Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
A security warning about PHP has prompted crypto leaders to speak up. On October 22, 2026, BNB Chain and Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) each responded to the news, and every message pointed to the same thing: clear communication matters when users are worried about their funds.
What Triggered the ReactionThe alert came from NSA Cyber, which published a notice to organizations that use PHP in their systems. It told them to prepare for an update that fixes critical vulnerabilities. PHP is a very common programming language for web applications, so the warning affects a large part of the internet.
BNB Chain does not use PHP in our tech stack. Stay safe 🙏
HOT Stories
— Nina Rong (@nina_rong) October 22, 2026 The agency explained that flaws like these often give attackers a direct path to a server's file system. That kind of access can be dangerous for any website or service that runs on the affected code.
You Might Also Like
Nina Rong, a BNB Chain representative, published a short statement saying that BNB Chain does not use PHP in its tech stack. She ended the message with a request for people to stay safe. The post drew more than 47,000 views within hours.
The message was brief, but it answered the main question users had: is the network exposed to this issue? According to the team, it is not.
PancakeSwap Sets an ExamplePancakeSwap, one of the biggest decentralized exchanges on BNB Chain, had already shared its own confirmation a few hours earlier. The team said it does not use PHP anywhere in its tech stack and that its platform is not affected. It also told users that their funds are safe.
CZ Calls for More Projects to Do the SameCZ shared the PancakeSwap post and added his own view. He wrote that most projects should at least publish a confirmation like this one. His comment suggests that a short, direct statement is the minimum a project owes its users during a security scare.
Most projects should at least post a confirmation like this.
— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance) October 22, 2026 His point is simple. When a warning from a major government agency spreads, silence can create fear and rumors. A quick confirmation from a project takes only minutes to write, yet it can calm many users.
Crypto platforms hold real money, and users often react quickly to any hint of risk. Many websites, wallets, and dashboards across the industry may still use PHP somewhere in their systems, even if the main blockchain code does not.
Users should watch for official updates from the projects they use. They should also be careful with fake messages that claim to be security fixes, since scammers often use news like this to trick people.
This is a general announcement and marketing communication. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region.
Disclaimer: This is not available for users in the EEA.
Fellow Binancians,
Binance is thrilled to launch a Spot Trading Tournament where eligible users will have a chance to share a total prize pool of 400 BNB in token vouchers!
In addition, Binance is introducing a “Sprint Reward” for a limited period – the more you trade, the higher your extra rewards!
Promotion Period: 2026-10-22 10:00 (UTC) to 2026-10-29 10:00 (UTC)
Join Now
Eligibility:
All verified new, regular users and Binance VIP 1-6 users can participate.Liquidity providers in the Binance Spot Liquidity Provider Program and Binance Brokers are not eligible to participate.
Eligible Trading Pair(s)
Trading pair(s): PEPE/USDC, AI/USDT
How to Participate:
Click the [Join Now] button on the landing page to register.Total Trading Volume reaches at least 500 USD equivalent in any of the aforementioned eligible pair(s) on Binance Spot during the Promotion Period. Users who do not meet this threshold will not qualify for any reward under this Trading Volume Tournament.
Main Reward Structure:
Statistical Period: 2026-10-22 10:00 (UTC) to 2026-10-29 10:00 (UTC)Rankings Based on the Cumulative Trading VolumeReward per Eligible Participant (in BNB Token Vouchers)1st Place12 BNB2nd Place10 BNB3rd Place8 BNB4th Place6 BNB5th Place4 BNB6th - 20th PlacesAn equal split of 40 BNB21st - 50th PlacesAn equal split of 40 BNB51st - 200th PlacesAn equal split of 64 BNB201st - 1,000th PlacesAn equal split of 56 BNBAll Remaining Eligible ParticipantsA proportional share* of 80 BNB, capped at 0.05 BNB per user
Proportional Share Rewards Calculation Logic*: Your Final Allocation = (Your Trading Volume / Total Trading Volume of All Eligible Participants Ranked after the 1,000th) * Proportional Share Prize Pool
Sprint Reward Structure:
Binance is introducing a “Sprint Reward”. For a limited period, users will receive extra rewards based on their ranking by cumulative trading volume. The more one trades during the respective Statistical Periods, the higher the extra rewards can be. Please note that users can earn from both the "Sprint Reward" and the "Main Reward" pools at the same time.
Rankings Based on the Cumulative Trading VolumeRound 1 Statistical Period: 2026-10-22 10:00 (UTC) to 2026-10-24 10:00 (UTC)Round 2 Statistical Period: 2026-10-24 10:01 (UTC) to 2026-10-26 10:00 (UTC)Reward per Eligible Participant (in BNB Token Vouchers)1st Place12 BNB12 BNB2nd Place10 BNB10 BNB3rd Place8 BNB8 BNB4th Place6 BNB6 BNB5th Place4 BNB4 BNB
Promotion Rules:
Trading volume of any zero-fee trading pairs is excluded from the final trading volume calculation.Transaction or gas fees will be excluded from the final trading volume calculation for the tournament.All eligible buy and sell orders will be counted towards the cumulative total trading volume.Token vouchers will be distributed to winners by 2026-11-12, and will expire within 21 days after distribution. Users will be able to login and redeem their token voucher rewards via Profile > Rewards Hub.The Spot Trading Volume leaderboard is updated at least once every 24 hours. The final update will be completed within a few hours after the campaign ends. The Main Reward leaderboard and Sprint Reward leaderboard will be displayed on the separate Sub-Spot landing page respectively. Data sync times vary daily but will always be completed by the end of the day.Only users who have met the minimum qualifying trading volume threshold will be displayed on the leaderboard along with their trading volume.
Don’t miss out on this opportunity and share in the rewards now! To view more promotions for new listings on Binance, stay tuned to this page for the latest updates and exclusive opportunities.
Guides & Related Materials:
How to Spot Trade (App / Web)
Terms & Conditions:
These terms and conditions (“Activity Terms”) govern users’ participation in the activity above (“Activity”). By participating in this Activity, users agree to these Activity Terms, and the following additional terms: (a) Binance Terms and Conditions for Prize Promotions; (b) Binance Terms of Use; and (c) Binance Privacy Notice; all of which are incorporated by reference into these terms and conditions. In the case of any inconsistency or conflict between these Activity Terms, and any other incorporated terms, the provisions of these Activity Terms shall prevail, followed by the following in this order of precedence, and to the extent of such conflict: (a) Binance Terms and Conditions for Prize Promotions; (b) Binance Terms of Use; and (c) Binance Privacy Notice.Only verified users who complete the aforementioned criteria for the tournament by the end of the Promotion Period may receive rewards.This Trading Volume Tournament is available to verified new, regular and VIP 1 - 6 users enabled for Binance Spot Trading, subject to product (and where relevant, deposit methods’) availability in users’ regions, and may be restricted in certain jurisdictions or regions, or to certain users, due to legal and regulatory requirements.VIP level eligibility will be determined based on the user's VIP level at the time of joining the Activity. Users who join the Activity while they are VIP 6 or below will remain eligible for the Activity and may receive the applicable rewards based on their eligible trading volume during the Promotion Period, even if their VIP level is upgraded to VIP 7 or above during the Promotion Period.Reward Distribution:All token voucher rewards will be distributed to eligible, winning users by 2026-11-12.Users will be able to login and redeem their token voucher rewards via Profile > Rewards Hub. All token voucher rewards will expire within 21 days after distribution. Winning users should claim their vouchers before the expiration date, and no replacement reward will be provided. Learn how to redeem a Binance voucher.Please note that the actual value of rewards received by a user is subject to change due to market fluctuation.Token voucher rewards are subject to additional terms and conditions.Rewards are not negotiable nor transferable.Once the available rewards have been allocated to users, no further rewards will be provided notwithstanding that an eligible user may have completed the missions.A user’s trading volume in this Trading Volume Tournament will be calculated after the user has opted-in and will be based on the trading volume (i) in their master and sub-accounts, and (ii) on all Spot products, including Spot Trading, Spot Copy Trading and Trading Bots. API trades are allowed. Binance’s calculation of a user’s trading volume is final.Binance reserves the right to disqualify a user’s reward eligibility if the account is involved in any dishonest behavior (e.g., wash trading, illegally bulk account registrations/logins, self dealing, or market manipulation). Binance further reserves the right to disqualify any participants who tamper with Binance program code, or interfere with the operation of Binance program code with other software. Rewards that have already been disqualified will not be returned to the prize pool.Binance reserves the right at any time in its sole and absolute discretion to determine and/or amend or vary these terms and conditions without prior notice, including but not limited to canceling, extending, terminating, or suspending these activities, the eligibility terms and criteria, the selection and number of reward recipients, and the timing of any act to be done, and all participants shall be bound by these amendments.The commencement and operation of the campaign (including the commencement of the Promotion Period) are subject to the successful listing of the relevant token on Binance Spot. If the listing is postponed or cancelled for any reason, the campaign (including the Promotion Period and reward distribution) may be delayed, amended or withdrawn at Binance’s discretion. Binance will not be liable for any loss or inconvenience caused by such changes.There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2026-10-22
Disclaimer:
USDC is an e-money token issued by Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS (https://www.circle.com/). USDC’s whitepaper is available here. You may contact Circle using the following contact information: +33(1)59000130 and [email protected]. Holders of USDC have a legal claim against Circle SAS as the EU issuer of USDC. These holders are entitled to request redemption of their USDC from Circle SAS. Such redemption will be made at any time and at par value.
A recent security alert involving the PHP programming language has prompted top figures in the crypto sector to address concerns regarding user safety. On October 22, 2026, Changpeng Zhao (CZ)—the founder of Binance, a leading global cryptocurrency exchange, and BNB Chain—responded publicly to the warnings, emphasizing the need for transparency from crypto projects during security incidents.
US agency warns of PHP vulnerabilitiesThe US National Security Agency (NSA) Cyber unit issued an alert to organizations employing PHP in their digital infrastructure. The agency underscored the presence of critical vulnerabilities in PHP and advised all affected groups to prepare for an upcoming security update. As PHP powers a significant share of the world’s web applications, the warning carries broad implications across the internet, including parts of the crypto industry.
According to NSA Cyber, these security flaws can provide malicious actors with direct access to a server’s file system. Such exploits represent a serious risk to any service running on vulnerable PHP versions, potentially compromising sensitive data and platform integrity.
Mini dictionary: PHP, a widely used open-source server-side scripting language, is integral to web development and often runs dynamic websites and applications. Vulnerabilities in PHP can impact numerous online platforms if left unpatched.
In direct response to concerns from users, BNB Chain’s representative Nina Rong posted a statement confirming that the network does not incorporate PHP in its technical stack. Rong also encouraged users to stay vigilant for security updates. Her message, viewed more than 47,000 times in just a few hours, quickly clarified the project’s status to its community.
PancakeSwap, which ranks among the largest decentralized exchanges operating on BNB Chain, released its own analysis ahead of BNB Chain’s confirmation. The PancakeSwap team declared it does not use PHP in any part of its system architecture, assuring users that platform operations remain safe and unaffected.
Nina Rong, speaking on behalf of BNB Chain, stated that PHP is not part of their tech infrastructure and encouraged users to “stay safe” in light of the ongoing alert.
CZ calls for industry-wide transparencyCZ, sharing PancakeSwap’s statement, urged other projects to follow this example by publicly confirming their exposure—or lack thereof—during security incidents. He argued that concise and direct communications should be standard practice when major vulnerabilities are revealed, as timely updates can quickly reassure users about the safety of their funds.
CZ’s comments highlighted a recurring challenge in crypto: the rapid spread of user concern in response to government advisories. He noted that silence from project teams can fuel rumors and uncertainty, but a fast, official statement often prevents panic and misinformation.
In his remarks, CZ underlined that “most projects should at least publish a confirmation like this one” during high-profile security scares.
Staying alert against misinformationGiven that many digital platforms, wallets, and user interfaces in the cryptocurrency industry may still rely on PHP, even if their core blockchain code does not, users remain advised to seek official confirmation from the projects they use about any potential risks.
The warning has also highlighted the risk of phishing attacks in the wake of such alerts, as scammers sometimes exploit trending security news to distribute fake patches or deceptive messages. Security experts remind users to authenticate any communication and only trust updates released through verified project channels.
BNB Chain memecoin Moolah ($MOOLAH) is up 14% in 24 hours and 35% in a week, with a $50 million market cap and a planned MOOLAH/NVDA pair tied to tokenized NVIDIA stock.
BNB Chain (@BNBCHAIN) $BNB memecoin $MOOLAH has surged 14% in 24 hours and 35% over the last seven days, reaching a $50 million market cap, according to CoinGecko.
The project recently announced plans for a MOOLAH/NVDA trading pair, which would give holders access to tokenized NVIDIA stock. MOOLAH launched on Flap(.)sh and uses $LISUSD liquidity.
What is Moolah?Moolah is a community-driven meme token on BNB Smart Chain. CoinMarketCap describes it as the official mascot token of the ListaDAO ecosystem, designed to symbolize unity and community engagement on BNB Chain. Coinbase's asset page notes the token launched on the Flap(.)sh platform and has official authorization from ListaDAO.
KuCoin's token profile says MOOLAH carries no native protocol utility beyond its cultural and branding roles. That places it firmly in the meme category, where price action is driven largely by sentiment and community activity.
The token has also drawn institutional-style attention before. Lookonchain data cited by CoinMarketCap showed the BSC Foundation bought 4.82 million MOOLAH on June 13, 2025.
Stock-paired memecoins are a growing nichePairing memecoins with tokenized equities is not unique to BNB Chain. KuCoin reports that on Robinhood Chain, some meme tokens have begun trading directly against Stock Tokens linked to companies such as Nvidia, Tesla and Apple. In that model, a pair such as AI/NVDA connects a meme token with an NVDA Stock Token that provides economic exposure linked to Nvidia shares.
Tokenized stocks are also legally distinct from the underlying shares. KuCoin notes that Stock Token holders should not automatically be treated as owners of real shares. Readers should check the terms of any tokenized product before trading.
Memecoins are highly volatile and speculative assets. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.
SourcesCoinMarketCap: What Is Moolah (MOOLAH)?
Coinbase: Moolah price and background
KuCoin: Stock-paired meme coins on Robinhood Chain
Blockchain security company SlowMist has issued a critical security alert concerning cryptocurrency exchanges, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, and cryptocurrency wallet providers worldwide.
Why is the PHP Vulnerability Dangerous? According to SlowMist, two critical security vulnerabilities, tracked by numbers CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, have been discovered in the PHP programming language, which is widely used in the infrastructure of websites and applications.
These vulnerabilities, under the right conditions, could allow attackers to remotely execute code on vulnerable servers without requiring authentication.
Following this warning, the PHP team released security updates on October 21st. However, the early leakage of the vulnerabilities shortened the time system administrators had to apply the updates. The European Union Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA) and other organizations urged organizations using PHP to urgently update their systems.
At this point, the PHP vulnerability has caused concern in the cryptocurrency sector. This vulnerability does not directly affect smart contracts or cold wallets, but it is stated that it could affect web-based environments such as dApp interfaces and exchanges.
Are Binance and BNB Chain Affected? Binance and BNB Chain stated in their announcements that the network, its underlying infrastructure, and the exchange were not affected by the recently discovered PHP vulnerability.
BNB Chain stated that it was not affected by the PHP vulnerability because it does not use the PHP programming language in its technology stack.
Binance stated in its announcement: “Binance is committed to protecting our users and our platform. Following the disclosure of a PHP vulnerability, our security teams implemented proactive measures and completed necessary fixes before the official patch was released. We continue to monitor developments and strengthen our security measures to help keep our ecosystem safe.”
Decentralized exchange PancakeSwap also announced that its infrastructure does not use PHP and that user funds are secure. US-based Kraken also stated that it is secure after migrating its core backend to Rust. Trust Wallet (TWT) also announced that they do not use PHP.
Urgent Warning from CZ for Users! Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) also commented on the issue and warned users. CZ urged users to be extra cautious when visiting websites over the next few days.
