Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Thu 02 Jul 2026 ▪ 6 min read ▪ by Luc Jose A.

Summarize this article with:

Capital movements within the blockchain very often precede the price dynamics visible on trading terminals. While the crypto market is going through a phase of uncertainty and successive corrections, a major divergence is emerging on the Ripple network. This phenomenon of complete disconnection between different categories of investors raises questions about the medium-term trajectory of the token. Far from the emotional reactions that often characterize the general public, on-chain data reveals large-scale institutional activity of rare intensity. Understanding this strategic positioning is crucial to anticipate the structure of upcoming market cycles.

In Brief Whales take advantage of the XRP drop to quietly strengthen their positions, while many retail investors succumb to panic. On-chain data shows growing concentration of XRP reserves in the hands of large holders, accompanied by a sharp increase in withdrawals from exchanges. This accumulation strategy could reduce the available supply on the market and encourage a rebound in XRP, even though such concentration also increases volatility risks. The Opportunism of XRP Whales : The Market Rift The behavior of retail investors facing the recent fluctuations of XRP perfectly illustrates the psychological mechanisms governing market turning points. According to recent data, the drop of Ripple’s crypto has intensified to reach a local bottom, profoundly altering the distribution of forces at play :

The decline of XRP’s price down to the threshold of $1.04 “may have triggered fear among smaller traders, but large investors saw this as a buying opportunity,” according to market analyst Xaif Crypto ; The altcoin initiated a technical rebound to settle at $1.06 ; The underlying blockchain activity indicates growing accumulation by whales rather than a true wave of widespread selling. This configuration reveals a massive value transfer from the less capitalized wallets to the most influential entities in the ecosystem. In behavioral finance, these periods of strong correction are called capitulation phases for the general public, which tends to sell at a loss triggered by anxiety. Historic whales, drawing on their experience of previous cycles, precisely exploit these moments of collective panic to build or reinforce their positions at heavily discounted prices.

The history of global financial markets, and more specifically cryptos, shows that these phases of discreet accumulation, conducted away from public view, very often precede a sustained trend reversal as soon as the retail selling pressure is completely exhausted.

Control Over Centralized Platforms and the Explosion of Outflows Beyond a simple assessment of buying dynamics, on-chain analysis tools reveal a structural change in XRP distribution on the main global exchanges. A technical indicator proves particularly revealing of this trend: “the All CEX whale spread,” which measures the holding gap between investor categories on centralized platforms. This indicator has risen to 50.9%, indicating factually that whales now control a significantly larger share of XRP reserves held on exchanges.

This phenomenon is not limited to a single platform, as Binance is also approaching the critical threshold of 50% dominance by whales, confirming that large holders continuously increase their influence over the liquidity available on the world’s largest exchanges.

Such supply concentration is accompanied by another major trend: a spectacular increase in token withdrawals to external custody solutions. Data from the Coinbase platform show that outflows initiated by very large wallets have accelerated sharply. Transfers involving volumes greater than 1 million XRP have jumped, rising from 10% to 25.7% of the total activity on this exchange within just two weeks.

Thus, these waves of massive withdrawals constitute fundamentally bullish signals. They indicate that these large-scale investors choose to secure their assets in private wallets for long-term holding rather than leaving them on exchanges where they might be liquidated at the slightest market disturbance.

Between Historic Seasonality and Risks of Supply Centralization To complete this analysis of the XRP ecosystem, it is important to consider a temporal dimension specific to the crypto’s history. Market cycles often follow recurring seasonal trends that overlay the movements of large investors. Historically, the month of July has established itself as one of the most favorable periods for XRP.

This historic seasonal strength triggers many speculations among observers, who believe that this favorable calendar could opportunely align with the current wave of accumulation by whales. While past data do not guarantee future performance, they provide a framework frequently integrated by fund managers into their predictive models to anticipate the end of latent consolidation phases.

The impact of these coordinated moves could redefine the balance of supply and demand in the coming weeks, opening the way to contrasting market prospects. By appropriating a predominant share of liquidity and moving these tokens off the circuit, whales are causing a progressive drying up of the available supply.

In the short term, if this accumulation phase continues and the general sentiment of the crypto market improves, even a slight return of demand from retail buyers could cause a rapid price appreciation, amplified by the scarcity of tokens available for sale on exchanges.

However, such volume concentration in the hands of a small circle of actors also carries risks of manipulation or increased volatility, as the future decisions of these few large holders will have a disproportionate influence on the price of XRP.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Luc Jose A.

Diplômé de Sciences Po Toulouse et titulaire d'une certification consultant blockchain délivrée par Alyra, j'ai rejoint l'aventure Cointribune en 2019. Convaincu du potentiel de la blockchain pour transformer de nombreux secteurs de l'économie, j'ai pris l'engagement de sensibiliser et d'informer le grand public sur cet écosystème en constante évolution. Mon objectif est de permettre à chacun de mieux comprendre la blockchain et de saisir les opportunités qu'elle offre. Je m'efforce chaque jour de fournir une analyse objective de l'actualité, de décrypter les tendances du marché, de relayer les dernières innovations technologiques et de mettre en perspective les enjeux économiques et sociétaux de cette révolution en marche.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has chosen a hill to die on, and it happens to be the entire European Union’s crypto regulatory framework. On July 2, Ardoino confirmed that Tether deliberately did not apply for a MiCA license for USDT, calling the EU’s stablecoin reserve rules “dangerous” and “ill-conceived.”

The timing is not subtle. His statement landed one day after MiCA’s transitional period officially ended on July 1, triggering the delisting and geofencing of USDT across major EU-regulated platforms including Coinbase, Kraken, Crypto.com, and Binance in the European Economic Area.

The reserve rule Tether won’t touch At the heart of the dispute is a single requirement: MiCA mandates that significant stablecoin issuers, defined as those with over 5 billion euros in circulation or more than 10 million users, must hold at least 60% of their reserves in cash deposits at European banks.

Tether, with a market cap of approximately $184B and a user base Ardoino claims exceeds 400 million, would comfortably qualify as “significant” under those thresholds. Which is precisely the problem, from his perspective.

Advertisement

Ardoino’s argument boils down to concentration risk. Parking tens of billions of dollars in European bank accounts means Tether’s reserves are only as safe as those banks. If a bank fails, a chunk of the reserves backing the world’s largest stablecoin could evaporate overnight.

It’s not a purely hypothetical concern. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March 2023 briefly caused Circle’s USDC to depeg when $3.3 billion of its reserves were trapped at the failing institution. Ardoino appears to be pointing at that exact scenario and saying, “Now imagine that, but mandated by law.”

Tether’s current strategy favors higher-yielding, more liquid assets, particularly US Treasuries. The company has repeatedly argued that short-dated government securities are safer and more transparent than fractional-reserve bank deposits.

What this means for European crypto traders The practical fallout is already here. European users of USDT are now locked out of trading pairs on several of the continent’s largest exchanges. Circle’s USDC and its euro-denominated EURC are fully authorized under MiCA and remain freely available on European platforms, while USDT is now effectively persona non grata in a market of 450 million people.

The competitive landscape shifts Circle is the obvious winner of this regulatory split, at least on paper. With USDC as the only major dollar-denominated stablecoin fully compliant with MiCA, the company has a clear runway to capture European market share that USDT is voluntarily surrendering.

That said, USDT’s $184B market cap dwarfs USDC by a significant margin. Tether’s dominance in global markets, particularly across Asia, Latin America, and emerging economies, remains largely untouched by European regulations. Ardoino has repeatedly framed Tether’s mission around serving the unbanked and underbanked, populations that are decidedly not the EU’s primary demographic.

The 400 million user figure Ardoino cited underscores this point. The vast majority of those users are outside Europe, and Tether’s growth strategy has long prioritized regions where access to stable dollar-denominated assets is a genuine lifeline rather than a trading convenience.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Solana delivered one of its strongest quarters to date in Q2 2026, setting new records across several of its most closely watched metrics. The network reached all-time highs in tokenized equities trading, perpetual futures volume, and transaction activity while maintaining its lead in dApp revenue.

Tokenized Equities Reach New Peak Solana recorded its strongest quarter ever for tokenized equities spot trading in Q2 2026, processing $4.84 billion in volume. The network also captured more than 96% of the market, handling more tokenized equity trading volume than every other blockchain combined.

The achievement also extended Solana's lead over all other blockchains to 4 consecutive quarters, reinforcing its position as the leading network for tokenized equities.

dApps Extend Revenue Leadership Applications built on Solana generated $257 million in revenue during the quarter, keeping the network ahead of every Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchain for the 9th consecutive quarter.

Developer activity and user demand remained strong across the ecosystem despite increasing competition from other networks.

Transaction Activity Hits New Records Solana's transaction activity reached new all-time highs across every major timeframe. Daily, weekly, and monthly transaction counts all set new records during Q2.

The network increased its share of total blockchain transactions to 59%, the highest level in 11 months. Quarterly transaction activity reached roughly 9.8 billion non-vote transactions, reflecting sustained growth in onchain usage.

Perpetual Futures Trading Surges Perpetual futures trading on Solana reached another milestone, with quarterly notional volume climbing to a record $183 billion. Competition among decentralized perp DEXs intensified throughout the quarter. GMTrade emerged as the largest contributor to quarterly volume, followed by Pacifica and Jupiter, also contributed meaningful activity.

GMTrade's rapid expansion built on momentum that began earlier in the year. By May, the platform had surpassed $40 million in TVL, processed more than $50 billion in cumulative trading volume, and generated over $6.58 million in protocol fees.

Phoenix also continued to gain traction despite claims of “kingmaking” by the Solana Foundation. The platform reached a new all-time high in daily trading volume in Q2 and introduced Flight Codes, a feature that allows developers to monetize applications and services built on its markets.

Foundation Stake Continues to Decline The Solana Foundation Delegation Program continued reducing its share of the network's stake. By the end of Q2 2026, Foundation delegated stake had fallen to about $1.6 billion, representing 4.92% of total network stake.

The continued decline reflects the Foundation's ongoing effort to reduce its direct influence over network validation as the validator ecosystem matures.

Taken together, the Q2 2026 metrics point to continued growth across Solana's ecosystem despite poor market ocnditions many participants viewed as the peak of the bear market. If Q2 ultimately proves to have marked the bottom of the present market cycle, these record metrics could provide a foundation for even greater growth in the coming quarters, particularly in tokenized equities trading.

