Live financial news intelligence

Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 5 premium feeds.

Latest market signal English
Coverage 103,982 Raw stories ingested 10,043 rewritten in CS_CZ • 1 to rewrite (last 2 days).
Agents 7 Live Pipeline agents
  • FMP Stock News Fetch every minute running now
  • FMP Forex News Fetch every 5 min 3m ago
  • CoinGecko News Fetch every 5 min 3m ago
  • FIO Stock News Fetch every 10 min 2m ago
  • Patria Stock News Fetch every 10 min 2m ago
  • Editorial rewrite Rewrite every minute 1m ago
  • Asset sync Assets every 1 hour 22m ago

Latest coverage

Market News Feed

Scan headlines quickly, then expand any story for source context.

View
Details Date Content Source
2026-07-27 00:49 4d ago
2026-07-26 15:32 4d ago
Uniswap Labs launches Permissioned Pools for regulated assets on v4
UNI Uniswap
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Uniswap Labs launches Permissioned Pools for regulated assets on v4
2026-07-27 00:44 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:27 4d ago
Solana tests $73 support, eyes $500 and $1,000 targets if breakout confirmed
SOL Solana
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Solana is currently holding a crucial support level near $73, a zone that could dictate the direction of its next move following recent pullbacks. The outcome at this level is expected to shape short-term price action as well as influence long-term targets cited by leading analysts.

Key price levels determine short-term outlookAnalyst Crypto Patel identified the $73 price area as a pivotal support for Solana, emphasizing that maintaining this level and reclaiming $77 would allow the recovery trend to persist. Patel cautioned that any loss of $73 could lead to increased selling pressure, potentially exposing the asset to deeper liquidity pockets between $68 and $64.

SOL is currently trading just under $74, hovering around the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement at $73.89 and supported by an ascending trendline established since June. This rising structure has repeatedly absorbed selling during earlier corrections.

Despite this, Solana faces descending resistance stemming from the July peak near $84. A move above $77 would push SOL past this trendline and likely target further advances toward $80 and $84, reinforcing the bullish scenario.

Should sellers drive the price below $73, Solana would be at risk of slipping toward the next major support at the 0.5 Fibonacci level of $71, and possibly into the $68.22-$64.46 region. Any sustained break beneath $64.46 could set a course for June’s lows near $60, undermining the current pattern of higher lows.

SOL continues to trade at a decision point, with bulls aiming to defend $73 to keep recovery prospects alive, while a confirmed breakdown could escalate the risk of a deeper drop toward $68-$64.

Long-term targets hinge on major breakoutsOn a broader time frame, Crypto Patel’s analysis positions Solana within a strong long-term support region, framing the $52-$73 range as a potential accumulation zone. The weekly chart shows SOL near $74, just above significant Fibonacci support at $72.55. A breakdown beneath this sector could test midrange support around $32.50 and would critically weaken the ongoing recovery outlook.

Looking ahead, the first major resistance stands near $101. Overcoming this level would solidify bullish momentum, but Solana must next contend with historical resistance between $180 and $295, encompassing its previous record highs. Only after a decisive breakout above these zones will the higher targets discussed by analysts come into play.

Patel’s weekly chart projects long-term objectives of $500 and even $1,000 for Solana. These projections would represent up to a 1,900% gain from current support, but depend on a break-and-retest pattern similar to past rallies. As things stand, Solana remains confined within support and has yet to launch a new expansion phase, making these price levels conditional and dependent on multiple technical signals being met.

In parallel with Solana’s technical developments, market participants are increasingly turning to platforms that simplify asset exposure and portfolio diversification. Notably, 1stepSwap has emerged as a practical gateway bridging traditional finance and crypto, enabling users to access shares of major U.S. companies and commodities like gold and silver directly from their wallets. The platform stands out for its price-matching engine, which constantly sources the best available market rates on leading stocks, allowing investors to purchase or sell these assets within seconds while maintaining portfolio diversity.

Solana’s ability to maintain support and break through key resistance levels will dictate if high-value targets near $500 and $1,000 can become attainable in the foreseeable future, but current conditions warrant cautious monitoring.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
2026-07-27 00:34 4d ago
2026-07-26 15:38 4d ago
Shiba Inu (SHIB) Deflation Spikes 5,223% in a Day, Hundreds of Millions of Tokens Gone Forever
SHIB Shiba Inu
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

While the crypto market is discussing Shiba Inu's (SHIB) sudden daily price surge of nearly 40%, another record has been set inside the ecosystem itself — an abnormal deflationary wave. Over the past 24 hours, the meme coin's burn rate posted a vertical spike of 5,223.98%, permanently destroying 401,219,021 tokens, according to SHIBBurn portal.

Such aggressive pressure completely rewrote the weekly statistics, which had previously looked rather sleepy. Over the past seven days, the burn rate increased by 816.02%, removing 457,511,537 SHIB from circulation.

Decoding SHIB's 5,223% overnight burn rate spikeComparing these figures reveals some amusing math, as almost the entire weekly burn volume went up in smoke during the past 24 hours alone. Most interestingly, the conveyor belt is not stopping for even a minute. Just one transaction over the past hour sent another 34,738,227 tokens to a burn address.

HOT Stories

At the same time, complete madness was unfolding on exchanges. SHIB recorded a net daily gain of 27.14%, although at the peak of the excitement, the price jumped by as much as 36%. 

Shiba Inu (SHIB) price 40% surge on intraday chart with burn rate timestamp, Source: TradingViewAs a result, SHIB settled at $0.00000540. Supported by a massive trading volume of $700 million, its market capitalization climbed to $3,179,718,980, bringing the asset back to around 25th place in CoinMarketCap's global rankings.

However, it is important to apply cold calculation here and not confuse cause with effect. The hundreds of millions of burned tokens are physically incapable of moving the coin's price. They represent a microscopic drop in an endless ocean, as SHIB's total supply still stands at an astronomical 589,159,143,761,521 tokens.

You Might Also Like

The real mechanism works in the opposite direction. It was the powerful spike in spot market trading activity that drove higher volumes and the accompanying transactions. Nevertheless, the impressive and intimidating figure of 5,223% acted as an extremely powerful psychological factor for holders.

The market's attention is now focused on SHIB's price behavior across spot exchanges and whether the current momentum can be sustained by new buyers or mass profit-taking will push the price back down to the low $0.0000040s.
2026-07-27 00:34 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:25 4d ago
Shiba Inu burns 401 million tokens in 24 hours as price soars 36%
SHIB Shiba Inu
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Shiba Inu burns 401 million tokens in 24 hours as price soars 36%
2026-07-27 00:34 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:11 4d ago
List of the Most-Searched Altcoins in Recent Hours Released—Shiba Inu Tops the List for the First Time in a Long Time
SHIB Shiba Inu
CoinGecko News
Original source text
CoinGecko, a cryptocurrency data and tracking platform, has announced the most searched cryptocurrencies on its platform in the last 3 hours. Shiba Inu (SHIB) topped the list, followed by Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) in second place and Euler (EUL) in third.

According to CoinGecko data, Shiba Inu’s price has risen by 36.5% in the last 24 hours, while Pudgy Penguins gained 7.6% and Euler 66.7%. In terms of weekly performance, Euler’s 163% and Pons’ 193.6% increases were particularly noteworthy.

The most searched cryptocurrencies on the platform and their total market capitalization, according to CoinGecko’s ranking, are as follows:

Shiba Inu (SHIB) — $3.37 billion Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) — $403.68 million Euler (EUL) — $60.87 million The Black Bull (ANSEM) — $83.34 million Pons (PONS) — $38.03 million Hyperliquid (HYPE) — $13.03 billion BitMart (BMX) — $27.55 million Pi Network (PI) — $893.29 million Bitcoin (BTC) — $1.29 trillion DeXe (DEXE) — $151.95 million Kaspa (KAS) — $777.64 million Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) — $147.53 million Ethereum (ETH) — $227.25 billion Uniswap (UNI) — $2.29 billion Pepe (PEPE) — $1.26 billion *This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
2026-07-27 00:34 4d ago
2026-07-27 00:01 4d ago
Zcash (ZEC), XRP, Shiba Inu (SHIB) and Bitcoin (BTC) Price Analysis for July 26: Liquidity Chooses Wrong Direction
BTC Bitcoin SHIB Shiba Inu XRP Ripple ZEC Zcash
CoinGecko News
Original source text
After failing to maintain its recent rally toward the $570 region, Zcash has entered a cooling-off phase. Sellers intervened close to local highs after a strong, impulsive move earlier in July, forcing ZEC into a controlled pullback that has since returned the asset to its short-term moving averages. The larger technical structure is still beneficial even after the correction. 

While the 200-day EMA (black) is still trending upward well below the current price action, ZEC is still trading above the 100-day and 200-day moving averages. The medium-term bullish structure holds true as long as the asset stays above the $460-470 support area. The 50-day EMA, which served as dynamic support during the recent rise, has begun to flatten. 

ZEC/USDT Chart by TradingViewThe first crucial test for purchasers is the price, which is currently hovering around that level. Before bulls challenge the $550-570 resistance zone once more, a successful defense here might lead to another attempt toward the $500 psychological barrier. But volume conveys a more circumspect narrative. 

HOT Stories

During the most recent decline, trading activity has steadily decreased, indicating that neither buyers nor sellers are currently very confident. In contrast to the explosive breakout that occurred earlier this month, lower volume during a correction is generally healthier than aggressive selling, but it also suggests that momentum has diminished. The RSI is currently close to the neutral 50 level after cooling considerably as well. 

By doing this, the overbought conditions that accompanied the prior rally are eliminated, thereby restarting momentum. A move below 45 could indicate that bearish pressure is starting to take over, while a bounce from current RSI levels would support the argument for trend continuation. For the time being, it seems that Zcash is going through a typical consolidation rather than a trend reversal. 

The long-term moving averages are still pointing upward, and the series of higher lows that have been in place since April is still in place. Bulls must, however, recover $500 rather quickly in order to rebuild confidence. If ZEC were to lose the $460 support cluster, it would probably be exposed to a deeper retracement toward the rising 200-day moving average close to the $410 area, where stronger long-term buyers might intervene once more. 

XRP remains compressedAs the price of XRP continues to compress inside a symmetrical triangle that has formed throughout July, the cryptocurrency is getting close to a crucial technical moment. Volatility has significantly decreased after a few weeks of lower highs and higher lows, indicating that a clear breakout might not be far off. 

As of this writing, XRP is trading at approximately $1.09, testing the descending resistance created by recent swing highs while remaining slightly above the rising support trendline. Following months of persistent downward pressure, buyers and sellers are becoming less certain, as evidenced by the narrowing price action. The larger trend is still difficult. 

XRP/USDT Chart by TradingViewAll of the major moving averages, such as the 100-day, 200-day, and long-term 200-day EMA, which are still sloping lower, are still below XRP. This indicates that despite the recent stabilization, the general macro trend is still bearish. Before bulls could seriously target the $1. 22 area, any breakout to the upside would need to overcome the nearby moving-average cluster around $1.11-$1.14. 

You Might Also Like

Positively, momentum indicators have started to level out. After recovering from oversold conditions, the RSI now oscillates around the neutral 48 level, suggesting that selling pressure has subsided. Even though this isn't a bullish signal yet, it allows buyers to gain momentum in the event that resistance eventually breaks. 

As is common with consolidation patterns, volume has steadily decreased during the triangle formation. Once the price leaves the current range, traders should keep a close eye out for a notable increase in volume, which would significantly increase the breakout direction's dependability. 

Short-term bullish momentum would probably be triggered by a confirmed close above the declining trendline, which might also disprove the recent run of lower highs. The next significant level to keep an eye on is psychological support at $1.00, as failing to maintain the rising support would expose XRP to fresh selling pressure. 

Shiba Inu spikes upIn a single session, Shiba Inu surged by almost 15% and broke through several significant technical barriers, delivering one of its best daily performances in weeks. SHIB finally attracted aggressive buying pressure after consolidating near yearly lows for the majority of July. 

This resulted in a sharp bullish candle and a significant increase in trading volume. Because it propelled the token above the 50-day and 100-day moving averages nearly simultaneously, the breakout is technically significant. Regaining those levels reverses the short-term momentum in favor of buyers because they had served as dynamic resistance during the protracted decline. 

SHIB/USDT Chart by TradingViewAdditionally, the price is testing the 200-day moving average in the vicinity of $0.0000059-$0.0000060, which is currently the next significant barrier before a more significant trend reversal can be verified. The story that volume conveys is equally significant. In contrast to a low-liquidity squeeze, the most recent candle shows the highest trading activity in months, indicating real market participation. When a breakout is accompanied by strong volume, the likelihood that the move will last longer than one session is usually increased. 

You Might Also Like

Momentum indicators also show the abrupt change in attitude. The RSI has risen above 80 and is now in highly overbought territory. This shows remarkable buying power, but it also increases the likelihood of short-term profit-taking following such a bold move. Before attempting another leg higher, SHIB has historically experienced brief consolidations after comparable vertical rallies. 

But the larger trend is still developing. The long-term 200-day EMA is still sloping downward despite SHIB regaining significant moving averages, indicating that the macro bearish structure has not yet been completely refuted. 

Instead of giving up the recovered averages right away, bulls will need to create support above them. The recent breakout may develop into a long-term trend reversal if buyers are able to stay above the 50-day and 100-day moving averages during the upcoming sessions. 

Bitcoin recovery stabilizesAfter making a significant comeback from June's sell-off, Bitcoin is still trading inside a recovery structure, but the market hasn't yet recovered enough strength to oppose the prevailing long-term downtrend. BTC has stabilized above its short-term moving averages at about $64,300, but there is still much stronger resistance above. 

While Bitcoin is still trading below the 100-day and 200-day moving averages, the 50-day moving average has flattened and now offers immediate dynamic support below price. These longer-term averages define the main bearish structure that has persisted for months and are currently grouped around the $67,500-$74,000 area. They also continue to slope downward. 

BTC/USDT Chart by TradingViewPositive indications of stabilization rather than acceleration can be seen in recent price action. Buyers successfully defended higher lows throughout July after the June capitulation, enabling Bitcoin to progressively recover without experiencing excessive volatility. Although there is still insufficient evidence, this slower recovery frequently indicates healthier accumulation as opposed to quick speculative spikes.

You Might Also Like

After hitting oversold territory during June's decline, the RSI has now recovered into the mid-50s. As a result, momentum slightly favors buyers, but it is still far below overbought levels. If market sentiment continues to improve, there is potential for another push higher. Following the massive liquidation event that occurred during the June sell-off, volume has returned to normal. 

The idea that Bitcoin is building a base rather than entering a decisive trend is reinforced by the fact that neither buyers nor sellers currently control the majority of trading activity. Before Bitcoin can challenge higher resistance levels, a significant increase in volume is probably going to be necessary. 

Technically speaking, recovering the 100-day moving average around $67,700 would greatly bolster the bullish argument and make it possible to test the declining 200-day EMA at $73,500. On the other hand, if the 50-day moving average is not maintained, focus will return to the $62,000–63,000 support range, which has prevented recent declines. 

All things considered, Bitcoin seems to be moving from a corrective phase into an accumulation range. Although the immediate structure is better than it was in June, bulls still need to recover a number of significant moving averages before the overall technical picture becomes convincingly positive.
2026-07-27 00:00 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:44 4d ago
FUTU DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on August 25, 2026
FUTU Futu Holdings
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Futu To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Futu between May 24, 2023 and May 27, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Futu Holdings Limited("Futu" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FUTU) and reminds investors of the August 25, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Futu was not in compliance with the requirements of the CSRC, including because the Company continued to conduct securities business, public fund sales business and futures business in mainland China without obtaining the requisite licenses or approval; (2) as a result, Futu was reasonably likely to face regulatory penalties, including the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and other penalties; (3) as a result of the foregoing, Futu's financial results were overstated; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On May 22, 2026, pre-market, Futu issued a press release allegedly disclosing that it had received a notification letter from the CSRC stating that "certain Futu entities in mainland China and Hong Kong . . . without obtaining the requisite licenses or approval, conducted securities business, public fund sales business and futures business in mainland China" and that the CSRC "proposes to order the Related Companies to rectify or cease such activities, confiscate illegal gains, and impose fines, with the total proposed penalty amounting to approximately RMB1.85 billion (approximately USD271 million)." The Futu class action lawsuit further alleges that the regulatory authority "proposes to impose a personal fine of RMB1.25 million (approximately USD 183,575) on Mr. LI Hua, the founder and CEO of the Company." On this news, the price of Futu stock fell more than 27%, according to the complaint.

Then, on May 28, 2026, before the market opened, Futu issued a press release reporting financial results for the first quarter of 2026, allegedly including the proposed penalties comprised of "(i) confiscation of illegal gains of approximately RMB470 million [approximately $69.21 million USD] and (ii) imposition of fines of approximately RMB1.38 billion in an aggregate amount of approximately RMB1.85 billion." On this news, the price of Futu stock declined nearly 5%, according to the complaint.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Futu's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Futu Holdings Limited class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/FUTU or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Futu Holdings Limited Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Futu Holdings Limited securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that Futu misled investors by failing to disclose it was conducting certain securities, public fund sales, and futures businesses in mainland China without required CSRC licenses or approvals. According to the complaint, this exposed the Company to significant regulatory penalties, overstated its financial results, and made its public statements about its business and prospects materially misleading.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU) securities between May 24, 2023 and May 27, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), and suffered losses may be eligible to participate in the securities class action. Eligibility depends on the specific facts of each investor's transactions and losses.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is the investor appointed by the court to represent the interests of all class members during the litigation. Generally, the investor with the largest financial interest who meets the legal requirements may be selected. Investors seeking appointment must file a motion with the court by the August 25, 2026 deadline through counsel of their choice.

What should investors do if they purchased Futu Holdings Limited stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Futu securities during the Class Period should review their investment records, preserve relevant documents, and consider contacting counsel to understand their legal rights. Those interested in serving as lead plaintiff must act before the August 25, 2026 deadline, while investors who do not seek that role may still remain eligible to share in any potential recovery.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Futu Holdings Limited securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306468

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 23:55 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:08 4d ago
HSBC Just Started Covering SpaceX With a $115 Price Target. The Stock Closed Friday at $115.07.
SPCX SpaceX
FMP Stock News
Original source text
SpaceX (SPCX -2.85%) got a new review from a major bank on Friday, and it wasn't the vote of confidence shareholders were hoping for. HSBC initiated coverage of the rocket and satellite company with a Hold rating and a $115 price target. That number sits below the $135 price at which SpaceX went public in June.

The market wasted no time making its own statement. Shares fell as much as 6% on Friday, dipping below the new target shortly after its publication, before closing at $115.07 -- seven cents above it.

That makes SpaceX the rare stock that trades simultaneously below its IPO price, right at a major bank's days-old price target, and roughly 50% below the high of $225.64 it reached shortly after its debut.

What's most interesting about HSBC's math, though, is how generous it tried to be.

Image source: Getty Images.

A premium for Musk, and still a Hold HSBC built its valuation as a sum of the parts, adding up what it believes SpaceX's businesses are worth. Then it did something unusual. It applied a 2x premium to account for CEO Elon Musk's track record of commercializing disruptive technologies. In other words, the bank built a 2x innovation premium into its sum-of-the-parts math, on the theory that Musk has repeatedly built industries where none existed.

Even with that premium, the answer came back at $115, along with a conclusion that the price already reflects much of the company's long-term growth potential -- including continued expansion of Starlink, rising launch activity, and the development of its artificial intelligence initiatives. The bank did sketch a friendlier picture. Its most optimistic scenario, which assumes the Starship rocket becomes commercially viable starting in 2027 and launch capacity doubles, values the stock at $293 per share. But that's the ceiling case, not the expectation.

