Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

, /PRNewswire/ -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Verra Mobility Corporation ("Verra" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: VRRM) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's securities between February 24, 2026, and May 26, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 4, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Verra misled investors about its growth prospects. The Company downplayed the risk of major customers in the rental car industry replacing its services with in-house solutions. The Company concealed the fact that its relationship with Avis Budget Group, which represented  10% of its revenue, was at significant risk of falling apart. The Company finally revealed that Avis Budget Group terminated its relationship on May 26, 2026. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Verra, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.             

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

SOURCE The Schall Law Firm

Calix, Inc. Sued for Securities Law Violations - Contact the DJS Law Group to Discuss Your Rights - CALX PR Newswire

LOS ANGELES, June 15, 2026

, /PRNewswire/ -- The DJS Law Group reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Calix, Inc. ("Calix" or "the Company") (NYSE: CALX) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shareholders who purchased shares of CALX during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointments. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.

CLASS PERIOD: January 28, 2026 to April 21, 2026

DEADLINE: July 27, 2026

CASE DETAILS: According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Calix's Q1 performance was improved by the advanced purchase of memory modules. As the Company's supply of memory fell, it suffered from significant margin pressure due to increasing memory prices on the open market. Based on these facts, Calix's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, contact us to participate.

WHY DJS LAW GROUP? DJS Law Group's primary focus is to enhance investor return through balanced counseling and aggressive advocacy. We specialize in securities class actions, corporate governance litigation, and domestic/international M&A appraisals. Our clients are some of the largest and most sophisticated hedge funds and alternative asset managers in the world. The litigation claims of our clients are extraordinarily valuable assets that demand respect, focus, and results.

Join the case to recover your losses.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

David J. Schwartz

DJS Law Group

274 White Plains Road, Suite 1

Eastchester, NY 10709

Phone: 914-206-9742

Email: [email protected]

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/calix-inc-sued-for-securities-law-violations---contact-the-djs-law-group-to-discuss-your-rights--calx-302799915.html

SOURCE DJS Law Group LLP

Casey's General Stores delivered strong Q4 2026 results, with broad-based inside-store growth and notable margin expansion. CASY's inside-store performance improved structurally, with margin gains driven by better cost management and a favorable sales mix. Fuel margins surged, but I view the Q4 levels as unsustainable and would not capitalize them as a new baseline.

Blue Owl Capital is rated Buy, trading at a steep discount despite robust growth in fee-related earnings and AUM. OWL's recurring management fees, primarily from permanent capital, drive predictable earnings and support a well-covered dividend. Real assets, especially data center buildouts with partners like Meta, are a key growth engine, offsetting concerns in the Credit Platform.

June 15 (Reuters) - U.S.-based cybersecurity firm N-able Inc (NABL.N), opens new tab plans to expand its India workforce by at least 50% by the end of 2026, targeting ​the country's deep pool of AI and cybersecurity talent, CEO John ‌Pagliuca said.

N-able, which provides IT management, cybersecurity, and data protection software to more than 500,000 organizations globally, opened a Global Capability Center (GCC) in Bengaluru on Monday. The center currently ​employs more than 100 people.

Get the latest news from India and how it matters to the world with the Reuters India File newsletter. Sign up here.

The expansion comes amid a broader boom ​in India's GCC ecosystem. The country's GCC workforce is projected ⁠to reach 2.36 million employees by the end of 2026, with AI ​and cybersecurity driving much of the demand, according to a report by industry ​body Nasscom and consultancy Zinnov.

"The reason we're in Bengaluru is capability," Pagliuca told Reuters in an interview. "Our priority is to build for the long term, with the right people ​and a strong foundation, not to pursue a short-term headcount play."

Pagliuca said ​N-able's move was driven primarily by access to talent rather than cost reduction.

While Bengaluru is ‌India's ⁠premier technology hub, the market for AI and cybersecurity professionals is highly contested, with multinational companies and local technology firms competing for the same talent.

Pagliuca said skills in AI engineering, applied machine learning, cloud security, and threat research ​are among the hardest ​to source. ⁠To attract high-caliber talent, N-able is relying on competitive packages and the opportunity to drive global innovation while building ​strong local career paths, he said.

The launch comes as cybercriminals ​increasingly use ⁠generative AI to carry out sophisticated, automated attacks, with Pagliuca adding that the Bengaluru team will play a key role in developing defensive AI capabilities, including ⁠automated ​threat detection, monitoring and faster response times.

However, N-able ​did not disclose its current market penetration among Indian small and medium-sized businesses or specific revenue ​targets for the country.