Read More on SolanaFloor Solana Launches Onchain Governance, Giving Stakers a Direct Voice in Protocol Decisions

Grass Farmers Furious with Disappointing Stage 2 Rewards Ahead of Tokenholder Call

Solana Foundation CPO Shares 2026 Outlook For Solana!

Trust Wallet just handed its 220 million users a new security layer, integrating Intercepta’s real-time threat detection technology to flag risky transactions before they get signed.

The partnership is notable not just for its scale but for its timing. Trust Wallet suffered a browser extension breach in December 2025 that resulted in roughly $7 million in losses. Adding Intercepta’s screening is a direct response to the kind of threat that already cost its users real money.

What Intercepta actually does Intercepta, which rebranded from its previous identity as Web3 Antivirus, operates as infrastructure-level security rather than a consumer-facing product. It plugs into wallets and platforms behind the scenes, running risk analysis on transactions before users ever hit “confirm.”

The company offers six core modules: threat detection, signing simulation, risk and compliance screening, automation rules, and continuous monitoring. It watches what’s happening onchain in real time, simulates what a transaction will actually do, checks it against known threats, and flags anything suspicious, all in under one second of processing time.

Advertisement

Intercepta claims a false positive rate below 0.001%. False positives in security systems are the reason people disable their antivirus software. A near-zero false positive rate means the warnings carry weight when they actually appear.

The platform monitors more than 100,000 threats daily across its supported blockchains.

A security infrastructure play across major wallets Trust Wallet isn’t Intercepta’s first major integration. The company already provides security infrastructure for MetaMask, which has over 100 million users, and 1inch, the DEX aggregator that has facilitated more than $788 billion in swap volume. Adding Trust Wallet’s 220 million users to that footprint makes Intercepta one of the most widely deployed security layers in the self-custody wallet ecosystem.

The company was founded around 2022 by Alexei Dulub, and its trajectory from a niche Web3 security tool to a platform embedded in the three largest wallet and trading interfaces in crypto has been remarkably quiet.

Trust Wallet’s December 2025 incident is a case study in why proactive screening matters. That $7 million loss came through a browser extension vulnerability, exactly the kind of attack vector that transaction simulation and threat detection are designed to catch before funds move.

What this means for investors and the broader market The self-custody wallet sector is entering an era where security is table stakes, not a differentiator. When the three largest wallet platforms—MetaMask, Trust Wallet, and the interfaces connected through 1inch—all run the same underlying threat detection infrastructure, the baseline expectation for transaction safety rises across the entire industry.

The risk to watch is concentration. If a single security provider underpins transaction screening for 300 million-plus wallet users across multiple platforms, a vulnerability in that provider’s system becomes a systemic risk for the entire ecosystem.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

The Arbitrum Foundation just put a $43.5 million price tag on keeping the lights on through 2027. The formal governance proposal, submitted on May 22, requests $16 million in real-world assets and stablecoins, 1,740 ETH, and 230 million ARB tokens to fund everything from core infrastructure to ecosystem development.

Here’s the thing: the Arbitrum DAO only generated $23.49 million in gross profit during 2025. Asking for roughly 1.85 times your annual revenue to cover next year’s expenses is, to put it mildly, a conversation starter.

The numbers that matter The Foundation projects $27.6 million in operating expenses for 2027, plus an additional 244.9 million ARB tokens earmarked for various costs. More than half of the budget, about 54%, goes toward technical infrastructure, security, and hosting for the Arbitrum One and Nova networks.

Advertisement

The 2025 revenue of $23.49 million came from transaction fees, a mechanism called Timeboost, and expansion programs. One DeFi analyst flagged that the Foundation would effectively be operating at approximately 2.3 times its 2025 revenue level if the proposal passes.

An on-chain vote is scheduled to begin on June 8, giving ARB token holders the final say. This funding request goes beyond the initial AIP 1.1 allocation, meaning the Foundation is coming back to the well for more than originally planned.

Why Offchain Labs looms large Buried in the proposal is a detail that adds urgency to the timeline. Offchain Labs, the primary developer behind Arbitrum’s core technology, has its current funding arrangement through the Foundation set to expire in January 2027. Without a new deal, the team building the actual protocol could theoretically need to seek DAO funding directly.

The Foundation positions itself as a cost center designed to let the DAO maximize revenue, handling operational work so the broader ecosystem can focus on generating value.

Growth metrics vs. financial reality Daily transactions on Arbitrum have increased over 270% since early 2023, and the network’s stablecoin supply has tripled over the same period.

The 230 million ARB tokens requested represent meaningful dilution pressure. When a DAO allocates hundreds of millions of its native token for operational expenses, those tokens eventually hit the market in some form, whether through direct spending, grant distributions, or contractor payments.

The 2.3x revenue-to-expense ratio is the number to watch. If Arbitrum’s transaction fee revenue scales meaningfully through 2027, possibly driven by that 270% transaction growth trend, the spending could look prescient. If revenue flatlines or L2 fee compression continues across the industry, this proposal could become exhibit A in a case study about DAO fiscal discipline.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Hyperliquid Adds GRAM Perps After Sustained Community Requests@HyperliquidX has officially listed $GRAM perpetual futures, allowing traders to go long or short on the asset with up to 5x leverage. The listing follows a sustained wave of community requests as the token gained volume across major global venues including @Official_Upbit and @Binance.

The move gives traders their first high-performance decentralized venue for hedging $GRAM exposure. Hyperliquid is a Layer 1 blockchain known for its fully onchain order book and perpetual futures exchange, where every order and liquidation is executed and settled transparently onchain.

What Is GRAM and Why Does It Matter NowThe timing of the listing is closely tied to a significant rebrand on @Ton_blockchain. On June 15, 2026, the token formerly known as Toncoin was officially renamed Gram, with the ticker switching from TON to GRAM after a community governance vote passed with 81.22% support. The blockchain itself retains the name The Open Network.

The rebrand was a pure branding update covering name, ticker, and logo only. There was no new contract, no token swap, and no migration step of any kind. All $TON balances converted to $GRAM automatically at a 1:1 ratio, with no action required from holders.

The name Gram carries historical weight. The Gram rename is step four of Pavel Durov's Make TON Great Again roadmap, with Telegram now serving as the network's primary operator and largest validator. Gram was the original token name chosen in TON's 2018 whitepaper before U.S. regulatory pressure forced the project to pause and restructure under community leadership.

With $GRAM now trading at scale across centralized venues and the rebrand fully live, Hyperliquid's listing provides a decentralized derivatives layer for traders seeking to hedge or speculate on the asset without relying on custodial infrastructure.

Sources
Hyperliquid overview, CoinMarketCap
GRAM rebrand guide, MEXC News
Toncoin to GRAM rebrand explained, SpotedCrypto

US-based artificial intelligence data center company Hyperscale Data has announced the addition of 67 more Bitcoin to its reserves. With this latest purchase—which took place between June 30 and July 1—the company’s total Bitcoin holdings have now increased to 849 BTC. That makes Hyperscale Data the second most prominent public company acquiring Bitcoin in July, coming just behind Metaplanet.

Headquartered in Las Vegas, Hyperscale Data has moved up to 49th place among publicly traded companies holding Bitcoin, following its most recent acquisition. With this latest purchase, the company has surpassed Ming Shing Group, Yueda Digital Holdings, and SOS Limited in listed Bitcoin reserves.

The company’s management has positioned Bitcoin as a core asset on its balance sheet. Milton Todd Ault III, Executive Chairman of the Board, stated that Hyperscale Data plans to continue steadily accumulating Bitcoin via a disciplined dollar-cost averaging approach in order to maximize long-term returns for the company.

Milton Todd Ault III emphasized that the company aims to maintain its disciplined dollar-cost averaging strategy for Bitcoin acquisitions, as this approach is expected to strengthen Hyperscale Data’s long-term potential.

As an enterprise investing in AI-focused data center infrastructure, Hyperscale Data’s latest Bitcoin purchase comes right after a separate, recently announced addition of 53.54 BTC made just two days earlier. At the time of that statement, the company’s total reserves had climbed to 780.48 BTC.

Stock performance and asset valuation debateIn its announcement dated June 30, the company revealed that the combined value of its Bitcoin, cash, restricted cash, and silver assets was approximately $106.7 million. On that date, this figure amounted to roughly 117% of Hyperscale Data’s common stock market capitalization.

Milton Todd Ault III pointed to these figures as evidence that investors currently undervalue Hyperscale Data. He argued that the market cap of the company’s common shares does not fully reflect the value of its declared assets, operations, or the significant opportunity created by a major service contract at its Michigan-based AI data center.

Milton Todd Ault III stated that the company’s market capitalization does not accurately represent its reported assets, operations, or the scale of opportunities arising from the Michigan AI data center agreement.

According to Yahoo Finance, GPUS shares are trading at $0.1529, giving Hyperscale Data a market capitalization of $53.212 million. The company recently signed a computing power agreement with a California-based neocloud provider. Management projects this contract could generate up to $1.2 billion in revenue.

On the same day, Metaplanet also announced it had acquired 2,823 BTC as of July 1. This brought Metaplanet’s total Bitcoin holdings to 43,000 BTC, propelling the company to third place among public firms with the largest Bitcoin reserves—surpassing MARA Holdings.

Data from Bitcoin Treasuries shows that total Bitcoin held by public companies now stands at 1.268 million BTC, representing a 0.6% increase over the last 30 days. Despite this rise in holdings, the price of Bitcoin fell more than 10% in the same period. At a price of $61,809, the total value of public companies’ Bitcoin reserves stands at approximately $78.4 billion.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Ripple spent $1.25 billion to buy a prime broker that clears trillions of dollars a year, then wired it into the XRP Ledger and RLUSD. Here is what a prime broker actually does, what Ripple Prime offers, and whether any of it reaches XRP.