That's the detail I'd sit with. When a valuation grants the founder credit most models never grant, and still can't reach the IPO price, the exercise says as much about the price as it does about the company.

Today's Change

(

-2.85

%) $

-3.37

Current Price

$

114.87

The disagreement is enormous To be fair, HSBC is one voice, and a notably cautious one next to the rest of Wall Street. The average price target on SpaceX sits at about $237, more than twice the recent share price. Even more telling, individual targets range from $62 all the way to $800. A range that wide is less a forecast than an admission that nobody has figured out how to value this company yet. And HSBC's Hold rating, for what it's worth, implies the stock roughly treads water from here. The bank's caution is about the price, not the business.

The fundamentals explain the confusion. SpaceX's trailing-12-month revenue totals about $19 billion, and its 2025 revenue grew 33% -- remarkable growth for an industrial company. But the stock's market capitalization stands at about $1.5 trillion, which values the company at more than 75 times its sales. The business remains unprofitable, too, as it pours money into developing its Starship rocket. There are no earnings to check the valuation against yet, and there won't be for some time.

Hard evidence is finally coming, though. SpaceX is expected to report its first quarterly results as a public company on Aug. 4, giving investors their first standardized look at the company's finances since the IPO. The first wave of insider share lockups begins expiring shortly after the report. For a debate currently running on beliefs, that report is the first common set of facts both sides will have to reckon with -- and every model on Wall Street, HSBC's included, gets rebuilt on real quarterly disclosure from that day forward.

So, is the newly cheaper stock worth buying now that it has fallen to even a skeptic's target? I don't think the target itself should drive anyone's decision. HSBC's $115 is one bank's estimate, and the consensus near $237 is an average of guesses that disagree with one another by hundreds of dollars.

My takeaway is simply that SpaceX's current valuation continues to require a lot of imagination to justify. A major bank went looking for reasons to be generous with SpaceX, applied the biggest one it could justify, and still concluded the stock was worth less than its IPO price.

I'm not buying before the company's Aug. 4 numbers are released. Sure, a business compounding revenue at 33% deserves respect. But at a $1.5 trillion valuation, I want to see more momentum in its financials before paying up for this stock.
2026-07-26 23:55 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:00 4d ago
Prediction: Alphabet Will Beat Apple to a $5 Trillion Market Cap
GOOGL Alphabet
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Currently, Alphabet (GOOG +0.24%) (GOOGL +0.58%) is trailing Apple (AAPL +3.52%) in the race to join Nvidia (NVDA -1.01%) in the $5 trillion market-cap club. Apple is just over $200 billion in market cap away from joining, while Alphabet is about $1 trillion away following its sell-off.

However, I think Alphabet can overcome this deficit if the market comes to its senses. Alphabet's business can actually justify a $5 trillion market cap, while Apple's is questionable. It's all because of one factor: valuation.

Image source: Getty Images.

Alphabet's financials are more representative of a $5 trillion company than Apple's When comparing Alphabet and Apple, it's clear that they are two entirely different businesses. Apple stakes its company on the success of its hardware business, although it generates a fair bit of revenue from its services as well. Alphabet is more software focused. Alphabet clearly has some hardware exposure, but it also has a cloud computing business that involves purchasing hardware and renting it back out to clients. Regardless, both companies have proved their merits over the long term.

Today's Change

(

0.58

%) $

1.84

Current Price

$

319.53

However, Alphabet looks to be the stronger company. From a revenue standpoint, Apple is still outperforming Alphabet. But that's not nearly as important for companies this size. What matters is how the company uses that revenue, and investors are more focused on profits. From a net income standpoint, Alphabet is starting to put some distance between itself and Apple.

GOOG Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts.

With Alphabet's $160 billion in net income (as of the first quarter of 2026), it has significantly more net income than Alphabet. All else being equal, that would place Alphabet far ahead of Apple in terms of valuation. But that's not the case at all. Because the market values Apple in a higher regard, Apple's stock is worth far more.

However, I think the relationship is starting to get a bit strained.

Apple's valuation has become stretched There's always a question about what a fair price to pay for a stock is. Some stocks will always trade at a premium, whether that's through visionary leadership, strong long-term execution, or being in a reliable industry. However, there's a limit as to what all of those factors can earn, and Apple is toying with it.

Today's Change

(

3.52

%) $

11.31

Current Price

$

332.97

From a trailing-earnings standpoint, Apple is incredibly expensive and approaching five-year highs. Meanwhile, Alphabet is at the higher end of its range but still fairly close to average.

GOOG PE Ratio data by YCharts.

For reference, the S&P 500 trades for 25.5 times trailing earnings, so Alphabet is nearly in line with the broader market, while Apple commands a massive premium. When forward earnings are utilized, this relationship doesn't improve.

GOOG PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.

Apple's earnings aren't expected to grow that much throughout the year, so the stock will still look expensive at the end of the year even if Apple hits all analyst projections. Meanwhile, Alphabet looks reasonably priced. So, what does this mean for the race to become a $5 trillion company?

If the market comes to its senses and values Apple's stock for what it really is, it could have a tough time reaching the $5 trillion threshold. The company just doesn't have the finances to justify this level. However, Alphabet does, and if it traded at the same valuation as Apple, it would already be a part of the $5 trillion club.

As a result, I think Alphabet will get there first even if it takes some time. Over the long term, I'm far more confident in Alphabet's growth strategy, so even if Apple beats Alphabet to the $5 trillion level, I think Alphabet will easily get to $6 trillion first.
2026-07-26 23:54 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:31 4d ago
STORJ: An open letter to the Storj token community: the restructuring, the network, and a proposed path to shared ownership
STORJ Storj
CoinGecko News
Original source text
To our token holders and network participants, 

Today Storj Management and Board have commenced a voluntary, court-supervised financial restructuring — an accelerated reorganization. You deserve more than a press release, so here is the full picture, plainly. 

Why we did this. The company carries liabilities that largely predate our current strategy. Inveniam has continued to support us, and the operating business has been right-sized — lean team, disciplined costs. But past obligations of this scale cannot be outgrown; they can only be resolved. This process resolves them in one place, under court supervision, with full transparency, and gives us the time to present a strong business plan for what comes next. 

The network and the token today. The network continues to operate normally. The token’s utility in the network is unchanged by today’s announcement. We will not comment on price — not today, not during the process; we know trading has been quiet and low for a long time, and nothing in this letter is a prediction or an inducement to buy or sell anything. 

The path we intend to propose. Our goal — stated openly — is that the restructured company be owned by the people who built it and the people who believed in it: management, this decentralized community, Token holders and other investors. Concretely, we intend to propose, as part of a plan of reorganization, a mechanism for Token holders to participate in the equity of the restructured company. The design (eligibility, mechanics, and terms) will be developed during the process and disclosed formally. 

What we cannot promise. A plan must be approved through the court process, and the law sets priorities among stakeholders that we must respect. So we are promising you a seat at the table and a genuine intention — not an outcome. We would rather be straight with you now than walk anything back later. 

How to engage — concretely: 

Organization: we strongly encourage token holders who wish to organize as a group during the process are welcome to do so; we are keen to engage constructively with any representative group, and the email above is the starting point. Please reach out so that we can build Storj with our community. 

Dedicated channel: [email protected] — staffed, read daily, with a commitment to respond within [2] business days. 

Open AMA with Storj management team: TBD. Questions can be submitted in advance via the email above. 

Formal process information: court documents, timelines, and official notices. If you believe you hold a claim, please email [email protected] — please rely on it over rumor. 

Kaloyan Raev, Director, Software Engineering, Storj 

Important: This letter is for information only. It is not an offer or solicitation of any security or token, not a promise of any recovery or distribution, and not financial advice. Any participation by token holders in the restructured company will occur only pursuant to a court-approved plan and definitive documentation, and applicable securities laws. 
2026-07-26 23:54 4d ago
2026-07-26 21:12 4d ago
Storj Chapter 11 Raises the Biggest Question for STORJ Token Holders
MOVE Movement STORJ Storj
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Storj Chapter 11 Raises the Biggest Question for STORJ Token Holders
2026-07-26 23:54 4d ago
2026-07-26 21:52 4d ago
Storj’s Chapter 11 filing raises concerns for STORJ token holders
STORJ Storj
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Storj Labs, the company behind one of crypto’s longest-running decentralized storage networks, filed for voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on July 26 in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. The filing aims to resolve what the company calls “legacy obligations” from prior operations and acquisitions, while keeping the lights on for customers and node operators.

Here’s the thing: Storj isn’t just a company. It’s also a token ecosystem with a fixed maximum supply of 425 million STORJ tokens that serve as the economic backbone of its decentralized storage network. When the entity behind that ecosystem enters bankruptcy court, token holders are left holding something that looks a lot like a front-row seat to a restructuring they have very little control over.

What happened and why it matters The Chapter 11 case, filed under Case No. 5:26-bk-00512, is being framed by the company as a strategic move rather than a distress signal. Storj says it will continue operating in the ordinary course, with no anticipated interruptions to customer services or the underlying network.

Advertisement

Inveniam Capital Partners, which acquired Storj in October 2025 through a reverse triangular merger, is backing the reorganization process. The company’s messaging positions the bankruptcy as a pathway to what it describes as a more sustainable business structure, one that better aligns ownership among management, the decentralized community, STORJ token holders, and investors.

Chapter 11 is not Chapter 7. This isn’t a liquidation. It’s a reorganization, which means Storj intends to emerge from the process as a going concern. But reorganizations can involve significant changes to ownership structures, equity stakes, and the priority of different classes of stakeholders. In traditional bankruptcies, equity holders, the closest analogy to token holders, typically sit at the bottom of the creditor hierarchy.

The token question nobody can answer yet The STORJ token isn’t just a speculative asset. It serves a genuine utility function: users pay for storage and bandwidth with it, and node operators earn it as compensation for providing capacity to the network. The company has stated explicitly that no changes to network economics are anticipated.

Back in May 2026, Binance placed STORJ under a “monitoring tag” as part of a review covering nine tokens. That designation signals potential delisting risk, though Binance did not confirm removal at the time. A monitoring tag from the world’s largest exchange, followed two months later by a bankruptcy filing, is not the kind of one-two punch that inspires confidence among retail holders.

Context: Storj’s long road to this moment Storj has been around since 2014, making it ancient by crypto standards. The project launched with a genuinely compelling thesis: use blockchain-based incentives to create a decentralized alternative to Amazon S3 and similar cloud storage services. Node operators around the world contribute spare hard drive space, get paid in STORJ tokens, and collectively form a distributed storage layer.

The Inveniam acquisition in October 2025 was supposed to be a new chapter. Inveniam, a firm focused on data integrity and asset digitization, positioned the deal as complementary to Storj’s decentralized infrastructure. Less than a year later, the combined entity is in bankruptcy court.

What this means for investors For current token holders, the key variables to watch are straightforward but critical. First, the restructuring plan itself: how the bankruptcy court handles the relationship between corporate equity, creditor claims, and the token’s role in the network will determine whether STORJ retains meaningful value. Second, exchange listings: any movement from Binance’s monitoring tag to actual delisting would be a significant negative catalyst. Third, network activity: if node operators begin leaving the network or users migrate to alternatives like Filecoin or Arweave, the token’s utility argument weakens regardless of what happens in court.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-26 23:54 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:50 4d ago
Microsoft's Next Earnings Report on July 29 Could Send the Stock Soaring. Here's Why.
MSFT Microsoft
FMP Stock News
Original source text
It’s been a tough year for Microsoft (MSFT +0.02%) shareholders. The stock, typically viewed as one of the safest plays in the entire stock market, has lost nearly a fifth of its value.

Concerns about elevated capital expenditures on artificial intelligence infrastructure and a software armageddon have extracted their pound of flesh.

Microsoft will have the opportunity to prove the naysayers wrong when it reports its 2026 fiscal fourth-quarter earnings after the market closes on Wednesday, July 29.

Following the results, CEO Satya Nadella and the rest of Microsoft’s senior management will host a live conference call with Wall Street analysts to discuss the results.

The earnings report could send the stock soaring. Here’s why.

Image source: Motley Fool.

The chance to prove the company’s AI strategy is workingMicrosoft’s stock has sold off for a few reasons.

The company has guided for $190 billion in capital expenditures in calendar year 2026,  largely for AI infrastructure.

Investors are also concerned that the company’s AI digital assistant Copilot is not gaining traction and that Microsoft 365, its suite of office tools that powers the business world, could eventually be vulnerable to AI-made alternatives.

All the concerns are valid, of course. Copilot had about 20 million paid enterprise seats on Microsoft’s last earnings call, despite the company’s 450 million-plus Microsoft 365 subscribers.

Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Wood thinks Microsoft has a good opportunity on the upcoming earnings release to prove that its AI strategy is making progress.

Wood expects Azure, Microsoft’s cloud business benefitting from AI, to show accelerated growth over the next few quarters and for Copilot adoption to pick up steam as well.

Wood sees tremendous upside for Microsoft, particularly if Azure growth and Copilot adoption drive growth in Microsoft 365. Wood has a $795 price target as his bull case, which would imply more than a double from current levels.

Long-term investors can buy the stockI do think long-term investors can buy the stock. While Microsoft could soar following its upcoming earnings results, investors should still be careful about trading around a near-term earnings event.

Other large AI companies that have reported high capex guidance have experienced significant sell-offs, and this poses a potential risk for Microsoft. The company could guide for higher-than-expected capex next quarter or in the calendar year.

Today's Change

(

0.02

%) $

0.06

Current Price

$

381.64

It’s also possible Microsoft sells off if Azure revenue disappoints, Copilot adoption fails to impress the market, or Microsoft 365 subscriber growth comes in weak.

That said, negative sentiment surrounding the stock could also send it soaring on a strong earnings print. Furthermore, I like the long-term setup for Microsoft, which trades around 23 times trailing earnings, well below its five-year average of roughly 32.5.

Now, it’s true that Copilot may never be the powerhouse that Claude or ChatGPT is in terms of total users. AI will also undoubtedly make software solutions easier to build, eroding the moat of software players that can’t adapt quickly enough.

That said, I do think there is a very good chance that Microsoft can position Copilot to support Microsoft 365 growth and maintain its dominance in the business world with its suite of office tools.

Furthermore, Azure revenue has been growing at an annual rate of around 40% in recent quarters, indicating that high AI investment is paying off on this front.

Microsoft is also very likely to survive any major sell-off or correction in AI. Trading at an undemanding multiple, I do see the stock as a good long-term bet.
2026-07-26 23:54 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:30 4d ago
Microsoft and Meta Platforms Are Negative in 2026. Here's My Favorite One to Buy Now.
MSFT Microsoft
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Being a Microsoft (MSFT +0.02%) and Meta Platforms (META -1.80%) investor in 2026 has been pretty disappointing. The stocks are both negative for the year, with Meta down nearly 10% while Microsoft is down over 20%. With these two widely being considered two of the major AI hyperscalers, it's surprising to see their stocks down so much, but the market hasn't bought what these two are selling.

All of that could change in the next few days as they report final results, but in the meantime, I think there's a clear winner to load up on.

Image source: Getty Images.

Why are these two down so much? Meta Platforms' demise has ultimately been in its own hands. The market is worried that Meta's AI spending could be a repeat of its metaverse debacle, in which it spent billions on developing a metaverse that never panned out and was eventually shut down. Meta is spending hundreds of billions on AI data centers and using all of this AI computing capacity for internal uses, but doesn't really have a groundbreaking model to show for it. While its Llama model is used heavily on its social media platforms, it hasn't found a ton of use in the AI community at large, making it seem like a flop. Furthermore, Meta isn't charging for it, so there doesn't appear to be a payoff for investors, either.

Today's Change

(

-1.80

%) $

-10.91

Current Price

$

595.19

Meta is focused on building a superintelligence model that could be paired with some of its AI glasses to see and interact with the world around it. This is its major bet, and if it pans out, it could pay off, but if it doesn't, hundreds of billions of dollars would have been spent for nothing. Meta's strategy doesn't convince the market of its worth, so the stock is down.

The bear case for Microsoft is a lot less clear. Microsoft's AI strategy is actually panning out, with its AI annual revenue run rate passing $37 billion during its last quarter, up 123% year over year. This includes products like Copilot, which has become a top tool for businesses to use. Microsoft also has a thriving cloud computing segment, with revenue soaring 40% year over year. Microsoft is checking all of the boxes it should be to be a successful investment in the AI world, yet the market has chosen to sell it off.

These two now trade for similar valuations, with Meta being slightly cheaper.

MSFT PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts

For reference, the S&P 500 trades for 21.5 times forward earnings, so both stocks are cheaper than the broader market.

But which one is the better buy now?

A new division could turn Meta's stock around One announcement could change the course of Meta's stock trajectory: a cloud computing business. Investors have largely given companies like Microsoft a pass because some of the money that it's spending on data centers is being used for cloud computing capacity, which has a well-defined payoff. Meta doesn't have that, but rumors are growing that it may be launching one soon. The market would then have a clear path as to partial monetization of its computing resources, and that could ignite a rally in Meta's stock.

Today's Change

(

0.02

%) $

0.06

Current Price

$

381.64

While that's a positive outlook, I think the better bet is Microsoft stock, as it already has a thriving cloud computing segment and a great AI business. With Microsoft trading at a fairly cheap valuation and having little execution risk, I think it's about as no-brainer a buy in the stock market as it gets.

Unless Microsoft completely flops during the next quarter, I wouldn't be surprised to see the stock rally, as there isn't a great reason for it to be down so much when it's executing at a high level.
2026-07-26 23:53 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:04 4d ago
Nvidia to acquire $1 billion of new shares of South Korea's Naver
NVDA Nvidia
FMP Stock News
Original source text
By Reuters

July 26, 202611:04 PM UTCUpdated 43 mins ago

Nvidia logo is seen in this illustration taken June 11, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SEOUL, July 27 (Reuters) - South ​Korea's Naver (035420.KS), opens new tab ‌said in a ​regulatory ​filing on Monday ⁠that ​Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab will ​acquire $1 billion of its ​shares ​to be newly ‌issued ⁠as part of an ​investment ​partnership ⁠to build ​a ​new ⁠data center.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide during the World Cup. Sign up here.

Reporting ⁠by ​Jack ​Kim; Editing by ​Chris Reese

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-07-26 23:53 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:19 4d ago
Nvidia in Talks With OpenAI to Guarantee $250 Billion Financing for Data Center
NVDA Nvidia
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Project would be one of the largest AI computing hubs and involve power controlled by the U.S. government.
2026-07-26 23:53 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:39 4d ago
Nvidia in talks with OpenAI to guarantee $250 billion financing for data center, WSJ reports
NVDA Nvidia
FMP Stock News
Original source text
By Reuters

July 26, 202611:39 PM UTCUpdated 12 mins ago

An NVIDIA logo and a computer motherboard appear in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

CompaniesJuly 26 (Reuters) - Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab is in talks ​to provide a ‌roughly $250 billion backstop for OpenAI as ​part of ​a massive data center ⁠project, The ​Wall Street Journal ​reported on Sunday.

The guarantees from Nvidia would help ​the ChatGPT ​maker lease a 10-gigawatt ‌project ⁠that SoftBank’s (9984.T), opens new tab energy subsidiary is developing in southern ​Ohio, ​the ⁠newspaper said citing people ​familiar with the ​matter.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide during the World Cup. Sign up here.

Reuters ⁠could not immediately verify the ⁠report.

