SouthState Bank NYSE: SSB reported second-quarter 2026 results marked by continued loan growth, stable net interest margin, low credit losses and ongoing investment in banker recruiting and artificial intelligence initiatives.
Chief Executive Officer John Corbett said the company generated a 1.36% return on assets and a 17.6% return on tangible common equity during the quarter. He said results reflected “solid balance sheet growth, stable margins, improving efficiency, and continued strength in credit quality.”
Over the past year, loans increased 8% and deposits rose 5%, both within the company’s previously issued guidance ranges. During the second quarter, loan growth totaled $1.35 billion, representing an 11% annualized rate. Average loan growth also ran at an 11% annualized pace.
Get SouthState Bank alerts:
Corbett said growth was broad-based across SouthState’s footprint, with Florida leading the company in loan-growth dollars. Florida, Texas and South Carolina were the largest contributors by dollar amount, while Atlanta, Virginia and Alabama posted strong percentage growth, including commercial and industrial lending gains in Atlanta.
Recruiting Supports Growth Strategy SouthState has expanded its commercial banking sales force by more than 10% over the past three quarters as it seeks to capitalize on disruption in its markets. Corbett said the company had offered division presidents the opportunity to increase their commercial relationship manager teams by 15% to 20% over several years.
The newer hires have generated $600 million of loan production so far and have a $1.5 billion pipeline, according to Corbett. Texas has been the strongest market for sales-force expansion, with its commercial relationship manager count up 25%.
The company expects loan growth to remain in the mid- to upper-single-digit range. Corbett said SouthState sees a potential mix shift in the second half, with commercial and industrial lending expected to increase while planned commercial real estate payoffs, including multifamily projects, rise.
Construction lending increased during the quarter, driven partly by owner-occupied projects for commercial clients and multifamily construction. However, Corbett noted that the overall construction category remained about 10% below its level a year earlier.
Margin Outlook Remains Stable SouthState reported a net interest margin of 3.78%, down 1 basis point from the first quarter and within its 3.75% to 3.80% guidance range. Deposit costs were unchanged from the prior quarter at 1.76%, while loan yields declined 5 basis points to 5.91% due to lower purchase-accounting accretion income.
Excluding accretion, loan yields increased 1 basis point and net interest margin rose 4 basis points, the company said. Net interest income totaled $576 million, up $14 million from the first quarter.
Chief Strategy Officer Steve Young said management’s outlook assumes no interest-rate increases or reductions through 2027 and calls for net interest margin to remain within the 3.75% to 3.80% range. He said deposit costs could rise modestly as the company funds loan growth, but anticipated asset repricing should help support the margin.
SouthState said approximately 76% of quarterly loan production carried floating rates. The share of the overall loan portfolio in floating-rate loans has increased to 38%, from 32% a year earlier.
Management also pointed to future repricing opportunities, including roughly $6 billion of loans expected to reprice over the next year and about $1 billion of securities expected to cash flow and be reinvested. Young said legacy loans with coupons in the 3% to 4% range are being replaced at rates in the 6% range.
Credit Quality and Expenses Credit quality improved during the quarter. Nonperforming assets declined 14%, classified loans also decreased, and net charge-offs were 6 basis points. It was the eighth time in the past nine quarters that SouthState’s net charge-offs were below 10 basis points.
Provision expense was $16 million, primarily reflecting loan growth. Management said it expects modest downward pressure on reserve levels absent meaningful changes in Moody’s economic forecasts and other loss drivers. The company continues to use a more conservative weighting toward Moody’s pessimistic scenario than its traditional model weighting.
Noninterest income was $97 million, or 57 basis points of average assets, within the company’s 55- to 60-basis-point guidance range. The figure was $3 million below the first quarter, as higher deposit fees were offset by lower mortgage revenue. SouthState said it continues to expect correspondent banking revenue of roughly $25 million per quarter.
Noninterest expense totaled $358 million, slightly better than guidance. Management maintained its forecast for 4% noninterest expense growth in 2026. It expects compensation costs to rise in the second half as recently hired employees remain in the run rate and company merit increases take effect July 1.
Capital Returns and Technology Investment SouthState repurchased 1 million shares during the quarter at a weighted average price of $97.62, producing a 68% total payout ratio including dividends. Year-to-date repurchases totaled 2.5 million shares and the total payout ratio was 80%.
Corbett said the company repurchased nearly 5% of its outstanding shares over the past year while increasing its dividend and maintaining a common equity tier 1 capital ratio above 11%. CET1 ended the quarter at 11.1%, tangible common equity was 8.7%, and tangible book value per share was $58.72, up 13% from a year earlier.
Management reiterated its longer-term total capital return framework of 40% to 60%, saying recent higher repurchase activity is not expected to be sustained if the company continues to target mid- to high-single-digit loan growth while maintaining CET1 in an 11% to 12% range.
Corbett also highlighted artificial intelligence as a strategic priority. The company is using the technology in credit operations, fraud management and call-center support, as well as through an internally developed small language model. SouthState is also testing commodity-hedging and foreign-exchange offerings, though Young said those initiatives are expected to launch in 2027 rather than materially affect 2026 results.
About SouthState Bank (NYSE:SSB)SouthState Bank NYSE: SSB is a bank holding company headquartered in Winter Haven, Florida, that provides a range of commercial and retail banking services. Through its subsidiary, SouthState Bank, the company serves businesses, institutions and individuals with deposit, lending and treasury management solutions. Its core business lines include commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate lending, consumer mortgages and home equity loans.
In addition to traditional lending and deposit products, SouthState Bank offers specialized services such as treasury and cash management, merchant services, payment solutions and online banking.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in SouthState Bank Right Now?Before you consider SouthState Bank, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and SouthState Bank wasn't on the list.
While SouthState Bank currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Enter your email address and we’ll send you MarketBeat’s list of ten stocks set to soar in Summer 2026, despite the threat of tariffs and what's happening in Iran. These ten stocks are incredibly resilient and are likely to thrive in any economic environment.
SouthState Bank Corporation (SSB) Q2 2026 Earnings Call July 24, 2026 9:00 AM EDT
Company Participants
William Matthews - Senior Executive VP & CFO
John Corbett - CEO & Chairman
Stephen Young - Senior Executive VP & Chief Strategy Officer
Conference Call Participants
Stephen Scouten - Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division
John McDonald - Truist Securities, Inc., Research Division
Hannah Wynn - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Michael Rose - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division
Sun Young Lee - TD Cowen, Research Division
Gary Tenner - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division
Anthony Elian - JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Benjamin Gerlinger - Citigroup Inc., Research Division
David Chiaverini - Jefferies LLC, Research Division
David Bishop - Hovde Group, LLC, Research Division
Samuel Varga - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the SouthState Bank Corporation Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]
I will now hand the conference call over to Will Matthews, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Matthews, please go ahead.
William Matthews
Senior Executive VP & CFO
Good morning. This is Will Matthews, and welcome to SouthState's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call.
I'm here with John Corbett, Steve Young and Jeremy Lucas. We'll follow our typical pattern of brief prepared remarks and then move into Q&A. And I'll refer you to the Investor Relations tab of our website for the earnings materials.
Before we begin our remarks, I want to remind you that comments we make may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws and regulations. Any such forward-looking statements we may make are subject to the safe harbor rules. Please review the forward-looking disclaimer and safe harbor language in the press release and presentation for more information about our forward-looking statements and risks and uncertainties, which may affect us.
PECO Pullback Presents a Retail REIT Worth Shopping ForPhillips Edison & Company, Inc. NASDAQ: PECO reported higher second-quarter funds from operations and same-center net operating income, citing sustained demand for space at its grocery-anchored shopping centers, record in-line occupancy and strong leasing spreads. The company also raised its 2026 outlook for earnings, same-center NOI growth and acquisitions.
Chairman and CEO Jeff Edison said the company generated 8.1% year-over-year growth in NAREIT FFO per share, 7.8% growth in Core FFO per share and 3.8% same-center NOI growth during the second quarter. He attributed the performance to occupancy gains, leasing activity, rent spreads and operating execution across the portfolio.
Get PECO alerts:
“Our centers generated 2% year-over-year traffic growth in June and 2% traffic growth year-to-date,” Edison said, adding that consumers continued to make frequent trips to necessity-based retail destinations despite seeking value.
Occupancy and Leasing Reach New Highs President Bob Myers said second-quarter leasing activity reached a record number of leases, while retailer demand showed “no current signs of slowing.” Necessity-based categories such as quick-service and fast-casual restaurants, health and wellness, beauty, fitness, services and medical retail continued to drive activity. The company said 74% of its rent comes from necessity-based goods and services.
Portfolio leased occupancy was 97.3%. Leased anchor occupancy was 98.4%. Leased in-line occupancy reached a record 95.5%. Economic in-line occupancy reached a record 94.8%. Comparable renewal rent spreads were 21.2%. Comparable new rent spreads were 33.7%. Annual rent bumps on in-line renewal leases averaged a record 3.1%. Myers said the company retained roughly 90% of its tenants and spent less than $1 per square foot to retain them. He said Phillips Edison expects it can increase in-line occupancy by another 100 basis points over time and lift anchor occupancy by 50 to 60 basis points by year-end.
The company reported lower-than-expected bad debt of about 70 basis points of revenue in the quarter and reduced its full-year bad-debt outlook. Management now expects bad debt for 2026 to be in line with or slightly better than 2025.
FFO, NOI and Balance Sheet CFO John Caulfield said second-quarter NAREIT FFO rose to $93.7 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, while Core FFO increased to $95.5 million, or $0.69 per diluted share. Same-center NOI rose 3.8%, primarily because of higher average rents and economic occupancy.
Phillips Edison raised its full-year 2026 guidance for NAREIT FFO per share, Core FFO per share and same-center NOI growth. At the midpoint, the updated outlook implies 6.3% growth in NAREIT FFO per share from 2025, 6.2% growth in Core FFO per share and 3.7% same-center NOI growth.
Caulfield said the increased FFO outlook reflects strong first-half operations and healthy tenant credit trends. However, he noted that asset sales occurring ahead of reinvestment in acquisitions create a short-term cash-flow gap, while positioning the company for growth in 2027.
The company ended the quarter with $857 million of liquidity. Net debt to trailing 12-month annualized adjusted EBITDAre was 5.1 times at quarter-end and 5.0 times on a last-quarter annualized basis. Its debt had a 4.4% weighted average interest rate and a 5.6-year weighted average maturity, including extension options. Fixed-rate debt represented 95.9% of total debt, including Phillips Edison’s share of joint-venture debt.
Moody’s revised the company’s outlook to positive, which Caulfield said reflected operating performance, balance-sheet management and liquidity.
Acquisition Target Increased Management raised 2026 gross acquisition guidance to $500 million to $600 million, an increase of $100 million. Caulfield confirmed in response to an analyst question that the net acquisition outlook also increased by $100 million.
The company completed $278 million of acquisitions at its share year to date through the week of the call, including eight grocery-anchored shopping centers, three everyday retail centers, an outparcel and land for future development. It had more than $225 million of awarded or contracted assets expected to close in the second half.
Management said acquisitions have been funded through dispositions, equity issuance and the company’s revolving credit facility. Phillips Edison raised $92 million of equity during June and July, though Caulfield said the full-year guidance does not assume additional equity issuance.
The company continues to target unlevered internal rates of return of 9% for grocery-anchored centers and 10% for everyday retail centers. Myers said the acquisition pipeline consists of about 60% grocery-anchored properties and 40% everyday retail assets. He said the company has identified more than 50,000 potential everyday retail opportunities near leading grocers and has acquired 12 such assets to date, where it has increased occupancy by 450 basis points.
Phillips Edison also maintained 2026 disposition guidance of $100 million to $200 million. Edison said the company had sold nearly $100 million of properties at a 6.3% capitalization rate and with an IRR below 7.5%, intending to redeploy that capital into higher-return opportunities.
Development Pipeline and Grocery Outlook The company has 21 active development and redevelopment projects with estimated investment of about $82 million and estimated average yields of 9% to 12%. Eleven projects stabilized year to date, delivering more than 212,000 square feet and approximately $3.4 million of annual incremental NOI, according to Myers.
Management also discussed grocer industry developments, including Kroger’s announced acquisition of Giant Eagle. Edison called the transaction positive for Phillips Edison, which has 10 Giant Eagle-anchored centers. He said Kroger’s investment in brick-and-mortar stores signaled confidence in physical grocery locations as a channel for sales and fulfillment.
While Edison acknowledged that grocers are responding to consumer caution by investing in price and observing shifts toward private-label products, he said Phillips Edison has not seen a deterioration in portfolio traffic. The company plans to continue monitoring consumer behavior and retailer health while pursuing growth through leasing, development, acquisitions, joint ventures and portfolio recycling.
About Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO)Phillips Edison & Company, Inc is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in the acquisition, ownership and operation of grocery-anchored, necessity-based shopping centers. The company's investment strategy is centered on properties that benefit from everyday consumer demand, seeking to deliver stable cash flows through long-term, triple-net leases with national and regional tenants in the grocery, drugstore and essential retail sectors.
In addition to its core retail portfolio, Phillips Edison & Company provides integrated services covering property management, asset management, leasing, development and acquisition sourcing.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. Right Now?Before you consider Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. wasn't on the list.
While Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
MarketBeat just released its list of the 7 hottest IPOs expected to hit Wall Street in 2026. See which companies are preparing to go public and why investors are watching closely.
Consumer-Driven Stocks Boost Buybacks, Including Visa's $20B PlanByline Bancorp NYSE: BY reported record second-quarter net income of $40.2 million, or $0.90 per diluted share, as revenue increased and expenses declined from the prior quarter. Adjusted earnings per share were $0.91, up 10% sequentially and 21% from a year earlier, President Alberto Paracchini said during the company’s earnings call.
The Chicago-based commercial bank posted a 1.63% return on average assets and a return on average common equity of just under 14.5%. Its pre-tax, pre-provision return on assets was 2.49%, marking the company’s 15th consecutive quarter above 2%, according to management.
Get Byline Bancorp alerts:
Could This Entertainment Stock be the Belle of the Gaming Ball?“We delivered net income of $40.2 million or $0.90 per diluted share,” Paracchini said. “Record net income and excellent profitability really stood out this quarter.”
Revenue Growth and Efficiency Improvement Revenue totaled $118 million, up 4.7% from the prior quarter, while non-interest expenses fell. The adjusted efficiency ratio improved to 46.5% from 49.8% in the first quarter, which Paracchini described as the company’s best result since becoming a public company in 2017.
Boyd Gaming stock: All signs point to a significant break higherNet interest income was $101 million, up modestly from the preceding quarter. Net interest margin declined 5 basis points to 4.28%, primarily reflecting higher funding costs associated with a maturing balance-sheet hedge and changes in earning-asset mix, CFO Tom Bell said.
Management emphasized that it prioritizes growth in net interest income dollars rather than managing to a particular margin target. Paracchini said the bank may accept lower spreads on high-quality, relationship-oriented business if it is accretive to earnings and supports long-term franchise value.
For the third quarter, Byline projected net interest income of $100 million to $102 million, non-interest income of $14 million to $15 million, and gain-on-sale revenue averaging about $5.5 million per quarter. The company maintained its full-year non-interest expense outlook of $59 million to $60 million per quarter.
Bell said second-half expenses are expected to rise due largely to employee-related costs, including health care benefits and commissions tied to production. Management also said potential opportunities to hire banking talent are included in its outlook.
Loans, Deposits and Rate Environment Total loans ended the quarter at $7.6 billion, increasing at a 4.2% annualized rate. New originations totaled $234 million, while payoffs were elevated at $339 million. Loan commitments rose slightly, and line utilization increased to 60% from 59% in the prior quarter.
Management expects full-year loan growth in the mid-single digits if payoff activity normalizes in the second half. Paracchini said the recent elevated payoff activity partly reflects the bank’s effort to recycle acquired loan portfolios into new customer relationships.
Total deposits reached $7.9 billion, rising at a 3.5% annualized rate. Growth in interest-bearing checking balances was partly offset by lower money-market balances. The loan-to-deposit ratio ended the quarter at 96%.
Byline said competition for both loans and deposits remains elevated. Paracchini said price competition has intensified in commercial real estate, particularly as larger institutions return to certain segments of that market. He cited multifamily and industrial properties as areas where more capital is competing for a reduced level of transaction activity.
Bell said the company remains focused on relationship deposits rather than more rate-sensitive funding. He added that commercial customers moving balances from money-market accounts to interest-bearing checking could indicate they anticipate uses for that capital.
Credit Trends Remain Favorable Credit costs were $7.2 million during the quarter, including $4.4 million of net charge-offs and a $2.8 million reserve build. Net charge-offs equaled 24 basis points of loans, down from 32 basis points in the first quarter.
Criticized loans declined to 3.9% of total loans from 4.5% both sequentially and from a year earlier. Nonperforming loans totaled $69.1 million, or 92 basis points of total loans, up marginally from the prior quarter and flat year over year. The allowance for credit losses rose to $112 million, or 1.48% of total loans.
Chief Credit Officer Mark Fucinato said the decline in criticized and classified loans reflected improved performance at several larger operating companies, as well as the resolution of a workout situation in which an operating company sold a mortgaged asset and repaid its exposure in full. The bank also recorded a recovery on a prior charge-off.
Paracchini said management’s near-term expectation for net charge-offs remains in the range of 30 to 40 basis points, although he expects that level may migrate lower over time as the SBA portfolio becomes a smaller part of Byline’s overall balance sheet.
Capital Returns and $10 Billion Threshold Byline ended the quarter with total assets of $9.9 billion. Tangible common equity rose to 11.4%, while the common equity tier 1 ratio reached 12.9%. Tangible book value per share increased 14% from a year earlier to $24.48.
During the quarter, the company repurchased about 275,000 shares for $9.1 million. Including dividends and buybacks, its total shareholder payout ratio was 36%.
The board also approved a 16.7% increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.14 per share. Paracchini said the increase reflects the company’s capital position and earnings profile.
Management said it continues preparing to cross the $10 billion asset threshold. Paracchini said the company is not currently constraining normal balance-sheet activity to stay below that level, but it could manage the balance sheet near year-end if doing so would delay the effects of the Durbin amendment until mid-2028.
On acquisitions, Paracchini described the environment for smaller-bank transactions as constructive. He said Byline would generally seek deals with tangible book value earn-backs within three years, while continuing to weigh acquisitions against organic growth, investments in the business and share repurchases.
About Byline Bancorp (NYSE:BY)Byline Bancorp, Inc is the bank holding company for Byline Bank, a full-service commercial bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. Established under its current name in 2016, the company operates as a community-focused financial institution offering a broad array of banking products and services to corporate, professional and consumer clients.
On the commercial banking side, Byline Bancorp serves small and midsize businesses, real estate developers, professional services firms and nonprofit organizations.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Byline Bancorp Right Now?Before you consider Byline Bancorp, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Byline Bancorp wasn't on the list.
While Byline Bancorp currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
The AI wave will soon hit public markets with Anthropic and OpenAI set to go public later this year. However, you don't have to wait to invest. This report shows seven AI stocks that you can buy today while the big model providers get ready to go public.
NEW YORK CITY & NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the proposed sale of Finward Bancorp (NasdaqCM: FNWD) to First Financial Bancorp. (NasdaqGS: FFBC). Under the terms of the proposed transaction, shareholders of Finward will receive 1.35 shares of First Financial for each share of Finward that they own. KSF is seeking to determine whether this consideration and the.
Earnings DERBY, VT / ACCESS Newswire / July 24, 2026 / Community Bancorp. (NASDAQ:CMTV), the parent company of Community National Bank (the "Bank"), reported consolidated earnings for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, of $4.7 million or $0.84 per share, an increase of $628,008 or 15.47% compared to $4.1 million or $0.72 per share reported for the second quarter of 2025. Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2026, were $9.1 million, or $1.62 per share, also a significant increase of $1.5 million or 19.40% compared to $7.6 million or $1.34 per share in the same period in 2025.
