SummaryComcast Corporation announces a breakup into two public companies: connectivity-focused Comcast and media-centric NBCUniversal/Sky (MediaCo), creating a clear sum-of-the-parts catalyst.The separation aims to unlock value by removing the CMCSA conglomerate discount, enabling each business to be valued on its distinct cash flow and strategic merits.Current valuation appears too low, with combined post-breakup equity value estimated at $110–180 billion versus a ~$90 billion market cap.I rate Comcast a Buy, as the breakup offers a defined timeline and clearer asset narratives despite ongoing broadband and media operational pressures. JHVEPhoto/iStock Editorial via Getty Images
I am bullish on Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) after the latest breakup announcement. The investment thesis is now becoming a catalyst-driven sum-of-the-parts story with a defined separation path. Specifically, the company announced plans to split
9.68K Followers
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Not financial advice
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Marvell Technology could have more room to run after its sharp rally this year.
UBS became the latest brokerage to turn more bullish on the semiconductor company as artificial intelligence infrastructure spending accelerates demand for next-generation connectivity products.
The brokerage raised its price target on Marvell to $340 from $230, implying roughly 27.5% upside from Friday's closing price.
UBS also lifted its target on Astera Labs to $400 from $205 while maintaining a Neutral rating, saying both companies stand to benefit from the rapid adoption of Compute Express Link (CXL), a technology increasingly viewed as essential for AI data centers.
Marvell's MRVL share price was trading lower by about 1% on Monday though.
UBS said CXL, a cache-coherent, low-latency, high-bandwidth interconnect built on PCIe, is becoming a critical technology as AI workloads require memory systems with significantly higher capacity and faster data movement.
"CXL is becoming a critical enabling technology. We believe MRVL has the leading market share in CXL products to date, but we do see ALAB becoming a larger player," analyst Timothy Arcuri wrote in a note to clients on Monday.
The brokerage expects demand for CXL products to rise sharply as data centers evolve beyond conventional server architectures toward rack-wide and multi-rack memory fabrics connecting CPUs and XPUs.
UBS estimates the addressable market for CXL-related ASIC attachment products could grow to between $7 billion and $10 billion by 2030.
While Marvell currently leads the market, UBS expects competition to increase over time, with Astera Labs and Broadcom emerging as more significant players as adoption expands.
Reflecting stronger demand expectations, UBS increased its revenue forecasts for Marvell over the next two years.
The brokerage expects CXL-related revenue to reach about $1 billion in 2027, driven primarily by XPU connectivity inside AI server racks, supported by growing demand for agentic AI running on CPUs.
It also projects Marvell's CXL revenue will climb to roughly $2 billion in 2028.
Overall, UBS raised its 2027 revenue estimate to $16.8 billion from $16.5 billion and increased its 2028 forecast to $23.9 billion from $21.9 billion.
The brokerage also lifted earnings-per-share estimates to $6.23 for 2027 and $9.62 for 2028, compared with previous forecasts of $6.09 and $8.60.
Marvell, which now commands a market capitalization of roughly $233 billion, has posted revenue growth of 34% over the past 12 months and its shares have surged about 190% in 2026, significantly outperforming the broader S&P 500.
Marvell has long been viewed as a beneficiary of the AI boom because of its custom application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) designed for hyperscale cloud providers.
However, analysts increasingly believe the company's networking business could prove even more valuable over the longer term.
Earlier this month, analysts led by John Vinh raised Marvell's price target by 48% to $385 from $260 while reiterating an Overweight rating. The stock climbed 14% after that report.
Following an investor meeting with Marvell, KeyBanc said it had become increasingly optimistic about the company's optical networking business, arguing that it could offer a more durable growth opportunity than custom AI chips.
The firm noted that increasingly powerful AI data centers require optical transceivers to move massive volumes of information by converting electrical signals into light.
Marvell supplies the digital signal processors used inside those transceivers.
"Networking represents the most significant and durable growth opportunity," Vinh wrote, estimating the addressable market could reach approximately $30 billion by 2030.
He added that Marvell appears well positioned to capture a significant share of that opportunity as AI infrastructure spending continues to expand.
SHENYANG, CHINA - JUNE 13: Hundreds of yoga enthusiasts practice yoga at the Sun Square of Shenyang Grand Theatre on June 13, 2026 in Shenyang, Liaoning Province of China. (Photo by Cai Jingyu/VCG via Getty Images)
VCG via Getty Images
At a May 30 promotional event on the Great Wall of China, the company featured a giant Japanese taiko drum instead of a culturally appropriate Chinese dagu drum for a musical performance. The misstep immediately sparked backlash for cultural insensitivity and drew over 50 million views on Weibo—other Western brands, including H&M, Dolce & Gabbana, Dior, Burberry, and Gucci, have been caught in similar cultural crosshairs.
It took Lululemon over two weeks to acknowledge the mistake and issue an apology on Weibo, pledging its commitment to honoring Chinese culture—a critical priority for Western brands doing business in China—and accepting responsibility for an inadequate planning and review process.
As global communications firm Edelman said, “Trust is the currency of consumer power,” and another misstep gives loyal customers an excuse to leave the brand and potential customers a reason to look elsewhere—something Lululemon can ill afford now as its business growth slows, leadership is in transition and its stock price is down 50% this year.
Plagued By ControversiesControversies have haunted Lululemon almost from the beginning in 1998 under founder Chip Wilson. He explained that the company name with multiple L’s was originally chosen because it was a letter that Japanese people couldn’t pronounce. “It’s funny to watch them try to say it,” he infamously said.
He later walked it back later by saying the name is “innately North American and authentic” because the letter L does not exist in Japanese phonetics. The Chinese drum controversy recalled those remarks, reinforcing the perception that Lululemon still struggles with cultural awareness.
MORE FOR YOU
Wilson continued to make highly controversial remarks throughout his tenure with the company, which officially ended in 2015. Though as the company’s single largest shareholder, he has persisted in speaking out publicly against leadership’s decisions, most recently in his proxy battle to get his chosen picks on the board.
Back in the day, Wilson defended not offering clothing for plus-sized women because such larger sizes were too expensive to make and he blamed excess pilling in some designs because women were wearing the clothing wrong or had a body shape that wasn’t suitable to its designs.
Beyond such insensitive remarks, the company had a major quality issue in 2013 after widespread complaints emerged that its yoga pants were too sheer. That led to millions of yoga pants being recalled and a reputational crisis for the brand.
Lululemon was hit with further complaints about sheerness in its Align leggings in 2021 and again in 2025. Early this year is got the same complaints for its Get Low leggings, causing the company to temporarily halt online sales. Plus, in 2024, the Breezethrough leggings were pulled for quality issues.
It also was caught making false claims about the health benefits of products made with seaweed-infused fabrics. In 2007, the Canada’s Competition Bureau ruled the company’s claims of anti-inflammatory, detoxifying qualities in its Vitasea product line were unsubstantiated, false and misleading and forced the company to remove all such health benefit claims from its advertising and marketing.
And most recently, in April, the Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into Lululemon’s use of PFAS, so-called “forever chemicals” that don’t break down in the environment and may have negative health effects. The company claims it phased out use of the substances in early 2024 and is cooperating with the state. However, it’s one more black eye against the company.
Taken together, these controversies suggest a pattern that Lululemon has never fully put behind it. They invite debate about whether the most recent missteps will quickly fade from memory or if they deepen a persistent trust problem for the brand.
Clouds Of UncertaintyThe general consensus is that the latest China misstep will leave no permanent damage. BNP Paribas analyst Laurent Vasilescu said, “The push back tends to be a short-term headwind.” And RepTrak’s Stephen Hahn noted any reputational damage will remain confined to the local market and have no long-term impact globally. “This story is less likely to drum up any major reputational noise about Lululemon outside of China.”
However, the China drum incident, paired with the Texas AG’s PFAS investigation, reopens the question of whether Lululemon is a brand consumers can trust. It refreshes memories of past controversies and casts the company once again in a negative light.
Notably, during the first-quarter earnings call, the company acknowledged it experienced “spikes of negative commentary” in the media and across social media—including in China where brand momentum slowed after a strong Chinese New Year. And that was before the Great Wall of China fiasco, casting a cloud over second-quarter results, potentially even beyond.
Customer trust is the key metric. Edelman’s global research among 15,000 consumers in 15 countries found 88% rank trust equally important to “ best quality” and “good value for the money” when making a purchase decision. Lululemon is challenged on all counts—quality questions persist, value is threatened amid rising prices and trust shaken by cultural missteps and regulatory scrutiny.
GlobalData retail analyst and managing director Neil Saunders told CBS News earlier this year that Lululemon’s products have become “junkified,” adding, “What it suggests is that there’s kind of a lack of quality control, there’s a lack of care, there’s a lack of attention to detail.”
Reasons To FleeConsumers have a long memory when controversies around a brand’s cultural sensitivity and product quality issues resurface again and again—a memory that shapes how they interpret its latest controversies and could drive them to look elsewhere. And unlike in Lululemon’s early days, the competition is coming on strong.
Privately-held Vuori has reached a market cap of $5.5 billion valuation after a recent investment round. It’s on a path to 100 global stores, including five just opened in China, and an IPO is rumored to be in the works.
Alo Yoga has about 130 stores globally, with plans to open a 7,000-square-foot, two-story Hong Kong waterfront store shortly. Forbes estimates that Alo Yoga’s parent company, Color Image Apparel, has generated nearly $2 billion most recently.
And heavy-hitter Nike entered the premium women’s activewear market in a collaboration with Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS brand last year, with the NikeSKIMS product line expanding globally this year.
The irony is that Lululemon, a brand that once defined the athleisurewear category, opened the door for these and other challengers while being distracted by controversies of its own making.
And hanging over all of this is Chip Wilson’s highly-publicized proxy battle where he was characteristically outspoken about the company’s leadership mistakes and claims that Lululemon has “lost its cool.”
Eroding TrustBefore the China drum backlash, Lululemon was guiding on a net revenue decline between 2%-3% in the second quarter, after squeaking out 4% revenue growth in the first quarter. In the latest earnings call, the company acknowledged headwinds as it entered the second quarter around negative publicity—e.g. Wilson’s critiques and the Texas PSFA investigation—and recent product launches that didn’t “generate anticipated guest response,” such as the alleged see-thru Get Low leggings.
These remarks came before the China controversy, which is likely to hit the company’s sales harder than its earlier guidance suggests. Noting that momentum is slowing in China—comparable sales slipped from 30% in fourth quarter 2025 to 20% in first quarter 2026—BNP Paribas warned, “We are worried that China revenues will flatten out,” as it also expressed concerns about Lululemon’s continued decline in North America—the Americas comparable sales dropped 5% in first quarter. And the firm noted this was before the full impact of the two recent social media controversies are factored into results.
The last thing Lululemon needs now is further erosion of consumer trust and while the particulars of the latest controversies will fade, more general negative feelings about the brand are likely to persist, adding fuel to the competition’s fire.
If trust continues to slip, the question won’t be if Lululemon can regain momentum with new product drops and marketing initiatives, but whether consumers will continue to give the brand the benefit of the doubt.
See Also:
ForbesLululemon Controversy In China Threatens Growth In Key MarketBy Mary Whitfill RoeloffsForbesLululemon Founder Chip Wilson Wins Two Board Seats To End Bitter Proxy BattleBy Pamela N. DanzigerForbesLululemon's Billionaire Founder Has Been Fighting To Oust Its CEO–He Won, But He’s Still Not HappyBy Simone Melvin
Key Takeaways OPEN signed more than 5,000 acquisition contracts in Q1, its strongest quarterly volume since Q2 2022.Opendoor's resale contribution margin reached 4.4% in Q1, up 340 basis points sequentially.OPEN reduced homes on the market for more than 120 days to 10% from 51% two quarters earlier. Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN - Free Report) is entering the back half of 2026 with seasonality becoming an important test for Opendoor 2.0. Although housing activity typically softens during this period, recent operating metrics suggest Opendoor 2.0 is giving the company a stronger operating base heading into the seasonal slowdown.
Seasonality is a meaningful factor in OPEN’s operating model. The company stated that the housing selling season typically begins shortly after the Super Bowl, peaks in early summer, tapers through the fall and bottoms in December. This pattern affects resale velocity, spread decisions and acquisition cadence. OPEN also noted that days on market usually lengthen in the back half of the year, while margins tend to compress in the fourth quarter.
OPEN enters this seasonal test with improved operating metrics. In the first quarter of 2026, the company entered into more than 5,000 contracts, its strongest quarterly contract volume since the second quarter of 2022. Resale contribution margin improved every month since September 2025 and closed the quarter at 4.4%, up 340 basis points sequentially. The percentage of homes on the market for more than 120 days fell to 10% from 51% two quarters earlier. This healthier inventory position gives OPEN a stronger starting point as seasonal demand moderates, with fewer aged homes reducing clearance pressure and supporting resale-margin stability.
The back half of 2026 will provide a key checkpoint for OPEN’s margin durability as seasonal housing demand moderates. The company’s ability to limit margin slippage will likely depend on fresh inventory, sustained resale velocity and continued contribution-margin stability as housing demand tapers.
Opendoor’s Competitor LandscapeZillow Group, Inc. (ZG - Free Report) provides a relevant benchmark for OPEN because it is navigating housing-market softness through a capital-light platform. Zillow’s integrated housing ecosystem spans search, touring, financing, agent workflows and closing, helping it support buyer and seller engagement without direct owned-home resale exposure. This positions Zillow as a lower-inventory-risk benchmark, while OPEN’s margin profile is more directly tied to resale execution and owned-home turns.
Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD - Free Report) provides a closer operating comparison because it remains exposed to home-level execution, resale timing and capital discipline. Offerpad is expanding its Cash Offer, Cash Offer Marketplace, Brokerage Services and Renovate platform while using SCOUT and HENRY to improve seller routing, acquisition accuracy, renovation estimates and disposition decisions. These efforts are aimed at improving conversion and managing asset-level risk in a pressured housing market.
Against this backdrop, OPEN sits between Zillow’s capital-light housing platform and Offerpad’s more targeted seller-solutions model. Zillow benefits from platform breadth and lower inventory exposure, while Offerpad is focused on improving seller conversion and asset-level execution. OPEN’s differentiation lies in applying Opendoor 2.0 across a larger resale funnel, where tighter execution can have a greater impact on margin performance.
