Key Takeaways Hexcel Q1 earnings beat estimates, with adjusted EPS up 59.5% and sales rising 9.9% year over year.HXL growth was driven by commercial aerospace demand, with Airbus and Boeing programs boosting sales.HXL expects 2026 sales of $2.00-$2.10B and free cash flow above $195M, signaling steady outlook. Hexcel Corporation (HXL - Free Report) reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 59 cents per share, which improved 59.5% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of 37 cents. The bottom line also surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 42 cents by 40.5%.
The company reported GAAP earnings of 49 cents per share, which surpassed the year-ago quarter’s earnings of 35 cents.
HXL’s Total SalesThe company’s net sales totaled $501.5 million, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $487 million by 3%. The top line also witnessed an improvement of 9.9% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of $456.5 million.
Hexcel’s Operational UpdateHexcel's gross margin was 26.9%, which increased 450 basis points from the prior-year quarter. The improvement can be attributed to favorable cost leverage driven by higher sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 14.1% year over year to $49.4 million.
Meanwhile, research and technology expenses rose 29% year over year to $17.8 million.
HXL’s adjusted operating income was $57.6 million compared with $44.2 million in the year-ago period.
Contribution From Different MarketsCommercial Aerospace: Net sales increased 18.8% year over year to $332.7 million, driven by sales growth from Airbus A350 and A320, as well as Boeing 787 and 737 programs. This market contributed 66% to total revenues in the quarter.
Defense, Space & Other: Net sales decreased 4.3% year over year to $168.8 million, due to the divestment of the Austrian-based industrial business and lower sales of launchers and rocket motors. This market contributed 34% to total revenues in the quarter.
HXL’s Financial DetailsAs of March 31, 2026, Hexcel’s cash and cash equivalents were $54.1 million compared with $71 million as of Dec. 31, 2025.
The company’s long-term debt totaled $998.1 million as of March 31, 2026, up from $993 million as of 2025-end.
HXL’s cash flow from operating activities was $19 million, in contrast to a cash outflow of $28.5 million in the prior year.
Hexcel’s 2026 GuidanceHexcel expects to generate sales in the range of $2.00-$2.10 billion for 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is pegged at $2.07 billion, which lies above the midpoint of the company’s sales guidance.
HXL also expects its adjusted earnings per share to be in the range of $2.10-$2.30 for 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is currently pegged at $2.22 per share, which is above the midpoint of the company’s guided range.
Hexcel expects to generate a free cash flow of more than $195 million in 2026. It also expects capital expenditure to be less than $100 million.
HXL’s Zacks RankHexcel currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Recent Defense ReleasesRTX Corporation’s (RTX - Free Report) first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.78 beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.52 by 17%. The bottom line improved 21.1% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $1.47.
Quarterly revenues came in at $22.08 billion, up 8.7% from $20.31 billion in the year-ago period. Sales also beat the consensus mark of $21.56 billion by 2.43%.
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC - Free Report) reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $6.14 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $6.08 by 1%. The bottom line also improved 1.3% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $6.06.
NOC’s total sales of $9.88 billion in the first quarter beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.79 billion by 1%. The top line also improved 4.4% from $9.47 billion reported in the year-ago quarter.
The Boeing Company (BA - Free Report) incurred an adjusted loss of 20 cents per share in the first quarter of 2026, narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of 95 cents. The bottom line improved from the year-ago quarter’s reported loss of 49 cents.
Revenues amounted to $22.22 billion, which outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $21.87 billion by 3.5%. The top line also surged 14% from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure of $19.5 billion.
Hexcel Corporation is upgraded to strong buy with a $105.52 price target, reflecting 16% upside and robust operating leverage. HXL's commercial aerospace sales surged nearly 19% quarterly, driven by Airbus A350, Boeing 787, and strong single-aisle program volumes. 2026 guidance calls for $2–$2.1B in sales, $2.10–$2.30 EPS, and >$195M in free cash flow, as margins and leverage improve.
Hexcel Corporation delivered robust Q1 2026 results, with EPS of $0.59, beating consensus by $0.15, and revenue surpassing $500 million. HXL's revenue grew nearly 10% year-over-year, and the company outperformed the SPY ETF by more than sixfold over the past five months. I maintain a BUY rating on HXL, supported by price momentum and strong projected earnings growth.
Key Takeaways WWD Q2 EPS jumped 34% to $2.27, beating estimates as sales rose 23% to $1.09B.Woodward saw strong Aerospace and Industrial demand, driving growth across OEM and services markets.WWD raised FY26 outlook, now sees sales up 2023% and EPS of $9.15$9.45 on solid momentum. Woodward, Inc. (WWD - Free Report) reported second-quarter fiscal 2026 adjusted net earnings per share (EPS) of $2.27, which jumped 34.3% year over year and beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 13.5%.
Quarterly net sales increased 23.4% year over year to $1090.6 million. The upside was fueled by market tailwinds across Aerospace and Industrial. The top line beat the consensus estimate by 9.9%.
Management highlighted that it is raising its full-year outlook, supported by strong first-half performance and continued demand strength. The company remains focused on disciplined execution in a dynamic environment, while continuing to invest in innovation and operational excellence to drive sustained profitable growth and long-term shareholder value.
In the past year, shares have gained 90.3% compared with the Zacks Aerospace - Defense Equipment industry’s rise of 23.6%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
WWD’s Segment ResultsAerospace: Net sales were $703 million, up 25% year over year, driven by broad-based strength across commercial services, commercial OEM and defense OEM. Defense OEM and defense services sales were up 9% and 8%, respectively, year over year. Commercial OEM sales were up 30% year over year, while services jumped 36%.
Segmental earnings were $158 million, up from $125 million a year ago. The increase was driven by price realization and higher sales volumes, partially offset by the impact of inflation as well as continued investments in manufacturing capabilities, research and development and the enterprise resource planning system upgrade. Margins expanded 30 basis points (bps) to 22.5%.
Industrial: Net sales totaled $387 million, up 20% year over year, driven by gains across transportation, power generation and oil & gas markets. Core industrial sales, excluding the China on-highway impact, rose 19%.
Transportation sales surged 34%, and oil and gas sales increased 18%. Power generation grew a modest 7%.
Segmental earnings were $66 million, up from $46 million in the year-ago quarter. In the industrial segment, margins increased 270 bps to 17%. The increase was driven by higher sales volumes, effective price realization and a favorable product mix, partially offset by inflationary pressures and a reserve related to a product performance claim.
Other Details of WWDGross margin was up 180 bps year over year to 29%.
Total costs and expenses were $923.1 million, up 23% year over year.
Adjusted EBITDA was $215.5 million compared with $164 million a year ago.
WWD’s Cash Flow & LiquidityAs of March 31, 2026, Woodward had $501.2 million in cash and cash equivalents with $453.4 million of long-term debt (less the current portion).
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, WWD generated $90.8 million of net cash from operating activities compared with $77.8 million reported in the same period last year. For the first half, WWD generated $205.3 million of net cash from operating activities compared with $112.3 million reported a year ago.
For the second quarter, free cash flow was $38.2 million compared with $59.4 million in the year-ago period. This uptick was driven by higher earnings.
Capital expenditures reached $53 million in the second quarter, up from $18 million. The company expects capital spending to rise meaningfully over the remaining two quarters.
In the quarter under review, WWD returned $245 million to its shareholders in the form of $19 million of dividends and $226 million worth of share repurchases.
WWD’s Fiscal 2026 GuidanceFor fiscal 2026, Woodward has raised its overall outlook, reflecting strong performance and improved visibility. The company now expects total sales to grow 20–23%, an increase from the earlier guidance of 14–18%.
At the segment level, Aerospace sales growth is now anticipated at 21–24%, up from the earlier estimated 15–20% range, with segment earnings expected to improve to 23–23.5% of sales compared with 22–23% previously. In the Industrial segment, sales are projected to grow 18–20%, an increase from the prior outlook of 11–14%, while segment earnings are expected to rise to 18–18.5% of sales from the earlier 16–17% range.
The company anticipates adjusted EPS of $9.15–$9.45 versus the prior range of $8.20–$8.60.
Other assumptions remain unchanged — the company still anticipates free cash flow of $300–$350 million, capital expenditures of around $290 million and an adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 22%.
WWD’s Zacks RankWoodward currently carries a Zacks Rank #3(Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Recent Performance of Other CompaniesTeledyne Technologies Inc. (TDY - Free Report) reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $5.80 per share, which surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $5.48 by 5.9%. The bottom line also improved 17.2% from $4.95 recorded in the year-ago quarter.
Including one-time items, the company recorded GAAP earnings of $4.85 per share, up 21.6% from the prior-year period’s earnings of $3.99.
The year-over-year improvement in the bottom line can be attributed to higher net sales and operating income in the first quarter than the year-ago quarter’s reported actuals.
Hexcel Corporation (HXL - Free Report) reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 59 cents per share, which improved 59.5% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of 37 cents. The bottom line also surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 42 cents by 40.5%.
The company reported GAAP earnings of 49 cents per share, which surpassed the year-ago quarter’s earnings of 35 cents.
The company’s net sales totaled $501.5 million, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $487 million by 3%. The top line also witnessed an improvement of 9.9% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of $456.5 million.
RTX Corporation’s (RTX - Free Report) first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of $1.78 beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.52 by 17%. The bottom line improved 21.1% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $1.47.
Quarterly revenues came in at $22.08 billion, up 8.7% from $20.31 billion in the year-ago period. Sales also beat the consensus mark of $21.56 billion by 2.43%.
, /PRNewswire/ -- AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE: AME) today announced that its Board of Directors has appointed Nick L. Stanage as a new director of the Company. Mr. Stanage is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hexcel Corporation (NYSE: HXL), a global leader in advanced lightweight composite technologies for aerospace, defense, and industrial applications.
"We are excited to welcome Nick as a member of AMETEK's Board of Directors," said David A. Zapico, AMETEK Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "Nick is a seasoned executive with decades of global industrial experience. His proven success at Hexcel combined with his outstanding operating experience nicely complements our current Board of Directors."
Mr. Stanage joined Hexcel in 2009 as President, before assuming the role of Chief Operating Officer in 2012. In 2013, he was named Hexcel's Chief Executive Officer and in 2014, became Chairman of the Board. Following his retirement in May 2024, Mr. Stanage served as Executive Chairman until November 2024. Mr. Stanage now serves as a Director on Hexcel's Board in addition to the boards of Huntington Ingalls Industries and TriMas Corporation.
Prior to joining Hexcel, Mr. Stanage served as President of the Heavy Vehicles Product Group and Vice President and General Manager of the Commercial Vehicle Group at Dana Holding Corporation. Prior to these roles, Mr. Stanage spent 20 years with Honeywell, Inc. holding a number of leadership roles, including Vice President and General Manager, Engine Systems & Accessories.
Mr. Stanage holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Western Michigan University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Notre Dame.
Corporate Profile
AMETEK (NYSE: AME) is a leading global provider of industrial technology solutions serving a diverse set of attractive niche markets with annual sales of approximately $7.5 billion. The AMETEK Growth Model integrates the Four Growth Strategies - Operational Excellence, Technology Innovation, Global and Market Expansion, and Strategic Acquisitions - with a disciplined focus on cash generation and capital deployment. AMETEK's objective is double-digit percentage growth in earnings per share over the business cycle and a superior return on total capital. Founded in 1930, AMETEK has been listed on the NYSE for over 95 years and is a component of the S&P 500. For more information, visit www.ametek.com.
Contact:
Kevin Coleman
Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasurer
[email protected]
Phone: 610.889.5247
For new and old investors, taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals. Zacks Premium provides lots of different ways to do both.
Featuring daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, the research service can help you become a smarter, more self-assured investor.
Zacks Premium includes access to the Zacks Style Scores as well.
What are the Zacks Style Scores? Developed alongside the Zacks Rank, the Zacks Style Scores are a group of complementary indicators that help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.
Each stock is given an alphabetic rating of A, B, C, D or F based on their value, growth, and momentum qualities. With this system, an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on, meaning the better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform.
The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:
Value ScoreValue investors love finding good stocks at good prices, especially before the broader market catches on to a stock's true value. Utilizing ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and many other multiples, the Value Style Score identifies the most attractive and most discounted stocks.
Growth ScoreGrowth investors are more concerned with a stock's future prospects, and the overall financial health and strength of a company. Thus, the Growth Style Score analyzes characteristics like projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow to find stocks that will see sustainable growth over time.
Momentum ScoreMomentum traders and investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." This investing style is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook. Employing factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates, the Momentum Style Score can indicate favorable times to build a position in high-momentum stocks.
VGM ScoreWhat if you like to use all three types of investing? The VGM Score is a combination of all Style Scores, making it one of the most comprehensive indicators to use with the Zacks Rank. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, which helps narrow down the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum.
How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank The Zacks Rank, which is a proprietary stock-rating model, employs earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings expectations, to make building a winning portfolio easier.
It's highly successful, with #1 (Strong Buy) stocks producing an unmatched +23.7% average annual return since 1988. That's more than double the S&P 500. But because of the large number of stocks we rate, there are over 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, plus another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.
With more than 800 top-rated stocks to choose from, it can certainly feel overwhelming to pick the ones that are right for you and your investing journey.
That's where the Style Scores come in.
To maximize your returns, you want to buy stocks with the highest probability of success. This means picking stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B. If you find yourself looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, make sure they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.
As mentioned above, the Scores are designed to work with the Zacks Rank, so any change to a company's earnings outlook should be a deciding factor when picking which stocks to buy.
Here's an example: a stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, even one with Style Scores of A and B, still has a downward-trending earnings outlook, and a bigger chance its share price will decrease too.
Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.
Stock to Watch: Hexcel (HXL - Free Report) Delaware-based Hexcel Corporation develops, manufactures and distributes lightweight, high-performance structural materials for use in the Commercial Aerospace, Space & Defense and Industrial markets. Hexcel Corporation, founded in 1946, was incorporated in California in 1948, and reincorporated in Delaware in 1983. The company's products are used in a wide variety of end applications, such as commercial and military aircraft, space launch vehicles and satellites, wind turbine blades, automotive and other complex industrial applications. The company serves international markets through manufacturing facilities located in the United States, Asia Pacific, Europe, Russia and Africa.
HXL is a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of B.
Momentum investors should take note of this Aerospace stock. HXL has a Momentum Style Score of B, and shares are up 8.8% over the past four weeks.
Three analysts revised their earnings estimate upwards in the last 60 days for fiscal 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.02 to $2.24 per share. HXL boasts an average earnings surprise of +12.6%.
With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Momentum and VGM Style Scores, HXL should be on investors' short list.
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Hexcel (HXL - Free Report) . Shares have lost about 7.2% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500.
But investors have to be wondering, will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Hexcel due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its latest earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers.
Hexcel Corporation reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 59 cents per share, which improved 59.5% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of 37 cents. The bottom line also surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 42 cents by 40.5%.
The company reported GAAP earnings of 49 cents per share, which surpassed the year-ago quarter’s earnings of 35 cents.
HXL’s Total SalesThe company’s net sales totaled $501.5 million, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $487 million by 3%. The top line also witnessed an improvement of 9.9% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of $456.5 million.
Hexcel’s Operational UpdateHexcel's gross margin was 26.9%, which increased 450 basis points from the prior-year quarter. The improvement can be attributed to favorable cost leverage driven by higher sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 14.1% year over year to $49.4 million.
Meanwhile, research and technology expenses rose 29% year over year to $17.8 million.
HXL’s adjusted operating income was $57.6 million compared with $44.2 million in the year-ago period.
Contribution From Different MarketsCommercial Aerospace: Net sales increased 18.8% year over year to $332.7 million, driven by sales growth from Airbus A350 and A320, as well as Boeing 787 and 737 programs. This market contributed 66% to total revenues in the quarter.
Defense, Space & Other: Net sales decreased 4.3% year over year to $168.8 million, due to the divestment of the Austrian-based industrial business and lower sales of launchers and rocket motors. This market contributed 34% to total revenues in the quarter.
HXL’s Financial DetailsAs of March 31, 2026, Hexcel’s cash and cash equivalents were $54.1 million compared with $71 million as of Dec. 31, 2025.
The company’s long-term debt totaled $998.1 million as of March 31, 2026, up from $993 million as of 2025-end.
HXL’s cash flow from operating activities was $19 million, in contrast to a cash outflow of $28.5 million in the prior year.
Hexcel’s 2026 GuidanceHexcel expects to generate sales in the range of $2.00-$2.10 billion for 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is pegged at $2.07 billion, which lies above the midpoint of the company’s sales guidance.
HXL also expects its adjusted earnings per share to be in the range of $2.10-$2.30 for 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is currently pegged at $2.22 per share, which is above the midpoint of the company’s guided range.
Hexcel expects to generate a free cash flow of more than $195 million in 2026. It also expects capital expenditure to be less than $100 million.
How Have Estimates Been Moving Since Then?Since the earnings release, investors have witnessed a downward trend in estimates review.
VGM ScoresCurrently, Hexcel has a great Growth Score of A, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with a C. Following the exact same course, the stock was allocated a score of C on the value side, putting it in the middle 20% for value investors.
Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of B. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in.
OutlookEstimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, Hexcel has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months.
WICHITA, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hexcel Corporation (NYSE: HXL), a global leader in advanced composite materials, today announced the groundbreaking of the Hexcel Applications Center at Wichita State University's National Institute for Aviation Research (NIAR). The new center marks a significant expansion of Hexcel's long‑standing collaboration with NIAR and reflects a shared commitment to advancing composite materials, automated processing, and aerospace manufacturing innovation. “This investme.
On May 28, 2026, Hexcel Corp HXL shares rose 3.3%, bringing the current price to $91.08. This price falls within a 52-week range of $51.52 to $98.26, reflecting a significant year-to-date gain of 23.8% and a remarkable one-year increase of 78.0%.
GF Value™ verdict: Current price of $91.08 compared to GF Value™ of $79.27 indicates the stock is 14.9% overvalued.GF Score™ of 91/100 suggests a strong overall ranking in terms of quality and performance potential.Most notable signal: A momentum rank of 10/10 indicates strong performance trends in the stock’s price movements. Is HXL Overvalued or Undervalued? Hexcel Corp HXL is currently trading at $91.08, which is above its GF Value™ estimate of $79.27, indicating that the stock is approximately 14.9% overvalued. This situation presents a potential risk for investors, as buying into an overvalued stock can lead to losses if the price corrects to align with its intrinsic value. The GF Valuation label of "Modestly Overvalued" further reinforces this assessment, suggesting that while the stock may not be egregiously overvalued, caution is warranted.
GF Value™ is GuruFocus' proprietary measure of intrinsic value, calculated from historical trading multiples, past business growth, and future performance estimates. With the current market price exceeding this intrinsic value, investors may want to consider the margin of safety that exists when purchasing shares. A significant overvaluation may lead to a price adjustment, posing a risk to those holding the stock at the current levels.
How Does HXL's Valuation Compare to Its History? Metric Current Historical P/E (TTM) 59.9x 50.1x Forward P/E 39.7x N/A Hexcel's current P/E (TTM) of 59.9x is significantly above its 5-year median P/E of 50.1x, indicating that the stock is trading at a premium compared to its historical valuation. This analysis aligns with the GF Value™ verdict of being overvalued, suggesting that the current price may not be justified by historical earnings performance.
What Does HXL's GF Score™ Tell Us? Metric Rating GF Score™ 91 Financial Strength 6/10 Profitability 8/10 Growth 9/10 Valuation 7/10 Momentum 10/10 The GF Score™ of 91/100 indicates that Hexcel Corp demonstrates strong potential for long-term returns, particularly highlighted by its high growth rank of 9/10 and momentum rank of 10/10. However, the financial strength rating of 6/10 suggests there could be areas of improvement regarding the company’s balance sheet or liquidity, which may warrant further scrutiny for risk-averse investors.
What Are Insiders Doing with HXL Stock? There have been no insider transactions reported in the last three months for Hexcel Corp. This lack of activity might suggest that insiders are currently not making significant moves, possibly indicating confidence in the stock’s valuation or a wait-and-see approach regarding future price movements. Insider activity can often be a telling sign of internal sentiment regarding share price and company performance.
