BNB has returned to a price range closely watched by investors in recent months. According to market analysts, the asset is once again approaching areas that have previously paved the way for significant upward moves. Having pulled back from its recent highs, BNB has been trading sideways within a broad band for some time.
Ongoing balance within the main rangeMonthly charts reveal that BNB retreated after reaching its all-time high above $1,300 and is currently trading within a wide band between $550 and $700. With the current price positioned near the middle of this range, some market participants interpret this as a potential accumulation phase.
According to analyst Aman, BNB has displayed a persistent tightening pattern that warrants attention. Similar patterns in the past have often preceded sharp moves in either direction. As a result, the market is closely watching whether the ongoing sideways action is a precursor to a breakout.
If BNB breaks above its current resistance zone, the next target could be in the $800 to $900 range, with $1,000 coming into focus after that.
The relative strength index (RSI), which measures price momentum, stands at about 40. While this signals waning momentum, analysts note it does not necessarily point to a definitive downtrend. In their view, a move toward the 50 level in the RSI could be critical for BNB’s short and mid-term direction.
Mini glossary: RSI is a technical indicator used to gauge the speed and strength of price movements. Typically, a reading below 30 is considered oversold, while above 70 denotes overbought conditions; however, it does not give absolute directional signals on its own.
Key short-term support at $560 to $570Short-term charts show a more cautious picture. Analyst Sjuul points out that after an unsuccessful breakout attempt, BNB has fallen back to a crucial support zone. On the 12-hour chart, the $560 to $570 region has repeatedly seen buyers step in.
Since February, the price has bounced each time it approached this area. Conversely, the $675 to $690 range remains a strong resistance zone. The most recent upward attempt appeared promising for a short time but was quickly followed by a sharp pullback, which many in the market have described as a bull trap.
Binance shifts European licensing strategyAmid these price movements, a regulatory development on the Binance front has gained attention in Europe. Binance, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, announced it has withdrawn its license application in Greece under the MiCA regulations and will seek authorization in another European Union country.
Binance has confirmed the withdrawal of its MiCA license application in Greece and will continue the authorization process in a different EU member state.
The company said the decision came after a renewed reassessment of the licensing timeline and process in Greece. Binance emphasized it remains committed to the European market and will continue to align with MiCA rules. The exchange expects to secure a license in the coming months and plans to complete all compliance steps required ahead of the July 1 deadline.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
BNB Chain remains one of the most active blockchain ecosystems in crypto despite ongoing market uncertainty. Fast transaction speeds, deep liquidity, and strong retail participation continue making the network a hub for emerging projects and established assets alike.
As investors search for the top crypto coins on Binance BNB to buy in June 2026, three names continue appearing across watchlists: 币安人生 (BinanceLife), MemeToro ($MT), and Siren (SIREN). While each project targets a different audience, all three are benefiting from increased attention inside the BNB ecosystem.
Understanding what separates them can help investors identify which opportunities best match their risk profiles and investment goals.
Continues Building Momentum Among the strongest recent performers on BNB Chain is 币安人生.
The token has managed to gain more than 4% despite broader market weakness, climbing to approximately $0.72 while generating daily trading volumes above $12 million. That level of activity has helped the asset secure a market capitalization approaching $718 million and maintain a position among the more visible mid-cap projects.
What has attracted attention is the consistency of demand.
Trading activity across 币安人生/USDT pairs continues showing steady accumulation rather than short-lived speculative spikes. This behavior has encouraged analysts to maintain relatively optimistic long-term outlooks.
Some forecasts suggest the token could continue advancing toward higher targets if current support levels remain intact throughout the second half of 2026.
For investors seeking a more established BNB Chain asset, 币安人生 remains one of the more closely monitored options.
Siren Offers High-Risk Exposure for Aggressive Traders Siren sits at the opposite end of the risk spectrum.
The token continues trading around $0.0031 and remains one of the more volatile assets within the BNB ecosystem. Recent network improvements and periodic risk-on sentiment have helped support activity, but price swings remain substantial.
This volatility is exactly what attracts a specific segment of traders.
Micro-cap assets often appeal to investors willing to accept elevated risk in exchange for potentially larger percentage gains. However, those same characteristics can also create sharp drawdowns when sentiment turns negative.
Siren’s future performance will likely remain heavily tied to speculative activity and broader market conditions.
For aggressive traders, that volatility creates opportunities. For conservative investors, it represents a significant risk factor.
Why MemeToro Is Becoming a Popular BNB Chain Discussion While 币安人生 benefits from accumulation and Siren attracts speculative interest, MemeToro ($MT) is gaining visibility through ecosystem development.
The project combines artificial intelligence, SocialFi participation, and behavioral finance into a single platform. This positioning places it directly within one of the strongest narratives currently shaping crypto markets.
AI-related projects continue attracting investor attention even during periods of broader market weakness.
Rather than operating as a conventional memecoin, MemeToro aims to create an ecosystem where users actively participate through multiple products and services. That distinction has helped separate the project from many traditional meme-focused launches.
The MemeToro AI Agent Powers the Platform At the center of the ecosystem is the MemeToro AI Agent.
The system continuously analyzes social conversations, cultural developments, market narratives, and online trends. The goal is to identify opportunities and emerging themes before they become widely recognized across crypto markets.
These insights support broader ecosystem activity.
Instead of functioning as a standalone analytics tool, the AI layer works alongside several participation-focused products designed to keep users engaged with the platform.
This creates a more dynamic environment than simple token ownership alone.
Inside the MemeToro Ecosystem MemeToro ($MT) combines several products under one framework. Users can launch memecoins through an automated no-code creation system that removes traditional technical barriers. Every major feature within the ecosystem is powered by the native $MT token.
The platform also includes decentralized prediction markets where participants can use both $MT and BNB to forecast outcomes across crypto, sports, entertainment, and world events.
Additional engagement comes through staking rewards of up to 35% APR. These features work together to create multiple participation paths within a single ecosystem.
The project’s Stage 2 presale has already surpassed 92% completion, raising more than $72,955 toward its current target.
Step-by-Step MemeToro Presale Instructions Securing an allocation in the MemeToro presale requires a connected digital wallet and a verified network connection. The allocation process is fully automated through the project’s verified smart contracts.
Visit Official Site: Open the presale interface directly via the authorized link on the main website. Configure Wallet: Attach your digital wallet application while prioritizing the BNB Chain mainnet protocol. Execute Transfer: Input the desired allocation amount and authorize payment using BNB, ETH, stablecoins, or traditional cards. Balance Verification: Complete the transfer protocol to automatically register the corresponding $MT asset balance. Participating in the presale provides early access to the native asset before full ecosystem deployment. Registered users can subsequently access the platform’s trading features, delegate tokens to secure staking yields, and utilize native tools for market analysis.
Get your $MT tokens before stage changes and presale price increases.
More Information on MemeToro ($MT) Presale Here:
Website: https://memetoro.com/
X: https://x.com/memetoro_mt
Telegram: https://t.me/memetoro_mt
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
The search for the best BNB coin to buy in June 2026 has become increasingly competitive as investors navigate a market defined by volatility, sector rotation, and shifting narratives.
While many large-cap cryptocurrencies continue struggling under broader market pressure, activity inside the BNB Chain ecosystem remains relatively strong.
Several projects are attracting attention for different reasons. Some investors are targeting high-risk micro-caps, while others are focusing on AI-powered ecosystems and infrastructure plays. Among the names frequently appearing on watchlists are MemeToro ($MT), Siren (SIREN), Aster (ASTER), and Sky (SKY).
Each represents a different opportunity within the BNB ecosystem.
Siren Remains a High-Risk BNB Chain Play Siren has maintained its reputation as one of the more volatile assets on BNB Chain.
The token currently trades around $0.0031 after experiencing significant fluctuations tied to broader market sentiment and ecosystem developments. Recent network upgrades have helped support activity, but Siren remains firmly positioned as a speculative asset rather than a stability-focused investment.
That volatility is precisely what attracts some traders.
High-beta assets often become popular during periods when investors are seeking outsized returns. However, those opportunities come with equally elevated risks, particularly when market sentiment remains fragile.
For investors evaluating the best BNB coin to buy, Siren represents a higher-risk option designed for participants comfortable with substantial price swings.
Sky Is Currently Outperforming Aster The comparison between Sky and Aster has become a common discussion among BNB Chain traders.
Recent activity on PancakeSwap shows a growing preference for Sky. Analysts attribute part of that trend to stronger institutional inflows, which have created a measurable divergence between the two projects. Sky has benefited from that capital rotation.
At the same time, improvements across the BNB Chain network have helped support liquidity conditions for smaller assets. The chain’s Fermi upgrades reduced block times to approximately 0.45 seconds, helping maintain efficient transaction processing even during periods of elevated activity.
Aster continues attracting interest, but recent trading behavior suggests that many market participants currently favor Sky when choosing between the two projects.
Why MemeToro Is Appearing on More BNB Watchlists While Siren, Sky, and Aster are primarily attracting attention through market activity, MemeToro is benefiting from a different catalyst.
The project sits directly within the growing intersection of artificial intelligence and SocialFi. These themes remain among the strongest narratives in crypto, even as broader market sentiment remains cautious.
MemeToro ($MT) is not positioned as a traditional memecoin.
Instead, it functions as an ecosystem where users can interact with AI-powered tools, prediction markets, staking systems, and community-driven asset creation mechanisms. This broader utility framework has helped the project stand out among newer BNB Chain launches.
As investors search for the best BNB coin to buy, ecosystems offering multiple forms of participation are receiving increasing attention.
Breaking Down the MemeToro Ecosystem The core of MemeToro revolves around behavioral finance and AI-powered participation.
The platform includes an automated memecoin creation system that allows users to launch assets without coding expertise. Artificial intelligence continuously monitors social conversations, cultural developments, and market narratives to identify emerging trends.
Alongside token creation, users can participate in decentralized prediction markets powered by both $MT and BNB. These markets allow participants to forecast outcomes across crypto, sports, entertainment, and major world events.
The platform also features staking rewards of up to 35% APR, creating an additional incentive for long-term engagement.
Rather than relying on a single product, the ecosystem combines multiple participation layers under one framework.
MemeToro Is Raising Fast and Stage 2 Is Almost Gone MemeToro’s Stage 2 presale is 92.82% complete. The round has raised $72,955.51 out of a $78,590.46 target. When Stage 2 closes, the price moves from $0.00139 to $0.00154 per $MT token.
That price jump is coming soon. Buyers who get in before Stage 2 fills lock in the lower price automatically.
MemeToro runs on the BNB Chain and combines four features in one place. An AI agent creates memecoins from live trending data. Prediction markets let you bet on real-world events. A crypto casino uses $MT tokens directly. High-yield staking pays up to 35% APR.
The $MT token powers everything. There are only 1.2 billion tokens total, and 71% go to presale buyers with no vesting locks.
You can buy with a card, ETH, BNB, USDT, or USDC right now at memetoro.com.
Choosing the Best BNB Token in 2026 Choosing the best BNB coin to buy in June 2026 ultimately depends on investor priorities. Siren offers high-risk speculative exposure. Sky continues benefiting from stronger trading activity than Aster. Both remain important projects within the ecosystem.
MemeToro ($MT) combines AI-powered memecoin creation, decentralized prediction markets, staking rewards, and SocialFi participation, the platform is building a broader utility-focused ecosystem.
These four projects remain among the most discussed names heading into the second half of 2026.
More Information on MemeToro ($MT) Presale Here:
Website: https://memetoro.com/
X: https://x.com/memetoro_mt
Telegram: https://t.me/memetoro_mt
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
PANews June 26 news, USDC announced on X that USDC privacy features are now live on Starknet, enabled by STRK20 — Starknet's privacy feature for ERC-20 tokens with built-in compliance capabilities. Users can shield, send, and unshield USDC while maintaining privacy of balances, amounts, and counterparty information on the public ledger. USDC remains a USD-denominated stablecoin, and the new privacy features are suitable for payments, fund flows, payroll, and on-chain financial activities on Starknet.
Why Is Kraken Looking at Aave? Kraken parent Payward Inc. is in talks to acquire a 15% stake in Aave Group at a $385 million valuation, according to people familiar with the matter, in a deal that would deepen the exchange’s exposure to decentralized finance ahead of a potential public listing.
The proposed transaction would see Kraken invest 35,000 ether in return for 250,000 AAVE tokens and a 15% common equity stake in Aave Group, according to deal materials reviewed by people with knowledge of the discussions. The investment is valued at roughly $71 million, with Kraken also looking to syndicate part of the transaction to other investors.
The talks point to a broader shift in Kraken’s strategy. Rather than staying focused on spot trading, the company is building a larger financial infrastructure business across derivatives, asset management, and DeFi. Aave would give Kraken exposure to one of the most important lending venues in crypto at a time when regulated exchanges are trying to capture more of the activity moving through onchain markets.
A Kraken spokesperson declined to comment. Aave did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.
How Would Aave Fit Into Payward Asset Management? The Aave investment would reportedly be the first in a series of transactions aimed at building out Payward Asset Management. That would mark a more active investment posture for Kraken’s parent company, with the firm seeking exposure to DeFi protocols and other crypto market opportunities rather than acting only as a trading venue.
For Kraken, the logic is clear. Aave is the largest decentralized lending protocol, allowing users to lend and borrow crypto assets without intermediaries. Depositors supply tokens to liquidity pools and earn yield, while borrowers post crypto collateral to take out loans. Smart contracts manage the lending process, liquidation rules, and collateral requirements.
That makes Aave a core part of DeFi’s credit infrastructure. A stake in the group would give Kraken a closer relationship with one of the sector’s largest liquidity networks, while the AAVE token component would add direct exposure to the protocol’s market value. If completed, the transaction would also show how centralized exchanges are moving toward hybrid models that combine regulated trading businesses with selective ownership in decentralized infrastructure.
Investor Takeaway Kraken’s potential Aave investment is not just a financial stake. It would place the exchange closer to DeFi credit infrastructure as Payward builds a broader platform ahead of a possible IPO.