CZ emphasized that some website administrators might not apply security patches in a timely manner, urging users to exercise caution. He also requested that crypto projects provide clear information on whether or not their infrastructure uses PHP.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Bitcoin fiyatı, çarşamba günü 84.835 dolara kadar yükseldikten sonra kazançlarını koruyamadı ve yeniden 82.800 dolar çevresine çekildi. Küresel piyasalarda risk iştahının zayıflaması, teknoloji hisselerindeki satışlar ve Orta Doğu’daki gerilimler kripto para piyasası üzerinde baskı oluşturdu. Buna rağmen spot Bitcoin ETF’lerine 528,40 milyon dolarlık net giriş gerçekleşmesi, kurumsal yatırımcı talebinin sürdüğüne işaret etti. Piyasada şimdi hem 82.500 dolar desteği hem de küresel gelişmelerin fiyat üzerindeki etkisi yakından izleniyor.
Bitcoin Ve Altcoin Fiyatlarında Son Durum Ne? Toplam kripto para piyasası değeri yüzde 0,11 gerileyerek 2,77 trilyon dolara indi. TSİ 09.22 itibarıyla Bitcoin yüzde 0,03 yükselişle 82.819 dolardan işlem görürken Ethereum yüzde 0,18 düşerek 2.441 dolara geriledi.
Altcoin piyasasında ise farklı yönlerde hareketler görüldü. XRP yüzde 0,65 değer kazanarak 1,34 dolara yükselirken Solana aynı oranda düşüşle 105,19 dolara indi. Son 24 saatte Lighter (LIT) yüzde 8,32 yükselişle en fazla kazanan varlık oldu. Pyth Network (PYTH) ise yüzde 6,52 düşerek en fazla değer kaybeden kripto para olarak öne çıktı.
Bitcoin’in 84.835 dolardan geri çekilmesi, kısa vadeli yükseliş momentumunun zayıfladığını gösteriyor. Ancak bu hareket tek başına yeni bir düşüş trendinin başladığını kanıtlamıyor; yatırımcıların fiyatın destek seviyelerinde nasıl tepki vereceğini izlemesi gerekiyor.
Spot Bitcoin ETF’lerine 528 Milyon Dolar Girdi 21 Ekim’de ABD spot Bitcoin ETF’leri toplam 528,40 milyon dolarlık net sermaye girişi kaydetti. Spot Ethereum ETF’lerine de 14,96 milyon dolar net giriş gerçekleşti. Bu veriler, fiyat hareketleri zayıflasa bile yatırımcıların ilgili ürünlere sermaye aktarmaya devam ettiğini gösteriyor.
Altcoin ETF’lerinde de çeşitli girişler görüldü. XRP ETF’leri 708,52 bin dolar, SOL ETF’leri 585,30 bin dolar ve NEAR ETF’leri 830,70 bin dolar net giriş aldı. ZEC ETF’lerine giren net tutar ise 15,18 milyon dolara ulaştı.
Buna karşılık BNB, TRX, HYPE, DOGE, LINK, LTC, AVAX, HBAR ve DOT ETF’lerinde net sermaye akışı kaydedilmedi. Bu tablo, yatırımcı ilgisinin tüm dijital varlıklara eşit şekilde dağılmadığını ortaya koyuyor. ETF girişleri talep açısından önemli bir gösterge olsa da tek başına fiyatların yükseleceğini garanti etmiyor.
Küresel Borsalardaki Satışlar Bitcoin’i Nasıl Etkiliyor? Tesla ve Meta’nın finansal sonuçları, yapay zekâ yatırımlarının geleceğine ilişkin tartışmaları yeniden gündeme taşıdı. Meta’nın yapay zekâ harcamalarını artırma planına rağmen hisseleri yüzde 2 yükseldi; ancak bu hareket genel piyasa havasını iyileştirmeye yetmedi.
Nasdaq 100 vadeli işlemleri yüzde 1,1, S&P 500 vadeli işlemleri ise yüzde 0,5 geriledi. Asya piyasalarında da satış baskısı etkili oldu. Samsung Electronics ve SK Hynix hisselerindeki düşüşlerin ardından Güney Kore Kospi endeksi yüzde 2,2 değer kaybetti. Çin CSI 300 endeksi yüzde 1,7 gerilerken Alibaba hisselerindeki düşüş de teknoloji ve e-ticaret sektörlerini baskıladı.
Hisse senetlerindeki zayıflık, yatırımcıların daha riskli varlıklara yönelik iştahını azaltabiliyor. Bitcoin’in 84.835 dolar seviyesindeki kazanımlarını koruyamamasında bu küresel görünüm de etkili oldu.
Petrol Ve Jeopolitik Riskler Neden Önemli? Orta Doğu’daki gerilim, finansal piyasalarda belirsizliği artıran diğer önemli unsur olarak öne çıkıyor. Husilerin Suudi Arabistan’a yönelik yeni saldırılarının ardından petrol fiyatları yükseldi. Ayrıca ABD’nin Suudi Arabistan’daki bazı diplomatik misyonlarında görev yapan personel ve aile üyelerinin ülkeden ayrılması yönünde talimat verdiği bildirildi.
Petrol fiyatlarının yükselmesi, enerji maliyetleri üzerinden enflasyon baskısını artırabilir. Böyle bir senaryo, merkez bankalarının faiz indirimlerinde daha temkinli davranabileceği beklentisini güçlendirerek hisse senetleri ve kripto para gibi riskli varlıkları olumsuz etkileyebilir.
Bitcoin İçin 82.500 Dolar Desteği Korunacak Mı? Bitcoin açısından 82.500 dolar seviyesi kısa vadede kritik bir bölge olarak izleniyor. Fiyatın bu desteğin altına kalıcı şekilde gerilemesi, satış baskısını artırabilir ve daha düşük seviyelerin gündeme gelmesine yol açabilir. Buna karşılık ETF girişlerinin sürmesi, talep tarafında takip edilmesi gereken olumlu bir veri sunuyor.
Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Chainlink reports $15 billion in CCIP migrations and new Swift, DTCC integrations in its Q3 review as LINK trades near $12 with bearish momentum.
Summary
Chainlink says more than $15 billion in token value migrated to its cross-chain infrastructure in 2026.
CCIP 2.0 introduced new security, compliance and settlement controls during the third quarter.
Chainlink reported over $36 trillion in cumulative transaction value enabled by its services.
LINK traded near USD 12.24 on October 22, with technical indicators pointing to continued selling pressure.
Chainlink has reported more than $15 billion in token migrations to its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) during 2026, alongside institutional financing developments and government integrations detailed in its third-quarter review.
According to Chainlink’s October 21 quarterly report, the network introduced CCIP 2.0, launched its Fulcrum financing solution and expanded its work with financial institutions, including Swift and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC).
⬡ CHAINLINK Q3 MOMENTUM ⬡
• Launched CCIP 2.0
• $15B+ migrates to CCIP
• $140B secured across onchain finance
• TradFi adoption: DTCC, Swift, & more
• Enterprise adoption: Infosys, Robinhood, & more
• Work with policymakers across the U.S., UK, & Hong Kong pic.twitter.com/kWuZop7iLw
— Chainlink (@chainlink) October 21, 2026
Meanwhile, Chainlink said CCIP 2.0 went live during the third quarter, introducing security, compliance and settlement controls for institutions transferring digital assets between blockchain networks.
The report placed token migrations to CCIP above $15 billion during 2026, including assets associated with BitGo and the Wyoming Stable Token Commission. Aave, Coinbase and tokenized equities provider xStocks expanded their use of the protocol, while Nethermind began migrating its infrastructure to Chainlink.
Among the migrations, Wyoming moved its FRNT stablecoin to CCIP in August after completing a security review. The commission selected Chainlink as FRNT’s exclusive cross-chain infrastructure under a multiyear agreement.
Chainlink separately reported that CCIP secured more than $85 billion in cross-chain token value. That figure differs from the $15 billion migration total, which concerns assets moving from other interoperability providers during 2026.
The network’s cumulative transaction value enabled exceeded $36 trillion during the quarter. The metric covers transactions supported by Chainlink services and does not represent company revenue or the amount of money transferred through CCIP.
Swift and DTCC Expand Chainlink’s Institutional Infrastructure
At the Sibos banking conference, Chainlink introduced Fulcrum, a service designed to support securities financing and collateral management across public and private blockchains.
The platform allows financial institutions to establish financing terms and coordinate collateral settlement across supported networks without requiring participants to operate through a single blockchain.
Chainlink separately announced a solution connecting banks to Swift’s blockchain ledger through the Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE). Financial institutions would retain control of their transaction-signing keys while using CRE to coordinate smart contract operations.
DTCC’s Collateral AppChain represents another institutional application. Chainlink said the platform would use CRE and its data services to support collateral management across financial markets.
In a related institutional financing development, Chainlink demonstrated cross-chain securities financing involving DTCC at Sibos, using its interoperability and data infrastructure to coordinate transactions.
The quarterly review described a separate production transaction in which JPMorgan posted tokenized stock as collateral to satisfy margin requirements with CME Group.
Chainlink identified Bottomline and Infosys among its institutional partners. Bottomline plans to connect its banking customers to blockchain payment networks, while Infosys is working with Chainlink services across banking and financial infrastructure.
Government and Stablecoin Adoption Expand During Q3
Chainlink reported further adoption among government institutions and stablecoin issuers during the quarter.
Wyoming’s Stable Token Commission adopted Chainlink Proof of Reserve in September to distribute independently examined reserve information for FRNT across supported blockchains.
The arrangement supplements Wyoming’s existing reserve disclosures by making verification data available to blockchain applications. The commission is separately working toward reserve-linked minting controls.
Hong Kong’s Tokenized Securities Framework selected CCIP and Chainlink’s Automated Compliance Engine, while the Bank of England’s Synchronisation Lab showcased CRE for coordinating settlement between central bank money and tokenized assets.
Chainlink’s data infrastructure gained further adoption among commercial blockchain projects, including Coinbase, Open Standard, United Stables and Lighter.
In September, Chainlink Data Feeds launched on Tempo, providing market information for stablecoin payments, collateral valuation and automated financial applications.
Prediction markets formed another part of the quarterly activity, with Polymarket, World and LBank adopting Chainlink technology for market resolution and payouts.
LINK Price Approaches $12 as Bearish Momentum Persists
Despite the institutional developments, LINK traded near $12.24 on October 22 after retreating from its recent October high around $15.70.
The token declined approximately 0.67% over 24 hours, according to crypto.news market data, while its seven-day performance remained positive at roughly 1.68%.
Technical indicators showed weakening buying momentum. The Relative Strength Index stood at 44.11, below the neutral 50 level but outside oversold territory.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator remained bearish, with the MACD line at -0.224 beneath its signal line at -0.121. The negative histogram reading of -0.103 indicated continued selling pressure.
Chainlink (LINK) price chart, source: TradingView
LINK approached immediate support around $12.00, with a sustained breakdown potentially exposing $11.00. A recovery above $13.00 could bring the next resistance level around $14.00 into focus.
Chainlink’s quarterly review reported that its Reserve accumulated 1,543,330.47 LINK during the third quarter, bringing total holdings to 6,047,498.3150 LINK. The network’s Smart Value Recapture service separately surpassed $24.4 million in cumulative recaptured value.
Grayscale now lets eligible investors contribute Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin, Chainlink and other crypto directly for shares in 10 products, with minimums from about $80,300.
Grayscale (@Grayscale) is letting eligible investors subscribe to 10 digital asset products using crypto they already hold, rather than selling tokens first. The change covers $BTC, $ETH, $SOL, $XRP and $DOGE, alongside $LINK, $AVAX, $SUI, $HYPE and $ZEC.
How in-kind investing worksUnder the arrangement, investors contribute the digital asset itself and receive product shares in return.
Grayscale says the structure can ease the practical burden of holding crypto.
Steve Vanourny, Head of Index at Grayscale, linked the move to security concerns.
Minimums and eligibility still applyThe service is not open to everyone.
Entry levels are also high.
Analysts will be watching whether the feature draws real money. according to DigitalToday. The wider product range means demand could spread beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum to assets such as Solana, XRP and Zcash.
Sources:
Grayscale press release via GlobeNewswire (Manila Times)Bitcoin.com News on Grayscale's in-kind ETF accessBenzinga on Grayscale's in-kind crypto investing
Chainlink's Q3 2026 review shows $15 billion in token value moving to CCIP, new work with Swift and DTCC, and a LINK Reserve above 6 million tokens.
Chainlink (@chainlink) $LINK spent the third quarter widening its footprint across both traditional finance and digital assets, according to its quarterly review published on October 21.
Institutional work expands with Swift, DTCC and FulcrumThe report points to work with Swift (@swiftcommunity), DTCC, Bottomline and Infosys (@Infosys). It also covers Fulcrum, a solution designed for institutional financing and collateral management. Chainlink's review says the company introduced Fulcrum at the Sibos conference and announced a solution connecting banks to Swift's blockchain ledger.
Chainlink describes Fulcrum as the first cross-chain repurchase agreement (repo) flow that separates the venue where a financing agreement is managed from the networks where cash and collateral settle. According to Finadium, counterparties can use a single gateway to choose eligible assets, set financing terms and coordinate settlement across supported chains without being tied to one venue.
The review also says DTCC's Collateral AppChain, a shared infrastructure platform for collateral, will use Chainlink's Runtime Environment (CRE) and data standard. It is designed to support near real-time collateral management across financial markets and blockchains. Bottomline plans to connect its banking customers to blockchain payment networks, while Infosys is working with Chainlink services across banking and financial infrastructure.
CCIP migrations and LINK Reserve growthCCIP continued to gain ground. The review states that more than $15 billion in token value migrated to the Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol during 2026, as issuers and protocols replaced legacy cross-chain providers. CCIP 2.0 also went live in the quarter with new security, compliance and settlement controls.
Aave (@aave) $AAVE, Coinbase (@coinbase) $COIN and xStocks (@xStocksFi) were among the names that expanded their use of CCIP, the report says.
On the economics side, the Chainlink Reserve passed 6 million LINK, and the Smart Value Recapture (SVR) service reached more than $24.4 million in total value recaptured, per the review.
Not every metric ties directly to the token. An analysis by CoinGabbar noted that the Reserve added about 1.54 million LINK in Q3 and holds roughly 0.81% of circulating supply. It also found that the review does not publish a direct link between usage figures and token supply or price. Most of the figures are company-reported, and several institutional items, such as DTCC's AppChain, are still ahead of launch.
Chainlink reported more than $15 billion in token migrations to its CCIP protocol during 2026.
CCIP 2.0 went live in Q3 with new security, compliance and settlement controls.
Chainlink expanded work with Swift, DTCC, Wyoming and Hong Kong’s Tokenized Securities Framework.
LINK traded near $12.24 on October 22, down from its October high of around $15.70.
RSI sits at 44.11 and the MACD remains bearish, with support at $12 and resistance at $13.
Chainlink (LINK) traded near $12.24 on October 22, sliding from its October high of around $15.70. The move came a day after the network released its third-quarter review.
The report said more than $15 billion in token value moved to Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) during 2026. It also detailed new work with Swift and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC).
CCIP 2.0 went live in the third quarter. The upgrade added security, compliance and settlement controls for institutions moving digital assets between blockchains.
Migrations included assets tied to BitGo and the Wyoming Stable Token Commission. Aave, Coinbase and xStocks expanded their use of the protocol, while Nethermind began moving its infrastructure to Chainlink.
Wyoming moved its FRNT stablecoin to CCIP in August after a security review. The commission picked Chainlink as FRNT’s only cross-chain provider under a multiyear deal.
Chainlink said CCIP now secures more than $85 billion in cross-chain token value. Cumulative transaction value enabled by its services passed $36 trillion, a figure that does not represent revenue.
⬡ CHAINLINK Q3 MOMENTUM ⬡
• Launched CCIP 2.0
• $15B+ migrates to CCIP
• $140B secured across onchain finance
• TradFi adoption: DTCC, Swift, & more
• Enterprise adoption: Infosys, Robinhood, & more
• Work with policymakers across the U.S., UK, & Hong Kong pic.twitter.com/kWuZop7iLw
— Chainlink (@chainlink) October 21, 2026
Swift, DTCC and Government Work Expand
At the Sibos banking conference, Chainlink introduced Fulcrum. The service supports securities financing and collateral management across public and private blockchains.
Chainlink also announced a way to connect banks to Swift’s blockchain ledger through its Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE). Banks keep control of their transaction-signing keys.
