Dan Dreyfus, founder of Borneite Capital, warned on the All-In Podcast that America’s grid is in such poor shape that blackouts, when power is completely lost, and brownouts, when voltage is reduced, and electricity becomes less reliable, are coming from ordinary electrification alone. AI data centers are layering onto an existing problem.
A Grid Frozen in Time Dreyfus explained the central reason why he believes we have this problem today: “We have not invested in upgrading and modernizing and hardening the electric grid since post-World War II. We just let it go.” A transmission and distribution network designed for mid-century load patterns is being asked to handle heat pumps, EV charging, electric appliances, and reshored manufacturing simultaneously.
His point is that the shortfall is already baked in before accounting for AI demand, and that electrifying existing buildings and increasing EV penetration will cause blackouts and brownouts on its own. American Electric Power (NASDAQ:AEP | AEP Price Prediction) recently expanded its five-year capital plan to $78 billion, with an additional $10 billion in potential projects primarily tied to contracted load growth. PJM Interconnection, the largest U.S. grid operator and a private company, has projected its peak summer demand growing from 161,000MW to 241,000MW over the next 15 years, a 50% increase.
The Real Bottleneck Is Craft Labor One of Dreyfus’s most unexpected points was that the single biggest bottleneck to solving the energy crisis is craft labor, not money or materials. Linemen, electricians, and skilled tradespeople who physically build and maintain the grid are in short supply. He lamented the cultural trend, asking, “What did we tell all our kids to do in the last 10 or 15 years? Liberalist degrees in the Northeast.”
The labor backdrop supports the squeeze. Average hourly earnings across the private sector rose to $37.53 in May 2026, up from $36.28 a year earlier. Construction value added, the backbone of any grid buildout, has stalled at 0.0% growth in Q4 2025 after running closer to 1% earlier in the year, signaling tight capacity even as utility capex commitments balloon.
Where the Costs Are Really Rising The AI Multiplier and the Limits of Routing Around the Grid Layer AI on top of existing supply problems, and the math becomes even more vivid. Dreyfus argued that a 1-gigawatt AI data center powered entirely by solar would require 5 gigawatts of solar capacity, covering 35,000 acres, an area larger than San Francisco. That explains why hyperscaler demand keeps returning to firm grid power. According to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, data centers are projected to account for between 6.7-12% of total annual U.S. electricity consumption by 2028.
Can households route around the issue? Dreyfus noted that half of the live audience had already installed solar and Powerwalls, but he pushed back, arguing industrial users will always need the grid at scale. Factories and data centers cannot run on rooftop systems. The workaround economy is forming at the edges: General Motors (NYSE:GM) is entering sodium-ion grid-scale battery storage via a partnership with Peak Energy, and mobile charging firms are pitching DC fast charging without needing permanent grid upgrades.
Key Investor Takeaways Dreyfus believes copper prices will “easily double” from current levels, tying the grid thesis to a materials thesis. For investors, the binding constraints sit in transmission, distribution, and skilled labor, with copper as the connective tissue. These are long-cycle, policy-dependent trends. The clearest signal from BEA industry data and utility capex announcements is that grid modernization is shaping up as a multi-decade necessity, with the bottlenecks Dreyfus names likely to dictate where pressure and pricing power end up.
Holding a high-yield dividend portfolio in a taxable account at the 24% federal bracket means writing the IRS a $14,400 check every year on $60,000 of income that should have been yours. It repeats annually, forever, on the same dollars you already earned.
This series exists because most readers know what a Roth IRA is but have never run the actual dollar delta on the specific high-yield names they own. The basket below is built from ten tickers that pay mostly ordinary-income distributions, which is exactly where Roth placement matters most.
The Tax Delta: Roth Versus Taxable on a $60,000 Income Portfolio Assume a roughly $1 million portfolio split evenly across ten high-yield names. Current yields pulled from each company’s most recent dividend declarations:
Stock Current Yield Tax Character British American Tobacco (NYSE:BTI | BTI Price Prediction) 5% Qualified dividend; subject to 15% UK withholding tax that a Roth cannot recover Altria (NYSE:MO) 6% Qualified AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV) 3% Qualified Verizon (NYSE:VZ) 6% Qualified AT&T (NYSE:T) 4% Ordinary income Realty Income (NYSE:O) 5% Ordinary (REIT) Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) 10% Ordinary (BDC) Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) 8% Ordinary (BDC) Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) 6% K-1, ordinary plus return of capital; UBTI considerations apply inside an IRA above $1,000 annually JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA:JEPI) 8% Largely ordinary (option premium) Ares Capital declared $0.48 quarterly, Main Street pays $0.26 monthly plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, and EPD distributes $0.55 per unit quarterly. Blended together the basket produces roughly $60,000 in gross annual income on $1 million invested.
Inside a Roth, that $60,000 lands in the account untouched. In a taxable account at the 24% bracket, $14,400 leaves for the IRS and the investor nets $45,600. Over a flat 10 years with no growth assumed, that is $144,000 of permanent tax cost.
The Bracket Multiplier The Roth advantage scales directly with marginal rate. Same basket, same $60,000 gross, different bracket:
Federal Bracket Annual Tax Taxable Net Roth Net Annual Roth Advantage 22% $13,200 $46,800 $60,000 $13,200 24% $14,400 $45,600 $60,000 $14,400 32% $19,200 $40,800 $60,000 $19,200 37% $22,200 $37,800 $60,000 $22,200 State income tax is not included. Add it on top and the gap widens further.
Why These Names Specifically Most S&P 500 dividends are qualified and taxed at preferential rates. The basket above is different. BDCs like Ares Capital and Main Street Capital are required to distribute substantially all taxable income to shareholders, taxed at ordinary rates. REIT dividends from Realty Income are characterized as ordinary income. JEPI’s covered-call premium income flows through as non-qualified. AT&T’s distribution is treated as ordinary income for many holders.
Even qualified payers like Altria, with a $1.06 quarterly dividend, and AbbVie at $1.73 per quarter, generate enough yield that the tax drag in a taxable account is meaningful.
The Compounding Cost Most Readers Miss The Roth advantage compounds well beyond the annual delta. Reinvest the $14,400 tax savings each year at a conservative 5% 10-year Treasury yield and the gap widens with every passing year. Over 20 years of reinvestment, the same basket inside a Roth versus a taxable account at the 24% bracket produces a six-figure income gap, with no stock price appreciation assumed. That is the permanent cost of wrong-account placement.
Risks and Caveats BDC distributions vary with credit cycles. Ares Capital’s Q1 2026 core EPS of $0.47 came in just below its $0.48 dividend, though $0.15 per share in net realized gains brought total coverage well above the distribution. The gap between core EPS and the dividend is a trend worth monitoring as rates compress NII. Non-accruals rose to 2.1% in Q1 2026 from 1.8% at year-end 2025. EPD issues a K-1 with UBTI considerations inside an IRA depending on custodian and ownership levels. JEPI’s covered-call overlay caps upside in strong equity rallies. This is general education on placement of existing Roth dollars, not personal tax advice. What to Do If you hold any BDC, REIT, or covered-call ETF in a taxable account, calculate the annual tax cost at your bracket before next April. Run the conversion math on ordinary-income payers first. They benefit more from Roth placement than qualified-dividend names. Model a phased Roth conversion starting with ARCC, MAIN, O, and JEPI before touching qualified payers.
A $100,000 portfolio throwing off $750 a month answers the retirement income question. The math is unforgiving: $9,000 a year on $100,000 is a 9% yield, roughly double what investment-grade bonds pay and well above the S&P 500’s dividend yield. Funds that hit that number exist, but each makes a tradeoff somewhere, usually trading future price growth for current cash.
This question shows up constantly in retiree forums. On Reddit’s r/dividends, the recurring post is some version of “I have $100K and want a paycheck replacement.” The appeal is obvious. Social Security, a pension, and a steady monthly deposit from a brokerage account is a budget that works.
The Retiree Setup at a Glance Capital: $100,000, taxable or IRA Goal: $750 a month, $9,000 a year in cash Required yield: 9% Allocation: three equal slices of roughly $33,333 Horizon: indefinite, with principal preservation a secondary goal Yield Versus Total Return: The Real Tension The single tradeoff driving this decision is yield versus total return. Covered call ETFs like JPMorgan’s JEPI and NEOS’s SPYI generate income by selling call options on stock holdings. That premium becomes the distribution, but it caps upside when the market rallies hard.
Business development companies like Main Street Capital lend to private middle-market businesses at high rates and pass the spread to shareholders. The risk lies in credit quality and floating-rate exposure when benchmark rates fall.
Taxes compound the choice. Covered call income and BDC distributions are largely taxed as ordinary income, not at the 15% to 20% qualified dividend rate. A married couple at $150,000 of taxable income sits in the 22% bracket in 2026. On $9,000 of distributions, holding these funds in a taxable account costs roughly $2,000 a year in federal tax. A Roth IRA eliminates the drag.
Three Funds, Three Engines Splitting the capital evenly diversifies the income engine itself, not just the holdings underneath.
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA: JEPI): JPMorgan’s flagship covered call fund pays monthly. Recent distributions ran $0.34 to $0.45 per share in 2026, an annualized rate near 8%. Expense ratio is 0.35%. Best for retirees who want lower volatility than the S&P 500 with chunky cash flow, accepting they will lag in roaring bull markets. NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (NYSEARCA: SPYI): A similar covered call strategy structured to deliver some return-of-capital tax treatment. Monthly payouts have hovered between $0.51 and $0.54 in 2026, putting the trailing yield near 11%. Heavier reliance on call premiums can pressure NAV in sustained rallies. Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN | MAIN Price Prediction): The BDC backbone. The regular monthly dividend is $0.26 plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, for $4.32 per share annually. At a recent price near $50, that is a yield close to 7.5%, and management has raised the regular monthly dividend 11 times since late 2021. Q1 2026 distributable net investment income of $1.00 per share covered the payout. What to Decide First Account location matters more than fund picking. If this $100,000 sits in a Roth IRA, the entire $9,000 stream is tax-free for life. In a taxable brokerage at the 22% federal bracket, that tax drag is real. The common mistake is buying these funds in a taxable account when IRA contribution or rollover space is available.
Second, watch NAV erosion. A 9% distribution only counts if the principal holds up. Covered call ETFs that consistently distribute more than they earn will grind their share price lower over time. MAIN itself is down about 15% year to date, a reminder that even a high-quality BDC can swing with credit cycles. Compare each fund’s total return, not just its yield, over rolling three-year windows. A 9% yield paired with a 6% annual NAV decline leaves only a 3% real return.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The pitch sounds clean: park $40,000 across three high-yield dividend names — Altria (NYSE: MO | MO Price Prediction), Verizon (NYSE: VZ), and Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN) — and collect $4,800 a year in passive income. That math requires a 12% blended yield, which is where dividend cuts usually live. These three stocks are legitimate income workhorses, but the honest version of this trade pays closer to $2,700 a year today. The gap between the headline and reality is the whole point of this piece.
The Scenario, In One Glance Capital available: $40,000, split roughly $13,333 per name Income target: $4,800/year (a 12% blended yield) Profile: Retiree or near-retiree wanting cash flow without selling shares Core decision: Stretch for yield, or accept what quality pays and grow it over time Reddit’s r/dividends is full of versions of this question. Someone has a lump sum from a 401(k) rollover, an inheritance, or a home sale, and wants it to replace a paycheck immediately. The trap is treating yield as a thermostat you can dial up. Past a certain point, a 10%+ yield is the market telling you the dividend is in question.
What These Three Actually Pay Today Altria trades around $72 with a $1.06 quarterly payout, an annualized $4.24 per share. That works out to roughly a 5.9% yield. Management raised the dividend for the 60th time in 56 years, and Q1 2026 adjusted EPS came in at $1.32 on $5.43B in revenue.
Verizon sits near $48 and just raised the quarterly dividend to $0.7075, an annualized $2.83, and a yield of around 5.9%. Free cash flow guidance of $17.5B to $18.5B covers the payout with room for the Frontier deal and the $144B debt stack.
Main Street Capital is the highest-yielding leg. The BDC pays $0.26 monthly plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, the 19th consecutive supplemental. At $51, that is roughly an 8.4% yield, covered by Q1 distributable net investment income of $1 per share.
Run the math: $13,333 in each produces about $785 from Altria, $784 from Verizon, and $1,124 from Main Street. Total: roughly $2,693. To reach $4,800, you need either ~$71,000 of capital at the same blended yield, or layer in something paying double digits (covered-call ETFs, mortgage REITs) and accept the NAV decay that usually comes with it.
Three Levers That Actually Move the Outcome Account location. Main Street’s distributions are mostly ordinary income, not qualified dividends. In a taxable brokerage at the 24% bracket (single filers over $105,700 in 2026), that $1,124 from MAIN becomes about $854 after tax. Held inside a Roth or traditional IRA, you keep the full payment. BDCs belong in tax-advantaged accounts whenever possible. Reinvestment versus spending. If you do not need the cash today, a DRIP on this trio compounds the income roughly 5% to 8% per year, on top of the base dividend growth rate. Altria’s payout went from $0.84 quarterly in 2019 to $1.06 today. Five more years of that trajectory, plus reinvested shares, gets a portfolio meaningfully closer to the $4,800 target without raising risk. Concentration risk. Three names are a thesis. Verizon was on dividend-cut watchlists during the rate-hiking cycle. Altria’s domestic cigarette volumes fell roughly 5% last quarter. One impairment can erase a year of income. If this is retirement money, three names should be a slice of a broader allocation, not the whole thing. What To Do With This The most expensive mistake here is reaching for a 12% headline yield by replacing one of these with a covered-call ETF and treating the income as equivalent.
Quality dividend payers grow the cash; high-distribution funds often erode the principal that produces it. Start with what these three actually pay, decide whether the ~$2,700 covers what you need, and either add capital or reinvest to close the gap. Then, verify the account is the right one before the first check clears.
We will explain how to structure a new retirement portfolio in today's highly volatile market for sustainable income. We will present a balanced portfolio of funds and individual stocks with an initial yield of 5.7%. The portfolio presents 5 funds, supplemented with 10 individual stocks that offer reasonable growth, high income, and wide diversification.
A retiree with $100,000 in a brokerage account wants a predictable monthly check covering recurring bills. The target is $750 a month, or $9,000 a year, a 9% blended yield. That exceeds what an S&P 500 index fund or bond ladder pays today. So the income must come from covered-call ETFs and a business development company.
This scenario appears constantly on retirement forums. A recent r/Dividends thread asked how to turn a six-figure rollover into rent and grocery money without selling shares monthly. The answer is straightforward: a small set of monthly-paying funds chosen with a clear understanding of the tradeoffs.
The Setup at a Glance Capital: $100,000, split evenly into three sleeves of about $33,333 Income target: $750/month ($9,000/year) Required blended yield: 9% Cadence: All three holdings pay monthly, with one adding quarterly supplementals Why the Yield Comes From Options Income and Private Credit To clear 9%, you sacrifice some upside. Covered-call ETFs cap equity gains for option premiums, and BDCs lend to private companies at floating rates that compress when the Fed cuts. A 9% distribution on $100,000 produces $9,000 in cash, but if the underlying NAV drifts down 2% annually, the real return approaches 7%. That remains meaningful supplemental income for a retiree whose principal is not earmarked for heirs.
Account location matters more than most realize. Covered-call premiums and BDC dividends are taxed largely as ordinary income, not qualified dividends. Holding these inside an IRA shelters the drag. In a taxable account, a retiree in the 12% bracket keeps most of it; one in the 24% bracket loses real ground.
The Three Sleeves NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (NYSEARCA: SPYI) sells call options on the S&P 500 to generate monthly cash. Recent payouts have run $0.51 to $0.53 per share on a $54 share price, annualizing near 11.5%. The fund holds nearly $6.9 billion in assets and charges 0.68%. SPYI delivered a 23% total return over the past year, so the capped-upside critique has not materialized recently. JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA: JEPI) uses equity-linked notes against a low-volatility stock basket and distributes around 8% monthly. The 0.35% expense ratio is the cheapest sleeve, and the lower-beta basket dampens drawdowns when SPYI’s options book gets whipsawed. Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN | MAIN Price Prediction) anchors private credit. The BDC pays $0.26 monthly plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, now in its nineteenth consecutive quarter as a top-up, stacking to $4.32 annually, or roughly 8.4% on a $51 share price. Coverage looks healthy: Q1 distributable net investment income was $1.00 per share against $0.82 paid, NAV rose to $33.46, and insiders bought across multiple coordinated windows between March and May. Blended, the three sleeves produce roughly $9,000 to $10,300 annually on $100,000, with supplementals from MAIN cushioning when option premiums compress in quiet markets.
What to Do With This Put the portfolio inside an IRA if you have room. Ordinary-income tax treatment eats 20% to 30% of cash flow in a taxable account, the single most expensive mistake with monthly-payer portfolios.
Treat distributions as variables. SPYI’s payout has swung from $0.46 to $0.55 in the last two years, so build a one-month cash buffer rather than auto-paying bills the day a distribution lands.
