accumulation, with investors closely watching for a potential breakout as overall market sentiment improves. The cryptocurrency saw renewed attention after asset manager T. Rowe Price included it in its actively managed crypto ETF, reinforcing Litecoin’s status among institutional investors.
Institutional adoption boosts sentimentT. Rowe Price, a leading global investment management firm handling approximately $1.8 trillion in assets, recently launched the T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF, listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker TKNZ. This fund takes an active management approach, allowing its portfolio manager to adjust holdings across 15 selected cryptocurrencies.
Unlike conventional crypto ETFs that follow passive index tracking, the TKNZ ETF invests dynamically in its chosen assets according to market conditions and the manager’s discretion. Litecoin is included on its list of qualified digital assets, placing it alongside other major cryptocurrencies available for institutional investment.
Mini dictionary: T. Rowe Price is a global investment management firm headquartered in Baltimore, specializing in mutual funds and retirement plans for institutions and individuals.
Market participants have interpreted LTC’s inclusion as a sign of its continued viability and recognition as an investible asset for large-scale investors. However, selection in the ETF does not guarantee automatic investment, as the portfolio manager decides on allocations based on prevailing market opportunities and fund strategy.
ETF ApproachNumber of CryptosManagementLitecoin EligibilityActive (TKNZ)15ActiveIncludedPassive (general)VariesPassiveNot always includedPrice action and investor outlookAt press time, Litecoin is trading at $47.52 with a 24-hour volume of $212.39 million and a market capitalization of $3.67 billion. The past 24 hours have seen a 1.04% uptick in price, indicating a shift in the short-term trend.
Crypto analyst Crypto Patel pointed out that Litecoin has spent nearly four years consolidating within an accumulation phase. Many market observers consider the $30–$40 band as a significant buying opportunity, expecting eventual upward movement if market conditions improve.
Long-term holders believe that this extended consolidation is laying the groundwork for a potential major rally, especially as broader sentiment across crypto begins to turn positive.
Bullish targets spark optimismInvestors with a bullish outlook are eyeing ambitious price targets for Litecoin. Should LTC successfully break out of its long-standing range, projections indicate potential moves toward $100, $200, $300, $400, and even $500. These targets, however, remain speculative and hinge on sustained positive market momentum and increased adoption.
Many supporters maintain that patience in previous cycles has been rewarded, though specific price forecasts always involve considerable risk in the volatile cryptocurrency sector.
The recent inclusion of Litecoin in the T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF, combined with bullish sentiment from market analysts and continued network participation, has fueled expectations of further upside. The positive trend in Bitcoin’s price has also provided a tailwind, encouraging optimism among Litecoin holders.
While inclusion in high-profile funds reflects growing interest, it does not guarantee automatic gains for Litecoin. Portfolio composition remains subject to the fund manager’s investment decisions and market dynamics.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Tokenizované americké státní dluhopisy na XRP Ledger vzrostly z 50 milionů USD na 418,5 milionu USD za 12 měsíců. Za poslední čtyři měsíce dosáhl objem převodů 352,3 milionu USD.
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is experiencing rapid growth in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), with tokenized U.S. Treasuries driving much of this expansion. Verified data from Trensik, a platform specializing in monitoring real-world assets on XRPL, shows that the value of tokenized U.S. Treasuries rose sharply from $50 million in April 2025 to $418.5 million by April 2026, marking an eightfold increase in twelve months. Such growth highlights increasing institutional interest in regulated, blockchain-based financial options.
Institutional activity surges on XRPLBeyond just the issuance of these assets, on-chain activity involving tokenized U.S. Treasuries on the XRP Ledger has also intensified. In the last four months, transfer volumes reached $352.3 million, a figure that nearly matches the entire market’s on-chain value. For comparison, all of 2025 saw only $70.1 million in transfer volume for these tokenized securities, making the recent surge a fivefold jump in a much shorter time frame.
This uptick in activity indicates that tokenized Treasuries on XRPL are being put to practical use. Financial institutions increasingly employ these assets for collateral, liquidity management, and real-time settlement, moving beyond simple digital versions of traditional securities. This trend reflects their growing role as foundational components of blockchain-based financial infrastructure.
Recent analysis attributes the increase in transfer volumes to expanding usage by institutions rather than just heightened speculative interest, underlining XRPL’s evolving role in the crypto market.
Over the past four months, tokenized U.S. Treasuries generated $352.3 million in transfer volume on XRPL, nearly matching the market’s total on-chain value and pointing to growing real-world adoption among financial institutions.
Mini dictionary: Trensik, a data platform that monitors and verifies real-world asset (RWA) activity, provides on-chain analytics on tokenized asset issuance and transfer metrics across the XRP Ledger.
PeriodTokenized Treasuries IssuedTransfer VolumeApril 2025$50 million—April 2026$418.5 million$352.3 million (last 4 months)2025 (full year)—$70.1 millionMajor institutions boost XRPL presenceInstitutions such as Ondo Finance, OpenEden, Guggenheim, and Archax have launched or signaled plans for tokenized Treasury projects on XRPL. Their involvement suggests growing confidence in the ledger’s ability to support regulated, high-volume financial operations.
London-based Archax, an FCA-authorized digital asset exchange and custodian, stands out among these firms. Archax has committed to tokenizing up to $1 billion in real-world assets on the XRP Ledger by mid-2026. This figure is more than twice the current size of XRPL’s tokenized Treasury market, highlighting considerable institutional expectations for future growth.
Other asset categories on XRPL are also showing signs of growth. Tokenized Gold (traded as XAUa) recently surpassed $1 million in trading volume. At the same time, XRPL’s network has expanded to accommodate more than 8 million accounts, reflecting broader ecosystem adoption.
Large investors and whale wallets have also increased their holdings, accumulating over 70 million XRP in recent months. This trend may suggest expanding optimism about the network’s future among major market participants.
Institutional momentum is building as Archax and others tap the XRP Ledger’s infrastructure to launch sizable tokenization projects, paving the way for further growth in both asset diversity and network activity.
As the global financial sector moves further toward tokenization, the XRP Ledger is positioning itself as a growing hub for regulated real-world assets. With rapid expansion in both the issuance and utilization of tokenized Treasuries, as well as significant commitments from institutional players, XRPL appears to be transitioning from a traditional payments system into a key platform for on-chain financial products.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Grayscale podporuje Ripple a jeho XRPL i stablecoin RLUSD pro institucionální použití. Pilot s Mastercard, JPMorgan a Ondo Finance dokončil první téměř real-time přeshraniční, mezibankovní zpětné odkoupení tokenizovaného amerického státního dluhopisového fondu za méně než pět sekund.
@Grayscale is lending its institutional credibility to @Ripple's pitch for the XRP Ledger and its stablecoin, RLUSD. The asset manager recently sat down with Jack McDonald, Ripple's Senior Vice President of Stablecoins, to lay out the case for $XRP and RLUSD adoption among financial institutions.
The Institutional Case for XRPL The conversation, led by Grayscale Research's Charlie Perkins, covered Ripple's long-standing focus on building infrastructure for banks and payment providers. McDonald framed the company's mission simply: Ripple's long-term strategy has remained focused on building institutional-grade infrastructure that enables banks, payment providers, and enterprises to move value more efficiently across the globe.
Within that framework, RLUSD and $XRP serve distinct but complementary roles. RLUSD provides a regulated, US dollar-backed stablecoin for payments, treasury management, decentralized finance, and tokenized asset settlement, while XRP functions as a bridge asset that delivers instant liquidity and near-instant cross-border settlement. Ripple launched RLUSD in December 2024 under a charter from the New York State Department of Financial Services.
A Landmark Pilot with Mastercard, JPMorgan, and Ondo Finance Central to the Grayscale pitch is a May 2026 pilot that put XRPL's institutional credentials on public display. Ondo Finance announced the successful completion of the first near real-time cross-border, cross-bank redemption of a tokenized US Treasury fund, conducted in collaboration with Kinexys by J.P. Morgan, Mastercard, and Ripple.
