Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

The meme coin known as ANSEM, part of the Solana ecosystem, experienced an explosive rally in the last week, surging by 18,000% within just three days. The token’s market value rocketed to as high as $125 million before later settling at around $117 million. This remarkable ascent took place amid broader market weakness and widespread fear, at a time when overall liquidity in crypto is turning towards smaller, more speculative assets.

Buyers emerged despite market fearsOnchain analyst Ai Yi revealed that over the course of 24 hours, 12 separate wallets each bought more than $100,000 worth of ANSEM, with the combined purchases reaching $1.985 million. These concentrated inflows were enough to push the token’s total market capitalization beyond $100 million, even as sentiment across the crypto sector remained subdued.

According to data shared by Ai Yi, 12 different wallets bought more than $100,000 in ANSEM each over the past 24 hours, bringing total net inflows to $1.985 million.

The coin takes its name from “Ansem,” a widely recognized figure on X, who is known for a strong presence in Solana-based meme coin communities. Under the handle @blknoiz06, Ansem has become influential in driving attention and momentum behind various meme-related tokens within the Solana ecosystem.

Creator wallet saw limited profitsBlockchain analytics firm Lookonchain identified the original creator address for ANSEM as yHCxHB, noting that the wallet spent just $6,300 to launch the token and initially acquired 792.45 million ANSEM coins. Of these, 650 million were later transferred to Ansem’s personal wallet, presumably for promotional or community-related purposes.

Lookonchain stated that although the creator’s wallet gave rise to a token now worth over $120 million, it only realized a total profit of around $5,500 itself.

The remaining 142.45 million tokens were sold for roughly $11,800, resulting in an estimated net profit for the creator wallet of about $5,500. According to Lookonchain’s update on June 29, Ansem’s own wallet held 604 million ANSEM tokens valued at more than $71 million at that time.

Early buyers recorded outsized gainsOne of the most striking aspects of ANSEM’s price jump was the extraordinary gains realized by early investors. Lookonchain pointed to the address CxCTVj, which invested just $2,330 and managed to turn that into a combined realized and unrealized profit of $614,500— an astounding 261-fold return. This wallet sold 4.2 million tokens for $68,100 but still held 10 million ANSEM, valued at $548,800 as of June 28.

Another investor, known as 2M2vLX, bought 25.99 million ANSEM ten days before the pump for 56.4 SOL (around $4,050) and later sold all tokens for 7,649 SOL (about $539,000), resulting in a gain of roughly 135 times the initial investment, as reported by Lookonchain.

WalletInitial purchaseCurrent statusReturnCxCTVj$2,330$614,500 total profit261x2M2vLX56.4 SOL, approx. $4,0507,649 SOL, approx. $539,000135xConcentration risks draw attentionThe capital structure behind ANSEM’s rally has raised questions over the sustainability of such rapid gains. Analysis from AInvest underscored that the value of Ansem’s personal ANSEM holdings, at $71 million, actually exceeded the token’s circulating market cap at certain times. The new $1.985 million that flowed in recently represented about 1.5% of the total held across all wallets.

During one period, ANSEM saw a daily trading volume of $30 million against a market capitalization of $60 million, putting the 24-hour turnover ratio at 0.5. Such a high rate of token movement in a short span is often associated with speculation and short-term trading, but in the context of cryptocurrencies, this kind of activity needs to be judged alongside liquidity, wallet concentration, and order book depth.

ANSEM’s dramatic surge occurred when the widely-followed Crypto Fear and Greed Index stood at just 12, indicating extreme fear in the market. The rally highlighted once more how capital can abruptly concentrate in a single high-risk asset, especially within meme coin sectors where price action tends to be driven more by hype and momentum than by fundamental usage or utility.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

SOL has recently exhibited strong bullish pressure. After hitting a low of $69, the altcoin defended $70 and climbed to a local high of $73 before slightly retracing.

In fact, as of this writing, Solana [SOL] traded at $72 after gaining 2.6% over the past day. At the same time, the altcoin’s trading volume rose 39%, indicating strong market participation.

What do Solana’s charts reveal? Solana held above its 9-day and 21-day Moving Averages, reinforcing its bullish market structure. That move signaled strengthening short-term momentum.

The altcoin’s momentum indicators also supported this trend. The Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI) formed a bullish crossover two days ago.

Source: TradingView Since then, the SMI has climbed to 27, remaining just below the 30 threshold. This continued upward trajectory suggested improving market conditions.

Together, the Moving Averages and SMI pointed to sustained bullish momentum. A move above 30 on the SMI could confirm the trend’s strength, potentially opening the door to further gains.

Is whale sentiment shift the driving force? Solana’s renewed strength seems largely driven by a shift in sentiment among whales. Whale activity on the spot market has remained steady over the past week. 

CryptoQuant’s Spot Average Order Size data showed large whale orders concentrated around the $70 and $71 price levels.

Source: CryptoQuant These orders suggest that, at these levels, whales have increased participation in either buying or selling. Interestingly, the jump in whale orders has coincided with a significant jump in exchange outflows.

In fact, CoinGlass data showed that Solana Spot Netflow has remained negative over the past three days. Over the last week, Netflow recorded a positive value once.

Source: CoinGlass At press time, Spot Netflows stood at -$112k, improving from -$1.7 million recorded the previous day. A negative Spot Netflow suggested whales were primarily accumulating SOL.

Can SOL extend its rally? Solana maintained bullish momentum, supported by renewed whale demand. That could keep buyers in control if accumulation continues.

Therefore, if demand continues absorbing selling pressure, SOL could reclaim $75 and target the $80 resistance over the short to medium term.

However, if whale demand weakens, Solana could fall below $70 again, with $62 serving as the next key support.

Final Summary Solana gained 2.6% after defending $70 and reaching a local high of $73 before easing slightly. Renewed whale accumulation and improving momentum indicators could support a move toward $80 if demand persists.

The rivalry between crypto’s two unlikely revenue juggernauts just got another chapter. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad, has reclaimed its position above Polymarket in 24-hour protocol revenue after the prediction market platform briefly seized the lead.

The revenue flip, and the flip back On May 31, Polymarket pulled ahead of Pump.fun in daily revenue for the first time in a notable stretch. Polymarket generated $999K in 24-hour protocol revenue that day, compared to Pump.fun’s $848K, according to DefiLlama data.

That gap, roughly $151K, was enough to turn heads. But Pump.fun has since reclaimed its lead in the daily revenue rankings, reasserting the dominance it has held for much of the past year.

Advertisement

Pump.fun earns revenue through bonding-curve trade fees and graduation fees, the costs users pay when launching and trading memecoins. Polymarket pulls in revenue from trading fees on its prediction markets, where users bet on everything from election outcomes to interest rate decisions.

Pump.fun’s revenue slowdown is real Pump.fun’s Q2 2026 revenue pace is down approximately 36% from the prior quarter. That’s a significant deceleration for a platform that crossed $100 million in cumulative revenue by late 2024 and has likely generated hundreds of millions in total fees by now.

Earlier in April 2026, Pump.fun still held a clear edge over Polymarket in 7-day revenue metrics. But the gap has been narrowing, and Polymarket’s brief daily overtake on May 31 was a signal that the prediction market platform is gaining ground.

Polymarket’s momentum is partly structural. The platform rolled out new fee structures that have boosted its revenue capture from trading activity. Combined with increased user engagement around major global events, those fee changes have turned Polymarket into a more efficient revenue machine.

What this means for investors For investors evaluating the Solana ecosystem, Pump.fun’s 36% quarterly revenue decline is worth watching closely. Pump.fun has been one of the largest single sources of fee revenue on Solana, and a sustained downturn would ripple through the chain’s economic activity metrics.

The broader takeaway is that fee-generating protocols are increasingly the metric that matters. Total Value Locked, or TVL, dominated the conversation in previous cycles. Now revenue is the benchmark, and for good reason: it measures actual demand for a product rather than just capital sitting in a smart contract.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Ansem, one of the most recognized voices in the Solana ecosystem, has airdropped roughly $7 million worth of the $ANSEM memecoin to Solana users. The distribution campaign, which unfolded between June 27 and June 29, represents one of the largest influencer-driven token giveaways in recent memory.

The goal is ambitious: grow the $ANSEM holder base from approximately 25,000 wallets to 1 million.

Inside the airdrop mechanics Ansem, who posts under the handle @blknoiz06, controls an estimated 604 million $ANSEM tokens. That’s somewhere between 60% and 66% of the total supply, worth anywhere from $30 million to $71 million depending on which price snapshot you use.

Advertisement

The distribution methods varied across rounds. Some recipients received as little as $23 in tokens, while larger community-focused rounds engaged participants through social actions like following accounts or leaving comments.

Ansem has framed the initiative as a redistribution of Pump.fun creator fees rather than a traditional token launch. Those creator fees reportedly ranged from approximately $200,000 to $378,000 in a single week, providing a recurring revenue stream that funds ongoing distributions.

The numbers behind the frenzy The $ANSEM token, nicknamed “The Black Bull,” has seen its market cap climb above $66 million during late June 2026.

Early participants have done extraordinarily well. One trader reportedly turned an initial $2,330 investment into over $614,000, a 261x return.

Community building or concentration risk The $ANSEM token’s value proposition is, quite literally, one person’s reputation and willingness to keep distributing tokens. Ansem has indicated a commitment to further airdrops tied to the rising market cap, suggesting a structured plan rather than a one-off event.

Even after distributing $7 million worth of tokens, Ansem’s wallet still controls a dominant share of the supply. A 60%-plus ownership stake in any token means one entity has the theoretical ability to crash the price at any moment.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

A wave of Solana memecoins carrying the name of influencer Ansem has gone parabolic, with one version running to tens of millions in market cap in under two weeks. But Ansem did not create most of them, has publicly disavowed several, and the eye-catching pump figures often do not survive a look at the chain. Here is what $ANSEM actually is, why it is trending, and what it teaches about influencer coins.