Reporting ​by ​Abu Sultan in Bengaluru; Editing ​by Christian Schmollinger

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-07-26 23:53 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:12 4d ago
American Airlines Cut Its Full-Year Guidance. The Stock Rose 6.8% the Next Day.
AAL American Airlines
FMP Stock News
Original source text
American Airlines (AAL +6.79%) reported second-quarter results on Thursday and lowered its outlook for the year. Initially, investors were spooked, and the stock fell about 8% to close at $13.56.

Then on Friday they bought it back. Shares rose 6.8% to $14.48, recovering much of the drop in a single session.

Two days, two opposite verdicts on the same report. What gives?

A record quarter and a worse year The quarter itself was not bad at all.

Second-quarter revenue came in at $16.7 billion, up 16.3% year over year and the highest quarterly revenue in the company's history.

American posted net income of $71 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, on a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis. On a non-GAAP (adjusted) basis, net income was $99 million, or $0.15 per share.

Image source: Getty Images.

Then came the outlook. Management now expects full-year adjusted earnings per share somewhere between a loss of $0.65 and a profit of $0.65. The prior range ran from a loss of $0.40 to a profit of $1.10.

The midpoint of that new range is zero -- and that's for a company generating record revenue.

The cause is not complicated, and management named it. Aircraft fuel expense rose by more than $2.2 billion in the second quarter, an 83.3% increase year over year, lifting the average price American paid to $4.05 per gallon.

For context, $2.2 billion is more than 13% of the quarter's entire revenue, added to the cost side in twelve months. Almost any airline's profit would disappear under a move like that, and arguably American's thin margin makes it the most exposed of the big three.

What Friday's buyers were looking at So why buy the stock a day later? I think there are several reasons.

First, American guided for third-quarter revenue growth of 16% to 19% year over year -- an acceleration from the 16.3% it just posted. Demand isn't softening. And the company said it offset nearly 50% of the fuel headwind in the second quarter through higher fares, which is a meaningful thing for a business often accused of having no pricing power.

The second is the fuel price itself. Management's third-quarter outlook assumes an average of $3.75 per gallon, down from the $4.05 it paid in the second quarter. That still implies about $1.7 billion of additional fuel cost versus the third quarter of 2025, so the pressure hasn't gone away. But the direction has changed at the margin.

Put those together, and the bull case is straightforward. The revenue engine is running faster than it has in years, and what broke the profit forecast is a commodity price rather than anything American is doing in its own operation -- and commodity prices move in both directions.

Of course, the bear case sits in the same guidance. Third-quarter adjusted earnings are forecast between a loss of $0.70 and a loss of $0.10 per share. That is a loss at every point in the range, during what is normally the industry's strongest stretch of the year. And a third-quarter loss would mean American needs a strong fourth quarter just to reach the middle of its own full-year guidance range.

So would I buy it here? No -- and the reason has less to do with this quarter than with what American is as an investment.

Airline earnings are often a small difference between two enormous numbers, and one of those numbers is a commodity the company cannot control. American's second quarter shows it. Revenue hit an all-time high, and the year's profit forecast straddles zero anyway.

Today's Change

(

6.79

%) $

0.92

Current Price

$

14.48

On the surface, the stock looks cheap. Shares trade at $14.48, about 23% below the 52-week high of $18.79 -- at roughly nine times the earnings analysts expect over the coming year. Most screens would call that a value stock.

But a forward price-to-earnings ratio is only as good as its denominator, and this one divides by a figure management itself says could land anywhere between a loss and a profit. A multiple built on a range that wide isn't a margin of safety.

I understand Friday's buyers, though. If jet fuel pricing eases further while revenue holds a mid-teens growth rate, the earnings math flips quickly, and it flips hardest for the carrier with the thinnest margin. But that's largely a bet on an unpredictable commodity, and I'd rather make bets I can actually analyze. Additionally, investors who want exposure to the travel recovery can get it elsewhere -- from businesses whose largest cost isn't set in a commodity market.

I'll watch this one from the sidelines.
2026-07-26 23:53 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:05 4d ago
AT&T Beat on Earnings, Announced a $10 Billion Buyback, and Still Trades at 8 Times Earnings With a 4.6% Yield.
T AT&T
FMP Stock News
Original source text
The market has spent years treating AT&T (T +4.77%) as a bond that happens to trade on an exchange. Slow growth, a big dividend, and not much to think about in between.

The company's second-quarter report, delivered on Wednesday, July 22, mostly confirms that description on the revenue line. Second-quarter revenue rose 2.3% year over year to $31.6 billion. But nobody is buying this stock for the top line anyway.

What the quarter did change is the size of the indirect "payments" shareholders get via share repurchases. Management lifted its 2026 buyback plan to about $10 billion from $8 billion, and the stock closed Friday at $24.13 after a 5.1% gain in the session -- still about 19% below its 52-week high of $29.79, and yielding 4.6%.

So does the cash actually cover everything management has now promised?

Image source: AT&T.

A slow top line and a fast bottom line Notably, underneath that 2.3% revenue figure, the profit lines are moving considerably faster.

Non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share came in at $0.65, up from $0.54 a year earlier -- growth of about 20% year over year. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations rose to $0.66 from $0.62. And adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 110 basis points to 39.1%.

Free cash flow, the figure that actually pays the dividend, was $4.7 billion in the second quarter, up from $4.4 billion in the year-ago period.

And the operating detail behind it is better than the revenue growth rate suggests. AT&T added 432,000 postpaid phone subscribers and 646,000 internet customers, split between 367,000 fiber and 279,000 fixed wireless. Fiber now passes 38.6 million locations, up by a million in three months.

That mix matters. Fiber and postpaid phone customers are the higher-margin, longer-tenured end of this business, and the margin expansion is what a shift toward them looks like in the numbers.

Where the free cash flow goes Here is the arithmetic that decides the investment case.

AT&T pays $1.11 per share annually across about 6.9 billion shares, which comes to about $7.6 billion of dividends. Add the roughly $10 billion of repurchases management now plans, and the company intends to hand shareholders somewhere near $18 billion this year.

Its guidance for 2026 free cash flow is at least $18 billion.

In other words, the dividend and the buyback together consume essentially all of it. That isn't a hidden problem. It's the plan, and management said as much. But it does define what an investor is buying: a payout covered with almost no cushion this year -- unless, of course, you consider the company's capital allocated for repurchases a cushion for the dividend. And this would be a fair way to think about it.

But the company's multi-year outlook suggests there could be greater breathing room for the dividend in the future. Management guided for free cash flow above $19 billion in 2027 and above $21 billion in 2028, against a commitment to return more than $45 billion to shareholders across the three years. Stack those up and the company expects to generate about $58 billion while returning $45 billion, which leaves some runway for paying down debt.

Of course, debt is the part income investors should look at hardest. Net debt stood at $126.4 billion at quarter's end, or 2.68 times adjusted EBITDA. Management expects that ratio to climb to about 3.2 times once its transaction with EchoStar closes, then work back toward 2.5 times over about three years.

So leverage is going up before it comes down, at a company already returning all of its free cash flow.

Today's Change

(

4.77

%) $

1.10

Current Price

$

24.06

That is the trade-off, and I think it's a fair one at this price. The stock trades at about eight times earnings, though the sharper comparison uses the $2.25 to $2.35 in adjusted earnings per share management guided to for 2026, which puts shares closer to 10 times. Even at the 52-week high of $29.79, that guidance would imply under 13 times.

A 4.6% yield covered by contracted, recurring revenue, from a company that grew adjusted earnings about 20% year over year last quarter while buying back its own stock, is a reasonable thing to own. CEO John Stankey said the accelerated repurchase reflects a gap between the company's operating fundamentals and how the market values the shares, and the numbers back that up more than they don't.

I wouldn't call it a bargain, though. AT&T grows revenue 2% a year -- a concerning rate, and one that is just a few percentage points from flipping to a decline.

Still, for income investors, this quarter made the case stronger. The dividend is covered, the fiber business is finally producing the margin expansion it promised, and the stock sits nearly a fifth below its 52-week high. I'd own it for the yield, keep the position modest, and treat the buyback as a bonus rather than the reason.
2026-07-26 23:52 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:15 4d ago
Jamie Dimon Said Markets Are Underestimating Risks Shifting "Like Tectonic Plates." He Made the Warning Right After JPMorgan Posted Its Best Quarter Ever.
JPM JPMorgan Chase
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Sometimes events unfold slowly on Wall Street. Other times, events move so quickly that it is like a sudden earthquake, as two tectonic plates lurch past one another. That's the analogy that JPMorgan Chase (JPM +0.95%) CEO Jamie Dimon used to describe the current market and economic environment. How should investors juxtapose that against the giant bank's impressive second-quarter earnings?

JPMorgan Chase had a good quarter In the second quarter of 2026, JPMorgan Chase posted earnings of $7.70 per share. That was up from $5.94 in the first quarter and $5.24 a year earlier. To put percentage numbers on that, earnings rose 30% from the first quarter of 2026 and a huge 47% from the second quarter of 2025. From that top-level view, JPMorgan is doing shockingly well right now.

Image source: JPMorgan Chase

But there are some caveats. For example, the quarter included a one-time benefit of $1.27 per share related to the conversion of Visa (V +1.03%) securities the company owns. The transaction is a bit complex, but the key is that this benefit had nothing to do with JPMorgan Chase's actual business results. Pulling the Visa impact out, earnings would have been $6.43 per share. Still good, but not nearly as good. That's the first grain of salt; the second is CEO Jamie Dimon warning about the future.

Today's Change

(

0.95

%) $

3.31

Current Price

$

353.21

The key is the lofty market The really important aspect of Jamie Dimon's fear is the fact that the market is trading near record highs. In and of itself, however, that's not a problem. However, given the other risks he sees, it sets the stage for a downdraft:

Several risks are shifting below the surface like tectonic plates, including geopolitical tensions and wars, sticky inflation, large global fiscal deficits and elevated asset prices. We cannot predict how these forces will ultimately play out. They may remain manageable, but they could also cause meaningful disruptions when they shift or collide.

Despite the CEO's carefully articulated concerns, consumers appear to be holding up, and investors are enthusiastic about the future, which set the stage for JPMorgan's strong quarter. If nothing changes, the giant bank could continue to post strong results across its various businesses. However, that could also be blinding investors to the very real risks that are taking shape. If the tectonic plates collide, JPMorgan's results could suffer as its customers deal with a recession, a bear market, or worse.

Dimon is telling investors to be ready Jamie Dimon isn't telling investors to run for the hills. After all, the bank, one of the world's largest financial institutions, is doing well right now and will continue to do well so long as current conditions prevail. What the CEO is saying is that investors should temper their enthusiasm with a bit of reality, given the world's current uncertainty. That's good advice, for those willing to listen.
2026-07-26 23:52 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:26 4d ago
Ford Motor vs. Tesla: What The Revenue Trends of These Automotive Giants Tell Investors
F Ford Motor Company
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Ford Motor: Steady Revenue Amid Operational ShiftsFord Motor (F +1.55%) primarily generates its revenue by designing, manufacturing, and selling a broad spectrum of vehicles to individual consumers and commercial fleets.

While announcing plans to form a manufacturing joint venture with Geely Auto in Spain, it reported a 6% net income margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2026.

Tesla: Revenue Fluctuations and New ProductionTesla (TSLA -2.14%) primarily earns its revenue by producing and selling electric vehicles (EVs), alongside offering energy generation and storage solutions.

It commenced Cybercab production at Gigafactory Texas and reported a 4% net income margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.

Why Revenue Matters for InvestorsRevenue represents the total money brought in by sales before any expenses are deducted. Tracking this figure helps investors understand the total scale and top-line growth trajectory of a business.

Quarterly Revenue for Ford Motor and TeslaQuarter (Period End)Ford Motor RevenueTesla RevenueQ3 2024 (Sept. 2024)$46.2 billion$25.2 billionQ4 2024 (Dec. 2024)$48.2 billion$25.7 billionQ1 2025 (March 2025)$40.7 billion$19.3 billionQ2 2025 (June 2025)$50.2 billion$22.5 billionQ3 2025 (Sept. 2025)$50.5 billion$28.1 billionQ4 2025 (Dec. 2025)$45.9 billion$24.9 billionQ1 2026 (March 2026)$43.3 billion$22.4 billionQ2 2026Not yet reported$28.2 billion (period ended June 2026)Data source: Company filings. Data as of July 24, 2026.

Foolish TakeWith more than a century under its belt, Ford’s sales naturally tower over Tesla’s. This difference also speaks to the broader market Ford addresses with gas-powered automobiles compared to Tesla’s more narrow focus on electric vehicles.

However, Tesla is growing at a far faster rate. Its first-quarter sales of $22.4 billion represented a 16% year-over-year increase compared to Ford’s 6%, and that rate accelerated to an impressive 26% in Q2. If this trend continues, Tesla’s revenue will eventually catch up to Ford.

The veteran automaker has attempted to capitalize on the rise of EVs, but this part of Ford’s operations remains deeply unprofitable, and only produced $1.2 billion in Q1 sales. This suggests the company’s EV efforts are not resonating with customers to the level that Tesla has managed to achieve.

The introduction of its Ford Energy division in May points to the company’s effort to capitalize on its EV investments by providing battery storage solutions to organizations. The new division also provides an additional income stream.

Tesla is evolving its lead in EVs into a self-driving vehicle business. Its Cybercab will be dedicated to this. The challenge is that developing the artificial intelligence required to perform the driving has eaten into the company’s free cash flow, which fell nearly 850% year over year. Still, this could be a far more lucrative new business in the years ahead compared to Ford Energy.
2026-07-26 23:52 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:15 4d ago
GE Aerospace has a Backlog Worth $210 Billion. Here's Why I'm Still Not Buying
GE General Electric
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Benjamin Graham, who helped train Warren Buffett, often talked about the difference between a company and a stock. Graham had a saying that, to paraphrase, even a good company can be a bad investment if you pay too much for it. That's the lens through which I view GE Aerospace (GE +1.33%) today. Here's why I wouldn't buy the stock, despite the company's business success.

The future is right in front of you The big number for GE Aerospace is its $210 billion backlog. That's a massive number, representing the future income the company already has lined up. Adding to the allure of that figure is that it comprises two income streams: product sales and services.

Image source: Getty Images.

The aerospace company's jet engines are expensive and are ordered years in advance. But each jet engine sold must be maintained, generating an annuity-like parts-and-services income stream for GE Aerospace. And each new engine sold just adds to the parts-and-services business. There's no question that GE Aerospace has a bright future ahead. And it is doing very well already, with adjusted revenues up 24% year over year in the second quarter of 2026, and earnings up 22%.

I don't have any problem with the business. My issue with GE Aerospace is the valuation.

GE Aerospace looks expensive to me I have an income focus and a value bias. Starting with the income side of the equation, GE Aerospace's dividend yield is a miserly 0.5%. That's even lower than the S&P 500 index's (^GSPC +0.05%) 1% yield. Like many dividend investors, I prefer yields in the 4% area, though I'll make exceptions for stocks that look cheap relative to their own histories.

Today's Change

(

1.33

%) $

4.64

Current Price

$

353.64

GE Aerospace's history is a bit complex, as you might expect given General Electric's massive restructuring. Essentially, GE Aerospace is what was left after a series of asset sales and spin-offs. Still, the stock's price-to-sales ratio is 7.2x compared to a five-year average of 2.1x. Its price-to-earnings ratio is 41x compared to a five-year average of around 30x. And its price-to-book value ratio is 20.5x compared to a five-year average of 4.5x. There are a lot of moving parts, but it is pretty apparent that GE Aerospace isn't cheap.

The nearly 300% price advance over the past three years has something to do with that, of course. Investors have clearly been pleased with the GE overhaul and GE Aerospace's business performance. However, with the S&P 500's average P/E ratio at 27.5x and its average P/B ratio at 5.4x, it is also very clear that investors are pricing in a lot of good news for GE Aerospace relative to its recent past and the broader market.

Not a bad company, but Wall Street sees only blue skies ahead GE Aerospace deserves a lot of credit; it is performing very well as a business. However, investors know it and are pricing in continued strong performance. That could very well be the outcome, given the huge backlog. However, I think the valuation prices in the good news and more. This is a stock I would keep on my watch list for now.
2026-07-26 23:44 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:34 4d ago
EUR/USD, GBP/USD Outlook: Same Sunday TACO, Same Monday Reaction
OIL Ropa (Brent) EURUSD EUR/USD GBPUSD GBP/USD
FMP Forex News
Original source text
Ceasefire headlines trigger familiar Monday playbook Brent may now influence escalation risks Light calendar on Monday leaves geopolitics in control Charts suggest rallies remain opportunities to sell Donald Trump has delivered another Sunday TACO, triggering a familiar market reaction as Globex reopened for the week. Energy futures that spiked last week tumbled in early Asian trade, while equity futures jumped and the euro and British pound strengthened against the US dollar. Whether those moves extend into the European session will largely depend on the news flow from the Middle East. As this conflict has repeatedly shown, sentiment can turn very quickly.

Another Sunday TACO Almost inevitably, we're back here again early on Monday morning in Asia with a risk-on tone, sparked by another barrage of positive headlines out of the Middle East. After spending the weekend worrying about a major escalation, traders have once again been handed a de-escalation headline just before Globex reopened, amplifying the initial reaction in extremely illiquid conditions.

Zooming out to 40,000 feet, it seems Brent crude may no longer be just a barometer of geopolitical risk. Repeated moves below $70 a barrel during the conflict have been followed by renewed escalation. Conversely, the latest de-escalation arrived with Brent trading above $100 a barrel, a level that risks fuelling inflation and lifting gasoline prices at a politically awkward time for Trump ahead of November's midterm elections.

It's entirely speculative on my behalf, but both sides appear to have developed an implicit reaction function around Brent since the conflict began. Prices below $70 a barrel seem to invite renewed escalation, while moves above $100 have so far been met with efforts to de-escalate.

Europe Wins, For Now

Source: TradingView

The latest headlines have provided Europe an immediate release valve. Natural gas and Brent crude, shown on the left and right respectively above, have fallen sharply, drowning out renewed trade concerns after Trump threatened additional tariffs on Europe in response to the EU's antitrust fine against Alphabet. Whether those moves last will depend almost entirely on where the news flow heads next. 

EUR/USD: Downtrend Still Intact

Source: TradingView

Despite the pop higher on the ceasefire headlines, the EUR/USD H4 chart suggests this remains a sell-on-rallies play for now, with the string of lower highs and lower lows in place since the middle of July still intact.

The price remains trapped within a well-defined range between 1.1364 and 1.1397. Bulls have already failed twice to break above the upper end of that structure, including earlier today when EUR/USD briefly pushed through 1.1400 before retreating. That leaves a clear range to work with.

The oscillators suggest downside momentum is ebbing but has yet to trigger an outright bullish signal. RSI (14) has lifted but remains below the neutral 50 level, while MACD is on the cusp of a bullish crossover despite remaining in negative territory, placing greater emphasis on price action around the range extremes.

Should buyers finally break above 1.1397 and hold there, attention shifts to the former uptrend from the June 24 low, which comes in around 1.1415 today, followed by the July 7 swing high at 1.1436. On the downside, a break beneath 1.1364 would expose the June 24 swing low at 1.1325, with little meaningful technical support in between.

As long as the positive news flow from the Middle East continues, there may be scope for further upside. But the broader technical picture still favours selling rallies. The daily chart shows EUR/USD remains below its 50, 100 and 200-day moving averages, all of which continue to slope lower, suggesting the medium-term downtrend remains intact.