What This Means for Investors Based on the GF Value™ assessment, Hexcel Corp HXL is currently overvalued. With the stock trading at $91.08 against a GF Value™ of $79.27, investors may want to consider this valuation before making any investment decisions.
For the complete analysis, visit the Hexcel Corp HXL stock page. You can also explore the GF Value™ page for detailed valuation methodology, or use the GuruFocus Stock Screener to find similar opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions What is HXL's GF Score™?
HXL's GF Score™ is 91/100, indicating a strong overall ranking based on key aspects such as financial strength, profitability, growth, valuation, and momentum.
Is HXL overvalued or undervalued?
HXL is currently overvalued, with a GF Value™ of $79.27 compared to its current price of $91.08, suggesting a potential risk for investors.
What is HXL's P/E ratio?
HXL's P/E ratio is 59.9x (TTM), which is above its 5-year median P/E of 50.1x, indicating that the stock is trading at a premium compared to its historical valuation.
This stock alert was generated using automated technology and GuruFocus financial data to provide readers with timely and accurate market reporting. This content was reviewed by GuruFocus editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Hexcel Corporation is rated Buy with a $119/share price target, reflecting strong growth prospects in aerospace, defense, and space markets. Robust Q1'26 results, including 10% top-line growth and 180 bps margin expansion, highlight operational momentum and margin-accretive growth. HXL is positioned to benefit from rising aircraft production, space infrastructure investments, and increased defense spending, with operating leverage expected to improve through FY26.
Investors often weigh the stability of established industry leaders against the high-growth potential of newer challengers. Today, we compare the long-standing Hexcel (HXL +6.32%) against the rapidly expanding Loar (LOAR +5.98%) to see which fits your portfolio.
Hexcel leads the market in advanced composite materials used to make aircraft lighter and more fuel-efficient. Loar focuses on designing and manufacturing niche components for both commercial and military aviation. Both companies benefit from the aerospace recovery, yet they offer different risk and reward profiles for those investing in commercial aviation or military technology.
The case for HexcelHexcel supplies advanced lightweight composite materials, including carbon fiber reinforcements and resins, to the global aerospace market. These products are essential for modern aircraft because they reduce weight and improve fuel efficiency. Roughly 39% of net sales in FY 2025 came from Airbus, while Boeing and its subcontractors accounted for nearly 13%. Customer concentration like this adds a layer of risk to the business. The company remains a key player among defense stocks due to its participation in military aviation programs.
In FY 2025, revenue reached nearly $1.9 billion, which was approximately 0.5% lower than the prior year. Despite this slight decline in sales, the company reported net income of roughly $109.4 million. This resulted in a net margin of close to 5.8%, down from the 6.9% achieved in the previous fiscal year.
As of its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio is approximately 0.8x. This ratio measures how much a company finances its operations through debt, rather than through shareholder capital, and includes both short- and long-term debt. The current ratio, which compares short-term assets to short-term liabilities, is roughly 2.3x. In FY 2025, Hexcel generated nearly $307.2 million in free cash flow, the cash remaining after capital expenditures.
The case for LoarLoar focuses on designing and manufacturing niche aerospace and defense components for a variety of end markets. These include commercial aviation, business jets, and military platforms. Unlike some competitors, the company maintains a more diversified customer base, with no single customer accounting for more than 12% of net sales in 2025. Customer concentration like this adds a layer of risk to the business. This strategy helps insulate the business from the production issues of any one aircraft manufacturer.
During FY 2025, the company reported revenue of nearly $496.3 million. This represented a substantial increase of approximately 23.2% compared to the prior year. Net income for the period was roughly $72.1 million, resulting in a net margin of nearly 14.5%, a significant improvement over the 5.5% net margin recorded in the previous fiscal year.
As of the December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio was 0.0x, indicating the company has no significant debt relative to its equity. The current ratio was approximately 4.7x, suggesting a very strong ability to cover short-term financial obligations. During FY 2025, Loar generated nearly $99.3 million in free cash flow. This metric measures the cash a company generates after subtracting the cost of physical assets, such as equipment.
Risk profile comparisonHexcel faces significant risks due to its heavy reliance on two primary customers. If either Airbus or Boeing experiences program delays or production slowdowns, Hexcel's revenue would likely suffer. Furthermore, the company is vulnerable to supply disruptions because it depends on limited-source raw materials. It must also navigate strict government regulations and the constant threat of cybersecurity breaches targeting its proprietary data.
Loar carries different risks, particularly related to its acquisition-based growth strategy. Integrating new businesses can be difficult and may lead to unforeseen expenses or the loss of key personnel. The company also competes against larger entities such as Honeywell International or TransDigm Group for market share. Because many of its government contracts are fixed-price, Loar faces the risk of shrinking net margins if raw material costs increase unexpectedly.
Valuation comparisonHexcel offers a much lower entry point for investors based on its sales and earnings multiples, while Loar carries a significant growth premium.
MetricHexcelLoarSector BenchmarkForward P/E40.4x52.4x29.8xP/S ratio3.7x12.4xn/aSector benchmark uses the SPDR XLI sector ETF.
Valuation metrics sourced from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.
While both stocks are leaders in their respective niches, they are vastly different types of companies to hold. If you are looking for a stock that is the dominant force in its industry but probably doesn’t offer multibagger returns anytime soon, Hexcel, with its No. 1 position in aerospace composites, is an excellent steady-Eddie investment. On the other hand, Loar is more of a swing-for-the-fences type of investment, offering multibagger potential thanks to its smaller size and a strong history of successful M&A.
Both companies trade at premium forward P/E ratios, but for different reasons. Hexcel gets its lofty valuation thanks to its No. 1 position, wide moat, and tough-to-disrupt operations. Meanwhile, Loar has grown its sales by 38% annually since 2012 and boasts high-and-rising margins. In this sense, I’d say both stocks deserve their premium. However, I think Loar stands out because of its higher growth potential.
Though Loar “competes” with TransDigm in the aerospace components and parts industry, it mostly does so through the M&A process rather than individual parts. They both love to add new parts through tuck-in acquisitions, but TransDigm’s much larger size leaves them uninterested in some tiny M&A deals that wouldn’t move the needle for them -- but do for Loar. In a sense, Loar is borrowing from TransDigm’s playback to try to generate similarly impressive results as the latter has delivered over the years.
That said, while I would rather own Loar, Hexcel could prove an interesting stock over the next decade, as Boeing and Airbus have massive backlogs to fill, which should keep the company busy. At the same time, Hexcel also makes composites for satellites, rocket motors, and other space applications, making it an interesting investment as the space industry booms.
Imperial Oil is upgraded to Strong Buy, driven by a robust FCF outlook and favorable oil price dynamics. IMO's vertically integrated structure and Exxon Mobil's 69.5% ownership provide resilience and operational flexibility across market cycles. Free cash flow could reach $8B in 2026, supporting a forward return yield above 9% and continued aggressive dividends and buybacks.
Wall Street expects a year-over-year decline in earnings on higher revenues when Imperial Oil (IMO - Free Report) reports results for the quarter ended March 2026. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates.
The earnings report, which is expected to be released on May 1, might help the stock move higher if these key numbers are better than expectations. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower.
While management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call will mostly determine the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations, it's worth having a handicapping insight into the odds of a positive EPS surprise.
Zacks Consensus EstimateThis oil and gas and petroleum products company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.67 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -4.6%.
Revenues are expected to be $9.79 billion, up 12.3% from the year-ago quarter.
Estimate Revisions TrendThe consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 157.6% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period.
Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts.
Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
Earnings WhisperEstimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. Our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) -- has this insight at its core.
The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.
Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only.
A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP.
Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell).
How Have the Numbers Shaped Up for Imperial Oil?For Imperial Oil, the Most Accurate Estimate is the same as the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that there are no recent analyst views which differ from what have been considered to derive the consensus estimate. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of 0%.
On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #1.
So, this combination makes it difficult to conclusively predict that Imperial Oil will beat the consensus EPS estimate.
Does Earnings Surprise History Hold Any Clue?Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number.
For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Imperial Oil would post earnings of $1.36 per share when it actually produced earnings of $1.41, delivering a surprise of +3.68%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates four times.
Bottom LineAn earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss.
That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.
Imperial Oil doesn't appear a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release.
Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar.
Imperial Oil Limited (TSE:IMO – Get Free Report) (NYSEMKT:IMO) has been assigned an average recommendation of “Strong Sell” from the ten brokerages that are covering the firm, MarketBeat.com reports. Six equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell recommendation and four have assigned a hold recommendation to the company. The average 12-month target price among brokerages that have covered the stock in the last year is C$137.58.
IMO has been the subject of several recent analyst reports. Raymond James Financial lifted their price target on Imperial Oil from C$107.00 to C$126.00 in a report on Monday, March 30th. UBS Group lifted their price target on Imperial Oil from C$155.00 to C$185.00 in a report on Monday, March 16th. TD Securities lifted their price target on Imperial Oil from C$101.00 to C$110.00 and gave the company a “sell” rating in a report on Monday, February 23rd. Royal Bank Of Canada lifted their price target on Imperial Oil from C$116.00 to C$124.00 and gave the company an “underperform” rating in a report on Wednesday, April 8th. Finally, JPMorgan Chase & Co. lifted their price target on Imperial Oil from C$108.00 to C$155.00 in a report on Wednesday, April 8th.
Read Our Latest Research Report on Imperial Oil
Imperial Oil Trading Down 2.1% Shares of IMO stock opened at C$169.79 on Friday. The firm has a 50-day moving average price of C$170.43 and a 200 day moving average price of C$144.74. Imperial Oil has a twelve month low of C$91.78 and a twelve month high of C$185.73. The company has a market capitalization of C$82.11 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 26.20, a PEG ratio of 0.21 and a beta of 0.52. The company has a current ratio of 1.27, a quick ratio of 0.98 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 19.69.
Imperial Oil (TSE:IMO – Get Free Report) (NYSEMKT:IMO) last announced its earnings results on Friday, January 30th. The company reported C$1.97 earnings per share for the quarter. The firm had revenue of C$11.28 billion during the quarter. Imperial Oil had a net margin of 7.02% and a return on equity of 14.75%. Research analysts forecast that Imperial Oil will post 8.6164609 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Imperial Oil Increases Dividend The firm also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Wednesday, April 1st. Shareholders of record on Wednesday, April 1st were issued a $0.87 dividend. This is a positive change from Imperial Oil’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.72. The ex-dividend date was Thursday, March 5th. This represents a $3.48 annualized dividend and a yield of 2.0%. Imperial Oil’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 44.44%.
About Imperial Oil (Get Free Report)
Imperial Oil is one of Canada’s largest integrated oil companies, focusing on upstream operations, petroleum refining operations, and the marketing of petroleum products. Production averaged 398 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2020. The company estimates that it holds 5.2 billion boe of proved and probable crude oil and natural gas reserves. Imperial remains the largest refiner of petroleum products in Canada, operating three refineries with a combined processing capacity of 421 mboe/d.
Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than Imperial Oil
Receive News & Ratings for Imperial Oil Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Imperial Oil and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEBioLargo (NASDAQ:BLGO) versus Global Partner Acquisition Corp II (NASDAQ:GPAC) Critical Survey
NEXT HEADLINE »Financial Survey: Meridian Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ:MRDN) and CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ:CCC)
Wall Street expects a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when Suncor Energy (SU - Free Report) reports results for the quarter ended March 2026. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates.
The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expected to be released on May 5. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower.
While management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call will mostly determine the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations, it's worth having a handicapping insight into the odds of a positive EPS surprise.
Zacks Consensus EstimateThis energy company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.45 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +59.3%.
Revenues are expected to be $8.94 billion, up 3.1% from the year-ago quarter.
Estimate Revisions TrendThe consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 31.15% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period.
Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts.
Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
Earnings WhisperEstimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. This insight is at the core of our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction).
The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.
Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only.
A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP.
Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell).
How Have the Numbers Shaped Up for Suncor Energy?For Suncor Energy, the Most Accurate Estimate is the same as the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that there are no recent analyst views which differ from what have been considered to derive the consensus estimate. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of 0%.
On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #1.
So, this combination makes it difficult to conclusively predict that Suncor Energy will beat the consensus EPS estimate.
Does Earnings Surprise History Hold Any Clue?Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number.
For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Suncor Energy would post earnings of $0.77 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.79, delivering a surprise of +2.60%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates four times.
Bottom LineAn earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss.
That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.
Suncor Energy doesn't appear a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release.
An Industry Player's Expected ResultsAnother stock from the Zacks Oil and Gas - Integrated - Canadian industry, Imperial Oil (IMO - Free Report) , is soon expected to post earnings of $1.67 per share for the quarter ended March 2026. This estimate indicates a year-over-year change of -4.6%. Revenues for the quarter are expected to be $9.79 billion, up 12.3% from the year-ago quarter.
The consensus EPS estimate for Imperial Oil has been revised 70.9% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. However, an equal Most Accurate Estimate has resulted in an Earnings ESP of 0.00%.
When combined with a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy), this Earnings ESP makes it difficult to conclusively predict that Imperial Oil will beat the consensus EPS estimate. The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters.
Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar.
CALGARY, Alberta--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Imperial Oil Limited (TSE: IMO, NYSE American: IMO) today declared a quarterly dividend of 87 cents per share on the outstanding common shares of the company, payable on July 1, 2026, to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 4, 2026. This second quarter 2026 dividend compares with the first quarter 2026 dividend of 87 cents per share. Imperial has a long and successful history of growth and financial stability in Canada as a leading member of.
CALGARY, Alberta--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Imperial (TSE: IMO) (NYSE American: IMO): First quarter millions of Canadian dollars, unless noted 2026 2025 ∆I Net income (loss) (U.S. GAAP) 940 1,288 (348) Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution (dollars) 1.94 2.52 (0.58) Capital and exploration expenditures 478 398 +80 Imperial reported estimated net income in the first quarter of $940 million, up from net income of $492 million in the fourth quarter of 2025, primarily driven by the absence.
The Imperial Strathcona Refinery which produces petrochemicals is seen near Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, October 7, 2021. REUTERS/Todd Korol Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesMay 1 (Reuters) - Canadian oil producer Imperial Oil (IMO.TO), opens new tab missed analysts' estimates for first-quarter profit on Friday, as weaker crude realizations and unplanned outages at its facilities reduced refinery throughput.
Shares of the Calgary, Alberta-based company, which is majority owned by U.S. oil and gas major Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab, were down 4%.
Get a daily digest of breaking business news straight to your inbox with the Reuters Business newsletter. Sign up here.
Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East tightened global oil supply, which boosted fuel prices, but the gains were not enough to offset weaker realizations and lower downstream volumes.
Imperial Oil's refinery quarterly throughput fell to 384,000 barrels per day (bpd) in the first quarter from 397,000 bpd a year earlier, while capacity utilization declined to 88% from 91%, primarily due to unplanned downtime and disruptions in synthetic crude feedstock.
At its Syncrude oil sands project, Imperial faced operational setbacks due to an unplanned coker outage.
The company said on its earnings call that additional maintenance requirements at Syncrude this quarter have led it to defer a planned coker turnaround to late summer.
Imperial Oil's synthetic crude oil average realization fell to C$96.13 per barrel in the reported quarter from C$98.79 per barrel a year earlier, while Western Canada Select was largely flat at $58.33 a barrel.
Quarterly upstream production, however, marginally rose to 419,000 gross barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd), compared with 418,000 gross boepd a year earlier.
The company also said U.S. trade measures introduced in 2025 and Canada's retaliatory tariffs were not expected to materially impact its financial position or operations.
Its net income fell to C$940 million ($692.96 million), or C$1.94 per share, in the quarter ended March 31, from C$1.29 billion, or C$2.52 per share, a year earlier.
Analysts had expected C$995 million, or C$2.47 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
($1 = 1.3565 Canadian dollars)
Reporting by Pranav Mathur in Bengaluru; Editing by Shinjini Ganguli
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Imperial Oil (IMO - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $1.41 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.67 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.75 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -15.57%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this oil and gas and petroleum products company would post earnings of $1.36 per share when it actually produced earnings of $1.41, delivering a surprise of +3.68%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times.
Imperial Oil, which belongs to the Zacks Oil and Gas - Integrated - Canadian industry, posted revenues of $9.07 billion for the quarter ended March 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 7.31%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $8.72 billion. The company has not been able to beat consensus revenue estimates over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Imperial Oil shares have added about 55.3% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 5.3%.
What's Next for Imperial Oil?While Imperial Oil has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Imperial Oil was favorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to outperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $2.83 on $10.82 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $8.45 on $38 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Oil and Gas - Integrated - Canadian is currently in the top 2% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
One other stock from the same industry, Suncor Energy (SU - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended March 2026. The results are expected to be released on May 5.
This energy company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.45 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +59.3%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 31.2% higher over the last 30 days to the current level.
Suncor Energy's revenues are expected to be $8.94 billion, up 3.1% from the year-ago quarter.
Key Takeaways IMO posted Q1 EPS of $1.41, missing estimates and falling YoY, while sales rose to $9.1B but missed consensus.IMO saw weaker upstream income and lower prices, with declines in downstream sales and refinery throughput.IMO returned C$350M via dividends and expects 2026 upstream output of 441K-460K boe/d with steady utilization. Imperial Oil Limited (IMO - Free Report) reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of $1.41, which missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.67 and decreased from the year-ago quarter’s $1.75 due to lower net income in the upstream segment and a lower average realized price for synthetic crude.
Revenues of $9.1 billion missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.8 billion due to weak performance in both the Upstream and Downstream segments. However, the top line increased from the year-ago quarter’s level of $8.7 billion.
During the quarter, Imperial Oil returned C$350 million to its shareholders through dividend payments.
On May 1, 2026, the Calgary-based integrated oil and gas company declared a quarterly dividend of 87 Canadian cents per share on its outstanding common shares, payable on July 1, 2026, to its shareholders of record as of June 4.
IMO’s Segmental InformationUpstream: Revenues of C$4 billion decreased from the prior-year level of C$4.5 billion. The segment reported a net income of C$470 million compared with C$731 million in the year-ago quarter.
The company recorded average upstream production of 419,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day (boe/d) in the first quarter, which increased from the prior-year level of 418,000 boe/d. However, the figure missed our expectation of 436,000 boe/d.
IMO recorded total gross bitumen production at Kearl averaged 259,000 barrels per day (183,000 barrels Imperial Oil's share), up from 256,000 barrels per day (181,000 barrels Imperial Oil's share) in the first quarter of 2025.
The company also posted gross bitumen production at Cold Lake, averaging 155,000 barrels per day (bpd), which was an increase from 154,000 bpd in the first quarter of 2025.
IMO’s share of gross production from Syncrude averaged 72,000 bpd, down from 73,000 bpd in the first quarter of 2025. Lower volumes at Syncrude were caused by unplanned coker downtime.
Bitumen price realizations totaled C$68.21 per barrel compared with C$75.31 in the year-ago period. IMO received an average realized price of C$96.13 per barrel for synthetic oil compared with the prior-year quarter’s C$98.79. For conventional crude oil, it received C$52.44 per barrel compared with C$48.70 in the corresponding period of 2025.
Downstream: Revenues of C$13.9 billion decreased from the prior-year level of C$14 billion. Net income totaled C$611 million compared with C$584 million in the year-ago period.
The company recorded petroleum product sales of 441,000 bpd, compared to 455,000 bpd in the first quarter of 2025. The figure missed our expectation of 494,000 bpd. The refinery throughput in the first quarter averaged 384,000 bpd, down from the prior-year quarter’s level of 397,000 bpd. Moreover, the figure missed our estimate of 412,000 bpd. Imperial Oil recorded lower refinery throughput, primarily due to unplanned downtime and a disruption of synthetic crude feedstock caused by Syncrude's coker outage. The capacity utilization of 88% was down from the year-ago level of 91%. The figure also missed our estimate.
Chemical: Revenues of C$336 million decreased from C$372 million in the first quarter of 2025. Net income totaled C$24 million compared with C$31 million in the year-ago period.
IMO’s Total Costs & CapexTotal expenses of C$11.2 billion increased from the year-ago quarter’s C$10.8 billion.
In the quarter under review, this Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) company’s capital and exploration expenditures totaled C$478 million, up from the year-ago quarter’s C$398 million.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Financial Performance for IMOCash flow from operating activities was C$756 million compared with C$1.5 billion in the year-ago quarter.