Summary

Ripple Prime is Ripple’s institutional prime brokerage arm, built from its $1.25 billion acquisition of Hidden Road, offering clearing, financing, and trading across digital assets, foreign exchange, derivatives, swaps, and fixed income. A prime broker is the plumbing behind professional trading: it gives hedge funds and trading firms one account for execution, clearing, settlement, financing, and custody, with cross-margining that improves capital efficiency. The acquisition made Ripple the first crypto company to own and operate a global, multi-asset prime broker, and the business has grown roughly threefold since the deal was announced. Ripple has wired its own products into the platform: RLUSD is used as collateral, some derivatives clients hold balances in it, and Ripple plans to move post-trade activity onto the XRP Ledger. For XRP the token, the benefit is indirect and unproven, because Ripple Prime is institutional infrastructure, not a retail venue, and the token has not tracked the platform’s growth. Table of Contents

First, what is a prime broker?From Hidden Road to Ripple Prime: the $1.25 billion dealWhat Ripple Prime actually doesRLUSD as collateral: the cross-margining hookThe XRP Ledger connectionWhy Ripple Prime matters for cryptoDoes Ripple Prime actually help XRP?The risks and open questions for Ripple PrimeFrequently Asked Questions Ripple Prime is Ripple’s institutional prime brokerage platform, a one-stop service that lets large trading firms clear, finance, and trade across both traditional and digital assets through a single account. It exists because in 2025 Ripple paid $1.25 billion to acquire Hidden Road, one of the largest non-bank prime brokers in the world, and rebranded it. That deal turned Ripple from a payments and stablecoin company into an operator of the kind of core market infrastructure that hedge funds and banks have relied on for decades. This explainer covers what a prime broker is, how Ripple Prime works, how Ripple has connected it to RLUSD and the XRP Ledger, and the honest answer to the question every XRP holder asks: does it help the token?

First, what is a prime broker? Before Ripple Prime makes sense, the underlying concept has to. A prime broker is a firm that sits behind professional trading operations and bundles together the services those operations need to function. In traditional finance, a hedge fund does not open a separate relationship with every exchange, lender, and custodian it uses. Instead it routes much of that activity through a prime broker, which provides trade execution and access to markets, clearing and settlement of those trades, financing and securities lending so the fund can use leverage, and custody of the assets. The prime broker becomes the single hub through which capital and positions flow.

The reason this matters is capital efficiency. A prime broker can look at all of a client’s positions together and net them, so the client posts collateral against the combined risk of the book instead of against each trade in isolation. This is called cross-margining, and it frees up capital that would otherwise sit idle backing individual positions. A fund running many strategies at once can therefore do more with the same balance sheet. Prime brokers also extend credit, letting clients borrow to amplify positions, and manage the risk of that credit in real time.

In short, prime brokers are the professional-grade infrastructure that makes large-scale, multi-strategy trading possible. They bring credibility, credit, and operational scale, the things institutions expect from legacy finance. For years, crypto largely lacked a prime broker of this caliber, which was one reason big institutions hesitated to trade digital assets at scale. Filling that gap is exactly what Ripple set out to do.

Ripple did not build a prime broker from scratch. It bought one. In April 2025, at Paris Blockchain Week, Ripple announced an agreement to acquire Hidden Road for $1.25 billion, one of the largest deals the digital-asset industry had seen. Hidden Road was a fast-growing non-bank prime broker that cleared roughly $3 trillion a year across markets and served more than 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, and major liquidity providers. Ripple had been an investor in Hidden Road and a customer of its platform, so it knew the business from the inside before buying it.

The acquisition closed in October 2025, and Hidden Road was immediately rebranded as Ripple Prime. The move made Ripple the first crypto company to own and operate a global, multi-asset prime broker, giving it a financing and clearing engine of a type that had previously belonged only to traditional financial firms. Ripple committed to inject significant capital into the business to expand its capacity, and by its own account the platform grew roughly threefold in activity between the announcement and the close. Hidden Road founder Marc Asch stayed on to work alongside Ripple leadership through the integration.

The strategic logic was that core infrastructure is what unlocks the next phase of institutional crypto adoption. Payments and custody move value and store it, but a prime broker is where institutions actually trade and finance positions at scale. By owning one, Ripple positioned itself to sit at the center of institutional digital-asset activity instead of at the edges, and to bring its own assets, XRP and the RLUSD stablecoin, into that flow.

What Ripple Prime actually does Ripple Prime offers the full prime-brokerage stack across an unusually broad range of markets. Its services span clearing, prime brokerage, and financing across foreign exchange, digital assets, precious metals, exchange-traded derivatives, over-the-counter swaps, and fixed income repo. Clients can access markets through over-the-counter desks, sponsored access, and direct market access, with real-time risk management, cross-margining across their positions, and risk-based margin financing. That breadth is the point: an institution can manage exposures across traditional and digital assets from one platform instead of stitching together many providers.

In November 2025, shortly after the deal closed, Ripple launched digital-asset spot prime brokerage for the United States market under the Ripple Prime brand. This let US-based institutional clients execute over-the-counter spot transactions across dozens of major digital assets, including XRP and RLUSD, and cross-margin those spot positions alongside swaps and exchange-listed futures and options. It combined Ripple’s regulatory licenses with Hidden Road’s prime-brokerage infrastructure into a single US offering, complementing the derivatives services the platform already ran.

The platform has kept adding connectivity. Ripple Prime enabled support for Hyperliquid, a high-performance decentralized derivatives protocol, letting institutional clients reach on-chain derivatives liquidity while cross-margining their decentralized-finance exposure against all other asset classes on the platform. That combination, a regulated institutional prime broker reaching directly into on-chain markets, is a concrete example of the bridge between traditional finance and decentralized finance that Ripple describes as its goal.

RLUSD as collateral: the cross-margining hook One of the most important features of Ripple Prime is how it uses RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin. RLUSD is being used as collateral across a range of prime-brokerage products, and Ripple has positioned it as the first stablecoin to enable efficient cross-margining between digital assets and traditional markets. In practice, an institution can post RLUSD as margin and have it recognized across both its crypto and its traditional exposures, which is exactly the kind of capital efficiency prime brokers exist to provide.

Adoption of this feature has been concrete instead of theoretical. Some derivatives customers have chosen to hold their balances in RLUSD, and Ripple expects that to grow. RLUSD has been approved as margin collateral on the OKX exchange across more than 280 trading pairs, and Ripple Prime clients can trade Bitcoin options on the Bullish exchange using RLUSD as collateral. To support the stablecoin’s institutional credibility, Bank of New York Mellon serves as the primary reserve custodian of RLUSD, a signal aimed squarely at the compliance expectations of large institutions.

The reason this matters is that it gives RLUSD a real institutional job to do. Many stablecoins circulate mostly among crypto traders; RLUSD, through Ripple Prime, is being embedded into the margin and settlement plumbing that professional firms use. That is a more durable form of demand than speculative trading, because it ties the stablecoin to the operational needs of institutions rather than to market sentiment. It is also the clearest way that Ripple Prime strengthens one of Ripple’s own products, as distinct from the broader industry.

The XRP Ledger connection Ripple has also linked Ripple Prime to the XRP Ledger, the blockchain whose native asset is XRP. The plan Ripple has described is to migrate parts of Hidden Road’s post-trade activity, the clearing and settlement that happens after a trade is agreed, onto the XRP Ledger. The goal is to streamline settlement and lower operational costs, while showcasing the ledger as institutional-grade infrastructure for decentralized finance. If that migration proceeds at scale, real institutional settlement volume would run across the XRP Ledger.

That connection took a further step through traditional clearing infrastructure. Ripple Prime, still listed under the Hidden Road name in the relevant notice, was integrated into the participant directory of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation’s National Securities Clearing Corporation, the backbone of US securities clearing. Ripple’s chief technology officer at the time flagged the development as significant, because it connects a crypto-owned prime broker to the same clearing rails that settle Wall Street’s equity trades. Ripple Prime also received an investment-grade rating from Kroll in April 2026, a distinction Ripple says no other crypto-affiliated prime broker holds, which opens the door to conservative institutions such as pension funds, banks, and insurers.

Taken together, these moves position the XRP Ledger and RLUSD as pieces of institutional market infrastructure instead of purely retail crypto assets. The migration of post-trade activity, the DTCC connection, and the investment-grade rating are all steps toward embedding Ripple’s technology into the machinery of regulated finance. Whether that machinery ends up generating meaningful demand for XRP the token is a separate question, and an important one.

Why Ripple Prime matters for crypto Zooming out, Ripple Prime matters because it imports a missing layer of financial infrastructure into digital assets. Crypto has never lacked exchanges or wallets, but it has lacked a large, credible, multi-asset prime broker of the kind institutions take for granted in traditional markets. By acquiring one that already cleared trillions of dollars a year and serving 300-plus institutional clients, Ripple gave the industry a bridge between the way hedge funds and banks already operate and the way digital assets trade and settle.

For Ripple itself, the deal marked a transformation. The company had been known primarily for cross-border payments and, more recently, for its RLUSD stablecoin and custody services. Ripple Prime added institutional trading and financing to that stack, so Ripple now spans payments, custody, a stablecoin, and a prime broker. That makes it one of the more vertically integrated firms in crypto, able to offer institutions a connected suite instead of a single product. It also gives Ripple multiple ways to weave XRP and RLUSD into institutional workflows.

The broader significance is about legitimacy. Institutional adoption of digital assets has been held back partly by the absence of familiar, trusted infrastructure. A prime broker with an investment-grade rating, a connection to DTCC clearing, and bank-grade custody speaks the language institutions understand. If Ripple Prime succeeds, it lowers a real barrier to large-scale institutional participation in crypto, which is a meaningful development regardless of what happens to any single token’s price.

Does Ripple Prime actually help XRP? Here is the question that matters most to XRP holders, and it deserves a straight answer instead of a hopeful one. The connection between Ripple Prime and XRP is infrastructure-driven, not retail-facing. Ripple Prime is a service for institutions; it does not change how ordinary users buy or trade XRP, which still happens on exchanges. The potential benefit to XRP is indirect: if institutional settlement volume grows on the XRP Ledger through Ripple Prime, that could raise network usage, and XRP, as the ledger’s native asset used for transaction fees and liquidity, might see more demand over time.

The trouble is that this benefit has not shown up in the token’s price. Over the year following the acquisition, Ripple Prime delivered on its roadmap, earning an investment-grade rating, launching US spot prime brokerage, and integrating RLUSD as collateral, while XRP fell rather than rose. The token dropped sharply even as the platform executed, which underlines a recurring pattern with Ripple news: the company’s commercial progress and the token’s price are only loosely connected. Much of the value Ripple Prime creates accrues to Ripple the company, to RLUSD, and to the institutions using the platform, not automatically to XRP.

