Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Table of contents

The numbers are stark. Movement Labs raised $141.4 million from investors, yet its fully diluted valuation collapsed more than 99% from its all-time peak to $107 million. Daily on-chain fees in the last 24 hours? Just $1. Application revenue hasn’t topped $800 per day since last November. The company has now filed for bankruptcy, according to the weekly project update from WuBlockchain.

The episode sits inside a wider pattern: a growing number of projects that secured nine-figure war chests during the last bull cycle are running out of runway without ever finding a market fit. Earlier this week, DEX aggregator Odos announced it will shut down all services permanently on July 30, with users urged to withdraw funds or export private keys before then. Not every shutdown gets a bankruptcy label, but the dynamic is the same—capital alone doesn’t create demand. In contrast, the most active chains right now show a different kind of metabolism, as seen in the latest developer activity rankings this week.

Worldcoin Sells $52.5M of WLD at a 36% Discount The Worldcoin Foundation sold 217.4 million WLD tokens to institutional investors including Pantera Capital, raising approximately $52.5 million. At an effective price near $0.24 per token, the deal closed at roughly a 36% discount to the spot market at the time. The tokens came from the team wallet, are now distributed across multiple addresses, and carry a one-year lock-up period.

The Worldcoin Foundation stressed that the sold WLD does not represent equity or profit entitlements in Tools for Humanity, the main development firm behind the project. Proceeds are earmarked to expand World ID technology for enterprises, consumers, and AI agents. The network now reports over 39 million users, with more than 18 million Orb-verified. Still, a large over-the-counter sale at a deep discount suggests the foundation needed to raise cash without spooking order books, a move that often signals liquidity management rather than purely strategic allocation.

A Bridge Exploit, a 30% Price Drop, and Frozen Exchange Accounts Wanchain’s cross-chain bridge connecting to Cardano was hit by an exploit that drained roughly 515 million NIGHT tokens from the bridge vault, worth around $9 million. The vulnerability stemmed from non-injective encoding of signed messages inside the TreasuryCheck validator. By directly concatenating 14 variable-length fields to build signed payloads, the system allowed different field combinations to produce identical byte sequences, enabling a signature reuse attack.

The incident sent the NIGHT token tumbling more than 30% in 24 hours to as low as $0.0158. The Midnight Foundation said exchanges including Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, Bybit, OKX, Gate, and MEXC froze linked accounts, blacklisted attacker wallets, and suspended NIGHT deposits and withdrawals where needed. The foundation noted the core network and underlying asset remain unaffected, but the breach undercut confidence in third-party bridging solutions yet again, adding to a long list of bridge exploits that have plagued multi-chain users.

Compliance Infrastructure and Institutional Entry Points Not every development this week pointed toward failure. Uniswap Labs announced Permissioned Pools, a new hook standard built on Uniswap v4 that lets asset issuers manage whitelists at the protocol layer instead of relying on frontend or off-chain controls. The design verifies wallet permissions on every trade and liquidity addition, and leverages v4’s virtual accounting to keep permissioned assets secure. Initial partners include Superstate, Securitize, and Dowgo, tapping into the ERC-3643 standard. The move fits into a larger tokenization trend where regulated assets are moving on-chain, a theme explored in the recent tokenization market roundup.

On the exchange front, Robinhood Chain hit $700 million in total on-chain assets three weeks after launch, with stablecoins making up $430 million. Roughly $200 million sits in Morpho, which is now integrated directly into the Robinhood app, removing the need for a standalone Robinhood Wallet and generating around 7% annualized yield. That kind of native yield access inside a mainstream brokerage app is precisely the bridge between traditional fintech and DeFi that many projects promised but rarely delivered. In a separate sign of institutional engagement, LayerZero partnered with payment infrastructure firm Keeta to support cross-chain transfers of tokenized commercial bank deposits across Ethereum, Solana, Base, and Keeta Network. Keeta plans to launch stablecoins pegged to nine fiat currencies later this month.

The divergence is sharp. While some former high-fliers file for bankruptcy or sell tokens at distressed prices, others are building infrastructure that connects regulated capital to on-chain rails. The industry is not shrinking—it’s getting sorted.

AUTHOR

Brenda is a writer with three years of experience specializing in cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. She graduated from the University of Mombasa with a degree in Psychology. She has worked at Cryptopolitan and Blockchain Reporter.

Posted by Defense World Staff on Jul 26th, 2026

NexGen Energy (NYSE:NXE – Get Free Report) and South32 (OTCMKTS:SOUHY – Get Free Report) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation This table compares NexGen Energy and South32″s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NexGen Energy N/A N/A -$221.63 million ($0.49) -18.66 South32 $5.78 billion 2.42 $213.00 million N/A N/A South32 has higher revenue and earnings than NexGen Energy.

Analyst Ratings This is a breakdown of current recommendations for NexGen Energy and South32, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NexGen Energy 1 1 4 0 2.50 South32 0 1 1 1 3.00 Volatility and Risk NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, South32 has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability This table compares NexGen Energy and South32’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NexGen Energy N/A -13.11% -8.91% South32 N/A N/A N/A Institutional & Insider Ownership 42.4% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of South32 shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of South32 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary South32 beats NexGen Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

About NexGen Energy (Get Free Report)

NexGen Energy Ltd., an exploration and development stage company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and evaluation and development of uranium properties in Canada. It holds a 100% interest in the Rook I project that consists of 32 contiguous mineral claims totaling an area of 35,065 hectares located in the southwestern Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

About South32 (Get Free Report)

South32 Limited operates as a diversified metals and mining company in Australia, India, China, Japan, the Middle East, Mozambique, the Netherlands, Brazil, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, the United States, and internationally. The company operates through Worsley Alumina, Brazil Alumina, Brazil Aluminium, Hillside Aluminium, Mozal Aluminium, Sierra Gorda, Cannington, Hermosa, Cerro Matoso, Illawarra Metallurgical Coal, Australia Manganese, and South Africa Manganese segments. It has a portfolio of assets producing bauxite, alumina, aluminum, copper, silver, lead, zinc, nickel, metallurgical coal, manganese, ferronickel, and other base metals. The company also exports its products. South32 Limited was incorporated in 2000 and is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Receive News & Ratings for NexGen Energy Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for NexGen Energy and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

« PREVIOUS HEADLINEAnalysts Set Sonic Automotive, Inc. (NYSE:SAH) Target Price at $90.67

NEXT HEADLINE »Comparing Cyrela Brazil Realty (OTCMKTS:CYRBY) and Soho China (OTCMKTS:SOHOF)

President Trump hit the brakes on US military strikes against Iranian targets on July 25, suspending operations after 13 consecutive nights of attacks near the Strait of Hormuz. The pause comes as diplomatic channels with Tehran remain open, though Trump has made clear that military options aren’t going anywhere if talks fall apart.

For crypto markets, the damage was already done. Bitcoin fell approximately 2.3% during the escalation, sliding from around $65,500 to below $64,000. The total cryptocurrency market capitalization shed roughly $80 billion as investors rotated out of risk assets and into traditional safe havens.

What happened and why it matters for markets The 2026 Iran conflict escalated after a ceasefire breakdown in June, with US military operations targeting threats to commercial shipping in one of the world’s most critical chokepoints. The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly a fifth of global oil supply.

Advertisement

Oil prices surged past $100 per barrel for the first time since May 2026.

The pause in military action was reportedly influenced by Gulf states pushing for more time to pursue diplomacy.

The sanctions enforcement angle The US Treasury seized nearly $500 million in crypto assets linked to Iranian entities as part of sanctions enforcement. That figure is notable not just for its size but for what it signals about the government’s growing capability to track and seize digital assets tied to sanctioned regimes.

Prediction markets and what comes next Prediction markets are painting a picture of cautious pessimism. The estimated probability of the US lifting the Iranian blockade by July 31 sits at just 14%. Look a month further out and the odds improve modestly, with a 50.5% chance of some resolution by August 31.

The oil price spike compounds the problem. When crude sits above $100, it feeds directly into inflation readings. Higher inflation makes central banks less likely to cut rates, and rate expectations have been one of the primary drivers of crypto valuations throughout 2026.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Institutional demand for Bitcoin [BTC] gained momentum as Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin Trust crossed $400 million in cumulative inflows.

Meanwhile, U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $51.83 billion in cumulative net inflows.

Source: The Wolf Of All Streets/X However, the funds registered approximately $240 million in daily outflows, showing that near-term demand remained uneven. The divergence emerged as Bitcoin traded below the psychological $65,000 level.

This left investors questioning whether institutional demand could provide enough fuel for a recovery.

On-chain indicators suggested that the market may still have room for an upward move.

Source: CoinGlass Are institutions still buying Bitcoin? According to AMBCrypto’s analysis, Bitcoin’s MVRV Z-Score stood at 0.39. The reading suggested that BTC traded relatively close to its Realized Value.