GBP/USD: Breakout Fading

Source: TradingView

GBP/USD looks much the same as EUR/USD on the H4 timeframe. The pair is attempting to break the downtrend that's been in place since the middle of July, although it's already given back a sizeable chunk of the gains seen earlier in the session.

The daily chart, shown in the right-hand pane, suggests rallies should still be treated with caution. The 50-day moving average is found at 1.3368, but it's the 100 and 200-day moving averages around 1.3400 that are of greater interest. The pair stalled beneath those levels last week, making them an important resistance zone should the current bounce extend.

On the H4 chart, support emerged around 1.3300 late last week, while 1.3360 is the first level overhead to watch, having acted as support earlier in the month. Outside of that range, 1.3263 is the next level of note on the downside, while 1.3400 and 1.3413 provide additional resistance above.

The oscillators suggest downside momentum is ebbing but has yet to trigger an outright bullish signal. RSI (14) continues to climb towards the neutral 50 level, while MACD has crossed above its signal line but remains below zero, placing greater emphasis on price action around these key technical levels.
2026-07-26 23:44 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:32 4d ago
FSLR DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds First Solar (FSLR) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on August 24, 2026
FSLR First Solar
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In First Solar To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in First Solar between February 26, 2025 and February 24, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against First Solar, Inc. ("First Solar" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FSLR) and reminds investors of the August 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Defendants had overstated First Solar's capacity to manage the impact of U.S. tariff policy on the Company's business; (2) Defendants understated the extent to which its responses to U.S. tariff policy, including the intentional underutilization of production facilities in Malaysia and Vietnam, and attempted relocation of production to the U.S., were likely to negatively impact First Solar's projected performance in the 2026 fiscal year; and (3) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

The truth began to emerge on January 7, 2026, when Jefferies downgraded First Solar to Hold from Buy, noting that during 2025, the Company had lowered guidance, faced significant de-bookings and experienced margin compression through 2025. Jefferies also flagged that "[international] facilities remain a pain point while tariffs exist" and "underutilization at [international] facilities remains a concern." The Jefferies analyst also predicted that First Solar's deployment opportunities were likely to be more limited in 2026.

On this news, First Solar's stock price fell $27.67 per share, or 10.29%, to close at $241.11 per share on January 7, 2026.

Then, on February 24, 2026, First Solar issued a press release "announc[ing] financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2025." Among other items, First Solar announced earnings that missed expectations by a wide margin and issued lower-than-expected FY 2026 revenue guidance, citing customer headwinds such as permitting delays under the Trump administration. Following First Solar's announcement, Baird Research downgraded its stock to Neutral from Outperform, citing "several question marks in forward outlook".

On this news, First Solar's stock price fell $33.09 per share, or 13.61%, to close at $210.12 per share on February 25, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding First Solar's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the First Solar, Inc. class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/FSLR or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the First Solar, Inc. Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the First Solar securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that First Solar, Inc. and certain executives violated federal securities laws by making false or misleading statements and failing to disclose material information regarding the impact of U.S. tariff policies, production facility utilization, and risks to the Company's projected 2026 financial performance.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR) securities during the applicable Class Period and suffered losses may be eligible to participate in the securities class action. Eligibility will depend on the specific circumstances of each investor's transactions and losses.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. Any eligible investor may seek appointment as lead plaintiff by filing the appropriate motion with the court on or before the August 24, 2026 deadline.

What should investors do if they purchased First Solar stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased First Solar securities during the Class Period and experienced losses should review their legal rights and options. They may contact counsel to discuss the lawsuit, determine whether they qualify to participate, and learn more about seeking appointment as lead plaintiff before the applicable deadline.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased First Solar securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306467

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 23:40 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:17 4d ago
REGN DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Regeneron Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on September 14, 2026
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Regeneron To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Regeneron between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (""Regeneron" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: REGN) and reminds investors of the September 14, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose the true state of Regeneron's Phase III Fianlimab-Libtayo Study; notably, that its preliminary statistical assumptions were fundamentally flawed, that the active treatment arm was failing to achieve meaningful clinical differentiation over standard therapies, and that the trial would ultimately fail to reach statistical significance on its primary endpoint even without overperformance of the control arm.

On April 29, 2026, Defendants disclosed that the Phase III Fianlimab-Libtayo Study had been altered, expanding the number of patients in the study eligible for "analysis of progression-free survival." On this news, Regeneron's stock price fell $45.41, or approximately 6.2%, to close at $686.36 per share on April 29, 2026.

On May 15, 2026, Regeneron issued a press release announcing that the "Phase 3 Trial of Fianlimab . . . did not reach statistical significance for the primary endpoint of improvement in progression-free survival (PFS)." On this news, Regeneron's stock price fell $68.57, or approximately 9.8%, to close at $629.68 per share on May 18, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Regeneron's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Regeneron class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/REGN or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Regeneron Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Regeneron securities fraud lawsuit about?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has filed a securities class action lawsuit against Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) on behalf of investors who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period. The lawsuit alleges that Regeneron and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Phase III Fianlimab-Libtayo clinical study. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants concealed that the study's preliminary statistical assumptions were fundamentally flawed, that the active treatment arm was allegedly failing to achieve meaningful clinical differentiation over standard therapies, and that the trial would ultimately fail to reach statistical significance on its primary endpoint. The alleged fraud is said to have come to light through two disclosures: first, on April 29, 2026, when defendants announced an expansion of patients eligible for analysis of progression-free survival — causing Regeneron's stock to fall approximately 6.2% — and then on May 15, 2026, when Regeneron announced that the Phase III trial did not reach statistical significance for its primary endpoint, causing the stock to fall an additional approximately 9.8%.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) securities on the NASDAQ between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit. Eligibility to participate is not limited to those who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any investor who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period and suffered a loss may potentially share in any recovery obtained on behalf of the class. Investors are encouraged to review their trading records to determine whether their purchases fall within the Class Period. Participation in the litigation does not require investors to take any active litigation role beyond filing a timely claim if a recovery is ultimately achieved.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation, including working with counsel to make key strategic decisions regarding the case. Any investor who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period and suffered losses may move the court for appointment as lead plaintiff, but must do so no later than September 14, 2026, which is the court-established deadline for such motions. Courts generally appoint the movant with the largest financial interest in the relief sought who also satisfies the adequacy requirements of the applicable securities laws. Importantly, investors are not required to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in order to participate in or potentially share in any recovery that may result from this litigation. Those who do not seek lead plaintiff status may still submit a claim and may be eligible to receive a portion of any settlement or judgment obtained on behalf of the class.

What should investors do if they purchased Regeneron stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) securities between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026 are encouraged to promptly review their brokerage and trading records to confirm the timing and size of their purchases and any resulting losses. Investors should take steps to preserve all relevant documentation, including trade confirmations, account statements, and any communications relating to their Regeneron holdings, as such records may be material to any future claim. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is September 14, 2026, investors who wish to be considered for that role should act in advance of that date. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP to better understand their legal rights and options before the deadline passes. Retaining counsel or seeking lead plaintiff status is not required to participate in any potential class recovery, but timely action is advisable to preserve all available options.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306476

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 23:40 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:00 4d ago
Texas Instruments Can Ride AI Demand to New Highs
TXN Texas Instruments
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Texas Instruments (TXN -1.90%) is relatively late to the artificial intelligence (AI) party. The stock was mostly flat over the past five years until a 58% year-to-date rally surprised investors. Its analog chips manage the electrical power that AI chips need.

These analog chips essentially serve as the middleman between electric grids and AI chips. Analog chips process electricity and distribute it to AI chips in a way that lets them function without overheating. They position Texas Instruments for a multiyear run as AI infrastructure demand accelerates.

Image source: Getty Images.

Revenue growth is picking up Fundamental growth is a key factor for stocks that beat the S&P 500 over the long run, and Texas Instruments has been checking off that box. Its 23% year-over-year growth rate in the second quarter was its highest in multiple years.

The recent growth isn't a fluke. Texas Instruments anticipates $5.65 billion to $6.15 billion in Q3 revenue. A midpoint of $5.9 billion implies a 24.5% year-over-year growth rate. Sequential growth has been solid, but that is a normal trend for Texas Instruments. If the company delivers positive sequential growth in Q4, that's a major catalyst, since that's the slower season for Texas Instruments.

Texas Instruments barely beat the top end of its Q2 guidance when delivering results. If its analog chips continue to gain momentum in data centers, it might end up beating the top end of Q3 guidance. That would position the company for at least 38% year-over-year revenue growth.

Texas Instruments is achieving this growth while boosting its net income. Profits were up by 53% year over year in the second quarter.

Today's Change

(

-1.90

%) $

-5.41

Current Price

$

279.58

Prudent financial management Texas Instruments isn't a flashy name, and the executives never intended for it to reach that point. The company's website starts with a boring quote from CEO Haviv Ilan, but it's boring in a good way.

"We believe that long-term growth of free cash flow per share is the ultimate measure to generate value. We achieve this by strengthening our competitive advantages, being disciplined with capital allocation and pursuing efficiency," Ilan wrote on the investor relations site.

The emphasis on cash flow explains why Texas Instruments' net income is rising faster than revenue. It also offers some insight into why it's one of the few fast-growing AI stocks that still has a dividend yield above 2%.

To top it all off, Texas Instruments actually pulled back on capital expenditures (capex) while other companies are rushing to throw their money at AI. The company heavily invested in manufacturing capabilities for multiple years. Now, it's scaling down capex while enjoying the fruits of its labor.

The second quarter featured $514 million in capex, which is a 60.6% year-over-year reduction. At a time when tech giants can deliver good results that get overlooked due to rising capex, Texas Instruments is delivering high growth rates while cutting back on spending. It's a rarity in the current market that can justify an extended rally.
2026-07-26 23:36 4d ago
2026-07-26 19:21 4d ago
Best Dividend Kings: July 2026
NUE Nucor
FMP Stock News
Original source text
HomeDividends AnalysisDividend Quick Picks

SummaryThe Dividend Kings outperformed SPY in June and July, regaining a 4.83% lead YTD with 39 of 58 Kings beating SPY.37 Dividend Kings have double-digit gains in 2026, with Gorman-Rupp (GRC), Nucor (NUE), and Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) leading.21 Dividend Kings are both potentially undervalued and offer expected long-term annualized returns of at least 10%.Dividend Yield Theory and analyst growth projections underpin the selection of promising Kings, with average dividend growth at 3.90% and robust double-digit earnings forecasts for select names. Thapana Onphalai/iStock via Getty Images

2026 Review The S&P 500's strong run through April and May faded in June, the State Street SPDR® S&P 500® ETF (SPY) finished the prior month with a 1.03% loss. Meanwhile the Dividend Kings, on average, posted

10.47K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of ABBV, ADP, HRL, JNJ, LOW, PEP, SPGI either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-07-26 23:31 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:56 4d ago
Brown-Forman board says Sazerac unsolicited proposal not actionable
BFB Brown-Forman
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Sazerac logo is seen in this illustration taken April 22, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

July 26 (Reuters) - Brown-Forman (BFb.N), opens new tab said on Sunday its ​board had received an unsolicited ‌proposal from Sazerac, but concluded the offer was "not actionable."

The Jack Daniel's maker did not disclose ​the value of the proposal ​from the U.S. spirits company Sazerac.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Wolf Pen Branch, ⁠LP, which represents a majority of ​Brown-Forman's Class A shares, said it ​remains confident in the company's brands, adding Sazerac's proposal does not align with its vision for ​Brown-Forman's future.

Sazerac did not immediately respond ​to a request for comment outside regular business ‌hours.

Reuters ⁠reported in May that Brown-Forman had rejected a $32-per-share cash takeover offer from Sazerac that valued the company at about $15 billion.

Sazerac ​emerged as ​a suitor ⁠after Brown-Forman and Pernod Ricard (PERP.PA), opens new tab ended merger discussions in late April, ​having failed to agree on ​mutually ⁠acceptable terms.

Privately owned Sazerac, controlled by the Goldring family, owns more than 500 ⁠brands, ​including Buffalo Trace bourbon ​and Fireball cinnamon whisky.

Reporting by Abu Sultan in Bengaluru; ​Editing by Nia Williams and Chris Reese

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-07-26 23:29 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:05 4d ago
GTM DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds ZoomInfo Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on August 24, 2026
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In ZoomInfo To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in ZoomInfo between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. ("ZoomInfo" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: GTM) and reminds investors of the August 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that the true state of ZoomInfo's slowing growth its legacy seat-based subscription platforms and weakening customer retention in its downmarket segment. Further, the Company minimized concerns that customers were moving towards consumption-based usage models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions.

On May 11, 2026, after the market closed, ZoomInfo announced its first quarter 2026 financial results, unveiling a sharp decline in growth outlook and accordingly lowered its 2026 full year financial guidance, and announced it was realigning its downmarket business, laying off 20% of its workforce, and expecting to incur approximately $45-60 million in restructuring costs. On this news, ZoomInfo's stock price fell $1.98, or approximately 33%, to close at $4.06 per share on May 12, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding ZoomInfo's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the ZoomInfo class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/GTM or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the ZoomInfo Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the ZoomInfo securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) and certain of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements to investors during the class period. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants issued overwhelmingly positive statements while allegedly concealing the true extent of slowing growth in ZoomInfo's legacy seat-based subscription platforms and weakening customer retention in its downmarket segment. The complaint further alleges that defendants minimized concerns that customers were shifting toward consumption-based usage models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions, which allegedly masked material adverse trends affecting the Company's business. On May 11, 2026, after markets closed, ZoomInfo allegedly disclosed the severity of these conditions when it announced sharply lowered full-year 2026 guidance, a realignment of its downmarket business, a workforce reduction of approximately 20%, and anticipated restructuring costs of approximately $45-60 million — news that allegedly caused the Company's stock to decline approximately 33% the following trading day.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) securities during the class period — between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026, inclusive — may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit. Eligible investors are not limited to those who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any class member who suffered losses during the class period may potentially share in any recovery obtained on behalf of the class. Investors are encouraged to review their trading records to determine whether their purchases fall within the applicable class period dates. Participation in the litigation does not require that an investor take an active role in the case or incur out-of-pocket legal expenses to be considered a potential class member.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation, including selecting and overseeing class counsel and making key strategic decisions in the case. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, any investor who purchased ZoomInfo Technologies securities during the class period and suffered a loss may move the court for appointment as lead plaintiff. The deadline to file a motion seeking lead plaintiff appointment is August 24, 2026. Importantly, investors are not required to serve as lead plaintiff in order to be eligible to share in any recovery that may result from the litigation; the vast majority of class members participate without taking on that representative role.

What should investors do if they purchased ZoomInfo stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) securities between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026 should promptly review their brokerage and account records to confirm the dates and prices of any relevant transactions. Investors are strongly encouraged to preserve all documentation related to their ZoomInfo securities purchases, including trade confirmations, account statements, and any communications concerning those investments. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is August 24, 2026, investors who wish to explore their legal options — including the possibility of seeking appointment as lead plaintiff — should act in a timely manner. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP or other qualified securities counsel to evaluate their rights and potential claims prior to that deadline.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased ZoomInfo securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306479

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 23:26 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:35 4d ago
Regulators Disagree On Paramount's Warner Deal. Price Rises In October
PARA Paramount Global
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Paramount Skydance takeover bid of Warner Bros. (Photo by Michael Yanow/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

NurPhoto via Getty Images

Washington cleared the deal. A California court paused it. Brussels attached conditions. Britain may rewrite its media law to review it.

Both parties to the largest media transaction of the decade are now waiting. Only one of them will pay for it.

The Paramount Warner Deal Delay Has A Price Paramount Skydance Corporation has agreed not to close its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery until five days after a ruling on the merits, or June 1, 2027, whichever comes first. That followed a temporary restraining order secured four days earlier by twelve state attorneys general.

The delay is not simply procedural. It is priced.

Under the merger agreement, Warner shareholders receive $31 a share in cash. If the deal has not closed after September 30, additional consideration begins accruing daily at a rate equivalent to 25 cents a share every 90 days, payable when the transaction eventually completes.

Across WBD’s outstanding shares that is roughly $650 million a quarter, or about $7 million a day. A wait until next June would add something close to $1.7 billion to the purchase price.

Behind that sits a larger number. If the transaction fails under specified regulatory circumstances, Paramount could owe WBD a $7 billion regulatory termination fee.

Larry Ellison and his revocable trust have jointly and severally guaranteed that fee, along with $45.72 billion of the merger consideration and the $2.8 billion Paramount already paid Netflix on Warner’s behalf when Warner took the higher offer. Warner, for its part, would owe Paramount $3 billion if it were the one to walk away.

MORE FOR YOU

The timing was not lost on the court. In granting the restraining order it recorded that the companies had conceded they would incur no carrying costs from a delayed merger until the end of September, and found they would suffer no apparent near-term harm from waiting.

Who Pays For The Delay: Warner or Paramount?That structure explains a great deal about how the two companies have behaved since the lawsuit.

Paramount has forcefully argued that the states’ challenge is disconnected from the modern media market and that delay serves large technology platforms rather than consumers.

Warner has been comparatively quiet. It does not need to speak. Its position is written into the contract, which converts every additional month of regulatory argument into a higher price for its shareholders and a guaranteed payment if the whole thing collapses.

One company is buying time. The other is selling it.

Four Regulators, Four Different MarketsThe difficulty is that the clock runs against a process no party controls. Four authorities are reviewing this transaction, but they are not measuring the same source of media power.

On June 12, the Justice Department closed an eight-month investigation that had drawn more than two million documents from over 80 custodians.

It found the deal "not likely to result in harm to competition or American consumers" in three named markets: streaming video on demand, linear television and the development, production and distribution of films for theatrical release.

On July 20, a federal court in California reached the opposite preliminary conclusion about the third of those markets. Its finding rested on Paramount’s anticipated 27% share of wide-release theatrical distribution and the concentration the merger would produce, which the court held sufficient to presume a likely violation.

Brussels was looking at something narrower again. Its conditional clearance on July 22 is not addressed to streaming scale or theatrical share. It requires Paramount to exit United International Pictures, the European film distribution venture it shares with Universal.

Britain’s Media Law Has Not Caught UpBritain is doing the hardest thing of the four, because the category it wants to examine is not yet in its statute.

On June 30, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told Parliament she was minded to intervene under the Enterprise Act 2002 on two public interest grounds. One is conventional, covering plurality of views in news media, which here means CNN International and Channel 5 arriving under a single owner.

The other concerns the number of owners controlling on-demand programming services, and that consideration is not currently specified in section 58 of the Act. The legislation, as Nandy put it, "does not cover the effect of a merger on streaming or video-on-demand services." She said she would introduce secondary legislation to change it.

That places a British parliamentary calendar inside an American merger timetable.

The Commons adjourned for the summer on July 16 without a decision on formal intervention. It returns on September 1 and rises again for the conference recess in the middle of that month.

Paramount’s ticking consideration begins accruing after September 30. The body that would need to approve Britain’s new legal test is therefore largely unavailable until around the point the meter starts.

The Deal’s Regulatory Clock Is TickingFebruary 27, 2026: Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery sign a $31-per-share cash agreement valuing WBD at about $110 billion including debt.

June 12: The Justice Department closes its investigation without challenging the transaction.

June 30: Britain’s culture secretary signals possible intervention on news plurality and on-demand services.

July 13: California and eleven other states sue to block the acquisition.

July 16: The House of Commons begins its summer recess without a formal intervention decision.

July 20: A federal court temporarily restrains the transaction over concerns about theatrical distribution.