Reporting by Chandini Monnappa in Bengaluru; Editing by Rashmi Aich

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Chandini Monnappa leads a team of reporters at Reuters overseeing coverage of European companies. She has helped run various breaking news teams over the last seven years, covering corporate news across the UK, South Africa, Australia, and Asia. She has previously reported on automaker and consumer retail firms in India and frequently contributes to the coverage of Indian general and political news.

, /PRNewswire/ -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Helen of Troy Limited ("Helen of Troy" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: HELE) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's securities between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 3, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Helen of Troy misled investors about the success of its Project Pegasus restructuring program. The Company touted the "fuel" produced by Project Pegasus, despite what it called "implementation hiccups." The Company continued to tout its restructuring effort, telling shareholders, "despite the delayed savings related to our Tennessee distribution center, Project Pegasus continues to move forward. We have made good progress on the cost of goods sold work streams, implementing multiple projects that reduce costs and simplify our supplier base." Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Helen of Troy, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.             

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

SOURCE The Schall Law Firm

Here are three stocks with buy rank and strong value characteristics for investors to consider today, June 15:

Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB - Free Report) : This publicly traded real estate investment trust carries a Zacks Rank #1, and has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing by 5% over the last 60 days.

Pebblebrook Hotel Trust has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 10.84 compared with 13.70 for the industry. The company possesses a Value Scoreof A.

GDS Holdings Limited (GDS - Free Report) : This data center company carries a Zacks Rank #1, and has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing by 222.8% over the last 60 days.

GDS Holdings Limited has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 5.76 compared with 9.80 for the industry. The company possesses a Value Score of A.

Alto Ingredients, Inc. (ALTO - Free Report) : This specialty chemicals company carries a Zacks Rank #1, and has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its next year earnings increasing 184.21% over the last 60 days.

Alto Ingredients has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 10.56 compared with 12.20 for the industry. The company possesses a Value Score of A.

See the full list of top ranked stocks here.

Learn more about the Value score and how it is calculated here.

, /PRNewswire/ -- The DJS Law Group reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against POET Technologies Inc. ("POET" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: POET) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shareholders who purchased shares of POET during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointments. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.

CLASS PERIOD: April 1, 2026 to April 27, 2026

DEADLINE: June 29, 2026

CASE DETAILS: According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. The likelihood of POET being declared a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC") led it to misrepresenting its tax status. Based on these facts, POET's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, contact us to participate.

WHY DJS LAW GROUP? DJS Law Group's primary focus is to enhance investor return through balanced counseling and aggressive advocacy. We specialize in securities class actions, corporate governance litigation, and domestic/international M&A appraisals. Our clients are some of the largest and most sophisticated hedge funds and alternative asset managers in the world. The litigation claims of our clients are extraordinarily valuable assets that demand respect, focus, and results.

Join the case to recover your losses.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

David J. Schwartz

DJS Law Group

274 White Plains Road, Suite 1

 Eastchester, NY 10709

Phone: 914-206-9742

Email: [email protected]

SOURCE DJS Law Group LLP

Ladder Capital stands out as the top commercial mREIT pick, offering a compelling blend of yield, growth, and conservative management. LADR's diversified model, investment-grade ratings, and founder-led management drive resilience, with a covered 9.1% yield and consensus 20% growth for 2027. Starwood Property Trust is positioned as a stable, high-yield income vehicle, maintaining an 11.3% yield and conservative leverage but limited dividend growth.

Hancock Prospecting Executive Chairman Gina Rinehart reacts during the Lest We Forget sunset tribute on the eve of ANZAC Day at Sydney Opera House in Sydney, Australia, April 24, 2025.... Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab Read more

MELBOURNE, June 15 (Reuters) - Australia's wealthiest person, mining baron Gina Rinehart, has taken a stake of more than $1 billion in the record-setting $75 billion SpaceX (SPCX.O), opens new tab IPO, the Wall Street Journal reported on ​Monday, citing a person familiar with the matter.

Rinehart's company Hancock Prospecting did not ‌confirm the size of its stake in Elon Musk's SpaceX. However, she said in a statement: "This is a significant investment for Hancock, and we are pleased to have received an allocation in what has been ​an extremely popular and oversubscribed IPO."

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide during the World Cup. Sign up here.

She praised Musk for having built two of the ​world's top 10 largest companies.

“We see SpaceX as a rare business: led ⁠by a truly exceptional person, technically exceptional and operating in sectors that are crucial, and ​with long-term potential," said Rinehart, whose wealth was built on iron ore mined by her ​company, Hancock Prospecting.

Hancock, which is a significant investor in critical minerals projects, aims to work with SpaceX on supplying its mineral needs.

“In the future, we also see the possibility of mutually beneficial arrangements between SpaceX and ​Hancock Prospecting’s significant critical minerals investments, as demand grows for the materials and infrastructure needed ​to support advanced technology," Hancock CEO Garry Korte said in the statement.