Historically, lower MVRV Z-Score readings have appeared near favorable accumulation periods. However, the metric alone cannot confirm that Bitcoin has reached a market bottom.

Source: CoinGlass At the same time, miners appeared to reduce their selling activity. Miner transfers to exchanges fell to 968 BTC, marking their lowest monthly reading during the observed period.

Lower transfers could reduce immediate selling pressure and give incoming demand greater influence over Bitcoin’s price.

Even so, weaker miner transfers do not guarantee that miners have stopped selling elsewhere. Together, institutional inflows and softer miner transfers could improve Bitcoin’s chances of recovering.

Source: CryptoQuant Bitcoin’s technical setup showed that $65,000 remained a crucial resistance level. The former support zone became resistance during May’s decline, restricting subsequent recovery attempts.

At press time, Bitcoin traded below several unfilled market imbalances.

The largest concentration sat above $65,000, placing that level firmly on traders’ radar.

Markets sometimes revisit such inefficiencies before establishing a new trend. However, those gaps are not guaranteed to close. A decisive move above $65,000 could signal an improving market structure and strengthen the recovery case.

Bitcoin’s Stochastic RSI stood at 31 and approached the conventional oversold region below 20.

Source: TradingView That decline suggested weakening momentum, although an oversold reading would not independently confirm a reversal.

Therefore, ETF demand and reduced miner transfers may support BTC. Price confirmation above $65,000 remains the critical test.

Final Summary Morgan Stanley’s rising inflows showed institutional interest despite broader daily ETF withdrawals. Reduced miner transfers could ease supply pressure, but $65,000 remains Bitcoin’s decisive test.

A coalition of major financial institutions and Bitcoin-focused firms has formed the Bitcoin Security Consortium, committing substantial resources to bolster the cryptocurrency network’s long-term defenses. Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), the company formerly known as MicroStrategy and led by Michael Saylor as executive chairman, is among the nine founding members.

The group also includes Anchorage Digital, ARK Invest, BlackRock, Block, Blockstream, Coinbase, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Galaxy.

Together they have pledged a combined $15 million over the next three years to support open-source developers and researchers working on Bitcoin’s security infrastructure.

The consortium’s primary aim is to reinforce the resilience of the Bitcoin network without interfering in its decentralized development process.

Members will independently direct their contributions to engineers and organizations of their choosing, focusing especially on efforts to prepare the system for potential future risks posed by quantum computing.

While large-scale quantum computers capable of breaking current cryptographic standards do not yet exist and are widely estimated to remain years away, the initiative treats post-quantum cryptography as an important long-term priority already being pursued by the technical community.

Phong Le, chief executive officer of Strategy, underscored the motivation behind the effort.

As long-term holders of Bitcoin, the participating organizations have a strong interest in ensuring the network remains secure across generations.

Providing financial support to those performing this specialized work, while also helping clarify public discussions around it, represents a practical form of contribution, he noted.

BlackRock’s global head of digital assets, Robert Mitchnick, similarly highlighted the value of the work done by Bitcoin Core developers.

He expressed satisfaction that his firm and the other members would now supply meaningful additional funding to address the network’s extended security requirements.

Coordination of the consortium’s day-to-day activities will be handled on a volunteer basis by Mike Schmidt, executive director of Brink, a nonprofit that already funds and assists Bitcoin open-source developers.

The structure deliberately mirrors established models in which industry participants support open-source software they rely upon by offering resources and raising awareness, while refraining from controlling the underlying code or development decisions.

Organizers emphasized that the consortium will neither create nor dictate changes to Bitcoin’s protocol, nor take positions on specific technical proposals.

It will not claim to represent Bitcoin or its developers.

Protocol evolution will continue to rest with the global, decentralized community of contributors.

In addition to funding, the group plans to publish and maintain informational materials on Bitcoin’s security posture, updating them as circumstances evolve, and to serve as a reliable reference point for investors, the public, and the media.

The formation of this alliance reflects growing institutional involvement in Bitcoin and a recognition that its security constitutes a shared responsibility.

By channeling resources toward existing technical efforts rather than attempting to centralize control, the consortium seeks to strengthen the open ecosystem that has sustained Bitcoin through previous challenges. Over the coming months, participants intend to expand support for developers while fostering clearer communication about the network’s defensive readiness, including preparations for a possible quantum computing environment.

Around $167 million of Poolin's debt comes from IOUs issued after customer withdrawals were frozen during 2022's market crash.

Singapore-based Bitcoin mining company Poolin on July 22 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New Jersey, alongside its US affiliates Lonestar Dream Inc. and Lonestar Taproot LLC. The firm is also looking for court approval for a $52 million sale of its Texas mining properties.

The bankruptcy filing comes nearly four years after Poolin froze customer withdrawals, leaving thousands of wallet users with IOU tokens and turning a mining business failure into a long-running creditor dispute.

Poolin Enters Chapter 11 With $173 Million in Liabilities Court records filed in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey show Poolin listed between 10,001 and 25,000 creditors, with petition assets estimated between $1 million and $10 million.

Chief Restructuring Officer Michael DuFrayne’s declaration placed prepetition obligations at about $173.1 million, with roughly $163.7 million tied to unsecured IOUs issued to Poolin Wallet customers.

The company’s current bankruptcy case is focused on selling its Texas assets rather than rebuilding its mining operations. Lonestar Dream stopped mining and hosting activities at its Pyote and Tarbush sites on July 10, according to the filing documents.

Poolin has entered asset purchase agreements with Thor CALAP LLC for a combined $52 million stalking-horse bid. The offer includes $15 million for the Pyote property and associated power rights and equipment, plus $37 million for Tarbush power rights and equipment. The deal remains subject to competing bids and court approvals.

The company spent more than three months marketing the asset, contacting over 335 potential buyers, including cryptocurrency miners and artificial intelligence and high-performance computing operators. The process resulted in 28 confidentiality agreements, seven letters of intent and three additional expressions of interest.

You may also like: $141M Fundraise to $8 Daily Fees: Movement Labs Files for Bankruptcy How Bitcoin Survived Its Biggest Miner Walkout 3 Key Metrics Show Bitcoin Miners Are Under Mounting Pressure Poolin’s Texas expansion struggled after the company moved mining operations from China as Beijing imposed a ban on mining in the year 2021. It expected to receive up to 600 megawatts of power, but only 100 megawatts were made available. This meant the equipment the firm had bought for its US run ended up being more than was necessary.

Some of that equipment was sold, resulting in a loss of $8.8 million from fiscal year 2023 to 2025. In the end, Lonestar Dream and Lonestar Taproot accumulated about $45.9 million in losses.

The Collapse of Poolin Wallet Remains Central to Creditor Claims Poolin’s financial problems go beyond mining, as back in June 2022, when Bitcoin fell below $20,000, it triggered margin calls from Tether against collateral the firm had pledged through the Poolin Wallet. It then transferred almost all of that collateral to Antalpha and borrowed about $213 million against crypto assets valued at just under $356 million.

However, in September 2022, Poolin Wallet suspended withdrawals and issued around $163.7 million worth of IOU tokens to customers, with about 11,700 wallet users holding balances above $100, according to the filing.

Bitcoin later fell below $16,800 in November 2022, after which Poolin ceased operations, and Antalpha liquidated the collateral. Management estimated that about $260 million was owed to Antalpha against digital assets valued near $265 million at the time.

Poolin was once one of the largest Bitcoin mining pools globally, reaching roughly 14% of the Bitcoin network’s mining share in 2019. However, the company’s remaining value now depends on the Texas asset sale and the outcome of the bankruptcy process.

The court-supervised auction will determine how much creditors recover, and any distribution will depend on competing bids, sale expenses, administrative claims, and approval of the proposed liquidation plan.

Tags:

August has not been kind to Bitcoin [BTC]. Since 2022, each August has seen an average Bitcoin drawdown of 19.38%. If history were to repeat, that would mean BTC could fall to the $51.9k level or even lower.

Popular crypto analyst Ali Martinez demonstrated this fact in a post on X.

Source: Ali Charts on X Coinbase analysts observed that the leading crypto was transitioning from a bear market phase into an accumulation phase. Though the valuation was compressed, the macro backdrop was “hawkish” due to the U.S.-Iran conflict, rising oil prices, and selling from prominent digital asset treasuries.

Record volume of realized losses in this Bitcoin bear market phase Source: Axel Adler Jr. The Bitcoin realized loss metric’s 30-day moving average showed a record loss in February 2026, wrote crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr.

A realized loss peak of $1.37 billion, the highest in the metric’s available history, was 19% higher than the June 2022 cycle peak of $1.15 billion.

With a current reading of $597 million, the realized loss has declined by 56.5%. The cycle low BTC price of $58.5k in late June recorded a profit-to-loss ratio of 0.26. In 2022, this ratio had fallen to 0.13.

