Kontroverzní návrh BIP-110 na omezení nefinančních dat pro Bitcoin má v srpnu termín, ale podpora těžařů je stále pod 1 %. Aktivace by podle článku mohla vytvořit jen menšinový chain.
A controversial proposal known as BIP-110, which would temporarily restrict non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain, faces an early August deadline with miner support still below 1%.The measure would tighten limits on OP_RETURN and other data-carrying methods for one year, a move backers say would refocus Bitcoin on payments but critics argue improperly censors valid, fee-paying transactions.With major figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back opposing the plan and both miner and node adoption stuck in the low single digits, BIP-110 appears likely to create only a small minority chain rather than a network-wide change.An infamous proposal to purge non-financial data from the Bitcoin blockchain is heading toward a hard deadline in early August, and the initial support it has gathered from miners is less than 1% so far - a signal of outsized opposition despite the immense social chatter around the topic.
BIP-110, formally titled the Reduced Data Temporary Soft Fork, is basically a fight over what Bitcoin block space is for.
Bitcoin transactions can carry money and extra data. An OP_RETURN section is the obvious “note field” for small bits of data within transactions, and data pushes are another route - where users can place larger chunks of raw data inside Bitcoin script or witness data. Ordinals, inscriptions and some token schemes use those paths to put images, text or token metadata onchain.
BIP-110 would temporarily tighten those paths for one year. It would cap OP_RETURN at the old small size, block most arbitrary data chunks above 256 bytes, and restrict some script formats used mainly for data storage.
Supporters say this keeps Bitcoin focused on payments and lowers node burden, but critics think it turns a policy fight into a consensus rule and tells users which transactions are “acceptable.”
Two of Bitcoin's most influential figures came out against it on Saturday. Strategy founder Michael Saylor posted that "there are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam," arguing the proposal "turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions." The precedent, he wrote, is the real danger.
There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam.
BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions.
That precedent is the danger. We should save our energy for threats that really matter. $BTC https://t.co/LoSkl9XSo1
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) July 11, 2026 Adam Back, the Blockstream co-founder whose hashcash design is cited in the bitcoin white paper, made a similar case at greater length, addressed to the newcomers backing the proposal.
"Bitcoin respectfully says no to what you want," he said, adding that their real recourse, if unconvinced, is to group together and fork away, but that "bitcoin won't be joining it."
The support data shows what the broader market really thinks. BIP 110 does not rely on the usual path of overwhelming miner approval, but uses a user-activated soft fork, a mechanism in which nodes enforce a rule whether or not miners agree, set to a 55% miner-signaling threshold rather than the traditional 95%.
Backing is absent even at that significantly lower bar.
Miner signaling has never risen above about 1% in any period and stands at zero in the current one, with no major mining pool behind it, according to the BIP 110 signaling monitor.
Among the nodes that store and relay the chain, adoption sits in the low single digits, carried almost entirely by Bitcoin Knots, an alternative to the dominant Bitcoin Core software.
The deadline arrives regardless. The current signaling period runs from block 957,600 to 959,615, and a voluntary lock-in deadline falls at block 961,542 in the following period, expected in early August.
Nodes running BIP 110 software would then begin rejecting any block that does not signal support, with activation projected near September. In practice, a rule enforced by a few percent of nodes and almost no miners does not change Bitcoin for everyone but would split off a minority chain.
As such, Bitcoin's resistance to change is not written down anywhere, but is the product of thousands of independent operators who each have to opt in as a means of consensus.
The underlying spam concern is real. Blocks have carried more non-financial data since the October change, and reasonable people see that as a drift from Bitcoin as money toward Bitcoin as a database. But Bitcoin changes only when the network agrees to run the change, and on the evidence so far, it will not run this one.
12345678910
Digital Assets: Quarterly Review and Outlook Q2
Digital Assets: Quarterly Review and Outlook Q2
Digital assets posted a third consecutive quarter of losses in Q2 2026, the longest losing streak since the 2022 bear market, as institutional capital rotated into AI equities and Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest quarterly outflow since launch. Our report examines what drove the divergence, where structural adoption continued regardless, and what Q3 signals to watch.
Jul 10, 2026
Digital assets posted a third consecutive quarter of losses in Q2 2026, the longest losing streak since the 2022 bear market, as institutional capital rotated into AI equities and Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest quarterly outflow since launch. Our report examines what drove the divergence, where structural adoption continued regardless, and what Q3 signals to watch.
Why it matters:
Digital assets posted a third consecutive quarter of losses in Q2 2026, the longest losing streak since the 2022 bear market, as institutional capital rotated into AI equities and Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest quarterly outflow since launch. Our report examines what drove the divergence, where structural adoption continued regardless, and what Q3 signals to watch.
Japonsko zrychluje reformy digitálních aktiv a může otevřít cestu ke spotovým ETF, což by mohlo výrazně prospět XRP. SBI navíc rozšiřuje spolupráci s Ripple a v Japonsku spustila RLUSD po schválení JFSA.
From SBI's expanding Ripple partnership to potential crypto ETF reforms, Japan's role is growing.
Even in times when XRP and the company behind it were not in good shape in their home country, Japan has long stood out as a major ally. However, the most recent regulatory and institutional developments suggest that the country could play an even bigger role in their future.
Over the past several months, Japan has accelerated efforts to modernize its digital asset framework and has proposed legal reforms to classify many cryptocurrencies as financial instruments, paving the way for spot ETFs. It also introduced a more investor-friendly tax regime.
Although the legislation still needs to complete the entire process before such financial vehicles are allowed to launch, the direction has become increasingly clearer. This could be significantly beneficial for XRP.
XRP, Ripple, and Japan For starters, SBI continues with its pro-Ripple initiatives. Both parties have been tangled for years through SBI Ripple Asia to expand cross-border payments across the region. Meanwhile, SBI VC Trade remains one of Japan’s largest XRP-friendly exchanges.
Most recently, Ripple and SBI announced that the former’s stablecoin, RLUSD, has launched in the country after receiving approval from the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA), which expanded their partnership into the regulated stablecoin market.
SBI has also filed for a product that could eventually become the first Japan-based XRP ETF. Instead of pairing the two largest cryptocurrencies by market cap, the proposed products went for BTC and XRP, highlighting the firm’s conviction that Ripple’s token could become a core institutional asset in the country.
Institutional Demand Given the relatively short history of the cryptocurrency industry and the lack of regulation in most jurisdictions, proper regulatory frameworks can open the door for additional investments from larger players and institutions. Japan has been at the forefront of crypto regulation, and XRP has generally benefited from this.
You may also like: Circle Receives Final Green Light to Establish National Trust Bank Ripple Rolls Out New XRPL Upgrade, but Less Than Half of Nodes Have Upgraded Ripple Lands Major XRP Partnership as Garlinghouse Shares Rare Personal Moment Unlike the prolonged legal battle Ripple endured in the US against the SEC, Japanese regulators have long treated its token as a crypto asset rather than a security. Combined with SBI’s banking relationships and Ripple’s growing enterprise presence, that regulatory certainty has helped create one of XRP’s strongest international footholds.
If Japan indeed approves spot crypto ETFs, XRP could be among the earliest beneficiaries, thanks to its history and the infrastructure already in place there.
Ether za týden vzrostl o 3 % díky tokenizaci a nákupům institucí. Přesto zůstává pod 1 800 USD, protože on-chain data i derivátové trhy jsou stále slabé.
The cryptocurrency market has experienced mixed developments in recent days, but Ether stood out with a 3% increase between Thursday and Friday. This rise occurs in a context marked by the growth of tokenization, the successful launch of Robinhood Chain, and continued purchases by several companies. Despite this favorable dynamic, surpassing the 1,800-dollar threshold remains out of reach. On-chain data and indicators from derivative markets still show signs of weakness, limiting short-term growth potential.
In brief Ether advanced 3% in one week, supported by the rise of Tokenization and institutional purchases. Robinhood Chain has already attracted 106 million dollars in deposits and strengthens the Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum retains 47% of the real-world assets (RWA) market, confirming its lead in tokenization. On-chain indicators and derivative markets remain weak, hindering a sustained breakthrough above 1,800 dollars. BitMine has accumulated 198,370 ETH in 30 days, illustrating continued purchases by institutional investors. Ether Rallies as Tokenization and Robinhood Chain Drive Fresh Optimism The recent rise of Ether is first based on the rapid development of initiatives related to asset tokenization. Robinhood notably launched Robinhood Chain, a layer 2 solution using ETH as the native gas token. This new infrastructure quickly strengthened user interest in the Ethereum ecosystem. At the same time, the platform is expanding its offer of tokenized stocks to an international clientele, consolidating the adoption of EVM-compatible infrastructures.
Here are the main figures illustrating this dynamic:
106 million dollars in deposits already recorded on Robinhood Chain. 120 countries now have access to the tokenized stocks offered by Robinhood. 47% market share for Ethereum in the real-world assets (RWA) sector. 260 billion dollars of total value locked (TVL) on Ethereum. 210 billion dollars capitalization for Ether, a level below the network’s TVL. Tokenization thus continues to strengthen Ethereum’s dominant position in the real-world asset market. Apart from stablecoins, assets like Tether Gold (XAUT), Ondo US Dollar Yield (USDY), and Franklin Templeton iBENJI government bonds illustrate this evolution. Tokenized stocks STRCx from Strategy and CRCLon from Ondo also rank among the main sector references.
This dynamic feeds specialist analyses. Leon Waidmann, research director at Lisk, believes the gap between the network’s total value locked and Ether’s capitalization reflects a relatively lower valuation than observed during the 2022 bear market. This interpretation fuels debate on the asset’s current positioning without changing the network fundamentals.
On-Chain Indicators Continue to Limit the Recovery Despite this improvement in Ether’s price, several indicators show network activity remains less dynamic than before. Layer 2 solutions continue their development, and institutional investments hold steady, but overall demand on the blockchain remains limited. The 2026 bear market reduced activity across several segments, while some competing blockchains strengthened their presence in synthetic perpetual futures and automated yield vaults.