OPEN’s Stock Price Performance, Valuation & EstimatesShares of Opendoor have skyrocketed 719.9% in the past year against the industry’s 23.6% decline.
OPEN One-Year Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, OPEN trades at a forward price-to-sales (P/S) multiple of 0.75, significantly below the industry’s average of 3.55.
OPEN’s P/S Ratio (Forward 12-Month) vs. Industry
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for OPEN's 2026 loss per share suggests a 53.9% year-over-year improvement. Loss per share estimates for 2026 have widened in the past 30 days.
EPS Trend of OPEN Stock
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Investors interested in Computer and Technology stocks should always be looking to find the best-performing companies in the group. Is Amkor Technology (AMKR - Free Report) one of those stocks right now? By taking a look at the stock's year-to-date performance in comparison to its Computer and Technology peers, we might be able to answer that question.
Amkor Technology is one of 591 individual stocks in the Computer and Technology sector. Collectively, these companies sit at #1 in the Zacks Sector Rank. The Zacks Sector Rank considers 16 different groups, measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the sector to gauge the strength of each group.
The Zacks Rank is a proven model that highlights a variety of stocks with the right characteristics to outperform the market over the next one to three months. The system emphasizes earnings estimate revisions and favors companies with improving earnings outlooks. Amkor Technology is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy).
Over the past 90 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for AMKR's full-year earnings has moved 28.3% higher. This signals that analyst sentiment is improving and the stock's earnings outlook is more positive.
According to our latest data, AMKR has moved about 99.4% on a year-to-date basis. Meanwhile, the Computer and Technology sector has returned an average of 13% on a year-to-date basis. This means that Amkor Technology is performing better than its sector in terms of year-to-date returns.
One other Computer and Technology stock that has outperformed the sector so far this year is Ceva (CEVA - Free Report) . The stock is up 96.7% year-to-date.
For Ceva, the consensus EPS estimate for the current year has increased 15.9% over the past three months. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
Looking more specifically, Amkor Technology belongs to the Electronics - Semiconductors industry, a group that includes 47 individual stocks and currently sits at #59 in the Zacks Industry Rank. This group has gained an average of 48.5% so far this year, so AMKR is performing better in this area.
On the other hand, Ceva belongs to the Internet - Software industry. This 169-stock industry is currently ranked #79. The industry has moved -15.8% year to date.
Investors with an interest in Computer and Technology stocks should continue to track Amkor Technology and Ceva. These stocks will be looking to continue their solid performance.
When it comes to short-term investing or trading, they say "the trend is your friend." And there's no denying that this is the most profitable strategy. But making sure of the sustainability of a trend to profit from it is easier said than done.
The trend often reverses before exiting the trade, leading to a short-term capital loss for investors. So, for a profitable trade, one should confirm factors such as sound fundamentals, positive earnings estimate revisions, etc. that could keep the momentum in the stock alive.
Our "Recent Price Strength" screen, which is created on a unique short-term trading strategy, could be pretty useful in this regard. This predefined screen makes it really easy to shortlist the stocks that have enough fundamental strength to maintain their recent uptrend. Also, the screen passes only the stocks that are trading in the upper portion of their 52-week high-low range, which is usually an indicator of bullishness.
There are several stocks that passed through the screen and ATI (ATI - Free Report) is one of them. Here are the key reasons why this stock is a solid choice for "trend" investing.
A solid price increase over a period of 12 weeks reflects investors' continued willingness to pay more for the potential upside in a stock. ATI is quite a good fit in this regard, gaining 34.6% over this period.
However, it's not enough to look at the price change for around three months, as it doesn't reflect any trend reversal that might have happened in a shorter time frame. It's important for a potential winner to maintain the price trend. A price increase of 12.7% over the past four weeks ensures that the trend is still in place for the stock of this maker of steel and specialty metals.
Moreover, ATI is currently trading at 94.1% of its 52-week High-Low Range, hinting that it can be on the verge of a breakout.
Looking at the fundamentals, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), which means it is in the top 20% of more than the 4,000 stocks that we rank based on trends in earnings estimate revisions and EPS surprises -- the key factors that impact a stock's near-term price movements.
The Zacks Rank stock-rating system, which uses four factors related to earnings estimates to classify stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive externally-audited track record, with Zacks Rank #1 stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 1988. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>
Another factor that confirms the company's fundamental strength is its Average Broker Recommendation of #1 (Strong Buy). This indicates that the brokerage community is highly optimistic about the stock's near-term price performance.
So, the price trend in ATI may not reverse anytime soon.
In addition to ATI, there are several other stocks that currently pass through our "Recent Price Strength" screen. You may consider investing in them and start looking for the newest stocks that fit these criteria.
This is not the only screen that could help you find your next winning stock pick. Based on your personal investing style, you may choose from over 45 Zacks Premium Screens that are strategically created to beat the market.
However, keep in mind that the key to a successful stock-picking strategy is to ensure that it produced profitable results in the past. You could easily do that with the help of the Zacks Research Wizard. In addition to allowing you to backtest the effectiveness of your strategy, the program comes loaded with some of our most successful stock-picking strategies.
Click here to sign up for a free trial to the Research Wizard today.
Taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals for new and old investors, and Zacks Premium offers many different ways to do both.
The research service features daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, all of which will help you become a smarter, more confident investor.
Zacks Premium includes access to the Zacks Style Scores as well.
What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores, developed alongside the Zacks Rank, are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on three widely-followed investing methodologies; they also help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.
Based on their value, growth, and momentum characteristics, each stock is assigned a rating of A, B, C, D, or F. The better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform; an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on.
The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:
Value ScoreFor value investors, it's all about finding good stocks at good prices, and discovering which companies are trading under their true value before the broader market catches on. The Value Style Score utilizes ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and a host of other multiples to help pick out the most attractive and discounted stocks.
Growth ScoreGrowth investors are more concerned with a stock's future prospects, and the overall financial health and strength of a company. Thus, the Growth Style Score analyzes characteristics like projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow to find stocks that will see sustainable growth over time.
Momentum ScoreMomentum traders and investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." This investing style is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook. Employing factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates, the Momentum Style Score can indicate favorable times to build a position in high-momentum stocks.
VGM ScoreWhat if you like to use all three types of investing? The VGM Score is a combination of all Style Scores, making it one of the most comprehensive indicators to use with the Zacks Rank. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, which helps narrow down the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum.
How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank A proprietary stock-rating model, the Zacks Rank utilizes the power of earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings outlook, to help investors create a successful portfolio.
#1 (Strong Buy) stocks have produced an unmatched +23.94% average annual return since 1988, which is more than double the S&P 500's performance over the same time frame. However, the Zacks Rank examines a ton of stocks, and there can be more than 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, and another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.
This totals more than 800 top-rated stocks, and it can be overwhelming to try and pick the best stocks for you and your portfolio.
That's where the Style Scores come in.
You want to make sure you're buying stocks with the highest likelihood of success, and to do that, you'll need to pick stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B. If you like a stock that only has a #3 (Hold) rank, it should also have Scores of A or B to guarantee as much upside potential as possible.
Since the Scores were created to work together with the Zacks Rank, the direction of a stock's earnings estimate revisions should be a key factor when choosing which stocks to buy.
For instance, a stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, even one that boasts Scores of A and B, still has a downward-trending earnings forecast, and a much greater likelihood its share price will decline as well.
Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.
Stock to Watch: Paychex (PAYX - Free Report) Paychex, Inc. is one of the leading providers of integrated human capital management (“HCM”) solutions for payroll, human resource (“HR”), retirement and insurance services for small- to medium-sized businesses. The company was incorporated in Delaware in 1979.
PAYX is a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of B.
Additionally, the company could be a top pick for growth investors. PAYX has a Growth Style Score of B, forecasting year-over-year earnings growth of 7.8% for the current fiscal year.
Four analysts revised their earnings estimate higher in the last 60 days for fiscal 2027, while the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.03 to $5.94 per share. PAYX also boasts an average earnings surprise of +1.3%.
With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Growth and VGM Style Scores, PAYX should be on investors' short list.
Key Takeaways BKR won a subsea production systems contract for Azule Energy's Greater PAJ project in Angola.The award includes deepwater trees, control systems, installation, commissioning and production services.Delivery of BKR's subsea trees is expected to begin in 2027, boosting order backlog & its presence in Africa. Baker Hughes Company (BKR - Free Report) has secured a significant contract from Azule Energy to provide subsea production systems for the Greater PAJ offshore development in Angola, strengthening its position in the global deepwater services market. The award underscores BKR’s industry leadership in offshore production technologies while broadening its presence across one of Sub-Saharan Africa's premier energy-producing regions.
Under the agreement, Baker Hughes will supply deepwater horizontal tree systems, subsea control modules, intervention workover control systems and associated connection, distribution and topside equipment. The company will also provide integrated tooling, installation support, commissioning and ongoing production services through its established facilities in Angola. This broad scope allows BKR to generate revenues not only from equipment sales but also from services throughout the project's operating life.
The contract highlights Baker Hughes' technological advantage in ultra-deepwater developments. Its horizontal tree systems are engineered to operate at pressures of up to 10,000 pounds per square inch and water depths of 10,000 feet, while their modular design supports faster deployment and improved long-term production efficiency.
The award also reinforces BKR’s long-standing footprint in Angola, where it already maintains the largest installed subsea equipment base in Sub-Saharan Africa. Leveraging its local infrastructure and supply chain is expected to improve execution efficiency and strengthen customer relationships.
With subsea trees delivery scheduled to begin in 2027, the contract enhances Baker Hughes' future order backlog and revenue visibility. The agreement strengthens BKR’s business model and customer base while enhancing investor appeal by highlighting robust demand for its offshore production technologies.
Baker Hughes currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
The business models of oilfield equipment and service providers, including BKR, are closely linked to the capital spending of upstream players. With Brent prices trading above the $70-per-barrel mark and West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude prices trading around the $70-per-barrel mark, according to oilprice.com, players like Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. (VIST - Free Report) , YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF - Free Report) and W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI - Free Report) which have presence in upstream operations are benefiting from the elevated crude pricing environment. WTI and VIST currently carry a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) each, while YPF sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Vista operates 205,600 acres within the Vaca Muerta Basin, widely recognized as Argentina's premier shale basin. Supported by this massive footprint, VIST expects to achieve production of 200 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day by 2030.
Argentina’s integrated energy company, YPF, has an extensive footprint in the Vaca Muerta formation to fuel production growth. YPF anticipates increased spending and activity in the coming quarters to bolster oil and gas production in the second half of 2026.
W&T Offshore’s robust offshore footprint in the Gulf of America spans approximately 605,000 acres and supports a large reserve base. WTI's 1P and 2P reserves provide 20 years of production potential and resource longevity.
Freshworks (FRSH) saw its shares surge in the last session with trading volume being higher than average. The latest trend in earnings estimate revisions may not translate into further price increase in the near term.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Bitcoin crossed back above $60,000 on June 29 as the final hours of the worst monthly candle of the 2026 correction cycle play out with an unexpected positive: the Fear & Greed Index dropped to 12 — a new absolute cycle low in sentiment — while price simultaneously pushed above the key $60,000 level. That divergence between deepening fear and recovering price is the most significant macro signal of the day. Total crypto market cap sits near $2.12 trillion. Volume is elevated across the board, with BTC up 52% and ETH up 29% on the prior session.
Key Takeaways BTC $60,190 (+0.16%), reclaiming $60,000 ahead of June 30 UTC midnight monthly close Fear & Greed Index at 12 (Extreme Fear) — new absolute cycle low; yesterday 18, last week 20, last month 23 Sentiment making new lows while BTC makes higher lows — textbook divergence signal SOL +1.26% leads large-cap recovery; XRP +0.32% first green day in four sessions ETH –0.01% flat, BNB –0.81%, TRX –0.38% — mixed picture DOGE –13.39% weekly — worst 7-day performer in top 10 by significant margin BTC 4H MA(7) $59,881 — price $309 above it; first time BTC has held above MA(7) since June breakdown June monthly close in hours: BTC needs to hold $60,000+ to shift the narrative into July Crypto Market Snapshot — June 29, 2026 AssetPrice1h24h7dMarket CapVolume (24h)Bitcoin (BTC)$60,350+0.68%+0.16%–6.71%$1.21T$22.24BEthereum (ETH)$1,579+0.34%–0.01%–10.55%$190.65B$8.02BTether (USDT)$0.9984+0.01%0.00%–0.05%$186.04B$50.15BBNB$551.67–0.25%–0.81%–7.67%$74.35B$1.01BUSDC$0.99950.00%0.00%–0.02%$73.72B$9.07BXRP$1.05+0.38%+0.32%–8.07%$65.61B$1.46BSolana (SOL)$72.67–0.47%+1.26%–1.87%$42.2B$2.52BTRON (TRX)$0.3219–0.35%–0.38%–2.80%$30.53B$560.11MHyperliquid (HYPE)$63.53+0.10%+0.65%–6.57%$16.07B$384.03MDogecoin (DOGE)$0.07291+0.15%–1.04%–13.39%$11.29B$514.23M Fear & Greed at 12: The Most Important Number of the Day The Fear & Greed Index printing 12 on June 29 is the single most important data point in today’s market — not because of what it tells you about current conditions, but because of what it has historically signalled about what comes next.
The trajectory over the past 30 days: last month 23, last week 20, yesterday 18, today 12. Every reading has been in Extreme Fear. The index has now been below 20 for multiple consecutive days — a condition that in prior cycles (2018 bottom, March 2020 COVID crash, November 2022 FTX bottom) preceded major recoveries within days to weeks. The 2022 bear market absolute bottom saw a reading of 6; today’s 12 is not that extreme, but the directional trend — rapidly falling sentiment while price is simultaneously recovering above $60,000 — is the divergence pattern that characterises exhaustion bottoms.
The divergence on June 29 is clean: Fear & Greed at a new cycle low of 12 while BTC trades at $60,190, above both the $59,130 May cycle low and the $58,115 June 26 intraday low. Price is making higher lows; sentiment is making lower lows. One of them is wrong. Historically, price leads sentiment out of cycle bottoms.