As of March 31, 2026, Imperial Oil had cash and cash equivalents of C$1 billion. Total debt of the company amounted to C$4 billion, with a debt-to-capitalization of 14.9%.
IMO’s Outlook for 2026IMO has already disclosed a capital and exploration spending budget ranging between C$2 billion and C$2.2 billion for 2026. Within its Upstream segment, production is anticipated to be in the range of 441,000-460,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day for the same year. Meanwhile, throughput in the Downstream segment is projected to be in the range of 395,000-405,000 barrels per day, accompanied by a capacity utilization rate of 91-93% throughout 2026.
Important Earnings at a GlanceWhile we have discussed IMO’s first-quarter results in detail, let us take a look at three other key reports in this space.
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN - Free Report) reported a first-quarter 2026 adjusted net loss of 6 cents per share, narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a 10-cent loss. However, the bottom line decreased from the year-ago quarter's breakeven result due to a decrease in operating income in its Drilling Services, Completion Services and Drilling Products segments.
Total revenues of $1.1 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 3.1%. This was driven by higher-than-expected revenues from the Drilling Services and Completion Services segments. The Drilling Services and Completion Services segments reported revenues of $351.7 million and $679.6 million, which beat the consensus mark of $350 million and $37.1 million, respectively. However, the top line decreased about 12.8% year over year. This underperformance can be attributed to the decrease in year-over-year segment revenues.
As of March 31, 2026, the company had cash and cash equivalents worth $337.2 million and long-term debt of $1.2 billion. Its debt-to-capitalization was 27.8%.
NOV Inc. (NOV - Free Report) reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 15 cents per share, which missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 17 cents. The bottom line also decreased 21% from the year-ago quarter’s 19 cents.
The oil and gas equipment and services company’s total revenues of $2.05 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by $2 million but fell 2.4% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of $2.1 billion.
The lower-than-expected quarterly earnings of the company were primarily attributable to conflict in the Middle East, which disrupted logistics, delayed deliveries and increased operational costs.
As of March 31, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $1.3 billion and long-term debt of $1.7 billion with a debt-to-capitalization of 21.2%. NOV had $1.5 billion available on its primary revolving credit facility during the same time.
Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR - Free Report) reported a first-quarter 2026 adjusted loss of $1.54 per share, narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $2.39. Additionally, the metric is significantly above the prior-year quarter’s reported loss of $7.5 per share. This outperformance was mainly driven by higher adjusted operating income from its International Drilling segment.
The oil and gas drilling company’s operating revenues of $783.5 million beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $779 million. The top line also increased from the year-ago quarter’s $736.2 million, primarily supported by higher contributions from the U.S. Drilling, International Drilling and Drilling Solutions segments.
As of March 31, 2026, Nabors had $500.9 million in cash and short-term investments. Long-term debt was about $2.1 billion, with a debt-to-capitalization of 78.8%.
For those looking to find strong Oils-Energy stocks, it is prudent to search for companies in the group that are outperforming their peers. Imperial Oil (IMO - Free Report) is a stock that can certainly grab the attention of many investors, but do its recent returns compare favorably to the sector as a whole? By taking a look at the stock's year-to-date performance in comparison to its Oils-Energy peers, we might be able to answer that question.
Imperial Oil is one of 240 companies in the Oils-Energy group. The Oils-Energy group currently sits at #1 within the Zacks Sector Rank. The Zacks Sector Rank includes 16 different groups and is listed in order from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors.
The Zacks Rank is a successful stock-picking model that emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions. The system highlights a number of different stocks that could be poised to outperform the broader market over the next one to three months. Imperial Oil is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy).
Over the past three months, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for IMO's full-year earnings has moved 83.3% higher. This is a sign of improving analyst sentiment and a positive earnings outlook trend.
Based on the latest available data, IMO has gained about 48.1% so far this year. Meanwhile, stocks in the Oils-Energy group have gained about 28.9% on average. This means that Imperial Oil is outperforming the sector as a whole this year.
Another Oils-Energy stock, which has outperformed the sector so far this year, is Cenovus Energy (CVE - Free Report) . The stock has returned 71.5% year-to-date.
Over the past three months, Cenovus Energy's consensus EPS estimate for the current year has increased 89.8%. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).
To break things down more, Imperial Oil belongs to the Oil and Gas - Integrated - Canadian industry, a group that includes 4 individual companies and currently sits at #4 in the Zacks Industry Rank. This group has gained an average of 54.9% so far this year, so IMO is slightly underperforming its industry in this area. Cenovus Energy is also part of the same industry.
Going forward, investors interested in Oils-Energy stocks should continue to pay close attention to Imperial Oil and Cenovus Energy as they could maintain their solid performance.
Listen to the audio version of this article (generated by AI).
The AI trade shifts to CPUs… Luke Lango with a batch of AI stocks to consider… Jonathan Rose eyes a Canadian oil squeeze … Louis Navellier is positioning for the Warsh Era If you acted on our March 19 Digest and jumped into Intel (INTC), congrats – you’re up about 150%, a move that’s nearly 14X’d the S&P over the same period.
What’s behind this surge?
A mix of rising AI-infrastructure demand, renewed enthusiasm around Intel’s foundry ambitions, and growing demand for server CPUs.
Zeroing in on that “server CPU” element, It’s not just Intel…
As we covered in yesterday’s Digest, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) – another huge CPU maker – jumped nearly 19% on Wednesday after strong earnings highlighted surging demand for AI data-center hardware – including server CPUs.
AMD forecast that server CPU revenue will grow by more than 70% year-over-year in the upcoming second quarter.
And CEO Lisa Su doubled the company’s long-term forecast for the server CPU market, now expecting it to reach $120 billion by 2030 (up from a previous estimate of $60 billion).
Now, before we go any further, let’s fill in some details…
What’s a CPU, and why should we care? Until recently, the AI boom has been defined by one thing…
Graphics processing units, or GPUs.
These specialized chips handle massive workloads all at once – powering everything from ChatGPT to enterprise AI systems – and they’ve been at the center of the AI explosion.
But as AI shifts from standalone chatbots to coordinated AI agents (the next phase of AI that’s racing toward us), the demands inside data centers are beginning to change.
Here’s our macro investing expert Eric Fry of Fry’s Investment Report connecting that shift:
Technology companies are now building agentic AI systems – networks of AI agents that collaborate to complete complex tasks.
Instead of answering one question, they manage entire workflows.
That shift dramatically changes the computing demands inside data centers.
Given this shift, a much older, far less flashy piece of technology suddenly becomes critical again…
You guessed it – the central processing unit, or CPU.
Of course, modern AI systems also rely on advanced networking, memory, and orchestration software. But CPUs remain central to directing workloads and keeping these increasingly complex systems operating efficiently.
If GPUs are the engines doing the heavy lifting, CPUs are increasingly becoming the conductors They direct traffic, coordinate tasks, and keep everything operating efficiently.
Back to Eric:
The GPUs run the AI models…
But the CPUs increasingly run the system that manages the AI.
So, the next phase of the AI boom may not be driven solely by bigger models, but by the infrastructure required to coordinate them.
Translation: growing demand for server CPUs.
Back to Eric:
The semiconductor industry is already seeing early signs of tightening supply for server CPUs.
Delivery times for some processors have stretched toward six months. Prices have risen more than 10% in certain markets.
That was the core analysis that led us to put Intel on your radar back in March. And here we are, 150% later.
We expect outsized demand for CPUs to continue driving INTC and AMD higher over the next 12 months.
But the opportunity here extends far beyond CPU leaders We also expect huge growth to come from:
high-bandwidth memory networking chips data-center interconnects power infrastructure AI server manufacturers Given this opportunity set, let’s put some new ideas on your radar today, courtesy of our technology expert Luke Lango of Innovation Investor.
On Tuesday, Luke covered the hyperscalers’ $700 billion spending commitments in 2026 to build out AI infrastructure, then asked the question…
Who benefits?
Here he is with some of the stocks he flagged:
Nvidia (NVDA) remains the primary beneficiary of AI compute spending, supplying GPUs to all four hyperscalers. Marvell Technology (MRVL) is building custom chips for Amazon and Microsoft. Applied Materials (AMAT), KLA Corporation (KLAC), and Lam Research (LRCX) supply the equipment used to manufacture every chip going into these data centers. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) provides power management semiconductors critical to the efficiency of AI compute. This list is hardly exhaustive. And while Luke is bullish on these companies, they’re not necessarily his favorite AI picks right now. To access his official AI recommendation list in Innovation Investor, click here to learn about joining him.
Here’s Luke’s overall message to investors today:
The AI trade is not a momentum trade built on narrative. It is a fundamental trade anchored in the largest capital investment cycle in the history of technology, validated by real revenue, real margins, and real customer commitments.
And the companies on the receiving end of that spending remain the most compelling investment opportunity in the market.
Shifting gears to the oil patch… Over the last two days, Brent crude has tumbled from around $108 to $101 (as I write) while West Texas Intermediate has pulled back from about $101 to $96.
As we covered in the Digest, the trigger was an Axios report that the U.S. and Iran are nearing a 14-point memorandum of understanding to end the war that has strangled roughly a fifth of global oil and gas supplies. As I write on Thursday, we’re still waiting for Iran’s response to the latest proposal from the U.S.
For most investors, this pullback in oil is just a headline. For veteran trader Jonathan Rose of Masters in Trading, it was the latest chapter in a story he’s been tracking since February.
When the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz was beginning, Jonathan was already highlighting where volatility-based opportunities would arise.
He flagged refiners, domestic producers, and commodity names before the crowd caught on – and his subscribers locked in a string of big wins as the conflict escalated.
Now, with oil pulling back sharply on peace hopes, Jonathan is looking at a completely different angle – one most traders aren’t even aware of…
While everyone watches the Middle East, he’s eyeing Canadian oil sands Here’s Jonathan to explain:
Bitumen – that thick, sludgy oil used in Canadian oil sands – is ripping higher.
To make sure we’re all on the same page, while bitumen prices have some sensitivity to Strait of Hormuz volatility, they’re primarily driven by Chinese infrastructure demand.
Oil sands producers, characterized by low marginal costs and high fixed capital, see explosive cash flow growth – and often, related stock moves – when these margins expand.
And recently, margins have been widening due to a “perfect storm” of rising prices and falling transportation costs.
For example, in March, Western Canada Select (WCS) prices averaged $75.85/barrel, nearly 40% higher than a year prior. Meanwhile, the “discount” Canadian producers pay to ship their oil has shrunk significantly. The Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) has allowed producers to reach Asian markets directly, boosting industry revenue by billions.
Which brings us back to Jonathan’s characterization of bitumen prices “ripping” higher.
Priced in Chinese yuan (because China is the world’s largest consumer), bitumen has jumped nearly 50% since January.
Back to Jonathan:
That’s a massive move.
There’s a squeeze happening in a market most traders don’t follow.
So, how do you play it? Jonathan has built a basket of five names with direct exposure: Suncor (SU), Cenovus (CVE), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Imperial Oil (IMO) and Strathcona (STHRF).
In Tuesday’s free Masters in Trading LIVE episode, he highlighted all five, but then zeroed in on his favorite: CNQ – low implied volatility, clean options structure, and room to run toward $60.
Rather than simply buying the stock outright, Jonathan is using options to structure a defined-risk bullish position in CNQ.
The appeal of this approach is straightforward – a relatively small upfront investment can yield significant upside if Canadian oil producers continue to rally.
In the example Jonathan walked through, roughly $150 of risk could turn into $800 or more if CNQ hits his target price.
Meanwhile, risk is capped at the initial premium Jonathan pays upfront – an approach Jonathan often favors when volatility creates asymmetric opportunities.
This is exactly how Jonathan operates… While the crowd chases the trade that’s playing out in the wake of the headline, Jonathan is positioning himself in the next setup that will become tomorrow’s headline.
If you’d like to understand how he finds opportunities like this ahead of time, his Masters in Trading Challenge walks you through that exact process over seven days, using real setups in real time.
Here’s Jonathan:
You’ll see how we identify catalysts, interpret the signals that matter, and translate those into real trades – all while managing risk in real time.
You’ve got nothing to prove. You’ve just got to be willing to learn.
You can get more details right here.
We’ll keep you updated on all these stories and trades here in the Digest.
Before we wrap up… legendary investor Louis Navellier has a message for you The Fed conversation we’ve been tracking in the Digest – rates stuck, inflation sticky, June 2027 the new baseline – has a flip side that’s caught Louis’ radar…
He believes that we’re still early in a major cycle shift – not because rate cuts are coming tomorrow, but because the broader transition to a new Fed regime is already underway. And historically, such transitions have been the setup for some of the biggest stock market winners in decades.
It happened in 1995, 2001, 2008, and 2020. Louis believes it’s happening again – which is why he’s already looking at the right portfolio positioning.
Louis just created a list of 53 under-the-radar stocks that his Stock Grader system is flagging. They have the same early signals he’s used to find some of the biggest winners of his four-decade career.
I’ll bring you more details on this over the coming days, but just a heads-up: he’s going live next Tuesday, May 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern to walk through all of it. He’ll also share one of his favorite stocks for this market shift during the broadcast.
More details to come, but to reserve your spot here today for this free event, just click here.
Key Takeaways IMO produced 419,000 barrels per day in Q1 2026, supported by Kearl and Cold Lake growth.Imperial Oil's downstream earnings reached C$611M in Q1 2026 from strong refining economics.IMO's strong balance sheet supports expansion projects and shareholder distributions. Imperial Oil Limited (IMO - Free Report) operates one of the largest integrated energy businesses in Canada, with operations spanning crude oil production, oil sands development, refining, chemicals and fuel marketing. The company generates revenues through upstream production from major assets like Kearl and Cold Lake, while its downstream refining and marketing business provides stable cash flows through the sale of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and petrochemical products.
Imperial Oil’s integrated structure allows it to reduce exposure to commodity price swings because stronger refining margins can partially offset weaker crude realizations. The company also benefits from an extensive coast-to-coast logistics network, which enhances refining flexibility and supports higher-margin product optimization across domestic and export markets. Over the past 60 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for IMO’s earnings per share has been revised up 89.33% for 2026 and 55.58% for 2027, signaling improving analyst expectations.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Over the past three months, IMO has outperformed the broader oil and energy sector, as represented by the Oils-Energy industry. IMO delivered a price return of 14.1% during this period, compared with the industry’s 8.9% growth, reflecting stronger relative momentum and investor confidence in its operational and financial performance.
Trend Analysis of Price Behavior Over 3 Months
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Given its strong standing within the industry, IMO continues to attract considerable investor attention. The company has benefited from several fundamental strengths that have supported its growth and operational momentum. Let’s discuss the key positive factors that could continue driving IMO’s performance.
Factors Strengthening IMO’s Market PositionIntegrated Business Model Reduces Volatility: IMO benefits from strong integration across upstream, downstream and chemical operations, which reduces earnings volatility during commodity price fluctuations. While weaker upstream realizations affected first-quarter earnings, downstream operations and refining margin improvements partially offset those pressures. This integrated business model provides greater stability compared with pure-play exploration and production companies, helping preserve profitability during challenging market conditions.
Strong Upstream Production Growth and Operational Stability: IMO continues to demonstrate strong operational resilience through stable upstream production growth and reliable asset performance. During the first quarter of 2026, gross oil-equivalent production averaged 419,000 barrels per day, supported by improved output from Kearl and Cold Lake. The company’s technology-driven operational strategy, particularly at Cold Lake, is helping increase production efficiency while lowering long-term unit cash costs, strengthening profitability across commodity cycles.
Advantageous Downstream Business Supports Earnings: IMO possesses a structurally advantaged downstream business that consistently supports earnings even during volatile crude price environments. In the first quarter of 2026, downstream earnings reached C$611 million, benefiting from lower operating expenses, strong refining economics and high-margin product optimization. The company’s coast-to-coast logistics network and refining flexibility allow it to maximize profitability by shifting production toward premium diesel and jet fuel markets.
Attractive Long-Term Production Expansion Pipeline: IMO’s long-term production growth outlook remains attractive due to multiple expansion projects across Kearl and Cold Lake. The company continues to advance secondary recovery initiatives, solvent-assisted SAGD developments and future projects like Mahihkan, which is expected to contribute substantial low-cost production volumes beginning later this decade. These projects are designed to improve recovery rates and extend reserve life with capital-efficient investments.
Renewable Diesel Operations Add Growth Potential: IMO’s downstream renewable diesel operations are becoming an increasingly valuable earnings contributor. During the first quarter of 2026, the Strathcona renewable diesel facility captured strong market value by replacing a more expensive imported supply. The project improves product diversification while positioning the company to benefit from tightening environmental regulations and growing low-carbon fuel demand in Canada.
Exposure to Stronger Global Energy Markets: Imperial Oil remains well-positioned to benefit from geopolitical supply uncertainty and tightening global energy markets. Management emphasized that Canada’s strategic importance as a stable commodity supplier has increased amid Middle East tensions and global supply disruptions. Imperial Oil’s integrated infrastructure and diversified asset base allow it to capitalize on stronger commodity pricing environments while maintaining resilience during weaker periods.
Extensive Logistics Network Creates Competitive Advantage: Imperial Oil’s refining and logistics infrastructure provides strong competitive advantages within the Canadian energy market. The company can optimize crude sourcing, transportation and refined product distribution through its extensive coast-to-coast network. This operational flexibility enables Imperial Oil to direct production toward the highest-value regional and export markets, supporting stronger refining margins and improved downstream profitability.
Kearl Optimization Supports Higher Margins: Imperial Oil’s Kearl operations continue to deliver reliable high-volume production while improving maintenance efficiency. The company is extending turnaround intervals at Kearl’s processing trains from two years to four years, which should reduce maintenance downtime and lower operating costs over time. Management also expects secondary recovery initiatives to generate incremental production growth using already processed ore, enhancing capital efficiency.
Strong Balance Sheet Enhances Financial Flexibility: Imperial Oil maintains a strong financial position with manageable leverage and significant asset strength. As of March 31, 2026, shareholders’ equity stood at approximately C$22.7 billion, while long-term debt remained below C$4 billion. This conservative balance sheet provides the company with flexibility to continue funding expansion projects, shareholder distributions and operational improvements even during periods of commodity market weakness.
Verdict for IMO Stock Imperial Oil continues to show strong growth through stable production, efficient operations and a resilient integrated business model that supports earnings during volatile market conditions. The company also benefits from expanding low-cost projects, a strong downstream and renewable diesel business, and a solid balance sheet that supports growth and financial flexibility.
With the company’s potential for improved financial performance and enhanced operational stability, investors may want to stay optimistic about its growth prospects. As this Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) company continues to strengthen position in the oil and gas sector, it offers exciting opportunities for those looking to benefit from long-term gains.
Other Key PicksInvestors interested in the energy sector might look at some other top-ranked stocks like APA Corporation (APA - Free Report) , Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ - Free Report) and Diamondback Energy (FANG - Free Report) , sporting a Zacks Rank #1 each at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
APA Corporation is valued at $13.71 billion. It is an independent exploration and production company engaged in developing oil and natural gas assets across the United States, Egypt and the North Sea. APA Corporation focuses on disciplined capital spending and operational efficiency to strengthen production growth and shareholder returns.
Canadian Natural Resources is valued at $101.13 billion. The company is one of Canada’s largest energy producers, with a diversified portfolio that includes crude oil, natural gas and oil sands operations. Canadian Natural Resources’ long-life, low-decline asset base supports stable cash flows and enables it to maintain a strong dividend profile.
Diamondback Energy is valued at $56.46 billion. It is a leading independent oil and gas company primarily operating in the prolific Permian Basin of West Texas. Diamondback Energy is recognized for its low-cost production model, strong free cash flow generation and focus on enhancing shareholder value through dividends and share repurchases.
Key Takeaways ADM is gaining from Nutrition growth, BioSolutions expansion and stronger digital capabilities.CASY and ROST are seeing sales growth from pricing, merchandising and store expansion efforts.NUE and IMO are benefiting from higher demand, expansion projects and improving profitability. Wall Street has been witnessing an astonishing rally since the beginning of 2023, barring some minor fluctuations. The prolonged rally has been primarily driven by the global artificial intelligence (AI) technology boom. Generative and agentic AI have transformed the entire landscape of the information technology sector worldwide.