Why Does Aave’s Recent Crisis Matter? The timing is sensitive because Aave was recently pulled into one of DeFi’s largest contagion events. In April, attackers tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group exploited KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge and minted roughly $292 million of unbacked rsETH.
The attackers deposited the tokens as collateral on Aave and borrowed real assets against them. When the collateral became worthless, the protocol was left with an estimated $190 million to $230 million in bad debt.
Aave’s own smart contracts were not compromised, but the incident exposed the risk of interconnected DeFi systems. A failure in one protocol’s bridge was able to move through collateral markets and affect a major lending venue. The crisis triggered more than $8 billion in withdrawals as users reduced exposure and reassessed counterparty and collateral risk across the ecosystem.
For Kraken, that creates both risk and opportunity. Investing after a major stress event may give the company a better entry point and a clearer view of Aave’s weaknesses, governance response, and resilience. But it also means the deal would place Kraken closer to a protocol still facing questions about bad debt, cross-chain dependencies, and risk controls.
What Does This Say About Kraken’s IPO Preparation? The potential Aave deal follows a wider acquisition push by Payward as Kraken prepares for a possible public listing. In April, Payward agreed to acquire crypto derivatives exchange Bitnomial for up to $550 million, adding U.S. licenses covering brokerage, clearing, and exchange operations.
That acquisition strengthened Kraken’s regulated derivatives strategy. Aave would serve a different purpose: exposure to onchain credit markets and DeFi liquidity. Together, the moves suggest Payward is trying to show public-market investors that Kraken is more than a spot crypto exchange. It is building a multi-asset platform with regulated derivatives, asset management ambitions, and DeFi-linked growth channels.
The company has also been reported to be raising new capital at a $20 billion valuation. That makes strategic investments more important because they can help define the IPO story. Investors will likely assess whether Kraken can diversify revenue, manage regulatory exposure, and participate in onchain markets without taking excessive operational or reputational risk.
Investor Takeaway The proposed Aave stake would support Kraken’s push to present itself as a broader crypto financial platform. The main question is whether DeFi exposure strengthens that story or adds risk before a public-market debut.
What Are the Market Implications? If the deal closes, it would show that large centralized crypto firms are willing to take direct strategic stakes in DeFi infrastructure rather than only listing tokens or integrating protocols at arm’s length. That could encourage more transactions between exchanges, asset managers, and major DeFi projects.
For Aave, Kraken’s involvement could bring capital, institutional credibility, and closer links to centralized liquidity. It could also raise questions about governance influence, especially if a major exchange gains both token exposure and equity ownership tied to the protocol’s development group.
For the wider market, the deal would mark another step in the convergence between centralized and decentralized finance. Exchanges want access to DeFi growth, while protocols may increasingly need institutional partners, risk oversight, and deeper capital sources after major stress events.
The proposed investment therefore lands at an important point for both sides. Kraken is trying to broaden its business before a potential listing, while Aave is emerging from a crisis that tested confidence in DeFi’s interconnected infrastructure. A deal would not remove those risks, but it would show that major crypto firms still see lending protocols as central to the next phase of market structure.
The line between centralized exchanges and decentralized finance protocols is getting harder to trace. Kraken is reportedly in advanced discussions to acquire a 15% equity stake in Aave Group, the parent entity behind the lending protocol Aave. The proposed transaction, detailed in a sourced report from WuBlockchain, would see Kraken invest 35,000 ETH in exchange for 250,000 AAVE tokens and the 15% equity position, valuing the deal at roughly $71 million at an implied $385 million valuation for Aave Group.
This would be the first investment under Kraken’s planned Payward Asset Management initiative, signaling a structured push beyond spot trading and custody. Kraken isn’t just listing tokens anymore; it’s buying governance influence and direct exposure to a protocol that holds over $18 billion in total value locked.
Strategic Hedge or Deep Integration? Aave remains one of the most battle-tested lending protocols in DeFi, surviving multiple market cycles since its 2020 launch. Its governance token AAVE gives holders a say in protocol upgrades, fee structures, and risk parameters. A 15% stake is significant enough to sway votes, though not controlling. Kraken would effectively become a major stakeholder in the DAO’s future direction.
For Aave, an exchange equity infusion brings not only capital but also potential user funneling. Kraken’s retail and institutional base could be steered toward Aave’s lending and borrowing markets, boosting protocol revenue. For Kraken, owning a slice of a top DeFi protocol diversifies its revenue beyond trading fees and puts it squarely in the path of on-chain yield generation. That’s a strategic hedge against margin compression in exchange businesses.
This isn’t a one-off. Earlier this year, Bullish acquired Equiniti for $4.2B in a tokenization and trust services play, and Ondo Finance settled live tokenized Treasury trades with JPMorgan, as covered in a recent tokenization roundup. The Kraken-Aave discussion fits a pattern where deep-pocketed crypto firms are building vertical stacks that span exchange, asset management, and protocol-level infrastructure.
Regulatory Hurdles and Uncertainty The deal is not finalized, and terms could shift. Regulatory considerations loom large, especially in the United States. The SEC has been aggressive in its stance that many DeFi tokens may be securities. A major US exchange taking a 15% stake in an offshore protocol could attract scrutiny.
With the Senate vote on a landmark crypto bill approaching, as reported in a recent legislative update, the political climate remains fluid. Kraken must weigh the risk of regulatory blowback against the upside of deeper DeFi integration. If the framework shifts unfavorably, the investment could become a liability rather than a growth lever.
Institutional DeFi Bets Stacking Up The AAVE token price will be closely watched. A direct purchase of 250,000 tokens could tighten liquidity and signal conviction. Yet if the deal collapses, the unwind could pressure the token. Traders are likely already modeling scenarios. The broader DeFi market is sensitive to any moves by centralized players that might raise concerns about conflicts of interest or unregistered securities.
This move doesn’t exist in isolation. Recently, SUI surged 18% after news of institutional staking from a Nasdaq-listed firm and a fintech partnership, as noted in a market analysis. The common thread is that major capital allocators are using staking and governance tokens to gain exposure to protocol growth without directly operating validator or lending infrastructure. Kraken’s approach with Aave mirrors that trend.
The talks remain private, and neither Kraken nor Aave has issued a public statement. But the leak underscores how blurred the lines have become. If the deal goes through, it will be the most direct equity link between a major centralized exchange and a DeFi protocol to date.
AUTHOR
Brenda is a writer with three years of experience specializing in cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. She graduated from the University of Mombasa with a degree in Psychology. She has worked at Cryptopolitan and Blockchain Reporter.
The founder said all Aave protocol and GHO revenue flows to the AAVE token and that the brand and software belong to holders, responding to a report that Kraken is in talks to buy a 15% stake at a $385 million valuation.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov on Thursday disputed a report that crypto exchange Kraken is in talks to take a stake in the largest decentralized lending protocol, saying the team would not sell its AAVE tokens cheaply.
"First off, there is NO WAY we'd sell AAVE at a 70% discount lol," Kulechov wrote on X, addressing what he called "lots of discussions around Aave." He said an allocation of AAVE held by Aave Labs is what "multiple market participants have discussed purchasing, directly or indirectly, through deeper long-term partnerships," and that "the article's framing is inaccurate."
The valuation at the center of the report sits well below where the market prices the token. CoinDesk reported Thursday that Kraken, part of Payward Inc., was in talks to acquire a 15% stake in Aave at a $385 million valuation, citing three people familiar with the matter. That figure is about 69% below AAVE's roughly $1.24 billion market capitalization, according to CoinGecko data.
Aave is the largest decentralized lending protocol, with about $11.6 billion locked in its main V3 markets, according to DefiLlama.
What Kraken Is Said to Be WeighingThe proposed deal would see Kraken invest 35,000 ether in return for 250,000 AAVE tokens and a 15% common equity stake in Aave Group, according to a document CoinDesk said it reviewed. At current prices, that AAVE allocation is worth about $20 million, per CoinGecko. CoinDesk reported the transaction was worth around $71 million and that Kraken was looking to syndicate it, and described the investment as the first in a series of deals to build out Payward Asset Management.
Kraken's parent has been acquisitive ahead of a planned public listing. In April, Payward agreed to buy crypto derivatives exchange Bitnomial for up to $550 million, and CoinDesk reported in May that the company was raising capital at a $20 billion valuation.
Kulechov's Revenue and Ownership ClaimsKulechov used the post to lay out how Aave directs its income. He said 100% of Aave protocol and GHO stablecoin revenue goes to the AAVE token under the "Aave Will Win" proposal, and that the arrangement extends to product revenue from the Aave App, Aave Pro and Swaps. No protocol or product revenue goes to Aave Labs, which he described as a service provider to the DAO responsible for building and growing Aave.
He said Aave generates $134 million in annualized revenue that flows to the Aave DAO. DefiLlama, which tracks onchain fees, shows Aave produced about $123 million in protocol revenue over the trailing year. Kulechov also said all intellectual property, including the Aave brand and any software built for Aave, belongs to the token.
Kulechov said the team is designing "Aavenomics 3.0," which he said would include a new automated and non-discretionary buyback mechanism, without providing details or timing. He said Aave is building for the broader finance asset market, including tokenized real-world assets, and that "everyone at Aave Labs and Aave DAO works for $AAVE."
AAVE rose about 5% over the 24 hours through Thursday, outpacing a roughly 3% slide in ether over the same period, according to CoinGecko.
The KelpDAO OverhangThe talks come as Aave continues to recover from the largest DeFi exploit of the year. On April 18, an attacker exploited KelpDAO's LayerZero bridge to mint roughly $292 million of unbacked rsETH, then deposited the tokens on Aave and borrowed real assets against them, as The Defiant reported. Aave's own smart contracts were not compromised, but the protocol was left with between $124 million and $230 million in modeled bad debt, according to a later incident report, and its total value locked fell by roughly $10 billion as users withdrew, The Defiant reported. LayerZero attributed the attack to the North Korea-linked Lazarus Group.
Aave coordinated a "DeFi United" relief effort with other protocols to restore rsETH backing, The Defiant reported, and Aave LLC later asked a New York court to vacate a restraining notice on about $71 million in recovered ether frozen by Arbitrum, The Defiant reported.
The reported terms come from a document and three anonymous sources cited by CoinDesk, not from Aave or Kraken, both of which declined to comment or did not respond to that outlet.
Kulechov said Aave will host its quarterly community call in the coming weeks, where the team plans to share updates on its roadmap.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov pushed back against reports that Kraken parent firm Payward is in talks to buy a 15% stake in the protocol at a $385 million valuation, which would represent just 30% of the AAVE token's fully diluted valuation.
"First off, there is NO WAY we’d sell AAVE at a 70% discount lol," Kulechov said in an X post on Thursday.
CoinDesk reported those figures on Thursday, citing two unnamed sources.
Aave is the largest Ethereum-based decentralized lending protocol. Kulechov said it's generating $134 million in annualized revenue, which is currently directed toward the Aave DAO.
Notably, Kulechov did not outright deny that Aave Labs, the for-profit R&D firm that initially built the Aave protocol, could sell some of its accumulated (AAVE) tokens.
"Aave Labs owns an allocation of AAVE that multiple market participants have discussed purchasing, directly or indirectly, through deeper long-term partnerships," Kulechov said, noting, however, that CoinDesk's "article's framing is inaccurate."
Kraken and Aave have linked up in the past. Last year, for instance, Kraken’s Layer 2 Ink launched a white-label instance of Aave called Tydro to serve as the blockchain’s core lending infrastructure.
The rumors come amid a somewhat challenging period for Aave, which has seen its total value locked plummet following the Kelp DAO in April. While Aave wasn’t directly attacked, the KelpDAO bridge exploiter was able to leverage Aave to convert stolen rsETH into other assets.
Expand Chart
Earlier this month, Aave released an updated risk framework to prevent situations like the KelpDAO attack.
Aave Labs also raised community ire last year after redirecting its website interface swap fees to itself instead of the DAO, leading to a significant governance challenge. Core Aave contributors ACI, Chaos Labs, and BGD Labs left the ecosystem, and proposals were published calling for the DAO to subsume Aave Labs’ intellectual property.
In response, Kulechov submitted his “Aave Will Win” (AWW) proposal, which passed with about 75% support in April 2026, that redirected 100% of protocol and Aave-branded product revenue to the DAO and AAVE token holders. In exchange, the DAO approved multi-year funding for Labs.
Aave released v4, including an updated hub-and-spoke model, in March.
"No protocol or product revenue goes to Aave Labs, which is a service provider to the DAO responsible for building and growing Aave," Kulechov said on Thursday. "We haven’t shared much on this yet, but the Aave team is designing Aavenomics 3.0, which includes a new automated and non-discretionary buyback mechanism. More on this later."
"Everyone at Aave Labs and Aave DAO works for $AAVE," he added.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
A report dropped on June 25 claiming Kraken was in talks to buy a 15% stake in Aave Group for roughly $71 million. The implied valuation, somewhere between $385 million and $473 million, would represent a steep haircut from where the market has previously priced the protocol. Aave founder Stani Kulechov had thoughts, and he shared them publicly.
Kulechov went on social media to flatly deny the core claims, saying no AAVE tokens were being sold at a 70% discount and that the reported figures were simply inaccurate.
What Kulechov actually said The distinction Kulechov drew matters more than it might appear on the surface. He clarified that any revenues flowing from the Aave protocol and its GHO stablecoin go directly to the Aave DAO, not to Aave Labs, the commercial entity he heads.
He did acknowledge that discussions are ongoing around Aave Labs’ own AAVE holdings, framed around potential long-term partnerships. That’s a different conversation from selling protocol tokens at a discount, but it’s also not nothing.
Advertisement
Kraken already has skin in the game regardless. The exchange’s DeFi Earn product is currently integrated with Aave’s protocol, meaning the two companies have an existing commercial relationship.
Kulechov also used the moment to preview Aavenomics 3.0, an upcoming update that will introduce an automated buyback mechanism for the protocol. The protocol is generating roughly $134 million in annualized revenue as of June 2026. Selling a meaningful stake at a valuation that implies a fraction of that figure would be an unusual move.
Why the valuation gap is the real story Here’s the thing about the $385 million to $473 million valuation range implied by the reported deal: it sits awkwardly against Aave’s operational metrics. A protocol doing $134 million in annual revenue trading at roughly three times that figure would be priced like a distressed asset, not a market leader.