Hancock is a significant investor in ‌a swathe ⁠of rare earths companies including U.S.-based MP Materials, and Rare Earths Americas (REA.A), opens new tab, and Australia's Lynas Rare Earths (LYC.AX), opens new tab, as well as lithium producer Liontown Resources (LTR.AX), opens new tab among many others.

It bulked up its defence, gold and rare-earths holdings in its $3.3 billion U.S. portfolio this year, filings showed last month.

Rinehart's investment ​in SpaceX was an ​instant winner. The ⁠shares shot up 19% in their debut last Friday, sending the company's value past $2 trillion to make it the sixth-biggest U.S. company as ​investors jumped at the chance to get a piece of Musk's sprawling empire ​spanning rockets, ⁠satellites and AI.

While commending Musk's entrepreneurial prowess, Rinehart also called him a patriot for slashing U.S. federal jobs through President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

"SpaceX is yet another clear example of ⁠why the ​world needs more enterprise, more builders and much less ​bureaucracy," Rinehart said.

Rinehart, too, has become increasingly political, encouraging some of Australia's wealthiest voters to shift support from the ​country's opposition Liberal-National conservatives to populist, anti-migration party One Nation.

Reporting by Melanie Burton; Editing by Sonali Paul

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Scottish Mortgage Trust share price jumped by over 1% on Friday, paring back some of the losses made earlier that week as investors cheered the SpaceX IPO, which marked a major milestone for the fund. It jumped to a high of 1,497p before paring back the gains to close at 1,450p. SMT stock now faces a major headwind, but the upcoming Anthropic IPO may offer a reprief.

The SMT stock has embarked on a strong rally earlier this year as investors cheered the growing valuation of SpaceX, its biggest investment. SpaceX launched its IPO on Friday, raising $75 billion and attaining a $2.1 trillion valuation. 

This means that Scottish Mortgage has a substantial return as it invested in the company when it was valued at less than $100 billion. It invested 315 million pounds in the company in 2018, a figure that has now surged.

Still, the trust faces a major risk based on how companies behave when they go public. Data shows that over 90% of all companies that went public since January 2025 made a similar pattern. They surged initially amid the IPO hype and then retreated sharply after that.

There are several good examples of this, including Figma, Circle, and Medline. Figma stock price jumped from $33 to $142, before crashing to below $20 today. Circle jumped to $300 and then crashed to $49 a few months later. Medline rose to $50 and then tumbled to $36 today.

Therefore, there is a likelihood that the SPCX stock will retreat in the coming days as investors book profits and valuation concerns remain. If this happens, the value of Scottish Mortgage’s investment will drop substantially.

Some key companies in Scottish Mortgage’s portfolio have lost momentum this year. Meta Platforms has sunk by 30% from its highest point last year, while Amazon has dropped by 14% from the YTD high.

Still, on the positive side, the SMT share price will receive a reprieve because of its stake in Anthropic, the creator of Claude. Bailie Gifford, which runs SMT, made its first investment in Anthropic in 2021 and has steadily grown its position. Anthropic now accounts for about 2.7% of its holdings.

The fund’s return has been strong as Anthropic recently raised capital at a $900 billion valuation. This fundraising makes it the fastest-growing company to cross that valuation.

Anthropic recently filed its IPO papers, with traders anticipating that it will receive a $1.5 trillion valuation after going public later this year. 

The company’s other potential catalysts are its investments in Stripe and Bytedance, the parent company of TikTok. Stripe has become a major player in the finance industry, where it is used by some of the biggest companies in the world like OpenAI, Amazon, Nvidia, Ford, Coinbase, and Google.

It processes transactions worth trillions of dollars a year, with its valuation soaring to over $150 billion. After remaining private for years, Stripe will likely go public in the near future.

ByteDance will also likely go public, a move that will see it attract hundreds of billions of dollars in value. 

Scottish Mortgage share price chart | Source: TradingView

The daily chart shows that the Scottish Mortgage share price has slipped in the past few days. It retreated from a high of 1,565p earlier this month to a low of 1,395p. It then rebounded to the current 1,450p. 

The stock has formed a doji candlestick pattern, pointing to a reversal as the SpaceX IPO hype starts to fade. If this happens, the stock will drop to about 1,300p before resuming the uptrend.

Item 1 of 2 A Tesla robotaxi drives on the street along South Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, U.S., June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Joel Angel Juarez/File Photo To Match Special Report TESLA-FSD/SAFETY

[1/2]A Tesla robotaxi drives on the street along South Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, U.S., June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Joel Angel Juarez/File Photo To Match Special Report TESLA-FSD/SAFETY Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SummaryCompaniesTesla used dubious safety stats to make case for FSD approval in EuropeAutomaker's crash data has been called into question by researchersSweden says regulators 'look beyond headline figures' to assess safetyJune 15 (Reuters) - In its efforts to secure European approval of its “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) system, Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab has presented self-published safety statistics to regulators in Sweden and the Netherlands that independent traffic-safety researchers have said amount to misleading marketing.