The mechanics were straightforward but significant. Ripple redeemed part of its OUSG holding on the XRP Ledger. The redemption triggered an instruction through Mastercard's Multi-Token Network to Kinexys, which debited Ondo's blockchain deposit account at JPMorgan and wired the equivalent dollars to Ripple's bank in Singapore. The redemption cleared on XRPL in under five seconds, completing a settlement flow that typically takes correspondent banks one to three business days.
The actual settlement ran on RLUSD, with a fraction of XRP used as the network fee, because Ondo's OUSG was built to use RLUSD as the settlement asset on XRPL since June 2025. That distinction matters for institutions: RLUSD's regulatory backing and price stability make it the practical choice for large-scale compliance-sensitive transactions.
By framing this as a Grayscale-endorsed narrative, the message is aimed squarely at institutional allocators rather than retail markets. The pilot demonstrated that public blockchain infrastructure and global interbank rails can operate as a single integrated flow, a proof of concept that gives traditional finance a concrete reason to engage with XRPL.
Sources:
Ondo, Kinexys by J.P. Morgan, Mastercard, and Ripple: Official Press Release (PR Newswire)
Ripple's Enterprise-First Strategy: Jack McDonald on Mastercard and JPMorgan (CoinPaper)
Ripple, JPMorgan settle first cross-border tokenized Treasury redemption on XRP Ledger (CoinDesk)
Osm veřejně obchodovaných firem oznámilo téměř 2 miliardy USD do XRP treasury. Největší plán má Trident Digital Tech Holdings s cílem získat 500 milionů USD.
A wave of institutional investment in XRP is taking shape as eight public companies have pledged almost $2 billion for dedicated XRP treasuries. Notably, leading firms are formalizing substantial commitments to XRP as an asset on their balance sheets, with full public disclosure in line with regulatory requirements. This shift echoes the path that propelled Bitcoin into corporate finance circles.
The companies and their commitmentsTrident Digital Tech Holdings, a Singapore-based technology firm listed on Nasdaq, tops the list by planning to raise $500 million for one of the largest corporate XRP treasuries to date. Webus International, active in cross-border payments, is seeking $300 million in non-equity financing to establish an XRP-backed reserve supporting its global network.
VivoPower International, a sustainable energy company, raised $121 million in private funding, allocating $100 million for XRP and staking those funds on the Flare Network. Other participants include Wellgistics Health, which secured a $50 million equity line drawn specifically for an XRP treasury; and Japan’s Gumi Inc., introducing a $17 million program split between XRP and Bitcoin.
Nature’s Miracle Holding, a supplier of agricultural products, announced a $20 million XRP treasury initiative, becoming the first U.S.-listed non-financial public company to do so. Hyperscale Data committed $10 million to XRP, while Worksport, a manufacturer in the automotive sector, allocated up to $5 million derived from its existing operational cash flow.
Mini dictionary: Flare Network – A decentralized, interoperable blockchain designed to bring smart contract functionality to various tokens and facilitate staking and bridging between blockchains.
CompanyCountrySectorXRP Treasury CommitmentTrident Digital Tech HoldingsSingaporeTechnology$500 millionWebus InternationalUndisclosedPayments$300 millionVivoPower InternationalGlobalEnergy$100 millionWellgistics HealthUndisclosedHealthcare$50 millionGumi Inc.JapanGaming/Tech$17 million (XRP & BTC)Nature’s Miracle HoldingUSAAgriculture$20 millionHyperscale DataUndisclosedData/Technology$10 millionWorksportUSAAutomotiveUp to $5 millionThe blueprint that brought Bitcoin into mainstream company treasuries is now increasingly being applied to XRP, with eight public firms announcing nearly $2 billion in in-house XRP reserves.
Strategic objectives and funding modelsUnlike speculative trading, these allocations are long-term treasury strategies embedded into the companies’ financial planning. Trident Digital and VivoPower have financed their positions with capital raised from investors, while Webus International opted for debt-based facilities. Worksport redirected surplus cash, and Hyperscale mixed direct acquisitions with DeFi-based lending mechanisms.
Soon Huat Lim, CEO of Trident Digital Tech Holdings, stated that digital assets are central to the changing global financial landscape, indicating the firm’s conviction in holding XRP for strategic purposes.
According to Soon Huat Lim, embracing digital assets within the company’s treasury is aligned with their long-term vision for global finance.
XRP follows the corporate bitcoin playbookThe trend mirrors the playbook initiated by Strategy, previously MicroStrategy—a US-based business intelligence company—in 2020, which famously allocated billions into Bitcoin. With approximately $2 billion in planned corporate XRP treasuries, institutional adoption is accelerating along similar lines.
Legal clarity around XRP’s regulatory status has improved, encouraging public companies to make significant, publicly disclosed investments. Each new treasury signals growing institutional acceptance and helps reinforce XRP’s profile as a reserve asset among listed firms.
Notably, Evernorth, a Ripple-supported digital asset treasury company, currently holds nearly 0.5% of XRP’s total token supply but is not included in the current tally of public commitments.
Mini dictionary: Evernorth – An institutional-grade digital asset treasury manager focused on helping large organizations allocate digital assets for long-term holdings, with particular expertise in XRP-based reserves.
The sustained accumulation by multiple public companies underlines structural demand for XRP and could have long-term effects on its price stability as institutions scale up their positions.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ripple Labs has obtained a full Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license through Luxembourg, granting the company regulatory approval to operate crypto payment services across 30 countries in the European Economic Area. This single license provides Ripple with the ability to deliver regulated digital asset payments throughout participating European markets without needing separate authorizations in each jurisdiction.
MiCA framework enables passporting across EuropeUnder the European Union’s MiCA regulatory framework, licenses secured in one member state can be “passported” to other nations within the union. For Ripple, this Luxembourg-based license streamlines the company’s operations by providing blanket legal clarity, which experts say is vital for institutional adoption of crypto assets.
Dr. Kamilah Stevenson, a financial educator and crypto commentator, emphasized that Ripple’s approval goes beyond just local permission in Luxembourg. She stated that this regulatory clearance allows Ripple to provide crypto payment services across Europe, eliminating uncertainty that has long hindered institutional engagement.
Across Europe, Ripple now has both the regulatory clarity and operational green light required to expand its crypto payment products. This stands in contrast to ongoing regulatory uncertainty in the United States, where companies are still seeking clear legal definitions for digital assets.
Stevenson argued that for banks and large institutional players, compliance barriers often pose a bigger obstacle than technological limitations. She noted that MiCA licensing addresses this hurdle by providing a continent-wide solution.
Mini dictionary: MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) is a regulatory framework adopted by the European Union to standardize rules for crypto assets and related service providers across member states. Passage of MiCA is considered a major step toward institutionalizing the crypto industry in Europe.
RegionRipple’s Regulatory StatusKey MilestoneEuropean Union (EEA)MiCA License GrantedFull passported approvalUnited StatesAwaiting Regulatory ClarityClarity Act delayedContrasts with U.S. regulatory uncertaintyStevenson drew attention to the legislative delays in Washington, where the Clarity Act—intended to bring statutory definition to digital assets—has missed another Senate deadline. She contrasted this with Europe’s progress, pointing out that American firms must still seek permission that Ripple has now secured in the EU.
She also differentiated between two timelines in crypto investing: the fast-moving “sentiment clock,” which tracks price volatility and headlines, and the slower “infrastructure clock,” guided by milestones like licensing, partnerships, and product integration. Stevenson stressed the importance of infrastructure progress, noting that regulatory achievements can shape long-term value even when short-term price action appears stagnant.
“A license does not get un-granted. A partnership does not get unsigned,” Stevenson remarked, highlighting the permanence of structural advances compared to fleeting market reactions.
The gap she identified between infrastructure improvements and fluctuating sentiment creates both opportunity and risk, especially for long-term holders of digital assets like XRP.
Tax efficiency and portfolio planning for crypto holdersBeyond regulatory developments, Stevenson advised investors to pay close attention to tax implications and exit strategies. She warned that taxes and poor account structures often erode gains for long-term holders more than market volatility.
Stevenson cited the advantages of tax-efficient vehicles such as Roth IRAs for sheltering digital asset gains, advising viewers to establish these arrangements ahead of any future cryptocurrency rally.