A handful of non-AI stocks have also jumped year to date. Investment in these stocks with a favorable Zacks Rank should be fruitful in 2026. Five such non-AI stocks are: Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. (ADM - Free Report) , Casey's General Stores Inc. (CASY - Free Report) , Nucor Corp. (NUE - Free Report) , Ross Stores Inc. (ROST - Free Report) and Imperial Oil Ltd. (IMO - Free Report) .
Each of our picks currently carries either a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The chart below shows the price performance of our five picks year to date.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Zacks Rank #2 Archer-Daniels-Midland is benefiting from a rebound in its Nutrition segment. Human Nutrition is gaining traction, with the Flavors portfolio benefiting from solid North American demand, international customer wins and improved margins from a favorable mix and disciplined pricing.
ADM continues to advance its Optimize, Drive and Grow pillars, enhancing productivity, accelerating cost savings, expanding BioSolutions and leveraging digital tools to unlock margin opportunities and strengthen customer reach.
ADM is actively managing productivity and innovation as well as aligning work to the interconnected trends in food security, health and wellbeing. The company is well-positioned for sustainable long-term profit growth across new avenues.
ADM has been creating additional margin opportunities, opening up channels to customers, advancing digital technologies in areas like farmer needs, the extension of Regen Act programs and partnerships, and the growth of its BioSolutions platform.
Archer-Daniels-Midland has an expected revenue and earnings growth rate of 6.5% and 32.4%, respectively, for the current year. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year’s earnings has improved 5.3% over the last 30 days.
Casey's General Stores Inc.Zacks Rank #2 Casey's General Stores shows strong growth momentum, supported by resilient inside sales, driven by prepared foods, beverages and high-margin grocery categories. Effective pricing, product innovation and a favorable product mix continue to enhance CASY’s margins and customer traffic.
We anticipate the inside gross margin to expand 60 basis points year over year in fiscal 2026. CASY’s fuel segment is outperforming industry trends, strengthening market share and profitability despite price fluctuations.
The Fikes/CEFCO acquisition is boosting scale, operational efficiency and long-term growth potential, supported by integration synergies. CASY’s strong cash flow generation and stable financial position provide flexibility for investments, expansion, and shareholder returns, reinforcing confidence in its sustained growth trajectory and overall business strength.
Casey's General Stores has an expected revenue and earnings growth rate of 10.8% and 12.4%, respectively, for the current year (ending April 2027). The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year’s earnings has improved 1.5% over the last 30 days.
Nucor Corp.Zacks Rank #1 Nucor is committed to expanding its production capabilities and growing its business through strategic acquisitions. NUE’s efforts to boost production capacity through several growth projects should drive profitability. Nucor is also seeing strong momentum in non-residential construction.
NUE remains focused on achieving greater penetration in the automotive market. NUE is committed to maximizing returns to its shareholders by leveraging strong cash flows. Higher steel prices are also expected to support Nucor’s margins. Steel mills' price hikes amid a recovery in demand in key markets and tighter supply have led to an uptick in steel prices.
Nucor has an expected revenue and earnings growth rate of 14% and 92.5%, respectively, for the current year. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year’s earnings has improved 1.8% over the last seven days.
Ross Stores Inc.Zacks Rank #2 Ross Stores has been benefiting from the strong execution of its off-price retail model. ROST continues to benefit from solid demand for value-driven merchandise, delivering 21% sales growth and 17% comps growth in first-quarter fiscal 2026, supported by effective merchandising and marketing initiatives.
ROST is also progressing well on store-expansion plans, with long-term growth potential across both banners, targeting 2,900 Ross Dress for Less and 700 dd’s DISCOUNTS stores. For fiscal 2026, ROST expects comps growth of 6-7%, with earnings of $7.50-$7.74, up 13-17% year over year.
Solid financial flexibility, disciplined capital allocation and ongoing share repurchases highlight ROST’s commitment to shareholder returns, underscoring a robust business for continued growth.
Ross Stores has an expected revenue and earnings growth rate of 8.2% and 15.6%, respectively, for the current year (ending January 2027). The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year’s earnings has improved 3.9% over the last seven days.
Imperial Oil Ltd.Zacks Rank #1 Imperial Oil’s integrated business model, spanning oil sands production, refining, petrochemicals and retail operations, provides stable earnings and lowers exposure to oil-price volatility. Backing from parent Exxon Mobil strengthens IMO’s financial flexibility and access to low-cost capital.
IMO also maintains a growth pipeline, with expansion plans at Kearl and Cold Lake alongside projects like Mahihkan and Grand Rapids SA-SAGD that can increase production while improving recovery rates and lowering costs. Operating cash flow supports dividends and share repurchases, while IMO’s downstream and renewable diesel operations enhance profitability during periods of strong fuel demand.
Imperial Oil has an expected revenue and earnings growth rate of 28.6% and 70.7%, respectively, for the current year. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year’s earnings has improved 4.7% over the last seven days.
These ten large-cap stocks were the worst performers last week. Are they a part of your portfolio?
Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZS) fell 20.06% last week after the company reported third-quarter financial results and issued fourth-quarter sales guidance with its midpoint below estimates.
Cerebras Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:CBRS) declined 16.83% last week.
Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE:BSX) slumped 16.95% last week after multiple analysts lowered their price forecast on the stock.
AutoZone, Inc. (NYSE:AZO) decreased 14.21% last week. The company reported third-quarter financial results. Multiple analysts lowered their price forecast on the stock.
Fervo Energy Company (NASDAQ:FRVO) fell 13.09% last week.
PDD Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:PDD) decreased 9.14% last week. Multiple analysts lowered their price forecast on the stock.
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:RGC) decreased 12.61% last week.
Lumentum Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:LITE) slumped 0.87% last week.
Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX:IMO) declined 11.53% last week.
Image by refrina via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Teledyne Gas and Flame Detection (Teledyne GFD), part of Teledyne Technologies Incorporated NYSE:TDY , is responding to updated International Maritime Organization (IMO) recommendations for entering enclosed spaces aboard ships with gas detection solutions that help operators strengthen atmospheric monitoring and address evolving safety expectations.
This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260601441845/en/
Teledyne Gas and Flame Detection's Maritime Safety Monitoring
IMO Resolution MSC.581(110) broadens recommended gas testing protocols to include carbon dioxide alongside other key atmospheric hazards. Growing demand for these solutions has contributed to multiple related awards year-to-date, reflecting increased focus across the maritime sector on safety readiness and compliance.
“The IMO’s revised recommendations represent an important advancement for maritime safety,” said Thibault Fourlegnie, Vice President and General Manager, Teledyne GFD. “We provide practical gas detection solutions that help customers improve enclosed-space safety and meet evolving compliance expectations.”
Manufactured at Teledyne GFD’s facility in Renfrew, Scotland, the company’s gas detection solutions draw upon more than 75 years of engineering and manufacturing expertise in industrial safety technologies. Investment at the plant is ongoing in line with growing global demand.
About Teledyne Gas and Flame Detection
Teledyne GFD equips ship operators, partners, and stakeholders with technologies that help protect personnel, strengthen compliance, and promote safer working practices across the industry. With marine-approved gas detection solutions manufactured in Renfrew, Scotland, the company helps customers address evolving enclosed-space safety expectations. For more information, visit Teledyne Gas and Flame Detection.
About Teledyne
Teledyne is a leading provider of sophisticated digital imaging products and software, instrumentation, aerospace and defense electronics, and engineered systems. Teledyne's operations are primarily located in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Western and Northern Europe. For more information, visit Teledyne's website at teledyne.com.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260601441845/en/
PPG (NYSE: PPG) today announced the publication of a white paper, Electrostatic Application of Marine Hull Coatings, detailing how this advanced application technology can help ship owners and operators improve efficiency and reduce environmental impact.
This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260602638674/en/
PPG issues white paper exploring how electrostatic application supports operational efficiency throughout the shipping industry.
Electrostatic application works by negatively charging paint particles at the spray gun nozzle while the substrate is grounded, causing the coating to be attracted to the surface like a magnet. Compared with traditional spraying, the process improves transfer efficiency and reduces overspray, resulting in a more uniform coating application. In one case study, the EDR Antwerp shipyard reported a 40% reduction in overspray.
“Electrostatic application is a breakthrough process innovation that, combined with our chemistry innovation, delivers improved productivity and sustainability for our shipyard customers,” said Jan Willem Tegelaar, PPG global platform director, marine coatings. “It has already revolutionized the automotive and aerospace industries; building on this cross-industry expertise, we have adapted the technology and developed compatible fouling control coatings to save time and reduce waste without disrupting existing workflows for marine vessels.”
The process supports reduced waste and Scope 3 carbon lifecycle savings compared to traditional application methods, as significant reduction in paint consumption means fewer raw materials need to be extracted, manufactured or transported. These reductions are in addition to the operational carbon savings achieved by vessels coated with low-friction solutions, which can help ship owners reduce Scope 1 emissions.
“Electrostatic application is just one piece of the puzzle. Combined with advanced hull coating performance, it contributes to a more effective sustainability solution,” said Joanna van Helmond, PPG product development director, marine fouling control, Protective and Marine Coatings. “Friction caused by biofouling can account for 50% of a ship’s total drag1, leading to higher fuel consumption. By applying solutions such as PPG SIGMAGLIDE® 2390 coating electrostatically, we can create a smoother, glossier film that reduces hydrodynamic resistance. This in turn leads to lower fuel consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.”
Topics covered in the white paper include:
The history of electrostatic spray technology and how it works. Operational advantages of electrostatic application for shipyards and owners. The role of hull coatings in supporting the International Maritime Organization (IMO) decarbonization goals and improving vessel efficiency. In addition, PPG will present its 360 degree approach to marine coatings, including low-friction hull coatings, electrostatic application and digital tools, at the Posidonia International Shipping Exhibition (Stand 3.104) under the theme Reach New Horizons of Sustainability and Performance.
The white paper is available for download here. To learn more about PPG’s Protective and Marine Coatings business, visit ppg.com/pmc.
1) Youngrong Kim, Refik Ozyurt, Underestimated penalty of hull fouling: A scenario-based analysis of GHG emissions from global shipping, Applied Ocean Research, Volume 165, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104870.
PPG: WE PROTECT AND BEAUTIFY THE WORLD®
At PPG NYSE:PPG , we work every day to develop and deliver the paints, coatings and specialty products that our customers have trusted for more than 140 years. Through dedication and creativity, we solve our customers’ biggest challenges, collaborating closely to find the right path forward. With headquarters in Pittsburgh, we operate and innovate in more than 50 countries and reported net sales of $15.9 billion in 2025. We serve customers in construction, consumer products, industrial and transportation markets and aftermarkets. To learn more, visit www.ppg.com.
The PPG Logo and We Protect and Beautify the World are registered trademarks of PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.
Sigmaglide is a registered trademark of PPG Coatings Nederland B.V.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260602638674/en/
For those looking to find strong Oils-Energy stocks, it is prudent to search for companies in the group that are outperforming their peers. Is Imperial Oil (IMO - Free Report) one of those stocks right now? A quick glance at the company's year-to-date performance in comparison to the rest of the Oils-Energy sector should help us answer this question.
Imperial Oil is a member of our Oils-Energy group, which includes 238 different companies and currently sits at #4 in the Zacks Sector Rank. The Zacks Sector Rank includes 16 different groups and is listed in order from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors.
The Zacks Rank is a successful stock-picking model that emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions. The system highlights a number of different stocks that could be poised to outperform the broader market over the next one to three months. Imperial Oil is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy).
Over the past 90 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for IMO's full-year earnings has moved 100.2% higher. This means that analyst sentiment is stronger and the stock's earnings outlook is improving.
Our latest available data shows that IMO has returned about 37.9% since the start of the calendar year. At the same time, Oils-Energy stocks have gained an average of 24.4%. This shows that Imperial Oil is outperforming its peers so far this year.
Another stock in the Oils-Energy sector, Cenovus Energy (CVE - Free Report) , has outperformed the sector so far this year. The stock's year-to-date return is 63.4%.
For Cenovus Energy, the consensus EPS estimate for the current year has increased 178.2% over the past three months. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).
Looking more specifically, Imperial Oil belongs to the Oil and Gas - Integrated - Canadian industry, a group that includes 4 individual stocks and currently sits at #7 in the Zacks Industry Rank. Stocks in this group have gained about 47.5% so far this year, so IMO is slightly underperforming its industry this group in terms of year-to-date returns. Cenovus Energy is also part of the same industry.
Investors with an interest in Oils-Energy stocks should continue to track Imperial Oil and Cenovus Energy. These stocks will be looking to continue their solid performance.
The Imperial Strathcona Refinery which produces petrochemicals is seen near Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, October 7, 2021. REUTERS/Todd Korol Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesJune 11 (Reuters) - Canada's Imperial Oil (IMO.TO), opens new tab was fined C$120,000 ($85,849.19) after pleading guilty in an Alberta court to breaching environmental regulations tied to an industrial wastewater overflow at its Kearl oil sands site, the province's energy regulator said on Thursday.
Following a May 29 hearing in the Alberta Court of Justice, the Canadian oil producer was ordered to pay C$2,000 in fines, including a victim surcharge, along with C$118,000 towards a creative sentencing project, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.
The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.
The company has taken actions to prevent reoccurrence, including reprogramming equipment, updating sediment management processes and increasing inspections and training, it said in an emailed statement.
"No water from this overflow entered any rivers and there continues to be no indication of adverse impacts to local wildlife. We continue to share monitoring data with local Indigenous communities and provide site tours of the area."
The charge relates to an incident on February 4, 2023, in which wastewater overflowed from a drainage pond at the Kearl Oil Sands Processing Plant and Mine and was reported to the regulator.
The offence falls under the province's Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act.
($1 = 1.3978 Canadian dollars)
Reporting by Sumit Saha in Bengaluru; Editing by Leroy Leo
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
1. Elliott Investment to Push Synopsis Profitability Elliott Investment Management has built up a multibillion-dollar stake in chip-design software maker Synopsys (SNPS 0.92%), according to The Wall Street Journal. The activist investor intends to push Synopsys – recommended by both Team Hidden Gems and Team Rule Breakers – to grow its software and services profitability, the report says. The stock rose 2.5% in early trading.
"Synopsys tool users are gonna go through the roof": Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia (NVDA +2.30%) – a Synopsys customer and shareholder – spoke at the Synopsys Converge 2026 conference this month. Other chip design customers include Tesla (TSLA +4.65%), Alphabet (GOOG +1.19%) and Intel (INTC +9.34%). "Necessary tools because chips will continue to be designed": Speaking of the impact of AI on Synopsys and Cadence (CDNS 0.36%), Fool contributing analysts Travis Hoium, Jon Quast, and Jose Najarro concluded: "AI may change workflows, but it doesn't remove the need for subscriptions, and usage could rise as AI features expand." 2. Oil Shock Pushes Markets Down The Dow last week hit its longest losing streak since 2023, declining for four weeks in a row, as the uncertain direction of the conflict in Iran continues to put pressure on markets. The S&P 500 fell 1.9% over the week, with the Nasdaq down 2.1%. Futures fell 0.6% and 0.7% for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq respectively this morning. Gold is following markets down, losing over 7% earlier to just over $4,100 an ounce.
"Where can I put my money to work to make money off this?": Fool contributing analyst Jim Mueller notes "the urge to do something is really strong," but there's no point chasing prices that have already moved. He reminds us "We're looking five, 10, 20 years out, right?" So "let others 'enjoy' the panic and fear." "The war in Iran doesn't seem to be slowing down": With WTI crude still hovering around $100 per barrel, a recent Motley Fool Money podcast episode suggests higher costs could hit many industries, and highlights "how we're investing through it all." 3. Pick of the Week's Q4 Earnings Braze (BRZE +0.00%) is due to report Tuesday, after the Rule Breakers recommendation saw Q3 revenue climb 25% year over year (YoY) as management lifted full-year guidance. Watch for revenue contributions from new AI-based tools on the company's enterprise platform. Oxford Industries (OXM 17.01%) saw losses widen in Q3, partly due to a $61 million impairment, but also suffering margin pressures. Management at the Dividend Investor rec lowered full-year expectations, and we should expect net sales between $1.47 billion and $1.49 billion. Recent share price falls put the forecast dividend yield at 8.1%. Chewy (CHWY 6.06%), a Team Rule Breakers rec in Stock Advisor, will update us Wednesday – following an 8% YoY revenue rise in the previous quarter. At the time, Fool analyst Alicia Alfiere pointed out customer counts shrank after the pandemic, but noted the "trend flipped back to growth in the middle of last year," adding "net sales per active customer grew almost 5%" in Q3. 4. Your Take Which – if any – of the Magnificent Seven companies are you most tempted to invest in at the current moment? What's driving that temptation – valuation, a specific catalyst, or something else?
Share with friends and family, or become a member to hear what your fellow Fools are saying!
When the Strait of Hormuz effectively closed on Feb. 28, most of the financial coverage focused on oil. That's understandable, as roughly 20% of the world's oil and natural gas supplies transit that waterway every day. But fixating on oil prices misses the bigger supply chain story, and for investors in consumer goods, that story is more immediately threatening. It's threatening for things as commonplace as your favorite blue jeans or baby products.
The countries most responsible for manufacturing the clothes, shoes, and household goods sold in American retail stores -- Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Sri Lanka -- sit either directly within the affected shipping corridors or in adjacent routes that are now severely congested and expensive. Within hours of the closure, four of the world's largest container shipping lines suspended transits. War risk premiums on hull insurance surged to as high as 1.5% of hull value.
Image source: Getty Images.
Rerouting costs that occurred from trucking goods overland, using smaller alternative ports, and rerouting around the African continent entirely are adding high costs at every node.
Even with the possibility of the conflict ending sooner rather than later, plenty of companies from multiple industries will be adversely affected, possibly for the full year. Here are four consumer goods stocks with clear, measurable exposure to these current events.
1. Carter's Carter's (CRI +5.72%) is the largest branded baby and young children's apparel company in North America, and it sources predominantly from contract manufacturers in Vietnam, Cambodia, Bangladesh, India, and China. The company already estimated that tariff-related costs would amount to $200 million to $250 million on an annualized basis, even before the Hormuz closure. The tariff impact will result in the closing of 150 stores and the cutting 15% of its workforce.
Any sustained supply disruption from the corridor on which Carter's manufacturing base depends would compound an already-stressed cost structure.
Today's Change
(
5.72
%) $
2.25
Current Price
$
41.58
2. Oxford Industries Oxford Industries (OXM 17.01%) is the parent company of Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, and Johnny Was. In fiscal 2025, tariffs alone reduced earnings by $1.25 to $1.50 per share, forcing inventory cuts and deeper discounts. The company has been scrambling to shift sourcing away from China, but its alternatives -- India, Vietnam, Bangladesh -- are precisely the countries most affected by the Hormuz shipping disruption and the resulting rerouting costs.
A company already carrying $81 million in debt and cutting earnings guidance cannot easily absorb another spike in freight and insurance costs.
Today's Change
(
5.89
%) $
4.47
Current Price
$
80.41
3. Kontoor Brands Kontoor Brands (KTB +5.89%) owns Wrangler and Lee, two of the most recognizable denim brands in the world. Kontoor sources more than 60% of its total apparel output from Asia, primarily Bangladesh, Vietnam, China, India, and Pakistan.
Cotton sourcing and specialty denim materials from India and Pakistan, in particular, face disruption as vessels reroute or shelter in place. Freight surcharges and war risk premiums will be reflected directly in Kontoor's cost of goods.
Today's Change
(
5.89
%) $
4.47
Current Price
$
80.41
4. Gap Inc. Gap (GAP +3.60%) has done the work of diversifying away from China; Vietnam is now its largest supplier at about 29% of sourcing, followed by Indonesia and India. That's exactly the problem: Vietnam and India are the two countries most exposed to rising shipping costs and route disruption from the Hormuz closure.
Vogue magazine reported that the Port of Salalah in Oman -- a key transshipment hub for Gap, Banana Republic, and Old Navy garments -- is directly entangled in the conflict zone. CEO Richard Dickson has been making all the right moves on supply chain diversification, but the diversification landed the company's sourcing base in precisely the wrong place for this crisis.