Bitcoin: Above $60,000 Into the Monthly Close Bitcoin reclaimed $60,000 in the afternoon session on June 29 and is currently trading at $60,190 — up 0.16% on the day and holding above the 4H MA(7) at $59,881 for the first time since the June breakdown. The 4H candle shows BTC opened at $59,956, hit a high of $60,202, dipped to $59,595, and recovered to close the 4H candle at $60,190 — a constructive structure with a higher low than the prior candle.
The June monthly close now looks like a Scenario 2 outcome: a close between $59,130 and $60,078 (MA(25)) that preserves the structural floor without confirming a recovery. If BTC can close the June 30 UTC midnight candle above $60,078, the monthly close would be the most bullish technical outcome possible given the June 26 capitulation — reclaiming the 4H MA(25) on a monthly closing basis. For daily BTC analysis, see our Bitcoin news today page.
Ethereum: Flat at $1,580, MA(7) and MA(25) Tight Again Ethereum is essentially flat at $1,580 on June 29 — down 0.01% — with the 4H MA(7) at $1,576 and MA(25) at $1,575 sitting within $1 of each other directly below price. Unlike the compression setups on June 27–28 that resolved lower, ETH is currently trading above both MAs — a marginal improvement. MA(99) at $1,680 remains $100 above current price, reflecting the full extent of the June selloff.
ETH’s 7-day loss of 10.55% is the worst among top-8 assets, making it the biggest relative underperformer of the correction week. The Glamsterdam upgrade targeting Q3 2026 mainnet, BitMine’s 5.67 million ETH embedded in Russell 1000 passive funds, and the Ethereum Foundation’s 40% spending cut remain the three structural support pillars heading into July.
Solana: Best Large-Cap Performer, Above All Three MAs Solana is the standout on June 29 — up 1.26% to $72.95 with the 4H chart showing price above MA(7) at $72.15, MA(25) at $70.98, and MA(99) at $70.99. SOL is the only large-cap asset with a bullish 4H MA alignment entering the June monthly close. The 7-day loss of just 1.87% confirms SOL’s relative resilience since the $64.04 cycle low on June 26 — it has recovered faster and held better than Bitcoin, Ethereum, or XRP.
SOL’s 100-billion lifetime transaction milestone crossed on June 26 and the Alpenglow upgrade targeting Q3 2026 mainnet — 150ms finality — remain the primary fundamental catalysts. The combination of bullish MA structure, above-average recovery speed from cycle lows, and strong fundamental pipeline makes SOL the highest-quality technical setup in the large-cap space entering July.
XRP: First Green 24H in Four Sessions XRP printed +0.32% on June 29 — the first positive 24-hour session since the June 25 pre-capitulation high. The 4H chart shows price at $1.057 above MA(7) at $1.0509 and MA(25) at $1.0491 — the same bullish MA reclaim pattern that appeared briefly on June 27 before fading. MA(99) at $1.1261 remains significant overhead resistance.
The June 29 green candle matters more symbolically than technically: XRP’s 7-day loss of 8.07% and monthly loss of roughly 18% reflect the scale of the correction, and a 0.32% recovery does not reverse that. What it does confirm is that the $1.0092 cycle low from June 26 has now held across four consecutive sessions — and that each session above $1.00 strengthens the psychological floor. The CLARITY Act remains at 48% on Polymarket; a Senate floor vote scheduling announcement remains the primary XRP catalyst for July.
BNB: Slipping Below $555 BNB is down 0.81% to $554.40 on June 29 — the weakest large-cap performer of the day alongside TRX. The 4H chart shows price below MA(7) at $552.73 but above MA(25) at $559.12 — wait, the current price of $554.40 is actually between MA(7) at $552.73 below and MA(25) at $559.12 above, confirming a compressed bearish structure. BNB’s 7-day loss of 7.67% places it in the middle of the correction pack. The $540.60 June 26 cycle low held, and the $552–$555 range is the near-term base.
TRON: Defensive Position Maintained TRX is down 0.38% to $0.3224 — a small loss on a day when several assets are recovering. The 4H chart shows all three MAs compressed within $0.001 of each other: MA(7) $0.3227, MA(25) $0.3221, MA(99) $0.3230 — an even tighter triple convergence than the double-MA setup seen on June 28. TRX’s 7-day loss of just 2.80% remains one of the best performances in the top 10, reflecting its utility-driven demand base from USDT settlement volume. MiCA enforcement began July 1 — the structural volume catalyst for TRON-based stablecoin flows from non-compliant European platforms.
Dogecoin: Worst Weekly Performer at –13.39% DOGE is down 13.39% over 7 days and 1.04% on the day to $0.07291 — the worst weekly performance in the top 10 by a significant margin, nearly double Ethereum’s –10.55% weekly loss. With no utility catalyst or fundamental development, DOGE is a pure sentiment indicator: at Fear & Greed 12, meme assets absorb the maximum sentiment discount. DOGE’s recovery, when it comes, will likely be the fastest in the top 10 — precisely because sentiment-driven assets move furthest in both directions.
Hyperliquid: Holding $63 Despite Market Pressure Hyperliquid (HYPE) at $63.53 — up 0.65% on the day — continues to demonstrate relative strength at #9 by market cap with $16.07 billion. The on-chain perpetuals exchange has maintained record volumes through the June correction, and the 7-day loss of 6.57% is better than most top-10 assets. HYPE above $60 on a day when Fear & Greed prints 12 is a meaningful signal about the depth of fundamental demand for the asset.
The June 30 Monthly Close: What July Inherits The monthly close arriving at UTC midnight tonight will set the technical framework for July positioning across every asset. Three scenarios remain in play:
For Bitcoin: a close above $60,000 into July is the most constructive possible outcome given the June 26 capitulation. Current price at $60,190 makes this the base case.
For Ethereum: a close above $1,575 (MA(7)) would confirm the double-MA compression resolved to the upside. Currently trading at $1,580 — marginally constructive.
For XRP: a close above $1.05 would be the first month-end close above that level since May. Currently at $1.057 — possible.
For Solana: a close above $72 with bullish MA alignment would make SOL the strongest technical setup entering July among all large-cap assets. Currently at $72.95.
The catalysts for July are clear: CLARITY Act Senate floor vote timing, Fed speaker commentary, and any development on the American Reserve Modernization Act. A Fear & Greed Index at 12 entering July means the positioning bar for a sentiment reversal is extremely low.
Today’s Market in One Paragraph June 29 closes with a contradiction that defines the current cycle: Fear & Greed at 12 — its lowest reading since the correction began — while Bitcoin trades at $60,190, Solana holds a bullish 4H MA alignment, and XRP prints its first green session in four days. Sentiment is maximally compressed; price is holding or recovering. The June 30 monthly close in hours will either confirm this divergence as a bottom signal or resolve it lower if selling resumes into the close. The week ahead brings the CLARITY Act’s most important legislative window of 2026 — the August recess deadline creates urgency that has not existed in any prior week of the correction.
Polygon establishes itself in the race for stablecoin payments. The network processed about 79.25 billion dollars in May, across nearly 198 million transactions. An activity that allows it to overtake Solana and BNB Chain in the number of transfers.
In brief Polygon processed nearly 79.25 billion dollars in stablecoins in May. The network dominated the market with about 198 million transactions. The increase in activity has not yet translated into a recovery in the POL token. Stablecoins propel Polygon to the top May 2026 marks the second-best month in Polygon’s history for stablecoins. The network processed nearly 80 billion dollars, confirming its turn towards payments. Polygon mainly claims first place in the number of transactions. The 198 million operations recorded during the month allow it to surpass other major blockchains on this indicator.
This distinction remains important. A network can show a high volume with a few massive institutional transfers. Polygon, on the contrary, shows a very fragmented activity, composed of a large number of operations of different sizes. The cumulative volume of stablecoin transfers on Polygon now exceeds 2.4 trillion dollars. USDC and USDT still concentrate most of this activity.
Polygon puts forward a simple argument: cost. A transaction on the network would cost on average about 0.002 dollar. Its settlement occurs in nearly two seconds. These characteristics make stablecoins more suitable for daily payments. A user can send a few dollars without losing a significant part of the amount in network fees.
This efficiency also interests businesses. Classic cross-border payments sometimes pass through several intermediary banks. The transfer can take several days and accumulate unpredictable fees. Polygon seeks to replace this complex chain with a direct settlement on the blockchain. Visa has moreover added the network to its stablecoin settlement program.
The network claims to have processed more than seven billion transactions since its launch, with availability close to 99.99%. These figures reinforce its message to companies that demand a stable infrastructure.
Polygon transforms its strategy around stablecoins This progression did not happen by chance. Polygon Labs has refocused a large part of its strategy on payments and stablecoins, at the expense of a positioning solely focused on DeFi or NFTs. The company has invested in Coinme and Sequence to strengthen its infrastructure. Coinme facilitates entries and exits between traditional currencies and digital assets. Sequence provides wallet and interoperability tools.
Polygon is also developing its Open Money Stack. This infrastructure aims to bring together payments, wallets, compliance, and cross-blockchain transfers within a single environment.
Latin America occupies an important place in this offensive. Polygon reportedly processed about 309 million dollars of Latin American stablecoins in May. Tokens indexed to the Brazilian real or the Colombian peso meet local needs that USDT does not always cover.
In economies marked by inflation or costly bank transfers, stablecoins become more than just a trading tool. They are used to pay, save, receive a salary, or transfer money between countries.
Activity explodes, but POL token remains aside The growth of stablecoins does not yet clearly benefit the price of the POL crypto. Polygon’s native token remains under pressure despite the increase in transactions and the network’s repositioning. This discrepancy shows that using a blockchain does not automatically guarantee an increase in its token. Users can transfer USDC or USDT while only keeping a minimal amount of POL to pay fees.
Polygon also faces strong competition. Ethereum and Tron still host the largest stablecoin reserves. Solana, on its side, attracts high-throughput applications, traders, and services aimed at artificial intelligence agents. The real test will therefore be over time. Polygon will have to maintain its lead in the number of transactions and attract more companies. It will also have to turn this activity into sustainable revenue for its ecosystem.
The 79.25 billion dollars processed in May nevertheless marks a milestone. Stablecoins are gradually leaving trading platforms to become a payment infrastructure. Polygon takes a lead, but Solana is already preparing the next battle with automated payments.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Evans S.
Fascinated by Bitcoin since 2017, Evariste has continuously researched the subject. While his initial interest was in trading, he now actively seeks to understand all advances centered on cryptocurrencies. As an editor, he strives to consistently deliver high-quality work that reflects the state of the sector as a whole.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Cryptocurrency Stellar (XLM) has handed investors an unexpected gift disguised as market panic, and while the project's team is preparing to launch complex financial infrastructure under the umbrella of DTCC, the coin's price is showing a steep decline.
As Q2 2026 concludes, XLM slips to $0.17167, falling back below its 200-week moving average and fully erasing its spring momentum, as per TradingView. However, for those who consciously ignored the May hype because of inflated prices, this pullback opens up an entirely different perspective.
The key to spotting this hidden opportunity lies not in the depth of the drop, but in the structural anomaly of the trendline itself.
HOT Stories
Stellar (XLM) token price chart with 200-week moving average, Source: TradingViewA look at the weekly chart is enough to see how uniquely the 200-week curve is behaving for XLM. Instead of the usual market waves, it has turned into an almost perfectly horizontal line since mid-2022.
For nearly four years, it served as a virtually impenetrable resistance level for the price — an insurmountable resistance level that Stellar could not break from below. A short-term breakout above this line happened in May, but the price failed to consolidate above it just two weeks before the year's main trigger.
The "buy the rumor" effectWhat is happening on exchanges looks illogical when viewed against the project's calendar, because the first live tests of the tokenization platform from clearing giant DTCC are set to begin on July 13, 2026, with Stellar chosen as the base network. At stake is the digitization of Russell 1000 stocks and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Institutional integration of this scale with Wall Street has not disappeared — the real value of the technology remains the same. Only the exchange price has changed.
You Might Also Like
In practice, the cynical market mechanism of "buy the rumor, sell the news" has played out, and the entire May rally triggered by the announcements was fully liquidated over four weeks in June. While engineers were configuring blockchain gateways for the U.S. financial market, short-term speculators were locking in profits and moving into cash as a safe haven along with falling Bitcoin, artificially pushing the asset's price lower.
The coming days will show whether this legendary horizontal level can hold. If the weekly candle closes deep below $0.18244, Stellar risks getting temporarily stuck under this overhang, with a local pullback toward $0.140, which would only increase the discount for investors waiting on the sidelines.
Stellar’s ambitions in the tokenization sector have come into sharper focus this year, but the price of XLM, its native token, saw a sharp retreat near the close of the second quarter. According to TradingView data, XLM slipped to $0.17167, falling back below its 200-week moving average for the first time since earlier in the spring. As a result, much of the upward momentum gained during the spring months has dissipated.
Key long-term technical threshold in focusOn the weekly chart, the most notable feature has been the nearly flat trajectory of the 200-week moving average since mid-2022. For an extended period—almost four years—this level has served as a formidable resistance zone for XLM. While the price briefly broke above this barrier in May, it failed to sustain the move.
With its strong historical significance, this region is once again at the center of attention for market participants. How XLM’s weekly close shapes up around this threshold in the coming days is likely to play a decisive role in the token’s short-term direction.
If XLM records a weekly close clearly below $0.18244, the risk emerges for a further pullback toward the $0.140 region.
Divergence between DTCC project timeline and market pricingA striking disconnect has become evident between XLM’s price action and the project’s longer-term roadmap. The first live tests of the DTCC’s tokenization platform are scheduled to begin on July 13, 2026, with Stellar serving as the underlying network. The initiative aims to tokenize Russell 1000 stocks and US Treasury securities, bringing them on-chain in a digital environment.
DTCC is regarded as a central player in the US securities settlement and custody infrastructure, and the ongoing collaboration with Stellar is closely watched by institutional stakeholders. As such, the integration tests linked to Stellar are considered pivotal for assessing the potential of blockchain integration in traditional finance.
Mini glossary: The DTCC, or Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, is a major US market infrastructure provider responsible for the clearing and settlement of securities transactions. Tokenization refers to representing real-world assets such as stocks or bonds as digital tokens on a blockchain network.