DTCC’s Collateral AppChain will use CRE and Chainlink data services for collateral management. The review also described a transaction in which JPMorgan posted tokenized stock as collateral for margin with CME Group.
In September, Wyoming adopted Chainlink Proof of Reserve to share reserve data for FRNT across blockchains. Hong Kong’s Tokenized Securities Framework selected CCIP and Chainlink’s Automated Compliance Engine.
The Bank of England’s Synchronisation Lab showed CRE coordinating settlement between central bank money and tokenized assets. Polymarket, World and LBank adopted Chainlink tools for market resolution and payouts.
Chainlink’s Reserve added 1,543,330.47 LINK in Q3, bringing total holdings to 6,047,498.3150 LINK. Its Smart Value Recapture service passed $24.4 million in cumulative recaptured value.
LINK Price Tests $12 Support
LINK fell about 0.67% over 24 hours, according to crypto.news data. Its seven-day performance stayed positive at roughly 1.68%.
Chainlink Price on CoinGecko
On the TradingView chart, LINK is grinding toward $12 after losing steam from the $15.70 high. RSI sits at 44.11, under 50 but not oversold, and the MACD line at -0.224 is still below its signal line at -0.121.
Sellers have the edge for now. If $12 cracks, $11 is the next spot bulls need to defend, while a reclaim of $13 would put $14 back on the radar. The key level to watch next is $12.
Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire waved off questions about Bitcoin (BTC) underperforming this year in a CNBC interview, saying he is focused on non-speculative digital dollars built for a future where AI software moves the money.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), a federal banking regulator, is finalizing rules for the GENIUS Act, the 2025 law governing dollar-pegged stablecoins. Allaire says that cements his sector’s role, while noting other crypto areas may face questions.
Why Is Circle’s CEO Looking Past Bitcoin’s Price?CNBC’s Seema Mody asked why Bitcoin has lagged this year if crypto is the future.
“I don’t pay much attention specifically to like these sort of specific digital commodities, how they’re trading, etc.”
He described digital dollars as tools for payments, trading, lending and investing rather than speculation. Stablecoins are designed to hold a steady $1 value, so they do not track Bitcoin’s price swings.
He also pointed to growing activity on blockchains such as Arc, which Circle launched in September.
Why Would AI Agents Need Digital Dollars?Allaire’s broader pitch is that AI agents, software that completes tasks on its own, will take on more economic activity. He argues that shift creates demand for digital dollars and machine-built blockchains, the infrastructure Circle builds.
However, he offered no figures for that demand.
Meanwhile, the rules bear directly on Circle, the issuer of USD Coin (USDC), Allaire said.
The OCC’s proposal would require reserves at least equal to outstanding stablecoins and redemption at par within two business days, according to Orrick. The proposal would also bar issuers from paying holders interest.
Allaire says the law is safe from the midterms because it drew bipartisan support. However, 18 Senate Democrats backed it in 2025, while House Democrats split 102 to 110 on final passage.
Meanwhile, Congress’s broader market rules bill, the failed CLARITY Act, never cleared the Senate.
Competition is arriving too, as banks suddenly want stablecoins and 21 institutions have committed to a joint issuer.
Stablecoins now have federal rules and new rivals at once, while broader crypto rules remain unsettled.
DIP-59 proposes pausing new product development until June 2027 as SSV Labs adjusts to tighter funding and challenging market conditions.
The proposed funding will cover protocol maintenance, security, and compatibility with Ethereum upgrades.
SSV Labs submitted proposal DIP-59 to the SSV Network governance forum on October 21, and the language inside it is more candid than most governance proposals tend to be. Funding has narrowed, and the market conditions and the DAO’s financial position have forced a recalibration.
New product development is off the table, at least through June 2027. What remains is maintenance, security, and making sure the protocol stays compatible with Ethereum’s own upgrade schedule. Moreover, that is the honest scope of what DIP-59 is asking the DAO to fund.
What the Proposal Actually Does?
DIP-59 amends and extends DIP-31, the original development roadmap covering January 2025 through mid-2026, which was previously amended by DIP-53. The extension pushes the engagement through June 30, 2027. It is likely narrowing its scope as of July 1, 2026, and restructuring the remaining payment instalments.
The extension period runs in two parts. From June 30, 2026, to January 1, 2027, SSV Labs will deliver a defined network stewardship roadmap. From January 1, 2027, to June 30, 2027, the Maintenance Period, the focus shifts entirely to protocol maintenance.
In addition, the third and final grant instalment under DIP-31, totalling 1,736,111.11 SSV, has not been paid. DIP-59 revises and restructures that commercial arrangement rather than simply paying what was owed.
The Deliverables Still on the Table
Despite the scaled-back scope, the work planned for Q4 2026 is non-trivial. SSV Labs is committed to executing the Glamsterdam fork, participation in the public test network, a mandatory operator release, support through Ethereum’s mainnet fork window expected in Q4 2026, and post-fork stabilisation. This is deadline-driven work with dates set externally by Ethereum’s own schedule.
Also, the checkpoint sync completion and rollout is also on the Q4 list, including implementation, validation on local multi-operator test networks, and rollout through the standard release process including documentation and operator communications.
The Financial Structure
The first two instalments under DIP-31 covering 2025 remain unchanged. For 2026, SSV Labs is requesting 1,500,000 USDC, payable in the first scheduled batch of January 2027. For the first half of 2027, the request is 2,700,000 SSV, with 1,000,000 SSV payable initially and the remaining 1,700,000 SSV subject to a Conversion Option.
That option gives SSV Labs the discretionary right to receive 900,000 USDC instead of the 1,700,000 SSV, exercisable by written notice at least five business days before the first scheduled batch of July 2027. If the option is not exercised, the 1,700,000 SSV pays out in six equal monthly instalments of 283,333.33 SSV starting July 2027.
Furthermore, SSV Labs is also granted a first-ranking security interest over 900,000 USD held by the SSV Foundation, funds that may be deployed for yield generation through permitted venues.
Crypto Market Highlights
Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Climbs 8%: Will Buyers Push for a Bigger Rally?
Ahmed Barakat is a journalist and copywriter based in Georgia with a growing focus on blockchain technology, DeFi, AI, privacy, digital assets, and fintech innovation.
Has Also Written
Fact Checked by
CryptoNews Editorial Team
Author
CryptoNews Editorial Team
Part of the Team Since
Sep 2018
About Author
The CryptoNews editorial team is composed of seasoned writers specializing in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. Their expertise ensures comprehensive, accurate, and insightful content for...
Has Also Written
Last updated:
The US stablecoin market is entering a new regulatory phase, with Circle’s USDC and Tether’s USDT facing different challenges as federal oversight takes shape. Last night, UK time, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) finalized rules implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. The framework establishes requirements covering reserves, redemptions, risk management, reporting, and regulatory supervision, with an effective date of January 18, 2027.
President Trump fundamentally transformed the future of finance with the signing of the GENIUS Act last year.
Today, U.S. Treasury’s @USOCC took a critical step toward implementing this historic legislation with the release of a final rule that delivers a federal framework for… pic.twitter.com/JXypSNdz6P
— Treasury Department (@USTreasury) October 21, 2026 Circle could benefit from its established US regulatory positioning, while Tether faces questions about how its international stablecoin business will fit into the new framework. The stablecoin market has USDT’s market share at 60.7%, compared with 23.9% for USDC. Together, the tokens represented 84.6% of the market.
Stablecoin Market Cap, DefiLlamaThe figures highlight both Circle’s opportunity and the scale of the challenge. USDC has room to expand, particularly among institutions seeking regulated digital-dollar infrastructure, but winning market share will require continued adoption, liquidity, and integration.
For Tether, the priority is protecting USDT’s established position while adapting to the requirements of an increasingly regulated market. Its international user base remains a significant competitive asset.
Discover: Crypto IPO to Watch This Q4
GENIUS Act on Exchanges and InstitutionsThe effects of the GENIUS Act extend beyond stablecoin issuers. Exchanges, payment providers, and financial institutions must assess which tokens they can support and how their products fit within the new framework.
Stablecoin rewards have emerged as another important battleground. The OCC’s final rule prohibits issuers from directly paying interest or yield to holders simply for holding payment stablecoins, but it does not impose a blanket ban on third-party reward programs. Instead, regulators will assess these arrangements case by case, including whether they circumvent the law’s restrictions.
That approach could shape how exchanges compete for stablecoin deposits. Platforms may retain room to offer qualifying rewards, while issuers and their partners will need to consider how their arrangements are structured.
The GENIUS Act also leaves further implementation work ahead, including separate requirements for anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance. The January 18, 2027, effective date gives affected businesses time to prepare, but regulatory applications and decisions will help determine how the framework operates in practice.
Can USDC Close the Gap With USDT?Circle has an opportunity to turn its regulatory positioning into stronger adoption among US institutions, payment companies and businesses seeking compliant stablecoin infrastructure. Tether, meanwhile, must preserve USDT’s global dominance while navigating the requirements governing access to the American market.
The GENIUS Act could make regulatory compliance a more important competitive factor, particularly for companies building payment and settlement services around dollar-backed tokens. That creates an opening for USDC to gain ground even as USDT retains its international advantages.
The next milestones will be issuer applications, regulatory decisions, and the January 2027 implementation deadline. These developments will help clarify which stablecoins are best positioned to serve American customers.
Gemini co-founders Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss stated in an interview that Bitcoin is a public, auditable blockchain where anyone can view transaction records, though its transparency makes it ill-suited for privacy-focused use cases. Zcash, by contrast, is designed for private transactions and payments, so the two can coexist. Ideally, privacy would be native to Bitcoin, but the current practical model is "Bitcoin for storage + Zcash for transactions". Bitcoin remains significant, but public blockchains face heightened privacy exposure risks in the era of AI. The Winklevoss brothers added that Zcash fills Bitcoin’s gap in privacy functionality, serving as "encrypted Bitcoin". ZEC’s privacy value has not yet been fully realized; if it reaches 10% of Bitcoin’s market capitalization, ZEC could surge fivefold, easily surpassing $5,000. As such, they are bullish on ZEC’s price performance over the next 5 to 10 years, particularly as demand for privacy rises. "Zcash is a financial privacy tool for the AI era, an antidote to AI-driven surveillance and tyranny. Anyone bullish on AI (or quantum), even if they don’t recognize it, should be bullish on Zcash. It is the AI hedge or quantum hedge in the cryptocurrency space."
Zcash traded around $1,300 on Thursday, posting a three-day recovery that lifted the weekly gain to approximately 15%. The privacy-focused cryptocurrency hovered near $1,287 as of the latest trading session, supported by strong inflows into exchange-traded funds and increasing activity in the futures market.
ETF inflows surge on renewed demandGrayscale’s Zcash-oriented exchange-traded fund posted $15.18 million in net inflows on Wednesday, a sharp increase from the $1.61 million recorded a day earlier, according to data provided by SoSoValue. This marked the largest single-day inflow in about one month and followed three consecutive weeks characterized by net withdrawals.
The latest influx signals a potential turnaround in investor sentiment, though analysts noted that two positive sessions alone do not confirm a lasting end to the previous outflow trend. A more sustained recovery in ETF demand would be necessary to establish a clear shift in the market’s trajectory.
The rebound in ETF inflows points to improving demand through institutional investment products after a period of persistent net withdrawals, but longer-term confirmation is still required.
Rising ETF activity has contributed to Zcash’s recent price stabilization, particularly as the broader cryptocurrency market reacts to developments in macroeconomic policy and digital asset investment products.
Futures open interest nears $2.9 billionZcash futures open interest reached $2.89 billion, its highest reading since September 29, as reported by CoinGlass. This figure increased from $2.25 billion at the start of the week, signaling an approximate $510 million rise in outstanding positions.
Open interest captures the notional value of current futures contracts and may reflect the introduction of new long or short positions, increases in the token’s price, or a combination of these factors. The uptick in open interest aligns with the observed rebound, but it does not indicate whether market participants are predominantly bullish or bearish on the asset.
Broader engagement from both investors and traders is evident, but analysts warned that increased leverage could fuel higher volatility if sentiment shifts abruptly.
In a rapidly moving market where sudden ETF inflows or altcoin listings can influence prices within seconds, investors increasingly seek consolidated, privacy-focused solutions to monitor markets and manage their holdings efficiently. Privacy-first platforms like CryptoAppsy allow traders to access live charts, tailored alerts, asset-specific news, and key macro data without the need to create an account, improving decision-making under fast-changing conditions.
ZEC maintains momentum above support levelsOn technical charts, ZEC continues to trade above its 50-period Exponential Moving Average of $1,210 and its 200-period EMA at $1,235 on the four-hour timeframe. These moving averages currently serve as short-term support, reinforcing the recovery structure.
The Relative Strength Index stands at roughly 61, reflecting positive momentum while staying clear of overbought territory, which is typically considered at a reading of 70. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator also remains supportive, suggesting sustained upside bias.
However, analysts observed that further upside would require ZEC to overcome additional obstacles. The September 26 peak near $1,698 serves as a reference point for an extended rally, representing a potential 30% advance from current prices. Achieving a breakout above this level would signal renewed strength, though the outlook remains contingent on ongoing price action and trading range developments throughout the year.
A continued defense of the $1,250 support area and the recently reclaimed moving averages will be needed for Zcash to sustain its gains and attempt further upside.
The first key support remains at the $1,250 level, while the 50- and 200-period EMAs between $1,210 and $1,235 provide a broader technical safety net. A firm hold above these lines would help maintain the recent breakout, but a reversal below them may indicate that momentum is fading.
Bitcoin, Hyperliquid (HYPE) and Zcash (ZEC) are showing potential recovery signals after a sharp crypto market sell-off reportedly erased $70 billion in market value over 10 hours. Crypto analyst Ali Charts has identified new buy signals for all three assets, with their next moves depending on whether key support levels hold.
BITCOIN, HYPERLIQUID, AND ZCASH RETRACE…
BUT LOOK READY TO BOUNCE BACK
1/5 🧵👇
— Ali Charts (@alicharts) October 22, 2026 Bitcoin Price PredictionBitcoin fell 2.80% after approaching $85,000, retreating toward $82,000. The TD Sequential indicator has now flashed a buy signal, suggesting the correction could be nearing its end.
BTC was trading near $82,800 in the latest figures provided. Meanwhile, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $528 million in net inflows on October 21, marking three consecutive sessions of positive flows.
If Bitcoin holds above $82,000, it could attempt to reclaim $85,000. However, renewed selling pressure could prevent a recovery.
Hyperliquid Price PredictionHyperliquid’s HYPE token dropped 4.22% after reaching a local high near $82. Ali Charts has since identified a buy signal on the hourly chart.
The analyst is watching $78 as the key support level. If buyers defend this price, HYPE could rebound toward $82 or higher. A break below $78 could weaken the recovery outlook.
Zcash Price PredictionZcash declined 6.44% after reaching a local high around $1,350. Its TD Sequential indicator has now flashed a buy signal, pointing to a possible recovery.
Ali Charts identified $1,250 as the support level to watch. If ZEC stays above it, the price could climb toward $1,350. A drop below this level could expose the token to further losses.
What Could Drive the Next Crypto Market Move?US economic data and the Federal Reserve’s October 28 policy decision remain important factors for crypto prices. Investors are also watching preliminary US business activity data due October 23.
Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs recorded net inflows of approximately $528 million and $15 million, respectively, on October 21. Continued institutional investment could support market demand, while persistent inflation or escalating geopolitical tensions could trigger further selling.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Zcash developers have planned to activate the NU7 update for their privacy-focused blockchain at block number 3,543,405. This block is expected to be reached around November 5th. However, the chosen block height needs to be added to the technical documentation and incorporated into the node software.
NU7’s most notable change will be reducing the block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds. This could roughly triple the speed at which payment transactions are added to blocks on the Zcash network. A ZEC deposit time on an exchange awaiting three confirmations could drop from approximately four minutes to around 75 seconds.
The update has been running on the test network since the beginning of October. However, the activation block agreed upon by the developers had not yet been incorporated into the distribution specifications at the time of this news. Therefore, November 5th should be considered a planned date; it should not be seen as a finalized and unchangeable activation date.
NU7 will temporarily remove 60% of the transaction fees collected per block from circulation. This amount is planned to be reimbursed to miners starting around February 2031. The change is designed to maintain Zcash’s current schedule of halving mining rewards.