Global supply chain issues are the new norm It's important to note that, right now (in late March 2026), some tankers and shipping vessels are starting to make their way through the Strait, and just this week, President Donald Trump said he's going to pause strikes after "very good" talks with Iran. The public comments coming from Iran aren't nearly as positive. Who is to be believed? In the world of politics and global commerce, things can change with a simple social media post.
That being said, the global supply chain is a complicated thing, and issues of all sorts are always being dealt with. The best companies are the ones that can manage the complications well. With regard to this particular complication, it is still to be seen how much harm will come to these companies and others. But I'd be wary of touching the above tickers until there is some clearer guidance on what's actually going on in the Middle East.
Oxford Industries, Inc. (NYSE:OXM) will release earnings for its fourth quarter after the closing bell on Thursday, March 26.
Analysts expect the Atlanta, Georgia-based company to report quarterly earnings of 3 cents per share, down from $1.37 per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Oxford Industries' quarterly revenue is $371.84 million (it reported $390.5 million last year), according to Benzinga Pro.
On Dec. 10, Oxford Industries posted upbeat third-quarter results but slashed its FY25 guidance below estimates.
Oxford Industries shares fell 2.5% to close at $32.97 on Wednesday.
Benzinga readers can access the latest analyst ratings on the Analyst Stock Ratings page. Readers can sort by stock ticker, company name, analyst firm, rating change or other variables.
Let's have a look at how Benzinga's most-accurate analysts have rated the company in the recent period.
Considering buying OXM stock? Here’s what analysts think:
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Oxford Industries, Inc. (NYSE:OXM) will release earnings for its fourth quarter after the closing bell on Thursday, March 26.
Analysts expect the Atlanta, Georgia-based company to report quarterly earnings of 3 cents per share, down from $1.37 per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Oxford Industries' quarterly revenue is $371.84 million (it reported $390.5 million last year), according to Benzinga Pro.
On Dec. 10, Oxford Industries posted upbeat third-quarter results but slashed its FY25 guidance below estimates.
Oxford Industries shares fell 2.5% to close at $32.97 on Wednesday.
Benzinga readers can access the latest analyst ratings on the Analyst Stock Ratings page. Readers can sort by stock ticker, company name, analyst firm, rating change or other variables.
Let's have a look at how Benzinga's most-accurate analysts have rated the company in the recent period.
Considering buying OXM stock? Here’s what analysts think:
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Initiates fiscal 2026 guidance reflecting meaningfully improved profitability on modest sales growth driven by improvement at Tommy Bahama.Fiscal 2026 guidance includes revenues of $1.475 billion to $1.530 billion, GAAP EPS of $1.83 to $2.43 and adjusted EPS of $2.10 to $2.70; EPS expectations assume IEEPA tariff rates continued for balance of year.Increases quarterly dividend to $0.70 per share. ATLANTA, March 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Oxford Industries, Inc. (NYSE:OXM) today announced financial results for its fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2025 ended January 31, 2026 and initiated guidance for the first quarter and full fiscal year 2026.
Consolidated net sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 were $374 million compared to $391 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Diluted loss per share on a GAAP basis was $0.48, which includes $0.24 per share of charges related to an increased LIFO reserve compared to earnings per share (EPS) of $1.13 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. On an adjusted basis, loss per share was $0.09 compared to EPS of $1.37 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, loss per share on both a GAAP and adjusted basis includes a $0.19 charge related to the Saks Global bankruptcy.
Consolidated net sales for the full fiscal year 2025 decreased 3% to $1.48 billion compared to $1.52 billion in fiscal 2024. Loss per share was $1.86 compared to EPS of $5.87 in fiscal 2024. Fiscal 2025 results included noncash impairment charges totaling $61 million, or $3.02 per share primarily associated with the Johnny Was trademark. On an adjusted basis, EPS was $2.11 in fiscal 2025 compared to $6.68 in fiscal 2024.
Tom Chubb, Chairman and CEO, commented, “Momentum in our largest business, Tommy Bahama, improved as the quarter progressed, with trends strengthening beginning in late January. This momentum helped us deliver fourth quarter net sales and adjusted earnings per share within our guidance ranges, excluding charges associated with the bankruptcy of Saks Global, against the backdrop of an uneven consumer environment. While traffic and conversion trends were pressured across much of our portfolio during the holiday season, and higher tariffs increased our costs, the strategic actions we took to strengthen our supply chain and diversify our sourcing allowed us to protect our strong gross margins. We also adjusted our merchandise assortments to better match customer expectations, important actions that helped return overall comparable sales to positive territory as fiscal 2025 concluded.”
Mr. Chubb concluded, “Fiscal 2026 is off to a good start, with the improving top-line momentum driven by mid single digit positive comps at Tommy Bahama starting in late January continuing first quarter to-date during the start of our important resort and early spring seasons. We expect this momentum, together with the actions we took in fiscal 2025, to support improved earnings in fiscal 2026. While uncertainty persists across the consumer and macroeconomic environment, including tariffs and the conflicts in the Middle East, we are entering the year with a stronger operational foundation. Our investments in technology and infrastructure, including our recently opened Lyons, Georgia distribution center, support that foundation and are expected to provide meaningful financial and strategic benefits over time. As always, we remain focused on disciplined execution, with an emphasis on improving profitability and strengthening our brands for the long term. We are proud of the teams across our organization that make this all possible.”
Fiscal 2025 versus Fiscal 2024
Net Sales by Operating GroupFourth QuarterFiscal Year($ in millions)20252024% Change20252024% ChangeTommy Bahama$229.2$237.6(4%)$828.5$869.6(5%)Lilly Pulitzer73.574.0(1%)337.8323.94%Johnny Was37.947.4(20%)169.1195.0(13%)Emerging Brands34.031.67%142.9128.411%Other(0.2)(0.1)NM(0.4)(0.3)NMTotal Company$374.5$390.5(4%)$1,477.8$1,516.6(3%) For the full fiscal year 2025, consolidated net sales of $1.48 billion decreased 3% compared to sales of $1.52 billion in the prior year. Fourth quarter consolidated net sales decreased 4% over the prior year to $374 million. The net sales decrease includes the following in each channel of distribution: Full-price DTC sales of $1.0 billion decreased 3% for the year. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, full-price DTC sales of $268 million decreased 5% versus the prior-year period. Full-price retail sales of $509 million decreased 3% for the year. For the fourth quarter, full-price retail sales of $130 million decreased 4%;E-commerce sales of $506 million decreased 3% for the year. For the fourth quarter, e-commerce sales of $137 million decreased 6%; Food and beverage sales of $121 million grew 4% for the year. For the fourth quarter, food and beverage sales of $34 million increased 15%. The increases for the full year and the fourth quarter were driven by new locations.Outlet sales of $74 million decreased 2% for the year. For the fourth quarter, outlet sales of $18 million decreased 2%.Wholesale sales of $268 million decreased 5% for the year. For the fourth quarter, wholesale sales of $55 million decreased 10%. Gross margin was 60.7% compared to 62.9% in the prior year. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, gross margin was 56.8% compared to 60.6%. The decreased gross margin for the full fiscal year was primarily due to (1) approximately $30 million of increased cost of goods sold, or approximately 200 basis points, from additional tariffs enacted in fiscal 2025, (2) a change in sales mix with a higher proportion of net sales occurring during promotional and clearance events at Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer and (3) a $5 million higher LIFO accounting charge in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024. These decreases were partially offset by (1) lower freight costs to customers due to improved carrier rates from contract renegotiations and (2) a change in sales mix with wholesale sales representing a lower proportion of net sales. On an adjusted basis, gross margin was 61.3% compared to 63.2% in the prior year. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, adjusted gross margin was 58.0% compared to 60.8%.SG&A was $818 million for the full fiscal year 2025 compared to $787 million in the prior year. For the fourth quarter, SG&A was $207 million compared to $203 million in the prior year. For the full fiscal year, approximately $15 million, or 47%, of the increase was due to the increase in bricks and mortar retail locations with a net of 10 additional locations added during fiscal 2025. There were additional increases in (1) software subscription related costs, (2) occupancy costs, (3) consulting and professional services and (4) credit losses primarily due to the Saks Global bankruptcy. These increases were partially offset by decreases in (1) advertising costs and (2) samples, supplies and travel costs. On an adjusted basis, SG&A was $815 million compared to $784 million in the prior year. For the fourth quarter, adjusted SG&A was $206 million compared to $201 million in the prior year.Royalties and other operating income decreased $4 million to $16 million for the full year primarily due to decreased royalty income in Tommy Bahama reflecting the lower sales of licensing partners.Full-year net loss was $28 million in fiscal 2025, compared to net earnings of $93 million in the prior year. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, net loss was $7 million compared to net earnings of $18 million in the prior year.Full-year EBITDA was $36 million in fiscal 2025, compared to $187 million in the prior year. On an adjusted basis, full-year EBITDA was $107 million compared to $193 million in the prior year. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, adjusted EBITDA was $8 million compared to $38 million in the prior year, while adjusted EBITDA was $14 million in fiscal 2025 and $40 million in the prior year.As a result of interim impairment assessments performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company recognized noncash impairment charges totaling $61 million, primarily related to the Johnny Was trademark.Interest expense increased to $7 million from $2 million in the prior year period primarily due to higher average outstanding debt during fiscal 2025 than the prior year.The effective tax rate for fiscal 2025 was 27% compared to 20% in the prior year. The effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 was 27% compared to 8% for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. The effective tax rates for both the full year and fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 were higher than a typical effective tax rate of 25% and included certain unfavorable discrete items that are not expected to recur in future periods.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
Inventory decreased $2 million, or 1%, on a LIFO basis and increased $6 million, or 2%, on a FIFO basis compared to the end of fiscal 2024 primarily due to slight inventory increases in all operating segments, with the exception of Johnny Was. The increase on a FIFO basis was driven primarily by increased tariffs. As of January 31, 2026, the Company had $11 million of additional costs capitalized into inventory related to the U.S. tariffs implemented in Fiscal 2025.
During fiscal 2025, cash flow from operations was $120 million compared to $194 million in fiscal 2024. The decrease in cash flow from operations reflects the result of lower net earnings and working capital needs.
Borrowings outstanding increased to $116 million at the end of fiscal 2025 as lower earnings, capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividends and working capital needs exceeded cash flows from operations. At the end of fiscal 2025, the Company had $8 million of cash and cash equivalents versus $9 million of cash and cash equivalents at the end of fiscal 2024.
Capital expenditures of $108 million in fiscal 2025 decreased from $134 million in fiscal 2024. The decrease in fiscal 2025 was primarily due to the opening of fewer new retail stores and Tommy Bahama Marlin Bars in fiscal 2025 than in fiscal 2024. We also spent $54 million of capital expenditures related to the new distribution center in Lyons, Georgia in fiscal 2025 compared to $69 million in fiscal 2024. Approximately $20 million of spending originally expected in fiscal 2025 to complete the Lyons, Georgia project is now expected to occur in fiscal 2026.
Dividend
On March 23, 2026, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.70 per share, or a 1% increase above the previous dividend payment. The dividend is payable on May 1, 2026 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 17, 2026. The Company has paid dividends every quarter since it became publicly owned in 1960.
Outlook
The Company initiated sales and EPS guidance for fiscal 2026. The Company expects net sales in a range of $1.475 billion to $1.530 billion compared to net sales of $1.478 billion in fiscal 2025. In fiscal 2026, GAAP EPS is expected to be between $1.83 and $2.43 compared to fiscal 2025 GAAP loss per share of $1.86. Adjusted EPS is expected to be between $2.10 and $2.70, compared to fiscal 2025 adjusted EPS of $2.11. The fiscal 2026 guidance also includes:
An approximate $20 million, or $1.00 per share impact of higher tariffs resulting from the annualized impact of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA") tariffs enacted in April 2025;$5 million of primarily increased depreciation related expenses, or approximately $0.25 per share impact, related to the new Lyons, Georgia distribution center;A higher adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 28% compared to 24% in 2025, or $2 million of additional tax expense, or a $0.15 per share impact; and$1 million, or $0.05 per share impact from higher interest expense with increases from higher average debt levels in the first half of the year partially offset by decreases from lower average debt levels in the second half of the year. For the first quarter of fiscal 2026, the Company expects net sales to be between $385 million and $395 million compared to net sales of $393 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. GAAP EPS is expected to be in a range of $1.13 to $1.23 in the first quarter compared to GAAP EPS of $1.70 in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Adjusted EPS is expected to be between $1.20 and $1.30 compared to adjusted EPS of $1.82 in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. The first quarter fiscal 2026 guidance also includes:
An approximate $12 million, or $0.60 per share impact of higher tariffs resulting from the annualized impact of the IEEPA tariffs enacted in April 2025;$1 million of primarily increased depreciation related expenses, or approximately $0.05 per share impact, related to the new Lyons, Georgia distribution center;$1 million, or $0.05 per share impact from higher interest expense; andA higher adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 25% compared to 24% in 2025. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2026 are expected to be approximately $65 million, including approximately $20 million to complete the new Lyons, Georgia facility, compared to $108 million in fiscal 2025. The decrease is due to reductions in expenditures related to the completion of the new distribution center in Lyons, Georgia in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 along with fewer new store openings.
Conference Call
The Company will hold a conference call with senior management to discuss its financial results at 4:30 p.m. ET today. A live web cast of the conference call will be available on the Company’s website at www.oxfordinc.com. A replay of the call will be available through April 9, 2026 by dialing (412) 317-6671 access code 13758689.
About Oxford
Oxford Industries, Inc., a leader in the apparel industry, owns and markets the distinctive Tommy Bahama®, Lilly Pulitzer®, Johnny Was®, Southern Tide®, The Beaufort Bonnet Company®, Duck Head® and Jack Rogers® lifestyle brands. Oxford's stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 1964 under the symbol OXM. For more information, please visit Oxford's website at www.oxfordinc.com.
Basis of Presentation
All per share information is presented on a diluted basis.
Non-GAAP Financial Information
The Company reports its consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). To supplement these consolidated financial results, management believes that a presentation and discussion of certain financial measures on an adjusted basis, which exclude certain non-operating or discrete gains, charges or other items, may provide a more meaningful basis on which investors may compare the Company’s ongoing results of operations between periods. These measures include EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted segment EBITDA, adjusted net earnings (loss), adjusted net earnings (loss) per diluted share, adjusted gross profit, adjusted gross margin, adjusted SG&A and adjusted operating income (loss), among others.
Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operational, and planning decisions to evaluate the Company’s ongoing performance. Management also uses these adjusted financial measures to discuss its business with investment and other financial institutions, its board of directors and others. As noted, below in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, we changed our segment profitability metric to segment EBITDA. As a supplement to this metric, we also present adjusted segment EBITDA, which excludes certain non-operating, non-cash or extraordinary items such as LIFO adjustments, the amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets, Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives, Johnny Was Distribution Center movement costs, Johnny Was impairment charges, Emerging Brands impairment charges and the impact of income taxes. Reconciliations of these adjusted measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP are presented in tables in this release.