A Reuters examinationpublished last month found that Tesla ​CEO Elon Musk and other leaders over the past year have increasingly cited statistics they say prove its FSD driver-assistance feature is up to 10 times safer than human drivers. But the ‌news agency’s review found several invalid data comparisons underlying Tesla’s statistics, opens new tab that exaggerated its safety claims.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Tesla has presented the inflated safety data to some European regulators, according to correspondence obtained by Reuters through public records requests, as the EV maker seeks wider approval of FSD in a region where it is trying to regain market share. Tesla approached RDW, the Dutch road regulator, in late 2024 to begin the FSD approval process.

In a November 2024 letter to RDW, Tesla provided a link to its safety report and claimed “increased usage” of FSD “leads to ​safer roads.” Tesla charges a monthly subscription for FSD, which can drive itself under certain circumstances but requires the human driver to pay attention.

After more than a year of testing and discussions with Tesla, RDW in ​April approved FSD for use in the Netherlands. The Dutch regulator is now seeking EU-wide approval on behalf of Tesla.

RDW declined to comment on the issues Reuters identified ⁠with Tesla's safety statistics, but the agency said in a statement that it "does not rely on marketing claims or external statistics" to make decisions and performs its own "tests, analyses and verifications" of the system on public roads and test ​tracks. The agency did not say whether it assessed Tesla's U.S. safety statistics.

RDW said Tesla “collected a lot of data” during testing and the agency “validated, tested and audited all of this data.” RDW did not say what kind of data Tesla ​collected or what it measured.

Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.

SAVING 32,000 LIVES?Soon after the Dutch announced the decision on April 10, a Tesla policy manager, Ivan Komusanac, wrote an email to Swedish regulators asking for similar FSD approval. He attached a slide presentation displaying the exaggerated claim that Teslas using FSD can travel more than seven times farther between crashes than the average U.S. human driver.

The presentation also claimed FSD could have potentially saved 32,000 lives and prevented 1.9 million injuries.

Researchers interviewed by Reuters said those figures are ​highly misleading because they are based on the unrealistic assumption that every U.S. vehicle, including freight trucks and crash-prone motorcycles, would be replaced by an FSD-enabled Tesla car – and that every Tesla car is, in fact, at least seven ​times safer than the one it replaces.

The Reuters examination also found Tesla exaggerates the technology’s safety by comparing a rate of crashes in FSD-piloted Teslas that triggered airbag deployments to a U.S. crash rate for all vehicles that includes far less-severe accidents. The ‌company also compares ⁠its cars to the average U.S. vehicle – which is much older than the average Tesla. That distorts the results because automakers have gradually introduced new safety features that reduce crashes.

Anders Eriksson, an investigator at the Swedish Transport Agency, declined to comment on the data Tesla provided, but added that Swedish regulators “look beyond headline figures” and that any assessment of such a system would not be based “solely on aggregated safety claims, but on the overall evidence presented.”

The regulator did not answer Reuters’ questions about what other evidence Tesla provided.

Dudley Curtis, a spokesperson for the watchdog group European Transport Safety Council, said his organization is “certainly concerned” that Tesla presented “unreliable safety data” from the United States to regulators in Sweden, after Reuters told ​the group about the correspondence.

He added that if Tesla wants ​to make safety claims, they should “give the data ⁠to a university, have it independently verified by a qualified researcher, and then let’s talk.”

TESLA LOOKS TO FSD FOR EUROPEAN REBOUNDTesla has said FSD approval in Europe is key to vehicle sales growth in the region. The EV maker is still trying to regain market share after sales plummeted last year amid protests over Musk’s political activities, including his embrace ​of far-right European political parties.

Failing to secure approval could make it harder for Tesla to compete in a region where Chinese EV makers are steadily making inroads.

In ​the coming months, representatives of 55% ⁠of member states that make up 65% of the bloc's population must vote “yes” for FSD to become legal throughout the EU.

In the meantime, individual member states can approve the technology on their own. A regulator in Greece, which said last month the country aims to approve FSD, cited data “from the other side of the Atlantic” that showed “this system ultimately leads to a very significant drop in accidents.”

The Greek transport ministry declined to answer questions about whether the data it cited was from Tesla’s safety ⁠report.

Regulators in other ​European countries have been inundated by drivers citing Tesla’s safety statistics and urging swift approval of FSD, emails showed.