July 22: The European Commission clears the deal on condition that Paramount exits its European distribution venture with Universal.

July 24: Paramount agrees not to close until five days after a ruling on the merits, or June 1, 2027, whichever comes first.

September 1: The House of Commons returns, shortly before another recess interrupts the British review timetable.

After September 30: Additional consideration begins accruing at roughly $7 million a day until the transaction closes.

June 1, 2027: The agreed standstill reaches its outer limit unless the litigation is resolved earlier.

One Narrow Market Can End A Global DealThe precedent for what a single jurisdiction can do is three weeks old. The proposed merger of Getty Images and Shutterstock cleared U.S. review.

The Competition and Markets Authority found no problem in stock imagery, reasoning that generative AI had already made that market fiercely contested, but did find one in editorial content supplied to British media outlets, and cleared the $3.7 billion deal only on condition that Shutterstock sold that business.

Getty’s board declined. The merger was terminated on July 7. The CMA’s inquiry chair called the outcome "ultimately a commercial choice."

One narrow market in one country ended a global transaction.

The Ellisons can guarantee the money. Paramount can promise films, investment and jobs. Warner can make the wait expensive for Paramount. What none of them can do is make four legal systems agree on what kind of company is being bought.
2026-07-26 23:04 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:55 4d ago
Silver (XAG) Forecast: Silver Market Faces FOMC, PCE and Wage Risk Next Week FMP Forex News
Original source text
A weekly gain after the kind of selling silver took this month looks like real buying. It also arrived while the bond market was pricing tighter policy, the dollar was holding firm and crude was running near levels that keep the inflation story alive. That is not the backdrop where silver rallies tend to last. Silver also carries the industrial demand weight that gold does not, which makes a tighter Fed a problem from both sides of the trade.

Warsh Wants Price Stability and He Is Not Hiding It Warsh dropped easing language from the June statement, skipped the dot plot and told the ECB Forum that prices are too high. He has not said a single thing since taking the chair that suggests he is in a hurry to make life easier for silver bulls. Fed funds futures already reflect that with a 35.8% chance of a July hike and 79% cumulative odds of tightening by September. Those numbers were near zero two weeks ago.

Wednesday afternoon is where silver’s rally either survives or gets taken apart. If Warsh leans into the oil-driven inflation story, yields and the dollar respond and the sellers who stepped back last week come right back. If he holds without adding pressure, the buyers defending the recent lows keep their trade. The range breaks Wednesday one way or the other.

PCE and Wages Round Out the Week Thursday’s GDP and personal income data at 12:30 GMT land the morning after Warsh speaks and the PCE number inside that release either confirms or undercuts whatever the market takes from the press conference. A hot print after a hawkish Wednesday locks in the selling. A soft number pulls the rate conversation back and gives last week’s buyers room to stay.

Friday’s Employment Cost Index at 12:30 GMT closes the week. Wages running hot after a hawkish Fed and firm PCE keep the dollar bid through the weekend. Wages coming in soft give the bond market a late reason to ease up and help silver hold into the close.

Silver’s Industrial Side Makes the Rate Risk Worse Gold gets some cover from the geopolitical bid when the war heats up. Silver has that element but it also carries the industrial weight that gold does not. Higher borrowing costs slow manufacturing activity and weigh on the fabrication demand that accounts for a large share of physical silver consumption. A Fed that is tightening or signaling it will tighten hits silver from the investment side and the industrial side at the same time.
2026-07-26 22:55 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:23 4d ago
Forget IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum. This Trillion-Dollar Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Is the Best Quantum Computing Opportunity, and It's Currently Trading at a 7-Year Valuation Low.
IONQ IONQ
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Quantum computing represents a fundamental shift from classical systems, which process data using binary bits that exist as zeros or ones in underlying codebases. Quantum machines use qubits, which possess a property called superposition -- allowing them to evaluate vast numbers of possibilities simultaneously.

This capability holds particular promise for artificial intelligence (AI), where quantum computers could deliver faster answers to complex optimization problems, enhance machine learning, and simulate molecular interactions, among many other uses. According to McKinsey & Company, quantum computing could add up to $2.7 trillion of value to the global economy by 2035, underscoring the scale of the opportunity as this technology matures from laboratory curiosity toward practical utility.

Image source: Getty Images.

What are the most popular quantum computing stocks? IonQ (IONQ -3.61%), Rigetti Computing (RGTI -4.71%), and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS -5.09%) are the primary publicly traded pure-play companies focused on quantum computing hardware and services.

IonQ employs trapped-ion qubits in its quantum systems, which aim to improve AI models and create better data for research purposes. Meanwhile, Rigetti uses superconducting qubits to build quantum computers that customers can leverage with existing AI-native tools. Both IonQ and Rigetti offer access to their platforms through cloud-based environments, seeking integrations with infrastructure providers like Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud. D-Wave has primarily focused on a niche technology called quantum annealing that is only useful for solving optimization problems and sampling problems. However, those types of problems include a host of real-world applications in areas like logistics, finance, and drug discovery.

Across these companies, technology remains heavily research-oriented. While commercial systems and cloud access are expanding, they are still years away from delivering enterprise-grade fault-tolerant machines capable of providing a measurable quantum advantage.

Analyzing the financial realities of quantum pure plays Though they are all generating some revenues and receiving support from government subsidies, each of these quantum pure plays continues to post substantial operating losses. All of them have relied on repeated equity raises to fund their research and development. The result has been ongoing shareholder dilution.

IONQ Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts.

The valuations of the quantum pure plays reflect extreme speculation rather than concrete fundamentals. IonQ has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio around 58, while Rigetti and D-Wave both sport P/S multiples near 480. For cash-burning operations whose progress has yet to translate into profitability or self-funding growth, these valuation profiles are overextended, to say the least.

In my view, Nvidia (NVDA -1.01%) is the strongest candidate to consider buying for any investor seeking quantum computing exposure in their portfolio.

Nvidia supplies the classical infrastructure essential to building quantum machines through its CUDA-Q platform, which enables hybrid quantum-classical programming across GPUs, CPUs, and quantum processors. As quantum AI scales up, these systems will increasingly depend on Nvidia's ecosystem for next-generation algorithms that allow the strengths of classical and quantum computing to be efficiently combined.

Meanwhile, Nvidia's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 32 is hovering around its lowest level in nearly seven years. This discount suggests that the potential upsides of quantum computing adoption and continued AI infrastructure expansion are not yet fully reflected in Nvidia's stock price.

NVDA PE Ratio data by YCharts.

This positions Nvidia stock as a compelling buy to capture the near-term momentum of data center build-outs, while offering leveraged exposure to longer-term advances of quantum computing over the coming decade.

Adam Spatacco has positions in Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, IonQ, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-07-26 22:47 4d ago
2026-07-26 16:38 4d ago
Marvell Technology vs. UiPath: What Do the Quarterly Revenue Trends of These Artificial Intelligence Companies Tell Investors?
MRVL Marvell Technology Group
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Marvell Technology: Steady Revenue ClimbingMarvell Technology (MRVL -7.25%) primarily earns revenue by developing data infrastructure semiconductor solutions and system-on-a-chip architectures for enterprise clients across the globe.

It was officially added to the S&P 500 index on June 22, 2026, and it reported a 52% gross margin for the quarter ended May 2, 2026.

UiPath: Examining Quarterly Revenue FluctuationsUiPath (PATH +6.37%) primarily earns revenue by delivering a software ecosystem focused on robotic process automation to organizations in various commercial and government settings.

While launching new artificial intelligence features for its Automation Suite on May 5, it recorded an 81% gross margin for the quarter ended April 30, 2026.

Why Revenue Matters for Retail InvestorsTracking revenue helps investors understand the total volume of money a business brings in before operating expenses or taxes are deducted. This metric reveals whether an organization is successfully attracting customers and growing its overall business volume over time.

A Closer Look at Quarterly Revenue for Marvell Technology and UiPathQuarter (Period End)Marvell Technology RevenueUiPath RevenueQ3 2024$1.3 billion (period ended Aug. 2024)$316.3 million (period ended July 2024)Q4 2024$1.5 billion (period ended Nov. 2024)$354.7 million (period ended Oct. 2024)Q1 2025 (Jan. 2025)$1.8 billion$423.6 millionQ2 2025$1.9 billion (period ended May 2025)$356.6 million (period ended April 2025)Q3 2025$2.0 billion (period ended Aug. 2025)$361.7 million (period ended July 2025)Q4 2025$2.1 billion (period ended Nov. 2025)$411.1 million (period ended Oct. 2025)Q1 2026 (Jan. 2026)$2.2 billion$481.1 millionQ2 2026$2.4 billion (period ended May 2026)$418.4 million (period ended April 2026)Data source: Company filings. Data as of July 24, 2026.

Foolish TakeBoth Marvell Technology and UiPath are seeing sales growth from the rapid expansion of the artificial intelligence sector. Looking at these two is a comparison between the former’s involvement in the high-growth semiconductor industry against the latter’s enterprise AI automation software.

While both are enjoying an increase in revenue year over year, Marvell is experiencing a more impressive accomplishment by delivering quarterly sales growth. The company expects this trend to continue in the next quarter with forecasted revenue of about $2.7 billion. This illustrates the unprecedented customer demand for Marvell’s products.

UiPath’s software solutions are capturing customers, as demonstrated by its 17% year-over-year increase to $418.4 million in its latest quarter. The company is also anticipating this revenue trend to extend into next quarter with sales in the range of $395 million to $400 million compared to $361.7 million in the previous year.

However, Marvell’s quarterly sales acceleration helped its stock price soar over 150% in the past 12 months through July 24. Meanwhile, Wall Street has not been impressed with UiPath’s progress as its share price fell more than 10% in that time.

Robert Izquierdo has positions in Marvell Technology and UiPath. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Marvell Technology and UiPath. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-07-26 22:44 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:00 4d ago
Aptos TVL falls 43% as capital flees – Can APT price recover?
APT Aptos
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Aptos’ [APT] price action has been trending downward for the past 18 months. Last week alone, APT’s Total Value Locked (TVL) declined by about 43% as of writing, and the decline shows no signs of slowing.

Why is Aptos’ TVL crashing? According to DefiLlama, TVL has been falling over the past two months. In early June, it was around $280 million but lost over $100 million by the end of the month.

In the past week, Aptos’ TVL tumbled from $156 million to $100 million, equivalent to about a 43% drop. Excluding active loans, double counts, staking, and liquid staking, the TVL stands at $63 million.

Source: DefiLlama One key factor behind last week’s sharp plunge was Echo Protocol pulling a significant amount of liquidity. As a Bitcoin [BTC]-focused bridge on Move chains, including Aptos, Echo’s exit hit APT the hardest.

This drop was an indication of low user activity. It was backed by the low Daily Active Addresses of around 40.5K. Additionally, earnings have declined by 72% from $366K to $103K, as per DefiLlama.

Such a decline could cause traders to pull out staked APT, viewing it as less profitable and potentially affecting the chain’s security. Notably, the decline in RWA TVL on Aptos should not be overlooked as it dropped 70% in the past thirty days.

Source: rwa.xyz Together, these factors led to capital flight from Aptos.

Is APT’s price responsible for the TVL drop? Moreover, weak price performance played a part when measuring the TVL in terms of USD valuation. When the price of APT drops, the USD value of the TVL also drops.

At press time, APT was falling in a trend channel following a breakdown from a sideways range. This trend was reinforced by Open Interest (OI) crashing to around $42 million.

Source: APT/USDT on TradingView Notably, APT was trading above the mid-level of the channel, a potential sign that bulls may be gaining strength in bear territory.

Final Summary Aptos’s TVL crashed more than 43% in a week due to Echo Protocol pulling liquidity, RWA underperformance, low usage, and earnings.  APT price was declining in a trend channel, with OI reinforcing that traders were not interested in the token. 
2026-07-26 22:44 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:00 4d ago
Baker Hughes Announces Second-Quarter 2026 Results
BKR Baker Hughes
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Second-quarter highlights

Orders of $10.5 billion, including $7.1 billion of IET orders. RPO of $40.1 billion, including record IET RPO of $37.1 billion.Revenue of $6.7 billion.Attributable net income of $681 million.GAAP diluted EPS of $0.68 and adjusted diluted EPS* of $0.64.Adjusted EBITDA* of $1,231 million.Cash flows from operating activities of $1,345 million and free cash flow* of $1,109 million. HOUSTON and LONDON, July 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Baker Hughes Company (Nasdaq: BKR) ("Baker Hughes" or the "Company") announced results today for the second quarter of 2026.

"Baker Hughes delivered another strong quarter, reflecting the breadth of our portfolio and continued momentum across data center, gas infrastructure, and upstream markets. Disciplined execution and our ability to effectively navigate ongoing Middle East challenges contributed to Adjusted EBITDA exceeding the high end of our guidance range. Looking ahead, favorable underlying fundamentals support our confidence in achieving the midpoint of our full-year guidance as we continue to manage through the Middle East uncertainty."

"IET delivered another exceptional quarter of orders, with record bookings doubling year-over-year to $7.1 billion and backlog increasing 19% to a new all-time high. The strength was driven by robust demand across Power Systems and LNG, with particularly strong momentum in power generation. Given broadening customer demand, a growing pipeline across industrial and energy infrastructure markets, and our decision to further expand capacity, we are raising our full-year IET order guidance and increasing our Horizon 2(1) IET orders outlook to more than $45 billion."

"OFSE delivered an impressive quarter, with EBITDA exceeding the high end of our guidance range despite a complex operating environment. Increased activity and higher product shipments late in the quarter in the Middle East, along with solid performance in North America land and Latin America, drove the upside and demonstrated the resilience and durability of our portfolio despite higher inflationary costs."

"Our second-quarter performance further reinforces confidence in Baker Hughes’ strategic direction. Energy security and rising power demand are driving investment across both energy and industrial value chains, and our expanding portfolio is increasingly aligned with the most attractive growth opportunities across our core end markets."

"The successful closing of the Chart acquisition marks a major milestone in our evolution as a leading industrialized energy solutions company. Chart enhances our capabilities in thermal management, air and gas handling, compression and lifecycle services, while expanding our reach across attractive core and adjacent markets. The addition of Chart further advances our portfolio, broadens our growth opportunities, and enhances our ability to create long-term value for customers and shareholders. We are pleased to welcome Chart’s employees to Baker Hughes and look forward to their contributions as part of our team," concluded Simonelli.

(1) Horizon 2 represents 2026-2028.
* Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled "Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures."

 Three Months Ended Variance(in millions except per share amounts)June 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearOrders$10,501$8,159$7,032 29%49%Revenue 6,742 6,587 6,910 2%(2%)Net income attributable to Baker Hughes 681 930 701 (27%)(3%)Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes* 640 573 623 12%3%Adjusted EBITDA* 1,231 1,158 1,212 6%2%Diluted earnings per share (EPS) 0.68 0.93 0.71 (27%)(3%)Adjusted diluted EPS* 0.64 0.58 0.63 12%2%Cash flow from operating activities 1,345 500 510 FFFree cash flow* 1,109 210 239 FF * Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations in the section titled "Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures."
Certain columns and rows in our tables and financial statements may not sum up due to the use of rounded numbers.
"F" is used in the above table when variance is above 100%. Additionally, "U" is used when variance is below (100)%.

Quarter Highlights

Executing our portfolio management strategy

Announced the sale of Waygate Technologies to Hexagon, in an all-cash transaction for approximately $1.45 billion, before customary closing adjustments.In July, completed the previously announced purchase of Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS) in an all-cash transaction. The acquisition enhances Baker Hughes' portfolio with highly complementary technologies and expands exposure to attractive industrial and energy markets, while increasing the Company's installed base and recurring aftermarket opportunities.
Key awards and technology achievements

Leveraging enterprise-wide capabilities

Advanced large-scale geothermal development in North America through a commercial agreement with Mantle Reach Power, a dedicated geothermal development company backed by EnCap Energy Transition Fund III. With the goal to install up to 500 megawatts of power in the next five years, the Company will act as an integrated subsurface solution provider, and Mantle Reach Power will lead project development, ownership and financing. Industrial & Energy Technology

Industrial & Energy Technology (“IET”) secured important awards and agreements across diverse end markets and capabilities.

Received a major Venture Global award to provide six liquefied natural gas (LNG) blocks, for a total of 12 liquefaction modules. Each block is based on two single mixed-refrigerant (SMR) liquefaction modules and related compression trains featuring Baker Hughes' advanced centrifugal compressor technology, as well as cold boxes, air coolers and integrated control systems, building on the successful track record of delivering critical energy infrastructure in Louisiana.Secured substantial awards from Cheniere and Bechtel that highlight Baker Hughes’ full-lifecycle LNG capabilities, including liquefaction equipment for Sabine Pass Train 7, as well as a boil-off gas re-liquefaction unit and fleet-wide gas turbine upgrades across the facility. The awards are expected to support approximately 6 MTPA of additional LNG production capacity.Strengthened its position in floating LNG through a significant award from Golar to supply four PGT25 gas turbine-driven refrigerant compressor trains for a 3.5 MTPA floating LNG facility, marking the fourth Golar vessel to utilize Baker Hughes' liquefaction solutions.Extended a significant, multi-year services agreement with Nigeria LNG to enhance the reliability and efficiency of the project's critical Train 7 turbomachinery equipment.Received a major award from Dynamis Power Solutions, including 76 NovaLT™16 gas turbines, for approximately 1.3 GW of capacity for its hypermobile power solutions for a wide range of data center and oil & gas applications in North America.Signed a multi-year strategic agreement with Kodiak Gas Services, including an initial major award supporting 1 GW of power generation capacity and a broader framework providing a pathway for up to 1.8 GW over time. The initial order leverages Baker Hughes' NovaLT™16, Frame 5 and BRUSH™ Power Generation generator technologies to meet accelerating power demand from data centers and energy infrastructure projects across North America.Awarded significant order to enable improved recovery, sustained production levels, and extension of field life in a mature offshore field in the Middle East. The scope includes nine electric motor-driven compressor trains for gas injection, gas lift, and boosting applications.Received a significant award from Saipem Nasser Saeed Al-Hajri Contracting Company (SNSH), a JV between Saipem and NSH in KSA, following a Novation Agreement with Aramco. The contract covers the supply of compression solutions for Aramco's Uthmaniyah conventional gas wells, supporting production optimization and enhanced recovery to extend the life of the field. The scope includes five electric motor-driven centrifugal compressor trains, together with associated balance-of-plant and auxiliary systems.Continued expanding IET’s presence into new markets, securing RINA certification for its fuel-flexible NovaLT™16 for maritime propulsion applications, specifically to operate on natural gas and up to 100% hydrogen to support maritime decarbonization.Grew digital solutions globally across a mix of software, hardware and services awards, leveraging the Company's Cordant™ Solutions portfolio to deploy asset performance software, analytics, and monitoring technologies through agreements with SINOPEC, Petrobras, and KNPC (formerly KIPIC) to enhance asset visibility and optimize operational performance. In addition, the Company secured a multi-year preferred supplier agreement with a global OEM to include vibration, sensing, condition monitoring, asset health software and services ─ supporting broader deployment across both new build and retrofit projects while driving greater standardization of asset protection and monitoring technologies.
Oilfield Services & Equipment

Oilfield Services & Equipment (“OFSE”) secured strategic orders and agreements across key product lines and geographies.