Therefore, the realized loss has reached a record high in amplitude, but when considering profit-to-loss, the relative market stress has been less this cycle.

The analyst concluded that it is too early to look at these record realized losses and conclude that the worst of the capitulation is behind us. It would only be clear in hindsight, when a bull run begins and the bear and accumulation phase end without a sharper sell-off.

Bitcoin long-term holder accumulation at six-year high Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant analyst Burak Kesmeci used the LTH net position change metric to show that it had reached the highest level in six years. On the 24th of May, 2026, the metric reached 1.29 million BTC/30 days, surpassing the August 2017 record.

Accumulation at such a level from long-term holders was a sign of firm conviction.

The analyst clarified that this fact alone isn’t enough to say that the bull market is back. It is, however, a strong positive sign in a market beleaguered by sellers.

Final Summary Bitcoin has posted losses in August of each of the previous four years, and a similar drop could take prices to $52k. Realized losses reached record highs, but the long-term holder accumulation levels surpassed the August 2017 record.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) has remained on edge for nearly two months as the crypto winter continues. The token was most recently trading at $1.1022, still confined within the $1.0077 support level and $1.2898 resistance level that have defined its range throughout this period.

XRP ETF Inflows Have StalledThe Ripple token has wavered as demand from Wall Street investors has waned. SoSoValue data shows that spot XRP ETFs added no assets in the last three market days. 

These funds attracted $12.3 million in inflows this month, the weakest performance since April. They had added $59 million in June and $131 million in May. In total, the funds have received cumulative inflows of $1.4 billion and currently hold $997 million in assets.

One reason for the waning crypto ETF inflows is that investors have shifted to the stock market. Some of the most active funds this year are those tracking the S&P 500 Index and the recently launched Roundhill Memory ETF (CBOE: DRAM).

On the positive side, Ripple Labs is working on improving XRP Ledger’s utility. In a statement this week, t54, a company behind XRPL x402 Facilitator, AI agent payments on XRPL now support Mastercard’s Verifiable Intent (VI) standard. Through this integration, developers can prove who authorized a payment, under what limits, and for which purchases.

XRP Price is Stuck in a Tight RangeThe daily chart shows that the XRP token has remained in a tight range in the past two months. It has remained above the key support level of $1.007 and resistance at $1.2898. 

The token has dropped below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped below the neutral level of 50. 

Therefore, the token may continue falling, potentially to the key support level of $1. A drop below that level will point to more downside, potentially to the psychological point at $0.50.

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

John Squire, known as TheCryptoSquire on X, recently brought attention to a new perspective from investment and crypto advisor Jake Claver on XRP portfolio strategy. Instead of debating how many XRP tokens make someone wealthy, Claver encouraged holders to think in terms of the income their holdings could generate, depending on future price scenarios and personal needs.

Claver’s calculation: Income over accumulationClaver ran a calculation based on a hypothetical XRP price of $100. At that level, a holder with 20,000 tokens would have a portfolio valued at $2 million. If that person drew 5% of their holdings annually, it would provide $100,000 in pre-tax income per year. This approach, he explained, shifts attention from chasing token targets to tailoring holdings to financial goals.

Claver, who regularly shares crypto insights online, stated that each investor’s situation is unique and that “the right bag can go far with patience.” He advised individuals to consider their own income requirements and preferred withdrawal rates instead of following blanket recommendations.

Claver explained that calculating how many tokens are enough depends entirely on a person’s required annual income and personal circumstances, not generic price targets.

Changing the XRP conversationSquire agreed with this focus on personal finance. He argued that while most XRP debates revolve around potential price surges or setting millionaire thresholds, Claver’s view reframes the discussion: the determining factor should be how much passive income a person wants to generate from their crypto assets, not just the number of tokens in an account.

Rather than approaching a price target as the final destination, Claver’s analysis positions it as a tool for income and lifestyle planning. Investors are encouraged to use different price scenarios and calculate the portfolio size needed to achieve their goals—whether those goals require $100,000 per year, a particular level of security, or some other benchmark.

Claver’s public predictions and criticismClaver has been a controversial voice in the XRP community for his high-profile price predictions. Some of his ambitious targets, including $100 and even as much as $750 for XRP, have prompted debate and skepticism, especially when previous timelines were missed. Despite this, he has maintained his conviction about the long-term outlook for the digital asset.

He has continued to argue that price points like $100 remain possible, even as others question their feasibility. However, Claver’s recent commentary emphasizes that the logic of planning income from one’s crypto stack applies at any price. According to his framework, the same calculation process can be applied whether XRP trades at $10, $50, $100, or $500.

Mini dictionary: Jake Claver is a cryptocurrency analyst and financial educator known for his public XRP price targets and income-focused investment approach. He is active on social media platforms, sharing perspectives on digital assets and portfolio management.

The value of patience and individual goalsBoth Squire and Claver underscored the theme of patience for XRP holders. For those performing long-term investment planning, the discussion shifts away from comparing wallet sizes to setting realistic income targets based on individual circumstances, including lifestyle costs and tax obligations.

Claver’s approach offers a framework for evaluating whether a certain position in $XRP is large enough to meet desired financial outcomes. The calculation is entirely dependent on each person’s timeline and needs, with patience standing out as a key advantage for those prepared to wait for potential price increases.

Squire emphasized that patience can be the biggest advantage for long-term holders aiming to transform their XRP holdings into meaningful financial security.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Ethereum ETF outflows raised fresh concerns over institutional demand after U.S. spot ETFs recorded a $70.7 million net outflow on July 24. 

BlackRock accounted for the largest share of that activity after investors withdrew $52.8 million from its ETH fund. 

The figures interrupted a period of sustained inflows and shifted attention toward whether large investors had started locking in profits. 

However, one trading session rarely defines a broader trend, especially after weeks of consistent institutional accumulation. 

Instead, the latest withdrawal suggested that some investors had adopted a more cautious stance near key price resistance. 

As a result, Ethereum faced greater scrutiny because sustained ETF outflows could reduce institutional demand and weaken bullish sentiment if similar withdrawals continued over the coming sessions.

Exchange inflows add another layer of caution On-chain spot flow data also reflected a subtle shift after Ethereum recorded a $5.92 million net inflow into exchanges during the latest session. 

Positive netflows generally indicate that more ETH moved onto exchanges than left them, increasing the amount of readily tradable supply. 

Although the inflow remained relatively modest, it contrasted with the recent pattern of stronger exchange outflows that had previously limited immediate selling pressure. 

Meanwhile, the ETF withdrawal and positive spot netflow pointed in the same direction, showing that fresh supply had started returning to the market. 

Even so, the figures remained far below the large exchange inflows that often accompany aggressive selloffs. 

Consequently, buyers still retained an opportunity to absorb the additional supply before it significantly altered Ethereum’s broader market structure.

Source: CoinGlass Ethereum loses steam as bears target lower support Ethereum faced a strong rejection after testing the $1,950 supply zone, where sellers quickly regained control and halted the recent recovery.

That rejection pushed price out of the ascending channel, signaling that bullish pressure had weakened considerably.

The RSI fell to 54.05, while remaining below its 59.40 moving average, indicating that buying strength continued fading instead of improving.

Price action also started forming lower highs after the rejection, reinforcing the growing bearish outlook.

As a result, $1,800 has emerged as the next likely support level as downside pressure builds.

A move toward that level now appears increasingly probable based on the current structure.

Should selling pressure accelerate after reaching $1,800, Ethereum would likely continue lower toward $1,700, where the next major demand zone could attract renewed buying interest.

Source: TradingView Liquidity clusters point toward Ethereum’s next move The Binance Liquidation Heatmap revealed concentrated liquidity resting above and below the current market price, suggesting volatility could increase once either cluster came under pressure. 

The largest short liquidation zone appeared around $1,875 to $1,890, with additional liquidity extending toward $1,920 and $1,930. 

A bullish move into those levels could trigger forced short liquidations, adding fuel to further upside. 

On the downside, another significant liquidity pocket formed around $1,830 to $1,840, where long positions could face liquidation if sellers strengthened control. 

Since price traded between these dense liquidity zones, Ethereum lacked a clear directional advantage. 

Instead, whichever side absorbed liquidity first would likely dictate the next significant move as leveraged traders reacted to forced position closures.

Source: CoinGlass To sum up, Ethereum faced increasing pressure after ETF investors withdrew $70.7 million, while exchange inflows added another sign of rising available supply. 

Even so, price continued holding above key support despite the rejection below $1,950. 

If buyers regained control and reclaimed that resistance, bullish continuation would remain possible. 

Otherwise, sustained selling pressure could push Ethereum toward $1,800 before any stronger recovery attempt emerged.