That’s partly why Kulechov’s denial landed with some force. The framing of a 70% discount implies either that the market has dramatically re-rated Aave, or that the report had the terms wrong. Kulechov is arguing for the latter.
The broader context here is a recurring tension in DeFi between the decentralized protocols that hold the assets and generate the revenues, and the commercial entities built around them. Aave Labs is a separate organization from the Aave DAO, and how value flows between those two structures is genuinely complicated.
What investors should watch For anyone holding AAVE or watching the protocol, a few things are worth tracking. First, the Aavenomics 3.0 rollout. An automated buyback mechanism is a direct return of value to token holders, and Kulechov flagging it in the context of this dispute suggests it’s meant to signal protocol health.
Second, the governance question. If Aave Labs does reach any kind of formal arrangement with Kraken involving its own AAVE holdings, the Aave DAO community will need to process what that means for protocol independence.
Third, the revenue picture. At $134 million in annualized revenue, Aave is generating real cash flows. Any deal that gets done at terms implying a fraction of that revenue figure would warrant serious scrutiny from the community.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov pushed back on a report about a potential Kraken investment in Aave Group, saying the company would not sell AAVE tokens at a 70% discount.
Lots of discussions around Aave so I want to clarify a few things:
• First off, there is NO WAY we’d sell AAVE at a 70% discount lol.
• 100% of Aave Protocol and GHO revenue goes to the $AAVE token. This was established in the Aave Will Win proposal.
• AWW also applies to…
— Stani (@StaniKulechov) June 25, 2026
“There is no way we’d sell AAVE at a 70% discount,” Kulechov said, calling the framing of the reported transaction inaccurate.
CoinDesk reported that Kraken is in advanced talks to invest 35,000 ETH for 250,000 AAVE tokens and a 15% equity stake in Aave Group. The proposed transaction is reportedly worth about $71 million and values the company at $385 million.
Kulechov did not deny that strategic discussions are taking place. Instead, he said Aave Labs owns an allocation of AAVE that several market participants have discussed purchasing through deeper, long term partnerships.
The distinction separates Aave Labs, a service provider responsible for developing the protocol, from the Aave DAO and its treasury.
Advertisement
Kulechov said 100% of revenue generated by the Aave Protocol and GHO flows to the AAVE token through the Aave DAO.
The same framework applies to revenue from Aave App, Aave Pro and swaps following the approval of the Aave Will Win proposal. Aave Labs does not retain protocol or product revenue and instead receives funding from the DAO for its development work.
Kulechov said Aave is currently generating approximately $134 million in annualized revenue, all of which accrues to the DAO.
He also said the Aave brand, protocol software and other intellectual property built for the ecosystem belong to AAVE under the new framework.
Kulechov also revealed that the team is designing Aavenomics 3.0, which will include a new automated and nondiscretionary AAVE buyback mechanism.
He did not provide details on the size, launch date or funding structure of the planned system.
Aave already operates a buyback program financed through protocol excess revenue. The new mechanism could reduce reliance on discretionary governance decisions and create a more predictable link between protocol revenue and token purchases.
Kulechov said Aave is expanding beyond crypto lending to target the broader financial asset market, including tokenized real world assets.
AAVE reached an intraday high of $87.5 before easing to around $81. The token has also received support from Standard Chartered’s newly published $3,500 price target for the end of 2030.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov has rejected reports suggesting Aave would sell AAVE tokens to Kraken at a roughly 70% discount, while confirming that discussions around long-term strategic partnerships have taken place.
Summary
Stani Kulechov rejected claims that Aave would sell AAVE tokens to Kraken at a roughly 70% discount. Kulechov said all Aave Protocol revenue flows to the Aave DAO and revealed plans for an automated AAVE buyback mechanism. Grayscale maintained AAVE appears undervalued, with a model-based fair value of up to $175 if tokenized assets expand in DeFi. Earlier, a report claimed that Kraken is in advanced talks to invest 35,000 ETH in exchange for 250,000 AAVE tokens and a 15% equity stake in Aave Group. The reported transaction was valued at approximately $71 million and implied an Aave Group valuation of about $385 million.
Responding to the report, Kulechov argued that its framing did not accurately describe the discussions. He said there was “no way” Aave would sell AAVE tokens at a 70% discount. While disputing that characterization, he did not deny that negotiations with strategic partners have occurred.
Lots of discussions around Aave so I want to clarify a few things:
• First off, there is NO WAY we’d sell AAVE at a 70% discount lol.
• 100% of Aave Protocol and GHO revenue goes to the $AAVE token. This was established in the Aave Will Win proposal.
• AWW also applies to…
— Stani (@StaniKulechov) June 25, 2026 Instead, Kulechov explained that Aave Labs holds an allocation of AAVE tokens that several market participants have expressed interest in purchasing as part of deeper, long-term partnerships. His comments drew a distinction between Aave Labs, which develops the protocol, and the Aave DAO, which governs the ecosystem and controls protocol economics.
Protocol revenue continues flowing to the DAO Expanding on that structure, Kulechov said every dollar of revenue generated by the Aave Protocol and the GHO stablecoin accrues to AAVE through the Aave DAO. He added that the same arrangement now covers revenue from Aave App, Aave Pro, and swap-related products following the approval of the Aave Will Win governance proposal.
Under that framework, Aave Labs does not keep protocol or product revenue. Instead, the development company receives funding approved by the DAO to continue building the protocol.
Kulechov said Aave is currently generating approximately $134 million in annualized revenue, with those proceeds flowing to the DAO rather than the development company. He also stated that the Aave brand, protocol software, and other intellectual property created for the ecosystem now belong to AAVE under the updated governance model.
Separately, Kulechov revealed that the team is designing Aavenomics 3.0, which he said will introduce an automated, non-discretionary AAVE buyback mechanism. He did not disclose the launch timeline, funding source, or expected size of the program.
Aave already operates a buyback system funded by excess protocol revenue. Based on Kulechov’s comments, the proposed mechanism would automate purchases rather than relying on governance decisions for each buyback.
Tokenized assets remain central to Aave’s valuation case Looking beyond governance, Kulechov said Aave is expanding its focus beyond crypto lending to include tokenized real-world assets and other financial products.
That strategy aligns with a recent assessment from crypto.news, which reported last week that Grayscale Research considers AAVE undervalued at current prices using a cash-flow model commonly applied to traditional financial companies.
Grayscale estimated Aave could generate roughly $60 million in revenue during 2026 and placed the token’s current fair value between $80 and $100 based on a 20x to 25x fintech earnings multiple.
According to Grayscale Research, a fair value of about $175 could become possible within a year if regulatory clarity accelerates the use of tokenized assets such as Treasury products, private credit, and money market funds as collateral in DeFi lending.
The research noted that the estimate is model-based rather than a guaranteed price target and depends on tokenized assets bringing additional deposits, borrowing activity, and fee generation to the protocol.
Following Kulechov’s comments, AAVE climbed to an intraday high of $87.50 before easing to around $82, while the token continued to receive support from Standard Chartered’s previously published $3,500 price target for the end of 2030.
TLDR: Kulechov firmly denied reports of selling AAVE at a 70% discount, calling the media framing inaccurate. All Aave Protocol, GHO, and product revenue flows entirely to the AAVE token under the Aave Will Win proposal. Aave Labs is designing Aavenomics 3.0, featuring a new automated and non-discretionary AAVE buyback mechanism. Aave targets the entire financial asset market, including real-world assets, beyond the crypto-native TAM. Aave co-founder Stani Kulechov has moved to address circulating discussions about AAVE token sales and the protocol’s revenue model.
In a post on X, Kulechov pushed back on what he called inaccurate media framing surrounding Aave Labs and its token allocation.
He confirmed that all protocol and GHO revenue flows to the AAVE token while teasing a new automated buyback mechanism. The protocol currently generates $134 million in annualized revenue.
Kulechov Rejects Discount Sale Reports, Outlines Revenue Framework Kulechov was direct in dismissing reports suggesting AAVE tokens could be sold at a steep discount. Addressing the claim head-on, he wrote, “There is NO WAY we’d sell AAVE at a 70% discount lol.”
Lots of discussions around Aave so I want to clarify a few things:
• First off, there is NO WAY we’d sell AAVE at a 70% discount lol.
• 100% of Aave Protocol and GHO revenue goes to the $AAVE token. This was established in the Aave Will Win proposal.
• AWW also applies to…
— Stani (@StaniKulechov) June 25, 2026
He then moved to clarify the structure governing all revenue flows within the Aave ecosystem. The Aave Will Win (AWW) proposal, already passed by the DAO, forms the backbone of that structure.
Under AWW, 100% of Aave Protocol and GHO revenue is directed to the AAVE token. Kulechov confirmed the framework also covers all product revenue streams. “AWW also applies to all product revenue, including the Aave App, Aave Pro, and Swaps,” he stated. None of that revenue flows to Aave Labs, which operates solely as a service provider to the DAO.
He also addressed Aave Labs’ own AAVE token allocation separately. Kulechov noted that “multiple market participants have discussed purchasing, directly or indirectly, through deeper long-term partnerships.”
That allocation is distinct from the DAO’s revenue framework and does not alter how protocol earnings are distributed to token holders.
On intellectual property, Kulechov was equally clear. He confirmed that “all intellectual property, including the Aave brand and any software built for Aave, belongs to AAVE.” Token holders, not Aave Labs, hold rights over these core assets under the current governance structure.
Aavenomics 3.0 and Aave’s Broader Financial Ambition Beyond correcting the revenue narrative, Kulechov pointed to a coming upgrade. He revealed that “the Aave team is designing Aavenomics 3.0, which includes a new automated and non-discretionary buyback mechanism.” He noted that further details would follow in a later announcement, keeping the specifics close for now.
The planned buyback builds on a strong revenue foundation. Aave is generating $134 million in annualized revenue, all of which flows to the Aave DAO.
That base positions the DAO to sustain meaningful token buybacks without relying on discretionary decisions from any single party.
Kulechov also broadened the scope of Aave’s stated ambitions. He said Aave is “building not only for the crypto TAM, but for the entire finance asset TAM, including RWAs.” That framing places Aave alongside traditional finance infrastructure rather than solely within the DeFi space.
He closed his remarks with a pointed statement on organizational alignment. “Everyone at Aave Labs and Aave DAO works for AAVE,” he wrote.
That statement was directed at reassuring token holders that commercial and governance structures remain oriented around their interests above all else.
PANews June 26 news, according to The Block, in response to a CoinDesk report stating that Kraken parent company Payward is in talks to acquire a 15% stake in the Aave protocol at a valuation of $385 million (equivalent to only 30% of AAVE token's FDV), Aave founder Stani Kulechov responded on X platform: "We would never sell AAVE at a 70% discount," and pointed out that CoinDesk's report was inaccurate. Kulechov said that the Aave protocol generates an annualized revenue of $134 million, all of which currently flows to the Aave DAO. However, he did not completely deny that Aave Labs might sell part of its AAVE token holdings, saying that multiple market participants have discussed direct or indirect purchases through deeper long-term partnerships.
The Nikkei 225 Index has seen its decline widen to 5%.
According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index has extended its decline to 5%, with SoftBank and chip stocks plummeting.
2 minutes ago
Micron hits a record earnings high, pulls back 9.6%; a major bullish whale is less than $15 away from liquidation.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron (MU) — which rallied on the back of record earnings — pulled back sharply amid risk-off sentiment triggered by higher-than-expected PCE inflation. It fell roughly 9.6% from its overnight high of ~$1,255, saw intraday flash crashes, and extended losses in after-hours trading. On Hyperliquid, MU is currently trading at $1,128, down 6.9% in 24 hours. On-chain whales remain heavily bearish, with total short positions standing at ~$95.24 million, 1.76 times the long positions ($54.24 million). In terms of entry costs, the average long position price is ~$958.74, while short positions average ~$972.94. The current price remains above both levels, meaning longs are in profit and shorts are deeply underwater. As prices fall, long liquidation pressure has surged. The nearest long liquidation threshold has dropped to ~$1,114.21, just ~2.9% below the current price. This long whale (0x9e2c) holds a 5,000 MU long position with 10x leverage, worth ~$5.6 million at an average entry price of $1,215, with a liquidation price of $1,114 — less than $15 away from the current price. By contrast, the nearest short liquidation threshold is at $1,427.77, roughly 24.4% above the current price, making it relatively safe. The largest short position was opened at $774.99 with 10x leverage, worth ~$15.92 million and currently sitting on an unrealized loss of $5.17 million. - The HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permissions) to automatically sync on-chain updates.
2 minutes ago
Nikkei 225 index’s decline widened to 4.6%, with SoftBank and chip stocks plummeting.
According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index has widened its decline to 4.6%, with SoftBank and chip stocks falling sharply.
2 minutes ago
A trader’s 1x short position on ESPORTS generated $5.6 million in unrealized profit in one week.
According to on-chain analytics firm Lookonchain, a trader created a new wallet one week ago and deposited $3.9 million into it. The trader then opened a 1x leveraged short position of 139.58 million ESPORTS tokens at an entry price of approximately $0.07, with a nominal value of around $9.44 million. As of now, the unrealized profit on this position has reached roughly $5.6 million.
2 minutes ago
Zhipu's stock drops more than 10%, retreating to HK$2,090.
According to market data, Hong Kong-listed Zhipu AI fell more than 10%, with its share price dropping back to HKD 2090.
2 minutes ago
trade.xyz launches SoftBank contract trading, supporting up to 10x leverage.
According to official announcements, trade.xyz has launched SoftBank contract trading, supporting a maximum leverage of 10x.
The Nikkei 225 Index has seen its decline widen to 5%.
According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index has extended its decline to 5%, with SoftBank and chip stocks plummeting.