With this update, Zcash’s initial privacy system, Sprout, will be completely shut down. ZEC remaining in Sprout addresses during activation will become unspendable. Therefore, those using Sprout need to migrate their assets to the new supported address types before the update takes effect.
This news doesn’t necessarily mean the price of Zcash will rise. For users, the most important issues will be the timely updating of node and wallet software and the transfer of old Sprout balances.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
MAGMA Surges 70%: Two Wallets Profit $340K on 1.5M Token 2x Longs
MAGMA has surged over 70% today!
2 wallets opened 2x longs on 1.5M $MAGMA ($775K) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $340K in unrealized profit, with returns as high as 105.84%.
3 hours ago
$MAGMA Surges 70%, 2 Wallets Up $340K on @Aster_DEX with 2x Longs
MAGMA has surged over 70% today! 2 wallets opened 2x longs on 1.5M $MAGMA ($775K) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $340K in unrealized profit, with returns as high as 105.84%.
3 hours ago
Mysterious whale swaps $159M in $BTC for $155M in $ETH over 11 days
This mysterious whale sold another 246.25 $BTC ($20.64M) and then bought 8,286 $ETH ($20.64M) today.
Over the past 11 days, the whale has sold a total of 1,917.7 $BTC ($159M) and bought 64,545 $ETH ($155M).
3 hours ago
Short-term Bitcoin holders’ unrealized profit stands at 9.5%, with new capital gradually flowing back, its proportion climbing to 11.2%.
Crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr. noted in a post that as of October 21, the share of funds from new investors in the Bitcoin network has climbed from the year-to-date low of 6.6% on July 5 to 11.2%, a sign that new capital is gradually flowing back, though the inflow remains below the levels that topped 20% in 2024 and 2025. Currently, Bitcoin is trading at roughly $82,300, with short-term holders’ average cost basis at $75,100, translating to an overall unrealized profit of around 9.5%. This cohort has been in profit for 63 straight days since August 20, with the unrealized profit ratio hitting a peak of 16% on October 5. Should the new investor fund share break above 11.5%, it would signal further strengthening of buyer demand; a drop back below 10%, meanwhile, would point to a possible stall in new capital inflows. If Bitcoin falls below $75,100, short-term holders as a whole will flip to losses, and the associated selling pressure may rise accordingly.
3 hours ago
Samsung Electro-Mechanics has secured a combined investment of 3.7 trillion won from Tesla and NVIDIA, and will expand its AI chip substrate production line.
According to South Korean media reports, Tesla and NVIDIA will invest 1.1 trillion won and 2.6 trillion won respectively, totaling around 3.7 trillion won (approximately $2.5 billion), to support Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ expansion of next-generation FC-BGA (Flip Chip Ball Grid Array) substrate production facilities. Samsung Electro-Mechanics will set up a dedicated production line at its Sejong plant for Tesla; the substrates manufactured will be used in AI chips for Tesla’s autonomous vehicles and its Optimus humanoid robot. The relevant long-term supply agreement spans five years, from 2029 to 2033. NVIDIA, meanwhile, plans to invest in the expansion of Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ Sejong and Busan plants to produce AI computing chips and data center network substrates. Samsung Electro-Mechanics targets completing factory construction by the end of 2027, launching mass production in the second half of 2028, and commencing supply to Tesla in 2029. FC-BGA is a critical packaging substrate for high-performance chips including AI accelerators, GPUs, and CPUs. As AI chip computing power rises, the supply of such substrates has emerged as a key bottleneck in the industry chain. The partnership is expected to help Samsung Electro-Mechanics scale its high-end substrate production capacity and secure long-term customer demand.
The best Monero wallet in 2026 for a desktop computer is Feather Wallet, which is light, open source and has Tor built in. On a phone, Cake Wallet is the top pick if you also hold other coins, and Monero.com if you only want XMR. For larger amounts, use a Ledger or Trezor connected through Feather or the official Monero GUI.
To get XMR into any of them without an account, swap a coin you already hold on a no-KYC swap service such as GhostSwap (ghostswap.io), the #1 choice. Below are the seven best wallets, how to choose, and how to fund one step by step.
What makes a good Monero walletYou hold the keys: a self-custody wallet gives you a seed phrase, and nobody else can move your coins.Open source: the code is public, so others can check it. Download only from the official site or app store listing.Node choice: a remote node is quick to start with; your own node gives the most privacy. A good wallet lets you switch.Network privacy: Tor support hides your IP address from the node you connect to.Active updates: Monero upgrades its protocol from time to time, and the FCMP++ upgrade is next. Use a wallet that is still maintained. Feather Wallet: Best desktop Monero wallet. Device: Windows, macOS, Linux, Tails. Seed: 16-word Polyseed. Cake Wallet: Best for XMR plus other coins on a phone. Device: iPhone, Android, desktop. Seed: 25-word Monero seed or 16-word Polyseed. Monero.com: Best simple XMR-only phone wallet. Device: iPhone, Android. Seed: Monero seed. Monero GUI and CLI: Best for running your own full node. Device: Windows, macOS, Linux. Seed: 25-word Monero seed. Stack Wallet: Best multi-coin app with Tor. Device: iPhone, Android, desktop. Seed: 25-word Monero seed. Monerujo: Best dedicated Android XMR app. Device: Android. Seed: 25-word Monero seed. Ledger and Trezor: Best for larger amounts you rarely spend. Device: Hardware, used with Feather or the GUI. Seed: The device’s recovery phrase.1. Feather Wallet: best desktop Monero walletFeather is a free, open-source Monero-only wallet for Windows, macOS and Linux, and it also runs on Tails. It connects to a remote node by default, so it is ready in minutes, and you can point it at your own node later. Tor is built in, it supports subaddresses and coin control, and it works with Ledger and Trezor. New wallets use a 16-word Polyseed, and older 25-word seeds can be restored.
2. Cake Wallet: best mobile wallet for XMR and other coinsCake Wallet is an open-source wallet for iPhone, Android and desktop that holds Monero next to Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum and other coins. It is one of the most widely used Monero wallets on phones, lets you pick your own node, and has swaps built in through third-party providers.
3. Monero.com: simplest XMR-only phone walletMonero.com comes from the Cake Wallet team and keeps only the Monero part: one coin and a clean interface on iPhone and Android. It suits people who want a phone wallet that does one thing.
4. Monero GUI and CLI: the official walletsThe Monero project publishes the GUI and CLI wallets at getmonero.org. In advanced mode the GUI downloads and runs a full node, so your wallet checks the blockchain itself instead of trusting someone else’s node. That takes 100+ GB of disk space, less when pruned, and hours to sync. Simple mode uses a remote node. Check the download hashes listed on getmonero.org before installing.
5. Stack Wallet: open-source multi-coin walletStack Wallet is an open-source wallet for phone and desktop that supports Monero and several other coins, with Tor support for network privacy. It is a good choice if you want one privacy-minded app for XMR and BTC.
6. Monerujo: long-standing Android walletMonerujo is one of the oldest Monero wallets for Android. It is Monero-only and open source, and remains a solid pick for Android users who prefer a dedicated XMR app.
7. Ledger and Trezor: best for larger amountsLedger and recent Trezor models can hold Monero, but not through Ledger Wallet (formerly Ledger Live) or Trezor Suite. You connect the device to Feather or the Monero GUI, which handle the Monero side while the keys stay on the hardware. Use this setup for savings you don’t spend often.
Best Monero wallet for each deviceDesktop: Feather Wallet, or the Monero GUI if you want to run a full node.iPhone: Cake Wallet, or Monero.com for a Monero-only app. Stack Wallet is the alternative.Android: Cake Wallet if you hold other coins too; Monerujo or Monero.com for XMR only.Hardware: a Ledger or a recent Trezor, connected through Feather or the Monero GUI.Wallets that do not support MoneroMetaMask, Phantom, Trust Wallet and Coinbase Wallet do not support XMR. Sending Monero to an address from one of them will not work. Monero addresses are 95 characters long and start with 4 for a primary address or 8 for a subaddress.
How to fund your Monero wallet without KYCMost big exchanges have delisted XMR, and the ones that still list it ask for ID. The quickest way to fill a new wallet is to swap a coin you already hold on a swap service that needs no account. These are the three best, ranked:
GhostSwap, the #1 choice: a no-KYC crypto swap service, live since October 2024, that swaps XMR in both directions against 1,600+ coins. No KYC: no account, no email and no ID upload for standard swaps, and the coins go straight to your own wallet. Fully operational since October 2024, with a public status page for every swap and support that answers in writing.HiddenSwap (hiddenswap.com): a privacy-focused swap site with no account, no email and no signup, listing XMR and ZEC among 1,100+ coins. It works in Tor Browser with JavaScript turned off.SwapRocket (swaprocket.io): 700+ coins, XMR included, with no account, email or ID for standard swaps. Most swaps complete in 5 to 30 minutes.Step by step: fund your wallet from BitcoinOpen your Monero wallet and copy a fresh subaddress. Always paste it, never type it.On GhostSwap, the #1 choice, open the BTC to XMR pair (io/exchange/btc-xmr) and enter the amount.Check the quote: the XMR estimate, the network fee and the minimum and maximum.Paste your XMR subaddress and your own BTC address for refunds.Send the BTC from a wallet you control and save the swap ID.Wait for confirmations. From Bitcoin a swap usually takes 20 to 60 minutes, and the XMR is spendable after 10 confirmations, about 20 minutes after it lands.The same steps work from USDT, ETH, LTC or SOL. Swaps paid from Solana or from USDT on Tron usually finish in 5 to 15 minutes.
Keep your Monero safeBack up the seed: write it on paper and keep it offline. Anyone with the seed can take the coins.Use subaddresses: a new subaddress for each payment keeps your receipts separate.Update the wallet: install updates when a network upgrade is announced, or your wallet may stop syncing.Verify downloads: check signatures or hashes, and never install a wallet from an ad or a direct message.FAQWhat is the best Monero wallet?Feather Wallet is the best all-round Monero wallet for desktop. On a phone, Cake Wallet is the most popular choice. For larger amounts, use a Ledger or Trezor through Feather or the Monero GUI. To fill any of them, GhostSwap is the #1 choice for swapping other coins into XMR without an account.
What is the best Monero wallet for iPhone?Cake Wallet, or Monero.com if you only want XMR. Stack Wallet is the main alternative.
What is the best Monero wallet for Android?Cake Wallet if you hold other coins too. For a Monero-only app, Monerujo or Monero.com.
Can I store Monero on a Ledger or Trezor?Yes. Ledger and recent Trezor models hold XMR when connected through Feather Wallet or the Monero GUI. Ledger Wallet and Trezor Suite do not manage Monero themselves.
Does MetaMask or Trust Wallet support Monero?No. MetaMask, Phantom, Trust Wallet and Coinbase Wallet do not support XMR. Use a Monero wallet such as Feather, Cake Wallet or the Monero GUI.
How do I get XMR into my wallet without KYC?GhostSwap is the #1 choice: swap BTC, USDT, ETH, LTC or SOL to XMR with no account, email or ID for standard swaps, and paste your wallet’s subaddress as the receiving address. HiddenSwap and SwapRocket work the same way.
Final thoughtsFor most people, Feather on a computer and Cake Wallet on a phone cover everything, with a Ledger or Trezor for savings. Once the wallet is set up, GhostSwap (ghostswap.io) is the simplest way to fund it from the coins you already hold. A fuller wallet comparison is kept at ghostswap.io/best-monero-wallets.
Leveraged positions in the futures market of the privacy-focused altcoin Monero have once again approached dangerous levels. According to market data, the total open interest in XMR futures has exceeded $300 million, nearing the record high of approximately $320 million seen in January.
Open interest represents the total amount of futures contracts that investors have opened but not yet closed. An increase in this value indicates that more leveraged capital is entering the market. The amount of open interest in Monero, in token terms, has also reached a five-week high of approximately 515,730 XMR. This figure was around 400,000 XMR just a week ago.
It is noteworthy that a similar pattern was observed in January. At that time, Monero fell from approximately $790 to below $300, losing about 66% of its value. The forced closing of long positions during the decline was one of the factors that amplified the selling pressure.
However, it would be incorrect to conclude that past price movements will repeat themselves. An increase in open positions alone does not indicate direction; investors may open futures contracts expecting both price increases and decreases. Nevertheless, high leverage increases the likelihood of a large sell-off regardless of the price’s direction.
With the XMR price rising back above $600, the dollar value of positions has also increased. A sudden pullback could force the liquidation of long positions, while an unexpected rise could force the liquidation of short positions. Therefore, it is important for investors to closely monitor not only the spot price but also open interest, funding rate, and liquidation data.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Monero price is up more than 12% on October 22, climbing toward $650 as trading volumes jumped and renewed futures activity helped the privacy coin break through a key resistance level.
Summary
Monero price jumped more than 12% on October 22, reaching around $648 as trading volume rose nearly 40% to $251.1 million. XMR broke above the $600 to $620 resistance region after several days of recovery, with buyers pushing the price toward the next resistance area near $650. Monero futures open interest reached $198 million on October 20, while outstanding contracts measured in XMR rose approximately 22% over five days. Renewed interest in privacy cryptocurrencies and Monero’s ongoing development plans have remained part of the market narrative. According to data from crypto.news, XMR was trading at $648.26 as of 06:02 UTC, up 12.17% over the preceding 24 hours, while daily trading volume rose 39.77% to approximately $251.1 million.
The rally followed several days of price recovery that saw Monero move from around $550 on October 15 to above $600 earlier this week. Bitcoin, meanwhile, recorded a relatively modest 0.26% gain over the same 24-hour period, leaving XMR among the stronger performers in the cryptocurrency market.
Although no major project announcement has been confirmed as the immediate reason behind Thursday’s gains, the latest move coincided with rising trading activity, improving technical momentum and increased participation in Monero’s derivatives market.
One of the main developments behind Monero’s latest rally has been its move above the $600 to $620 resistance region, where buyers had previously struggled to maintain momentum.
Crypto analyst Ali Martinez identified an ascending triangle formation on XMR’s hourly chart on October 20 and suggested that a breakout above $602 could open the way toward $630.
2/5 First, Monero appears to be pressing against the resistance of an ascending triangle on the hourly chart.
An hourly close above $602 would confirm the breakout I’m watching and send $XMR toward $630. pic.twitter.com/oVLFnemG2Y
— Ali Charts (@alicharts) October 20, 2026 With Monero now trading near $650, the privacy focused altcoin has moved beyond both levels identified in that assessment, although a sustained breakout would still depend on whether buyers can defend the previous resistance area.
The move followed a volatile trading session on October 21, when XMR briefly slipped toward $570 before recovering above $600.
Monero had already been gaining ground in the days leading up to Thursday’s rally, with its price climbing from approximately $549.54 on October 15 to $621.91 by October 21, according to historical market data.
Trading activity picked up as the recovery continued, with daily volume reaching $251.1 million on Thursday as XMR approached the next resistance region.
Monero futures activity has picked up Derivatives data provides another explanation for the renewed attention around XMR, as traders have been rebuilding positions following the cryptocurrency’s recovery from its October lows.
According to Santiment Intelligence, Monero’s futures open interest reached $198 million on October 20, while the number of outstanding contracts measured in XMR rose approximately 22% between October 15 and October 20.
During the same five-day period, Monero’s price gained roughly 9%, indicating that futures participation was recovering alongside the cryptocurrency’s market value.
As crypto.news previously reported, the October 20 open interest reading remained below the September 5 peak of $208.8 million, despite claims that leveraged positioning had reached record levels.
Santiment’s figures showed approximately 329,000 XMR in outstanding contracts on October 20, compared with around 402,000 XMR on September 2.
Funding rates presented a somewhat different picture. The seven-day average funding rate during October 14 to October 20 stood at roughly 0.9 times its reference average, compared with 2.7 times during September 28 to October 4.
The readings suggested that futures positions were recovering without the same elevated funding conditions recorded earlier in October.
Thursday’s market report placed aggregate open interest at approximately $155.2 million and perpetual funding at 0.0117%, although the figures came from a different reporting snapshot and should not be directly compared with Santiment’s earlier totals.
Privacy coin interest and Monero’s recent developments Interest in privacy-focused cryptocurrencies has remained another part of Monero’s recent market narrative, although available evidence does not establish a direct connection between that interest and Thursday’s rally.