Final Summary Ethereum ETF outflows returned as exchange inflows increased, pointing to growing selling pressure. ETH lost strength below $1,950, with $1,800 now emerging as the next key support.

Dogecoin (DOGE) has shown signs of renewed momentum after recording a 6.08% gain within the past 24 hours, with the price climbing to $0.07330. The cryptocurrency’s 24-hour trading volume reached $619.51 million, while its market capitalization now stands at $11.37 billion. This positive movement occurred as Dogecoin held firm above a key long-term support level, providing optimism for investors tracking a possible bullish reversal.

Technical indicators signal bullish reversalProminent crypto analyst Ali Charts reported that Dogecoin displayed a rare monthly TD Sequential buy signal as its price approached important support near $0.056. The TD Sequential indicator is a technical tool used to identify possible inflection points by highlighting periods of trend exhaustion.

The emergence of this signal hints that bearish momentum may be waning after a prolonged downward trend. Analysts view the $0.056 level as pivotal; maintaining support here could draw in buyers and drive a shift in overall market sentiment.

DOGE finds support at $0.056, with analysts watching for a rebound toward $0.16. If this momentum continues, the next major resistance could be near the upper channel boundary at $0.45.

If Dogecoin continues to trade above the crucial support, analysts anticipate a rebound toward the immediate resistance at $0.16. However, if it fails to hold this support, the bullish outlook could deteriorate, leading to increased selling pressure.

Whale accumulation and investor confidenceRecent blockchain data compiled by the entity dogegod indicated that major holders acquired another 1 billion DOGE—valued at around $70 million—in a single day. This large-scale accumulation by top wallets suggests a renewed vote of confidence from influential investors, despite recent volatility.

Whale transactions, which typically reflect long-term investment strategies, are closely monitored as they can influence price trends by reducing market supply. This sustained buying activity has fueled optimism that institutional players anticipate further price gains for Dogecoin.

Mini dictionary: Whale accumulation, a term used to describe the process by which investors holding significant amounts of a cryptocurrency (whales) increase their positions. Such activity often signals growing institutional or large-scale investor interest and can impact overall liquidity and price movement in the market.

Although whale purchases do not always trigger immediate price surges, steady accumulation may reduce available supply and strengthen upward price trends. Traders continue to monitor trading volume and market activity for signs of sustained recovery.

Market sentiment and prospectsThe overall momentum in the cryptocurrency sector has turned more positive, with Bitcoin’s recent upward trajectory providing additional support for other assets, including Dogecoin. As the broader market sentiment improves, bulls are focused on defending the $0.056 support and building momentum toward higher resistance levels.

Should Dogecoin recover firmly above this threshold, analysts point to $0.16 as the next target, with further upside possible toward $0.45 if positive trends persist. However, a failure to maintain support would weaken bullish sentiment and expose the token to renewed profit-taking.

Price predictions remain speculative, with traders advised to monitor key support and resistance zones as well as broader market dynamics. Crypto assets are volatile and carry unique risks for investors.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

nVent Electric (NYSE:NVT – Get Free Report) and Allient (NASDAQ:ALNT – Get Free Report) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation This table compares nVent Electric and Allient”s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio nVent Electric $3.89 billion 6.29 $710.20 million $3.01 50.33 Allient $554.48 million 2.66 $22.03 million $1.43 60.69 nVent Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Allient. nVent Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership 90.0% of nVent Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Allient shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of nVent Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Allient shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends nVent Electric pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Allient pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. nVent Electric pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allient pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. nVent Electric has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. nVent Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for nVent Electric and Allient, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score nVent Electric 0 1 12 4 3.18 Allient 0 2 4 0 2.67 nVent Electric currently has a consensus target price of $190.57, suggesting a potential upside of 25.78%. Allient has a consensus target price of $79.83, suggesting a potential downside of 8.00%. Given nVent Electric’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe nVent Electric is more favorable than Allient.

Profitability This table compares nVent Electric and Allient’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets nVent Electric 11.37% 16.82% 9.03% Allient 4.25% 12.47% 6.37% Risk and Volatility nVent Electric has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Allient has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary nVent Electric beats Allient on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

About nVent Electric (Get Free Report)

nVent Electric plc, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, markets, installs, and services electrical connection and protection solutions in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company operates through three segments: Enclosures, Electrical & Fastening Solutions, and Thermal Management. The Enclosures segment provides solutions to protect electronics and data in mission critical applications, including data solutions. This segment also offers digital and automation solutions, system integrations, and global services. The Electrical & Fastening Solutions segment provides solutions that connect and protect power and data infrastructure. This segment also offers power connections, fastening solutions, cable management solutions, grounding and bonding systems, and tools and test instruments. The Thermal Management segment offers heat management solutions that protect people and assets. This segment includes heat tracing for freeze protection and process temperature maintenance and control; pipe freeze protection, surface deicing, hot water temperature maintenance, floor heating, fire-rated wiring, and leak detection; and heat trace systems, connected controls, remote monitoring, and annual service programs. The company markets its products through electrical distributors, contractors, and original equipment manufacturers under the CADDY, ERICO, GARDNER BENDER, HOFFMAN, ILSCO, RAYCHEM, SCHROFF, and TRACER brand names. Its products are used for various applications, such as industrial, commercial and residential, infrastructure, and energy. nVent Electric plc was founded in 1903 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.

About Allient (Get Free Report)

Allient Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and sells precision and specialty controlled motion components and systems for various industries in the United States, Canada, South America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. It offers brush and brushless DC motors, brushless servo and torque motors, coreless DC motors, integrated brushless motor-drives, gearmotors, gearing, modular digital servo drives, motion controllers, optical encoders, active and passive filters, input/output modules, industrial communications gateways, light-weighting technologies, and other controlled motion-related products, as well as nano precision positioning systems, servo control systems, and digital servo amplifiers and drives. The company sells its products to end customers and original equipment manufacturers in vehicle, medical, aerospace and defense, and industrial markets through direct sales force, authorized manufacturers’ representatives, and distributors. The company was formerly known as Allied Motion Technologies Inc. and changed its name to Allient Inc. in August 2023. Allient Inc. was incorporated in 1962 and is headquartered in Amherst, New York.

Receive News & Ratings for nVent Electric Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for nVent Electric and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Posted by Defense World Staff on Jul 26th, 2026

CocaCola (NYSE:KO – Get Free Report) is projected to release its Q2 2026 results before the market opens on Tuesday, July 28th. Analysts expect CocaCola to announce earnings of $0.92 per share and revenue of $13.1710 billion for the quarter. CocaCola has set its FY 2026 guidance at 3.240-3.270 EPS. Investors may visit the the company’s upcoming Q2 2026 earning summary page for the latest details on the call scheduled for Tuesday, July 28, 2026 at 8:30 AM ET.

CocaCola (NYSE:KO – Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, April 28th. The company reported $0.86 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $0.81 by $0.05. CocaCola had a net margin of 27.80% and a return on equity of 40.55%. The company had revenue of $12.47 billion for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $12.24 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm posted $0.73 earnings per share. The company’s quarterly revenue was up 11.4% compared to the same quarter last year. On average, analysts expect CocaCola to post $3 EPS for the current fiscal year and $3 EPS for the next fiscal year.

CocaCola Stock Up 1.3% Shares of NYSE KO opened at $82.19 on Friday. The company has a quick ratio of 1.15, a current ratio of 1.36 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.09. The company has a market cap of $353.60 billion, a P/E ratio of 25.84, a P/E/G ratio of 3.33 and a beta of 0.34. CocaCola has a 52 week low of $65.35 and a 52 week high of $85.68. The business has a 50-day simple moving average of $81.43 and a two-hundred day simple moving average of $78.05.

CocaCola Announces Dividend The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, October 1st. Stockholders of record on Tuesday, September 15th will be issued a $0.53 dividend. This represents a $2.12 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 2.6%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Tuesday, September 15th. CocaCola’s dividend payout ratio is presently 66.67%.

Key CocaCola News Here are the key news stories impacting CocaCola this week:

Positive Sentiment: Warren Buffett reportedly said Coca-Cola remains one of his preferred businesses, reinforcing the company’s reputation as a durable, high-quality consumer staple and potentially supporting investor confidence. Article Title Positive Sentiment: Articles highlighting Coca-Cola as a top dividend stock and a favorite among large investors may help reinforce the stock’s defensive, income-oriented appeal. Article Title Positive Sentiment: Coverage ahead of Q2 earnings suggests Wall Street is watching for pricing strength and margin gains, which could support the stock if Coca-Cola beats expectations again. Article Title Neutral Sentiment: Several articles simply preview Coca-Cola’s upcoming results and key metrics, indicating investor focus is centered on the earnings release rather than a new company-specific catalyst. Article Title Negative Sentiment: Recent market commentary noted Coca-Cola underperformed the broader market in the latest session, reflecting near-term selling pressure on the shares. Article Title Negative Sentiment: Some analyst-style pieces argue investors could do better in other dividend stocks or Pepsico, which may create mild competition for Coca-Cola among income-focused buyers. Article Title Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades KO has been the subject of a number of analyst reports. Piper Sandler restated an “overweight” rating on shares of CocaCola in a research report on Friday, June 26th. Royal Bank Of Canada reaffirmed an “outperform” rating on shares of CocaCola in a report on Friday. Citigroup increased their target price on shares of CocaCola from $91.00 to $97.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Tuesday, July 14th. Sanford C. Bernstein set a $83.00 price target on shares of CocaCola in a research report on Thursday, July 9th. Finally, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft upped their price target on shares of CocaCola from $83.00 to $86.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, March 30th. Fourteen investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and one has assigned a Hold rating to the company’s stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $89.33.