Expanded the Company’s Norwegian presence and relationship with Equinor, strengthening North Sea capabilities. The Company inaugurated a new subsea manufacturing facility in Dusavik and announced two significant contract extensions for integrated drilling and well services solutions, as well as wireline intervention services.Secured a major contract extension and expansion with Petrobras for integrated well construction solutions across Brazil’s Santos Basin. The agreement builds on a 2024 well construction services award, further expanding the scope and impact of Baker Hughes’ integrated drilling solutions in the region.Signed significant contracts for wireline services with Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India, to provide up to 46 advanced wireline units and integrated drill stem testing kits that will help improve reservoir insight, optimize production and support more efficient field development in offshore and onshore oil & gas fields.Secured a key milestone award for Leucipa™, marking its first deployment outside of the oil & gas sector. By integrating Baker Hughes’ ESP technology with the Leucipa™ digital optimization platform, the solution will support a geothermal and lithium extraction development in Europe through real-time monitoring, operational insights and performance optimization.Signed a strategic collaboration agreement with Helmerich & Payne, Inc. to support geothermal exploration and development in the United States. The companies will provide customers earlier access to dedicated rig capacity, reducing execution risk and allowing greater efficiency to move from project evaluation to development.Received a substantial subsea production systems contract from Azule Energy to support ultra-deepwater, greenfield development offshore Angola. Baker Hughes will manufacture and supply horizontal tree systems to enable safe, reliable and efficient production.Won a significant contract from McDermott to deliver integrated subsea systems for a natural gas development project offshore Brunei Darussalam. The scope includes six trees, controls, services, and subsea wellheads.
Consolidated Financial Results

Revenue for the quarter was $6,742 million, an increase of $155 million, or 2% sequentially, and down $168 million, or 2% year-over-year. The decrease in revenue year-over-year was mainly driven by the impact of the Precision Sensors & Instrumentation (“PSI”) and Surface Pressure Control (“SPC”) dispositions.

The Company's total book-to-bill ratio in the second quarter of 2026 was 1.6; the IET book-to-bill ratio was 2.2.

Net income, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") for the second quarter of 2026, was $681 million. Net income decreased $249 million, or 27% sequentially, and decreased $20 million, or 3% year-over-year.

Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2026 was $640 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $41 million. A list of the adjusting items and associated reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1b in the section titled "Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures." Adjusted net income for the second quarter of 2026 was up $67 million, or 12% sequentially, and up $17 million, or 3% year-over-year.

Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter of 2026 was $333 million.

Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of 2026 was $1,231 million, which excludes adjustments totaling $60 million. See Table 1a in the section titled "Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures." Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was up $73 million, or 6% sequentially, and up $19 million, or 2% year-over-year.

The sequential increase in adjusted net income and Adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by higher volume, price, productivity, FX, and cost-out initiatives, partially offset by inflation.

The year-over-year increase in adjusted net income and Adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by productivity, price, cost-out initiatives, and FX, partially offset by inflation, lower volume, change in business mix, and the PSI and SPC dispositions.

Other Financial Items

Remaining Performance Obligations ("RPO") in the second quarter of 2026 ended at $40.1 billion, an increase of $4.0 billion from the first quarter of 2026. OFSE RPO was $3.0 billion, remained flat sequentially, while IET RPO was $37.1 billion, up $4.0 billion sequentially. Within IET RPO, Gas Technology Equipment and Gas Technology Services were $15.0 billion and $16.7 billion, respectively.

Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2026 was $210 million.

Other (income) expense, net in the second quarter of 2026 was $(104) million, primarily related to a net gain of $125 million from the change in fair value of equity securities, partially offset by transaction related costs of $30 million incurred in connection with business disposals and acquisitions, and $24 million working capital adjustments related to business dispositions.

GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.68 for the second quarter of 2026. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) was $0.64. Excluded from adjusted diluted earnings per share were all items listed in Table 1b in the section titled "Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures."

Cash flow from operating activities was $1,345 million for the second quarter of 2026. Free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the quarter was $1,109 million. A reconciliation from GAAP has been provided in Table 1c in the section titled "Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures."

Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets, were $236 million for the second quarter of 2026, of which $135 million was for OFSE and $85 million was for IET.

Results by Reporting Segment

The following segment discussions and variance explanations are intended to reflect management's view of the relevant comparisons of financial results on a sequential or year-over-year basis, depending on the business dynamics of the reporting segments.

Oilfield Services & Equipment

(in millions)Three Months Ended VarianceSegment resultsJune 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearOrders$3,413 $3,272 $3,503  4%(3%)Revenue$3,451 $3,237 $3,617  7%(5%)EBITDA$605 $565 $677  7%(11%)EBITDA margin 17.5% 17.4% 18.7% 0.1pts-1.2pts (in millions)Three Months Ended VarianceRevenue by Product LineJune 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearWell Construction$899$843$921 7%(2%)Completions, Intervention, and Measurements 944 883 935 7%1%Production Solutions 930 898 968 4%(4%)Subsea & Surface Pressure Systems 678 613 793 11%(14%)Total Revenue$3,451$3,237$3,617 7%(5%) (in millions)Three Months Ended VarianceRevenue by Geographic RegionJune 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearNorth America$933$927$928 1%1%Latin America 732 600 639 22%15%Europe/CIS/Sub-Saharan Africa 568 558 653 2%(13%)Middle East/Asia 1,218 1,152 1,398 6%(13%)Total Revenue$3,451$3,237$3,617 7%(5%)       North America$933$927$928 1%1%International$2,518$2,310$2,689 9%(6%) EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of $266 million, $278 million, and $233 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, March 31, 2026, and June 30, 2025, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.
"F" is used in the above table when variance is above 100%. Additionally, "U" is used when variance is below (100)%.

OFSE orders of $3,413 million for the second quarter of 2026 increased by $141 million, or 4% sequentially. Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems orders were $667 million, up $17 million, or 3% sequentially, and down $31 million, or 4% year-over-year.

OFSE revenue of $3,451 million for the second quarter of 2026 was up $214 million, or 7% sequentially, and down $166 million, or 5% year-over-year. The year-over-year decrease was driven mainly by the impact of the SPC disposition and disruptions in the Middle East, offset by the benefit of FX in Latin America.

North America revenue was $933 million, up $5 million, or 1% sequentially. International revenue was $2,518 million, up $208 million, or 9% sequentially, with an increase in Latin America, Middle East/Asia, and Europe/CIS/Sub-Saharan Africa.

Segment EBITDA for the second quarter of 2026 was $605 million, an increase of $40 million, or 7% sequentially. The sequential increase in EBITDA was a result of higher volume, price, cost-out initiatives, and FX, partially offset by inflation, productivity, and a change in business mix.

Industrial & Energy Technology

(in millions)Three Months Ended VarianceSegment resultsJune 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearOrders$7,088 $4,887 $3,530  45%FRevenue$3,291 $3,350 $3,293  (2%)—%EBITDA$678 $678 $585  —%16%EBITDA margin 20.6% 20.2% 17.8% 0.3pts2.8pts (in millions)Three Months Ended VarianceOrders by Product LineJune 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearGas Technology Equipment$4,913$1,824$781 FFGas Technology Services 1,314 973 986 35%33%Total Gas Technology 6,227 2,797 1,767 FFIndustrial Products 533 604 513 (12%)4%Industrial Solutions 274 229 327 20%(16%)Total Industrial Technology 807 833 839 (3%)(4%)Climate Technology Solutions 54 1,257 923 (96%)(94%)Total Orders$7,088$4,887$3,530 45%F (in millions)Three Months Ended VarianceRevenue by Product LineJune 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025 SequentialYear-over-yearGas Technology Equipment$1,524$1,665$1,624 (9%)(6%)Gas Technology Services 831 791 752 5%11%Total Gas Technology 2,355 2,456 2,377 (4%)(1%)Industrial Products 549 491 488 12%13%Industrial Solutions 182 185 273 (2%)(33%)Total Industrial Technology 731 676 761 8%(4%)Climate Technology Solutions 205 218 156 (6%)31%Total Revenue$3,291$3,350$3,293 (2%)—% EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization of $60 million, $69 million, and $56 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, March 31, 2026, and June 30, 2025, respectively. EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA divided by revenue.
"F" is used in the above table when variance is above 100%. Additionally, "U" is used when variance is below (100)%.

IET orders of $7,088 million for the second quarter of 2026 increased by $3,558 million, or 101% year-over-year. The increase was driven by continued strength in Gas Technology Equipment and Gas Technology Services.

IET revenue of $3,291 million for the second quarter of 2026 remained flat year-over-year, with decreases in Gas Technology Equipment and Industrial Solutions driven by the PSI disposition, offset by increases in all other product lines.

Segment EBITDA for the quarter was $678 million, an increase of $93 million, or 16% year-over-year. The year-over-year increase in segment EBITDA was driven by price, productivity, cost-out initiatives, and FX, partially offset by lower volume and inflation.

Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management provides non-GAAP financial measures because it believes such measures are widely accepted financial indicators used by investors and analysts to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance (including adjusted EBITDA; adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes; and adjusted diluted earnings per share) and liquidity (free cash flow) and that these measures may be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. Management believes that the exclusion of certain identified items from several key operating performance measures enables us to evaluate our operations more effectively, to identify underlying trends in the business, and to establish operational goals for certain management compensation purposes. Management also believes that free cash flow is an important supplemental measure of our cash performance but should not be considered as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities presented in accordance with GAAP.

Table 1a. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA

 Three Months Ended(in millions)June 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)$681 $930 $701 Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 1  8  10 Provision for income taxes 210  336  256 Interest expense, net 66  86  54 Depreciation & amortization 333  354  293 Restructuring 11  37  — Inventory impairment —  2  — Gain (loss) on business dispositions(1) 24  (721) — Change in fair value of equity securities(1) (125) 50  (119)Transaction related costs(1) 30  28  — Other charges and credits(1)  48  17 Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) 1,231  1,158  1,212 Corporate costs 82  74  78 Other (income) / expense not allocated to segments (30) 11  (28)Total Segment EBITDA (non-GAAP)$1,283 $1,243 $1,262 OFSE 605  565  677 IET 678  678  585  (1)   The gain on business dispositions, change in fair value of equity securities, transaction related costs, and other charges and credits are reported in "Other (income) expense, net" on the condensed consolidated statements of income (loss).

Table 1a reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the most directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment EBITDA exclude the impact of certain identified items.

Table 1b. Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes to Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Baker Hughes

 Three Months Ended(in millions, except per share amounts)June 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025Net income attributable to Baker Hughes (GAAP)$681 $930 $701 Restructuring 11  37  — Inventory impairment —  2  — (Gain) loss on business dispositions 24  (721) — Change in fair value of equity securities (125) 50  (119)Transaction related costs(1) 30  72  — Other adjustments —  48  17 Tax adjustments 19  155  24 Total adjustments, net of income tax (41) (357) (78)Less: adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests —  —  — Adjustments attributable to Baker Hughes (41) (357) (78)Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes (non-GAAP)$640 $573 $623     Denominator:   Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding diluted 997  996  991 Earnings per share - diluted (GAAP)$0.68 $0.93 $0.71 Total adjustments per share, net of income tax (0.04) (0.35) (0.08)Adjusted earnings per share - diluted (non-GAAP)$0.64 $0.58 $0.63  (1)   For the period ending March 31, 2026, transaction related costs included $43 million of interest expense fees related to the Bridge Facility.

Table 1b reconciles net income attributable to Baker Hughes, which is the most directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes. Adjusted net income attributable to Baker Hughes excludes the impact of certain identified items.

Table 1c. Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

 Three Months Ended(in millions)June 30, 2026March 31, 2026June 30, 2025Net cash flows from operating activities (GAAP)$1,345 $500 $510 Add: cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposal of assets (236) (290) (271)Free cash flow (non-GAAP)$1,109 $210 $239  Table 1c reconciles net cash flows from operating activities, which is the most directly comparable financial result determined in accordance with GAAP, to free cash flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash flows from operating activities less expenditures for capital assets plus proceeds from disposal of assets.

Financial Tables (GAAP)
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
    Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,(In millions, except per share amounts) 2026  2025  2026  2025 Revenue$6,742 $6,910 $13,329 $13,337 Costs and expenses:    Cost of revenue 5,165  5,295  10,246  10,247 Selling, general and administrative 569  567  1,131  1,144 Research and development costs 143  161  277  307 Restructuring 11  —  50  — Other (income) expense, net (104) (134) (691) 6 Interest expense, net 66  54  151  105 Income before income taxes 892  967  2,165  1,528 Provision for income taxes (210) (256) (545) (408)Net income 682  711  1,620  1,120 Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 1  10  9  17 Net income attributable to Baker Hughes Company$681 $701 $1,611 $1,103      Per share amounts:   Basic income per Class A common stock$0.69 $0.71 $1.63 $1.11 Diluted income per Class A common stock$0.68 $0.71 $1.62 $1.11      Weighted average shares:    Class A basic 992  988  991  990 Class A diluted 997  991  996  995      Cash dividend per Class A common stock$0.23 $0.23 $0.46 $0.46       Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(Unaudited)
(In millions)June 30, 2026December 31, 2025ASSETSCurrent Assets:  Cash and cash equivalents$15,727$3,715Current receivables, net 6,654 6,641Inventories, net 4,961 4,954All other current assets 3,241 3,518Total current assets 30,583 18,828Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation 5,540 5,326Goodwill 5,566 6,068Other intangible assets, net 3,997 4,097Contract and other deferred assets 1,947 1,620All other assets 4,987 4,942Total assets$52,620$40,881LIABILITIES AND EQUITYCurrent Liabilities:  Accounts payable$4,509$4,579Short-term debt 774 689Progress collections and deferred income 6,598 5,904All other current liabilities 2,718 2,705Total current liabilities 14,599 13,877Long-term debt 15,479 5,398Liabilities for pensions and other postretirement benefits 959 1,066All other liabilities 1,499 1,530Equity 20,084 19,010Total liabilities and equity$52,620$40,881   Outstanding Baker Hughes Company shares:  Class A common stock 992 987 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,(In millions) 2026  2026  2025 Cash flows from operating activities:   Net income$682 $1,620 $1,120 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:   Depreciation and amortization 333  687  579 Stock-based compensation cost 57  102  102 Change in fair value of equity securities (125) (75) 21 (Gain) loss on business dispositions 24  (697) — (Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes (166) 58  (17)Working capital 523  350  98 Other operating items, net 17  (200) (684)Net cash flows provided by operating activities 1,345  1,845  1,219 Cash flows from investing activities:   Expenditures for capital assets (300) (636) (601)Proceeds from disposal of assets 64  110  74 Proceeds from business dispositions —  1,381  — Other investing items, net 72  19  (69)Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities (164) 874  (596)Cash flows from financing activities:   Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt —  9,885  — Dividends paid (228) (456) (456)Repurchase of Class A common stock —  —  (384)Other financing items, net (8) (142) (105)Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities (236) 9,287  (945)Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 18  6  45 (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 963  12,012  (277)Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 14,764  3,715  3,364 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$15,727 $15,727 $3,087 Supplemental cash flows disclosures:   Income taxes paid, net of refunds$193 $381 $418 Interest paid$181 $237 $148 
Supplemental Financial Information

Supplemental financial information can be found on the Company's website at: investors.bakerhughes.com in the Financial Information section under Quarterly Results.

Conference Call and Webcast

The Company has scheduled an investor conference call to discuss management's outlook and the results reported in today's earnings announcement. The call will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time, 8:30 a.m. Central time on Monday, July 27, 2026, the content of which is not part of this earnings release. The conference call will be broadcast live via a webcast and can be accessed by visiting the Events and Presentations page on the Company's website at: investors.bakerhughes.com. An archived version of the webcast will be available on the website for one month following the webcast.

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release (and oral statements made regarding the subjects of this release) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (each a "forward-looking statement"). Forward-looking statements concern future circumstances and results and other statements that are not historical facts and are sometimes identified by the words "may," "will," "should," "potential," "intend," "expect," "would," "seek," "anticipate," "estimate," "overestimate," "underestimate," "believe," "could," "project," "predict," "continue," "target," "goal" or other similar words or expressions. There are many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2025 and those set forth from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The documents are available through the Company's website at: https://investors.bakerhughes.com or through the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval system at: www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements.

Our expectations regarding our business outlook and business plans; the business plans of our customers; oil and natural gas market conditions; cost and availability of resources; economic, legal and regulatory conditions, and other matters are only our forecasts regarding these matters.

These forward-looking statements, including forecasts, may be substantially different from actual results, which are affected by many risks, along with the following risk factors and the timing of any of these risk factors:

Economic and political conditions - the impact of worldwide economic conditions; the impact of inflation and interest rates; the impact of tariffs, including the potential for significant increases in tariffs and changes in global trade policy that could affect supply chain costs, pricing, and customer demand; the effect that declines in credit availability may have on worldwide economic growth and demand for hydrocarbons; foreign currency exchange fluctuations and changes in the capital markets in locations where we operate; and the impact of government disruptions and sanctions.Orders and RPO - our ability to execute on orders and RPO in accordance with agreed specifications, terms and conditions and convert those orders and RPO to revenue and cash.Oil and gas market conditions - the level of petroleum industry exploration, development and production expenditures; the price of, volatility in pricing of, and the demand for crude oil and natural gas; drilling activity; drilling permits for and regulation of the shelf and the deepwater drilling; excess productive capacity; crude and product inventories; LNG supply and demand; seasonal and other adverse weather conditions that affect the demand for energy; severe weather conditions, such as tornadoes and hurricanes, that affect exploration and production activities; Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") policy and the adherence by OPEC nations to their OPEC production quotas.Terrorism and geopolitical risks - war, military action, terrorist activities or extended periods of international conflict, particularly involving any petroleum-producing or consuming regions, including Russia and Ukraine; and the recent conflict in the Middle East and the associated impact to the Strait of Hormuz; labor disruptions, civil unrest or security conditions where we operate; potentially burdensome taxation; expropriation of assets by governmental action; cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks; epidemic outbreaks.
About Baker Hughes:

Baker Hughes (Nasdaq: BKR) is an energy technology company that provides solutions to energy and industrial customers worldwide. Built on a century of experience and conducting business in over 120 countries, our innovative technologies and services are taking energy forward - making it safer, cleaner and more efficient for people and the planet. Visit us at bakerhughes.com.

For more information, please contact:

Investor Relations

Chase Mulvehill
+1 346-297-2561
[email protected]

Media Relations

Adrienne M. Lynch
+1 713-906-8407
[email protected]
2026-07-26 22:44 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:22 4d ago
Oilfield services provider Baker Hughes beats Q2 profit estimates
BKR Baker Hughes
FMP Stock News
Original source text
CompaniesJuly 26 (Reuters) - Baker Hughes (BKR.O), opens new tab surpassed Wall Street ​expectations for second-quarter ‌profit on Sunday, as strength in ​its industrial and ​energy technology unit offset ⁠lower drilling ​activity caused by disruptions ​in the Middle East.

The U.S. oilfield services ​provider posted an ​adjusted profit of 64 ‌cents ⁠per share for the quarter ended June 30, compared ​with ​analysts' ⁠expectations of 50 cents per share, according ​to data ​compiled ⁠by LSEG.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

Reporting by Vallari Srivastava and ⁠Devika ​Nair in ​Bengaluru; Editing by Devika ​Syamnath and Cynthia Osterman

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-07-26 22:39 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:59 4d ago
AVAV DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds AeroVironment (AVAV) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on July 27, 2026
AVAV AeroVironment
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In AeroVironment To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in AeroVironment between 4:30 PM EST on June 24, 2025 and June 18, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against AeroVironment, Inc. ("AeroVironment" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: AVAV) and reminds investors of the July 27, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) AeroVironment understated the likelihood that it would imminently face competition from other vendors for the work it performed in connection with the SCAR program and the U.S. Space Force's ongoing efforts to modernize the SCN; (2) accordingly, Defendants overstated AeroVironment's business and financial prospects; and (3) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding AeroVironment's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the AeroVironment class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/AVAV or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the AeroVironment Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the AeroVironment securities fraud lawsuit about?