Do not chase higher yields by concentrating in any single fund. Diversification across S&P call writing, low-volatility equity income, and private credit keeps a bad quarter in one strategy from disrupting the monthly check.
The pitch sounds simple. Put $40,000 to work, collect $4,800 a year, never sell a share. The arithmetic behind that promise is less friendly. Generating $4,800 on $40,000 requires a 12% blended yield, and that is roughly double what mature dividend payers like Altria, Verizon, and Main Street Capital actually pay today after a strong run in income stocks.
This article walks through what an investor would really earn from Altria (NYSE: MO | MO Price Prediction), Verizon (NYSE: VZ), and Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN), why the headline number is a stretch, and how to think about chasing yield without buying trouble.
The setup, in plain English You have $40,000 and want a monthly cash flow without selling principal. Splitting the money three ways gives roughly $13,333 per name, which is enough diversification to avoid single-stock disaster but concentrated enough for the income to feel real.
Here is what $13,333 actually buys at recent prices:
Altria shares are around $74 with an annualized payout of $4.24 per share, a yield near 5.7%. Verizon trades near $48 with a declared quarterly dividend of $0.7075, and a yield near 5.9%. Main Street Capital sits around $50 with $0.26 monthly plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, putting the combined yield near 8.7%. Spread evenly, the portfolio throws off roughly $2,700 a year, a blended yield close to 7%. That is real money on real risk, but it is not $4,800. Anyone selling you that number today is either using stale prices or quietly swapping in a covered-call ETF with NAV decay baked in.
Why yield alone is the wrong target Income stocks have rallied hard. Altria is up 33% over the past year, and Verizon is up about 20%. When prices rise faster than payouts, yields compress. A stock advertising 12% today usually signals a broken thesis. Verizon itself was on dividend watch a few years ago before the payout survived a heavy capex cycle.
Tax treatment matters too. Altria and Verizon dividends are qualified, taxed at long-term capital gains rates. Main Street Capital is a Business Development Company, so most of its distribution is ordinary income, taxed at your marginal bracket, which for many households is 22% or 24%. That argues for holding BDCs inside an IRA or Roth rather than a taxable brokerage account.
What each name actually does in the portfolio Altria Group is a cash machine, with 60 dividend increases over the past 56 years and a forward P/E of roughly 13. The risk is secular: domestic cigarette volumes keep declining, and domestic cigarette volumes continue to decline. Buyers are renting a slow-melting ice cube, paying you to wait.
Verizon is the stability anchor. Wireless service revenue continues to grow sequentially, but a heavy debt load caps growth and keeps the multiple low at about 12 times earnings.
Main Street Capital is the yield kicker. Q1 2026 distributable net investment income of $1 slightly underearned the $1.08 paid in dividends and supplementals, a warning that supplementals are not guaranteed. The 19th consecutive supplemental signals management confidence, though supplementals remain discretionary.
The takeaways worth acting on Three things matter more than the headline number.
First, set a realistic yield expectation: 6% to 7% is achievable from quality names today, and reaching for 12% almost always means accepting either capital decay or distribution cuts. Second, put the BDC inside a Roth IRA if you can; the ordinary-income tax drag on MAIN is the silent killer of after-tax returns. Third, reinvest distributions during accumulation and only flip to cash payouts when you actually need the income. Compounding $2,700 a year for a decade meaningfully changes the ending balance. Chasing a phantom $4,800 today rarely does.
At the 24% federal bracket, a $500,000 portfolio of high-yield REITs, BDCs and mortgage REITs generating roughly $35,000 in annual ordinary-income distributions hands the IRS $8,400 every year. That tax bill never appears on a brokerage statement, but it shows up in net income, in reinvestment power and in the slope of every long-term compounding curve.
The five names below are the textbook reason asset location exists.
The Tax Delta: Roth Versus Taxable at the 24% Bracket Assume an equal-weighted $500,000 portfolio, $100,000 in each name, using current yields:
Realty Income (NYSE:O | O Price Prediction): yield 5%, generating roughly $5,270 per $100,000. REIT distributions are classified as ordinary income, so every one of the 12 monthly payments is fully taxable in a brokerage account. AGNC Investment (NASDAQ:AGNC): yield 14%, generating roughly $13,700 per $100,000. Agency mREIT dividends are taxed as ordinary income, not qualified dividends, which is why a double-digit yield bleeds the most in a taxable account. Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN): yield 6%, generating roughly $5,970 per $100,000 before the $0.30 quarterly supplemental. BDC distributions are ordinary income; supplementals magnify the drag. Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC): yield 10%, generating roughly $10,200 per $100,000. The largest publicly traded BDC has paid 48 cents quarterly for eight consecutive quarters, all taxed at ordinary rates. PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (NYSE:PDI): closed-end fund trading near $16.65. Distributions blend ordinary income and return of capital, with the ordinary-income slice taxed at full marginal rates outside a Roth. Across the four names with verified current yields, the $400,000 allocation throws off roughly $35,140 in gross annual income. At 24%, the taxable account nets about $26,706. The Roth nets the full $35,140. Annual delta: roughly $8,434. Ten-year delta with no reinvestment: roughly $84,340. PDI’s ordinary-income component adds to that gap.
The Bracket Multiplier On the same $35,140 of gross ordinary-income distributions:
Bracket Annual Tax in Taxable Net in Taxable Annual Roth Advantage 22% ~$7,731 ~$27,409 ~$7,731 24% ~$8,434 ~$26,706 ~$8,434 32% ~$11,245 ~$23,895 ~$11,245 37% ~$13,002 ~$22,138 ~$13,002 The 37% bracket kicks in above $640,600 for single filers and $768,700 for married filing jointly in 2026. A reader at that bracket loses more than a third of every BDC and mREIT distribution to the IRS the moment it hits a brokerage account.
The Insight Most Readers Miss The $8,434 annual gap at 24% compounds year after year. Reinvested back into the same yield basket and compounded at a conservative 5% reinvestment rate, the Roth advantage stacks into roughly $106,000 over 10 years and roughly $279,000 over 20 years on this single $500,000 portfolio. No price appreciation assumed. No additional contributions. The compounding is purely the recaptured tax. AGNC’s 32% one-year total move and Realty Income’s 12% one-year gain are incremental returns on top of that tax recapture.
What to Do Three concrete steps for readers holding any of these five names in a taxable account:
Pull the 1099-DIV from the most recent tax year for O, AGNC, MAIN, ARCC or PDI and identify how much of each distribution sat in Box 1a (ordinary) versus Box 1b (qualified). The ordinary slice is the line that benefits most from Roth placement. Run the conversion math on the specific positions named here before assuming the conversion tax outweighs the long-term income delta. At 24%, a $100,000 AGNC position pays for its own conversion cost in roughly three years of recaptured tax drag. If the highest-yielding names sit in the taxable account and lower-yielding qualified-dividend payers sit in the Roth, model a swap. Asset location is the lever that matters here.
A seasoned realtor with 25 years in the business and a steady book of repeat clients can clear roughly $95,000 a year in commissions, which usually requires $3.2 million to $3.8 million in annual gross sales at typical split rates. The question for the 58-year-old agent eyeing retirement is straightforward: can a $1.1 million dividend portfolio replace that paycheck without showings, weekend open houses, or another cycle of E&O renewals?
The math says yes, with tradeoffs. Here is how $1.1 million produces income at three very different yield levels, and what each tier gives up to get there.
Building the Floor at 3% to 4% Yield Broad dividend growth ETFs and large-cap quality funds sit here. On $1.1 million at 3.5%, you generate $38,500 of annual income. That falls short of the realtor’s gross commissions, but the portfolio grows the distribution and principal alongside it. A 3.5% yield growing 7% to 8% a year roughly doubles income inside a decade, the only realistic way a stock portfolio keeps pace with inflation over a 30-year retirement.
The cost: you need more capital, or you accept reinvesting rather than living off this tier alone.
Where Most Income Portfolios Actually Land This is where most realistic income portfolios land. Two anchors fit cleanly.
Realty Income (NYSE:O | O Price Prediction) trades around the low-$60 range and pays a $0.2705 monthly dividend, producing a yield of roughly 5% to 5.5% depending on the share price. The company’s portfolio occupancy remains near 99%, and management’s 2026 AFFO guidance is $4.41 to $4.44 per share. Realty Income has increased its dividend for more than 30 consecutive years and has declared hundreds of consecutive monthly dividends. At a yield near 5.3%, a $1.1 million position would generate roughly $58,000 annually in distributions.
Altria (NYSE:MO) yields 5.8% at $69, with a quarterly dividend that just stepped up to $1.06 and 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $5.56 to $5.72. Altria has delivered 60 dividend increases in 56 years. The tradeoff is real: cigarette volumes shrink each year, and the dividend grows in the low single digits rather than the high single digits you would get from a faster-growing payer.
At a blended 7.5% across this tier and the next, $1.1 million throws off about $82,500 a year, which after federal tax in the 22% to 24% bracket nets close to the $66,000 the realtor keeps after self-employment tax, MLS dues, E&O, and business expenses.
Reaching for 8% to 14%, and What It Costs Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) is a business development company paying a $0.26 monthly regular dividend and periodic supplemental dividends, including a recent $0.30 quarterly supplemental. Blended, that has produced a yield in the 7% to 8% range at recent share prices around $51. MAIN continues to benefit from strong profitability and internally managed operations, although supplemental dividends can vary over time.
Neos S&P 500 High Income ETF (CBOE:SPYI) writes calls against an S&P 500 basket and has paid roughly $0.51 to $0.54 every month in 2026, working out to a distribution yield near 11.7% at a $54 price, with an expense ratio of 0.7% and $6.9 billion in net assets. $1.1 million in SPYI alone would generate roughly $129,800 a year in distributions. The catch: covered-call ETFs cap upside in strong markets, and the NAV can drift sideways or down over long stretches.
Why Yield Alone Can Be Misleading A 12% yield with no growth is a flat $132,000 every year. A 5% yield growing 7% annually starts at $55,000 and crosses $130,000 in roughly 13 to 14 years, with the underlying shares often appreciating along the way. The broader lesson is that income growth can become more valuable than starting yield over a multi-decade retirement. The 10-year Treasury near 4.5% remains the hurdle rate that income investments must justify exceeding.
Three Steps Before Leaving Real Estate Calculate your actual after-tax spending, not your gross commissions. The realtor’s $95,000 becomes roughly $66,000 net once self-employment tax and business costs come out. Replace the net, not the headline. Stress-test the blend. A portfolio split across O, MO, MAIN, and SPYI lands near the 7.5% blended yield needed to net $66,000, but model what happens if SPYI cuts its distribution 20% in a flat-to-down tape and MAIN drops its supplemental in a recession. Keep the license active for retainer work. Two or three referrals a year preserves Social Security earnings credits (portfolio distributions do not generate any), and it gives the income engine a year or two to compound before you fully step away.
A married couple filing jointly in the 24% federal bracket who pull in $80,000 in ordinary dividend income from a taxable brokerage will have to hand over $19,200 to the IRS every year. That is the entire cost of holding BDCs and mortgage REITs in the wrong account. Inside a Roth IRA, that same basket of stocks pays out the full $80,000, untouched.
The Tax Delta: Roth Versus Taxable The basket below is built from three ordinary-income payers. None of them qualify for the preferential 15% qualified-dividend rate. Every dollar distributed is taxed at the investor’s marginal ordinary rate.
Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC | ARCC Price Prediction): current yield of 10% on a $1.92 annualized payout. As a business development company, ARCC distributes ordinary interest income from middle-market loans. The full distribution is taxed at the investor’s marginal bracket, which makes Roth shelter the highest-leverage account choice. Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN): regular monthly payout of $0.26 plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, totaling $4.32 per share annually. MAIN just declared its 19th consecutive quarterly supplemental. Both the regular and supplemental streams are ordinary-income taxed, so a Roth captures both layers. AGNC Investment (NASDAQ:AGNC): yield of 14% on a $1.44 annualized payout. Mortgage REIT distributions are non-qualified by statute. AGNC delivered a 35% total return in 2025 with dividends reinvested, all of it taxed at ordinary rates outside a Roth. A blended basket of roughly $250,000 in ARCC, $300,000 in MAIN, and $215,000 in AGNC produces approximately $80,000 in gross annual dividends. The Roth-versus-taxable split at the 24% bracket:
Scenario Gross Federal Tax Net Income Taxable brokerage $80,000 $19,200 $60,800 Roth IRA $80,000 $0 $80,000 The annual Roth advantage on this exact basket is $19,200. Held flat across a decade with no growth or reinvestment, the cumulative shelter equals roughly $192,000 in retained income.
Worth noting: if those same dollars came from qualified-dividend stocks taxed at 15%, the federal bill would be $12,000. The penalty for holding BDCs and mREITs in a taxable account, rather than qualified payers, runs $7,200 per year at this bracket.
The Bracket Multiplier The same $80,000 basket produces a different delta at every bracket the IRS publishes for tax year 2026:
Bracket Federal Tax Net Kept Annual Roth Advantage 22% $17,600 $62,400 $17,600 24% $19,200 $60,800 $19,200 32% $25,600 $54,400 $25,600 37% $29,600 $50,400 $29,600 The 24% bracket begins for joint filers at $211,400 of taxable income in 2026. Anyone above that threshold who holds this basket outside a Roth is voluntarily writing the IRS a five-figure check every year.
The Insight Most Readers Miss The annual delta is the visible cost. The hidden cost is what that $19,200 would have done if it had stayed in the account. Reinvested into the same basket at its blended ordinary yield, the recaptured tax compounds inside the Roth tax-free.
Held flat across 10 years, the linear Roth advantage on this basket sits near $192,000. Across 20 years, it sits near $384,000 of preserved income, with reinvested distributions then producing their own dividends on top. ARCC’s 55-cent Q1 2026 net investment income covering the 48-cent dividend, MAIN’s $1.00 DNII per share, and AGNC’s $0.42 net spread and dollar roll income all suggest the payouts are funded from current earnings rather than capital. The shelter is durable as long as the distributions are.
What To Do If any BDC or mortgage REIT sits in a taxable account, calculate the annual tax cost at the current bracket before the next quarterly distribution clears. Run the Roth conversion math on ARCC, MAIN and AGNC specifically before assuming the upfront conversion bill outweighs the 10-year and 20-year income delta. If the highest-yielding positions are taxable, model a phased conversion that starts with ordinary-dividend payers and leaves qualified-dividend names where they sit.
A first-year public school teacher in the United States earns an average salary of about $46,500, according to data from the National Education Association. Starting pay varies widely by state, ranging from approximately $39,000 in Montana to more than $60,000 in states such as New York, California, and Massachusetts. That income level represents the entry point into a licensed, middle-class profession. The key question is how much invested capital would be required to generate the same income entirely from portfolio yield, eliminating the need for an employer, a daily commute, or classroom responsibilities.
The Three Yield Tiers Against a Teacher’s Starting Salary The math is simple: income target divided by yield equals capital required. Run that on a $46,500 replacement income and the spread between tiers is dramatic.
Conservative tier (3% to 4% yield). Broad dividend growth ETFs, blue-chip dividend payers, and core equity index funds. At a 3.5% yield, $46,500 divided by 0.035 equals roughly $1,328,000 of capital. The reward is diversification, principal appreciation, and dividends that historically grow faster than inflation. The cost is the largest upfront balance. Moderate tier (5% to 7% yield). REITs, preferred share ETFs, high-dividend equity funds, and investment-grade corporate bond funds. At 6%, capital needed drops to $775,000. Dividend growth slows, some strategies cap equity upside, and income is more sensitive to rate cycles. Aggressive tier (8% to 14% yield). Business development companies, covered call ETFs, mortgage REITs, and high-yield credit funds. At a blended 8.4% yield, replacing a teacher’s starting salary takes only about $555,000 of capital. Principal growth is minimal or negative, distributions can be cut in a credit downturn, and the investor lives largely off current income rather than total return. What a $560,000 Aggressive-Tier Portfolio Actually Looks Like A working blueprint uses three differentiated income engines. Half of the $560,000 sits in a covered call income ETF like Neos S&P 500 High Income ETF (CBOE:SPYI), which sells index options on top of S&P 500 exposure and carries a 0.68% expense ratio against $6.9 billion in net assets. SPYI shares trade near $54, up 24% over the past year, so equity participation has not disappeared even with the options overlay.
A quarter goes into a preferred share ETF such as iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (NASDAQ:PFF), which yields in the mid-6% range and sits senior to common equity in the capital stack. The remaining quarter spreads across business development companies, the highest-yielding regulated income vehicles in the public market. Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC | ARCC Price Prediction) pays a $0.48 quarterly dividend that has held steady for 13 consecutive quarters, earning a roughly 10% yield on a $13.6 billion market cap. Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) layers a $0.26 monthly dividend with a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, pushing all-in yield into the high single digits on a $4.8 billion book.
Blend those weights and the portfolio’s gross yield lands near 8.4%, throwing off about $46,900 per year on $560,000. That is a hair above the average first-year teacher’s contract, generated without showing up anywhere.