Several Tesla drivers wrote to ​Norwegian road regulators citing Tesla’s vehicle safety report last autumn. One argued the technology is “significantly safer than average manual driving,” with the potential to “reduce traffic accidents by up to 90% and thus save lives on Norwegian roads.”

Stein-Helge Mundal of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration responded to several Tesla enthusiasts, ​saying Tesla’s figures “are self-produced,” which makes it “difficult to find correlation with the authorities’ accident statistics.”

Reporting by Chris Kirkham in Los Angeles and Marie Mannes in Stockholm; Additional reporting by Toby Sterling in Amsterdam; Editing by Mike Colias and Anna Driver

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Chris Kirkham is a business reporter in Los Angeles who writes about Tesla, electric vehicles and the wider automotive industry. He previously worked at The Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, and has covered topics including tobacco, worker safety, gambling, and the economy over a two-decade career. Contact him at [email protected] or on Signal at chris_kirkham.51

Stockholm-based company news correspondent who mainly covers anything to do with retail and industrial companies in Sweden as well as other sectors with Swedish companies. She previously covered the general Nordic stock market from Gdansk, reporting on a range of subjects, from companies exiting Russia to M&As and supply chain concerns. Marie has degrees in journalism and international relations and is keen on finding stories that drive the market and that have unreported elements to it.

Here are three stocks with buy rank and strong income characteristics for investors to consider today, June 15:

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW - Free Report) : This commercial vehicle equipment company witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing 15.4% the last 60 days.

This Zacks Rank #1 company has a dividend yield of 2.5%, compared with the industry average of 0.0%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR - Free Report) : This materials and industrial component company has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing 7.1% the last 60 days.

This Zacks Rank #1 company has a dividend yield of 2.9%, compared with the industry average of 0.0%.

Starbucks Corporation (SBUX - Free Report) : This coffee company has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing 4.4% in the last 60 days.

This Zacks Rank #1 company has a dividend yield of 2.4%, compared with the industry average of 0.0%.

See the full list of top ranked stocks here.

Find more top income stocks with some of our great premium screens.

1.58K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. This post is illustrative and educational and is not a specific offer of products or services or financial advice. Information in this article is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned herein. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. Expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

DaVita Inc. (DVA - Free Report) : This kidney dialysis company has a Zacks Rank #1, and has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing 6.4% over the last 60 days.

DaVita Inc. has a PEG ratio of 0.65 compared with 2.13 for the industry. The company possesses a Growth Score of B.

Five Below, Inc. (FIVE - Free Report) : This specialty retail company carries a Zacks Rank #1, and has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing 8.1% over the last 60 days.

Five Below has a PEG ratio of 1.09 compared with 2.01 for the industry. The company possesses a Growth Score of A.

Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI - Free Report) : This shipping and mailing services company carries a Zacks Rank #1, and has witnessed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increasing 11% over the last 60 days.

Pitney Bowes has a PEG ratio of 0.75 compared with 0.86 for the industry. The company possesses a Growth Score of A.

See the full list of top ranked stocks here.

Learn more about the Growth score and how it is calculated here.

, /PRNewswire/ -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Roblox Corporation ("Roblox" or "the Company") (NYSE: RBLX) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's securities between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 7, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Roblox assured investors that it could minimize risks associated with age verification and accurately forecast its business performance. The Company claimed to be "enormously bullish" and able to rely on "tremendous organic growth." The Company relied on viral events to supply growth while misleading shareholders about how age verification would impact platform engagement and the public's view of its products. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Roblox, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

SOURCE The Schall Law Firm

The Kroger Co. (NYSE:KR) will release its first quarter earnings report before the opening bell on Thursday, June 18.

Analysts expect the Cincinnati, Ohio-based grocer to report quarterly earnings of $1.59 per share, up from $1.49 per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Kroger’s quarterly revenue is $45.49 billion. It reported $45.12 billion last year, according to Benzinga Pro.

On May 26, Kroger announced the retirement of Tim Massa, executive vice president and chief associate experience officer.

Kroger shares fell 0.6% to close at $51.26 on Friday.

Benzinga readers can access the latest analyst ratings on the Analyst Stock Ratings page. Readers can sort by stock ticker, company name, analyst firm, rating change or other variables.

Let's have a look at how Benzinga's most-accurate analysts have rated the company in the recent period.

Considering buying KR stock? Here’s what analysts think:

Photo via Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

, /PRNewswire/ -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Lucid Group, Inc. ("Lucid" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: LCID) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's securities between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are encouraged to contact the firm before July 28, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Lucid's deliveries were disrupted by a supplier quality issue. The Company suffered a material impact on its business results due to this quality issue. The Company overstated the strength of manufacturing capabilities. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Lucid, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.             

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

SOURCE The Schall Law Firm

, /PRNewswire/ -- The DJS Law Group reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Zoetis Inc. ("Zoetis" or "the Company") (NYSE: ZTS) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shareholders who purchased shares of ZTS during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointments. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.