She cautioned investors to prepare their portfolio strategies in advance and avoid making emotional decisions when prices move sharply. In her view, having clear guardrails in place is essential for managing both market swings and tax exposure.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies minulý týden odkoupila asi 5,5 milionu vlastních akcií za téměř 86 milionů USD a zpomalila nákupy Ethereum. Ve stejném týdnu koupila jen 7 430 ETH za zhruba 14 milionů USD.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies repurchased approximately 5.5 million of its common shares for nearly $86 million last week, redirecting capital from its aggressive Ethereum accumulation strategy to support its own stock.
The company paid an average of $15.6156 per share under its previously authorized $4 billion repurchase program. Chairman Tom Lee said Bitmine viewed the transaction as accretive to shareholder value.
The decision marks a notable shift in Bitmine’s capital allocation. The company acquired only 7,430 ETH during the same week, worth about $14 million. Lee directly attributed the reduced pace of Ethereum purchases to the stock repurchase.
Advertisement
Bitmine has continued buying ETH every week since launching its treasury strategy on June 30, 2025. However, its latest acquisition was among its smallest weekly purchases after the company regularly added tens of thousands of ETH throughout the first half of the year.
The repurchase program was expanded from $1 billion to $4 billion in April. At the time, Lee said the authorization would allow Bitmine to retire shares when management believed the stock was trading below its intrinsic value. The latest transaction suggests Bitmine currently sees greater per share value in buying its own stock than using all available capital to accelerate ETH purchases.
Bitmine now holds 5,777,468 ETH, representing approximately 4.8% of Ethereum’s total supply. Its wider portfolio includes 207 Bitcoin, $385 million in cash and marketable securities, a $180 million stake in Beast Industries and a $58 million position in Eightco Holdings. The company valued those combined holdings at $11.5 billion as of July 19.
The company has staked 4,917,189 ETH, or about 85% of its total Ethereum position. Bitmine projects that the staked assets will generate approximately $247 million in annualized revenue based on a seven day yield of 2.67%. That staking income gives the company another potential source of capital for future ETH purchases or additional share repurchases.
BMNR shares traded around 2.7% higher at $16.12 during Monday’s session, placing the stock above Bitmine’s average repurchase price.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Výstupní fronta pro validátory Etherea spadla na nulu, což naznačuje slabý zájem o výběr stakovaného ETH. Síť má zároveň 884 440 aktivních validátorů a přes 40,8 milionu ETH ve stakingu.
Ethereum‘s validator exit queue has dropped to zero for the second time this year, signaling that stakers are not seeking to withdraw their holdings from the network.
Validator exit queue remains emptyOn-chain data from ValidatorQueue shows that the exit queue has remained empty from July 18 to July 20, with no validators in line to exit the Ethereum network. This situation indicates that there is no substantial desire among participants to withdraw staked ETH at this time.
Previously, in September 2025, the exit queue backlog soared as high as 2.67 million ETH, valued at approximately $11.7 billion. This spike led to significant sell-side pressure for ETH and created concerns among investors about network stability. However, the network’s staking environment changed direction, and by January 2026, the queue had dwindled to zero.
At present, Ethereum supports 884,440 active validators. More than 40.8 million ETH are currently staked, accounting for over 33.51% of Ethereum’s total circulating supply.
Since September 2025’s peak, Ethereum’s staking dynamics have shifted, eliminating the validator exit backlog and easing pressure on the market.
Despite the absence of an exit queue, interest in joining the validator set remains high. There are 2,499,792 ETH awaiting activation as validators, with newcomers facing an expected wait time of 43 days and 10 hours, according to ValidatorQueue data.
MetricCurrent ValueActive Validators884,440ETH Staked40.8 millionETH Awaiting Activation2,499,792Wait Time to Activate43 days 10 hoursPercentage of Circulating Supply Staked33.51%Plans for scaling validator capacityEthereum’s staking process relies on validators who confirm and secure transactions on the network. The beacon chain, which manages validator data, must process and store records for each participant, making scaling to larger sizes technically challenging as the validator count grows.
On July 26, co-founder Vitalik Buterin proposed a new design strategy. He introduced a concept labeled “The Extremely Lean Chain,” which aims to significantly reduce the per-validator state to around 6 bytes by leveraging zero-knowledge proofs. This technical approach would modernize how the network tracks individual validator balances and activities.
The proposed changes include replacing per-epoch balance updates with a single daily ZK-STARK proof and assigning more state management responsibilities to validators. This would allow full nodes to remain lightweight and help Ethereum move toward the concept of a “Lean Ethereum.”
Mini dictionary: ZK-STARKs, or Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Arguments of Knowledge, are advanced cryptographic proofs used to verify computations with strong privacy and scalability, and form a key innovation enabling more efficient blockchain design.
Buterin claimed this would be the network’s third major overhaul and could enable Ethereum to scale up to millions of validators should the demand arise.
Vitalik Buterin suggested that the new design could support millions of validators, marking a significant step forward in Ethereum’s evolution.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Poměr stakingu Etherea dosáhl rekordních 33,9 %, což znamená, že je uzamčena zhruba třetina všech ETH. Ve stakingu je asi 40,9 milionu ETH v hodnotě kolem 74,5 miliardy dolarů.
Ethereum’s staking ratio has reached an unprecedented 33.9%, according to data from Token Terminal. This milestone indicates that approximately one-third of all ETH is now locked in staking contracts, reflecting increased confidence in the network’s security and potential future value. The rise in staking comes amid record-low exchange balances of liquid ETH, as institutional investors continue to channel funds into staked-ETH ETFs, such as those offered by BlackRock. With roughly 40.9 million ETH staked and valued near $74.5 billion, this development suggests a notable shift in Ethereum’s market dynamics.
Advertisement
Key Takeaways The new all-time high in Ethereum’s staking ratio suggests increased confidence in the network’s future potential. The substantial amount of ETH staked indicates a supply squeeze on liquid ETH, which could impact market liquidity. Current market pricing appears to reflect cautious optimism about Ethereum’s long-term value, with some scenarios supportive of a significant price increase. What to Watch Watch for further movements in institutional capital flows into staked-ETH ETFs, as these could indicate growing investor confidence. Additionally, developments such as Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) or regulatory changes could further influence Ethereum’s market dynamics. Market participants will likely keep a close eye on any announcements from key figures like Vitalik Buterin or major financial institutions that could impact Ethereum’s future price trajectory.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31, 2026 1.9% — — View market → December 31, 2026 2.4% — — View market → December 31, 2026 2.8% — — View market → December 31, 2026 3.2% — — View market → December 31, 2026 5.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 9.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 12.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.1% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 3.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 7.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 45.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 7.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 30.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 25.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 17.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 82.5% — — View market →
The hard fork that pushed Cardano to version 11 over the weekend wasn’t just another scheduled upgrade. It was the first time the network’s upgrade decision sat entirely in the hands of its community rather than the company that originally built the chain. According to the original report, the Van Rossum hard fork activated on Saturday after a community-led vote, rewiring Cardano’s governance on a practical level almost five years into the blockchain’s lifecycle.
The upgrade itself moves the chain to Cardano Node 11, a technical milestone that would normally draw limited outside attention. What matters more is who pulled the trigger. For years, Input Output Global—the development firm behind Cardano—steered upgrade decisions alongside the Cardano Foundation and Emurgo. This time, the community had the final word. It’s not a change that happened overnight. Cardano’s roadmap has been inching toward collective decision-making through its Voltaire era, but seeing an actual mainnet hard fork pass through community ratification turns a white-paper ideal into operational fact.
A Hard Fork, a Community Mandate Van Rossum is not a radical fork in terms of new features. The version bump to Node 11 comes with performance enhancements and fixes that are important for the network’s validator set, but the headline is procedural. The upgrade proposal was put forward as part of Cardano’s ongoing decentralized governance framework, and the approval required a quorum of stake pool operators and delegated ADA holders. Reaching consensus without IOG acting as the default tiebreaker shifts the network’s center of gravity.