The AeroVironment securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVAV) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that the Company faced imminent competition for its SCAR program contracts and overstating its business and financial prospects. As the truth emerged through a series of disclosures — including a U.S. government stop work order on January 20, 2026, a Space Force announcement that it was reopening the SCAR program on March 2, 2026, and AeroVironment's disclosure of a $151.3 million goodwill impairment and contract termination on March 10, 2026 — AVAV's stock price dropped sharply, causing significant losses for investors.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or acquired AeroVironment (AVAV) stock between 4:30 PM EST on June 24, 2025 and June 18, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the AeroVironment securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former AeroVironment employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff in the AeroVironment class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any AeroVironment investor who purchased AVAV stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 27, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.

What should investors do if they purchased AeroVironment stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased AeroVironment (AVAV) stock between 4:30 PM EST on June 24, 2025 and June 18, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the AeroVironment securities class action is July 27, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/AVAV for more information.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased AeroVironment securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306458

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 22:34 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:04 4d ago
CALX DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Calix (CALX) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on July 27, 2026
CALX Calix
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Calix To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Calix between January 28, 2026 and April 21, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Calix, Inc. ("Calix" or the "Company") (NYSE: CALX) and reminds investors of the July 27, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company's first quarter margins had significantly benefited from advanced purchasing of memory components; (2) that the Company's advanced supply of memory components was dwindling; (3) that, as a result, the Company was experiencing negative margin pressure as it was forced to purchase memory components at rising market prices; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's margins, business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On April 21, 2026, Calix reported results for the first quarter of 2026 earnings, including that "Non-GAAP gross margin was 57.2%, down 80 basis points sequentially." Further, the Company reported "gross margin guidance for the second quarter of 2026 is between 54.25% and 57.25%" and "[f]or the year, we expect our non-GAAP gross margin to decline between 50 and 150 basis points."

In the accompanying earnings call, the Company's CFO stated "advanced purchasing had allowed us to avoid higher memory component costs during the first quarter. However, that advanced supply has run its course, and we now face market prices."

On this news, Calix's stock price fell $6.93, or 13.98% to close at $42.65 per share on April 22, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Calix's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Calix class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/CALX or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Calix Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Calix securities fraud lawsuit about?

The Calix securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Calix, Inc. (NYSE: CALX) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that the Company's strong first quarter margins were artificially inflated by advanced purchasing of memory components, that its advanced supply of those components was dwindling, and that it would soon be forced to purchase memory components at rising market prices — creating significant negative margin pressure. As the truth emerged on April 21, 2026, when Calix reported Q1 2026 results and its CFO disclosed that "advanced supply has run its course" and the Company would "now face market prices," CALX's stock price fell $6.93 per share, or 13.98%, causing significant losses for investors.

Who may be eligible to participate in the Calix class action lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or acquired Calix (CALX) stock between January 28, 2026 and April 21, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Calix securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Calix employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Calix lawsuit?

A lead plaintiff in the Calix class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Calix investor who purchased CALX stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 27, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.

What should investors do if they purchased Calix stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Calix (CALX) stock between January 28, 2026 and April 21, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Calix securities class action is July 27, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/CALX for more information.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306463

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 22:24 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:39 4d ago
PLNT DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Planet Fitness Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on September 14, 2026
PLNT Planet Fitness
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Planet Fitness To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Planet Fitness between November 6, 2025, and May 6, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 26, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Planet Fitness, Inc. (""Planet Fitness" or the "Company") (NYSE: PLNT) and reminds investors of the September 14, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose facts concerning the true state of Planet Fitness' customer acquisition and marketing metrics. Notably, the Company's updated marketing messaging was failing to resonate with, and was actively intimidating, its core target demographic of fitness beginners and casual gym-goers. As a result, Planet Fitness was experiencing a significant headwind in net member joins during its peak first-quarter sign-up period that rendered its previously issued fiscal 2026 guidance and long term financial targets unachievable.

On May 7, 2026, Planet Fitness announced its first quarter results for fiscal 2026, revealing that its critical peak sign-up period was off to a slower-than-expected start internally, slashing same-store growth guidance from 4-5% to only 1%, completely withdrawing its long-term three-year growth algorithm, and announcing a pause of the planned national rollout of the Black Card price increase. On this news, Planet Fitness's stock price fell $19.95, or 31.19%, to close at $44.01 per share on May 7, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Planet Fitness's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Planet Fitness Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Planet Fitness securities fraud lawsuit about?

This securities class action lawsuit alleges that Planet Fitness, Inc. made materially false and misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts during the class period concerning the company's customer acquisition and marketing metrics. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Planet Fitness's updated marketing messaging was failing to resonate with - and was allegedly actively intimidating - its core target demographic of fitness beginners and casual gym-goers. As a result, the company allegedly experienced a significant headwind in net member joins during its critical peak first-quarter sign-up period, rendering its previously issued fiscal 2026 guidance and long-term financial targets unachievable. On May 7, 2026, Planet Fitness announced its first quarter fiscal 2026 results, at which time it slashed same-store growth guidance from 4-5% to only 1%, completely withdrew its long-term three-year growth algorithm, and announced a pause of the planned national rollout of its Black Card price increase. On that news, Planet Fitness's stock price fell $19.95 per share, or approximately 31.19%, to close at $44.01 per share on May 7, 2026.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Planet Fitness, Inc. common stock traded on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol PLNT between November 6, 2025 and May 6, 2026, inclusive, may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit. Eligibility to participate in any potential recovery is not limited to investors who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any class member who suffered losses during the class period may be entitled to share in any recovery that may be obtained. Investors are encouraged to review their trading records to determine whether their purchases fall within the applicable class period. Additional information about eligibility may be obtained by contacting Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who serves on behalf of all class members and plays an active role in directing the litigation, including working with counsel on case strategy and settlement negotiations. The lead plaintiff is typically the class member who suffered the largest financial loss and who satisfies certain adequacy and typicality requirements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court no later than September 14, 2026. Importantly, investors do not need to serve as lead plaintiff in order to participate in the lawsuit or share in any recovery that may be obtained - class membership alone may entitle eligible investors to a portion of any proceeds.

What should investors do if they purchased Planet Fitness stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Planet Fitness, Inc. common stock on the NASDAQ (PLNT) during the class period from November 6, 2025 through May 6, 2026 are encouraged to review their brokerage and trading records to confirm the timing and details of their purchases. Investors should take steps to preserve all relevant documentation, including trade confirmations, account statements, and any communications related to their Planet Fitness holdings, as such records may be important to establishing their claims. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is September 14, 2026, investors who wish to be considered for appointment as lead plaintiff should act promptly. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP prior to that deadline to evaluate their legal options and understand their rights, even if they do not intend to seek the lead plaintiff role.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Planet Fitness securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306474

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-26 22:09 4d ago
2026-07-26 15:14 4d ago
How Crypto Lets Traders Bet on China’s Biggest Chip IPO
GT Gate
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Blockchain

26 July 2026 | 18:14 Crypto exchanges have built a parallel market around one of China's largest technology listings before the underlying shares have traded a single lot.

Key Takeaways CXMT perps settle in USDT and convey no shares, dividends or voting rights. Gate lists long and short positions from 1x to 10x. Direct STAR Market entry requires RMB500,000 (approx. $73,800) in assets and two years of experience. About $19m in CXMT perps traded before a roughly RMB66.6bn ($9.8bn) IPO. According to a Financial Times report, tradeXYZ and Gate launched perpetual futures tied to CXMT, China’s leading domestic DRAM manufacturer, ahead of its July 27 debut on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Roughly $19 million of CXMT contracts changed hands in one 24-hour window.

Gate’s product announcement confirms the contract settles in USDT. It tracks changes in CXMT’s expected valuation, and none of the collateral posted to trade it ever reaches the company.

So the exchanges are not widening foreign access to China’s equity market. They are cloning its price action inside a separate, stablecoin-funded venue that needs no mainland brokerage account.

Why the Contract Floats Free of the Shares CXMT is scheduled to begin trading on Shanghai’s STAR Market under the code 688825. The company priced its shares at RMB8.66 (approx. $1.28). According to China’s official capital-market disclosure platform, the base offering could raise about RMB57.9 billion (approx. $8.5 billion) before expenses, rising to roughly RMB66.6 billion (approx. $9.8 billion) if the over-allotment option is fully exercised.

The listing is unusually observable: the issue price is public, the debut date is fixed, and Shanghai will soon post a share price anyone can check the contract against.

When-issued trading in traditional markets stays tethered to the equity because participants eventually deliver or receive shares. Here no practical route exists. Holders of the crypto contract cannot buy, borrow, short or deliver CXMT stock, and bridging the two venues would require both mainland securities access and an offshore crypto account in the same hands.

Without that link, the perpetual is not discovering CXMT’s price. It is recording what a self-contained pool of leveraged traders believes the price will be. The $19 million of early volume shows an active speculative market, and says little about the valuation Shanghai will set.

CXMT Pre-IPO Perps vs. Direct STAR Market Access Feature CXMT Crypto Perpetual Direct STAR Market (Shanghai) Settlement & Currency USDT (Crypto) RMB (Fiat) Leverage Up to 10x 1x (Spot) Investor Requirements Crypto exchange account & KYC RMB500,000 ($73,800) assets + 2 years experience Rights Acquired Price exposure only Legal equity ownership & dividends Price Anchor Reference index; no arbitrage path Order book with settlement How the Pre-IPO Contract Works A perpetual future is a derivative built to track a reference price without a fixed settlement date. The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s description of perpetual contracts explains that funding payments between longs and shorts keep the contract near the market it tracks.

Before CXMT trades publicly, no continuous cash price exists, so the perpetual reflects what traders expect the shares to be worth at the open. The estimate can fold in the issue price, IPO demand, comparable chipmakers and the outlook for China’s domestic memory industry. A trader anticipating a stronger listing goes long; one anticipating a weaker open takes the short side.

Profit turns on four things: entry price, exit price, accumulated funding, and whether the position survives an adverse swing before the expected move arrives. A listing that opens above its IPO price can still lose money on any of them.

Once the shares trade, the contract can switch to tracking the public market. The holder still owns a derivative position against the trading venue rather than an equity interest recorded through a securities custodian. That separates the product from a tokenised stock, which may be structured to represent ownership or a custodial claim over real shares.

If the listing is postponed or withdrawn, the contract has no price to converge on, and resolution falls entirely to the venue’s own terms. Traders should read those terms before committing collateral.

How the Contracts Sidestep Access Rules Foreign access to mainland equities stays controlled, though the official routes differ.

Northbound Stock Connect lets eligible investors trade selected Shanghai and Shenzhen shares through Hong Kong. Under Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing’s current rules, purchases remain subject to daily net-buy quotas of RMB52 billion (approx. $7.7 billion) each for Shanghai and Shenzhen Connect.

The Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor framework is permissioned rather than quota-capped. China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange removed QFII and RQFII investment quotas in 2020, though participants still need regulatory approval, custodians and compliant securities accounts.

Domestic retail investors face a different bar. The Shanghai Stock Exchange requires individual STAR Market participants to hold at least RMB500,000 (approx. $73,800) in eligible assets and to have two years of investment experience.

A stablecoin-settled perpetual sidesteps those requirements because no share purchase occurs: the trader posts collateral with a crypto platform and opens a contract linked to the stock. Gatekeepers still exist, but different ones: identity checks, regional blocks, sanctions screening, collateral rules and the laws of the trader’s home jurisdiction.

For mainland residents, technical access is not legal permission. China’s 2021 virtual-currency notice classifies cryptocurrency derivatives and services offered by overseas exchanges to mainland residents as illegal financial activity. An offshore venue may be harder for Chinese authorities to shut directly, though that offers no recognised exemption from domestic financial rules.

Shanghai’s Trading Rules Create a Specific Oracle Problem The index feeding the contract becomes critical the moment CXMT lists, and the STAR Market’s mechanics make it harder to build than one tracking an ordinary stock.

The exchange applies no daily price limit during a new listing’s first five trading days, moving to a 20% band afterwards. Debut day therefore has no ceiling, though circuit breakers still apply. Trading halts automatically when the price first moves 30% from the opening level, and again at 60%, with each suspension lasting ten minutes.

Those halts are the practical risk for a leveraged offshore contract. During a ten-minute suspension the underlying market produces no price at exactly the moment it is moving fastest. Whether the perpetual keeps trading through the blackout, how it treats the stale quote, and which fallback source it uses are all decisions the venue makes on its own.

Crypto derivatives also trade through evenings, weekends and Chinese exchange holidays, when the share price cannot absorb news while the perpetual keeps moving. The mismatch can force abrupt resets when Shanghai reopens, and an accurate directional call can be stopped out on that gap before the official market reflects it.

At 10x leverage, an adverse move of about 10% can erase the initial margin before maintenance requirements, fees and funding costs are counted. A thin index reaches that threshold faster than the underlying stock would.

Holding the Position Has a Running Cost Perpetual contracts avoid fixed settlement dates, but holding one can turn expensive. Funding payments shift between longs and shorts to hold the contract near the index, so when long demand dominates and funding runs positive, longs pay shorts at each interval.

That matters around a hyped listing. If most traders anticipate CXMT climbing, staying long can cost more even before the shares open. A trader can be right on direction and still bleed capital as funding accrues and steadily offsets an unrealised gain. This is a different failure from a leverage-driven liquidation: the call is correct and the position stays open, but the running cost eats the return.

Skipping expiry removes the roll into a later contract, and replaces it with a charge that accrues for as long as the position stays open.

Equity Perps Are Drawing Regulatory Attention Securities and derivatives law still applies to these products. What changes on crypto rails is who can enforce it, and how.

In February 2026, the European Securities and Markets Authority warned that products marketed as perpetual futures may fall under existing rules for contracts for difference. Where that classification applies, providers face leverage caps, margin close-out rules, mandatory risk warnings and a duty to assess client suitability.

Those obligations bind authorised firms. An offshore venue settling in stablecoins falls outside that perimeter, and no European regulator can compel it to change a contract specification. Their leverage runs through the routes into the product instead: warning lists, payment-processor pressure, app-store removals, advertising restrictions and conditions on any licensed entity the same group operates locally.

China’s position is similar in structure. The CSRC’s domestic derivatives framework, due to take effect in November 2026, adds licensing, real-name accounts, investor-suitability tests and stronger risk controls, all of which govern the onshore market. Mainland authorities can pursue residents who trade offshore and the intermediaries that serve them, though they cannot compel a foreign platform to delist a ticker.

As volume grows, it becomes harder to argue that equity-linked perpetuals are pure crypto instruments with no connection to regulated securities markets. That argument, rather than any single enforcement action, is what these venues depend on.

The Real Test Comes After CXMT Lists The first signal is convergence: whether the contract tracks CXMT’s public share price once Shanghai trading opens on July 27. A functioning market should let traders enter and exit without severe slippage while the index keeps the perpetual close to the stock during Shanghai hours. A persistent gap would show the contract trading its own assumptions rather than the equity.

Funding is the second signal. A contract that tracks the share price but grows prohibitively expensive to hold would offer little as a longer-term access tool.

Post-IPO volume will tell more than the pre-listing burst. Some traders only want to bet the opening valuation and would leave once ordinary market data arrives; sustained participation would point to real demand for synthetic exposure to equities that stay hard to reach through traditional brokerage accounts. A fast decline would mark CXMT as a short-lived pre-market event.

The listing leaves Chinese share ownership exactly where it was. What it exports is the price movement, tradable outside the market where ownership is legally recorded. That buys investors a bet, not a stake in the company. In exchange for fewer account barriers, they take on leverage, funding costs, platform risk and dependence on an index bridging two markets with different hours and rulebooks.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and analytical purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment or legal advice. Perpetual futures are complex leveraged instruments and may result in the rapid or total loss of deposited collateral. Methodology: The launch of the CXMT contracts, tradeXYZ’s involvement and the $19 million volume figure are reported by the Financial Times and were not independently verified by Coindoo. Contract specifications were checked against Gate’s own product announcement. Offering size and pricing come from CXMT’s statutory disclosures. Trading rules, quotas and regulatory positions were checked against primary material from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, HKEX, SAFE, the People’s Bank of China, ESMA, the CFTC and the CSRC. Sources reviewed on July 26, 2026. Author

Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.
2026-07-26 22:09 4d ago
2026-07-26 18:00 4d ago
Bitget Wins Two CFD Awards at Wiki Finance Expo 2026
BGB Bitget Token
CoinGecko News
Original source text
20h00 ▪ 5 min read ▪ by Evans S.

Summarize this article with:

Bitget received two industry awards during its first appearance at Wiki Finance Expo Hong Kong 2026. The recognition comes as the exchange expands its CFD and multi-asset trading ecosystem beyond conventional crypto markets. For Bitget, the awards support a wider message: the next exchange model will connect digital assets, stocks, commodities, forex and indices inside one capital environment.

In brief Bitget received two industry awards at Wiki Finance Expo Hong Kong 2026. The recognition follows its expansion across CFDs and multi-asset trading. Bitget is using the awards to reinforce its Universal Exchange strategy. Bitget gains recognition as its CFD business expands Bitget received the Outstanding All-Asset Innovation Platform – Global award and the Leading Innovative Trading Platform – Asia award. The honors arrive shortly after the exchange moved deeper into TradFi perpetual trading, where it processed nearly $70 billion in volume during the second quarter of 2026.

The award names go beyond CFDs alone. They recognize Bitget’s broader development as a multi-asset platform. Still, the timing closely reflects the exchange’s rapid CFD expansion across commodities, forex, indices and other traditional market-linked products.

Bitget is using this momentum to strengthen its Universal Exchange, or UEX, strategy. Rather than keeping crypto and traditional financial products in separate systems, the model aims to bring them into one trading experience. Lewis Huang, Bitget’s CFD Chief Analyst, used the event to focus on a familiar difficulty. Traders may follow bitcoin, gold, currencies and global equities at the same time, yet often need separate apps, accounts and capital pools to act across those markets.

That fragmentation creates delays. A trader may identify an opportunity in forex but still need to move funds from a crypto platform to another service. Each transfer adds steps, costs and operational risk. Bitget argues that one shared trading environment can reduce those obstacles. The exchange wants users to respond to movements across several asset classes without repeatedly moving capital through disconnected platforms.

This approach also increases the need for education. Crypto-native users may understand blockchain markets but remain unfamiliar with central-bank decisions, commodity pricing or CFD financing costs. Bitget’s TradFi 101 program addresses that knowledge gap as the product range expands.

The awards support a broader UEX narrative Bitget’s participation included more than receiving awards. Lewis Huang delivered a keynote titled “One Account, Global Investment: The Cross-Asset Trading Revolution in the UEX Era.” He also joined a panel on institutional liquidity and the evolution of crypto markets. The discussion focused on how liquidity, product design and market infrastructure are changing as blockchain-based trading moves closer to traditional finance.

This convergence has become central to Bitget’s recent product strategy. The exchange has added tokenized equities, CFD products, stock options, pre-IPO exposure and perpetual contracts linked to traditional assets.

The logic is straightforward. Web3 offers continuous markets, programmable infrastructure and digital settlement. Traditional finance brings deeper liquidity, mature instruments and decades of market structure. Bitget wants its platform to sit where those two systems meet.