Safe Harbor
This press release includes statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Generally, the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "project," "will" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. We intend for all forward-looking statements contained herein, in our press releases or on our website, and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf, to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Such statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, without limitation:
changes in the trade policies of the United States and those of other nations, including risks of potential future changes or worsening trade tensions between the United States and other countries and the impact of uncertainties surrounding U.S. trade policy on consumer sentiment;the roll-back of incremental tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and any additional actions taken in response to their roll-back, including tariffs imposed pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 or our ability to recover refunds of incremental tariff amounts or other tariffs paid;demand for our products, which may be impacted by macroeconomic factors that may impact consumer discretionary spending and pricing levels for apparel and related products, many of which may be impacted by inflationary pressures, tariffs, volatile and/or elevated interest rates, the stability of the banking industry or general economic uncertainty, and the effectiveness of measures to mitigate the impact of these factors;risks relating to our product sourcing efforts, including our ability to identify alternative countries to source and produce our products and to successfully implement changes in our supply chain;possible changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including, but not limited to, Federal Reserve policies in connection with continued inflationary pressures or other factors;competitive conditions and/or evolving consumer shopping patterns, particularly in a highly promotional retail environment;global supply chain constraints that have affected, and could continue to affect, transit, and other costs, including those related to disruptions of land or sea transportation routes or distribution or shipping channels;the impact of inflationary pressures on labor costs, including wages, healthcare and other benefit-related costs;costs of products as well as the raw materials used in those products, as well as our ability to pass along price increases to consumers;energy costs;our ability to respond to rapidly changing consumer expectations;unseasonal or extreme weather conditions or natural disasters, such as the 2024 hurricanes impacting the Southeastern United States;lack of or insufficient insurance coverage;financial difficulties for our business partners, including suppliers, vendors, wholesale customers, licensees, logistics providers and landlords, that may impact their ability to meet their obligations to us and/or continue our business relationship to the same degree as they have historically;hiring of, retention of and disciplined execution by key management and other critical personnel, as well as the effective transition of executive level responsibilities;the execution of key strategic initiatives to drive operating performance, such as the organizational realignment initiatives being undertaken at Johnny Was;cybersecurity breaches and ransomware attacks, as well as our and our third party vendors’ ability to properly collect, use, manage and secure business, consumer and employee data and maintain continuity of our information technology systems;inability or failure to successfully and effectively implement new information technology systems and supporting controls, including artificial intelligence-enabled tools;the effectiveness of our advertising initiatives in defining, launching and communicating brand-relevant customer experiences;the level of our indebtedness, including the risks associated with heightened interest rates on the debt and the potential impact on our ability to operate and expand our business;the timing of shipments requested by our wholesale customers;fluctuations and volatility in global financial and/or real estate markets;our ability to identify and secure suitable locations for new retail store and food and beverage openings;the timing and cost of retail store and food and beverage location openings and remodels, technology implementations and other capital expenditures, including those related to enhancing artificial intelligence capabilities;the timing, cost and successful implementation of changes to our distribution network;the effectiveness of recent, focused efforts to reassess and realign our operating costs in light of revenue trends, including potential disruptions to our operations as a result of these efforts;pandemics or other public health crises;expected outcomes of pending or potential litigation and regulatory actions;consumer, employee and regulatory focus on sustainability issues and practices, including failures by our suppliers to adhere to our vendor code of conduct;the regulation or prohibition of goods sourced, or containing raw materials or components, from certain regions and our ability to evidence compliance;access to capital and/or credit markets;factors that could affect our consolidated effective tax rate, including the impact of recent changes in U.S. tax laws and regulations and the interpretation and application of such laws and regulations;the risk of impairment to goodwill and other intangible assets such as the impairment charges incurred in our Johnny Was and Jack Rogers reporting units during the third quarter of fiscal 2025; andgeopolitical risks, including ongoing challenges between the United States and China and those related to the ongoing war in Ukraine and the U.S.-Iran conflict and potential regime change in Iran, as well as other hostilities in the Middle East. Forward-looking statements reflect our expectations at the time such forward-looking statements are made, based on information available at such time, and are not guarantees of performance.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations could prove inaccurate as such statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our ability to control or predict. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties, or other risks or uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Important factors relating to these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in our fiscal 2024 Form 10-K, as updated by Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2025, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC. We caution that one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We disclaim any intention, obligation or duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Contact:Brian SmithE-mail:[email protected] Oxford Industries, Inc.Consolidated Balance Sheets($ in thousands, except par amounts)(unaudited) January 31,February 1, 2026 2025 ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents$8,129 $9,470 Receivables, net 72,957 77,756 Inventories, net 165,284 167,287 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 46,076 38,269 Total Current Assets$292,446 $292,782 Property and equipment, net 325,597 272,690 Intangible assets, net 189,411 257,915 Goodwill 25,604 27,383 Operating lease assets 379,898 364,436 Other assets, net 61,838 54,279 Deferred income taxes 34,164 20,320 Total Assets$1,308,958 $1,289,805 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities Accounts payable$104,622 $104,825 Accrued compensation 28,805 22,309 Current portion of operating lease liabilities 64,506 58,711 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 67,370 62,430 Total Current Liabilities$265,303 $248,275 Long-term debt 116,443 31,105 Non-current portion of operating lease liabilities 382,492 359,366 Other non-current liabilities 29,883 28,499 Shareholders’ Equity Common stock, $1.00 par value per share 14,887 15,707 Additional paid-in capital 205,689 190,816 Retained earnings 295,974 419,713 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,713) (3,676)Total Shareholders’ Equity$514,837 $622,560 Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$1,308,958 $1,289,805 Oxford Industries, Inc.Consolidated Statements of Operations($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)(unaudited) Fourth Quarter Annual Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024 Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024Net sales$374,486 $390,505 $1,477,834 $1,516,601Cost of goods sold 161,930 153,821 580,096 562,030Gross profit$212,556 $236,684 $897,738 $954,571Operating expenses SG&A 207,102 202,599 817,922 786,977Depreciation and amortization 15,876 17,576 65,899 67,872Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and equity method investments — — 60,980 —Total Operating expenses 222,978 220,175 944,801 854,849Royalties and other operating income 2,619 3,805 15,779 19,314Operating income (loss)$(7,803)$20,314 $(31,284)$119,036Interest expense, net 1,956 895 6,870 2,468Earnings (loss) before income taxes$(9,759)$19,419 $(38,154)$116,568Income tax expense (benefit) (2,680) 1,525 (10,265) 23,595Net earnings (loss)$(7,079)$17,894 $(27,889)$92,973 Net earnings (loss) per share: Basic$(0.48)$1.14 $(1.86)$5.94Diluted$(0.48)$1.13 $(1.86)$5.87Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 14,881 15,703 14,963 15,665Diluted 14,881 15,834 14,963 15,827Dividends declared per share$0.69 $0.67 $2.76 $2.68 Oxford Industries, Inc.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows($ in thousands)(unaudited) Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Net earnings (loss)$(27,889)$92,973 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation 56,216 55,872 Amortization of intangible assets 9,683 12,000 Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and equity method investments 60,980 — Impairment of property and equipment 1,323 1,174 Equity compensation expense 15,679 16,674 Impairment of operating lease assets — 1,303 Amortization of deferred financing costs 385 385 Deferred income taxes (13,607) 3,825 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: Receivables, net 10,772 (7,654)Inventories, net 3,185 (8,237)Income tax receivable (5,868) 14,225 Prepaid expenses and other current assets (7,785) 4,755 Current liabilities 15,436 9,523 Other non-current assets, net (22,082) (124,199)Other non-current liabilities 23,218 121,413 Cash provided by operating activities$119,646 $194,032 Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (28) (7,688)Purchases of property and equipment (108,339) (134,231)Other investing activities (33) (1,351)Cash used in investing activities$(108,400)$(143,270)Cash Flows From Financing Activities: Repayment of revolving credit arrangements (450,889) (401,580)Proceeds from revolving credit arrangements 536,227 403,381 Repurchase of common stock (55,216) — Proceeds from issuance of common stock 1,623 1,852 Repurchase of equity awards for employee tax withholding liabilities (2,251) (6,199)Cash dividends paid (42,128) (43,231)Other financing activities (260) (2,830)Cash used in financing activities$(12,894)$(48,607)Net change in cash and cash equivalents (1,648) 2,155 Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents 307 (289)Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year 9,470 7,604 Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period$8,129 $9,470 Oxford Industries, Inc.Reconciliations of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Information(in millions, except per share amounts)(unaudited) Fourth QuarterAnnualAS REPORTEDFiscal 2025Fiscal 2024% ChangeFiscal 2025Fiscal 2024% ChangeTommy Bahama Net sales$229.2$237.6(3.5)%$828.5$869.6(4.7)%Gross profit$136.1$147.0(7.4)%$512.1$548.9(6.7)%Gross margin 59.4% 61.9% 61.8% 63.1% Segment EBITDA$23.6$40.9(42.2)%$94.6$146.3(35.3)%Segment EBITDA margin 10.3% 17.2% 11.4% 16.8% Lilly Pulitzer Net sales$73.5$74.0(0.6)%$337.8$323.94.3%Gross profit$42.1$43.9(4.1)%$211.9$209.01.4%Gross margin 57.3% 59.4% 62.7% 64.5% Segment EBITDA$3.7$7.6(51.5)%$52.1$58.1(10.3)%Segment EBITDA margin 5.0% 10.3% 15.4% 18.0% Johnny Was Net sales$37.9$47.4(19.9)%$169.1$195.0(13.3)%Gross profit$22.9$30.3(24.5)%$105.2$127.1(17.2)%Gross margin 60.3% 63.9% 62.2% 65.2% Segment EBITDA$(5.7)$0.5(1204.2)%$(8.5)$7.5(213.4)%Segment EBITDA margin(14.9)% 1.1% (5.1)% 3.9% Emerging Brands Net sales$34.0$31.67.5%
$142.9$128.411.3%Gross profit$16.3$16.8(3.1)%$77.5$73.75.2%Gross margin 47.8% 53.1% 54.3% 57.4% Segment EBITDA$(2.2)$0.0NM$4.7$9.9(52.1)%Segment EBITDA margin(6.5)% 0.1% 3.3% 7.7% Corporate and Other Net sales$(0.2)$(0.1)(131.9)%$(0.4)$(0.3)(36.5)%Gross profit$(4.8)$(1.4)(254.2)%$(9.0)$(4.1)(120.1)%Corporate EBITDA$(11.4)$(11.1)(2.4)%$(47.3)$(34.9)(35.5)%Consolidated Net sales$374.5$390.5(4.1)%$1,477.8$1,516.6(2.6)%Gross profit$212.6$236.7(10.2)%$897.7$954.6(6.0)%Gross margin 56.8% 60.6% 60.7% 62.9% SG&A$207.1$202.62.2%
$817.9$787.03.9%SG&A as % of net sales 55.3% 51.9% 55.3% 51.9% Depreciation and amortization$15.9$17.6(9.7)%$65.9$67.9(2.9)%Depreciation and amortization as % of net sales 4.2% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and equity method investments$—$—NM$61.0$—NMImpairment of goodwill, intangible assets and equity method investments as a % of net sales —% —% 4.1% —% Operating income (loss)$(7.8)$20.3138.4%
$(31.3)$119.0(126.3)%Operating margin(2.1)% 5.2% (2.1)% 7.8% Earnings (loss) before income taxes$(9.8)$19.4150.3%
$(38.2)$116.6(132.7)%Net earnings (loss)$(7.1)$17.9139.6%
$(27.9)$93.0(130.0)%Net earnings (loss) per diluted share$(0.48)$1.13142.1%
$(1.86)$5.87(131.7)%Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted 14.9 15.8(6.0)% 15.0 15.8(5.5)% The following table presents a reconciliation from segment EBITDA to net earnings (loss) (in millions):
Fourth QuarterAnnual Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024% ChangeFiscal 2025Fiscal 2024% ChangeSegment EBITDA Tommy Bahama$23.6$40.9(42.2)%$94.6$146.3(35.3)%Lilly Pulitzer$3.7$7.6(51.5)%$52.1$58.1(10.3)%Johnny Was$(5.7)$0.5(1204.2)%$(8.5)$7.5(213.4)%Emerging Brands$(2.2)$0.0NM$4.7$9.9(52.1)%Corporate and Other$(11.4)$(11.1)(2.4)%$(47.3)$(34.9)(35.5)%Adjusted EBITDA$8.1$37.9(78.7)%$95.6$186.9(48.9)%Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets$0.0$0.0NM$61.0$0.0NMEBITDA$8.1$37.9(78.7)%$34.6$186.9(81.5)%Depreciation and amortization$15.9$17.6(9.7)%$65.9$67.9(2.9)%Consolidated operating income (loss)$(7.8)$20.3(138.4)%$(31.3)$119.0(126.3)%Interest expense, net$2.0$0.9118.5%$6.9$2.5178.4%Earnings (loss) before income taxes$(9.8)$19.4(150.3)%$(38.2)$116.6(132.7)%Income taxes$(2.7)$1.5(275.7)%$(10.3)$23.6(143.5)%Net earnings (loss)$(7.1)$17.9(139.6)%$(27.9)$93.0(130.0)% The table below summarizes adjustments made to the as reported figures shown above (in millions):
Fourth QuarterAnnualADJUSTMENTSFiscal 2025Fiscal 2024Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024LIFO adjustments(1)$4.7$0.9$8.4$3.3Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)$1.9$2.7$7.7$10.9Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives(3)$1.0$—$2.9$—Johnny Was Distribution Center movement costs(4)$—$1.4$—$3.0Johnny Was impairment charges(5)$—$—$57.0$—Emerging Brands impairment charges(6)$—$—$4.0$—Impact of income taxes(7)$(1.9)$(1.3)$(20.4)$(4.4)Adjustment to net earnings (loss)(8)$5.7$3.7$59.7$12.8 The table below clarifies where the items that have been adjusted above to improve comparability of the financial information from period to period are presented in the consolidated statements of operations (in millions):
Fourth QuarterAnnual Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024Cost of goods sold (as reported)$161.9$153.8$580.1$562.0LIFO adjustments(1)$4.7$0.9$8.4$3.3 SG&A (as reported)$207.1$202.6$817.9$787.0Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives(3)$0.9$—$2.8$—Johnny Was Distribution Center movement costs(4)$—$1.4$—$2.8 Depreciation and amortization (as reported)$15.9$17.6$65.9$67.9Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)$1.9$2.7$7.7$10.9Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives(3)$0.1$—$0.1$—Johnny Was Distribution Center movement costs(4)$—$—$—$0.2 Consolidated operating income (loss) (as reported)$(7.8)$20.3$(31.3)$119.0Johnny Was impairment charges(5)$—$—$57.0$—Emerging Brands impairment charges(6)$—$—$4.0$— Fourth QuarterAnnualAS ADJUSTEDFiscal 2025Fiscal 2024% ChangeFiscal 2025Fiscal 2024% ChangeTommy Bahama Net sales$229.2$237.6(3.5)%$828.5$869.6(4.7)%Gross profit$136.1$147.0(7.4)%$512.1$548.9(6.7)%Gross margin 59.4% 61.9% 61.8% 63.1% Segment EBITDA$23.6$40.9(42.2)%$94.6$146.3(35.3)%Segment EBITDA margin 10.3% 17.2% 11.4% 16.8% Lilly Pulitzer Net sales$73.5$74.0(0.6)%$337.8$323.94.3%Gross profit$42.1$43.9(4.1)%$211.9$209.01.4%Gross margin 57.3% 59.4% 62.7% 64.5% Segment EBITDA$3.7$7.6(51.5)%$52.1$58.1(10.3)%Segment EBITDA margin 5.0% 10.3% 15.4% 18.0% Johnny Was Net sales$37.9$47.4(19.9)%$169.1$195.0(13.3)%Gross profit$22.9$30.3(24.5)%$105.2$127.1(17.2)%Gross margin 60.3% 63.9% 62.2% 65.2% Segment EBITDA(2)(3)(4)(5)$(4.8)$1.9(346.4)%$(5.7)$10.3(155.4)%Segment EBITDA margin(2)(3)(4)(5)(12.7)% 4.1% (3.4)% 5.3% Emerging Brands Net sales$34.0$31.67.5%$142.9$128.411.3%Gross profit$16.3$16.8(3.1)%$77.5$73.75.2%Gross margin 47.8% 53.1% 54.3% 57.4% Segment EBITDA(6)$(2.2)$0.0NM$4.7$9.9(52.1)%Segment EBITDA margin(6)(6.5)% 0.1% 3.3% 7.7% Corporate and Other Net sales$(0.2)$(0.1)(131.9)%$(0.4)$(0.3)(36.5)%Gross profit$(0.1)$(0.5)78.1%$(0.6)$(0.8)25.6%Corporate EBITDA(1)(7)$(6.6)$(10.2)35.2%$(38.9)$(31.6)(23.0)%Consolidated Net sales$374.5$390.5(4.1)%$1,477.8$1,516.6(2.6)%Gross profit$217.3$237.5(8.5)%$906.2$957.9(5.4)%Gross margin 58.0% 60.8% 61.3% 63.2% SG&A$206.2$201.22.5%$815.1$784.23.9%SG&A as % of net sales 55.1% 51.5% 55.2% 51.7% Depreciation and amortization$13.8$14.92.5%$58.0$56.83.9%Depreciation and amortization as % of net sales 3.7% 3.8% 3.9% 3.7% Operating income (loss)$(0.2)$25.3(100.6)%$48.8$136.3(64.2)%Operating margin 0.0% 6.5% 3.3% 9.0% Earnings (loss) before income taxes$(2.1)$24.4(108.7)%$41.9$133.8(68.7)%Net earnings (loss)$(1.4)$21.6(106.4)%$31.8$105.8(70.0)%Net earnings (loss) per diluted share$(0.09)$1.37(106.8)%$2.11$6.68(68.4)% Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2025 Fiscal 2025 Fiscal 2024 Fiscal 2025 Fiscal 2024 Actual Guidance(9) Actual Actual ActualNet earnings (loss) per diluted share: GAAP basis$(0.48)$(0.10) - 0.10$1.13$(1.86)$5.87LIFO adjustments(1)(10) 0.24 — 0.04 0.42 0.16Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)(10) 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.38 0.51Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives(3)(10) 0.05 — — 0.15 —Johnny Was distribution center relocation costs(4)(10) — — 0.07 — 0.14Johnny Was impairment charges(5)(10) — — — 2.82 —Emerging Brands impairment charges(6)(10) — — — 0.20 —As adjusted(8)$(0.09)$0.00 - 0.20$1.37$2.11$6.68 First Quarter First Quarter Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2025 Guidance(12) Actual Net earnings per diluted share: GAAP basis$1.13 - 1.23$1.70 LIFO adjustments(11) 0.00 0.02 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)(10) 0.07 0.09 As adjusted(8)$1.20 - 1.30$1.82 Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2025 Guidance(12) Actual Net earnings per diluted share: GAAP basis$1.83 - 2.43$(1.86) LIFO adjustments(11) 0.00 0.42 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)(10) 0.27 0.38 Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives(3)(10) 0.00 0.15 Johnny Was impairment charges(5)(10) 0.00 2.82 Emerging Brands impairment charges(6)(10) 0.00 0.20 As adjusted(8)$2.10 - 2.70$2.11 (1) LIFO adjustments represents the impact of LIFO accounting adjustments. These adjustments are included in cost of goods sold in Corporate and Other.
(2) Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets represents the amortization related to intangible assets acquired as part of the Johnny Was acquisition. These charges are included in depreciation and amortization in Johnny Was.
(3) Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives include severance costs, consulting fees and store closure related costs. These charges are included in SG&A and depreciation and amortization in Johnny Was.
(4) Johnny Was distribution center relocation costs relate to the transition of Johnny Was distribution center operations from Los Angeles, California to Lyons, Georgia including systems integrations, employee bonuses and severance agreements, moving costs and occupancy expenses related to the vacated distribution centers. These charges are included in SG&A and depreciation and amortization in Johnny Was.
(5) Johnny Was impairment charges represent the impairment of the Johnny Was intangible asset balances. These charges were included in impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in Johnny Was.
(6) Emerging Brands impairment charges represent the impairment of the Jack Rogers goodwill and intangible asset balances. These charges were included in impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in Emerging Brands.
(7) Impact of income taxes represents the estimated tax impact of the above adjustments based on the estimated applicable tax rate on current year earnings.
(8) Amounts in columns may not add due to rounding.
(9) Guidance as issued on December 10, 2025.
(10) Adjustments shown net of income taxes.
(11) No estimate for LIFO accounting adjustments is reflected in the guidance for any future periods.
(12) Guidance as issued on March 26, 2026.
Direct to Consumer Location Count End of Q1End of Q2End of Q3End of Q4Fiscal 2024 Tommy Bahama Full-price retail store102103106106Retail-food & beverage23232524Outlet35363736Total Tommy Bahama160162168166Lilly Pulitzer full-price retail store60606164Johnny Was Full-price retail store75767777Outlet3333Total Johnny Was78798080Emerging Brands Southern Tide full-price retail store20242830TBBC full-price retail store4555Total Oxford322330342345 Fiscal 2025 Tommy Bahama Full-price retail store103103104102Retail-food & beverage26262828Outlet36383837Total Tommy Bahama165167170167Lilly Pulitzer full-price retail store65666667Johnny Was Full-price retail store77757575Outlet3333Total Johnny Was80787878Emerging Brands Southern Tide full-price retail store35363534TBBC full-price retail store8999Total Oxford353356358355 We changed our segment profit margin measure in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 to segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("segment EBITDA"). Segment EBITDA also excludes infrequent operating charges, including impairments of goodwill, intangible assets and equity method investments.
Further, effective as of the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, we revised the presentation of depreciation and amortization expense within the consolidated statements of operations to present it separately from SG&A, where it had previously been included. The consolidated statements of operations for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This change in presentation had no effect on previously reported operating income (loss), earnings (loss) before income taxes, net earnings (loss), or basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for any period presented.
The tables below present depreciation and amortization and segment EBITDA by quarter for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024 (in millions):
Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024AS REPORTEDQ1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Tommy Bahama Depreciation and amortization$7.6$7.6$7.8$8.0$7.2$7.0$7.2$7.6Segment EBITDA$38.3$34.3$(1.7)$23.6$49.8$47.9$7.6$40.9Lilly Pulitzer Depreciation and amortization$4.9$4.6$4.3$3.9$4.6$4.7$4.8$5.0Segment EBITDA$23.1$17.8$7.6$3.7$20.1$21.7$8.8$7.6Johnny Was Depreciation and amortization$3.4$3.2$3.1$2.8$4.0$4.0$4.3$3.9Segment EBITDA$0.0$(1.3)$(1.6)$(5.7)$4.3$2.4$0.3$0.5Emerging Brands Depreciation and amortization$0.9$1.0$1.0$0.9$0.6$0.7$0.8$0.9Segment EBITDA$2.9$4.0$0.1$(2.2)$4.4$3.5$2.0$0.0Corporate and Other Depreciation and amortization$0.1$0.1$0.2$0.3$0.1$0.1$0.1$0.1Corporate EBITDA$(11.0)$(12.8)$(12.1)$(11.4)$(9.7)$(6.4)$(7.7)$(11.1)Consolidated Depreciation and amortization$17.0$16.6$16.5$15.9$16.5$16.5$17.2$17.6EBITDA$53.2$42.0$(7.6)$8.1$69.0$69.1$11.0$37.9 Fiscal 2025Fiscal 2024AS ADJUSTEDQ1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Tommy Bahama Depreciation and amortization$7.6$7.6$7.8$8.0$7.2$7.0$7.2$7.6Segment EBITDA$38.3$34.3$(1.7)$23.6$49.8$47.9$7.6$40.9Lilly Pulitzer Depreciation and amortization$4.9$4.6$4.3$3.9$4.6$4.7$4.8$5.0Segment EBITDA$23.1$17.8$7.6$3.7$20.1$21.7$8.8$7.6Johnny Was Depreciation and amortization$1.4$1.3$1.2$0.9$1.3$1.3$1.6$1.2Segment EBITDA$0.0$(1.3)$0.4$(4.7)$4.3$3.3$1.0$2.0Emerging Brands Depreciation and amortization$0.9$1.0$1.0$0.9$0.6$0.7$0.8$0.9Segment EBITDA$2.9$4.0$0.1$(2.2)$4.4$3.5$2.0$0.0Corporate and Other Depreciation and amortization$0.1$0.1$0.2$0.3$0.1$0.1$0.1$0.1Corporate EBITDA$(10.6)$(11.9)$(9.8)$(6.6)$(7.5)$(5.8)$(8.1)$(10.3)Consolidated Depreciation and amortization$15.0$14.7$14.5$13.9$13.8$13.8$14.2$14.9EBITDA$53.6$42.9$(3.4)$13.8$71.2$70.6$11.0$40.2
Oxford Industries, Inc. reported weak Q4 financials. Sales declined across brands, and margins deteriorated. OXM's FY2026 guidance finally suggests stabilization. Tommy Bahama's momentum is expected to improve, and margins are guided to improve slightly. I estimate OXM stock to have 19% upside to a base scenario fair value of $37.9.
U.S. stocks were lower, with the Nasdaq Composite falling more than 1% on Friday.
Shares of Oxford Industries Inc (NYSE:OXM) rose sharply during Friday's session following fourth-quarter results.
Oxford Industries reported quarterly losses of 9 cents per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of earnings of 2 cents per share. The company reported quarterly sales of $374.500 million which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $371.838 million.
Oxford Industries also raised its quarterly dividend from 69 cents to 70 cents per share.
Oxford Industries shares jumped 11.2% to $35.47/
Here are some other big stocks recording gains in today’s session.