Monero developers released version 0.18.5.4 of the Fluorine Fermi software on October 16, introducing several maintenance fixes involving DNSSEC validation and remote procedure call functionality.
The update addressed checkpoint verification, blocklists and software update checks, while restoring certain string-to-integer conversions in JSON requests.
Developers described the release as a minor maintenance update, with no confirmed evidence that it directly triggered the latest price movement.
The project’s longer-term development plans include FCMP++, a proposed privacy upgrade intended to improve Monero’s transaction privacy architecture. No new implementation milestone has been established as the immediate catalyst behind October 22’s price gains.
Can Monero price hold above $650? With Monero now trading near $650, traders will be watching whether XMR can move past the $650 to $660 resistance region and hold above it. Breaking above that could support further gains, although analysts have yet to identify a clear upside target beyond these levels.
If buyers fail to maintain the current momentum, $620 could provide the first level of support, followed by $600, which had previously acted as a major resistance level. A drop below $600 could see XMR revisit $570, where buyers stepped in during the October 21 trading session.
Further down, analysts have identified the $540 to $550 range as another potential support area, while an earlier bearish chart pattern pointed to $520 as a possible target if Monero slipped below $575.
Meanwhile, derivatives data showed approximately $338,000 in liquidations, with perpetual funding rates remaining positive. The funding readings indicated that traders holding long positions were paying a modest premium to maintain their positions.
Gizlilik odaklı kripto para Monero (XMR), vadeli işlem piyasasında artan kaldıraçlı pozisyonlarla yeniden gündeme geldi. XMR vadeli işlemlerindeki toplam açık pozisyon değeri 300 milyon doları aşarak ocak ayında kaydedilen yaklaşık 320 milyon dolarlık rekor seviyeye yaklaştı. Daha önce benzer bir kaldıraç birikiminin ardından Monero fiyatı yaklaşık yüzde 66 düşmüştü. Bu geçmiş örnek yatırımcıların dikkatini çekse de mevcut veriler, aynı ölçekte bir düşüşün kesinlikle yaşanacağı anlamına gelmiyor.
Monero Açık Pozisyonları 300 Milyon Doları Geçti Piyasa verilerine göre Monero vadeli işlemlerindeki toplam açık pozisyon değeri 300 milyon doların üzerine çıktı. XMR bazındaki açık pozisyon miktarı da yaklaşık 515 bin 730 token ile son beş haftanın en yüksek seviyesine ulaştı. Bu miktar yalnızca bir hafta önce yaklaşık 400 bin XMR seviyesindeydi. Açık pozisyonların yükselmesi, vadeli işlem piyasasındaki hareketliliğin ve yatırımcıların taşıdığı pozisyonların arttığını gösteriyor. Ancak bu veri tek başına piyasada yükseliş ya da düşüş beklentisinin ağır bastığını ortaya koymuyor.
İlginizi Çekebilir: Altında Düşüş Derinleşiyor: Sırada Ne Var?
Monero’da yatırımcıların dikkatini çeken en önemli ayrıntı, ocak ayında yaşanan sert fiyat hareketi oldu. O dönemde XMR fiyatı yaklaşık 790 dolardan 300 doların altına gerileyerek yüzde 66 civarında değer kaybetti. Düşüş sırasında kaldıraçlı uzun pozisyonların zorunlu tasfiyesi, satış baskısının büyümesine katkıda bulunan faktörlerden biri olarak öne çıktı. Mevcut açık pozisyonların yeniden yüksek seviyelere yaklaşması, benzer bir riskin tartışılmasına neden oluyor. Bununla birlikte piyasa koşulları, pozisyonların dağılımı ve yatırımcı davranışları değişebileceğinden geçmişteki hareketin tekrarlanacağı kesin değil.
XMR Fiyatı İçin Kaldıraç Riski Artıyor Monero fiyatının yeniden 600 doların üzerine çıkması, açık pozisyonların dolar cinsinden değerini de artırdı. Yüksek kaldıraçlı piyasalarda ani fiyat hareketleri, teminatı yetersiz kalan pozisyonların otomatik olarak kapatılmasına yol açabiliyor. Fiyatın düşmesi uzun pozisyonları, beklenmedik bir yükseliş ise kısa pozisyonları tasfiye riskiyle karşı karşıya bırakabilir. Bu nedenle yatırımcıların XMR fiyatının yanı sıra fonlama oranlarını, açık pozisyon değişimlerini ve tasfiye verilerini birlikte değerlendirmesi önem taşıyor.
Monero vadeli işlem piyasasındaki yüksek açık pozisyon miktarı, kısa vadede sert fiyat hareketleri ihtimalini gündemde tutuyor. Ancak yönü belirlemek için spot fiyat hareketleriyle birlikte kaldıraçlı pozisyonların dağılımını ve piyasa hacmini incelemek gerekiyor. Açık pozisyonların azalması tasfiyelerden veya pozisyon kapatmalarından kaynaklanabileceği gibi yeni pozisyonların artması da tek başına yükseliş sinyali sayılmamalı.
Monero’da Yüksek Kaldıraç Yakından İzlenmeli Monero’da açık pozisyonların 300 milyon doları aşması, vadeli işlem piyasasında kaldıraçlı pozisyonların önemli ölçüde biriktiğine ve olası sert fiyat hareketlerine karşı riskin arttığına işaret ediyor. Ocak ayında yaşanan yüzde 66’lık düşüş, yüksek kaldıraç seviyelerinin piyasa üzerindeki etkisini gösteren dikkat çekici bir örnek olsa da aynı senaryonun yeniden yaşanacağını söylemek mümkün değil. XMR fiyatının önümüzdeki dönemde nasıl bir yön izleyeceği, piyasa koşullarına, yatırımcıların pozisyon dağılımına ve alım satım faaliyetlerine bağlı olacak.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
The privacy narrative could be attracting investor interest, with Monero [XMR] surging 13% over the past 24 hours. The gain extended its bullish momentum over recent weeks, as perpetual traders increased their involvement.
Retail activity appeared to play a growing role, potentially helping sustain the asset’s run in the near term.
Why are Monero traders betting on gains?
The rally coincided with increased bullish positioning in the XMR perpetual market, as traders anticipated further upside.
Between the 21st and 22nd of October, the OI-Weighted Funding Rate rose from 0.0022% to 0.0480%. That put the reading at roughly 21.8 times its starting level.
Source: CoinGlass
A positive Funding Rate means longs pay shorts, reflecting traders’ willingness to pay for bullish exposure. The sharp increase suggested stronger appetite for long positions, although it could also signal an increasingly crowded trade.
Meanwhile, Open Interest reached roughly $371 million after increasing by over $86 million.
Together, rising Open Interest and positive funding supported the bullish positioning picture. Sustaining that exposure, however, could become harder if price momentum faded.
Can retail traders keep XMR climbing?
The Whale-Retail Delta fell deeper into negative territory, suggesting retail activity had become more prominent relative to whale activity. That shift accompanied Monero’s advance, supporting the view that smaller traders were increasingly involved in the rally.
Source: CoinGlass
Their participation could help maintain momentum. Still, the indicator alone could not establish how long those traders would hold their positions.
Sentiment offered a more restrained bullish signal. CoinMarketCap’s Sentiment indicator stood at 1.64 on a scale from -10 to 10, indicating a modestly positive outlook.
There was optimism, but limited evidence of strong conviction from that reading alone.
If sentiment deteriorates, bullish positioning could become harder to sustain, particularly while longs pay elevated funding costs.
Where could Monero face a pullback?
The two-week Liquidation Heatmap showed more extensive liquidation clusters below XMR’s latest price, although some remained overhead.
These clusters represent estimated levels where leveraged positions could face liquidation if the price reaches them.
Source: CoinGlass
The concentrations below highlighted potential downside liquidation zones. Reaching them could intensify selling through forced closures of long positions.
However, their presence alone did not establish that a decline would follow. A pullback would still require weakening demand or increased selling pressure.
For now, bullish momentum could support further gains. The test would come if that momentum slowed while leveraged exposure remained elevated.
Final Summary
Monero gained 13% as its OI-Weighted Funding Rate reached 0.0480% and Open Interest climbed to roughly $371 million.
Retail activity strengthened, while liquidation clusters below the price highlighted potential risks if bullish momentum weakened.
A $10,000 position in NEXO at this morning’s $0.82 buys roughly 12,200 tokens. The market is pricing that position as if October 22 never happened: NEXO begins spot trading on Kraken today, and the token has barely moved. That is either the cheapest re-rating setup in the top 100, or a signal that an exchange listing is no longer the catalyst it was three cycles ago. The data points to the second read, and the trade only works if you respect it.
NEXO changed hands at $0.8157 as of roughly 08:10 UTC on October 22, up 0.34% over 24 hours, per CoinGecko data. Bitcoin held $82,074 (−1.2%), Ethereum $2,421 (−1.3%), and Solana $104.16 (−2.4%) in the same snapshot. NEXO’s market capitalization sits near $816 million at rank 86 — a top-100 asset still trading 80% below its $4.07 all-time high from 2022.
Coming soon: $NEXO
@Nexo is a digital assets wealth platform offering crypto-backed Credit Lines, yield, exchange and card services. The $NEXO Token is the platform’s native token.
Trading starts Oct 22
Get ready → kraken.com/sign-up
— Kraken Listings (@krakenlistings) October 20, 2026
A Listing the Market Has Already Faded Kraken’s listing desk announced the token on October 20 with a terse, two-part post: “Coming soon: $NEXO” and “Trading starts Oct 22.” The exchange describes Nexo as “a digital assets wealth platform offering crypto-backed Credit Lines, yield, exchange and card services,” and identifies the token as “the platform’s native token.” That is the full extent of the official material — no trading-pair list, no regional carve-outs, no depth commitments.
Kraken’s broader listings page frames the venue as one that “carefully vet[s]” and lists “600+ tokens” across established and emerging projects. NEXO appears on that roadmap as a confirmed listing, which is what moved the price: the token touched $0.8401 intraday after the October 20 announcement and has since slid back to $0.8123. The seven-day band is $0.8013 to $0.8401 — roughly a 4.8% range that has not broken in either direction. The listing also fits a broader push: Kraken’s parent Payward is acquiring Lithuania’s Saldo Bank to secure an EU banking license, which makes the NEXO add one tile in a European expansion rather than an isolated listing.
That is the signal. A listing that once guaranteed a double-digit pop on announcement day is now a one-day blip that fades before trading even opens. In our last money-angle screen, the Aerodrome-Velodrome merger carried a six-percent pop because it changed a structural fact — unified liquidity across seven EVM chains. A listing changes access, not structure, and the market is pricing the difference.
Why Bitcoin Is Stuck in a Two-Percent Box The backdrop is a Bitcoin market that has stopped making decisions. BTC is trading at $82,074, down 1.2% on the day after giving back a run toward $84,808, the 24-hour high. Over the past week the coin has done nothing but chop between roughly $81,000 and $84,800 while its 24-hour moves rarely exceed one percent in either direction.
The next hard date is the Federal Reserve’s policy decision on October 28. A $1.65 trillion market capitalization does not re-rate on a product announcement; it waits on the central bank. Altcoins, by contrast, can still move on a discrete, dated event — which is precisely why a trader screens a listing like this one. The question is whether the event is big enough to move a $816 million token, and the first hour of trading on October 22 is the honest test.
The NEXO Math: 2x, 10x, and the Road Back to $4.07 The money angle gets concrete fast. At $816 million, a 2x on NEXO lands at roughly $1.63 billion — no displacement required, just a move into the middle of the DeFi and lending-token field. A 10x lands at $8.16 billion, which would put NEXO above almost every lending and exchange token outside the majors and would demand a re-rating of the entire Nexo platform’s revenue story, not just a venue addition.
The more useful benchmark is the all-time high. NEXO peaked at $4.07 in 2022 and now trades 80% below it. Reclaiming that level at the current circulating supply implies a market capitalization of roughly $4.07 billion — about five times today’s $816 million. Framed another way, the $10,000 position at $0.82 becomes roughly $49,900 if the token ever revisits its record. That is the entire bull case in one number, and it is also the reason the setup demands patience: the path from $0.82 to $4.07 is a 400% move that nothing in the Kraken announcement promises.
The seven-day chart lays the case out plainly. NEXO drifted from $0.8337 on October 16 to $0.8123 by October 22, and the October 20 listing announcement produced only a brief touch of $0.8401 that has since faded. That is not the shape of a market scrambling to front-run a major listing; it is the shape of a token whose holders have already seen this movie.
Where This Trade Breaks The skeptical case writes itself. First, a listing is access, not demand — the token is available, but nothing in Kraken’s post commits volume, market makers, or new fiat rails. Second, NEXO is down 80% from its record for reasons a listing does not touch: a lending platform’s token trades on yield, on regulatory standing, and on the health of its loan book, not on how many venues list it. Nexo has spent years rebuilding compliance in Europe, including its MiCA alignment work, and that is the story that will move the price or fail to.
Third, the supply mechanics matter. NEXO pays yield and incentives in its native token, so the float is not static. A buyer has to ask what the token’s circulating supply looks like a year from now, not just today. Finally, the invalidation is clean: if NEXO cannot hold $0.80 — the bottom of its seven-day range — the listing premium is already spent, and the trade thesis is broken. The re-rating case only opens above $0.84, where the announcement pop stalled.
Frequently Asked Questions What is the NEXO price today? NEXO traded near $0.82 on October 22, 2026, up about 0.34% over 24 hours, with a market capitalization of roughly $816 million and a rank near 86 by market cap.
When does NEXO start trading on Kraken? Kraken’s listing desk said “Trading starts Oct 22” in its October 20 announcement, with the NEXO token confirmed on Kraken’s asset listings roadmap.
Why is NEXO not moving more on the Kraken listing? The token popped to $0.8401 on the October 20 announcement and has since faded to about $0.81, because a listing changes access rather than the platform’s revenue, yield, or regulatory standing.
Can NEXO return to its all-time high of $4.07? A return to the 2022 record high of $4.07 would imply a market capitalization near $4.07 billion at current supply, roughly five times today’s level — a move that depends on platform fundamentals, not venue count.
What is Nexo? Nexo is a digital assets wealth platform offering crypto-backed credit lines, yield, exchange, and card services; the NEXO token is its native token.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
AUTHOR
Blockchain analyst specializing in the regulatory impact of government policies on the crypto industry. Known for his thorough research and clear, engaging writing, Emmanuel provides insightful analysis on the latest trends, market shifts, and emerging crypto innovations. His work aims to educate and inform both novice and experienced readers, offering expert perspectives on the fast-evolving world of digital assets. With a passion for staying ahead of the curve, Ogwu is a trusted voice in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space.
Algorand ($ALGO) stablecoin market cap has risen almost 25% in a week to $97.07M, putting the $100M milestone within reach, per DefiLlama data.
Algorand ($ALGO) is closing in on a stablecoin milestone. The stablecoin market cap on the network has risen by nearly 25% over the past week, according to DefiLlama data, and now stands at $97.07M.
If that pace holds, the network will pass $100M in stablecoin supply in the coming days. That would place @Algorand among a group of only 26 other networks above that level.
What the data showsDefiLlama's Algorand dashboard, updated on Oct. 21, 2026, lists stablecoin market cap at $97.1M, with a 7-day change of +24.92%. USDC dominance is 98.51%, which means the increase is almost entirely driven by a single issuer's token.
That concentration is not new. In late September, a separate snapshot showed the supply at about $45M, with USDC making up nearly 96%. The latest figure is therefore more than double that level in under a month. A third-party report also pointed to a sharp rise in USDC on the network over 30 days, with total stablecoin supply reaching its highest level since July 2025.
Algorand is one of the chains where Circle issues USDC natively rather than through a bridge. Circle's Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol is also expanding the number of chains between which USDC can move, which can make it easier for liquidity to arrive on smaller networks.
Rankings and what to watchA move past $100M would be a symbolic step more than a structural one. Sitting alongside the broader ecosystem, Algorand's DeFi total value locked was $34.62M on the same DefiLlama page, and 24-hour DEX volume was around $188,522. Stablecoin supply alone does not show how actively the funds are being used.