The main on-chain data illustrating this slowdown of activity on Ethereum are as follows:
11 million dollars in weekly revenue generated by DApps, compared to 20 million dollars in Q1 2026. Sky: 3.1 million dollars in weekly revenue. Titan Builder: 2.4 million dollars in weekly revenue. Chainlink: 1.1 million dollars in weekly revenue. Active addresses dropped from 5.4 million to 3.2 million, confirming the decline in on-chain activity. Weekly revenues of Ethereum DApps, in USD (left) vs active addresses (right). Source: DefiLlama
This evolution limits Ether’s ability to immediately extend its rebound. Even if tokenization fundamentals remain solid, network usage metrics do not grow at the same pace. Investors therefore continue to monitor these indicators to determine if the recent price rise can be accompanied by a sustained recovery of activity on Ethereum.
Institutional Purchases Provide Fresh Support to the Market Derivative markets also provide a more measured signal. According to Laevitas data, the annualized funding rate of Ether perpetual futures contracts fell back to 3% on Saturday, after reaching 12% the previous day. This level remains below the neutral threshold set at 6%, indicating weaker demand for long positions. This development suggests that operators remain cautious despite the recent price rise.
Annualized funding rate of ETH perpetual futures contracts. Source: Laevitas
At the same time, institutional flows continue to support the market. Arkham Intelligence identified a withdrawal of 20,500 ETH, representing about 36 million dollars, from Galaxy Digital to a new wallet. This movement corresponds to a pattern previously observed during purchases attributed to Tom Lee via BitMine Immersion. Over the last thirty days, BitMine has accumulated 198,370 ETH, bringing the total value of its reserves to 10.3 billion dollars.
These acquisitions offer additional market support, although they are not enough to erase the more cautious signals seen on technical and on-chain indicators. Tokenization continues to expand use cases for the network, while institutional investments maintain steady demand. However, actual blockchain activity remains below the levels observed at the beginning of the year.
Future movements will therefore depend on the balance between these factors. If tokenization continues its development and institutional purchases hold steady, Ether could maintain a solid base. Conversely, a sustained recovery will also require improvement in on-chain indicators and derivative markets to confirm a return of broader demand across the ecosystem.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Ghiles A.
Journaliste et rédacteur web passionné par l’univers des cryptomonnaies et des technologies Web3. J’y traite les dernières tendances et actualités afin de proposer un contenu de haute qualité à un large public du secteur.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Ethereum Foundation uvedla, že AI agenti odhalili skutečnou zranitelnost v Gossipsubu libp2p a chyba byla před zveřejněním opravena. Podle týmu může AI zásadně změnit auditování bezpečnosti blockchainu.
The Ethereum Foundation said it used AI agents to uncover a real vulnerability, which could be the new way of improving blockchain security.
The organization behind the second-largest blockchain network revealed it had employed a coordinated army of AI agents to identify vulnerabilities in Ethereum’s critical infrastructure.
The team said one major bug was successfully discovered and patched before it could become a larger problem. But that could be just the start of this major story.
AI and Ethereum The blog post published by the Ethereum Foundation reveals that the Protocol Security team disclosed that AI-powered agents found a remotely triggerable vulnerability in libp2p’s Gossipsub networking layer. This is a core component used by the blockchain’s consensus clients to communicate with each other.
The AI agents were deployed against the protocol code, cryptographic software, and smart contracts that underpin the network. The most significant issue the team faced was not finding the bug itself, but filtering genuine issues from the overwhelming number of false positives generated by the agents.
The team published its findings only after fixing the issue, but researchers said the bigger breakthrough lies in the process of finding it rather than the bug itself. AI has become highly effective at identifying potential weaknesses, but without a human touch, the process is still far from being good enough for such major tasks.
The Foundation compared AI agents to modern fuzzing tools. They won’t replace human auditors, but can dramatically expand the search process by generating proof-of-concept exploits, tracing attack paths, and testing assumptions at a scale that would be challenging to achieve manually.
Is This the Future? The cryptocurrency community has wondered for a few years how and why the cryptocurrency industry can be linked to artificial intelligence. The EF said that one of the most important connections between the two is now through AI-assisted auditing, which can fundamentally change how blockchain security operates.
You may also like: Analyst Sees Upside for ETH Ahead of Glamsterdam Upgrade ‘Summer of Ethereum Love’ Gaining Steam, Says Lubin, But When Will ETH Price Follow? Charles Hoskinson Says Ethereum Is Adopting Cardano Ideas Without Credit Development teams may deploy more and more AI agents to continuously probe protocol code for vulnerabilities before malicious actors discover them. This could be the opposite of numerous examples in which bad actors employed such agents to hack different blockchains.
Nevertheless, the Foundation cautioned that today’s systems remain far from autonomous as they still generate reports that are duplicates, contain false alarms, or describe attack paths that cannot actually be exploited. The team doubled down that every serious finding still requires careful human review before developers can act on it.
Dogecoin ETF zaznamenaly od 6. do 10. července čistý příliv 0 USD, už druhý týden po sobě bez nového kapitálu. Celkový čistý příliv činí 11,77 milionu USD.
Dogecoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) experienced another subdued week, with cumulative weekly net inflows reaching $0 for the period from July 6 to July 10, according to recent figures from SoSovalue. This marks the second consecutive week without any fresh capital entering Dogecoin-linked ETFs.
Institutional demand stagnatesDogecoin ETFs have alternated between periods of zero inflow and minor positive net flows, signalling cautious market sentiment and an absence of major buying pressure. The previous week had already delivered a net negative outflow, a trend not seen since January, when the week ending January 23 also recorded negative weekly flows for these products.
The affected investment vehicles include the offerings from digital asset managers Bitwise, Grayscale, and 21Shares. These firms oversee various Dogecoin ETFs that allow investors to gain exposure to the prominent memecoin without directly holding the asset.
Recent data indicates that the total cumulative net inflow for Dogecoin ETFs has reached $11.77 million, while the products currently manage $10.23 million in net assets. This total represents just 0.09% of Dogecoin’s current market capitalization.
A lack of new inflows could indicate a pause in institutional interest toward Dogecoin-related funds. Market participants are now waiting for a fresh narrative or catalyst that could trigger renewed investment activity in the asset.
Date/PeriodDogecoin ETF Net FlowCumulative Net Inflow (Total)Net AssetsJuly 6 – July 10$0$11.77 million$10.23 millionWeek ending July 2Negative––Week ending January 23Negative––ETF product updates and benchmarksIn product news, 21Shares, a Switzerland-based provider known for offering a range of cryptocurrency exchange-traded products, will restructure its Dogecoin ETF’s pricing benchmark. The company has announced intentions to license market index data from FTSE for improved pricing transparency.
Mini dictionary: 21Shares is a Swiss-based investment firm that offers cryptocurrency ETPs (exchange-traded products), providing institutional and retail investors access to digital assets via traditional equity markets.
The decision to adapt its pricing model arrives amid stagnant inflows and reduced excitement for Dogecoin across institutional products. Market watchers are awaiting signs of renewed interest to help drive participation.
Market sentiment remains weakDogecoin has lacked a strong narrative in recent weeks, which has contributed to muted performance within investment vehicles tied to the asset. The broader cryptocurrency market continues to be characterised by declining valuations, with a majority of altcoins trading close to multi-year lows.
Despite the lack of enthusiasm, certain indicators point to reduced volatility compared to earlier in the year. Crypto derivatives markets are displaying more stable trends, with a shift away from short-term speculation and a rise in longer-term positions.
Market sentiment has also shown marginal improvement. The Fear and Greed Index, a commonly watched metric for gauging investor sentiment in cryptocurrency markets, increased to 32, classified as “fear”, after remaining in the extreme fear range for more than 40 days. The index has not exceeded the neutral 50-point threshold since November, suggesting traders are no longer panicking but remain cautious about potential upside.
Dogecoin ETFs have alternated between weeks of zero and modest positive net flows, underscoring cautious institutional sentiment and the absence of new market drivers for the meme-inspired cryptocurrency.
At the time of reporting, Dogecoin had gained 1.45% over the past 24 hours, trading at $0.075.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
BNB Agent Studio spustilo autonomní AI agenty na BNB Smart Chain s integrací AWS Bedrock AgentCore, takže běží nepřetržitě a platí se jen za aktivní výpočet. Platforma už hlásí přes 120 000 vytvořených agentů.
BNB Agent Studio launched on July 1, 2026, on BNB Smart Chain, integrating Amazon Bedrock’s AgentCore as its managed cloud runtime. The result is autonomous AI agents that stay live around the clock, billed only when active, and completely independent of whatever machine a developer happens to be running.
Here’s the core pitch: a developer writes a single prompt inside familiar tools like Cursor or Claude Code, and a fully operational on-chain AI agent is live in under 15 minutes. Deploying autonomous agents on blockchain infrastructure historically involved days of configuration work, sometimes weeks, covering identity management, payment rails, task interfaces, and compute provisioning separately.
Advertisement
Nina Rong, Executive Director of Growth at BNB Chain, framed it directly: with BNB Agent Studio, developers can dedicate their creativity and focus toward agent logic as the platform streamlines the underlying infrastructure requirements.
In practice, three open standards are doing the heavy lifting underneath. ERC-8004 handles on-chain identity, giving each agent a permanent, ownable digital presence on BNB Smart Chain. ERC-8183 defines the task interface, standardizing how agents receive and execute instructions. The x402 protocol manages self-funded payments, meaning agents can pay for their own operations without a developer manually topping up wallets.
The AWS Bedrock AgentCore integration is what makes the persistence story credible. Rather than running on a developer’s local machine or a self-managed server, agents execute inside isolated cloud environments managed by Amazon’s infrastructure. BNB Chain uses microVM technology for agent isolation, meaning each agent runs in its own sandboxed environment. The billing model follows a pay-per-use structure, with agents only charged for compute when they’re actually doing something.
AWS joins Trust Wallet and PieVerse as the platform’s anchor partners. Trust Wallet handles wallet integration, giving agents a native interface with the BNB Chain ecosystem. PieVerse provides payment infrastructure, sitting alongside the x402 protocol to support the agent economy.
Over 120,000 AI agents have already been created on BNB Smart Chain using the platform. A follow-up update on July 7, 2026, added real-time CoinMarketCap data access through Binance Pay’s B402 integration, meaning agents can now query live market data natively as part of their decision logic without developers building separate data pipeline connections.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Injective (INJ) podle analytiků znovu kreslí vzor předchozích velkých růstů a může mířit do zóny 80 až 90 USD. Potvrzení ale bude vyžadovat jasné proražení na týdenním grafu a vyšší objemy.