2 minutes ago
Micron hits a record earnings high, pulls back 9.6%; a major bullish whale is less than $15 away from liquidation.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron (MU) — which rallied on the back of record earnings — pulled back sharply amid risk-off sentiment triggered by higher-than-expected PCE inflation. It fell roughly 9.6% from its overnight high of ~$1,255, saw intraday flash crashes, and extended losses in after-hours trading. On Hyperliquid, MU is currently trading at $1,128, down 6.9% in 24 hours. On-chain whales remain heavily bearish, with total short positions standing at ~$95.24 million, 1.76 times the long positions ($54.24 million). In terms of entry costs, the average long position price is ~$958.74, while short positions average ~$972.94. The current price remains above both levels, meaning longs are in profit and shorts are deeply underwater. As prices fall, long liquidation pressure has surged. The nearest long liquidation threshold has dropped to ~$1,114.21, just ~2.9% below the current price. This long whale (0x9e2c) holds a 5,000 MU long position with 10x leverage, worth ~$5.6 million at an average entry price of $1,215, with a liquidation price of $1,114 — less than $15 away from the current price. By contrast, the nearest short liquidation threshold is at $1,427.77, roughly 24.4% above the current price, making it relatively safe. The largest short position was opened at $774.99 with 10x leverage, worth ~$15.92 million and currently sitting on an unrealized loss of $5.17 million. - The HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permissions) to automatically sync on-chain updates.
2 minutes ago
Nikkei 225 index’s decline widened to 4.6%, with SoftBank and chip stocks plummeting.
According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index has widened its decline to 4.6%, with SoftBank and chip stocks falling sharply.
2 minutes ago
A trader’s 1x short position on ESPORTS generated $5.6 million in unrealized profit in one week.
According to on-chain analytics firm Lookonchain, a trader created a new wallet one week ago and deposited $3.9 million into it. The trader then opened a 1x leveraged short position of 139.58 million ESPORTS tokens at an entry price of approximately $0.07, with a nominal value of around $9.44 million. As of now, the unrealized profit on this position has reached roughly $5.6 million.
2 minutes ago
Zhipu's stock drops more than 10%, retreating to HK$2,090.
According to market data, Hong Kong-listed Zhipu AI fell more than 10%, with its share price dropping back to HKD 2090.
2 minutes ago
trade.xyz launches SoftBank contract trading, supporting up to 10x leverage.
According to official announcements, trade.xyz has launched SoftBank contract trading, supporting a maximum leverage of 10x.
Polkadot (DOT) is trading at $0.8758 on June 25, 2026 — below the $1.00 psychological support level for the first time in its modern history and approximately 98% below its all-time high of $54.87 reached in November 2021. The token that once ranked in the top 5 by market cap with a $50+ billion valuation now sits at #44 with a market cap of $1.48 billion. This page covers Polkadot’s complete price history, what drove the collapse, and what structural changes the project has made in 2026.
What Is Polkadot? Polkadot is a multi-chain blockchain network designed to solve one of crypto’s most fundamental problems: blockchains cannot communicate with each other natively. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana each operate as isolated silos. Polkadot connects them.
The network was designed by Dr. Gavin Wood — co-founder of Ethereum and author of the Ethereum Yellow Paper — and launched on mainnet in May 2020. It operates through two core architectural components. The Relay Chain is the central coordination layer that provides shared security, consensus, and cross-chain communication. Parachains are independent, application-specific blockchains that connect to the Relay Chain and inherit its security without needing to bootstrap their own validator sets.
This shared security model is Polkadot’s primary technical differentiator. A new blockchain launching as a Polkadot parachain receives the full security of the Relay Chain’s validator network from day one — something Cosmos chains and Avalanche subnets cannot offer, as they must secure themselves independently.
DOT is the native token of the Polkadot network. It serves three functions: governance (voting on network upgrades through OpenGov), staking (securing the Relay Chain with approximately 11% annual yield), and coretime bonding (purchasing blockspace under the Agile Coretime model, which replaced the old parachain slot auctions in 2024–2025).
The official Polkadot website and documentation are available at polkadot.network.
Critical update — March 2026 tokenomics reform: On March 12, 2026, Polkadot enacted runtime upgrade v2.1.0, fundamentally changing DOT’s economic model. Before this upgrade, DOT had an uncapped, inflationary supply issuing approximately 120 million DOT annually — roughly 7–10% inflation with no maximum. After the upgrade: total supply is now hard-capped at 2.1 billion DOT, issuance is cut by over 50%, and 80% of coretime sales revenue plus a portion of fees are burned from circulation. This transforms DOT from an inflationary utility token into a scarcer asset with a defined supply ceiling — one of the most significant tokenomics overhauls in Polkadot’s history.
Polkadot Price History 2020: Launch and Initial Listing Polkadot launched its mainnet in May 2020. DOT was initially priced at approximately $2.70 at its earliest exchange listings and ended 2020 at around $9.28 — a gain of roughly 200% in its first year. The initial rally was driven by strong developer interest, the prestige of Gavin Wood’s involvement, and early anticipation around the parachain auction model. During this period, Polkadot quickly entered the top 10 by market cap, establishing itself alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum as one of the most watched new Layer 0 protocols.
2021: All-Time High at $54.87 2021 was Polkadot’s defining year. The best year for DOT saw the average price reach $29.03 and the token hit its all-time high of $54.87 in November 2021. The rally was fueled by the successful launch of parachain auctions on Kusama — Polkadot’s canary network — in June 2021, followed by the first Polkadot mainnet parachain auction wins in November 2021, with Acala, Moonbeam, and Parallel Finance among the early winners. Retail enthusiasm for the parachain narrative drove DOT to a peak market cap exceeding $50 billion, ranking it among the top 5 cryptocurrencies globally.
The year closed at $26.70, down 51% from the November peak but still 188% above the 2020 year-end price.
2022: Bear Market Collapse In 2022, DOT entered a steep decline, falling from approximately $30 at the start of the year to below $10 by mid-year and stabilizing near $5 by year-end — a loss of roughly 83% over the calendar year. The collapse mirrored the broader crypto bear market driven by the Luna/UST crash in May 2022, the Three Arrows Capital insolvency in June, and the FTX collapse in November.
The parachain model came under significant criticism during this period. Projects that had won parachain slots by locking up millions of dollars in DOT saw those funds depreciate dramatically, while the two-year lock-up structure prevented capital reallocation. The model that had driven 2021’s euphoria became a structural headwind in the bear market.
2023: Consolidation Between $5 and $7 DOT spent most of 2023 consolidating between $5 and $7, closing the year at approximately $8.20 — a 90% gain over the 2022 close and one of the best calendar year performances in the post-crash period. Recovery was driven by improving macro sentiment following the Federal Reserve’s pause on rate hikes and renewed institutional interest in the broader crypto market. Early announcements of Polkadot’s transition away from the parachain slot auction model toward Agile Coretime gave the market a credible narrative catalyst heading into 2024.
2024: Brief Recovery to $10.40, Then Renewed Weakness DOT briefly recovered toward $10.40 in December 2024, riding the broader crypto rally that followed Bitcoin’s ETF approval and the post-halving momentum. However, DOT significantly underperformed relative to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana during the 2024–2025 bull cycle. While BTC reached an all-time high of $126,173 and ETH peaked at $4,951.66, DOT’s recovery was modest and short-lived. The year closed at approximately $6.63, down 19% from the January open of $11.85 — a stark underperformance that signalled a structural market discount was being applied to Polkadot’s architecture.
2025: Sustained Decline Through the Bull Cycle In 2025, DOT weakened considerably, falling from a January high of $7.98 to around $4.30 in March, then drifting below $4 through April and May. By June it dropped toward $3.30, briefly stabilized near $4.00–$4.30 from August to October, then fell to around $2.10 by late November and early December. The year closed at approximately $1.79 — down 73% from the January open.
2025 represented a defining divergence: Bitcoin and Ethereum made new all-time highs while DOT did not come close to its $54.87 peak. Active parachain counts were declining, developer activity was migrating toward Ethereum L2s and Solana, and the parachain slot auction model was broadly viewed as having failed to generate sustainable ecosystem growth. The market delivered a clear verdict.
2026: Sub-$1 Territory and Structural Reforms In 2026, DOT remained under pressure across every quarter. The token traded between $1.66 and $2.33 in January, fell to a cycle low near $0.84–$0.85 in the May–June selloff, and is currently trading at $0.8758 on June 25. This represents an approximately 98% drawdown from the $54.87 all-time high — a level that was once unthinkable for a top-5 asset.
However, 2026 has also brought the most significant structural reforms in Polkadot’s history:
March 2026 hard supply cap: Runtime upgrade v2.1.0 permanently capped DOT’s maximum supply at 2.1 billion tokens, cut issuance by 50%+, and introduced burn mechanics tied to coretime sales revenue.
Agile Coretime model: Replaced the parachain slot auction system with an on-demand blockspace market, dramatically lowering the cost for new developers to build on Polkadot. Over 150 new decentralized applications joined in Q1 2026.
21Shares TDOT ETF: The first regulated institutional vehicle for DOT exposure launched in 2026, with $11 million in initial AUM — providing infrastructure for institutional allocation to scale.
JAM protocol (roadmap): Polkadot’s next major architectural upgrade — replacing the Relay Chain with a general-purpose decentralized computation environment — is targeting Q3–Q4 2026 milestones on testnet.
Is Polkadot Dead in 2026? It’s the question every DOT holder is asking. The honest answer is: no, but the market has delivered a harsh verdict.
DOT is down approximately 98% from its all-time high and trading below $1.00 — a price level that would have seemed impossible during the 2021 bull cycle when Polkadot was a top-5 asset with a $50 billion market cap. The drop from #5 to #44 by market cap reflects a fundamental shift in how the market values interoperability infrastructure relative to high-throughput execution chains.
Three structural problems defined the 2022–2026 decline. First, the parachain slot auction model required projects to lock millions of dollars in DOT for two-year periods, pricing out smaller teams and generating artificial scarcity without proportional ecosystem growth. Second, Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem — Arbitrum, Optimism, Base — solved cross-chain communication within Ethereum’s liquidity-rich environment without requiring a separate relay chain, directly undermining Polkadot’s core value proposition. Third, Solana captured the developer narrative for high-speed execution, leaving DOT without a clear competitive identity in the 2024–2025 cycle.
The 2026 picture is structurally different. The March supply cap ended DOT’s inflationary headwind. Agile Coretime lowered barriers to building on Polkadot. The JAM protocol — if it delivers on Q3–Q4 milestones — represents the most ambitious pivot in Polkadot’s history, expanding the network beyond interoperability into general-purpose decentralized computation. Whether the market re-rates DOT on these fundamentals before year-end is the central question for current holders.
Where to Buy Polkadot (DOT) Binance — world’s largest exchange by volume, deep DOT/USDT liquidity, DOT staking available. Bybit — spot and perpetual DOT pairs with competitive fees. Coinbase — U.S.-regulated platform, DOT available for spot purchase with insured custody. Kraken — established 2011, DOT staking with competitive APY available on-platform. KuCoin — wide DOT trading pairs, good access to Polkadot parachain ecosystem tokens. Gate.io — broad parachain token selection including Moonbeam, Astar, and other DOT ecosystem assets. OKX — DOT derivatives and spot trading with Web3 wallet integration.
Frequently Asked Questions What is Polkadot (DOT)? Polkadot is a multi-chain Layer 0 blockchain network designed by Dr. Gavin Wood, co-founder of Ethereum, and launched on mainnet in May 2020. It connects independent blockchains called parachains through a central Relay Chain that provides shared security and cross-chain communication. DOT is the native token used for governance, staking with approximately 11% annual yield, and purchasing blockspace under the Agile Coretime model. As of March 2026, DOT's maximum supply is hard-capped at 2.1 billion tokens following the v2.1.0 tokenomics upgrade. More information is available at polkadot.network.
What is Polkadot's all-time high? Polkadot's all-time high is $54.87, reached in November 2021 during the parachain auction launch period. As of June 25, 2026, DOT trades at approximately $0.88 — around 98% below that record. The 2026 cycle low is approximately $0.84, reached during the May–June 2026 broad crypto market selloff alongside Bitcoin's retest of its $59,102 cycle low.
Why has Polkadot dropped so much from its all-time high? DOT's 98% decline from its 2021 peak reflects three structural problems. The parachain slot auction model locked up millions of dollars in DOT without generating proportional ecosystem growth. Ethereum's Layer 2 ecosystem addressed cross-chain communication within Ethereum's existing liquidity base, reducing demand for a separate relay chain. And Solana captured developer mindshare for high-throughput execution, leaving Polkadot without a clear competitive identity during the 2024–2025 bull cycle. DOT underperformed Bitcoin and Ethereum significantly through both the 2022 bear market and the 2024–2025 bull cycle.
What changed in Polkadot's tokenomics in 2026? On March 12, 2026, Polkadot enacted runtime upgrade v2.1.0, permanently capping DOT's maximum supply at 2.1 billion tokens. Before this change, DOT had unlimited inflation issuing approximately 120 million new tokens annually at a 7–10% rate. The upgrade cut issuance by over 50% and introduced burn mechanics: 80% of coretime sales revenue plus a portion of network fees are now removed from circulation. This was the most significant tokenomics change in Polkadot's history and represents the first time DOT's supply trajectory has reversed direction.
What is the JAM protocol and why does it matter for DOT? JAM — Join Accumulate Machine — is Polkadot's next major architectural upgrade, designed to replace the Relay Chain with a general-purpose decentralized computation environment. Rather than simply connecting blockchains, JAM expands Polkadot's capabilities to support arbitrary computation, positioning the network as infrastructure for AI agents, ZK proofs, and applications beyond standard DeFi. JAM is targeting Q3–Q4 2026 milestones on testnet. Progress toward those deliverables is the primary near-term price catalyst for DOT and the clearest measure of whether Polkadot can differentiate itself in the next market cycle.
Spark is migrating $150 million of stablecoin liquidity to Uniswap v4 as the first phase of a shared exchange layer for multiple issuers.
The deployment brings together USDS, USDT, and PYUSD liquidity under Spark’s orchestration framework, which the protocol calls one of DeFi’s largest AMM liquidity migrations.
Spark manages the coordination layer, while Uniswap v4 provides the programmable infrastructure that governs trade execution.