That does not mean Ripple Prime is irrelevant to XRP. The post-trade migration to the XRP Ledger, if it reaches scale, is a genuine potential channel of demand, and a maturing institutional ecosystem around the ledger could matter over a long horizon. But the honest framing is that Ripple Prime is a strong development for Ripple and its institutional ambitions, an indirect and unproven one for XRP, and no substitute for the broad demand that actually moves the token. As with most Ripple news, the wise approach is to separate the company’s execution from the token’s price and to watch for real ledger usage rather than announcements.

The risks and open questions for Ripple Prime For all its promise, Ripple Prime is not a finished story, and a balanced view has to weigh what could go wrong or fail to materialize. The first question is integration. Merging a large prime broker into a crypto company is complex, and the value of the deal depends on combining Hidden Road’s infrastructure and client relationships with Ripple’s licenses, custody, and stablecoin without friction. Integrations of this size take time, and the benefits Ripple describes assume the two businesses knit together smoothly.

Prime brokerage itself carries inherent risks that Ripple now owns. A prime broker extends credit and holds client assets, which means it takes on counterparty and credit risk: if a large client fails or a market move is violent enough, the broker can be exposed. Managing that risk in real time is the core discipline of the business, and it is why prime brokers live or die on their risk engines and capital buffers. The business is also cyclical, tied to trading volumes and market conditions that rise and fall, so revenue is not guaranteed to grow in a straight line.

Competition is intensifying as well. Other crypto-native firms and incumbent traditional players are building or expanding their own institutional prime services, so Ripple Prime has to win and keep clients in a crowded field. Its differentiators, an investment-grade rating, a connection to traditional clearing, and the integration of RLUSD, are meaningful, but competitors will not stand still, and institutions can multi-home across several prime brokers.

The largest open question for XRP holders specifically is execution on the XRP Ledger. Ripple has said it plans to migrate post-trade activity onto the ledger, but plans and delivery are different things. The scale, timing, and real economic impact of that migration remain to be seen, and much of the token-level thesis rests on it actually happening at volume. Until the ledger is carrying meaningful institutional settlement, the connection between Ripple Prime’s growth and XRP demand stays more potential than proven. None of this makes Ripple Prime a weak business; it makes it a young one whose full impact, on Ripple and on XRP, will be judged over years, not announcements.

Frequently Asked Questions What is Ripple Prime in simple terms? Ripple Prime is Ripple’s institutional prime brokerage platform. It gives large trading firms and institutions a single service for clearing, financing, and trading across digital assets, foreign exchange, derivatives, swaps, and fixed income. It was created when Ripple acquired the prime broker Hidden Road for $1.25 billion in 2025 and rebranded it. It is built for professional institutions, not retail traders.

What is a prime broker? A prime broker is a firm that bundles the services professional traders need into one relationship: trade execution and market access, clearing and settlement, financing and lending for leverage, and custody. Its key advantage is cross-margining, which lets a client post collateral against the combined risk of all their positions instead of each trade separately, freeing up capital and improving efficiency.

How much did Ripple pay for Hidden Road? Ripple agreed to acquire Hidden Road for $1.25 billion, announced in April 2025 and closed in October 2025. Hidden Road was a non-bank prime broker that cleared roughly $3 trillion a year across markets and served more than 300 institutional clients. After closing, Ripple rebranded it as Ripple Prime, becoming the first crypto company to own and operate a global, multi-asset prime broker.

How does Ripple Prime use RLUSD? RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin, is used as collateral across Ripple Prime’s products, positioned as the first stablecoin to enable cross-margining between digital assets and traditional markets. Some derivatives clients hold balances in RLUSD, it is approved as margin collateral on OKX across 280-plus pairs, and Ripple Prime clients can trade Bitcoin options on Bullish using RLUSD. Bank of New York Mellon is its primary reserve custodian.

Does Ripple Prime run on the XRP Ledger? Not entirely, but Ripple plans to migrate parts of the platform’s post-trade activity, its clearing and settlement, onto the XRP Ledger to lower costs and showcase the ledger for institutional use. Ripple Prime has also been integrated into the DTCC’s securities clearing directory and received an investment-grade rating from Kroll, steps that position the ledger and RLUSD within regulated financial infrastructure.

Is Ripple Prime good for the XRP price? The benefit to XRP is indirect and, so far, unproven. Ripple Prime is institutional infrastructure, not a retail venue, so it does not change how people trade XRP. If settlement volume grows on the XRP Ledger through the platform, XRP demand could rise over time. But XRP fell during the year Ripple Prime executed its roadmap, showing how loosely Ripple’s progress and the token’s price are connected.

How is Ripple Prime different from a crypto exchange? An exchange is a venue where users, including retail traders, buy and sell assets directly. A prime broker sits behind professional institutions, providing credit, clearing, settlement, custody, and cross-margining across many venues and asset classes. Ripple Prime serves hedge funds, trading firms, and other institutions with portfolio-level financing and risk management, not everyday retail trading. The two operate at different layers of the market.

Why does Ripple Prime matter for crypto? It imports a missing layer of financial infrastructure into digital assets. Institutions rely on prime brokers in traditional markets, and crypto had lacked a large, credible one. By acquiring Hidden Road, Ripple gave the industry an investment-grade prime broker connected to traditional clearing rails and bank-grade custody, lowering a real barrier to institutional participation and transforming Ripple into a firm spanning payments, custody, a stablecoin, and prime brokerage.

Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Details of Ripple Prime’s services and integrations may change over time. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. Information is accurate as of July 2, 2026, and may change.

The XRP community has been warned of a fake OUSD stablecoin scam on the XRP Ledger. This comes as on the XRPL, a suspicious wallet claiming to be the new stablecoin Open USD (OUSD) has emerged. It is a cause for concern among validators, who suspect it is a scam.

XRP Ledger Validators Flag OUSD Scam On The Network GrimmReaper, who is a validator operator on the XRP Ledger, posted a screenshot of his transaction-monitoring tool on Bithomp. The snapshot shows a page name that he detected was a new issuer using the “Open Standard” name and this triggered the alert.

Moreover, they have a website linked to their account: joinopenstandard.netlify.app. They also have an XRP Ledger address that has been recently activated.

There are also several red flags on the Bithomp screenshot that typically accompany crypto scams. The ads above the account promote “Earn 12% on XRP” and “Play Slots and win 70,000 XRP” and are typical of those that attract unwary players to bogus schemes.

Sharing the image on X, GrimmReaper wrote, “We might have our answer about OUSD being on the xrpl if this is legit. What do you guys think, Krippenreiter and Vet?” He added that he runs a tool monitoring transactions received by his validator.

He explained, “I have an app that [watches] my transactions coming into my validator and [makes] it very able to watch for any issuer for a token name so this came up today.”

We might have our answer about OUSD being on the xrpl if this is legit. What do you guys think @krippenreiter and @Vet_X0 ? I have an app that watched my transactions coming into my validator and made it very able to watch for any issuer for a token name so this came up today. pic.twitter.com/tdxgl6KHsq

— GrimmReaper (@jgrimm5) July 2, 2026

However, XRPL dUNL validator Vet responded by urging the community not to trust the issuer.

“[It’s] a scam and always is a scam by default until you get people to confirm from Open USD that this is their issuer,” Vet responded. The XRP Ledger validator also said that he is a valid issuer and they should have verifiable confirmation from both parties, but here they don’t. Vet added, “We always need a 2 way pointer. Issuer address points to Project and Project points to Issuer address. This is not the case here.”

Already, the XRPL v3.2.0 upgrade is registering complaints of several bugs. Hence, such potential scams seem to be exacerbating the situation.

About The OUSD Stablecoin Launch The XRP Ledger validators’ warning comes on the heels of OUSD Stablecoin launch on June 30 by the Open Standard consortium. It boasts backing from over 140 companies, including Ripple, Visa, Mastercard, BNY, Standard Chartered, BlackRock, Google, Shopify, Coinbase and Solana.

The consortium claims that OUSD will allow businesses to mint and redeem the stablecoin without any fees or set volume limits. It also will return money generated from reserves to partners participating in the consortium with a small management fee. Moreover, it will have governance shared by each partner in the consortium.

The announcement has garnered attention in the XRP ecosystem, as Ripple is among the founding participants. This could have made OUSD a potential target for bad actors to take advantage of by using fake issuer accounts on the XRP Ledger.

Ethereum (ETH) has rebounded from its recent lows, but the recovery may not be enough to reverse a prolonged exodus from spot Ethereum ETFs, highlighting a growing disconnect between the cryptocurrency’s price action and institutional investor sentiment.

ETH has climbed back above the psychologically important $1,500 level and was recently trading in the $1,600-$1,620 range after briefly dipping to around $1,500. However, Simon-Peter Massabni, Head of Business Development at global multi-asset broker XS.com, cautioned that the move appears to be more of a technical rebound than the beginning of a sustained rally.

“The current rebound is still not enough to confirm a clear reversal,” Massabni said. “Instead, it mainly appears to be a corrective move after selling pressure had persisted for several sessions.”

ETF Flows Remain the Biggest HeadwindWhile Ethereum’s price has stabilized, spot Ethereum ETFs continue to paint a less encouraging picture.

According to Massabni, the funds have logged seven consecutive weeks of net outflows totaling roughly $1.18 billion, underscoring continued institutional caution toward the second-largest cryptocurrency. If withdrawals continue this week, Ethereum ETFs would extend their losing streak to eight straight weeks.

“Spot Ethereum ETFs have faced seven consecutive weeks of net outflows, with the total value reaching around $1.18 billion, clearly reflecting institutional investors’ cautious stance toward ETH,” he said.

The persistent outflows stand in sharp contrast to the optimism surrounding the launch of spot Ethereum ETFs, which many market participants expected would unlock a fresh wave of institutional demand, similar to the record inflows seen in spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Instead, Ethereum funds have struggled to establish sustained momentum as investors remain selective amid elevated interest rates, macroeconomic uncertainty and mixed sentiment across digital assets.

Macro Environment Still Weighs on CryptoMassabni believes the broader macro backdrop continues to limit risk appetite.

“The macro backdrop is still not truly supportive of risk assets,” he said, pointing to uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate path. “In an environment where interest rates may stay higher for longer, capital tends to be more cautious toward highly volatile assets such as cryptocurrencies.”

He added that weak ETF demand has become a key signal of institutional positioning.

“The lack of positive ETF flows reflects cautious sentiment among large investors and reduces ETH’s short-term appeal compared with initial expectations,” Massabni said.