Institutional-scale integration remains firmly on the agenda; what has changed is not the scope of the technology’s application, but only the market price on exchanges.
May gains reversed throughout JuneThe recent market moves in XLM appear to mirror a classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” pattern. Gains sparked by developments in May were erased over the four weeks of June, as short-term investors opted to take profits. Additionally, weakening risk appetite due to ongoing softness in Bitcoin contributed to the renewed downward pressure on XLM.
As selling intensified, investors with a longer horizon have found new grounds for reassessment. While preparations for institutional blockchain infrastructure continue, short-term market sentiment pushed XLM’s price lower for now.
Technically, the nearest critical level remains $0.18244. If the price stays below this threshold, a further correction toward $0.140 remains in play. Conversely, reclaiming this key level could signal that the late-quarter decline is merely a temporary disruption rather than a lasting trend.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Arista Networks (ANET - Free Report) is one of the stocks most watched by Zacks.com visitors lately. So, it might be a good idea to review some of the factors that might affect the near-term performance of the stock.
Over the past month, shares of this cloud networking company have returned -1.2%, compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.9% change. During this period, the Zacks Internet - Software industry, which Arista Networks falls in, has lost 5.2%. The key question now is: What could be the stock's future direction?
Although media reports or rumors about a significant change in a company's business prospects usually cause its stock to trend and lead to an immediate price change, there are always certain fundamental factors that ultimately drive the buy-and-hold decision.
Earnings Estimate RevisionsRather than focusing on anything else, we at Zacks prioritize evaluating the change in a company's earnings projection. This is because we believe the fair value for its stock is determined by the present value of its future stream of earnings.
We essentially look at how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to reflect the impact of the latest business trends. And if earnings estimates go up for a company, the fair value for its stock goes up. A higher fair value than the current market price drives investors' interest in buying the stock, leading to its price moving higher. This is why empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.
For the current quarter, Arista Networks is expected to post earnings of $0.89 per share, indicating a change of +21.9% from the year-ago quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
The consensus earnings estimate of $3.63 for the current fiscal year indicates a year-over-year change of +21.8%. This estimate has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $4.39 indicates a change of +20.8% from what Arista Networks is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed +0.1%.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, Arista Networks is rated Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Projected Revenue GrowthEven though a company's earnings growth is arguably the best indicator of its financial health, nothing much happens if it cannot raise its revenues. It's almost impossible for a company to grow its earnings without growing its revenue for long periods. Therefore, knowing a company's potential revenue growth is crucial.
In the case of Arista Networks, the consensus sales estimate of $2.82 billion for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of +28%. The $11.58 billion and $13.97 billion estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of +28.6% and +20.6%, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryArista Networks reported revenues of $2.71 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +35.1%. EPS of $0.87 for the same period compares with $0.65 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.62 billion, the reported revenues represent a surprise of +3.48%. The EPS surprise was +7.41%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates each time over this period.
ValuationWithout considering a stock's valuation, no investment decision can be efficient. In predicting a stock's future price performance, it's crucial to determine whether its current price correctly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects.
While comparing the current values of a company's valuation multiples, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), with its own historical values helps determine whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of the reasonability of the stock's price.
The Zacks Value Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which pays close attention to both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics to grade stocks from A to F (an A is better than a B; a B is better than a C; and so on), is pretty helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
Arista Networks is graded F on this front, indicating that it is trading at a premium to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
Bottom LineThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Arista Networks. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT / ACCESS Newswire / June 29, 2026 / FatPipe, Inc. (NASDAQ:FATN) ("FatPipe" or the "Company"), a pioneer and multiple patents holder in enterprise-class software-defined wide area networking (SD-WAN) and single-stack cybersecurity solutions, today announced that it qualified to continue as a member of the Russell Microcap® Index following the June 2026 Russell indexes semi-annual reconstitution, effective when the U.S. market opens on June 29.
The June reconstitution of the Russell U.S. indexes captures up to the 4,000 largest U.S. stocks as of April 30, ranking them by total market capitalization. Membership in the Russell Microcap® Index, which remains in place for half a year beginning 2026, means automatic inclusion in the appropriate growth and value style indexes. FTSE Russell determines membership for its Russell indexes primarily by objective, market-capitalization rankings and style attributes.
FatPipe was first added to the Russell Microcap® Index and the Russell 3000E™ Index in June 2025.
Dr. Ragula Bhaskar, CEO of FatPipe, Inc. comments:
"We are proud to continue our inclusion in the Russell Microcap® Index and the Russell 3000E™ Index for the second consecutive year. Since our initial addition in June 2025, FatPipe has delivered significant growth, including 90% year-over-year quarterly revenue growth and 18% full-year revenue growth in fiscal 2026, while expanding our channel through strategic partnerships such as TD SYNNEX. As we continue to scale our platform and bring next-generation SD-WAN, SASE, and cybersecurity solutions to enterprises modernizing their network infrastructure, our continued Russell index membership reflects the momentum we are building. We remain focused on driving sustainable growth and creating long-term value for our shareholders."
Russell indexes are widely used by investment managers and institutional investors for index funds and as benchmarks for active investment strategies. According to data as of the end of June 2025, about $12.2 trillion in assets are benchmarked against the Russell U.S. indexes, which belong to FTSE Russell, the global index provider.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this press release, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "continue," or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management's current expectations and are inherently subject to various risks, uncertainties, assumptions, or changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict or quantify. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in FatPipe's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, FatPipe expressly disclaims a duty to provide updates to forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or other occurrences.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.
About FatPipe Inc.
FatPipe, Inc. (NASDAQ:FATN) pioneered the concept of software-defined wide area networking (SD-WAN) and hybrid WANs that eliminate the need for hardware and software or cooperation from ISPs, and allows companies and service providers to control multi-link network traffic. FatPipe introduced Total Security 360, a single-stack cybersecurity and network security solution providing control over data within company and sovereign boundaries. FatPipe currently has 13 U.S. patents related to multipath, software-defined networking. FatPipe products are sold by 200+ resellers worldwide. For more information, visit www.fatpipe.com. Follow us on X @FatPipe_Inc.
About FTSE Russell, an LSEG Business
FTSE Russell is a global index leader that provides innovative benchmarking, analytics and data solutions for investors worldwide. FTSE Russell calculates thousands of indexes that measure and benchmark markets and asset classes in more than 70 countries, covering 98% of the investable market globally.
FTSE Russell index expertise and products are used extensively by institutional and retail investors globally. Approximately $21.20 trillion is benchmarked to FTSE Russell indexes. Leading asset owners, asset managers, ETF providers and investment banks choose FTSE Russell indexes to benchmark their investment performance and create ETFs, structured products and index-based derivatives.
A core set of universal principles guides FTSE Russell index design and management: a transparent rules-based methodology is informed by independent committees of leading market participants. FTSE Russell is focused on applying the highest industry standards in index design and governance and embraces the IOSCO Principles. FTSE Russell is also focused on index innovation and customer partnerships as it seeks to enhance the breadth, depth and reach of its offering.
FTSE Russell is wholly owned by LSEG.
For more information, visit FTSE Russell.
Contacts:
Vikrant Ragula
Director of Investor Relations
FatPipe Networks
+1 801.683-5656 x 1140 [email protected]
Key Takeaways BTSG, KNSA, ATI and VMI were selected for strong net profit margins.Each stock has witnessed upward EPS estimate revisions for the current fiscal year.All four picks have a Zacks Rank of 1 or 2 and solid VGM Scores, suggesting further upside potential. Net profit, also referred to as the bottom line, is one of the key tools to determine the financial health of an enterprise. The metric demonstrates a company’s ability to convert per-dollar sales into profits.
A low profit margin indicates higher risks, implying that a revenue drop might dampen profits, pushing a company into the red. However, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. (BTSG - Free Report) , Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc (KNSA - Free Report) , ATI Inc. (ATI - Free Report) and Valmont Industries, Inc. (VMI - Free Report) boast solid net profit margins.
Net Profit Margin = Net profit/Sales * 100
In simple terms, net profit is the amount a company retains after deducting all costs, interest, depreciation, taxes and other expenses. In fact, net profit margin can turn out to be a potent point of reference to gauge the strength of a company’s operations and its cost-control measures.
Also, higher net profit is essential for rewarding stakeholders. Further, strength in the metric not only attracts investors but also draws well-skilled employees who eventually enhance business value.
Moreover, a higher net profit margin compared with peers provides a company with a competitive edge.
Pros and ConsNet profit margin helps investors gain clarity on a company’s business model in terms of pricing policy, cost structure and manufacturing efficiency. Hence, a strong net profit margin is preferred by all classes of investors.
However, net profit margin, as an investment criterion, has its share of pitfalls. The metric varies widely from industry to industry. While net income is a key metric for investment measurement in traditional industries, it is not that important for technology companies.
In addition, the difference in accounting treatment of various items — especially non-cash expenses like depreciation and stock-based compensation — makes comparison a daunting task.
Furthermore, for companies preferring to grow with debt instead of equity funding, higher interest expenses usually weigh on net profit. In such cases, the measure is rendered ineffective while analyzing a company’s performance.
The Winning StrategyA healthy net profit margin and solid EPS growth are the two most sought-after elements in a business model.
Apart from these, we have added a few criteria to ensure maximum returns from this strategy.
Screening ParametersNet Margin 12 months – Most Recent (%) greater than equal to 0: A high net profit margin indicates solid profitability.
Percentage Change in EPS F(0)/(F-1) greater than equal to 0: It indicates earnings growth.
Average Broker Rating (1-5) equal to 1: A rating of #1 indicates brokers’ extreme bullishness on the stock.
Zacks Rank less than or equal to 2: Stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) generally perform better than their peers in all types of market environments.
VGM Score of A or B: Our research shows that stocks with a VGM Score of A or B, when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 or 2, offer the best upside potential.
Here we discuss our four picks from the 11 stocks that qualified the screen:
BrightSpring Health Services provides complementary home and community-based pharmacy and health solutions. The stock sports a Zacks Rank #1 and has a VGM Score of B. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for BrightSpring Health Services’ 2026 earnings has moved upward by 16 cents to $1.67 per share over the past 60 days. BTSG outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate thrice in the trailing four quarters while missing the same on one occasion, with the average surprise being 14.61%.
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical company developing and commercializing novel therapies for diseases with unmet need, with a focus on cardiovascular indications. The stock currently sports a Zacks Rank of 1 and has a VGM Score of B.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals’ 2026 earnings has been revised upward by 13.8% over the past 60 days to $1.24 per share. KNSA beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate twice in the trailing four quarters while missing on two occasions, the average surprise being 1.53%.
ATI is a diversified specialty materials producer. It has two main business segments, High Performance Materials & Components, and Advanced Alloys & Solutions. The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of 2 and has a VGM Score of B.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ATI’s 2026 earnings has been revised upward to $4.43 per share from $4.20 in the past 60 days. ATI outperformed the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 8.56%.
Valmont Industries is primarily engaged in the production of fabricated metal products, metal and concrete pole and tower structures, and mechanized irrigation systems in the United States and abroad. The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of 2 and has a VGM Score of B.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Valmont Industries’ 2026 earnings has moved upward by 5 cents to $22.83 per share over the past 30 days. VMI outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate thrice in the trailing four quarters while missing the same on one occasion, with the average surprise being 6.71%.
Ultragenyx (RARE) saw its shares surge in the last session with trading volume being higher than average. The latest trend in earnings estimate revisions may not translate into further price increase in the near term.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Kraken is set to list the Bittensor subnet Alpha token.
Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of Digital Currency Group (DCG), parent company of Grayscale, reposted on X to disclose that crypto exchange Kraken is set to list Alpha tokens from Bittensor subnets. According to leaked details, the first batch of tokens to be listed includes Chutes, Targon, Score, Ridges AI, Hippius, and others.
1 seconds ago
Trump: Will Take Immediate Action on Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s Eligibility for Her Position
US President Trump stated that in the lawsuit over the eligibility of Federal Reserve Governor Cook, the Supreme Court remanded the case to a lower court solely on procedural grounds. We will immediately take appropriate action to ensure that individuals who have engaged in misconduct do not continue to make decisions on major matters related to the well-being of the United States.
1 seconds ago
Castle Securities warns that the Federal Reserve’s policies will become more stringent.
Castle Securities stated that investors have underestimated Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s resolve to curb inflation, warning that higher interest rates could put pressure on risk assets. The firm also cautioned that the rally in the artificial intelligence market faces growing risks, including weak demand, declining returns, and intensified political and regulatory scrutiny.
1 seconds ago
X's Android version of XChat is now live.
According to official announcements, the Android version of X’s chat application XChat is now available, allowing users to hold private chats with friends directly within X. The iOS version of XChat launched on the App Store on April 25.
1 seconds ago
Ripple has launched an XRPL lending protocol, with developers now able to integrate and test it on the testnet.
Ripple has launched the XRPL Lending Protocol, an on-chain credit infrastructure for tokenized assets. The protocol’s core principle is to keep credit assessment off-chain while only standardizing execution processes on-chain. Institutions handle their own underwriting and compliance reviews, with the protocol responsible for standardized execution of liquidity pooling, loan disbursement, repayment, and default handling. The protocol comprises two components: the Single Asset Vault, which manages on-chain pooling of individual assets; and the Lending Protocol, which disburses vault liquidity as loans with clear terms. The two correspond to the XLS-65 and XLS-66 proposals respectively and are pending approval from validator nodes. At the infrastructure level, the protocol supports a subordinated capital mechanism, where pool managers assume risk exposure senior to that of other liquidity providers. Developers can now access and test the protocol on the devnet.
1 seconds ago
阿曼外交大臣：不支持收取霍尔木兹海峡通行费
Local time on the 29th, Oman’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs released excerpts from an interview with Foreign Minister Badr. Badr stated that Oman is committed to maintaining a safe, peaceful, and free navigation environment for all parties in the Strait of Hormuz. He pointed out that Oman and Iran have reached a consensus in their ongoing dialogues that any future arrangements related to the Strait of Hormuz must be conducted within the framework of international law. Addressing the widely discussed transit fee issue, Badr said Oman does not support levying tolls on passing vessels, though he did not rule out the possibility of exploring mechanisms related to maritime services. Badr added that topics such as strengthening navigation safety, improving maritime accident emergency response capabilities, and preventing marine pollution could be discussed, with reference to practices from other straits. He noted that such arrangements would be developed in consultation with countries and shipping companies that use the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to enhance maritime services and ensure navigation safety rather than imposing new burdens on global trade. (CCTV News)
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Kraken is set to list the Bittensor subnet Alpha token.
Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of Digital Currency Group (DCG), parent company of Grayscale, reposted on X to disclose that crypto exchange Kraken is set to list Alpha tokens from Bittensor subnets. According to leaked details, the first batch of tokens to be listed includes Chutes, Targon, Score, Ridges AI, Hippius, and others.
1 seconds ago
Trump: Will Take Immediate Action on Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s Eligibility for Her Position
US President Trump stated that in the lawsuit over the eligibility of Federal Reserve Governor Cook, the Supreme Court remanded the case to a lower court solely on procedural grounds. We will immediately take appropriate action to ensure that individuals who have engaged in misconduct do not continue to make decisions on major matters related to the well-being of the United States.
1 seconds ago
Castle Securities warns that the Federal Reserve’s policies will become more stringent.
Castle Securities stated that investors have underestimated Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s resolve to curb inflation, warning that higher interest rates could put pressure on risk assets. The firm also cautioned that the rally in the artificial intelligence market faces growing risks, including weak demand, declining returns, and intensified political and regulatory scrutiny.
1 seconds ago
X's Android version of XChat is now live.
According to official announcements, the Android version of X’s chat application XChat is now available, allowing users to hold private chats with friends directly within X. The iOS version of XChat launched on the App Store on April 25.
1 seconds ago
Ripple has launched an XRPL lending protocol, with developers now able to integrate and test it on the testnet.
Ripple has launched the XRPL Lending Protocol, an on-chain credit infrastructure for tokenized assets. The protocol’s core principle is to keep credit assessment off-chain while only standardizing execution processes on-chain. Institutions handle their own underwriting and compliance reviews, with the protocol responsible for standardized execution of liquidity pooling, loan disbursement, repayment, and default handling. The protocol comprises two components: the Single Asset Vault, which manages on-chain pooling of individual assets; and the Lending Protocol, which disburses vault liquidity as loans with clear terms. The two correspond to the XLS-65 and XLS-66 proposals respectively and are pending approval from validator nodes. At the infrastructure level, the protocol supports a subordinated capital mechanism, where pool managers assume risk exposure senior to that of other liquidity providers. Developers can now access and test the protocol on the devnet.
1 seconds ago
阿曼外交大臣：不支持收取霍尔木兹海峡通行费
Local time on the 29th, Oman’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs released excerpts from an interview with Foreign Minister Badr. Badr stated that Oman is committed to maintaining a safe, peaceful, and free navigation environment for all parties in the Strait of Hormuz. He pointed out that Oman and Iran have reached a consensus in their ongoing dialogues that any future arrangements related to the Strait of Hormuz must be conducted within the framework of international law. Addressing the widely discussed transit fee issue, Badr said Oman does not support levying tolls on passing vessels, though he did not rule out the possibility of exploring mechanisms related to maritime services. Badr added that topics such as strengthening navigation safety, improving maritime accident emergency response capabilities, and preventing marine pollution could be discussed, with reference to practices from other straits. He noted that such arrangements would be developed in consultation with countries and shipping companies that use the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to enhance maritime services and ensure navigation safety rather than imposing new burdens on global trade. (CCTV News)
Hyper Foundation will allocate about $10 million in grants to help builders affected by the USDH sunset. The funding is meant to cover migration and wind-down costs as the Hyperliquid ecosystem moves more trading activity toward USDC.
Summary
Hyper Foundation will fund builders affected by the USDH sunset with about $10m in grants. Eligible teams include HIP-1, HIP-3, HyperEVM protocols, bridges and Native Markets. The grant plan supports a wider move from USDH markets toward deeper USDC liquidity. “Hyper Foundation announced approximately $10 million in grants to help builders affected by the USDH sunset, covering migration and wind-down costs,” Wu Blockchain said. The post said eligible recipients include HIP-1 and HIP-3 deployers, HyperEVM protocols, USDH bridges and Native Markets.
Hyper Foundation Allocates $10M in Grants to Support USDH Migration
Hyper Foundation announced approximately $10 million in grants to help builders affected by the USDH sunset, covering migration and wind-down costs. Grants will be distributed to eligible HIP-1 and HIP-3… pic.twitter.com/Hwy7ZNwswz
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) June 28, 2026 The grants come with a clear deadline. Recipients must complete migrations or orderly shutdowns by the end of July. The plan gives affected builders a limited period to update markets, move liquidity, adjust bridges or close USDH-related services.
Eligible builders face July deadline HIP-1 deployers relate to spot market deployments, while HIP-3 deployers relate to perpetual market deployments. Both groups may need support because USDH served as a quote asset or liquidity route for some products. HyperEVM protocols and USDH bridge operators may also face direct technical changes.
Native Markets is also listed among eligible grant recipients. The firm won the validator vote to issue USDH in September 2025, beating larger bidders such as Paxos, Frax and Ethena. Its plan aimed to return reserve yield to the ecosystem through HYPE buybacks and ecosystem support.
The migration affects users as well as builders. Users holding USDH may need to convert balances, close positions or follow protocol-level migration steps. The officialUSDH migration page says the dashboard supports USDH to USDC and u.s. dollar fiat conversions until July 17, while the USDH/USDC spot order book will remain available.
USDC becomes the main stablecoin route The grant program follows Hyperliquid’s wider move toward USDC. Coinbase became the official USDC treasury deployer on Hyperliquid in May, strengtheningUSDC as the aligned quote asset across the ecosystem. The deal also gave Coinbase the right to purchase USDH brand assets from Native Markets.
“USDH remains fully backed and maintained, with feeless conversions into USDC and fiat for onboarded customers available on dashboard.usdh.com,” Native Markets said. The statement means users still have conversion routes while USDH markets move through the transition.
The shift marks a change from the original USDH strategy. USDH launched to reduce reliance on outside stablecoin issuers and keep more reserve yield inside Hyperliquid. However, two stablecoin systems can split liquidity and add friction for traders. A move back toward USDC may simplify markets and reduce conversion steps.
Migration plan follows earlier stablecoin race The USDH sunset follows a competitive stablecoin race that drew wide attention across DeFi. Hyperliquid validators voted on the USDH ticker after proposals from Native Markets, Paxos, Frax, Agora and other teams.USDH later launched in a USDH/USDC pair and recorded more than $2 million in early trading.
The new grant plan now focuses on cleanup rather than expansion. Builders may need to change collateral settings, update front ends, move liquidity, close markets or support users during withdrawals. The July deadline gives the ecosystem a short window to finish those steps.
For Hyperliquid, the grants may reduce the risk of unfinished integrations and stranded liquidity. They also give builders a financial reason to complete the transition on time. The move shows how stablecoin strategy can change quickly when trading venues balance liquidity depth, user experience and reserve-yield economics.
Hyperliquid’s [HYPE] stablecoin market is becoming increasingly concentrated as liquidity continues shifting toward USD Coin [USDC] instead of the native USDH.
The trend reflects traders’ preference for deeper liquidity and established settlement assets over newer DeFi-native stablecoins.
Hyperliquid Foundation has put out roughly $10 million in grants to assist in migration costs and ensure that each of its protocols continues to run smoothly. Those are HIP-1, HIP-3, HyperEVM protocols, bridges, and native markets.
Source: X In addition, users can swap their USDH for USDC through the same migration paths, reducing friction during the transition.
According to DeFiLlama, USDC now dominates Hyperliquid’s stablecoin liquidity.
In fact, USDC accounts for $5.74 billion of Hyperliquid’s $5.96 billion stablecoin pool. Conversely, USDH holdings have fallen sharply to just $20 million.
Source: DeFiLlama Meanwhile, Tether [USDT] trails at around $155 million. These figures clearly indicate that network effects are supporting the growing dominance of USDC.
This imbalance suggests network effects are reinforcing USDC’s leadership, making it the preferred collateral across spot and perpetual markets. If institutional activity continues expanding, USDC’s dominance could strengthen further.
Otherwise, USDH would require meaningful utility improvements to regain market share.
Protocol activity reinforces HYPE utility That orderly migration is already translating into stronger on-chain activity as Hyperliquid continues expanding around its USDC-first model. The shift did not disrupt the user participation.
It allowed for a sustained level of approximately 6,932 Daily Active Addresses and over 315,000 Daily Transactions, according to DeFiLlama data.
Meanwhile, Perpetual Trading Volume remained near $2.8 billion, reinforcing Hyperliquid’s leadership in on-chain derivatives.
Growing activity also generates Annualized Fee Revenue in the hundreds of millions, creating recurring value for the ecosystem. Those fees increasingly flow into HYPE through staking, priority fees, buybacks, and incentives instead of relying mainly on speculation.
If trading activity and USDC liquidity continue growing together, HYPE’s long-term value capture could strengthen further. Otherwise, slower network activity may gradually reduce revenue growth.
Kraken is set to list the Bittensor subnet Alpha token.
Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of Digital Currency Group (DCG), parent company of Grayscale, reposted on X to disclose that crypto exchange Kraken is set to list Alpha tokens from Bittensor subnets. According to leaked details, the first batch of tokens to be listed includes Chutes, Targon, Score, Ridges AI, Hippius, and others.
1 seconds ago
Trump: Will Take Immediate Action on Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s Eligibility for Her Position
US President Trump stated that in the lawsuit over the eligibility of Federal Reserve Governor Cook, the Supreme Court remanded the case to a lower court solely on procedural grounds. We will immediately take appropriate action to ensure that individuals who have engaged in misconduct do not continue to make decisions on major matters related to the well-being of the United States.
1 seconds ago
Castle Securities warns that the Federal Reserve’s policies will become more stringent.
Castle Securities stated that investors have underestimated Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s resolve to curb inflation, warning that higher interest rates could put pressure on risk assets. The firm also cautioned that the rally in the artificial intelligence market faces growing risks, including weak demand, declining returns, and intensified political and regulatory scrutiny.
1 seconds ago
X's Android version of XChat is now live.
According to official announcements, the Android version of X’s chat application XChat is now available, allowing users to hold private chats with friends directly within X. The iOS version of XChat launched on the App Store on April 25.
1 seconds ago
Ripple has launched an XRPL lending protocol, with developers now able to integrate and test it on the testnet.
Ripple has launched the XRPL Lending Protocol, an on-chain credit infrastructure for tokenized assets. The protocol’s core principle is to keep credit assessment off-chain while only standardizing execution processes on-chain. Institutions handle their own underwriting and compliance reviews, with the protocol responsible for standardized execution of liquidity pooling, loan disbursement, repayment, and default handling. The protocol comprises two components: the Single Asset Vault, which manages on-chain pooling of individual assets; and the Lending Protocol, which disburses vault liquidity as loans with clear terms. The two correspond to the XLS-65 and XLS-66 proposals respectively and are pending approval from validator nodes. At the infrastructure level, the protocol supports a subordinated capital mechanism, where pool managers assume risk exposure senior to that of other liquidity providers. Developers can now access and test the protocol on the devnet.
1 seconds ago
阿曼外交大臣：不支持收取霍尔木兹海峡通行费
Local time on the 29th, Oman’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs released excerpts from an interview with Foreign Minister Badr. Badr stated that Oman is committed to maintaining a safe, peaceful, and free navigation environment for all parties in the Strait of Hormuz. He pointed out that Oman and Iran have reached a consensus in their ongoing dialogues that any future arrangements related to the Strait of Hormuz must be conducted within the framework of international law. Addressing the widely discussed transit fee issue, Badr said Oman does not support levying tolls on passing vessels, though he did not rule out the possibility of exploring mechanisms related to maritime services. Badr added that topics such as strengthening navigation safety, improving maritime accident emergency response capabilities, and preventing marine pollution could be discussed, with reference to practices from other straits. He noted that such arrangements would be developed in consultation with countries and shipping companies that use the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to enhance maritime services and ensure navigation safety rather than imposing new burdens on global trade. (CCTV News)
BNY has expanded its partnership with Circle to launch new institutional stablecoin services, allowing clients to custody, transfer, mint and burn USDC through BNY’s Digital Asset Custody platform, the company announced Monday.
BNY’s Digital Asset Custody platform provides institutional investors with regulated custody and servicing for digital assets such as bitcoin, ether and tokenized securities. Designed to bridge traditional finance and blockchain, it integrates digital asset custody with banking services including payments, liquidity management and operational support.
Advertisement
The offering makes Circle’s flagship stablecoin the platform’s first supported stablecoin and extends BNY’s role as custodian of USDC reserves.
According to the company, clients can now hold USDC in BNY custody while directing Circle to issue or redeem tokens against US dollars, creating a direct connection between traditional cash management and digital asset custody.
BNY said the integrated platform is designed to support institutional adoption of digital assets by bringing blockchain-based transactions into existing financial workflows, with plans to support additional stablecoins over time.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Kraken is set to list the Bittensor subnet Alpha token.
Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of Digital Currency Group (DCG), parent company of Grayscale, reposted on X to disclose that crypto exchange Kraken is set to list Alpha tokens from Bittensor subnets. According to leaked details, the first batch of tokens to be listed includes Chutes, Targon, Score, Ridges AI, Hippius, and others.
1 seconds ago
Trump: Will Take Immediate Action on Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s Eligibility for Her Position
US President Trump stated that in the lawsuit over the eligibility of Federal Reserve Governor Cook, the Supreme Court remanded the case to a lower court solely on procedural grounds. We will immediately take appropriate action to ensure that individuals who have engaged in misconduct do not continue to make decisions on major matters related to the well-being of the United States.
1 seconds ago
Castle Securities warns that the Federal Reserve’s policies will become more stringent.
Castle Securities stated that investors have underestimated Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s resolve to curb inflation, warning that higher interest rates could put pressure on risk assets. The firm also cautioned that the rally in the artificial intelligence market faces growing risks, including weak demand, declining returns, and intensified political and regulatory scrutiny.
1 seconds ago
X's Android version of XChat is now live.
According to official announcements, the Android version of X’s chat application XChat is now available, allowing users to hold private chats with friends directly within X. The iOS version of XChat launched on the App Store on April 25.
1 seconds ago
Ripple has launched an XRPL lending protocol, with developers now able to integrate and test it on the testnet.
Ripple has launched the XRPL Lending Protocol, an on-chain credit infrastructure for tokenized assets. The protocol’s core principle is to keep credit assessment off-chain while only standardizing execution processes on-chain. Institutions handle their own underwriting and compliance reviews, with the protocol responsible for standardized execution of liquidity pooling, loan disbursement, repayment, and default handling. The protocol comprises two components: the Single Asset Vault, which manages on-chain pooling of individual assets; and the Lending Protocol, which disburses vault liquidity as loans with clear terms. The two correspond to the XLS-65 and XLS-66 proposals respectively and are pending approval from validator nodes. At the infrastructure level, the protocol supports a subordinated capital mechanism, where pool managers assume risk exposure senior to that of other liquidity providers. Developers can now access and test the protocol on the devnet.
1 seconds ago
阿曼外交大臣：不支持收取霍尔木兹海峡通行费
Local time on the 29th, Oman’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs released excerpts from an interview with Foreign Minister Badr. Badr stated that Oman is committed to maintaining a safe, peaceful, and free navigation environment for all parties in the Strait of Hormuz. He pointed out that Oman and Iran have reached a consensus in their ongoing dialogues that any future arrangements related to the Strait of Hormuz must be conducted within the framework of international law. Addressing the widely discussed transit fee issue, Badr said Oman does not support levying tolls on passing vessels, though he did not rule out the possibility of exploring mechanisms related to maritime services. Badr added that topics such as strengthening navigation safety, improving maritime accident emergency response capabilities, and preventing marine pollution could be discussed, with reference to practices from other straits. He noted that such arrangements would be developed in consultation with countries and shipping companies that use the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to enhance maritime services and ensure navigation safety rather than imposing new burdens on global trade. (CCTV News)
Bitcoin infrastructure company Breez has added a feature to its developer toolkit that lets users send USDC (USDC) and USDt (USDT) across more than 30 blockchain networks directly from a Bitcoin balance, without first converting or holding stablecoins.
According to an announcement shared with Cointelegraph, the feature uses the Lightning Network alongside automated conversion to route payments from Bitcoin (BTC) to USDC or USDT before delivering funds to the recipient's preferred blockchain.
When a user enters a recipient's wallet address, the Breez SDK identifies the destination blockchain, calculates a conversion route and displays the amount, network and fees before the payment is confirmed. The transaction is then routed through liquidity providers, including Flashnet and Boltz, which convert the sender's Bitcoin into stablecoins and deliver it on the recipient's chosen blockchain.
Roy Sheinfeld, CEO of Breez, told Cointelegraph the feature does not require USDT or USDC to be issued on the Lightning Network. Instead, it relies on "interoperability" to let users spend from a Bitcoin balance while recipients receive stablecoins on supported blockchain networks.
Breez said users continue holding Bitcoin until they initiate a payment, while recipients receive stablecoins on their preferred blockchain without requiring the sender to manage separate stablecoin balances. The feature is non-custodial and initially supports only outbound stablecoin payments, with support for receiving stablecoins from external blockchain networks planned for a future release.
The feature is designed to allow developers to add stablecoin payments without integrating multiple blockchain networks or requiring users to manage separate Bitcoin and stablecoin balances.
Bitcoin payment infrastructure expandsThe launch comes as companies expand Bitcoin and the Lightning Network, a layer-2 payment network designed to make Bitcoin transactions faster and less expensive, into new financial and commercial applications.
In February, Secure Digital Markets, an institutional trading and lending desk, completed a $1 million Bitcoin payment to Kraken over the Lightning Network in less than half a second, demonstrating the protocol's potential for high-value institutional transfers. The transaction illustrated how Lightning is increasingly being tested for use cases beyond small retail payments.
That same month, Bitcoin infrastructure company Voltage introduced a US dollar-settled revolving credit line that embeds business credit into Lightning payment flows, allowing companies to settle repayments in either US dollars or Bitcoin. The product is intended to enable businesses to access working capital using Lightning for payments, without holding crypto on their balance sheets.
Event platform Satlantis also launched a Bitcoin-native ticketing platform with embedded Lightning wallets, allowing organizers to sell tickets and accept BTC alongside traditional payment methods.
In March, Tether-backed Bitcoin infrastructure startup Ark Labs in a $5.2 million funding round to develop technology supporting stablecoin issuance, transfers and settlement on Bitcoin.
Lightning adoption has continued to grow. A February report from River estimated the network surpassed $1 billion in monthly transaction volume in late 2025, up from around $12 million in 2021.
Lightning Network transaction volumes continue to grow. Source: River
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Kraken is set to list the Bittensor subnet Alpha token.
Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of Digital Currency Group (DCG), parent company of Grayscale, reposted on X to disclose that crypto exchange Kraken is set to list Alpha tokens from Bittensor subnets. According to leaked details, the first batch of tokens to be listed includes Chutes, Targon, Score, Ridges AI, Hippius, and others.
1 seconds ago
Trump: Will Take Immediate Action on Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s Eligibility for Her Position
US President Trump stated that in the lawsuit over the eligibility of Federal Reserve Governor Cook, the Supreme Court remanded the case to a lower court solely on procedural grounds. We will immediately take appropriate action to ensure that individuals who have engaged in misconduct do not continue to make decisions on major matters related to the well-being of the United States.
1 seconds ago
Castle Securities warns that the Federal Reserve’s policies will become more stringent.
Castle Securities stated that investors have underestimated Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s resolve to curb inflation, warning that higher interest rates could put pressure on risk assets. The firm also cautioned that the rally in the artificial intelligence market faces growing risks, including weak demand, declining returns, and intensified political and regulatory scrutiny.
1 seconds ago
X's Android version of XChat is now live.
According to official announcements, the Android version of X’s chat application XChat is now available, allowing users to hold private chats with friends directly within X. The iOS version of XChat launched on the App Store on April 25.
1 seconds ago
Ripple has launched an XRPL lending protocol, with developers now able to integrate and test it on the testnet.
Ripple has launched the XRPL Lending Protocol, an on-chain credit infrastructure for tokenized assets. The protocol’s core principle is to keep credit assessment off-chain while only standardizing execution processes on-chain. Institutions handle their own underwriting and compliance reviews, with the protocol responsible for standardized execution of liquidity pooling, loan disbursement, repayment, and default handling. The protocol comprises two components: the Single Asset Vault, which manages on-chain pooling of individual assets; and the Lending Protocol, which disburses vault liquidity as loans with clear terms. The two correspond to the XLS-65 and XLS-66 proposals respectively and are pending approval from validator nodes. At the infrastructure level, the protocol supports a subordinated capital mechanism, where pool managers assume risk exposure senior to that of other liquidity providers. Developers can now access and test the protocol on the devnet.
1 seconds ago
阿曼外交大臣：不支持收取霍尔木兹海峡通行费
Local time on the 29th, Oman’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs released excerpts from an interview with Foreign Minister Badr. Badr stated that Oman is committed to maintaining a safe, peaceful, and free navigation environment for all parties in the Strait of Hormuz. He pointed out that Oman and Iran have reached a consensus in their ongoing dialogues that any future arrangements related to the Strait of Hormuz must be conducted within the framework of international law. Addressing the widely discussed transit fee issue, Badr said Oman does not support levying tolls on passing vessels, though he did not rule out the possibility of exploring mechanisms related to maritime services. Badr added that topics such as strengthening navigation safety, improving maritime accident emergency response capabilities, and preventing marine pollution could be discussed, with reference to practices from other straits. He noted that such arrangements would be developed in consultation with countries and shipping companies that use the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to enhance maritime services and ensure navigation safety rather than imposing new burdens on global trade. (CCTV News)
Key HighlightsBitcoin-to-USDC Payment Capability Now Available Through Breez SDKUSDT Payment Functionality Extended Across Multiple Blockchain NetworksEnhanced Functionality for Bitcoin Payment Ecosystem Breez enables direct stablecoin transmission from Bitcoin holdings without requiring users to maintain USDC or USDT balances.
The payment solution operates across more than 30 different blockchain networks.
Bitcoin remains in user wallets until the moment of payment execution and conversion.
Application developers gain stablecoin payout capabilities without complex multi-chain infrastructure.
Future updates will enable users to receive stablecoins from external blockchain networks.
Breez has introduced a novel payment mechanism that allows Bitcoin holders to transmit USDC or USDT without maintaining stablecoin balances. The technology operates through the company’s software development kit and facilitates transactions across more than 30 blockchain ecosystems. This innovation provides applications with a streamlined method to integrate stablecoin payment options without requiring users to pre-fund stablecoin wallets.
Bitcoin-to-USDC Payment Capability Now Available Through Breez SDK The payment functionality has been integrated directly into Breez’s software development kit, which application developers utilize to incorporate Lightning Network payment capabilities. The architecture allows users to initiate transactions from Bitcoin holdings while delivering value to USDC-enabled recipients. Users benefit from eliminating the requirement to maintain separate USDC reserves prior to transaction execution.
The system performs recipient address verification and blockchain identification before transaction approval. It provides senders with complete visibility into routing paths, associated fees, payment amounts, and destination networks. Upon user confirmation, designated liquidity providers execute Bitcoin-to-USDC conversion and complete delivery to the intended recipient.
The solution leverages Lightning Network infrastructure alongside Breez’s proprietary Spark Layer 2 protocol for rapid settlement processing. Breez collaborates with industry partners such as Flashnet and Boltz to facilitate conversion operations and payment delivery. This approach allows developers to offer USDC payment functionality without constructing independent blockchain integration systems.
USDT Payment Functionality Extended Across Multiple Blockchain Networks The platform additionally facilitates USDT transmission from Bitcoin balances using identical payment workflows. Users maintain Bitcoin exposure until payment initiation, while recipients receive USDT in their designated wallets. This architecture eliminates the burden of stablecoin wallet management prior to fund transmission.
Current functionality focuses exclusively on outbound stablecoin payments, based on the company’s deployment roadmap. Breez has announced intentions to incorporate stablecoin receiving capabilities from external blockchain networks in subsequent releases. This enhancement could transform the SDK into a comprehensive multi-asset payment infrastructure layer.
USDT maintains significant relevance in global remittance channels due to widespread preference for dollar-denominated transactions. Regional variations in blockchain adoption stem from differences in transaction costs and exchange accessibility. Breez’s support for 30 distinct chains provides developers with enhanced flexibility to serve diverse geographic markets.
Enhanced Functionality for Bitcoin Payment Ecosystem This release expands stablecoin capabilities within Bitcoin payment infrastructure and Lightning Network-enabled applications. Breez currently provides services to over 75 applications via its SDK, including notable platforms like Deblock and Cake Wallet. This established distribution network provides the new payment feature with immediate accessibility across wallet and payment product ecosystems.
Breez secured $4.5 million in funding during December 2022 from investment firms including Fulgur Ventures and Ego Death Capital. Following this capital raise, the company has concentrated development efforts on Lightning Network tools for wallet applications, social platforms, and payment infrastructure. The latest product release advances this strategic direction into stablecoin delivery and remittance applications.
The broader Bitcoin payment sector has evolved beyond small-scale retail transaction processing. During February, Secure Digital Markets successfully executed a $1 million Lightning Network payment to Kraken exchange in less than half a second. Voltage launched a dollar-denominated credit facility integrated with Lightning payment infrastructure.
Oliver Dale
Editor-in-Chief of Blockonomi and founder of Kooc Media, A UK-Based Online Media Company. Believer in Open-Source Software, Blockchain Technology & a Free and Fair Internet for all. His writing has been quoted by Nasdaq, Dow Jones, Investopedia, The New Yorker, Forbes, Techcrunch & More. Contact [email protected]
BNY will let institutional clients custody, mint and redeem Circle's USDC through its digital asset platform.The bank plans to expand the service to additional stablecoin issuers over time.The move reflects growing demand from traditional financial institutions for regulated stablecoin infrastructure.BNY, the world's largest custody bank overseeing $59 trillion in assets, is deepening its ties with Circle (CRCL) as the Wall Street bank ramps up its stablecoin services.
The bank said Monday that USDC will become the first stablecoin supported on its Digital Asset Custody platform. Clients will be able to hold USDC in custody at BNY and instruct Circle to convert U.S. dollars into the stablecoin or redeem USDC back into dollars through the bank.
The move expands BNY's role in the USDC ecosystem. The bank already serves as the primary custodian of the reserves backing the stablecoin. The new offering lets institutions manage both their cash and digital assets through a single platform.
BNY said it plans to support additional stablecoin issuers over time.
The announcement comes as stablecoins gain momentum among banks and asset managers following the 2025 passage of the GENIUS Act, the U.S. law establishing a federal framework for U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins. The legislation is widely expected to accelerate institutional adoption by setting rules for reserve assets, disclosures and issuer oversight.
Unlike cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, stablecoins are designed to maintain a fixed price pegged to a fiat currency, typically to the U.S. dollar and backed with cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries. Originally used primarily by crypto traders on exchanges, they are increasingly finding broader uses in payments, cross-border transfers and securities settlement.
Institutions see significant room for growth. Standard Chartered projected the stablecoin market could expand from roughly $300 billion today to $2 trillion by the end of 2028, while Citigroup estimated it could reach $4 trillion by 2030 in its base case. Circle's USDC is the second-largest stablecoin with a market capitalization of over $73 billion.
"As digital assets become increasingly integrated into financial markets, institutions need infrastructure that seamlessly works across traditional and blockchain-based systems," said Carolyn Weinberg, chief product and innovation officer at BNY.
12345678910
The Evolution of the Crypto CEX Landscape: A Case Study on Binance
The Evolution of the Crypto CEX Landscape: A Case Study on Binance
Binance remains crypto’s leading exchange, expanding from spot and derivatives into RWAs, payments, savings, yield, and broader financial services.
5 hours ago
Binance remains crypto’s leading exchange, expanding from spot and derivatives into RWAs, payments, savings, yield, and broader financial services.
Why it matters:
Binance remains crypto’s leading exchange, expanding from spot and derivatives into RWAs, payments, savings, yield, and broader financial services.
America's oldest bank will allow institutional clients to store, mint, redeem, and transfer USDC.
The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY), the oldest bank in the United States, has expanded its partnership with Circle to introduce new stablecoin services for institutional clients.
Circle’s USDC will become the first stablecoin supported on BNY’s Digital Asset Custody platform under the arrangement. This will allow BNY clients to store, transfer, mint, and burn USDC through the bank’s custody services.
BNY Mellon integrates USDC According to the official blog post, the latest move broadens BNY’s role as the primary custodian of USDC reserves. Institutional clients using BNY’s digital asset custody platform can now hold USDC in their custody wallets and use the bank to instruct Circle to convert US dollars into USDC.
Clients will also be able to redeem USDC for US dollars through the burning process. Circle said that these services are intended to support the entire lifecycle of institutional stablecoin activity by connecting traditional cash services with digital asset custody within one framework. BNY said the stablecoin capabilities are part of its integrated Digital Assets platform, which is designed to help institutional clients manage the growing connection between traditional finance and digital assets.
By combining custody and cash management services, the bank aims to provide access to blockchain-based networks while maintaining the controls, governance, and operational resilience required by institutional markets. BNY also plans to expand support to other stablecoin issuers and additional digital cash workflows over time.
BNY’s Chief Product and Innovation Officer Carolyn Weinberg commented,
“As digital assets become increasingly integrated into financial markets, institutions need infrastructure that seamlessly works across traditional and blockchain-based systems. With the addition of our enhanced stablecoin enablement capabilities, we’re expanding the ways clients can move value with the operational scale, trust, and resiliency they expect from BNY.”
BNY’s Crypto Footprint BNY Mellon and Circle first partnered in March 2022, when the bank was selected as a primary custodian for the reserves backing the stablecoin. Since then, the bank has steadily strengthened its presence in digital assets over the past few years.
You may also like: Tim Draper Explains Why Bitcoin Is Safer Than Banks in the Quantum Era Peter Schiff Blasts Jamie Dimon’s Push for Bank-Style Rules on Stablecoins Banks Fear Stablecoins as Yield Threatens Deposit Business: Report This year, the Wall Street giant expanded its digital asset custody business by partnering with Finstreet and ADI Foundation to develop regulated crypto infrastructure within Abu Dhabi’s ADGM financial hub.
ELGIN, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD) today announced that in connection with the previously announced spin-off of its Food Processing business, Midera Food Processing, Inc. (“Midera”) has entered into a five-year, $1.0 billion credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and other financial institutions and lenders, consisting of a $750 million U.S. dollar revolving credit facility and a $250 million multi-curren.
The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD) today announced that in connection with the previously announced spin-off of its Food Processing business, Midera Food
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Artificial intelligence has no shortage of obstacles. The industry is scrambling to secure enough electricity to power new data centers, enough land to build them, and enough high-bandwidth memory (HBM) to keep next-generation chips fed with data.
Yet another constraint is emerging that could prove just as important: moving information between those chips fast enough to keep them working. As AI clusters grow from thousands to hundreds of thousands of GPUs, the network connecting them is becoming just as valuable as the processors themselves.
For investors, that shifts attention beyond Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction) and toward the companies building AI’s digital highways.
AI Needs Better Roads, Not Just Faster Cars Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) CEO Lip-Bu Tan said on the No Priors podcast that the best investment opportunities lie where technology runs into a bottleneck. Today, one of the clearest choke points is interconnect technology — the hardware that transfers data between GPUs, CPUs, storage, and memory throughout an AI data center.
A modern AI cluster is really a massive logistics hub. GPUs perform the calculations, but every result depends on data arriving exactly when it is needed. If information is delayed, expensive processors sit idle. That wastes electricity, computing capacity, and billions of dollars of infrastructure investment.
The problem grows with scale. Traditional copper connections struggle to carry ever-faster electrical signals over longer distances because heat rises, power consumption increases, and signal quality deteriorates. Fiber optics solves many of those limitations by transmitting data as pulses of light instead of electricity, allowing far greater bandwidth while consuming less power.
Seven Companies Building AI’s Connectivity Infrastructure Company AI Connectivity Role Recent Highlights Credo Semiconductor (NASDAQ:CRDO) High-speed optical connectivity and active electrical cables Fiscal 2026 revenue reached approximately $1.3 billion, while four hyperscale cloud providers each represented more than 10% of sales. Astera Labs (NASDAQ:ALAB) PCIe connectivity, memory expansion, and AI fabric solutions First-quarter 2026 revenue climbed 93% year over year to $308 million. Coherent (NASDAQ:COHR) Lasers, optical transceivers, and photonic components Customer demand for AI optical products has extended backlog visibility well into 2028. Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) Optical networking, custom AI silicon, and switching Expanded its AI portfolio through the acquisition of Celestial AI and its photonic fabric technology capable of delivering up to 16 terabits per second of bandwidth. Lumentum (NASDAQ:LITE) Optical engines and laser components Continues expanding production to meet accelerating AI networking demand. Corning (NYSE:GLW) Fiber optic cable and connectivity solutions Leveraging decades of fiber manufacturing expertise to support hyperscale AI deployments. Ciena (NASDAQ:CIEN) Optical transport systems linking AI data centers Benefiting from rising investments in long-distance, high-capacity networking infrastructure. Surprisingly, none of these companies manufactures the AI processors grabbing headlines. Instead, they build the infrastructure that allows those processors to work together efficiently.
Connectivity Could Become AI’s Next Arms Race Every billion dollars a hyperscaler spends on GPUs creates additional demand for networking switches, optical modules, fiber, lasers, cables, and connectivity chips. Compute power alone no longer determines AI performance. The speed at which thousands of processors exchange information increasingly defines how much useful work those processors can perform.
SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion. Open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $1,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts. See for yourself by clicking here now.
That helps explain why Nvidia has aggressively expanded into photonics and optical networking through investments and strategic partnerships. CEO Jensen Huang also emphasized during Computex 2026 that while copper remains effective over shorter distances, optics become essential as AI systems scale across larger data centers.
Granted, these companies carry risks. Many rely heavily on a handful of hyperscale customers, and spending cycles can fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Valuations across AI infrastructure also remain elevated after a powerful multiyear rally.
Still, the long-term trend appears difficult to ignore. Industry spending is expanding beyond chips into every layer supporting AI infrastructure.
Key Takeaway In short, AI’s next breakthrough may not come from building a faster GPU but from ensuring thousands of them can communicate without delay. Investors have spent the past three years focusing almost exclusively on semiconductor designers. The next phase of the AI buildout broadens the opportunity to companies enabling high-speed connectivity.
Credo Semiconductor and Astera Labs offer the purest exposure to the networking bottleneck, while Marvell, Coherent, Lumentum, Corning, and Ciena provide investors with different ways to participate in what could become one of AI’s fastest-growing infrastructure markets.
Ultimately, as AI clusters continue expanding, the companies building the digital roads between processors may prove every bit as indispensable as those building the processors themselves.
Want Up To $1,000? SoFi Is Giving New Active Invest Users Free StockLooking to grow your money but unsure where to begin? SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion—open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $1,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts.
From $0 commission trading to fractional shares and automated investing, this app is designed to simplify investing for everyone, whether you’re just starting or already experienced. Its easy to sign up and secure your bonus.
SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Calix, Inc. (NYSE:CALX) today announced that on Monday, July 20, 2026, after market close, the company will post on the Calix Investor Relations website its second quarter stockholder letter for the period ended June 27, 2026. The posting of the stockholder letter will be announced over the newswire with a link to the letter to stockholders available at https://investor-relations.calix.com/.Calix will host a conference call to discuss these results the followin.
[url="]Calix, Inc.[/url] (NYSE: CALX) today announced that on Monday, July 20, 2026, after market close, the company will post on the [url="]Calix Investor Relat
Madison Square Garden (MSGS) was a big mover last session on higher-than-average trading volume. The latest trend in earnings estimate revisions might not help the stock continue moving higher in the near term.
Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL - Free Report) has recently been on Zacks.com's list of the most searched stocks. Therefore, you might want to consider some of the key factors that could influence the stock's performance in the near future.
Over the past month, shares of this company have returned +9.1%, compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.9% change. During this period, the Zacks Technology Services industry, which Duolingo falls in, has lost 5.6%. The key question now is: What could be the stock's future direction?
While media releases or rumors about a substantial change in a company's business prospects usually make its stock 'trending' and lead to an immediate price change, there are always some fundamental facts that eventually dominate the buy-and-hold decision-making.
Earnings Estimate RevisionsRather than focusing on anything else, we at Zacks prioritize evaluating the change in a company's earnings projection. This is because we believe the fair value for its stock is determined by the present value of its future stream of earnings.
We essentially look at how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to reflect the impact of the latest business trends. And if earnings estimates go up for a company, the fair value for its stock goes up. A higher fair value than the current market price drives investors' interest in buying the stock, leading to its price moving higher. This is why empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.
Duolingo is expected to post earnings of $0.58 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of -36.3%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate remained unchanged.
For the current fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $2.76 points to a change of -67.8% from the prior year. Over the last 30 days, this estimate has remained unchanged.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $3.08 indicates a change of +11.5% from what Duolingo is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has remained unchanged.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, Duolingo is rated Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Projected Revenue GrowthEven though a company's earnings growth is arguably the best indicator of its financial health, nothing much happens if it cannot raise its revenues. It's almost impossible for a company to grow its earnings without growing its revenue for long periods. Therefore, knowing a company's potential revenue growth is crucial.
For Duolingo, the consensus sales estimate for the current quarter of $296.19 million indicates a year-over-year change of +17.4%. For the current and next fiscal years, $1.21 billion and $1.36 billion estimates indicate +16.4% and +12.5% changes, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryDuolingo reported revenues of $291.97 million in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +26.5%. EPS of $0.89 for the same period compares with $0.72 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $288.54 million, the reported revenues represent a surprise of +1.19%. The EPS surprise was +12.66%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates each time over this period.
ValuationNo investment decision can be efficient without considering a stock's valuation. Whether a stock's current price rightly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects is an essential determinant of its future price performance.
While comparing the current values of a company's valuation multiples, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), with its own historical values helps determine whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of the reasonability of the stock's price.
As part of the Zacks Style Scores system, the Zacks Value Style Score (which evaluates both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics) organizes stocks into five groups ranging from A to F (A is better than B; B is better than C; and so on), making it helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
Duolingo is graded C on this front, indicating that it is trading at par with its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
ConclusionThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Duolingo. However, its Zacks Rank #4 does suggest that it may underperform the broader market in the near term.
ACI Worldwide (ACIW) witnessed a jump in share price last session on above-average trading volume. The latest trend in earnings estimate revisions for the stock doesn't suggest further strength down the road.
When deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock, investors often rely on analyst recommendations. Media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts often influence a stock's price, but are they really important?
Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about Chewy (CHWY - Free Report) .
Chewy currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.67, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 27 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.67 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.
Of the 27 recommendations that derive the current ABR, 18 are Strong Buy and two are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 66.7% and 7.4% of all recommendations.
Brokerage Recommendation Trends for CHWY
Check price target & stock forecast for Chewy here>>>
While the ABR calls for buying Chewy, it may not be wise to make an investment decision solely based on this information. Several studies have shown limited to no success of brokerage recommendations in guiding investors to pick stocks with the best price increase potential.
Do you wonder why? As a result of the vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover, their analysts tend to rate it with a strong positive bias. According to our research, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations for every "Strong Sell" recommendation.
This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.
With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, which classifies stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), is a reliable indicator of a stock's near-term price performance. So, validating the Zacks Rank with ABR could go a long way in making a profitable investment decision.
Zacks Rank Should Not Be Confused With ABRIn spite of the fact that Zacks Rank and ABR both appear on a scale from 1 to 5, they are two completely different measures.
The ABR is calculated solely based on brokerage recommendations and is typically displayed with decimals (example: 1.28). In contrast, the Zacks Rank is a quantitative model allowing investors to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.
It has been and continues to be the case that analysts employed by brokerage firms are overly optimistic with their recommendations. Because of their employers' vested interests, these analysts issue more favorable ratings than their research would support, misguiding investors far more often than helping them.
In contrast, the Zacks Rank is driven by earnings estimate revisions. And near-term stock price movements are strongly correlated with trends in earnings estimate revisions, according to empirical research.
Furthermore, the different grades of the Zacks Rank are applied proportionately across all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide earnings estimates for the current year. In other words, at all times, this tool maintains a balance among the five ranks it assigns.
There is also a key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank when it comes to freshness. When you look at the ABR, it may not be up-to-date. Nonetheless, since brokerage analysts constantly revise their earnings estimates to reflect changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in predicting future stock prices.
Is CHWY a Good Investment?In terms of earnings estimate revisions for Chewy, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has declined 9.3% over the past month to $1.53.
Analysts' growing pessimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates lower, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to plunge in the near term.
The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) for Chewy. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>
Therefore, it could be wise to take the Buy-equivalent ABR for Chewy with a grain of salt.
THORChain Podcast #212: ADR29 Fee Debate ft. BooneW, KentonC137 & Patriotsounds | June 28, 2026 | Watch the full episode on YouTube
By Raynalytics
TL;DRBoone proposed ADR29, an asset-specific minimum swap fee lever built with Monero in mind. His working example is a 50 bps floor on each $XMR leg, but the proposal is not approved or implemented.ADR29 is designed to complement, not replace, THORChain’s dynamic fee model. When both apply, the protocol would use the higher floor.The core disagreement was strategic: charge more where THORChain has a permissionless edge, or keep fees low enough to win volume and discourage competitors.Higher Monero fees could feed more system income into protocol-owned liquidity, helping a shallow Monero pool deepen without depending entirely on outside LPs.The second half moved from fees to distribution: affiliate tooling, a swap widget, more browser wallets, and possible mobile paths for THORChain Swap.IntroductionPodcast #212 was supposed to feature Amir Taaki, but technical problems cut that conversation short. Boone joined while out shopping, without video and with one specific mission: make sure the community understood ADR29.
That intervention turned into a full debate about what THORChain should optimize for. Boone argued for monetizing permissionless demand now. Kenton argued that low prices build a longer-lasting moat. Denny focused on whether decentralized governance can manage manual fee levers quickly enough. Nobody pretended the answer was settled, which made the discussion more useful.
The result was less a sales pitch for one proposal and more a map of the choices around Monero, dynamic fees, protocol-owned liquidity, and THORChain’s route to a larger market.
1. ADR29: A Fee Floor for Each AssetToday, THORChain applies minimum swap fee floors broadly by asset class. The same L1 floor covers many unrelated assets, even when their liquidity, competition and market structure look completely different.
Boone’s proposed ADR29 adds per-asset minimum slip settings. Instead of raising the L1 floor for every pool to address one asset, nodes could set a different floor for Monero, Bitcoin or another specific asset. The proposal also allows an explicit zero override and optional economic caps on those operational fee levers.
Monero is the reason Boone built it. THORChain is preparing a genuinely permissionless $XMR route, while many existing cross-chain options rely on centralized or permissioned infrastructure. Boone’s working number was 50 bps per Monero leg. On an asset-to-$XMR double swap, that would produce a combined floor near 1%, roughly where he said many existing Monero venues already price their service.
His pitch is not simply “charge more because we can.” It is that THORChain could offer a better product at a familiar market price, then route the additional system income toward deeper protocol-owned liquidity.
The proposal remains an initial draft. Even if the code is accepted, the per-asset floor would be off unless nodes chose to use it.
"All it does is give the nodes more optionality." (Boone)2. Why ADR29 Is Not a Replacement for Dynamic FeesThe episode repeatedly returned to the difference between ADR29 and ADR26, THORChain’s dynamic L1 fee model.
Dynamic fees tune the minimum fee for eligible L1 swaps associated with approved affiliate THORNames and trading pairs. The aim is to discover whether a lower or higher fee produces more protocol revenue for that flow. ADR29 is broader in a different direction: it sets a governance floor for an individual asset and also reaches activity that the affiliate-based model does not, including arbitrage flow through trade and secured assets.
Boone estimated that arbitrage accounts for roughly 60% of THORChain volume. In a separate two-hour sample, he found that L1 swaps with affiliate fees represented about 33% of volume. Those were his working observations, not a complete protocol study, but they explain his concern: a dynamic feature limited to qualifying L1 affiliate flow may leave much of the network untouched.
He also questioned the signal used to adjust dynamic fees. If the controller reacts to revenue without accounting for changes in the wider exchange market, a high-volume market day could look like proof that the fee changed correctly even when macro conditions caused the move. His suggestion was to normalize against global exchange volume so the controller reads less noise.
ADR29 is designed to coexist with that experiment. If an affiliate’s dynamic fee and an asset-specific floor both apply, the higher value wins. Nodes can still test dynamic fees first, learn from live behavior, and consider ADR29 later.
"This is not a replacement. This is not instead of Chad’s dynamic fees." (Boone)3. The Real Debate: Revenue Now or Market Share Later?Once the mechanics were clear, the conversation became a strategy argument.
Boone sees two markets. The first is the enormous global exchange market, where centralized exchanges dominate and most users optimize for familiarity, price and convenience. The second is the much smaller permissionless market, where THORChain already has a meaningful edge.
His preferred sequence is to monetize the smaller market first. Higher-margin permissionless flow could build POL, fund marketing, strengthen node participation and give the network more resources before it attacks the mass market. In his framing, trying to beat subsidized competitors such as Near Intents on price today risks joining a race where other protocols can spend emissions or investor capital to offer uneconomic swaps.
Kenton pushed the other way. A high Monero fee could invite competitors, while a low fee makes the market less attractive to enter. More importantly, users who discover THORChain as the cheapest permissionless route may carry that first impression forward and spread it by word of mouth. If the long-term target is centralized exchange volume, price has to be part of the conversion story.
That question also reaches aggregators. SwapKit and other routers can move flow quickly when another venue offers a better quote, so loyalty may matter less than execution. Boone saw that as a reason fees can be lowered later when competition arrives. Kenton saw it as a reason to undercut competitors before they gain a foothold.
Denny added a governance concern. A centralized business can move a pricing lever quickly. A decentralized network may be slower to reach consensus, making an algorithmic approach more attractive than frequent manual adjustments. He also argued for getting the $XMR pool stable before experimenting with higher fees.
"Long term, of course we want to capture all swap volume." (Boone)The disagreement stayed productive because everyone shared the same destination. The open question is which stepping stone gets THORChain there.
4. POL Turns Fees Into Permissionless LiquidityADR29 matters beyond the fee itself. Boone tied it directly to protocol-owned liquidity.
If a shallow Monero pool generates higher fees and a portion of system income flows into POL, the protocol can progressively own more of that pool. That creates liquidity which does not leave when external LPs decide the return is no longer attractive. It also reduces the problem of asking outside capital to absorb the early operational risk of a new chain integration.
Boone described POL as an asset rather than a liability. If an early $XMR issue costs the pool money, the protocol can learn and recover without owing an external LP. Denny agreed that this makes POL especially powerful for a complex launch like Monero.
The wider security argument is equally important. A permissionless protocol can still become dependent on liquidity providers or market makers who withdraw during stress. Boone pointed to solver and market-maker systems that can lose liquidity exactly when markets become chaotic. POL is always-on capital controlled by protocol rules.
"You don’t just need a permissionless protocol. You need permissionless liquidity." (Boone)This is why the fee debate and the POL debate cannot be separated. ADR29 asks what each asset should pay. POL asks whether part of that income can become a permanent moat.
5. Distribution: Widgets, Wallets and the Next Front EndThe final major thread was how users actually reach THORChain.
Kenton outlined the immediate THORChain Swap priorities: finish Keplr Wallet support, complete the affiliate page, ship a reusable swap widget, fix the current bug backlog, and add more browser wallets. The affiliate flow is intended to let a partner register, receive an API key, configure its THORName, set a fee and preferred payout asset, then generate widget code for its own website.
The widget is central to Kenton’s distribution thesis. A newsletter or partner site can embed THORChain swaps, earn affiliate fees, and lend its existing credibility to the interface. Kenton said he has already arranged a year-long package of 12 articles with DeFi Llama and wants the supporting dashboard and destination experience ready before promotion ramps up.
Mobile remains the harder problem. IBEC raised a passkey-based wallet path, while Boone suggested he could help as an AI-assisted developer. Another option is a memoless mobile app that works with wallets users already have, avoiding yet another seed phrase. A fuller route would be to fork the open-source Unstoppable Wallet and keep applying upstream improvements, but that was brainstorming, not a committed build.
The team’s sequencing was practical: improve the existing frontend, make integrations self-serve, expand wallet connectivity, then decide whether a dedicated mobile wallet earns its place on the roadmap.
"Strong opinions loosely held." (Kenton)That line captured the whole episode. ADR29 now gives the community something concrete to evaluate, but its value will come from testing assumptions rather than defending camps.
What to WatchADR29 review: The draft merge request needs technical review and governance discussion. It is proposed, not live.ADR26 first: Dynamic fees may get a live trial before ADR29 advances, creating real evidence about eligible flow and fee sensitivity.Monero launch quality: The first priority is a stable $XMR pool and safe small swaps. Fee experiments can follow once the product works reliably.POL governance: Watch whether nodes gain a more responsive operational lever for directing system income into protocol-owned liquidity.Distribution work: Keplr, affiliate onboarding, the swap widget and additional browser wallets are the near-term THORChain Swap milestones.More THORChain data, check out raynalytics.net
Follow Raynalytics for more Weekly Analytics and Podcast recaps.
onsemi (ON) will acquire Synaptics (SYNA) in a $7B all-equity deal, aiming to expand into industrial robotics and automation. The acquisition is expected to be highly accretive, with $200M in cost synergies and a 2% EBITDA margin improvement projected with an expected close in eFY27. Both ON and SYNA are rated Buy with a $128/share target for ON, reflecting strong growth prospects despite near-term dilution-driven share price declines.
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Global professional services firm Huron (NASDAQ: HURN), today announced that three of its senior leaders have been recognized by Consulting Magazine as 2026 Top Consultants, underscoring the depth of expertise, innovation, and leadership that continues to drive value for its clients and support the firm's long-term growth strategy. John DiDonato received the Lifetime Achievement Award, Paul Praveen was honored in the Global & Cross-Border Consulting category, and A.
Deckers (DECK - Free Report) is one of the stocks most watched by Zacks.com visitors lately. So, it might be a good idea to review some of the factors that might affect the near-term performance of the stock.
Shares of this maker of Ugg footwear have returned -8.2% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.9% change. The Zacks Retail - Apparel and Shoes industry, to which Deckers belongs, has gained 0.2% over this period. Now the key question is: Where could the stock be headed in the near term?
Although media reports or rumors about a significant change in a company's business prospects usually cause its stock to trend and lead to an immediate price change, there are always certain fundamental factors that ultimately drive the buy-and-hold decision.
Earnings Estimate RevisionsHere at Zacks, we prioritize appraising the change in the projection of a company's future earnings over anything else. That's because we believe the present value of its future stream of earnings is what determines the fair value for its stock.
Our analysis is essentially based on how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to take the latest business trends into account. When earnings estimates for a company go up, the fair value for its stock goes up as well. And when a stock's fair value is higher than its current market price, investors tend to buy the stock, resulting in its price moving upward. Because of this, empirical studies indicate a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and short-term stock price movements.
For the current quarter, Deckers is expected to post earnings of $0.93 per share, indicating no change. The Zacks Consensus Estimate remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
For the current fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $7.42 points to a change of +5.7% from the prior year. Over the last 30 days, this estimate has changed +0.6%.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $8.26 indicates a change of +11.3% from what Deckers is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has remained unchanged.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, Deckers is rated Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Revenue Growth ForecastEven though a company's earnings growth is arguably the best indicator of its financial health, nothing much happens if it cannot raise its revenues. It's almost impossible for a company to grow its earnings without growing its revenue for long periods. Therefore, knowing a company's potential revenue growth is crucial.
In the case of Deckers, the consensus sales estimate of $1.02 billion for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of +5.4%. The $5.9 billion and $6.44 billion estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of +7.9% and +9.1%, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryDeckers reported revenues of $1.12 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +9.6%. EPS of $0.96 for the same period compares with $1 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.08 billion, the reported revenues represent a surprise of +3.45%. The EPS surprise was +18.52%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates each time over this period.
ValuationWithout considering a stock's valuation, no investment decision can be efficient. In predicting a stock's future price performance, it's crucial to determine whether its current price correctly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects.
Comparing the current value of a company's valuation multiples, such as its price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), to its own historical values helps ascertain whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, whereas comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of how reasonable its stock price is.
The Zacks Value Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which pays close attention to both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics to grade stocks from A to F (an A is better than a B; a B is better than a C; and so on), is pretty helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
Deckers is graded C on this front, indicating that it is trading at par with its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
Bottom LineThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Deckers. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
It doesn't matter your age or experience: taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals for all investors. Luckily, Zacks Premium offers several different ways to do both.
The research service features daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, all of which will help you become a smarter, more confident investor.
Zacks Premium also includes the Zacks Style Scores.
What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores, developed alongside the Zacks Rank, are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on three widely-followed investing methodologies; they also help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.
Based on their value, growth, and momentum characteristics, each stock is assigned a rating of A, B, C, D, or F. The better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform; an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on.
The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:
Value ScoreValue investors love finding good stocks at good prices, especially before the broader market catches on to a stock's true value. Utilizing ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and many other multiples, the Value Style Score identifies the most attractive and most discounted stocks.
Growth ScoreGrowth investors, on the other hand, are more concerned with a company's financial strength and health, and its future outlook. The Growth Style Score examines things like projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow to find stocks that will experience sustainable growth over time.
Momentum ScoreMomentum traders and investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." This investing style is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook. Employing factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates, the Momentum Style Score can indicate favorable times to build a position in high-momentum stocks.
VGM ScoreIf you want a combination of all three Style Scores, then the VGM Score will be your friend. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, helping you find the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum. It's also one of the best indicators to use with the Zacks Rank.
How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank A proprietary stock-rating model, the Zacks Rank utilizes the power of earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings outlook, to help investors create a successful portfolio.
Investors can count on the Zacks Rank's success, with #1 (Strong Buy) stocks producing an unmatched +23.94% average annual return since 1988, more than double the S&P 500's performance. But the model rates a large number of stocks, and there are over 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, plus another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.
This totals more than 800 top-rated stocks, and it can be overwhelming to try and pick the best stocks for you and your portfolio.
That's where the Style Scores come in.
To have the best chance of big returns, you'll want to always consider stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B, which will give you the highest probability of success. If you're looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, it's important they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.
Since the Scores were created to work together with the Zacks Rank, the direction of a stock's earnings estimate revisions should be a key factor when choosing which stocks to buy.
A stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, for instance, even one with Scores of A and B, will still have a declining earnings forecast, and a greater chance its share price will fall too.
Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.
Stock to Watch: Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF - Free Report) Established in 1962, Raymond James Financial Inc. is a diversified company based in St. Petersburg, FL. The company along with its subsidiaries – Raymond James & Associates Inc. (RJ&A), Raymond James Financial Services Inc. (RJFS), Raymond James Financial Services Advisors Inc. (RJFSA), Raymond James Ltd. (RJ Ltd.), Eagle Asset Management Inc. (Eagle) and Raymond James Bank N.A. (RJ Bank) – provide financial services mainly in the United States and Canada.
RJF is a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of B.
Additionally, the company could be a top pick for growth investors. RJF has a Growth Style Score of B, forecasting year-over-year earnings growth of 10.9% for the current fiscal year.
Two analysts revised their earnings estimate upwards in the last 60 days for fiscal 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.02 to $11.82 per share. RJF boasts an average earnings surprise of +2.7%.
With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Growth and VGM Style Scores, RJF should be on investors' short list.
LANSING, Mich.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson®), the main operating subsidiary of Jackson Financial Inc.1 (NYSE: JXN), has been named the 2026 Annuities Provider of the Year by InvestmentNews. The award recognizes the annuity provider or insurance carrier that has displayed leadership in delivering value to financial professionals and their clients in product innovation, education, service excellence and operational effectiveness.“Jackson is honored to be reco.
[url="]Jackson National Life Insurance Company[/url] (JacksonÂ), the main operating subsidiary of Jackson Financial Inc.1 (NYSE: JXN), has been named the 2026