Injective (INJ) is capturing renewed attention in the cryptocurrency market as analysts and traders highlight a recurring chart pattern that has preceded each of its past major bullish cycles.
Technical pattern signals potential rallyAnalyst Logical has pointed to a specific trading structure that has reliably appeared ahead of INJ’s strongest rallies. According to Logical, during the 2020–2021 market cycle, INJ surged approximately 4,898%, while the subsequent expansion saw gains of around 6,143%. Both of these large moves followed extended periods of price accumulation near cycle lows, staggered by decisive upward breaks through descending trendlines.
The latest weekly chart indicates this pattern is emerging again. INJ has spent several years retracing from its all-time highs, but now trades just above its long-term downward trendline and sits near the lower end of its historical price range. The token stays above crucial support zones, suggesting gradual accumulation by buyers may be under way.
Based on previous cycle durations and gains, market participants expect INJ could be entering a new growth phase—potentially targeting the $80 to $90 price range. However, analysts believe confirmation will require a clear breakout on the weekly chart, ideally accompanied by increasing volumes.
Market watchers highlight that signs of a third rally are visible, but emphasize that a confirmed breakout and stronger trading volumes are needed to validate this scenario. Without those triggers, the pattern remains an unproven projection at this stage.
Strengthening fundamentals underpin market optimismWhile technical patterns attract traders, ongoing expansion within the Injective ecosystem is also adding momentum to bullish expectations. CoinGecko has described Injective as an advanced Layer 1 blockchain focused on decentralized finance, offering streamlined trading, settlement, tokenization, and decentralized application creation on a single chain.
Since January 2025, Injective’s protocol has facilitated approximately $34.4 billion in derivatives trading volume and processed spot trades worth around $888 million. Of the total derivative activity, some $6.8 billion in volume is tied to real-world assets, accounting for about one-fifth of overall derivatives.
MetricValueDerivatives Volume (since Jan 2025)$34.4 billionSpot Volume (since Jan 2025)$888 millionReal-world Asset Derivatives$6.8 billionINJ Burned (since 2021)7.1 million tokens ($36.6 million)Protocol Profit (past year)$3.41 millionThe protocol’s rising transaction activity has generated approximately $3.41 million in profits for the chain over the past year. This performance places Injective among the ten most profitable Layer 1 blockchains, according to CoinGecko. Notably, the majority of these profits are directed toward community buybacks and token burns, with more than 7.1 million INJ removed from circulation since 2021—equivalent to $36.6 million in value.
Mini dictionary: Injective is a decentralized Layer 1 blockchain designed for finance applications. It offers a range of DeFi services such as derivatives trading, spot trading, and tokenization, enabling developers to build a variety of decentralized apps within its ecosystem.
Protocol updates and integration effortsThe pace of development may influence whether the breakout pattern continues along its historical route. The introduction of native USDC, as well as the integration of Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), could further boost settlement activity on the Cosmos network, which is the broader ecosystem within which Injective operates.
In April, Bitnomial exchange listed INJ futures, joining the growing array of exchange-traded products linked to the token. Additional exchange listings may follow, as some issuers have filed applications in recent months. For now, traders await stronger confirmation of the technical breakout.
Analysts continue to remind participants that, while technical and fundamental conditions appear constructive, price projections remain speculative. The cryptocurrency market is characterized by high volatility and rapid trend changes, warranting a cautious approach to forecasts.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Sui v testu s AI agentem Tunnels dosáhl 6 086 766 TPS, daleko nad cílem 1 milionu. SUI mezitím za 24 hodin vzrostl o 1,34 % a sleduje rezistenci na 0,82 USD.
Sui, a Layer 1 blockchain developed by Mysten Labs and known for its scalability features, is gaining momentum as new data from its AI-powered network test reveals record-breaking transaction processing speeds. The SUI token, the native asset of the network, is trading at $0.7464 with a 24-hour volume of $157.76 million, pushing its market capitalization to $3.02 billion. After climbing 1.34% in the last 24 hours, analysts are watching closely for a potential bullish breakout.
SUI price approaches resistance, eyes breakout targetAs SUI steadily recovers from previous dips, crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe observed that the coin maintains a bullish momentum. He noted that sustained buying activity and increasing trading volumes reflect growing investor confidence in the blockchain’s future. If SUI surpasses the pivotal $0.82 resistance level, analysts believe the price could retest the $1 mark, with $1.20 identified as a further upside target.
Sustained accumulation and a surge in trading activity could pave the way for SUI to break above $0.82 and initiate a new uptrend, potentially pushing the price to $1 and higher resistance levels at $1.20.
Key resistance points remain at $0.82, $1.00, and $1.20, historically significant marks from previous rallies. Market sentiment and overall strength in assets like BTC are contributing to renewed optimism.
Investors and traders are closely following SUI price action, looking for technical confirmation of a breakout that could establish a new bullish trend.
Price LevelStatusSignificance$0.82ResistanceBreakout trigger$1.00ResistancePsychological mark$1.20ResistancePrevious rally peakAI-powered Sui network test sets TPS recordSui recently completed a high-profile experiment using its Tunnels AI agent, aiming to showcase the network’s scalability under AI-driven workloads. The initial target for the test was 1 million transactions per second (TPS), a figure that would already place Sui at the top tier among blockchains. However, the AI agent achieved 6,086,766 TPS in the test environment, demonstrating the network’s capability to handle unprecedented throughput levels.
These results highlight Sui’s aim to support large-scale, high-performance Web3 applications that leverage artificial intelligence. The test was conducted off-mainnet, but developers view it as a major step toward bringing advanced AI and agentic operations to decentralized networks. The platform’s commitment to integrating artificial intelligence is seen as a driver for both price and technological growth.
Mini dictionary: Tunnels AI agent — An artificial intelligence-driven module developed for Sui to automate and maximize blockchain throughput by orchestrating high-frequency transaction processing. AI agents like this serve as a proof of concept for advanced smart contract and infrastructure automation within Web3 ecosystems.
Outlook: Adoption, upgrades, and key levelsBeyond technical performance, Sui continues to work on implementing AI enhancements across its network. The blockchain’s ability to achieve high TPS figures and support complex, AI-driven applications may attract further attention from developers and investors.
The next moves for SUI depend on a successful breach of the $0.82 resistance. If achieved, traders might expect moves toward $1.00 and $1.20. The broader market trend, especially upward momentum in BTC, could also play an important role in the asset’s trajectory.
Investors will monitor ongoing network developments, trading dynamics, and sentiment shifts as they assess the prospects for continued bullish price action.
Network scalability and AI integration will be crucial drivers for SUI’s appeal among both developers and financial markets, making the project a focal point in ongoing blockchain innovation discussions.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Pětiminutové bitcoinové kontrakty na Polymarket vyvolávají obavy z manipulace, protože obchodníci mohou v posledních sekundách hýbat spotovou cenou a ovlivnit vypořádání. Od spuštění nasbíraly kumulativní objem obchodů 4 miliardy USD.
Polymarket’s 5-minute Bitcoin prediction markets have become the crypto world’s fastest casino, and the house advantage belongs to whoever has the fastest bot. The platform’s binary contracts, which let traders bet on whether Bitcoin will be up or down at the end of each 5-minute window, have racked up $4 billion in cumulative trading volume since launching on February 12, 2026.
Traders are synchronizing Polymarket positions with spot Bitcoin trades in the final seconds of each 5-minute interval, effectively nudging the price just enough to tip the contract outcome in their favor. In English: they’re buying the prediction market equivalent of “Bitcoin goes up,” then actually pushing Bitcoin’s price up with a well-timed spot trade right before the clock runs out.
The speed gap is the whole game High-frequency trading firms, AI-powered bots, and algorithmic agents have flooded into Polymarket’s shortest-duration product. The first week alone generated roughly $200 million in volume, a pace that made clear this wasn’t a niche curiosity.
Advertisement
Retail traders trying to compete face a brutal math problem. Market spreads on these contracts range from 2 to 5 cents, which might sound trivial until you consider the contracts are priced around $0.50. The standard fee runs approximately 1.56% at the $0.50 pricing level. Reported average win rates for live trading bots tell the story with uncomfortable clarity: 25% to 27% below breakeven.
How the manipulation works A trader takes a position on Polymarket predicting Bitcoin will finish the 5-minute window above its starting price. With seconds remaining, that same trader places a spot Bitcoin buy order large enough to push the price in the desired direction. The Chainlink oracle that Polymarket uses for price resolution and settlement captures that final-second price, the contract resolves in the manipulator’s favor, and the payout arrives.
For the prediction market industry, the manipulation concerns raise questions about settlement mechanism design. Using a single price snapshot from a Chainlink oracle at the exact end of a 5-minute window creates a precise target for manipulation. Alternative approaches, like using a time-weighted average price over the final 30 seconds, could raise the cost and complexity of gaming the settlement.
The bigger picture for prediction markets The 5-minute Bitcoin contracts have cannibalized longer-duration contracts on the platform, pulling volume and attention toward the shortest possible timeframes.
What this means for investors For retail traders tempted by the apparent simplicity of a binary up-or-down bet, the combination of spreads, fees, and speed disadvantages creates a structural edge for automated participants that individual traders cannot realistically overcome. The $4 billion in cumulative volume proves demand exists. The question is whether that demand can be served in a way that doesn’t systematically disadvantage the majority of participants.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Spotové XRP ETF v pátek zaznamenaly čistý příliv asi 107 000 USD a ukončily čtyřdenní sérii odlivů. Za červenec 2026 ale zůstávají v čistém odlivu 2,61 milionu USD.
XRP ETFs Break Four-Day Outflow StreakSpot $XRP ETFs recorded a modest net inflow of around $107,000 on Friday, July 10, breaking a four-consecutive-day run of outflows. While the figure is small in absolute terms, it marks the first positive daily flow the products had seen in nearly a week.
Despite the brief recovery, the funds remain in negative territory for the month. The latest withdrawals had pushed cumulative flows into a net outflow of $2.61 million for July 2026. That reversal comes after a strong finish to June, when the funds pulled in $15.34 million on June 29, building on an equally impressive $15.63 million net inflow recorded just days prior on June 26.