Summary

$ANSEM is not a single coin but a cluster of competing Solana memecoins built around the online identity of crypto influencer Ansem, real name reported as Zion Thomas, who created none of them. The dominant “Black Bull” version on Pump.fun ran from a market cap in the tens of thousands to tens of millions of dollars within roughly 10 to 12 days in mid-to-late June 2026. Ansem amplified the frenzy by criticizing the launchpad Pump.fun and pledging to airdrop his creator fees to the community, while at the same time disavowing other $ANSEM tokens as impersonations. Several viral pump figures circulating on aggregator trackers did not hold up against live on-chain data, a reminder to verify the actual contract before trusting a headline number. $ANSEM is best understood not as a coin to buy but as a live case study in how an influencer’s name spawns a swarm of speculative and copycat tokens, and how easily retail buyers get hurt. $ANSEM is the name shared by a cluster of competing Solana memecoins that sprang up around the online identity of the crypto influencer known as Ansem, whose real name is reported as Zion Thomas and whose verified account is @blknoiz06, and the single most important fact about it is that Ansem did not create these tokens and has publicly distanced himself from several of them. That makes $ANSEM less a single coin than a phenomenon: a recognizable name in crypto that, the moment it started trending, spawned a swarm of tokens using it, some promoted heavily, some outright impersonations, and no single official one among them. In late June 2026, one version branded as “The Black Bull” went parabolic on the launchpad Pump.fun, climbing from a market cap in the tens of thousands of dollars to tens of millions within roughly 10 to 12 days, while traders fought in what the culture calls the trenches over which $ANSEM coin, if any, was the real one. The story drew enormous attention, and it is a near-perfect illustration of how influencer memecoins actually work, who tends to benefit, and who tends to get hurt.

This guide treats $ANSEM the way it deserves to be treated: not as a coin to evaluate buying, but as a case study to learn from. Understanding it requires understanding who Ansem is and why his name carries weight, why there is no single official $ANSEM coin, how the frenzy unfolded and what catalyzed it, the disavowal and the copycats that complicate the story, the creator-fee twist that made it unusual, the gap between viral pump figures and on-chain reality, and the genuine risks that influencer memecoins carry for the people who chase them. The aim is that by the end, a reader could recognize the pattern the next time a famous name starts trending and a wall of tokens appears using it, because that pattern repeats constantly, and $ANSEM is simply its latest and loudest example. The lesson is in the mechanics, not the ticker.

Who Ansem actually is To understand why a memecoin built on his name could run so far so fast, you have to understand the standing Ansem holds in crypto. Zion Thomas, who goes by Ansem and is sometimes called “The Solana Guy,” is one of the most-followed voices in the space, with roughly a million followers on the platform X. His reputation rests on a real track record: he was an early and vocal supporter of Solana and of memecoins like Dogwifhat and Bonk, and he is widely credited with calling Solana’s enormous 2023 rally, when the token climbed from around $8 to nearly $300. He has a background in computer science from Georgia Tech and worked as a software engineer before moving into crypto full time, and he holds a research role at an investment firm.

That combination of early correct calls, technical credibility, and a massive audience is why his name carries weight, and why a token attached to it can attract a flood of speculative buying on attention alone. But the picture is not uniformly flattering, and an honest explainer has to include the criticism, because it is directly relevant to the risks of any coin bearing his name. Ansem has drawn sustained accusations that he uses his influence to promote low-cap memecoins that spike and then collapse. In late 2024, the prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT publicly accused him of promoting micro-cap coins in a way that resembled pump-and-dump dynamics, hyping risky tokens to a large following, watching them briefly surge, and leaving late buyers with losses.

These remain accusations rather than proven findings, and Ansem has his defenders, but the pattern they describe is exactly the danger retail buyers face with influencer coins. Notably, Ansem himself has at times acknowledged the problem: he has publicly admitted that supporting some celebrity-backed memecoins was a mistake, citing misaligned incentives that hurt retail investors. That admission is worth holding onto, because it comes from the very person whose name is now attached to a fresh memecoin frenzy, and it captures the core risk better than any outside critic could. In influencer memecoins, the audience is often the liquidity, and the audience is usually the last to understand that.

There is no single $ANSEM coin The most common and costly misunderstanding about $ANSEM is the assumption that it refers to one coin. It does not. When Ansem’s name began trending, multiple distinct Solana tokens using the $ANSEM name appeared at the same time, and there is no single official one that Ansem created or endorsed as the canonical version. This is not unusual; it is the standard sequence in crypto. A well-known name starts trending, and within minutes a swarm of tokens appears using it, deployed by different anonymous creators all hoping their version becomes the one the market settles on.

The result was a chaotic competition, with the trading community flipping between rival $ANSEM coins and no clear winner crowned as the real one for a stretch, a dynamic participants describe as a player-versus-player battle in the trenches. Out of that scramble, one version did come to dominate the narrative: a coin branded as “The Black Bull,” launched on the Pump.fun launchpad in mid-June 2026, which became the token most associated with the headlines as it ran to tens of millions in market cap. Even so, the existence of that dominant version does not change the underlying reality that the name was contested and that other $ANSEM tokens continued to circulate alongside it, including ones Ansem explicitly disavowed. For anyone encountering the trend, the practical implication is severe: there is no safe assumption that a token labeled $ANSEM is the one being discussed, is endorsed by Ansem, or is anything other than an opportunistic deployment by a stranger.

The name on the token tells you almost nothing about who made it or whether it is connected to the person it references. That single fact, that the name is not the coin, is the first and most important thing to internalize about $ANSEM and about every influencer memecoin like it. This is whyverifying contracts and accounts matters before believing any viral ticker. A famous name can become a trap when anyone can attach it to a contract.

How the frenzy unfolded The timeline of the $ANSEM surge shows how quickly attention converts into market cap in this corner of crypto, and what lit the fuse. The dominant Black Bull version gained real traction around the middle of June 2026 and then, over roughly 10 to 12 days, went parabolic, rising from a starting market cap reportedly in the tens of thousands of dollars to a level above $50 million and then $60 million at its peak, accompanied by gains measured in thousands of %. On-chain trackers recorded enormous short-window moves, with one tracker reporting a single-day surge of well over a hundredfold at one point, the kind of move that draws the entire trading community’s attention and pulls in waves of new buyers chasing the run.

ANSEM price chart, source: DexScreener A specific catalyst supercharged the move. Ansem publicly criticized Pump.fun over how it handled rewards to users, and declared that he would deliver a financial boost directly to retail traders, a gesture he framed in the community’s own language. In a widely shared post on June 28, 2026, he wrote that he “had to give the trenches a stimmy since pump refuses to,” using slang for handing money to on-chain traders. That narrative, an influencer taking the side of small traders against the platform, spread rapidly across crypto social media and triggered a fresh wave of speculative buying that lifted the token’s valuation further.

The frenzy also minted dramatic individual outcomes that became their own marketing: in one widely reported case, a trader who put roughly $2,300 into an ANSEM-named token saw the position balloon to more than $600,000 after a parabolic rally, a return of tens of thousands of %. Stories like that, true but extraordinarily rare, are exactly what pull more people into the next frenzy, which is why they deserve to be read with as much caution as excitement. The setup also show  how the launch pricing worked, because these early Solana memecoin moves often begin on bonding curves before attention pushes them toward graduation or collapse. The bigger the screenshot gain, the more important it becomes to ask who bought before the crowd and who is left buying after the move.

The disavowal and the copycats Running directly against the bullish narrative is a fact that anyone tempted by $ANSEM needs front and center: Ansem publicly disavowed tokens trading on his name. According to posts reported from his verified account, he distanced himself from the activity, indicating that the coin being promoted was not him and that he was not endorsing any micro-cap tokens, and he clarified that he had only linked his account to a launchpad address to prove that he could, not to bless any particular coin. In other words, the person whose name was driving tens of millions of dollars in speculative value was, at the same time, telling people he had not created these tokens and was not endorsing them. That is a glaring contradiction at the heart of the trend, and it is the single clearest warning sign attached to it.

The disavowal points to the deeper pattern, which is the real lesson of $ANSEM. A recognizable crypto name reliably spawns a cluster of copycat and impersonation tokens, the overwhelming majority of which the named person never touched, because on a permissionless launchpad anyone can deploy a token and call it whatever they want. The Ansem case is a textbook instance: a swarm of $ANSEM tokens, no official one, and the real Ansem distancing himself from the activity even as it raged. The danger goes beyond merely buying the wrong version.

Ansem’s identity has been abused by outright impersonators before; reports describe a 2024 impersonation that phished roughly $2.5 million from victims, an event that had nothing to do with Ansem himself but used his name and likeness to steal. The takeaway is blunt: when a name is trending, impersonation and copycatting are not edge cases but the norm, and a token carrying a famous name should be treated as unaffiliated and unsafe until proven otherwise, a standard that becomes absolute when the person has publicly disavowed it, as Ansem did. The same pattern has appeared around other high-profile names and brands, including fake tokens designed to mimic official launches. That is why the first question should never be “how much is it up?” but “who actually created this contract?”

The creator-fee twist that made it unusual One feature did set the $ANSEM episode apart from the typical influencer-coin story and helps explain both its momentum and the debate around it. Rather than simply launching his own token to capture the speculative interest, which is the usual influencer playbook, Ansem leaned into a different mechanic tied to how the Pump.fun launchpad pays out fees. Pump.fun routes a share of trading fees to a token’s associated creator account, and screenshots of Ansem’s launchpad profile indicated he had accumulated substantial creator fees, reported in the area of several hundred thousand dollars. In response to community suggestions, he announced that, instead of pocketing those fees, he would airdrop portions of them back to the community of traders, framing it as giving the trenches the boost the platform would not.

This redistribution, returning earned fees to holders rather than extracting and exiting, was received notably well in a culture used to influencers benefiting at retail’s expense, and it reinforced the narrative that Ansem had “skin in the game.” Indeed, reporting on his launchpad wallet suggested a very large exposure to the token, with a holding worth tens of millions of dollars making up the overwhelming majority of that wallet’s value. Supporters read this as alignment: the influencer profiting only if holders profit. Skeptics read it differently, noting that a huge personal position and a fee-airdrop program are also powerful tools for sustaining hype around a token the influencer benefits from, and that the same dynamics ZachXBT criticized, an influencer’s attention inflating a coin’s price, are present whether or not fees are shared.

Both readings can be true at once. The creator-fee twist made $ANSEM a more interesting and arguably more community-friendly episode than the average influencer coin, but it did not remove the underlying risk that the value rests on one person’s attention and could evaporate the moment that attention moves on. For context, the fee airdrop at the center of it belongs to a broader memecoin-launchpad incentive system where creators can earn from trading activity. Fee sharing can create alignment, but it can also keep attention locked on a coin long enough for others to exit.

The gap between the pump figures and the chain A practical skill that the $ANSEM episode teaches, and one worth far more than any single trade, is the habit of checking on-chain reality against viral headline numbers, because the two frequently diverge. Some of the most eye-catching figures circulating during the frenzy, such as a roughly 1,900% single-day gain alongside a multi-million-dollar market cap, came from aggregator trackers and did not hold up when checked against live blockchain data. In at least one case, the token most associated with a headline pump turned out, on inspection, to be a coin dating to 2024 that had retraced to a market cap of only tens of thousands of dollars, with thin liquidity and minimal daily volume, a brief pump and fade instead of a sustained multi-million-dollar coin. Public data even dated that token’s all-time high to early 2024, which sat oddly with a supposedly brand-new 2026 surge.

The lesson is concrete and repeatable: never take an aggregator pump figure at face value without finding and verifying the actual contract address and reading the token’s real holder and liquidity profile. Aggregator trackers can display figures for tokens that are barely traded, can attach a trending name to the wrong contract, and can report point-in-time spikes that have already collapsed by the time a reader sees them. The discipline that protects you is to identify the specific contract, confirm it against the real person’s verified account where relevant, and screen it for safety using on-chain tools before believing any number attached to it. On Solana, traders commonly use a token-safety screener and a dedicated risk checker to read holder distribution, liquidity depth, and contract red flags before acting.

This habit, verifying the chain instead of trusting the headline, is the single most valuable thing the $ANSEM frenzy can teach, because it applies to every trending name that will follow. The same lesson appears whenever scammers reuse well-known names, whether they imitate a celebrity, a protocol, or a market-data brand. A ticker is not identity, and a chart is not verification. The chain is where the claim has to survive.

A worked example: telling the real from the fakes To make the lesson usable, walk through how a careful person would have navigated the $ANSEM trend in real time, because the same steps apply to any influencer-name frenzy. Suppose you see the name $ANSEM trending and a post claiming a particular token is the official Ansem coin, up thousands of %. The first step is to assume nothing: a trending name attached to a token is, by default, unaffiliated until proven otherwise. The second step is to find the actual contract address being promoted, not just the ticker, since dozens of tokens can share the name $ANSEM while having entirely different contracts.

The third step is to check the real person’s verified account directly. In this case, doing so would have surfaced Ansem’s own posts distancing himself from tokens trading on his name and stating he was not endorsing micro-caps, which is a decisive red flag against treating any of them as official. The fourth step is to screen the specific contract on a Solana safety tool, reading the holder distribution, the liquidity, and any contract warnings. A token where a tiny number of wallets hold most of the supply, or where liquidity is thin, is one where a few holders can crash the price at will.

The fifth step is to compare the on-chain figures with the viral claim; if the chain shows a token that has already retraced to a fraction of the headline market cap, the claim is stale or misleading. Running these steps during the $ANSEM frenzy would have revealed exactly the situation this guide describes: multiple competing tokens, no official one, a disavowal from the named person, and headline figures that the chain did not support. The point of the exercise is not that doing this guarantees a profitable trade; it is that it protects you from the most common and costly mistakes, which are buying an impersonation, chasing a stale pump, or trusting a famous name as if it were due diligence.

The worked example is really a checklist for skepticism, and skepticism is the only durable edge in this part of crypto. When a token’s story rests on a famous name, the burden of proof should be higher, not lower. If the contract, liquidity, holder distribution, and verified account do not line up, the safest conclusion is that the coin is not what the crowd says it is. That is especially true when the person whose name is being used has already denied involvement.

Risks: why a name is not a reason to buy Stepping back, $ANSEM concentrates nearly every risk that makes influencer memecoins dangerous, and naming them plainly is the most useful thing this guide can do. The first is extreme volatility: tokens like this can rise thousands of % and fall just as fast, and a coin that is up a hundredfold one day can be down 90% the next, with most such tokens ultimately trending toward zero. The second is the copycat and impersonation problem already described, where the name on a token tells you nothing about who made it, and where buying the wrong contract or an outright scam is a constant hazard. The third is the disavowal itself: when the person a coin is named after publicly states it is not theirs and that they do not endorse it, that is not a detail to trade around but a signal that the coin’s entire premise is unsupported.

The fourth risk is the pump-and-dump dynamic that critics, including ZachXBT, have attributed to influencer-driven micro-caps, where attention inflates a price that collapses when the attention moves on, leaving late buyers holding losses, a pattern Ansem himself has acknowledged can hurt retail. The fifth is the absence of any fundamental value: these tokens have no product, no cash flow, and no utility; their price is pure attention and speculation, which makes them closer to gambling than investing. That is also the scam pattern to watch for in celebrity or influencer-linked micro-caps, even when the token does not follow a classic liquidity-drain rug. The underlying danger is that attention becomes the product and late buyers become the exit.

The honest framing, which the responsible sources on this episode share, is that there is no official Ansem coin to buy, that any token using the name should be assumed unaffiliated until proven otherwise, and that chasing a celebrity name on vibes alone is among the fastest ways to lose money in crypto. None of this is a judgment of Ansem personally, who has at times warned about these very dynamics; it is a description of how the mechanism works and whom it tends to harm. The name is the bait. It is not, and never is, a reason to buy.

Frequently asked questions Is there an official $ANSEM coin? No. There is no single official $ANSEM coin created or canonically endorsed by Ansem. When his name began trending, multiple distinct Solana tokens using the $ANSEM name appeared at once, deployed by different anonymous creators, and Ansem publicly distanced himself from tokens trading on his name, indicating he was not endorsing micro-caps. One version branded “The Black Bull” came to dominate the headlines after running to tens of millions in market cap, but its prominence does not make it official, and other $ANSEM tokens, including impersonations, circulated alongside it. The safe assumption is that any token using the name is unaffiliated until proven otherwise.

Who is Ansem? Ansem, whose real name is reported as Zion Thomas, is a prominent crypto influencer with roughly a million followers on X, sometimes called “The Solana Guy.” He has a computer science background and a research role at an investment firm, and he built his reputation as an early supporter of Solana and memecoins, widely credited with calling Solana’s 2023 rally from around $8 to nearly $300. He is also a controversial figure: the investigator ZachXBT accused him in 2024 of promoting low-cap memecoins in a pump-and-dump-like pattern, and Ansem has himself admitted that supporting some celebrity-backed memecoins was a mistake due to misaligned incentives that hurt retail investors.

Why is $ANSEM trending? A combination of factors. Ansem’s name carries weight after years of influence and a famous correct call on Solana, so tokens using it attract attention automatically. The frenzy accelerated when he publicly criticized the launchpad Pump.fun over its handling of rewards and pledged to airdrop his accumulated creator fees back to traders, framing it as giving the community a boost the platform would not. That narrative spread quickly, dramatic individual gains became their own marketing, and the dominant version ran to tens of millions in market cap. The trend sits within a broader meta of influencer-linked memecoins on Solana, where a famous name plus social momentum can move a token enormously in days.

How do I avoid buying a fake influencer coin? Treat any token bearing a famous name as unaffiliated until proven otherwise. Find the specific contract address being promoted, not just the ticker, since many tokens can share a name. Check the real person’s verified account for whether they actually launched or endorsed it; a disavowal, as with Ansem, is a decisive red flag. Screen the contract on a Solana safety tool to read holder distribution and liquidity, watching for a tiny number of wallets holding most of the supply or thin liquidity. Compare on-chain figures against viral claims, since aggregator pump numbers often do not match reality.Never treat a celebrity name as a substitute for verification. Famous names are exactly what scammers and opportunistic deployers use because they create instant attention. The safest first assumption is that the token is not official unless the person or project proves otherwise from a verified channel. Even then, the contract itself still needs to be checked.

Is $ANSEM a good investment? This guide does not recommend buying it or any memecoin, and the honest answer is that $ANSEM carries the full set of risks that make influencer memecoins dangerous. It has no product, cash flow, or utility; its price is pure attention and speculation. It is extremely volatile, with most such tokens trending toward zero. There is no official version, copycats and impersonations are rampant, and the named influencer publicly disavowed tokens using his name.Critics have described influencer micro-caps like this as prone to pump-and-dump dynamics that harm late buyers. Treat any participation as high-risk speculation closer to gambling than investing, and never risk money you cannot afford to lose. The educational value of $ANSEM is not that it offers a clean trade, but that it shows how influencer-name tokens form, spread, and hurt careless buyers.

This article is educational information, not financial advice or an endorsement of any token. Details about $ANSEM, Ansem, market caps, and on-chain figures reflect reporting available as of June 29, 2026, are point-in-time, and can change rapidly. Memecoins are extremely high-risk and frequently lose most or all of their value. References to individuals reflect reported information and, where noted, unproven allegations. Verify any contract independently and consult a qualified professional before making any decision.

More than 550,000 BTC moved to deposit addresses linked to Binance and OKX as Bitcoin retested the $60,000 area, according to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost. The transfers came during a weak period for Bitcoin, when traders have focused on whether the $59,000–$60,000 range can hold as support.

Summary

More than 550k BTC moved to Binance and OKX deposit addresses during Bitcoin’s $60k retest. CryptoQuant says the spike may show potential selling pressure, but not completed market sales yet. Recent exchange data shows BTC holdings rising while stablecoin balances decline across major trading platforms. “550 000 BTC flood Binance and OKX a level last seen during the 2023 Bear Market,” Darkfost wrote. The analyst said more than 220,000 BTC moved to Binance-linked deposit addresses, while more than 330,000 BTC moved to OKX-linked deposit addresses.

🗞️ 550 000 BTC flood Binance and OKX a level last seen during the 2023 Bear Market

BTC has been moving sideways since February, after testing the $60,000 level for the first time.

→ This sideways action makes investors even more sensitive to the smallest price moves,… pic.twitter.com/xUH9PKmrvF

— Darkfost (@Darkfost_Coc) June 29, 2026 The data does not mean that all coins were sold. Deposit addresses are often the first stop before funds move into an exchange’s main wallets. Users may send BTC there for selling, collateral, trading, custody changes or internal transfers. Still, large exchange-bound flows often draw attention because they can raise near-term sell-side pressure.

Bitcoin’s $60k level remains under pressure The move came as Bitcoin tested a key price area after several weeks of weaker trading. A recentBitcoin price analysis said BTC briefly fell below $59,000 as ETF outflows and long liquidations hit the market. The same report said short-term holders were sending coins to exchanges at a loss, raising questions about capitulation and seller exhaustion.

“BTC has been moving sideways since February, after testing the $60,000 level for the first time,” Darkfost wrote. He said that rangebound trading made investors more sensitive to small price moves near the edges of the range.

That context matters because Bitcoin traders often treat $60,000 as both a technical and psychological level. A clean recovery can ease pressure on leveraged positions. A break lower can invite more selling, especially when large deposit flows appear at the same time.

Binance and OKX flows raise caution Darkfost said the latest transfer activity was well above normal. He compared it with yearly averages of about 60,000 BTC for Binance-linked deposit addresses and about 95,000 BTC for OKX-linked deposit addresses. The latest totals were far higher than those figures.

“These inflows suggest that this new test of $60 000 sparked panic among many investors on Binance and OKX,” Darkfost wrote. The comment points to fear-driven transfers rather than proof of actual liquidation.

Recent exchange data also shows changing user balances across large platforms. A Binance proof-of-reserves report showed users added 25,838 BTC in May, lifting reported BTC holdings to about 630,000 BTC. The same snapshot showed USDT balances fell by about 460 million tokens.

Reserve data offers only a snapshot Proof-of-reserves and exchange-flow data can help traders track where coins move, but they do not show full intent. A transfer to a deposit address can lead to a sale, but it can also support derivatives trading, collateral moves or wallet management. That makes the size of the flow important, but not final evidence of market selling.

A recent proof-of-reserves explainer noted that exchange transparency tools show on-chain assets and, in stronger versions, customer liabilities. The guide also said such reports cannot fully confirm off-chain obligations, asset claims or long-term exchange health.

The latest CryptoQuant data adds another caution signal as Bitcoin trades near a watched support zone. If the coins later move into exchange wallets and sell orders rise, pressure could increase. If the transfers fade without heavy spot selling, the move may remain a stress signal rather than a confirmed selloff.

Predict the podium, win a premium racing bike and other prizes.

Jun 28, 2026

Jun 28, 2026

This past weekend marked the first event under the Oasis × Slovenian Cycling Federation partnership: the National Road Cycling Championships. The event split its honors between Slovenia's established stars and its rising ones, exactly the kind of excitement the season ahead promises.

The nationals are finished, but there's plenty more to come. Oasis is backing the team throughout the season. Next up: the Tour, then World Championships, finishing with the European Championships this October - and we’re inviting fans to come along for the ride. 

Predict races, win prizesTo celebrate our sponsorship of Slovenian cycling, we’ve launched a prediction game, live now at cycling.oasis.net. The challenge is simple: call the podiums for the biggest races of the year - first, second, third. Every single correct pick earns a ticket. 

Ten winners are drawn at the season's close, weighted by tickets: more tickets, better odds, and anyone with a ticket can win. Top prize is a Canyon Endurace CF 5, alongside a jersey signed by the full national team, three more team jerseys, and five Canyon aero helmets. Up to €3000 in prizes total. 

What's coming nextThis is stage one. Through the summer, there’s a lot more to look forward to - expect exclusive content, rider access, more challenges, and bonuses as the season builds toward October. 

The game is powered by Oasis and Privana, our private trading platform, with more to come on that front as the campaign rolls on. The road to the European Championships runs all summer. Register and make your predictions now at cycling.oasis.net. 

The Oasis prediction challenge is free and open to anyone, register with your email. Oasis sponsors the Slovenian Cycling Federation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsoring the organizers of the individual races referenced.

FUNToken is pleased to announce support for DAI (ERC-20) as a new deposit asset, providing users with another convenient way to access the growing $FUN ecosystem.

With the addition of DAI, users can now deposit DAI (ERC-20) and receive $FUN automatically through a seamless conversion process with 0% conversion fees. This latest integration expands the range of supported assets, making it even easier to access the growing $FUN ecosystem.

As the $FUN ecosystem continues to grow, expanding deposit options remains a key priority. Supporting widely used digital assets such as DAI helps improve accessibility while giving users greater flexibility in how they acquire $FUN.

The deposit process has been designed to be simple and efficient. Users can deposit DAI (ERC-20), with funds automatically converted into $FUN, eliminating the need for additional swaps while ensuring a streamlined experience.

The addition of DAI follows FUNToken’s ongoing commitment to enhancing user accessibility across its expanding ecosystem, which includes $FUN mobile games, staking opportunities, and community rewards.

Further supported assets and ecosystem enhancements will be introduced in the coming months as FUNToken continues to expand its infrastructure and improve the user experience.

About FUNToken FUNToken is powering a growing Web3 gaming ecosystem designed to make digital rewards more accessible and engaging. Through $FUN mobile games, staking, community incentives, and an expanding range of supported assets, FUNToken continues to simplify how users participate in the $FUN ecosystem while creating new opportunities for engagement and rewards.

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Michelle DG

Michelle is an editor at CoinCentral & Blockonomi, covering the latest trends in crypto, blockchain, and digital finance. With a sharp eye for detail and a passion for emerging technologies. [email protected]

SharpLink has continued its renewed Ether buying campaign by acquiring another 39,196 ETH worth about $62.4 million over the past three days after returning to the market last week.

Summary

SharpLink has bought another $62.4 million worth of Ether over three days after ending an eight month buying pause. The company has backed Ethlabs alongside BitMine and Joe Lubin to support Ethereum’s institutional development. Ether has remained under pressure as ETF outflows continued and the token traded well below SharpLink’s average purchase price. According to on-chain data from Arkham, the crypto treasury company bought 5,000 ETH on Friday worth about $7.9 million, before adding another 29,196 ETH valued at roughly $46.7 million through three over the counter transactions on Saturday. The latest purchases followed a 5,000 ETH acquisition on Thursday, its first direct Ether purchase in eight months.

The fresh accumulation comes days after SharpLink resumed buying ETH as the token traded near its lowest price of 2026. As previously reported by crypto.news, a wallet linked to the company received 5,000 ETH from FalconX on Thursday, ending a buying pause that had lasted since October.

SharpLink resumes active accumulation Taken together, the recent transactions suggest SharpLink has restarted active treasury accumulation after relying largely on its existing holdings and staking rewards for several months. As per Lookonchain data, the company held 876,285 ETH after Thursday’s purchase, including 22,102 ETH earned through staking, with an average acquisition price of about $3,609.

Lookonchain also estimated that SharpLink’s Ether treasury was sitting on an unrealized loss of roughly $1.71 billion as ETH continued trading well below the company’s average purchase price.

Alongside the treasury expansion, SharpLink announced on Monday that it has joined BitMine, Ethereum co-founder and SharpLink chairman Joe Lubin, and other Ethereum contributors in supporting Ethlabs, a new research and development nonprofit focused on preparing Ethereum for institutional use.

According to the company, Ethlabs will work on improving Ethereum’s readiness as stablecoins, tokenized real world assets, investment funds, and AI-driven commerce increasingly settle on the network. SharpLink said the organization was created to help Ethereum handle institutional demand at scale.

Ether remains under pressure The renewed buying has come during a difficult period for Ethereum. Market data cited in the original report showed ETH was down 22.8% over the past month and nearly 50% since the beginning of the year. The decline briefly allowed Tether’s USDt stablecoin to overtake Ether by market capitalization last week.

Institutional demand through exchange traded funds has also remained weak. U.S. spot Ether ETFs posted their seventh consecutive week of net outflows, losing $12.9 million last week, with most of the withdrawals coming from BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust.

The latest purchases also arrive ahead of SharpLink’s expected inclusion in the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes following the latest FTSE Russell reconstitution. Earlier, CEO Joseph Chalom said the additions could increase the company’s shareholder base and improve access to capital markets while supporting its long term Ether treasury strategy.

Sneha Agrawal

With over four years of experience in covering and tracking the financial markets, Sneha Agrawal is a dedicated Crypto Journalist and Editor with passion for researching and writing the crypto pieces. She is currently leading the Block of Fame, here at CoinGape. She likes to keep track of political, legal and financial happenings all around the world - without which she deems her day incomplete. Apart from her Journalistic endeavours, she is a solo traveler, museum goer, and a keen reader of books.

Pre-market View on US Stocks: Large institutions will conduct end-of-quarter portfolio adjustments, and are bullish on NBIS and memory pooling concept stocks.

South Korea’s stock market rose after an early dip today, as Samsung and SK Hynix’s massive investment plans received backing from the South Korean government in late trading, helping their stock prices rebound. Renowned analyst degentrading (@degentradingLSD) noted that these events mark the arrival of the early phase of the global AI competition. “Countries are treating this as a make-or-break battle. South Korean small-cap stocks will be more promising in the coming period, and for small investors, these could be one of the best opportunities.” Looking ahead to US stocks, degentrading believes around $165 billion worth of stocks will be sold by month-end due to large institutions’ quarter-end rebalancing needs. However, market performance after July remains promising. On the other hand, hyperscale cloud providers will not halt capital spending anytime soon, even if their stock prices take a hit, as they see signs of positive returns on their investments. Degentrading said two key themes to watch right now are computing (neos) and memory pooling. While memory will remain strong, the easy gains and valuation gaps have already been priced in. “In the computing space, NBIS stands out as a leader. SHAZ (SharonAI Holdings Inc.) is an interesting emerging player, and Situational Awareness may still be adding to its position. For memory pooling, the stocks include ALAB, CRDO, PENG, and MRVL.” BlockBeats Note: Memory pooling is a key trend in AI computing infrastructure, referring to the technology that decouples memory resources from individual CPUs/GPUs, centralizes them into a shared memory pool, and enables dynamic on-demand access and allocation by multiple computing nodes.

3 minutes ago

Taiko: Attack vectors have been blocked, network to restart in four steps.

Taiko announced that the attack vector exploited on June 21 has been patched, the fix has been reviewed by independent security experts, and user funds are safe. The team has outlined a four-step recovery plan: Step 1: Deploy the fix and verify the chain’s final state is correct, ensuring no forged checkpoints or exploitable claim paths exist, a process audited by the Security Council. Step 2: Replenish cross-chain bridge funds to ensure L2 assets are fully backed at a 1:1 ratio, with all details verifiable on-chain by anyone. Step 3: Restore network operations and re-enable transfers, swaps, and trading on the L2. Step 4: Once the chain’s finality and network stability are confirmed, the Security Council will submit a proposal to lift the cross-chain bridge suspension. Users will then be able to freely transfer funds between Taiko and other blockchains. The team will implement conservative withdrawal limits as an additional security measure, though normal asset transfers are not expected to be restricted.

3 minutes ago

Bitget launches long-term investment education initiative "TradFi Literacy: 100 Questions" to help investors build a multi-asset framework.

Bitget has launched the long-term investor education initiative "100 Questions on TradFi General Knowledge", breaking down the traditional finance knowledge system into 100 core questions spanning six modules: financial basics, asset encyclopedia, market mechanisms, macroeconomics, risk management, and the evolution of multi-asset trading. The course leverages structured content and weekly updated educational materials, focusing on analyzing the driving logic behind stocks, commodities, interest rates, and capital flows to help traders build a cross-asset investment framework. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen noted that as financial markets grow increasingly interconnected, crypto investors need to monitor factors including interest rates, inflation, stocks, commodities, and global liquidity simultaneously. The "100 Questions on TradFi General Knowledge" initiative aims to lower the barrier to understanding traditional finance, helping users adapt to the multi-asset investment landscape where traditional and digital assets converge.

3 minutes ago

Iran's military has only allowed vessels to pass through the Strait of Hormuz via the shipping lane south of Larak Island.

，当地时间 29 日下午，伊朗军方通告称，所有通过霍尔木兹海峡的船只仅被允许从拉腊克岛以南航道通行。此前，伊朗方面曾在 28 日发布消息称，船只通过霍尔木兹海峡仍需与革命卫队协调，进入波斯湾的船只最安全的航线位于霍尔木兹岛以南，而驶离波斯湾的船只则应选择拉腊克岛以南航道通行。（央视）

3 minutes ago

Trump: Iran has requested a meeting, which will be held tomorrow in Doha.

Trump said Iran has requested a meeting, which will take place tomorrow in Doha.

3 minutes ago

Binance: Limited-time bStocks trading offers 4x Alpha points trading volume boost

Binance Wallet announced that during a limited period, eligible bStocks (tokenized stocks) traded on Binance Wallet will receive a 4x trading volume bonus to accelerate the accumulation of Alpha Points. Users can participate via the Binance App path: Wallet → Market → Alpha → Stock Tokens, or the Binance Wallet web version path: Market → Tokenized Securities → Stock Tokens.

3 minutes ago

Key Takeaways YoungHoon Kim, holder of the world’s highest verified IQ score (276), declared that the XRP Supercycle has only just commenced Three concurrent indicators have emerged: TD Sequential “9” buy formation, Morning Star Doji reversal pattern, and dramatic spike in daily active addresses XRP Ledger daily active addresses surged from approximately 23,000 to nearly 39,500 within a two-week period Kim’s earlier forecast projects XRP reaching $5–$10 during this market cycle; achieving $10 would represent a 646%+ increase from current levels Single-day XRP ETF inflows reached $11.88 million in May, contributing to cumulative 2026 net inflows of approximately $1.42 billion XRP currently trades around $1.05 following a convergence of technical indicators and a prominent market prediction that has refocused attention on the digital asset. A trio of signals has materialized simultaneously, capturing interest from traders monitoring both price charts and blockchain metrics.

XRP Price YoungHoon Kim, who holds the verified world record for highest IQ score at 276, announced on X that the XRP Supercycle is merely in its initial phase. The statement rapidly circulated throughout cryptocurrency forums and rekindled debate surrounding XRP’s potential long-term valuation.

Kim had earlier established a price projection between $5 and $10 for XRP during this market cycle. From present levels around $1.05, ascending to $5 would necessitate approximately a 376% appreciation. Climbing to $10 would translate to roughly an 852% surge.

Not all market participants embrace Kim’s perspective. Multiple X users challenged his viewpoint, highlighting that his earlier XRP forecasts failed to materialize. Additional critics questioned both his authority and the foundation supporting his $10 projection.

XRP remains approximately 67% below its July 2025 all-time peak of $3.66. That substantial distance renders the higher boundary of Kim’s target an ambitious objective from current trading levels.

Convergence of Three Technical Indicators Market analyst Ali Charts identified that the Tom DeMark Sequential indicator generated a “9” buy formation on XRP’s daily timeframe. This signal typically emerges near downtrend exhaustion points and may precede brief price rebounds spanning one to four trading sessions.

XRP: TWO BULLISH SIGNALS

XRP is flashing two bullish reversal signals on the daily chart, pointing to a potential shift in momentum.

1. The Tom DeMark Sequential indicator has printed a buy signal via a "9" candlestick. This pattern historically anticipates a one-to-four daily… pic.twitter.com/q0qBDVCGXT

— Ali Charts (@alicharts) June 27, 2026

A Morning Star Doji reversal formation also materialized over three consecutive sessions within the $1.02 to $1.07 support range. This candlestick configuration suggests a possible near-term price floor.

The third indicator originates from blockchain data. Daily active addresses on the XRP Ledger climbed from approximately 23,000 on June 14 to nearly 39,500 recently, indicating genuine network engagement beyond purely speculative trading.

Market analyst ChartNerdTA observed that XRP’s cyclical peaks have traditionally occurred at three to five-year intervals. Should a cycle trough establish during 2026, the subsequent potential peak might materialize between 2028 and 2030.

Investment Product Flows and Market Metrics XRP’s total market capitalization continues exceeding $65 billion, per CoinGecko data. Institutional appetite has remained consistent, with XRP-linked ETF products attracting $11.88 million during a single trading session on May 29.

Aggregate net inflows into XRP investment vehicles achieved approximately $1.42 billion throughout 2026, representing the most robust ETF capital influx period the token has experienced to date.

For near-term upward momentum confirmation, market analysts indicate XRP requires persistent buying pressure and a decisive breach above the $1.30 resistance threshold.

Updated Jun 29, 2026, 9:42 a.m. Published Jun 29, 2026, 7:03 a.m.

1 min read

Summary

BitMEX CEO Stephan Lutz, Chief Financial Officer Ina Steiner, and Chief Growth Officer Raphael Polansky are no longer with the company.BitMEX, which was co-founded in 2014 by Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo and Samuel Reed, has reportedly been looking for a buyer.BitMEX, the troubled cryptocurrency exchange reportedly looking for a buyer, has cleared out its executive team, losing CEO Stephan Lutz, CFO Ina Steiner, and Chief Growth Officer Raphael Polansky, CoinDesk has learned.

Stephan Lutz resigned from his role as CEO of BitMEX, a spokesperson for the exchange infomed CoinDesk.

The firm’s former global general counsel and chief operating officer, Peter Wilkinson, has taken over as CEO. The moves were highlighted in recent postings on LinkedIn.

Wilkinson, Lutz, Steiner and Polansky did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The crypto exchange and derivatives trading platform was co-founded in 2014 by Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo and Samuel Reed. In 2020, BitMEX was alleged to have failed to implement adequate anti-money laundering measures in place, and later pleaded guilty to the charges. Hayes, Delo and Reed resigned shortly after the U.S. brought criminal charges.

BitMEX is presumably looking to streamline its costs and appear more attractive to prospective buyers, as an ongoing depression in digital asset prices weights on the crypto industry.

It was during the last crypto downturn in 2022 that Lutz took over as CEO from Alexander Hoeptner, who became CEO in early 2021, when Hayes and his co-founders stepped down.

The latest crypto winter has prompted numerous crypto and tech firms to shed staff.

CORRECT (June 29, 09:37 UTC): Clarifies that Stephan Lutz resigned from his role as CEO of BitMEX in second paragraph.

12345678910

The Evolution of the Crypto CEX Landscape: A Case Study on Binance

The Evolution of the Crypto CEX Landscape: A Case Study on Binance

Binance remains crypto’s leading exchange, expanding from spot and derivatives into RWAs, payments, savings, yield, and broader financial services.

8 minutes ago

Binance remains crypto’s leading exchange, expanding from spot and derivatives into RWAs, payments, savings, yield, and broader financial services.

Why it matters:

Binance remains crypto’s leading exchange, expanding from spot and derivatives into RWAs, payments, savings, yield, and broader financial services.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes purchased 6.16 million Synapse ($SYN) tokens worth approximately $2.2 million in a single transaction, according to on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain. The buy was flagged publicly roughly one hour after it was recorded on-chain.

The Trade and the Thesis The transaction was routed through FlowDesk, a Paris-based over-the-counter trading desk that facilitates large block trades away from public order books, with an implied entry price of around $0.36 per token based on the reported transaction size. The purchase came before Hayes publicly backed Hypercall, an options decentralised exchange connected to the Synapse ecosystem. Hayes framed the position around seeking asymmetric exposure within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, pointing to Hypercall as an options DEX with the potential to compete with Deribit.

That framing places SYN inside a derivatives narrative rather than a straightforward cross-chain infrastructure play, which is what Synapse was originally built around. Synapse functions as an interchain programming interface, allowing developers to build applications with native cross-chain capabilities, with SYN serving as its primary governance and utility token.

A Token Already Deep in a Rally Hayes was not buying into a quiet market. SYN had already surged more than 10 times in value over the course of June before the trade was flagged. Data from CoinGecko shows the token trading at around $0.3856 on June 29, representing a 122.90% gain over the prior seven days alone, with 24-hour trading volume approaching $95 million. With a circulating supply of around 220 million tokens, the market cap stood at roughly $84 million, making Hayes' $2.2 million position one of the more closely watched small-cap moves of the month.

The rally appeared to be driven more by broad DeFi risk-on sentiment and momentum buying than by a single fundamental catalyst. CoinMarketCap data noted SYN's multi-day surge was attributed to technicals rather than new project fundamentals, with the token rebounding from an all-time low of $0.027 set earlier in June.

The trade is consistent with Hayes' broader pattern of accumulating smaller, higher-beta assets during momentum cycles. On-chain records show he has made several significant DeFi token purchases in recent months, including Ethereum, ENA, and ETHFI.

Sources:
CryptoAdventure: Arthur Hayes Buys 6.16M SYN Tokens Worth $2.2M Through FlowDesk
CoinGecko: Synapse (SYN) Price and Market Data

Intercontinental Exchange plans to launch futures products linked to monetary policy decisions and energy reserves.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), parent company of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), is planning to launch new futures contracts tied to global monetary policy decisions and U.S. natural gas inventories, aiming to provide investors with another avenue to hedge against risks from economic events. According to company executives, ICE plans to roll out futures products based on interest rate decisions by the U.S. Federal Reserve, European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of England (BoE). Subject to regulatory approval, these economic indicator-based products are scheduled to launch on August 10. The move will allow investors to trade or hedge around policy meetings of the three major global central banks and weekly U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) natural gas inventory releases.

16 minutes ago

Suspected shell accounts operating across multiple scattered addresses have laid in wait for Micron Technology, opening combined long positions in MU totaling 10 million.

According to Hyperinsight monitoring, four whales opened long positions on Micron Technology (MU) on Hyperliquid today, while only one large trader established a short position, reflecting an overall bullish bias among large market funds. Three of the addresses completed their positions almost simultaneously in the afternoon. On-chain data shows these three addresses have highly correlated position structures, trading rhythms, and funding sources, and are suspected to belong to the same trading entity splitting positions across multiple addresses. All three addresses boast a historical win rate of over 60%, are known for their conservative trading style, and maintain strong drawdown control. Since June alone, they have accumulated realized profits of approximately $1.8 million. Additionally, all three received large capital injections in June; two are new active wallets over the past month, with highly consistent fund deployment and trading behavior. Currently, the average entry price of MU long positions for the three addresses (0xf8a, 0xd5c, 0xf2d) is around $1,156, with a recent liquidation price of roughly $938. They hold a total of 9,027 MU contracts, with a notional position size of about $10.3 million. As of press time, affected by MU’s short-term pullback, this batch of positions has recorded an unrealized floating loss of approximately 15%. HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group, set it as an admin (enable message sending permission), and it will automatically sync on-chain news.

16 minutes ago

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: No Iran-US technical talks are scheduled for this week.

According to Iranian sources on the 29th, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Garibabadi stated that there are currently no arrangements to hold technical talks on a ceasefire memorandum of understanding (MoU) this week. Garibabadi emphasized in an interview that while consultations with parties including Qatar are proceeding as planned, reports that a working group technical meeting will be held in Doha remain unconfirmed. Once relevant conditions are met and all parties agree on the date and venue of the talks, Iran will participate in the first round of technical talks under the framework of the designated working group, with the relevant consultations currently being conducted through intermediary countries.

16 minutes ago

Melius Research assigns Western Digital a "Buy" rating, with a target price of $105.

Melius Research initiates coverage on Western Digital (WDC.O), assigning a "Buy" rating with a target price of $105.

16 minutes ago

Serenity: The key inflection point for the development of the robotics industry appears to have arrived.

Serenity published a report stating that General Motors (GM) has laid off roughly 1,000 employees and replaced some positions with around 50 robots. At the same time, there are reports that GM is in talks with NVIDIA over factory robot collaborations. This is regarded as an important signal that the robotics industry is moving toward large-scale commercial adoption, indicating that automation is expected to boost corporate operational efficiency and improve profit margins, especially in labor-intensive sectors such as automotive manufacturing and warehousing logistics. Serenity believes that robot and humanoid robot technologies have largely matured and are currently in the early phase of large-scale rollout. Although large enterprises generally categorize them as "auxiliary robots", their core goal remains replacing certain manual roles with automation, cutting labor costs including salaries and insurance, enabling round-the-clock operations, and enhancing profitability. While the widespread adoption of robots may bring employment pressure, the key inflection point for the industry’s development seems to have arrived.

16 minutes ago

JPMorgan analysts raise target levels for European stocks.

Amid the Iran-related conflict that has battered European stock markets, JPMorgan analyst Mislav Matejka expects the selloff to be temporary. Now, he has doubled down on his bullish stance, emerging as the most optimistic bull among forecasters tracked by Bloomberg. Matejka and his team raised their year-end target for the Euro Stoxx 600 index from 630 to 680 points, implying roughly 7% upside from current levels. This new forecast surpasses the previous highest estimate of 670 points set by Barclays and HSBC earlier this month. The strategists wrote in a report: "After three years of stagnant growth, corporate earnings in the eurozone are accelerating this year." They project earnings per share (EPS) growth of 18% and 12% for 2026 and 2027, respectively. "If the market rally broadens in the second half of the year, European stocks could once again become a highly attractive investment."

16 minutes ago

A major shakeup has taken place at cryptocurrency exchange and derivatives platform BitMEX. CEO Stephan Lutz, Chief Financial Officer Ina Steiner, and Chief Growth Officer Raphael Polansky have all stepped down from their roles. In their place, Peter Wilkinson, who previously served as BitMEX’s Global General Counsel, has now assumed the position of CEO.

Leadership overhaul at BitMEXThe recent changes are now reflected in the company’s executives’ professional profiles. Before becoming CEO, Peter Wilkinson held dual responsibilities as Global General Counsel and Head of Operations at BitMEX. Founded in 2014, BitMEX has long established itself as a major player in the crypto derivatives market, becoming synonymous with digital asset trading for a decade.

As Stephan Lutz, Ina Steiner, and Raphael Polansky leave BitMEX, Peter Wilkinson becomes the new chief executive.

None of the outgoing executives—Lutz, Steiner, or Polansky—have responded to requests for comment regarding the departures. BitMEX has yet to release a formal statement clarifying whether this management reshuffle is part of a wider organizational restructuring plan aimed at the company’s long-term future.

Rumors of a sale and BitMEX’s legal historyRecent months have been rife with speculation that BitMEX is actively seeking potential buyers. The platform, originally established by Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, and Samuel Reed, staked its reputation on advanced derivatives trading but also became known for run-ins with regulatory authorities.

In 2020, U.S. authorities accused BitMEX of failing to incorporate sufficient anti-money laundering controls. This led the company to eventually admit guilt in a drawn-out legal process. Following civil and criminal proceedings in the U.S., Hayes, Delo, and Reed all resigned from their executive roles.

The company is thought to be streamlining its costs in a bid to make itself more attractive to potential buyers.

Industrywide restructuring under market pressureWeak digital asset prices continue to exert pressure on companies throughout the crypto sector. The latest departures at BitMEX are widely seen as part of efforts to reduce overhead and simplify operations—in line with a broader industry trend fueled by challenging market conditions.

Stephan Lutz was only appointed CEO in 2022 during a period of sharp market decline, stepping in after Alexander Hoeptner’s tenure. Hoeptner himself succeeded the founders in early 2021, following the initial wave of executive exits in the aftermath of legal troubles.

The latest phase of management turnover at BitMEX follows a broader move across the industry, as crypto exchanges and digital asset companies respond to turbulent markets by implementing staff cuts and making significant leadership changes.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Key Takeaways ASML shares currently hover around $1,841, within a 52-week trading band of $683.48 to $1,959.04, commanding a $724 billion market valuation The company’s order backlog stays robust as semiconductor manufacturers reserve EUV machinery years ahead, guaranteeing revenue visibility Revenue from installed base operations reached €2.49 billion in Q1 2026, climbing from €2.13 billion in the preceding quarter Management elevated full-year 2026 sales outlook to €36–€40 billion, while earnings per share are projected to surge 33% in the coming year Analyst consensus leans Moderate Buy with a mean price objective of $1,772.62; Bank of America maintained its Buy stance and increased its target ASML began Friday’s session at $1,841.18. This represents a dramatic recovery from the 52-week floor of $683.48, and approaches the ceiling of $1,959.04. Following such a substantial appreciation, investors naturally wonder: does meaningful upside remain?

ASML Holding N.V., ASML

The current valuation demands attention. ASML commands approximately 49.9x this year’s anticipated EPS of just under $36. This multiple significantly exceeds its historical average in the mid-30s range. For typical corporations, such pricing would trigger caution.

Yet ASML operates in a category of its own.

The Dutch company maintains an uncontested monopoly on Extreme Ultraviolet lithography equipment — the critical machinery enabling cutting-edge semiconductor production. Manufacturing 2-nanometer chips is impossible without this technology. No competing suppliers exist.

Each unit commands a price exceeding $350 million and requires months for assembly, precision calibration, and delivery. Customers don’t simply submit purchase orders — they reserve manufacturing capacity years into the future. This represents far more than a healthy sales funnel. It constitutes structural market control.

Order Backlog and Service Revenue Drive Fundamentals Q1 2026 net revenue totaled €8.77 billion, representing a decline from Q4 2025’s €9.72 billion. At first glance, this suggests weakening momentum. The reality differs considerably.

ASML’s quarterly revenue fluctuates based on delivery schedules rather than underlying demand. Every system the company manufactures already has a committed buyer. The quarter-over-quarter decrease reflects production capacity constraints, not softening customer appetite.

The more revealing metric comes from installed base management. This revenue category — encompassing maintenance and enhancement of existing deployed systems — registered €2.49 billion in Q1, advancing from €2.13 billion the prior quarter. It delivers predictable, margin-rich, and expanding cash flows.

Executives lifted full-year 2026 guidance to a revenue corridor of €36 billion to €40 billion. The latter half of the year should show acceleration, powered by increasing system deliveries.

TSMC, Intel, and Samsung are all expanding fabrication facilities to satisfy AI infrastructure requirements. These facilities require ASML’s equipment. Hyperscaler capital spending is forecast to nearly double from $427 billion in 2025 to beyond $860 billion by 2027.

Profit Margin Improvement Represents the Upcoming Driver EPS consensus forecasts indicate 33% expansion next year. This figure anchors the bullish investment thesis.

The route to that outcome flows through margin enhancement. ASML is shifting from limited-volume, early-phase production of its latest systems — including the high-margin High-NA EUV platform and the NXE:3800 series — toward standardized, volume-scale manufacturing. Fixed expense allocation improves across larger unit counts. Gross margins should progress toward management’s 2030 objective of 56%–60%.

One notable risk persists. China continues to represent approximately 19% of ASML’s revenue, and export limitations remain an active concern. Dutch government representatives are reportedly advocating against stricter restrictions on equipment sales to Chinese customers. Any intensification on this front could constrain sales.

Decker Retirement Planning recently established a fresh $4.23 million stake in ASML. Dimensional Fund Advisors maintains ownership exceeding 990,000 shares. Institutional holdings comprise 26.07% of outstanding equity.

Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, and Deutsche Bank all maintain Buy ratings or equivalents. Bank of America elevated its price objective citing improved earnings projections for 2027 and 2028.

The consensus mean target stands at $1,772.62, though an alternative analyst cohort establishes it at $2,019 — suggesting approximately 12.5% appreciation potential from present levels.

Investment firm Multicoin Capital has published a detailed valuation report outlining a bullish base-case scenario for Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE. The analysis projects that HYPE could reach approximately $319 by 2028, implying roughly five times upside from levels near $63 at the time of the report.

According to insights from Multicoin Capital, the forecast rests on expectations that Hyperliquid will generate around $8 billion in annual earnings by 2028 and trade at a 20-times earnings multiple.

At current prices, the token appears to trade at roughly 36 times trailing twelve-month earnings, or about 30 times when factoring in revenue from Hyperliquid’s recent Coinbase and USDC integration.

Multicoin describes Hyperliquid as evolving into a comprehensive “everything exchange” — a fully integrated, always-available on-chain venue that supports perpetual futures, spot trading, and potentially broader asset classes.

This positioning, the firm argues, positions the platform to capture meaningful trading volume and fee revenue from centralized cryptocurrency exchanges (CEXs) that have long dominated derivatives and spot markets.

Hyperliquid has already built substantial momentum in perpetual futures.

It commands a leading share of on-chain derivatives activity and has steadily increased its portion of overall exchange perpetuals volume, recently surpassing 7% of the global total in some measurements.

Its high-throughput custom Layer-1 blockchain enables fast execution, deep liquidity, and on-chain transparency that many traders find attractive compared with traditional centralized platforms.

The report notes that Multicoin has accumulated a large position in HYPE, making it one of the biggest holdings in the firm’s liquid fund.

The team has followed the project since its early days and remains impressed by its execution and growth trajectory.

While the base-case projection is optimistic, Multicoin acknowledges several structural and market risks that could affect long-term outcomes.

These include competition from other decentralized platforms, regulatory developments, execution challenges in expanding product offerings, and broader crypto market volatility.

Despite these caveats, the firm maintains confidence in the token’s upside under its outlined assumptions.

The $319 target would represent a fully diluted valuation of roughly $160 billion at the projected 2028 earnings level.

Multicoin’s analysis applies standard valuation frameworks used across software and financial technology companies, adjusting for the unique characteristics of a decentralized trading venue with native token economics.

Hyperliquid’s growth story reflects more of a broader industry shift toward decentralized infrastructure that offers composability, transparency, and 24/7 global access without counterparty risk from a central operator. If the platform continues expanding beyond perpetuals while maintaining its performance edge, it could further erode market share held by legacy centralized exchanges.

A crypto whale dormant for over a year spent 5,000 SOL to buy PUMP.

Per Lookonchain’s monitoring, a whale address dormant for over a year has resumed buying PUMP tokens, spending 5,000 SOL (about $358,000) to acquire 242.66 million PUMP. More than a year ago, the whale bought 10,957 SOL at an average price of $237 (worth roughly $2.6 million back then) and has since staked the entire amount. Despite earning 1,206 SOL in staking rewards, the sharp drop in SOL’s price means the whale’s total holdings now carry an unrealized loss of over $1.7 million, a loss of approximately 66%.

1 seconds ago

Foreign investors pulled massive capital out of South Korea's stock market, with net sales of KOSPI stocks hitting a new single-day record on Monday.

Foreign investors net sold KOSPI stocks worth 7.7 trillion won (approximately $4.98 billion) on Monday, marking the largest single-day sell-off on record.

1 seconds ago

The A-share semiconductor sector turned higher following South Korean stocks, with Huahai Qingke surging 19.01%.

On Monday morning, the A-share semiconductor sector briefly tracked a pullback in related South Korean stocks. The KOSDAQ index triggered a program trading circuit breaker during intraday trading, with a maximum drop of 3.8%. Chip giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix saw sharp opening dips, but the decline was soon halted by news of a new round of expansion in South Korea's storage chip chain. Earlier in the afternoon, the South Korean government released its latest industrial plan. President Lee Jae-myung stated that South Korea must push forward with the construction of chip production facilities as soon as possible, as existing industrial parks are approaching their carrying limits in terms of water resources and infrastructure. Going forward, the country will focus on expanding semiconductor supply capacity through investments in its southwestern region. Under the plan, South Korea plans to build four chip manufacturing plants in the southwestern region, with a total investment of about 800 trillion won, and will allocate at least 30 trillion won over the next 15 years to semiconductor sectors including next-generation memory, edge AI, and defense. In response to the news, South Korea's KOSPI index turned from decline to gain in the afternoon, while related A-share stocks rebounded in tandem. Among them, Huahong Qingke surged 19.01%, Microtech Corporation rose 8.58%, Anji Technology gained 9.46%, Shanghai Silicon Industry climbed 11.30%, Coremax increased 9.06%, and Huace Testing & Control advanced 10.21%.

1 seconds ago

Japan and South Korea's stock markets closed higher.

According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index closed up 107.23 points on Monday, June 29, with a 0.15% gain, ending at 69,468.11 points, after earlier dropping more than 1%. South Korea’s KOSPI index rose 5.62 points on the same day, a 0.07% increase, closing at 8,416.83 points; the country’s KOSDAQ (its main tech-focused index) gained over 8% in the session. After Samsung and SK unveiled their investment plans, the KOSPI index erased a decline of up to 3.4% to turn positive intraday, while small-cap benchmark KOSDAQ also rebounded.

1 seconds ago

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: Convening the First Meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister announced that the first meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz was held.

1 seconds ago

Online reports indicate that South Korea’s previously expected aggressive investment of 2000 trillion won has materialized at 800 trillion won, easing market sentiment and triggering a minor rebound in the stock prices of Samsung and SK Hynix.

Hyperinsight’s monitoring shows that South Korea’s semiconductor sector rebounded in the afternoon. The previously-feared 2,000 trillion won investment plan was ultimately realized as a semiconductor project worth around 800 trillion won (approx. $518 billion). This is likely because capital expenditure pressure fell short of some market participants’ expectations, leading to eased risk aversion and narrowed losses. On Hyperliquid, SK Hynix (1H) rebounded by 4.5% at one point, currently quoted at $1,730; Samsung Electronics rose 2%, currently at $214. Currently, the average entry price of long positions for large holders of the two on-chain assets is $1,608 and $217.3 respectively, with Samsung Electronics trading below the moving average of long-position whales.

1 seconds ago

A crypto whale dormant for over a year spent 5,000 SOL to buy PUMP.

Per Lookonchain’s monitoring, a whale address dormant for over a year has resumed buying PUMP tokens, spending 5,000 SOL (about $358,000) to acquire 242.66 million PUMP. More than a year ago, the whale bought 10,957 SOL at an average price of $237 (worth roughly $2.6 million back then) and has since staked the entire amount. Despite earning 1,206 SOL in staking rewards, the sharp drop in SOL’s price means the whale’s total holdings now carry an unrealized loss of over $1.7 million, a loss of approximately 66%.

1 seconds ago

Foreign investors pulled massive capital out of South Korea's stock market, with net sales of KOSPI stocks hitting a new single-day record on Monday.

Foreign investors net sold KOSPI stocks worth 7.7 trillion won (approximately $4.98 billion) on Monday, marking the largest single-day sell-off on record.

1 seconds ago

The A-share semiconductor sector turned higher following South Korean stocks, with Huahai Qingke surging 19.01%.

On Monday morning, the A-share semiconductor sector briefly tracked a pullback in related South Korean stocks. The KOSDAQ index triggered a program trading circuit breaker during intraday trading, with a maximum drop of 3.8%. Chip giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix saw sharp opening dips, but the decline was soon halted by news of a new round of expansion in South Korea's storage chip chain. Earlier in the afternoon, the South Korean government released its latest industrial plan. President Lee Jae-myung stated that South Korea must push forward with the construction of chip production facilities as soon as possible, as existing industrial parks are approaching their carrying limits in terms of water resources and infrastructure. Going forward, the country will focus on expanding semiconductor supply capacity through investments in its southwestern region. Under the plan, South Korea plans to build four chip manufacturing plants in the southwestern region, with a total investment of about 800 trillion won, and will allocate at least 30 trillion won over the next 15 years to semiconductor sectors including next-generation memory, edge AI, and defense. In response to the news, South Korea's KOSPI index turned from decline to gain in the afternoon, while related A-share stocks rebounded in tandem. Among them, Huahong Qingke surged 19.01%, Microtech Corporation rose 8.58%, Anji Technology gained 9.46%, Shanghai Silicon Industry climbed 11.30%, Coremax increased 9.06%, and Huace Testing & Control advanced 10.21%.

1 seconds ago

Japan and South Korea's stock markets closed higher.

According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index closed up 107.23 points on Monday, June 29, with a 0.15% gain, ending at 69,468.11 points, after earlier dropping more than 1%. South Korea’s KOSPI index rose 5.62 points on the same day, a 0.07% increase, closing at 8,416.83 points; the country’s KOSDAQ (its main tech-focused index) gained over 8% in the session. After Samsung and SK unveiled their investment plans, the KOSPI index erased a decline of up to 3.4% to turn positive intraday, while small-cap benchmark KOSDAQ also rebounded.

1 seconds ago

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: Convening the First Meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister announced that the first meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz was held.

1 seconds ago

Online reports indicate that South Korea’s previously expected aggressive investment of 2000 trillion won has materialized at 800 trillion won, easing market sentiment and triggering a minor rebound in the stock prices of Samsung and SK Hynix.

Hyperinsight’s monitoring shows that South Korea’s semiconductor sector rebounded in the afternoon. The previously-feared 2,000 trillion won investment plan was ultimately realized as a semiconductor project worth around 800 trillion won (approx. $518 billion). This is likely because capital expenditure pressure fell short of some market participants’ expectations, leading to eased risk aversion and narrowed losses. On Hyperliquid, SK Hynix (1H) rebounded by 4.5% at one point, currently quoted at $1,730; Samsung Electronics rose 2%, currently at $214. Currently, the average entry price of long positions for large holders of the two on-chain assets is $1,608 and $217.3 respectively, with Samsung Electronics trading below the moving average of long-position whales.

1 seconds ago

A crypto whale dormant for over a year spent 5,000 SOL to buy PUMP.

Per Lookonchain’s monitoring, a whale address dormant for over a year has resumed buying PUMP tokens, spending 5,000 SOL (about $358,000) to acquire 242.66 million PUMP. More than a year ago, the whale bought 10,957 SOL at an average price of $237 (worth roughly $2.6 million back then) and has since staked the entire amount. Despite earning 1,206 SOL in staking rewards, the sharp drop in SOL’s price means the whale’s total holdings now carry an unrealized loss of over $1.7 million, a loss of approximately 66%.

1 seconds ago

Foreign investors pulled massive capital out of South Korea's stock market, with net sales of KOSPI stocks hitting a new single-day record on Monday.

Foreign investors net sold KOSPI stocks worth 7.7 trillion won (approximately $4.98 billion) on Monday, marking the largest single-day sell-off on record.

1 seconds ago

The A-share semiconductor sector turned higher following South Korean stocks, with Huahai Qingke surging 19.01%.

On Monday morning, the A-share semiconductor sector briefly tracked a pullback in related South Korean stocks. The KOSDAQ index triggered a program trading circuit breaker during intraday trading, with a maximum drop of 3.8%. Chip giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix saw sharp opening dips, but the decline was soon halted by news of a new round of expansion in South Korea's storage chip chain. Earlier in the afternoon, the South Korean government released its latest industrial plan. President Lee Jae-myung stated that South Korea must push forward with the construction of chip production facilities as soon as possible, as existing industrial parks are approaching their carrying limits in terms of water resources and infrastructure. Going forward, the country will focus on expanding semiconductor supply capacity through investments in its southwestern region. Under the plan, South Korea plans to build four chip manufacturing plants in the southwestern region, with a total investment of about 800 trillion won, and will allocate at least 30 trillion won over the next 15 years to semiconductor sectors including next-generation memory, edge AI, and defense. In response to the news, South Korea's KOSPI index turned from decline to gain in the afternoon, while related A-share stocks rebounded in tandem. Among them, Huahong Qingke surged 19.01%, Microtech Corporation rose 8.58%, Anji Technology gained 9.46%, Shanghai Silicon Industry climbed 11.30%, Coremax increased 9.06%, and Huace Testing & Control advanced 10.21%.

1 seconds ago

Japan and South Korea's stock markets closed higher.

According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index closed up 107.23 points on Monday, June 29, with a 0.15% gain, ending at 69,468.11 points, after earlier dropping more than 1%. South Korea’s KOSPI index rose 5.62 points on the same day, a 0.07% increase, closing at 8,416.83 points; the country’s KOSDAQ (its main tech-focused index) gained over 8% in the session. After Samsung and SK unveiled their investment plans, the KOSPI index erased a decline of up to 3.4% to turn positive intraday, while small-cap benchmark KOSDAQ also rebounded.

1 seconds ago

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: Convening the First Meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister announced that the first meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz was held.

1 seconds ago

Recently, over 550,000 Bitcoin have flowed into deposit addresses of Binance and OKX, marking a new high since the 2023 bear market.

Crypto Quant analyst Darkfost noted in a post that as Bitcoin recently dipped below $60,000 again, a large number of investors have transferred their Bitcoin to exchanges. Data shows more than 220,000 BTC flowed into deposit addresses linked to Binance’s hot wallet, and over 330,000 BTC entered OKX-related deposit addresses, totaling over 550,000 BTC—marking the largest such inflow this year and the highest level since the 2023 bear market. Typically, when users plan to sell Bitcoin, they first transfer funds to deposit addresses before aggregating them into the exchange’s operational wallet. As such, this massive inflow reflects panic among some investors after Bitcoin tested the $60,000 threshold, with increased potential selling pressure. However, the data does not mean all these BTC have been sold; it only signals a rise in exchanges’ selling willingness.

1 seconds ago

Foreign investors pulled massive capital out of South Korea's stock market, with net sales of KOSPI stocks hitting a new single-day record on Monday.

Foreign investors net sold KOSPI stocks worth 7.7 trillion won (approximately $4.98 billion) on Monday, marking the largest single-day sell-off on record.

1 seconds ago

The A-share semiconductor sector turned higher following South Korean stocks, with Huahai Qingke surging 19.01%.

On Monday morning, the A-share semiconductor sector briefly tracked a pullback in related South Korean stocks. The KOSDAQ index triggered a program trading circuit breaker during intraday trading, with a maximum drop of 3.8%. Chip giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix saw sharp opening dips, but the decline was soon halted by news of a new round of expansion in South Korea's storage chip chain. Earlier in the afternoon, the South Korean government released its latest industrial plan. President Lee Jae-myung stated that South Korea must push forward with the construction of chip production facilities as soon as possible, as existing industrial parks are approaching their carrying limits in terms of water resources and infrastructure. Going forward, the country will focus on expanding semiconductor supply capacity through investments in its southwestern region. Under the plan, South Korea plans to build four chip manufacturing plants in the southwestern region, with a total investment of about 800 trillion won, and will allocate at least 30 trillion won over the next 15 years to semiconductor sectors including next-generation memory, edge AI, and defense. In response to the news, South Korea's KOSPI index turned from decline to gain in the afternoon, while related A-share stocks rebounded in tandem. Among them, Huahong Qingke surged 19.01%, Microtech Corporation rose 8.58%, Anji Technology gained 9.46%, Shanghai Silicon Industry climbed 11.30%, Coremax increased 9.06%, and Huace Testing & Control advanced 10.21%.

1 seconds ago

Japan and South Korea's stock markets closed higher.

According to Bitget market data, the Nikkei 225 index closed up 107.23 points on Monday, June 29, with a 0.15% gain, ending at 69,468.11 points, after earlier dropping more than 1%. South Korea’s KOSPI index rose 5.62 points on the same day, a 0.07% increase, closing at 8,416.83 points; the country’s KOSDAQ (its main tech-focused index) gained over 8% in the session. After Samsung and SK unveiled their investment plans, the KOSPI index erased a decline of up to 3.4% to turn positive intraday, while small-cap benchmark KOSDAQ also rebounded.

1 seconds ago

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: Convening the First Meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister announced that the first meeting of the Iran-Oman Joint Commission on the Strait of Hormuz was held.

1 seconds ago

Online reports indicate that South Korea’s previously expected aggressive investment of 2000 trillion won has materialized at 800 trillion won, easing market sentiment and triggering a minor rebound in the stock prices of Samsung and SK Hynix.

Hyperinsight’s monitoring shows that South Korea’s semiconductor sector rebounded in the afternoon. The previously-feared 2,000 trillion won investment plan was ultimately realized as a semiconductor project worth around 800 trillion won (approx. $518 billion). This is likely because capital expenditure pressure fell short of some market participants’ expectations, leading to eased risk aversion and narrowed losses. On Hyperliquid, SK Hynix (1H) rebounded by 4.5% at one point, currently quoted at $1,730; Samsung Electronics rose 2%, currently at $214. Currently, the average entry price of long positions for large holders of the two on-chain assets is $1,608 and $217.3 respectively, with Samsung Electronics trading below the moving average of long-position whales.

1 seconds ago

Recently, over 550,000 Bitcoin have flowed into deposit addresses of Binance and OKX, marking a new high since the 2023 bear market.

Crypto Quant analyst Darkfost noted in a post that as Bitcoin recently dipped below $60,000 again, a large number of investors have transferred their Bitcoin to exchanges. Data shows more than 220,000 BTC flowed into deposit addresses linked to Binance’s hot wallet, and over 330,000 BTC entered OKX-related deposit addresses, totaling over 550,000 BTC—marking the largest such inflow this year and the highest level since the 2023 bear market. Typically, when users plan to sell Bitcoin, they first transfer funds to deposit addresses before aggregating them into the exchange’s operational wallet. As such, this massive inflow reflects panic among some investors after Bitcoin tested the $60,000 threshold, with increased potential selling pressure. However, the data does not mean all these BTC have been sold; it only signals a rise in exchanges’ selling willingness.

1 seconds ago

Subscribe to CNBC PROSubscribe to Investing ClubLicensing & ReprintsCNBC CouncilsJoin the CNBC PanelDigital ProductsNews ReleasesClosed CaptioningCorrectionsAbout CNBCInternshipsSite MapCareersHelpContactNews TipsGot a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.

Get In TouchCNBC NewslettersSign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox

Sign Up NowGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services.

Advertise With UsPlease Contact UsAd ChoicesPrivacy PolicyYour Privacy ChoicesCA NoticeTerms of Service© 2026 Versant Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company.

Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Market Data Terms of Use and Disclaimers

Data also provided by

Summary

U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs have logged about $4.06 billion in net outflows so far this month, the largest monthly redemption since the products launched.The funds saw roughly $1.79 billion in redemptions last week alone, undercutting earlier expectations of renewed demand following SpaceX’s June IPO.U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs have recorded $4.06 billion in net outflows this month, according to data from SoSoValue. It marks the largest monthly redemption on record, exceeding the previous high of $3.56 billion in February 2025.

Last week, the funds saw redemptions of about $1.79 billion, the second-highest weekly outflow since trading began in January 2024. (These figures could shift slightly based on flows over the final two trading days of the month.)

This trend runs counter to expectations early in the month of renewed demand following SpaceX's IPO on June 12.

Spot ETFs serve as a widely followed barometer for institutional investors seeking regulated exposure to bitcoin without directly holding the cryptocurrency.

June’s outflows followed $2.43 billion in net redemptions in May, bringing the two-month total close to $6.5 billion. That figure is comparable to the current market capitalization of zcash (ZEC), currently ranked among the world’s 15 largest cryptocurrencies by market cap.

On a year-to-date basis, net outflows tally roughly $5 billion in the first half of 2026.

The impact of this collapse in institutional demand is evident in bitcoin’s price performance, which has declined around 30% in the first half, underperforming nearly every major asset class except Strategy (MSTR). Shares in the bitcoin-holding publicly listed firm have tanked by 45%.

12345678910

Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison

Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison

US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale.

Jun 26, 2026

US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale.

Why it matters:

US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.