Ethereum also remains closely tied to broader crypto market sentiment, with Bitcoin yet to establish a decisive upward trend. As a result, ETH could struggle to outperform independently unless market conditions improve.

What Could Turn the Tide?Massabni said ETF flows may ultimately determine whether Ethereum’s rebound develops into a sustained recovery.

“If ETH manages to stay above the $1,500 area and ETF flows show signs of stabilizing, price could continue to recover toward higher zones around $1,700-$1,800,” he said.

However, he warned that renewed macro pressure or continued investor withdrawals from spot Ethereum ETFs could send the cryptocurrency back toward the $1,500 support level. A decisive break below that threshold, he added, could extend the broader downtrend before the market finds a new equilibrium.

Image: Shutterstock

This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

Charles Hoskinson has pushed back against criticism surrounding Cardano’s absence from the Open USD (OUSD) stablecoin consortium.

During a recent exchange on X, Hoskinson argued that ecosystem participants cannot criticize Cardano’s lack of involvement in major commercial initiatives while simultaneously voting against proposals specifically designed to create those opportunities.

Hoskinson’s remarks came in response to criticism from prominent Cardano DRep YODA. The DRep questioned why major Cardano-related organizations, including EMURGO, Cardano Foundation, and Input Output Global (IOG), were absent from the newly formed Open USD Consortium.

Notably, the consortium includes more than 140 institutional partners, among them Ripple, Mastercard, OKX, MoonPay, and Visa.

Hoskinson Calls for Governance Accountability In response, Hoskinson stressed that governance participants must accept responsibility for the consequences of their voting decisions. According to him, the development teams invested hundreds of hours designing proposals intended to accelerate Cardano’s commercialization efforts. However, once those proposals entered the governance process, DReps voted them down.

“We put hundreds of hours, carefully proposing direct routes to commercialize Cardano. We brought it to a vote. You voted against it,” the Carano founder noted. 

Hoskinson added that he does not care about the reasons behind those decisions because DReps ultimately own the outcome of their votes.

“I don’t care about your reasons. You own the vote,” he remarked. 

Commercial Partnerships Require More Than Membership: Hoskinson  Meanwhile, Hoskinson argued that joining initiatives such as the Open USD Consortium is relatively straightforward. The more difficult challenge, he said, involves deploying capital and building the financial infrastructure necessary to support those partnerships.

As part of that effort, he pointed to his proposal for a managed sovereign wealth fund capable of providing liquidity, minting stablecoins, and financing ecosystem growth initiatives. Hoskinson also highlighted several projects that he believes form the commercial backbone of the Cardano ecosystem, including RealFi, Midnight, Blockfrost, and Pogan.

According to him, these initiatives provide the infrastructure upon which larger commercial integrations can be built. 

Governance Tensions Continue Across the Ecosystem The latest dispute further highlights the governance tensions that have dominated much of the year within the Cardano ecosystem.

The disagreements contributed to the cancellation of several IOG funding proposals, including research and development funding for Blockfrost and the Cardano Summit 2026.

Amid the ongoing debate, Hoskinson recently advocated for governance reforms. His proposals include moving Cardano governance discussions to a moderated Discord server, becoming a DRep himself to participate directly in voting and improve accountability, and revising the ecosystem’s constitution. 

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

The US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned 134 cryptocurrency wallet addresses identified as belonging to ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), which has been a Specially Designated Global Terrorist since September 2015.

The wallet addresses were added to the OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list on Wednesday, which includes individuals, entities and digital asset addresses linked to terrorism, narcotics trafficking and other illicit activity.

Stablecoin issuer Tether has frozen the balances associated with 131 Tron addresses, while the remaining three sanctioned addresses were on the Monero network, blockchain forensics company Chainalysis said in a Wednesday report.

The development comes over a week after the OFAC’s previous round of sanctions against ISIS-supporting financiers using cryptocurrency. On June 22, the OFAC sanctioned three individuals and six entities across Europe, the Middle East and West Africa, including Syria-based MSB Bitcoin Xchange and Turkish MSB Spider.

OFAC said the previous round of sanctions targeted “key facilitators who enable ISIS to move funds among its regional affiliates.”

OFAC update to SDN list, new wallets included. Source: OFAC

131 wallets linked to ISIS-K received $1.4 million in donationsISIS-K has historically solicited crypto through donation campaigns on various websites and messaging platforms, Chainalysis said.

The report said that the 131 Tron addresses in the latest round of sanctions received over $1.4 million in crypto donations since 2023 and sent over $880,000.

Network of ISIS-K funding entities sanctioned by OFAC. Source: Chainalysis

Chainalysis identified multiple such donation addresses used by the group on Tron, Monero and the Bitcoin network. It found significant exposure to mainstream services, including some wallets that sent funds to Syria-based cryptocurrency exchanges.

Blockchain analytics tools are playing an increasingly prominent role in financial sanctions targeting illicit activity.

Earlier in April, blockchain intelligence company TRM Labs said that onchain evidence was key to securing the conviction of three individuals for terrorism financing in Indonesia in 2024 and 2025.

“Indonesian courts have demonstrated that cryptocurrency evidence — wallet addresses, transaction histories, on-chain flows — is not only admissible but can anchor a terrorism financing prosecution,” TRM said in a statement.

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

TRON could be emerging as one of the strongest Layer 1 contenders heading into Q3.

From a technical perspective, TRX closed June down 10.35%, largely in line with the broader market’s risk-off move that erased $500 billion from the market. Even so, its relative strength stood out.

Despite Solana benefiting from renewed interest in tokenized assets following the SPCX launch, TRX still outperformed SOL.

That resilience becomes even more compelling when viewed alongside TRON’s on-chain data. As the chart below shows, the network processed 385.77 million transactions and recorded 26.97 million active accounts in June, both new monthly records, according to Lookonchain.

Source: X Notably, the momentum was just as evident on a daily basis. 

On the 10th of June, TRON processed 14.55 million transactions and recorded 5.8 million active accounts, both all-time daily highs, according to Tronscan. With activity reaching record levels across the board, many in the market are calling June Tron’s “strongest month” on record. 

And it doesn’t look like a one-off spike.

According to DeFiLlama, TRON [TRX] has once again pulled ahead of Ethereum [ETH] in USDT transfer volume. The network now hosts over $86 billion in USDT, more than any other blockchain, reinforcing Tron’s role as one of crypto’s largest settlement layers. 

With the market starting to tilt back into a risk-on phase, TRON looks well-positioned to extend this momentum into the second half of the year.

In that context, Tron’s recent quantum upgrade also stands out as a forward-looking move, strengthening its positioning among competing L1s as the cycle develops. 

Quantum resistance adds a new layer to TRON’s utility story  As a Layer 1 network, TRON’s growth is no longer just about on-chain activity.

The focus is shifting toward long-term security, with quantum resistance becoming a major trend across L1s in 2026. Networks like Solana [SOL] have already sparked interest with their post-quantum roadmap.

TRON now looks to be following the same direction. 

Notably, the TRON Nile Testnet has launched GreatVoyage-v4.8.2-PQ1-build1, adding support for post-quantum signatures. The upgrade includes Falcon-512 and ML-DSA-44, covering transactions, block production, node communication, and contract verification. It is currently live on the Nile Testnet and still needs governance approval before any mainnet rollout.

Source: X From an investor’s point of view, this move signals TRON is getting ahead of the curve on long-term security.

Sure, it’s still in the testnet phase, but the push into post-quantum infrastructure adds a stronger long-term narrative to TRON’s ecosystem. The timing also looks intentional, given TRX’s strong on-chain activity and steady stablecoin flows, which continue to reinforce network usage and demand. 

Hence, TRON’s edge is no longer just about technical. Instead, it’s increasingly tied to its fundamental roadmap as well, putting the network in a relatively strong position heading into H2.

Final Summary

Decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Aave has deployed its V3 lending protocol on Monad, expanding the layer-1 blockchain’s lending ecosystem with support for 12 assets at launch. 

On Thursday, Aave announced that the initial market supports USDT0, USDC, Aave’s GHO stablecoin, USDe, mUSD, AUSD, WETH, cbBTC, wstETH, weETH, syrupUSDC and sUSDe. It is also Aave's first deployment with Chainlink Smart Value Recapture enabled from day one, allowing part of the value generated from liquidations to be redirected back to the protocol.

The deployment expands Aave’s multichain lending network while giving Monad users and developers access to an established borrowing market, Aave’s GHO stablecoin and liquidity incentives intended to support early adoption. 

Monad is compatible with Ethereum’s application environment, allowing existing Solidity contracts and Ethereum tooling to be used with minimal changes, according to Aave’s governance proposal.

Monad's total value locked as of Thursday. Source: DefiLlama

Aave deployment tests Monad’s liquidity ambitions Aave’s governance documents show that the Monad Foundation committed $15 million in incentives during the first 12 months after activation. The foundation also agreed to acquire and retain 10 million GHO for over six months, while Aave DAO committed another 500,000 GHO in incentives to support adoption on Monad.

These incentives could help establish initial liquidity. However, user activity will need to persist after incentives decline. According to a risk assessment by LlamaRisk, Monad’s mainnet launched on Nov. 24, 2025, and had about $359.5 million in total value locked as of June 8. It said early network usage had compressed after a strong start and that liquidity remained concentrated in established protocols.

LlamaRisk supported the deployment with conservative initial parameters, citing Monad’s short operating history.

The launch also comes as institutions increasingly explore bringing tokenized assets into DeFi lending markets. In June, Standard Chartered said that tokenized assets entering DeFi could drive deposits into Aave, whose deposit base reached about $75 billion at its October 2025 peak. 

In April, Centrifuge revealed plans to bring tokenized Treasurys, private credit and AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations to Monad for use in lending, collateral and secondary-market activity. 

Although Centrifuge has not announced that its assets will be integrated into Aave, the deployment gives Monad an established lending venue that could support tokenized assets as its ecosystem develops.

Magazine: China’s 107 Bitcoin memory thief, Bithumb CEO booked: Asia Express

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Securitize began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker SECZ on Thursday and launched a tokenized version of its common stock through its regulated platform.

Securitize is now officially a public company, listed on the @NYSE under the ticker SECZ.

Our focus is unchanged: building the regulated infrastructure for the next generation of capital markets.

To everyone who helped us get here, thank you.