Three-Month Inflow Run Now Under PressureThe July softness interrupts what had been a sustained period of investor appetite for the regulated products. According to data from Yahoo Finance, XRP ETFs ended April with roughly $82 million in net inflows, marking the funds' best month since the late-2025 launch period, a reverse of what happened in March, which ended with $31 million in outflows. May then topped that, with May's inflow of $118.29 million surpassing April's $81.59 million to become the strongest month of 2026.
The broader picture for the products remains constructive. Cumulative net inflows across all approved XRP spot ETFs continue to hover around a healthy $1.40 billion mark. As of July 11, 2026, seven XRP spot ETFs are trading in the United States with combined assets under management of around $1 billion and 964.5 million XRP tokens locked.
The leading products include the Bitwise XRP ETF (1XRP) with around $245.3 million in assets, followed by the Canary XRP ETF with approximately $225.9 million and the Franklin XRP ETF with about $167.9 million. Whether the July 10 inflow signals a genuine turn or merely a brief pause in the current negative run remains to be seen, but the month's performance will be closely watched given the three-month positive streak that preceded it.
Sources:
U.Today: XRP ETFs Log One of Biggest Outflows of 2026
Yahoo Finance: XRP ETFs Snap Longest Inflow Streak of 2026
Coinpedia: Spot XRP ETFs Record Largest Outflow Since March
XRP se na konci června krátce propadl na 1,01 USD a letos je níže o více než 25 %. Mezitím tokenizovaná aktiva na XRP Ledger překročila 3,5 miliardy USD.
In the last week of June, XRP printed its weakest price since late 2024, briefly touching $1.01 before stabilizing in the $1.05 to $1.13 range where it has traded through early July. The token is down more than 25% for the year and roughly 65% below the $3.65 cycle high it set in July 2025. On the same June days that the chart broke down, tokenized real-world assets on the XRP Ledger crossed $3.5 billion, more than triple the level at which they started the year, spot XRP exchange-traded funds extended a net inflow streak that would reach eight consecutive weeks, and Ripple stood weeks away from full European authorization under MiCA.
Summary
Ripple has delivered record institutional growth in 2026, but XRP remains more than 25% lower this year and near multi-year lows. The article examines both sides of the debate: whether Ripple’s expanding infrastructure will eventually lift XRP or whether the company and token have permanently diverged. Upcoming CLARITY Act votes, ETF flows, XRPL upgrades, and institutional adoption could determine whether the gap between Ripple and XRP finally closes. That is the whole story in one paragraph, and it is genuinely strange. By any operational measure, the 12 months behind Ripple are the most productive in the company’s history: a settled SEC case, launched ETFs, a $1.25 billion prime brokerage acquisition, membership in the clearing infrastructure of American equities, a stablecoin with $18 billion in quarterly transfer volume, and regulatory licenses stacking up on three continents.
By the only measure most holders care about, the same 12 months are the worst since the 2022 bear market. The gap between what Ripple built and what XRP is worth has never been wider, and how that gap closes, upward through the price or downward through the narrative, is now the central question hanging over the fourth largest ecosystem in crypto.
This feature lays out both sides honestly: the case that the infrastructure eventually drags the token up, and the case that the token and the company have simply decoupled, with the price telling the truer story.
The year Ripple built: an inventory It helps to see the accumulation in one place, because no single item explains the disconnect. The pattern does.
Legal closure came first. The SEC’s enforcement case against Ripple, filed in December 2020, formally concluded in 2025 with a financial settlement, ending the overhang that had defined the token’s American existence for half a decade and building on the 2023 court finding that programmatic exchange sales of XRP were not securities transactions.
Then distribution. Spot XRP ETFs launched in November 2025 across 5 providers and have accumulated roughly $1.49 billion in cumulative net inflows since. May 2026 was the strongest month of the year with $118 million, including a record $60.5 million week.
The streak ran 8 consecutive weeks into July, as crypto.news reported, before showing its first daily pauses, and assets under management sit near $1.05 billion, about 1.5% of the token’s market capitalization, led by Bitwise at $331 million, Canary at $265 million, and Franklin at $262 million.
Then market plumbing. Ripple closed its acquisition of prime broker Hidden Road in October 2025 and rebranded it Ripple Prime. On March 2, 2026, Ripple Prime joined the participant directory of the National Securities Clearing Corporation, placing an XRP-linked institution inside the DTCC complex that clears the bulk of American equity trading and safeguards roughly $100 trillion in assets. DTCC has since named Ripple Prime to the working group of more than 50 firms shaping its tokenization service for Russell 1000 stocks, ETFs, and Treasuries, scheduled for October 2026.
Then the ledger itself. XRPL tokenized assets grew from $991 million on January 1 to $3.5 billion by midsummer. In early May, JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo Finance, and Ripple completed the first cross-border tokenized US Treasury redemption on the XRPL, settling in under 5 seconds. Daily transactions hit 3 million on March 15, roughly three times mid-2025 averages.
A protocol amendment from XRPL version 3.1.0 that would enable fixed-term lending through Single Asset Vaults is under validator vote, and support has been climbing toward the 80% supermajority it needs, a governance process crypto.news has tracked as it approaches the threshold.
Then the stablecoin. RLUSD reached a $1.72 billion market capitalization in under a year, moved more than $18 billion in the first quarter alone, and Ripple hedged the strategy in July by joining Open USD, the consortium dollar token backed by Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, and more than 140 other companies.
Then the licenses. A full Electronic Money Institution approval from Luxembourg in February, UK Financial Conduct Authority permissions in January, and the full MiCA Crypto-Asset Service Provider license on July 6 that opened all 30 countries of the European Economic Area, arriving days after the transition deadline locked unlicensed competitors out of the bloc.
Any one of these, delivered into the 2024 market, would have produced a rally measured in double digits. Delivered into 2026, the entire list produced a chart that goes down and to the right.
The year XRP traded: an autopsy The price ledger is shorter and harsher. XRP closed 2025 near $1.90 after the July peak at $3.65, rallied to about $2.40 in the new year, then spent 2026 in decline: a sharp February selloff that prompted Standard Chartered to cut its year-end target from $8 to $2.80, a spring of lower highs between $1.28 and $1.50, a June that opened near $1.30 and closed near $1.04, and a July that has been a daily fight to defend the $1 line.
The token trades below every major moving average, with the 20-day near $1.11, the 50-day near $1.20, and the 200-day near $1.52. Relative strength readings in the low 30s mark the deepest oversold territory of the cycle.
Two facts about the decline matter for interpreting it. First, it was market-wide. Bitcoin fell from above $100,000 to below $62,000, briefly touching $58,000. Ethereum, Solana, and BNB fell comparably or worse; total crypto market capitalization shed $2.3 trillion over 8 weeks, and digital assets posted a third consecutive losing quarter, the longest streak since 2022, as institutional capital rotated toward AI equities. Everything outside Bitcoin and Ethereum lost roughly 23% in 6 months. XRP’s beta to that drawdown was high, as it always is, because the token falls harder than Bitcoin when sentiment turns.
Second, and more uncomfortable for the bull case, none of the good news interrupted it. The full MiCA license produced a 3% weekly decline around the preliminary approval and indifference at the final one. The DTCC milestone passed without a candle. The Treasury redemption pilot with JPMorgan, arguably the most institutionally significant event in XRPL history, is invisible on the chart.
The one catalyst the market visibly responds to is legislative: the token jumped 4.5% within an hour of the CLARITY Act clearing committee on May 14, and it sagged when the July 4 signing target slipped, price action crypto.news examined as the delay sank in. The market has, in effect, told everyone what it is waiting for, and it is not another license.
What the forecasters did with the same facts The professional forecasting record around XRP in 2026 is itself evidence of the disconnect, because analysts looking at identical data have produced the widest dispersion of targets for any large-cap asset.
Standard Chartered entered the year at $8 for 2026 and cut to $2.80 in February after the selloff, a 65% downgrade in a single revision, while explicitly leaving its 2030 target untouched at $28. The bank’s stated logic was that regulatory clarity, institutional involvement, and new investment products justify higher long-term valuations, but near-term price action would remain correlated with the broad crypto market. That is the lag thesis and the beta thesis coexisting in one research note.
Bitwise carries a $4.94 year-end forecast. JPMorgan’s contribution is conditional rather than directional: $4 to $8.4 billion of first-year ETF inflows if the CLARITY Act passes, with no comparable estimate under failure. Algorithmic models cluster far lower, in the $1.70 to $2 band, essentially extrapolating the chart. The professional consensus for year-end sits above $2, which would require a 77% rally from current levels in under 6 months, a move the asset has produced before but only during regime changes in sentiment.
Forecast dispersion this wide is unusual for an asset of this size, and it maps precisely onto the two readings of the disconnect. Analysts weighting the infrastructure see multiples of the current price; models weighting the tape see the current price as fair. When the same inputs produce a $1.70 answer and a $28 answer depending on the discount rate applied to institutional adoption, the market is not confused. It is unpriced, waiting on the one variable, classification, that neither the company nor the chart can supply.
The bear reading: the token and the company are different assets The uncomfortable thesis deserves its full strength. Ripple’s success and XRP’s value are linked by a mechanism, and the mechanism is thin.
Ripple the company earns revenue from payments, custody, prime brokerage, and stablecoin float. Almost none of that revenue requires the XRP price to be anything in particular. The company’s own announcements make the point unintentionally: the MiCA license release mentions XRP essentially once, in the boilerplate.
Ripple Payments has moved more than $100 billion across 60-plus markets, but most of that volume settles in fiat or RLUSD, and where it does route through the XRP Ledger, the burned fee per transaction is a fraction of a cent. 3 million daily transactions at those rates destroys token supply at a pace measured in rounding errors. The stablecoin strategy, on this reading, actively competes with the bridge-asset story that once justified the token: every corridor that settles in RLUSD is a corridor that does not need XRP volatility risk.