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Oxford Industries Inc (NYSE:OXM) posted mixed fourth-quarter results on Thursday.
Oxford Industries reported quarterly losses of 9 cents per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of earnings of 2 cents per share. The company reported quarterly sales of $374.500 million which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $371.838 million.
Oxford Industries also raised its quarterly dividend from 69 cents to 70 cents per share.
Oxford Industries said it sees FY2026 adjusted EPS of $2.10-$2.70, versus market estimates of $2.78. The company sees sales of $1.475 billion-$1.530 billion, versus estimates of $1.500 billion.
Oxford Industries shares gained 12.5% to trade at $35.83 on Friday.
These analysts made changes to their price targets on Oxford Industries following earnings announcement.
Telsey Advisory Group analyst Dana Telsey maintained Oxford Industries with a Market Perform and lowered the price target from $40 to $36. Truist Securities analyst Joseph Civello maintained the stock with a Hold and lowered the price target from $38 to $32. Considering buying OXM stock? Here’s what analysts think:
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Oxford Industries (NYSE: OXM) executives highlighted improving sales trends exiting fiscal 2025, ongoing tariff pressure, and plans to lean on operational and sourcing initiatives to support profitability in fiscal 2026, according to the company's fourth-quarter earnings call. Fourth-quarter finish and early fiscal 2026 trends Chairman and CEO Tom Chubb said fourth-quarter net sales and adjusted earnings
May 27, 2026 16:05 ET | Source: Oxford Industries, Inc.
ATLANTA, May 27, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Oxford Industries, Inc. (NYSE: OXM) today announced that it plans to release its first quarter fiscal 2026 financial results after the market close on Wednesday, June 10, 2026. Following the news release, the company will also hold a conference call starting at 4:30 p.m. ET, hosted by Thomas C. Chubb lll, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President, and K. Scott Grassmyer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer, to discuss its financial results.
A live webcast of the conference call will be available on the Company’s website at www.oxfordinc.com.
A replay of the webcast will be available on the Company’s website through Wednesday, June 24, 2026, and by phone by dialing (412) 317-6671 access code 13760616.
About Oxford
Oxford, a leader in the apparel industry, owns and markets the distinctive Tommy Bahama®, Lilly Pulitzer®, Johnny Was®, Southern Tide®, The Beaufort Bonnet Company®, Duck Head® and Jack Rogers® brands. Oxford's stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 1964 under the symbol OXM. For more information, please visit Oxford's website at www.oxfordinc.com.
1. Apple Kicks off WWDC 2026 Apple (AAPL +1.36%) launches its 2026 Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in Cupertino today, with a new AI strategy widely anticipated. A keynote later today should showcase a new version of its Siri digital assistant at the core of its AI world, plus a revamp of operating system software across the board – iOS 27, iPadOS 27, macOS 27, tvOS 27, watchOS 27, and visionOS 27.
"Developers will be able to more easily integrate AI into their apps using a new system called CoreAI": Bloomberg's Mark Gurman noted planned advances in services available for AI agent developers, with the new software expected to reach consumers in the fall. "From the department of Really?": Fool analyst Seth Jayson had earlier this year expressed skepticism about Apple's new Siri, as reports suggested it will have "a feature set no different than what OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and others have been offering for years." 2. Markets End Winning Streak A move away from tech stocks saw the Nasdaq fall 4.7% last week, with the S&P 500 losing 2.6% to end a nine-week winning streak – though futures turned positive this morning, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq up 0.2% and 0.7% respectively. Chip stocks led the losses, with Broadcom (AVGO +3.54%) falling over 12% the day after its Q2 earnings update disappointed on guidance – while Nvidia (NVDA +2.30%) CEO Jensen Huang warned of a lengthy global chip shortage.
"Whatever happened to the stock market, you should be very happy because now you can buy at a discount": Huang – in Seoul agreeing a contract with SK Hynix – said "Everybody should be very excited," even as South Korea's KOSPI fell nearly 9% to trigger a trading halt. Key inflation measures this week: Wednesday's May consumer price index (CPI) is expected to show a jump to 4.2% year over year – but with core CPI softer at 2.9%. May's producer price index (PPI) is due Thursday. 3. Key Earnings This Week from Team RB Recommendations Vail Resorts (MTN +0.33%) – also a Dividend Investor rec – reports its third quarter after today's closing bell, after a difficult Q2 saw extreme weather impact guest numbers at leading U.S. ski destinations. Management guided to net income in fiscal 2026 of $144 to $190 million. Chewy (CHWY 6.06%) delivers a Q1 update Wednesday, and investors should watch for subscriptions and customer growth translating into higher GAAP profitability and expanded margins. Adobe (ADBE 6.25%) posts Q2 results Thursday, as the company negotiates the challenge to traditional software development from the new AI generation. Casey's General Stores (CASY +0.07%) – beating the S&P 500 by 12.9% since its latest Stock Advisor recommendation – will report Q4 and full-year fiscal 2026 Tuesday, following strong growth in Q3. 4. More Notable Earnings to Watch: ASO, OXM, ORCL Academy Sports and Outdoors (ASO +4.91%) – recommended in Dividend Investor – starts its new fiscal year with a 2026 Q1 update Tuesday, after lifting its dividend 15% in Q4. Oxford Industries (OXM 17.01%), also a DI rec, reports Q1 Wednesday. Management expects the full year to be stable, or up slightly. Oracle (ORCL 8.48%) closes fiscal 2026 with Q4 earnings Wednesday, the first under new CFO Hilary Maxson – tasked with overseeing finances for the company's big push into AI and cloud growth. 5. Today's Take: The Story vs. the Numbers
The holy grail of investing is finding businesses where the numbers end up making the narrative look conservative.-- JP Bennett Team Rule Breakers
6. Your Take The Nasdaq fell 4.2% on Friday alone, as investors rotated out of AI and semiconductor stocks.
Did that feel like a healthy breather the market needed, or the start of something more concerning? What's your read?
Debate with friends and family, or become a member to hear what your fellow Fools are saying!
This image and article was created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Adobe, Apple, Broadcom, Chewy, Nvidia, Oracle, and Vail Resorts. The Motley Fool recommends Academy Sports And Outdoors, Casey's General Stores, and Oxford Industries and recommends the following options: long January 2028 $330 calls on Adobe and short January 2028 $340 calls on Adobe. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
ATLANTA, June 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Oxford Industries, Inc. (NYSE:OXM) today announced financial results for its first quarter of fiscal 2026 ended May 2, 2026.
Consolidated net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 were $391 million compared to $393 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. EPS on a GAAP basis was $1.00 compared to $1.70 in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. On an adjusted basis, EPS was $1.39 compared to $1.82 in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Both GAAP and adjusted EPS in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 included $11 million, or $0.55 per share, of incremental tariff costs compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2025.
Tom Chubb, Chairman and CEO, commented, “We delivered net sales in line with our expectations, led by mid-single-digit positive comps at Tommy Bahama, and adjusted EPS above our guidance range, fueled by better-than-expected gross margins. Our overall performance also reflects softer than expected results at Lilly Pulitzer and a challenging environment marked by weak consumer sentiment and higher energy prices. At the same time, we made important progress during the first quarter on several strategic initiatives in our merchandising and marketing functions that we believe will enhance the operating performance of each of our brands over the long term."
Mr. Chubb concluded, “As we look to the remainder of the year, we expect macroeconomic pressures to continue weighing on consumer sentiment, and we are allowing time for our corrective actions at Lilly Pulitzer to gain traction. In light of these factors and recent comparable sales trends, we are narrowing our full-year sales guidance range by lowering the top end of the range. We are also raising the low end of our EPS guidance range, as we expect the current lower tariff rates to continue for the remainder of the year, together with disciplined expense and inventory management, to offset the impact of the narrowed sales outlook on profitability."
First Quarter of Fiscal 2026 versus Fiscal 2025
Net Sales by Operating GroupFirst Quarter($ in millions)20262025% ChangeTommy Bahama$224.6$216.23.9%Lilly Pulitzer90.499.0(8.8%)Johnny Was37.943.5(12.9%)Emerging Brands38.634.212.8%Other(0.1)(0.1)NMTotal Company$391.4$392.9(0.4%) Consolidated net sales were $391 million compared to $393 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Full-price direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales decreased 1% to $247 million versus the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Full-price retail sales of $135 million were comparable to the prior-year period.E-commerce sales of $111 million were 2% lower than the prior-year period. Food and beverage sales of $38 million were 14% higher than the prior-year period driven by new locations opened in fiscal 2025. Comparable store sales were flat.Outlet sales of $19 million were comparable to the prior-year period.Wholesale sales of $88 million were 5% lower than the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Gross margin was 62.3%, compared to 64.2% in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. The decreased gross margin was primarily due to (1) approximately $11 million of increased cost of goods sold from additional tariffs implemented in fiscal 2025 and (2) a $4 million higher LIFO accounting charge in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2025. These decreases were partially offset by (1) updated sourcing and pricing strategies across our portfolio, (2) lower freight costs to customers and (3) a change in sales mix with a shift to a higher proportion of direct to consumer sales. On an adjusted basis, which excludes the impact of LIFO accounting, gross margin was 63.4% compared to 64.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.SG&A was $211 million compared to $206 million, impacted primarily by new brick and mortar retail and food and beverage locations, increases in software and consulting costs and costs associated with the transition of our Lyons, Georgia distribution center operations. On an adjusted basis, SG&A was $209 million compared to $206 million in the prior-year period.Royalties and other operating income decreased from $7 million to $6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 primarily reflecting lower Tommy Bahama royalty income due to reduced sales by licensing partners impacted by higher tariffs.Operating income on a GAAP basis was $22 million, or 5.7% of net sales, compared to $36 million, or 9.2% of net sales, in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. On an adjusted basis, operating income was $30 million, or 7.7% of net sales, compared to $39 million, or 9.8% of net sales, in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.Interest expense was $2 million, an increase from the prior year period, primarily due to a higher average outstanding debt balance during the first quarter of fiscal 2026 than the first quarter of fiscal 2025.For the first quarter of fiscal 2026 and first quarter of fiscal 2025, our effective tax rate of 25.4% and 24.1%, respectively, included the net impact of discrete items including interest received on tax receivables.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
Inventory as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2026 decreased $15 million, or 9%, on a LIFO basis compared to the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2025 primarily as a result of an increase to the LIFO reserve due to inflation in inventory costs. On a FIFO basis, inventory decreased $3 million, or 1%, compared to the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Inventory as of May 2, 2026 included $9 million of additional costs capitalized into inventory related to the incremental U.S. tariffs implemented starting in fiscal 2025 compared to $3 million as of May 3, 2025.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, cash provided by operations was $8 million compared to cash used in operations of $4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. The increase in cash flow from operations reflects disciplined working capital management partially offset by lower earnings.
Borrowings outstanding increased to $143 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to $118 million of borrowings outstanding at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2025 and $116 million of borrowings outstanding at the end of fiscal 2025. During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, capital expenditures of $23 million, primarily associated with the new distribution center in Lyons, Georgia, and the opening of new brick and mortar locations, dividend payments of $11 million, and working capital requirements collectively exceeded cash flow from operations. The Company had $9 million of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2026 versus $8 million of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2025.
Dividend
The Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.70 per share. The dividend is payable on July 31, 2026 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 17, 2026. The Company has paid dividends every quarter since it became publicly owned in 1960.
Outlook
For fiscal 2026, the Company is narrowing its full-year sales outlook by lowering the high end of the previous range and also tightening its adjusted EPS guidance by raising the low end of the previous guidance range. The Company now expects net sales in a range of $1.475 billion to $1.505 billion as compared to net sales of $1.478 billion in fiscal 2025. The Company expects GAAP earnings per share to be between $1.70 and $2.10, compared to fiscal 2025 GAAP net loss per share of $1.86, which included noncash impairment charges primarily associated with Johnny Was totaling $61 million, or $3.02 per share. Adjusted EPS is now expected to be between $2.30 and $2.70, compared to fiscal 2025 adjusted EPS of $2.11.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2026, the Company expects net sales to be between $380 million and $400 million compared to net sales of $403 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. GAAP EPS is expected to be between $1.13 and $1.33 in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to $1.12 in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Adjusted EPS is expected to be in a range of $1.20 to $1.40 compared to $1.26 in the second quarter of fiscal 2025.
The Company anticipates interest expense of $7 million in fiscal 2026, including $2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2026. The Company’s effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 28% for the full year of fiscal 2026 and approximately 29% for the second quarter primarily reflecting the unfavorable net discrete tax expense related to shortfalls from stock-based compensation vesting during the quarter.
Capital expenditures in fiscal 2026, including the $23 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, are expected to be approximately $60 million compared to $108 million in fiscal 2025. The planned year-over-year decrease relates to the completion of the new distribution center in Lyons, Georgia and fewer new store openings expected in fiscal 2026.
Conference Call
The Company will hold a conference call with senior management to discuss its financial results at 4:30 p.m. ET today. A live web cast of the conference call will be available on the Company’s website at www.oxfordinc.com. A replay of the call will be available through June 24, 2026 by dialing (412) 317-6671 access code 13760616.
About Oxford
Oxford Industries, Inc., a leader in the apparel industry, owns and markets the distinctive Tommy Bahama®, Lilly Pulitzer®, Johnny Was®, Southern Tide®, The Beaufort Bonnet Company®, Duck Head® and Jack Rogers® lifestyle brands. Oxford's stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 1964 under the symbol OXM. For more information, please visit Oxford's website at www.oxfordinc.com.
Basis of Presentation
All per share information is presented on a diluted basis.
Non-GAAP Financial Information
The Company reports its consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). To supplement these consolidated financial results, management believes that a presentation and discussion of certain financial measures on an adjusted basis, which exclude certain non-operating or discrete gains, charges or other items, may provide a more meaningful basis on which investors may compare the Company’s ongoing results of operations between periods. These measures include EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA (when applicable), adjusted segment EBITDA, adjusted net earnings (loss), adjusted net earnings (loss) per share, adjusted gross profit, adjusted gross margin, adjusted SG&A, and adjusted operating income, among others.
Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operational, and planning decisions to evaluate the Company’s ongoing performance. Management also uses these adjusted financial measures to discuss its business with investment and other financial institutions, its board of directors and others. Reconciliations of these adjusted measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP are presented in tables included at the end of this release.