The Catch Most Income Charts Hide Reducing the required portfolio from roughly $1.3 million to about $560,000 comes with a tradeoff that is easy to overlook: slower income growth over time. A portfolio yielding 3.5% and increasing its income stream by roughly 8% annually, a pattern often associated with diversified dividend-growth stocks, can double its income in about nine years. In that scenario, a $46,500 income stream grows to roughly $93,000 without any additional capital contributions. By contrast, an 8.4% yield generated from sources such as business development company interest income and covered-call premiums is more likely to remain flat and may even decline during periods of credit stress, when non-accrual rates increase and net asset values come under pressure. That is why metrics such as Ares Capital’s approximately $20 per-share book value remain important indicators of underlying portfolio health.
A teaching position also provides benefits that do not appear in a simple salary comparison. Health insurance, pension accrual, and extended breaks throughout the year all have economic value. A portfolio generating $46,500 of dividend income may replace the paycheck itself, but it does not automatically replace the full compensation package attached to the job.
What To Do Next Calculate the income you actually need to replace, not the salary you currently earn. Most working households spend 60% to 75% of gross pay, which shrinks required capital at every tier. Compare 10-year total return, not just current yield, between a dividend growth ETF and a covered-call or BDC fund. The compounding gap is the real decision. Stress-test the aggressive tier against a credit downturn. Model a 20% distribution cut on the BDC and preferred sleeves and see whether remaining income still clears your fixed expenses.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Business development companies (BDCs) pay distributions that are taxed mostly as ordinary income, not qualified dividends. For an investor in the 24% federal bracket (income over $105,700 single, $211,400 married filing jointly), that means roughly a quarter of every BDC payment held in a taxable account walks out the door at tax time. Few names make that cost as visible as Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN | MAIN Price Prediction), an internally managed monthly payer often called the “O of BDCs.”
The Tax Setup: Why BDC Distributions Hit Harder Outside a Roth IRA BDCs pass through interest, fees, and short-term gains. The bulk of what Main Street Capital pays is ordinary income, not the preferential qualified-dividend rate. Supplemental dividends are taxed as ordinary income too, which compounds the inefficiency relative to a single-dividend REIT or qualified payer. Roth IRA placement removes the entire drag.
The Tax Delta: Roth Versus Taxable on Main Street Capital Main Street Capital declared a regular monthly dividend of $0.26 per share for April, May, and June 2026, alongside a $0.30 per share supplemental for June 2026, the 19th consecutive quarterly supplemental. That puts the annualized run-rate at $3.06 in regular distributions plus roughly $1.20 in supplementals, producing a trailing yield in the 8.0% to 8.5% range against a recent price of $50.71 on June 3, 2026.
Using an 8.5% yield assumption, here is what a $100,000 Main Street Capital position throws off at the 24% bracket:
Scenario Gross Income Federal Tax Net Income Taxable brokerage $8,500 $2,040 $6,460 Roth IRA $8,500 $0 $8,500 Annual Roth advantage is $2,040. Across 10 years with no reinvestment or price change, that equals $20,400 in retained income on a single $100,000 lot.
Why Main Street Capital Specifically Belongs in the Roth Main Street Capital is internally managed, which keeps the expense load lower than typical externally managed BDCs. Operating expense-to-assets ran 1.3% in Q1 2026. Net asset value per share reached a record $33.46 (up from $33.33 at year-end 2025), and the firm posted a 17.1% full-year 2025 return on equity. The dividend record matters: 11 increases to the regular monthly dividend since Q4 2021, and a 20-year payment history. Monthly cash flow plus quarterly supplementals reinvested tax-free is a faster snowball than a quarterly-only payer.
The Bracket Multiplier The same $100,000 position, same $8,500 gross income, at the four major brackets above the standard deduction:
Bracket Tax Drag Net in Taxable Roth Advantage 22% $1,870 $6,630 $1,870 24% $2,040 $6,460 $2,040 32% $2,720 $5,780 $2,720 37% $3,145 $5,355 $3,145 For a $250,000 position at the 24% bracket, the annual Roth advantage scales to roughly $5,100. At $500,000, it exceeds $10,000 per year.
The Insight Most Readers Miss The Roth advantage is the annual delta reinvested tax-free, every year, into more shares paying ordinary-income distributions. At the 24% bracket on a $100,000 Main Street Capital position, $2,040 reinvested annually at the same 8.5% yield grows to roughly $30,800 in cumulative tax-saved income over 10 years and roughly $107,000 over 20 years. That is the permanent cost of holding Main Street Capital outside a Roth, not a projection of price appreciation.
One housekeeping note: unrelated business taxable income is generally not a concern with BDCs, which are regulated investment companies, not master limited partnerships (MLPs). Do not conflate BDCs with pass-through MLPs on unrelated business taxable income. The 2026 IRS rules also tightened nothing on the BDC side. Watch non-accruals, which were 1.2% at fair value in Q1 2026, and the price-to-book ratio of 1.55x for valuation discipline before adding.
What to Do If Main Street Capital sits in a taxable account, calculate the annual ordinary-income tax cost at your bracket before the next supplemental payment. Run the Roth conversion math on Main Street Capital specifically. The conversion is taxed once at today’s rate; the distribution stream is sheltered forever. Prioritize ordinary-income payers (BDCs, mortgage REITs) ahead of qualified-dividend payers when sequencing a phased Roth conversion.
High earners in the 32% federal bracket holding ordinary-income dividend payers in a taxable brokerage account face a math problem that most never run on paper. If your $60,000 in dividend income is taxed as ordinary income at the 32% bracket, you owe $19,200 to the IRS, leaving $40,800 in net income. The same $60,000 inside a Roth IRA keeps every dollar.
The Tax Delta: Roth Versus Taxable on $60,000 of Dividend Income The 32% bracket in 2026 covers married couples filing jointly with taxable income above $403,550, and single filers above $201,775. At that rate, the contrast between account types is binary.
Scenario Gross Dividend Income Federal Tax Net Income Taxable brokerage (32%) $60,000 $19,200 $40,800 Roth IRA $60,000 $0 $60,000 Annual Roth advantage N/A N/A $19,200 10-Year Delta (no growth) N/A N/A $192,000 The reason the delta is this wide: every name below distributes ordinary dividends, not qualified. They never qualify for the 15% or 20% long-term capital gains rate. They are taxed at your marginal rate, which is why Roth placement is the highest-leverage decision for this category of stock.
4 The Stocks That Belong in the Roth First 1. Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC | ARCC Price Prediction) currently yields 10% on a $1.92 annual dividend. The largest publicly traded BDC has held its $0.48 quarterly payout for eight consecutive quarters. All BDC distributions are ordinary income, full stop.
2. Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) yields 6% on a $3.06 annualized base, plus quarterly supplemental dividends of roughly $0.30. Monthly cadence amplifies the tax drag in a taxable account.
3. Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) yields roughly 17% after the May 2026 cut from $0.045 to $0.035 monthly. The cut is exactly why ordinary-income payers belong inside a Roth: you cannot afford to also hand the IRS a third of a shrinking distribution.
4. Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC), a CLO-equity closed-end fund, distributes $0.20 monthly for a yield near 24% at the current $9.98 price. CLO-equity distributions are taxed almost entirely as ordinary income. Agency mREIT dividends are ordinary income at the federal level.
The Bracket Multiplier The same $60,000 dividend stream produces a different tax bill at every bracket:
Bracket Federal Tax Net Income Annual Roth Advantage 22% $13,200 $46,800 $13,200 24% $14,400 $45,600 $14,400 32% $19,200 $40,800 $19,200 37% $22,200 $37,800 $22,200 The higher your bracket, the more aggressive the case for Roth placement of ordinary-income payers.
The Insight Most Readers Miss The $19,200 annual advantage recurs every year as cash flow available for reinvestment inside the Roth, where its future income is also untaxed. Compounded at a conservative 8% reinvestment rate, the Roth advantage on this portfolio reaches roughly $278,000 over 10 years and roughly $878,000 over 20 years on the income delta alone, before any share-price appreciation. Hold these stocks in a taxable account at 32% and that figure is the permanent cost.
Backdrop matters too. With the 10-year Treasury at 4%, double-digit ordinary-income yields are still available, which makes the location decision more consequential than the security selection.
What to Do If you hold any BDC, mortgage REIT or CLO-equity fund in a taxable account, calculate your annual tax cost at your bracket before your next quarterly estimated payment. Run the Roth conversion math on the specific positions named here before assuming the conversion tax outweighs the recurring $19,200 annual delta. If your highest-yielding ordinary-income positions sit outside a Roth, model a phased conversion starting with the largest yields first, ahead of the qualified-leaning names in the rest of your portfolio.
Five thousand dollars a month in spendable dividend income works out to $60,000 per year after federal tax, roughly equivalent to the salary of a typical police officer in Indiana. The headline yield shown on a brokerage statement does not tell the full story. Taxes, the type of distributions received, and future dividend growth all influence how much income ultimately reaches your checking account.
Start with the gross-up. Qualified dividends from blue-chip payers face a top federal rate of 0%, 15%, or 20% depending on bracket. Ordinary dividends from REITs, BDCs, and mortgage REITs are taxed at marginal rates that top out at 37% on income above $768,700 for joint filers in 2026. That spread is the whole game.
Blue-Chip Dividend Growth: 3% to 4% Yield Dividend aristocrats and broad dividend-growth funds sit here. Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ | JNJ Price Prediction) yields about 2.3% on a $5.28 annualized run rate after raising its payout to $1.34 quarterly in May 2026. P&G (NYSE:PG) lifted its quarterly to $1.0885, extending a streak that began in 1890.
Because these are qualified dividends, a retired couple needs roughly $62,000 to $68,000 of gross distributions to net $60,000. At a 3.5% blended yield, that math is roughly $1.9 million. The payoff for the capital outlay: JNJ shares returned 155% over the last decade and PG returned 124%, while the dividend grew alongside the price.
REITs, Telecom, and Preferred Income: 5% to 7% Yield This is where REITs, telecom, preferred shares, and covered-call ETFs live. Verizon (NYSE:VZ) currently pays $0.7075 per quarter, a qualified dividend backed by a slow-grower telecom. Realty Income (NYSE:O) yields 5.4% on a $3.234 annualized monthly distribution, with 98.9% portfolio occupancy and a 670-month payment streak. REIT distributions are taxed as ordinary income.
The mixed tax treatment raises the gross target to roughly $70,000 to $80,000. At a 6% blended yield, that lands near roughly $1.3 million of capital. The tradeoff is dividend growth: Realty Income’s quarterly only nudged from $0.27 to $0.2705 this year. That pace will not outrun the CPI trajectory from 321.4 to 332.4 over the past 12 months.
Maximum Income With Principal Risk: 8% to 14% Yield BDCs, mortgage REITs, and leveraged covered-call funds anchor this tier. Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) yields 5.9% on its base monthly plus quarterly supplementals. Ares Capital (Nasdaq:ARCC) yields 10.1% on a $0.48 quarterly rate held steady for 13 quarters. AGNC Investment (Nasdaq:AGNC) yields 14.1%.
The capital requirement drops sharply. Grossing up to $85,000 at an 11% blended yield gets you to roughly roughly $770,000. The cost is principal. AGNC’s monthly distribution fell from $1.40 quarterly in 2010-2012 to $0.12 monthly today, a roughly 74% cut. Tangible book value slipped 5.6% in Q1 2026 alone. The high distributions are real. So is the slow drain on the asset funding them.
The Income Factor Many Investors Overlook The tax treatment of dividends can have a greater impact than the stated yield itself. A portfolio of qualified-dividend stocks yielding 4% may produce nearly as much spendable income as a portfolio yielding 5% to 6% that relies primarily on ordinary distributions. Dividend growth adds another layer of value. Johnson & Johnson’s annual dividend increased from $3.98 per share in 2020 to $5.28 in 2026. A portfolio yielding 3.5% with annual dividend growth of 7% to 8% can double its income stream within about a decade, while a portfolio yielding 12% with little or no growth may generate roughly the same income year after year.
Three Moves Before You Commit Capital Calculate actual annual spending rather than gross income. A retired couple often needs less than the $60,000 figure suggests once a mortgage is gone and payroll taxes vanish. Park ordinary-income payers like ARCC, MAIN, and AGNC inside an IRA where the marginal-rate hit disappears, and keep qualified-dividend payers like JNJ and PG in taxable accounts to capture the 15% to 20% preferential rate. Compare the 10-year total return of a 3.5% dividend-growth fund against a 10%-plus high-yield fund. The compounding gap usually settles the tier debate without further argument.
Healthcare social workers earn roughly $68,000 per year on average in the United States, making them one of the higher-paid specialties within the profession. Replacing that entire income with portfolio cash flow from just $620,000 of invested capital requires a blended yield of about 11%, placing much of the allocation in the higher-risk corner of the income market. The math works on paper. The real question is what tradeoffs are required to make it work.
The Three Yield Tiers Every income-replacement question reduces to the same equation: target income divided by yield equals capital required. Run that for $69,000 across three tiers and the tradeoffs come into focus.
Conservative tier (3% to 4% yield). Broad dividend-growth ETFs, blue-chip dividend payers, and the S&P 500 sit here. At 3.5%, $69,000 of income requires roughly $1,971,000 of capital, more than three times the $620,000 budget. On $620,000, this tier produces only about $21,700 a year. The payoff is principal appreciation, dividend growth that compounds, and a portfolio that funds a 30-year retirement without being consumed.
Moderate tier (5% to 7% yield). Covered-call equity funds, preferred shares, equity REITs, and high-dividend funds populate this range. At 6%, $69,000 of income requires about $1,150,000. Income improves sharply, but dividend growth slows or stalls, upside is often capped by option-writing strategies, and the income stream tends to lag inflation across decades.
Aggressive tier (10% to 14% yield). This is the only tier that fits $69,000 onto $620,000. At an 11.1% blended yield, $69,000 of income requires roughly $621,000 of capital. Business development companies, mortgage REITs, leveraged covered-call funds, and high-yield bond funds dominate here. The price is principal erosion, periodic distribution cuts, and a portfolio that often loses value over time even as the checks keep arriving.
What an 11% Yield Actually Looks Like Three names illustrate the aggressive tier and its hazards. Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC | ARCC Price Prediction), the largest publicly traded BDC, pays a $0.48 quarterly dividend on shares around $18.61, a yield close to 10%. Coverage is thin: Q1 2026 core EPS came in at $0.47, and the non-accrual rate ticked up to 2.1%. CEO Kort Schnabel cited “enhanced spreads and fees, lower leverage and more attractive terms” on new originations.
Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) layers $0.26 monthly regular dividends on top of a nineteenth consecutive quarterly supplemental of $0.30, yielding high 8% on the current $50.63 share price. It is the most durable of the three, but trades at a premium to its $33.46 NAV, a real risk if sentiment toward BDCs reverses.
AGNC Investment (NASDAQ:AGNC) is the cleanest aggressive-tier case study. A $0.12 monthly dividend on shares near $10.18 prints a yield above 14%. Yet Q1 2026 produced a $0.17 per-share loss, tangible book value dropped 5.6% to $8.38, and the economic return on tangible common equity was negative 1.6%. CEO Peter Federico framed the quarter as a geopolitical shock tied to conflict in the Middle East, with a constructive longer-term view. That volatility is the cost of the yield.
The Dividend Growth Advantage Many Income Investors Overlook The highest-yielding portfolio often delivers the most income on day one, but that does not necessarily make it the better long-term choice. A $620,000 portfolio yielding 11.1% generates about $69,000 in annual income immediately. In many cases, however, that income remains relatively flat over time as distributions are reduced, net asset values decline, or the underlying capital base slowly erodes.
A dividend-growth strategy produces a very different outcome. The same $620,000 invested in a portfolio yielding 3.5% would generate roughly $21,700 in annual income initially. If those dividends grow at an average rate of 8% per year, however, the income stream can roughly double within nine years and exceed $50,000 annually by year 12. For a younger healthcare social worker with decades before retirement, the lower-yield, higher-growth approach will often produce greater long-term income. For retirees who need cash flow immediately, a higher-yield strategy may still make sense, provided they understand the potential impact on principal over time.
Three Actions Before You Build the Portfolio Model your actual income gap, not your salary. The Social Security Fairness Act repealed the WEP and GPO provisions that had cut Social Security checks for teachers with non-covered pensions. Combined with a state pension, many teachers need to replace far less than $69,000 from a portfolio. Blend the tiers instead of maxing the yield. A 50/50 split between a 4% dividend-growth sleeve and an 11% aggressive sleeve produces a blended yield near 7.5% and preserves some compounding. On $620,000 that is roughly $46,500 today, with growth. Park the highest-yield slice inside a 403(b) or Roth IRA. BDC and mREIT distributions are taxed largely as ordinary income. With the 10-year Treasury yielding almost 4.5%, the risk premium on the aggressive tier is real, and so is the tax drag in a brokerage account. The $620,000 figure clears the math. Whether it clears the next 20 years depends on what gets layered around it.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Thirty-six thousand dollars a year sits at the center of many retirement plans. It is roughly comparable to the annual Social Security benefits received by a retired couple, enough to cover rent in many parts of the country, and a meaningful supplement to other retirement income sources. The question this article answers is simple: what does a portfolio look like when $480,000 generates that income through dividends and distributions while leaving the underlying share count intact?