Supply mechanics deepen the skepticism, and they deserve their own accounting. Ripple releases up to 1 billion XRP from escrow every month under a schedule set in 2017, relocking the majority into new escrow contracts while a smaller portion enters circulation through sales and ecosystem distributions. The market has watched this metronome for years, and its psychological weight exceeds its mechanical weight: even in months when net new supply is modest, the release event itself gives traders a recurring reason to expect selling, and expectations of supply function like supply. Set the monthly release against the demand side and the imbalance is stark. The entire ETF complex has absorbed roughly $1.49 billion over 8 months, an average of around $6 million of daily buying, in a token that trades north of $1.4 billion in daily volume.
Institutional flows at that scale can support a floor; they cannot fight a distribution schedule and a bear market simultaneously. The bear case does not need Ripple to fail. It needs only for the demand mechanisms to keep growing slower than the supply mechanisms, which is a fair description of every month of 2026 so far.
There is also the exchange migration to consider from the skeptical side. Tokens leaving exchanges for ETF custody are commonly read as bullish scarcity, but a share of that movement is simply the same speculative holders changing wrappers, retail selling spot that funds buy into trusts, with no net new demand created. The flow data cannot distinguish conviction from repackaging, which is why the bears discount it. The comparison Brad Garlinghouse himself invited when he attacked Michael Saylor’s leverage model cuts both ways, as crypto.news observed: both Strategy and Ripple sit atop enormous token treasuries whose value depends on a market they are simultaneously supplying.
On this view, the 2026 chart is not a mispricing. It is the market correctly concluding that owning XRP is not owning Ripple, that the institutional build-out accrues to Ripple’s private shareholders, and that the token’s fair value is whatever speculative demand plus modest utility demand will bear in a risk-off tape. The disconnect is not a gap waiting to close. It is the honest spread between an equity story and a token story that were never the same story.
The bull reading: infrastructure is demand with a lag The counterargument does not deny any of that. It argues the causality has a delay measured in years, and that 2026 is the trough of the lag, not the verdict.
Start with the demand channels that did not exist 18 months ago. ETFs holding $1.05 billion sound small against a $69 billion market cap until you note the direction and the constraint: 8 straight weeks of net inflows through the worst quarter since 2022, from a buyer base that is still legally capped. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and most insurance portfolios cannot allocate to an unclassified asset at all.
That is precisely the constraint the CLARITY Act removes by making XRP a digital commodity under CFTC oversight, and it is why JPMorgan and Standard Chartered independently project $4 to $8.4 billion in first-year inflows under passage, a 5- to 8-fold expansion of the current ETF base. The bill’s merged draft is due the week of July 13, with floor action targeted a week later. The single largest catalyst in the token’s history has a date range attached to it.
Second, the utility story is finally measurable instead of theoretical. Tokenized assets tripling to $3.5 billion, a functioning institutional redemption pilot with the largest bank in America, a lending protocol approaching validator approval, and RLUSD volume in the tens of billions are all activity that lives on the ledger whose native asset is XRP.
The fee-burn mechanism is tiny per transaction, but the investment case was never fee burn; it is that reserve requirements, liquidity provisioning, and settlement paths on a busy institutional ledger create structural demand for the asset that denominates it. Japan already offers the proof of concept, where SBI’s remittance corridors made the country the one place XRP is used at scale in production, a story crypto.news has documented, and Europe post-MiCA is the first market since Japan where Ripple holds the full regulatory stack to attempt a repeat.
Third, the on-chain footprint of conviction is visible even at the lows. Whale accumulation ran through the spring, with roughly 450 million XRP moving through Binance in a 10-day stretch in March, wallet creation hit a 3-month high near 5,000 per day in late June, and large-holder balances rose while retail sentiment collapsed. Someone with size is treating $1 as a level to buy, and the historical pattern in this asset is that accumulation phases at multi-month lows precede the violent repricings the token is famous for. July, for what it is worth, is historically XRP’s strongest month, averaging around 10% gains, though seasonality in a fear-gripped market deserves limited weight.
The bull synthesis: the company spent 2026 building the pipes, the law that fills them sits 3 weeks from a vote, and the price is a coiled spring compressed by macro conditions that have nothing to do with Ripple. Standard Chartered, even after cutting its 2026 target to $2.80, left its 2030 target at $28, which is the lag thesis expressed as a forecast.
The map of the battlefield at $1 For traders, the disconnect compresses into a few price zones that both camps agree on even while disagreeing about everything else.
Support is a dense band between $1.00 and $1.06, where a thick concentration of historical buying has absorbed every test since late June, including seven separate probes of the $1.04 to $1.06 area. Beneath it, the map goes dark: a decisive daily close below $1 opens territory the token has not traded since 2024, with the next meaningful demand zone estimated between $0.80 and $0.90. The bounce attempts of early July have built a sequence of higher lows above $1.03, and the immediate breakout zone sits at $1.056 to $1.066, where a surge of volume, at one point 1,400% above the hourly average, marked the strongest buying of the month.
Resistance begins where the moving averages live. The 20-day average near $1.11 and the descending channel midline have capped every rally attempt; above that, $1.18 to $1.20 is the zone that separates a technical bounce from a trend change, since it contains the 50-day average and the highs of the last failed breakout. A move through $1.20 would be the first structural repair of the year. The level that matters for the larger argument is further up: analysts broadly treat $1.65 as the line above which the downtrend that began at $3.65 would formally be broken.
The holder structure beneath those levels is where the two theses interact most directly. Exchange balances have been falling as tokens migrate to ETF custodians and cold storage, whale addresses have grown through the decline, and the retail cohort, measured by funding rates and sentiment indexes reading extreme fear, is maximally absent.
That configuration, shrinking liquid supply against a depressed price, is the classic setup for violent moves in both directions: thin order books amplify whatever catalyst arrives. A CLARITY passage into this structure would meet little overhead supply until the mid-$1.20s. A failure into this structure would find equally little bid support below $1. The market has arranged itself for an outsized reaction to a binary event, which is rational, because that is exactly what the calendar is offering.
What would actually settle the argument Disconnects resolve through evidence, and four specific markers will decide which reading was right.
The CLARITY floor vote before the August 7 recess is the binary. Passage activates the constrained buyer base and converts the classification question from risk to fact; failure removes the identified catalyst and hands the bear thesis another year of confirmation. Nothing else on this list matters as much.
XRPL settlement disclosures are the slow variable. Europe will produce client announcements through the fall; the tell is whether named institutions settle on the ledger or through RLUSD and fiat rails that bypass the token. Every disclosure is a data point for exactly the mechanism the two camps dispute.
ETF flow behavior around the $1 level tests the institutional bid. The first net outflow day arrived on June 30 as the quarter closed. If inflows resume through a flat tape, the allocation story survives the drawdown. If outflows follow the price down, the ETF base was momentum money wearing an institutional costume.
The lending amendment vote tests whether the ledger’s institutional roadmap ships. Validator support has been grinding toward the 80% threshold; activation would open uncollateralized fixed-term credit through Single Asset Vaults, the first XRPL primitive aimed squarely at the institutional DeFi demand the bull case requires.
One more marker sits outside the token entirely: Ripple’s own capital decisions. The company has explored an initial public offering intermittently, and hints have circulated that XRP holders might somehow participate in a listing. Nothing concrete has emerged, and nothing should be assumed, but the scenario clarifies the stakes of the disconnect better than any chart.
If Ripple lists, the market will finally price the company and the token side by side, in public, every trading day. Either the equity valuation validates the institutional story and drags attention back to the ledger that underpins it, or investors will buy the company and continue ignoring the token, at which point the decoupling thesis stops being a thesis and becomes a quote on two screens. The company has every incentive to make the token matter before that comparison goes live.
For holders, the practical takeaway is about position sizing against a calendar, not about conviction in either narrative. The next 26 days contain the merged CLARITY draft, a possible floor vote, the July escrow release, continuing ETF flow data, and the validator vote on the lending amendment. That is an unusual density of resolution for a single month. The disconnect between Ripple’s year and XRP’s year has been stable precisely because nothing forced the two stories to reconcile. The Senate schedule is about to force it.
The widest gap in crypto right now is not between any two tokens. It is between a company having its best year and a token having its worst, wearing the same three letters. Markets close gaps like this one eventually, and they are indifferent about the direction. 26 days of Senate calendar will supply the first, and probably decisive, piece of the answer.
Ripple získal v Lucembursku plnou licenci MiCA, takže může nabízet regulované krypto služby ve všech 30 zemích EHP. V USA ale právní klasifikace XRP stále čeká na zákon CLARITY Act.
On July 6, Luxembourg’s financial regulator, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, upgraded Ripple’s preliminary Crypto-Asset Service Provider authorization into a full license under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets framework. The approval means Ripple can passport regulated crypto services across all 30 countries of the European Economic Area, from Lisbon to Helsinki, under a single national authorization. Cassie Craddock, Ripple’s managing director for the UK and Europe, framed the moment plainly: the company enters the post-transitional MiCA era fully compliant and ready to scale.
Summary
Ripple secured a full MiCA license in Luxembourg, allowing it to offer regulated crypto services across the European Economic Area. While Europe has given Ripple regulatory certainty, XRP’s legal classification in the U.S. still depends on the CLARITY Act. The article explores whether Ripple’s expanding regulatory footprint can eventually translate into stronger XRP demand. Five days later, on the other side of the Atlantic, the legislation that would finally tell American regulators what XRP actually is remained stuck in the Senate. A merged draft of the CLARITY Act is expected the week of July 13, floor action is penciled in for the week of July 20, and the whole effort still needs roughly 7 Democratic votes it does not currently have. Galaxy Research has cut its odds of passage in 2026 to a coin flip.
That is the strange position Ripple occupies in the summer of 2026. A company born in San Francisco, hardened by a 4-year fight with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and lobbying harder than almost anyone for American crypto legislation, is now more comprehensively regulated in Europe than it has ever been at home. The Luxembourg license is not just a compliance milestone. It is a measuring stick for how far apart the two largest Western markets have drifted, and a live experiment in whether regulatory certainty actually converts into business, and eventually into token demand.
What Ripple actually won in Luxembourg The July 6 approval was the second half of a two-part regulatory build that Ripple has been assembling in the Grand Duchy for most of a year. The first half arrived on February 2, when the CSSF granted Ripple full approval as an Electronic Money Institution. The EMI license lets the company issue electronic money and run regulated fiat payment services across the European Union. It followed a preliminary EMI approval a month earlier and came shortly after Ripple picked up an EMI license and a cryptoasset registration from the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, extending the same regulated posture to Britain.