Get Our Latest Stock Report on KO

Insider Activity at CocaCola In other CocaCola news, Chairman James Quincey sold 436,296 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, June 5th. The shares were sold at an average price of $80.13, for a total value of $34,960,398.48. Following the completion of the transaction, the chairman owned 122,833 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $9,842,608.29. The trade was a 78.03% decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this hyperlink. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Also, EVP Nancy Quan sold 31,625 shares of the stock in a transaction on Friday, May 15th. The stock was sold at an average price of $80.93, for a total transaction of $2,559,411.25. Following the completion of the transaction, the executive vice president directly owned 223,330 shares in the company, valued at $18,074,096.90. The trade was a 12.40% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Insiders have sold 899,905 shares of company stock valued at $71,832,315 over the last three months. 0.90% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.

Institutional Trading of CocaCola A number of hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in KO. Brighton Jones LLC raised its stake in shares of CocaCola by 13.3% during the fourth quarter. Brighton Jones LLC now owns 39,072 shares of the company’s stock worth $2,433,000 after acquiring an additional 4,591 shares in the last quarter. Revolve Wealth Partners LLC boosted its stake in shares of CocaCola by 3.4% in the 4th quarter. Revolve Wealth Partners LLC now owns 8,795 shares of the company’s stock valued at $548,000 after purchasing an additional 293 shares in the last quarter. Dynamic Technology Lab Private Ltd purchased a new stake in shares of CocaCola in the 1st quarter valued at $210,000. Jump Financial LLC grew its holdings in shares of CocaCola by 450.5% during the 2nd quarter. Jump Financial LLC now owns 39,583 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,800,000 after purchasing an additional 32,392 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Osterweis Capital Management Inc. raised its position in CocaCola by 548.2% in the 2nd quarter. Osterweis Capital Management Inc. now owns 1,063 shares of the company’s stock worth $75,000 after purchasing an additional 899 shares during the period. 70.26% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

About CocaCola (Get Free Report)

The Coca‑Cola Company (NYSE: KO) is a global beverage manufacturer, marketer and distributor best known for its flagship Coca‑Cola soda. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, the company develops and sells concentrates, syrups and finished beverages across a broad portfolio of brands. Its product range spans sparkling soft drinks, bottled water, sports drinks, juices, ready‑to‑drink teas and coffees, and other still beverages, marketed under both global and regional brand names.

Coca‑Cola’s brand portfolio includes widely recognized names such as Coca‑Cola, Diet Coke, Coca‑Cola Zero Sugar, Sprite, Fanta, Minute Maid, Powerade and Dasani, and in recent years the company has expanded into the coffee and premium beverage categories through acquisitions such as Costa Coffee.

Featured Articles Five stocks we like better than CocaCola Telecom Earnings Reveal a Sector That Finally Looks Healthier Defense Earnings Show Readiness Now and Modernization Ahead Why Palantir Investors Aren’t Panicking While the Rest of AI Sells Off MarketBeat Week in Review – 07/20- 07/24

Receive News & Ratings for CocaCola Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for CocaCola and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

« PREVIOUS HEADLINEMerchants Bancorp (MBINN) Projected to Announce Earnings on Tuesday

NEXT HEADLINE »American Assets Trust (AAT) to Announce Quarterly Earnings on Tuesday

Microsoft is rated Strong Buy, driven by accelerating cloud and AI monetization, with a compelling setup ahead of fiscal Q4 earnings. MSFT's Intelligent Cloud and Productivity segments are showing sequential acceleration, while elevated AI-driven capex is expected to peak and then moderate. I project Q4 revenue of $91.3B, well above guidance, with Azure growth at 43% c. FX% and operating margin expansion despite margin headwinds.

Cocoa prices are beginning to ease after a record-breaking rally, but don't expect cheaper candy just yet as the world's biggest chocolate makers turn to social media-inspired products and other strategies to win shoppers back.

Cocoa prices reached record highs over the past two years, triggered by adverse weather conditions and poor cocoa harvests that pushed chocolate costs higher and dampened consumer sentiment.

However, the price of cocoa now appears to be falling.

Cocoa futures were last trading at $5327 per metric ton and are down 34% over the past year. The commodity surged to almost $12,000 per metric ton at the end of 2024. Cocoa prices typically hovered around $2,000 to $3,000 over the past two decades.

Cocoa futures over the past five years.

Swiss Chocolate giants Barry Callebaut, Lindt, and Nestlé all pointed to soaring cocoa prices as a drag on earnings.

Lindt said Monday that groupwide price increases of 11.8% led to chocolate sales volumes dropping 7.5% as fewer shoppers bought chocolate in the first half of the year.

"Record cocoa prices required unprecedented price increases across the industry, while geopolitical uncertainty, inflation and weak consumer sentiment weighed on demand," Group CEO Adalbert Lechner said in an analyst call. "The crisis in the Middle East added another headwind with weaker tourism flows from Asia and the Middle East to Europe."

The world's largest chocolate and cocoa supplier, Barry Callebaut, said that while global consumers are buying 4.4% less chocolate in the third quarter than the same time last year, overall sales volumes for the company grew 5.7% in the quarter, turning positive for the first time in over two years. Additionally, its global cocoa sales accelerated 18% due to a market correction earlier this year.

Meanwhile, food and beverage firm Nestlé said higher cocoa and coffee prices hit its underlying trading operating profit in the first half of the year, dropping 2.8%. The firm's confectionery business makes up 9.7% of its total sales. Nestlé expects to see margins benefit from cocoa prices coming down.

What's happening with cocoa? Cocoa prices' volatile run was largely due to poor cocoa harvests in West Africa, which were worsened by weather patterns related to El Niño and climate change, resulting in tight supply.

El Niño is a weather phenomenon with warmer-than-average temperatures that occurs every two to seven years in the Pacific Ocean. Soaring cocoa prices in 2024 were largely due to a 'strong' El Niño that led to drier, hotter weather and erratic rainfall in West Africa, according to a December analysis by Dr Tanya Lander, a researcher at the Oxford Martin School Programme on the Future of Food.

"So, it is unsurprising that the El Niño weather was linked to poor cocoa harvests in both Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana (where 60-70% of global cocoa beans are produced)," Lander wrote.

Climate change and increasing temperatures are also playing a role, with 2024 being the hottest year on record. A recent heatwave across Europe could also dampen consumer enthusiasm for chocolate, UBS analysts said in an early July note on Lindt.

Heatwaves and rising temperatures in some of Lindt's core European markets could impact chocolate demand, with European sales excluding Eastern Europe, declining in the four weeks ending June 14, the analysts said.

However, Barry Callebaut said that while a strong El Niño has been confirmed for 2026 and 2027 and creates a downside risk on supply, a large surplus for 2025-2026 acts as a buffer, resulting in a very different situation from 2023-2024.

The UBS analysts expect that Lindt has hedged at favourable cocoa bean prices for 2027, a move they estimate could reduce costs by as much as 500 million Swiss francs.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs have also had a brief but significant impact, causing price spikes and supply chain disruptions. More recently, the conflict in the Middle East also hit Lindt's travel retail business globally by reducing tourism flows.

Premium chocolate, social media trendsAs cocoa prices are expected to recover, chocolatiers are looking to win back their core customer base by innovating their premium product formats, as well as keeping a closer eye on social media trends that young people are engaging with.

Lindt released its Dubai-style chocolate bar in December 2024, a in a bid to capitalize on a viral social media trend. Global retailers from Walmart to Trader Joe's, Shake Shack, and Harrods are now selling Dubai chocolate too.

Lindt CEO Lechner said the company plans to expand its "social media presence" to create a seamless journey between inspiration, discovery, and purchase.

"The extraordinary success of our Dubai Style Chocolate launch demonstrated the growing power of social media in building awareness, engagement, and demand for our brands," Lechner said in the earnings call.

"This strategy is helping us reach new audiences and strengthen our relevance with younger consumers."

watch now

Nestlé's CEO Philipp Navratil echoed this view, saying in an analyst call on Thursday that the company plans to invest more in influencer marketing, with changes coming to how the brand advertises itself.