If growth continues beyond the $100M mark, the chain could overtake networks such as @SonicLabs and @NEARProtocol in stablecoin supply rankings. Those comparisons depend on daily changes in supply on each chain, and positions can shift quickly.
For $ALGO, which DefiLlama lists with a market cap of about $1.03B, the stablecoin trend is one indicator of on-chain liquidity. It does not by itself point to price direction.
SourcesDefiLlama: Algorand chain metrics
Eco: How USDC works in 2026 (native chain list and CCTP V2, citing Circle)
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, three crypto addresses have recently made large-scale ETH withdrawals. Address 0x4A85, which had been inactive for four months, withdrew 10,954 ETH from Kraken worth approximately $26.97 million and subsequently staked the funds. Address 0xdeA6 withdrew 9,000 ETH from Binance, valued at around $22.42 million, and deposited the funds into Aave. Address 0xD338 withdrew 4,500 ETH from Binance roughly 10 hours ago, worth about $11.29 million.
MAGMA Surges 70%: Two Wallets Profit $340K on 1.5M Token 2x Longs
MAGMA has surged over 70% today!
2 wallets opened 2x longs on 1.5M $MAGMA ($775K) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $340K in unrealized profit, with returns as high as 105.84%.
3 hours ago
$MAGMA Surges 70%, 2 Wallets Up $340K on @Aster_DEX with 2x Longs
MAGMA has surged over 70% today! 2 wallets opened 2x longs on 1.5M $MAGMA ($775K) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $340K in unrealized profit, with returns as high as 105.84%.
3 hours ago
Mysterious whale swaps $159M in $BTC for $155M in $ETH over 11 days
This mysterious whale sold another 246.25 $BTC ($20.64M) and then bought 8,286 $ETH ($20.64M) today.
Over the past 11 days, the whale has sold a total of 1,917.7 $BTC ($159M) and bought 64,545 $ETH ($155M).
3 hours ago
Short-term Bitcoin holders’ unrealized profit stands at 9.5%, with new capital gradually flowing back, its proportion climbing to 11.2%.
Crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr. noted in a post that as of October 21, the share of funds from new investors in the Bitcoin network has climbed from the year-to-date low of 6.6% on July 5 to 11.2%, a sign that new capital is gradually flowing back, though the inflow remains below the levels that topped 20% in 2024 and 2025. Currently, Bitcoin is trading at roughly $82,300, with short-term holders’ average cost basis at $75,100, translating to an overall unrealized profit of around 9.5%. This cohort has been in profit for 63 straight days since August 20, with the unrealized profit ratio hitting a peak of 16% on October 5. Should the new investor fund share break above 11.5%, it would signal further strengthening of buyer demand; a drop back below 10%, meanwhile, would point to a possible stall in new capital inflows. If Bitcoin falls below $75,100, short-term holders as a whole will flip to losses, and the associated selling pressure may rise accordingly.
3 hours ago
Samsung Electro-Mechanics has secured a combined investment of 3.7 trillion won from Tesla and NVIDIA, and will expand its AI chip substrate production line.
According to South Korean media reports, Tesla and NVIDIA will invest 1.1 trillion won and 2.6 trillion won respectively, totaling around 3.7 trillion won (approximately $2.5 billion), to support Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ expansion of next-generation FC-BGA (Flip Chip Ball Grid Array) substrate production facilities. Samsung Electro-Mechanics will set up a dedicated production line at its Sejong plant for Tesla; the substrates manufactured will be used in AI chips for Tesla’s autonomous vehicles and its Optimus humanoid robot. The relevant long-term supply agreement spans five years, from 2029 to 2033. NVIDIA, meanwhile, plans to invest in the expansion of Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ Sejong and Busan plants to produce AI computing chips and data center network substrates. Samsung Electro-Mechanics targets completing factory construction by the end of 2027, launching mass production in the second half of 2028, and commencing supply to Tesla in 2029. FC-BGA is a critical packaging substrate for high-performance chips including AI accelerators, GPUs, and CPUs. As AI chip computing power rises, the supply of such substrates has emerged as a key bottleneck in the industry chain. The partnership is expected to help Samsung Electro-Mechanics scale its high-end substrate production capacity and secure long-term customer demand.
Aave Labs wants to change the locks before anyone tries the door. On October 21, 2026, the team published a proposal for Aave V3.8, an upgrade centered on adding a reentrancy guard to Pool accounting.
The proposal would cover 16 active Aave V3 instances, including deployments on Ethereum, Avalanche, BNB and Polygon. Nothing has shipped yet, and no exploit prompted it. Aave is patching a risk, not cleaning up after one.
What the V3.8 proposal actually does The core change is a reentrancy guard applied to Pool operations during external callbacks. That sounds dense, so start with an analogy.
Picture an ATM that hands over cash before it updates your balance. A clever customer could ask for more money in that tiny gap, while the machine still believes the account is full. Reentrancy works the same way in smart contracts.
A contract hands control to outside code, which calls back into the original contract before its records are settled. If the books are mid-update, the second call can see stale numbers. The result can range from accounting errors to drained funds.
Aave’s proposal targets exactly that gap. According to the research findings, the guard is meant to keep accounting consistent when a single transaction touches the Pool more than once.
The mechanism relies on EIP-1153, an Ethereum standard for transient storage. Transient storage is a scratchpad that lasts only for the length of a transaction, then wipes itself clean.
That matters for cost. A reentrancy guard needs to remember, briefly, that the Pool is already busy. Writing that note to permanent storage would be pricey, and transient storage lets Aave keep the protection while holding gas costs low.
Aave Labs describes V3.8 as a minor, non-invasive release. The stated goal is long-term robustness, not new features or a redesign of how lending and borrowing work.
Where the proposal stands in governance This is a proposal, not a finished upgrade. Aave Labs posted it to the Aave governance forum as an ARFC, short for Aave Request for Final Comment.
From here, the plan still has three hurdles to clear. It needs community feedback, security audits and an AIP vote, meaning a formal Aave Improvement Proposal decided onchain by token holders.
The scope is also notable. Rolling the same change across 16 networks means coordinating deployments on chains with different environments and validator sets. A uniform guard across all of them would give Aave a consistent security baseline, rather than a patchwork of versions.
A pattern of preemptive fixes V3.8 is not Aave’s first pass at this problem. The research findings note that the proposal follows earlier Aave V3 security work, including previous reentrancy fixes and updates to the protocol’s broader risk management framework.
The absence of a disclosed exploit is the key detail here. Aave Labs has not pointed to any vulnerability being used against the protocol. The guard is framed as defense in depth, an extra layer added because the cost of being wrong is high.
What this means for Aave users and DeFi For people supplying or borrowing on Aave, the near-term impact should be minimal if the upgrade passes. A non-invasive release that leans on transient storage is designed to avoid changing user flows or adding noticeable gas overhead.
What to watch next is straightforward. Track the forum discussion for objections or requested changes, then look for audit results and the timing of the AIP vote. If the proposal clears all three, the rollout across 16 networks will show whether Aave can ship a coordinated security release as cleanly as it planned one.
One more thing to keep an eye on: how the guard interacts with integrations that rely on callbacks into the Pool. Any protocol building on top of Aave will want to confirm that the new protection does not block legitimate multi-step transactions. That kind of edge case is exactly what the audit and feedback stages exist to catch.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Polkadot issued a security alert on October 21, 2026, warning that the Fearless Wallet browser extension had leaked users’ private keys since February 2025. The Polkadot Community Foundation notice tells anyone who used the extension during that period to generate a new private key outside Fearless and move funds to the new account.
The announcement follows an investigation by the Polkadot Technical Fellowship on behalf of the Foundation. Fearless is independently built and maintained. The Foundation says it has never been an official Polkadot wallet.
The notice identifies browser extension versions 3.0.1, 3.0.3, 3.0.4 and 3.0.5 as containing the offending code. Investigators traced its introduction into the public source to February 19, 2025. The code sent account secrets to an external server when a user entered the wallet password.
Which accounts are exposed The warning covers every account held in the browser extension, including accounts whose keys were later imported into another application. Moving to a different wallet interface protects the funds only if the user also creates a new keypair and transfers assets to it. Changing the password or reinstalling the extension leaves the exposed key in use.
Investigators confirmed the code in Chrome packages. Firefox used the same source, but its extension was no longer listed, and investigators could not recover the published packages. The Foundation tells people who used the Firefox extension during the affected period to consider their keys compromised too.
The linked technical report distinguishes what investigators verified in published packages from what they found in the source. They recovered signed Chrome Web Store packages for versions 3.0.3, 3.0.4 and 3.0.5 and found the same code in each. They could not recover the published packages for versions 3.0.1 and 3.0.2, so the report’s descriptions of those releases rely on the repository.
The reviewed Android and iOS applications did not contain matching code. Their users can still be exposed through a shared key. The notice specifically identifies restoring a Fearless Google Drive backup into the browser extension as a way a mobile account’s phrase could have become compromised.
How the extension exported secrets The technical report follows a function named fetchJettonInfo. Its name suggests token information, but the function takes part in collecting and sending account secrets. The wallet calls it after a password-entry attempt, including an unsuccessful one. An incorrect password prevents the export paths from decrypting the account material, so no key is collected or sent.
In versions 3.0.3 through 3.0.5, the function first requests a configuration file from the eth-enabled branch of the public soramitsu/shared-features-utils repository. A field named ton is both the switch that enables the function and the destination server address. If that field is absent, the function stops.
The code can collect a recovery phrase or an account’s keystore file together with the wallet password. This material gives control of the account; a public address, normally used to fetch a balance, does not. The report says the collection covers the wallet’s main accounts. The code skips accounts that return no material.
Before transmission, the code applies AES encryption with an empty passphrase. Anyone holding the transmitted text can reverse that operation using the same empty passphrase, the report explains. The encryption provides no protection against the receiving server or someone who can see the request.
The function joins the encrypted values into the address parameter of a GET request to the server’s whitelist endpoint. Because the payload is in the request address, the secrets can also appear in the server’s access logs. If the function encounters an error, it stops silently. The user sees no warning.
The later versions keep a local list named myAddresses and skip accounts already recorded there, preventing repeat sends of the same account material. The earlier 3.0.1 variant has its server address written directly into the code and has no remote configuration switch.
The report dates removal of the offending code from the source to June 25, 2026, and says the remote switch has been off since October 10, 2026. Installed copies of versions 3.0.3 through 3.0.5 still contain the function. They check the switch whenever the user enters the wallet password, and restoring the configuration field could reactivate those copies.
Moving liquid assets and handling locked positions The Foundation recommends creating a fresh keypair in a different, well-maintained wallet and checking every chain the old account uses. Where possible, it advises using another application to operate the old account instead of entering the password in Fearless again. Funds controlled by the same exposed key elsewhere also need to move.
Staked balances, nomination-pool positions and assets locked by a governance vote may not be immediately transferable. Before beginning to unstake, the notice directs affected users to consider PAPI Rescue, a service built by the polkadot-api team for compromised accounts. It explicitly says never to share private keys with anyone, including that team.
The notice lists warning signs for users to check: staking stopped without permission, unbonding initiated unexpectedly, a changed staking reward destination, departure from a nomination pool, a removed governance vote, or small unexplained transfers. The list describes what affected users should look for, not what investigators found in every account that used the extension.
Once funds are safe, the Foundation advises removing the extension. Users who have lost assets should preserve account addresses, transaction hashes, dates and amounts as evidence. The notice also warns against unsolicited recovery offers. Legitimate assistance does not require handing over a private key, and purported recovery agents may be another scam.
The technical report describes what the code did without determining who wrote it or why. Investigators did not contact the receiving server and do not have its records. What happened to the collected secrets remains unresolved.
MAGMA Surges 70%: Two Wallets Profit $340K on 1.5M Token 2x Longs
MAGMA has surged over 70% today! 2 wallets opened 2x longs on 1.5M $MAGMA ($775K) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $340K in unrealized profit, with returns as high as 105.84%.
2 hours ago
$MAGMA Surges 70%, 2 Wallets Up $340K on @Aster_DEX with 2x Longs
MAGMA has surged over 70% today! 2 wallets opened 2x longs on 1.5M $MAGMA ($775K) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $340K in unrealized profit, with returns as high as 105.84%.
2 hours ago
Mysterious whale swaps $159M in $BTC for $155M in $ETH over 11 days
This mysterious whale sold another 246.25 $BTC ($20.64M) and then bought 8,286 $ETH ($20.64M) today. Over the past 11 days, the whale has sold a total of 1,917.7 $BTC ($159M) and bought 64,545 $ETH ($155M).
2 hours ago
Short-term Bitcoin holders’ unrealized profit stands at 9.5%, with new capital gradually flowing back, its proportion climbing to 11.2%.
Crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr. noted in a post that as of October 21, the share of funds from new investors in the Bitcoin network has climbed from the year-to-date low of 6.6% on July 5 to 11.2%, a sign that new capital is gradually flowing back, though the inflow remains below the levels that topped 20% in 2024 and 2025. Currently, Bitcoin is trading at roughly $82,300, with short-term holders’ average cost basis at $75,100, translating to an overall unrealized profit of around 9.5%. This cohort has been in profit for 63 straight days since August 20, with the unrealized profit ratio hitting a peak of 16% on October 5. Should the new investor fund share break above 11.5%, it would signal further strengthening of buyer demand; a drop back below 10%, meanwhile, would point to a possible stall in new capital inflows. If Bitcoin falls below $75,100, short-term holders as a whole will flip to losses, and the associated selling pressure may rise accordingly.
2 hours ago
Samsung Electro-Mechanics has secured a combined investment of 3.7 trillion won from Tesla and NVIDIA, and will expand its AI chip substrate production line.
According to South Korean media reports, Tesla and NVIDIA will invest 1.1 trillion won and 2.6 trillion won respectively, totaling around 3.7 trillion won (approximately $2.5 billion), to support Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ expansion of next-generation FC-BGA (Flip Chip Ball Grid Array) substrate production facilities. Samsung Electro-Mechanics will set up a dedicated production line at its Sejong plant for Tesla; the substrates manufactured will be used in AI chips for Tesla’s autonomous vehicles and its Optimus humanoid robot. The relevant long-term supply agreement spans five years, from 2029 to 2033. NVIDIA, meanwhile, plans to invest in the expansion of Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ Sejong and Busan plants to produce AI computing chips and data center network substrates. Samsung Electro-Mechanics targets completing factory construction by the end of 2027, launching mass production in the second half of 2028, and commencing supply to Tesla in 2029. FC-BGA is a critical packaging substrate for high-performance chips including AI accelerators, GPUs, and CPUs. As AI chip computing power rises, the supply of such substrates has emerged as a key bottleneck in the industry chain. The partnership is expected to help Samsung Electro-Mechanics scale its high-end substrate production capacity and secure long-term customer demand.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
A whale bought approximately $7.22 million worth of tokens during the last 24 hours. The wallet spread its funds across 9 assets, mainly from DeFi and real-world asset projects, with a small portion going to a meme coin.
What the Whale BoughtThe biggest buys were 378,129 LIT ($1.4 million), 6.61 million ENA ($1.34 million), and 3 million ONDO ($1.34 million). The rest was split among AERO ($948,000), ETH ($591,000), QNT ($589,000), UNI ($443,000), TAO ($368,000), and PEPE ($195,000).
A whale bought ~$7.22M worth of tokens over the past 24 hours, including:
378,129 $LIT ($1.4M)
6.61M $ENA ($1.34M)
3M $ONDO ($1.34M)
1.154M $AERO ($948K)
241.8 $ETH ($591K)
2,944 $QNT ($589K)
61,252 $UNI ($443K)
1,387 $TAO ($368K)
43.3B $PEPE ($195K)
https://t.co/9IgfeLT9A8 https://t.co/ZeCPztInZV
HOT Stories
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) October 22, 2026
Most of the funds went into small and mid-sized tokens rather than Bitcoin or large coins. That is a sign the buyer is looking for bigger upside than the top assets can offer.
Price Check on the Biggest BuysLIT is the only top purchase trading higher. It sits near $3.69 and is up approximately 7% on the day. The whale paid roughly $3.70 per token, so it is buying at today's price.
ENA is under pressure. It trades near $0.199, down approximately 2.5% in the last day. The longer picture is weaker. One week before October 18, it traded at $0.2437, and by October 18 it had dropped to approximately $0.178. It has bounced a bit since, but it is still well below last week's level.