The CASP license completes the picture on the crypto side. Under MiCA, a Crypto-Asset Service Provider authorization covers custody, exchange, transfer, and related services for cryptoassets. Ripple received preliminary CASP approval from the CSSF on June 23, then satisfied the remaining conditions in under 2 weeks, converting the in-principle nod into a full license just after MiCA’s transition period closed on July 1. As crypto.news reported, the timing put Ripple inside the licensed perimeter at the exact moment the perimeter became a hard wall.
The combination matters more than either license alone. With the EMI approval, European banks, fintechs, and corporates can move regulated fiat and e-money through Ripple. With the CASP approval, the same clients can move cryptoassets and stablecoin flows through the same provider under the same rulebook. Ripple Payments, the company’s cross-border settlement product, has processed more than $100 billion across more than 60 markets globally. The Luxembourg stack gives that product a clean legal wrapper in a bloc of roughly 450 million people, with one regulator to answer to and 30 countries to sell into.
Ripple says its global license count now exceeds 75 authorizations, registrations, and approvals, a portfolio that spans Singapore, Dubai, New York’s BitLicense regime, and now the heart of the EU. Few crypto-native companies carry anything comparable. That was a deliberate strategy long before MiCA existed: sell to banks, and you must look like something a bank compliance department can approve.
The graveyard on the other side of the deadline The value of a MiCA license is easiest to see in what happened to the companies that do not have one. The regulation’s transition period ended on July 1, 2026. From that date, any firm offering covered crypto services in the EEA without CASP authorization must limit or stop those services. The European Securities and Markets Authority added 57 newly approved firms to its register right after the deadline, bringing the total to around 300 authorized providers. Set that against the more than 1,200 firms that operated in Europe under the old patchwork of national regimes, and the scale of the cull becomes clear. By some counts, only around 210 of those incumbent companies completed the licensing process in time.
The casualty list includes names that would have seemed untouchable 2 years ago. Binance, the largest exchange in the world by volume, failed to secure authorization in time through its Greek application and has told customers in several European markets that services are suspended while it seeks approval elsewhere. Tether chose not to apply at all, citing objections to MiCA’s stablecoin requirements, and USDT has been delisted from European venues as a result. Hundreds of smaller firms now face a choice between merging with licensed competitors, shrinking to non-covered activities, or exiting the region entirely.
The passporting mechanism is what makes a single national license so valuable. Under MiCA, a firm authorized in one member state can offer covered crypto services throughout the EU and the wider EEA without seeking separate national approvals, the same single-market logic that has governed European banking and investment services for decades.
Before MiCA, a crypto company wanting continental coverage needed a patchwork of national registrations, each with its own rules, timelines, and supervisory quirks, and each revocable on its own schedule. After MiCA, the choice of home regulator became a strategic decision, because one supervisor now stands behind a firm’s entire European footprint. That concentration cuts both ways.
A company with a Luxembourg license answers to a regulator with a long institutional finance pedigree and a reputation for rigor, which reassures bank counterparties. It also means a single supervisory dispute could, in theory, imperil access to 30 markets at once. Firms accepted that trade because the alternative, 30 separate relationships, was worse.
Luxembourg, meanwhile, has become one of the main gateways for the firms that made it through. Coinbase won its MiCA license from the CSSF in June 2025, opened a physical hub in the country, and migrated its EU operations into a dedicated Luxembourg entity.
Standard Chartered received its authorization through the same regulator. B2C2 took the Luxembourg route for its European trading business. Ripple now joins that group, which turns the Grand Duchy into something like the institutional crypto capital of the EU, a jurisdiction that courted the industry with dedicated blockchain legislation and a regulator willing to process serious applications quickly.
For Ripple specifically, the competitive math is straightforward. Every payments client it pitches in Europe now faces a shrunken menu of fully licensed providers. The company spent years and considerable money building a compliance posture that most rivals treated as optional. MiCA just made it mandatory, and Ripple crossed the line while much of the field did not.
The license lands on top of an institutional build-out The Luxembourg approval did not arrive in isolation. It caps 12 months in which Ripple assembled more institutional infrastructure than in the previous decade combined, which is what makes the token’s indifference so striking and the license so strategically loaded.
Start with the prime brokerage. Ripple closed its $1.25 billion acquisition of Hidden Road in October 2025, folding a multi-asset prime broker into the company and rebranding the operation as Ripple Prime. On March 2, 2026, Ripple Prime appeared in the participant directory of the National Securities Clearing Corporation, the DTCC subsidiary that clears the vast majority of American equity trades.
The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation processes transactions measured in the quadrillions of dollars annually and safeguards roughly $100 trillion in assets. Having XRP-linked infrastructure inside that machine is the kind of positioning that takes years to arrange and cannot be improvised later. DTCC has since named Ripple Prime to the industry working group of more than 50 firms shaping its tokenization service for Russell 1000 stocks, major ETFs, and US Treasuries, scheduled to launch in October 2026.
Then the ledger itself. Tokenized real-world assets on the XRP Ledger grew from $991 million at the start of 2026 to roughly $3.5 billion by midsummer. In early May, JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo Finance, and Ripple completed the first cross-border tokenized US Treasury redemption on XRPL, clearing in under 5 seconds.
Daily transactions on the ledger hit 3 million on March 15, roughly triple the averages of mid-2025. RLUSD, the stablecoin at the center of Ripple’s settlement strategy, reached a market capitalization of $1.72 billion in under a year, with more than $18 billion in transfer volume in the first quarter of 2026 alone. And in July, Ripple joined Open USD, the consortium dollar stablecoin backed by Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, and more than 140 other companies, hedging its own stablecoin bet with a seat at the industry table.
Every item on that list is the kind of development that, in a friendlier market, would have carried its own rally. Instead, each landed on a chart grinding lower, which is a useful reminder of how much of crypto pricing in 2026 is macro beta and how little is project-specific fundamentals. The relevance to the Luxembourg story is this: the license is not a standalone trophy. It is the regulatory layer of a stack that now includes clearing access, tokenization rails, a stablecoin, and a prime broker. Europe is where that full stack can operate legally today.
Meanwhile in Washington: a bill, a deadline, and seven missing votes The contrast with the United States is not subtle. The CLARITY Act, the market structure bill that would sort digital assets into commodity and security buckets and hand spot market oversight of digital commodities to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, has traveled further than any crypto legislation in American history. The House passed it 294 to 134 in July 2025. The Senate Banking Committee advanced its version 15 to 9 on May 14, 2026, with Democrats Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks crossing over. The bill sits on the Senate Legislative Calendar, eligible for a floor vote whenever leadership schedules one.
And there it sits. A unified draft merging the Banking and Agriculture Committee texts, reportedly more than 70 pages longer than the earlier versions and heavier on consumer protections, is expected as soon as the week of July 13, with floor action targeted for the week of July 20. The Senate breaks for recess on August 7.
Senator Cynthia Lummis has warned that failure in this window likely means no market structure law before 2030. Galaxy Research has lowered its passage odds for 2026 to 50%, down from 75% right after the committee vote, and Stifel’s Washington strategist has written that the bill’s prospects deteriorate materially if it misses the recess deadline.
The blockage is not primarily about crypto. It is about ethics. Senate Democrats have demanded language barring senior government officials, including the president, from holding business interests in the crypto industry, a demand aimed squarely at the Trump family’s estimated $2.3 billion in crypto exposure across memecoins, World Liberty Financial, and mining ventures.
The White House has said it will accept rules that apply across the board but not language that singles out one officeholder. A tentative compromise involving state attorney general enforcement fell apart. Even Gallego and Alsobrooks have said their floor votes depend on the ethics fix. As crypto.news covered, disputes over vacant SEC and CFTC commissioner seats have layered a second standoff on top of the first.
Two more fault lines complicate the count. Senator Amy Klobuchar has proposed an amendment that would block new CFTC rules from taking effect until at least four commissioners are confirmed, effectively turning the agency staffing dispute into a statutory switch on the entire regulatory framework the bill would create. CFTC Chair Selig has pushed back, arguing on July 9 that the bill is being derailed by matters extraneous to its substance and that the agency does not need a quorum to write rules.
And law enforcement groups have raised objections to Section 604, the developer protection language drawn from the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, worried it could complicate illicit finance cases. Senator Ron Wyden countered on July 8 with a letter to Senate leadership urging that the BRCA provisions be preserved, giving the DeFi industry its one clear win of the month. Lummis, for her part, has answered the illicit finance critique by pointing to more than 16 safeguards in the text and $150 million in dedicated enforcement funding.
Add it together, and the arithmetic is unforgiving. Three working weeks remain in July, a defense spending bill competes for floor time, and every unresolved dispute needs to close simultaneously for 7 Democrats to move. The committee vote on May 14 offered a preview of what passage would be worth: within an hour of the 15-9 result, Bitcoin jumped to $81,449, and XRP gained 4.5% on the day. Citi has a $143,000 Bitcoin target and Standard Chartered a $150,000 target contingent on the bill becoming law. Markets have, in other words, priced regulatory clarity as a real asset. The Senate simply has not delivered it.
So the American question that matters most to Ripple, whether XRP is a digital commodity under CFTC oversight or something the SEC can still reach, remains formally unanswered. The 2023 court ruling in the SEC’s case against Ripple found that programmatic sales of XRP on exchanges were not securities transactions, and the SEC case itself ended in a settlement in 2025. But a court ruling in one district and a dropped enforcement action are not a statute. They are precedents that a future administration, a future commission, or a future judge could narrow. That is precisely the uncertainty the CLARITY Act exists to remove, and precisely the uncertainty Europe has already removed for Ripple’s payments business.
Does a license move a token? Here is where the bull case and the bear case split, and both deserve a fair hearing.
The bear case is blunt: the Luxembourg license is a company milestone, not a token catalyst. Ripple’s own announcement barely mentions XRP. The approval covers Ripple’s regulated payments services, not its tokens, and MiCA runs a separate authorization track for stablecoins that RLUSD has not yet cleared. Until that happens, Ripple’s own dollar token cannot be offered to the European public, a gap rivals like Circle’s USDC do not have.