"More digital, more social, more organic, more fun. Tapping into how younger consumers engage with the world," Navratil said.

Both Barry Callebaut and Lindt are focusing on consumer interest in premium products for the remaining half of the year, but they're getting creative about how they offer products rather than increasing prices.

"By broadening our price architecture, we can attract new consumers, increase purchase frequency, and offer more touchpoints with the Lindt brand without compromising our premium positioning," Lechner said.

Lechner pointed out that Lindt had selectively lower prices in key markets such as Germany and Switzerland, particularly over Christmas, to support consumer demand during its most important season. Meanwhile, Barry Callebaut and Nestlé haven't mentioned lowering prices.

Instead, Barry Callebaut is also leaning into premium chocolate, growing its Gourmet business, which supplies chefs and bakers, while expanding higher-end specialty chocolate products.

PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP – Get Free Report) and Embotelladora Andina (NYSE:AKO.B – Get Free Report) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Dividends PepsiCo pays an annual dividend of $5.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Embotelladora Andina pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. PepsiCo pays out 77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Embotelladora Andina pays out 36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PepsiCo has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years. PepsiCo is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings This table compares PepsiCo and Embotelladora Andina”s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PepsiCo $93.92 billion 1.99 $8.24 billion $7.63 17.91 Embotelladora Andina $3.52 billion 1.36 $295.57 million $2.04 14.89 PepsiCo has higher revenue and earnings than Embotelladora Andina. Embotelladora Andina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PepsiCo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk PepsiCo has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Embotelladora Andina has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability This table compares PepsiCo and Embotelladora Andina’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PepsiCo 10.78% 54.63% 10.49% Embotelladora Andina 8.70% 24.47% 8.89% Institutional and Insider Ownership 73.1% of PepsiCo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Embotelladora Andina shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Embotelladora Andina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for PepsiCo and Embotelladora Andina, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PepsiCo 1 12 7 0 2.30 Embotelladora Andina 0 1 0 1 3.00 PepsiCo currently has a consensus target price of $157.90, indicating a potential upside of 15.56%. Given PepsiCo’s higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PepsiCo is more favorable than Embotelladora Andina.

Summary PepsiCo beats Embotelladora Andina on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

About PepsiCo (Get Free Report)

PepsiCo, Inc. engages in the manufacture, marketing, distribution, and sale of various beverages and convenient foods worldwide. The company operates through seven segments: Frito-Lay North America; Quaker Foods North America; PepsiCo Beverages North America; Latin America; Europe; Africa, Middle East and South Asia; and Asia Pacific, Australia and New Zealand and China Region. It provides dips, cheese-flavored snacks, and spreads, as well as corn, potato, and tortilla chips; cereals, rice, pasta, mixes and syrups, granola bars, grits, oatmeal, rice cakes, and side dishes; beverage concentrates, fountain syrups, and finished goods; ready-to-drink tea, coffee, and juices; dairy products; and sparkling water makers and related products, as well as distributes alcoholic beverages under Hard MTN Dew brand. The company offers its products primarily under the Lay’s, Doritos, Fritos, Tostitos, BaiCaoWei, Cheetos, Cap’n Crunch, Life, Pearl Milling Company, Gatorade, Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Quaker, Rice-A-Roni, Aquafina, Bubly, Emperador, Diet Mountain Dew, Diet Pepsi, Gatorade Zero, Crush, Propel, Dr Pepper, Schweppes, Marias Gamesa, Ruffles, Sabritas, Saladitas, Tostitos, 7UP, Diet 7UP, H2oh!, Manzanita Sol, Mirinda, Pepsi Black, Pepsi Max, San Carlos, Toddy, Walkers, Chipsy, Kurkure, Sasko, Spekko, White Star, Smith’s, Sting, SodaStream, Lubimyj Sad, Agusha, Chudo, Domik v Derevne, Lipton, and other brands. It serves wholesale and other distributors, foodservice customers, grocery stores, drug stores, convenience stores, discount/dollar stores, mass merchandisers, membership stores, hard discounters, e-commerce retailers and authorized independent bottlers, and others through a network of direct-store-delivery, customer warehouse, and distributor networks, as well as directly to consumers through e-commerce platforms and retailers. The company was founded in 1898 and is based in Purchase, New York.

About Embotelladora Andina (Get Free Report)

Embotelladora Andina S.A., together with its subsidiaries, produces, markets, and distributes Coca-Cola soft drinks in Chile, Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay. It also offers fruit-flavored beverages, juices, sports and energy drinks, ice tea, and bottled water. Embotelladora Andina S.A. was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Receive News & Ratings for PepsiCo Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for PepsiCo and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Posted by Defense World Staff on Jul 26th, 2026

Shares of International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM – Get Free Report) have been given an average rating of “Moderate Buy” by the twenty-seven research firms that are currently covering the stock, MarketBeat.com reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, eleven have given a hold rating and fifteen have given a buy rating to the company. The average 12-month target price among brokers that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $265.40.

A number of brokerages have recently issued reports on IBM. Barclays lowered their target price on shares of International Business Machines from $288.00 to $262.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research note on Thursday. Sanford C. Bernstein reiterated a “market perform” rating on shares of International Business Machines in a report on Thursday, July 16th. Royal Bank Of Canada reissued an “outperform” rating and issued a $270.00 price objective on shares of International Business Machines in a research report on Tuesday. Wedbush set a $350.00 target price on shares of International Business Machines in a research note on Tuesday, June 2nd. Finally, Wall Street Zen lowered shares of International Business Machines from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Saturday, July 18th.

Read Our Latest Report on IBM

Institutional Investors Weigh In On International Business Machines A number of institutional investors and hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of the company. VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ET Al lifted its position in International Business Machines by 424.6% during the fourth quarter. VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ET Al now owns 260,740 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $77,234,000 after acquiring an additional 211,040 shares during the last quarter. Assetmark Inc. grew its stake in International Business Machines by 24.8% during the 1st quarter. Assetmark Inc. now owns 64,458 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $15,624,000 after buying an additional 12,791 shares during the last quarter. GLOBALT Investments LLC GA increased its position in International Business Machines by 19.1% during the 4th quarter. GLOBALT Investments LLC GA now owns 18,288 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $5,417,000 after buying an additional 2,930 shares in the last quarter. Newbridge Financial Services Group Inc. increased its position in International Business Machines by 30.0% during the 4th quarter. Newbridge Financial Services Group Inc. now owns 13,122 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $3,887,000 after buying an additional 3,029 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Rice Partnership LLC purchased a new stake in International Business Machines in the fourth quarter valued at about $3,317,000. 58.96% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

International Business Machines Price Performance Shares of IBM stock opened at $214.16 on Thursday. The stock has a 50 day moving average price of $262.92 and a 200 day moving average price of $260.50. International Business Machines has a 52-week low of $199.19 and a 52-week high of $332.46. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.63, a quick ratio of 0.76 and a current ratio of 0.79. The firm has a market capitalization of $201.28 billion, a P/E ratio of 19.00, a P/E/G ratio of 2.32 and a beta of 0.68.

International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, July 22nd. The technology company reported $2.93 EPS for the quarter, meeting the consensus estimate of $2.93. International Business Machines had a return on equity of 35.65% and a net margin of 15.52%.The company had revenue of $17.16 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $17.46 billion. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company posted $2.80 EPS. International Business Machines’s quarterly revenue was up 1.1% on a year-over-year basis. As a group, sell-side analysts predict that International Business Machines will post 12.34 earnings per share for the current year.

International Business Machines Announces Dividend The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, September 10th. Investors of record on Monday, August 10th will be paid a $1.69 dividend. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, August 10th. This represents a $6.76 annualized dividend and a yield of 3.2%. International Business Machines’s dividend payout ratio is 59.98%.

International Business Machines News Summary Here are the key news stories impacting International Business Machines this week:

Positive Sentiment: Unusual options activity showed strong bullish interest, with traders buying 108,601 call options on IBM, about 35% above normal call volume. This suggests some investors are betting on a rebound. Positive Sentiment: Citigroup lowered its price target to $245 from $255 but kept a Buy rating, implying meaningful upside from current levels and signaling that some analysts still see value in the shares. Positive Sentiment: IBM announced a dividend of $1.69 per share, reinforcing its appeal to income-focused investors at a time when the stock has been under pressure. Neutral Sentiment: Recent commentary has turned split: some analysts and strategists view the post-earnings decline as a potential long-term opportunity, while others say IBM may be stuck in a holding pattern until growth reaccelerates. IBM: The Historic Stock Rout Is A Generational Opportunity Neutral Sentiment: IBM is still getting support from its long-term quantum computing strategy, including the announced acquisition of HRL Laboratories, which expands its quantum R&D capabilities. That could help sentiment, but the benefit is longer term rather than immediate. Negative Sentiment: The main reason the stock fell sharply is IBM’s Q2 report and lowered 2026 outlook: revenue missed expectations, mainframe sales weakened, and management cut full-year constant-currency revenue growth guidance after customers shifted spending toward AI infrastructure. Negative Sentiment: Shortly after the earnings slump, law firms announced securities-fraud investigations tied to IBM’s disclosures about the mainframe slowdown, adding legal overhang and uncertainty for shareholders. International Business Machines Company Profile (Get Free Report)

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is a global technology and consulting company headquartered in Armonk, New York. Founded in 1911 as the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR) and renamed IBM in 1924, the company has evolved from early electromechanical machines to a diversified technology provider serving enterprises and governments worldwide. IBM is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol IBM.