CLASS PERIOD: January 14, 2025 to May 6, 2026

DEADLINE: July 27, 2026

CASE DETAILS: According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Zoetis faced challenges in multiple product lines including Librela, Apoquel, and Cytopoint. Based on these facts, Zoetis' public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, contact us to participate.

WHY DJS LAW GROUP? DJS Law Group's primary focus is to enhance investor return through balanced counseling and aggressive advocacy. We specialize in securities class actions, corporate governance litigation, and domestic/international M&A appraisals. Our clients are some of the largest and most sophisticated hedge funds and alternative asset managers in the world. The litigation claims of our clients are extraordinarily valuable assets that demand respect, focus, and results.

Join the case to recover your losses.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

David J. Schwartz

DJS Law Group

274 White Plains Road, Suite 1

 Eastchester, NY 10709

Phone: 914-206-9742

Email: [email protected]

SOURCE DJS Law Group LLP

Listen to the audio version of this article (generated by AI).

Editor’s Note: SpaceX is finally public. And the FOMO is already building. But before you buy, Louis Navellier — who has been investing through major technology cycles for nearly five decades — wants you to ask one question: can you afford the volatility?

In today’s piece, Louis walks through three reasons he’s not buying SpaceX right now, despite believing it’s a wonderful company. It’s a masterclass in the difference between a great business and a great entry point — and a timely reminder that the best investors don’t just know what to buy. They know when.

He and TradeSmith CEO Keith Kaplan recently sat down to talk through all of it — including two free stock picks for the summer ahead. Watch the replay here.

Now here’s Louis.

In 2017, legendary billionaire investor Ron Baron made a big bet.

His firm invested in SpaceX (SPCX) when the company was valued at less than $22 billion.

Now, with SpaceX public, that bet could go down as one of the great investments in history. So, let’s give credit where credit is due.

But folks, before you think about buying SpaceX stock, you need to think about your risk tolerance and ask yourself:

How much risk can you stomach?

A billionaire like Baron can make a huge, concentrated bet on Elon Musk. He can wait years for it to pay off. He can ride the ups and downs. He can afford to be early and patient.

Most investors cannot afford to do any of those things.

And that is the real lesson I want you to think about as SpaceX begins trading.

So, let’s talk about how investors should handle SpaceX now that it is public and the three reasons why I do not recommend buying SpaceX stock right now… and a new tool that can help you time the market better and make bigger gains – so you don’t have to ride the emotional roller coaster on the way to profits. 

Reason No. 1: Great Companies Make Terrible IPO Buys — Just Ask Facebook Now, let me first say that I think SpaceX is a wonderful company. Starlink makes money. SpaceX makes money. But a great company can still be a risky stock if you buy it at the wrong price, at the wrong time.

Case in point: Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

Facebook went public on May 18, 2012. At the time, it was one of the most anticipated IPOs Wall Street had seen in years. Investors were clamoring to get in. The stock was priced at $38. 

The FOMO was real. Then reality set in. By August 2012, Facebook had fallen to about $17.50. That was a loss of more than 50% from the IPO price.

Now, Facebook eventually became a tremendous long-term winner, up more than 1,300% since it first went public. But investors who chased the IPO still got taken to the woodshed.

That wasn’t some one-off case, either. Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) became one of the greatest stocks of all time – but it first fell more than 90% from its dot-com peak. Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), then Google, became a monster winner – but only after testing investors’ patience with steep pullbacks.

Bottom line: Great stocks do not move in a straight line.

That is why I have a simple rule when it comes to IPOs. I usually wait at least a year before I buy.

That may sound boring when everyone is talking about a stock that could soar on its first day of trading. But I have been doing this for nearly five decades, and I have learned that the best time to buy a great company is not always the first time Wall Street lets you buy it.

When a company goes public, there is usually a lockup period for insiders. They cannot immediately sell their shares. But once that lockup expires, a lot of stock can come onto the market, creating selling pressure.

We saw something similar recently with another space-related stock, Rocket Lab Corporation (RKLB). As excitement around SpaceX picked up, a lot of Rocket Lab insiders were cashing out. So do not be surprised if some SpaceX insiders eventually sell after their lockup period expires.

Reason No. 2: You Can’t Grade What You Can’t See Yet The second reason I wait is to see the data.

After a company has been public for a year, I can calculate reward-to-risk. I can look at alpha. I can study standard deviation. And I can get four quarters of fundamentals to see whether the stock fits my eight-factor fundamental model.

In other words, I can stop guessing. My Stock Grader tool can give it a simple ranking of A to F, giving my followers and me a clear understanding of whether to buy it.