Recognition does not remove the risks of multi-asset trading Awards can strengthen Bitget’s industry profile, but they do not guarantee product quality or trading outcomes. CFDs remain complex instruments. They can involve leverage, financing charges and rapid losses when markets move sharply.

A unified account can improve capital flexibility, but it can also concentrate risk. A trader exposed to bitcoin, gold and forex from one capital base may face several correlated losses during a global market shock. Bitget will therefore be judged on more than the number of products it offers. Liquidity, pricing, execution, risk controls and clear product information will decide whether the UEX model works under pressure.

The Hong Kong context also requires clarity. Bitget stated that its attendance was limited to industry participation and receiving the awards. Hong Kong remains a prohibited jurisdiction under its terms, so the event should not be interpreted as a local offer or solicitation.

Even with that limitation, the two honors reinforce Bitget’s current direction. The exchange is building an identity around cross-asset trading rather than crypto alone. Its recent quanto perpetual launch shows how far that strategy has moved from branding into actual market structure.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Evans S.

Fascinated by Bitcoin since 2017, Evariste has continuously researched the subject. While his initial interest was in trading, he now actively seeks to understand all advances centered on cryptocurrencies. As an editor, he strives to consistently deliver high-quality work that reflects the state of the sector as a whole.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
2026-07-26 21:59 4d ago
2026-07-26 15:08 4d ago
WEMIX Contract Suspected Security Issue, Project Team Says Investigating
WEMIX WEMIX
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.
2026-07-26 21:59 4d ago
2026-07-26 15:12 4d ago
WEMIX confirms security incident: Contract ownership may have been compromised, reminds users to exercise caution when trading
WEMIX WEMIX
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Israeli Prime Minister: This visit to the US aims to understand the US President’s views on the Iran issue.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview that the conflict between Israel and Iran will only end when Iran’s current regime is overthrown or so weakened that it is forced to abandon its nuclear program. He emphasized that Iran’s nuclear program must be terminated "regardless of whether an agreement is reached". When discussing the planned meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, Netanyahu noted that the meeting will not focus on delivering new intelligence, as the military and intelligence agencies of the U.S. and Israel are already in close cooperation. He stated that the purpose of the trip is to discuss with Trump and understand his thinking, adding that the development of the situation largely depends on Trump’s final decision. In addition, Netanyahu also commented on the U.S.-Saudi nuclear deal. He expressed agreement with Trump’s stance that "Saudi Arabia can only access a civilian nuclear deal", and stressed that both Israel and the U.S. will never allow Saudi Arabia to possess a military nuclear program. Netanyahu also said he will "definitely" attend the United Nations General Assembly to be held in New York in September. (CCTV News)

6 hours ago

Lido Responds to stETH Yield Calculation Anomaly: Issue Fixed, Oracle Upgraded, User Funds Unaffected.

Ethereum staking protocol Lido stated on X that today’s stETH rebase has been completed as expected, with ETH rewards omitted yesterday due to calculation gaps now fully restored. The corresponding annual percentage rate (APR) stands at approximately 2.29%. The protocol’s oracle has also been updated and audited; the new version will boost report processing speed and enable faster root cause identification for similar future issues. Regarding yesterday’s reward calculation anomaly, Lido said contributors are still conducting root cause analysis, with additional investigation details to be shared on its official forum and social media channels. User funds were never at risk throughout the entire incident. The initial assessment points to a special edge case as the likely cause: a validator in pending deposit status was omitted from yesterday’s reward report, resulting in some staking rewards not being included in calculations. Lido noted that a full incident post-mortem report will be released in the coming days to further detail the root cause, remediation measures, and subsequent improvement plans.

6 hours ago

On Robinhood Chain, on-chain speculation remains active, with multiple tokens hitting new market cap highs today.

According to GMGN market data, hype on Robinhood Chain remains active, with multiple tokens hitting new all-time highs (ATH) in market capitalization today. Among them: PONS, the largest token issuance platform on Robinhood Chain by market cap, briefly exceeded $56 million, and is now trading at $52.47 million, marking a new ATH with a 24-hour gain of 31.88%. BRODIE, a meme token in the PONS ecosystem, broke through $6 million in market cap, also hitting a new ATH, with a 24-hour surge of 151.7%. STONKBROKER, an RWA + meme project token, surpassed $15 million in market cap, also hitting a new ATH, with a 24-hour increase of 29.61%. BlockBeats reminds users that related tokens are highly volatile, so investors should exercise caution.

6 hours ago

Founder of Mango Labs: Has gone long on Changxin Technology, calling it a rare 1:5 leverage trading opportunity.

Mango Labs founder @dov_wo shared his market views, noting he has gone long on Changxin Technology, calling it a rare 1:5 risk-reward opportunity with a 20% downside and 100% upside, a 5-to-1 payout. @dov_wo outlined his bullish thesis as follows: low float ratio, regulatory tailwinds, and institutional optimism for its investment opportunity at a market cap below $3 trillion. He advised on the strategy: if Changxin gaps up tomorrow, close the position to lock in profits directly; if it gaps down then rallies, wait patiently and wrap up the trade within 3 days.

6 hours ago

Jiang Zhuoer: Changxin Memory will likely hit its all-time high on its first day of trading, and recommended pairing it with hedging operations on Hyperliquid.

Jiang Zhuoer, founder of BTC.TOP (B.TOP), posted that Changxin Memory will likely open higher, surge then pull back, hitting its all-time high on the first trading day. The ideal play is to buy at the A-share opening, sell during the midday H-share-driven rally, then sell on A-share and buy back on H-share the next day to square positions. Without H-share exposure, investors will be trapped by the T+1 trading rule, possibly holding the stock for a lifetime just like PetroChina.

6 hours ago

OpenAI's CEO will travel to Washington in person to push for expedited approval of its new AI model, possibly GPT-6.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman will visit Washington next week to showcase the company’s most powerful AI model to the White House and push for its rapid approval. The model previously infiltrated Hugging Face. Reports note the new model has long-term planning capabilities, can independently complete original scientific research, and supports agent groups to collaborate on complex tasks including legal and financial matters. Though the report does not specify whether the new model is GPT-6, analyst Chubby believes Altman’s trip is to prepare for the launch of GPT-6. (Axios)

6 hours ago
2026-07-26 21:59 4d ago
2026-07-26 16:37 4d ago
WEMIX investigates potential security breach of WEMIX$ stablecoin contract
WEMIX WEMIX
CoinGecko News
Original source text
WEMIX is back in uncomfortable territory. The South Korean blockchain gaming platform is investigating a potential security breach involving the ownership of its WEMIX$ stablecoin contract, raising fresh questions about the security posture of an ecosystem that was already working to rebuild trust after a damaging incident earlier this year.

The investigation was disclosed on July 26, 2026. No confirmed details about the scope or impact of the breach have emerged yet.

What is WEMIX$ and why does it matter WEMIX$ is a stablecoin that runs on the WEMIX3.0 mainnet, fully collateralized by USDC. It keeps transactions stable and predictable for players and protocol users who don’t want exposure to the volatility of WEMIX itself.

Advertisement

Wemade had already announced plans to transition away from WEMIX$ on WEMIX PLAY toward USDC.e, suggesting the stablecoin was already on a sunset track.

A platform still recovering from its last breach In February 2025, attackers drained approximately 8.65 million WEMIX tokens from the Play Bridge Vault, a haul worth roughly $6.1 to $6.2 million at the time. The breach was traced back to compromised authentication keys connected to the NILE NFT monitoring system.

WEMIX CEO Kim Seok-hwan had to publicly address allegations that the company attempted to downplay or cover up the incident.

The February 2025 hack was attributed to compromised authentication keys, not a smart contract vulnerability. If the current WEMIX$ incident turns out to involve contract ownership, that represents a different attack surface entirely.

Recent momentum, suddenly complicated On July 1, WEMIX completed its second halving event. On July 8, WEMIX was listed for spot trading on Kraken. Around the same time, the platform announced integration of Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, or CCIP, designed to improve token transfers across different blockchains.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-26 21:45 4d ago
2026-07-26 16:18 4d ago
Why CoreWeave Stock Fell 30% in Just 1 Month
CRWV CoreWeave
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Just a few weeks ago, CoreWeave (CRWV -11.58%) looked unstoppable.

The neocloud provider had become one of Wall Street's hottest stocks, riding the wave of excitement generated by artificial intelligence. Investors were captivated by its explosive revenue growth, massive backlog of customer contracts, and strategic partnerships with some of the biggest names in AI.

Then, almost as quickly as it climbed, the stock tumbled. As of mid-afternoon Friday, CoreWeave had lost 30% of its market capitalization in just one month, leaving many investors wondering whether something has gone seriously wrong. 

The answer is both yes and no.

Image source: Getty Images.

Investors are starting to ask tougher questions For much of the past year, investors focused on one question: Can CoreWeave grow fast enough?

The answer appeared to be yes. The company signed enormous contracts with clients, expanded aggressively, and established itself as one of the leading independent providers of AI cloud computing infrastructure. In the first quarter of 2026, revenue more than doubled year over year to $2.1 billion, while revenue backlog almost tripled to about $100 billion.

Yet despite the impressive performance, Wall Street is asking a very different question today: Can CoreWeave become a highly profitable business despite spending tens of billions of dollars on its infrastructure?

That distinction may sound subtle, but it changes everything. Growing quickly is impressive. Growing profitably in one of the most capital-intensive industries on Earth is much harder. Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), CoreWeave remained loss-making in Q1 despite its massive contract wins. The only silver lining in the quarterly report it delivered on May 7 was that its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and adjusted operating income came in positive.

In short, investors are focused on whether CoreWeave will report GAAP profits in the near future.

Today's Change

(

-11.58

%) $

-9.40

Current Price

$

71.71

Meta may have changed the competitive landscape One of the biggest catalysts behind the stock's recent sell-off was a report that Meta Platforms is exploring leasing out some of its artificial intelligence computing infrastructure to external customers.

At first glance, that might not sound like bad news. After all, demand for AI computing capacity continues to surge.

But investors immediately see a much bigger implication over the long run. Meta isn't just one of the world's largest AI companies. It could also become one of the world's largest suppliers of AI computing capacity.

That shines a spotlight on an uncomfortable scenario. The largest customers of neoclouds like CoreWeave today could become its biggest competitors tomorrow. Whether Meta ultimately succeeds isn't the point.

In short, the market now views it as more probable that the AI infrastructure space will become more competitive over time, which would reduce the pricing power of independent compute providers like CoreWeave.

Expectations were probably too high to start with Sometimes, a stock falls not because the business deteriorates, but because the expectations baked into its price become impossible for the company to satisfy. That appears to be part of CoreWeave's recent share price decline.

To put it into perspective, the stock now trades at a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 5.9 -- and that's after the stock price collapsed from its 52-week high of $153 to around $74 as of mid-afternoon Friday. Amazon, despite owning the largest cloud computing business globally, trades at a P/S ratio of 3.4.

In other words, investors weren't just valuing CoreWeave like a fast-growing cloud provider. They were valuing it as one of the defining winners of the AI revolution.

When expectations reach those levels, almost any uncertainty -- such as a potential new competitor or concerns over long-term profitability -- can trigger a sharp correction.

None of these developments, individually, fundamentally changes CoreWeave's business. Together, however, they have created enough uncertainty to drive investors to reassess how much they're willing to pay for the stock.

What does it mean for investors? When a stock falls by more than 50% from its 52-week high, it naturally raises concerns among shareholders.

But let's put things into perspective. If you expected CoreWeave's stock to rise continuously in a straight line, that's likely unrealistic. Long-term investors should focus on a different question: Has the long-term investment thesis changed?

So far, the answer appears to be no. AI infrastructure demand continues to grow. CoreWeave remains deeply integrated with leading AI developers, and the company still has a substantial runway for expansion if management executes well.

What has changed is the need for a margin for error. Investors are no longer rewarding growth at any cost. What they want now is proof that CoreWeave can transform extraordinary demand for its services into a durable, profitable business.

The company's ability to provide that proof may ultimately determine where the stock goes over the next few years.
2026-07-26 21:39 4d ago
2026-07-26 20:05 4d ago
Top Three Crypto Tokens to Watch This Week: Pi Network, Worldcoin, Bitcoin
BTC Bitcoin WLD World
CoinGecko News
Original source text
The crypto market has stabilized this weekend as crude oil prices continue to fall in perpetual futures markets following the pause in US-Iran attacks. This week could bring heightened volatility across the crypto industry. 

Bitcoin in the Spotlight as Focus Remains on ETF Inflows and Strategy ActionsBitcoin has held steady above the crucial support of $64,000 in the past few days. This performance will come to the test on Monday as Michael Saylor’s Strategy unveils its recent corporate actions. 

The company has now gone for three weeks without selling its Bitcoin holdings and now holds 843,775 coins worth about $54 billion. Instead, the management has opted to raise capital by selling shares. 

Strategy will reveal its actions on Monday. If it reports that it sold Bitcoin, the coin may go under pressure and possibly reverse some of the recent gains. 

Bitcoin price will also react to the actions in the ETF market. Recent data shows that spot Bitcoin ETFs shed assets in the last two consecutive days. Before that, these funds added assets in the last eight days. In total, these funds have had net inflows of $233 million after losing $7 billion in May and June, combined.

WorldCoin in Focus After Raising $52.5 MillionWorldCoin’s price has plunged by over 50% from its peak amid concerns that OpenAI may delay its IPO. The two companies were both founded by Sam Altman, who now heads OpenAI, currently the second most valuable AI startup in the world after Anthropic.

WLD price will be in the spotlight after World Foundation raised $52.5 million from prominent companies like Pantera Capital, Susquehanna Crypto, Eightco, and Selini Capital.

Pi Network in Focus After Major UpgradesPi Network token has been in a freefall since its mainnet launch in February last year, and is now hovering near its all-time low. The token will be in focus after the developers completed the distribution of its second testnet token, SLICE.

Pi Network’s launchpad is a feature that will make it possible for developers to launch utility tokens on the network. It will have liquidity pools and other features.

At the same time, the developers are working on the PiDEX platform that will make it possible for people to trade these tokens. This capability will be made possible by the recent network upgrades that have introduced smart contracts to the network. Pi Network will also unlock millions of tokens this week.

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
2026-07-26 21:31 4d ago
2026-07-26 17:06 4d ago
Can Apple make smart glasses that aren't a constant privacy threat?
AAPL Apple
FMP Stock News
Original source text
As Apple prepares to launch its first smart glasses, the company is also wrestling with how to address consumer privacy concerns, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman.

Gurman reports that Apple has pushed back the launch target from early 2027, with the glasses now set for unveiling at the Worldwide Developers Conference in June 2027 and actually becoming available by the end of the year. That delay allows Apple to work on the product itself, and on the messaging around privacy.

It sounds like the company has noticed the concerns around Meta’s smart glasses — sometimes decried as “pervert glasses” — being used to make non-consensual video recordings. That could be a bigger issue for Apple, which constantly emphasizes privacy in its marketing.

Among other things, Apple will reportedly try to emphasize privacy-friendly features like on-device processing, as well as the absence of facial recognition. The company will likely steer clear of using customer recordings to train AI models, and it’s unlikely to follow Meta’s reported practice of using contractors to review customer footage.
2026-07-26 21:31 4d ago
2026-07-26 15:57 4d ago
Tesla Is Still Overvalued After Its 14% Post-Earnings Drop
TSLA Tesla
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Tesla (TSLA -2.14%) plunged by 14% after releasing its second-quarter earnings, but that dip may just be the beginning. The company has physical artificial intelligence (AI) products in the pipeline, with Optimus robots being a future catalyst, but Tesla still relies heavily on automobile sales and has the profit margins of an automaker.

Image source: Getty Images.

Rising capital expenditures without rising profits Elon Musk told investors to expect a "massive capex year" in 2026, while Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja anticipates capital expenditures (capex) growing for "the next two or three years."

It's the cost of doing business as tech companies scramble to throw capital at AI opportunities, but Tesla hasn't boosted profits for all of that spend. Alphabet (GOOG +0.21%) (GOOGL +0.58%) reported higher operating income, even with higher AI expenditures, and that has been a common pattern among the largest tech companies.

Tesla's operating income dropped by 57% year over year, and the company had only a 1.4% operating margin. Electric vehicles still make up a large portion of total revenue, more than 70%. Automobiles are a low-margin business, and Tesla's rising capital expenditures guarantee that its margins will be under more pressure for multiple years.

Today's Change

(

-2.14

%) $

-6.85

Current Price

$

312.84

Assessing the valuation Tesla trades at almost a 300 price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, even after the recent dip. If you treat it like a pure-play automobile stock, that valuation needs to drop a lot before Tesla reaches fair value.

Bulls have rightly argued that it's not just an automobile stock. The high capital expenditures are going toward Robotaxis and Optimus robots. These are moonshot opportunities that can help justify the current valuation, but for now, they have zero impact on Tesla's business.

A quote from Elon Musk perfectly sums up the opportunities and risks associated with Tesla stock: "I'm confident that all the things that we're investing in will yield incredible returns," Musk said during the call.

Investors are holding on to shares because they believe robotaxis and robots will fuel the next megacycle. However, there are several questions that the current valuation does not account for.

How long will it take for these opportunities to become commercialized? Will Tesla get a large market share with these innovations or gradually lose ground, as has been the case for its electric vehicles? Will demand be strong enough to justify Tesla's current market cap?

These questions show plenty of uncertainty and business execution risk. Elon Musk previously predicted its Robotaxis would be available to half the U.S. population by the end of 2025, which did not materialize. These initiatives may eventually pan out. However, "eventually" isn't a justification for a nearly 300 P/E ratio when most of the money coming in is from electric vehicles and margins are tightening.

Tesla stock needs a deeper dip before it will justify purchasing shares.
2026-07-26 21:31 4d ago
2026-07-26 13:30 4d ago
1 Top Warren Buffett Stock for Dividend Investors
KO Coca-Cola
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA +0.71%)(BRKB +0.83%) owns dozens of businesses in its $350 billion public equities portfolio. Not just any company can get in, of course. It must meet strict quality and valuation criteria before being considered.

But there's one business that has been a mainstay holding for quite some time. And it throws off a ton of cash for the Omaha-based conglomerate. Here's a leading Warren Buffett stock that dividend investors need to know -- and consider for their portfolios.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

As of this writing, Coca-Cola (KO +1.33%) is a top-five position in Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio. It's currently valued at $32.5 billion. The company's strong brand supports customer loyalty, pricing power, and huge profits. These are compelling characteristics in Buffett's eyes. And they have stood the test of time.

The beverage stock pays a dividend that yields 2.61%, sending investors $0.53 per share each quarter. Since Berkshire Hathaway owns 400 million shares, it's able to generate $848 million in annualized passive income.

Today's Change

(

1.33

%) $

1.08

Current Price

$

82.25

Individual investors who are after a dependable income stream for their portfolios can do much worse than taking a closer look at Coca-Cola. It's a Dividend King, a company that has raised its dividend in 50 or more consecutive years. Coca-Cola's board of directors has raised the payout in 64 straight years, which is a phenomenal streak that demonstrates the company's unwavering commitment to its shareholder base.

Are you ready to quench your thirst for dividends?

Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-07-26 21:28 4d ago
2026-07-26 13:31 4d ago
As Financials Rally, Is the Steady Vanguard Financials ETF or the Leveraged ProShares Ultra Financials the Better Buy Right Now?
JPM JPMorgan Chase
FMP Stock News
Original source text
ProShares' 2x leverage amplifies daily returns but introduces leverage decay risk and deeper drawdowns. Vanguard's broad 427-stock portfolio delivered steadier gains with a 0.89 beta versus 1.74.