Most Ripple Payments volume today settles in RLUSD or fiat, not XRP, and where XRP does route payments across the XRP Ledger, the fees burned per transaction amount to fractions of a cent. When the preliminary CASP approval landed in June, XRP fell about 3% that week alongside the broader market. The market looked at the news and, quite rationally, did not treat it as a buy signal.
The token’s price action through 2026 supports that reading. XRP peaked near $3.65 in July 2025, closed last year around $1.90, and has spent this summer defending the $1 level, trading recently in the $1.05 to $1.13 range. None of Ripple’s regulatory wins arrested the slide, because the slide was never about Ripple. It tracked a market-wide drawdown that pulled Bitcoin below $60,000 and cut altcoins far deeper.
The bull case asks for a longer clock. Regulatory moats compound slowly. Ripple can now sell regulated crypto payments to European banks and corporates at a moment when much of its competition legally cannot, and enterprise procurement cycles that begin in 2026 produce volume in 2027 and 2028. If that volume increasingly touches the XRP Ledger, whether through On-Demand Liquidity corridors, RLUSD flows that settle on XRPL, or tokenized asset activity, the token accrues usage that exists independently of speculative sentiment.
Institutional demand channels are also open in a way they were not a year ago: spot XRP ETFs have logged roughly $1.49 billion in cumulative net inflows since launching in November 2025, and as crypto.news noted, that streak recently stretched to 8 consecutive weeks even as the price languished. Standard Chartered and JPMorgan have both projected $4 to $8.4 billion in first-year ETF inflows if the CLARITY Act passes and unlocks allocators who cannot touch unclassified assets.
The honest synthesis is that the license changes Ripple’s revenue trajectory with high confidence and XRP’s demand trajectory with low confidence. The link between the two runs through actual ledger usage, and that is a metric to watch, not a headline to trade.
The deeper pattern: Two systems, two bets Step back from Ripple and the transatlantic gap looks like two different theories of how to regulate an industry.
Europe chose comprehensiveness first. MiCA is a single rulebook, written once, applied across 30 countries, with a hard deadline and real exclusion for non-compliance. Its critics have a point: the regime’s stablecoin rules, including a blanket ban on interest and heavy bank-deposit reserve requirements, pushed the largest stablecoin issuer on earth out of the market, and the European Commission has already opened a consultation on whether parts of the framework need repair. A rulebook that excludes Tether and stalls RLUSD is not obviously optimized for growth. But it exists, it is enforceable, and a company that clears it knows exactly where it stands.
The United States chose litigation first and legislation later, maybe. The SEC’s enforcement campaign defined the rules by lawsuit, Ripple’s case being the canonical example, and the current Congress is attempting to replace that regime with statute under intense time pressure and presidential conflict-of-interest baggage that no other financial bill has ever carried. The fallback if CLARITY fails is the SEC’s administrative framework known as Regulation Crypto, which Chair Paul Atkins has described as a bridge to legislation. A bridge built by one commission can be dismantled by the next, which is exactly the problem statutes exist to solve. Similar dynamics played out in the stablecoin fight that preceded this one, where, as crypto.news reported, even a bill that eventually passed spent months hostage to fights over state versus federal authority.
For a company like Ripple, which sells to the most conservative buyers in finance, the European bet pays off immediately, and the American bet pays off only if Congress acts. Cross-border payments are also a business where network effects follow regulatory access. Japan already shows what deep institutional integration looks like, with SBI running XRP-based remittance corridors that have no real American equivalent, a story crypto.news has examined in depth. Europe is now the second major bloc where Ripple can attempt that playbook with full regulatory cover. The United States, the company’s home market, is the one place where it still cannot.
There is one more wrinkle worth naming. If the CLARITY Act does pass before the August recess, the transatlantic gap closes fast, and it closes in a way that favors assets with existing institutional plumbing. XRP would enter CFTC jurisdiction as a digital commodity with ETFs already trading, a prime brokerage arm already inside the DTCC’s clearing ecosystem, and a European license portfolio already generating regulated volume. The pieces would connect. If the bill dies, the gap becomes the story for another year at minimum, and Ripple’s center of commercial gravity keeps shifting toward jurisdictions that gave it an answer.
What to watch from here Three markers will tell the story faster than any press release.
First, RLUSD’s European stablecoin authorization. The EMI license gives Ripple the corporate foundation to seek approval for its stablecoin under MiCA’s separate e-money token rules. Until that clears, the most natural settlement asset in Ripple’s European stack stays off the shelf for public offering, and the license story remains half finished.
Second, disclosed European client wins. Licenses are permission, not demand. The proof that regulatory certainty converts into business will arrive as named banks, payment providers, and corporates routing volume through Ripple Payments in the EEA. Watch for whether those announcements specify XRPL settlement or quietly settle in fiat and RLUSD, because that distinction is the entire XRP investment case in miniature.
Third, the Senate floor in the last 2 weeks of July. The merged CLARITY draft, the ethics compromise or its absence, and the 7-Democrat math will determine whether the United States joins Europe in giving Ripple a rulebook or hands the company another year of asymmetry. Either outcome is informative. One of them is also tradable.
The Luxembourg license will not move XRP this week, and anyone claiming otherwise is selling something. What it does is quietly settle an older argument. For years, skeptics said Ripple’s compliance-heavy strategy was expensive theater in an industry that rewarded speed over permission.
In Europe, in July 2026, permission became the product. The companies that skipped the theater are locked out of a market of 450 million people, and the company that endured 4 years of litigation from its own government is, for the moment, more welcome in Brussels than in Washington. That inversion says less about Ripple than it does about the two systems that produced it, and the next month will reveal whether the American half of the story finally catches up.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has revealed that his company also shut down after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued it in 2020. He highlighted how they faced a dilemma after the Commission sued them, seeing as the government had unlimited resources to see the lawsuit through to the end.
Ripple CEO Says The Crypto Firm Almost Shut Down In an appearance at the KU School of Business, Garlinghouse said that they almost decided to shut down the company after the SEC sued them. He noted that the government had “infinite power and resources,” signaling that they faced a tough decision about whether to challenge the lawsuit.
The Ripple CEO further remarked that shutting down the company would likely have been an easier choice. Under such a scenario, he said that they would have simply distributed their XRP holdings to shareholders on a pro rata basis and informed the SEC that they no longer held ay XRP since the Commission said it was a security.
However, he added that such a decision would have been a bad outcome, seeing as hundreds of people would have lost their jobs. In line with this, he said he was glad they did not make such a decision, although it wasn’t easy at the time. The SEC sued Ripple in 2020 over the sale of XRP, and both sides eventually settled the long-running lawsuit last year after the Trump administration took office.
It is worth noting that the SEC had also sued Garlinghouse and Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen, claiming that they had sold XRP as an unregistered security. However, Judge Analisa Torres eventually ruled that XRP was not a security in itself. Interestingly, the Ripple lawsuit judge recently handed Kalshi a major loss in its case against New York, ruling that New York state gambling laws apply to Kalshi’s sports-related event contracts.
XRP Community Member Reflects On The Journey Commenting on how far Ripple and XRP have come, community member BankXRP noted that Ripple’s U.S. business is fully back and that the company has secured licenses across multiple jurisdictions. As CoinGape reported, Ripple recently secured a new EU license, making it MiCA-compliant.
I remember December 2020 like it was yesterday.
SEC sues Ripple. Exchanges start delisting XRP overnight. Coinbase, one by one, others follow.
XRP is done. It’s over, sell before it goes to zero. Ripple is finished, the SEC just killed it.
For almost 2 years, that was the…
— 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP (@BankXRP) July 11, 2026
Meanwhile, BankXRP added that institutional partnerships are stacking up globally for the crypto firm, while banks are building on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) rather than just talking about it. “The same “dead” project people wrote off in 2020 is now sitting at the center of institutional adoption,” he said.
The XRP community member also declared that bear markets and lawsuits do not kill real conviction; rather, they just test who actually understood the thesis in the first place.
For more on regulated crypto firms, please check out Best Regulated Crypto Exchanges in Europe in July 2026 – MiCA Compliant List
BNB Chain uvedla, že BSC dosáhl do června 2026 propustnosti asi 5 200 TPS, téměř dvojnásobku oproti 2 800 na začátku roku. Ve 2. pololetí 2026 cílí na další dvojnásobné zvýšení propustnosti.
BNB Chain reported that its Binance Smart Chain (BSC) network has achieved a benchmark throughput of approximately 5,200 transactions per second (TPS) by June 2026, almost doubling its TPS from 2,800 at the beginning of the year. BNB Chain is a leading blockchain platform recognized for prioritizing scalability and speed across its ecosystem.
BSC performance improves in 2026The network reduced its block interval from 750 milliseconds to 450 milliseconds in the first half of 2026, decreasing the time users wait for new blocks to be added and resulting in faster transaction confirmations for developers and applications. BNB Chain also reported that its memory finality improved from 1,125 milliseconds to 650 milliseconds, further reducing the time required to consider transactions as finalized.
BNB Chain highlighted a significant year-to-date rise: “Block intervals: 750 ms to 450 ms, memory finality: 1,125 ms to 650 ms, benchmark throughput: 2,800 to 5,200 TPS. H2 goes further, targeting another 2x throughput increase.”
In parallel, network throughput reached the 5,200 TPS milestone, allowing the BSC to process far more transactions per second than at the start of 2026. This growth serves BNB Chain’s growing user and developer base, which requires higher performance for both decentralized applications and token transfers.
Mini dictionary: Block interval refers to the time between the creation of two consecutive blocks in a blockchain, impacting how quickly new transactions can be processed. Memory finality is the time it takes for a transaction to be confirmed as irreversible on the network.
MetricJanuary 2026June 2026Block Interval750 ms450 msMemory Finality1,125 ms650 msBenchmark TPS2,8005,200Key engineering upgrades fuel gainsBNB Chain attributed its recent performance improvements to a series of technical upgrades. Key enhancements included the Block-Level Access List (BAL), which enables transaction data to be prepared before execution, increasing efficiency and laying the groundwork for parallel processing in future updates.
Another key upgrade, Incremental Snapshot, allows new or delayed nodes—computers responsible for helping operate the blockchain—to synchronize more quickly with the active chain. Enhancements to the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), known as EVM SuperInstruction, seek to reduce unnecessary repeat executions, boosting overall throughput. The introduction of Extended Voting Rules is designed to maintain transaction finality even under challenging network conditions.