Stablecoin Issuance is Accelerating Beyond Crypto-Native Firms The initiative arrives as traditional finance companies rapidly expand into stablecoin issuance and distribution across payments, payroll, and treasury operations. PayPal has launched PYUSD, Ripple introduced RLUSD, and firms including Robinhood, Revolut, and Deel are actively developing competing products.
Stablecoins processed more than $28 trillion in adjusted economic volume during 2025, reflecting 133% compound annual growth since 2023, according to Chainalysis. Separately, Bloomberg Intelligence projects that annual stablecoin payment flows could reach $56.6 trillion by 2030, driven by institutional adoption.
Every new issuer currently faces the same structural problem: bootstrapping liquidity, sourcing market makers, and managing inventory independently across venues. Spark’s collaboration with Uniswap targets that fragmentation directly through a custom DualPool hook deployed on Uniswap v4.
The hook enables idle pool capital to be directed toward approved yield strategies when not required for trade execution. Uniswap’s infrastructure has processed more than $4.4 trillion in cumulative trading volume with no security breaches, according to the announcement.
Spark Ceo Frames The Play as Infrastructure “The next generation of stablecoins won’t be defined by who can issue another digital dollar,” Sam MacPherson, CEO of Spark, said in the announcement. “It will be defined by the infrastructure that allows hundreds of issuers to operate together at a global scale.”
MacPherson’s framing positions Spark as a backend service provider rather than a competing stablecoin issuer entering a crowded market.
For banks and fintechs weighing their own stablecoin launches, the value proposition is operational simplicity over infrastructure ownership. The protocol wants institutions to connect to existing liquidity rails rather than build and maintain their own from the ground up.
Analysis: The FX Parallel Reveals The Real Strategic Bet The structural wager is that the proliferation of stablecoins will create the same coordination problem that traditional foreign exchange markets solved decades ago.
As dozens of fiat-backed tokens enter circulation from banks, fintechs, and payment processors, the market will require shared clearing infrastructure. Spark is betting it can become the routing layer on decentralized rails, enabling USDS, USDT, and PYUSD to function as interchangeable settlement assets.
Individual currencies remain distinct in traditional FX, but a shared infrastructure layer makes conversion seamless and liquid. If institutional issuance accelerates at projected rates, the protocol that controls liquidity routing could capture outsized value without issuing a stablecoin.
Uniswap Says Its Pools Already Dominate Stablecoin Swaps Hayden Adams, founder of Uniswap, noted that the protocol’s liquidity already powers approximately 60% of stable-to-stable trading volume across supported chains. Adams confirmed the DualPool hook enables assets sitting in AMM pools to earn additional yield while awaiting trade execution, further improving capital efficiency.
What’s Next? The initial deployment covers three stablecoins, but Spark has designed its orchestration framework to onboard additional issuers as they enter the market. As banks and payment providers launch live stablecoin products, the liquidity layer’s scale will test whether shared DeFi infrastructure can meet institutional demand.
Spark announced DualPool, a new hook made in collaboration with Uniswap that keeps idle LP capital earning yield.
Listen
0
0:00 0:00
Subscribe to Bankless or sign in
Spark has migrated $150M of its stablecoin liquidity to Uniswap v4 in one of the largest AMM liquidity migrations in DeFi history. The move will let Spark capitalize on its new programmable hook called DualPool, which is designed to keep idle stablecoin inventory earning yield between swaps.
What's the Scoop?The big idea: Spark is positioning this release as the foundation of a "Stablecoin FX Layer," i.e. shared liquidity infrastructure for a world where 100s of stablecoins from banks, fintechs, and beyond all need their own market depth. The initial deployment covers USDS, USDT, and PYUSD liquidity, with USDS as the primary quoting asset.The DualPool : DualPool parks liquidity in Spark's ERC-4626 yield vaults between swaps, then pulls exactly the capital needed into a concentrated liquidity position at the moment a trade arrives before returning it to the vault in the same block once the swap settles. For swappers the experience is identical to any normal Uniswap pool, but for LPs, the same capital does two jobs simultaneously.Why now: Stablecoin issuance is accelerating across TradFi. PayPal, Revolut, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, and major European and Japanese banking consortiums are all building around stablecoins in various capacities. The argument Spark is making is that the industry's issuance problem is largely solved, and solving the coordination and liquidity problem is what comes next. Their answer is shared programmable infra.
0
Written by Bankless
778 Articles • View all
It’s time to break up with your bank, and join the movement for a better world.
Uniswap received $150 million in stablecoin liquidity from Spark, with the assets set to transition to DualPool, a new custom liquidity hook, according to an announcement on Thursday.
Under the new setup, liquidity providers will be able to earn swap fees while their underlying assets continue generating yield, eliminating the need to choose between the two.
USDS will serve as the initial quoting asset for DualPool, with support for USDT and PYUSD liquidity expected under Spark's coordination framework. The integration is intended to deepen stablecoin liquidity on Uniswap v4 and reduce slippage for traders.
Uniswap expands product suite with token launch infrastructureUniswap Labs has also launched a no-code token auction tool within the Uniswap Web App, allowing projects to create and distribute tokens through onchain auctions without deploying custom smart contracts, according to a statement on Wednesday.
The feature introduces a self-service interface that enables teams to either import an existing token or create a new one and launch token sales directly from the platform.
Auctions will be available in a dedicated section of the Uniswap Web App, the Auctions tab, where participants can submit bids and track activity in real time.
The launch expands Uniswap's product suite beyond decentralized trading and positions the protocol to compete more directly in the token launch market, where platforms such as Pump.fun have dominated in recent years.
CCA model powers onchain price discoveryUniswap’s latest platform is powered by Continuous Clearing Auctions (CCA), a mechanism designed to facilitate transparent and permissionless token distributions through onchain price discovery.
Unlike fixed-price sales or allocation-based launches, CCA continuously clears bids onchain, allowing token prices to adjust according to market demand throughout the auction process. According to Uniswap Labs, the design reduces opportunities for sniping and manipulation while ensuring all successful participants receive tokens at the same final clearing price.
Following an auction's completion, proceeds are automatically used to seed liquidity in Uniswap v4 pools, eliminating the need for projects to manually establish secondary-market liquidity.
The feature is currently available across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and Unichain. Projects can also configure advanced settings, including custom liquidity ranges, treasury allocations, participant verification requirements and other launch parameters.
Uniswap Labs highlighted previous deployments of the CCA framework, including Aztec's November token sale, which raised approximately $59 million from more than 17,000 participants.
The CCA contracts have also been reviewed by seven independent auditing firms, including OpenZeppelin and Spearbit, according to the statement.
UNI is trading at $2.85, up 1% over the past 24 hours at the time of writing.
TLDR: Uniswap’s no-code tool lets teams launch onchain token auctions from a browser in four simple steps. The Continuous Clearing Auction spreads bids across blocks, removing bot sniping and last-second advantages. Aztec’s CCA raised $59M from 17,000 bidders across 191 countries, clearing 60% above its floor price. Cap Labs’ $CAP auction closed 5.5x oversubscribed at a $106M FDV, pulling in $16.4M in commitments. Uniswap has rolled out a no-code token auction tool within its Web App, enabling teams to configure and run onchain token sales directly from a browser.
The feature is built on Uniswap’s Continuous Clearing Auction mechanism, which processes bids across multiple blocks.
All winning bidders pay the same final clearing price. The move positions Uniswap as a direct competitor to platforms like Pump.fun in the token-launch market.
How the Continuous Clearing Auction Works The Continuous Clearing Auction conducts price discovery entirely onchain without resolving in a single block. Bids accumulate over multiple blocks, each clearing at a price carried forward from the previous one. This structure removes the speed advantage that typically favors bots and last-second snipers.
Bidders set a total budget and a maximum price per token during the process. Tokens are distributed to participants whose bids remain competitive as each block clears. Every successful bidder pays the same final clearing price at the end of the auction.
Uniswap previously described the CCA mechanics through a post on Aztec’s token sale. That auction raised $59 million from 17,000 bidders across 191 countries. It cleared at a price 60% above Aztec’s floor, demonstrating strong demand discovery through the mechanism.
Uniswap Launches No-Code Token Auction Tool in Challenge to Pumpfun
Uniswap, one of DeFi’s largest decentralized exchange protocols, has launched a no-code token auction tool in its Web App, allowing projects to configure and run onchain token sales directly from a browser. The… pic.twitter.com/udagBBlCzP
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) June 25, 2026
Once a CCA closes, liquidity routes automatically into a Uniswap pool. Projects therefore get both price discovery and a bootstrapped trading pair from a single workflow. This end-to-end flow reduces the technical steps teams previously needed to manage separately.
Track Record and What the Tool Offers Teams The CCA mechanism already has a verified track record before the no-code interface launched. Cap Labs’ $CAP auction drew 1,002 unique bids and closed 5.5x oversubscribed. It cleared at a $106 million fully diluted valuation, pulling in $16.4 million in total commitments.
STRATO also ran a CCA that became the fourth largest in Uniswap’s history. Both auctions ran before Uniswap made the no-code setup available to teams. The results show the mechanism can attract meaningful participation even without simplified tooling.
The no-code flow now guides teams through four steps: adding token information, configuring the auction, customizing the liquidity pool, and launching.
Uniswap posted a walkthrough of the setup sequence on Wednesday. A dedicated @UniswapAuctions account also tracks live auctions and outcomes in real time.
The tool lowers the barrier for projects that previously needed developer resources to run token launches. Teams can now manage the entire process from a browser with no code required.
As token launch competition grows, Uniswap’s onchain-native approach offers a structured alternative to existing platforms.
Uniswap Labs has unveiled a groundbreaking auction tool on its web application, allowing projects to launch token sales directly on-chain without writing a single line of code. This no-code solution empowers teams to raise funds with ease, streamlining the process for those who lack technical expertise.
Seamless token launches from your browserThe tool features an intuitive, guided setup workflow. Project teams simply input token details, configure auction parameters, customize liquidity pools, and can launch their token sales all from within their browser. By eliminating the need to build custom infrastructure, Uniswap brings together token issuance and initial liquidity provisioning into one seamless experience.
Uniswap Labs emphasizes that their new tool simplifies direct on-chain token sales and introduces a single-price auction system designed to counter last-second trades often executed by bots.
Upon the conclusion of a sale, liquidity is transferred automatically into a dedicated Uniswap pool. This integration enables projects to establish both a trading pair and initial price discovery within the same system. With this move, Uniswap extends its reach beyond just decentralized exchange services, strengthening its position as a key player in token launches.
How the auction mechanism worksThis new feature is powered by Uniswap’s Continuous Clearing Auction mechanism. Participants specify both their total budget and the maximum price they are willing to pay per token. Rather than settling all bids in a single block, offers are processed over multiple blocks, and allocations are determined according to the bid prices entered by eligible participants.
Mini glossary: A Continuous Clearing Auction processes bids over a set time window rather than all at once. All successful participants transact at the final clearing price established at the end of the auction.
At the close of each auction, all winning buyers pay the same final clearing price. Uniswap notes that spreading bids out over time helps mitigate the risks posed by bots and opportunistic last-second transactions.
Participants lock in their maximum price and budget up front, and once the sale ends, all winners purchase at the same closing price.
Record-breaking sales draw attentionUniswap highlighted a previous example with the Aztec token sale, where the model was put to the test. That event drew 17,000 participants across 191 countries, raising an impressive $59 million. Notably, the final sale price came in well above the minimum threshold set by the organizers.
Other high-profile auctions on Uniswap have seen massive demand. For example, Cap Labs’ $CAP token sale secured 1,002 unique bids with demand exceeding supply by 5.5 times, resulting in a fully diluted value of $106 million and $16.4 million in total commitments. The recent STRATO token sale, leveraging the Continuous Clearing Auction, was the fourth-largest auction in Uniswap’s history.
SaleKey metricsOutcomeAztec17,000 bids, 191 countries$59 million raised$CAP1,002 unique bids, 5.5x oversubscribed$16.4 million committed, $106 million FDVSTRATOUsed Continuous Clearing AuctionFourth-largest auction in Uniswap’s historyCompetition in token launches heats upBy rolling out this browser-based, no-code system, Uniswap is stepping up its rivalry with other token launch platforms. The tool is specifically designed to lower technical hurdles for smaller teams and broaden access to price discovery through wider community participation.
Industry observers believe this step could reshape token issuance processes across DeFi, prompting competing platforms to develop similar user-friendly, no-code auction systems in response.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Avalanche (AVAX) trades above $6.50 at the time of writing on Thursday, extending its recovery and gaining nearly 7% so far this week. The rebound is supported by improving conditions in the derivatives market despite muted institutional demand. On the technical side, improving momentum indicators suggest a potential continuation of AVAX's recovery.
Derivatives data show improving sentimentDerivatives data for AVAX shows improving sentiment. CoinGlass funding rate for AVAX turned positive on Wednesday, reading 0.0015% on Thursday, indicating that longs are paying shorts and suggesting bullish sentiment.
Avalanche funding rates chart. Source: CoinglassIn addition, the long-to-short ratio improved to 0.97 on Thursday from 0.77 on Monday, indicating that bearish positioning has started to ease. However, the ratio remains below the bullish threshold of 1; the improvement suggests fading bearish sentiment and weakening downside pressure.
AVAX long-to-short ratio chart. Source: CoinglassDespite improving sentiment, institutional demand remains subdued. SoSoValue data shows that AVAX’s spot Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have remained largely silent since June 11, indicating a lack of meaningful institutional demand. The muted ETF demand suggests that the current recovery is mostly being driven by the derivatives traders.
Total AVAX spot ETF net inflow daily chart. Source: SoSoValueSome signs of optimismCryptoQuant’s summary data shows mild bullish sentiment. AVAX’s spot and futures markets show large whales' orders with neutral conditions in other metrics, supporting a potential recovery.
Avalanche Price Forecast: Momentum indicators show fading bearish strength Avalanche price trades at $6.54 on Thursday, extending its recovery nearly 7% so far this week. However, AVAX maintains a bearish bias as price remains well below the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs) at $7.65, $8.61, and $10.74, respectively.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) has crossed into positive territory, and its histogram is expanding, hinting at improving short-term momentum. However, this has yet to challenge the dominant overhead structure, and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at about 40 still reflects only a modest recovery from oversold conditions.