IBM’s principal businesses encompass cloud computing and software, infrastructure and systems, consulting and technology services, and research and development.

Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than International Business Machines Telecom Earnings Reveal a Sector That Finally Looks Healthier Defense Earnings Show Readiness Now and Modernization Ahead Why Palantir Investors Aren’t Panicking While the Rest of AI Sells Off MarketBeat Week in Review – 07/20- 07/24

Receive News & Ratings for International Business Machines Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for International Business Machines and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

« PREVIOUS HEADLINEContrasting Fulton Financial (NASDAQ:FULT) and Magyar Bancorp (NASDAQ:MGYR)

NEXT HEADLINE »The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (NYSE:EL) Receives $98.11 Average Target Price from Analysts

Posted by Defense World Staff on Jul 26th, 2026

Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHTR – Get Free Report) has received an average rating of “Reduce” from the nineteen analysts that are presently covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. Six investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell recommendation, eight have issued a hold recommendation and five have given a buy recommendation to the company. The average 1 year target price among brokers that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $249.1250.

CHTR has been the subject of several recent research reports. BNP Paribas Exane lowered their price objective on shares of Charter Communications from $150.00 to $120.00 and set an “underperform” rating for the company in a research report on Tuesday, July 14th. The Goldman Sachs Group decreased their target price on shares of Charter Communications from $185.00 to $125.00 and set a “sell” rating for the company in a research note on Thursday, July 2nd. Citigroup lowered their price target on shares of Charter Communications from $230.00 to $190.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a report on Monday, June 29th. JPMorgan Chase & Co. dropped their price target on shares of Charter Communications from $215.00 to $200.00 and set a “neutral” rating on the stock in a research note on Monday, July 20th. Finally, Benchmark reaffirmed a “buy” rating on shares of Charter Communications in a research note on Wednesday.

Check Out Our Latest Report on Charter Communications

Charter Communications News Roundup Here are the key news stories impacting Charter Communications this week:

Positive Sentiment: Charter beat second-quarter earnings expectations, reporting $10.66 per share versus estimates around $9.98, and revenue of $13.53 billion came in slightly ahead of forecasts. Charter Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results Positive Sentiment: Mobile line growth remained a bright spot, with the company adding more than 400,000 new mobile lines, showing that its wireless expansion is still gaining traction. MarketWatch article on internet erosion Neutral Sentiment: Charter also announced debt exchange offers, which could help manage its capital structure, but the move is not a clear near-term catalyst for the stock. Charter Announces Debt Exchange Offers Negative Sentiment: Broadband subscriber losses were steeper than expected, reinforcing concerns that Charter is losing share to fiber and fixed-wireless competitors and weakening the outlook for its core internet business. Reuters broadband customer losses article Negative Sentiment: Multiple reports say Charter’s shares fell sharply to fresh lows as investors worried about ongoing internet and video customer losses, declining revenue, and a worsening competitive environment. MarketWatch article on Charter stock sharply lower Charter Communications Price Performance CHTR stock opened at $123.31 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.56, a quick ratio of 0.40 and a current ratio of 0.40. Charter Communications has a 1 year low of $111.55 and a 1 year high of $335.52. The firm has a market cap of $15.17 billion, a P/E ratio of 3.20, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.23 and a beta of 0.71. The stock has a 50-day simple moving average of $136.02 and a 200-day simple moving average of $184.01.

Charter Communications (NASDAQ:CHTR – Get Free Report) last announced its earnings results on Friday, July 24th. The company reported $10.66 EPS for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $9.98 by $0.68. The business had revenue of $13.53 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $13.51 billion. Charter Communications had a return on equity of 24.20% and a net margin of 9.03%.The company’s revenue was down 1.7% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period last year, the business posted $9.18 EPS. On average, equities analysts predict that Charter Communications will post 41.29 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

Insider Activity at Charter Communications In other Charter Communications news, Director Wade Davis purchased 5,728 shares of Charter Communications stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, April 28th. The stock was purchased at an average price of $173.72 per share, with a total value of $995,068.16. Following the completion of the acquisition, the director owned 6,925 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $1,203,011. This trade represents a 478.53% increase in their position. The purchase was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, CEO Christopher L. Winfrey acquired 3,468 shares of the stock in a transaction on Tuesday, April 28th. The shares were acquired at an average price of $172.23 per share, with a total value of $597,293.64. Following the purchase, the chief executive officer owned 74,409 shares in the company, valued at $12,815,462.07. This represents a 4.89% increase in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this purchase is available in the SEC filing. Over the last ninety days, insiders acquired 20,125 shares of company stock valued at $3,167,116. 1.10% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.

Hedge Funds Weigh In On Charter Communications Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in the business. Thompson Siegel & Walmsley LLC grew its holdings in Charter Communications by 1,804.0% during the 4th quarter. Thompson Siegel & Walmsley LLC now owns 102,528 shares of the company’s stock worth $21,403,000 after acquiring an additional 97,143 shares in the last quarter. Gateway Investment Advisers LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Charter Communications in the 4th quarter valued at about $5,911,000. Norges Bank acquired a new stake in shares of Charter Communications in the 4th quarter valued at about $555,383,000. First Eagle Investment Management LLC lifted its position in shares of Charter Communications by 119.6% during the fourth quarter. First Eagle Investment Management LLC now owns 2,969,507 shares of the company’s stock worth $619,885,000 after purchasing an additional 1,617,148 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Swiss Life Asset Management Ltd lifted its position in shares of Charter Communications by 110.7% during the fourth quarter. Swiss Life Asset Management Ltd now owns 31,239 shares of the company’s stock worth $6,521,000 after purchasing an additional 16,415 shares during the last quarter. 81.76% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

About Charter Communications (Get Free Report)

Charter Communications, Inc is a U.S.-based telecommunications and mass media company that provides broadband communications and video services to residential and business customers. Operating primarily under the Spectrum brand, the company offers high-speed internet, cable television, digital voice (phone) and wireless services, as well as managed and enterprise networking solutions for commercial customers. Charter’s service portfolio targets both consumer and business markets with bundled and standalone offerings designed to meet streaming, connectivity and communications needs.

The company’s consumer-facing products include Spectrum Internet, Spectrum TV and Spectrum Voice, while Spectrum Mobile provides wireless service through arrangements with national wireless carriers.

Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than Charter Communications Telecom Earnings Reveal a Sector That Finally Looks Healthier Defense Earnings Show Readiness Now and Modernization Ahead Why Palantir Investors Aren’t Panicking While the Rest of AI Sells Off MarketBeat Week in Review – 07/20- 07/24

Receive News & Ratings for Charter Communications Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Charter Communications and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

« PREVIOUS HEADLINEComparing Rand Capital (NASDAQ:RAND) & Blackrock Tcp Capital (NASDAQ:TCPC)

NEXT HEADLINE »Brokerages Set PulteGroup, Inc. (NYSE:PHM) Price Target at $142.21

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

South Korea's pension fund has turned to net buying of KOSPI for the first time this year, taking a heavy position in SK Hynix.

South Korean exchange data shows that pension funds, including the National Pension Service (NPS) — one of the largest institutional investors in South Korea's stock market — have turned net buyers in the Korean stock market for the first time this month. As of July 24, the NPS and other pension funds have net purchased 68.4 billion won (approximately $46.8 million) of KOSPI index constituent stocks in July this year. This marks the first monthly net purchase by pension funds this year after six consecutive months of net selling. In terms of individual stocks, SK Hynix is the most bought stock by pension funds since July, with a net purchase amount of 425.8 billion won. (Jinshi)

28 minutes ago

Iran and Oman hold multiple rounds of consultations on the Strait of Hormuz issue.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahaei stated that from the 24th to 25th, Iran and Oman held multiple rounds of deputy foreign minister-level talks in Tehran. On the basis of respecting the sovereign rights of the two coastal states, Iran and Oman, the two sides held in-depth exchanges of views on the common principles and specific operational mechanisms for ensuring safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Bahaei noted that the talks were productive and yielded certain progress. The Omani delegation left Tehran on the afternoon of the 25th, but the two sides will continue to maintain consultations at the technical and political levels. In addition, Bahaei said that the current navigation status of ships in the Strait of Hormuz has not changed. (CCTV International News)

28 minutes ago

Changxin Technology will go public tomorrow, with its over-the-counter market valuation reaching 2.76 trillion yuan.