The arithmetic is straightforward. Divide $36,000 by a 7.5% yield and the result is $480,000 in required capital. That yield sits near the boundary between moderate and aggressive income investing. Reaching it typically requires blending several types of income-producing securities, each offering its own mix of yield, growth potential, and risk.
The Conservative Anchor: 3% to 4% At a 3.5% yield, replacing $36,000 requires roughly $1,028,571 in capital. That is the price of safety. Broad dividend-growth funds like the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD) sit here, with a 6 basis point expense ratio and a holdings list anchored by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, ConocoPhillips, and Chevron.
This tier exists for one reason: dividend growth compounds. SCHD is up 28% over the past year and has nearly tripled over the past decade. The income starts small. It rarely stays small.
The Moderate Workhorse: 5% to 7% Drop to a 7% yield and the capital required falls to roughly $514,286. This is the high-yield equity and net-lease REIT range. Realty Income (NYSE:O | O Price Prediction) is the archetype: a 5.4% dividend yield, monthly payments, and an annualized distribution of about $3.20 per share. The company has now strung together 114 consecutive quarterly dividend increases and 670 consecutive monthly checks.
Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) blends into this tier too. Its regular dividend yield is 5.9%, but supplemental payouts of $0.30 per share arrive every March, June, September, and December, pushing total cash returns higher when the lower middle market portfolio performs. The tradeoff: shares trade at 1.6 times book value, well above peers.
The Aggressive Slice: 8% to 12% At a 12% yield, the math collapses to roughly $300,000 of capital for $36,000 of income. Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) is the largest publicly traded business development company, paying $1.92 annualized for a 10.1% yield. The portfolio is 73% first-lien senior secured loans with a 10.3% weighted average yield on debt investments.
The bill arrives on the balance sheet. ARCC’s book value per share is almost $20, and the stock has slipped 5% over the past year. Non-accruals ticked up to 2.1% at amortized cost. The income is real; the principal moves.
Building a Portfolio That Reaches a 7.5% Yield One way to approach a 7.5% blended yield is through a mix of covered-call income funds, REITs, preferred shares, business development companies, and traditional dividend-paying stocks. A portfolio allocation of roughly 35% covered-call funds, 20% REITs, 20% preferred shares, 15% BDCs, and 10% broad dividend ETFs can land near the target yield. For perspective, the 10-year Treasury yields about 4.5%, meaning investors are collecting an additional yield premium in exchange for taking on greater risk and complexity.
The Income Growth Tradeoff Many Investors Overlook A dividend-growth portfolio yielding 3% on $480,000 generates about $14,400 in income during the first year. If those dividends grow at 8% annually, however, the income stream can exceed $40,000 within 15 years without requiring additional capital. A portfolio yielding 7.5% with little or no distribution growth remains closer to its starting income level, while higher-yield holdings can sometimes experience distribution cuts or declining net asset values. The tradeoff is straightforward: younger investors often benefit from prioritizing dividend growth, while retirees who need income immediately may prefer a higher starting yield despite the slower growth profile.
Three Moves Worth Making Hold the high-distribution slice inside a Roth IRA when possible. BDC and REIT payouts are taxed as ordinary income at federal rates that reach 37% at the top bracket. Inside a Roth, those distributions are tax-free. Track NAV per share annually, not just the yield. If a fund’s NAV is eroding faster than its category index, part of your “distribution” is actually return of capital. The “without touching principal” framing fails the moment NAV slips, regardless of what shows up in your brokerage statement. Compare a 10-year total return of a dividend-growth fund against a 10% high-yield fund before committing. The income line tells you nothing about whether you finished richer or poorer. A $480,000 balance producing $36,000 of yearly distributions is roughly equivalent to a $1.2 million portfolio drawn at a 3% safe-withdrawal rate, with one difference: the cash arrives without selling a share. Whether that trade is worth it depends entirely on how many more dividend hikes you have left to collect.
Saratoga Investment (NYSE:SAR – Get Free Report) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN – Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.
Profitability This table compares Saratoga Investment and Gladstone Investment’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Saratoga Investment 30.61% 9.19% 3.09% Gladstone Investment 118.55% 6.77% 3.22% Analyst Ratings This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Saratoga Investment and Gladstone Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.
Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Saratoga Investment 0 6 0 0 2.00 Gladstone Investment 0 4 1 0 2.20 Saratoga Investment currently has a consensus price target of $23.63, suggesting a potential upside of 3.85%. Given Saratoga Investment’s higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Saratoga Investment is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.
Institutional & Insider Ownership 19.1% of Saratoga Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.0% of Saratoga Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Dividends Saratoga Investment pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Saratoga Investment pays out 123.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
Valuation and Earnings This table compares Saratoga Investment and Gladstone Investment”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Saratoga Investment $148.85 million 2.48 $28.09 million $2.44 9.32 Gladstone Investment $93.66 million 6.44 $65.32 million $3.11 4.87 Gladstone Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Saratoga Investment. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saratoga Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Volatility and Risk Saratoga Investment has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary Gladstone Investment beats Saratoga Investment on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Saratoga Investment (Get Free Report)
Saratoga Investment Corp. is a business development company specializing in leveraged and management buyouts, acquisition financings, growth financings, recapitalization, debt refinancing, and transitional financing transactions at the lower end of middle market companies. It structures its investments as debt and equity by investing through first and second lien loans, mezzanine debt, co-investments, select high yield bonds, senior secured bonds, unsecured bonds, and preferred and common equity. The firm prefers to invest in aerospace, automotive aftermarket and services, business products and services, consumer products and services, education, environmental services, industrial services, financial services, food and beverage, healthcare products and services, logistics, distribution, manufacturing, restaurants services, food services, software services, technology services, specialty chemical, media and telecommunications. It seeks to invest in the United States. The firm primarily invests $5 million to $50 million in companies having EBITDA of $2 million or greater and revenues of $8 million to $250 million. The firm prefer to take a majority stake. It invests through direct lending as well as participation in loan syndicates. The firm was formerly known as GSC Investment Corp. Saratoga Investment Corp. was formed on 2007 and is based in New York, New York with an additional office in Florham Park, New Jersey.
About Gladstone Investment (Get Free Report)
Gladstone Investment Corporation is business development company, specializes in lower middle market, mature stage, buyouts; refinancing existing debt; senior debt securities such as senior loans, senior term loans, lines of credit, and senior notes; senior subordinated debt securities such as senior subordinated loans and senior subordinated notes; junior subordinated debt securities such as subordinated notes and mezzanine loans; limited liability company interests, and warrants or options. The fund does not invest in start-ups. The fund seeks to invest in manufacturing, consumer products and business/consumer services sector. It seeks to invest in small and mid-sized companies based in the United States. The fund prefers to make debt investments between $5 million and $30 million and equity investments between $10 million and $40 million in companies. The fund seeks to invest in companies with revenue between $20 million and $100 million. The fund invests in companies with EBITDA from $3 million to $20 million. It seeks minority equity ownership and prefers to hold a board seat in its portfolio companies. It also prefers to take majority stake in its portfolio companies. The fund typically holds the investments for seven years and exits via sale or recapitalization, initial public offering, or sale to third party.
Receive News & Ratings for Saratoga Investment Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Saratoga Investment and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEAnalyzing Agilon Health (NYSE:AGL) & iSpecimen (NASDAQ:ISPC)
NEXT HEADLINE »Franklin Electric (FELE) & Its Competitors Head to Head Analysis
Gladstone Investment (GAIN) pays a strong monthly dividend and trades at a slight discount to NAV, buoyed by recent NAV per share gains. GAIN's concentrated portfolio, with 43% in equity and only 29 holdings, increases risk but has driven strong returns and supplemental payouts. Recent management transition appears low-risk, with seasoned internal executives assuming key leadership roles and continuity in strategy.
Gladstone Investment Corporation (NASDAQ:GAIN) pays shareholders $0.08 per share every month, an annualized rate of $0.96. At a share price near $15.36, that works out to a yield just above 6%. The question income investors need to answer is whether that check keeps coming, or whether the tightening coverage picture signals trouble ahead.
GAIN is not an ETF. It is a business development company (BDC), a structure that functions like a closed-end fund investing directly in private businesses. GAIN targets lower middle market companies, deploying capital as secured debt (primarily first lien loans) and equity. The debt generates interest income that funds the monthly distribution. The equity positions, when exited at a profit, generate realized capital gains that fund supplemental distributions paid on top of the regular monthly payment.
How Coverage Has Tightened The monthly distribution is supported by adjusted net investment income (NII), which strips out accounting accruals that distort GAAP results. Over the past four quarters, that coverage has narrowed. Adjusted NII was $0.26 per share in Q4 FY25, $0.24 in Q1 FY26, $0.24 in Q2 FY26, and $0.21 in Q3 FY26. The quarterly distribution obligation is $0.24 (three months at $0.08), meaning the most recent quarter came in below the threshold.
The primary culprit is yield compression. The weighted-average yield on interest-bearing investments fell from 14.1% in Q1 FY26 to 13.4% in Q2 and 12.9% in Q3. That compression tracks directly with the Fed’s rate cuts: the Fed funds rate dropped from 4.5% to 3.75% between October and December 2025. The problem is structural: 52.1% of GAIN’s debt investments sit at interest rate floors, which means further rate cuts would compress income while rate increases offer limited upside for more than half the portfolio.
Interest expense is rising at the same time income is under pressure. Quarterly interest expense averaged roughly $9.2 million in the most recent four quarters, up from roughly $6.4 million in the prior year period, driven by credit facility expansions and new debt issuances including $60 million of 6.875% Notes due 2028.
What Supports the Distribution Several factors argue against an imminent cut. CFO Taylor Ritchie noted on the Q1 FY26 earnings call that “we are comfortable with where we stand right now, and we continue to evaluate it quarter-to-quarter” regarding the company’s spillover income position. That spillover, $0.50 per share in undistributed taxable income, provides a buffer that can support distributions even in quarters where NII falls short.
New investments are also building the income base. GAIN deployed capital into Rowan Energy ($33.1 million), Global GRAB Technologies ($67.6 million), and Smart Chemical Solutions ($49.5 million) across recent quarters. CFO Ritchie noted that “they’ll stay at 13.5% despite any changes in SOFR” due to contractual floors on new deals, which helps stabilize forward income.
NAV per share has climbed to $14.95 in Q3 FY26, driven by $70.23 million in net unrealized appreciation. The stock has returned nearly 25% over the past year, meaning total return investors have done well even as the income picture tightened.
Whether the Monthly Distribution Can Hold The $0.08 monthly distribution is not in immediate danger, but the margin of safety has narrowed. Adjusted NII missed the quarterly distribution threshold in Q3 FY26 for the first time in recent history, and portfolio yields are compressing as rates fall. The spillover buffer and new investment floors provide real protection, but another rate cut cycle or a credit event in the four nonaccrual portfolio companies could push coverage below sustainable levels. The next earnings report, expected around May 13, 2026, will be the clearest signal of whether the trend is stabilizing or deteriorating. For investors who understand BDC risk and can tolerate coverage volatility, the income profile remains intact — for now. Investors expecting rock-solid, recession-proof income should look elsewhere.
Gladstone Investment Corporation (NASDAQ:GAIN) operates an unusual BDC model. Most business development companies generate income from interest on debt loans to private companies. GAIN layers an equity buyout strategy on top, taking ownership stakes in lower-middle-market businesses and realizing capital gains when those companies are sold. This produces two income streams: a steady monthly base distribution funded by net investment income (NII) from debt, and periodic supplemental distributions funded by realized gains from equity exits.
Shares have climbed 14% over the past year and are up 14% year-to-date, recently trading near $15.94. That price now sits above the most recent NAV per share of $14.95, a reversal of prior-quarter discounts.
Two Streams, Two Different Risk Profiles The base monthly distribution of $0.08 per share, when annualized, is $1.50 per share and is funded by NII. Supplemental distributions, which have totaled $0.54 in 2025, $0.70 in 2024, and $0.88 in December 2023, depend entirely on portfolio company sales at a gain. The declining trend reflects fewer large exits, meaning total annual income from GAIN has been shrinking.
This infographic outlines GAIN (Gladstone Investment Corporation)’s unique equity-heavy strategy, illustrating its dual income streams from debt and equity and evaluating the stability of its distributions. It highlights the declining trend in supplemental distributions and tight NII coverage. CEO David Gladstone stated on the fiscal year 2025 earnings call: “We’re not really in that giant buyout game, which seems to be stalled due to a lack of exits in the public marketplace. Others have investments in large buyouts that aren’t liquid, but we typically sell what we put up for sale quickly.” Since its inception through March 2025, GAIN has invested in 62 buyout portfolio companies and generated approximately $353 million in net realized gains.
The Base Distribution Faces Pressure Net investment income coverage remains the key measure of dividend stability, and recent results show that coverage has tightened. Reported NII has softened over the past several quarters, and while the base distribution has been maintained, the most recent period did not fully cover the payout on an adjusted basis. GAAP results were also affected by non‑cash incentive‑fee accruals, which reduce reported income even though the associated fees are not yet payable.
These accruals do not draw cash in the quarter but do represent real economic cost. Total investment income has also come under pressure, reflecting a more challenging yield environment across the portfolio.
Portfolio yields have compressed as well. Weighted‑average yields on interest‑earning assets have declined over recent quarters, consistent with broader trends across the BDC sector. With a meaningful portion of the portfolio at or near interest‑rate floors, further Fed cuts would primarily affect the remaining floating‑rate exposure rather than the entire book. While the retrieved data did not provide a current Fed Funds rate, the broader backdrop of moderating short‑term rates continues to influence portfolio yields, earnings power, and dividend coverage.
Balance Sheet and Spillover Support Management noted that the company ended the fiscal year with meaningful spillover income, providing coverage for the current monthly distribution and the recently declared supplemental payout. The asset‑coverage ratio remains comfortably above the 150% regulatory minimum, and the company has expanded its credit capacity, giving it additional flexibility even as NII coverage has tightened. These balance‑sheet buffers provide a runway should earnings remain under pressure.
NAV per share improved in the most recent quarter, supported by net unrealized appreciation across the portfolio. That recovery reflects genuine mark‑to‑market gains, but unrealized appreciation does not generate cash and therefore cannot directly fund distributions. Dividend sustainability continues to depend on recurring net investment income rather than valuation movements.
Base Distribution Is Defensible, but the Margin Is Narrow The base monthly distribution sits near the edge of coverage. Net investment income has tightened over recent quarters, and the most recent period did not fully cover the payout on an adjusted basis. Portfolio yields have also compressed and have yet to show a sustained recovery. Supplemental distributions have trended lower and remain dependent on realized gains, which are inherently tied to exit timing and therefore outside management’s control.
The base payout appears defensible given the company’s spillover income and balance‑sheet flexibility, but the margin is narrow. The overall structure aligns with how most BDCs balance stable base dividends with variable supplemental payouts.
Monthly income investors rarely get to watch the machinery behind their payout. Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) keeps that machinery unusually visible: a business development company that pays $0.08 a month on the dot, then periodically tops shareholders up with a much larger supplemental check funded by private-company exits. Shares change hands near $16, up about 18% year to date, with a base yield of roughly 5.9% before any supplementals.
How the payout is funded As a BDC, Gladstone earns income from four sources: interest on secured first-lien loans, preferred equity dividends, success fees when portfolio companies refinance or sell, and realized gains on the equity stakes taken alongside those loans. Roughly 28 portfolio companies sit inside a fair-value book of $1.13 billion. The weighted-average yield on interest-bearing investments has drifted from 14% in the first fiscal quarter to 13% in the third, tracking SOFR lower.
The “tweak” is the supplemental. Management pairs the fixed monthly distribution with a separate payout sized to realized gains. Shareholders received a $0.54 supplemental on June 13, 2025 after the Nocturne Luxury Villas exit delivered $3.5 million in success fees and a $19.8 million realized gain. Prior years saw supplementals as high as $0.88 in December 2023 and $0.70 in October 2024, always declared separately rather than baked into the monthly number.
Coverage of the monthly check Quarterly adjusted EPS has to cover three monthly payments totaling $0.24. The recent run: $0.26 in Q4 FY25, $0.24 in Q1 FY26, $0.24 in Q2 FY26, and $0.21 in Q3 FY26. Three of the last four quarters cleared the hurdle; the Q3 miss reflected total investment income of $25 million, a 40% year-over-year drop driven by the lumpy timing of success and dividend income.
GAAP tells a noisier story. Q3 FY26 swung to a GAAP loss of $0.16 because of a $15 million capital-gains-based incentive fee accrual that is not yet contractually due. That accrual is a non-cash expense created by unrealized appreciation; it pressures reported earnings but does not drain the cash pool that actually funds the dividend.
Structural risks Two pressures deserve attention. 52% of debt investments sit at their interest rate floor, so the 75 basis points of Fed cuts over the past year (target upper bound now 3.75%) compress future coupon income. Realized losses also happen: a $29.9 million loss on J.R. Hobbs in Q2 FY26 was absorbed, but repeat events would erode NAV and the supplemental engine.