That matters with SpaceX because it’s a complex business. You have the launch business. You have Starlink. And you have other long-term projects that could eventually become very valuable – or not. 

But as an investor, I want to know which part of the business is driving the growth. That is one of the main reasons I am willing to wait. Right now, SpaceX’s future as a public company is still speculative. A year from now, we should have a much clearer picture.

Reason No. 3: When You Buy SpaceX Stock, You’re Also Buying Elon Musk’s Headlines I should also add the Elon Musk factor.

I am not here to dispute the man’s genius. Elon Musk helped reinvent the auto industry. He helped restart America’s space ambitions. He built the world’s largest satellite internet network. He turned Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) into one of the most valuable companies on the planet. 

That is an extraordinary record. But investors need to ask a very practical question: 

Can you afford the volatility that comes with Elon Musk?

When you invest in a Musk-led company, you are not just investing in the business. You are also accepting the market’s reaction to Elon Musk himself. 

We have seen that with Tesla. A single Musk headline can move billions of dollars in market value. His political comments, public battles and unpredictable behavior have all created added volatility around the stock at different times.

That does not erase what Musk has accomplished. But it does add another layer of risk.

The Smarter Trade This Summer: Here’s What to Do Instead The reality is there is still a tremendous amount of money sloshing around. When I was on Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Business show recently, she pointed out that there is about $7 trillion in cash on the sidelines. 

Some of that money will naturally gravitate toward the market.

High-profile IPOs like SpaceX, Anthropic and eventually OpenAI could help pull more of that money into stocks. That is bullish for growth stocks and suggests investors still have a strong appetite for innovation.

But bullish does not mean blind, folks.

June is a seasonally strong month, helped by the annual Russell realignment. We should also have another great earnings announcement season kick off in July. But as we get into August and the first half of September, we’ve entered the seasonally weakest period for the market.

So, if we see drawdowns or stair-steps lower this summer, I will not be surprised.

Bottom line: This is still not a market where you can afford to guess or ignore your risk tolerance. You need to know what you own. You need to know what you are missing. And you need to know when to be aggressive – and when to be cautious.

That is exactly why I sat down with TradeSmith CEO Keith Kaplan earlier this week.

During our special event, we discussed why today’s market reminds me of the late 1990s, why I believe the AI boom still has much further to run and how a new AI-powered tool could help investors become more tactical as volatility picks up this summer.

It works by taking my financial analysis, and combining it with a new system developed by my friends over at TradeSmith. And then it adds a revolutionary new form of AI to give investors the best possible shot at massive, rapid-fire gains.

We also share two stock picks – absolutely free.

If you missed it, you can watch the replay right here.

I strongly encourage you to watch it as soon as you can.

LONDON, June 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Willis, a WTW business (NASDAQ: WTW), today unveiled a new version of its Climate Diagnostic model to help risk managers better understand and respond to climate-driven volatility affecting property insurance markets.

Embedded within WTW’s Risk IQ platform, Climate Diagnostic is a climate risk technology capable of predicting the current and future impact of floods, windstorms and other material climate threats on an organisation’s assets, business activities and supply chain.

As extreme weather events become more severe and frequent, insurers worldwide are responding either by increasing the cost of property insurance or withdrawing from vulnerable regions entirely. With the costs of protection predicted to keep rising with climate risks and in some regions become increasingly unsustainable, the implications for individuals, businesses and economies will be long-lasting.

In order to help address this growing protection gap, Willis has embedded Climate Diagnostic into its broking workflows and risk engineering surveys. The enhanced analytics tool enables brokers and risk managers to identify and quantify the impact of acute climate hazards, such as extreme flooding or windstorm risk, on global assets and business interruption under the current and future climates.

Peter Carter, Head of Climate Practice at Willis, said: “The volatility and frequency of climate hazards are increasing. Embedding Climate Diagnostic in broking workflows and engineering surveys sets a new industry standard, with clients benefiting from a built-in scan of the risk against ongoing climate change volatility.”

Climate Diagnostic conducts scenario-based assessments across an organisation’s portfolio to identify current and future physical risk exposure to insurable climate-related perils, stress testing risk management and finance strategies in the short, medium and longer term. With this forward-looking approach, risk managers can incorporate safety measures into their risk transfer strategies that allow for rising climate volatility and explore alternative risk management methods, such as physical adaptation or alternative risk transfer solutions.

Climate Diagnostic also estimates the value of a portfolio exposed to levels of extreme weather risk and longer-term shifts in climate patterns. This supports the stress testing of current risk financing and risk transfer strategies amidst increasing climate volatility.

Peter Carter said: “Early sighting of assets exposed to climate-related perils gives risk managers the chance to build resilience, improving future insurability before disaster strikes.”