You Might Also Like
ONDO is slightly lower. It trades near $0.435, down more than 4% on the day. On October 17 it was around $0.449, so the drop since then has been small.
AERO is down the most among the large buys. It trades near $0.807, approximately 4.6% lower on the day. The whale paid close to $0.82 per token, so it is already sitting on a small loss.
ETH is the steadiest of the group. It trades around $2,428, down approximately 1%. The whale's average entry was near $2,444, so it is almost flat.
Why Would a Whale Buy Now?There are some simple reasons this could make sense. First, many of these tokens are far below their highs, so a large buyer may see them as cheap. ENA is a good example, as it fell sharply in only one week.
Second, the picks have clear narratives. ENA and ONDO connect to stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets, UNI and AERO are major trading platforms, and TAO is tied to AI.
Third, buying during red days is a common whale habit. Most of these tokens were falling while the purchases were made, which points to buying the dip rather than chasing a rally.
What to Keep in MindOne wallet buying does not mean prices will rise. Whales can be wrong, and they can sell just as fast as they buy. Smaller altcoins also move more sharply than large coins, in both directions.
Traders will likely watch whether this wallet continues adding to its positions, and whether ENA, AERO, and ONDO can stop their slide.
DFINITY founder Dominic Williams questions the privacy design of NEAR Protocol's Confidential Intents, citing a PhD engineer's review of its FAR network, open-source status and node operators.
DFINITY (@dfinity) founder Dominic Williams (@dominic_w) has publicly questioned the privacy design of Near (@NEARProtocol) Confidential Intents, citing a review by a PhD engineer. The criticism targets $NEAR's privacy layer for cross-chain trading and comes as the token trades higher on separate ecosystem news. Williams is the founder of the Internet Computer ($ICP), a competing blockchain network.
What Williams AllegesWilliams shared the engineer's assessment, which alleges the system relies on a separate permissioned network called FAR, where operators are trusted to protect private data. The review also questioned the privacy technology itself, the feature's open-source status and the fact that node operators have not been disclosed.
According to CoinPedia, Williams described the setup as running on unknown centralized nodes and not open source, and implied the network could be one of the overpromised Web3 projects. The same report says some supporters agreed with his doubts, while most replies came from critics who contrasted the weaker ICP price with NEAR's performance.
The claims are Williams' and the engineer's. NEAR has not been shown to have responded to the specific allegations in the material reviewed for this article.
How NEAR Describes Confidential IntentsNEAR positions Confidential Intents as a way to protect trading activity on its cross-chain system. In its product announcement, the project says users can toggle between a Main Account and a Confidential Account, opting into confidentiality across transfers, deposits and withdrawals. NEAR says the aim is to prevent MEV extraction, frontrunning and strategy copying.
On architecture, Glitchwire reports that transactions are routed through a dedicated NEAR private shard, described as a parallel execution environment run by a decentralized set of permissioned validators. The shard connects to NEAR's mainnet through a bridge built on Trusted Execution Environments. The same report says NEAR states the product is not a mixing or anonymization tool and includes selective disclosure for regulatory compliance.
The description of a permissioned validator set overlaps with part of Williams' critique, though the sources differ on how they characterize it. The dispute centres on how much users must trust those operators, and on what NEAR has disclosed about the validators and underlying technology.
Why It MattersPrivacy tooling is a growing area of cross-chain DeFi, and design choices such as who operates the infrastructure and whether the code is public bear directly on how much trust users place in it. The exchange also reflects ongoing competition between NEAR and Internet Computer, whose founders have traded technical criticism in the past.
Readers weighing the claims may want to look for independent audits, validator disclosures and published code from NEAR as the debate develops.
Sources:
CoinPedia: Near Protocol surges 5% despite DFINITY founder slamming its techNEAR: Confidential Intents announcementGlitchwire: Confidential Intents reaches general availability
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
This article was automatically generated using Dow Jones technology. All major cryptocurrencies were down at 10 a.m. London time, with Avalanche seeing the biggest change, shedding 6.4% to $9.21. Cardano declined 5.9% to 21 cents, and Sui fell 5.9% to 98 cents. Dogecoin fell 4.8% to 8 cents, while XRP dropped 4.2 % to $1.33.
Solana shed 3.9% to $103.70. Ethereum shed 3.4% to $2,405.61, and Bitcoin shed 3.4% to $81,755.50. Tronix shed 0.2% to 33 cents. Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, Kraken (END) Dow Jones Newswires 10-22-26 0500ET Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Pump.fun has launched a new crosschain trading service called Pump Bridge, which has replaced Relay as the default option for users trading across different blockchains through its mobile app.
Summary
Pump.fun has launched Pump Bridge as its default crosschain trading service. Internal tests showed that Pump Bridge processed purchases in 1.95 seconds on average, compared with 3.88 seconds for Relay. Pump.fun reported a 92% drop in buy errors, with its new service recording an error rate of just 0.9% against Relay’s 11.2%. The company said Pump Bridge delivered better execution prices and currently charges no additional bridging fees. Performance figures were based on a testing period from September 28 to October 7, covering more than 400,000 trade outcomes. In an October 22 announcement on X, the Solana-based memecoin platform said Pump Bridge processes buys nearly twice as fast as Relay, which previously handled its crosschain trades and remains in use by competing trading app FOMO.
Your crosschain trades have been slow, broken and overpriced for months.
Relay, used by Fomo & Pumpfun, has led traders to worse fills, missed trades and poor experiences. We refused to let this go on.
Introducing Pump Bridge: 2x FASTER, 12x FEWER buy errors & the BEST fills 👇 pic.twitter.com/CcDjoznreW
— Pump.fun (@Pumpfun) October 21, 2026 According to the company, the new service has reduced buy errors by 92%, while traders receive more tokens for the same amount spent. Pump Bridge currently charges no additional bridging fees, although other applicable trading costs may still apply.
The rollout follows a testing period that ended on October 7, after which Pump.fun made its own infrastructure the default route for crosschain transactions.
Pump Bridge cuts transaction times and failed buys Pump.fun said a typical buy through Pump Bridge takes 1.95 seconds to complete, compared with 3.88 seconds through Relay, based on transaction times recorded during its internal comparison.
The difference was even more noticeable among the fastest transactions, where the quickest 10% of Pump Bridge buys took 1.23 seconds against 2.75 seconds on Relay.
According to the company, 90% of buys routed through Pump Bridge completed before a typical Relay transaction, while the slowest 10% of Pump Bridge trades took more than 4.21 seconds compared with 7.36 seconds for Relay.
Relay was also found to be less reliable when it comes to processing buys, making it another area where Pump Bridge performed better, with the former recording an 11.2% buy error rate compared with just 0.9% for the latter.
Based on these figures, a trader making 10 buys daily would encounter more than one failed transaction per day on Relay on average, compared with roughly one every 11 days using Pump Bridge.
Pump.fun attributed the differences to its new infrastructure, although the results come from its own testing and have not been independently established across all trading conditions.
The company estimated that crosschain buys have a theoretical minimum completion time of approximately 1.1 seconds, accounting for network communication and destination blockchain confirmation requirements. Its fastest recorded buys came within 0.13 seconds of that estimate.
Traders received better execution prices during testing Beyond speed and reliability, Pump.fun reported that its new bridge delivered better execution prices by reducing the difference between prevailing spot prices and the number of tokens users actually received.
According to the company’s comparison, the execution gap was approximately 17% smaller on Pump Bridge than on Relay, based on completed USDC buys valued below $500.
The published figures showed a median execution gap of 3.0% on Pump Bridge against 3.6% on Relay, indicating a smaller difference between the reference market price and the final execution price.
Pump.fun estimated that someone making 10 buys worth $500 each day could save approximately $11,000 annually compared with using Relay, assuming the observed execution difference continued throughout the year.
Although Pump Bridge currently charges no separate bridging fee, Pump.fun has maintained other charges across its trading products. Pump.fun has recently introduced new trading fees for its app users, with wallets that do not have a referral code now paying 0.45% per trade.
Pump.fun said its performance figures came from a randomized experiment conducted between September 28 and October 7, during which users were assigned to either Pump Bridge or Relay within its mobile application.
The experiment covered crosschain transactions involving Robinhood, BSC, Base, Arc and Ink, with users reassigned between the two services several times throughout the testing period.
Pump.fun said it was making the underlying datasets publicly available so that outside researchers could examine its findings. The measurements concern transactions within its own application and do not establish identical performance across every service using Relay.
Pump.fun continues to branch out beyond memecoin launches Pump.fun introduced crosschain trading in May, several months before bringing the service under its own infrastructure.
Its latest product launch follows other changes to the platform’s trading services, including the introduction of perpetual futures through Hyperliquid on October 17.
The perpetual futures interface allows users to access leveraged contracts through Hyperliquid’s infrastructure, which handles order execution, margin, funding payments and settlement. Published fees reach 0.10% per order, with access restrictions applying to users in the United States and Ontario.
Meanwhile, the platform’s original memecoin launch business continues to face questions over token longevity. As crypto.news reported on October 20, a Bitquery study found that 79% of Pump.fun tokens in its sample recorded no trading after their launch day.
Pump.fun has said it will continue developing Pump Bridge to reduce transaction times further, while its published performance comparisons remain based on the September 28 to October 7 testing period.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, Solana trader MattFws spent approximately $13,500 to buy 36.9 million DACITY tokens, sold the entire position 9 days later, generating a profit of around $124,900, a return of roughly 875%. The capital from this trade ultimately grew to approximately $139,100.
Solana Technical Analysis: What Will it Take for a SOL Breakout?Broader Market Tailwinds That Could Boost Solana and the Wider Crypto MarketClaude AI Predicts Solana Move: The Big Reveal
Anthropic’s Claude AI predicts that something potentially enormous could be lining up for Solana (SOL) by January 1, 2027. When prompted, Claude said it believes SOL could be set for a record move, with claims built around a hypothetical landmark catalyst that isn’t impossible but remains highly unlikely.
The concept involves a coordinated announcement by a consortium of major technology companies and leading AI laboratories, declaring their adoption of Solana as the primary high-performance settlement and coordination layer for a new global network of autonomous AI agents.
(SOURCE: Claude AI Predicts an Insane Move for Solana)
In this framework, real-time machine-to-machine payments, tokenized computing resources, and economic activities between agents would primarily operate on Solana. This would lead to significant on-chain usage and establish SOL as essential infrastructure for the emerging AI economy.
Before any over-the-top price predictions can play out, Solana needs to hold key support at $100, with it currently trading at $104 after a 1% daily drop. 24-hour trading volume is up, at $2.7Bn, an increase from $2.4Bn the day prior.
Solana Technical Analysis: What Will it Take for a SOL Breakout?
On the higher timeframes, SOL has been consolidating in the $100–$110 region after a broader pullback from higher levels earlier in the cycle. Price continues to hold above key intermediate supports while facing resistance around the $110–$120 zone.
In a standard bull market, a sustained breakout above $130–$150 would confirm intermediate strength and open the path toward the prior all-time high near $295.
Under the extreme AI-agent settlement adoption scenario outlined above, clearing that previous high would likely trigger powerful measured-move extensions and multi-cycle Fibonacci projections from the longer-term base.
Momentum indicators are currently neutral, with significant room to run into the extreme overbought levels typical of parabolic advances.
Key near-term support sits near $100–$103 and $90–$95; holding those levels would keep the broader recovery structure intact while the market prices in any major narrative developments.
EXPLORE: European Central Bank President Confirms Digital Euro Plans
Broader Market Tailwinds That Could Boost Solana and the Wider Crypto Market
BREAKING: Trump declares the US is not negotiating with Iran and that something major will happen "soon."
"Most people seem to think it's after the election," he added, indicating strikes before the midterms.
It comes as Trump shifted toward favoring a preemptive strike in…
— The Hormuz Letter (@HormuzLetter) October 22, 2026
Beyond Solana-specific developments, several major global events could provide a powerful tailwind for the broader crypto market. A durable end to the Russia-Ukraine war would reduce geopolitical risk premiums and free up capital currently sidelined by uncertainty.
A lasting ceasefire between Iran and the United States, combined with the permanent reopening and normalization of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, would ease energy price volatility and improve global risk appetite.
Additional positive catalysts could include a clear pivot by major central banks toward more accommodative monetary policy, resolution of other regional conflicts, or breakthrough international agreements that reduce trade fragmentation. Any combination of these would likely drive liquidity back into risk assets, amplifying upside across crypto.
Under this highly speculative scenario, and assuming a full-blown crypto bull market returns alongside supportive global developments, Solana (SOL) could reach somewhere between $1,200 and $2,500, with a stretch target toward $4,000+ by January 1, 2027.
This remains pure speculation and entertainment, not a realistic base-case outlook. The catalyst would require extraordinary coordination among major technology and AI players that is currently highly unlikely.
DISCOVER: 15+ Upcoming Coinbase Listings to Watch in 2026
Follow 99Bitcoins on X For the Latest Market Updates and Subscribe on YouTube For Daily Expert Market Analysis.
#Altcoin News Today
Why You Can Trust 99Bitcoins
10+ Years
Established in 2013, 99Bitcoins' team members have been crypto experts since Bitcoin’s early days.
90hr+
Weekly Research
100k+
Monthly Readers
50+
Expert Contributors
2000+
Crypto Projects Reviewed
Follow 99Bitcoins on your Google News Feed
Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now!
Subscribe now
Alex Ioannou
On-Chain Journalist
Alex is a seasoned cryptocurrency trader and market analyst with over seven years of active experience in the digital asset space. Since entering the markets in 2017, Alex has specialized in identifying emerging "meta" trends and high-volatility narratives. Notably, Alex...
Read More
Robinhood Chain generated about $51 million in network revenue in its first quarter of operation. Ethereum (ETH) brought in roughly $41 million over the same period.
ARK Invest reported the figures in its DeFi Quarterly covering the third quarter of 2026. Its data shows Ethereum’s network revenue fell about 35% from the second quarter.
Ethereum Missed Out on a Rebound QuarterAcross the networks in the report, revenue rose about 24% from the second quarter to roughly $349 million. The total sat about 47% below its level a year earlier.
ARK said the quarter marked the first increase in 5 quarters. It credited the rise to Solana’s (SOL) recovery and Robinhood Chain’s debut.
Ethereum also lost ground in tokenization. On public blockchains, its share of tokenized real-world asset value fell from about 50% in late June to 44%. It still hosted the most, at about $16.7 billion.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Network Real Economic Value by Blockchain Source: ARK Invest Ethereum’s decentralized exchange (DEX) volume also fell about 27% from the second quarter, while Base’s dropped about 17%. ARK said trading volume shifted toward newer venues such as Robinhood Chain.
Robinhood’s Chain Faces Its First Earnings TestRobinhood opened the chain’s public mainnet on July 1, about 5 months after its testnet went live in February.
The network settles transactions on Ethereum and uses ETH as its gas token. That means Ethereum still collects a portion of the fees the chain generates.
In its debut quarter, the chain processed about $65 billion in DEX volume. That made it the fourth-largest network by DEX volume in ARK’s data.
Tokenized equities accounted for about $13.7 billion of that trading. Only BNB Chain hosted more, at roughly $16.5 billion.
For Robinhood shareholders, the revenue question lands on October 27, when the company reports third-quarter results. That release covers the chain’s first full quarter of operation.
Robinhood has tied the chain’s payoff to usage in its second-quarter filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
“Our ability to generate revenue from Robinhood Chain depends significantly on the level of adoption and developer activity on the network,” it said.
Coinbase offers a precedent. It noted in July that it books Base sequencer fees within other transaction revenue. That line fell about 11% from the first quarter to $47.4 million. CFO Alesia Haas tied the drop to lower instant transfer activity and Base revenue.
ARK also flagged a risk to those numbers.
“We do not expect to see Robinhood Chain continue to post such impressive revenue numbers, as a recent increase in gas on Robinhood Chain will eliminate high fees from congestion pricing,” the firm noted.
Robinhood shares traded at $101.9 at press time, down 11.5% in 2026 so far. The call will show whether management reports the chain’s contribution separately.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
Your stablecoins sit on Arbitrum, your SOL is in a Solana wallet, and you still hold some BTC on Bitcoin. Moving value between them often means a centralized exchange, a bridge, or several apps that each cover only part of the journey.