The offsets are real. NAV per share climbed to $15 from $14 the prior quarter on $70 million of net unrealized appreciation. The credit facility was expanded from $270 million to $300 million, fresh 6.875% Notes due 2028 refinanced older paper at lower rates, and the ATM program has sold shares above NAV, which is accretive to existing holders.
Where this leaves income investors The $0.08 monthly base looks safe, with a 16-plus-year record of uninterrupted monthly payments and adjusted NII generally covering the run-rate. Supplementals, by design, are variable and tied to exit timing, not guaranteed. Income-focused investors comfortable with lumpy top-ups and BDC-level credit risk have a coherent setup here; anyone treating the headline yield plus supplementals as a fixed figure should size positions accordingly. Total return has worked so far, with the stock up 32% over the past year.
The market has spent much of 2026 stuck between two competing forces — stubbornly high interest rates and a growing expectation they’ll eventually fall. That tension has left income investors asking a simple question: where can you still find a reliable yield without taking on outsized risk?
Monthly dividend stocks are an obvious place to look. But not all of them are built the same. So where does Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN | MAIN Price Prediction) fit in — and could it really be the best monthly dividend stock to buy right now?
Why BDCs Play by Different Rules Let’s start with the structure, because it matters. Main Street Capital is a business development company (BDC). That’s a fancy way of saying it provides financing — primarily debt and some equity — to lower middle-market companies that don’t have easy access to traditional bank funding. In exchange, it earns interest income and occasionally equity upside.
Here’s what separates BDCs from typical dividend stocks:
They must distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders, similar to real estate investment trusts (REITS) That leads to higher yields, but also limits retained earnings Earnings are best measured by net investment income (NII), not EPS That last point is critical. Traditional metrics like P/E ratios can mislead investors because they don’t reflect how cash actually flows through a BDC. Instead, savvy investors focus on NII per share, net asset value (NAV), and dividend coverage ratio.
That’s the lens we need to evaluate MAIN properly.
How MAIN Stacks Up Against Its Peers Let’s not box Main Street into a single comparison because it doesn’t fit neatly into one. If you’re buying the BDC for monthly income, you need to compare it to the few BDCs that actually pay monthly. But if you’re judging whether its premium valuation is justified, you also need to see how it stacks up against the highest-quality BDCs overall.
Let’s look at both — because each answers a different question.
Monthly Dividend BDCs: The True Income Comparison There aren’t many — which is exactly why MAIN stands out.
Metric Main Street Capital Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) Dividend Frequency Monthly Monthly Monthly Base Yield ~6.5% ~6% ~8% Price/NAV ~1.6–1.8x ~1.2–1.3x ~1.0–1.1x Specials Yes (semi-regular) Yes (frequent) Occasional NII Coverage >100% Variable Less consistent Here’s what the numbers tell us:
Gladstone Investment comes closest to Main Street’s hybrid model of income plus equity upside, but its results have been less consistent. Gladstone Capital offers a higher yield, but that income has shown more variability and weaker coverage at times. Main Street Capital doesn’t lead on yield, but it does lead on consistency and coverage, which is what income investors rely on when the market gets choppy.
Best-in-Class BDCs: The Valuation Reality Check Now let’s zoom out. Because monthly payments don’t mean much if the underlying business isn’t strong.
Metric Main Street Capital Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) Dividend Yield ~6.5% base ~9% Price/NAV ~1.6–1.8x ~1.1x Dividend Frequency Monthly Quarterly NII Coverage >100% ~100% Scale Lower middle market focus Large-cap sponsor-backed deals Here’s what stands out: Ares Capital offers a higher yield and trades closer to NAV, while Main Street trades at a 50% to 70% premium — and has for years.
Key Takeaway That premium isn’t random. It reflects the BDC’s long history of NAV growth, more conservative underwriting, and internally managed operations that keep costs lower over time. That suggests investors are willing to accept a lower yield in exchange for greater reliability.
However, valuation still matters. At current levels, Main Street looks like a solid buy for long-term income investors, and if shares pull back closer to 1.4x NAV or below, that would signal a more aggressive entry point. In any case, the stock’s premium has been durable — and justified by performance.
Yet, investors should be realistic. You’re not buying Main Street for maximum income today. You’re buying it for dependable income over time. If the stock dips, lean in more aggressively. If it doesn’t, it still deserves a place on a watchlist — or in a diversified income portfolio.
When all is said and done, Main Street Capital may not be the cheapest BDC — but it makes a strong case as one of the best.
Southside Bancshares (SBSI - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.78 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.76 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.71 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +2.19%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this holding company for Southside Bank would post earnings of $0.8 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.7, delivering a surprise of -12.5%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times.
Southside Bancshares, which belongs to the Zacks Banks - Southwest industry, posted revenues of $72.15 million for the quarter ended March 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.66%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $66.43 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates three times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Southside Bancshares shares have added about 7.3% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 4.2%.
What's Next for Southside Bancshares?While Southside Bancshares has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Southside Bancshares was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.82 on $73.1 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $3.24 on $294.55 million in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Banks - Southwest is currently in the top 14% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
One other stock from the broader Zacks Finance sector, Gladstone Investment (GAIN - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended March 2026.
This business development company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.22 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -15.4%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
Gladstone Investment's revenues are expected to be $25.14 million, down 8.8% from the year-ago quarter.
Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) is the income-focused business development company that pays shareholders a $0.08 monthly distribution plus periodic supplemental payouts tied to portfolio exits. Income investors lean on GAIN for that monthly check, so the Q3 FY26 earnings miss reported February 3, 2026, where adjusted EPS came in at $0.21 against a $0.2275 estimate, raised a fair question: is the GAIN distribution still safe? The short answer is yes, but with caveats worth understanding before the next check hits your account.
How GAIN generates the income it pays out Gladstone Investment is a BDC that makes secured debt and equity investments in lower middle market businesses, then funnels three streams of cash back to shareholders: interest on its loans, dividend income from equity stakes, and success fees plus realized gains when portfolio companies exit. The base monthly $0.08 is funded primarily by interest income. Supplemental distributions, like the $0.54 paid in June 2025, come from capital gains such as the Nocturne Luxury Villas exit that generated a $19.8M realized gain.
The coverage math is tightening Adjusted net investment income covers the base distribution, but the cushion is shrinking. Q3 FY26 adjusted EPS of $0.21 came in below the $0.24 quarterly base distribution rate ($0.08 times three months), the first such shortfall in recent quarters. Compared to Q2 FY26 adjusted EPS of $0.24 and Q1 FY26 adjusted EPS of $0.24, the trend is unmistakable. For a BDC whose entire promise is reliable monthly income, generating less than you pay out for even a single quarter matters.
The driver is yield compression in the loan book. The weighted-average yield on interest-bearing investments fell from 14.1% in Q1 FY26 to 13.4% in Q2 to 12.9% in Q3. With 52.1% of debt investments at interest rate floors, GAIN cannot ride rates back up easily, and the Fed has already cut 0.75 percentage points over the past year to 3.75%, which pulls SOFR-linked coupons lower.
Why the GAAP loss looks scarier than it is Q3 FY26 showed a GAAP net investment loss of $0.16 per share, but the cause was a $14.75 million accrual for capital gains-based incentive fees that are not yet contractually due. That is an accounting reservation against future fees, not cash leaving the building. NAV per share actually rose to $14.95 from $13.53 sequentially, lifted by $70.23M of unrealized appreciation, which is the opposite of a fund eroding its capital base to fund distributions.
Balance sheet supports the payout Management reinforced the capital stack. The credit facility expanded from $270M to $300M in Q3 FY26, and the company priced a $100M offering of 7.125% Notes due 2031 on April 9, 2026, with proceeds going to repay the revolver and fund new investments. Asset coverage sits at 189%, well above the 150% regulatory minimum, and the spillover taxable income was roughly $0.50 per share after the June supplemental, which is essentially pre-funded distribution capacity.
Total return tells a kinder story Shares are around $17 today, up 23% since the February 3 earnings filing and 34% over the past year. The 5.7% trailing dividend yield understates the picture because it excludes supplementals. With base monthly plus typical supplemental payouts, GAIN holders have collected meaningful income on top of price appreciation.
Verdict: safe for now, watch the May 12 earnings report The base $0.08 monthly distribution is not in immediate danger. Coverage is thinner than it was, but spillover income, a rising NAV, refreshed credit lines, and a payout ratio around 31% all argue for continuity. The supplemental distribution is a different question, since those rely on exits and realized gains, which are inherently lumpy. Holders should watch the Q4 FY26 release on May 12, 2026, where the $0.22 EPS consensus would once again fall short of the $0.24 quarterly base rate. Two consecutive quarters of under-coverage would shift this from a yellow flag to a red one. For investors who want a similar income thesis with less single-manager risk, the broader VanEck BDC Income ETF (NYSEARCA:BIZD) spreads the bet across the BDC sector and removes the supplemental-distribution lottery from the equation.
By webcast -- Log on to the web at the address above
By phone -- please call (866) 373-3416
Contact:
Gladstone Investment Corporation, (703) 287-5893
A conference call replay will be available beginning after the call and will be accessible through May 20, 2026. To hear the replay, please dial (877) 660-6853 and use playback conference number 13759089.
If you are unable to participate during the live webcast, the call will be archived on the website www.gladstoneinvestment.com. The event will be archived and available for replay on the Company's website.
Gladstone Investment Corporation is a publicly traded business development company that seeks to make secured debt and equity investments in lower middle market businesses in the United States in connection with acquisitions, changes in control and recapitalizations.
For further information: Gladstone Investment Corporation, (703) 287-5893
Earnings MCLEAN, VA / ACCESS Newswire / May 12, 2026 / Gladstone Investment Corporation (Nasdaq:GAIN) (the "Company") today announced earnings for its fourth quarter and fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. Please read the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which is available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or the investors section of the Company's website at www.gladstoneinvestment.com.
Summary Information: (dollars in thousands, except per share data (unaudited)):
March 31,
2026
December 31,
2025
$
Change
%
Change
For the quarter ended:
Total investment income
$
25,192
$
25,062
$
130
0.5
%
Total expenses, net(A)
35,802
31,571
4,231
13.4
%
Net investment loss(A)
(10,610
)
(6,509
)
(4,101
)
63.0
%
Net realized gain
163
2,180
(2,017
)
(92.5
)%
Net unrealized appreciation
92,821
70,227
22,594
32.2
%
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations(A)
$
82,374
$
65,898
$
16,476
25.0
%
Net investment loss per weighted-average common share(A)
$
(0.27
)
$
(0.16
)
$
(0.11
)
68.8
%
Adjusted net investment income per weighted-average common share(B)
$
0.20
$
0.21
$
(0.01
)
(4.8
)%
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per weighted-average common share(A)
$
2.07
$
1.66
$
0.41
24.7
%
Cash distribution per common share from net investment income(C)
$
0.24
$
0.24
$
-
-
%
Cash distribution per common share from cumulative net realized gains(C)
$
-
$
-
$
-
-
%
Weighted-average yield on interest-bearing investments
12.9
%
12.9
%
-
%
-
%
Total dollars invested
$
2,300
$
37,438
$
(35,138
)
(93.9
)%
Total dollars repaid and/or collected from sales and
recapitalization of investments
$
8,513
$
19,221
$
(10,708
)
(55.7
)%
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted
39,821,967
39,678,402
143,565
0.4
%
Total shares of common stock outstanding
39,821,967
39,821,967
-
-
%
As of:
Total investments, at fair value
$
1,309,248
$
1,222,792
$
86,456
7.1
%
Fair value, as a percent of cost
124.4
%
115.5
%
8.9
%
7.7
%
Number of portfolio companies
29
29
-
-
%
Net assets
$
668,225
$
595,408
$
72,817
12.2
%
Net asset value per common share
$
16.78
$
14.95
$
1.83
12.2
%
Total distributable earnings
$
181,468
$
108,702
$
72,766
66.9
%
Total distributable earnings per common share
$
4.56
$
2.73
$
1.83
67.0
%
Estimated spillover
$
21,283
$
22,943
$
(1,660
)
(7.2
)%
Estimated spillover per common share
$
0.53
$
0.58
$
(0.05
)
(8.6
)%
March 31,
2026
March 31,
2025
$
Change
%
Change
For the year ended:
Total investment income
$
99,077
$
93,662
$
5,415
5.8
%
Total expenses, net(A)
102,829
65,567
37,262
56.8
%
Net investment (loss) income(A)
(3,752
)
28,095
(31,847
)
NM
Net realized (loss) gain
(27,595
)
63,184
(90,779
)
NM
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
216,100
(25,960
)
242,060
NM
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations(A)
$
184,753
$
65,319
$
119,434
182.8
%
Net investment (loss) income per weighted-average common share(A)
$
(0.10
)
$
0.76
$
(0.86
)
NM
Adjusted net investment income per weighted-average common share(B)
$
0.88
$
0.97
$
(0.09
)
(9.3
)%
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per weighted-average common share(A)
$
4.77
$
1.78
$
2.99
168.0
%
Cash distribution per common share from net investment income(C)
$
0.99
$
0.64
$
0.35
54.7
%
Cash distribution per common share from cumulative net realized gains(C)
$
0.51
$
1.02
$
(0.51
)
(50.0
)%
Weighted-average yield on interest-bearing investments
13.3
%
13.9
%
(0.6
)%
(4.2
)%
Total dollars invested
$
173,616
$
221,217
$
(47,601
)
(21.5
)%
Total dollars repaid and/or collected from sales and
recapitalization of investments
$
33,540
$
199,625
$
(166,085
)
(83.2
)%
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted
38,712,611
36,735,218
1,977,393
5.4
%
Total shares of common stock outstanding
39,821,967
36,837,381
2,984,586
8.1
%
As of:
Total investments, at fair value
$
1,309,248
$
979,320
$
329,928
33.7
%
Fair value, as a percent of cost
124.4
%
104.3
%
20.1
%
19.3
%
Number of portfolio companies
29
25
4
16.0
%
Net assets
$
668,225
$
499,084
$
169,141
33.9
%
Net asset value per common share
$
16.78
$
13.55
$
3.23
23.8
%
Total distributable earnings
$
181,468
$
53,535
$
127,933
239.0
%
Total distributable earnings per common share
$
4.56
$
1.45
$
3.11
214.5
%
Estimated spillover
$
21,283
$
55,337
$
(34,054
)
(61.5
)%
Estimated spillover per common share
$
0.53
$
1.50
$
(0.97
)
(64.7
)%
NM = Not Meaningful
(A)
Inclusive of $18.5 million, or $0.47 per weighted-average common share, and $14.7 million, or $0.37 per weighted-average common share, of capital gains-based incentive fees accrued during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively; and $38.0 million, or $0.98 per weighted-average common share, and $7.4 million, or $0.21 per weighted-average common share, of capital-gains based incentive fees accrued during the years ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively. These fees were accrued in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), where such amounts were not contractually due under the terms of the investment advisory agreement for the respective periods. Also see discussion under Non-GAAP Financial Measure - Adjusted Net Investment Income below.
(B)
See Non-GAAP Financial Measure - Adjusted Net Investment Income, below, for a description of this non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation from Net investment income (loss) to Adjusted net investment income, including on a weighted-average per share basis. The Company uses this non-GAAP financial measure internally in analyzing financial results and believes it is useful to investors as an additional tool to evaluate ongoing results and trends for the Company.
(C)
Estimates of tax characterization made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax characterization of distributions for the full year. Estimates made on a quarterly basis are updated as of each interim reporting date.
Highlights for the Quarter: During the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the following significant events occurred:
Distributions and Dividends:
Paid an $0.08 per common share monthly distribution to common stockholders in each of January, February, and March 2026.
Financing Activity:
Issued 7.125% Notes due 2031 with an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million.
Fourth Quarter Results: Net investment loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 was $10.6 million, or $0.27 per weighted-average common share, compared to net investment loss for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 of $6.5 million, or $0.16 per weighted-average common share. This change was a result of an increase in total expenses, net of credits, partially offset by an increase in total investment income, quarter over quarter.
Total investment income for the quarters ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was $25.2 million and $25.1 million, respectively. The quarter over quarter increase was primarily due to a $0.4 million increase in dividend and success fee income, the timing of which can be variable, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in interest income, primarily due to the partial repayment of certain existing debt investments.
Total expenses, net of credits, for the quarters ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was $35.8 million and $31.6 million, respectively. The increase quarter over quarter was primarily due to a $3.8 million increase in accruals for capital gains-based incentive fees in the current quarter, as a result of the net impact of realized and unrealized gains and losses, a $0.4 million increase in base management fee and a $0.1 million decrease in credits from Adviser. These amounts were partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in other expenses.
Net asset value per common share as of March 31, 2026 was $16.78 compared to $14.95 as of December 31, 2025. The quarter over quarter increase was primarily due to $92.5 million, or $2.32 per common share, of net unrealized appreciation of investments. The increase was partially offset by $10.6 million, or $0.27 per common share, of net investment loss and $9.6 million, or $0.24 per common share, of distributions paid to common stockholders.