Key features of Climate Diagnostic include:

Interactive climatic and exposure maps to view highest risk areas - or physical asset portfolio exposures - for a selection of climate risks for given climate scenarios and time horizons, locate individual assets and identify financial exposure to each hazard.It is designed to be embedded in property broking and engineering workflows, helping clients consider climate volatility in risk management decisions.Climate Diagnostic data is scientifically sound, providing an independent forward-looking lens of insurable perils to clients. About WTW 
At WTW (NASDAQ: WTW), we provide data-driven, insight-led solutions in the areas of people, risk and capital. Leveraging the global view and local expertise of our colleagues serving 140 countries and markets, we help organisations sharpen their strategy, enhance organisational resilience, motivate their workforce and maximise performance.

Working shoulder to shoulder with our clients, we uncover opportunities for sustainable success - and provide perspective that moves you.

Learn more at wtwco.com.

Media contact
Andrew Collis, +44 (0) 7932 725267 | [email protected]

, /PRNewswire/ -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Commvault Systems, Inc. ("Commvault" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: CVLT) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's securities between April 29, 2025 and January 26, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are encouraged to contact the firm before July 17, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Commvault shared overwhelmingly positive statements about its ARR growth while knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that its growth guidance failed to factor in important variables including the type of sale. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Commvault, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.             

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

SOURCE The Schall Law Firm

Property and casualty (P&C) insurer Progressive (PGR +0.32%) continued to knock it out of the park in the first quarter. So, then, why has it underperformed other insurance stocks? For instance, while Progressive shares are down over 23% in the last 12 months, Allstate shares are up nearly 12%.

While revenue and earnings growth has continued, it has slowed in recent quarters. There are also lingering concerns that a softening insurance market with increased competition, relaxed underwriting standards, and lower premiums, will eventually affect quarterly results.

Image source: Getty Images.

Diving deep into Progressive's Q1 2026 results For the first quarter, Progressive reported total revenue of $22.2 billion and net income of $2.8 billion, or around $4.81 per share. Underwriting margins came in at 13.6% . The company's combined ratio, which represents the percentage of premiums spent on claims and underwriting expenses, was 86.4. For comparison, most P&C insurers have combined ratios exceeding 90.

Today's Change

(

0.32

%) $

0.65

Current Price

$

202.91

Progressive managed to deliver strong margins while continuing to grow its total number of policies in force. Over the past year, policies in force increased 9%, from 36.3 million to 39.6 million.

Yet while Progressive's underwriting margins and growth remained industry-leading, the market had a mixed at best reaction to the latest figures. Metrics like net income and total policies in force fell slightly short of forecasts.

Premium and policyholder growth also slowed down in the quarter. Progressive reported a 6% year-over-year increase in premiums written, and an 8% increased in earned premiums. During the full year 2025, these figures were at 12% and 10%, respectively.

Shares remain pricey, despite continued uncertainty Progressive is about a month away from releasing quarterly results again, but as the company also issues monthly financial reports, investors aren't completely in the dark. On May 20, Progressive released its April 2026 financial report.

In April, Progressive once again reported solid net written and earned premium growth, with these metrics rising 6% and 7%, respectively, year-over-year. Net income also increased by 10% compared to the prior year's month. However, a large increase in realized investment gains skewed results; while Progressive's profitability increased by double digits, the company's combined ratio for the month came in at 90.2, meaning underwriting margins were only 9.8%, a big decline from reported margins during Q1 2026.

As Progressive did not provide any commentary alongside these figures, the root cause of this margin drop is unclear. We do know, based on commentary from CEO Tricia Griffith in the Q1 earnings call, that Progressive appears focused on capitalizing on a softening, more competitive insurance market to "continue on our growth trajectory."

With Griffith's comments suggesting a preference for growth over margins, it makes sense sell-side earnings forecasts remain downbeat, calling for earnings of $16.40 and $16.19 per share in 2026 and 2027, respectively. Compare that to 2025, when Progressive reported earnings of $18.25 per share . As uncertainty persists, you may want to stick to the sidelines. Progressive, trading for 12 times forward earnings, continues to trade at a premium to peers like Allstate, which trades for around 9 times earnings. That's not to say it will become one of the most undervalued stocks, but a further de-rating could be in store.

, /PRNewswire/ -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Graphic Packaging Holding Company ("Graphic Packaging" or "the Company") (NYSE: GPK) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company's securities between February 4, 2025 and February 2, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), are encouraged to contact the firm before July 6, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Graphic Packaging suffered from inventory management problems, increased costs and reduced demand. The Company downplayed the severity of these issues despite the fact they would have a material impact on its financial performance. The Company overstated the strength of its business model. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Graphic Packaging, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.             

CONTACT:
The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

SOURCE The Schall Law Firm

714 Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in SPSC over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.