Second Quarter 2026 Financial Highlights and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
(Unaudited)
Six months Ended
Quarter Ended
Six months Ended
Quarter Ended
June 30, 2026
June 30, 2026
June 30, 2025
June 30, 2025
Return on average assets
1.47
%
1.53
%
1.29
%
1.38
%
Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue return on average assets
1.96
%
2.11
%
1.67
%
1.81
%
Return on average shareholders' equity
15.63
%
15.83
%
15.05
%
15.62
%
Net Interest Margin
3.88
%
3.95
%
3.56
%
3.64
%
Efficiency Ratio
54.2
%
52.8
%
57.3
%
55.8
%
Noninterest expense to average assets
2.31
%
2.37
%
2.24
%
2.29
%
Dividend payout
30.86
%
29.76
%
35.82
%
33.33
%
Fully diluted tangible book value per common share (1)
$
19.51
$
19.51
$
16.63
$
16.63
Total capital to risk-weighted assets (2)
16.05
%
16.05
%
14.85
%
14.85
%
Total common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (2)
14.79
%
14.79
%
13.60
%
13.60
%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets (2)
10.63
%
10.63
%
10.06
%
10.06
%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets (1)
9.41
%
9.41
%
8.21
%
8.21
%
Earnings per common share
$
1.62
$
0.84
$
1.34
$
0.72
Weighted average number of common shares
used in computing earnings per share
5,590,465
5,594,749
5,608,997
5,612,675
(1)
Refer to the "Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures" section of this document for additional detail.
(2)
Represents Bank-only ratios. Current period capital ratios are preliminary subject to finalization of the Bank's June 30, 2026 FDIC Call Report.
Total assets for the Company at June 30, 2026, were $1.17 billion, a decrease of $114.8 million from year end 2025, but $6.2 million or 0.53% higher compared to $1.17 billion as of June 30, 2025. The year-to-date change primarily reflects annual maturities of municipal non arbitrage relationships and lower cash balances used to pay off two maturing advances totaling $25.0 million, as well as a cyclical decrease in deposit balances. Contributing to the Company's year-over-year growth in assets was growth in the Company's gross loan portfolio of $28.8 million, or 3.06%, compared to the 2025 period. Deposit balances increased $48.7 million, or 5.22%, compared to the same period in 2025 but decreased $89.0 million or 8.31% since year end 2025 reflecting cyclical changes. The year-over-year loan growth was primarily funded by a combination of cash, maturities of securities, as well as an increase in core deposits.
The Company's securities portfolio totaled $128 million as of June 30, 2026, an 11.45% decrease compared to $144.6 million as of December 31, 2025. The portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and is required to be reported at fair market value with the unrealized loss, net of a deferred tax adjustment, as an adjustment to total equity. Such unrealized losses reflect the interest rate environment, as current rates remain below the coupon rates on the securities, resulting in a fair market value lower than current book values. As of June 30, 2026, the adjustment to equity was $9.4 million, representing an improvement of $3.1 million from the adjustment to equity of $12.5 million on June 30, 2026 and $9.6 million as of December 31, 2025.
Total net interest income for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, increased $1.4 million, or 13.68%, to $11.2 million, compared to $9.9 million for the same quarter in 2025. The quarter-over-quarter improvement reflects an increase of $1.1 million, or 7.72%, in interest and fees on loans due to strong loan growth and higher yields, partially offset by higher interest on deposits expense of $37,533, or 0.94%. Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2026, increased $2.9 million or 14.81%, to $22.2 million, compared to $19.3 million for the same period in 2025, reflecting the same trends.
The provision for credit losses for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, was $720,967 compared to $407,046 for the same period in 2025. The year-to-date provision for credit losses was $1.1 million, compared to $732,100 for the same period in 2025. The $380,373 year-over-year increase was driven primarily by strong loan growth. The provision for credit losses for June 30, 2026, was determined under Accounting Standard No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, commonly referenced as the Current Expected Credit Losses, or CECL.
Total non-interest income for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, of $2.3 million increased $254,036, or 12.34%, compared to $2.1million for the same period in 2025. Total non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2026, grew to $4.1 million, compared to $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of $420,767, or 11.57% year-over-year. Total non-interest expenses increased $497,838, or 7.47%, for the second quarter comparison period, and $1.1 million, or 7.98%, for the six months period year-over-year.
Equity capital increased to $120.9 million, with a book value per share of $21.58, as of June 30, 2026, compared to equity capital of $113.7 million and a book value per share of $20.36 as of December 31, 2025, and $106.3 million and book value per share of $18.69 as of June 30, 2025. This change includes a decrease of $237,432 in unrealized losses in the investment portfolio year-to-date and a decrease of $3.1 million year-over-year, due to changing bond rates, which increased the fair market value of the investment portfolio, as well as an increase of $6.3 million year-to-date and an increase of $12.8 million year-over-year in retained earnings. The unrealized loss position is considered temporary and does not impact the Company's regulatory capital ratios. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company completed the optional redemption of all fifteen of the Company's outstanding shares of its Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock. The preferred stock value of $1,500,000 was included in the Company's equity capital as of June 30, 2025.
President and CEO Christopher Caldwell commented on the Company's results: "Through the first half of 2026, the company continued its strong performance. Community banking thrives through relationship-based banking and this long-term approach to clients and our communities continues to serve us well. Our inclusion in both the ABA Nasdaq Community Bank Index and the Russell 2000 Index has increased the Company's visibility among investors and may support broader market awareness of our stock over time. Tangible book value per share increased by 17% for the year-to-date period compared to the same period of 2025. Year-to-date earnings per share increased 20% compared to the same period last year, and 16% for the second quarter compared to the same quarter of 2025. These results demonstrate the Company's commitment to serving our customers as Vermont's Community Bank. We are grateful for the trust that our communities, clients, and shareholders have placed in us."
As previously announced, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share payable August 1, 2026, to shareholders of record as of July 15, 2026.
About Community Bancorp.
Community Bancorp. is the parent holding company for Community National Bank, headquartered in Derby, Vermont. Community National Bank is an independent bank that has been serving its communities since 1851, with retail banking offices located in Derby, Derby Line, Island Pond, Barton, Newport, Troy, St. Johnsbury, Montpelier, Barre, Lyndonville, Morrisville and Enosburg Falls as well as loan offices located in Burlington, Vermont and Lebanon, New Hampshire
Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including, without limitation, statements about the Company's financial condition, capital status, dividend payment practices, business outlook and affairs. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words like "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," and "intend" or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may." Although these statements are based on management's current expectations and estimates, actual conditions, results, and events may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements, as they could be influenced by numerous factors which are unpredictable and outside the Company's control. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from such statements include, among others, the following: (1) general national or regional economic conditions, national fiscal or monetary policies, or national or international tariff or trade conditions result in a deterioration of the credit quality of our loan portfolio or diminished demand for the Company's products and services; (2) changes in laws or government rules, or the way in which courts interpret those laws or rules, adversely affect the financial industry generally or the Company's business in particular, or may impose additional costs and regulatory requirements; (3) interest rates change in such a way as to reduce the Company's interest margins and its funding sources; and (4) competitive pressures increase among financial services providers in the Company's northern New England market area or in the financial services industry generally, including pressures from nonbank financial service providers, from increasing consolidation and integration of financial service providers and from changes in technology and delivery systems, and other factors that are listed from time to time in our financial filings with the SEC, including our Forms 10Q and 10K. The Company cautions you not to rely unduly on forward-looking statements because the assumptions, beliefs, expectations, and projections about future events may, and often do, differ materially from actual results or events. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as to the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect developments occurring after the statement is made, except as otherwise required by law.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to evaluating the Company's results of operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"), management supplements this evaluation with certain non-GAAP financial measures such as pre-tax, pre-provision income; fully diluted tangible book value per common share and tangible common equity to tangible assets. Management believe these non-GAAP financial measures help investors better understand the Company's operating performance and trends and allow for better performance comparisons to other financial institutions. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures remove the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in the Company's underlying performance. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP operating results, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other financial institutions. Reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures can be found at the end of this document.
Community Bancorp. And Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
June 30,
December 31,
2026
2025
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
19,772,554
$
11,802,391
Federal funds sold and overnight deposits
5,840,996
116,259,370
Total cash and cash equivalents
25,613,550
128,061,761
Securities available-for-sale (amortized cost $139,848,277
and $156,694,754 at 06/30/26 and 12/31/25, respectively
127,982,828
144,528,758
Restricted equity securities, at cost
1,918,950
2,933,050
Loans held-for-sale
813,332
138,000
Loans
970,535,252
965,285,662
Allowance for credit losses
(11,881,321
)
(10,864,983
)
Deferred net loan costs
940,423
786,604
Net loans
959,594,354
955,207,283
Bank premises and equipment, net
12,220,494
12,090,886
Accrued interest receivable
4,505,039
4,607,975
Bank owned life insurance
5,435,603
5,398,085
Goodwill
11,574,269
11,574,269
Other real estate owned
-
319,019
Other assets
23,090,295
22,699,860
Total assets
$
1,172,748,714
$
1,287,558,946
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Demand, non-interest bearing
$
204,738,374
$
218,842,543
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
278,551,211
299,636,739
Money market funds
125,665,889
187,132,921
Savings
146,071,626
142,543,291
Time deposits, $250,000 and over
48,195,437
46,913,997
Other time deposits
178431659
175,598,510
Total deposits
981,654,196
1,070,668,001
Repurchase agreements
35,019,257
41,498,171
Borrowed funds
10,975,022
35,975,022
Junior subordinated debentures
12,887,000
12,887,000
Accrued interest and other liabilities
11,319,225
12,843,774
Total liabilities
1,051,854,700
1,173,871,968
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock - $2.50 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized,
5,902,267 shares issued at 06/30/26, 5,882,266 shares issued at 12/31/25
14,755,668
14,705,665
Additional paid-in capital
40,757,013
40,076,561
Retained earnings
79,287,690
73,021,908
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(9,373,705
)
(9,611,137
)
Less: treasury stock, at cost; 300,409 shares at 06/30/26 and 299,399
shares at 12/31/25
(4,532,652
)
(4,506,019
)
Total shareholders' equity
120,894,014
113,686,978
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
$
1,172,748,714
$
1,287,558,946
Book value per common share outstanding
$
21.58
$
20.36
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)
Quarter Ended
Quarter Ended
June 30, 2026
June 30, 2025
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
$
14,748,598
$
13,691,705
Interest on taxable debt securities
741,821
948,048
Interest on tax-exempt debt securities
80,411
80,411
Dividends
47,363
58,595
Interest on federal funds sold and overnight deposits
424,413
71,857
Total interest income
16,042,606
14,850,616
Interest expense
Interest on deposits
4,009,541
3,972,008
Interest on borrowed funds
301,838
444,596
Interest on repurchase agreements
262,376
298,057
Interest on junior subordinated debentures
221,045
241,413
Total interest expense
4,794,800
4,956,074
Net interest income
11,247,806
9,894,542
Credit loss expense
720,967
407,046
Net interest income after credit loss expense
10,526,839
9,487,496
Non-interest income
Service fees
988,219
969,775
Income from sold loans
89,692
96,705
Other income from loans
537,043
331,759
Income from investment in CFS Partners
579,795
548,307
Other income
117,998
112,165
Total non-interest income
2,312,747
2,058,711
Non-interest expense
Salaries and wages
2,632,767
2,392,661
Employee benefits
1,102,841
1,056,273
Occupancy expenses, net
779,462
794,451
Other expenses
2,650,168
2,424,015
Total non-interest expense
7,165,238
6,667,400
Income before income taxes
5,674,348
4,878,807
Income tax expense
986,564
819,031
Net income
$
4,687,784
$
4,059,776
Earnings per common share
$
0.84
$
0.72
Weighted average number of common shares
used in computing earnings per share
5,594,749
5,612,675
Dividends declared per common share
$
0.25
$
0.24
Six Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2026
June 30, 2025
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
$
29,181,219
$
26,906,737
Interest on taxable debt securities
1,546,571
1,807,276
Interest on tax-exempt debt securities
160,823
160,823
Dividends
99,321
106,485
Interest on federal funds sold and overnight deposits
1,081,511
393,806
Total interest income
32,069,445
29,375,127
Interest expense
Interest on deposits
8,186,172
8,157,915
Interest on borrowed funds
687,788
815,574
Interest on repurchase agreements
556,106
584,016
Interest on junior subordinated debentures
443,692
484,758
Total interest expense
9,873,758
10,042,263
Net interest income
22,195,687
19,332,864
Credit loss expense
1,112,473
732,100
Net interest income after credit loss expense
21,083,214
18,600,764
Non-interest income
Service fees
1,924,696
1,856,557
Income from sold loans
159,237
166,082
Other income from loans
887,238
601,927
Income from investment in CFS Partners
822,234
797,658
Other income
264,682
215,096
Total non-interest income
4,058,087
3,637,320
Non-interest expense
Salaries and wages
5,211,603
4,712,727
Employee benefits
2,214,118
2,074,245
Occupancy expenses, net
1,554,443
1,576,307
Other expenses
5,242,433
4,807,731
Total non-interest expense
14,222,597
13,171,010
Income before income taxes
10,918,704
9,067,074
Income tax expense
1,861,817
1,481,843
Net income
$
9,056,887
$
7,585,231
Earnings per common share
$
1.62
$
1.34
Weighted average number of common shares
used in computing earnings per share
5,590,465
5,608,997
Dividends declared per common share
$
0.50
$
0.48
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
Earnings Per Share ("EPS") (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
For the Quarter Ended June 30,
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2026
2025
2026
2025
(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income
$
4,688
$
4,060
$
9,057
$
7,585
Less: dividends to preferred shareholders
-
$
28
-
$
56
Net income available to common shareholders
$
4,688
$
4,032
$
9,057
$
7,529
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing earnings per share
5,594,749
5,612,675
5,590,465
5,608,997
Earnings per common share
$
0.84
$
0.72
$
1.62
$
1.34
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures
(unaudited)
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Quarter Ended
June 30, 2026
Computation of Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue
Net interest income
$
11,247,806
Non-interest income
$
2,312,747
Less: Non-interest expense
$
7,165,238
Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue
$
6,395,315
Computation of Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue return on average assets
Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue
$
6,395,315
Average Assets
$
1,228,309,434
Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue return on average assets
2.11
%
As of
June 30, 2026
December 31, 2025
June 30, 2025
Computation of Fully Diluted Tangible Book Value per Common Share
Total shareholders' equity
$
120,894
$
113,687
$
106,343
Less:
Preferred Stock
-
-
$
1,500
Common shareholders' equity
$
120,894
$
113,687
$
104,843
Less:
Goodwill
$
11,574
$
11,574
$
11,574
Other Intangibles
-
-
-
Tangible common shareholders' equity
$
109,320
$
102,113
$
93,269
Common shares issued and outstanding
5,601,858
5,582,927
5,608,914
Fully Diluted Tangible Book Value per Common Share
$
19.51
$
18.29
$
16.63
As of
June 30, 2026
December 31, 2025
June 30, 2025
Computation of Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
Common Equity
$
120,894
$
113,687
$
106,343
Less:
Goodwill
$
11,574
$
11,574
$
11,574
Other Intangibles
-
-
-
Tangible Common Equity
$
109,320
$
102,113
$
94,769
Total Assets
$
1,172,749
$
1,287,559
$
1,166,586
Less:
Goodwill
$
11,574
$
11,574
$
11,574
Other Intangibles
-
-
-
Tangible Assets
$
1,161,175
$
1,275,985
$
1,155,012
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
9.41
%
8.00
%
8.21
%
For more information, contact:
Investor Relations
[email protected]
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y., July 24, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: NECB) (the “Company”), the parent holding company of NorthEast Community Bank (the “Bank”), reported net income of $9.8 million, or $0.75 per basic share and $0.72 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to net income of $11.2 million, or $0.85 per basic share and $0.82 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025.
Key Takeaways Boston Beer's Q2 EPS fell 33% y/y to $3.65, while revenues declined 3.3% to $568 million.SAM's depletions dropped 6% as weakness across key brands offset growth in Sun Cruiser and Angry Orchard.SAM cut its 2026 capital spending forecast to $60-$80 million from $70-$90 million. The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM - Free Report) reported lower-than-expected revenues and earnings in second-quarter 2026. The top and bottom lines also fell year over year. It posted second-quarter adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $3.65, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.77. The reported number decreased 33% from the year-ago figure.
Net revenues declined 3.3% to $568 million and missed the consensus estimate of $572 million by 0.7%. Higher advertising, promotional and selling expenses, along with lower volumes, weighed on results.
SAM Faces Weaker Volumes and Brand PressureDepletions dipped 6% in the quarter, while shipment volume declined 4.5% to about 2 million barrels. Lower shipments of Twisted Tea, Truly, Samuel Adams, Hard Mountain Dew and Dogfish Head more than offset growth in Sun Cruiser and Angry Orchard.
Year-to-date depletions through the 26-week period ended June 27, 2026, decreased roughly 5% from the comparable period in 2025.
Boston Beer said distributor inventories were appropriate at the quarter-end and averaged roughly four and a half weeks on hand, unchanged from the comparable 2025 period. Favorable product mix and pricing partly cushioned the impact of lower volumes.
Analysis of Boston Beer’s Q2 Margins & ExpensesSAM reported a gross margin of 50.4%, up 60 basis points (bps) from the second quarter of 2025, benefiting from price increases, a favorable product mix, procurement savings and enhanced brewery efficiencies. The gain was partly offset by inflationary, commodity and tariff costs. Gross margin also included $1.6 million of shortfall fees and non-cash expenses of third-party production pre-payments in total, which hurt the metric by nearly 28 bps on an absolute basis.
Advertising, promotional and selling expenses increased 16.4%, or $26.2 million, from the prior-year quarter. The increase included $17.5 million of higher brand, local marketing and point-of-sale investments.
Freight costs rose $8.6 million because of higher rates, partly offset by lower volumes. General and administrative expenses increased $3.1 million, mainly because of higher legal fees and salary and benefit costs.
SAM Maintains Liquidity and Returns Cash to HoldersBoston Beer ended the quarter with $265.5 million in cash and no debt. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $117.6 million for the first 26 weeks of 2026, while capital expenditures were $22.9 million.
The company repurchased $54.1 million of Class A shares from Dec. 29, 2025, through July 17, 2026. About $174 million remained under its board-authorized $1.6 billion repurchase limit as of July 17.
SAM Updates 2026 GuidanceBoston Beer updated its full-year 2026 guidance while cautioning that results remain sensitive to volume trends, supply-chain execution, inflation, commodity costs and tariff policies. The company continues to expect depletions and shipments to decline in the low-single-digit to mid-single-digit range, with price increases of 1-2%. It raised the lower end of its gross margin outlook to 48.5% from 48%, while retaining the upper end at 50%. Tariff costs are still projected at $20-$30 million.
Management lowered its anticipated year-over-year increase in advertising, promotional and selling expenses to $0-$20 million from $20-$40 million expected earlier. It also revised the GAAP loss outlook to $6.23-$4.23 per share from a loss of $7.02-$5.02, reflecting a reduced litigation-related impact of $14.73 per share versus $15.52 previously. The adjusted tax rate forecast remains 29-30%, while adjusted earnings guidance was maintained at $8.50-$10.50 per share. Capital spending is now expected to be $60-$80 million, down from the prior projection of $70-$90 million.
The company continues to monitor commodity inflation, particularly energy costs, which affect freight and aluminum expenses. Supply-chain improvements implemented in 2025 have helped stabilize distributor inventory levels, though shipment timing is expected to influence second-half comparisons. Boston Beer anticipates shipments to decline in the low- to mid-single-digit range in the third quarter, followed by modest growth in the fourth quarter.
Gross margin improvement is expected to be most pronounced in the fourth quarter, aided by lower shortfall fees compared with the prior year. However, shortfall fees and non-cash expenses related to third-party production prepayments are still projected to reduce full-year gross margin by 40-60 basis points. Advertising investment is expected to decline year over year in the fourth quarter due to lower planned spending and a tough comparison with elevated production costs in the prior-year period.
This Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company’s shares have declined 25.5% in the past three months, underperforming the industry’s 3.8% growth.
SAM Stock's Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Stocks to ConsiderSome better-ranked stocks have been discussed below:
Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (FMX - Free Report) operates as a franchise bottler of Coca-Cola trademark beverages worldwide. It currently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for FMX's current fiscal-year sales and earnings indicates growth of 17.3% and 131%, respectively. FMX delivered a trailing four-quarter negative earnings surprise of nearly 17%, on average.
Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA - Free Report) manufactures and markets fresh deli-prepared foods in the United States. At present, the company flaunts a Zacks Rank of 1. Mama's Creations delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 129.2%, on average.
The consensus estimate for Mama's Creations’ current fiscal-year sales and earnings implies growth of 30% and 73.3%, respectively, from the year-ago figures.
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO - Free Report) develops, manufactures, markets and distributes coconut water products under the Vita Coco brand name. The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for COCO's current fiscal-year sales and earnings implies growth of 22.3% and 48.7%, respectively, from the year-ago actuals. COCO delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 11.7%, on average.