Highlights for the Year: During the year ended March 31, 2026, the following significant events occurred:
Portfolio Activity:
In May 2025, we invested $49.5 million in a new portfolio company, Smart Chemical Solutions, LLC ("Smart Chemical"), in the form of $35.7 million of secured first lien debt and $13.8 million of preferred equity. Smart Chemical, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is a leading provider of production chemicals for onshore oil and gas operators throughout the United States.
In May 2025, we invested $12.8 million in a new portfolio company, Sun State Nursery and Landscaping, LLC ("Sun State"), in the form of $9.8 million of secured first lien debt and $3.1 million of preferred equity. Sun State, headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, is a leading commercial landscaping installation and maintenance provider in the Jacksonville area.
In June 2025, we restructured our investment in PSI Molded Plastics, Inc. As a result of the restructuring, we converted debt with a cost basis of $10.6 million into preferred equity.
In July 2025, we invested $67.6 million in a new portfolio company, Global GRAB Technologies, Inc. ("Global GRAB"), in the form of $46.5 million of secured first lien debt and $21.1 million of preferred equity. Global GRAB, headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee, is a provider of turnkey perimeter security and hostile vehicle mitigation systems, serving various government and commercial organizations.
In September 2025, we entered into a new $20.0 million secured first lien term loan with J.R. Hobbs Co. - Atlanta, LLC ("J.R. Hobbs"), restructuring our previously outstanding first lien term loans and line of credit with an aggregate total cost basis of $49.9 million, which resulted in a realized loss of $29.9 million.
In December 2025, we invested $33.1 million in a new portfolio company, Rowan Energy Inc. ("Rowan"), in the form of $25.8 million of secured first lien debt and $7.3 million of preferred equity. Rowan, headquartered in Arcadia, Oklahoma, specializes in advanced frac sand filtration, completion-equipment deployment and field-operations support.
Distributions and Dividends:
Paid an $0.08 per common share distribution to common stockholders each month from April 2025 through March 2026; and
Paid a $0.54 per common share supplemental distribution to common stockholders in June 2025.
At-the-market ("ATM") program activity:
Sold 2,984,586 shares of our common stock under our common stock ATM program at a weighted-average gross price of $14.12 per share and raised approximately $41.5 million in net proceeds. These sales were above our then current NAV per share.
Financing Activities:
Issued 6.875% Notes due 2028 with an aggregate principal amount of $60.0 million.
Amended our credit facility, increasing the size from $270.0 million to $300.0 million.
Voluntarily redeemed the 8.00% Notes due 2028 with an aggregate principal amount of $74.8 million.
Issued 7.125% Notes due 2031 with an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million.
Fiscal Year End Results: Net investment loss for the year ended March 31, 2026 was $3.8 million, or $0.10 per weighted-average common share, compared to net investment income for the year ended March 31, 2025 of $28.1 million, or $0.76 per weighted-average common share. This change was a result of an increase in total expenses, net of credits, partially offset by total investment income, year over year.
Total investment income for the years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $99.1 million and $93.7 million, respectively. The year over year increase was primarily due to a $6.1 million increase in interest income, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in dividend and success fee income, related to fees that did not reoccur in the current fiscal year, as the timing of such fee income can be variable. The increase in interest income was primarily due to an increase in the weighted-average principal balance of our interest-bearing investments, due to the additional debt investments made during the year, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted-average yield on interest-bearing investments, resulting from a decrease in SOFR.
Total expenses, net of credits, for the years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $102.8 million and $65.6 million, respectively. The increase year over year was primarily due to a $30.5 million increase in accruals for capital gains-based incentive fees in the current year, as a result of the net impact of realized and unrealized gains and losses, an $8.9 million increase in interest expense, related to the issuance of the 7.875% 2030 Notes in December 2024, the 6.875% 2028 Notes in November 2025 and the 7.125% 2031 Notes in February 2026 and increased borrowings on the credit facility, partially offset by a decrease in the effective interest rate and the redemption of the 8.00% 2028 Notes in December 2025, and a $3.7 million increase in base management fee.
Net asset value per common share as of March 31, 2026 was $16.78 compared to $13.55 as of March 31, 2025. The year over year increase was primarily due to $216.1 million, or $5.58 per common share, of net unrealized appreciation of investments, which included $197.0 million, or $5.09 per common share, of unrealized appreciation and $19.1 million, or $0.49 per common share, of reversal of unrealized depreciation on our investment in J.R. Hobbs upon its restructure, and $0.07 per common share of net accretive effect of equity offerings. These increases were partially offset by $57.2 million, or $1.50 per common share, of distributions paid to common stockholders, $26.3 million, or $0.68 per common share, of net realized losses on investments, $3.8 million, or $0.10 per common share, of net investment loss and $1.3 million, or $0.03 of realized loss on other upon the redemption of the 8.00% Notes due 2028.
The following table provides relevant information related to our notes payable and Credit Facility as of March 31, 2026:
Interest Rate
Aggregate Principal Amount
Notes Payable
5.00% 2026 Notes(A)
5.00%
$
127,938
4.875% 2028 Notes
4.875%
134,550
7.875% 2030 Notes
7.875%
126,500
6.875% 2028 Notes
6.875%
60,000
7.125% 2031 Notes
7.125%
100,000
Total notes payable
$
548,988
Credit Facility (B)
Commitment amount
SOFR + 3.25%
$
300,000
Borrowings outstanding at cost
$
23,900
Availability(C)
$
276,100
Percentage of borrowings at:(D)
Fixed rate
95.8
%
Floating rate
4.2
%
(A)
On May 1, 2026, we repaid the 5.00% 2026 Notes at maturity.
(B)
The Credit Facility bears interest at 30-day Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR").
(C)
Availability is subject to various constraints, characteristics and applicable advance rates based on collateral quality under our Credit Facility, which equated to an adjusted availability of $276.1 million as of March 31, 2026.
(D)
The percentage uses the Credit Facility borrowings outstanding at cost as of March 31, 2026. The fixed rate borrowings consist of the outstanding notes payable. The floating rate borrowings consist of the Credit Facility borrowings outstanding at cost.
The following table presents certain selected information regarding the debt investments of our portfolio companies as of March 31, 2026:
March 31, 2026(A)(B)
Weighted average interest rate of debt investments
12.9
%
Weighted average interest rate floor of debt investments
12.1
%
Current percentage of debt investments at interest rate floor
52.5
%
Weighted average interest rate of debt investments assuming:
25 basis points decrease in SOFR
12.8
%
50 basis points decrease in SOFR
12.7
%
75 basis points decrease in SOFR
12.6
%
100 basis points decrease in SOFR
12.5
%
(A)
Debt investments presented exclude line of credit commitments and all debt investments on non-accrual status as of March 31, 2026. The weighted average interest rate is based on the cost balance of the debt investments.
(B)
As of March 31, 2026, 100.0% of our debt investments are variable rates with a floor and are indexed to 30-day SOFR. The interest rate is the greater of the floor or the total of SOFR plus a spread. As of March 31, 2026, we did not have any loans with a paid-in-kind interest component.
Subsequent Events: After March 31, 2026, the following significant events occurred:
Distributions and dividends: In April 2026, our Board of Directors declared the following monthly distributions to common stockholders:
Record Date
Payment Date
Distribution per Common Share
April 24, 2026
April 30, 2026
$
0.08
May 20, 2026
May 29, 2026
0.08
June 23, 2026
June 30, 2026
0.08
Total for the Quarter:
$
0.24
Notes Payable: On May 1, 2026, we repaid the 5.00% Notes due 2026 with an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $127.9 million at maturity.
Non-GAAP Financial Measure - Adjusted Net Investment Income: On a supplemental basis, the Company discloses Adjusted net investment income, including on a weighted-average per share basis, which is a financial measure that is calculated and presented on a basis of methodology other than in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted net investment income represents net investment (loss) income, excluding capital gains-based incentive fees. The Company uses this non-GAAP financial measure internally in analyzing financial results and believes that this non-GAAP financial measure is useful to investors as an additional tool to evaluate ongoing results and trends for the Company. The Company's investment advisory agreement provides that a capital gains-based incentive fee is determined and paid annually with respect to realized capital gains (but not unrealized appreciation) to the extent such realized capital gains exceed realized capital losses and unrealized depreciation on investments for such year. However, under GAAP, a capital gains-based incentive fee is accrued if realized capital gains and unrealized appreciation of investments exceed realized capital losses and unrealized depreciation of investments. Refer to Note 4 - Related Party Transactions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. The Company believes that Adjusted net investment income is a useful indicator of operations exclusive of any capital gains-based incentive fees, as net investment (loss) income does not include realized or unrealized investment activity associated with the capital gains-based incentive fee.
The following table provides a reconciliation of net investment (loss) income (the most comparable GAAP measure) to Adjusted net investment income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited):
For the quarter ended
March 31, 2026
December 31, 2025
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Net investment loss
$
(10,610
)
$
(0.27
)
$
(6,509
)
$
(0.16
)
Capital gains-based incentive fee
18,533
0.47
14,749
0.37
Adjusted net investment income
$
7,923
$
0.20
$
8,240
$
0.21
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted
39,821,967
39,678,402
For the year ended
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2025
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Net investment (loss) income
$
(3,752
)
$
(0.10
)
$
28,095
$
0.76
Capital gains-based incentive fee
37,970
0.98
7,445
0.21
Adjusted net investment income
$
34,218
$
0.88
$
35,540
$
0.97
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted
38,712,611
36,735,218
Adjusted net investment income may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies, as it is a non-GAAP financial measure that is not based on a comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles and therefore may be defined differently by other companies. In addition, Adjusted net investment income should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP.
Conference Call: The Company will hold its earnings release conference call on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time. Please call (866) 373-3416 to enter the conference call. An operator will monitor the call and set a queue for any questions. A replay of the conference call will be available through May 20, 2026. To hear the replay, please dial (877) 660-6853 and use the playback conference number 13759089. The replay will be available after the call concludes. The live audio broadcast of the Company's quarterly conference call will also be available online at www.gladstoneinvestment.com. The event will be archived and available for replay on the Company's website.
About Gladstone Investment Corporation: Gladstone Investment Corporation is a publicly traded business development company that seeks to make secured debt and equity investments in lower middle market businesses in the United States in connection with acquisitions, changes in control and recapitalizations. Information on the business activities of all the Gladstone funds can be found at www.gladstonecompanies.com.
To obtain a paper copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed today with the SEC, please contact the Company at 1521 Westbranch Drive, Suite 100, McLean, VA 22102, ATTN: Investor Relations. The financial information above is not comprehensive and is without notes, so readers should obtain and carefully review the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2026, including the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained therein.
Investor Relations Inquiries: Please visit ir.gladstoneinvestment.com or call (703) 287-5893.
Forward-looking Statements:
The statements in this press release regarding potential future distributions, earnings and operations of the Company are "forward-looking statements." These forward-looking statements inherently involve certain risks and uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Although these statements are based on the Company's current plans that are believed to be reasonable as of the date of this press release, a number of factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, including those factors described from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Gladstone Investment (GAIN - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.2 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.22 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.26 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -9.09%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this business development company would post earnings of $0.24 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.21, delivering a surprise of -12.5%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates just once.
Gladstone Investment, which belongs to the Zacks Financial - SBIC & Commercial Industry industry, posted revenues of $25.19 million for the quarter ended March 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.21%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $27.55 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Gladstone Investment shares have added about 18% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 8.3%.
What's Next for Gladstone Investment?While Gladstone Investment has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Gladstone Investment was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.24 on $25.36 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $0.89 on $102.92 million in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Financial - SBIC & Commercial Industry is currently in the bottom 14% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
Crescent Capital BDC (CCAP - Free Report) , another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended March 2026. The results are expected to be released on May 13.
This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.41 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -8.9%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
Crescent Capital BDC's revenues are expected to be $38.82 million, down 7.9% from the year-ago quarter.
Gladstone Investment NASDAQ: GAIN reported what management described as solid results for its fiscal fourth quarter and year ended March 31, 2026, citing portfolio growth, higher total investment income and a significant increase in net asset value.
CEO and President David Dullum said the business development company generated adjusted net investment income of $0.88 per share for the fiscal year and grew the fair value of its investment portfolio to $1.3 billion as of March 31, up 34% from $979 million a year earlier. He attributed the increase to four new buyout investments, appreciation in the existing portfolio and an increase in NAV per share.
“We also continue to see growth in our investment portfolio through new buyout investments and the improving performance at a number of our existing portfolio companies,” Dullum said. The company currently has 29 operating companies in its portfolio, he added.
Get Gladstone Investment alerts:
Portfolio Growth Driven by New Buyouts and Appreciation Gladstone Investment invested approximately $163 million in four new portfolio companies during fiscal 2026, compared with about $221 million invested in the prior year. Dullum said the deals were consistent with the company’s buyout strategy, under which it typically seeks to become the majority economic owner and provides both equity and debt capital.
He said the debt investments are intended to generate operating income to support monthly distributions, while equity investments provide potential upside through capital gains upon exit. Dullum also emphasized that the company sets floors on its debt securities, which he said helps maintain income above its cost of capital and reduces exposure to spread compression.
Since inception in 2005 through March 31, 2026, Gladstone Investment has invested in 66 buyout portfolio companies for an aggregate of approximately $2.2 billion and has exited 33 companies. Those exits generated about $354 million in net realized gains and $45 million in other income on exit, according to Dullum.
Income Rises, While Quarterly Adjusted NII Trails Dividend CFO and Treasurer Taylor Ritchie said Gladstone Investment ended fiscal 2026 with its fifth consecutive year of earned total investment income, generating $99.1 million compared with $93.7 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase was primarily driven by higher interest income from growth in the debt investment portfolio, partially offset by lower dividend and success fee income.
The weighted average principal balance of interest-bearing investments was $672 million for the fiscal year, up about $70 million from the prior year. The portfolio’s weighted average yield declined to 13.3% from 13.9%. Ritchie said embedded interest rate floors helped reduce the impact of declining benchmark rates, noting that the portfolio yield decline of 63 basis points was less than the 82 basis point decline in SOFR during the year.
For the fiscal fourth quarter, total investment income was $25.2 million, slightly above $25.1 million in the prior quarter. Adjusted net investment income, which excludes capital gains-based incentive fee accruals, was $7.9 million, or $0.20 per share, compared with $8.2 million, or $0.21 per share, in the prior quarter.
Net expenses increased to $35.8 million from $31.6 million in the prior quarter, driven primarily by a $3.8 million increase in capital gains incentive fee accruals and a $0.4 million increase in base management fees. The company reported a net investment loss of $10.6 million for the quarter, compared with a net investment loss of $6.5 million in the prior quarter.
In response to a question from Erik Zwick of Lucid Capital Markets about adjusted NII per share coming in below the dividend level in the last two quarters, Ritchie said the company ended the year with $21.3 million, or $0.53 per share, in spillover income. She said that amount is sufficient to cover the current $0.08 per share monthly distribution for approximately six months.
“We still feel confident in our $0.08 per share monthly distribution rate and don’t really envision that changing,” Ritchie said.
NAV Increases on Unrealized Appreciation Gladstone Investment’s NAV rose to $16.78 per share as of March 31, 2026, from $14.95 per share at the end of the prior quarter. Ritchie said the increase was primarily due to $2.32 per share of net unrealized appreciation on investments, partially offset by $0.27 per share of net investment loss and $0.24 per share of distributions to common shareholders.
Portfolio valuations increased by $92.5 million during the quarter. Ritchie said the unrealized appreciation was driven by improved operating performance at several portfolio companies and higher valuation multiples, partially offset by weaker performance at certain other companies.
The company continues to have three portfolio companies on non-accrual status, representing 3.8% of the total portfolio at cost and 0.7% at fair value. Dullum said during the Q&A session that Diligent Delivery Systems, one of the non-accrual investments, is improving and could potentially return to accrual status, though he did not provide a specific timeline.
Regarding the other non-accrual investments, Dullum said one is a small investment where the company may take action to “eliminate the issue,” while B&T is “performing fairly well.” He said he does not expect much change with those two companies over the next six months and added, “I’m not concerned about our non-accrual situation.”
Liquidity and Capital Structure Remain in Focus Ritchie said maintaining liquidity and financial flexibility remains essential as the company supports and grows its portfolio. In February, Gladstone Investment issued $100 million of 2.125% five-year notes in anticipation of the maturity of its 5% notes. After quarter-end, the company repaid the outstanding balance of the 5% notes using proceeds from the new issuance and borrowings on its credit facilities.
The company was not active under its common stock at-the-market program during the quarter or after quarter-end, but Ritchie said management would remain opportunistic and use the program when prices are accretive to NAV.
As of March 31, 2026, Gladstone Investment had an asset coverage ratio of 214% and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.84 times. Ritchie described the company’s leverage as conservative.
Management Highlights Pipeline and Competitive Position Erika Highland, currently executive vice president and set to become president on Oct. 1, said liquidity in the M&A market continues to create a competitive environment for acquisitions at reasonable valuations. However, she said the company remains active in diligence on new opportunities and add-on acquisitions.
