Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Binance Coin (BNB) price is in focus after reports that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) is investigating whether Binance complied with a 2023 settlement deal. At press time, BNB traded at $748 with $1.12 billion in 24-hour trading volume.

DoJ Investigates Binance Compliance Agreement A report by Bloomberg noted that the US Department of Justice (DOJ is looking into whether Binance violated its settlement agreement with the US government.

The agreement included Binance paying a $4.3 billion fine to the US government. The exchange pleaded guilty to violating banking guidelines and also agreed to increase compliance controls.

“There is an ongoing investigation there that we are involved with… we’re not going to get into specifics about exactly what the status of the facts are, how it’s developing,” said the head of the DOJ’s criminal division, Tysen Duva.

The DOJ probe comes shortly after we reported that Binance is under fresh scrutiny for violating Iran sanctions by allowing certain trading on the exchange. However, Binance CEO Richard Teng criticised the accusations, saying the exchange has zero tolerance for sanctions violations.

Analysts Weigh in on BNB Price as ETF Inflows Spike Analyst Crypto Patel on X notes that BNB price currently trades above its accumulation zone between $350 and $525. He notes that the bullish leg after this breakout could push BNB price to $2,000.

However, other analysts note Binance Coin price is headed for a downtrend. Analyst Jesse Olson notes that the altcoin has created a sell signal on the daily chart that could trigger a drop to the $600 zone.

Another analyst dubbed Cryptorphic on X also notes that the short-term future BNB outlook is under pressure. If the price fails to reclaim the $746 zone, the analyst warns of a steeper drop to $674.

The mixed outlook comes as BNB ETFs record $98.89 million in inflows month-to-date. This marks the best-performing month for the ETFs since launching in May 2026.

Source: SoSoValue The rising inflows come after VanEck updated its spot BNB ETF to include staking, as earlier reported by CoinGape.

BNB Price Prediction: Key Levels to Watch The one-day chart shows that BNB price has dropped below the lower trendline of an ascending parallel channel. This drop suggests that the bullish momentum is becoming weak, and BNB price may record a trend reversal to the downside.

BNB now faces crucial support at the 61.8% Fib of $730. Breaking below this support could push Binance Coin to $681.

The AO bars also support a bearish price outlook. The RSI reading at 47 also shows that bears have a slight upper hand.

Source: TradingView BNB will confirm a resumption of the uptrend if it closes above the resistance at the midline of the ascending channel, with such a move set to pave the way for a move to $809.

At 20:19 UTC on October 9, 2026, Coinbase Developer Platform announced that Coinbase and Gennius would bring ONED USD to Latin American banks, starting in Argentina. ONED USD is backed 1:1 by $USDC. The planned service covers stablecoin payments, custody and trading from a banking app.

Coinbase described a direct conversion route from eligible bank deposits into ONED USD. Customers would be able to transfer the stablecoin around the clock and spend through Visa. The announcement does not identify an Argentine bank, give a launch date, name a supported chain or state the fees and redemption terms. Those details determine whether the service works as a bank-integrated dollar balance or as a separate crypto product reached through the bank’s interface.

The October announcement extends a product that Gennius launched on June 15, 2026. The launch release describes ONED USD as a stablecoin for rewards, payments and digital assets across banks and financial technology partners. Gennius said the token is powered by Coinbase and fully backed by $USDC. Coinbase described it the following day as live and built to connect rewards, payments and digital assets across global banking partners.

How the bank route is meant to work The user-facing sequence in Coinbase’s announcement has three steps. A customer starts with an eligible deposit at a participating bank, converts it into ONED USD, then transfers it at any time or spends it through Visa. Custody and trading sit in the same banking-app proposition. Coinbase did not say whether the bank, Gennius or Coinbase would face the customer for each function. It also did not say whether Visa purchases would settle from ONED USD directly or convert into another balance before authorization.

Gennius built ONED USD for a broader pool of balances than bank deposits. Its launch release names loyalty points, cashback balances, merchant credits and stored value as examples of value held in separate systems. The company says banks, fintech companies, wallets and buy-now-pay-later providers can use ONED USD to turn loyalty liabilities into programmable assets. A wallet can combine rewards, fiat balances and digital assets behind one interface. The original issuer remains responsible for backing tokenized points, miles, cash deposits and digital assets while Gennius provides the liquidity and programming layer described in the release.

That structure matters for depositors. The latest announcement says only eligible deposits can be converted. It does not define eligibility or say whether a conversion changes the customer’s legal claim from a bank deposit into a stablecoin claim. The June release says original issuers continue to back the underlying balances, while ONED USD itself is backed by $USDC. Participating banks will need to explain which entity owes redemption, how the two backing statements interact and what happens when a customer moves ONED USD out of the bank app.

The distinction also matters for round-the-clock transfers. Continuous token movement does not by itself establish continuous bank redemption. Coinbase promises transfers 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but its announcement gives no cut-off rules for moving between a deposit and ONED USD. Operators will need the supported network, confirmation policy, withdrawal controls and reconciliation process before they can assess settlement risk. None of those implementation details appears in the announcement.

What operators need to establish The product description joins two balance models. The October flow begins with an eligible bank deposit. The June release also covers rewards, cashback, merchant credits and stored value, with each original issuer continuing to back its own balance. A participating bank therefore needs to show customers which balance they hold before and after each conversion. It also needs to distinguish ONED USD custody from the bank account shown beside it.

The same separation applies to spending. Visa access tells customers where they can use the balance, while the announcement leaves the conversion path unstated. The operator must disclose whether ONED USD is redeemed before a card payment, who sets the conversion rate and which party handles a failed or reversed purchase. Coinbase’s reference to custody and trading also leaves open whether those functions share the same terms as deposit conversion.

For rewards operators, the launch release presents ONED USD as a common liquidity layer across points, fiat and digital assets. The original issuer backing statement means those source balances do not automatically become Coinbase liabilities. Programs considering the system need to identify the issuer for each balance, the route into ONED USD and the redemption route back to the original program.

The existing ONED network Gennius reported in June that it supported more than 83 banking and financial-institution partners, with deployments in Latin America and the CEMEA region. It also reported more than 500 rewards programs and more than 18 billion tokens issued through its platform during the preceding year. The same release’s company description says Gennius supports more than 70 banking and financial-institution partners. The document does not reconcile the two partner counts, so neither figure establishes how many institutions will offer ONED USD.

The scale of $USDC provides context for the backing asset. At research time, the DefiLlama stablecoin API returned circulating $USDC of about $73.0 billion across 157 chains. ONED USD is therefore a branded access layer over a much larger reserve asset, according to the companies’ description, rather than a separately disclosed reserve portfolio. The announcement does not provide ONED USD supply, reserves, attestations or a contract address.

Gennius framed the initial use case around a large pool of closed balances. Its launch release puts global issued loyalty and rewards value above $1 trillion. Group CEO Ruben Salazar Genovez said ONED USD was intended to convert fragmented balances into programmable digital value. Coinbase infrastructure head Alec Lovett said the work brings $USDC liquidity and Coinbase infrastructure into sectors where value had been fragmented. These are company descriptions of the opportunity, not measures of deposits committed to the Argentine rollout.

For users, the practical attraction is access through an existing bank relationship, with deposit conversion, continuous transfers and Visa spending in one interface. The main unanswered questions concern the named bank partners, rollout date, conversion and redemption fees, supported chain, custody terms and treatment of deposit protections after conversion. Coinbase and Gennius have not dated the Argentine launch or identified the first participating bank.

3 hours ago

According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (@ai_9684xtpa), two addresses belonging to the same whale have built positions worth $14.89 million in ETH. Over the past 20 minutes, the two addresses have withdrawn a total of 5,965 ETH from Binance at an average price of $2,496.95 per ETH. Notably, the address that sourced the funds also transferred similar amounts of USDC to several other new addresses, suggesting it may continue to buy ETH in batches.

Source

Scan the QR code

Download APP

TLDR: The Bitcoin price fell 3.6% for the week after touching $80,400, then recovered above $83,000 following Thursday’s sharp decline. NEAR lost just 0.3% in the weekly comparison after a 91.7% monthly advance, then jumped more than 10% to about $5.25 on October 10. Monero’s 1.3% weekly decline beat Bitcoin’s loss, though price performance alone cannot show whether trading activity or buying demand drove the difference. Bitcoin ETF outflows reached $244 million in one day, while XRP funds saw $8.2 million in inflows even as XRP fell 9% for the week. The Bitcoin price fell to a weekly low near $80,400 on October 8 as a crypto market selloff accelerated. By October 9, BTC had recovered to $83,247, leaving it 3.6% lower for the week. Most large tokens lost more over that same seven-day period. 

NEAR Protocol and Monero were exceptions, down 0.3% and 1.3%, respectively, in the weekly comparison. Yet those figures capture only one point in a volatile stretch. NEAR had climbed 91.7% over the prior month, then rose more than 10% on October 10. The Bitcoin price and altcoin moves show resilience in the data, but not its cause.

Source: Coingecko Bitcoin Price Slide Put NEAR and Monero Under Scrutiny The selloff followed several failed attempts by BTC to reclaim $87,000. After slipping below $84,000 earlier in the week, Bitcoin fell to $80,400 on Thursday. The decline erased nearly $7,000 in a few days before buyers lifted BTC above $83,000. Bitcoin price weakness contrasted with the narrower weekly losses in NEAR and Monero.

NEAR’s small weekly drop deserves context. Its token price had climbed 91.7% in the previous month. That run can change how a weekly selloff appears. Even an intraday pullback may leave a token close to its starting price for the week. NEAR then gained more than 10%, reaching roughly $5.25 on October 10.

BTC price rebound shows how quickly the comparison shifted as prices recovered. Monero’s 1.3% loss also compared favorably with BTC. But a small decline alone cannot show whether buyers were accumulating, holders were inactive, or trading was thin. 

ETF Flows and Weekend Recovery Point to Uneven Demand Gains were not broad among large-cap coins. Thirteen of 16 tracked major tokens fell more than BTC during the measured week. Stellar posted the steepest decline at 13.5%. XRP lost 9%, despite XRP funds recording $8.2 million in inflows. Bitcoin ETFs, meanwhile, had $244 million in daily net outflows. Those flows complicate a simple demand narrative. Positive fund subscriptions did not protect XRP from falling. BTC declined despite its ETFs recording daily net outflows.

Bitcoin’s dominance increased to 59.5% as its market capitalization stood around $1.66 trillion. The total crypto market value rebounded to about $2.8 trillion after losing roughly $200 billion from its high to low. ETH recovered toward $2,500 after falling to $2,400, while XRP moved from $1.34 to around $1.41. The bounce restored some lost value but left several large tokens below recent levels.

Source: Coingecko NEAR and ADA led the daily rebound among larger altcoins. Cardano rose about 7%, reclaiming $0.255, while NEAR’s advance outpaced peers. The Bitcoin price remained near $83,000 on October 10, below Monday’s $87,000 test and above Thursday’s low. This places the weekly outperformance beside a quick bounce, without confirming a lasting change in market leadership.

That matters for the Bitcoin price beside smaller tokens. Daily changes can look calm if trading is light, but weekly returns alone do not reveal activity. The same result can emerge from steady demand, limited selling, or a sharp drop followed by a rebound. 

Ex-FTX Executive Accuses Netflix of Turning $8B Fraud Into a Love Story: “Shame on You”

Polkadot [DOT] has extended its bullish recovery by recording a 10.93% to $1.27 over the last 24 hours. The move comes just two days after the token price action rebounded from key EMA support at around $1.02.

Interestingly, the bullish advances follow a 54% reduction in annual token issuance and the launch of a native stablecoin, two developments that could strengthen the network’s long-term outlook.

At the same time, the network’s increasing Open Interest (OI) and a growing preference for leveraged long positions also point to increased trader participation. Could the token’s sustained buying pressure turn these developments into a lasting DOT recovery?

Tokenomics changes strengthen Polkadot’s outlook The reduction in annual token issuance marks a significant shift in Polkadot’s tokenomics. Fewer new tokens entering circulation equates to reduced selling pressure. Its circulating supply currently ranks 36th among the L1 tokens.

Source: Token Terminal Meanwhile, the launch of a native stablecoin could expand activity across the ecosystem. Stablecoins support payments, decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, and liquidity, potentially creating new use cases for Polkadot.

Together, these developments offer investors additional reasons to reassess DOT’s prospects after its prolonged price weakness.

Derivatives data reveals a strong preference for longs Zooming down to the Polkadot’s derivative data, its OI has also increased 15% to $78 million as of writing, suggesting traders are opening new positions as the token advances.

Source: Coinalyze Notably, long accounts now represent 73% of total leveraged positions, according to the recent Polkadot’s Long/Short data, suggesting that most traders and investors are betting on further gains for the token.

Source: Coinalyze Can DOT sustain its recovery above $1.27? On the daily chart, DOT has rebounded from support near $1.02 to reach $1.27, marking a notable improvement in its short-term structure. Besides, the token is now trading above all its key EMA support, pointing to potential buyer dominance continuation in the short run.

Holding above reclaimed support could strengthen the case for further gains, while renewed selling could expose the token to another test of lower levels.

All in all, Polkadot’s issuance reduction, stablecoin launch, and increased derivatives activity provide potential catalysts for continued price appreciation to $1.75.

Source: TradingView Final Summary DOT prices have jumped by 10.93% to $1.27, extending its two-day recovery from EMA support near $1.02. The recent network upgrade paired with surging open interests and buyer dominance, points to a continuation rally.

Cardano gains 6% as Ethereum and XRP recover cautiously. October 10 analysis maps support, resistance, and key signals for ETH, XRP, HYPE, ADA, and Uniswap.

Asset Aggregate USD price Rolling 24-hour change Aggregate 24-hour volume Market-cap rank Ethereum (ETH) $2,490.34 −0.08% $8.51 billion 2 XRP $1.40 +0.55% $1.65 billion 5 Hyperliquid (HYPE) $83.86 −1.83% $627.49 million 11 Cardano (ADA) $0.250879 +6.38% $533.38 million 17 Uniswap (UNI) $7.35 −0.21% $472.85 million 27 Ethereum Remains Below Its 50-Day EMA Ethereum closed October 9 at $2,485.34 on Kraken, gaining 0.50% from $2,472.90. The session’s $2,469.04–$2,518.11 range stayed inside the previous day’s wider range, showing stabilization after the decline without a confirmed reversal.

ETH/USD daily candles with 20-day and 50-day EMAs; the October 9 rebound closed both averages below. The 50-day exponential moving average eased to $2,501.13, while the 20-day EMA fell to $2,616.99. Although the shorter average remains above the longer one, price closed below both. That combination shows the recent selloff has outpaced the slower adjustment in the averages.

ETH traded above the 50-day EMA during the session but failed to retain that level at the close. A daily close above $2,501, followed by a break above $2,518–$2,533, would strengthen recovery prospects toward $2,585.31. The declining 20-day EMA near $2,617 is a further obstacle.

Initial support is $2,469.04. A close below it would expose the October 8 low at $2,405.35; losing that low would reopen the September lows around $2,355–$2,367. A recovery above $2,533 that subsequently closes below $2,501 would weaken the bullish case.

ETH’s aggregate quote was approximately 2.86% below the $2,563.70 snapshot in its October 8 report. The $2,533 support discussed then has since failed on a completed daily close.

XRP RSI Improves but Stays Below Neutral XRP closed October 9 at $1.39438, up 1.10% from $1.37915. Its $1.37297–$1.40583 session range was entirely inside the preceding candle, leaving the October 8 low intact.

XRP/USD daily candles and Wilder RSI (14); RSI recovered to 43.30 while price formed an inside candle. Daily RSI, calculated over 14 periods with Wilder smoothing, rose to 43.30 from 41.17. Momentum improved with the higher close but remained below the neutral 50 line.

Four-hour RSI at the synchronized cutoff was 39.95, also below neutral. Neither reading establishes a completed momentum reversal.

The first support area spans $1.37297–$1.37915, combining the latest low with the preceding close. A daily close below $1.37297 would weaken the rebound and place $1.31770 back in focus.

A close beneath that lower boundary would invalidate the developing base and expose the September lows at $1.24610–$1.26409.

For recovery, XRP needs a daily close above $1.40583, followed by $1.42869. Clearing both would reopen the former support area around $1.447–$1.464. A return below $1.40583 after that breakout would weaken its confirmation.

The aggregate quote increased from Friday’s rounded $1.39 snapshot to $1.40, approximately 0.7%.

However, the completed close remained below the initial $1.39796 recovery hurdle identified in the previous report.

Hyperliquid Closes Flat as MACD Weakens Hyperliquid finished October 9 at $84.16, unchanged from the previous daily close. The session reached $86.56 but settled near the lower part of its $83.33–$86.56 range.

HYPE/USD daily candles with MACD (12,26,9); an unchanged close accompanied a more negative histogram. Daily MACD, using 12- and 26-period exponential averages and a nine-period signal EMA, remained below its signal line. The MACD line declined to 0.7585 against a signal of 1.9092. Its histogram became more negative, moving from −0.9359 to −1.1507.

This was continued weakening within an existing bearish line-signal relationship, not a new crossover. The MACD line remained above zero, while the four-hour MACD was below both zero and its signal at the chart cutoff.

Support lies at $82.61–$83.33, the latest two daily lows. A close below $82.61 would confirm another leg lower and expose the September trading area around $80.27–$81.56. The September 15 low at $75.11 is the deeper reference.

A daily close above $86.56 would improve the immediate structure, but $88.83 remains the stronger recovery threshold. Clearing it would reopen $91.28–$92.32. A subsequent close below $86.56 would weaken the breakout scenario.

Cardano Rebounds Toward the 50% Retracement Cardano closed October 9 at $0.242953, up 4.67%, after reaching $0.243405. The rebound followed the sharp October 8 decline, but the completed close recovered only part of that lost ground.

ADA/USD daily candles with Fibonacci levels of the October 6–8 decline; the completed close reclaimed 23.6%, with further gains occurring intraday. The Fibonacci grid measures an upward retracement of the downswing from the October 6 high of $0.282499 to the October 8 low of $0.223147.

Its principal recovery levels are $0.237154 at 23.6%, $0.245819 at 38.2%, $0.252823 at 50% and $0.259827 at 61.8%.

Friday’s close reclaimed 23.6% but remained below 38.2%. The later aggregate quote of $0.250879 stood above 38.2% and below the midpoint; that advance remains intraday.

A daily close above $0.245819 would confirm the next recovery step. Clearing $0.252823 would strengthen the case for a test of $0.258051–$0.259827, where the October 8 high meets the next retracement.

A close below $0.237154 would surrender the first recovery level and expose Friday’s $0.231118 low. Losing $0.223147 would invalidate the current rebound from the swing low and reopen $0.218200.

These levels describe conditional retracement scenarios, not assured targets.

Uniswap Rebounds but Remains Below Its Lower Bollinger Band Uniswap closed October 9 at $7.3206, up 2.93% from $7.1120. The session recovered from $7.1039 to $7.4482 but ended below the upper part of that range.

UNI Price Analysis 2026 10 10 Daily Bollinger Bands, using a 20-day simple moving average and two population standard deviations, placed the midpoint at $8.8970, the upper band at $10.3552 and the lower band at $7.4388. The close remained below the lower band for a second session.

That positioning shows persistent downside pressure relative to the recent price distribution. It does not, on its own, establish that a rebound must follow. Friday’s 348,333 UNI turnover was only 33% of the preceding 20-session average on Kraken.

A daily close above $7.4482 would clear Friday’s high and, if maintained relative to the recalculated band, mark a return inside the envelope. The next resistance references are $7.6730 and $8.0208. A return below $7.4388 would weaken the initial recovery, subject to the band’s daily adjustment.

Support spans $6.9894–$7.1039. Losing $6.9894 on a daily close would invalidate the latest rebound and expose the September support area around $6.6164–$6.6650.

U.S. crypto ETFs tracked across Farside Investors’ Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Hyperliquid and Zcash tables recorded combined net outflows of $1.29 billion during Oct. 5–9, with Bitcoin and Ether funds accounting for most withdrawals.

Summary

Bitcoin ETFs lost $678.9 million despite returning to net inflows on Friday. Ethereum ETFs recorded $542.2 million in withdrawals across five consecutive negative sessions. Solana ETFs shed $25 million, with Bitwise’s BSOL accounting for most weekly redemptions. Zcash and Hyperliquid products posted respective weekly outflows of $30.8 million and $9.4 million. Farside Investors’ daily figures put combined Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF withdrawals at $1.22 billion for the five trading sessions. The other three tracked categories added $65.2 million in net outflows, leaving all five groups negative for the week.

Calculated from those tables, the five categories had attracted a combined $29.2 million during Sept. 28–Oct. 2. Bitcoin’s earlier inflows had offset withdrawals elsewhere, but its reversal pushed the latest aggregate sharply into negative territory.

Bitcoin ETFs lose $678.9 million despite Friday inflows Farside’s Bitcoin table recorded three negative sessions and two positive sessions during Oct. 5–9. Funds lost $89.8 million on Monday before attracting $118.8 million on Tuesday.

Wednesday brought the largest daily withdrawal at $484.9 million, followed by another $244.1 million on Thursday. Friday’s $21.1 million inflow reduced the weekly loss to $678.9 million, compared with $241.1 million in inflows the previous week.

At fund level, Fidelity’s FBTC led withdrawals with $380.3 million, followed by ARK 21Shares’ ARKB at $207.2 million. Bitwise’s BITB lost $45.3 million, while Grayscale’s GBTC shed $47.5 million.

BlackRock’s IBIT finished marginally positive at $1.1 million. Monday and Tuesday inflows totaled $191.9 million, but Wednesday’s $207.7 million withdrawal erased that gain. Thursday brought a further $5.5 million exit before Friday added $22.4 million.

Morgan Stanley’s MSBT gained $7.8 million, and Franklin Templeton’s EZBC added $4.7 million. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust lost $11 million, while VanEck’s HODL finished $1.2 million lower.

Ethereum ETFs record five straight days of withdrawals Farside’s Ethereum figures showed $542.2 million in weekly net outflows, up from $138.1 million during Sept. 28–Oct. 2. Every session in the latest reporting period ended negative.

Monday’s $50.8 million withdrawal was followed by $201.9 million on Tuesday, the largest daily exit. Funds then lost $160.9 million on Wednesday, $72.5 million on Thursday and $56.1 million on Friday.

BlackRock’s ETHA accounted for $477.1 million, or approximately 88% of the weekly total. Its Tuesday withdrawal matched the entire category’s $201.9 million outflow that day.

Grayscale’s ETHE lost $31.9 million, while Fidelity’s FETH recorded $13.4 million in net withdrawals. Bitwise’s ETHW shed $5.9 million, and 21Shares’ TETH lost $7.5 million.

VanEck’s ETHV and Invesco’s QETH posted respective exits of $3.7 million and $2 million. Grayscale’s Ethereum Mini Trust also lost $2 million.

Morgan Stanley’s MSSE added $1.3 million on Thursday, making it the only Ethereum fund in the table with positive net flows for the week. BlackRock’s ETHB and Franklin Templeton’s EZET recorded no net flows.

Solana ETFs shed $25 million across five negative sessions Farside’s Solana table showed withdrawals on every trading day, totaling $25 million. The previous week had ended with a much smaller $800,000 net inflow.

Monday’s $9.2 million exit was the largest daily withdrawal. Tuesday recorded $3.7 million in outflows, followed by $4.8 million on Wednesday, $3.5 million on Thursday and $3.8 million on Friday.

Bitwise’s BSOL accounted for $21 million in weekly withdrawals, with negative flows on four sessions. Farside recorded no net movement for the fund on Tuesday.

The FSOL product lost $2.1 million on Monday, while Grayscale’s GSOL shed $3.7 million on Tuesday. Morgan Stanley’s MSOL partly offset those exits with $1.8 million in Thursday inflows.

VSOL, TSOL and SOEZ recorded no net flows during the period. Farside’s cumulative total for the Solana category stood at approximately $1.58 billion after Friday’s session.

Zcash and Hyperliquid funds add $40.2 million in exits Farside’s Zcash table recorded $30.8 million in weekly withdrawals from ZCSH. Monday brought a $3.6 million exit, Wednesday added $8.5 million, and Thursday recorded $18.7 million. Tuesday and Friday showed no net flows.

The latest loss followed $77.6 million in withdrawals during Sept. 28–Oct. 2. Across the two five-session periods, the table therefore recorded combined redemptions of $108.4 million.

Hyperliquid products lost $9.4 million during Oct. 5–9, reversing the previous week’s $3.4 million inflow, according to Farside’s separate table.

THYP accounted for $12.4 million in withdrawals, split between $2.7 million on Monday and $9.7 million on Thursday. Tuesday’s inflows of $1 million into BHYP and $2 million into HYPG partly offset those redemptions. Wednesday and Friday recorded no net flows across the three products.

14h47 ▪ 5 min read ▪ by Eddy S.

Summarize this article with:

Solana generates $38.2 million in revenue on dApps in seven days, compared to Ethereum’s poor performance which no longer holds up, even when adding up its entire ecosystem. Are we witnessing the beginning of a new era in the crypto market?

In brief $38.2 million revenue on dApps for Solana in seven days, compared to $11.7 million for Ethereum. Ethereum, Base, Polygon and OP Mainnet combined make $21.2 million, compared to $38.2 million for Solana. In August 2026, Solana was already number 1 for the month with $143 million, or 38% of the total onchain according to DefiLlama. See you on October 31, 2026, for the month’s closing which will tell if this crypto lead still holds. Solana Outperforms Ethereum on dApps in 7 Days Solana earns more than three times what Ethereum earns on dApps in 7 days, $38.2 million versus $11.7 million according to Token Terminal, in a ranking published by Solana Hub on October 10, 2026. Hyperliquid, a very fast crypto trading platform, comes second with $14.8 million. Ethereum still makes the podium but not on the highest step.

Why follow this figure? Because it can signal strong activity that generates money for the crypto network, beyond the tokens we buy hoping for an increase. However, it does not count the number of orders placed. Also watch the scope because the ranking follows entities of different natures (blockchains, platforms, ecosystems), it does not compare ten identical blockchains.

RankNetworkApplication revenue over 7 days (million dollars)1Solana38.22Hyperliquid14.83Ethereum11.74BNB Chain6.65Base4.36Robinhood4.27Polygon4.08OP Mainnet1.29Avalanche0.87410Near0.665Source: Token Terminal, ranking published by Solana Hub on X, data from the last 7 days as of October 10, 2026. Why do Crypto Users and Developers Choose Solana? Because crypto transactions cost very little there and go through quickly, which allows trading applications to operate at large scale. In August 2026, two trading terminals, Axiom (about $24 million) and FOMO (about $14.6 million), generated nearly $38.6 million of the $143 million of application revenue for the month, according to DefiLlama. According to our calculations, that represents 27% of the total.

The effect is like a snowball because the more crypto traders trade, the more applications (dApps) earn. The more they earn, the more other teams come to build in the same place. Solana is also called monolithic; everything happens on a single chain, with a single reserve of money available for exchange. This can facilitate liquidity flow and transaction execution.

Is the Ethereum Ecosystem Underestimated by its Main Network? Partly. Over seven days, Ethereum with its $11.7 million, represents only a part of its ecosystem’s activity. Base ($4.3 million) and OP Mainnet ($1.2 million) are Ethereum Layer 2s, and Polygon ($4.0 million) is a neighboring network, whose PoS network has a distinct technical status from a classic Layer 2. According to our calculations, this extended scope totals $21.2 million. But even with this extended scope, Solana still holds a $17 million lead.

Crypto : Has Solana Definitively Beaten Ethereum? Not yet… A seven-day ranking does not prove a lasting reversal. Except that Solana is not new to success against Ethereum because in August 2026, it was already number 1 in dApp revenues, and the official crypto network account made this known on X: 

Solana is number 1 for application revenues in August with $143M. 38% of all onchain application revenues.

But revenues don’t tell everything. They do not measure liquidity, security, value locked in applications (TVL), or the number of active users. Especially since Solana still has points to prove. These revenues mainly come from trading, so from an activity that follows the appetite for risky assets. So these performances will have to be watched over three to six months to know if they last.

The competition between Solana and Ethereum pushes the entire crypto sector to move faster, and Solana is no longer a mere challenger on dApp revenues. The real test will come at the month’s close, October 31, 2026. In your opinion, will Ethereum regain first place thanks to its Layer 2s, or is SOL the new king of dApps?

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Eddy S.

The world is evolving and adaptation is the best weapon to survive in this undulating universe. Originally a crypto community manager, I am interested in anything that is directly or indirectly related to blockchain and its derivatives. To share my experience and promote a field that I am passionate about, nothing is better than writing informative and relaxed articles.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

China could become a major driver of the next crypto market cycle if it finds a way to reopen access to digital assets. Solana Company CEO Joseph Chee says Beijing is using Hong Kong to test crypto regulations. 

Meanwhile, China’s reported Bitcoin holdings and mining activity show why any policy shift could matter to the global market.

China Uses Hong Kong to Test Crypto RulesIn a recent interview, Joseph Chee, CEO of Solana Company, said that China cannot afford to ignore blockchain technology despite its restrictions on cryptocurrency trading.

“They are using Hong Kong as the region to test how the technology will be implemented and are going to find ways to manage it.” 

Beijing continues to use Hong Kong as a testing ground for Web3 development. Hong Kong is approving regulated spot ETFs, tightening audit rules for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), and developing stablecoins such as HSBC’s RedCoin. 

🇨🇳Crypto bears might have another thing to worry about if this story develops.

Joseph Chee says China is using Hong Kong as a testing ground for crypto regulation while exploring ways to manage digital assets.

“It’s HUGE

I think crypto is gonna go through another super cycle.”… pic.twitter.com/5glnhFsahu

— nordin.eth (@nordin_eth) October 10, 2026 This approach could help mainland China study how crypto markets operate under tighter rules before deciding whether to expand access.

Chee believes that if China allows more crypto trading and blockchain use, the impact could be significant.

“I think the crypto is going to go through another super cycle.”

Why China’s Return Could Matter for CryptoChee pointed to Asia’s large population and its early role in crypto adoption. He said restrictions in China slowed that growth, while the U.S. market gained a larger role.

Despite banning crypto trading in 2021, China holds an estimated 190,000 in government-linked wallets, worth around $15.7 billion. Although the government does not officially buy Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, it remains one of the world’s largest government-linked Bitcoin holders.

China also remains connected to Bitcoin mining. Estimates suggest China-linked miners control around 14% to 20% of the global Bitcoin mining power.

Therefore, a reopening could bring Chinese traders and companies back into the market. 

“Chee believes China will eventually find a way to manage cryptocurrencies.”

China Builds Blockchain Infrastructure Beyond CryptoChina is also developing blockchain technology for uses beyond token trading. According to Xinhua, a 19-measure policy aims to build nationwide blockchain and computing infrastructure.

BREAKING: 🇨🇳 China moves to establish a nationwide blockchain network to integrate blockchain technology across its economy.

— Bull Theory (@BullTheoryio) October 10, 2026 The plan focuses on bringing blockchain into manufacturing, banking, and data sharing, while improving data ownership rules and cross-border data flows.

This suggests Beijing is continuing to explore blockchain applications even as access to cryptocurrencies remains restricted.

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

Solana has faced intensified selling pressure in recent days as the broader crypto market turned sharply bearish, causing the digital asset’s momentum to weaken. The trend has also heightened volatility and spurred notable transactions on major exchanges.

Major whale transaction draws attentionOnchain data from Whale Alert flagged a significant movement involving Solana. An unidentified address transferred 470,087 SOL, valued at over $51 million at prevailing prices, directly to Coinbase, the US-based cryptocurrency trading platform. This transfer was executed in a single transaction, drawing significant interest from market watchers due to both its size and timing.

Though the owner of the address was not publicly disclosed, analysts noted that moving a large volume of tokens to an exchange often signals an intent to sell, especially amid turbulent market conditions.

The timing and scale of the 470,087 SOL transfer to Coinbase have led many traders to interpret it as a strategic move by a major holder, possibly reacting to the sudden increase in market volatility.

This transfer occurred amid a wave of market uncertainty and growing risk aversion among digital asset investors. Many traders reportedly viewed the movement as a potential signal that large holders are taking steps to exit the market, at least temporarily, in response to sudden price fluctuations.

Mini dictionary: Whale Alert — A blockchain tracking service that monitors and reports large cryptocurrency transactions across major networks, providing transparency and real-time updates for market participants.

Solana price struggles after sharp downturnEarlier this month, Solana climbed as high as $123, supported by optimistic investor sentiment. However, a steep drop soon followed, with the price plunging to $105 within the past two days. Since then, Solana has struggled to recover, remaining below the $110 threshold.

The recent reversal has contributed to heightened anxiety among traders, prompting a series of liquidations and position exits as Solana continued to lose ground. The increasing flow of SOL tokens back to exchanges, especially involving large transactions, has intensified concerns over the asset’s short-term outlook.

EventDate/PeriodPrice/ValueRecent highEarlier this month$123Recent lowTwo days ago$105Current price rangeLatestBelow $110Whale transfer to CoinbaseLatest470,087 SOL ($51 million)With ongoing return of both large and smaller amounts of SOL to exchanges, analysts see limited immediate prospects for Solana to rebound to its recent peak values. The persistent market retreat and continued sell-side activity have reduced optimism among holders looking for a swift recovery.

Since the reversal, Solana has continued to trade under pressure, with traders closely monitoring exchange inflows and the behavior of major token holders for further clues on market direction.

China Is Building a National Blockchain Network: Will Bitcoin Benefit?

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

The attacker behind Triple-A’s July treasury breach has transferred 4,970 ETH worth approximately $12.4 million into Tornado Cash, according to blockchain security firm Salus.

Summary

4,970 ETH entered Tornado Cash on Oct. 9 through 56 deposits, according to Salus. The attacker combined funds from two intermediary addresses through a single wallet before depositing them. Triple-A said the July breach affected company treasury assets, while customer funds remained untouched. The company attributed the attack to social engineering and engaged specialists to trace the stolen assets. Salus said its Tornado monitoring system tracked 49 deposits of 100 ETH and seven deposits of 10 ETH linked to the Triple-A attacker on Oct. 9.

In its account of the transactions, the security firm described two streams of funds that passed through separate intermediary addresses before reaching one wallet. Salus said the attacker used that wallet to make the Tornado Cash deposits, with one stream containing funds from earlier withdrawals from the mixer.

The firm valued the combined deposits at approximately $12.4 million. Its tracing account placed the transfers after the attacker had moved assets across blockchains to Ethereum, exchanged the tokens, and divided the funds between two addresses on Sep. 6.

Triple-A attacker combined two fund streams before depositing ETH According to Salus, the Sep. 6 transfers separated the funds into two intermediary wallets after the cross-chain movements and asset swaps. The attacker later routed both streams through a single address before depositing the Ether into Tornado Cash.

In the post, Salus stated:

“One stream included funds from earlier withdrawals.”

The firm’s transaction breakdown puts 4,900 ETH in the 49 larger deposits and another 70 ETH in the seven smaller deposits. Its account links the activity to the attacker responsible for stealing Triple-A’s own treasury assets in July, when public estimates placed the loss at approximately $11.8 million.

Earlier tracing had already identified Ethereum as a destination for assets removed from wallets associated with the payments company. On July 25, crypto.news reported the wallet drain, citing researchers who put the receiving address’s balance at approximately 5,226.66 ETH, worth about $9.7 million at the time.

In that initial reporting, blockchain investigator Specter estimated that more than $9.3 million had been removed, exchanged, and bridged to Ethereum. PeckShield subsequently drew attention to the transactions, while later estimates put the suspected loss above $9.7 million.

Triple-A said the July breach affected its treasury assets By July 27, Triple-A had confirmed unauthorized wallet access and said the financial impact would be absorbed through its treasury reserves. The report attributed the approximately $11.8 million loss estimate to Specter.

In its official statement, the company said it detected unauthorized access on July 25 and temporarily placed certain services into maintenance mode for approximately three hours while securing the affected infrastructure.

Triple-A said the compromised wallets belonged to Triple A Technologies Pte. Ltd., its Singapore entity. According to the statement, no other company entities or operations were affected, and transactions and settlements resumed normally across all markets after security checks.

Addressing its financial position, Triple-A stated:

“Triple-A remains well capitalised, is able to meet all its liabilities.”

The company also said customer funds were held separately in trust accounts maintained with safeguarding institutions. According to Triple-A, those accounts were not exposed because it did not provide digital asset custody on behalf of its clients.

In the same statement, the payments provider identified internal and external cybersecurity experts, blockchain forensic specialists, and Singapore police as participants in its investigation and asset-recovery efforts.

Social engineering gave the attacker access to operational systems In an Aug. 21 post-mortem, Triple-A said the attack began with social engineering against an engineering employee. According to the company, the approach involved impersonation, communications across different channels, and a live call.

After compromising credentials, the attacker obtained elevated system permissions, deployed malware, accessed production databases, and abused API credentials to execute cryptocurrency withdrawals, the report said.

The company identified affected operational wallets on TRON, Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum. Its post-mortem said customer money remained in separate trust accounts with institutions including DBS and Standard Chartered.

For the investigation, Triple-A engaged Sygnia to conduct forensic work and strengthen security controls, while zeroShadow handled asset tracing and supported recovery efforts. The company said it notified the Monetary Authority of Singapore and Singapore police immediately after detecting the incident.

According to the report, remediation included tighter access and approval requirements, credential restrictions, separation of operational environments, expanded monitoring, and reviews of wallet exposure limits. Triple-A said active attacker access had been removed and identified persistence mechanisms eliminated, while tracing and potential freezing actions remained in progress.

Tornado Cash sanctions were removed while U.S. proceedings continued In March 2025, the U.S. Treasury removed Tornado Cash sanctions, reversing the designation imposed in August 2022.

Treasury’s delisting announcement said the decision followed its review of legal and policy questions concerning financial sanctions and evolving technology. The department nevertheless said it would continue monitoring transactions that could benefit malicious cyber actors or North Korea.

Separately, an Aug. 26 report detailed how a U.S. judge had postponed Roman Storm’s retrial until April 26, 2027. According to the Aug. 25 court order, Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the Tornado Cash co-founder’s request after his defense cited scheduling conflicts and a pending acquittal motion.

The report said Storm’s first jury convicted him in August 2025 of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business but deadlocked on money laundering and sanctions conspiracy charges. Under the revised calendar, the final pretrial conference was scheduled for April 20, 2027, six days before the retrial.

Arbitrum recorded the largest increase in stablecoin market capitalization among blockchain networks within the past 24 hours, adding $127 million. This surge points to rising stablecoin liquidity on the network, which analysts say could stimulate trading activity and expand decentralized finance (DeFi) participation.

Stablecoin growth and DeFi implicationsFigures shared by RWA Foundation, an organization focused on advancing real-world asset adoption in blockchain, show Arbitrum outpacing other major blockchain networks in stablecoin market-cap growth during the latest daily period. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to the value of fiat currencies such as the US dollar, serve as a backbone for DeFi, supporting trading, lending, and value transfers.

Rising stablecoin availability on Arbitrum may enhance the capital pool accessible to decentralized exchanges and lending protocols. This development could also make the network more appealing for users seeking lower transaction fees compared to some alternative blockchains.

However, growth in stablecoin capitalization does not guarantee immediate or sustained network activity. The reported increase reflects a climb in stablecoin supply rather than confirmed inflows or active usage of the Arbitrum ecosystem.

Stablecoin liquidity remains a vital component of DeFi services, as users often rely on these dollar-pegged assets to protect against volatility and to facilitate trades efficiently.

A broader stablecoin base allows decentralized applications on Arbitrum to tap into larger reserves of capital, which could foster deeper participation and more robust market activity. Analysts note that if stablecoin growth is paired with elevated transaction and lending volumes, it would indicate more active ecosystem engagement.

Importantly, the presence of additional liquidity on Arbitrum does not necessarily mean immediate value accrual for its governance token, ARB. The ecosystem could expand operationally even if direct demand for ARB remains unchanged.

Sustained growth in both stablecoins and on-chain applications would present a stronger case for long-term network adoption compared to a single day’s metric.

Mini dictionary: RWA Foundation — A non-profit group driving the integration of real-world assets such as stablecoins and tokenized securities with blockchain technology, aiming to bridge traditional and digital finance.

Analyst view: Key technical level for ARBCrypto analyst Bitcoinmeraklsi identified a potential inverse head-and-shoulders pattern emerging on the ARB token’s chart. In this technical setup, the neckline acts as a key resistance, and Bitcoinmeraklsi highlighted $0.23 as the level to watch.

The analyst noted that ARB has tested the presumed right-shoulder support and responded positively. If ARB manages to break above the $0.23 resistance, a bullish confirmation could follow, potentially attracting more buyers.

Bitcoinmeraklsi points to $0.23 as the neckline for an inverse head-and-shoulders formation, stressing that a decisive breakout could give bulls the upper hand and improve the technical setup for ARB.

However, failure to clear this resistance would leave the pattern unconfirmed. A decline through the right-shoulder support would weaken the optimistic scenario, emphasizing the technical importance of the $0.23 area for ARB’s direction.

TokenResistance LevelPattern TypeIndicatorARB$0.23Inverse head-and-shouldersBreakout needed for confirmationNetwork adoption outlookArbitrum’s increase in stablecoin assets highlights a positive development within its ecosystem. However, for ARB’s price prospects, analysts are monitoring whether the token can definitively surpass the resistance identified in technical analysis.

If stablecoin growth supports higher and lasting DeFi participation, it could reinforce the case for wider network adoption. Still, for ARB itself, a convincing move above $0.23 would provide a clearer signal to the market.

Until any breakout materializes, sector observers suggest stablecoin momentum and price structure should be viewed separately—one demonstrates network usage potential, while the other reveals investor appetite for the ARB token.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

CZ: Does not oppose hardware wallets, noting that different wallet products are suitable for different scenarios.

CZ posted on X that users should prioritize asset security (SAFU), adding that he does not oppose hardware wallets or self-custody. He pointed out that different wallets and products suit different use cases, with distinct security implications and best practices. YZi Labs has invested in hardware wallet projects including OneKey and SafePal, as well as mobile wallet products such as Trust Wallet.

4 minutes ago

Trump: I have made enormous contributions to world peace, and it is unbelievable that I was not selected for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Trump posted on Truth Social, stating: "I ended 8 wars, and 2 more are set to end or be resolved. I freed all Israeli hostages, including the last 28 survivors and victims. I released hundreds of hostages from around the world and sent them back home. I won the Venezuela conflict, captured the dictator who tyrannically ruled the country, and prevented Iran—the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism—from acquiring nuclear weapons—wait a minute! Yet despite all I and the U.S. have accomplished, I did not receive the Nobel Peace Prize. It’s truly unbelievable!"

4 minutes ago

Viewpoint: Bitcoin’s current trend resembles that of late 2025 to early 2026, with the $80,000 level serving as a key support.

Crypto analyst Darkfost posted on X that Bitcoin’s current trend closely resembles the market pattern from the end of 2025 to early 2026. Prices are fluctuating continuously around the capital-weighted cost benchmark, with $80,500 emerging as a potential key near-term support level. Unlike the realized price, which only calculates purchase prices, the capital-weighted cost benchmark metric weights holding costs based on the size of invested funds, making it a key indicator of the market’s average profit and loss status. Darkfost added that the current zone is a critical juncture where investors are roughly at the break-even point, and market uncertainty may drive more investors to take action. While the $80,500 level is likely to act as support for now, its subsequent trend remains to be closely watched.

4 minutes ago

South Korea's Financial Services Commission stated that its regulation on shareholding limits for major shareholders of virtual asset trading platforms is not targeting specific individuals or enterprises.

According to Yonhap News Agency, Lee Won-uk, chairman of South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC), stated that the ongoing Digital Asset Basic Act’s provisions on shareholding limits for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges are not targeted at specific individuals or firms, but are designed to address the higher public responsibilities exchanges must assume after operating on an institutionalized basis. Currently, South Korea’s virtual asset exchanges operate under a triennial renewal and reporting system, which will be switched to a licensing-based operation system once the Digital Asset Basic Act takes effect. Lee emphasized that virtual asset exchanges possess infrastructure attributes and need to demonstrate the level of public accountability commensurate with their status.

4 minutes ago

1st Anniversary Review of the October 11 Crash: Crypto Market Risks Persist, Investors Need to Reasonably Control Leverage

It has been one year since the "Oct 11 Crash". Back then, Bitcoin hit an all-time high of roughly $126,000, then plummeted rapidly from around $122,000 to $105,000, sparking about $19 billion in epic liquidations across the crypto market. On the anniversary, institutional analysts are revisiting the crash’s impacts and lessons on the crypto sector. Mark Connors, head of Risk Dimensions, pointed out the market topped out extremely quickly, with open interest near all-time highs, as numerous traders bet on Bitcoin’s continuation of its four-year cycle rally—ultimately suffering losses when the market reversed. Connors noted the Oct 11 Crash was driven primarily by the derivatives market, not shifts in on-chain demand, underscoring that leveraged positions can still dominate Bitcoin’s price movement in the short term. He added that leveraged trading such as perpetual swaps remains widespread, leaving the market primed for a similar crash. Chris Sullivan, co-founder of Hyperion Decimus, advised traders to reduce leverage and track metrics including open interest, funding rates, and market sentiment to identify risks of excessive one-sided bets. Connors also stated that investors’ understanding of market structure has improved, but Bitcoin’s "four-year cycle" as a price predictor is losing validity, with macroeconomic and political factors likely playing a larger role. (CoinDesk)

4 minutes ago

During the crypto market correction, whales increased their holdings by approximately 15,000 Bitcoin.

According to crypto analyst alicharts, during the ongoing Bitcoin correction, whale groups have adopted an accumulation strategy for major cryptocurrencies. Over the past 72 hours, whales have added approximately 15,000 Bitcoin, more than 166,000 ETH, and over 45 million XRP to their holdings.

4 minutes ago

Kripto para piyasasında güvenlik endişelerini artıran yeni bir hack iddiası gündeme geldi. Dünyanın önde gelen donanım cüzdanı üreticilerinden Ledger, bazı kullanıcıların kripto varlıklarının çalındığına yönelik iddiaların ardından soruşturma başlattı. Zincir üstü araştırmalara göre toplam kaybın 86 milyon doları aşmış olabileceği belirtilirken, Binance kurucusu Changpeng Zhao (CZ) da yatırımcıları dikkatli olmaları konusunda uyardı.

86 Milyon Dolarlık Kripto Para Çalındı mı? Güneydoğu Asya’daki bazı Ledger kullanıcılarının kripto para varlıklarını kaybettiğine yönelik iddialar, sektörde büyük yankı uyandırdı. Zincir üstü araştırmacı Specter, Ethereum, TRON ve Bitcoin ağlarında yüzlerce cüzdandan şüpheli adreslere gerçekleştirilen transferleri takip ettiğini açıkladı. Specter’ın tahminlerine göre olayla bağlantılı toplam kayıp 86 milyon doların üzerine çıkmış olabilir. Ancak saldırıların hangi yöntemle gerçekleştirildiği henüz kesinleşmedi. Ledger cihazlarının temel güvenlik altyapısının doğrudan ele geçirildiğine ilişkin doğrulanmış bir kanıt bulunmadığı belirtiliyor.

İlginizi Çekebilir: Bitcoin’in Kaderi Bu Seviyeye Bağlı!

Ledger, güvenlik iddialarının CryptoBilis adlı satıcı üzerinden satın alınan cihazlarla bağlantılı olabileceğini değerlendiriyor. Şirket, soruşturma tamamlanana kadar ilgili satıcının satış ve sevkiyat faaliyetlerini durdurmasını istedi. Ayrıca son 90 gün içerisinde CryptoBilis üzerinden Ledger cihazı satın alan kullanıcıların cihazlarını henüz kurmamaları gerektiği bildirildi. Cihazlarını daha önce kullanmaya başlayan kişilere ise yeni bir kurtarma ifadesi oluşturarak varlıklarını güvenilir yeni bir Ledger cihazına taşımaları tavsiye edildi. Bu uyarılar, donanım cüzdanlarının güvenliğinin yalnızca yazılımsal korumaya değil, cihazların güvenilir kaynaklardan temin edilmesine de bağlı olduğunu yeniden gündeme taşıdı.

Binance Kurucusu CZ’den Ledger Açıklaması Binance’in kurucusu Changpeng Zhao (CZ), olayla ilgili ilk bulguların olası bir tedarik zinciri saldırısına işaret ettiğini belirtti. Zhao’ya göre bazı kullanıcılar, orijinal cihazlar yerine üzerinde değişiklik yapılmış veya sahte Ledger ürünleri satın almış olabilir.

CZ, Ledger’ın kripto para sektörünün en köklü donanım cüzdanı üreticilerinden biri olduğunu vurgularken, olayın şirketin tüm cihazlarının güvenliğinin ihlal edildiği anlamına gelmediğine dikkat çekti.

Zhao ayrıca BNB ekosistemindeki katılımcıların ve sektörün diğer aktörlerinin çalınan kripto varlıkların izlenmesi ve geri alınması konusunda destek sağlayabileceğini ifade etti.

Kripto Para Yatırımcılarını Nasıl Etkileyebilir? Ledger hakkındaki güvenlik iddiaları, kripto para yatırımcılarının donanım cüzdanı kullanırken dikkat etmesi gereken riskleri yeniden gündeme getirdi. Özellikle üçüncü taraf satıcılardan temin edilen cihazların güvenilirliği ve kurtarma ifadelerinin korunması kritik önem taşıyor. Genel değerlendirmede 86 milyon dolarlık kayıp iddiasının henüz kesinleşmemiş olması ve saldırı yönteminin tam olarak belirlenememesi, soruşturmanın sonuçlarını önemli hale getiriyor. Ledger’ın yapacağı yeni açıklamalar, olayın kapsamının netleşmesi ve etkilenen kullanıcıların belirlenmesi açısından yakından takip edilecek.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

The token’s rally outpaced bitcoin and ether, while daily trading on Starknet’s decentralized exchanges rose to about $33.7 million.

Free newsletters

Good reporting. Delivered.Choose your coverage: crypto and DeFi, the future of finance, or both.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

ASML to Uniformly Hike Prices of Lithography Machine Components for Samsung and SK Hynix by 10%, As AI Production Expansion Boom Drives Up Equipment Costs.

According to South Korean media reports, ASML has notified Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix that it will implement a uniform 10% price increase on EUV and DUV lithography machine components for the South Korean market. The adjustment covers regularly replaced consumable parts and core components required for fault repairs, including optical systems, light sources, and precision drive units. After consultations between the procurement departments of both sides, the two memory chip giants have accepted the price hike plan, with the adjustment set to take effect in January next year. This uniform across-the-board price increase is relatively rare; ASML previously typically adjusted prices only individually for components facing rising raw material costs or tight supply of specific materials. Meanwhile, the company is in negotiations with key clients over price hikes for new equipment. According to earlier reports, equipment manufacturers including Applied Materials and Tokyo Electron have also raised product prices, and the price hike trend in the semiconductor equipment sector is spreading. AI data center investment is driving memory chip and foundry players to expand production capacity, leading to a concentrated surge in demand for equipment and components. With suppliers taking time to ramp up production, coupled with inflation and raw material cost pressures, bargaining power in the equipment supply chain is shifting toward suppliers. The report noted that TSMC had previously opposed ASML’s equipment price hikes, indicating that different clients still have varying levels of acceptance of rising costs.

30 minutes ago

Apple places a 30% additional order for iPhone Duo, while the total volume of the iPhone 18 Pro series remains unchanged.

According to sources from Apple's supply chain, the tech giant is making structural adjustments to its 2026 fall new iPhone orders: it has placed an additional 30% order for the iPhone Duo, though the total volume still remains below 10 million units; it has cut orders for the iPhone 18 Pro by 10% to 15%, while increasing orders for the iPhone 18 Pro Max by 10% to 15%, leaving the total order volume for the entire iPhone 18 Pro series unchanged. An Apple supply chain source said, "This means sales are shifting toward higher-value products, which is overall positive for the performance of Apple's supply chain companies."

30 minutes ago

A crypto whale adds to HYPE buy orders, with planned buy-the-dip positions totaling $10.8 million.

According to TradingBeats monitoring, a crypto whale has added 7 new limit buy orders for HYPE at prices ranging from $64.099 to $77.93, totaling roughly $2.52 million. Combined with orders placed on October 8 that are still active, the account holds a total of 30 buy orders spanning $61.26 to $81.94, with a combined value of approximately $10.828 million. The account currently has no open positions. HYPE is trading at around $84.22 at press time, and its highest buy order price of $81.94 is roughly 2.7% lower than the current spot price; order amounts are distributed across the entire price range.

30 minutes ago

Claude Code Projects has fully lifted its waitlist, enabling Pro and Max users who were on the waitlist to now use the service.

Beating AI Express (Insight) – Anthropic announced that all waitlisted Pro and Max tier users who applied for Claude Code Projects have now been granted testing access. The feature launched in September, initially available only to a small subset of users. While its scope has expanded, it remains in Beta testing and is not yet fully open to all paid subscribers. Claude Code Projects functions as a project management agent: users only need to submit requests, and it automatically splits tasks and assigns them to multiple concurrent Claude Code sessions. Each session independently writes code, runs tests, submits pull requests (PRs), and reports back to the manager, eliminating the need for users to assign tasks or track progress manually. These sessions share project data and memory, run on the cloud by default, and can continue operating even when the user’s computer is powered off. For tasks requiring local files or software, users can also designate execution on their own device.

30 minutes ago

2 New Wallets Withdraw 280.75M $龙虾 ($12.21M) From Exchanges in 3 Days

2 newly created wallets (0x4d28 and 0x5a42) withdrew 280.75M $龙虾 ($12.21M) from exchanges over the past 3 days, 28.08% of the total supply.

30 minutes ago

Supermicro contractor pleads guilty; $2.5 billion server order tied to smuggling case.

Beating AI Express News: Ting-Wei Sun, a former contractor of Supermicro, has pleaded guilty in a New York federal court in the U.S. He was involved in illegally diverting servers equipped with NVIDIA high-end AI chips to China, admitting to four charges: conspiracy to violate export controls, conspiracy to smuggle, conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government, and obstruction of justice. Previously, U.S. prosecutors indicted three people total. Besides Sun, the defendants include Supermicro co-founder Yih-Shyan Liaw and Ruei-Tsang Chang, general manager of the company’s Taiwan office. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) disclosed earlier that between 2024 and 2025, a Southeast Asian middleman purchased approximately $2.5 billion worth of equipment from the involved U.S. server manufacturer. Prosecutors allege that at least $510 million worth of these servers were illegally diverted to China in just a few weeks in 2025. The involved servers were typically first shipped via Taiwan to Southeast Asia, then repackaged and sent to China. To evade inspections, the suspects placed thousands of non-functional dummy servers in warehouses and used hair dryers to remove labels and serial numbers. Prosecutors said Sun participated in arranging the dummy servers and made false statements during inspections by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Supermicro was not named as a defendant in the case and has cut ties with the three involved individuals. An independent investigation released by the company in August found no evidence that current executives were aware of the smuggling scheme.

30 minutes ago

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

ASML to Uniformly Hike Prices of Lithography Machine Components for Samsung and SK Hynix by 10%, As AI Production Expansion Boom Drives Up Equipment Costs.

According to South Korean media reports, ASML has notified Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix that it will implement a uniform 10% price increase on EUV and DUV lithography machine components for the South Korean market. The adjustment covers regularly replaced consumable parts and core components required for fault repairs, including optical systems, light sources, and precision drive units. After consultations between the procurement departments of both sides, the two memory chip giants have accepted the price hike plan, with the adjustment set to take effect in January next year. This uniform across-the-board price increase is relatively rare; ASML previously typically adjusted prices only individually for components facing rising raw material costs or tight supply of specific materials. Meanwhile, the company is in negotiations with key clients over price hikes for new equipment. According to earlier reports, equipment manufacturers including Applied Materials and Tokyo Electron have also raised product prices, and the price hike trend in the semiconductor equipment sector is spreading. AI data center investment is driving memory chip and foundry players to expand production capacity, leading to a concentrated surge in demand for equipment and components. With suppliers taking time to ramp up production, coupled with inflation and raw material cost pressures, bargaining power in the equipment supply chain is shifting toward suppliers. The report noted that TSMC had previously opposed ASML’s equipment price hikes, indicating that different clients still have varying levels of acceptance of rising costs.

26 minutes ago

Apple places a 30% additional order for iPhone Duo, while the total volume of the iPhone 18 Pro series remains unchanged.

According to sources from Apple's supply chain, the tech giant is making structural adjustments to its 2026 fall new iPhone orders: it has placed an additional 30% order for the iPhone Duo, though the total volume still remains below 10 million units; it has cut orders for the iPhone 18 Pro by 10% to 15%, while increasing orders for the iPhone 18 Pro Max by 10% to 15%, leaving the total order volume for the entire iPhone 18 Pro series unchanged. An Apple supply chain source said, "This means sales are shifting toward higher-value products, which is overall positive for the performance of Apple's supply chain companies."

26 minutes ago

A crypto whale adds to HYPE buy orders, with planned buy-the-dip positions totaling $10.8 million.

According to TradingBeats monitoring, a crypto whale has added 7 new limit buy orders for HYPE at prices ranging from $64.099 to $77.93, totaling roughly $2.52 million. Combined with orders placed on October 8 that are still active, the account holds a total of 30 buy orders spanning $61.26 to $81.94, with a combined value of approximately $10.828 million. The account currently has no open positions. HYPE is trading at around $84.22 at press time, and its highest buy order price of $81.94 is roughly 2.7% lower than the current spot price; order amounts are distributed across the entire price range.

26 minutes ago

Claude Code Projects has fully lifted its waitlist, enabling Pro and Max users who were on the waitlist to now use the service.

Beating AI Express (Insight) – Anthropic announced that all waitlisted Pro and Max tier users who applied for Claude Code Projects have now been granted testing access. The feature launched in September, initially available only to a small subset of users. While its scope has expanded, it remains in Beta testing and is not yet fully open to all paid subscribers. Claude Code Projects functions as a project management agent: users only need to submit requests, and it automatically splits tasks and assigns them to multiple concurrent Claude Code sessions. Each session independently writes code, runs tests, submits pull requests (PRs), and reports back to the manager, eliminating the need for users to assign tasks or track progress manually. These sessions share project data and memory, run on the cloud by default, and can continue operating even when the user’s computer is powered off. For tasks requiring local files or software, users can also designate execution on their own device.

26 minutes ago

2 New Wallets Withdraw 280.75M $龙虾 ($12.21M) From Exchanges in 3 Days

2 newly created wallets (0x4d28 and 0x5a42) withdrew 280.75M $龙虾 ($12.21M) from exchanges over the past 3 days, 28.08% of the total supply.

26 minutes ago

Supermicro contractor pleads guilty; $2.5 billion server order tied to smuggling case.

Beating AI Express News: Ting-Wei Sun, a former contractor of Supermicro, has pleaded guilty in a New York federal court in the U.S. He was involved in illegally diverting servers equipped with NVIDIA high-end AI chips to China, admitting to four charges: conspiracy to violate export controls, conspiracy to smuggle, conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government, and obstruction of justice. Previously, U.S. prosecutors indicted three people total. Besides Sun, the defendants include Supermicro co-founder Yih-Shyan Liaw and Ruei-Tsang Chang, general manager of the company’s Taiwan office. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) disclosed earlier that between 2024 and 2025, a Southeast Asian middleman purchased approximately $2.5 billion worth of equipment from the involved U.S. server manufacturer. Prosecutors allege that at least $510 million worth of these servers were illegally diverted to China in just a few weeks in 2025. The involved servers were typically first shipped via Taiwan to Southeast Asia, then repackaged and sent to China. To evade inspections, the suspects placed thousands of non-functional dummy servers in warehouses and used hair dryers to remove labels and serial numbers. Prosecutors said Sun participated in arranging the dummy servers and made false statements during inspections by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Supermicro was not named as a defendant in the case and has cut ties with the three involved individuals. An independent investigation released by the company in August found no evidence that current executives were aware of the smuggling scheme.

26 minutes ago