Southern California Edison today announced that more than 12,000 participants have sought compensation directly through its [url="]Wildfire Recovery Compensati
Investors interested in Insurance - Multi line stocks are likely familiar with Radian (RDN) and Axa Sa (AXAHY). But which of these two stocks presents investors with the better value opportunity right now?
Sheryl Palmer, Taylor Morrison CEO, joins 'Squawk on the Street' to discuss the company's merger with Berkshire Hathaway, what to expect from housing demand and much more.
SEI Investments (SEIC - Free Report) could be a solid choice for investors given the company's remarkably improving earnings outlook. While the stock has been a strong performer lately, this trend might continue since analysts are still raising their earnings estimates for the company.
Analysts' growing optimism on the earnings prospects of this investment management firm is driving estimates higher, which should get reflected in its stock price. After all, empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements. This insight is at the core of our stock rating tool -- the Zacks Rank.
The five-grade Zacks Rank system, which ranges from a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive externally-audited track record of outperformance, with Zacks #1 Ranked stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 2008.
Consensus earnings estimates for the next quarter and full year have moved considerably higher for SEI Investments, as there has been strong agreement among the covering analysts in raising estimates.
The chart below shows the evolution of forward 12-month Zacks Consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Current-Quarter Estimate RevisionsThe company is expected to earn $1.59 per share for the current quarter, which represents a year-over-year change of +22.3%.
Over the last 30 days, four estimates have moved higher for SEI compared to no negative revisions. As a result, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased 6.01%.
Current-Year Estimate RevisionsThe company is expected to earn $6.20 per share for the full year, which represents a change of +10.1% from the prior-year number.
There has been an encouraging trend in estimate revisions for the current year as well. Over the past month, four estimates have moved up for SEI versus no negative revisions. This has pushed the consensus estimate 5.4% higher.
Favorable Zacks RankThanks to promising estimate revisions, SEI currently carries a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). The Zacks Rank is a tried-and-tested rating tool that helps investors effectively harness the power of earnings estimate revisions and make the right investment decision.
You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Our research shows that stocks with Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and 2 (Buy) significantly outperform the S&P 500.
Bottom LineWhile strong estimate revisions for SEI have attracted decent investments and pushed the stock 10% higher over the past four weeks, further upside may still be left in the stock. So, you may consider adding it to your portfolio right away.
Key Takeaways FICO's Q3 revenues are expected to rise 26.64%, with earnings projected to grow 40.26% year over year.Higher mortgage pricing, healthy originations and Score 10T adoption may support FICO's Scores growth.FICO Platform ARR rose 49% to $349 million on customer wins, broader use cases and migrations. Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO - Free Report) is set to report its third-quarter 2026 results on July 29.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for third-quarter 2026 revenues is pegged at $679.31 million, suggesting an increase of 26.64% from the reported figure in the year-ago quarter.
The consensus mark for third-quarter 2026 earnings is pegged at $12.02 per share, down by 0.25% over the past 30 days, while indicating 40.26% year-over-year growth.
The company’s earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average surprise of 8.78%.
Let us see how things have shaped up prior to this announcement.
Factors Likely to Impact FICO’s Q3 PerformanceFICO's third-quarter 2026 performance is likely to have been driven by continued strength in its Scores business, supported by higher mortgage pricing and healthy origination activity. Mortgage origination revenues surged 127% year over year in the second quarter of 2026, reflecting the benefit of higher pricing and stronger volumes.
The rollout of FICO Score 10T is expected to have provided another growth tailwind in the to-be-reported quarter. During the second quarter of 2026, the company added 11 lenders to its Early Adopter Program, bringing the total to 55 lenders that represent more than $495 billion in annual serviceable mortgage originations. Three of the five largest mortgage resellers have signed up for the Direct Licensing Program, with the remaining two expected to join pending final regulatory approval. These developments are likely to have supported broader adoption of FICO Score 10T in the to-be-reported quarter.
Fair Isaac’s software business is also likely to have benefited from continued momentum in the FICO Platform. Total software ARR increased 10% year over year to $789 million in the second quarter of 2026, while Platform ARR jumped 49% to $349 million. Platform revenues grew 54%, supported by new customer wins, expanded use cases among existing customers and migrations to the platform. Management noted that software bookings are expected to be stronger in the second half of fiscal 2026 than in the first half, reflecting a healthy sales pipeline. This momentum is expected to have continued in the to-be-reported quarter as well.
FICO’s investments in explainable artificial intelligence (AI) and decisioning software are expected to remain a positive catalyst. The company highlighted that the FICO Platform is "agentic-by-design," with more than 150 customers using it across multiple use cases. Management noted that FICO has been issued 137 AI-related patents and continues to invest in explainable AI capabilities for highly regulated industries, strengthening its competitive positioning as enterprise AI adoption accelerates.
However, delays in regulatory approvals for the FICO Score 10T Direct Licensing Program and uncertainty regarding the timing of its commercial rollout could affect the pace of adoption in the to-be-reported quarter. Management continues to assume conservative mortgage volume trends, while macroeconomic conditions and housing market activity remain variables that could influence quarterly performance.
What Our Model Says About FICOPer the Zacks model, the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. But that is not the exact case here.
Fair Isaac currently has an Earnings ESP of -0.04% and a Zacks Rank #3. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.
Stocks to ConsiderHere are some companies worth considering, as our model shows that they have the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat in their upcoming releases.
Amphenol (APH - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +1.12% and a Zacks Rank #1 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Amphenol shares have gained 16.5% year to date. Amphenol is scheduled to report its second-quarter 2026 results on July 29.
ASE Technology (ASX - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +21.21% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present.
ASE Technology shares have surged 145.1% year to date. ASE Technology is set to report its second-quarter 2026 results on July 30.
Fortive (FTV - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +2.82% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present.
Fortive shares have gained 9.8% in the year-to-date period. Fortive is set to report its second-quarter 2026 results on July 29.
Key Takeaways Liquidia is seeing rapid YUTREPIA adoption, rising referrals, more prescribers and market-share gains.Energy Transfer's 140,000-mile pipeline network supports stable fee-based revenue across key U.S. basins.PBF Energy may benefit as strong refinery utilization offsets high-oil-price input costs. Oil prices are climbing again as the Iran war intensifies. This is creating uncertainty, and the market will likely be volatile. With fears dominating the market, it is an ideal time for investors to increase their allocation to low-beta companies. Stocks that seem to be good bets now are Liquidia Corporation (LQDA - Free Report) , Energy Transfer LP (ET - Free Report) and PBF Energy Inc. (PBF - Free Report) .
What Does Beta of a Stock Measure?
Beta measures the volatility or risk of a particular asset compared to the market. In other words, beta measures the extent of a security’s price movement relative to the market. In this article, we are considering the S&P 500 as the market.
If a stock has a beta of 1, then the price of the stock will move with the market. So, the stock is more volatile than the market if its beta is more than 1. In the same way, the stock is not as volatile as the market if its beta is less than 1.
For example, if the market offers a return of 20%, a stock with a beta of 3 will return 60%, which is overwhelming. Similarly, when the market slips 20%, the stock will sink 60%, which is devastating.
Screening Criteria Using Research Wizard:
We have taken a beta between 0 and 0.6 as our prime criterion for screening stocks that are less volatile than the market. However, this should not be the only factor to be considered while selecting a winning strategy. We need to take into account other parameters that can add value to the portfolio.
Percentage Change in Price in the Last 4 Weeks Greater Than Zero: This ensures that the stocks saw positive price movement over the last month.
Average 20-Day Volume Greater Than 50,000: A substantial trading volume ensures that the stocks are easily tradable.
Price Greater Than or Equal to $5: They must all be trading at a minimum of $5 or higher.
Zacks Rank Equal to 1 (Strong Buy):Zacks Rank #1 stocks indicate that they will significantly outperform the broader U.S. equity market over the next one to three months. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Here are three of the 24 stocks that qualified for the screening:
Liquidia
Liquidia is experiencing rapid growth in YUTREPIA adoption, with increasing patient referrals, expanding prescriber base and rising market share. The company has achieved profitability and is generating positive cash flow, supported by a strong cash position. It is also pursuing expansion into additional indications and larger market opportunities through ongoing and planned clinical developments.
Energy Transfer
Energy Transfer has a stable business model with its huge pipeline network of natural gas, oil and refined petroleum products across 140,000 miles. The partnership has midstream assets in all the key basins in the United States, generating stable fee-based revenues.
The partnership has offered a higher dividend yield than the composite stocks belonging to the industry over the past three consecutive years. For this year, the partnership is likely to see earnings growth of 18.2%.
PBF Energy
PBF Energy is among the leading refiners in the United States. Strong refinery utilization in the United States to meet resilient demand is expected to continue to offset the negative impacts of elevated input costs, driven by high oil prices. This is possibly aiding PBF’s bottom line.
These 3 Cash-Flow Stocks Give Investors More Than Just Growth PotentialComfort Systems USA NYSE: FIX reported second-quarter 2026 revenue above $3 billion for the first time, as demand from technology and industrial customers helped drive higher bookings, record backlog and sharply improved profitability.
Chief Executive Officer Brian Lane said the company generated $3.3 billion in quarterly revenue and earned $12.53 per share, a 92% increase from the prior-year period. The company’s backlog reached a record $14.1 billion at quarter-end, supported by continued technology-sector demand and favorable project margins.
Get Comfort Systems USA alerts:
Industrials Are Leading in 2026, But These ETFs Take Different Routes“We had a fantastic quarter with amazing execution by our teams,” Lane said. “Demand remains strong, especially in technology, as we continue to book work with good margins and favorable working conditions for our valuable people.”
Revenue, Profit and Cash Flow Rise Chief Financial Officer Bill George said second-quarter revenue increased by $1.1 billion from a year earlier, with same-store revenue up 44%. Electrical-segment revenue rose 81%, while mechanical-segment revenue increased 40%.
3 Infrastructure Stocks Fueling the Data Center Building BoomFor the first six months of 2026, same-store revenue grew 47%. The company expects full-year same-store revenue growth to finish in the mid- to high-30% range, George said.
Gross profit increased to $844 million from $510 million in the second quarter of 2025, while gross margin expanded to 25.9% from 23.5%. Mechanical gross margin rose to 25.6% from 22.9%, and electrical gross margin increased to 26.4% from 25.3%.
SG&A expense increased to $287 million from $210 million as the company invested in personnel and innovation, though SG&A as a percentage of revenue declined to 8.8% from 9.7%. Operating income rose 86% to $558 million, and operating margin increased to 17.1% from 13.8%.
Net income was $442 million, or $12.53 per share, compared with $231 million, or $6.53 per share, a year earlier. EBITDA increased 80% to $600 million, bringing trailing 12-month EBITDA to approximately $2 billion.
Free cash flow totaled $999 million in the quarter. George attributed the result partly to advanced customer cash, strong payment terms and broad-based project performance, rather than a single factor. He said the company expects cash flow over time to align with net income plus noncash expenses.
The company ended the quarter with a net cash position of more than $1.8 billion, despite acquisition spending and capital investments. It expects capital expenditures for the full year to equal approximately 5% of revenue, primarily supporting production facilities and modular capacity.
Backlog Expands as Technology Work Drives Demand President Trent McKenna said backlog increased by $1.6 billion sequentially, including a $1.4 billion same-store increase. Compared with a year earlier, total backlog increased $5.9 billion, or 73%, with $5.6 billion of the gain coming from same-store operations.
Same-store backlog entering the third quarter was 69% higher than a year earlier. McKenna said project pipelines remained at historically high levels, led by technology-sector construction and modular work.
Industrial customers accounted for 75% of first-half revenue. Technology, which is included within industrial, represented 58% of revenue, up from 40% in the prior year. Institutional markets, including education, healthcare and government, represented 17% of revenue. Commercial markets accounted for 8% of revenue. Construction represented 90% of revenue, while service represented 10%. New-building construction accounted for 75% of total revenue, including modular activity, while existing-building construction represented 15%. Modular revenue represented 17% of year-to-date revenue.
During the quarter, modular operations booked $510 million, enough to cover the business’s production activity and add roughly $500 million to backlog, according to George. The company said demand from customers remains consistent with its plans to expand modular manufacturing capacity.
Modular Capacity Plans Tied to Customer Commitments Comfort Systems USA has more than 3.5 million square feet of capacity dedicated to modular operations and expects to exceed 4 million square feet in production by year-end. It plans to reach approximately 5 million square feet of capacity by late summer 2027.
Management said the planned capacity expansion is principally intended to serve existing customers and existing orders. The company is pursuing pilot contracts with frontier labs and colocation providers, but said meaningful programmatic business from those newer customers would require additional manufacturing space.
George said the company will not add buildings solely on speculation and will expand only when customers provide meaningful multiyear commitments. He said recent capital investments have generated rapid returns, with projects producing what he described as full paybacks within one or two years.
Management said it does not see a slowdown in data-center demand despite public opposition and moratorium discussions in some markets. Lane said the company’s direct relationships with hyperscalers and key intermediaries provide visibility into customer plans, and that management sees “no letdown whatsoever” in their need to continue building capacity.
McKenna said much of the company’s current backlog consists of projects that were already planned and permitted. He added that modular capacity is more programmatic and can be directed toward customer locations as needed.
Acquisition and Capital Allocation The company also discussed its acquisition of Hunt Electric, a Utah-based electrical contractor that closed May 1. Lane said Hunt is expected to contribute approximately $250 million in annualized revenue.
McKenna said Hunt has begun pursuing opportunities jointly with Comfort Systems USA’s mechanical contractors in Utah and called it the premier electrical provider in that market.
Comfort Systems USA increased its quarterly dividend by $0.10 to $0.90 per share. George said capital allocation will continue to include investments in facilities, selective share repurchases and a patient approach to acquisitions.
Management also highlighted the longer-term service opportunity created by its growing data-center installed base. McKenna said service revenue increased 7% during the year and remains profitable, though the data-center service opportunity is expected to develop over time as newly constructed facilities move beyond warranty periods.
About Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX)Comfort Systems USA, Inc is a U.S.-based mechanical contracting company that provides a range of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) services to commercial, industrial and institutional customers. The company focuses on the design, installation, maintenance and repair of HVAC systems, and it supports projects from initial engineering and system selection through long-term service agreements and upgrades.
Its service offerings include new construction and retrofit installations, preventive and corrective maintenance, emergency repair, energy management and building automation systems.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Comfort Systems USA Right Now?Before you consider Comfort Systems USA, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Comfort Systems USA wasn't on the list.
While Comfort Systems USA currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Discover the 10 Best High-Yield Dividend Stocks for 2026 and secure reliable income in uncertain markets. Download the report now to identify top dividend payers and avoid common yield traps.
Getting big returns from financial portfolios, whether through stocks, bonds, ETFs, other securities, or a combination of all, is an investor's dream. But when you're an income investor, your primary focus is generating consistent cash flow from each of your liquid investments.
While cash flow can come from bond interest or interest from other types of investments, income investors hone in on dividends. A dividend is that coveted distribution of a company's earnings paid out to shareholders, and investors often view it by its dividend yield, a metric that measures the dividend as a percent of the current stock price. Many academic studies show that dividends account for significant portions of long-term returns, with dividend contributions exceeding one-third of total returns in many cases.
Associated Banc-Corp (ASB - Free Report) is headquartered in Green Bay, and is in the Finance sector. The stock has seen a price change of 17.47% since the start of the year. Currently paying a dividend of $0.24 per share, the company has a dividend yield of 3.17%. In comparison, the Banks - Midwest industry's yield is 2.51%, while the S&P 500's yield is 1.33%.
Looking at dividend growth, the company's current annualized dividend of $0.96 is up 3.2% from last year. Over the last 5 years, Associated Banc-Corp has increased its dividend 4 times on a year-over-year basis for an average annual increase of 5.59%. Looking ahead, future dividend growth will be dependent on earnings growth and payout ratio, which is the proportion of a company's annual earnings per share that it pays out as a dividend. Associated Banc-Corp's current payout ratio is 33%, meaning it paid out 33% of its trailing 12-month EPS as dividend.
Earnings growth looks solid for ASB for this fiscal year. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 is $2.91 per share, which represents a year-over-year growth rate of 5.05%.
From greatly improving stock investing profits and reducing overall portfolio risk to providing tax advantages, investors like dividends for a variety of different reasons. But, not every company offers a quarterly payout.
Big, established firms that have more secure profits are often seen as the best dividend options, but it's fairly uncommon to see high-growth businesses or tech start-ups offer their stockholders a dividend. Income investors must be conscious of the fact that high-yielding stocks tend to struggle during periods of rising interest rates. With that in mind, ASB is a compelling investment opportunity. Not only is it a strong dividend play, but the stock currently sits at a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold).
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 24, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE: BTU) between October 14, 2024 to May 4, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important August 24, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Peabody Energy common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Peabody Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/peabody-energy-corporation/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 24, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Peabody Energy's Centurion mine and the multitude of issues causing delays to the ramp-up and the return to full longwall production dates. On March 30, 2026, Peabody Energy issued a press release lowering guidance pertaining to Centurion mine's expected first quarter 2026 output ahead of Peabody Energy's full earnings release. In pertinent part, defendants announced that sales volume from the Centurion mine was expected to deliver approximately 250,000 tons in the first quarter due to mining commissioning challenges (compared to previous estimates of around 700,000 tons). When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Peabody Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/peabody-energy-corporation/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306469
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
AI, Satellites and Staples: Insiders Are Buying and Selling 3 Big NamesLamb Weston NYSE: LW reported higher fourth-quarter sales and continued volume growth in fiscal 2026, led by North America, while international operations faced pressure from weaker European demand, higher costs and disruption tied to the Middle East conflict.
Fourth-quarter net sales increased 6% from a year earlier, including a 7% increase in sales volume and a 2% favorable currency effect, partly offset by a 3% decline in price and mix. On a constant-currency basis, net sales rose 4%. The quarter marked Lamb Weston's sixth consecutive quarter of sales-volume growth.
Get Lamb Weston alerts:
Frozen Out: Lamb Weston Beats Earnings, but the Stock Still Slides“We made meaningful progress as an organization in fiscal 2026,” President and CEO Mike Smith said, pointing to the stabilization of the company’s North American business, progress on cost savings and reduced capital spending.
North America drives quarterly performance North America net sales rose 9% in the fourth quarter, as volume increased 11%, supported by customer wins, share gains, retention and an extra week in the fiscal calendar. Price and mix declined 2%, with price investments and a shift toward lower-priced channels, including chains and private label, each contributing to the decline.
5 Under-the-Radar Consumer Staples Stocks With Pricing PowerNorth American segment EBITDA increased 17%, or $45 million, in the quarter. Smith said volume growth, modest price-and-mix investment and cost savings more than offset inflation. The segment ended the fiscal year with a 26% EBITDA margin, according to Smith.
U.S. restaurant traffic was flat during the quarter, based on Circana Crest data cited by Chief Financial Officer Jim Gray. Quick-service restaurant traffic was also flat, as 3% growth in quick-service chicken traffic was largely offset by a 4% decline in quick-service burger traffic.
Smith said the company extended several large customer contracts during the year, supported customer rollouts and introduced higher-margin limited-time offers. He also said Lamb Weston’s U.S. net promoter score rose from the prior year and was the highest among major competitors, according to the company’s proprietary research.
For the full fiscal year, North America net sales increased 3%, with a 9% volume increase partly offset by a 6% price-and-mix decline. The company said the 53rd week in fiscal 2026 added $86 million to annual North American sales.
International business faces EMEA headwinds International net sales declined 2% in the fourth quarter. Sales volume fell 2% and price and mix declined 4%, while currency provided a partial offset. Growth in Asia-Pacific and Latin America was more than offset by conditions in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, including shipment disruption and higher freight costs resulting from the Middle East conflict.
Gray said quick-service traffic declined 2% in the U.K. and France and 1% in Italy during the quarter, while traffic rose slightly in Germany and Spain. The company also faced higher raw potato costs, lower fixed-cost absorption amid slower European demand and higher freight expenses.
For the full year, international sales increased 1%, aided by a 5% currency benefit and 2% volume growth, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Price and mix declined 6%. On a constant-currency basis, international sales declined 4%.
International EBITDA declined for the year due to lower organic sales in a competitive environment and higher manufacturing costs. The higher costs included write-offs of excess potatoes, lower utilization at international plants and startup expenses at the company’s Argentina facility.
Lamb Weston temporarily curtailed a line in the Netherlands during the fourth quarter and announced plans in June to close an older plant in Broekhuizenvorst, Netherlands. Smith said the facility represents about 10% of EMEA production capacity. He said the closure is expected to improve utilization by roughly 10 percentage points, moving utilization into the high-80% to low-90% range.
Executive Chair Jan Craps said the company is conducting a broader strategic review of its international footprint, evaluating country clusters, profit pools, resource allocation and potential roles for mergers and acquisitions, partnerships or divestitures. “Technically, everything is on the table,” Craps said in response to an analyst question, adding that more details are expected at an investor day planned for early calendar 2027.
Cash flow, cost savings and shareholder returns Full-year adjusted EBITDA declined 9%, as international challenges only partly offset gains in North America. The extra week added $29 million in adjusted EBITDA for the year.
The company generated $943 million of operating cash flow, up $75 million from the prior year, helped by $55 million of favorable working-capital changes. Capital expenditures fell by more than $240 million year over year to $410 million, resulting in free cash flow of $537 million.
Lamb Weston returned $321 million to shareholders during fiscal 2026, including $208 million in cash dividends and $113 million in share repurchases. The company repurchased $63 million of stock during the fourth quarter. It also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share, payable Sept. 4.
At year-end, the company had approximately $1.3 billion available under its revolving credit facility. Net debt was $3.8 billion, and its net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio was 3.4 times on a trailing 12-month basis.
Smith said the company exceeded its first-year cost-savings milestone under a program targeting at least $250 million in annualized run-rate savings by the end of fiscal 2028. The first-year target had been $100 million. Savings have come from supply-chain improvements, lower manufacturing cost per pound and reduced selling, general and administrative expenses, he said.
Fiscal 2027 outlook For fiscal 2027, Lamb Weston expects net sales ranging from flat to up 1% compared with a 52-week adjusted fiscal 2026 sales base of $6.5 billion. The company forecast adjusted operating income of $720 million to $800 million, adjusted EBITDA of $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $2.95 to $3.25, compared with adjusted EPS of $2.90 for the comparable 52-week fiscal 2026 period.
The outlook assumes flat global restaurant traffic. Gray said lower raw potato costs, further supply-chain savings, higher utilization and the absence of prior-year potato write-offs and Argentina startup costs are expected to be largely offset by inflation in other inputs.
North America sales are expected to range from flat to up low single digits on a comparable-week basis, with low-single-digit volume growth and a low-single-digit price-and-mix decline. International sales are expected to decline by low single digits, reflecting competitive conditions in EMEA, while international EBITDA is projected to improve 40% to 50% as prior-year charges are lapped. First-quarter fiscal 2027 sales are expected to be flat and EBITDA is expected to decline by the low teens before earnings growth accelerates through the remainder of the year. The company expects operating cash flow of $750 million to $800 million and capital expenditures of approximately $380 million to $410 million in fiscal 2027. On an accrual basis, it expects investments of up to $350 million as it applies tighter capital-allocation discipline.
About Lamb Weston (NYSE:LW)Lamb Weston, traded on the NYSE under the symbol LW, is a leading global processor and supplier of frozen potato products. The company's portfolio includes a variety of potato-based items such as French fries, potato wedges, hash browns and specialty cuts tailored to the foodservice and retail grocery channels. Lamb Weston serves quick-service restaurants, full-service operators, grocery chains and food distributors, offering customized product formats, packaging solutions and seasoning options to meet evolving customer demands.
Founded in 1950 and headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, Lamb Weston has grown from a regional processor into one of the world's largest producers of frozen potato products.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Lamb Weston Right Now?Before you consider Lamb Weston, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Lamb Weston wasn't on the list.
While Lamb Weston currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Click the link to see MarketBeat's list of seven stocks and why their long-term outlooks are very promising.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) Q4 2026 Earnings Call July 24, 2026 9:00 AM EDT
Company Participants
Debbie Hancock - Vice President of Investor Relations
Jan Eli B. Craps - Executive Chair
Mike Smith - President, CEO & Director
James Gray - Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Andrew Lazar - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division
Peter Galbo - BofA Securities, Research Division
Thomas Palmer - JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Max Andrew Gumport - BNP Paribas, Research Division
Scott Marks - Jefferies LLC, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Good day, and welcome to the Lamb Weston Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 Earnings Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Debbie Hancock. Please go ahead.
Debbie Hancock
Vice President of Investor Relations
Thank you. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Lamb Weston's Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 Earnings Call. I'm Debbie Hancock, Lamb Weston's Vice President of Investor Relations. Earlier today, we issued our press release and posted slides that we will use for our discussion today. You will find both on our website at lambweston.com.
Please note that during our remarks, we will make forward-looking statements about the company's expected performance that are based on our current expectations. Actual results may differ materially due to risks and uncertainties. Please refer to the cautionary statements and risk factors contained in our SEC filings for more details on our forward-looking statements.
Some of today's remarks include non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a replacement for and should be read together with our GAAP results. You can find the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations in our earnings release in the appendix to our presentation. Joining me today are Jan Craps, Executive Chair; Mike Smith, President and CEO; and Jim Gray, Chief Financial Officer.
Key Takeaways Lamb Weston's fiscal Q4 sales rose 6% as volume grew 7% for a sixth consecutive quarter.North America sales climbed 9% on contract wins, share gains, retention and an extra week.Fiscal 2027 sales are seen flat to up 1%, with adjusted EPS projected at $2.95-$3.25. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW - Free Report) reported solid fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results, wherein both top and bottom lines beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate. While net sales increased, earnings decreased from the year-ago period’s actuals.
LW’s adjusted earnings were 87 cents per share, down 5% year over year. However, the bottom line beats the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 62 cents.
Net sales amounted to $1,770.1 million, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1,701 million. The top line increased 6% year over year, driven by a 7% increase in sales volume, a 2% favorable currency impact and the benefit of an extra week, partially offset by a 3% decline in price/mix. Sales volume increased for the sixth consecutive quarter. Our model suggested a volume increase of 1.9% in the quarter.
LW’s Quarterly Results: Key Metrics & InsightsAdjusted gross profit decreased 0.2% year over year to $342.9 million. The adjusted gross margin decreased 110 basis points (bps) to 19.4%. Our model projected adjusted gross margin contraction of about 220 basis points to 18.4%.
Adjusted SG&A expenses were up 11.1% to $163.5 million from $147.1 million reported in the year-ago quarter. As a percentage of sales, the same increased 40 bps to 9.2%.
Adjusted EBITDA declined 2% to $287.6 million, while adjusted EBITDA margin contracted 130 bps to 16.2%.
LW Provides Q4 Insights by SegmentNet sales for the North America segment increased 9% to $1,206.2 million compared with the prior-year quarter, driven by 11% sales volume growth, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of volume growth. This increase was fueled by customer contract wins, market share gains, strong customer retention and the benefit of an additional week. The segment’s price/mix declined 2%, reflecting modest pricing and trade support for customers, as well as an ongoing mix shift toward faster-growing chain customers and private-label products.
The North America segment adjusted EBITDA increased 17% to $304.7 million, driven by higher sales volumes and lower manufacturing costs per pound, reflecting operating leverage from cost savings initiatives and improved manufacturing efficiencies. These benefits more than offset inflationary pressures, unfavorable price/mix and higher operating expenses.
Net sales for the International segment declined 2% to $563.9 million, reflecting a 2% decrease in sales volume and a 4% decline in price/mix, partially offset by a favorable foreign currency impact. Growth in Asia Pacific and Latin America, along with the benefit of an additional week, was more than offset by challenging market conditions in EMEA, including the impact of the Middle East conflict that began early in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026.
International segment adjusted EBITDA fell 81% to $11.8 million, primarily due to lower net sales, higher manufacturing costs per pound and increased operating expenses.
Lamb Weston’s Financial Health SnapshotThe company ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $68.2 million, long-term debt and financing obligations (excluding the current portion) of $3,595.2 million and total shareholders’ equity of $1,824.9 million.
Lamb Weston generated $942.9 million as net cash from operating activities for fiscal 2026, wherein capital expenditures amounted to $410.1 million.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, Lamb Weston returned $116 million to its shareholders through cash dividends and stock repurchases.
On July 23, management declared a quarterly dividend of 38 cents per share, payable on Sept. 4, to its shareholders of record as of Aug. 7, 2026.
What to Expect From LW in FY27?For fiscal 2027, Lamb Weston expects net sales to be flat to 1% growth over the adjusted fiscal 2026 52-week base of $6.5 billion. The company expects adjusted EBITDA to be between $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion, while adjusted EPS is projected at $2.95 to $3.25, compared with $3.01 in fiscal 2026. Capital expenditures are expected to be $380 million to $410 million.
LW’s Share Price PerformanceShares of this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company have gained 13.5% in the past three months compared with the industry’s 5.8% growth.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Stocks to ConsiderUnited Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI - Free Report) distributes natural, organic, specialty, produce and conventional grocery and non-food products in the United States and Canada. At present, United Natural sports a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The consensus estimate for United Natural’s current fiscal-year earnings implies growth of 254.9% from the year-ago figures. UNFI delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 29.9%, on average.
Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA - Free Report) manufactures and markets fresh deli-prepared foods in the United States. At present, MAMA holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy). Mama's Creations delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 129.2%, on average.
The consensus estimate for Mama's Creations’ current fiscal-year sales and earnings implies growth of 30% and 73.3%, respectively, from the year-ago figures.
Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL - Free Report) develops, processes and distributes various meat, nuts and other food products to foodservice, convenience store and commercial customers in the United States and internationally. It carries a Zacks Rank of 2 at present. HRL delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 3.2%, on average.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Hormel Foods’ current fiscal-year sales and earnings indicates growth of 1.4% and 9.5%, respectively, from the prior-year reported levels.
Key Takeaways AppFolio beat Q2 earnings and revenue estimates as Value Added Services and premium tiers grew.APPF raised 2026 revenue and non-GAAP operating margin guidance after a strong second quarter.AppFolio expanded premium-tier adoption, boosted cash flow and grew units under management to 9.6 million. AppFolio, Inc. (APPF - Free Report) reported second-quarter 2026 non-GAAP earnings of $1.71 per share, which increased 23.9% year over year. The bottom line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.67 by 2.4%.
Revenues rose 19.3% to $281 million and beat the consensus mark of $277 million by 1.5%. Growth reflected strength in Value Added Services, premium-tier adoption and new customer wins. Units under management increased 8% to 9.6 million.
APPF's Q2 Revenue Mix StrengthensSubscription Services revenues increased 14% year over year to $59.8 million. Management attributed the gain to new customer additions, growth in units under management and continued upgrades to the Plus and Max premium tiers.
Value Added Services revenues advanced 21.8% to $219.5 million, led by FolioGuard risk mitigation services, FolioScreen offerings and online payments. Resident Onboarding Lift, Move-In Services through LiveEasy and Realm-X Performers also contributed a growing share. Other revenues declined 37.2% to $1.9 million.
AppFolio Expands Platform AdoptionAppFolio ended the quarter with 22,751 customers, up 6% from 21,403 a year earlier. Nearly one in three units was on a premium tier compared with approximately one in four previously, indicating deeper adoption of the company’s Plus and Max offerings.
The company expanded Realm-X Flows, its workflow orchestration layer, to five times the number of triggers and more than 1,000 conditional routing options. Among customers using Flows, runs grew at a triple-digit rate across lead nurturing, rental applications, move-ins, delinquency and renewals.
Leasing Performer was involved in roughly half of completed showings for customers that deployed it. Bluestone’s use of the product handled more than 10,000 leads, 55% of which arrived after hours, while delivering an average response time of less than nine seconds.
APPF Widens Operating MarginsNon-GAAP operating income grew 23.8% year over year to $76.2 million. The non-GAAP operating margin expanded 90 basis points to 27.1%, reflecting operating leverage as revenues grew faster than several expense categories.
GAAP operating income increased 30.8% to $53 million, while the corresponding margin improved 160 basis points to 18.8%. GAAP net income rose 15.5% to $41.5 million.
Non-GAAP cost of revenues, excluding depreciation and amortization, was 36% of revenues, up from 35%. Operating efficiencies were offset by the payments product mix and incremental data-center capacity supporting increased customer use of AI capabilities.
Research and development declined to 15% of revenues from 16%, aided by productivity gains from AI tools. Sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses remained at 14% and 7% of revenues, respectively. The workforce grew 3% to 1,732 employees.
AppFolio's Cash Flow and Balance SheetOperating cash flow totaled $87.6 million, up 66.4% from $52.6 million in the year-ago quarter. The measure represented 31.2% of revenues compared with 22.3% a year earlier, highlighting stronger cash conversion alongside profit growth.
APPF ended June with $217.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $4.3 million in current investment securities. The company had no borrowings under its $150 million revolving credit facility and remained in compliance with its covenants.
The company did not repurchase shares during the second quarter after spending $125 million on buybacks in the first quarter. Management said its capital-allocation priorities remain focused on business investment, with repurchases conducted opportunistically.
APPF Raises 2026 OutlookAppFolio raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $1.117-$1.127 billion. The midpoint implies 18% growth, supported by premium-tier adoption, new business units and increased use of offerings, including agentic AI Performers and resident services. The Zacks Consensus Estimates for AppFolio’s revenues are pegged at $1.12 billion, implying a year-over-year increase of 17.5%.
The outlook assumes a more moderate pace of unit expansion among existing customers, while new customer acquisition and retention remain healthy. Management expects Subscription Services and Value Added Services seasonality to be broadly consistent with 2025.
The company also lifted its non-GAAP operating margin outlook to 26.5-28%. Management expects cost of revenues, excluding depreciation and amortization, to remain relatively flat as a percentage of revenues compared with 2025. Diluted weighted-average shares are projected at approximately 36 million.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AppFolio’s earnings in 2026 is pegged at $6.75, implying a year-over-year increase of 28%.
Zacks Rank and Stocks to ConsiderCurrently, TXN carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Some better top-ranked stocks in the broader Zacks Computer and Technology sector are Analog Devices (ADI - Free Report) , Applied Materials (AMAT - Free Report) and Cisco Systems (CSCO - Free Report) , each carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Shares of Analog Devices have rallied 69.6% year to date. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ADI’s fiscal 2026 earnings is pegged at $12.42 per share, down by a penny over the past seven days, indicating an increase of 59.4% year over year.
Shares of Applied Materials have skyrocketed 196.2% year to date. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AMAT’s fiscal 2026 earnings is pegged at $12.14 per share, up by a penny over the past seven days, indicating a rise of 28.9% year over year.
Cisco Systems shares have surged 63.6% year to date. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CSCO’s fiscal 2026 earnings is pegged at $4.28 per share, unchanged over the past 30 days, indicating an increase of 12.3% year over year.
HTX Named in EU's Latest Russia Sanctions PackageCryptocurrency exchange HTX was sanctioned by the European Union on Thursday as part of the bloc's latest effort to tighten pressure on Russia's financial system. HTX was included in a list of 18 companies providing crypto services, and was formerly known as Huobi, established in China in 2013. Hong Kong-based billionaire Justin Sun (@justinsuntron) bought a controlling stake in the exchange in 2022.
The EU said the 18 listed companies helped Russians evade sanctions. EU authorities included the crypto companies in the bloc's 21st sanctions package against Russia over the war in Ukraine. The EU's latest sanctions package against Russia over its war in Ukraine targets banks, cryptocurrency networks, oil traders, the shadow fleet, and Russian energy revenues.
The EU's sanctioning of HTX does not amount to a full designation and does not include an asset freeze. Instead, the listing bans EU operators from transacting with the exchange, placing a compliance burden on European counterparties without directly freezing HTX's assets.
UK Action Came First, HTX Pushed BackHTX had already faced sanctions in the United Kingdom. On May 26, British authorities targeted Huobi Global S.A., the Panama-based company behind HTX, over alleged financial services involving A7 and Garantex, two entities previously sanctioned over their links to Russia. The UK Foreign Office alleged that HTX provided services to A7, a payments network backed by Russian state-controlled Promsvyazbank, and Moscow-based crypto exchange Garantex. British restrictions included an asset freeze and barred UK companies from processing payments or maintaining financial relationships with the designated entities.
The UK government suspects HTX of channeling over $1.5 billion to Russia to help the regime bypass international trade blockades. HTX responded to the UK action by arguing that Huobi Global S.A. was a legally distinct Panama entity, separate from the trading platform itself. HTX argued that the UK action targeted Huobi Global S.A. as a distinct legal entity and that the trading platform's operations remained unaffected. The EU's latest listing places both HTX and Huobi Global S.A. side by side, making that distinction harder to sustain.
The sanctions are the latest sign of countries cracking down on the use of crypto to move funds outside the mainstream financial system. HTX is the largest exchange yet caught in the Russia sanctions net, and the coordinated EU and UK actions signal that offshore platforms of any scale are now within reach of Western enforcement.
HTX did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Sources:
Reuters via Euronext: Crypto exchange HTX included in EU's Russia sanctions
Finance Magnates: EU Adds HTX to Russia Sanctions Two Months After UK's Action
Chainalysis: UK Sanctions Crypto Companies With Russia Ties
Key Takeaways CMCSA wireless added a record 448K lines as Connectivity & Platforms EBITDA beat estimates.Peacock's first EBITDA profit helped Media EBITDA beat estimates on sports and ad strength.Studios EBITDA beat estimates, while Theme Parks EBITDA missed on weaker attendance. Comcast (CMCSA - Free Report) reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.04, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 7 cents and declined 16.7% year over year.
Revenues of $29.94 billion beat the consensus mark by 2.33% and declined 1.2% year over year, though pro forma revenues, which adjust for the Versant separation and the sale of Sky's German operations, increased 4.7%. (Read More: Comcast's Q2 Earnings Surpass Estimates, Revenues Decrease Y/Y)
The company ended the quarter with 10.2 million domestic wireless lines, up from 8.5 million in the prior year period. However, total domestic broadband customers declined to 28.5 million from 29 million. Adjusted EBITDA declined 13.4% to $8.9 billion, or 5.3% on a pro forma basis.
Wireless and Peacock Strength Drive Segment BeatsDomestic wireless line net additions of 448,000 marked the company's best quarterly result on record and beat the consensus estimate by 11.64%. Domestic broadband customer net losses of 167,000 came in worse than expected, missing the consensus mark by 3.43%, while domestic video customer net losses of 280,000 also missed estimates by 2.28%.
At Media, Peacock achieved quarterly profitability for the first time, generating EBITDA of $189 million compared with a loss of $101 million in the prior year period, on the back of the NBA playoffs, the FIFA World Cup and Love Island USA. Media Adjusted EBITDA of $708 million beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 34.63%.
Studios also outperformed, with Adjusted EBITDA of $202 million beating the consensus mark by 18.07%, supported by strong theatrical performance across the slate.
Connectivity & Platforms Beats While Theme Parks MissTotal Connectivity & Platforms Adjusted EBITDA of $7.96 billion declined year over year but beat the consensus estimate by 0.69%. Within the segment, Residential Connectivity & Platforms Adjusted EBITDA of $6.45 billion beat estimates by 0.25%, while Business Services Connectivity Adjusted EBITDA of $1.52 billion beat by 2.34%, aided by growth in enterprise solutions offerings.
Theme Parks Adjusted EBITDA of $609 million missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.72%, pressured by softening attendance in Orlando amid higher travel costs and weaker consumer sentiment, as well as continued China-related travel restrictions affecting the Osaka park.
Total Content & Experiences Adjusted EBITDA of $1.33 billion beat the consensus mark by 13.48%, as strength in Media and Studios more than offset the Theme Parks shortfall.
Broadband and Advertising Revenue Top EstimatesDomestic broadband revenues declined 5.5% to $6.28 billion, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.45%, as lower average rates and a smaller customer base weighed on the top line despite the beat.
Media domestic advertising revenue rose 55% to $2.16 billion, beating the consensus mark by 12.24%, driven in part by incremental FIFA World Cup advertising along with stronger NBA and Peacock advertising demand.
Within Content & Experiences, Studios content licensing revenues declined slightly to $1.80 billion, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 7.04%, as lower film studio licensing activity offset gains at the television studios.
Studios’ theatrical revenues, however, surged to $972 million from $284 million a year earlier, beating the consensus mark by 199.46%, powered by The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, Obsession and the international distribution of Michael.
Comcast generated free cash flow of $4.6 billion in the quarter and returned $2.1 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
Zacks Rank & Stocks to ConsiderComcast currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
Some better-ranked stocks in the broader Zacks Consumer Discretionary sector are Cimpress (CMPR - Free Report) , The Marcus (MCS - Free Report) and News Corporation (NWSA - Free Report) , each currently sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Shares of Cimpress have returned 46.2% in the year-to-date period. Cimpress is slated to report fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results on July 29.
Shares of The Marcus have returned 53.4% in the year-to-date period. The Marcus is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 30.
Shares of News Corporation have returned 0.8% in the year-to-date period. News Corporation is slated to report its fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results on Aug. 05.
Key Takeaways Cadence reports Q2 results on July 27, with EPS and revenues expected to rise more than 20%.Recurring revenues, an $8 billion backlog and rising EDA spending support Cadence's outlook.Macroeconomic uncertainty, U.S.-China tensions and stiff competition remain concerns. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS - Free Report) will release results for the second quarter of 2026 on July 27.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is $2.05 per share, unchanged in the past 60 days. The consensus mark implies a 24.2% increase from the year-ago actual. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pinned at $1.58 billion, indicating a nearly 23.6% uptick from the year-ago actual.
Management expects revenues to be $1.555-$1.595 billion for the second quarter. The company reported sales of $1.275 billion in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP EPS is anticipated to be between $2.02 and $2.08. The company reported an EPS of $1.65 in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP operating margin is estimated to be between 44.5% and 45.5% in the second quarter.
Cadence has an impressive earnings surprise history. The company’s earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, with an average surprise of 5.48%.
Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
CDNS stock has gained 2.7% in the past six months against the Computer-Software industry’s decline of 22.7%. The S&P 500 composite and the Zacks Computer and Technology sector have risen 5.6% and 8.7%, respectively, in the same time frame.
Factors Shaping CDNS’ Q2 ResultsBroad-based momentum across electronic design automation (“EDA”), IP and System Design & Analysis (“SDA”), supported by robust bookings, improving pricing dynamics and sustained demand tied to AI-driven semiconductor complexity, remains a key catalyst.
AI has been driving a major transformation in semiconductor and system design and Cadence is deeply integrated into this shift. Design activity across several verticals, especially data centers, drones, robotics and automotive, has been robust, due to AI, hyperscale computing and 5G. The focus on Generative AI, Agentic AI and Physical AI has been leading to an exponential increase in computing demand and semiconductor innovation.
Rising customer R&D investments in AI-driven automation have been creating a favorable demand environment for Cadence. On the last earnings call, Management noted that EDA spending has now increased from approximately 7% to 11% of customer R&D budgets, and this is expected to rise further with AI-driven automation.
The launch of ChipStack AI Super Agent (February 2026), the industry’s first agentic AI workflow purpose-built for front-end silicon design and verification, bodes well. Cadence acquired Chipstack, which provides agentic AI solutions for chip verification, in November 2025. On the last earnings call, the company emphasized its agentic AI strategy, including the launch of AgentStack framework and new AI Super Agents (ViraStack and InnoStack) that are designed to automate more of the chip design workflow. Cadence expects agentic tools to drive higher EDA consumption and usage across its platform as customers run more simulations, verification and implementation cycles.
Cadence’s ratable software model and high mix of recurring revenues are other positives. At the end of the first quarter of 2026, Cadence had a backlog of $8 billion.
The company has been collaborating with several tech giants, including Qualcomm and NVIDIA, on their next-generation AI designs across both training and inference. Expanding partnerships with its foundry partners, like Samsung, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Intel and Arm Holdings, bodes well.
Ongoing uncertainty prevailing over global macroeconomic conditions, especially U.S.-China tech tensions, along with stiff competition in the EDA space and inflation, remains a concern ahead of the first-quarter earnings. China contributed to about 13% of first-quarter 2026 revenues and management expects 2026 contribution to be about the same percentage.
Taking a Look at SegmentsCore electronic design automation (“EDA”) business (which constitutes Custom IC, Digital IC and Functional Verification businesses) is likely to have gained from demand for the new hardware systems, especially among AI, automotive and high-performance computing clients. Uptake of solutions such as Cerebrus AI Studio, Virtuoso Studio, Xcelium, Verisium SimAI and ChipStack is likely to have cushioned the segment’s performance.
The SDA division is likely to have gained from the increasing demand for BETA CAE solutions, along with 3D-IC, Sigrity and Clarity.
The IP business has been gaining from an expanding silicon solutions portfolio and increasing demand for solutions in AI, HPC and automotive use cases. The company has been witnessing higher demand for its Star IP portfolio across interface, memory and foundation IP amid higher complexity of advanced node designs and chiplet-based architectures.
Earnings Whispers for CDNSOur proven model does not predict an earnings beat for Cadence this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. This is not the case here.
CDNS currently has a Zacks Rank #3 and an Earnings ESP of 0.00%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.
Stocks to ConsiderHere are a few stocks that you may want to consider, as our model shows that these have the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat this season.
Celestica (CLS - Free Report) currently has an Earnings ESP of +1.86% and a Zacks Rank #2. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Celestica is scheduled to report quarterly earnings on July 27. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CLS’ to-be-reported quarter’s earnings and revenues stands at $2.29 per share and $4.35 billion, respectively. Shares of Celestica have gained 96.7% in the past year.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +1.75% and a Zacks Rank #1 at present. STX is scheduled to report quarterly figures on July 28. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Seagate Technology’s to-be-reported quarter’s earnings and revenues is pinned at $5.10 per share and $3.49 billion, respectively. Shares of Seagate Technology are up 505.3% in the past year.
Teradyne (TER - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +0.59% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present. The company is scheduled to report quarterly figures on July 28. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Teradyne’s to-be-reported quarter’s earnings and revenues is pinned at $2.04 per share and $1.22 billion, respectively. Shares of Teradyne are up 314.6% in the past year.
Paul Cunningham, Sr. Vice President of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS +1.09%), sold 2,000 shares of common stock on July 15, 2026, as disclosed in a recent SEC Form 4 filing.
Transaction summaryMetricValueTransaction value~$767,000Shares sold2,000Post-transaction shares (directly held)125,586Post-transaction value$46.66 millionTransaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average sale price ($383.36); post-transaction value based on July 15, 2026 market close ($371.50).
Key questionsWhat is the current scale of the executive's remaining interest?
Paul Cunningham maintains 125,586 direct shares valued at $46.66 million, representing a 0.0455% insider ownership stake in the $91.0 billion company.What market context surrounded the timing of this disposition?
The sale occurred while the stock was priced at $371.50 at the July 15, 2026 market close, following a 17% one-year total return as of the transaction date.How does this transaction relate to the executive's equity compensation schedule?
The shares were acquired through the exercise of options that vested at a rate of 1/48th per month beginning in March 2021, with 8,328 derivative securities remaining in the executive's holdings.What are the fundamental indicators for the company at the time of filing?
Cadence Design Systems reported trailing twelve-month revenue of $5.5 billion and net income of $1.2 billion, supported by a workforce of 13,800 employees.Company OverviewMetricValueShare Price (as of market close 2026-07-16)$364.65Market Capitalization$100.6 billionRevenue (TTM)$5.5 billionNet Income (TTM)$1.2 billionCompany SnapshotCadence Design Systems delivers a comprehensive portfolio of electronic design automation (EDA) software, specialized hardware platforms, professional services, and pre-designed integrated circuit building blocks that enable semiconductor and systems companies to design, verify, and manufacture advanced chips.The company generates revenue through software licensing, subscription-based services, hardware sales for emulation and prototyping platforms, and professional consulting services that support customers throughout the semiconductor design and verification lifecycle.Cadence serves semiconductor manufacturers, fabless design companies, and systems-on-chip developers globally, with particular strength in serving enterprise customers requiring advanced functional verification, simulation, and emulation capabilities for complex chip design.Cadence Design Systems is a global leader in electronic design automation with a market capitalization of $100.6 billion and TTM revenue of $5.5 billion, commanding a dominant position in the semiconductor design software market. The company's integrated platform approach—combining software tools such as JasperGold for formal verification and Xcelium for logic simulation with enterprise-grade hardware platforms including Palladium emulation and Protium prototyping systems—creates significant switching costs and customer lock-in. With 13,800 employees and a TTM net income of $1.2 billion, Cadence demonstrates strong operational leverage and profitability while maintaining strategic focus on next-generation chip design methodologies and artificial intelligence-driven design automation capabilities.
What this transaction means for investorsCunningham’s sale of Cadence shares likely should not concern investors.
It occurred under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, indicating it was a pre-planned sale driven by portfolio management rather than concerns about the company. Moreover, the fact that he sold around 2% of his direct holdings strongly indicates that he remains bullish on the tech stock.
This logic appears sound. As previously mentioned, Cadence stock has risen over the last year. Rising demand related to AI and high-performance computing (HPC) has helped boost revenue. Furthermore, it has made tech-related deals with companies such as Intel and Samsung.
Today's Change
(
1.09
%) $
3.59
Current Price
$
334.05
Additionally, it remains a leader in the electronic design automation (EDA), which is critical in the design, simulation, and manufacture of semiconductors.
Admittedly, considering its P/E ratio of 85, now may not be a great time to add shares. Still, considering the AI-driven growth in its industry, now is a good time to focus on holding the 98% of shares Cunningham chose to keep rather than the modest amount he sold.
Will Healy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Cadence Design Systems and Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Americké akciové trhy rostou díky naději na obnovení rozhovorů mezi USA a Íránem a zmírnění napětí na Blízkém východě.
Širší index S&P 500 posiluje o 0,41 % na 7438,47 bodu a index Dow Jones si připisuje 0,56 % na 52002,68 bodu. Technologie však mírně zaostávají, technologický Nasdaq Composite odepisuje 0,07 % na 25120,91 bodu. Pozitivní náladu na trhu podporuje také úspěšný start výsledkové sezóny, v níž většina firem překonává očekávání ziskovosti.
V rámci jednotlivých odvětví indexu S&P 500 vykazují nejsilnější růst reality o 2,6 %, následované základními materiály s nárůstem o 1,2 % a nezbytnou spotřebou, která si připisuje 0,8 %. Na druhé straně zaznamenávají jen mírné zisky zbytná spotřeba, informační technologie i utility, které shodně přidávají 0,1 %.
Mezi nejsilnější individuální akcie se řadí Digital Realty Trust (DLR) s prudkým růstem o 14 %. Výrazně posiluje také SLB (SLB) o 10 %, Smurfit Westrock (SW) o 7,9 %, Equinix (EQIX) o 6,3 % a International Paper (IP), která si připisuje 6,2 %. Na opačné straně trhu po výprodejích v technologickém a dodavatelském sektoru klesá Coherent Corp (COHR) o 7,8 %. Nedaří se ani firmám Sandisk Corp (SNDK) a CH Robinson Worldwide (CHRW), které shodně odepisují 7,5 %, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) s poklesem o 6,9 % a Robinhood Markets (HOOD), jež oslabuje o 6,1 %.
Zprávy o možném uklidnění situace na Blízkém východě tlačí dolů ceny energií. Severoamerická lehká ropa WTI klesá o 4,2 % na 88,31 dolaru za barel. Spotové zlato naopak mírně posiluje o 0,4 % na 4064,95 dolaru za unci. Americký dolar vykazuje stabilní vývoj, když k euru zůstává téměř bez změny na 1,1379 dolaru, britská libra mírně roste o 0,1 % na 1,3333 dolaru a japonský jen drží úroveň 163,76 jenu za dolar. Pokles cen ropy zmírňuje obavy z inflace, což vede ke poklesu výnosů desetiletých amerických vládních dluhopisů o tři bazické body na 4,66 %. Bitcoin reaguje na celkový vývoj poklesem o 1,9 % na 63850,84 dolaru.
Index Dow Jones +0,56 % na 52002,68 b.
S&P 500 +0,41 % na 7438,47 b.
Nasdaq Composite -0,07 % na 25120,91 b.
Index S&P 500 +0,41 % na 7438,47 b. Nejsilnější sektory S&P Změna Nejslabší sektory S&P Změna Reality +2,6 % Zbytná spotřeba +0,1 % Základní materiály +1,2 % Informační technologie +0,1 % Nezbytná spotřeba +0,8 % Utility +0,1 % Nejsilnější akcie S&P Změna Nejslabší akcie S&P Změna Digital Realty Trust (DLR) +14 % Coherent Corp (COHR) -7,8 % SLB (SLB) +10 % Sandisk Corp (SNDK) -7,5 % Smurfit Westrock (SW) +7,9 % CH Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -7,5 % Equinix (EQIX) +6,3 % Lumentum Holdings (LITE) -6,9 % International Paper (IP) +6,2 % Robinhood Markets (HOOD) -6,1 %
Daniel Marván, Fio banka, a.s.
Four VPN providers reliably take TRON: GnuVPN, NordVPN, Surfshark, and Ivacy. Only one of them treats TRON as a first-class payment option instead of one line in a processor’s coin list.
If you are looking for a VPN that accepts TRON because you already hold TRX or USDT on TRC20, the network is a good fit for a subscription payment. Transfers clear in about three seconds for well under a dollar, which matters more on a $67 purchase than it does on a large transfer.
Here is who accepts it, how each one handles the payment, and where the differences actually show up.
Why TRON Suits a Subscription Payment Table of Contents
Why TRON Suits a Subscription PaymentThe Providers That Accept TRON1. GnuVPN2. NordVPN3. Surfshark4. IvacyChosen, or Inherited From the ProcessorFAQWhich VPN is best for paying with TRX?Can I pay for a VPN with USDT on TRC20 instead of TRX?What happens if I send TRC20 funds to the wrong network?Is paying for a VPN with TRON anonymous?Does NordVPN accept TRON directly? TRON was built for cheap, fast transfers, and a VPN subscription is exactly the kind of small payment that punishes you on other networks.
Send USDT as an ERC20 token on Ethereum, and you pay gas, which can run from a couple of dollars to more than thirty when the network is busy. Send the same dollar as a TRC20 token on TRON, and you pay energy and bandwidth, which usually works out to cents.
TRON also cut its own costs recently. Network proposal #104 halved the energy price for USDT transfers in August 2025, pushing a typical send well under a dollar.
Here is how the common options compare on a single VPN payment:
Network Typical fee Settlement Cost on a $67 plan TRON (TRC20) Under $1 About 3 seconds Under 1.5% Ethereum (ERC20) $2 to $35 About 15 minutes 3% to 45% Bitcoin $1 to $5 10 to 60 minutes 1.5% to 7% Litecoin Cents 5 to 15 minutes Under 1% The spread is the reason buying VPN with TRON is a question worth asking before you default to Bitcoin at checkout.
The VPNs that accept TRX arrive at it in two different ways. Three route the payment through a third-party gateway that happens to support TRON, and one lists it directly.
1. GnuVPN A Portugal-based provider built around protocol choice, running SoftEther and AmneziaWG alongside WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2. It is the only provider here that names TRON as a payment option in its own right.
Accepts: TRX and USDT on TRC20, plus Bitcoin and Litecoin How it works: a GnuVPN TRON payment is one of four named coins, not an entry buried in a dropdown of twenty Price: from $2.79/month on the two-year plan, $66.99 upfront Settlement: GnuVPN TRC20 transfers clear in roughly three seconds for under a dollar Trade-off: 55+ countries and 5 devices, a smaller network than the majors, and a shorter refund window If you already hold USDT on TRON, this is the shortest path from wallet to subscription on this list.
2. NordVPN The largest name in consumer VPNs, based in Panama, with five audited no-logs assessments and servers in over 110 countries. Its crypto support is broad and its customers use it.
Accepts: 10+ coins including TRX, BTC, ETH, USDT, XRP, LTC, SOL and DOGE Processors: CoinGate, BinancePay and BitPay Worth knowing: TRX accounts for 5.4% of NordVPN’s crypto payments, with USDT at 29.1% and Bitcoin at 40.9% Price: from $3.09/month, backed by a 30-day money-back guarantee NordVPN is the strongest all-round service here. TRON is available, but it is one option among many, not a deliberate focus.
3. Surfshark A budget-focused provider offering unlimited simultaneous devices on every plan, run by Nord Security since the 2022 merger. It carries the longest coin list of any mainstream VPN.
Accepts: 13+ coins including TRX, BTC, ETH, LTC, BNB, SOL, BCH, XRP, DOGE, SHIB, USDT and DAI Processors: CoinGate and CoinPayments Price: from roughly $2.49/month, with a 30-day money-back guarantee Trade-off: crypto checkout is web-only and desktop-only If you hold an unusual altcoin, Surfshark is the most likely provider on this list to take it.
4. Ivacy A budget provider known for long-term plans at low headline prices. Its crypto support comes through two gateways, not a direct integration.
Accepts: TRX, plus Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, XRP, Cardano, Dogecoin and the wider CoinGate list Processors: CoinGate and BitPay Worth knowing: TRON appears explicitly in its published coin list, which is not true of most providers this size Ivacy is the cheapest way onto this list, though it competes on price, not on protocol depth or network size.
Chosen, or Inherited From the Processor Here is the distinction that decides which of these actually suits a TRON holder.
Three of the four accept TRX because their payment processor supports it. CoinGate runs a dedicated TRON payment gateway, so any merchant using it can display TRX at checkout without making a decision about TRON at all. NordVPN, Surfshark and Ivacy all fall into that group.
That is not a criticism. Broad processor support is genuinely useful, and it is why Surfshark can take thirteen coins. But it does mean TRON is a byproduct, not a priority, and it shows in the checkout experience: one ticker among twenty, with no particular attention paid to the network you are sending on.
GnuVPN crypto payment support works the other way around. Four coins, each named, with the network stated for every one. A VPN TRC20 payment there is a labelled option, not something you locate in a dropdown and hope you have selected the right chain on.
For most purchases that distinction is cosmetic. On TRON it is not, because sending TRC20 funds to an address on the wrong network is the most common way people lose money at crypto checkout.
FAQ Which VPN is best for paying with TRX? It depends on what you want from the VPN itself. For the cleanest TRON experience, GnuVPN names TRX and USDT-TRC20 directly and clears in seconds. For the largest server network, NordVPN takes TRX through CoinGate. For unlimited devices, Surfshark does the same.
Can I pay for a VPN with USDT on TRC20 instead of TRX? Yes, and for most people it is the better choice. USDT on TRC20 is a stablecoin, so the amount you send is the amount that arrives, with no price movement while the transfer confirms. GnuVPN, NordVPN and Surfshark all support it.
What happens if I send TRC20 funds to the wrong network? The transaction confirms on the chain you selected, so the funds are not destroyed, but the receiving address cannot reach them unless someone controls the private key for that network. A TRON address starts with T, and an Ethereum address starts with 0x. Check the prefix before you send, and send a small test amount first.
Is paying for a VPN with TRON anonymous? No. Paying for a VPN with TRX removes the card and bank link, which is real, but you still provide an email address and connect from a real IP when you sign up. Most providers also route the payment through a KYC-compliant processor. It is more private than a card. It is not anonymous.
Does NordVPN accept TRON directly? No. NordVPN accepts TRX through CoinGate and BinancePay, which are third-party gateways, not a direct wallet transfer. The same applies to Surfshark and Ivacy. Among providers on this list, only GnuVPN lists TRON as a named option in its own checkout.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Submit proposals & participate in on-chain governance
DocumentationFaucetBscScanBSCTraceDocumentationFaucetBridgeopBNBScanDocumentationFaucetBridgeGreenfieldScanDCellarLearn more about FusionToken Recovery ToolBeacon Chain ExplorerNative StakingLiquid Staking
Build
GET STARTED
Wallets
Your gateway to BNB Chain
Examples & Tutorials
Start with example and tutorials
Networks and RPC
A list of BNB Chain related networks
Faucet
Pilot tokens on BNB Smart Chain
ADVANCED
Documentation
Full technical documentation
Tools
Essential tools for builders
EXPLORERS
BscScan
opBNBScan
GreenfieldScan
SOLUTIONS
Institutional Finance
Privacy
Agent Infrastructure
Real World Assets Tokenization
Stablecoin
Payment
BNB Agent Studio
Submit dApps
Explore
Release Note
Strategic updates for your advantage
Blog
Follow our blog for the latest updates
Wallets
Securely connect to funds & dApps
Explore dApps
Explore dApps on BNB Chain
Bridge
Cross-chain transfer between networks
Get BNB
Get BNB & explore use cases
Accelerate
Ideation
BNB Hack
Explore online & offline hackathons on BNB Chain
BNB Incubation Alliance (BIA)
Building together to fast-track your Web3 journey
Most Valuable Builder Accelerator Program (MVB)
Incubation for top Web3 projects
Deployment
BNB Chain Grants
Grants for ecosystem builders
Kickstart
Explore essential tools & support
Space
Builder Bunker
A Workspace to Meet & Build
See All Programs
Connect
Community
Community Hub
Connect with the community
Build N’ Build Forum
A public, community-driven dev forum
in Real Life
Events
Global and local meetups, conferences, and hackathons
Every week, new builders join BNB Chain - spanning DeFi, AI, RWAs, infra and more.
Scroll through the latest projects below. If something grabs your attention, give them a follow. We’ll keep updating this list as the ecosystem grows.
The momentum’s real. Let’s keep pushing Web3 forward.
Project name
Category
Description
Dapital
DeFi
A social trading app
Privacy Cash
Privacy
Privately fund your wallet
Stove Protocol
Infra
RWA infrastructure
Pay Protocol
Infra
Open Protocol Enterprise Wallet Infra
IXS Finance
RWA
Regulated AI Agentic RWA Settlement Layer for Tokenized RWAs
Sixpence
RWA
On-chain yield for tokenized stocks
Reserve
Infra
Pioneering onchain funds (called DTFs or Decentralized Token Funds), in pursuit of asset-backed currency
StandX
Infra
Offering universal markets and yields
Poppie Finance
DeFi
Borrow stablecoins with your tokenized stocks
IMPORTANT: Please note that all the information in the table above is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Please DYOR.
Follow us to stay updated on everything BNB ChainWebsite | X | Telegram | Facebook | dApp Store | YouTube | Discord | LinkedIn | Build N' Build Forum
Key Takeaways Lockheed Martin exceeded Q2 earnings projections with EPS of $7.94 compared to analyst expectations of $7.09 Quarterly revenue climbed 11% year-over-year to $20.06 billion, surpassing the anticipated $19.34 billion New contracts totaling $65 billion drove the order backlog to an unprecedented $230 billion Annual EPS forecast increased to $29.95–$30.65 range; revenue projection elevated to $79.75–$81.75 billion Shares traded flat at $568.60 in Friday premarket activity following Thursday’s rally Lockheed Martin (LMT) impressed investors with strong second-quarter results released Thursday, providing substantial evidence of operational momentum.
Lockheed Martin Corporation, LMT
The aerospace and defense leader reported GAAP diluted earnings per share of $7.94, significantly exceeding the $7.09 consensus forecast. Quarterly revenue reached $20.06 billion, representing an 11% increase from the same period last year and beating expectations of $19.34 billion.
Thursday’s trading session saw shares jump following the announcement, although LMT remains approximately 17% off its 2026 peak entering Friday. The stock showed no movement in early morning trading, holding steady at $568.60.
The quarter’s most impressive metric was the order backlog. Lockheed closed Q2 with an industry-leading $230.4 billion in committed orders — representing a $64 billion increase year-over-year. The firm achieved a remarkable 3.2-to-1 book-to-bill ratio, indicating $3.20 in new business secured for each dollar of recognized revenue.
This substantial backlog reflects major contract wins during the period. The company secured a massive $35 billion THAAD interceptor agreement and a $3 billion GMLRS contract, contributing to $65 billion in total quarterly bookings.
Cash generation showed marked improvement with free cash flow reaching $2.9 billion in Q2, bouncing back from previous-year challenges related to program setbacks and supply chain constraints.
Updated Financial Projections Leadership upgraded the full-year earnings per share forecast to $29.95–$30.65, representing an increase from the previous $29.35–$30.25 guidance. This updated range exceeds the Street’s consensus estimate of $29.86.
Revenue projections for 2026 were also elevated to $79.75–$81.75 billion, up from the earlier $77.5–$80.0 billion range. Analysts had been modeling $79.14 billion for the year.
Operational highlights from the quarter included restarted F-16 deliveries, expanded C-130 manufacturing, and ongoing advancement of the Grizzly counter-drone platform.
Business Unit Performance The Aeronautics division is forecast to deliver $31.7–$32.7 billion in annual revenue, with mid-single-digit percentage growth anticipated in the latter half driven by expanded F-35 manufacturing.
Missiles and Fire Control is projected to contribute $16.5–$16.9 billion, with momentum building in the second half as ammunition production scales up.
Rotary and Mission Systems is targeted for $17.7–$18.1 billion in sales, bolstered by radar initiatives and increased Sikorsky helicopter production.
The Space segment forecast was upgraded to $13.85–$14.05 billion, fueled by Next Generation Interceptor and Fleet Ballistic Missile development work.
Derivatives market activity supports the bullish narrative. January contract put-to-call ratios stand at 0.67x — suggesting optimistic positioning. The maximum strike price on these contracts approaches $645, representing potential appreciation exceeding 14% from current trading levels within the next half year.
Analyst consensus rates LMT as a “Moderate Buy,” with an average price objective around $611 — approximately 7% higher than Friday’s opening price.
Key Highlights Tenet Healthcare shares skyrocketed 23% following a blockbuster Q2 report showing adjusted EPS of $6.12 versus the $4.26 consensus forecast The company boosted its annual EPS forecast to $20.30–$21.69 from the previous $16.38–$18.68 range HCA Healthcare climbed a modest 3.7% after confirming previously disclosed Q2 figures HCA reduced its annual EPS projection to $28.70–$30.50 from $29.10–$31.50 Investment firm Barclays increased its Tenet target price to $271 from $240 while keeping its Overweight stance Tenet Healthcare (THC) shares exploded 23% higher during Friday’s trading session, marking what could be the stock’s most significant one-day rally since February. The dramatic move followed the company’s release of second-quarter earnings that significantly exceeded Wall Street projections while substantially upgrading its annual forecast.
Tenet Healthcare Corporation, THC
The healthcare provider delivered second-quarter adjusted profits of $6.12 per share, substantially surpassing the analyst consensus of $4.26. Total operating revenue climbed 6.8% year-over-year to reach $5.63 billion, exceeding the anticipated $5.43 billion.
Management substantially increased its annual adjusted EPS forecast to between $20.30 and $21.69, representing a significant jump from the earlier projection of $16.38 to $18.68. The company’s full-year net operating revenue guidance was similarly elevated to $21.9 billion–$22.5 billion from the prior $21.5 billion–$22.3 billion range.
Tenet Healthcare delivered a dramatic Q2 beat, fueled by exceptional hospital margin expansion and pricing power in its ambulatory segment. While net operating revenues grew a respectable 6.8%… pic.twitter.com/pxCFX3irFc
— Finsee (@Finsee_main) July 24, 2026
The midpoint of these revised forecasts substantially exceeds analyst projections, which had been calling for earnings of $17.94 per share and revenue of $21.97 billion.
HCA Healthcare Presents Contrasting Results HCA Healthcare released its quarterly results on the same day, though investor response proved considerably more subdued. HCA shares advanced 3.7%, a fraction of Tenet’s explosive move.
The divergence largely stems from earlier disclosure. HCA had already announced its second-quarter performance on July 14, meaning Friday’s formal release contained minimal new information for market participants.
HCA reported second-quarter adjusted earnings of $7.59 per share, marginally beating the $7.56 estimate. Revenue increased 9% to $20.23 billion, surpassing the $19.76 billion consensus projection.
Yet a substantial $400 million net gain from Medicaid supplemental payments significantly boosted these figures. When accounting for this benefit, the underlying performance appeared less robust.
HCA highlighted an increase in uninsured patient volumes, partially attributed to expanded loss of exchange-based insurance coverage throughout the quarter. Management estimated this trend reduced pre-tax income by approximately $400 million.
HCA Reduces Annual Projections HCA trimmed its full-year EPS forecast to $28.70–$30.50 from the earlier $29.10–$31.50 range. The company also narrowed its revenue guidance to $77 billion–$79.5 billion versus the previous $76.5 billion–$80 billion projection.
The S&P 500 declined modestly on Friday, making Tenet’s 23% surge even more remarkable against the wider market environment.
Barclays raised its price objective on Tenet to $271 from $240 while maintaining its Overweight recommendation. The firm noted that Tenet’s second-quarter results “stand out and reinforce the case for a premium valuation,” especially considering guidance reductions from competing hospital operators.
Tenet’s extensive ambulatory surgery center platform has emerged as a crucial competitive advantage. While both organizations operate hospitals and outpatient centers nationwide, Tenet maintains greater exposure to its surgery center operations, which have consistently delivered strong margin performance.
Barclays’ revised $271 price objective suggests additional upside potential even after Friday’s substantial post-earnings appreciation.
Treasury yields pulled back as bond traders focused on falling oil prices. The yield of 2-year Treasuries declined towards the 4.32% level, while the yield of 10-year Treasuries settled near 4.67%. Falling Treasury yields provided support to gold that pays no interest.
It should be noted that Fed policy outlook remains hawkish. The market believes that there is a 55.4% chance that Fed will raise rates by 25 bpd in September. The probability of two rate hikes by September is estimated at 24.7%. Hawkish Fed policy outlook will remain a key negative catalyst for gold in the near term.
U.S. dollar was mostly flat against a broad basket of currencies despite the pullback in Treasury yields. Fluctuations of the American currency did not have a material impact on gold price dynamics today.
Gold failed to settle below the support level at $4020 – $4050 and is trying to settle back above the $4050 level. In case this attempt is successful, gold will move towards the nearest resistance level at $4180 – $4200. RSI is in the moderate territory, so there is plenty of room to gain momentum in case the right catalysts emerge.
On the support side, a successful test of the support level at $4020 – $4040 will open the way to the test of the next support level at $3930 – $3950.
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Paychex (PAYX - Free Report) . Shares have added about 14.4% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500.
But investors have to be wondering, will the recent positive trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Paychex due for a pullback? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers.
Paychex's Q4 Earnings:Paychex, Inc. reported solid fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results, with adjusted earnings beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate and revenues coming in line. Adjusted earnings of $1.32 per share surpassed the consensus estimate of $1.31 by a slight margin and increased 10.9% from the year-ago quarter. Total revenues of $1.61 billion rose 12.5% year over year and beat the consensus estimate by a slight margin.
The earnings upside was backed by segment growth, Paycor contributions and disciplined expense performance. Management Solutions led the quarter, while PEO and Insurance Solutions, and client fund interest added further support.
PAYX's Management Solutions Powers GrowthManagement Solutions’ revenues increased 14% year over year to $1.18 billion in the fiscal fourth quarter. The segment benefited from higher product penetration and growth in client worksite employees within Human Resources Solutions.
Paycor, acquired in April 2025, contributed about 8 percentage points to Management Solutions revenue growth. The acquisition also supported price realization and higher revenues per client, reflecting Paycor’s upmarket client base.
Management noted that the quarter included a full period of Paycor revenues and expenses compared with a partial period in the prior-year quarter. That comparison helped drive the sharper contribution from the acquired business in the latest quarter.
Paychex's PEO & Client Funds Add SupportProfessional Employer Organization and Insurance Solutions revenues were $369.7 million, up 9% from the year-ago quarter. Growth in the number of average PEO worksite employees supported the segment’s performance.
PEO insurance revenues also increased during the quarter. Interest on funds held for clients rose 15% to $52.2 million, driven by higher average investment balances resulting from the Paycor acquisition.
Total service revenues came in at $1.55 billion, up 12% from the year-ago period. The broad advance across core services showed that growth was not confined to one operating line.
PAYX's Margin Profile Expands in Q4Total expenses were relatively flat year over year at $1 billion. Increases in compensation-related expenses, amortization of intangible assets, technology investments, selling initiatives and marketing spending were offset by lower acquisition-related compensation and professional service costs.
Operating income rose 40% to $604.7 million. The operating margin expanded to 37.7% from 30.2% a year earlier, while the adjusted operating margin improved to 42.1% from 40.4%.
Adjusted operating income increased 17% to $675.8 million. The adjusted figure excludes acquisition-related costs, which were lower than in the prior-year quarter.
Paychex's Profitability Shows Earnings LeverageNet income increased 41% year over year to $420.6 million in the fiscal fourth quarter. Diluted earnings were $1.17 per share, up 43% from the prior-year period.
Adjusted net income rose 10% to $474.6 million. EBITDA increased 39% to $719.1 million, while adjusted EBITDA advanced 17% to $729.7 million, reflecting revenue gains and reduced acquisition-related drag.
Interest expenses increased to $64.7 million from $63.7 million. Other income, net, declined to $14.2 million from $21.9 million due to lower average balances on corporate investments and higher share repurchases in fiscal 2026.
PAYX's Balance Sheet Remains SolidPaychex ended fiscal 2026 with cash, restricted cash and total corporate investments of $1.2 billion. Short-term and long-term borrowings, net of debt issuance costs, totaled $4.6 billion as of May 31, 2026.
Cash flow from operations was $2.6 billion for the fiscal year. The company paid out cumulative dividends of $4.43 per share, totaling $1.6 billion, and repurchased 5.6 million shares for $611 million.
Fiscal 2026 total revenues increased 17% to $6.51 billion. Adjusted diluted earnings advanced 11% to $5.51 per share, whereas adjusted operating income grew 19% to $2.81 billion.
Paychex's FY27 View Points to GrowthFor fiscal 2027, Paychex expects total revenues to grow 5-6%. Management Solutions’ revenues are also projected to rise 5-6%, while PEO and Insurance Solutions revenues are expected to increase 6-7%.
Interest on funds held for clients is expected to be $195-$205 million. The company anticipates an adjusted operating margin of 44%, an effective income tax rate of 24% and adjusted diluted earnings growth of 7-9%.
Paychex also highlighted the launch of WISE, its AI-powered intelligence engine, across HCM platforms and internal operations. Management said that the platform is designed to unlock insights from unstructured data, increase productivity and enhance client outcomes.
Adjusted earnings of 99 cents per share beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.2% and increased 8.8% on a year-over-year basis. Total revenues of $1.2 billion also beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.5% and increased 7.4% year over year.
Revenues in Detail
Revenues from Management Solutions segment increased 8% year over year to $895.3 million. The segment benefited from growth in the number of client employees served for human capital management (HCM) and additional worksite employees for HR Solutions. Also, improved revenue per client on price realization and higher product penetration, strong demand for HR Solutions, retirement, time and attendance solutions and expansion of HCM ancillary services acted as tailwinds.
Professional employer organization (“PEO”) and Insurance Solutions’ revenues were $273.3 million, up 4% from the year-ago quarter’s level. The uptick was owing to growth in the number of average worksite employees. Interest on funds held for clients increased 54% year over year to $21.7 million.
Operating Performance
Operating income increased 7% year over year to $472.3 million. EBITDA of $518.6 million increased 4.7% year over year.
Balance Sheet & Cash Flow
Paychex exited second-quarter fiscal 2022 with cash and cash equivalents of $1.1 billion compared with $1.18 billion reported at the end of the prior quarter. Long-term debt was $797.9 million compared with $797.8 million in the prior quarter. Cash provided by operating activities was $321.6 million in the reported quarter. During the reported quarter, PAYX paid out $284.7 million as dividends.
Fiscal 2023 View Tweaked
Paychex upped its adjusted earnings per share view with respect to year-over-year growth for fiscal 2023. Adjusted EPS is now expected to register 12-14% growth compared with the prior expectation of 11-12% growth. PAYX continues to expect total revenues to register 8% (prior view: 7-8%) growth. Management Solutions’ revenues are expected to grow 7-8% (prior view: 5-7%). PEO and Insurance Solutions’ revenues are expected to grow 5-7% (prior view: 8-10%).
How Have Estimates Been Moving Since Then?In the past month, investors have witnessed a upward trend in estimates revision.
VGM ScoresAt this time, Paychex has a nice Growth Score of B, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with a D. Charting a somewhat similar path, the stock has a grade of C on the value side, putting it in the middle 20% for value investors.
Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of C. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in.
OutlookEstimates have been broadly trending upward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, Paychex has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months.
Key Takeaways GEHC is expected to post healthy Q2 revenue growth, backed by imaging, diagnostics, and services demand.GEHC faces margin pressure from inflation, freight, tariffs, and higher input costs despite pricing actions.GEHC expects stronger second-half performance as efficiencies, pricing, and new products gain traction. GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC - Free Report) is scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 29, before market open.
In the last reported quarter, the company’s adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of 99 cents missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 7.48%. The company beat on earnings in three of the trailing four quarters and missed once, delivering an average surprise of 2.90%.
Let’s check out the factors that might have shaped GEHC’s performance prior to the announcement.
Factors Likely to Have Driven GEHC’s Q2 PerformanceGE HealthCare is expected to have delivered another quarter of healthy revenue growth, supported by resilient global demand for imaging equipment, continued strength in Pharmaceutical Diagnostics (PDx), and robust services performance. On its first-quarter earnings call, management had maintained its full-year organic revenue growth outlook of 3-4%, citing healthy order trends, a record $21.8 billion backlog, strong book-to-bill, and improving commercial execution despite a cautious view on China.
However, profitability is likely to have remained under pressure from elevated inflation in memory chips, freight, oil and commodity costs, with management already guiding for low-single-digit adjusted EPS decline in the second quarter before improvement in the second half.
Following the organizational restructuring, the newly created Advanced Imaging Solutions business is likely to have benefited from sustained demand for CT, X-ray, ultrasound and visualization products. Imaging demand should have been supported by Revolution Vibe cardiac CT systems, while Advanced Visualization Solutions likely continued to benefit from adoption of products, such as Vivid Pioneer and other AI-enabled platforms. Although Photonova Spectra photon-counting CT generated encouraging customer interest after regulatory approvals, revenue contribution is unlikely before 2027 due to typical installation timelines.
Pharmaceutical Diagnostics is likely to have remained the company's strongest-performing business. Continued growth in contrast media, radiopharmaceuticals and molecular imaging, along with accelerating Flyrcado adoption and increasing Vizamyl demand driven by Alzheimer's imaging, likely supported another solid quarter. However, planned investments in the radiopharmaceutical pipeline and integration of recent acquisitions may have weighed on margin expansion.
Patient Care Solutions likely remained the weakest segment, although management expects gradual improvement later in the year as large monitoring installations convert from backlog and the premium anesthesia platform approaches regulatory clearance. Lower first-half volume and ongoing tariff-related costs probably continued to weigh on segment profitability.
On the margin front, the second quarter is expected to represent the peak impact from inflationary input costs, including memory chips and freight, while pricing actions and cost mitigation initiatives are likely to have provided only limited near-term relief because much of the second-quarter revenues probably originated from existing backlog. Adjusted EBIT margin and EPS are expected to have remained pressured, with a stronger recovery anticipated during the second half as pricing actions, operating efficiencies and new product momentum begin to offset inflationary pressures.
GEHC’s Estimate PictureFor second-quarter 2026, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $5.25 billion, implying an improvement of 5% from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure.
The consensus estimate for EPS is pegged at $1.04, indicating a decrease of 1.9% from the prior-year period’s reported number.
What Our Model Suggests for GE HealthCarePer our proven model, the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. That is not the case here, as you will see below.
Earnings ESP: GE HealthCare has an Earnings ESP of 0.00%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.
Zacks Rank: The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
GEHC’s Share Price PerformanceSo far this year, GE HealthCare’s shares have lost 24.4% compared with the industry’s 22.5% decline. The S&P 500 has gained 9.2% during the said period.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Stocks Worth a LookHere are some stocks from broader medical sector worth considering, as these have the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat this reporting cycle.
Cardinal Health (CAH - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +1.24% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present. The company is set to release fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results on Aug. 11. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rankstocks here.
CAH’s earnings surpassed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, with the average surprise being 10.27%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CAH’s fourth-quarter EPS indicates an improvement of 16.4% from the year-ago reported figure.
Henry Schein (HSIC - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +0.41% and a Zacks Rank of 2 at present. The company is scheduled to release second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 4.
HSIC’s earnings surpassed estimates in three of the trailing four quarters and missed once, with the average surprise being 3.74%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for HSIC’s second-quarter EPS implies an improvement of 10.9% from the year-ago reported figure.
Agilent Technologies (A - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +1.02% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present.
A’s earnings surpassed estimates in three of the trailing four quarters and missed once, the average surprise being 1.61%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for A’s third-quarter fiscal 2026 EPS reflects an improvement of 8% from the year-ago reported figure.
Looking for a stock that has been consistently beating earnings estimates and might be well positioned to keep the streak alive in its next quarterly report? Steven Madden (SHOO - Free Report) , which belongs to the Zacks Shoes and Retail Apparel industry, could be a great candidate to consider.
This footwear and accessories retailer has seen a nice streak of beating earnings estimates, especially when looking at the previous two reports. The average surprise for the last two quarters was 5.75%.
For the most recent quarter, Steven Madden was expected to post earnings of $0.42 per share, but it reported $0.45 per share instead, representing a surprise of 7.14%. For the previous quarter, the consensus estimate was $0.46 per share, while it actually produced $0.48 per share, a surprise of 4.35%.
Price and EPS Surprise
With this earnings history in mind, recent estimates have been moving higher for Steven Madden. In fact, the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) for the company is positive, which is a great sign of an earnings beat, especially when you combine this metric with its nice Zacks Rank.
Our research shows that stocks with the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) or better produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time. In other words, if you have 10 stocks with this combination, the number of stocks that beat the consensus estimate could be as high as seven.
The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a version of the Zacks Consensus whose definition is related to change. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.
Steven Madden has an Earnings ESP of +13.68% at the moment, suggesting that analysts have grown bullish on its near-term earnings potential. When you combine this positive Earnings ESP with the stock's Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), it shows that another beat is possibly around the corner. The company's next earnings report is expected to be released on July 30, 2026.
Investors should note, however, that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss, but a negative value does reduce the predictive power of this metric.
Many companies end up beating the consensus EPS estimate, but that may not be the sole basis for their stocks moving higher. On the other hand, some stocks may hold their ground even if they end up missing the consensus estimate.
Because of this, it's really important to check a company's Earnings ESP ahead of its quarterly release to increase the odds of success. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.
Key Takeaways PHM beat Q2 earnings and revenue estimates, though both declined from the prior year.PHM's $131 target offers modest upside as shares trade above key homebuilding valuation benchmarks.Buybacks and low leverage support PHM, but 2026 earnings and revenues are projected to fall. PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM - Free Report) gave investors a mixed second-quarter readout. Earnings and revenues topped expectations, but both fell from the prior year as closings, pricing and margins weakened.
The investment case now rests on balance. PHM offers capital returns, a solid balance sheet and modest price-target upside, but growth estimates and margins remain under pressure.
PHM Beats Estimates Despite Lower EarningsAdjusted earnings were $2.48 per share, topping the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.38 by 4.2%. Total revenues of $3.983 billion edged past the consensus mark of $3.980 billion by 0.1%.
The beat did not erase the year-over-year decline. Earnings fell 18.2% from $3.03 per share, while total revenues decreased 9.6% as lower closings and softer average selling prices weighed on results.
PulteGroup’s Valuation Offers Limited UpsidePHM’s $131 price target compares with a reported share price of $124.67, leaving only modest potential appreciation. That limits the valuation argument, even though the company continues to generate orders and return capital.
The stock traded at 11.85 times forward earnings, above the sub-industry’s 10.88 multiple and PHM’s five-year median of 8.33. It still traded well below the broader construction sector and the S&P 500, keeping the valuation picture mixed rather than clearly cheap.
D.R. Horton (DHI - Free Report) and Lennar Corporation (LEN - Free Report) remain relevant comparisons because both operate as national homebuilders facing similar affordability and margin pressures. D.R. Horton describes itself as the largest U.S. homebuilder by volume, while Lennar is commonly tracked alongside DHI and PHM in homebuilding comparisons.
PHM’s Forecasts Point to a Difficult 2026Current projections call for 2026 revenues of $16.404 billion, down from $17.312 billion in 2025. Expected earnings are $10.01 per share, compared with $11.44 in 2025.
Estimates point to improvement in 2027, with revenues projected at $17.045 billion and earnings at $11.09 per share. The timing and durability of that recovery are central to whether PHM’s valuation can become more appealing.
PulteGroup Returns Capital While Funding GrowthPHM repurchased 3.1 million shares for $373 million in the second quarter. First-half repurchases totaled 5.5 million shares, or roughly 3% of outstanding shares, for $681 million.
The company maintained a quarterly dividend of 26 cents per share and had $1.8 billion remaining under its repurchase authorization. It is also funding land investment, though first-half operating cash flow fell to $176.8 million from $421.7 million as inventories increased.
PHM’s Balance Sheet Limits Financial RiskPulteGroup ended June with $1.38 billion in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. Its debt-to-capital ratio was 12.3%, while net debt-to-capital was 3.3%, giving the company financial flexibility in a softer housing cycle.
The land pipeline also supports flexibility. PHM controlled about 228,000 lots, with 55% held through option agreements, limiting upfront ownership exposure when demand is uncertain.
PHM’s Scores Support a Selective ApproachThe bottom line is that PHM looks more balanced than broadly attractive. The earnings beat, buybacks and balance sheet help, but declining estimates and margin compression keep the risk-reward selective.
PHM currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), with a Value Score of B, Momentum Score of B and VGM Score of B. Those grades provide positive near-term signals, while the Growth Score of D reflects weaker projected earnings and sales trends. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
The stock may suit investors focused on disciplined capital returns and balance-sheet strength. Investors prioritizing immediate growth may need clearer evidence that earnings, revenues and margins are stabilizing.
Key Takeaways PulteGroup's wider community base lifted second-quarter net new orders 6.4% to 7,536 homes.Build-to-order homes rose to 45% of orders as PulteGroup cut spec homes in production 13%.PulteGroup's gross margin fell 200 basis points to 25.0% as incentives reached 10.4% of prices. PulteGroup (PHM - Free Report) is widening its community base to support orders across first-time, move-up and active-adult buyers. That broader reach is helping offset ofter affordability conditions.
The trade-off is clear. Closings, average selling prices and margins remain under pressure, making inventory discipline central to PHM’s near-term execution.
PulteGroup’s Community Growth Supports New OrdersSecond-quarter net new orders increased 6.4% year over year to 7,536 homes. The gain came as average community count rose 8% to 1,074.
Absorption slipped 1% to 2.3 homes per community per month. That suggests community expansion, rather than stronger demand at each location, remains the main volume driver.
PHM Shifts Back Toward Build-to-Order HomesPulteGroup is moving back toward its long-term mix of 60% build-to-order homes and 40% spec homes. Build-to-order properties represented 45% of second-quarter orders, up from 40% a year earlier.
The shift is helping reduce inventory risk. Spec homes in production declined 13% to 6,638, while finished spec inventory fell to about 1.3 homes per community.
PulteGroup Reaches Multiple Buyer SegmentsPulteGroup’s second-quarter orders were balanced across buyer groups: 39% first-time, 36% move-up and 25% active adult. That mix reduces reliance on one customer category.
Orders increased across all three groups. Active-adult orders rose 12%, while first-time and move-up orders advanced 5% and 4%, respectively.
PHM Uses Geographic Scale to Manage VolatilityOrders rose in every region except the West, led by 19% growth in Florida. Demand was also favorable in several Midwest markets, Greenville and the Coastal Carolinas.
This geographic breadth gives PulteGroup room to adjust incentives, inventory and capital by local market. Peers such as D.R. Horton (DHI - Free Report) and Lennar Corporation (LEN - Free Report) face similar affordability and pricing trade-offs, making local scale an important competitive lever across the homebuilding group.
PulteGroup Faces Persistent Margin PressureHome sale gross margin declined 200 basis points year over year to 25.0%. Incentives equaled 10.4% of gross selling prices, up from 8.7% a year earlier.
Lower closings and a softer average selling price weighed on revenues, while selling, general and administrative expenses rose as a percentage of home sale revenues. Higher lot costs also remain a risk, even if lower construction costs provide some offset.
PHM’s Ratings Reflect Balanced Near-Term SignalsThe bottom line is that PulteGroup is generating orders through broader market coverage and tighter inventory control, but affordability pressure is still limiting operating leverage. The setup is resilient, not risk-free.
PHM currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), indicating a favorable short-term earnings-revision signal. The stock also has a Value Score of B, Momentum Score of B and VGM Score of B, which support a constructive near-term profile. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
The Growth Score of D keeps the outlook mixed. Projected declines in earnings and sales suggest investors should balance PHM’s order resilience against ongoing margin and demand pressure.
If you are looking for a stock that has a solid history of beating earnings estimates and is in a good position to maintain the trend in its next quarterly report, you should consider Huntington Ingalls (HII - Free Report) . This company, which is in the Zacks Aerospace - Defense industry, shows potential for another earnings beat.
When looking at the last two reports, this shipbuilder has recorded a strong streak of surpassing earnings estimates. The company has topped estimates by 5.52%, on average, in the last two quarters.
For the most recent quarter, Huntington Ingalls was expected to post earnings of $3.7 per share, but it reported $3.79 per share instead, representing a surprise of 2.43%. For the previous quarter, the consensus estimate was $3.72 per share, while it actually produced $4.04 per share, a surprise of 8.60%.
Price and EPS Surprise
With this earnings history in mind, recent estimates have been moving higher for Huntington Ingalls. In fact, the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) for the company is positive, which is a great sign of an earnings beat, especially when you combine this metric with its nice Zacks Rank.
Our research shows that stocks with the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) or better produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time. In other words, if you have 10 stocks with this combination, the number of stocks that beat the consensus estimate could be as high as seven.
The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a version of the Zacks Consensus whose definition is related to change. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.
Huntington Ingalls currently has an Earnings ESP of +0.53%, which suggests that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This positive Earnings ESP when combined with the stock's Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) indicates that another beat is possibly around the corner. We expect the company's next earnings report to be released on July 30, 2026.
With the Earnings ESP metric, it's important to note that a negative value reduces its predictive power; however, a negative Earnings ESP does not indicate an earnings miss.
Many companies end up beating the consensus EPS estimate, but that may not be the sole basis for their stocks moving higher. On the other hand, some stocks may hold their ground even if they end up missing the consensus estimate.
Because of this, it's really important to check a company's Earnings ESP ahead of its quarterly release to increase the odds of success. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.
IMAX Corp (NYSE:IMAX) received a price target increase from Wedbush to $54 from $46, with the firm reiterating its Outperform rating as it expects continued growth from a stronger film pipeline, market share gains and global expansion.
The analysts wrote that IMAX remains on Wedbush’s Best Ideas List as the company benefits from an increase in the volume and quality of films produced for IMAX, a broader mix of local-language and global releases, expanded alternative content offerings and further international footprint growth.
“IMAX remains on Wedbush’s Best Ideas List given our view that it is benefitting from an uptick in volume and quality of filmed-for-IMAX titles in the second half of 2026 through 2028, which is driving market share gains,” the analysts wrote.
Wedbush highlighted IMAX’s second-quarter results as evidence of the strength of its business model, noting that the company exceeded expectations despite weaker Chinese box office performance and a modest domestic share decline during a quarter with a heavier focus on family films.
“IMAX’s results demonstrated the quality of its business model that handily beat expectations despite a shortfall in its Chinese box office and a modest domestic share loss in a quarter heavier on family fare,” the analysts wrote.
IMAX reported second-quarter revenue of $103 million, up 12% year over year and above Wedbush’s and consensus estimates of $94 million. Adjusted EBITDA came in at $45 million, ahead of Wedbush’s estimate of $39 million, driven by higher installations, improved margins and operating expense leverage.
The analysts wrote that additional installations during the quarter supported results and helped ease concerns around IMAX’s ability to reach its 2026 box office target of $1.4 billion, given the strength and diversity of its upcoming release slate.
Wedbush also highlighted IMAX’s profitability outlook, writing that the company’s target of achieving EBITDA margins above 45% in 2026 and surpassing 50% by 2028 now appear conservative.
“IMAX’s 45% plus EBITDA margin target for 2026 and guidance to surpass 50% EBITDA margins by 2028 now appear conservative,” the analysts wrote.
Looking ahead, Wedbush wrote that the next phase of IMAX’s growth story will focus on improving the timing and flow of major film releases. The analysts noted that while 2026 includes several major IMAX titles, including The Odyssey and Dune 3, a crowded release schedule has limited the ability of studios and IMAX to maximize overall box office performance.
“Focus will now shift to the next leg of IMAX’s growth story: better orchestrating the flow of the annual release slate,” the analysts wrote.
Wedbush wrote that the 2027 release schedule already appears less crowded, as IMAX has become an increasingly important partner for studios across genres, languages and geographies. The analysts added that improved release timing, market share gains and international expansion provide additional opportunities for growth.
The revised $54 price target is based on a 13 times enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple applied to Wedbush’s updated 2028 EBITDA estimate, compared with a previous 12 times multiple. It also implies upside from current levels of about $45.
Wedbush also noted potential upside if IMAX were to attract acquisition interest, writing that the company’s combination of a globally recognized premium brand, an asset-light licensing model and a structurally expanding earnings profile could make it attractive to a potential buyer.
Key Takeaways Humana is expected to post strong Q2 revenue growth driven by higher premiums and Medicare expansion.HUM's rising Insurance and CenterWell operating income support earnings beat hopes.Higher opex, weaker investment income and a rising benefits expense ratio may partially offset positives. Humana Inc. (HUM - Free Report) is set to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 29, before the opening bell. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the to-be-reported quarter’s earnings is currently pegged at $6.22 per share on revenues of $40.65 billion.
The second-quarter earnings estimate has witnessed three upward revisions and no movement in the opposite direction over the past 60 days. However, the bottom-line projection indicates a year-over-year decrease of 0.8%. Yet, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for quarterly revenues implies year-over-year growth of 25.5%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
For full-year 2026, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for Humana’s revenues is pegged at $162.60 billion, implying a rise of 25.3% year over year. However, the consensus mark for current-year EPS is pegged at $9.25, implying a plunge of around 46% on a year-over-year basis.
HUM’s earnings beat the consensus estimate in three of the trailing four quarters and missed once, with the average surprise being 3.8%.
Q2 Earnings Whispers for HUMOur proven model predicts a likely earnings beat for the company this time around as well. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. That is precisely the case here.
Humana has an Earnings ESP of +1.71% and a Zacks Rank #1. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
What’s Shaping HUM’s Q2 Results?The Zacks Consensus Estimate for HUM’s second-quarter premiums indicates a 25.6% increase from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure, whereas our model predicts 24% growth. We expect total Medicare to witness 26.6% growth in the quarter under review. Similarly, the consensus mark for service revenues signals a 22.3% increase from a year ago, whereas our model predicts a nearly 16% jump.
Also, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for insurance membership predicts a 18.2% year-over-year growth, whereas specialty membership is expected to rise 3.7%.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for operating income from the Insurance unit indicates 10.2% growth from a year ago. The same for the CenterWell unit predicts a 12.8% growth from the year-ago level. The above-mentioned factors are expected to have positioned the company for an earnings beat in the second quarter.
However, the consensus estimate indicates that Humana’s investment income will see a 13.5% drop from the year-ago level. We expect total operating costs to increase 24.4% in the second quarter, bringing the figure above $38.9 billion. This is likely to have led to a year-over-year decline in the bottom line.
The consensus mark for insurance benefits expense ratio is pegged at 91.3% for the to-be-reported quarter, deteriorating from 89.9% a year ago. These are likely to have partially offset the positives.
How Did Peers Perform?Several healthcare companies, including UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH - Free Report) , Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH - Free Report) and Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV - Free Report) , have already reported their financial results for the June quarter of 2026. Here’s how they performed:
UnitedHealth reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted EPS of $6.38, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.94. The bottom line rose 56.4% year over year. Its strong quarterly results were aided by growth in commercial fee-based membership and the strength witnessed in Optum Insight. Medical cost management, pricing discipline and benefit design changes also contributed to the upside. However, weakness in UNH’s Optum Health, Optum Rx and declining risk-based membership partially offset the positives.
Molina reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.51, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 10.2%. But the bottom line declined 72.4% from the year-ago period's level. MOH’s earnings benefited from lower operating expenses. However, lower premium revenues, declining membership, and weaker investment income weighed on its performance.
Elevance reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted EPS of $7.45, which surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 20.6%. However, the bottom line declined 15.7% year over year.The quarterly results were primarily driven by higher premium yields in the Health Benefits segment and increased CarelonRx product revenues. The upside was partly offset by a decline in ELV’s overall medical membership and an elevated expense level.
The Board of Directors of ArcBest (Nasdaq: ARCB) has declared a quarterly cash dividend of twelve cents ($0.12) per share to holders of record of its Common
Lien Finance has lost about $542,000 in USDC after an attacker exploited a flaw in its bond token logic to mint unsupported assets and drain liquidity from the protocol.
Summary
Lien Finance lost about $542,000 in USDC after attackers exploited a flaw in its bond token exchange logic. Security researchers said the exploit allowed unsupported bond tokens to be minted and exchanged for real liquidity from the protocol. The incident adds to a series of DeFi exploits this month as researchers continue to examine weaknesses in protocol pricing and validation logic. Blockchain security firm SlowMist said the exploit targeted Lien Finance’s bond exchange mechanism, allowing the attacker to create bond tokens without destroying the corresponding input bonds before swapping them for USDC. The firm estimated the loss at roughly 542,144.63 USDC and identified the attacker wallet as 0x0d7d…1808a.
🚨SlowMist TI Alert🚨
💸 @LienFinance Loss: ~542k USD
🔍 Root Cause: The `exchangeEquivalentBonds` function in BondMakerCollateralizedEth lacks proper multiset integrity checks. It only counts total exception occurrences instead of verifying each bondID's appearance per group.…
— SlowMist (@SlowMist_Team) July 24, 2026 According to SlowMist, the vulnerability was located in the exchangeEquivalentBonds function of the BondMakerCollateralizedEth contract. Its analysis said the function failed to properly verify the integrity of bond groups during exchanges. Instead of checking whether every bond ID appeared the required number of times, the contract counted only the total number of exception entries. By repeatedly using the same exception bond ID in the output group, the attacker satisfied the validation logic while omitting another required bond from the input.
SlowMist said the flaw allowed the attacker to mint new BondTokens that appeared valid even though no matching collateral had been consumed. The newly created assets were then exchanged for USDC through three pre-authorized endpoints, resulting in the withdrawal of about 542,144.63 USDC from the victim address 0xa961684a3a654fb2cca8f8991226c0cefc514d80.
The security firm identified the affected contracts as 0xda6fc5625e617bb92f5359921d43321cebc6bef0 and 0x843225cf6e663e4454732d6b551a737ac7b47de0.
Permissionless bond registration and pricing logic under scrutiny Separate on-chain analysis from DefimonAlerts, later amplified by researcher exvulsec, described the incident as a protocol logic failure that combined permissionless bond registration with pricing weaknesses inside Lien Finance’s over-the-counter bond pools.
🚨 @LienFinance – Loss $542K (2026-07-24)
Network: Ethereum
Type: Oracle / Price Manipulation
Lien Finance's GeneralizedDotc bond-to-ERC20 OTC pools were drained. An attacker-deployed orchestration contract (0xe74d17c1) permissionlessly registered new bond groups on the…
— Defimon Alerts (@DefimonAlerts) July 24, 2026 According to that analysis, the attacker first deployed an orchestration contract before registering a new bond group through the BondMakerCollateralizedEth contract. Because the registration process did not require governance approval, the attacker was reportedly able to introduce a bond group built around a malicious payoff function.
The report said the crafted bond tokens were then routed into Lien Finance’s GeneralizedDotc OTC pools. It pointed to the protocol’s internal _calcRateBondToErc20 function, saying it appears to have assigned excessive value to the newly created bonds despite their lack of genuine collateral backing.
As a result, the attacker exchanged what researchers described as effectively unsupported structured products for real USDC liquidity held in the protocol’s pools. The primary affected liquidity pool was the GeneralizedDotc contract at 0x656e…9ef18, while the attacker wallet received the proceeds through the main exploit transaction.
Researchers examining the exploit have described it as a protocol pricing and validation failure rather than a conventional smart contract exploit such as reentrancy or an access control bypass. According to the published analysis, the attack relied on introducing synthetic financial instruments whose economic value was not sufficiently validated before they became eligible for OTC swaps.
The researchers compared the incident with April’s Drift Protocol exploit, where attackers reportedly introduced fabricated collateral that the protocol accepted at inflated values before real assets were withdrawn. They noted that the two cases differ in implementation but share a similar pattern of exploiting valuation logic instead of breaking cryptographic protections.
Latest incident adds to a string of DeFi exploits The Lien Finance exploit comes during an active period for decentralized finance security incidents.
Just one day earlier, on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain described July 23 as “Hackers’ Day” after three separate exploits resulted in combined reported losses of about $35.55 million. Those incidents included a $24.15 million exploit involving AFX Trade’s bridge infrastructure, a $7.54 million attack on the Verus Ethereum Bridge, and a separate $3.86 million exploit affecting B² Network.
In the AFX incident, blockchain security firm Blockaid said attackers drained about $24.15 million in USDC from infrastructure operated by the protocol rather than Arbitrum’s native bridge. Offchain Labs separately confirmed that Arbitrum’s core bridge was not compromised and said the incident involved third-party infrastructure.