Highland said the ability to provide both debt and equity remains a competitive advantage. In response to a question from Christopher Nolan of Ladenburg Thalmann, she said the company’s ability to provide all of the capital for a transaction offers sellers greater certainty to close.
Management also discussed specific portfolio valuation changes during the Q&A session. Highland said the increase in fair value for Schylling was tied to improved financial performance and strong demand for its NeeDoh toy product. Ritchie and Dullum also addressed a significant write-up for SEG Holding, citing add-on acquisitions, strategic initiatives, EBITDA growth and third-party market valuation inputs.
Looking ahead, Highland said most existing portfolio companies have posted positive results, though management remains cautious because of the macroeconomic environment and its potential impact on demand and margins. She said the company is working with portfolio companies on supply chain alternatives and cost efficiencies.
Chairman David Gladstone said he believes the company remains attractive for investors seeking monthly distributions and supplemental distributions from capital gains and other income.
About Gladstone Investment NASDAQ: GAINGladstone Investment NASDAQ: GAIN is a publicly traded business development company (BDC) that focuses on providing debt and equity financing to U.S. middle-market companies. As an externally managed closed-end fund, Gladstone Investment seeks to generate current income and capital appreciation for its shareholders by originating senior secured debt, subordinated debt and equity investments. The firm typically targets established businesses with revenues between $10 million and $150 million, across a range of industry sectors including business services, health care, industrials and specialty manufacturing.
The company's investment strategy centers on deploying capital through first-lien and second-lien term loans, mezzanine debt and equity co-investments, often including warrants or other equity kickers.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Gladstone Investment Right Now?Before you consider Gladstone Investment, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Gladstone Investment wasn't on the list.
While Gladstone Investment currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Click the link to see MarketBeat's list of seven best retirement stocks and why they should be in your portfolio.
Gladstone Investment maintains a buy rating, supported by strong NAV growth, portfolio outperformance, and capital-efficient management. GAIN's concentrated equity-focused portfolio and disciplined underwriting have driven a 20.5% total return over twelve months, outpacing the BDC sector. Despite a recent rally, GAIN trades at a 3.4% discount to NAV, with management actively deploying capital into high-quality investments and restructuring underperforming positions.
Gladstone Investment has delivered a 24% total return and 23.8% fourth quarter NAV growth, outperforming peers despite sector headwinds. GAIN trades near a 3-year high but still trades at a roughly 2% discount to NAV per share. The BDC is paying out a 5.8% base dividend yield, with a potential special dividend likely on the back of equity gains in its investment portfolio.
MCLEAN, VA / ACCESS Newswire / June 2, 2026 / Gladstone Investment Corporation (NASDAQ:GAIN) (the "Company") announced that George "Chip" Stelljes, III has been elected to the 2028 class of directors for the Company, effective June 1, 2026. Mr. Stelljes has also been appointed to serve on the Company's Compensation Committee, Ethics, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and Valuation Committee. In connection with Mr. Stelljes' appointment, the size of the Company's board of directors has been expanded from seven to eight directors. Mr. Stelljes was selected to serve as a director due to his more than twenty-five years of experience in the investment analysis, management, and advisory industries.
"We are excited to strengthen our board with the appointment of Chip Stelljes," said David Gladstone, Chairman of the Company's board of directors. "His prior service with the Gladstone companies and his deep experience in private equity fund investment will be a valuable asset to the Company as we continue to grow."
Mr. Stelljes is currently the managing partner of St. John's Capital, LLC, a vehicle used to make private equity investments. From 2001 to 2013, Mr. Stelljes held various senior positions with the Gladstone Companies, including serving as the chief investment officer, president and a director of Gladstone Capital Corporation, Gladstone Investment Corporation, Gladstone Commercial Corporation, and Gladstone Management Corporation. Prior to his service at the Gladstone companies, for 23 years, Mr. Stelljes served in a variety of roles at multiple private equity and venture capital funds, including Patriot Capital, Camden Partners, and Columbia Capital as well as Allied Capital.
Mr. Stelljes is currently the chairman of the board of directors of Equalize Community Development Fund, a closed-end investment company that operates as an interval fund and an independent director of Oxford Square Capital Corporation, a publicly-traded, closed-end management investment company. He is also a former board member and regional president of the National Association of Small Business Investment Companies. Mr. Stelljes holds an MBA from the University of Virginia and a BA in Economics from Vanderbilt University.
About Gladstone Investment Corporation: Gladstone Investment Corporation is a publicly traded business development company that seeks to make secured debt and equity investments in lower middle market businesses in the United States in connection with acquisitions, changes in control and recapitalizations. For more information, please visit www.gladstoneinvestment.com.
About the Gladstone Companies: Information on the business activities of all the Gladstone family of funds can be found at www.gladstonecompanies.com.
CONTACT: For further information: Gladstone Investment Corporation, (703) 287-5893.
Investors love dividend stocks, especially the monthly pay variety, because they provide dependable passive income streams and an excellent opportunity for solid total return. Total return includes interest, capital gains, dividends, and distributions realized over time. In other words, the total return on an investment or portfolio consists of income and stock appreciation. At 24/7 Wall St., we have focused on dividend stocks for over 15 years because, despite stock market volatility, many people need reliable passive income streams to supplement their income from employment or other sources such as Social Security and pensions.
Real estate investment trusts (REITs) own, operate, or finance income-producing real estate. They enable individuals to invest in real estate without directly owning properties. REITs pool funds from investors to purchase and manage a diversified portfolio of real estate assets, including office buildings, apartments, shopping malls, hotels, and warehouses. Investors seeking total return should balance the need for passive income and the desire to add growth to combat inflation and the potential for a recession, which we could face later this year or early in 2027. Investors should consider REITs as an option for 2026 and beyond. Many investment advisors feel that an allocation of up to 15% is a good level for most growth and income portfolios.
Here are our five top monthly pay REITs, all of which are rated Buy at top Wall Street firms that we cover.
AGNC Investment This company is among the highest-paying REITs for investors, with its massive 13.30% dividend, but it does carry somewhat higher dividend-cut risk. AGNC Investment (NASDAQ: AGNC | AGNC Price Prediction) is an investor in Agency residential mortgage-backed securities (agency MBS), which benefit from a guarantee against credit losses by Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), or Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae).
The company’s business is a source of private capital for the U.S. residential housing market.
AGNC Investment invests on a leveraged basis, financing its agency MBS assets primarily through repurchase agreements, and utilizes dynamic risk management strategies intended to protect the value of its portfolio from interest rate and other market risks.
The company may also invest in agency multifamily MBS that are similarly guaranteed by a U.S. government-sponsored enterprise (GSE), as well as in other assets related to the housing, mortgage, or real estate markets that a GSE or U.S. government agency does not guarantee.
Royal Bank of Canada has an Outperform rating with a $12 target price.
EPR Properties This REIT invests in some of the most popular entertainment companies. EPR Properties (NYSE: EPR) is a leading experiential net-lease REIT specializing in select enduring experiential properties and pays a 6.10% dividend. EPR recently increased its monthly dividend by 5.1% and expects FFO per share growth of more than 5% in 2026, supporting continued dividend increases. After suspending its dividend during COVID, it has recovered with five consecutive years of increases. Its $6.9 billion property portfolio generates solid cash flow, and the monthly dividend of $0.31 per share is well-covered by funds from operations.
The company operates through two segments. The Experiential segment consists of approximately:
157 theater properties 58 eat and play properties 24 attraction properties 11 ski properties Four experiential lodging properties One gaming property One cultural property 22 fitness and wellness properties The company’s Education segment comprises 59 early childhood education centers and nine private schools.
EPR’s investment portfolio includes ownership of and long-term mortgages on experiential and educational properties. The company has investments in approximately 44 states. All of the company’s owned single-tenant properties are leased on long-term, triple-net terms.
Raymond James has an Outperform rating with a $60 target price.
LTC Properties This healthcare REIT specializes in seniors housing and skilled nursing facilities, offering exposure to the growing healthcare real estate sector with a monthly dividend yield of 5.83%. LTC Properties (NYSE: LTC) invests in senior housing and healthcare properties through sale-leasebacks, mortgage financing, joint ventures, construction financing, and structured finance solutions, including preferred equity and mezzanine lending. The company invests in senior housing and skilled nursing properties secured by triple-net leases, mortgage loans, and other cash-generating structures, giving it relatively steady income to support its monthly dividend.
LTC Properties operates a diversified portfolio of over 200 senior care assets, encompassing skilled nursing facilities, assisted living communities, and memory care centers. The company prioritizes acquisitions with durable cash flow profiles and has demonstrated consistent monthly dividend payments across varied market conditions—a compelling combination given the structural demand growth driven by an aging U.S. population.
LTC focuses on senior housing and long-term care facilities, benefiting from the aging U.S. population. Its sale-and-leaseback model generates stable cash flow without landlord responsibilities. As a REIT, it must distribute 90% of taxable income, ensuring reliable dividends. Its smaller $1.6 billion market cap still supports consistent payouts.
It invests in various properties, including:
Skilled nursing centers, which provide restorative, rehabilitative, and nursing care Assisted living facilities that serve people who require assistance with activities of daily living Independent living facilities, also known as retirement communities or senior apartments, offer a community and numerous levels of service, such as laundry, housekeeping, dining options/meal plans, exercise and wellness programs, transportation, social, cultural, and recreational activities, on-site security, and others Memory care facilities offer specialized options for people with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia JMP Securities has a Market Outperform rating with a $43 target.
Modiv Industrial Modiv Industrial (NYSE: MDV) supports its 6.56% monthly dividend with a 98% occupancy rate and a clean balance sheet. It’s actively paying down debt, faces no near-term refinancing pressure, and is quietly buying back preferred shares—all moves that put shareholders first. Modiv is an internally managed REIT focused on single-tenant net-lease industrial manufacturing real estate.
The company acquires, owns, and manages a portfolio of single-tenant net-lease properties throughout the United States, with a focus on critical industrial manufacturing properties with long-term leases to tenants that fuel the national economy and strengthen the nation’s supply chains.
Modiv also owns non-core, legacy retail and office real estate properties. It seeks to provide investors with access to monthly dividends through a durable portfolio of real estate investments designed to generate both current income and long-term growth. Its real estate investment portfolio consisted of 43 operating properties, including one property held for sale. The company’s portfolio spans 16 states and comprises 39 industrial properties.
Cantor Fitzgerald has an Overweight rating on the shares, with an $18 price target.
Realty Income Realty Income (NYSE: O) is a REIT that has paid monthly dividends consistently for years. It owns over 15,000 properties leased primarily to defensive retailers. This is an ideal stock for growth and income investors seeking a safer contrarian idea for the rest of 2026, with a 5.22% dividend yield. The S&P 500 company acquires and manages freestanding commercial properties that generate rental revenue under long-term net lease agreements with its commercial clients.
It is engaged in a single business activity: leasing property to clients, generally on a net basis. This business activity spans various geographic boundaries and encompasses a range of property types and clients across multiple industries. Widely considered the gold standard of monthly dividend stocks, Realty Income has paid dividends since 1969. It has paid 667 consecutive monthly dividends as of early 2026 and increased its dividend 132 times since its 1994 IPO.
The company owns or holds interests in approximately 15,621 properties in all 50 U.S. states and:
United Kingdom France Germany Ireland Italy Portugal Spain With clients operating in 89 industries, its property types include retail, industrial, gaming, and other categories such as agriculture and office.
Its primary industry concentrations include:
Grocery stores Convenience stores Dollar stores Drug stores Home improvement stores Restaurants Quick service UBS has a Buy rating with a $72 target price.
KANSAS CITY, Mo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) today announced that its Board of Trustees has declared its monthly cash dividend to common shareholders. The dividend of $0.31 per common share is payable June 15, 2026 to shareholders of record on May 29, 2026. This dividend represents an annualized dividend of $3.72 per common share.
About EPR Properties
EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) is the leading diversified experiential net lease real estate investment trust (REIT), specializing in select enduring experiential properties in the real estate industry. We focus on real estate venues which create value by facilitating out of home leisure and recreation experiences where consumers choose to spend their discretionary time and money. We have total assets of approximately $5.7 billion (after accumulated depreciation of approximately $1.8 billion) across 42 states and Canada. We adhere to rigorous underwriting and investing criteria centered on key industry, property and tenant level cash flow standards. We believe our focused approach provides a competitive advantage and the potential for stable and attractive returns. Further information is available at www.eprkc.com.
EPR Properties (EPR - Free Report) could be a solid choice for investors given its recent upgrade to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). This rating change essentially reflects an upward trend in earnings estimates -- one of the most powerful forces impacting stock prices.
A company's changing earnings picture is at the core of the Zacks rating. The system tracks the Zacks Consensus Estimate -- the consensus measure of EPS estimates from the sell-side analysts covering the stock -- for the current and following years.
Individual investors often find it hard to make decisions based on rating upgrades by Wall Street analysts, since these are mostly driven by subjective factors that are hard to see and measure in real time. In these situations, the Zacks rating system comes in handy because of the power of a changing earnings picture in determining near-term stock price movements.
As such, the Zacks rating upgrade for EPR Properties is essentially a positive comment on its earnings outlook that could have a favorable impact on its stock price.
Most Powerful Force Impacting Stock PricesThe change in a company's future earnings potential, as reflected in earnings estimate revisions, and the near-term price movement of its stock are proven to be strongly correlated. That's partly because of the influence of institutional investors that use earnings and earnings estimates for calculating the fair value of a company's shares. An increase or decrease in earnings estimates in their valuation models simply results in higher or lower fair value for a stock, and institutional investors typically buy or sell it. Their bulk investment action then leads to price movement for the stock.
Fundamentally speaking, rising earnings estimates and the consequent rating upgrade for EPR Properties imply an improvement in the company's underlying business. Investors should show their appreciation for this improving business trend by pushing the stock higher.
Harnessing the Power of Earnings Estimate RevisionsEmpirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock movements, so it could be truly rewarding if such revisions are tracked for making an investment decision. Here is where the tried-and-tested Zacks Rank stock-rating system plays an important role, as it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions.
The Zacks Rank stock-rating system, which uses four factors related to earnings estimates to classify stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive externally-audited track record, with Zacks Rank #1 stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 1988. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .
Earnings Estimate Revisions for EPR PropertiesThis real estate investment trust is expected to earn $5.40 per share for the fiscal year ending December 2026, which represents no year-over-year change.
Analysts have been steadily raising their estimates for EPR Properties. Over the past three months, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the company has increased 2.6%.
Bottom LineUnlike the overly optimistic Wall Street analysts whose rating systems tend to be weighted toward favorable recommendations, the Zacks rating system maintains an equal proportion of "buy" and "sell" ratings for its entire universe of more than 4,000 stocks at any point in time. Irrespective of market conditions, only the top 5% of the Zacks-covered stocks get a "Strong Buy" rating and the next 15% get a "Buy" rating. So, the placement of a stock in the top 20% of the Zacks-covered stocks indicates its superior earnings estimate revision feature, making it a solid candidate for producing market-beating returns in the near term.
You can learn more about the Zacks Rank here >>>
The upgrade of EPR Properties to a Zacks Rank #2 positions it in the top 20% of the Zacks-covered stocks in terms of estimate revisions, implying that the stock might move higher in the near term.
EPR Properties offers a compelling 6.4% yield and 6% projected AFFO growth, appealing to income-focused investors. EPR trades at a discounted 10.7x forward P/AFFO, with potential for re-rating as the portfolio transitions away from theaters. Management raised 2026 AFFO, investment, and disposition guidance following strong Q1 results and increased investment activity.
A higher-for-longer interest rate environment has created a restrictive macro landscape where traditional income strategies fail to clear the surging 5.10% long-bond hurdle rate. This targeted pair provides a robust "Cash Flow Fortress" capable of absorbing inflationary pressures through exceptional balance sheet strength. By combining high-conviction Quant "Strong Buys" with accelerating fundamental momentum, this elite duo delivers an inflation-protected income stream without sacrificing safety or capital growth.
High-yield value stocks may help investors generate income while navigating elevated volatility, inflation pressures, and rising Treasury yields. Geopolitical risks, oil prices, and inflation trends remain critical factors likely to influence markets and dividend-focused strategies ahead. Defensive cash flow and shareholder-friendly capital returns remain attractive as markets struggle for direction ahead of midterm elections.
KANSAS CITY, Mo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) announced today that its Chairman and CEO Gregory Silvers, will make a presentation regarding the Company at Nareit's REITweek: 2026 Investor Conference in New York, NY on June 2, 2026 at 1:45 PM Eastern Time. The audio-only webcast and replay can be accessed via the Webcasts page in the Investor Center on the Company’s website located at http://investors.eprkc.com/webcasts.
About EPR Properties
EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) is the leading diversified experiential net lease real estate investment trust (REIT), specializing in select enduring experiential properties in the real estate industry. We focus on real estate venues that create value by facilitating out of home leisure and recreation experiences where consumers choose to spend their discretionary time and money. We have total assets of approximately $5.7 billion (after accumulated depreciation of approximately $1.8 billion) across 42 states and Canada. We adhere to rigorous underwriting and investing criteria centered on key industry, property and tenant level cash flow standards. We believe our focused approach provides a competitive advantage and the potential for stable and attractive returns. Further information is available at www.eprkc.com.