Safe Harbor
This press release includes statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Generally, the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "project," "will" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. We intend for all forward-looking statements contained herein, in our press releases or on our website, and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf, to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Such statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, without limitation:
changes in the trade policies of the United States and those of other nations, including risks of potential future changes or worsening trade tensions between the United States and other countries and the impact of uncertainties surrounding U.S. trade policy on consumer sentiment;our ability to mitigate current and potential future tariffs imposed and realize tariff refunds;demand for our products, which may be impacted by macroeconomic factors that may impact consumer discretionary spending and pricing levels for apparel and related products, many of which may be impacted by inflationary pressures, tariffs, interest rates, the stability of the banking industry or general economic uncertainty, and the effectiveness of measures to mitigate the impact of these factors;risks relating to our product sourcing efforts, including our ability to identify alternative countries to source and produce our products and to successfully implement changes in our supply chain;possible changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including, but not limited to, Federal Reserve policies in connection with continued inflationary pressures or other factors;competitive conditions and/or evolving consumer shopping patterns, particularly in a highly promotional retail environment, including those related to shifts in technology;global supply chain constraints that have affected, and could continue to affect, transit, and other costs, including those related to disruptions of land or sea transportation routes or distribution or shipping channels;the impact of inflationary pressures on labor costs, including wages, healthcare and other benefit-related costs;costs of products as well as the raw materials used in those products, as well as our ability to pass along price increases to consumers;energy costs, including rising fuel prices and their impact on the costs of raw materials and our distribution and logistics operations;our ability to respond to rapidly changing consumer expectations;unseasonal or extreme weather conditions or natural disasters;financial difficulties for our business partners, including suppliers, vendors, wholesale customers, licensees, logistics providers and landlords, that may impact their ability to meet their obligations to us and/or continue our business relationship to the same degree as they have historically;hiring of, retention of and disciplined execution by key management and other critical personnel, as well as the effective transition of executive level responsibilities;the execution of key strategic initiatives to drive operating performance, such as the organizational realignment initiatives being undertaken at Johnny Was;cybersecurity breaches and ransomware attacks, as well as our and our third party vendors’ ability to properly collect, use, manage and secure business, consumer and employee data and maintain continuity of our information technology systems;inability or failure to successfully and effectively implement new information technology systems and supporting controls, including artificial intelligence-enabled tools, and risks associated with third-party service providers and interconnected systems;the effectiveness of our advertising initiatives in defining, launching and communicating brand-relevant customer experiences;the level of our indebtedness, including the risks associated with heightened interest rates on the debt and the potential impact on our ability to operate and expand our business;the timing of shipments requested by our wholesale customers;fluctuations and volatility in global financial and/or real estate markets;our ability to identify and secure suitable locations for new retail store and food and beverage openings;the timing and cost of retail store and food and beverage location openings and remodels, technology implementations and other capital expenditures, including those related to enhancing artificial intelligence capabilities;the timing, cost and successful implementation of changes to our distribution network, including the possibility that we may not realize the anticipated benefits of our new state-of-the-art distribution center in Lyons, Georgia;the effectiveness of recent, focused efforts to reassess and realign our operating costs in light of revenue trends, including potential disruptions to our operations as a result of these efforts;pandemics or other public health crises;expected outcomes of pending or potential litigation and regulatory actions;consumer, employee and regulatory focus on sustainability issues and practices, including failures by our suppliers to adhere to our vendor code of conduct;the regulation or prohibition of goods sourced, or containing raw materials or components, from certain regions and our ability to evidence compliance;access to capital and/or credit markets;factors that could affect our consolidated effective tax rate, including the impact of recent changes in U.S. tax laws and regulations and the interpretation and application of such laws and regulations;the risk of impairment to goodwill and other intangible assets such as the impairment charges incurred in our Johnny Was and Jack Rogers reporting units during the third quarter of fiscal 2025; andgeopolitical risks, including the U.S.-Iran conflict as well as other hostilities in the Middle East, ongoing challenges between the United States and China and those related to the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Forward-looking statements reflect our expectations at the time such forward-looking statements are made, based on information available at such time, and are not guarantees of performance.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations could prove inaccurate as such statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our ability to control or predict. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties, or other risks or uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Important factors relating to these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in our Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC. We caution that one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We disclaim any intention, obligation or duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Contact:Brian SmithE-mail:[email protected] Oxford Industries, Inc.Consolidated Balance Sheets(in thousands, except par amounts)(unaudited) May 2,May 3, 20262025ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents$9,360 $8,175 Receivables, net 93,533 105,772 Inventories, net 147,488 162,334 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 52,312 41,253 Total Current Assets$302,693 $317,534 Property and equipment, net 341,800 281,504 Intangible assets, net 187,605 255,768 Goodwill 25,611 27,403 Operating lease assets 387,987 372,452 Other assets, net 61,578 63,195 Deferred income taxes 30,579 21,850 Total Assets$1,337,853 $1,339,706 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities Accounts payable$102,672 $86,212 Accrued compensation 23,075 21,417 Current portion of operating lease liabilities 66,274 64,119 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 66,372 69,007 Total Current Liabilities$258,393 $240,755 Long-term debt 142,717 117,714 Non-current portion of operating lease liabilities 383,438 360,935 Other non-current liabilities 29,915 27,879 Shareholders’ Equity Common stock, $1.00 par value per share 14,900 14,875 Additional paid-in capital 209,841 194,893 Retained earnings 300,286 385,761 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,637) (3,106)Total Shareholders’ Equity$523,390 $592,423 Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$1,337,853 $1,339,706 Oxford Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
First Quarter
Fiscal 2026
Fiscal 2025
Net sales$ 391,402 $ 392,861 Cost of goods sold 147,519 140,575 Gross profit$ 243,883 $ 252,286 Operating expenses SG&A 210,888 205,745 Depreciation and amortization 16,380 16,963 Total Operating expenses$ 227,268 $ 222,708 Royalties and other operating income 5,748 6,628 Operating income$ 22,363 $ 36,206 Interest expense, net 2,282 1,726 Earnings before income taxes$ 20,081 $ 34,480 Income tax expense 5,093 8,299 Net earnings$ 14,988 $ 26,181 Net earnings per share: Basic$ 1.01 $ 1.72 Diluted$ 1.00 $ 1.70 Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 14,892 15,222 Diluted 15,005 15,404 Dividends declared per share$ 0.70 $ 0.69 Oxford Industries, Inc.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(in thousands)(unaudited) First Quarter Fiscal 2026Fiscal 2025Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Net earnings$ 14,988 $ 26,181 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation 14,573 14,529 Amortization of intangible assets 1,807 2,434 Impairment of property and equipment 849 — Equity compensation expense 3,727 3,605 Amortization of deferred financing costs 96 96 Deferred income taxes 3,596 (1,440)Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: Receivables, net (24,281) (33,078)Inventories, net 17,870 5,271 Income tax receivable 3,547 5,053 Prepaid expenses and other current assets (6,239) (2,973)Current liabilities (15,709) (7,376)Other balance sheet changes (6,922) (16,244)Cash provided by (used in) operating activities$ 7,902 $ (3,942)Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Acquisitions, net of cash acquired — (28)Purchases of property and equipment (22,771) (23,427)Cash used in investing activities$ (22,771)$ (23,455)Cash Flows From Financing Activities: Repayment of revolving credit arrangements (115,975) (94,125)Proceeds from revolving credit arrangements 142,249 180,733 Repurchase of common stock — (50,526)Proceeds from issuance of common stock 438 482 Cash dividends paid (10,605) (10,381)Other financing activities — (224)Cash provided by financing activities$ 16,107 $ 25,959 Net change in cash and cash equivalents 1,238 (1,438)Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents (7) 143 Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year 8,129 9,470 Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period$ 9,360 $ 8,175 Oxford Industries, Inc.Reconciliations of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Information(in millions, except per share amounts)(unaudited) First QuarterAS REPORTEDFiscal 2026Fiscal 2025% ChangeTommy Bahama Net sales$224.6 $216.2 3.9%Gross profit$147.5 $139.7 5.6%Gross margin 65.7% 64.6% Segment EBITDA$40.1 $38.3 4.7%Segment EBITDA margin 17.9% 17.7% Lilly Pulitzer Net sales$90.4 $99.0 (8.8)%Gross profit$55.3 $64.9 (14.9)%Gross margin 61.2% 65.6% Segment EBITDA$15.0 $23.1 (34.9)%Segment EBITDA margin 16.6% 23.3% Johnny Was Net sales$37.9 $43.5 (12.9)%Gross profit$24.9 $28.1 (11.5)%Gross margin 65.7% 64.7% Segment EBITDA$(1.2)$0.0 NMSegment EBITDA margin(3.2)%(0.1)% Emerging Brands Net sales$38.6 $34.2 12.8%Gross profit$20.7 $20.3 1.9%Gross margin 53.6% 59.3% Segment EBITDA$3.0 $2.9 4.4%Segment EBITDA margin 7.7% 8.3% Corporate and Other Net sales$(0.1)$(0.1)NMGross profit (loss)$(4.5)$(0.8)NMCorporate EBITDA$(18.1)$(11.0)NMConsolidated Net sales$391.4 $392.9 (0.4)%Gross profit$243.9 $252.3 (3.3)%Gross margin 62.3% 64.2% SG&A$210.9 $205.7 2.5%SG&A as % of net sales 53.9% 52.4% Depreciation and amortization$16.4 $17.0 (3.4)%Depreciation and amortization as % of net sales 4.2% 4.3% Operating income$22.4 $36.2 (38.2)%Operating margin 5.7% 9.2% Earnings before income taxes$20.1 $34.5 (41.8)%Net earnings$15.0 $26.2 (42.8)%Net earnings per diluted share$1.00 $1.70 (41.2)%Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted 15.0 15.4 (2.6)% The following table presents a reconciliation from segment EBITDA to net earnings (in millions):
First Quarter Fiscal 2026Fiscal 2025% ChangeSegment EBITDA Tommy Bahama$ 40.1 $ 38.3 4.7%Lilly Pulitzer$ 15.0 $ 23.1 (34.9)%Johnny Was$ (1.2)$ 0.0 NMEmerging Brands$ 3.0 $ 2.9 4.4%Corporate and Other$ (18.1)$ (11.0)NMEBITDA$ 38.7 $ 53.2 (27.1)%Depreciation and amortization$ 16.4 $ 17.0 (3.4)%Consolidated operating income$ 22.4 $ 36.2 (38.2)%Interest expense, net$ 2.3 $ 1.7 32.2%Earnings before income taxes$ 20.1 $ 34.5 (41.8)%Income taxes$ 5.1 $ 8.3 (38.6)%Net earnings$ 15.0 $ 26.2 (42.8)% The table below summarizes adjustments made to the as reported figures shown above (in millions):
First QuarterADJUSTMENTSFiscal 2026Fiscal 2025LIFO adjustments(1)$4.4 $0.5 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)$1.4 $1.9 Lyons Distribution Center movement costs(3)$0.5 $0.0 Merchandising strategic initiatives(4)$0.8 $0.0 Store closure impairment charges(5)$0.8 $0.0 Impact of income taxes(6)$(2.0)$(0.6)Adjustment to net earnings(7)$5.9 $1.8 The table below clarifies where the items that have been adjusted above to improve comparability of the financial information from period to period are presented in the consolidated statements of operations (in millions):
First Quarter
Fiscal 2026
Fiscal 2025
Cost of goods sold (as reported)$147.5 $140.6 LIFO adjustments(1)$4.4 $0.5 SG&A (as reported)$210.9 $205.7 Lyons Distribution Center movement costs(3)$0.5 $— Merchandising strategic initiatives(4)$0.8 $— Store closure impairment charges(5)$0.8 $— Depreciation and amortization (as reported)$16.4 $17.0 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)$1.4 $1.9 Consolidated operating income (as reported)$22.4 $36.2 First QuarterAS ADJUSTEDFiscal 2026Fiscal 2025% ChangeTommy Bahama Net sales$224.6 $216.2 3.9%Gross profit$147.5 $139.7 5.6%Gross margin 65.7% 64.6% Segment EBITDA(4)$40.5 $38.3 5.6%Segment EBITDA margin(4) 17.9% 17.7% Lilly Pulitzer Net sales$90.4 $99.0 (8.8)%Gross profit$55.3 $64.9 (14.9)%Gross margin 61.2% 65.6% Segment EBITDA$15.0 $23.1 (34.9)%Segment EBITDA margin 16.6% 23.3% Johnny Was Net sales$37.9 $43.5 (12.9)%Gross profit$24.9 $28.1 (11.5)%Gross margin 65.7% 64.7% Segment EBITDA(5)$(0.9)$0.0 NMSegment EBITDA margin(5)(2.4)%(0.1)% Emerging Brands Net sales$38.6 $34.2 12.8%Gross profit$20.7 $20.3 1.9%Gross margin 53.6% 59.3% Segment EBITDA(5)$3.5 $2.9 22.7%Segment EBITDA margin(5) 9.1% 8.3% Corporate and Other Net sales$(0.1)$(0.1)NMGross profit (loss)$(0.2)$(0.3)NMCorporate EBITDA(1)(3)(4)(6)$(12.8)$(10.6)NMConsolidated Net sales$391.4 $392.9 (0.4)%Gross profit$248.3 $252.8 (1.8)%Gross margin 63.4% 64.3% SG&A$208.7 $205.7 1.4%SG&A as % of net sales 53.3% 52.4% Operating income$30.3 $38.6 (21.6)%Operating margin 7.7% 9.8% Earnings before income taxes$28.0 $36.9 (24.1)%Net earnings$20.9 $28.0 (25.4)%Net earnings per diluted share$1.39 $1.82 (23.4)% First Quarter First Quarter First Quarter Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2025 Actual Guidance(8) Actual Net earnings per diluted share: GAAP basis$1.00 $1.13 - 1.23$1.70 LIFO adjustments(1)(9) 0.22 0.00 0.02 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)(9) 0.07 0.07 0.09 Lyons distribution center movement costs(3)(9) 0.03 0.00 0.00 Merchandising strategic initiatives(4)(9) 0.04 0.00 0.00 Store closure impairment charges(5)(9) 0.04 0.00 0.00 As adjusted(7)$1.39 $1.20 - 1.30$1.82 Second Quarter Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2025 Guidance(10) Actual Net earnings per diluted share: GAAP basis$1.13 - 1.33 $1.12 LIFO adjustments(11) 0.00 0.05 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)(9) 0.07 0.10 As adjusted(7)$1.20 - 1.40 $1.26 Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2025 Guidance(10) Actual Net earnings (loss) per diluted share: GAAP basis$1.70 - 2.10 $(1.86) LIFO adjustments(11) 0.22 0.42 Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets(2)(9) 0.27 0.38 Lyons distribution center movement costs(3)(9) 0.03 0.00 Merchandising strategic initiatives(4)(9) 0.04 0.00 Store closure impairment charges(5)(9) 0.04 0.00 Johnny Was impairment charges(12)(9) 0.00 2.82 Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives(13)(9) 0.00 0.15 Emerging Brands impairment charges(14)(9) 0.00 0.20 As adjusted(7)$2.30 - 2.70 $2.11 (1) LIFO adjustments represents the impact of LIFO accounting adjustments. These adjustments are included in cost of goods sold in Corporate and Other.(2)Amortization of Johnny Was intangible assets represents the amortization related to intangible assets acquired as part of the Johnny Was acquisition. These charges are included in depreciation and amortization in Johnny Was.(3) Lyons distribution center relocation costs relate to one-time, non-recurring costs to move inventory between distribution facilities in Lyons, Georgia. These charges are included in SG&A in Corporate and Other.(4)Merchandising strategic initiatives relate to one-time, non-recurring costs, incurred to assess and strategically align our merchandising operations across the Company. These charges are included in SG&A in Tommy Bahama and Corporate and Other.(5)Store closure impairment charges relate to charges incurred to close retail stores. These charges are included in SG&A in Johnny Was and Emerging Brands.(6) Impact of income taxes represents the estimated tax impact of the above adjustments based on the estimated applicable tax rate on current year earnings.(7)Amounts in columns may not add due to rounding.(8)Guidance as issued on March 26, 2026.(9) Adjustments shown net of income taxes.(10)Guidance as issued on June 10, 2026.(11)No estimate for LIFO accounting adjustments is reflected in the guidance for any future periods.(12)Johnny Was impairment charges represent the impairment of the Johnny Was intangible asset balances. These charges were included in impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in Johnny Was.(13)Johnny Was organizational realignment initiatives include severance costs, consulting fees and store closure related costs. These charges are included in SG&A and depreciation and amortization in Johnny Was.(14)Emerging Brands impairment charges represent the impairment of the Jack Rogers goodwill and intangible asset balances. These charges were included in impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in Emerging Brands. Direct to Consumer Location Count End of Q1End of Q2End of Q3End of Q4Fiscal 2025 Tommy Bahama Full-price retail store103103104102Retail-food and beverage26262828Outlet36383837Total Tommy Bahama165167170167Lilly Pulitzer full-price retail store65666667Johnny Was Full-price retail store77757575Outlet3333Total Johnny Was80787878Emerging Brands Southern Tide full-price retail store35363534TBBC full-price retail store8999Total Oxford353356358355 Fiscal 2026 Tommy Bahama Full-price retail store102 Retail-food and beverage28 Outlet38 Total Tommy Bahama168 Lilly Pulitzer full-price retail store69 Johnny Was Full-price retail store70 Outlet3 Total Johnny Was73 Emerging Brands Southern Tide full-price retail store33 TBBC full-price retail store8 Total Oxford351
MarketBeat ‘Stock of the Week’: FIGS has healthy growth prospectsOxford Industries NYSE: OXM reported first-quarter fiscal 2026 sales that were roughly in line with its expectations while adjusted earnings came in better than anticipated, as stronger gross margin helped offset a significant year-over-year increase in tariff costs.
Chairman, President and CEO Thomas C. Chubb III said on the company’s earnings call that the quarter showed “several important positive takeaways,” led by Tommy Bahama and continued growth in Emerging Brands, but also highlighted ongoing challenges at Lilly Pulitzer and Johnny Was.
Get Oxford Industries alerts:
“Overall, sales in the first quarter were in line with our expectations, and earnings were better than we anticipated, primarily due to stronger than expected gross margin,” Chubb said. He added that Oxford absorbed an $11 million, or $0.55 per share, increase in tariff costs during the quarter compared with the prior year.
First-Quarter Sales Hold Steady as Comps Decline CFO and COO K. Scott Grassmyer said consolidated net sales were $391 million in the first quarter, compared with $393 million in the prior-year period and above the midpoint of the company’s guidance range of $385 million to $395 million.
Total company comparable sales decreased 2%, with both retail and e-commerce comps down 2%. Wholesale sales declined 5%, which Grassmyer said was better than the company’s original forecast. Food and beverage sales increased 14%, driven primarily by non-comparable locations.
Adjusted gross margin contracted 90 basis points to 63.4%, as higher tariff-related costs added about 280 basis points to cost of goods sold. Grassmyer said that pressure was partly offset by sourcing and pricing changes, lower freight costs following carrier contract renegotiations and a sales mix shift toward direct-to-consumer channels.
Adjusted SG&A expenses rose 1% to $209 million, with increases tied to new retail and food and beverage locations, software and consulting costs and expenses associated with the transition to the company’s Lyons, Georgia, distribution center. Oxford reported adjusted EBITDA of $45 million, compared with $54 million a year earlier, and adjusted earnings per share of $1.39.
Tommy Bahama Leads Portfolio Performance Tommy Bahama delivered the strongest brand performance in the quarter, with total sales increasing year over year. Grassmyer said the brand benefited from mid-single-digit comps in direct-to-consumer channels, partially offset by lower wholesale sales.
Chubb said Tommy Bahama saw strength in both men’s and women’s, with women’s direct-to-consumer sales up about 7.5% in the quarter. He said the women’s business was driven by fashion categories, including pants and wovens, while men’s benefited from core products including M-Field, Boracay and linen programs.
Chubb also highlighted that 30% of Tommy Bahama e-commerce orders in the quarter included both a men’s and women’s item, up from 25% in the prior year. He said the brand’s performance reflected “a better assortment balance, improved key item execution, and the enduring appeal of its relaxed, warm weather lifestyle positioning.”
Lilly Pulitzer Falls Short as Management Targets Fixes Lilly Pulitzer’s results were below company expectations, with Grassmyer citing significant declines in e-commerce and a difficult comparison to the prior year. The brand posted low-teen negative comps overall.
Chubb said the company initially believed colder February weather in Florida was a contributing factor, but later identified additional merchandising and execution issues. These included gaps in certain opening price points, allocation opportunities and an assortment that leaned too heavily into vintage prints and novelty products.
“The business did not execute to its potential in the first quarter,” Chubb said. “We did not bring together product pricing, allocation, and messaging. That is on us.”
Chubb said some fixes, such as messaging, marketing and promotional adjustments, can happen more quickly. Other improvements tied to merchandising and product development will take longer to flow through the assortment, with more meaningful changes expected around the resort season.
Johnny Was Turnaround Focuses on Margin and Store Base At Johnny Was, management said the brand remains on track with its turnaround plan, though sales were pressured. Chubb said wholesale was the most challenged channel, in part because Johnny Was has greater exposure than Oxford’s other brands to specialty stores, a market he said has declined meaningfully in recent years.
Sales were also lower to off-price retailers because of healthier inventory levels, and to Saks Global, which Chubb said has been affected by its bankruptcy process. Direct-to-consumer performance was “much more in line” with company expectations, he said.
Oxford is working to improve design cohesion, refine the assortment, strengthen marketing and drive execution across channels. The company also closed five underperforming Johnny Was stores in the first quarter and will continue reviewing the store base by market and location.
Grassmyer said Johnny Was has made progress on gross margin by buying inventory tighter, reducing promotions and improving gross margin return on investment. He said the company expects comps at Johnny Was to remain difficult in the first half but could begin to turn positive in the second half as product and assortment changes take effect.
Guidance Updated as Trends Soften Oxford narrowed its full-year sales outlook by lowering the top end of its range, citing softer trends in April, May and early June, continued caution among consumers and ongoing weakness at Lilly Pulitzer. For fiscal 2026, the company now expects net sales of $1.475 billion to $1.505 billion, compared with $1.478 billion in fiscal 2025.
The sales plan assumes growth at Tommy Bahama and Emerging Brands, partially offset by declines at Lilly Pulitzer and Johnny Was. Grassmyer said full-year comparable sales are now expected to range from slightly negative to slightly positive, down from the company’s prior expectation for flat to low-single-digit positive comps.
Oxford tightened its full-year adjusted EPS guidance to $2.30 to $2.70, compared with adjusted EPS of $2.11 last year. Grassmyer said the outlook assumes the current lower tariff rate of 10% remains in place for the rest of the year and does not include the impact of any tariff refunds.
Grassmyer said Oxford paid about $40 million of tariffs in fiscal 2025 and an additional $5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 that were ultimately invalidated by a February Supreme Court ruling. The company has filed approximately $25 million in phase one claims and has begun receiving refunds. He said any tariff refund proceeds would primarily be used to repay debt.
For the second quarter, Oxford expects sales of $380 million to $400 million, compared with $403 million a year earlier, and adjusted EPS of $1.20 to $1.40, compared with $1.26 last year. Management said second-quarter comps are expected to be in the low-single-digit negative to flat range, with wholesale sales down in the high-single-digit range.
Chubb said the consumer backdrop remains unsettled, with shoppers becoming more cautious and selective amid macroeconomic and geopolitical pressures. Still, he said Oxford plans to avoid short-term actions that could harm its brands over the long term.
About Oxford Industries NYSE: OXMOxford Industries, Inc, incorporated in 1942 and headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a leading designer, marketer and distributor of high-quality men's and women's lifestyle apparel and accessories. The company's product portfolio features a mix of owned brands and licensed partnerships that span casual, resort and performance categories. Key owned brands include Tommy Bahama, renowned for its island-inspired menswear and women's sportswear, and Southern Tide, which offers coastal-focused clothing and footwear.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Oxford Industries Right Now?Before you consider Oxford Industries, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Oxford Industries wasn't on the list.
While Oxford Industries currently has a Reduce rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Click the link to see MarketBeat's list of seven best retirement stocks and why they should be in your portfolio.
Oxford Industries (OXM - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $1.39 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.27 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.82 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +9.45%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this owner of the Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer and Southern Tide clothing lines would post earnings of $0.05 per share when it actually produced a loss of $0.09, delivering a surprise of -280%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times.
Oxford Industries, which belongs to the Zacks Textile - Apparel industry, posted revenues of $391.4 million for the quarter ended April 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.31%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $392.86 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates three times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Oxford Industries shares have added about 26.2% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 7.9%.
What's Next for Oxford Industries?While Oxford Industries has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Oxford Industries was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $1.48 on $413.8 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $2.51 on $1.5 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Textile - Apparel is currently in the top 39% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
Another stock from the same industry, Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE - Free Report) , has yet to report results for the quarter ended April 2026. The results are expected to be released on June 16.
This company is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.13 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +64.9%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
Vince Holding Corp.'s revenues are expected to be $63.05 million, up 8.8% from the year-ago quarter.
U.S. stock futures were higher this morning, with the Nasdaq futures gaining around 300 points on Thursday.
Shares of Oxford Industries Inc (NYSE:OXM) fell sharply in pre-market trading after the company reported mixed results for the first quarter.
The company posted quarterly earnings of $1.39 per share, which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.29 per share. The company reported quarterly sales of $391.402 million, which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $391.754 million.
The company raised its FY2026 earnings guidance, while narrowing its sales outlook.
Oxford Industries shares dipped 6.6% to $40.42 in pre-market trading.
Here are some other stocks moving lower in pre-market trading.
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
U.S. stock futures were higher this morning, with the Nasdaq futures gaining around 300 points on Thursday.
Shares of Oxford Industries Inc (NYSE:OXM) fell sharply in pre-market trading after the company reported mixed results for the first quarter.
The company posted quarterly earnings of $1.39 per share, which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.29 per share. The company reported quarterly sales of $391.402 million, which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $391.754 million.
The company raised its FY2026 earnings guidance, while narrowing its sales outlook.
Oxford Industries shares dipped 6.6% to $40.42 in pre-market trading.
Here are some other stocks moving lower in pre-market trading.
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs