Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

2.47K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of OBIO either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, today announced that it has commenced an investigation on behalf of HDFC Bank Limited (“HDFC Bank” or the “Company”) (NYSE: HDB) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of the federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON HDFC BANK LIMITED (HDB), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Happened? On May.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Intuit To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Intuit between August 22, 2025 and May 20, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 22, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Intuit Inc. ("Intuit" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: INTU) and reminds investors of the September 8, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) they had overstated Intuit's competitive advantages and growth, as well as the overall strength and sustainability of its business model and operations; (2) in reality, Intuit was losing significant business in its tax-related business, particularly in its Turbo Tax business, as a result of, inter alia, increasing competitive and pricing pressures; (3) accordingly, Intuit's previously issued FY 2026 TurboTax revenue growth guidance was unreliable and/or unrealistic; and (4) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On May 20, 2026, Intuit released its fiscal Q3 2026 financial results, which included its 2026 tax season revenue. Intuit stated that it "did not have the overall tax season we expected" and that it "faced pressure among the most price-sensitive DIY filers." Intuit said that "[w]e [lost] on price," and revealed that the Company needed to evolve its business model by delivering the right lineup and price points to meet simple filers' needs at the low end. Intuit also announced that TurboTax online paying units were expected to grow by only 2% as total IRS filers were expected to decline by approximately 30 basis points, representing the "most significant industry-wide contraction since the post-COVID tax season."

On this news, Intuit's stock price fell $76.86 per share, or 20.02%, to close at $307.07 per share on May 21, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Intuit's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Intuit class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/INTU or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Intuit Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Intuit securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges Intuit misled investors by overstating TurboTax growth, competitive strength, and FY2026 guidance while failing to disclose increasing pricing and competitive pressures.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased Intuit (NASDAQ: INTU) securities between August 22, 2025 and May 20, 2026 may be eligible if they suffered losses.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff represents the proposed class. Eligible investors must file a motion with the court by September 8, 2026. Participation does not require serving as lead plaintiff.

What should investors do if they purchased Intuit stock during the Class Period?

Investors should review their transactions and consider consulting counsel regarding their legal rights, participation in the lawsuit, or seeking lead plaintiff status.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi has represented investors since 1995 and recovered hundreds of millions of dollars. The firm offers free evaluations of potential securities fraud claims.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Intuit securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305988

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Key Takeaways SCHW added 1.4 million brokerage accounts and $120 billion in core net new assets in Q2.Management raised the 2026 revenue growth outlook to 17.5-18.5% on stronger momentum.SCHW is integrating AI tools to personalize client interactions and boost efficiency. The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW - Free Report) emphasized continued client expansion, deeper relationships and technology investments during its second-quarter 2026 earnings call. Management focused on broadening Schwab’s role across investing, wealth, banking and lending while highlighting a diversified revenue model.

Executives also raised their full-year outlook, citing stronger business momentum, higher trading activity and improving operating leverage. The discussion centered on growth opportunities, artificial intelligence (AI), and the company’s ability to serve evolving investor needs.

SCHW Expands Client Growth StrategyCEO, president and director Richard Wurster said that SCHW continued to see strong client engagement, with second-quarter results supported by new accounts, asset gathering and deeper relationships. The company added 1.4 million brokerage accounts and generated $120 billion in core net new assets during the quarter.

Wurster highlighted growth across wealth and lending offerings, noting that managed investing net flows increased 53% year over year, while bank lending balances reached $67 billion, up 33%. He said Schwab’s strategy remains focused on helping clients consolidate more of their financial lives on one platform.

The company reported adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.62, exceeding the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.53. Revenues totaled $7.07 billion, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $6.89 billion.

The Charles Schwab Corporation Price, Consensus and EPS SurpriseSchwab Pushes Wealth & Banking GrowthSchwab said that its wealth opportunity remains significant as more investors seek financial guidance. Wurster said only a small portion of retail clients currently use fee-based advice solutions, creating room for growth through expanded planning, tax and trust capabilities.

Wurster also pointed to lending as a key relationship-building opportunity. He noted that pledged asset line adoption has grown and said increasing lending penetration could strengthen both client relationships and revenue diversification.

CFO Michael Verdeschi said bank loan balances grew to $67 billion, while margin balances reached $165.1 billion. He added that increased lending activity supported revenue growth and improved the company’s business mix.

SCHW Advances AI & New CapabilitiesSCHW management continued to emphasize AI as a tool to enhance client experiences and operating efficiency. Wurster said AI is being integrated across the company’s platform to personalize interactions and support scalable growth.

The company highlighted new capabilities, including Portfolio Insights and progress on Schwab Assistant. Wurster said developer productivity improved 15-20% over the past year as AI tools became more embedded in operations.

SCHW also discussed expansion into emerging investment areas. Management said Schwab Crypto is progressing as planned, with transfer capabilities expected to enter pilot testing, while the Forge acquisition is intended to expand private market access.

Schwab Updates 2026 Financial OutlookSchwab raised its expectations for 2026 revenue growth, with Verdeschi saying the company now expects total revenue growth of 17.5-18.5%. Management also expects full-year net interest margin expansion to 3-3.10%.

Verdeschi said the updated 2026 outlook reflects stronger equity markets, continued asset gathering and increased trading activity. The company raised its full-year daily average trade assumption to 10.6 million while expecting some moderation from recent elevated levels.

The CFO added that expense growth expectations increased to 9.5-10.5%, driven by volume-related costs and the inclusion of Forge. He said underlying expense growth expectations remained consistent with prior targets.

SCHW Addresses Trading Activity QuestionsDuring the Q&A session, a Piper Sandler analyst asked about the sustainability of record trading activity. Wurster said SCHW views higher engagement as being supported by broader participation, younger investors, options adoption and increased use of AI in investing decisions.

Wurster also mentioned that market interest in areas such as artificial intelligence, major technology themes and new investment opportunities has contributed to elevated engagement. He emphasized that trading activity was not solely driven by short-term market conditions.

A Jefferies analyst questioned the durability of net new asset trends. Wurster said management remains confident in long-term organic growth of 5% or higher, supported by advisor services, wealth offerings and workplace opportunities.

Schwab Maintains Long-Term FocusSchwab’s leadership continued to frame the business around scale, diversification and client relationships. Wurster said the company is investing in branches, financial consultants, advisor support and technology while using its platform breadth to serve different client needs.

Management highlighted that record revenues of $7.1 billion and adjusted EPS of $1.62 reflected strength across multiple businesses, including net interest revenues, asset management fees and trading revenues.

The company enters the remainder of 2026 focused on expanding wealth, banking and investing capabilities while maintaining capital discipline. Verdeschi said Schwab’s diversified model supports continued earnings growth across market environments.

Zacks Rank & Style SignalsSCHW carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), which indicates favorable earnings estimate revision trends and places the stock among the higher-rated stocks in the Zacks Rank system. The Zacks Rank can change as analysts update earnings estimates following quarterly results. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

The stock’s Style Scores include a Value Score of C, Growth Score of D, Momentum Score of A and VGM Score of C. Zacks Style Scores are designed to complement the Zacks Rank, with higher grades generally reflecting stronger characteristics within each investment style.

Have you assessed how the international operations of Fastenal (FAST - Free Report) performed in the quarter ended June 2026? For this maker of industrial and construction fasteners, possessing an expansive global footprint, parsing the trends of international revenues could be critical to gauge its financial resilience and growth prospects.

In today's increasingly interconnected global economy, a company's ability to tap into international markets can be a pivotal factor in shaping its overall financial health and growth trajectory. For investors, understanding a company's reliance on overseas markets has become increasingly crucial, as it offers insights into the company's sustainability of earnings, ability to tap into diverse economic cycles and overall growth potential.

Being present in international markets serves as a counterbalance to domestic economic challenges while offering chances to engage with more rapidly evolving economies. However, this kind of diversification introduces challenges like currency fluctuations, geopolitical uncertainties and varying market trends.

Our review of FAST's last quarterly performance uncovered some notable trends in the revenue contributions from its international markets, which are commonly analyzed and tracked by Wall Street experts.

For the quarter, the company's total revenue amounted to $2.39 billion, experiencing an increase of 14.7% year over year. Next, we'll explore the breakdown of FAST's international revenue to understand the importance of its overseas business operations.

Exploring FAST's International Revenue PatternsOf the total revenue, $83.4 million came from Other foreign countries during the last fiscal quarter, accounting for 3.5%. This represented a surprise of +16.14% as analysts had expected the region to contribute $71.81 million to the total revenue. In comparison, the region contributed $79.1 million, or 3.6%, and $66.1 million, or 3.2%, to total revenue in the previous and year-ago quarters, respectively.

During the quarter, Canada and Mexico contributed $333.7 million in revenue, making up 14% of the total revenue. When compared to the consensus estimate of $325.21 million, this meant a surprise of +2.61%. Looking back, Canada and Mexico contributed $306.3 million, or 13.9%, in the previous quarter, and $281.4 million, or 13.5%, in the same quarter of the previous year.

Revenue Forecasts for the International MarketsIt is projected by analysts on Wall Street that Fastenal will post revenues of $2.44 billion for the ongoing fiscal quarter, an increase of 14.3% from the year-ago quarter. The expected contributions from Other foreign countries and Canada and Mexico to this revenue are 3.1%, and 13.7%, translating into $74.55 million, and $333.11 million, respectively.

For the full year, the company is expected to generate $9.23 billion in total revenue, up 12.5% from the previous year. Revenues from Other foreign countries and Canada and Mexico are expected to constitute 3.2% ($290.86 million), and 13.8% ($1.27 billion) of the total, respectively.

Wrapping UpThe dependency of Fastenal on global markets for its revenues presents a mix of potential gains and hazards. Thus, monitoring the trends in its overseas revenues can be a key indicator for predicting the firm's future performance.

In an environment where global interconnections and geopolitical skirmishes are intensifying, Wall Street analysts keep a keen eye on these trends, particularly for firms with overseas operations, to adjust their earnings predictions. Moreover, a range of other aspects, including how a company fares in its home country, significantly affects these projections.

Here at Zacks, we put a great deal of emphasis on a company's changing earnings outlook, as empirical research has shown that's a powerful force driving a stock's near-term price performance. Quite naturally, the correlation is positive here -- an upward revision in earnings estimates drives the stock price higher.

Boasting a remarkable track record that's been externally verified, the Zacks Rank, our unique stock rating system, leverages changes in earnings projections to function as a reliable gauge for predicting short-term stock price movements.

Fastenal, bearing a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), is expected to outperform the broader market's movements in the near term. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

A Look at Fastenal's Recent Stock Price PerformanceOver the past month, the stock has seen a decline of 1.3% in its value, whereas the Zacks S&P 500 composite has posted an increase of 0.3%. The Zacks Industrial Products sector, Fastenal's industry group, has descended 3.4% over the identical span. In the past three months, there's been an increase of 0.7% in the company's stock price, against a rise of 6.6% in the S&P 500 index. The broader sector has increased by 2.1% during this interval.

Key Takeaways LMT is expanding missile, fighter and munitions programs with a $186.4B backlog supporting growth.General Dynamics ended Q1 2026 with a $130.84B backlog and $188.44B in estimated contract value.GD and LMT differ on valuation, debt, earnings estimate revisions and recent share performance. Lockheed Martin (LMT - Free Report) and General Dynamics (GD - Free Report) derive a significant portion of their revenues from the U.S. Department of Defense and play critical roles in supporting national security through the development of advanced military platforms, combat systems, naval vessels, aerospace technologies and mission-critical services. Their long-standing relationships with the Pentagon, combined with large contract backlogs and exposure to rising global defense spending, make them natural peers for investors evaluating opportunities in the defense sector.

Both companies are positioned to benefit from long-term trends supporting defense spending. Heightened geopolitical tensions, military modernization efforts, growing demand for missile defense systems, increased naval investment and rising defense budgets among NATO allies and Indo-Pacific nations are driving sustained demand for advanced defense technologies. Since governments typically commit to multi-year procurement programs, both Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics enjoy relatively predictable revenue streams supported by long-term contracts and sizeable order backlogs.

Let's compare the two stocks' fundamentals to determine which one is better positioned at present.

Factors Acting in Favor of LMT StockLockheed Martin continues to convert demand for key franchise programs into sizable awards, supporting revenue visibility over a multiyear horizon. In the first quarter of 2026, Missiles and Fire Control was awarded $7 billion of PAC-3 contracts, including a fully funded $4.8 billion undefinitized contract, and the company also secured long-lead materials for F-35 Lots 20 and 21. These order flows, together with continued activity across strategic missile, combat systems and sustainment work, underpin a backlog of $186.4 billion as of March 29, 2026.

Management indicated that the current U.S. budget rollout reflects priorities such as accelerating munitions production, strengthening integrated air and missile defense, advancing next-generation aircraft and expanding space capabilities. These areas align closely with the company’s core platforms across PAC-3, THAAD and PrSM, as well as fighter and strategic programs. LMT has also signed multiyear framework agreements with the Department of War to scale munitions production and is planning investments across more than 20 new or modernized facilities, which can improve capacity planning and reduce supply-chain bottlenecks over time.

Factors Acting in Favor of GD StockGeneral Dynamics’ solid number of award wins and a strong global presence will help maintain a steady growth momentum. At the end of the first quarter of 2026, the company witnessed a solid backlog of $130.84 billion, driven by a strong order inflow. The estimated contract value, which combines the total backlog with the potential contract value, totaled $188.44 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2026. The strength of the order flow was driven by strong demand across the company’s product and services portfolio.

Significant awards won by General Dynamics in the last reported quarter included a $15.4 billion contract for continued design and support work on the Columbia-class submarines program. Such impressive order trends and strong backlog count indicate solid demand for the company’s products, thereby bolstering its revenue generation prospects significantly.

How Does the Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for LMT & GD?The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Lockheed Martin’s 2026 earnings per share (EPS) indicates an increase of 0.03% over the past 60 days. 
 

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

The consensus estimate for General Dynamics’ 2026 EPS indicates an increase of 0.12% over the past 60 days.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Valuation for LMT & GDLockheed Martin shares trade at a forward 12-month Price/Sales (P/S F12M) of 1.44X compared with General Dynamics’ 1.76X.

LMT & GD’s Debt PositionCurrently, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics’ total debt to capital is 73.43% and 23.51%, respectively.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

LMT & GD’s Price PerformanceIn the past three months, shares of General Dynamics have increased 15.4%, while those of Lockheed Martin have declined 4.3%, compared with the industry’s growth of 1%.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

LMT or GD: Which is a Better Choice Now?Lockheed Martin continues to secure major defense contracts across its core missile, fighter aircraft and sustainment programs. LMT is also well-positioned to benefit from U.S. defense priorities focused on expanding munitions production, strengthening missile defense and advancing next-generation aircraft. General Dynamics continues to benefit from strong demand across its defense portfolio, with robust contract wins supporting a large backlog and providing solid long-term revenue visibility. Recent major program awards, particularly in naval defense, highlight the company's strong market position and reinforce its growth prospects as it executes on long-term government contracts.

Our choice at the moment is General Dynamics, given its better price performance, strong earnings growth and better debt position than Lockheed Martin. GD carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and LMT has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) at present.

You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

It doesn't matter your age or experience: taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals for all investors. Luckily, Zacks Premium offers several different ways to do both.

The research service features daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, all of which will help you become a smarter, more confident investor.

It also includes access to the Zacks Style Scores.

What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores, developed alongside the Zacks Rank, are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on three widely-followed investing methodologies; they also help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.

Each stock is given an alphabetic rating of A, B, C, D or F based on their value, growth, and momentum qualities. With this system, an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on, meaning the better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform.

The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:

Value ScoreValue investors love finding good stocks at good prices, especially before the broader market catches on to a stock's true value. Utilizing ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and many other multiples, the Value Style Score identifies the most attractive and most discounted stocks.

Growth ScoreGrowth investors are more concerned with a stock's future prospects, and the overall financial health and strength of a company. Thus, the Growth Style Score analyzes characteristics like projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow to find stocks that will see sustainable growth over time.

Momentum ScoreMomentum trading is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook, and these investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." The Momentum Style Score can pinpoint good times to build a position in a stock, using factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates.

VGM ScoreIf you want a combination of all three Style Scores, then the VGM Score will be your friend. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, helping you find the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum. It's also one of the best indicators to use with the Zacks Rank.

How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank A proprietary stock-rating model, the Zacks Rank utilizes the power of earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings outlook, to help investors create a successful portfolio.

Investors can count on the Zacks Rank's success, with #1 (Strong Buy) stocks producing an unmatched +23.94% average annual return since 1988, more than double the S&P 500's performance. But the model rates a large number of stocks, and there are over 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, plus another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.

But it can feel overwhelming to pick the right stocks for you and your investing goals with over 800 top-rated stocks to choose from.

That's where the Style Scores come in.

To maximize your returns, you want to buy stocks with the highest probability of success. This means picking stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B. If you find yourself looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, make sure they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.

Since the Scores were created to work together with the Zacks Rank, the direction of a stock's earnings estimate revisions should be a key factor when choosing which stocks to buy.

A stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, for instance, even one with Scores of A and B, will still have a declining earnings forecast, and a greater chance its share price will fall too.

Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.

Stock to Watch: Rockwell Automation (ROK - Free Report) Based in Milwaukee, WI, Rockwell Automation provides industrial automation and information solutions worldwide. The company has a wide network spanning more than 100 countries. The United States generates around 50% of the company’s total sales. Outside the United States, the company’s primary markets are Canada, China, Mexico, Italy, and the United Kingdom.

ROK is a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of B.

Additionally, the company could be a top pick for growth investors. ROK has a Growth Style Score of B, forecasting year-over-year earnings growth of 24% for the current fiscal year.

For fiscal 2026, three analysts revised their earnings estimate upwards in the last 60 days, and the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.14 to $13.06 per share. ROK boasts an average earnings surprise of +10.2%.

With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Growth and VGM Style Scores, ROK should be on investors' short list.

The proven Zacks Rank system focuses on earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find winning stocks. Nevertheless, we know that our readers all have their own perspectives, so we are always looking at the latest trends in value, growth, and momentum to find strong picks.

Looking at the history of these trends, perhaps none is more beloved than value investing. This strategy simply looks to identify companies that are being undervalued by the broader market. Value investors rely on traditional forms of analysis on key valuation metrics to find stocks that they believe are undervalued, leaving room for profits.

Zacks has developed the innovative Style Scores system to highlight stocks with specific traits. For example, value investors will be interested in stocks with great grades in the "Value" category. When paired with a high Zacks Rank, "A" grades in the Value category are among the strongest value stocks on the market today.

One company value investors might notice is Archer Daniels Midland (ADM - Free Report) . ADM is currently holding a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and a Value grade of A. The stock has a Forward P/E ratio of 13.41. This compares to its industry's average Forward P/E of 15.94. ADM's Forward P/E has been as high as 14.13 and as low as 9.50, with a median of 11.12, all within the past year.

Another notable valuation metric for ADM is its P/B ratio of 1.32. The P/B ratio is used to compare a stock's market value with its book value, which is defined as total assets minus total liabilities. ADM's current P/B looks attractive when compared to its industry's average P/B of 1.35. Over the past year, ADM's P/B has been as high as 1.37 and as low as 0.91, with a median of 1.13.

Value investors also use the P/S ratio. The P/S ratio is calculated as price divided by sales. This is a popular metric because sales are harder to manipulate on an income statement, so they are often considered a better performance indicator. ADM has a P/S ratio of 0.52. This compares to its industry's average P/S of 0.88.

Finally, we should also recognize that ADM has a P/CF ratio of 13.25. This metric takes into account a company's operating cash flow and can be used to find stocks that are undervalued based on their solid cash outlook. This stock's P/CF looks attractive against its industry's average P/CF of 15.91. ADM's P/CF has been as high as 13.80 and as low as 7.44, with a median of 9.16, all within the past year.

These are only a few of the key metrics included in Archer Daniels Midland's strong Value grade, but they help show that the stock is likely undervalued right now. When factoring in the strength of its earnings outlook, ADM looks like an impressive value stock at the moment.

Luis Alvarez/DigitalVision via Getty Images

REIT earnings season is often kicked off by an early report from Prologis (PLD) and once again they delivered. In addition to being the largest industrial REIT in the world, Prologis is the single biggest source of knowledge on the industrial market. Other sectors have their bellwethers, but Prologis is a bellwether on steroids. Their 2Q26 earnings report was a massive trove of information, providing the freshest data with which to analyze the whole sector.

Even though Prologis beat earnings and raised guidance substantially, the bigger market impact was in peer industrial REITs. Through our Markets Monitor, we continuously track the biggest REIT gainers and losers on a real-time basis, and 4 industrial REITs made the top 10 on 7/16/26, the day of PLD’s report.

2MC Markets Monitor, Data compiled from Google Finance as of 7/16/2026.

Rexford (REXR) was up over 7.5%, STAG Industrial (STAG) was up 4%, while Terreno (TRNO) and First Industrial (FR) were each up about 3%. There was no individual news on these companies, it was just the read-through from PLD’s comprehensive report.

This article will examine the fresh batch of data. We will discuss the bullish and bearish data points for the industrial sector as well as some nuances that make certain industrial REITs better positioned than others.

Bearish data and risk factors for industrial REITs In my opinion the 2 largest risk factors for industrial are:

Supply growth USMCA uncertainty. Prologis is ramping up its development activity and they are not alone. Prologis' 2Q26 snapshot points toward industrial completions of 52-54 million square feet with another 216-227 million under construction.

PLD

Looking at a longer timeframe, new supply is expected to ramp up to levels above 2017-2019, which were fairly normal years.

Yardi Matrix

Fortunately, construction is not expected to reach the nosebleed levels of 2022 and 2023.

Certain submarkets are being hit particularly hard by supply.

Yardi Matrix

These submarkets also have very high-demand growth so it is not necessarily the case that they should be avoided despite the supply boom.

On July 1st, Ambassador Greer announced that the U.S. has not renewed the trade deal between North American countries (USMCA) for a 16-year term in favor of annual renewal. It will remain in effect, but the non-renewal creates uncertainty regarding future trade. I would ask readers on each side of the aisle to put aside political views on the USMCA and consider the practical implications for industrial REITs.

Industrial REITs serve domestic manufacturing and moving of products but also derive a significant amount of demand from international trade. The USMCA oversees about $2T in annual trade between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

Nonrenewal of the USMCA adds a layer of uncertainty. It is entirely possible that the USMCA will be replaced by something better for the U.S. or by something worse for the U.S.

Until that happens, however, it is difficult for importers and exporters to have clarity on future operations which could cause hesitancy for industrial tenants to sign up for 10-year leases. Thus, we view the uncertainty as inherently delaying some demand regardless of the eventual outcome.

For the most part, these bearish factors were already known prior to Prologis’ earnings. We believe the report had an extremely positive response in the sector because most of the fresh data was bullish in nature.

Fresh bullish data points Prologis’ earnings call had an overarching theme of a positive inflection point for the sector. In previous calls they anticipated a positive inflection, but it is quite a bit more convincing when the inflection actually shows up in the data.

Industrial REITs have maintained very strong same-store NOI growth throughout the entire downturn on the back of mark-to-market. Even though market rents were flat to slightly down sequentially in previous periods, REITs were replacing 10-year-old leases at current market rates which are much higher than 10 years ago.

Per a Yardi Matrix outlook:

“Leases signed in the past 12 months averaged $10.06 per square foot, $0.94 above in-place rents”

Thus, the “weakness” in the industrial sector in 2024 through early 2026 never filtered through to earnings with just about the entire sector showing strong AFFO/share growth. Analysts were merely concerned that the weak market rate growth would cause the mark-to-market to eventually dry up.

That was the major inflection point in Prologis’ report. Market rents have resumed growth which preserves the positive mark-to-market.

PLD’s CFO Tim Arndt discussed this on the 2Q26 earnings call:

“Notably, our portfolio lease mark-to-market remained unchanged from the prior quarter at 17% on a net effective basis, fully replenishing our embedded NOI opportunity of nearly $800 million available without any further market rent growth.”

Market rates are rising again as broad based demand caused net absorption to exceed new supply. Arndt continued:

“Customer demand is broadening with notable and growing strength across e-commerce, advanced manufacturing”

Occupancy rose on 66 million square feet of net absorption in 2Q26 nationally per Arndt’s statement:

“U.S. net absorption totaled 66 million square feet in the second quarter, a strong result and the highest level since 2022. This contributed to vacancy declining to 7.2%, while market rents increased approximately 70 basis points”

Same-store NOI growth and rent spreads both inflected upward in 2026.

PLD Supplemental

Chris Caton, managing director of global strategy and analytics, provided a longer term outlook on the 2Q26 earnings call:

“Net absorption, we see that amounting to 220 million square feet in the U.S. this year. [ ] For completions, we anticipate 195 million square feet this year, and that should allow market occupancies to rise a total of, let's say, 30 basis points this year”

Some of the incremental demand is coming from data centers and industrial properties being somewhat similar. With the right power infrastructure, industrial warehouses can be converted into functional data centers.

Another large portion of demand comes from the continual rise in logistics demand from E-Commerce. The data most often cited is the gradual market share capture of E-Commerce over brick and mortar.

FRED

However, the more relevant statistic is the raw magnitude of e-commerce sales, which is far steeper.

FRED

Higher sales volume requires more warehousing space.

All these positive demand drivers resulted in Prologis materially raising their 2026 guidance to $6.22-$6.30 from its previous range of $6.07-$6.23. Since PLD operates in nearly every important industrial submarket, their results loosely extrapolate to the rest of the sector. However, there are some data points that point to certain industrial REITs being better positioned than others.

Positioning within the industrial sector Industrial REITs are priced as a premium sector with an average 2026 AFFO multiple of 21.77X. Multiples properly correlate inversely with leverage.

2MC

All else equal, the industrial REITs below the line are relatively undervalued on a leverage-neutral basis while those over the line are relatively overvalued.

Prologis is pricey, and it arguably should be. It is an excellent company with a long track record of outperformance. I think it would be reasonable for an investor who wants a fairly passive approach to just buy PLD and forget about it.

We prefer to extract maximal value within the sector by finding those with some combination of favorable valuation and favorable property portfolio dynamics.

In addition to the cold storage REITs which have their own set of fundamentals, there are 4 traditional industrial REITs that we think are particularly interesting at the moment.

EGP STAG REXR OLP All 4 of these have U.S.-based portfolios which is advantageous as Prologis’ report revealed U.S. outperformance. Occupancy in the U.S. is relatively high and inflecting upward.

PLD Supplemental

Smaller footprint industrial properties are outperforming. Most of the new supply is big so the smaller properties have had to compete less with developments. PLD breaks down occupancy by size

PLD

EastGroup Properties (EGP) is the most exposed to smaller footprints which we believe will be an enduring advantage.

STAG Industrial and Rexford are the most undervalued industrial REITs on a leverage neutral basis. We have known STAG since we took our first position in it shortly after its IPO. It is a well-managed company and its fundamentals have been remarkably up and to the right.

S&P Global Market Intelligence

We view its current valuation as highly opportunistic.

Rexford is a bit more of a question mark. It is interesting and we will be looking into it further but are not yet ready to pull the trigger on a full position. Its valuation is very attractive at a steep discount to NAV and a low AFFO multiple. The sticking point is that REXR is highly concentrated in the Inland Empire which has been both the best submarket and the worst submarket depending on what timeframe one is viewing. These coastal markets are still rough but PLD did express some optimism for a positive inflection.

I am leaning toward waiting a bit longer to see the inflection actually hit the data, and in so doing, risk missing some of the upside in REXR stock.

OLP is a more niche play on the industrial space which we discuss in greater detail here.

The bottom line Industrial REITs are fundamentally strong with PLD providing fresh data on a clear upward inflection point. PLD is a reasonable way to play the sector, but given its high valuation I think some of its peers are better positioned.

Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN - Free Report) is one of the stocks most watched by Zacks.com visitors lately. So, it might be a good idea to review some of the factors that might affect the near-term performance of the stock.

Shares of this company have returned +11.2% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.3% change. The Zacks Financial - Miscellaneous Services industry, to which Coinbase Global belongs, has lost 3.8% over this period. Now the key question is: Where could the stock be headed in the near term?

While media releases or rumors about a substantial change in a company's business prospects usually make its stock 'trending' and lead to an immediate price change, there are always some fundamental facts that eventually dominate the buy-and-hold decision-making.

Earnings Estimate RevisionsRather than focusing on anything else, we at Zacks prioritize evaluating the change in a company's earnings projection. This is because we believe the fair value for its stock is determined by the present value of its future stream of earnings.

We essentially look at how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to reflect the impact of the latest business trends. And if earnings estimates go up for a company, the fair value for its stock goes up. A higher fair value than the current market price drives investors' interest in buying the stock, leading to its price moving higher. This is why empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

Coinbase Global is expected to post earnings of $0.19 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +58.3%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed -13.8%.

The consensus earnings estimate of $1.41 for the current fiscal year indicates a year-over-year change of -65%. This estimate has changed -18.8% over the last 30 days.

For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $4.27 indicates a change of +202.7% from what Coinbase Global is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed -10.8%.

Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, Coinbase Global is rated Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).

The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:

12 Month EPS

Projected Revenue GrowthWhile earnings growth is arguably the most superior indicator of a company's financial health, nothing happens as such if a business isn't able to grow its revenues. After all, it's nearly impossible for a company to increase its earnings for an extended period without increasing its revenues. So, it's important to know a company's potential revenue growth.

In the case of Coinbase Global, the consensus sales estimate of $1.32 billion for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of -11.8%. The $5.88 billion and $7.02 billion estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of -18.1% and +19.4%, respectively.

Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryCoinbase Global reported revenues of $1.41 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of -30.5%. EPS of -$0.17 for the same period compares with $1.94 a year ago.

Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.5 billion, the reported revenues represent a surprise of -5.61%. The EPS surprise was -147.22%.

Over the last four quarters, the company surpassed EPS estimates just once. The company topped consensus revenue estimates just once over this period.

ValuationNo investment decision can be efficient without considering a stock's valuation. Whether a stock's current price rightly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects is an essential determinant of its future price performance.

While comparing the current values of a company's valuation multiples, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), with its own historical values helps determine whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of the reasonability of the stock's price.

The Zacks Value Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which pays close attention to both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics to grade stocks from A to F (an A is better than a B; a B is better than a C; and so on), is pretty helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.

Coinbase Global is graded F on this front, indicating that it is trading at a premium to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.

Bottom LineThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Coinbase Global. However, its Zacks Rank #4 does suggest that it may underperform the broader market in the near term.

, /PRNewswire/ -- National shareholder rights firm Hagens Berman alerts investors in Roblox Corporation (NYSE: RBLX) that the alleged class period in the ongoing securities class action litigation has been expanded. A new lawsuit now covers investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Roblox common stock between October 31, 2024 through April 30, 2026, inclusive.

National shareholder rights firm Hagens Berman is investigating the legal claims that Roblox and its co-defendants violated the federal securities laws. The firm encourages Roblox investors who suffered substantial losses to submit your losses now.

Class Period: Oct. 31, 2024 – Apr. 30, 2026
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: Aug. 7, 2026
Visit: www.hbsslaw.com/investor-fraud/rblx
Contact the Firm Now: [email protected]
                                        844-916-0895

Roblox Corporation (RBLX) Securities Class Action:

The primary focus of the litigation is on the propriety of Roblox's disclosures about its commitment toward protecting the safety of young users of its platform and the recent the impact on its business and prospects of the age-check verification rollout aimed at increasing safety within certain social features on its platform. The rollout began in November 2025.

During the Class Period, Roblox and its senior management have assured investors that "safety would be paramount[,]" "building safety into our products has been a huge effort[,]" and "[o]ur approach to safety includes multiple proactive measures as well as parental controls[.]" They have also emphasized that "b]ecause our Platform includes children aged 5 and over, our safety and civility policies are purpose-built to be strict."

Investors slowly learned the truth through a series of disclosures beginning on October 30, 2025. That day, the Company revealed that it would be instituting enhanced age verification technology globally beginning in January 2026. On this news, the price of the Company's common stock declined 16% from $133.74 per share to $113.00 per share, wiping out $13 billion in market value.

Then, on April 30, 2026, Roblox revealed a steep deceleration in year-over-year and sequential DAU growth, slashed its 2026 revenue guidance (reflecting ongoing shrinkage in DAU growth), and severely cut its 2026 bookings growth midpoint from 24% to just 10%, investors glimpsed what was really going on.

Roblox said just 51% of its global DAUs age checked and also said that "as a result of age check […] we have seen a reduction in app store ratings, and we believe this may be contributing to a reduction in organic sign-ups that typically flow from app stores." Roblox also said its lowered prospects are the result of "continued friction" resulting from the age-check rollout.

"We're focused on when Roblox and its management knew of the adverse consequences of the age-check rollout and whether they intentionally misled investors it," said Reed Kathrein, the Hagens Berman partner leading the firm's investigation.

If you invested in Roblox and have substantial losses, or have knowledge that will assist the firm's investigation, submit your losses now.

If you'd like more information and answers to other frequently asked questions about the Roblox case and the firm's investigation, read more.

Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding Roblox should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 844-916-0895 or email [email protected] .

About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation firm focusing on corporate accountability. The firm is home to a robust practice and represents investors as well as whistleblowers, workers, consumers and others in cases achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and other wrongdoings. Hagens Berman's team has secured more than $2.9 billion in this area of law. More about the firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw. 

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any future case.

SOURCE Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

Wall Street expects a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when Automatic Data Processing (ADP - Free Report) reports results for the quarter ended June 2026. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates.

The earnings report, which is expected to be released on July 29, might help the stock move higher if these key numbers are better than expectations. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower.

While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise.

Zacks Consensus EstimateThis payroll and human resources company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $2.59 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +14.6%.

Revenues are expected to be $5.43 billion, up 5.9% from the year-ago quarter.

Estimate Revisions TrendThe consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period.

Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts.

Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

Earnings WhisperEstimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. This insight is at the core of our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction).

The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.

Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only.

A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP.

Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell).

How Have the Numbers Shaped Up for ADP?For ADP, the Most Accurate Estimate is higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of +0.16%.

On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3.

So, this combination indicates that ADP will most likely beat the consensus EPS estimate.

Does Earnings Surprise History Hold Any Clue?Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number.

For the last reported quarter, it was expected that ADP would post earnings of $3.28 per share when it actually produced earnings of $3.37, delivering a surprise of +2.74%.

Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates four times.

Bottom LineAn earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss.

That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.

ADP appears a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release.

Expected Results of an Industry PlayerF5 Networks (FFIV - Free Report) , another stock in the Zacks Internet - Software industry, is expected to report earnings per share of $3.98 for the quarter ended June 2026. This estimate points to a year-over-year change of -4.3%. Revenues for the quarter are expected to be $832.12 million, up 6.6% from the year-ago quarter.

The consensus EPS estimate for F5 has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. However, a lower Most Accurate Estimate has resulted in an Earnings ESP of -0.83%.

This Earnings ESP, combined with its Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), makes it difficult to conclusively predict that F5 will beat the consensus EPS estimate. The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters.

Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar.

Key Takeaways Annaly beat Q2 earnings estimates as earnings available for distribution rose year over year.NLY's total portfolio reached $109.4 billion, including a $95 billion Agency portfolio at quarter-end.NLY raised its quarterly dividend, increased hedging and expanded financing capacity amid rate uncertainty. Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY - Free Report) reported second-quarter 2026 earnings available for distribution (EAD) per average share of 79 cents, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 75 cents. The figure increased from 73 cents in the year-ago quarter.

NLY’s net interest income (NII) and net interest margin improved year over year in the reported quarter. Notably, the year-over-year increase in book value per common share (BVPS) was also encouraging. However, higher economic funding costs were concerning.

Net income available to common stockholders was $781.6 million compared with $19.8 million in the year-ago period.

Inside Annaly’s Q2 HeadlinesNII was $488.2 million in the reported quarter, which lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.1%. In the prior-year quarter, the company reported NII of $273.2 million.

Net interest spread (excluding PAA) of 1.50% in the second quarter increased from 1.47% in the prior-year quarter.

Annaly’s BVPS was $20.15 as of June 30, 2026, up from $18.45 in the prior-year quarter. At the end of the reported quarter, the company’s economic capital ratio was 14.9%, up from 14.3% in the prior-year quarter.

In the second quarter, the weighted average actual constant prepayment rate was 11.6%, up from 8.7% in the year-ago quarter.

Annaly generated an annualized EAD return on average equity of 15.12% in the second quarter, which increased from the prior-year quarter’s 14.86%.

The company’s total portfolio was $109.4 billion in the quarter, including a $95 billion Agency portfolio. The Residential Credit portfolio was $10.4 billion, while the MSR portfolio was $4.1 billion.

NLY Keeps Leverage Conservative With Ample LiquidityAnnaly maintained a disciplined leverage profile in the quarter, with GAAP leverage at 7.4X, up from 7.3X in the prior quarter, and economic leverage at 5.6X, down from 5.7X. The company also reported total stockholders’ equity of $16.9 billion as of the quarter-end.

Liquidity remained a focal point, given ongoing macro and rate uncertainty. Annaly ended the quarter with $9.6 billion in total assets available for financing, including $5.5 billion in cash and unencumbered Agency MBS. The company also increased financing capacity in its Residential Credit business by $740 million through expanded credit facilities.

Annaly Hedging Rises Amid Macro UncertaintyAgainst an uncertain rate environment, NLY adopted a more defensive hedge posture. The company ended the quarter with a hedge ratio of 97%, up from 87% in the prior quarter, while its hedge portfolio increased to $92 billion from $81 billion.

Funding costs were mixed during the quarter. Average GAAP costs of interest-bearing liabilities declined one basis point sequentially to 4.28%, while average economic costs increased three basis points to 3.96%. The net interest margin, excluding PAA, was 1.76% compared with 1.71% in the second quarter of 2025. Average yield on interest-earning assets, excluding the premium amortization adjustment, was 5.46%, up from 5.41% in the year-ago quarter.

NLY Leans on Dividend Coverage & Capital RaisingA key highlight for income-focused investors was that earnings again exceeded the common dividend. Annaly increased its quarterly common stock cash dividend to 75 cents per share for the second quarter from 70 cents in the year-ago period, supported by its earnings available for distribution.

The company also leaned on equity issuance to support growth. Annaly raised $447 million through its at-the-market sales program during the quarter, which it characterized as accretive, and largely deployed the capital into higher-coupon TBA securities and specified pools.

Our Take on NLYAnnaly’s second-quarter results benefited from higher net interest income, stronger net income and an improved net interest margin. While book value per share and the economic capital ratio rose year over year, higher economic funding costs and faster prepayment activity are likely to keep returns sensitive in the near term.

NLY currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).

You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Performance & Earnings Dates of Annaly’s PeersAGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC - Free Report) reported second-quarter 2026 net spread and dollar roll income per common share of 40 cents, topping the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 5.3%. The metric increased 5.3% from the year-ago quarter’s 38 cents.

AGNC’s results benefited from higher NII, an increase in tangible net book value per share (BVPS) and growth in the investment portfolio. However, a lower net interest spread, a rise in the weighted average cost of funds and elevated prepayment rates were concerning.

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD - Free Report) is expected to post second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 06.

Over the past seven days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for STWD’s quarterly earnings has been unchanged at 41 cents per share.

AGNC Investment (AGNC -0.33%) has become a remarkably consistent dividend stock. The real estate investment trust (REIT) recently hit a milestone of 75 consecutive months of paying the same dividend rate ($0.12 per share). That's impressive, considering all the volatility in the mortgage and interest rate markets over the past few years.

Here's a look at the mortgage REIT's recent second-quarter financial results and what they reveal about the future of its more than 13%-yielding monthly dividend.

Image source: Getty Images.

A strong quarter despite challenging market conditions AGNC Investment reported $0.52 per share of comprehensive net income during the second quarter and $0.40 per share in net spread and dollar roll income. Both metrics were above the REIT's dividend payout this quarter ($0.36 per share, or $0.12 per month). Meanwhile, its book value increased by $0.20 per share, or 2.4%, to $8.38 per share. When adding dividend income to the increase in book value, AGNC Investment generated an economic return of 6.7% during the period.

That's impressive, considering the market environment. CEO Peter Federico highlighted in the earnings press release that "the investment environment in the second quarter continued to be challenging, as escalating rhetoric and hostilities between the United States and Iran largely dictated financial market performance." Elevated energy prices and supply chain constraints "caused Treasury yields to increase, the yield curve to flatten, and the market's monetary policy expectations to pivot from rate cuts to rate hikes."

Today's Change

(

-0.33

%) $

-0.04

Current Price

$

10.75

While that drove up mortgage rates, reducing the projected Agency MBS supply during the quarter, demand for these low-risk mortgage investments remained strong. That created "a positive technical backdrop that supported Agency MBS performance and drove spreads to benchmark rates tighter."

The outlook for Agency MBS investments While the second quarter was a positive environment for Agency MBS investments, market conditions can change rapidly. Mortgage spreads have already declined from their recent peaks. However, they're still at historically elevated levels. As a result, Agency MBS offer compelling value relative to other fixed-income investments, especially corporate bonds. That drives Federico's view that "favorable dynamics should be supportive of Agency MBS performance over the near to intermediate term and position AGNC to continue to deliver strong risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders."

The CEO dove deeper into the current economic backdrop for MBS investments during its second-quarter conference call. He noted that, at the current spread, AGNC Investment can earn a return on equity in the 15% to 17% range by leveraging its capital at a multiple of 7.0 to 7.5. He highlighted that it "aligns really well with the economics of our dividend." The REIT can raise capital at a roughly 13% yield based on its current stock price of $11 per share, which is at a significant premium to its current book value. It can then lever that capital and earn a mid-to-high double-digit return in the current environment. That drives its continued confidence in the monthly dividend rate.

The dividend stability should continue AGNC Investment has now maintained its current dividend rate for 75 straight months. While the economic environment remains challenging, it's generating strong returns to sustain its dividend. While an abrupt change to the return economics poses a future risk to the dividend, it appears safe for now.

Can Trupanion Turn Pet Insurance Loyalty Into Real Earnings?Chubb NYSE: CB reported a strong second quarter of 2026, with Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Evan Greenberg pointing to underwriting performance, investment income, life insurance growth and global diversification as key contributors to results.

Core operating earnings were $2.8 billion, or $7.26 per share, up 14.6% and 18.2%, respectively, from the prior year, Greenberg said on the company’s earnings call. Tangible book value per share rose 17.1% year over year, which Greenberg described as the company’s “most important measure of shareholder wealth creation.”

Get Chubb alerts:

3 Insurance Stocks That Can Act as a New Inflation Hedge The insurer posted an annualized core operating return on tangible equity of 21.2% for the quarter and a core operating return on equity of 14.5%. Property and casualty underwriting income exceeded $1.9 billion, up almost 19%, with a combined ratio of 83.8%. On a current accident year basis excluding catastrophe losses, the combined ratio was 82.2%.

Investment Income Hits Record Level Adjusted net investment income reached a record $1.88 billion, up more than 11%, supported by performance in fixed income and alternative asset portfolios. Greenberg said the fixed income portfolio yield was 5.1%, while the current new money rate averaged 5.5% as of June 30. Chubb’s invested assets stood at $175 billion, up from $161 billion a year earlier.

Looking to Insure Your Portfolio? Start With These 3 StocksChief Financial Officer Peter Enns said adjusted operating cash flow totaled $3.5 billion in the quarter. He also noted that Chubb issued $2.2 billion of debt across several currencies at a weighted average cost of 4.2% and an average term of about 7.5 years, with proceeds intended for general corporate purposes, including repayment and refinancing of debt.

Enns said Chubb returned $1.4 billion of capital to shareholders in the quarter, including $979 million of share repurchases at an average price of $327.18 per share and $395 million in dividends. The company ended the quarter with book value of $75 billion, or $195.45 per share. Book value per share and tangible book value per share excluding accumulated other comprehensive income grew 2.8% and 3.8%, respectively, during the quarter.

Chief Investment Officer Chris Hogan said the public fixed income portfolio generated $1.63 billion of income, up 12% year over year, while private investments, representing 12% of the portfolio, contributed $250 million, up 9.5%. Hogan called the current environment “ideal” for investment-grade bond investors, citing reinvestment rates above the portfolio’s book yield.

Premium Growth Varies by Business Line Global property and casualty premiums rose 3%, or 6.3% excluding large account and excess and surplus property, Greenberg said. Overseas general premiums grew 10.2%, or 4.8% in constant dollars. North America premiums increased about 0.5%, as commercial lines declined 2.3%, while personal lines and accident and health each rose 6%.

Greenberg said the “substantial majority” of Chubb’s businesses are growing, while some are flat or shrinking because of inadequate pricing or terms. He specifically cited U.S. large account and E&S property as an area where the company again reduced premium volume.

International retail, which Greenberg said produces more than $17 billion in annual gross premiums and operates in 51 countries, grew almost 12%, or about 6% in constant dollars. Consumer-related businesses, including accident and health and personal lines, were up more than 12%, while commercial lines rose more than 11%. Latin America grew 15.6%, Asia grew 12% and Europe grew nearly 7.5%.

In North America commercial, middle market and small commercial premiums grew almost 9%, with property and casualty lines up 12% and financial lines down about 3%. Premiums in major account and specialty, including E&S, declined 9% because of property.

In North America personal lines, Chubb’s high-net-worth business generated 6% premium growth and renewal retention of 90% on an account basis. Greenberg said the North America personal lines business now produces more than $8 billion in annual gross premiums.

Greenberg Warns on Casualty Pricing Greenberg said soft market conditions have begun to extend beyond property into more casualty lines, particularly in E&S. He said certain classes of large account and middle market business are becoming more competitive, and pricing in multiple casualty areas is not keeping pace with loss costs.

“U.S. casualty loss costs are rising at a pretty steady 6%-7% for primary casualty, and 9.5%-12% for excess,” Greenberg said, adding that pricing can become inadequate quickly under those conditions. He said financial lines remain soft, with some newer market participants and managing general agents underwriting at prices and terms he considers inadequate.

In North America, commercial property and casualty pricing excluding financial lines and workers’ compensation was up 1.3%, with rates down 1.4% and exposure change of 2.7%. Property pricing was down about 6%, while casualty pricing rose 7.1%, including a 6.4% rate increase and 0.7% exposure growth. Financial lines pricing was up 0.3%.

Asked during the question-and-answer session about casualty pricing, Greenberg said the issue was not limited to commercial auto. “It’s across casualty,” he said, adding that there is “zero evidence across the industry” that loss costs have abated.

Life Insurance and Worksite Benefits Grow Life income was $332 million, up 9% from a year earlier. Greenberg said international life insurance premiums and deposits rose almost 14.5%, with most exposure in Asia and most growth in North Asia, including China, Hong Kong, Korea and Taiwan.

Chubb’s North America Worksite Benefits business grew premiums 14%. Greenberg said the business has been built steadily over more than five years, through brokerage distribution tied to small and middle market commercial relationships and through a retooled agency force focused on small and lower middle market employers.

Greenberg said the company sees “a tremendous opportunity” to continue growing Worksite Benefits organically at double-digit rates, and expects it to become a more significant contributor to Chubb’s top and bottom line over time.

Reserves, Catastrophe Losses and Capital Pre-tax catastrophe losses were $475 million, principally from weather-related events in the U.S., Enns said. Chubb recorded favorable pre-tax prior period development of $441 million in active companies, with 89% from short-tail lines and 11% from long-tail lines. The corporate runoff portfolio had adverse development of $158 million, more than two-thirds of which came from molestation-related claims development.

Net loss reserves increased to nearly $69 billion, up 4% from the second quarter of 2025. The paid-to-incurred ratio was 90% for the quarter, or 86% excluding catastrophe losses, prior period development and agriculture. When asked why the ratio remains below pre-pandemic levels, Greenberg said it “speaks to overall the strength of our reserves.”

Enns said the core operating effective tax rate was 19.2% for the quarter, below the company’s previously guided range because of shifts in income mix and discrete tax benefits. Chubb continues to expect a full-year core operating effective tax rate of 19.5% to 20%.

Greenberg said Chubb remains confident in its ability to generate strong operating earnings growth and double-digit tangible book value growth over time, while acknowledging softer commercial property and casualty market conditions. “We have many sources and handles to pull,” he said, citing the company’s global mix, life business, invested assets and capital management.

About Chubb (NYSE:CB)Chubb is a global property and casualty insurance company that underwrites a broad range of commercial and personal insurance products and related services. Its offerings include commercial property and casualty coverage, specialty liability, professional and management liability, cyber and technology insurance, marine and energy, surety, accident and health solutions, and high-net-worth personal lines such as homeowners, auto and valuables protection. Chubb serves businesses, individuals and institutions with tailored underwriting and risk-transfer solutions across multiple industry sectors.

In addition to core underwriting, Chubb provides risk engineering, loss control, claims management and risk consulting services intended to reduce loss severity and help clients manage exposures.

This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].

Should You Invest $1,000 in Chubb Right Now?Before you consider Chubb, you'll want to hear this.

MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Chubb wasn't on the list.

While Chubb currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.

View The Five Stocks Here

Tesla, Nvidia, and Google helped shape the last era of market growth, but the next wave could come from a new group of companies. Inside this report, you’ll find 7 stocks that could play a major role in the next tech-driven market boom.

Get This Free Report

Chubb Limited (CB) Q2 2026 Earnings Call July 22, 2026 8:30 AM EDT

Company Participants

Susan Spivak Bernstein - Senior Vice President of Investor Relations
Evan G. Greenberg - Chairman & CEO
Peter Enns - Executive VP & CFO
Christopher Hogan - Senior VP of Chubb Group & Chief Investment Officer

Conference Call Participants

Matthew Heimermann - Citigroup Inc., Research Division
Meyer Shields - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Jian Huang - Morgan Stanley, Research Division
Tracy Benguigui - Wolfe Research, LLC
Robert Cox - Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Research Division
David Motemaden - Evercore ISI Institutional Equities, Research Division
Charles Peters - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division
Andrew Kligerman - TD Cowen, Research Division
Taylor Scott - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Thank you for standing by. My name is Jerrill, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Chubb Limited Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]

I would now like to turn the conference over to Susan Spivak, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. You may begin.

Susan Spivak Bernstein
Senior Vice President of Investor Relations

Thank you, and welcome to our June 30, 2026, second quarter earnings conference call. Our report today will contain forward-looking statements, including statements relating to the company's performance, pricing and business mix, growth opportunities and economic and market conditions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. See our recent SEC filings, earnings release and financial supplement, which are all available on our website at investors.chubb.com for more information on factors that could affect these matters.

We will also refer today to non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations of which to the most direct comparable GAAP measures and related details are provided in our earnings press release and financial supplement.

Now

For the quarter ended June 2026, Iridium Communications (IRDM - Free Report) reported revenue of $225.24 million, up 3.8% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $0.19, compared to $0.20 in the year-ago quarter.

The reported revenue represents a surprise of +1.82% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $221.21 million. With the consensus EPS estimate being $0.26, the EPS surprise was -26.92%.

While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.

As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately.

Here is how Iridium performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

Billable Subscribers - Total government voice and data and IoT data service: 118 thousand versus 117.44 thousand estimated by four analysts on average.Billable Subscribers - Total commercial voice and data, IoT data and Broadband service: 2.51 million compared to the 2.49 million average estimate based on four analysts.Total Billable Subscribers: 2.63 million compared to the 2.61 million average estimate based on four analysts.ARPU - Commercial - IoT data: $7.64 compared to the $7.80 average estimate based on four analysts.Revenue- Subscriber equipment: $20.77 million versus $19.67 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +6.7% change.Revenue- Service: $161.33 million versus $160.27 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3.7% change.Revenue- Service- Commercial service revenue: $133.7 million versus $132.77 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3.8% change.Revenue- Service- Government service revenue: $27.63 million versus $27.51 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3.3% change.Revenue- Engineering and support service: $43.14 million versus the five-analyst average estimate of $41.27 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +3%.Revenue- Service- Commercial service revenue- Hosted payload and other data service: $16.57 million versus $14.53 million estimated by four analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +13.9% change.Revenue- Engineering and support service- Government: $41.45 million compared to the $39.54 million average estimate based on three analysts. The reported number represents a change of +5% year over year.Revenue- Engineering and support service- Commercial: $1.69 million versus $2.17 million estimated by three analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -29.7% change.View all Key Company Metrics for Iridium here>>>

Shares of Iridium have returned +7% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.3% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

When deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock, investors often rely on analyst recommendations. Media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts often influence a stock's price, but are they really important?

Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about Ares Capital (ARCC - Free Report) .

Ares Capital currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.67, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 15 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.67 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the 15 recommendations that derive the current ABR, nine are Strong Buy and two are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 60% and 13.3% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for ARCC

Check price target & stock forecast for Ares Capital here>>>

The ABR suggests buying Ares Capital, but making an investment decision solely on the basis of this information might not be a good idea. According to several studies, brokerage recommendations have little to no success guiding investors to choose stocks with the most potential for price appreciation.

Do you wonder why? As a result of the vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover, their analysts tend to rate it with a strong positive bias. According to our research, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations for every "Strong Sell" recommendation.

This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.

With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, which classifies stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), is a reliable indicator of a stock's near-term price performance. So, validating the Zacks Rank with ABR could go a long way in making a profitable investment decision.

Zacks Rank Should Not Be Confused With ABRAlthough both Zacks Rank and ABR are displayed in a range of 1--5, they are different measures altogether.

Broker recommendations are the sole basis for calculating the ABR, which is typically displayed in decimals (such as 1.28). The Zacks Rank, on the other hand, is a quantitative model designed to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

Analysts employed by brokerage firms have been and continue to be overly optimistic with their recommendations. Since the ratings issued by these analysts are more favorable than their research would support because of the vested interest of their employers, they mislead investors far more often than they guide.

In contrast, the Zacks Rank is driven by earnings estimate revisions. And near-term stock price movements are strongly correlated with trends in earnings estimate revisions, according to empirical research.

Furthermore, the different grades of the Zacks Rank are applied proportionately across all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide earnings estimates for the current year. In other words, at all times, this tool maintains a balance among the five ranks it assigns.

Another key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank is freshness. The ABR is not necessarily up-to-date when you look at it. But, since brokerage analysts keep revising their earnings estimates to account for a company's changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in indicating future price movements.

Is ARCC Worth Investing In?Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for Ares Capital, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has declined 0.2% over the past month to $1.9.

Analysts' growing pessimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates lower, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to plunge in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for Ares Capital. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Therefore, it could be wise to take the Buy-equivalent ABR for Ares Capital with a grain of salt.

While "the trend is your friend" when it comes to short-term investing or trading, timing entries into the trend is a key determinant of success. And increasing the odds of success by making sure the sustainability of a trend isn't easy.

The trend often reverses before exiting the trade, leading to a short-term capital loss for investors. So, for a profitable trade, one should confirm factors such as sound fundamentals, positive earnings estimate revisions, etc. that could keep the momentum in the stock alive.

Our "Recent Price Strength" screen, which is created on a unique short-term trading strategy, could be pretty useful in this regard. This predefined screen makes it really easy to shortlist the stocks that have enough fundamental strength to maintain their recent uptrend. Also, the screen passes only the stocks that are trading in the upper portion of their 52-week high-low range, which is usually an indicator of bullishness.

There are several stocks that passed through the screen and Geo Group (GEO - Free Report) is one of them. Here are the key reasons why this stock is a solid choice for "trend" investing.

A solid price increase over a period of 12 weeks reflects investors' continued willingness to pay more for the potential upside in a stock. GEO is quite a good fit in this regard, gaining 65.9% over this period.

However, it's not enough to look at the price change for around three months, as it doesn't reflect any trend reversal that might have happened in a shorter time frame. It's important for a potential winner to maintain the price trend. A price increase of 4.2% over the past four weeks ensures that the trend is still in place for the stock of this private prison operator.

Moreover, GEO is currently trading at 94.8% of its 52-week High-Low Range, hinting that it can be on the verge of a breakout.

Looking at the fundamentals, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), which means it is in the top 20% of more than the 4,000 stocks that we rank based on trends in earnings estimate revisions and EPS surprises -- the key factors that impact a stock's near-term price movements.

The Zacks Rank stock-rating system, which uses four factors related to earnings estimates to classify stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive externally-audited track record, with Zacks Rank #1 stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 1988. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Another factor that confirms the company's fundamental strength is its Average Broker Recommendation of #1 (Strong Buy). This indicates that the brokerage community is highly optimistic about the stock's near-term price performance.

So, the price trend in GEO may not reverse anytime soon.

In addition to GEO, there are several other stocks that currently pass through our "Recent Price Strength" screen. You may consider investing in them and start looking for the newest stocks that fit these criteria.

This is not the only screen that could help you find your next winning stock pick. Based on your personal investing style, you may choose from over 45 Zacks Premium Screens that are strategically created to beat the market.

However, keep in mind that the key to a successful stock-picking strategy is to ensure that it produced profitable results in the past. You could easily do that with the help of the Zacks Research Wizard. In addition to allowing you to backtest the effectiveness of your strategy, the program comes loaded with some of our most successful stock-picking strategies.

Click here to sign up for a free trial to the Research Wizard today.

Ekonom Michael Pettis působící v Číně nedávno poukazoval na článek Financial Times, který tvrdil, že: Analýza vládních dotací zpracovaná OECD a týkající se 15 klíčových průmyslových odvětvích zjistila, že téměř 60 % nárůstu podílu čínských firem na globálním trhu od roku 2015 lze připsat dotacím. Jinak řečeno, čínská vládní podpora tohoto typu za posledních deset let stála za 60 % toho, co čínské firmy od zmíněného roku získaly na světovém trhu. To není žádný detail, o čínském šoku 2.0 se hovoří intenzivně i v Evropě a já k tomu dnes přidám pár příběhů.

OECD k uvedenému dodala, že dotace sice vedly ke zvýšení podílu na trzích, ale nepřispívaly ke zvýšení produktivity a ziskovosti. Jinak řečeno, „dotace vedou k tomu, že méně produktivní hráči nespravedlivě vyhrávají na úkor těch inovativnějších a efektivnějších.“ Čínský exportní úspěch není tedy poháněn komparativní výhodou jejích společností, ale výhodou, „která je funkcí velkých transferů směrem od domácností.“ Jinak řečeno, domácnosti dotují výrobu. A tudíž exporty.

Pan Pettis k tomu zdůrazňuje, že „efektivní a konkurenceschopný“ není jedno a to samé. Na světovém trhu mohou být společnosti, které jsou efektivnější a produktivnější, ale přesto nejsou schopny konkurovat (třeba čínským) firmám, které dostávají vysoké dotace. Ty jim dají globální konkurenceschopnost. Výsledkem je pak pokřivená alokace zdrojů v celé globální ekonomice a různé reakce, které z „ideálního“ pohledu nejsou optimální. Ale z toho reálného dávají větší smysl (např. některá cla a obchodní bariéry).

Občas tu rozebírám, že Čína se stále hodně drží svého starého ekonomického modelu stojícího na investicích, budování dalších a dalších kapacit a vývozu jejich produkce do světa. Tento model je ždímán do poslední kapky a nese sebou řadu nerovnováh, včetně dluhů a špatné alokace zdrojů. Výše uvedené pak poukazuje na určitý paradox, který je jádrem tohoto modelu – v zemi deklarované jako komunistická jsou to domácnosti, tedy komuna, kdo jej dotuje a na jehož úkor v určitém smyslu tento model jede. Domácnosti by naopak těžily z modelu nového, který by stál mnohem více na spotřebě, která by zase stála na vyšších příjmech domácností. Tedy konec modelu stojícího naopak na transferu příjmů domácností financujícímu kapacity pro export. U starého a novému modelu se tak může vybavit ono známé „a komu tím prospějete?“

Výše uvedené by se dalo samozřejmě extrapolovat tak, že čínské domácnosti financují spotřebu domácností v zahraničí, včetně těch amerických a evropských. Měl by to být pro nás, Američany a další vlastně problém? Docela dlouhou dobu nebyl, Čína se stala vlastním rozhodnutím dílnou světa a spotřebitelé na Západě si užívali levnější zboží v dlouhé řadě oblastí (nerozebírám teď téma poměru cena/kvalita). Z hlediska problematičnosti je ale dobré vnímat, že pokud je Západ čistým dovozcem, znamená to, že se stále zadlužuje. Pokud chce totiž Čína vyváže více, než dováží, musí na to zbytku světa půjčovat. Pokud chce ten více dovážet, než vyváží, musí si půjčovat. A tato dynamika dluhů/exportů/importů má své (zdravé) limity.

K tomu je tu samozřejmě téma úpadku domácí výrobní základny, včetně technologického zaostávání a podobně. Krátce řečeno, exporty, importy, s nimi spojené závazky a pohledávky nejsou do určité míry problémem, od určité ano. A na více než jedné úrovni. Pokud USA a Evropa budou jednat a tím vyvinou tlak na Čínu, aby se více snažila o posun k modelu stojícímu na domácí poptávce a spotřebě, paradoxně by pak v uvedené logice pomohly i čínským domácnostem.

CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) shares are climbing in Wednesday morning trading, with CoreWeave stock up 6% to $84.02 after a fresh analyst endorsement. The move stands out against a soft tape for cloud infrastructure peers, with Cloudflare (NYSE:NET | NET Price Prediction) shares down 1% to $268.46, Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW) shares down 2% to $265.68, and Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) stock unchanged at $126.50.

The rally is idiosyncratic. CoreWeave stock is riding a specific analyst catalyst rather than a broader sector bid, and the divergence tells the story of the session.

Truist Upgrade Reframes the Inference Story Truist upgraded CoreWeave stock to Buy from Hold, with a price target of $126, trimmed slightly from $131. The firm’s thesis argues that the next phase of AI spending shifts from model training to inference, with open models and sovereign AI broadening compute demand beyond the largest hyperscalers.

Truist frames CoreWeave as the leading neocloud, with roughly 1 gigawatt of active power online, a large revenue backlog, and significant contracted capacity, trading at a discount to neocloud peers. The firm also flagged risks tied to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and its planned cloud initiatives, along with potential data-center policy constraints.

Separately, Baird initiated CoreWeave stock at Outperform with a $100 price target, stressing that demand far outpaces supply and that execution is key. Reinforcing the inference angle, CoreWeave announced today that Anam, a privately held interactive-AI-avatar platform, selected CoreWeave Cloud to run inference workloads on NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPUs across the U.S. and Europe.

Divergence Across the AI Cloud Cohort CoreWeave is pulling ahead while the broader cloud group lags. Cloudflare stock and Snowflake stock are both lower, and Oracle stock is flat, even with CoreWeave rallying on its upgrade. The move is analyst-driven, not a rising tide across cloud infrastructure names.

Two peers riding the same training-to-inference theme are also higher. DigitalOcean (NYSE:DOCN) shares are up 4% to $141.97 after Stifel upgraded it to Buy from Hold and Baird initiated coverage at Outperform. Nebius stock is up 2% to $220.70 after Baird initiated coverage at Outperform, calling it a strong beneficiary of the training-to-inference shift.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Snowflake didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

The First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (NASDAQ:SKYY) tells the divergence in one number. The fund holds all four of the subject names, yet the ETF is down 2% to $133.59 because the broader cloud tape is soft. CoreWeave sits as the third-largest CRWV-adjacent position at 3% of net assets, so its rally cannot lift a single-theme, sector-concentrated basket on its own.

Context on Targets and Valuation CoreWeave stock now trades well below the average analyst target of $140.55, with the sell-side split at 24 buy-equivalent, 11 hold, and 2 sell ratings. That backdrop leaves room for further analyst catalysts if the inference thesis gains traction.

The bull case rests on CoreWeave’s contracted backlog and NVIDIA partnership. Meanwhile, the bear case is heavy capital intensity, GPU depreciation exposure, and customer concentration. Investors may want to keep their position sizes modest given the stock’s volatility profile and the 33% pullback over the past month.

What to Watch Follow-on analyst commentary could shape the tape into the close. Investors can watch for whether CoreWeave stock holds its gains, whether DigitalOcean shares and Nebius stock continue to track the same inference narrative, and whether the AI-cloud peers stabilize as the session progresses.

The key takeaway is that today’s move is a single-name, catalyst-driven rally rather than a sector-wide re-rating. Truist’s upgrade reframes CoreWeave around the inference opportunity, and the stock’s discount to neocloud peers gives the thesis room to run if follow-on analyst commentary emerges.

For investors, the setup calls for discipline. The buyers lean on backlog visibility and the NVIDIA partnership, while the sellers may be concerned about the capital intensity and customer concentration. Watching for whether today’s gains hold into the close, and whether the peers stabilize, can help traders get a clean read on where CRWV and other AI-cloud stocks may be headed.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Snowflake didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

The proven Zacks Rank system focuses on earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find winning stocks. Nevertheless, we know that our readers all have their own perspectives, so we are always looking at the latest trends in value, growth, and momentum to find strong picks.

Looking at the history of these trends, perhaps none is more beloved than value investing. This strategy simply looks to identify companies that are being undervalued by the broader market. Value investors use fundamental analysis and traditional valuation metrics to find stocks that they believe are being undervalued by the market at large.

On top of the Zacks Rank, investors can also look at our innovative Style Scores system to find stocks with specific traits. For example, value investors will want to focus on the "Value" category. Stocks with high Zacks Ranks and "A" grades for Value will be some of the highest-quality value stocks on the market today.

One stock to keep an eye on is Cardinal Health (CAH - Free Report) . CAH is currently sporting a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), as well as an A grade for Value. The stock has a Forward P/E ratio of 15.48. This compares to its industry's average Forward P/E of 16.88. CAH's Forward P/E has been as high as 20.15 and as low as 13.69, with a median of 15.30, all within the past year.

CAH is also sporting a PEG ratio of 1.24. This popular figure is similar to the widely-used P/E ratio, but the PEG ratio also considers a company's expected EPS growth rate. CAH's industry currently sports an average PEG of 1.90. Over the last 12 months, CAH's PEG has been as high as 1.88 and as low as 1.22, with a median of 1.49.

Finally, our model also underscores that CAH has a P/CF ratio of 15.27. This metric takes into account a company's operating cash flow and can be used to find stocks that are undervalued based on their solid cash outlook. This company's current P/CF looks solid when compared to its industry's average P/CF of 17.89. Over the past 52 weeks, CAH's P/CF has been as high as 17.47 and as low as 12.96, with a median of 15.12.

These are only a few of the key metrics included in Cardinal Health's strong Value grade, but they help show that the stock is likely undervalued right now. When factoring in the strength of its earnings outlook, CAH looks like an impressive value stock at the moment.

NEW YORK, July 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Lucid Group, Inc. (“Lucid” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: LCID) on behalf of investors that purchased or otherwise acquired Lucid Group securities between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 (the “Class Period”).

CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE

If you are an investor in Lucid and have suffered losses, you may CLICK HERE to contact us. You may also contact Kaplan Fox by emailing [email protected] or by calling (646) 315-9003.

DEADLINE REMINDER: If you are a member of the proposed Class, you may move the court no later than July 28, 2026 to serve as a lead plaintiff for the purported class. If you have losses we encourage you to contact us to learn more about the lead plaintiff process. You need not seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery.

On Friday April 3, 2026, at the close of the market, Lucid issued in a press release stating that the Company “produced 5,500 vehicles” during the first quarter of 2026, while only “deliver[ing] 3,093 vehicles.” The press release further stated that “[d]uring the quarter, deliveries of the Lucid Gravity were disrupted for 29 days due to a supplier quality issue with the second-row seats” and, “[a]s result of this, the [C]ompany’s ability to meet customer demand was impacted.”   That same day, Reuters published an article entitled “Lucid misses first-quarter vehicle delivery estimates on supplier disruptions.” According to the article Chief Executive Officer Marc Winterhoff, said “[d]eliveries were particularly hit in February” when the Company “paused to reverse the change and inspect vehicles already produced.”

In the first two trading sessions following the news, the price of Lucid shares declined by $1.13 per share, or 11.35%, to close at $8.83 per share on April 7, 2026.

Then, on April 14, 2026, Lucid announced preliminary first quarter 2026 financial results, including revenue in the range of $280 million to $284 million, well below the consensus estimate of $433.8 million according to the complaint, and loss from operations in the range of $985 million to $1.005 billion.

Following this news, the price of Lucid stock fell $0.44 per share, or 4.76%, to close at $8.80 per share on April 14, 2026.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; (ii) the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company’s business and financial results; (iii) accordingly, the Defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid’s manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and (iv) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

WHY CONTACT KAPLAN FOX?

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP is a nationally recognized law firm focused on complex litigation, with offices in New York, Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New Jersey. Founded in 1956, the firm has spent more than 50 years prosecuting securities, antitrust, and consumer protection actions in federal and state courts nationwide, recovering more than $10 billion for clients and the classes it has represented.

Kaplan Fox is widely regarded as one of the nation's premier plaintiffs' securities litigation firms and has received recognition from Chambers and Partners, Benchmark Litigation, Super Lawyers, and Lawdragon. Serving as lead or co-lead counsel in many landmark cases, the firm has secured some of the largest recoveries in the history of securities litigation, including a $2.425 billion recovery on behalf of Bank of America shareholders in In re Bank of America—the largest recovery ever obtained for claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act—$800 million recovered for the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and other pension funds in ATRS v. Allianz Global Investors, and a $475 million settlement in In re Merrill Lynch.

For decades, Kaplan Fox has represented public pension funds, institutional investors, businesses, and individuals in high-stakes litigation. Through its successful advocacy and precedent-setting victories, the firm has helped shape important areas of securities and corporate law while advancing accountability and protecting investor interests.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

If you have any questions about this Notice, your rights, or your interests, please contact:

CONTACT:
Pamela A. Mayer
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
800 Third Avenue, 38th Floor
New York, New York 10022
(646) 315-9003
[email protected]

Laurence D. King
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1501
Oakland, California 94612
(415) 772-4704
[email protected]

Contacting or submitting information to Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor an obligation on the part of Kaplan Fox to retain you as a client.

https://www.kaplanfox.com/case/lucid-group-inc-class-action-alert-learn-more-now/

NEW YORK, July 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Lucid securities between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/LCID.

Lucid Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants failed to disclose that: 
      

 (1)a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; (2)the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company’s business and financial results; (3)accordingly, the defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid’s manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and (4)as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.    What's Next for Lucid Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/LCID. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Lucid you have until July 28, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Lucid Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Lucid Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In ZoomInfo To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in ZoomInfo between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 22, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. ("ZoomInfo" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: GTM) and reminds investors of the August 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that the true state of ZoomInfo's slowing growth its legacy seat-based subscription platforms and weakening customer retention in its downmarket segment. Further, the Company minimized concerns that customers were moving towards consumption-based usage models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions.

On May 11, 2026, after the market closed, ZoomInfo announced its first quarter 2026 financial results, unveiling a sharp decline in growth outlook and accordingly lowered its 2026 full year financial guidance, and announced it was realigning its downmarket business, laying off 20% of its workforce, and expecting to incur approximately $45-60 million in restructuring costs. On this news, ZoomInfo's stock price fell $1.98, or approximately 33%, to close at $4.06 per share on May 12, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding ZoomInfo's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the ZoomInfo class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/GTM or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the ZoomInfo Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the ZoomInfo securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) and certain of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements to investors during the class period. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants issued overwhelmingly positive statements while allegedly concealing the true extent of slowing growth in ZoomInfo's legacy seat-based subscription platforms and weakening customer retention in its downmarket segment. The complaint further alleges that defendants minimized concerns that customers were shifting toward consumption-based usage models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions, which allegedly masked material adverse trends affecting the Company's business. On May 11, 2026, after markets closed, ZoomInfo allegedly disclosed the severity of these conditions when it announced sharply lowered full-year 2026 guidance, a realignment of its downmarket business, a workforce reduction of approximately 20%, and anticipated restructuring costs of approximately $45-60 million - news that allegedly caused the Company's stock to decline approximately 33% the following trading day.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) securities during the class period - between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026, inclusive - may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit. Eligible investors are not limited to those who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any class member who suffered losses during the class period may potentially share in any recovery obtained on behalf of the class. Investors are encouraged to review their trading records to determine whether their purchases fall within the applicable class period dates. Participation in the litigation does not require that an investor take an active role in the case or incur out-of-pocket legal expenses to be considered a potential class member.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation, including selecting and overseeing class counsel and making key strategic decisions in the case. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, any investor who purchased ZoomInfo Technologies securities during the class period and suffered a loss may move the court for appointment as lead plaintiff. The deadline to file a motion seeking lead plaintiff appointment is August 24, 2026. Importantly, investors are not required to serve as lead plaintiff in order to be eligible to share in any recovery that may result from the litigation; the vast majority of class members participate without taking on that representative role.

What should investors do if they purchased ZoomInfo stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) securities between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026 should promptly review their brokerage and account records to confirm the dates and prices of any relevant transactions. Investors are strongly encouraged to preserve all documentation related to their ZoomInfo securities purchases, including trade confirmations, account statements, and any communications concerning those investments. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is August 24, 2026, investors who wish to explore their legal options - including the possibility of seeking appointment as lead plaintiff - should act in a timely manner. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP or other qualified securities counsel to evaluate their rights and potential claims prior to that deadline.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased ZoomInfo securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305993

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us