Tokenize the World. pic.twitter.com/XVhjA5udA9

— Securitize (@Securitize) July 2, 2026

The listing follows the completion of Securitize’s business combination with Cantor Equity Partners II. The company has brought more than $4 billion in assets onchain through its tokenization infrastructure.

Advertisement

Eligible investors in the United States will be able to access tokenized SECZ on Avalanche and Solana after completing onboarding, identity verification and jurisdictional eligibility checks.

The tokens are intended to represent the same common stock trading on the NYSE rather than a synthetic product, offshore wrapper or separate share class. Tokenization changes how ownership is recorded and transferred but does not alter the legal nature of the underlying shares or remove applicable transfer restrictions.

Securitize said the rollout makes it the first newly public company to bring its own stock onchain from the start of its life as a listed business. Based on expected shareholder participation, the company also expects SECZ to become the world’s largest tokenized stock.

The launch builds on Securitize’s broader effort to bring public equities onto blockchain infrastructure while preserving direct ownership and shareholder rights. Its platform has previously worked with asset managers including BlackRock, Apollo, KKR and VanEck on tokenized investment products.

Securitize plans to expand the functionality and market infrastructure surrounding tokenized SECZ as its onchain shareholder base develops.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

The way money moves is about to change fundamentally. AI agents, not humans, are increasingly the ones initiating payments.

They are making transactions, executing trades, procuring services, and settling obligations autonomously and at machine speed. The question is no longer whether autonomous payments will happen, but whether the infrastructure behind them will be fit for purpose when they do.

Quant already builds and runs tokenised deposit infrastructure that is interoperable and programmable by design. That is why we have joined the x402 Foundation, hosted by the Linux Foundation.

What is x402?

x402 is an open-source payment protocol designed specifically for machine-to-machine transactions. It provides a standard that allows AI agents, automated services, and software to pay each other directly using stablecoins or other digital tokens, without requiring human approval at each step.

The name references HTTP status code 402: ‘Payment Required.’ Reserved in the original HTTP specification decades ago, it anticipated a future where payments would be native to the internet. x402 is the protocol that finally makes that a reality.

This is familiar territory for Quant. Our heritage is in internet technologies, protocols and security, and our vision has always been to connect the internet to money. In 2016, we helped establish the new technical committee ISO TC307 – Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies, responsible for developing ISO standards. And in 2026, we helped publish ISO 82098 (ISO/TS 23516:2026), the first international standard for blockchain interoperability.

We have led contributions through the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force), building the technical standards at the intersection of finance and the open internet. When foundations form around protocols that matter, Quant is there shaping them.

Connecting the internet to blockchains has been Quant’s mission since our founding in 2015. Joining the x402 Foundation builds on that history, applying the same standards work to the emerging world of autonomous, machine-to-machine payments.

The problem with autonomous payments today

Most autonomous payment infrastructure today operates in a parallel financial system. Stablecoins and crypto-native tokens enable fast, programmable transfers, but they sit outside the regulated banking system. That means they lack the guardrails like deposit protections, settlement finality, and compliance frameworks that institutional finance requires and are there to protect both consumers and money.

For autonomous payments to reach systemic scale, where AI agents are transacting billions across borders on behalf of banks, corporates, and governments, they need to connect to the infrastructure where real economic value moves. A machine-speed payment layer built on unregulated rails will not be adopted by institutions with obligations to regulators, counterparties, and clients.

Where Quant comes in

Major UK banks are already working with Quant through the Great British Tokenised Deposits initiative, building interbank settlement infrastructure with full regulatory compliance and settlement finality. These are not synthetic tokens representing value.

They are commercial bank deposits, tokenised and made programmable, carrying the same trust, protections, and guarantees as traditional interbank payments.

By joining the x402 Foundation, we are connecting these two worlds, internet-native payment protocols and the regulated banking rails that underpin the real economy.

Autonomous agents will settle in tokenised bank money with the compliance, counterparty assurance and settlement certainty that wholesale markets demand, not confined to stablecoins operating outside the banking perimeter. It also closes the risk we have already seen play out, where agents drain wallets in response to a prompt because nothing stands between the instruction and the spend.

Banks authorise transactions and provide safeguards for our money. Agentic AI transactions should be no different, operating within the secure guardrails of bank security and protection.

Fusion: x402-ready from day one

Our Fusion Layer 2.5 multi-ledger roll-up already supports x402 payments out of the box. Fusion apps are designed to deploy in under a day, enabling developers and institutions to have x402-enabled applications running across any public or private network connected to Fusion’s network layer almost immediately.

This is production-ready infrastructure, available now.

Whether the use case is an AI procurement agent settling invoices across jurisdictions, an autonomous trading system executing cross-border FX, or a machine-to-machine micropayment layer for API services, Fusion provides the deployment framework, and Quant’s network provides the institutional connectivity. Currently spanning over 70 networks, that connectivity is available from day one.

Beyond developer tooling

Our decision to join the x402 Foundation goes beyond supporting an open-source protocol. It reflects a considered view that the next generation of payment infrastructure must be interoperable across both internet-native and bank-native inter-bank systems and networks.

The payments industry has spent years discussing programmable money, tokenised assets, and embedded finance. x402 represents the point where those concepts meet a real protocol, with real demand from AI infrastructure behind it. Through Quant, it now has real connectivity to the banking system.

The future of payments is not a choice between decentralised and institutional. It is the interoperability between them. That is what we are building.

Learn more about the x402 Foundation here.

Trust Wallet just made it meaningfully easier to trade perpetual futures from a mobile wallet. Users can now deposit assets directly into their Perps margin accounts from Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, and other supported chains, no third-party bridges, no separate exchange accounts, no KYC in supported regions.

How the direct deposit feature works Users can send supported assets like ETH, BNB, USDC, and SOL directly into their Perps margin account within Trust Wallet’s app. No bridging tokens manually across chains, no copying wallet addresses into separate platforms, no creating accounts on centralized exchanges first.

Once funds land in the margin account, traders can open long or short positions across a broad set of markets. When they close a position, the funds route back to their wallet automatically. The entire flow stays within a self-custodial environment, meaning Trust Wallet never takes control of user assets at any point in the process.

The feature is available in eligible jurisdictions only, and Trust Wallet has included warnings about leverage risks.

Advertisement

The Perps infrastructure behind the scenes Trust Wallet’s perpetual futures offering didn’t appear overnight. The foundation was laid in October 2025, when the wallet integrated with Aster DEX. That initial rollout offered up to 100x leverage across more than 100 markets.

Then came the Hyperliquid integration on April 29, 2026. Hyperliquid brought access to over 200 markets with leverage up to 200x on select pairs. It also introduced deeper liquidity and expanded the asset menu beyond standard crypto tokens to include real-world assets like commodities and precious metals.

The direct deposit capability is essentially the missing piece that ties these integrations together into a cohesive user experience. Before this update, the trading infrastructure was there but funding it required extra steps. Multi-chain deposits remove that bottleneck.

Trust Wallet is also exploring fee discounts for users who trade using Trust Wallet Token (TWT), though the specifics of that program haven’t been fully detailed yet.

What this means for investors Trust Wallet is betting that the future of derivatives trading is self-custodial and mobile. That’s a direct challenge to centralized exchanges like Binance, Bybit, and OKX, which have dominated perpetual futures volume for years. Those platforms require account creation, identity verification, and handing over custody of your funds.

By supporting Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, and potentially other networks, Trust Wallet avoids locking users into a single ecosystem. A trader holding ETH on Arbitrum and USDC on BNB Smart Chain can fund positions from either without first consolidating assets on one chain.

Offering 200x leverage to mobile users with no KYC requirements is a regulatory lightning rod in many jurisdictions. Trust Wallet’s current approach of restricting access by region and displaying risk warnings is the minimum viable compliance strategy. Whether regulators in key markets will consider that sufficient remains an open question, and any enforcement action could disrupt the product’s availability.

For TWT holders specifically, the prospect of trading fee discounts adds a potential demand catalyst. But until the discount structure is confirmed and live, it remains a forward-looking narrative rather than a concrete value driver.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Türkiye-based digital asset platform Paribu has launched DeFi access inside its main app, adding DEX trading, perpetual contracts through Hyperliquid, and Polymarket-linked option markets. 

Summary

Paribu now offers Hyperliquid perpetuals and Polymarket markets through its main self-custodial DeFi app section. The platform opened a waitlist for NYSE, Nasdaq, and Borsa Istanbul stock trading access soon. Paribu says users can trade DeFi products without separate wallet apps, seed phrases, or transfers. The company also opened a waitlist for stock trading as it works to combine crypto, DeFi, yield products, and equities in one app.

Paribu said it is the first regulated exchange to offer both Hyperliquid perpetuals and Polymarket option markets through a centralized exchange interface. Users can access the DeFi section with their existing balance, without a separate wallet app, seed phrase, or new account. The company said each DeFi position remains self-custodial, while trades settle onchain through linked protocols.

DeFi access targets Türkiye’s retail market Paribu framed the launch around Türkiye’s active crypto market. The company cited TRM Labs data showing Türkiye ranked fifth globally in retail crypto activity, with $40 billion in volume in Q1 2026. The figure rose 7% year over year while global retail crypto volume fell 11%.

The company said many local retail users keep their main crypto holdings inside one app and have not used DeFi wallet tools. Paribu’s DeFi access is designed to let these users reach onchain markets without switching platforms. Its blog post on DeFi access says the wallet setup uses passkeys and recovery tools instead of seed phrases.

Hyperliquid and Polymarket enter the app The Hyperliquid integration lets Paribu users trade perpetual contracts from the DeFi section of the app. Trades route to Hyperliquid’s decentralized blockchain, while positions remain in users’ self-custodial wallets. Paribu said Hyperliquid has processed more than $4 trillion in cumulative trading volume.

The launch follows wider activity around Hyperliquid. As reported by crypto.news, Kalshi launched CFTC-regulated HYPE perpetual futures, lifting HYPE futures open interest to $2.48 billion. Moreover, crypto.news reported thatHyperliquid added validator-settled outcome markets under HIP-4, expanding beyond perpetual futures.

Paribu also added access to Polymarket markets through the same DeFi section. The company said it will list curated markets only, with each contract reviewed for integrity, liquidity, and risk profile before appearing in the app. Paribu serves as the interface, while execution and settlement happen onchain through Polymarket infrastructure.

The rollout comes as prediction markets face closer review in several jurisdictions. As crypto.news reported, the CFTC is preparing new rules that could affect Polymarket and Kalshi. Crypto.news also reported that the CFTC sued Kentucky to block state action against Kalshi, Polymarket, and related partners.