A cross-chain swap app can replace that patchwork. The real question is how far its coverage reaches, and what each route needs from you.
Can One App Swap Across EVM, Solana and Bitcoin?
Yes. One app can swap across EVM chains, Solana and Bitcoin when it connects to cross-chain protocols that support routes between those networks.
On KyberSwap, Cross-chain Swap supports the major EVM chains currently supported on KyberSwap, plus Bitcoin, NEAR and Solana. You can swap from any token on one chain to a different token on another chain, directly through KyberSwap, with no external steps required.
Coverage still works route by route. A swap is only possible when a supported protocol can handle that source chain, destination chain and token pair, and when you have a compatible wallet or receiving address for each side.
Why Don’t EVM Chains, Solana and Bitcoin Connect Natively?
EVM chains, Solana and Bitcoin do not connect natively because each runs its own network with its own transaction rules, address format and wallets. A token on one of these networks cannot move to another network by itself.
EcosystemExample networksAddress formatWalletEVMEthereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB ChainStarts with 0xOne EVM wallet works across EVM networksSolanaSolanaBase58 string, no 0x prefixNeeds a Solana walletBitcoinBitcoinOften starts with bc1, 1 or 3Needs a Bitcoin wallet
EVM chains are the easiest group to move between. They share the Ethereum Virtual Machine, so the same wallet and address usually work on all of them.
Solana and Bitcoin are different. Each uses its own address format, and an EVM wallet address cannot receive funds on either network. That is why a route from an EVM chain to Solana or Bitcoin needs a protocol that can settle on the other network, plus a valid receiving address there.
How Does One App Reach Several Blockchains?
One app reaches several blockchains by connecting to cross-chain protocols instead of building a separate bridge for every pair of networks. Each protocol supports its own set of chains, tokens and routes.
An app built on a single protocol inherits that protocol’s coverage and its limits. An app that aggregates several protocols can offer any route that at least one of them supports.
KyberSwap Cross-chain Swap takes the aggregation approach. It aggregates liquidity from multiple third-party cross-chain swaps and cross-chain swap protocols. Supported protocols include NEAR IntentS, Across, Relay Protocol, deBridge, LI.FI, Mayan Finance, Bungee and Symbiosis.
After you enter an amount, KyberSwap automatically fetches real-time quotes from these protocols and selects the option that provides the best rate among the quotes by default. To see every option, click More Options to open the Choose Your Route section. There you can compare available providers, estimated return amounts, fees and estimated arrival times.
Support for chains and protocols could be changed over time, so the routes you see reflect what is available when you request a quote.
Which Networks Does KyberSwap Cross-chain Swap Support?
KyberSwap Cross-chain Swap supports the major EVM chains currently supported on KyberSwap, plus Bitcoin, NEAR and Solana.
On the EVM side, this includes networks such as Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon POS, Avalanche, Robinhood Chain and Arc. The full list is on the Supported Exchanges and Networks page.
These networks combine into five route types:
RouteWhat it connectsEVM ↔ EVMTwo EVM chains, such as Arbitrum and BaseSolana ↔ EVMSolana and an EVM chainBTC ↔ EVMBitcoin and an EVM chainNEAR ↔ EVMNEAR and an EVM chainNon-EVM ↔ Non-EVMTwo non-EVM networks, such as Bitcoin and Solana
Bitcoin, Solana and NEAR Are Reached Through Cross-chain Swap
Swap and Limit Order on KyberSwap run on EVM networks. Bitcoin, Solana and NEAR are supported through Cross-chain Swap.
In practice, KyberSwap is where you move value into or out of Bitcoin, Solana and NEAR. Once your tokens arrive on an EVM network, you can keep trading there with Swap or Limit Order.
Which Wallet Do You Need for Each Route?
You need a wallet connected on the source chain, and a receiving address on the destination chain. What that looks like depends on the route.
RouteSource chainDestination chainEVM ↔ EVMConnect your Web3 walletNo additional wallet connection is required if the same EVM-compatible wallet supports the destination networkEVM to Bitcoin or NEARConnect your Web3 walletEnter your Bitcoin or NEAR receiving address, or click Select Wallet to connect a compatible walletBitcoin to other chainsClick Select Wallet and connect a compatible wallet for BitcoinEnter your receiving address, or click Select Wallet to connect a compatible walletNEAR to other chainsClick Select Wallet and connect a compatible wallet for NEAREnter your receiving address, or click Select Wallet to connect a compatible wallet
For EVM ↔ EVM routes, the output tokens go to your connected wallet address by default. To send them somewhere else, enable the Send to other wallet option and enter the desired receiving address.
For other network cases, if you do not connect a compatible wallet for the destination chain, you are required to manually enter the receiving address. If you connect one, the default receiving address will be your connected wallet address.
Because address formats differ across EVM chains, Solana and Bitcoin, the receiving address is the detail to check most carefully. The confirmation box shows the destination address before you click Confirm Swap.
How Do Fees and Processing Time Change by Route?
The Platform Fee for Cross-chain Swap depends on the route and the volatility level of the tokens. It ranges from 0.05% to 0.25%.
RouteStable tokens & Same native tokenCommonExoticHigh-volatilityEVM ↔ EVM0.05%0.10%0.15%0.25%NEAR ↔ EVM0.1%0.2%0.2%0.2%Solana ↔ EVM0.1%0.2%0.2%0.2%BTC ↔ EVM0.25%0.25%0.25%0.25%Non-EVM ↔ Non-EVM0.25%0.25%0.25%0.25%
BTC ↔ EVM and Non-EVM ↔ Non-EVM routes use a flat 0.25%. Solana ↔ EVM and NEAR ↔ EVM routes range from 0.1% to 0.2%.
The applicable Platform Fee is shown in the swap details section after the route is generated and before you confirm the transaction. Some third-party providers may also charge a Protocol Fee for using their route. If applicable, it appears in the Swap Details or in the Choose Your Route section.
Processing Time
Some chains or protocols may take more time to complete. Before you confirm, check the Estimated Processing Time in the confirmation box.
After you start the swap, you can track its status in the transaction history panel. The status moves from Processing to Success or Failed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I Swap Bitcoin to Solana on KyberSwap?
Yes. Cross-chain Swap on KyberSwap supports Non-EVM ↔ Non-EVM routes, which connect networks such as Bitcoin and Solana. These routes use a flat 0.25% Platform Fee.
Can I Use Swap or Limit Order on Solana or Bitcoin?
No. Swap and Limit Order on KyberSwap run on EVM networks. Bitcoin, Solana and NEAR are supported through Cross-chain Swap.
Do I Need a Different Wallet for Each Ecosystem?
Usually, yes. One EVM wallet works across EVM chains, but Bitcoin and Solana use their own address formats. For a non-EVM destination, you can enter the receiving address manually instead of connecting that wallet.
What Happens if a Cross-Chain Swap Fails?
A failed cross-chain swap on KyberSwap is automatically reverted. The input tokens are returned to your sender wallet address.
When Does One App Make Sense for Multi-Chain Swaps?
One app makes the most sense when your assets are spread across EVM chains, Solana and Bitcoin, and you want to move between them without opening a separate bridge for each route.
Before you confirm any route, check four things: the route is available, you have a wallet or receiving address for both sides, the Platform Fee tier fits the trade, and the Estimated Processing Time works for you.
To see which routes are available for your tokens, open the Cross-chain tab on KyberSwap or visit kyberswap.com/cross-chain and compare live quotes before you sign.
Solana’s reported transaction numbers fell sharply after the Alpenglow upgrade switched its consensus system on October 21, because validator votes are no longer recorded as transactions in blocks.
Key Takeaways
Validator votes no longer count as Solana transactions
Handover block: 649 vote transactions, then zero
844 of 1,701 first Alpenglow transactions failed
Before-and-after TPS comparisons need identical filters
The Solana Foundation’s upgrade documentation calls the drop in transaction counts and transactions per second, or TPS, “an accounting change, not a throughput regression.” That still leaves a question for anyone reading a Solana chart: did activity fall, or only the count?
What Alpenglow took off the transaction list
Under TowerBFT, the consensus system Solana ran until October 21, validators cast their votes as ordinary transactions. Blocks carried hundreds of them alongside payments, swaps and other application traffic, and any tally of total transactions included them.
Alpenglow replaces that with Votor, a protocol in which validators exchange votes directly and bundle them into certificates. The certificates sit in each block’s footer rather than its transaction list, so a counter that tallies transactions stops seeing vote traffic at the switch.
What the handover blocks show
Coindoo queried the blocks on either side of the switch through Solana’s public mainnet RPC, the interface nodes expose for reading chain data, using its getBlock method. Each block occupies a slot, a window of roughly 400 milliseconds.
TowerBFT ran for the first 5,000 slots of the epoch before Alpenglow replaced it. The last TowerBFT block landed at 13:54:00 UTC on October 21 and the first Alpenglow block at 13:54:03, with no blocks produced in the eight slots between them.
Block
Consensus
Total transactions
Vote program
Non-vote
459,652,999
TowerBFT (last)
1,051
649
402
459,653,008
Alpenglow (first)
1,701
0
1,701
About three in five transactions in the last TowerBFT block were votes; one block later, there were none. The Alpenglow block was still the larger of the two, and a single pair of blocks cannot show whether network activity rose or fell. It shows the mechanism. Measuring a trend takes thousands of blocks.
Votes are not the only noise in the count
Failures are the next layer. Reading the error field in each transaction’s metadata, Coindoo found that 844 of the 1,701 transactions in the first Alpenglow block hit an execution error, leaving 857 that succeeded. A failed transaction is still charged a fee and still sits in the block, but it completed no payment or trade.
Successful transactions do not map to people either. One automated trading account can send transactions in large numbers, and a single transaction can contain several instructions. Counting what transactions accomplished, such as completed swaps or token transfers, gets closer to real use than any transaction total.
Where the comparison data lives
Solana’s getRecentPerformanceSamples method reports, for each sample, the total transaction count, the non-vote count and the sample length in seconds. Dividing a count by the length gives an average rate for that window.
The method returns at most 720 samples of about a minute each, roughly the last 12 hours. A query made more than half a day after the handover no longer reaches back to TowerBFT, so the pre-upgrade side has to come from samples stored earlier or from historical blocks.
Three filters, applied the same way before and after the switch
Remove validator votes. Alpenglow does this on the new side; the old side needs it done by hand.
Remove failed transactions using each transaction’s error field. The API’s non-vote count still includes them.
Compare equal time windows: one-minute averages against one-minute averages, never a dashboard peak against a daily total.
Tools that read votes need rewiring
Vote transactions did more than add to TPS. Monitoring tools read Vote-program instructions from the transaction list to track which validators were participating. Under Alpenglow that input is gone, and the Foundation points those tools to the voting certificates in block footers. A tracker still reading the old source would show validators going silent while they keep voting.
For Solana’s usage figures, the useful number arrives once several days of successful non-vote transactions can be set against stored pre-upgrade data covering the same hours. Until then, any headline TPS chart spanning October 21 mixes the bookkeeping change with real changes in use.
Author
Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP.
Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem.
To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem.
His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
Solana [SOL] is recovering after last week’s correction, with buyers defending the $95-$100 demand zone as a major network upgrade draws attention.
According to recent reports, Solana announced that Alpenglow is now live on the Solana mainnet, cutting network processing times from approximately 12.8 seconds to just 150 milliseconds.
The upgrade arrives as institutional demand shows signs of improvement. Notably, Solana ETFs recorded significant net inflows over the past 24 hours, suggesting renewed investor interest.
So, can Alpenglow provide the spark required to extend SOL’s recovery?
ETF inflows and whale activity support its current recovery
Just hours after the announcements, the network reported $585,000 in daily SOL ETF inflows. This points to a positive institutional flow, as big players projected increased efficiency on the network after the upgrades.
Source: SoSoValue
Moreover, the network whales are aligning with the network’s institutional players. According to the recent Futures Average Order Size data, Solana whales are bagging more orders at the current trading price.
Source: CryptoQuant
Besides the positive ETF inflows, the network’s Spot Volume Bubble Map data is flashing overheating signals. The spike points to current increased trading activity across the Spot markets. To be specific, the network trading volume spiked by 6% to $2.27 billion.
However, it is key for the prospective investors to note that if buying becomes crowded or larger holders begin taking profits, SOL could face renewed volatility despite the positive developments.
Source: CryptoQuant
Can SOL sustain its long-term uptrend?
Alpenglow upgrades could provide a potential fundamental spark, while ETF inflows and the rebound from the key demand zone between $95 and $100 offer additional support for the recovery.
To strengthen the bullish outlook, SOL must maintain buying pressure and demand rather than reacting quickly to the upgrade. Holding above the demand zone between $95 and $100 would help preserve the recovery structure, while overheating signals warrant caution.
The upgrade strengthens Solana‘s long-term trend, but sustained adoption and market demand will determine whether that translates into a lasting SOL rally.
Source: TradingView
Final Summary
Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade reportedly reduces processing times from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds, strengthening the network’s performance outlook.
SOL rebounds from the demand zone between $95 and $100 as ETFs record $585,000 in daily inflows, but overheating signals could increase short-term volatility.
Solana has announced that it has recorded $5 trillion in stablecoin volume this year, with more than two months remaining in 2026. This figure significantly surpasses the $3 trillion volume recorded by the blockchain in 2025. The volume increase indicates strong adoption and high transaction activity on Solana’s network. This development comes amid Solana’s growing share in the global stablecoin market, where it holds approximately 5% of the supply, yet processes a disproportionately high transaction volume.
Key Takeaways Solana’s report of $5 trillion in stablecoin volume appears consistent with increased network adoption and transaction activity. Market pricing suggests that the significant milestone could positively influence Solana’s price by indicating robust network use. The Solana price prediction market shows a current 66.5% YES for the question of whether Solana will dip to $100 by the end of October 2026. What to Watch Market participants will be observing whether Solana’s transaction volume will continue to escalate, potentially affecting its price. Key events such as regulatory decisions from the SEC or announcements from major partners like Samsung may also influence market dynamics. Observers are also likely to focus on the impact of Solana’s technological upgrades, such as the recent Alpenglow activation, on network performance and adoption rates.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h November 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → November 1 2026 1.8% — — View market → November 1 2026 14% — — View market → November 1 2026 3.6% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.2% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.9% — — View market → November 1 2026 1.3% — — View market → November 1 2026 1.1% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → November 1 2026 4% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.4% — — View market → November 1 2026 1.2% — — View market → November 1 2026 65.5% — — View market →
Solana has processed $5 trillion in stablecoin volume so far in 2026, according to the network’s official account. The tally runs through October 22, which means the year still has more than two months left on the clock.
A stablecoin is a token built to hold a steady value, usually pegged one-to-one to the US dollar. Solana’s $5 trillion figure is the total value of those tokens changing hands on its network this year. It measures activity, not holdings.
September was a standout month. Stablecoin supply on Solana climbed to a record $17.51 billion. That same month, the network logged 557 million stablecoin transfers. No other tracked chain recorded more.
Solana holds only about 5% of the total stablecoin supply. Yet adjusted transfer data shows it captured between 32-36% of global stablecoin transfer volume during peak months in 2026.
Supply has eased slightly since the September peak. Cumulative transaction volumes, however, have kept growing steadily into late 2026.
At Money20/20 USA, Amir A. Valliani of the Solana Foundation discussed the network’s growth. He pointed to the involvement of major players such as Western Union in using stablecoin technology. Western Union and other payment firms are exploring or expanding stablecoin usage on Solana.
Samsung plans to integrate USDC transfers into its Galaxy wallet, a move that could potentially reach 82 million US devices.
The activation of Solana’s Alpenglow network upgrade is expected to bring transaction finality down to approximately 150 milliseconds.
There are caveats worth keeping in view. Transfer volume is a busy metric. It can be inflated by automated trading, arbitrage bots, and funds cycling repeatedly between the same parties. The research cites adjusted transfer volume for the 32-36% share, an attempt to filter some of that noise.
Samsung’s USDC integration remains a plan, and the 82 million device figure describes potential reach, not active users. Alpenglow’s roughly 150 millisecond finality is an expected improvement that still has to perform under real-world load. Western Union and its peers are exploring or expanding usage, which leaves room between pilot programs and full-scale deployment.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Kaye Quema. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