Welcome to the Quant Growth & Income (QG&I) portfolio, a rules-based portfolio targeting long-term capital appreciation, consistent dividend income, and reduced exposure to dividend cuts. We've unlocked three stocks from the QG&I portfolio to give you a free preview of the new income portfolio in action.
OSLO, Norway, June 9, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Agilyx ASA (OSE: AGLX | OTCQX: AGXXF) ("Agilyx") today announces that its majority-held subsidiary GreenDot and osapiens have entered into a strategic partnership to bring to market an AI-powered Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) packaging compliance software solution. Combining GreenDot's deep expertise in EPR compliance, packaging licensing, and producer responsibility schemes across Europe with the osapiens HUB — osapiens' AI-powered platform for sustainable growth — the partnership delivers the first integrated digital solution to make EPR and PPWR reporting across all EU markets seamless, scalable, and cost-efficient.
EPR Properties remains a Hold after strong Q1 2026 results and a 56% total return since May 2024. EPR's 335-property portfolio boasts 99% occupancy, robust 2.0x tenant coverage, and positive box office trends supporting its theater segment. The recent $315M entertainment park acquisition and increased 2026 investment guidance ($500M–$600M) underpin continued FFO and AFFO growth.
EPR Properties is rated Buy, reflecting a post-COVID growth acceleration and a 6%+ dividend yield. EPR is shifting its portfolio away from theaters and education, targeting pure-play experiential assets for improved growth and valuation. Q1 results showed AFFO/share up 6.6% y/y, with 2024 FFOAA/share guidance implying 6.5% growth and increased investment activity.
Delray Beach, FL , June 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In terms of value, the Textile Recycling Market size is expected to reach USD 11.88 billion in 2030 from USD 8.41 billion in 2025, at a CAGR of 7.2% from 2026 to 2030, as per the recent study by MarketsandMarkets™. The demand for textile recycling is increasing due to environmental, economic, and regulatory factors. As global textile use and fast fashion expand quickly, large quantities of textile waste are produced, most of which end up in landfills or incinerators. This has led to serious concerns about pollution, resource depletion, and climate change. Consumers are becoming more eco-conscious, encouraging brands to adopt circular business models and include recycled materials. Meanwhile, governments worldwide are enacting stricter regulations, such as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and landfill bans, prompting manufacturers to manage waste more responsibly. Mechanical and chemical recycling advances are also making it more practical and scalable to process complex fiber blends. Additionally, recycled textiles offer long-term cost savings and support ESG goals, making them popular for industries aiming to boost sustainability efforts. This growing awareness is fuelling rapid growth in the sector.
Download PDF Brochure: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownloadNew.asp?id=17543449
Browse in-depth TOC on “Textile Recycling Market”
248 - Market Data Tables
57 – Figures
231 - Pages
List of Key Players in Textile Recycling Market:
Lenzing AG (Austria),Birla Cellulose (India),HYOSUNG TNC (South Korea),Unifi, Inc (US),Renewcell (Sweden),Patagonia, Inc (US),Leigh Fibers (US),Martex Fiber (US),The Woolmark Company (Australia),Textile Recycling International (UK), Drivers, Opportunities and Challenges in Textile Recycling Market:
Drivers: Increasing textile waste due to decreased garment lifeRestraint: Usage of harmful chemicals.Opportunity: Expansion in emerging markets.Challenge: Lack of global textile waste traceability systems. Get Sample Pages: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestsampleNew.asp?id=17543449
Key Findings of the Study:
Polyester & polyester fibers are expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecasted period.Pre-consumer textile waste is expected to register the highest growth in the textile recycling market, followed by textile waste.The online channel segment is expected to register the highest CAGR in the market, by distribution channel. Based on material, nylon and nylon fibers hold the third-largest market share in the textile recycling market by material segment due to their widespread use, durability, and recyclability. As a synthetic fiber known for its strength, elasticity, and resistance to abrasion, nylon is widely used in high-performance applications such as activewear, swimwear, hosiery, outdoor gear, and industrial textiles. Its durable properties make it especially suitable for reuse and recycling, particularly in industries where performance and longevity are important. Nylon’s recyclability, especially through chemical depolymerization methods, enables it to be broken down and reformed into high-quality fibers with performance features similar to virgin material. Additionally, leading brands and recyclers have invested in closed-loop systems and initiatives like Econyl (regenerated nylon made from waste materials such as fishing nets and fabric scraps), which have helped expand their presence in the recycled textile market. The rising focus on sustainable fashion and growing consumer demand for eco-friendly options have further boosted nylon's role, making it a key material in the transition toward circular textile production.
Based on end-use industry, home furnishing holds the third-largest market share in the textile recycling market due to its consistent demand for durable, cost-effective, and sustainable materials. This segment includes products such as curtains, upholstery, rugs, bed linens, and cushion covers that require large quantities of durable textiles. Recycled fibers, especially those made from cotton, polyester, and wool, are increasingly used in home furnishings as manufacturers aim to lower raw material costs and meet rising consumer demand for eco-friendly interior solutions. Moreover, large-scale construction and real estate projects are boosting demand for sustainable furniture options, particularly in markets with green building certifications and regulations that support circular materials. The home furnishing industry also benefits from simpler technical requirements compared to apparel or industrial uses, making it easier to incorporate recycled materials without sacrificing performance.
Get Customization on this Report: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestCustomizationNew.asp?id=17543449
Based on region, Europe holds the third-largest market share in the textile recycling industry because of its strong regulatory framework, established recycling infrastructure, and rising consumer demand for sustainable products. The European Union has been leading the way in promoting a circular economy, launching ambitious initiatives like the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles, which requires separate textile waste collection by 2025 and promotes using recycled fibers in new products. Countries such as Germany, the Netherlands, and France have put in place advanced sorting, reuse, and fiber recovery systems that support recycling of both post-consumer and post-industrial waste. Despite these efforts, Europe ranks third behind Asia-Pacific and North America, mainly because of higher production and consumption volumes in those regions. Still, Europe’s ongoing investments in innovation, policy-driven market changes, and public-private partnerships are steadily strengthening its position. The region’s emphasis on quality standards, environmental compliance, and ethical sourcing also helps ensure recycled textiles meet both sustainability and performance standards, boosting demand and future growth.
Browse Adjacent Markets Yarns Fabric & Textile Market Research Reports
Contact Data About MarketsandMarkets™: MarketsandMarkets™ has been recognized as one of America's Best Management Consulting Firms by Forbes, as per their recent report. MarketsandMarkets™ is a blue ocean alternative in growth consulting and program management, leveraging a man-machine offering to drive supernormal growth for progressive organizations in the B2B space. With the widest lens on emerging technologies, we are proficient in co-creating supernormal growth for clients across the globe. Today, 80% of Fortune 2000 companies rely on MarketsandMarkets, and 90 of the top 100 companies in each sector trust us to accelerate their revenue growth. With a global clientele of over 13,000 organizations, we help businesses thrive in a disruptive ecosystem. The B2B economy is witnessing the emergence of $25 trillion in new revenue streams that are replacing existing ones within this decade. We work with clients on growth programs, helping them monetize this $25 trillion opportunity through our service lines – TAM Expansion, Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy to Execution, Market Share Gain, Account Enablement, and Thought Leadership Marketing. Built on the 'GIVE Growth' principle, we collaborate with several Forbes Global 2000 B2B companies to keep them future-ready. Our insights and strategies are powered by industry experts, cutting-edge AI, and our Market Intelligence Cloud, KnowledgeStore™, which integrates research and provides ecosystem-wide visibility into revenue shifts. To find out more, visit www.MarketsandMarkets™.com or follow us on Twitter , LinkedIn and Facebook . Contact: Mr. Rohan Salgarkar MarketsandMarkets™ INC. 1615 South Congress Ave. Suite 103, Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA: +1-888-600-6441 Email: [email protected] Visit Our Website: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/
Manchester United Plc's (NYSE:MANU) New York-listed shares are on the buy list at UBS, with the Swiss bank eyeing Champions League qualification. An upgraded target price pitched at US$29.75, suggesting major upside from the current price of $17.77.
Manchester United Ltd. (NYSE:MANU – Get Free Report) passed above its 200-day moving average during trading on Wednesday . The stock has a 200-day moving average of $16.54 and traded as high as $17.84. Manchester United shares last traded at $17.5850, with a volume of 214,128 shares trading hands.
Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades Several brokerages have recently issued reports on MANU. Wall Street Zen cut Manchester United from a “hold” rating to a “strong sell” rating in a research note on Saturday, December 13th. Weiss Ratings reiterated a “sell (e+)” rating on shares of Manchester United in a research note on Monday, December 22nd. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a Sell rating, According to MarketBeat.com, Manchester United has an average rating of “Sell”.
Read Our Latest Stock Analysis on MANU
Manchester United Stock Performance The firm has a market capitalization of $3.03 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of -251.18 and a beta of 0.58. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.52, a current ratio of 0.32 and a quick ratio of 0.30. The firm has a 50 day moving average price of $17.20 and a 200-day moving average price of $16.54.
Manchester United (NYSE:MANU – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, February 26th. The company reported $0.03 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.09 by ($0.06). The company had revenue of $255.92 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $251.72 million. Manchester United had a negative net margin of 1.39% and a negative return on equity of 4.85%. As a group, sell-side analysts expect that Manchester United Ltd. will post -0.74 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Institutional Trading of Manchester United Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently bought and sold shares of the business. Raymond James Financial Inc. acquired a new stake in Manchester United in the second quarter valued at $29,000. Quarry LP acquired a new stake in Manchester United in the fourth quarter valued at $30,000. Garner Asset Management Corp acquired a new stake in Manchester United in the fourth quarter valued at $97,000. Quantbot Technologies LP raised its stake in Manchester United by 105.3% in the second quarter. Quantbot Technologies LP now owns 6,380 shares of the company’s stock valued at $114,000 after buying an additional 3,273 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Saranac Partners Ltd acquired a new stake in Manchester United in the third quarter valued at $169,000. 23.34% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.
About Manchester United (Get Free Report)
Manchester United plc is a global sports and entertainment company best known for its ownership and operation of Manchester United Football Club, one of the most prominent professional football clubs in the world. The company’s core activities include the organization and promotion of competitive football matches, management of club facilities such as Old Trafford stadium, and the development of youth and academy programs. As a publicly traded entity on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: MANU), Manchester United plc leverages its status to expand commercial partnerships and broaden its international footprint.
The company’s revenue streams are diversified across matchday operations, broadcast rights, commercial partnerships, and licensing and merchandising.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Manchester United Receive News & Ratings for Manchester United Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Manchester United and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEGenus (LON:GNS) Stock Price Crosses Above 200 Day Moving Average – Here’s What Happened
NEXT HEADLINE »Legal & General Group (LON:LGEN) Shares Cross Above 200 Day Moving Average – Should You Sell?
Inspirato (NASDAQ:ISPO – Get Free Report) and Manchester United (NYSE:MANU – Get Free Report) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.
Institutional and Insider Ownership 39.5% of Inspirato shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Manchester United shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of Inspirato shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Profitability This table compares Inspirato and Manchester United’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Inspirato -4.24% N/A -4.10% Manchester United -1.39% -4.85% -0.56% Risk and Volatility Inspirato has a beta of -0.03, suggesting that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Manchester United has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Analyst Ratings This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Inspirato and Manchester United, as reported by MarketBeat.
Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Inspirato 1 0 0 0 1.00 Manchester United 1 0 0 0 1.00 Valuation and Earnings This table compares Inspirato and Manchester United”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Inspirato $247.65 million 0.22 -$5.39 million ($0.87) -4.90 Manchester United $862.42 million 3.58 -$42.74 million ($0.07) -255.86 Inspirato has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Manchester United. Manchester United is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Inspirato, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary Manchester United beats Inspirato on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Inspirato (Get Free Report)
Inspirato Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a subscription-based luxury travel company. The company's portfolio includes luxury vacation homes, and accommodations at luxury hotels and resorts, as well as luxury safaris, cruises, custom-designed itineraries, and other experiences. It is involved in solving critical pain points for hospitality suppliers seeking to monetize their property with rental income. In addition, the company offers Inspirato Pass for member to book pass trips; Inspirato Club for members to book trips up to one year in advance Inspirato for Good, a platform designed to help nonprofit organizations accelerate funding results; Inspirato for Business, a business-to-business channel through which subscription and travel products are sold directly to businesses seeking to leverage luxury accommodations to recruit, retain, and reward their employees. The company was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
About Manchester United (Get Free Report)
Manchester United plc, together with its subsidiaries, owns and operates a professional sports team in the United Kingdom. It operates Manchester United Football Club, a professional football club. The company develops marketing and sponsorship relationships with international and regional companies to leverage its brand. It also markets and sells sports apparel, training and leisure wear, and other clothing; and other licensed products, such as coffee mugs and bed spreads featuring the Manchester United brand and trademarks, as well as distributes these products through Manchester United branded retail centers and e-commerce platforms, and through the company’s partners’ wholesale distribution channels. In addition, the company distributes live football content directly, as well as through commercial partners; broadcasts television rights relating to the Premier League, Union of European Football Associations club competitions, and other competitions; and delivers Manchester United programming through MUTV television channel to territories worldwide. Further, it operates Old Trafford, a sports venue with 74,240 seats, as well as invests in properties. The company was formerly known as Manchester United Ltd. changed its name to Manchester United plc in August 2012. Manchester United plc was founded in 1878 and is headquartered in Manchester, the United Kingdom.
Receive News & Ratings for Inspirato Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Inspirato and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEFluor Corporation (NYSE:FLR) Receives Consensus Recommendation of “Moderate Buy” from Analysts
NEXT HEADLINE »Comparing UGI (UGI) & The Competition
Studio City Ih (NYSE:MSC – Get Free Report) and Manchester United (NYSE:MANU – Get Free Report) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.
Institutional and Insider Ownership 23.3% of Manchester United shares are held by institutional investors. 54.9% of Studio City Ih shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Profitability This table compares Studio City Ih and Manchester United’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Studio City Ih -8.51% -9.60% -1.99% Manchester United -1.39% -4.85% -0.56% Risk and Volatility Studio City Ih has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Manchester United has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Analyst Ratings This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Studio City Ih and Manchester United, as reported by MarketBeat.
Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Studio City Ih 1 0 0 0 1.00 Manchester United 1 0 0 0 1.00 Valuation and Earnings This table compares Studio City Ih and Manchester United”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Studio City Ih $694.57 million 0.80 -$64.30 million ($0.31) -8.47 Manchester United $862.42 million 3.57 -$42.74 million ($0.07) -255.19 Manchester United has higher revenue and earnings than Studio City Ih. Manchester United is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Studio City Ih, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary Manchester United beats Studio City Ih on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Studio City Ih (Get Free Report)
Studio City International Holdings Limited operates an entertainment resort in Macau. It operates Studio City Casino, comprising gaming tables, including tables for VIP rolling chip operations and gaming machines; and resort, which offers various non-gaming attractions, including figure-8 ferris wheel, night club and karaoke venue, live performance arena, and an outdoor and indoor water park, as well as hotel rooms and various food and beverage establishments, and retail space. The company was formerly known as Cyber One Agents Limited and changed its name to Studio City International Holdings Limited in January 2012. The company was founded in 2000 and is based in Central, Hong Kong. Studio City International Holdings Limited is a subsidiary of MCO Cotai Investments Limited.
About Manchester United (Get Free Report)
Manchester United plc, together with its subsidiaries, owns and operates a professional sports team in the United Kingdom. It operates Manchester United Football Club, a professional football club. The company develops marketing and sponsorship relationships with international and regional companies to leverage its brand. It also markets and sells sports apparel, training and leisure wear, and other clothing; and other licensed products, such as coffee mugs and bed spreads featuring the Manchester United brand and trademarks, as well as distributes these products through Manchester United branded retail centers and e-commerce platforms, and through the company’s partners’ wholesale distribution channels. In addition, the company distributes live football content directly, as well as through commercial partners; broadcasts television rights relating to the Premier League, Union of European Football Associations club competitions, and other competitions; and delivers Manchester United programming through MUTV television channel to territories worldwide. Further, it operates Old Trafford, a sports venue with 74,240 seats, as well as invests in properties. The company was formerly known as Manchester United Ltd. changed its name to Manchester United plc in August 2012. Manchester United plc was founded in 1878 and is headquartered in Manchester, the United Kingdom.
Receive News & Ratings for Studio City Ih Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Studio City Ih and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEFinancial Analysis: Third Coast Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBX) versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ:SBCF)
NEXT HEADLINE »Masco (NYSE:MAS) Price Target Cut to $75.00 by Analysts at BMO Capital Markets
Manchester United has qualified for the Champions League, which will bring in additional revenue. Club valuation has doubled from $3.3 billion in 2016 to now $6.6 billion, according to Forbes. Future revenue growth will come from ticket price increases, continued strong on-the-field performance, and a new stadium.