Changxin Technology will list on the STAR Market of the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, with an initial market capitalization of around 580 billion yuan. The IPO is priced at 8.66 yuan per share, and the final online subscription winning rate hit 0.4714%, a new record for STAR Market IPOs. After full exercise of the over-allotment option, total fundraising can reach up to 66.6 billion yuan. According to Hyperinsight monitoring, the price of CXMT (Changxin Memory, with Changxin Technology as its listed entity) Pre-IPO contract on Hyperliquid is currently quoted at $6.087, equivalent to a share price of 41.2 yuan. Calculated based on the total share capital of 66.881 billion shares post-IPO, the on-chain implied market value stands at approximately $407.1 billion, or around 2.76 trillion yuan. Based on this valuation, the subscription cost for a single retail lot of 500 shares is 4,330 yuan, with an estimated market value of 20,600 yuan for 500 shares on the first trading day, translating to a single lot profit of roughly 16,000 yuan. Founded in 2016, Changxin Technology is China’s largest and most technologically advanced integrated DRAM R&D, design and manufacturing enterprise. In Q4 2025, it held a 7.67% global DRAM market share, ranking fourth worldwide and first in China, with ambitions to become the world’s third-largest DRAM supplier. In Q1 2026, the company’s revenue reached 50.8 billion yuan, surging 719% year-on-year; net profit attributable to shareholders hit 24.762 billion yuan, a 1688% year-on-year jump. For the first half of 2026, it forecasts net profit attributable to shareholders of between 50 billion and 57 billion yuan.

28 minutes ago

Elon Musk: China is highly likely to become an AI leader in the future.

Elon Musk stated in an interview with The Economist that China will most likely emerge as an AI leader at some point in the future, and even if the U.S. bans Chinese AI models, it cannot prevent this outcome. (The Paper)

28 minutes ago

Samsung's Lee Jae-yong is reportedly holding discussions with OpenAI on cooperation plans in the AI and semiconductor sectors.

According to South Korean media reports, Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong met with OpenAI founder Sam Altman at OpenAI’s San Francisco headquarters to discuss cooperation in the fields of artificial intelligence and semiconductors. OpenAI announced on the 26th that Lee and Altman held talks at the company’s San Francisco headquarters on the morning of the 25th local time. While OpenAI did not disclose specific discussion contents or topics, industry observers believe the two sides likely communicated about deepening cooperation on AI infrastructure such as high-bandwidth memory (HBM), dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), and advanced wafer foundry. They may also have explored Samsung’s digital transformation plan for rolling out generative AI across its entire business lines. (Jinshi)

28 minutes ago

The Big Short Michael Burry ramps up short positions on stocks including Micron and NVIDIA.

"The 'Big Short' protagonist Michael Burry has disclosed his latest portfolio adjustments, continuing to increase short exposure to semiconductor stocks. Specifically, he added to short positions in Micron Technology (MU), NVIDIA (NVDA), and semiconductor ETF SOXX at prices of $933.86, $210.28, and $535.83 respectively. Additionally, Burry also added to his short position in Caterpillar (CAT) at $893.49. On the long side, he increased holdings in Flutter (FLUT), DraftKings (DKNG), and Molina Healthcare (MOH) at prices of $100.72, $23.07, and $197.02 respectively. Burry’s short positions in Tesla, Palantir, and Nasdaq 100 Index ETF QQQ remained unchanged."

28 minutes ago

Micron Technology (MU -7.24%) has had a great year, with its shares rising about 217% so far. However, following a sell-off in early July, they are still down 25% from an all-time high set in late June.

A midyear sell-off like this shouldn't come as a surprise to investors since many of them wanted to lock in some profits. That's shortsighted thinking, though; the tailwinds that pushed Micron higher in the first part of the year are still there, and I wouldn't be surprised if the stock sets a new all-time high within the next few months. But how high can it rise? Let's take a look.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

The AI build-out continues Micron makes memory chips, and the artificial intelligence (AI) data center boom is consuming nearly all of its capacity. Memory chips have become the primary bottleneck in data center construction, and with high demand and low supply, prices are soaring.

The chipmaker is a beneficiary of soaring prices, boosting its revenue and profits. This situation can be resolved in one of only two ways.

First, the memory chip suppliers could dramatically increase supply to meet demand. This takes time, and Micron is building more production capacity to do just that. However, each year, AI hyperscalers continue to increase their data center spending, so this supply expansion may not be enough.

Today's Change

(

-7.24

%) $

-71.69

Current Price

$

918.52

Second, the hyperscalers could just quit building data centers, and demand would evaporate. This is a pretty unlikely scenario since the big tech companies are convinced there is major value in increasing AI computing capacity. A more realistic thought along the same lines is that AI hyperscalers could decrease their building plans, which still seems unlikely.

So, the only two ways for the memory chip market to correct the supply/demand imbalance are a time-consuming option or a highly unlikely action. As a result, I think that an investment in Micron is fairly safe, at least in the short term. Management backs this up, projecting that tightness in the memory chip market will last beyond 2027.

With AI demand expanding and more supply being a ways off, memory chip prices will continue to rise, and Micron will be a huge beneficiary. Wall Street analysts agree: They anticipate its revenue rising 84% during fiscal 2027 (ending August 2027), with earnings per share rising from $73.44 to $153.74. That prices the stock at a cheap 6.4 times next year's earnings.

MU PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts; PE = price to earnings.

So Micron is a cheap stock operating in an industry where the product is in short supply and high demand. That bodes well, and I think shares could be heading to new all-time highs very soon. Micron Technology's valuation may double at the very least, potentially causing the stock to surpass $2,000 per share.

NOW's Agentic AI-driven growth is evidenced by the accelerating net new ACV, the higher cross-selling trends, and the expanding customer base. The Claude Mythos fears have triggered their robust Security and Risk monetization trends, with the underpenetrated segment implying further cross-selling opportunities. The prior meltdown/ongoing consolidation has contributed to NOW's cheap P/E of 22.62x while offering more than doubling upside potential to my LTPT of $215.30.

Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency known for its advanced cryptographic technology, extended its downward movement over the past day, dropping below the $500 threshold as renewed selling pressure weighed on price action. The recent drop comes after Zcash failed to sustain its short-term recovery, raising questions about the next directional move.

Price action and current market dataAt the latest check, Zcash traded at $477.01, showing a decline of 4.44% in the past 24 hours. During this period, daily trading volume stood at $685.16 million, while Zcash maintained a market capitalization of $8.01 billion. The digital asset accounted for 0.37% of the broader cryptocurrency market.

Market participants have turned their attention to key support and resistance levels as the volatility continues. A closer look at technical levels suggests the $500 mark recently served as a critical resistance, while further support appears near the $460 area.

Team LAMBO, a crypto market analyst, indicated that the downward move hit its first downside target of $480 after the break below $500 resistance. They further noted that, “If $460 support does not hold, Zcash may target the $360 region—previously an area of strong buyer interest.”

LevelTypeStatus$528.75ResistancePrevious breakout, closely watched$500ResistanceRecently lost$460SupportImmediate, under test$360SupportPotential, if breakdown continuesTechnical outlook and potential scenariosEven as some traders brace for further declines, other technical perspectives maintain a cautiously optimistic view on Zcash’s medium-term prospects. Before the current pullback, ZEC managed to break above $528.75, a level that represented both the previous wave’s top and the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement from the May downturn. Technical analysts often interpret such breakouts as confirmation of a renewed upward impulse, suggesting that, structurally, the broader uptrend may remain intact if critical supports hold.

According to this analysis, the next significant upward target for ZEC remains at $674, a resistance area established last May. However, the intensity of selling pressure has clouded short-term direction.

The current technical mix reflects uncertainty among traders. Some anticipate additional downside if the $460 support fails, while others regard the previous breakout above $528.75 as a sign of underlying strength, indicating another rally could follow if sellers retreat.

In the near term, upcoming trading sessions are likely to prove pivotal. A resilient defense of $460 by buyers could stabilize the local trend and enable attempts to retake the $528.75 resistance. Alternatively, a sharp move below support would likely focus attention on the $360 area as the next significant base.

Focus remains on short-term price levelsWith conflicting technical signals, market participants are closely watching whether buyers can reestablish momentum or if selling extends toward lower support levels. Zcash’s price movement in the coming days is expected to determine the cryptocurrency’s next major trend direction.

Mini dictionary: Zcash, a specialized blockchain protocol, uses zero-knowledge proofs to enable private transactions that hide sender, recipient, and amount details on a public blockchain.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.