Stock trading remains pending Paribu is also preparing to offer equities. Its brokerage arm has received establishment authorization from Türkiye’s Capital Markets Board and is waiting for an operating license. The company said NYSE, Nasdaq, and Borsa Istanbul stocks will become tradable after the license process is complete.

For now, users can view real-time market data for U.S. and Turkish stocks inside the app. Paribu said the stock waitlist is open before trading goes live. Founder and CEO Yasin Oral said, “Paribu is becoming a single app for all of finance: crypto, DeFi, equities, and yield.”

The expansion follows other Paribu moves. Previously, crypto.news reported that Paribu’s $240 million CoinMENA acquisition led a weekly crypto funding period in December 2025. The company has also said Clave joined Paribu in 2026 to support passkey-based account abstraction and self-custody tools.

Metaplanet just added another 2,823 Bitcoin to its balance sheet, pushing its total stash to 43,000 BTC. For a company that didn’t own a single satoshi before April 2024, that’s a remarkable trajectory.

The Tokyo-listed firm, which trades on the Tokyo Stock Exchange under ticker 3350.T and as an ADR under MPJPY in the US, has been on a relentless accumulation spree. This latest purchase puts Metaplanet in direct competition with Twenty One Capital, which holds roughly 43,514 BTC, for the title of third-largest corporate Bitcoin holder on the planet.

The numbers behind the buying binge To appreciate how fast Metaplanet is moving, look at the timeline. The company ended 2025 with 35,102 BTC. By March 31, 2026, it had reached 40,177 BTC after scooping up 5,075 BTC in Q1 alone, a haul worth approximately $398 million to $405 million at an average price between $78,000 and $80,000 per coin.

Now, with this fresh 2,823 BTC purchase, the total sits at 43,000 BTC. That’s a jump of roughly 22.5% from where the company started the year.

Advertisement

The average acquisition cost across Metaplanet’s entire portfolio sits somewhere between $97,000 and $104,000 per BTC, depending on the reporting period. With Bitcoin trading well above that range in recent weeks, the company is sitting on meaningful unrealized gains.

Metaplanet has publicly stated its goal of reaching 100,000 BTC by the end of 2026 and 210,000 BTC by the end of 2027. That means CEO Simon Gerovich and his team need to acquire another 57,000 BTC in roughly the next six months.

How Metaplanet keeps funding the machine Metaplanet has been financing its purchases through a combination of equity raises, debt arrangements, and mNAV warrants — a financing mechanism designed to let Metaplanet raise capital while managing dilution for existing shareholders.

The company also opened Level I ADRs for US investors in December 2025, giving American traders a straightforward way to get exposure to Metaplanet’s stock without the friction of buying on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Level I ADRs don’t require full SEC registration, which makes them cheaper to issue, though they also come with trading limitations compared to higher-tier listings.

Gerovich has been tracking what he calls “Bitcoin yield,” a metric that measures how much additional Bitcoin per share the company generates through its treasury operations. That figure hit 2.8% year-to-date in recent reports.

What this means for investors The risk profile here is worth examining carefully. Metaplanet is using equity dilution and debt to buy a volatile asset. In a prolonged downturn, the company’s average cost basis of $97,000 to $104,000 per BTC becomes the line in the sand investors need to watch.

The 100,000 BTC target by year-end also deserves scrutiny. Acquiring 57,000 BTC in six months would require spending somewhere north of $5 billion at current prices, meaning Metaplanet will likely need multiple large equity raises and debt issuances, each of which carries execution risk and potential dilution.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

XRP, once a fixture in market debates, is now increasingly evaluated based on its on-chain activity and real-world use cases. The XRP Ledger boasts transaction finality in just 3 to 5 seconds while keeping fees low, an advantage that drives its adoption in Ripple’s cross-border payment solutions and bolsters XRP’s role as a functional digital asset.

Key data on network activityOn June 16, 2026, the XRP Ledger processed 769,646 transactions within a 24-hour span. During peak periods, successful payment transactions can exceed 2.7 million in a single day. These figures show that XRP network activity extends well beyond trading alone, with payment and transfer operations occupying a significant share of the network’s capacity.

The XRP Ledger is not limited to value transfer. It also supports native automated market maker functionality and oracle integrations, effectively incorporating core decentralized finance infrastructure directly into the network.

Mini glossary: Oracles bring off-chain data to on-chain applications, while automated market makers (AMMs) enable trading via liquidity pools rather than traditional order books.

Supply structure under scrutinyAccording to CoinGecko, approximately 62 billion XRP are currently in circulation, out of a near-100 billion total supply. Meanwhile, some 33–34 billion XRP remain locked in escrow accounts.

Ripple operates a schedule allowing up to 1 billion XRP to be released each month from escrow. Unused tokens are returned to these accounts. While this mechanism provides a level of transparency, the substantial reserves held in escrow continue to temper narratives about XRP’s scarcity.

The core question for long-term outlooks centers on how much Ripple’s commercial growth actually translates into direct demand for XRP.

RLUSD’s rise and shifts in demandRipple now lets customers complete payment transactions either using XRP or its own stablecoin, RLUSD. This creates uncertainty over whether an expanding client base will lead directly to equal growth in XRP demand.

As of August 2025, RLUSD’s market capitalization surpassed $611 million, and it continued to grow in subsequent periods. This trend illustrates RLUSD’s emerging visibility as an alternative settlement asset within the Ripple ecosystem.

Ripple remains recognized as a financial technology firm specializing in blockchain-based payment solutions, with XRP as the open-market native asset underpinning these platforms.

Regulatory clarity and the evolving networkIn 2025, Ripple’s legal dispute with the US Securities and Exchange Commission ended in a $125 million settlement. The court ruled that programmatic XRP sales on public crypto exchanges did not constitute securities offerings. However, certain institutional sales by Ripple were deemed to have breached securities regulations.

This decision has given XRP a clearer regulatory status in the US than many other altcoins. In terms of governance, the network also exhibits a more decentralized structure: Ripple operates just one of the 35 validators on its default trusted list, while the XRPL Foundation now plays a more prominent role in network administration.

With a current market capitalization of around $65.9 billion, XRP ranks among the largest crypto assets. This scale suggests that many of the network’s current strengths may already be factored into its price.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Ethereum traded near $1,615 on July 2 as buyers tried to stabilize the market after weeks of pressure. 

Summary

Ethereum trades near $1,615 as buyers defend support while ETF flows turn positive again. Analysts watch $1,700 to $1,800 as the recovery zone needed for stronger confirmation next move. Staking rate above 33% suggests more ETH is locked despite weak short-term price action. ETH remains close to the lower end of its recent range, but new ETF inflows and stronger staking activity have added fresh data points for traders watching a recovery attempt.

The token was up 2.49% over 24 hours, with a daily range between $1,564.82 and $1,637.22, according to crypto.news price data. Ethereum’s market cap stood near $194.87 billion, while 24-hour trading volume was about $10.81 billion.

Spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $14.895 million in net inflows on July 1, while BlackRock’s ETHA posted the largest single-day inflow at $36.639 million, according to SoSoValue. The shift came after a period in which ETF outflows weighed on ETH demand and kept traders focused on the $1,500 support region.

Ethereum spot ETF net inflow, source: SoSoValue Ethereum price holds near lower range Ethereum’s short-term setup remains cautious. The recent price trend has been mostly sideways near the lower range, with ETH holding around $1,580 to $1,650. The market still needs a move above the $1,700 to $1,800 area to show stronger recovery momentum.

Recently, Ethereum had remained pinned near the $1,500 support zone after quarter-end selling, whale distribution, and weak institutional flows. That report said analysts were watching $1,700 as a key recovery level, while a loss of $1,500 could open another move lower.

The technical picture shows early improvement, but not a full trend reversal. The MACD histogram is positive near 7.60, while the MACD line is around minus 66.92 and above the signal line near minus 74.52. That points to a bullish crossover and weaker bearish momentum, but both lines remain below zero.

Ethereum (ETH) price chart, source: crypto.news The RSI is near 40.46 and above its moving average around 36.50. This shows some recovery in momentum, but the reading remains below 50. Buyers need a stronger RSI move and a price reclaim of $1,700 to $1,800 before the setup turns more constructive.

ETF inflows return after weeks of pressure ETF flows remain central to ETH’s short-term outlook. Earlier pressure came from repeated outflows across U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs. Crypto.news previously reported that funds saw $273 million in net outflows during the week ending June 26, with BlackRock’s ETHA accounting for $236 million of withdrawals.

The latest positive daily flow gives bulls some relief, but one day of inflows does not erase the wider weakness. ETF demand matters because these products can create spot buying pressure when flows are positive. When flows reverse, fund managers may need to redeem underlying ETH, adding supply to the market.

Ethereum has underperformed during this period because its ETF market is smaller than Bitcoin’s. Ethereum ETF outflows have been more painful in relative terms because the ETH ETF complex is much smaller than the Bitcoin ETF market.

That makes the July 1 inflow important for sentiment. A steady run of inflows would support the case for ETH to retest $1,700. If inflows fade again, traders may keep treating rallies as weak rebounds inside a broader downtrend.

Staking rate reaches record level On-chain data adds a different signal. CryptoQuant analyst EgyHash said Ethereum’s staking rate has crossed 33% for the first time, reaching about 33.06%. The analyst described the trend as a sign that long-term holders continue locking ETH despite price weakness.

EgyHash noted that the staking rate has climbed steadily since the Merge, while ETH price has moved through several bull and bear phases. The analyst said this shows many holders prefer to keep ETH staked rather than sell during weak market periods.

Ethereum (ETH) staking rate, source: CryptoQuant analyst EgyHash A higher staking rate can reduce liquid supply available on exchanges. That may support price if demand returns, because fewer coins are immediately available for sale. Still, the analyst warned that “staking growth alone does not guarantee an immediate price recovery.”

This makes staking a medium-term support factor rather than a short-term trigger. It can help tighten supply, but ETH still needs demand from ETFs, spot buyers, treasury firms, and onchain users to produce a stronger recovery.

Corporate buyers keep accumulating ETH Corporate treasury demand remains active despite weak price action. As previously reported, SharpLink bought another 10,000 ETH for $16.1 million, lifting its holdings to 886,725 ETH. The purchase came as Ethereum headed toward a rare third straight quarterly loss.

BitMine has also expanded its Ethereum treasury. Moreover,  BitMine added 27,084 ETH in one week, raising its holdings to more than 5.7 million ETH, or about 4.7% of circulating supply.

The institutional push is also expanding beyond treasury buys. Earlier today, crypto.news reported that Ethereum Institutional launched with backing from BitMine, SharpLink and Joe Lubin to support adoption by banks, asset managers, custodians, and other financial firms.

The corporate buying has not yet changed the short-term trend. Whale selling, ETF weakness, and broader risk-off trading have kept ETH below the $1,700 to $1,800 recovery band. Still, these purchases show some institutions continue to add ETH at lower prices.

Ali Charts said ETH is approaching a long-term support area near $1,100, a level he described as the lower boundary of a multi-year channel. He pointed to $3,000 as a mid-range target and $5,000 as a macro ceiling if the lower channel holds.

ETHEREUM: WHEN TO BUY?

Ethereum is approaching a historically support level that has defined its macro price action for years.

Since 2021, the $1,100 level has served as the ultimate bottom boundary of Ethereum's long-term price channel. Historically, every single test of this… https://t.co/LNkygeXO5n pic.twitter.com/1NQMcvoXYL

— Ali Charts (@alicharts) July 2, 2026 Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Eligible institutional clients can access USDC through a single onboarding and service experience, without needing direct Circle accounts

Dubai, United Arab Emirates — July 2, 2026 —  Standard Chartered today announced the launch of its capability enabling institutional clients to access USDC minting and redemption, developed in partnership with Circle Internet Group, Inc. (Circle) (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC1 through its regulated entities.  

The launch makes Standard Chartered the first Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) licensed to offer institutional clients access to USDC minting and redemption through a  single onboarding and service experience, without requiring clients to hold direct accounts with Circle. 

The capability enables institutions to move value across traditional and digital financial ecosystems with greater speed and transparency by connecting fiat banking, digital asset infrastructure and public blockchain networks within a single, bank-led solution. It supports institutional use cases such as on-chain settlement, treasury, and liquidity management, while providing the infrastructure to support payment-related use cases in the future.

By embedding USDC access directly within Standard Chartered’s institutional offering, Standard Chartered will bring together banking, custody, and digital asset services within one integrated offering and that is delivered through the risk management, compliance and governance standards expected of a leading international financial institution.

Initially available to eligible clients through Standard Chartered’s DIFC operations, the capability reinforces the UAE’s position as a leading hub for regulated digital asset activity and represents the first phase of Standard Chartered’s broader global stablecoin proposition. The Bank intends to expand the capability into additional markets, subject to regulatory approvals and market readiness.

The announcement reflects growing demand from financial institutions and corporations for regulated stablecoin infrastructure that can support a range of financial activities, including payments, treasury management, settlement, liquidity management and participation in digital asset markets.

Roberto Hoornweg, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate and Investment Banking, Standard Chartered said: “Digital assets are becoming an increasingly important component of global financial infrastructure, and institutional clients are seeking the same levels of trust and governance that underpin traditional markets. With this launch, we are extending those standards into a rapidly evolving segment of the financial system. Ultimately, this is about enabling broader institutional participation in digital asset markets through the frameworks, controls and regulatory oversight that have long supported confidence in global financial markets.”

Kash Razzaghi, Chief Commercial Officer, Circle, said: “Financial institutions are increasingly looking for trusted ways to access stablecoins and participate in blockchain-enabled financial markets. By integrating Circle’s regulated stablecoin infrastructure into Standard Chartered’s global banking platform, we are helping institutions access new opportunities to use USDC across payments, settlement and treasury operations while maintaining the compliance, governance and risk management standards they expect.”

‍

‍For further information please contact:

Khaled Abdulla, CFA®
Head of Communications 
UAE, Middle East & Pakistan
Corporate and Investment Bank
Standard Chartered
M: +971 55  655 7553
T: +971 4 508 3155

About Standard Chartered
We are a leading international banking group, with a presence in 54 of the world’s most dynamic markets. Our purpose is to drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity, and our heritage and values are expressed in our brand promise, here for good.
Standard Chartered PLC is listed on the London and Hong Kong stock exchanges.
For more stories and expert opinions please visit Insights at sc.com. Follow Standard Chartered on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook.

About Circle
Circle (NYSE: CRCL) is one of the world’s leading internet financial platform companies, building the foundation of a more open, global economy through programmable blockchain infrastructure, digital assets, and payment applications. Circle’s platform includes the world’s largest stablecoin network anchored by USDC, Circle Payments Network for global money movement, and Arc, an enterprise-grade blockchain designed to become the Economic OS for the internet. Enterprises, financial institutions, and developers use Circle to power trusted, internet-scale financial innovation. Learn more at circle.com.

‍

1 USDC is issued by regulated affiliates of Circle. See Circle’s list of regulatory authorizations at circle.com/legal/licenses.

Aave V4 just opened its first specialized liquidity hub, and it’s built entirely around one stablecoin ecosystem. The Global Dollar Hub, sometimes called the Paxos Hub, went live with PT-USDG (September 2026) as its inaugural collateral asset, giving users a new way to borrow stablecoins against fixed-rate Pendle principal tokens.

This is the first real-world test of Aave’s hub-and-spoke architecture, a modular system introduced in March 2026.

How the Global Dollar Hub actually works Users deposit PT-USDG-24SEP2026, a Pendle principal token that matures in September 2026, as collateral. In return, they can borrow USDC and USDT directly from the hub. USDG itself is available too, but through a cross-hub credit line sourced from Aave’s Core Hub.

Advertisement

The governance machinery behind this moved at a deliberate pace. A proposal for onboarding PT-USDG-24SEP2026 was posted on May 19, 2026. Before that, a predecessor token, PT-USDG-28MAY2026, had been proposed back in March 2026 and listed on Aave V3.

Why USDG and why now USDG is a regulated stablecoin issued by Paxos on behalf of the Global Dollar Network. It launched in November 2024 and crossed $1 billion in market cap by December 2025. Fully backed by cash and cash equivalents, it’s designed to check the boxes that institutional compliance teams care about.

Pendle splits yield-bearing assets into principal and yield components, letting users trade future yield separately. A principal token like PT-USDG-24SEP2026 essentially locks in a fixed rate until maturity.

Rather than lumping all assets into one giant pool, the hub-and-spoke model isolates risk. Each hub operates with its own parameters. If something goes wrong in the Global Dollar Hub, it stays in the Global Dollar Hub.

What this means for investors The Global Dollar Hub creates a fairly specific opportunity set. Users comfortable with stablecoin-on-stablecoin strategies can borrow against fixed-rate collateral, effectively arbitraging the spread between their PT yield and borrowing costs.

The risk to watch is maturity concentration. PT-USDG-24SEP2026 has a fixed expiration date. As September 2026 approaches, the hub will need new collateral tokens to maintain relevance, which means ongoing governance cycles and potential gaps in coverage.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Solana’s tokenized real-world asset ecosystem has hit a new all-time high of $3.3 billion, cementing the network’s position as the third-largest blockchain for RWA value. That’s a nearly fourfold increase from roughly $873 million at the start of the year.

The milestone puts Solana behind only Ethereum at $15.9 billion and BNB Chain at $4.0 billion. With a 10.39% market share in the RWA space, Solana is no longer a rounding error in the tokenization conversation.

Advertisement

A trajectory that keeps steepening Solana’s RWA value climbed 27.92% over the previous 30 days, with 692 distinct assets now living on-chain. The network reached roughly $873 million in RWA value back in January 2026. By the end of Q1, that figure had ballooned to somewhere between $1.66 billion and $2.01 billion. The previous all-time high of $2.8 billion was set in May 2026.

Institutional players are already here Citigroup ran a pilot program for tokenized Bill of Exchange settlements on Solana back in February 2026. The pilot highlighted Solana’s low transaction fees and rapid processing speed as core advantages for institutional users.

Ondo Finance, which specializes in tokenized stocks and treasuries, has emerged as one of the key contributors to Solana’s RWA ecosystem. Kamino, another notable player, focuses on RWA-oriented DeFi markets. Together with support from the Solana Foundation and data infrastructure from platforms like rwa.xyz, the ecosystem supports a range of tokenized assets spanning treasuries, equities, and various financial instruments.

What this means for investors Solana’s 27.92% monthly growth rate and its position as the third-largest RWA blockchain changes the competitive dynamics. Ethereum maintains nearly five times Solana’s total RWA value, providing deeper liquidity pools and more composability options. Solana’s network has also historically dealt with outage concerns, and any significant downtime during institutional settlement processes could damage the trust that has taken months to build.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Boardwalk, the permissionless protocol built for launching and discovering token economies, is moving its protocol token to Arbitrum. The migration is set to open on July 17, 2026, marking the latest step in the project’s multi-chain expansion.

What Boardwalk actually does The protocol’s native token, BMX, functions as what the project calls a “deflationary consumption token.” BMX gets burned when people use it to launch tokens, spent when participants vote in discovery mechanisms, and staked when holders want to direct how protocol fees are routed.

Those fee routes include buybacks, burns, liquidity locks, and staking rewards.

Advertisement

BMX has a maximum supply of 10 million tokens, with roughly 2.7 million currently in circulation.

Why Arbitrum, and why now Boardwalk isn’t new to multi-chain deployment. The protocol has previously operated across Ethereum, Base, Fraxtal, and Katana.

The announcement surfaced in mid-to-late June 2026, with the July 17 date serving as the official opening for the Arbitrum deployment. Community discussions on X and Reddit have pointed to the migration as a potential catalyst for increased BMX utility, though the exact mechanics of the transition, including whether existing BMX holders on other chains need to take any action, remain part of the rollout details.

The token naming situation One wrinkle worth noting: the original announcement referenced the migrating token as “MTB,” while the protocol’s public-facing documentation and community predominantly reference “BMX” as the native protocol token. This appears to reflect either a transition from an earlier token version or a naming convention that varies across deployment stages.

What this means for investors For existing BMX holders, the migration could serve as a catalyst if it successfully introduces the protocol to Arbitrum’s user base. The tight circulating supply of 2.7 million tokens against a 10 million max supply means the deflationary mechanics have room to compress supply further, assuming usage materializes.

Investors watching this space should be tracking launch activity on the platform, liquidity depth on Arbitrum pairs, and whether the BMX burn rate accelerates post-migration.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.