On the topside, initial resistance is aligned at the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the latest swing at $6.82, with the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level at $7.52 and the 50-day EMA at $7.65 forming the next cap. Above that, the 50% retracement at $8.09, the horizontal barrier at $8.24, and the 100-day EMA clustered with the 61.8% retracement around $8.61–$8.65 create a dense supply zone ahead of $9.46 and the broader ceiling near $10.48–$10.75.
On the downside, the only nearby structural support emerges at the yearly low at $5.68, where buyers would be expected to defend the current bearish leg if selling pressure resumes.
(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool.)
Ecuador coach Sebastián Beccacece has rallied his squad ahead of a must-win Group E clash against Germany on June 25, signaling that La Tri intends to fight for survival at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. But the real story playing out at MetLife Stadium isn’t just about goals and group-stage arithmetic. It’s about crypto’s most visible mainstream audition in years.
Kraken officially became FIFA’s Official Crypto Exchange Supporter on June 9, with activation kicking off the very next day. Meanwhile, Avalanche is powering the tournament’s official NFT collectibles, and Chiliz-based fan tokens are giving supporters new ways to engage with their national teams.
The crypto infrastructure behind the tournament Kraken’s role as the Official Crypto Exchange Supporter suggests a deeper integration into the fan experience beyond simple logo placement. It’s a partnership designed to funnel World Cup audiences toward actual crypto products and services.
Advertisement
Avalanche’s role is even more technically interesting. The Layer 1 blockchain is the engine behind the tournament’s official NFT collectibles, marking the first time a major crypto exchange’s technology stack has been woven into FIFA’s digital memorabilia program.
Then there’s Chiliz, the blockchain purpose-built for fan engagement tokens. A World Cup deployment represents the largest possible proving ground for fan tokens, and if they gain traction during the tournament, Chiliz stands to benefit from both transaction volume and narrative momentum.
Ecuador’s do-or-die moment adds drama The Argentine coach, appointed on August 1, 2024, successfully guided Ecuador to its fifth World Cup qualification, a milestone that cemented his credibility with the federation and fanbase alike.
Facing Germany in a match where Ecuador likely needs a result to advance from Group E, Beccacece has projected confidence. The subtext is clear: lose, and La Tri’s tournament is effectively over.
What this means for investors Trading volume in AVAX, CHZ (the Chiliz token), and related fan tokens could see noticeable spikes on major match days. Speculative trading around match outcomes and collectible drops could amplify short-term price movements.
Kraken’s visibility as the tournament’s official crypto exchange partner could translate into meaningful user acquisition numbers. Being associated with the World Cup gives Kraken a differentiation angle that competitors like Coinbase and Binance simply don’t have right now.
FIFA’s willingness to partner with crypto entities signals continued institutional comfort with the industry. Having the world’s most powerful sports organization embrace crypto exchanges and blockchain-powered collectibles sends a message to other major institutions sitting on the fence.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
TLDR:What Is STRC and Why Are Investors Comparing It to LUNA?Why STRC Is Not LUNA and What the Slide Means for StrategyGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks STRC has dropped to $76.20, approximately 25% below its $100 par value, alarming income-focused investors. Strategy owes $1.2 billion annually in STRC dividends but holds only $1.4 billion in USD reserves currently. Unlike Terra LUNA, Saylor faces no forced liquidation if STRC falls, as dividends remain legally discretionary. A sustained STRC discount could weaken MSTR demand over time, quietly slowing Strategy’s Bitcoin accumulation pace. Is STRC the next LUNA? That question is circulating across crypto social media after Strategy’s preferred stock dropped to approximately $76.20, roughly 25% below its $100 par value.
On-chain intelligence firm Arkham has weighed in with a detailed breakdown, drawing both parallels and sharp distinctions between the two instruments.
With $1.2 billion in annual dividend obligations and $1.4 billion in reserves, the math is tight, and markets are paying close attention.
What Is STRC and Why Are Investors Comparing It to LUNA? STRC is a Nasdaq-listed perpetual preferred stock carrying a $100 stated par value. It launched in July 2025 at a 9% annual dividend rate, which Strategy has since raised seven consecutive times to 11.50% as of June 2026.
That rising yield mirrors the dynamic that drew retail investors into Terra’s Anchor protocol before its collapse. STRC also pays an 11.5% annual dividend, a yield that echoes the 20% return Terra’s Anchor protocol advertised before it imploded.
According to Arkham, there are 104.89 million STRC shares outstanding. At 11.5% on a $100 par value, Strategy owes approximately $1.2 billion per year to maintain those dividends. The firm held $1.4 billion in USD reserves as of earlier this week, leaving a thin buffer.
IS STRC THE NEXT LUNA?
Short answer – not quite.
STRC has depegged. It’s down to $76.2, approximately 25% below par. Michael Saylor has $1.4 Billion to pay STRC dividends, but will he be able to keep the stock alive? Here’s our breakdown: pic.twitter.com/bMDzGWEHMW
— Arkham (@arkham) June 25, 2026
The preferred stock fell to an intraday low of $82.53 last week, its deepest drawdown since launch, reviving comparisons on social media to Terra’s UST stablecoin collapse in 2022. A high yield and a price drifting below its target were enough to trigger that memory across crypto circles.
A hawkish Federal Reserve pivot on June 17, with nine of 18 FOMC officials projecting at least one rate increase in 2026, added further pressure on both Bitcoin and the income-oriented buyers STRC targets. That macro backdrop accelerated the selling.
Why STRC Is Not LUNA and What the Slide Means for Strategy The structural differences between STRC and Terra LUNA are where the comparison breaks down. Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer described STRC as “not a stablecoin,” characterizing the selloff as a market-driven reset of required yield rather than a depeg, noting that something never pegged cannot technically depeg.
Terra UST maintained a programmatic $1 peg enforced by algorithmic minting and burning of LUNA tokens, a mechanism STRC simply does not have.
Arkham noted that Saylor is not legally required to pay STRC dividends at any point. Unlike Terra’s design, there is no forced liquidation triggered by a price drop.
The market price of STRC reflects investor confidence in Strategy’s willingness and capacity to keep paying, nothing more.
Strategy’s legacy software business generates roughly $477 million in annual revenue against more than $1.2 billion in preferred-dividend obligations, a gap funded almost entirely by capital markets activity rather than operations. That structural mismatch is the real concern, not a death spiral.
A sustained discount still forces difficult choices on Strategy: richer preferred terms, more equity issuance, or drawing on the Bitcoin reserve itself.
Arkham warned that if MSTR investors begin to recognize their capital is being recycled into dividend payments for earlier preferred shareholders, demand for MSTR shares could soften over time, gradually constraining the firm’s broader Bitcoin accumulation engine.
PANews June 26 news, according to Arkham analysis, Strategy’s STRC perpetual preferred stock has de-pegged, falling about 25% from its face value to $76.2, with an annual dividend yield of 11.5%, requiring approximately $1.2 billion in dividend payments each year. Arkham stressed that Strategy is not legally obligated to pay these dividends, and if the company runs into trouble, STRC shareholders would not need to be prioritized. Unlike Terra LUNA, a decline in STRC’s price does not trigger liquidations; its price only reflects market concerns about Strategy’s ability to pay dividends and raise funds in the future. The current drop stems from investor doubts about the sustainability of dividend payments, rather than structural collapse risk. Arkham believes this will not directly bring down the company, but it could erode investor confidence over the long term — if the market perceives that new financing is only being used to repay old shareholders, future fundraising ability will be weakened.
Tokenized stocks trading on Solana hit $4.9 billion in volume during the first half of 2026, a sixfold increase from the $775 million recorded in the back half of 2025. The market cap for these on-chain equities reached $539 million by June, cementing Solana’s position as the dominant blockchain for a financial product category that barely existed 18 months ago.
The numbers behind Solana’s dominance The blockchain consistently accounts for more than 95% of cross-chain tokenized equity volume. During one week in mid-June, Solana processed $1.298 billion in tokenized stock trades, representing 95% of the global total for that period alone.
May 2026 was particularly notable. Cross-chain tokenized stock trading volume hit a record $5.3 billion that month, a 44% jump from April. And by June 23, Solana’s cumulative transfer volume for tokenized equities had crossed $10 billion.
Advertisement
The chain’s structural advantages help explain why traders keep choosing it. Low transaction fees, high throughput, and a mature DeFi ecosystem make it the path of least resistance for platforms looking to bring traditional equities on-chain.
SpaceX shares lit the fuse The single biggest catalyst for this explosion in volume has a familiar name: SpaceX.
Following the company’s initial public offering, demand for tokenized SpaceX shares went vertical. During peak periods after the IPO, Solana captured up to 99% of related volume.
Tokenized stocks first emerged as a distinct digital asset class around mid-2025, offering on-chain access to both publicly traded equities and pre-IPO shares. Several platforms attempted tokenized securities on Ethereum years ago, but high gas fees and slow throughput limited adoption. Solana’s architecture solved both problems simultaneously.
What this means for investors A $539 million market cap for tokenized stocks is still a rounding error compared to the trillions sitting in conventional equity markets. But the growth rate is the signal, not the absolute number. Six-times growth in six months, if it continues at even a fraction of that pace, starts to represent meaningful market share.
Solana’s 95%-plus market share is extraordinary for any blockchain-based product category. What remains is regulatory clarity, which varies significantly by jurisdiction and remains the primary wildcard for the sector’s trajectory.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Somewhere between nostalgia for holographic Charizards and the relentless financialization of everything, a billion-dollar market was born. Solana’s onchain trading card game ecosystem has crossed $1 billion in cumulative trading volume, with over 10 billion cards printed across the network’s tokenized collectibles platforms.
The milestone was driven primarily by Collector Crypt, a platform that vaults real graded trading cards and lets users buy packs, reveal cards, trade tokenized assets, and redeem physical copies. The platform alone hit roughly $1.05 billion in cumulative transaction volume by May 20, 2026, approximately 18 months after launching its gacha mechanics in December 2024.
How a gacha mechanic turned cards into a crypto category Gacha spending on Solana hit $230 million in May 2026 alone, setting a new all-time record. The prior month wasn’t exactly quiet either, with April 2026 clocking $184 million in monthly gacha spend.
Advertisement
Collector Crypt set another record in June 2026: 215,000 tokenized TCG packs opened in a single week. That’s roughly one pack opened every 2.8 seconds for seven straight days.
The platform has also facilitated around 50,000 physical card redemptions and shipments over its 18-month lifespan.
Solana’s quiet dominance in tokenized collectibles Solana has captured 63-64% of global onchain trading card game volume.
Broader onchain TCG trading volumes on Solana reached roughly $20 million weekly by mid-2025 and continued climbing into 2026. Protocol revenue for Collector Crypt alone crossed $50 million by June 2026.
A partnership with Solflare wallet in June 2026 added another growth vector, enabling in-wallet pack openings.
What this means for investors The current trajectory, with monthly gacha spend growing from $184 million in April to $230 million in May, suggests the market hasn’t hit saturation yet.
The $CARDS token, associated with Collector Crypt, has appreciated significantly alongside the platform’s activity growth.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
The Kazakhstan Stock Exchange just became the first in Central Asia to list US-based cryptocurrency ETFs. On June 19, KASE admitted two digital asset funds under its KASE Global framework: the Volatility Shares Solana ETF (SOLZ_KZ) and BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA_KZ).
What’s actually being listed SOLZ_KZ, the Solana fund from Volatility Shares, does not hold SOL directly. Instead, it gains exposure through futures contracts listed on the CME, along with cash equivalents. The net expense ratio sits at 0.95%, set to hold through June 30, 2026. As of June 18, SOLZ_KZ had roughly $80 million in assets under management.
On the Ethereum side, ETHA_KZ is BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF, carrying a leaner management fee of 0.25%.
Advertisement
Investment Company Standard JSC initiated the listing process for both products on KASE, acting as the bridge between US-based fund issuers and the Kazakh exchange infrastructure.
Kazakhstan’s crypto strategy has been building for a while In December 2025, KASE and the Solana Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding to collaborate on digital assets. That partnership directly facilitated KASE’s registration as Kazakhstan’s first digital asset platform operator, which became effective around mid-2026.
And even before KASE got into the game, the Astana International Exchange had already made waves. In September 2025, Fonte Capital launched what it described as the world’s first spot Solana ETF with staking on AIX. That product represented a different approach entirely, holding actual SOL tokens and generating staking yield, compared to the futures-based structure that SOLZ_KZ uses on KASE.
What this means for investors The immediate practical impact is straightforward: qualified investors in Kazakhstan can now gain exposure to Solana and Ethereum through their existing brokerage accounts on KASE. No need to set up a crypto wallet, manage private keys, or navigate the often-chaotic world of decentralized exchanges.
The fee structures also deserve attention. SOLZ_KZ’s 0.95% expense ratio is notably higher than ETHA_KZ’s 0.25%, reflecting the additional complexity and cost of managing a futures-based strategy. Futures-based funds can suffer from roll costs and tracking errors that eat into returns over time, a consideration that becomes more important the longer you hold.
For the Solana ecosystem specifically, having both a spot ETF with staking on AIX and a futures-based ETF on KASE operating in the same country represents a level of product diversity that most Western markets haven’t yet achieved. The $80 million in AUM for SOLZ_KZ is modest by US standards, but as a proof of concept for regulated crypto products in Central Asia, it’s the kind of number that tends to grow once institutional allocators see that the infrastructure actually works.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Collector Crypt hits $1 billion in volume, out-earns Pump.fun@Collector_Crypt, a @solana-based platform that vaults professionally graded physical trading cards and tokenizes them as redeemable NFTs, has crossed $1 billion in cumulative trading volume and over $50 million in cumulative revenue, according to data from DeFiLlama. The revenue milestone puts it ahead of some of the most well-known applications in the Solana ecosystem, including Pump.fun, the memecoin launchpad that dominated Solana headlines for months.
The platform uses a gacha system, a randomized pack-opening mechanic borrowed from mobile gaming, where users purchase digital packs containing tokenized versions of real graded cards, with each NFT mapped to a specific physical card graded by companies like PSA. Once a pack is opened, holders can trade the card instantly on-chain, sell it back through the platform's buyback system, or redeem the physical card and have it shipped to them. More than 30% of users have actually redeemed physical cards from the vaults.