Meanwhile, Blockaid also linked the latest Verus Ethereum Bridge exploit to the same bridge contract, entry path and apparent bug class involved in the project’s May breach. The firm said the July attack generated unbacked Ethereum-side payouts through the bridge’s import process, although a complete technical explanation had not yet been published.
Earlier this month, Lazy Summer Protocol lost about $6.04 million in a share price manipulation attack, while Bonzo Finance on Hedera reported losses of around $9 million following an oracle-related exploit. Allbridge Core also suffered a flash-loan-driven stable pool attack that drained roughly $1.65 million, and Polychain-backed Cascade lost approximately $1.34 million in another exploit during July.
🚨Blockaid's exploit detection system has identified an ongoing exploit on @summerfinance_.
~$6M drained so far.
More details in 🧵
— Blockaid (@blockaid_) July 6, 2026 Researchers tracking decentralized finance attacks have estimated cumulative losses exceeding $630 million during the first seven months of 2026. Their data identifies oracle manipulation, pricing flaws, compromised credentials and bridge validation weaknesses among the most common attack vectors recorded this year.
BondMaker architecture has faced security issues before For long-time Ethereum developers, the latest exploit revisits an architecture that has drawn security attention before.
In September 2020, a white-hat group led by security researcher Samczsun prevented the loss of roughly $10 million after identifying a flaw in Lien Finance’s original BondMaker system.
Security researchers at the time said the earlier vulnerability allowed attackers to create empty bond groups that could be exchanged for properly collateralized ones through an equivalence function, making it possible to extract Ether without matching backing. The issue was intercepted before malicious actors could exploit it, and the recovery became one of Ethereum’s most prominent coordinated white-hat rescue efforts.
Unlike the 2020 incident, the latest exploit resulted in an actual loss after attackers used weaknesses in bond validation and pricing logic to withdraw USDC from live liquidity pools. At the time of publication, Lien Finance had not released a detailed technical postmortem or announced whether any of the stolen funds had been frozen or recovered.
Circle is facing criminal charges in Wisconsin because, in relation to some investment fraud, "Circle Internet Financial LLC has declined to repatriate the corresponding fiat reserves" and "Circle has not complied with a Circuit Court Judge’s seizure warrant."
Law enforcement secured a seizure warrant which Circle will not enforce. Circle claims they cannot enforce it. The government is charging Circle for declining to enforce it. Whatever is going on: everyone agrees Circle is not currently enforcing it.
This column has a long history of pulling entertaining and contradictory bits out of company public statements and (usually much later) legal settlements where those companies got caught doing something they were not supposed to do. Much of the time the company in question made explicit statements that it would not do the conduct it eventually admitted doing. And much of the time those public statements were contemporaneous with the bad conduct. But we only found out they were lying years later.
Here we have the rare opportunity to work through seemingly-false statements made by a company during a public dispute with law enforcement in real time. So that is what we are going to do. Some of this was covered by the ICIJ but we think their narrative is too generous towards Circle.
Some BackgroundTether routinely seizes funds for law enforcement. Tether has the power to transfer USDT out of your address and burn them without your knowledge or consent. So to seize funds Tether just burns tokens from anywhere and then issues fresh replacement USDT to whatever address law enforcement wants. In theory Tether could also take the funds back from law enforcement — the same process can be used for any address — though that has not yet happened. Tether has had these powers for many years. Nothing is this paragraph is new or controversial.
Circle is a little bit different. Circle does not currently have a seize function in their tokens. Both Tether and Circle can freeze funds – immobilizing them in an address – but Circle's current smart contracts do not support seizure. Circle routinely freezes tokens but it does not seize them. This is presumably what Circle was referring to when it told the Walworth County Circuit Court:
Beyond the ability to blocklist wallets, however, Circle has no control of USDC held in third-party wallets and has no ability to invalidate and reissue such USDC or to transfer them.The key words here are "has no control" and "has no ability." Circle uses the conjunction "and" meaning Circle believes both of those claims to be independently true. If Circle has any way to wrangle invalidation then Circle made a false statement to the court. Given invalidation we know reissuance is possible because once you invalidate the "bad" tokens the reissuance is just issuance. Which happens all the time. So the threshold question here is whether Circle can "invalidate" USDC in an address specifed by law enforcement.
Circle's PowersCircle cannot currently invalidate USDC and seize funds. But Circle can upgrade USDC to have whatever functionality it desires. So it cannot follow this roadmap to comply with a seizure order:
Seize the fundsBut absolutely it can comply with this roadmap:
Upgrade USDC to allow seizureSeize the fundsIn a strange turn, Circle told the government the required process to seize the funds was as follows. And bear in mind we are quoting Circle's own court filing here so this is presumably a generous phrasing from Circle's perspective:
Circle also communicated to Detective Kuchta that (1) the address was not held at Circle; (2) Circle did not have the private keys for the address; (3) Circle could not, therefore, transfer USDC from the wallet; and (4) to recover the USDC for the victim law enforcement would need to locate the private keys for the address. By telling the police to go find the private keys Circle is being, well, let's call it intransigent. Actually, no, let us be a bit more direct (with apologies to Andy Samberg and Justin Timberlake). Circle looks to prefer these steps:
Get charged for no function to seizeMoan how it sucks to seizePut in a function to seizeThat’s the way they do it. Circle is being a...go watch the video in that last link.
It is hardly a secret Circle can upgrade the USDC contracts so it looks pretty likely this capability will eventually come up in court and the judge will sort Circle out. Circle's terms also provide the company with incredibly broad discretion to deny anyone access at any time and in any manner at all for pretty much any reason. This text is in the Acceptable Use Policy describing a list of things you are not allowed to do with USDC and which might lead Circle to cut you off:
For clarity, the following lists are not exhaustive and we may, at our sole discretion, modify them without notice.So Circle can decide anything it likes is out of bounds. And that document covers:
services provided by Circle Internet Financial, LLC, Circle Payments, LLC, Circle UK TradingLimited and/or Circle International Bermuda Limited (together, “Circle”), inclusive of, but not limited to, Circle Mint account,Application Programming Interface products, card processing, and the Circle Yield offering (together and separately, the “Services”), The "but not limited to" would seem to provide sufficient cover to enforce a court order by including whatever corners of Circle's operation are needed to effect the required upgrades. Remember: in this case a court is telling Circle to do something and Circle is not doing it. Maybe you think reading that clause in such a broad manner is squirrely. Sure, maybe. But that is a problem when a strained reading is used to evade a court or the clear intent of a contract or some other agreement. In the present case not reading these powers broadly led to criminal charges and is, in a real and on-going sense, blocking enforcement of a court order. Using this ambiguity to comply with the court is not going to anger the court. Certainly not any more than the current behaviour will.
Circle's Terms vs. ActionsIn Circle's documentation the company anticipates that court orders may come in to request asset freezes. There is an Access Denial Policy which sets out the freeze framework. And there is even a section entitled "Blocked Addresses & Forfeited Funds" in the USDC Terms. That later section includes this text:
Circle may also be required to freeze USDC and/or surrender associated USD held in Segregated Accounts in the event it receives a legal order from a valid government authority requiring it to do so.This anticipates the idea that a court order may mandate sending USD somewhere the court directs. The word "forfeited" appears in a section heading. And if we look at the government's description in Wisconsin we find something very much on point:
The Court’s Warrant ordered Circle to “facilitate the seizure” of Victim #1’s USDC and invalidate that USDC so that it had no value. The Warrant then ordered Circle to issue approximately $381,000 in new USDC to compensate Victim #1 and transfer that new USDC to a digital wallet owned by the Walworth County Sheriff’s Department. This procedure is known as “burn and reissue”."Facilitate the seizure" is a broad directive. The court is not telling Circle precisely how to satisfy the court's desires. The court is simply saying "find a way to do this." And Circle's on-the-record response is weird. Above we quoted Circle's broad claim of "no ability." The government's narrative gives a bit more colour there too:
In subsequent discussions, Circle’s representatives have explained that the company holds approximately $381,000 in US Currency in reserve to cover the value of Victim #1’s USDC, even though that USDC cannot be redeemed by anyone for US Currency because Circle froze it. Circle protested that if it issued $381,000 worth of new USDC, it would also have to hold an additional $381,000 in US Currency to cover the new USDC. Circle objected that it would be unfair for the company to have to set aside that much US Currency in reserve. Circle also stated that by the terms of its own contracts, it will not “burn and reissue” USDC.This is some twisted logic. Circle seems to believe it is required to maintain backing for all USDC, frozen or not, and that because it currently cannot burn and reissue USDC this would require holding double reserves for the recovered amount and that – the double reserving Circle just imposed on itself – is unfair.
We will immediately concede that double reserving here is unreasonable and dumb. But the double reserving is only "required" if we accept Circle's claim it cannot do the burn and reissue. This is a strained attempt for Circle to look like the victim. Possibly so that Circle can continue to collect interest on the US$381,000 in reserves it holds against the frozen tokens
Said another way: Circle's protest assumes Circle will not use its power to upgrade the USDC to allow seizures. We know this is Circle's thinking because, again quoting the Wisconsin government:
Circle also stated that by the terms of its own contracts, it will not “burn and reissue” USDC.This is weird. The word "reissue" does not appear on circle.com, as of this writing, per a number of searches. And the USDC Risk Factors also include a section entitled "Blocked Addresses & Forfeited Funds" so this is puzzling. If we read the reference to "its own contracts" in that last quote from Circle as pertaining to the USDC smart contracts it is again true in a literal-and-useless sense. By the terms of the currently deployed smart contracts there is no reissue power. But by the terms of those same contracts Circle can simply change the contracts.
Circle looks to be playing games so it can collect interest on frozen USDC forever. Holding frozen scam-related funds forever and keeping the interest is an interesting business model.
ContractsIf you have ever entered into any sort of commercial agreement you have probably seen clauses that allow someone to modify the terms under extreme circumstances and maybe also in a "commercially reasonable manner" if the need arises. Most contracts contemplate the idea that things can change and some amount of flexibility is required. For example, a company may change its office address. Or it may change where it banks. Or any number of other things. If you enter into a contract which includes bank details and the other party changes where it banks that does not mean you automatically can stop paying. If the company tells you where to send the money instead you cannot just decide to terminate the contract (unless it is a very strange contract indeed).
Similarly, you might enter into a contract based on some published reference price – think oil or gold or a commercial property index or some interest rate benchmark – and the name of that thing might change. Or where or how it is published might change. Someone is supposed to keep things up to date in a commercially reasonable manner. There is standard verbiage for this in many industries and if you end up in court the judge will make you do the sensible thing. Yes there are corner cases. But the Circle mess is really quite simple. Circle's term look to allow for enforcement here. And there is a simple sequence of steps Circle can follow to do the enforcement. None of this makes much sense.
Circle looks to be trying to interpret things in an incredibly narrow and self-serving way to manufacture an injury Circle would suffer if it complied. And then to moan that imagined injury is unfair. If we go back to Circle's own words to the court this is clearly exactly what they are doing:
The Complaint’s sole allegation regarding Circle’s intentional disobedience is that “Circle...refused to invalidate the stolen USDC or issue new USDC,” Compl. ¶ 9. But the Complaint clearly misrepresents the content of the relevant communication. Circle did not “refuse” to invalidate the stolen USDC; it stated that it “does not hold the private keys to the address.” Compare Compl. ¶ 9 with Ex. 6. That is an accurate statement that Circle lacked the tools required to “invalidate” the USDC held in the Blocklisted Wallet, not an intentional refusal to comply with the terms of the Second Warrant.Circle was directed to "facilitate the seizure" of the funds. And then Circle asserts it did not refuse to invalidate the USDC in question – its just that Circle has no button labelled "seize" to press. But Circle did refuse to upgrade the USDC contracts to add a seize button.
Circle also presented the total non-sequitur that it "does not hold the private keys to the address" of the fraud-linked funds. This is also arguable. It is true in the sense that Circle does not hold the fraudster's private keys. But the term "private keys" is not being used in a technically precise sense here because there are two sets of private keys that can move the funds. The term "private keys" as used here connotes control over funds. And so long as Circle has the private keys to upgrade USDC it has one set of private keys that can facilitate a seizure out of the addresses in question. Remember: USDC and USDT are not true bearer assets. The issuers retain a lot of control over "your" funds.
Maybe you think we are giving the authorities too much credit and we should interpret the claim in narrow technical terms? Under that reading, you may be thinking, it is not Circle's problem the government asked for the wrong thing. We have sympathy for this sentiment. But there is a bigger problem. If we interpret everything in these documents in narrow technical terms Circle is wrong that it has "no ability to invalidate and reissue such USDC or to transfer them." It has the ability to do this by upgrading the contract to give itself the ability. This falsity then gives rise to a litany of other false claims including:
Circle "would also have to hold an additional $381,000 in US Currency to cover the new USDC": false because once Circle has burn power there is no need to double reserve. And that is if we accept the need in the first place as Circle can simply declare the address outlaw and ignore it.Circle also stated that by the terms of its own contracts, it will not “burn and reissue” USDC: this is at most a policy Circle can revise in its sole discretion. And having a policy to defy court orders is pretty much exactly what Circle is charged with here.Circle has no control of USDC held in third-party wallets: false because in a technical sense Circle has more than "no" control via contract upgradability. It has, and we apologize for the technobabble here, "some" control.Circle...has no ability to invalidate: false via upgradability.Circle...has no ability to...reissue such USDC or to transfer them: false via upgradability.If we read the claims in the dispute broadly: Circle is not being candid. If we read the claims narrowly: Circle is not being honest. Unless Circle has somehow lost the ability to upgrade USDC – which would be a far larger problem if kept hidden for so long – we just cannot see a way they are telling the truth here. Maybe there is one but there is certainly no hint of such an explanation in the court filings to date.
Circle's Principled ResistanceWhat makes this even stranger: Circle's terms also contemplate circumstances in which the company will resist court orders. But that too does not fit what is happening here. Again from the Access Denial document:
Circle reserves all rights to object to an access denial order that presents a threat to Circle Stablecoin or that Circle determines is objectionable.USDC holders do not have any rights or derive any value from this. But it presumably empowers the company to do what it is doing in Wisconsin now without worrying about shareholders suing anyone for resisting court orders. The US legal system is adversarial and Circle is 100% entitled to resist government requests and to challenge orders. Within the US system. Telling law enforcement to go pound sand after the judge rules is not something Circle is entitled to.
It is certainly possibly Circle views anything that reduce's Circle's interest income as objectionable. There is a logical, if wacky, corporate theory here: "We prefer to hold frozen assets indefinitely to maximize shareholder value. We view this as part of our fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. Victims are not shareholders sorry." Probably no company wants to come out and say that. But it is true that public companies have a responsibility to shareholders and not victims. They also have a responsibility to judges and to shareholders to not egregiously defy judges. So it is all kind of mixed together there.
Now notice the seizure warrant requests Circle is fighting here date back to August 2025. Multiple seizure warrants have been issued. And Circle has been communicating false claims to Wisconsin officials for many months now. Criminal charges were filed in April 2026. Circle moved beyond objecting to an access denial order to simply refusing to follow one after multiple rounds of back and forth. This happened over many months.
We accept it is possible to read these most recent actions as part of resisting the order. And maybe law enforcement jumped the gun with criminal charges. But it is kind of hard to credit Circle here and think ongoing negotiations without criminal charges would go anywhere. Circle has stated clearly that it cannot comply for technical reasons. Circle claims it is impossible to do what the court wants. But those claims are plainly false (or Circle is covering up something worse). For negotiations to go anywhere Circle would need to concede it was wrong or the police would need to stop asking for seizure. That looks like a stalled negotiation to us.
If Wisconsin officials were demanding Circle seize USDT then we would certainly feel for Circle. Circle is not omnipotent. There are plenty of web3 things Circle cannot do. And, obviously, it is possible for law enforcement to order someone to do something that is technically impossible for them to do. This is true of anyone and any law enforcement unit anywhere in the world. Try this one: a court could issue an order for a witness to not die before a trial. That would not have the effect of conveying immortality on the witness. Law enforcement can be wrong. But here, today, Circle is wrong.
The court wants Circle to do something that Circle can do. So we are going to make two predictions. First, Circle will eventually comply. And second, Circle will blame confusion between the legal and engineering teams for the false statements. The court should not accept that explanation. We kind of hope Circle tries the shareholder value line too. If someone says "victims are not shareholders and our fiduciary responsibility is to shareholders" that will just be too amazing for words. As odd as that outcome seems remember a listed US company is currently engaged in a dispute with law enforcement in Wisconsin in which the listed US company is just straight-up lying. This is all incredibly odd.
We have long predicted the lawyers would need to throw the engineers under the bus at some point. Honk honk.
Licensed to Shill: Retail Barely Touches Stablecoins – Treasury & Remittance Are the Real Adoption (Jeannie Lim, Xweave)
At Xweave, Jeannie Lim says her team moved $1 million for an e-commerce client in under three minutes, cutting settlement costs 30% against a Tier 2 bank’s SWIFT rate.
Lien Finance lost approximately 542,000 USDC due to a vulnerability in the bond token exchange logic. The attacker exploited this flaw to create unbacked assets and drain the protocol’s liquidity. Security researchers stated that this vulnerability allowed new tokens to be minted and exchanged for real liquidity without destroying the bond tokens.
Technical Details of the Attack Blockchain security firm SlowMist announced that the attack targeted Lien Finance’s bond exchange mechanism. The attacker used the exchangeEquivalentBonds function in the BondMakerCollateralizedEth contract to create bond tokens without destroying the input bonds and then exchanged them for USDC. This resulted in the withdrawal of approximately 542,144.63 USDC. SlowMist stated that the attack occurred because the bond groups were not sufficiently verified during the exchange. The wallet address used by the attacker was identified as 0x0d7d…1808a.
Protocol Weaknesses and Their Consequences On-chain analysis by DefimonAlerts revealed the attack occurred due to permissionless bond registration and pricing vulnerabilities. The attacker created bonds containing a malicious payment function by registering a new batch of bonds through the BondMakerCollateralizedEth contract. These bonds were routed to Lien Finance’s OTC pools and replaced with actual USDC liquidity. Following the attack, several contracts were affected, including Lien Finance’s GeneralizedDotc contract.
This incident adds another vulnerability to the recently increasing number of security breaches in DeFi protocols. In July, other protocols also suffered similar attacks, resulting in losses totaling millions of dollars. Lien Finance has not yet released a detailed technical report following this attack. Researchers note that such attacks stem from weaknesses in the protocol’s pricing and validation logic.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Samsung just made stablecoins a default feature of its mobile wallet. At Galaxy Unpacked 2026 on July 22, the company announced that Samsung Wallet will integrate native stablecoin support, with USDC among the expected options. The move effectively puts digital dollars alongside tap-to-pay, boarding passes, and loyalty cards in the pockets of hundreds of millions of Galaxy device owners.
What Samsung actually announced The stablecoin integration was revealed as part of a broader push to make Samsung Wallet a unified hub for payments, rewards, and digital assets. Samsung framed it as a “secured payments and rewards experience.”
The company hasn’t confirmed a specific launch date for the stablecoin feature. It also hasn’t officially locked in which stablecoins will be supported beyond the strong signals pointing toward USDC, Circle’s regulated dollar-pegged token.
Advertisement
The announcement didn’t happen in isolation. Samsung simultaneously unveiled the Galaxy Card, a credit card issued by Barclays and running on the Visa network, targeting US users with tiered cash-back rewards.
In 2025, the company partnered with Coinbase to give millions of US Galaxy users access to cryptocurrency services directly through their devices. That collaboration laid the groundwork for what’s coming next, essentially graduating Samsung Wallet from a non-custodial blockchain wallet with basic crypto access into something closer to a full-featured digital asset platform.
What this means for investors For Circle, the company behind USDC, this partnership could strengthen its position ahead of any potential IPO or public market activity.
There are risks worth noting. Regulatory frameworks for stablecoins remain a work in progress in many jurisdictions. Samsung will need to navigate varying compliance requirements across its global markets, which could limit the feature’s availability to certain regions initially. The US market, where the Galaxy Card is launching alongside the Barclays partnership, is the likely first target.
The 2025 Coinbase partnership gave Samsung a foundation in crypto services, but stablecoin integration represents a fundamentally different proposition. Offering users the ability to buy Bitcoin through a partner app is one thing. Embedding dollar-equivalent digital currency into the core wallet experience is another.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