The implication for ADA holders is direct. Voting rights tied to staked holdings have existed in theory for a while, but having them actually shape a protocol-level decision sends a signal that participation carries real weight. Even so, voter turnout figures and SPO engagement rates are hard to measure from a single upgrade. What’s clear is that the Cardano ecosystem just demonstrated its governance architecture can sustain a mainnet decision without a centralized coordinator stepping in.
The Voltaire Vision Becomes Operational Cardano’s transition through its Byron, Shelley, Goguen, Basho, and Voltaire phases framed governance as the final frontier. The Van Rossum fork pushes Voltaire from infrastructure readiness into execution. This matters because earlier governance votes—like those on Project Catalyst—focused on treasury allocation, not protocol upgrades. Network parameter changes and hard forks carry higher stakes. A misstep on a protocol vote can split the chain or stall development. By testing community decision-making on a relatively low-risk version bump, Cardano has taken a cautious first step that avoids the volatility of contentious forks seen on other chains.
It also places Cardano alongside a small but growing cohort of Layer 1 blockchains experimenting with on-chain governance. Tezos built its identity around it. Polkadot’s OpenGov gives stakeholders veto power. Even Ethereum’s social layer has long relied on informal rough consensus. Cardano now belongs to a group where code upgrades must pass a formal vote rather than a developer call. That structural change could influence how projects building on Cardano think about their own upgrade paths and the durability of their smart contracts.
Cardano has been among the networks that regularly appear in developer activity rankings, and sustained developer interest will be crucial if governance becomes more demanding. A distributed vote only works if enough technically literate participants stay engaged with proposals, debates, and parameter changes. The Van Rossum experience offers a small-scale test case. The next challenge is scaling that engagement when the stakes are higher.
What Comes Next for ADA Holders The upgrade itself does not change ADA’s monetary policy or staking rewards, but it does alter the expectation of what holding ADA entitles someone to do. A token holder who previously viewed staking as passive yield generation now has a clearer path to influence network direction, assuming the governance framework gains momentum. The real question is whether the community can sustain coordination. Cardano has a large, globally distributed user base, and mobilizing enough of it to vote on each major change will require tooling, transparency, and credible formal processes that hold up under disagreement.
There is also a risk that active governance attracts well-resourced actors who attempt to steer parameters in their favor. The absence of central mediation means the system’s legitimacy will be tested not just by its successes but by how it handles contested votes and close outcomes. For now, the Van Rossum activation passed smoothly, but governance fatigue or apathy could surface if the cadence of votes accelerates without corresponding user education.
What makes this fork notable beyond Cardano’s own ecosystem is the running experiment in shrinking the gap between protocol design and community ownership. Blockchains often talk about decentralization while keeping upgrade authority heavily concentrated. The Van Rossum hard fork is a small but concrete data point that self-governance is moving from rhetoric to routine. The outcome will be scrutinized not just by ADA holders but by other networks designing their own governance primitives.
AUTHOR
Brenda is a writer with three years of experience specializing in cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. She graduated from the University of Mombasa with a degree in Psychology. She has worked at Cryptopolitan and Blockchain Reporter.
Chainlink byl jmenován oficiálním poskytovatelem datového orákulu a cross-chain infrastruktury pro United Stables. Partnerství má rozšířit $U napříč DeFi na BNB Chain.
Chainlink Steps In as Core Infrastructure for United Stables@Chainlink has been named the official data oracle and cross-chain infrastructure provider for @UTechStables, with the partnership aimed at broadening the reach of the $U stablecoin across decentralised finance on @BNBCHAIN.
The move gives the $U ecosystem access to Chainlink's price feeds, cross-chain messaging, and interoperability tooling. For a stablecoin focused on unified liquidity, reliable and tamper-resistant data infrastructure is a core requirement. Chainlink's network has enabled tens of trillions in transaction value and underpins a large share of DeFi activity globally.
What United Stables Is Building With $UAccording to BNB Chain, $U is the first stablecoin on BNB Chain to adopt a stablecoin-inclusive reserve model, allowing USD-backed stablecoins such as USDT, USDC, and USD1 to be used directly as minting collateral. The approach consolidates existing liquidity rather than competing for it. Crypto Briefing reports that $U is deployed on both BNB Smart Chain and Ethereum, offering immediate multi-chain access from launch.
All reserves are held in segregated accounts, verified through on-chain Proof-of-Reserve, and subject to independent quarterly audits. From day one, $U integrates with DeFi protocols including PancakeSwap, Aster, Four.meme, and ListaDAO, covering trading, liquidity provision, staking, and lending.
The Chainlink integration positions @UTechStables to scale $U across protocols within the BNB Chain ecosystem and, over time, beyond it. BNB Chain's total stablecoin supply has doubled to approximately $14 billion, and the network has consistently led all blockchains in monthly active addresses and transaction count for stablecoins. The Chainlink partnership gives $U the infrastructure backbone to compete in that growing market.
Sources
BNB Chain Blog: United Stables Launches $U as a Native Stablecoin on BNB Chain
Crypto Briefing: U Stablecoin Launches on BNB Chain and Ethereum
GlobeNewswire: $U Stablecoin Launches on BNB Chain and Ethereum by United Stables
Chainlink bude exkluzivní oracle infrastrukturou pro ADI Predictstreet, oficiálního partnera predikčních trhů FIFA World Cup 2026. Má zajistit téměř okamžité vypořádání a automatické výplaty u všech 104 zápasů.
Prediction markets just got their biggest stage yet. Chainlink has been named the exclusive oracle infrastructure behind ADI Predictstreet, the official prediction market partner of the FIFA World Cup 2026, enabling near-instant settlement and automated payouts across every single match of the tournament.
That’s 104 matches, 48 teams, 16 host cities across North America, and a projected audience north of 6 billion fans.
How it works under the hood The integration relies on Chainlink’s Runtime Environment, or CRE. CRE is the framework that lets Chainlink automate the entire lifecycle of a prediction market, from creating the bet to resolving it to settling payouts, without any human middleman touching the process.
Every market on the Myriad platform will pull verified FIFA data through Chainlink’s oracle network. When a match ends, the result flows through the oracle, triggers the smart contract, and pays out winners. No waiting for manual verification. No disputed outcomes sitting in limbo while some back-office team reviews footage.
Advertisement
The technical architecture here matters because prediction markets live and die on trust. Chainlink’s oracle network has been the backbone of decentralized finance for years, having facilitated over $30 trillion in transaction value across DeFi protocols.
Why FIFA, and why now The 2026 World Cup is a uniquely massive event. It’s the first tournament to feature 48 teams, up from 32 in previous editions. It’s spread across the US, Canada, and Mexico. And the sheer volume of matches, 104 in total, creates an enormous surface area for prediction market activity.
Every data point feeding into the smart contract is verifiable on-chain. Every payout logic is encoded before the match starts. There’s no house discretion on edge cases, no terms-of-service clause that lets a platform claw back winnings.
Chainlink Labs executives emphasized that this partnership establishes new industry standards for sports prediction markets, aiming to integrate decentralized oracle technology into the mainstream sports betting ecosystem.
What this means for LINK and the broader market From an investor perspective, this partnership is one of the highest-profile real-world use cases Chainlink has landed. The LINK token’s value proposition has always been tied to network usage: more protocols and platforms using Chainlink oracles means more demand for the token that secures the network.
Industry analysts predict substantial network effects that could drive increased on-chain activity for the LINK token, although initial reports on direct price impacts remain sparse.
There are risks worth flagging. Regulatory scrutiny around prediction markets varies wildly by jurisdiction, and a FIFA-branded product will attract attention from regulators who might otherwise ignore smaller platforms.
Traders should keep an eye on on-chain metrics for LINK during the tournament window, specifically transaction counts and unique callers to Chainlink’s CRE contracts.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Z centralizovaných burz za měsíc odteklo přes 15,7 milionu LINK, což znamená pokles nabídky o 12 %. Současně DTCC spustila živé tokenizované obchody s využitím Chainlink.
Exchange supply falls 12% in a monthMore than 15.7 million $LINK left centralized exchanges over the past month, a 12% drop in the supply parked on trading venues, according to on-chain analytics firm @SantimentData. On Sunday alone, a further 1.04 million tokens exited exchanges in a single day.
The key metric here is the Exchange Flow Balance, which measures the net amount of $LINK flowing into or out of wallets connected to centralized exchanges. When the indicator sits below zero, outflows dominate, a trend that can signal investor accumulation rather than selling pressure. The sustained negative reading means fewer coins are sitting ready to sell, compressing the readily available supply on the market.
DTCC goes live with Chainlink at the centerThe supply shift arrives during a significant month for @chainlink's institutional credentials. On July 15, 2026, @The_DTCC processed its first live production trades using tokenized versions of DTC-held assets, calling it its largest tokenization production event by breadth of assets, use cases, and participants. Live trades covered tokenized stocks, ETFs, and U.S. Treasuries, with the tokenized versions preserving the same legal ownership rights as the underlying securities.
The initiative involved over 30 major financial institutions, including BlackRock, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Vanguard. The driving force behind the transactions was Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) and Runtime Environment (CRE). JPMorgan posted tokenized shares of the Invesco QQQ Trust ETF as collateral to meet margin requirements at CME Group.
DTC secured a No-Action Letter from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission before the pilot began, authorizing it to operate a tokenization service for real-world assets it custodies, meaning the July trades ran as regulated production activity rather than a sandbox test. DTCC now plans to open the service more broadly in October 2026, expanding eligible participants and asset classes.
The pairing of shrinking exchange supply and a growing institutional footprint points to holders positioning around utility rather than an exit. Whether that dynamic translates into price momentum will depend on how broadly the DTCC service scales and how deeply @chainlink becomes embedded in the next phase of Wall Street's tokenization push.
Sources
CoinDesk: DTCC moves tokenized securities into live trading
Crypto Briefing: Chainlink orchestrates live trade with JPMorgan's tokenized stock collateral
Tradeweb: DTCC turns tokenization into reality
USDC v březnu 2023 spadl na zhruba 87 centů poté, co Circle držel 3,3 miliardy USD rezerv u Silicon Valley Bank. Po vládní záruce vkladů se navázání na dolar do pondělí obnovilo.
Crypto has been rescued by the US government exactly once, and the rescue was aimed at something else. The mechanism was an obscure override in banking law, and understanding how it worked in March 2023, and why it may never work that way again, is the closest thing to reading crypto’s actual safety net
Summary
The systemic risk exception is an override in US banking law: normally the FDIC must resolve failed banks at the least cost to its insurance fund, but with extraordinary sign-offs it may spend more to prevent broader financial instability. Invoking it requires a two-thirds vote of the FDIC board, a two-thirds vote of the Federal Reserve board, and the Treasury secretary’s determination in consultation with the president, one of the highest procedural bars in financial regulation. In March 2023 it was invoked for Silicon Valley Bank, making all depositors whole including the uninsured, at a cost to the insurance fund of roughly $16 billion to $17 billion, recovered through special assessments on banks. Circle held $3.3 billion of USDC reserves at SVB; the coin fell to roughly 87 cents over the weekend and recovered when the depositor guarantee landed. Crypto’s only bailout was a side effect of a banking rescue. The channel is narrowing by design: issuers moved reserves away from bank deposits, and watchdogs now warn that a future exception covering a bank heavy with stablecoin reserves could cost more than SVB did, which is exactly why regulators want the exposure shrunk. For one weekend in March 2023, the second-largest stablecoin in the world traded like a distressed bond. USDC, marketed as a dollar in digital form, touched roughly 87 cents, because $3.3 billion of the reserves behind it were trapped inside a bank that had just failed. By Monday morning the peg was back, and the crypto industry drew a comforting conclusion: when things get bad enough, the government steps in. The conclusion is half right and dangerously incomplete. The government did step in, through a mechanism called the systemic risk exception, and it was not stepping in for crypto. Understanding what that mechanism is, the extraordinary process it requires, what it actually did that weekend, and why the same rescue is being engineered out of repeatability, is the closest thing available to an honest map of crypto’s safety net. This guide is that map.
The rule the exception overrides The systemic risk exception only makes sense against the rule it breaks, and the rule is a scar from an earlier crisis.
After the savings-and-loan disaster of the 1980s drained the deposit insurance system, Congress passed the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, and at its center sat a discipline called least-cost resolution. When a bank fails, the FDIC must choose the resolution path that costs its Deposit Insurance Fund the least. In practice that usually means insured depositors are paid in full, up to the statutory limit, and uninsured depositors, everyone above the limit, stand in line as creditors of the receivership, recovering whatever the failed bank’s assets eventually yield. The rule exists to make large depositors police their banks: if money above the insurance cap is genuinely at risk, sophisticated customers have reasons to watch where they keep it, and banks that take wild risks lose big deposits before they blow up.
Congress knew the discipline could occasionally be catastrophic, a failure large enough or connected enough that letting uninsured depositors take losses would spread panic to healthy banks. So it built one exit: the systemic risk exception, permitting the FDIC to abandon least-cost and protect broader classes of creditors, including all uninsured depositors, when the cheap path would have serious adverse effects on economic conditions or financial stability.
Then it made the exit door heavy. Invoking the exception requires a written recommendation by two-thirds of the FDIC’s board, a matching two-thirds of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, and a determination by the Treasury secretary made in consultation with the president, with after-the-fact accountability including review of the determination. Three institutions, supermajorities in two, and the White House in the loop: American financial law contains few switches harder to flip, which is the point. The exception is designed to be used the way it reads, exceptionally.
March 2023: the weekend it flipped Silicon Valley Bank failed on Friday, March 10, 2023, in the fastest large-bank run in American history, tens of billions of withdrawal demands in a day, driven at smartphone speed by a depositor base of startups and funds that all read the same warnings at the same time. The failure’s signature problem was concentration above the cap: the overwhelming majority of SVB’s deposits were uninsured, held by companies that used the bank for payroll and treasury. Under least-cost resolution, those depositors faced haircuts of unknown size and timing, and by Saturday the question consuming regulators was not SVB but Monday: whether uninsured depositors at every similar bank would conclude their money was unsafe and run next.
Among those uninsured depositors was Circle, with $3.3 billion of USDC’s reserves, roughly 8% of the total, on deposit at SVB. The disclosure landed Friday night, and the stablecoin market did the arithmetic instantly: if the SVB money took, say, a 20% haircut, the coin was worth visibly less than a dollar. USDC broke, trading down to roughly 87 cents, redemption queues formed, and the depeg transmitted through DeFi, where USDC served as core collateral and as backing for other stablecoins, turning one bank’s failure into a system-wide crypto stress test in under 48 hours. For readers new to the mechanics, crypto.news has also explained the anatomy of the USDC break.
On Sunday evening, the switch flipped. The FDIC and Federal Reserve boards voted, the Treasury secretary determined, and the government announced that all SVB depositors, insured and uninsured alike, would have full access to their money Monday morning, with the identical treatment applied to the simultaneously failed Signature Bank. The Fed added the Fed authority this is often confused with, a new broad lending facility so other banks could borrow against securities at face value rather than fire-selling them. Crucially, the announcement drew a line: depositors were protected, while shareholders and certain bondholders of the failed banks were wiped out, this was a depositor guarantee, not a rescue of the banks as firms. The cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund from protecting uninsured depositors, later tallied around $16 billion to $17 billion, was recovered the way the statute prescribes, through special assessments levied on the banking industry.
USDC’s peg was restored by Monday. Circle’s $3.3 billion was simply there again, whole, because Circle was a depositor and every depositor had been made whole.
Reading the rescue correctly Everything important about this episode lives in the details the celebratory version skips.
The decision-makers were not looking at crypto. The systemic risk determination was about the American regional banking system: the fear that uninsured depositors at dozens of healthy-enough banks would run on Monday, converting one failure into a cascade. USDC’s exposure appeared in the weekend’s inputs mainly as evidence of how far SVB’s depositor base reached, not as an object of policy. The stablecoin was rescued the way a car parked next to a burning building is saved by the fire department: thoroughly, and incidentally.
The mechanism could not have reached crypto directly even if regulators had wanted it to. The exception overrides least-cost resolution of a failed insured bank; it has no application to a failing stablecoin issuer, which is not a bank, holds no insured deposits, and sits entirely outside the FDIC’s resolution machinery. Had the causality run the other way, Circle failing with SVB healthy, there was no switch to flip. The one rescue in crypto’s history worked only because the point of failure happened to be inside the traditional perimeter.
And the episode cut both ways for the industry’s reputation. It proved the deepest link between how reserves connect coins to banks and banking, and it showed regulators exactly what that link costs: a coin’s stability had become an unpriced pass-through of a bank’s uninsured-deposit risk, and the public backstop had absorbed it by accident. Nobody in Washington filed that under precedent to repeat. They filed it under exposure to close.
A note on scale completes the picture, because the exception’s economics are part of why its future use is contested. The Deposit Insurance Fund that absorbed the roughly $16 billion to $17 billion cost is not taxpayer money in the direct sense; it is funded by assessments on insured banks, and the special assessment that recouped the SVB and Signature costs was levied, by design, disproportionately on the largest banks. That structure is why the banking industry itself is a stakeholder in how the exception gets used: every invocation is a bill sent to banks that did nothing wrong, which is both the system’s discipline, the industry insures itself, and the source of its political friction. Now scale the stablecoin version. The sector’s reserves exceed $300 billion, and even a fraction of a major issuer’s backing sitting as deposits at one failing bank could produce an uninsured-depositor guarantee dwarfing 2023’s, with the cost assessed on banks to protect, in economic substance, the customers of a non-bank competitor that pays no assessments at all. That asymmetry, banks funding the accidental backstop of an industry built to disintermediate them, is the sharpest version of the Better Markets warning, and it explains the otherwise puzzling alliance of bank lobbies and consumer watchdogs pressing regulators to keep stablecoin reserves out of bank deposits. The exception’s door is heavy, and the parties who pay when it opens are now watching what stands outside it.
The weekend, hour by hour The compressed timeline of March 10 to 13, 2023 is worth walking in sequence, because the mechanics of how a bank failure became a stablecoin crisis and back again are clearest at ground level, and because the sequence is the template for reading any future episode.
Friday, March 10. California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank mid-morning and appointed the FDIC receiver, the standard Friday choreography of American bank failure, except at unprecedented speed and size for the era. The default path was least-cost resolution: insured depositors whole within days, uninsured depositors, the vast majority at SVB, issued receivership certificates for the excess, of uncertain value and timing. Through the afternoon, the exposure disclosures began. Circle’s landed that evening: $3.3 billion of USDC reserves at the failed bank.
Saturday. The stablecoin market traded the disclosure. USDC broke decisively below its peg, reaching roughly 87 cents, and the mechanics of the depeg mattered as much as its size: redemptions through Circle were constrained by the banking system being closed for the weekend, so price discovery happened entirely on secondary markets, in an information vacuum, with holders unable to distinguish a weekend liquidity discount from a genuine solvency haircut. The stress propagated through DeFi, where USDC collateralized lending markets and backed other stablecoins, notably DAI, which depegged in sympathy. A crypto-native observer watching only crypto saw a stablecoin crisis; the actual variable was a receivership in Santa Clara.
Sunday, March 12. The systemic machinery engaged, aimed at Monday’s banking open, not at crypto. The FDIC and Federal Reserve boards delivered their supermajority recommendations, the Treasury secretary made the determination in consultation with the president, and the announcement guaranteed all depositors of SVB and Signature Bank, with shareholders and certain debtholders wiped out. Simultaneously the Fed unveiled its new broad lending facility for banks, term funding against securities at par, the modern 13(3)-era answer to fire sales. Circle communicated that its exposure would be recovered in full and that the peg would restore when banking rails reopened.
Monday, March 13. Depositors had access. Circle’s $3.3 billion was whole, redemptions resumed through functioning banks, and USDC returned to parity within the day. Total elapsed time from failure to restoration: roughly 65 hours, most of them a weekend.
Read as a template, the sequence teaches four things. Stablecoin depegs driven by reserve exposure trade on disclosure and rumor while the actual determinants, receivership outcomes, official decisions, move on institutional time, so weekend prices are sentiment, not settlement. The transmission runs through whatever fraction of reserves sits at the failed institution, which is why the single most predictive number in any repeat is the issuer’s disclosed bank-deposit concentration. The rescue decision, when it came, was made by banking regulators weighing banking contagion, with crypto’s fate a dependent variable, and any future episode should be read the same way: watch what the FDIC and Fed fear for banks, not what they say about crypto. And the entire arc, break to restoration, required the failure to sit inside the insured perimeter, which is the fact every subsequent reform has been quietly working to make irrelevant.
Why the accident is being engineered out Three developments since March 2023 have narrowed the accidental-bailout channel, and each is worth registering because together they answer the question every holder actually cares about: would it work that way again?
Reserves moved. The proximate lesson issuers drew was that concentrated uninsured bank deposits are the weak joint, and reserve portfolios restructured accordingly, toward Treasury bills, government money market funds, and custody arrangements, with bank deposits reduced to operational cash. The GENIUS Act hardened the direction into law with full-reserve requirements in high-quality liquid assets. The less reserve money sits as uninsured deposits, the less a bank failure can transmit into a peg, and the less a future depositor guarantee would have any stablecoin to save.
The watchdogs did the arithmetic. Better Markets and others have warned that a future systemic risk exception covering a bank holding a major issuer’s reserves could cost the insurance fund more than SVB’s roughly $17 billion, socializing a stablecoin’s back end across assessed banks at a scale the 2023 episode only sketched. That warning is the political immune response to the accident: the argument now on the table is precisely that stablecoin reserve exposure should not be allowed to grow into something the exception would one day be pressured to cover.
And the doctrine hardened. The Fed chair who owned crypto just ruled out saving it, while the FDIC has separately confirmed that stablecoin holders have no deposit insurance of their own, no pass-through, no coverage, a creditor’s claim on the issuer and nothing more. Crypto.news has also examined why holders had no direct protection. The official architecture being built instead, GENIUS’s holder-priority rule and reserve requirements, is a resolution regime: machinery for letting an issuer fail in an orderly way, which is the exact opposite of machinery for rescuing one. The unfinished state of that rulebook, after regulators missed July’s statutory deadline, is the honest asterisk on the whole structure.
The synthesis is clean enough to carry. The systemic risk exception remains on the books, as heavy-doored as ever, and it protects one thing: depositors of failed insured banks, when three institutions and the White House agree that letting them take losses would endanger the system. Stablecoins touched that protection once, through a $3.3 billion accident of account location, and the years since have been a coordinated project, by issuers, by Congress, by regulators, to make sure the next stablecoin crisis is resolved inside crypto’s own machinery rather than caught in banking’s net. Whether that machinery is finished when the test comes is the open question of 2026, and it is the right one to watch, because the fire department has now said clearly which building it covers.
Frequently asked questions What is the systemic risk exception in one sentence? It is the override in US banking law that lets the FDIC abandon its normal obligation to resolve a failed bank at the least cost to the insurance fund, and instead protect broader groups such as all uninsured depositors, when the cheap path would threaten financial stability.
Who has to approve it? Three parties, at one of the highest bars in financial regulation: at least two-thirds of the FDIC’s board, at least two-thirds of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, and the Treasury secretary, who makes the determination in consultation with the president. The multi-institution supermajority design exists to keep the exception truly exceptional.
What happened with Silicon Valley Bank in 2023? SVB failed on March 10, 2023 after the fastest major bank run in US history, with the vast majority of its deposits above the insurance limit. Fearing Monday runs on similar banks, regulators invoked the exception on Sunday and guaranteed all depositors, insured and uninsured, at SVB and Signature Bank, while wiping out shareholders. The uninsured-depositor protection cost the insurance fund roughly $16 billion to $17 billion, recovered via special assessments on banks.
How did that rescue USDC? Circle held $3.3 billion of USDC’s reserves, about 8%, as deposits at SVB. When the failure was disclosed, USDC fell to roughly 87 cents as markets priced a possible haircut on that exposure. The depositor guarantee made Circle whole along with every other depositor, and the peg recovered by Monday. USDC was saved as a depositor of a rescued bank, not as a stablecoin.
Could the exception be used to rescue a stablecoin issuer directly? No. The mechanism applies to the resolution of failed insured banks, and a stablecoin issuer is not a bank and holds no insured deposits. If an issuer failed while its reserve banks stayed healthy, the exception would have nothing to attach to. The 2023 episode worked only because the point of failure sat inside the traditional banking perimeter.
Why might it not work the same way next time? Because the channel is being closed from three directions. Issuers moved reserves out of uninsured bank deposits into Treasury bills, government money funds, and custody, so a bank failure transmits less into any peg. Watchdogs such as Better Markets warn that covering a reserve-heavy bank could cost more than SVB did, building political resistance. And regulators, including the Fed chair this month, have explicitly disclaimed crypto rescues while constructing a resolution regime instead.
What protects stablecoin holders now, if not this? Under the GENIUS Act: full reserves in high-quality liquid assets and a priority rule paying stablecoin holders ahead of other creditors in an issuer’s failure, a strong first claim on the reserve pool. Holders have no deposit insurance and no pass-through coverage, as the FDIC has confirmed. The implementing rules for the new regime remain unfinished after agencies missed the July 2026 statutory deadline, which is the main open risk in the structure.
What should someone watch to judge the safety net today? Three things. Reserve disclosures, specifically how much of an issuer’s backing still sits as bank deposits versus Treasuries and government funds. The GENIUS rulemaking’s completion, since holder priority is only as fast and certain as the redemption and resolution mechanics behind it. And official rhetoric under stress: whether the next mid-sized crypto failure is actually allowed to fail, which is the only true test of the no-rescue doctrine. This is educational information, not financial advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. It describes past official actions and current law, neither of which guarantees any future action, and regulatory details remain subject to change. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of July 20, 2026.
Aave governance zvolilo Chainlink CCIP jako výchozí standard pro cross-chain převody sGHO. V rámci a.DI zůstává architektura vícebridgeová, ale CCIP bude hlavní cestou.
Aave Picks Chainlink CCIP As Default Standard For Cross-Chain sGHO Aave governance has moved to make Chainlink CCIP the default standard for cross-chain sGHO transfers, reinforcing the role of security-focused infrastructure in DeFi’s next phase.
The Aave governance proposal focuses on launching sGHO cross-chain and using Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol as the default option. The wider Delivery Infrastructure, known as a.DI, still uses a multi-bridge architecture for redundancy, but CCIP is positioned as the standard route for this specific cross-chain flow.
That distinction matters.
DeFi has spent years learning that bridges are one of the most sensitive parts of the stack. Cross-chain systems can unlock liquidity and improve user experience, but they also introduce risk. Aave’s decision shows that major protocols are increasingly treating cross-chain communication as a security decision, not just a convenience feature.
TL;DR Aave governance has selected Chainlink CCIP as the default standard for cross-chain sGHO. The proposal sits inside Aave’s broader a.DI cross-chain infrastructure. The move highlights DeFi’s growing focus on secure cross-chain messaging. Why Cross-Chain Infrastructure Matters For Aave Aave is one of DeFi’s most important lending protocols.
As DeFi spreads across multiple networks, Aave needs infrastructure that can move information and value safely between chains. That is especially important for GHO and sGHO, where liquidity, accounting, governance, and risk controls have to remain consistent across environments.
Cross-chain expansion is useful, but it is also dangerous if handled poorly.
Many of crypto’s largest exploits have involved bridges or cross-chain infrastructure. The reason is simple: bridges often sit between different consensus systems, custody models, liquidity pools, and message-passing mechanisms. If something goes wrong, the losses can be large and fast.
For a protocol like Aave, the bridge standard is therefore not a minor technical choice.
It affects user trust, governance execution, stablecoin liquidity, and the way the protocol expands beyond one network.
Why Chainlink CCIP Was Chosen Chainlink has positioned CCIP as a security-first cross-chain messaging and transfer standard.
The pitch is that major protocols need more than a basic bridge. They need risk controls, decentralized oracle infrastructure, and a model that can support large-scale cross-chain communication without relying on a single fragile route.
Aave’s proposal reflects that direction.
Using CCIP as the default route for sGHO suggests Aave wants a standard that can support cross-chain expansion while reducing operational risk. At the same time, the validation materials make clear that the broader a.DI system remains multi-bridge. That means CCIP is not the only infrastructure in the architecture, and alternative bridges are not simply being switched off.
That is the right nuance.
In complex DeFi systems, redundancy matters. A default route can provide consistency, while a multi-bridge design can help avoid dependence on one provider.
GHO Needs Stronger Distribution The GHO stablecoin has always needed distribution to grow.
A stablecoin’s success depends on more than minting. It needs liquidity, integrations, cross-chain availability, lending demand, and confidence in how it is managed. Making sGHO easier to move across networks can help expand its utility.
That is where CCIP can matter.
If users and protocols can move sGHO more safely between chains, Aave can support broader GHO adoption without forcing activity to remain concentrated in one environment. That can improve liquidity and make GHO more useful across DeFi.
But the stablecoin market is competitive.
USDC, USDT, DAI, and newer stablecoin models already dominate much of the liquidity conversation. GHO needs clear advantages to gain share. Cross-chain accessibility is one part of that, but not the whole story.
Aave still has to build demand for GHO itself.
DeFi Is Becoming More Infrastructure-Led The proposal also shows where DeFi is heading.
Early DeFi growth was often about yield, liquidity mining, and fast deployments. The next phase is more infrastructure-heavy. Protocols need safer cross-chain communication, more formal risk controls, better governance execution, and deeper integrations between networks.
That is a more mature market.
It may not produce the same kind of retail excitement as meme-token speculation, but it is the work required for DeFi to support larger amounts of capital.
Aave choosing CCIP as the default standard for sGHO is part of that shift. It shows that leading protocols are thinking carefully about how to expand without repeating the bridge failures of earlier cycles.
For Chainlink, the decision strengthens CCIP’s role as a core infrastructure product. For Aave, it gives sGHO a clearer cross-chain path. For DeFi users, it may eventually mean a smoother experience moving between networks.
The important point is not that every bridge problem is now solved. It is that major protocols are becoming more selective about the infrastructure they trust.
This article is based on the Aave governance forum and Chainlink CCIP materials.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Uniswap vygeneroval na Robinhood Chain 18 milionů USD na poplatcích za poskytování likvidity od spuštění mainnetu. Síť zároveň překročila 1 miliardu USD kumulovaného objemu obchodů za devět dní.
Uniswap’s liquidity providers have racked up $18 million in fees on the Robinhood Chain since the Layer 2 network launched its public mainnet on July 1. Uniswap crossed $1 billion in cumulative trading volume on Robinhood Chain by July 10, just nine days after launch. Daily trading volume peaked at nearly $500 million, fueled in large part by tokenized stock trading and Robinhood’s existing user base discovering DeFi for the first time.
How Robinhood Chain became a DeFi magnet overnight Robinhood Chain launched with Uniswap already deployed as the primary automated market maker. Uniswap deployed v2, v3, v4, and UniswapX simultaneously on day one, meaning the chain had functioning liquidity infrastructure from the moment it went live.
Advertisement
Over $70 million in ETH was bridged to the platform during its first week of operation alone. Uniswap’s total value locked on Robinhood Chain surpassed $106 million shortly after launch.
Governance moves signal long-term commitment By mid-July, proposals emerged to extend the protocol fee structure to cover activity on Robinhood Chain. One particularly notable discussion centered on routing fees from Uniswap v4 through a mechanism called TokenJar, which would be used for burning UNI tokens on the Ethereum mainnet. The governance discussions also touched on fee activation for v2 and v3 deployments.
Beyond governance, Uniswap has introduced on-chain auctions on the platform and pursued partnerships designed to expand the Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
What this means for investors For UNI holders specifically, the governance proposals around fee activation and token burning deserve close attention. If the protocol fee switch gets turned on for Robinhood Chain, it would add a significant new revenue stream to the Uniswap protocol. The $500 million daily volume peaks represent substantial fee-generating potential.
Robinhood brought roughly 23 million funded accounts to the table when it entered crypto. The $106 million in TVL and billion-dollar volume milestone suggest that when you reduce friction and pair decentralized infrastructure with a familiar brand, retail traders are willing to make the jump.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Uniswap zpracoval za jediný týden objem přes 15 miliard USD, čímž výrazně předčil všechny ostatní DEX. Růst táhnou nové integrace a snaha governance aktivovat poplatky pro burn UNI.
Uniswap just moved more than $15 billion in trading volume in a single week. To put that in perspective, that’s roughly the annual GDP of Iceland, except it happened on a protocol that nobody technically owns and that runs 24/7 without a lunch break.
The figure places Uniswap well ahead of every other decentralized exchange by volume. But what’s making this milestone particularly interesting isn’t just the raw number. It’s the convergence of new chain integrations, institutional partnerships, and governance moves that suggest the protocol is entering a fundamentally different phase.
What’s driving the volume surge Uniswap v4 has been steadily onboarding new networks, and one of the more notable additions is Robinhood Chain, which recorded $6 billion in trading volume as of July 19. That’s a single chain contributing nearly 40% of the protocol’s weekly haul.
In late June, Spark migrated $150 million in liquidity to Uniswap v4. Moves like that don’t just add depth to order books. They signal confidence from major DeFi players that v4’s architecture, with its hook-based customization and improved capital efficiency, is worth building on.
Advertisement
Governance gets aggressive on UNI burns Between July 19 and July 26, Uniswap’s governance process advanced votes focused on activating protocol fees across multiple chains, with the explicit goal of using those fees to support UNI token burns.
Protocol fees get collected from trading activity across chains, then channeled into buying and burning UNI. With $15 billion flowing through the protocol weekly, even a small fee percentage translates into substantial burn pressure.
Uniswap Labs also allocated a $20 million annual growth budget for UNI at the start of 2026, giving the team resources to fund ecosystem development, incentive programs, and strategic partnerships without constantly going back to governance for spending approvals.
The institutional bridge keeps widening The involvement of entities like BlackRock in Uniswap’s ecosystem represents a quiet but significant evolution. Traditional finance isn’t just buying Bitcoin and parking it in cold storage anymore. It’s engaging with DeFi infrastructure directly, using decentralized liquidity pools for tokenized asset trading.
The Robinhood Chain integration is particularly telling. Robinhood has spent years building a retail brokerage audience, and now that audience has a direct pipeline into Uniswap’s liquidity.
What this means for investors Protocol fees tied to volume create a direct link between Uniswap’s usage and UNI’s scarcity. If weekly volume stays anywhere near $15 billion and fees are activated even at modest rates, the annualized burn could become a significant percentage of UNI’s circulating supply.
The risk side of the equation centers on regulatory uncertainty and smart contract exposure. Uniswap has already faced scrutiny from the SEC in prior years. The protocol’s decentralized nature provides some insulation, but the Labs entity behind it remains a potential target. Meanwhile, v4’s hook system introduces new smart contract surface area that hasn’t been battle-tested at this scale for very long.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Dfinity Foundation chystá pro Internet Computer ($ICP) spuštění sady Open SaaS s desítkami on-chain služeb pro provoz firem přímo na blockchainu. Nabídka má být zdarma a snadno nastavitelná pomocí AI.
Dfinity Adds Open SaaS to Its Growing Cloud RoadmapThe @Dfinity Foundation is pushing further into enterprise territory. Alongside its upcoming Cloud Engines product, founder Dominic Williams has announced that the Internet Computer ($ICP) protocol is preparing to launch an "Open SaaS" suite, a collection of dozens of on-chain services designed to let users run full enterprises directly on the blockchain.
According to Williams' post on X, every user will be able to customize their own SaaS service using AI, with the offering described as free to use forever and straightforward to install. The announcement adds another layer to what has become an ambitious product push from @Dfinity in 2026.
Cloud Engines Lay the FoundationThe Open SaaS suite builds on top of Cloud Engines, @Dfinity's sovereign cloud infrastructure product. A Cloud Engine is a dedicated private subnet within the ICP ecosystem, configurable to a specific specification, allowing users to choose their own security, performance, and resilience parameters. The technology gives enterprises real control over their infrastructure while maintaining tamper-proof hosting guarantees.
The Internet Computer's underlying cloud runs software that supports AI agents generating apps, websites, and SaaS on demand, with generated apps allowing users to make arbitrary requests via fluid AI experiences because AI can see the data inside and dynamically create logic on the fly. The Open SaaS announcement appears to operationalize that vision into a product anyone can deploy.
Sentiment around the project has strengthened after @Dfinity teased its upcoming Cloud Engines initiative, an announcement many view as a major step toward expanding $ICP's role in AI and decentralized cloud infrastructure. The global cloud infrastructure and platform services market is estimated at roughly $781 billion in 2025, and @Dfinity's Mission 70 white paper explicitly frames ICP as a platform that could address a major portion of that market through Cloud Engines and its "self-writing cloud" approach.
For the broader ICP ecosystem, the Open SaaS suite signals that @Dfinity is moving beyond developer tooling and into products that could attract mainstream enterprise users, with onchain services, AI customization, and a zero-cost entry point as the core selling points.
Sources:
Internet Computer Official Site
Coinpedia: ICP Price Climbs as DFINITY Expands AI Cloud Vision
Incrypted: DFINITY Foundation Announces New Economic Model for Internet Computer
Více než 80 000 fanoušků dorazilo na sledovací akci s lístky postavenými na blockchainu Avalanche pro FIFA. Systém už zpracoval přes 100 000 RTB a sekundární objem přesáhl 25 milionů USD.
More than 80,000 people showed up to FIFA World Cup watch parties carrying tickets built on blockchain. Not a single one had to think about wallets, gas fees, or private keys.
The system running underneath those tickets is built on Avalanche, specifically a dedicated Layer-1 chain that Ava Labs and FIFA built together and simply call the FIFA blockchain. The goal from day one was infrastructure that works invisibly, where fans get verifiable, fraud-resistant tickets and never have to know or care that a blockchain is involved.
How the FIFA ticketing system actually works FIFA’s approach uses two distinct digital entitlements: a Right-to-Buy (RTB) and a Right-to-Ticket (RTT). Think of an RTB like a reservation at a restaurant that you can sell to someone else before you ever sit down. It gives the holder the verified right to purchase a ticket, without being the ticket itself.
FIFA separates the right to get a ticket from the ticket itself, and both layers live on-chain where they can be tracked, verified, and transferred, but where fraud, bots, and scalpers have a much harder time operating.
Advertisement
As of mid-June 2026, FIFA has issued more than 100,000 RTBs, including over 50,000 bundled Club World Cup tickets. Combined secondary-market volume from the RTB and RTT system has crossed $25 million.
The actual match-day tickets are still fulfilled through traditional infrastructure. Blockchain handles the rights management layer upstream, quietly.
FIFA’s longer road to blockchain FIFA did not arrive at Avalanche overnight. The organization previously ran its FIFA Collect digital collectibles platform across multiple blockchain networks before eventually consolidating on Avalanche.
Ava Labs, the company behind Avalanche’s development, has been pushing the dedicated subnet, now called a Layer-1 chain, architecture as the right model for enterprises that want blockchain’s benefits without sharing network congestion with the rest of the crypto ecosystem. A purpose-built FIFA chain means FIFA controls the validator set and governance rules, while still inheriting Avalanche’s consensus mechanism and security architecture.
The FIFA blockchain launched in 2025, giving the system roughly a year of operational runway before the 2026 World Cup cycle hit full stride.
What this means for Avalanche and the broader market For Avalanche as a network, a FIFA partnership is about as high-profile a real-world use case as exists in crypto right now. FIFA’s 2026 World Cup is projected to be one of the most-watched sporting events in history, expanding to 48 teams and spanning the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
The $25 million in secondary-market volume generated so far comes from the rights layer, before most of the primary tournament games have even been played.
The broader market implication cuts across the ticketing industry. Live event ticketing is a sector with well-documented problems: bot purchases, fraudulent resales, and opaque pricing have frustrated fans and organizers for decades. FIFA’s multi-year commitment and the decision to build a dedicated chain rather than use a shared network suggests a longer-term architectural bet, not a marketing experiment.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