Collector Crypt posted a record $1.06 million in daily revenue this month, overtaking Pump.fun on a single-day basis for the first time. The daily active user count has climbed to approximately 40,000, a figure that received a significant boost after the platform integrated with the Solflare wallet, driving a 129% week-over-week increase in fees.
A $230M market, with Solana taking the lion's shareThe tokenized trading card market posted its strongest month on record in May 2026. The top seven platforms generated $230 million in gacha-based pack sales, up from $32 million a year earlier, a sevenfold increase, with Solana accounting for approximately 64% of total volume, according to a Decrypt investigation. Solana's low transaction fees and fast settlement make it well-suited to high-frequency collectible trading.
Collector Crypt competes in the tokenized collectibles space alongside @Courtyard_io and @phygitals, both of which have built similar physical-to-digital redemption models on-chain. Phygitals has established itself as a major player in the category, recording nearly $149 million in cumulative gacha spending and more than $290 million in marketplace transaction volume.
The rapid growth has also drawn regulatory scrutiny. The biggest risk may be regulatory. Randomized pack mechanics with real monetary value sit in an uncomfortable gray zone between gaming, gambling, and securities. Multiple jurisdictions have already cracked down on loot boxes in traditional gaming, and a platform that sells randomized packs of tokenized assets for crypto could attract regulatory attention. Regulatory treatment of randomized pack mechanics varies by jurisdiction and has not been resolved for tokenized versions of the model. Collector Crypt operates with physical asset backing and a redemption pathway, which distinguishes it from purely digital loot boxes, but the regulatory question remains open.
Collector Crypt's performance matters beyond its own revenue line because it validates a category. Tokenized real-world assets have mostly been discussed in the context of treasury bills and real estate. The idea that physical collectibles could be an equally viable RWA vertical is gaining credibility with every record Collector Crypt sets.
Sources:
Collector Crypt hits $1B in trading volume and $50M revenue on Solana (Crypto Briefing)
Tokenized TCG Market Hits $230M in May, Solana Leads With 64% (Solana Compass)
Gacha Sports Launches on Solana as Collector Crypt Tops Pump.fun in Daily Revenue (Genfinity)
Tokenized stocks trading on Solana reached $553 million in daily volume on June 24, marking a new all-time high for the category. These are tokenized versions of actual equities, trading on a blockchain, at volumes that would make some small-cap stock exchanges jealous.
The milestone caps off a stretch where Solana has quietly, then not so quietly, become the dominant venue for on-chain equity trading. During the week of June 15-21, Solana captured roughly 95-98% of all tokenized equity spot trading volume globally, with weekly volume hitting $1.298 billion.
The category has now reached $10 billion in cumulative transfer volume, and Solana is running the table.
What’s actually driving the volume The biggest name in this space right now is Backpack, which offers tokenized shares of companies including SpaceX through its SPCX token. On certain peak days, SPCX alone has exceeded $100 million in trading volume.
SpaceX is a particularly interesting case study here. It’s one of the most sought-after private companies on Earth, and traditional retail investors have essentially zero access to its shares. Tokenization changes that equation entirely, offering fractional ownership of an asset that was previously locked behind private market gates.
Advertisement
Sunrise DeFi is another platform contributing to the momentum, and together these protocols are building out the infrastructure that makes 24/7 trading and DeFi integration possible. In English: you can trade a tokenized stock at 2 AM on a Sunday and potentially use it as collateral in a lending protocol.
The monthly volume across all chains for tokenized equities hit a record $5.3 billion in May 2026. Solana’s share of that pie has only grown since, suggesting June will comfortably surpass the previous month’s record.
Why Solana, and why now Solana’s dominance in this category isn’t accidental. The chain’s low transaction costs and high throughput make it naturally suited for the kind of frequent, smaller-sized trades that characterize retail equity participation. If you’re buying $50 worth of a tokenized stock, paying $15 in gas fees on Ethereum makes the trade economically absurd. On Solana, that friction essentially disappears.
Fractional ownership removes the barrier of high share prices. Round-the-clock trading removes the constraint of market hours. DeFi composability adds utility that a brokerage account simply doesn’t provide.
Unique wallets holding tokenized stocks on Solana have increased dramatically in recent periods, suggesting that the volume surge isn’t just a handful of whales churning positions. It reflects genuine broadening of the user base.
What this means for investors The $553 million daily volume figure matters because it represents a threshold. Tokenized equities on Solana are approaching volumes that demand attention from both traditional finance and crypto-native investors.
For the Solana ecosystem specifically, this is a significant narrative shift. The chain has spent much of the past two years associated with memecoin speculation and high-velocity token launches. Tokenized stocks represent the opposite end of the spectrum: real-world assets, relatively stable value propositions, and use cases that traditional investors can immediately understand.
There are real risks to watch. Regulatory clarity around tokenized securities remains a work in progress across most jurisdictions. The question of what legal rights a tokenized stock actually confers versus holding a share through a traditional transfer agent is not fully settled.
The concentration risk is also worth noting. When one chain handles 95-98% of a category’s volume, any Solana-specific issue becomes a systemic risk for the entire tokenized equity market. Diversification across chains hasn’t happened yet, and until it does, this remains a single point of failure that sophisticated investors should factor into their positioning.
Cumulative volume crossing $10 billion, monthly records being broken in consecutive months, and wallet counts expanding all point in one direction. Tokenized equities are transitioning from a niche crypto experiment to a genuine alternative market structure, and Solana is the venue where that transition is playing out in real time.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Solana has found stability in the 55 to 70 dollar support zone following its recent pullback, with current price action matching the levels where previous rebounds have started. According to analysts, this corridor is crucial; a return above 100 dollars could set the stage for a broader market recovery for SOL.
A key threshold in the multi-year formationOn weekly charts, Solana has been trading near the lower boundary of a broadening formation that has developed since early 2024. With trading focused around 68 dollars, market watchers say defending this region will be decisive. Historically, tests of this support have been followed by upward momentum.
Mini glossary: A broadening formation is a technical pattern where prices make higher highs and lower lows over time. Volatility tends to increase in these structures, with the upper and lower lines acting as key reference points for trend shifts and potential breakouts.
According to analysis by CryptoCurb, preserving the 55 to 70 dollar range could pave the way for a move first towards 100 dollars, followed by a potential revisit of the 200 to 300 dollar area.
Yet, for any robust long-term bullish scenario to materialize, SOL must escape above the pattern’s upper trendline. Analysts estimate this ceiling could form around 400 dollars if the formation continues to evolve. They emphasize that a confirmed breakout from this structure might target levels above 1,000 dollars in the long run, though they currently consider such projections speculative.
LevelSignificance55 to 70 dollarsMain support zone100 dollarsPrimary recovery threshold200 to 300 dollarsPotential medium-term target area400 dollarsResistance near upper trendlineAbove 1,000 dollarsLong-term speculative targetIf SOL slips below the 55 dollar threshold and remains there, the bullish outlook may deteriorate sharply, raising the risk of further losses.
Eyeing the 240 dollar target on daily chartsOn the daily timeframe, the 60 to 70 dollar band stands out as a vital region. Analyst Aman notes this area marked a decisive breakout during the previous market cycle. Recently, while SOL briefly dipped below the short-term congestion zone, it has managed to hover above the broader support corridor.
The analysis suggests reclaiming the 90 to 100 dollar zone could reinforce the recovery outlook, with attention then turning to the 120 to 150 dollar range and a potential run up to the 220–240 dollar area.
The latest double bottom in the relative strength index points towards a weakening in selling pressure. The current RSI has recovered to around 41. However, experts caution that this shift is not a guaranteed sign of a definitive trend reversal on its own.
A sustained move below the 50 to 60 dollar range in the short term could undermine expectations of a solid base forming for SOL. As a result, the marketplace is mainly focused on whether the major support zone will hold—and, crucially, if SOL can reclaim the 100 dollar milestone soon after.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
The Solana network has further expanded its dominance in the tokenized stock market, capturing a remarkable 97% market share. In May, the spot market trading volume for tokenized equities issued by major players soared to $869 million, while weekly trading volume climbed to a record $1.29 billion. These figures underscore the sustained interest in trading traditional financial assets on blockchain platforms.
Solana cements its lead in tokenized stocksSolana has solidified its position as the clear leader in the emerging market for tokenized stocks, where it now controls approximately 97% of total activity. June data confirm the continuation of this strong demand: as of June 16, tokenized stock volumes reached $188 million, rising further to $213 million by June 19.
Growth driven by SpaceX token and new platformsA significant share of this trading activity was attributed to the SPCX token, which is linked to SpaceX. Platforms such as Backpack, Ondo Finance, xStocksFi, and PreStocks have also played a key role, offering diverse avenues for users to access tokenized shares.
Solana claimed about 97% of the tokenized equity market, with May spot trading volume reaching $869 million and weekly activity hitting $1.29 billion.
These developments highlight the growing use of blockchain technology as a gateway to traditional financial assets. They also signal increased interest in integrating such assets with decentralized finance (DeFi) applications.
According to market data: May spot volume stood at $869 million; weekly trading was reported at $1.29 billion; volume on June 16 was $188 million; June 19 saw it rise to $213 million. Meanwhile, Solana’s market share remained close to 97%.
Technical outlook for SOL price under scrutinyAlongside the surge in tokenized equity activity, investors are closely tracking the technical outlook for SOL, Solana’s native token. An analysis shared by BATMAN notes that SOL is currently trading within a prominent symmetrical triangle formation on the four-hour chart—a pattern often preceding sharp price movements.
SOL began June trading in the $85–86 range but retreated sharply to around $61. Since then, the price has shown higher lows, while sellers have set lower highs. The 200 exponential moving average (EMA) between $73 and $74 has emerged as a key resistance zone in this setup.
Glossary: Multiparty computation allows multiple parties to process information together without exposing data at a single point, maintaining privacy. A symmetrical triangle is a technical formation that shows the price tightening in a narrowing band, often leading to a breakout in either direction.
Repeated unsuccessful attempts to break higher have limited bullish momentum for SOL. However, if buyers can push the price above the triangle’s resistance line and the 200 EMA, a new uptrend could emerge.
The analysis highlights the $73–74 range around the 200 EMA as the main resistance, with the $68–69 zone serving as a key short-term support.
On the downside, the $68–69 zone is identified as crucial support; buyers have repeatedly defended this level during recent pullbacks. A drop below it could weaken the overall technical outlook for SOL.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Solana Policy Institute President Kristin Smith says negotiations are ongoing on a daily basis between lawmakers. The U.S. Senate, White House, and crypto industry representatives behind the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act are having daily meetings. Still, the crypto bill is facing a delay as the Senate was adjourned till July 13.
CLARITY Act Negotiations Continue On Daily Basis Amid a surge in concerns about the bill’s progress, Smith tried to quell some of those fears in a thread on X. “Legislation is never guaranteed, but I strongly believe there is a path to get the Clarity Act to the President’s desk,” she wrote. There are a number of reasons she is optimistic, she added.
Smith said discussions are “actively ongoing between Senate Democrats, Senate Republicans, the White House, the crypto industry, and other stakeholders.” She described the negotiations as “serious, substantive work” that is “happening every day.”
11/ A little perspective: this industry has been through harder fights before – self-hosted wallet midnight rulemaking, debanking, the Gensler era – and kept going.
Hard battles are not new for us.
When crypto decides to engage, it has the staying power to win.
— Kristin Smith (@KristinSmith) June 25, 2026
She also noted that “there are daily in-person meetings between key negotiators at the member level,” Smith even said it would be a pointless exercise “if no one thought this could go anywhere.” The CLARITY Act has been receiving a great deal of interest in Congress with a hectic legislative schedule, according to Smith.
Smith spotlighted that several senators were making efforts to see the bill moving forward, noting this was a bipartisan effort. These include Sen. Cynthia Lummis, Sen. Ruben Gallego, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Sen. Angela Alsobrooks and Sen. Bernie Moreno.
“We have strong champions on both sides of the aisle who want to get to yes and get this done,” Smith wrote. She further stated that “bipartisan engagement is critical to turning policy into law. And Clarity has it.”
What’s Next For The Crypto Market Structure Bill? Smith also contended that there is more industry advocacy for the CLARITY Act than ever before. “We have a pro-crypto army on the ground, in meetings, working together, and at the negotiating table,” she said. Additionally, the crypto industry’s structure and Washington’s understanding of digital assets have evolved, the Solana Policy Institute President said.
Smith noted that there is a critical window for legislation from July 13 to Aug. 7. She said, “We have 4 critical weeks from July 13 to August 7 to get this through the Senate. That is enough time to put Clarity on the agenda – and move it forward.”
9/ Despite what people say, there is still time.
We have 4 critical weeks from July 13 to August 7 to get this through the Senate. That is enough time to put Clarity on the agenda – and move it forward.
— Kristin Smith (@KristinSmith) June 25, 2026
She admitted that there have been some obstacles in CLARITY Act negotiations. These include as disagreements on stablecoin yield-related provisions and ethics clause among others. However, she said that leaders have always found “creative ways to keep moving and get closer to yes.”
Thousands of hours have already been spent by lawmakers, administration officials and industry participants on the CLARITY Act, Smith added. In addition, she even pointed out that negotiators are hoping to make progress on the bill before Congress goes into recess in August.
The combined market capitalization of the US stock market's "Magnificent Seven" evaporated over $3 trillion in June.
According to Bitget market data, the combined market capitalization of the U.S. "Magnificent Seven" tech giants has shrunk by over $3 trillion since June, on track to set the largest monthly market cap drawdown in history. All seven companies—Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL), Tesla (TSLA), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), and Apple (AAPL)—closed lower across the board on Thursday.
8 minutes ago
Since MicroStrategy first started selling its bitcoin holdings, MSTR has nearly halved, generating an unrealized profit of $1.32 million for a whale that shorted at the peak.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, MicroStrategy (MSTR), the Bitcoin treasury proxy stock, remains under persistent pressure. Since the company’s first Bitcoin reduction in years (it sold 32 BTC at the end of May to cover preferred stock dividends), MSTR has fallen 48% cumulatively, dropping another 13.8% in the past 24 hours. It is currently trading at $82 on Hyperliquid, hitting a two-year low and leading declines in the HIP-3 market. The unrealized loss on the company’s Bitcoin holdings exceeds $13 billion. Across on-chain addresses, total short positions stand at ~$5.55 million, long positions at ~$5.86 million, with a short-to-long nominal ratio of ~0.95. In terms of entry costs, the average long position is ~$97.24, while the average short position is ~$103.31. The current price of $84 has fallen below the long average, pushing most longs into losses. The nearest long liquidation line is at $76.25, roughly 9.3% below the current price. One high-level short position opened at $130.65 with 10x leverage, holding $2.4 million in positions and boasting an unrealized profit of $1.32 million. Three new short positions have entered amid today’s sell-off. Address: 0x3dc908374e11623d8eb9f07dfc7a2e5e803a54b0 – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your TG group and set it as an admin (enable message-sending permissions) to automatically sync on-chain updates.
8 minutes ago
South Korean stocks plummeted 8%, SK Hynix fell 9%.
According to Bitget market data, South Korea’s KOSPI index has continued to slump, with its decline expanding to 8%. SK Hynix fell more than 9%, and Samsung Electronics dropped nearly 9%.
8 minutes ago
European and U.S. stock index futures extend their declines.
According to Bitget’s market data, US and European stock index futures continue to slump: Nasdaq 100 futures extended losses to 1.6%, S&P 500 futures fell 0.7%, Dow futures dropped 0.18%, Euro Stoxx 50 futures declined 0.9%, Germany’s DAX futures fell 1%, and UK FTSE futures dropped 0.8%.
8 minutes ago
The broader crypto market saw widespread declines, with BlackBerry bucking the trend to rally alone, as one trader notched a 70% return.
According to Hyperinsight’s monitoring, against the backdrop of high PCE inflation and broad tech stock sell-offs, BlackBerry (BB)’s Q1 revenue rose 26% year-over-year, beating guidance and raising its full-year outlook, standing out amid the downturn. On the Hyperliquid platform, BB’s 24-hour contract price surged 12.6% to $10.28. On-chain whales are overall bearish: total nominal short positions stand at ~$9.6 million, 2.17 times the long positions ($4.42 million), indicating a large net-short stance. However, the average entry price for short positions is ~$9.25, which has now been surpassed by the current price of $10.28, leaving shorts collectively in short squeeze unrealized losses. In contrast, the average entry price for longs is ~$9.05, resulting in overall unrealized profits. Looking at liquidation line distributions: the nearest short liquidation line is at $13.2, ~28.4% above the current price; the nearest long liquidation line is at $6.72, ~34.7% below the current price. Notably, the address with the largest profit holds a 5x leveraged long position worth $1.33 million, with an average entry price of $8.8, currently boasting a 70% return. Address: 0xfc079a49e371976f559bea0cd1c1f87a5f5b9464
8 minutes ago
Wall Street consensus has converged: S&P 500’s year-end target of 8,000 has emerged as a new psychological anchor, with bulls and conservative forecasters lifting their outlooks in lockstep.
Wall Street’s differing views on year-end U.S. stock market levels are narrowing, with 8,000 points for the S&P 500 emerging as a new psychological anchor. Fundstrat raised its year-end target for the index from 7,700 to 8,000; Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, and Societe Generale have also set targets near this level. Goldman Sachs previously lifted its 2026 S&P 500 target from 7,600 to 8,000, citing that earnings growth and AI investments continue to underpin the index, rather than relying solely on valuation expansion. Even the more conservative cohort is boosting targets: JPMorgan Chase raised its target from 7,600 to 7,800, while Barclays and Stifel also adjusted their year-end targets to 7,800. Barclays lifted its 2026 S&P 500 earnings per share forecast from $321 to $337, and set a 2027 target of 8,800 points. The shared rationale behind these moves includes upward revisions to corporate earnings, AI capital expenditure, improved visibility into tech sector profits, and easing geopolitical risks. However, this consensus does not equate to zero risk. JPMorgan Chase warned that momentum stocks, semiconductors, storage stocks, and second-tier AI concepts have become overcrowded in trading, and low-quality and speculative growth stocks may see sharp declines. It favors a barbell allocation strategy of "quality growth + low-volatility quality".
PANews June 26 news, according to SolanaFloor, the Solana Foundation stated that after cloud server provider Cherry Servers disclosed a security incident in its legacy monitoring system, validators hosted on that server should check their Sensu logs. Potentially affected validators are advised to rotate their identity keys, review exposed credentials, and rebuild the host if compromise cannot be ruled out.
PANews, June 26 – According to SolanaFloor, the Kazakhstan Stock Exchange (KASE), one of the largest stock exchanges in Central Asia, has listed Volatility Shares' Solana ETF (SOLZ). Earlier this year, KASE launched Kazakhstan's first licensed digital asset platform, which is built on the Solana network.
PANews June 26 news, according to SoSoValue data, yesterday (Eastern Time June 25) the total daily net outflow of SOL spot ETF was $3.9374 million.
Yesterday, only the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) saw net outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $3.9374 million. Its historical total net inflow now stands at $888 million.
As of press time, the total net asset value of SOL spot ETF is $756 million, the SOL net asset ratio is 1.96%, and the historical cumulative net inflow has reached $1.128 billion.
Solana Mobile’s dApp Store added 96 new applications in the span of a single week, pushing total listings to 1,561. The store had roughly 700 apps back in March 2026, climbed past 817 in April, crossed the 1,000 threshold in early June, and now sits at 1,561. That’s more than doubling its catalog in about three months.
Why developers keep showing up The Solana dApp Store charges developers a 0% platform fee. Zero. Not 15%, not 30%, not some convoluted tier system. Nothing. Compare that to Google’s 15-30% cut or Apple’s famously contentious 30% commission.
Advertisement
The store operates as an Android distribution platform, meaning it runs alongside Google Play on Solana’s Seeker smartphone rather than replacing it entirely.
Solana Mobile has also introduced a feature called dApp Spotlight, a curated carousel surfacing quality applications for users. The platform has also introduced AI-driven tools for ratings and reviews.
The hardware equation Solana Mobile’s Seeker smartphone has now shipped more than 150,000 units. The Seeker includes hardware-level security features like the Seed Vault Wallet, which handles private key management and asset storage directly on the device.
The SKR token and ecosystem economics Solana Mobile launched the SKR token in January 2026 with a total supply of 10 billion tokens. The token serves multiple functions within the ecosystem, including governance, staking, and user incentives.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
PANews, June 26 news, according to Cryptobriefing, Nasdaq-listed Solmate (formerly Brera Holdings) has seen its stock price plunge over 98% since completing a $300 million financing and transforming into a Solana treasury company. The company has received investments from institutions including ARK Invest, Pulsar Group, RockawayX, and the Solana Foundation, and currently holds about 2 million SOL, but SOL has declined by roughly 50% over the past year, leaving the company’s financial condition highly dependent on SOL’s price and liquidity.
Earlier on June 23, news reported that Solmate’s largest shareholder sued the board, alleging disclosure violations and self-dealing.
Japan and Sweden played to a 1-1 draw in their Group F match at the 2026 FIFA World Cup on June 26, with both teams punching their tickets to the Round of 16. Daizen Maeda opened the scoring for Japan before Anthony Elanga equalized for Sweden.
Chiliz, the blockchain platform underpinning the fan token ecosystem, saw its native token CHZ spike 28% during the tournament’s initial matchdays. That surge happened despite the fact that neither Japan nor Sweden actually has a fan token program or any direct partnership with crypto platforms.
Advertisement
The fan token paradox Fan tokens are digital assets that give holders access to voting rights on minor club decisions, exclusive content, and other engagement perks. They’re available for various clubs and some national teams on platforms like Socios.com. Chiliz powers the Socios.com platform where most fan tokens trade. When global football viewership spikes, trading activity on the platform tends to follow, and CHZ benefits as the infrastructure layer beneath it all.
Neither Japan’s football association nor the Swedish Football Association has launched a token or partnered with any crypto exchange. The price movement in CHZ is driven entirely by ambient enthusiasm and increased platform traffic during the tournament.
FIFA’s crypto playbook FIFA has been actively courting the digital asset industry, including a partnership with Kraken, the US-based crypto exchange. This is a notable shift from the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, where crypto sponsorships were already present but the industry was reeling from the FTX collapse and a brutal bear market. The 2026 tournament arrives in a very different environment, with Bitcoin having recovered dramatically and institutional adoption accelerating through spot ETFs.
What this means for investors Fan token prices historically correlate with tournament schedules. They spike during major competitions and deflate afterward. The 2022 World Cup saw a similar pattern with fan tokens rallying into the event and then fading once the final whistle blew.
For those watching CHZ specifically, the key metric isn’t the token price itself but trading volume on Socios.com. Volume tends to be a leading indicator. If platform activity stays elevated as the knockout rounds begin, CHZ could maintain its momentum. If volume drops as casual fans lose interest, the token will likely follow.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
With sellers retaining control following the breakdown below the long-standing support zone around $1.30, XRP is still trading in a strongly bearish structure. The daily chart demonstrates a distinct series of lower highs and lower lows, indicating that the overall downward trend is still present.
Following a brief attempt at recovery in mid-June, XRP resumed its decline after failing to regain the 50-day moving average. Currently, the asset is close to the psychologically significant $1.00 level. Although the significance of this area may draw buyers, there is currently little indication of sustained accumulation. During selloffs, volume stays high, indicating that investors are still reducing their exposure rather than actively buying the dip.
XRP/USDT Chart by TradingViewThere is a greater chance of a brief relief bounce because the RSI is close to oversold territory. However, during significant downtrends, oversold conditions alone seldom indicate a lasting bottom. XRP would need to regain the $1.15-$1.20 range and establish support above the short-term moving averages in order for bulls to pick up steam.
HOT Stories
Until then, any recovery should not be seen as the beginning of a new bullish phase but rather as a countertrend rally. Despite increasingly stretched momentum indicators, downside risks remain high in the current structure, which warrants caution.
Shiba Inu sellers dominateShiba Inu is displaying an even more subpar technical picture. The most recent attempt at recovery was invalidated when the meme coin recently broke below a short-term ascending support line that had developed following the June selloff. The breakdown occurred while SHIB continued to trade below all significant moving averages, further solidifying the sellers' dominance.
The market is struggling to generate significant buying pressure, and prices are currently trading close to annual lows. The intensity of recent selling activity is reflected in the RSI, which has fallen near oversold territory. Although these readings have historically preceded rebounds, the overall trend remains overwhelmingly negative. The persistent inability of SHIB to sustain breakout attempts is noteworthy.
You Might Also Like
Every recovery rally over the last few months has stalled below critical resistance levels before rolling over into a lower leg. This pattern implies that investors are still taking advantage of strength to close positions.
SHIB would need to rebound above the adjacent moving-average cluster and reclaim the former support zone around $0.0000049–$0.0000050 in order for a significant reversal to occur. Until then, despite increasingly oversold conditions, the path of least resistance continues to be downward, giving bears a definite advantage.
Bitcoin strugglesAfter failing to maintain its recovery attempt above the $80,000 area, Bitcoin remains under significant pressure. Lower highs and lower lows continue to dominate price action on the daily chart, which displays a classic bearish structure.
BTC began to decline again after being rejected near the 200-day moving average, and it has since returned to the crucial $58,000-$60,000 support range. The fact that Bitcoin is approaching a level where buyers previously intervened forcefully during the June crash makes the current setup especially important.
You Might Also Like
A relief rally could be sparked by a successful defense of this range, particularly since the RSI has moved dangerously close to oversold territory. Historically, when selling momentum wanes, these conditions frequently result in brief recoveries.
The overall trend, however, remains unfavorable. Bitcoin is trading below every significant moving average, including the 50-, 100-, and 200-day indicators. Long-term momentum is still bearish, as evidenced by the moving averages' continued downward slope. During recent downturns, volume has also increased, suggesting that sellers are still active.
Bitcoin would need to retake the $65,000 area and eventually break above the moving-average cluster around $70,000 in order for bulls to regain control. Until then, any increase is likely to be viewed more as a corrective bounce than a confirmed reversal of the trend.
The upcoming trading sessions will be critical. The market may experience another round of liquidation pressure if support around $58,000 fails. However, a strong reaction from current levels could be the first significant indication that a bottom is beginning to form.
Dogecoin's temporary underperformanceDogecoin is still underperforming as bearish momentum in the meme coin sector picks up speed. DOGE is currently trading close to $0.073, one of its lowest levels of the year, after losing significant support levels earlier this month. The multi-month support structure that had been developing since February is clearly broken down on the chart.
DOGE/USDT Chart by TradingViewSellers swiftly seized control after that trendline broke, driving the asset below all significant moving averages. There is a significant resistance cluster overhead because the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day averages are all above the current price and are still trending lower. The RSI's decline near oversold levels suggests that selling pressure may be becoming stretched in the near term.
However, during DOGE's broader decline, oversold readings have frequently failed to produce lasting reversals. Over the past few months, every bounce has eventually led to a new low. The $0.07 region remains the key level to watch. A breakdown below this support could trigger another leg lower and additional panic selling. On the other hand, if buyers are able to hold current levels, DOGE may experience a brief rebound toward the $0.085-$0.09 area.
For the time being, however, the trend remains clearly negative. Investors have little technical evidence that a long-term recovery is underway until Dogecoin reclaims its moving averages and begins to produce higher highs.
PANews, June 26 – Dawn Song, former founder of Oasis Labs and co-founder of Virtue AI, announced in a post on X that she will join Meta’s Meta Super Intelligence Lab (MSL) as Vice President of AI Research. Multiple members of the Virtue AI team will also join, responsible for advancing the security and safety of frontier AI models and agent AI systems.
Dawn Song co-founded the AI security startup Virtue AI in 2024. Additionally, according to Axios, Virtue AI co-founders Bo Li and Sanmi Koyejo will also join the Meta Super Intelligence Lab.