Mini dictionary: BSC, or Binance Smart Chain, is a blockchain network built for running smart contract-based applications with high throughput and lower transaction fees, operating alongside Binance Chain.
H2 roadmap aims for further scalingFor the second half of 2026, BNB Chain is targeting another twofold increase in throughput on BSC’s mainnet, forming part of a broader multi-year strategy to achieve a tenfold performance boost. The roadmap outlines plans to implement BEP-675 upgrades and additional fine-tuning of the BAL to further raise network capacity.
Additional roadmap goals include more robust congestion control measures to ensure stable network performance during periods of high demand. The decision to introduce dedicated lanes aims to limit interference between different applications operating on the blockchain.
BNB Chain is also preparing new gas fee models designed for specific business segments, aiming to optimize transaction cost structures for various user groups. The team is developing a new Layer 1 chain architecture with the ambition of reaching over 100,000 TPS and achieving sub-50 millisecond transaction preconfirmation times.
Mini dictionary: BEP-675 is a proposed protocol enhancement for the BSC, aiming to optimize transaction execution and throughput by enabling improved parallel processing and resource management.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
UNDP spustil blockchainové platby pomoci na blockchainové síti Stellar ve 17 zemích. Pět pilotních projektů už v Haiti, Sýrii, Keni, Guatemale a Gambii zajišťuje výplaty a remitence.
The United Nations has formally expanded its use of blockchain technology to deliver humanitarian aid, implementing a broad deployment of digital payment solutions based on the Stellar network. The initiative transitions from initial pilot programs into live, real-world implementation across multiple countries.
UNDP adopts Stellar for global aid deliveryThe United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), a leading agency focused on poverty reduction and sustainable development, has introduced blockchain-based payment pilots in 17 countries. Five of these pilots—in Haiti, Syria, Kenya, Guatemala, and Gambia—are actively facilitating aid distribution and cross-border remittance flows via the Stellar network.
The next step for UNDP is to integrate these digital payments with over 170 of its country-level programs or representative offices. This move could significantly expand the organization’s reach and efficiency in distributing assistance.
The UNDP aims to standardize digital aid flows using Stellar’s blockchain, setting a benchmark for transparency, speed, and cost-effectiveness in humanitarian finance.
Partnerships and platform benefitsStellar, developed by the Stellar Development Foundation, is a decentralized blockchain designed to facilitate affordable, fast, and auditable financial transactions globally. It enables instant payments, supports stablecoins and asset issuance, and is particularly suited to emerging markets with its 3-5 second transfer completion times and minimal transaction fees.
Key partners in the project include UNDP itself, the Stellar Development Foundation, local non-governmental organizations, and various regional payment gateways. Their collaboration seeks to deliver not only humanitarian aid but also a model for compliant wallets, robust KYC/AML protocols, and the availability of stablecoins on the Stellar network.
Mini dictionary: Stellar Development Foundation, the non-profit behind Stellar, works to expand access to low-cost global payments and financial services using blockchain technology.
Developers working with Stellar view this partnership as an opportunity to further deploy tailor-made wallets, introduce compliance tools, and issue local stablecoins for direct aid transfers.
Impact on stakeholders and regulatory frameworkFor financial institutions, custodians, and exchanges, the initiative promises new fiat channels as on and off-ramps in regions with previously limited digital infrastructure. This gives real-world credibility and measurable use cases for public blockchain payments in the humanitarian sector.
At the same time, investors and institutional players can track transparent and auditable streams of aid, enhancing trust in the system. Regulators also gain a model for supervised digital asset payments within an established global framework.
Bringing digital payments to over 170 UNDP offices could create a unified standard for humanitarian aid, potentially inspiring other agencies to adopt similar systems.
CountryStatusMain Use CaseHaitiActive pilotHumanitarian aid distributionSyriaActive pilotAid payments/remittancesKenyaActive pilotHumanitarian remittancesGuatemalaActive pilotAid distributionGambiaActive pilotRemittance paymentsChallenges and future outlookUNDP’s move with Stellar marks a departure from earlier periods of retail-driven blockchain adoption, which focused largely on speculative trading. Instead, the current shift is driven by direct use-value and the goal of global financial inclusion.
Despite the positive momentum, several challenges remain. These include ensuring compliance with varied local laws, overcoming barriers in internet access, and maintaining liquidity for widespread, effective use.
If the Stellar network is successfully rolled out across most UNDP programs, it could establish a standard for digital payments throughout the United Nations system. Other agencies might then replicate this approach for more transparent and efficient aid delivery worldwide.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Circle v roce 2024 zaplatila Coinbase 908 milionů USD za distribuci USDC a sdílení výnosů, což bylo asi 54 % jejích celkových výnosů. Smlouva se má znovu projednat v srpnu 2026.
Circle, the company behind the USDC stablecoin, paid Coinbase $908 million in distribution costs and revenue sharing during 2024. That figure represents roughly 54% of Circle’s total revenue for the year, making Coinbase less of a distribution partner and more of a landlord collecting majority rent.
The arrangement, formalized through a Collaboration Agreement that took effect on August 18, 2023, is approaching its first major renewal window in August 2026.
The economics of a lopsided partnership Coinbase earns 100% of the reserve interest generated on USDC held directly on its platform. For USDC held anywhere else in the world, Coinbase still collects 50% of that interest income.
Advertisement
For Coinbase, stablecoin-related revenue is projected to reach approximately $1.35 billion in 2025. USDC-related activities accounted for roughly 13.8% of Coinbase’s total revenue in 2024, a figure large enough that any disruption to the partnership would show up clearly in quarterly earnings.
How we got here The current arrangement replaced a previous structure called the Centre Consortium, a joint venture that both companies operated together. When they restructured in August 2023, Circle took sole governance and issuance control of USDC.
As part of that restructuring, Coinbase also took an equity stake in Circle. The Collaboration Agreement runs on an initial three-year term through August 2026, with automatic three-year renewals that depend on performance metrics.
Coinbase’s wandering eye In June 2026, Coinbase endorsed Open USD, a rival stablecoin project. The market reaction was swift: Circle’s stock price dropped more than 17%.
What this means for investors The August 2026 renewal window is the most important date on the calendar for anyone with exposure to either company or to USDC itself. A renegotiation that shifts more revenue toward Circle would hurt Coinbase’s stablecoin income, while a deal that maintains the current structure keeps Circle’s margins under pressure.
For Coinbase investors, the $1.35 billion in projected stablecoin revenue for 2025 represents a substantial revenue stream. Stablecoin demand tends to persist even during bear markets, since traders use stablecoins to park capital, making this revenue line more resilient than Coinbase’s trading fee income.
If Coinbase actively promotes rival stablecoins on its platform, the 50% revenue share on off-platform USDC becomes less valuable as total USDC circulation potentially shrinks. Circle would then face the worst of both worlds: paying high distribution costs on a shrinking asset base.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Hyundai Card na Avalanche vypořádala mezifiremní převod 20 000 USD v USDT za zhruba 7 minut, oproti 3 až 4 hodinám přes bankovní infrastrukturu. V Evropě chystá pilot s Visa a Circle na konec července 2026.
10 July 2026 | 19:31 Hyundai Card settled a $20,000 intercompany transfer between U.S. and Mexico affiliates in about seven minutes using USDT on Avalanche, with a European pilot involving Visa and Circle scheduled for late July 2026.
The pilot matters not because of the amount moved, but because it treats stablecoins as corporate treasury infrastructure rather than as a crypto investment product.
Key Takeaways $20,000 converted to USDT on Avalanche, settled in an average of 7 minutes, versus 3 to 4 hours through interbank rails. Participants included Hyundai Card, Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Mexico, Tether, Ava Labs, and Axiym. European subsidiaries, multi-currency, with Circle (USDC/EURC) and Visa as partners, scheduled to begin end of July 2026. South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not recognize stablecoins as a legitimate cross-border payment instrument. Seven Minutes From Dollars to Dollars Hyundai Motor America converted $20,000 into USDT, transferred the tokens over Avalanche to Hyundai Motor Mexico, and the Mexican entity converted the stablecoin back into fiat on arrival. End-to-end, including verification and reconversion, the process averaged seven minutes. The same transaction routed through correspondent banking would ordinarily require three to four hours at minimum, with additional intermediary hops and per-hop fees.
The important qualifier from Hyundai Card is that this was an actual intercompany settlement, not a sandbox test with synthetic funds. Real corporate money moved between real subsidiaries for a real reconciliation purpose. That distinction is what separates this from the dozens of blockchain proofs of concept that never leave a lab environment.
Why Avalanche, and Why It Matters for Enterprises Hyundai is not using Avalanche the way a retail wallet user would. The architecture Ava Labs offers to corporates is the Subnet, a permissioned environment where only approved validators process transactions and where the parent company can dictate the rules of the network.
For a multinational, three properties of this design carry weight: Validator geofencing. European transactions can be routed exclusively through validators located in approved jurisdictions, which addresses data-residency requirements under EU compliance frameworks. Gas abstraction. Instead of forcing every subsidiary to hold AVAX to pay for transactions, the parent can operate a corporate-funded or zero-gas model. Subsidiaries interact with the rail as if it were an internal system. Access control. Whitelisted wallets and pre-approved smart contract interactions replace open-network exposure. Few, if any, of these features exist in the same form on an unpermissioned public chain. They are the reason enterprise stablecoin pilots have tended to converge on subnet-style or permissioned architectures rather than on unmodified Layer 1 rails.
The Compliance Layer Is the Real Product The technology piece of a seven-minute cross-border transfer is not, on its own, novel. What Hyundai Card actually built, and the reason the pilot is being treated as significant, is the compliance scaffolding around the transfer.
According to the company’s disclosure, Hyundai Card led reviews of accounting treatment, tax exposure, legal standing, and internal-control frameworks across both jurisdictions before running the transfer. The design depends on whitelisted corporate wallets, KYC and AML controls at the entity level, pre-approved smart contract access, and stablecoins whose issuers, Tether and Circle, can freeze tokens if a compliance event occurs.
That last property is a feature for a corporate treasurer and a bug for a decentralization purist. For Hyundai, the ability to freeze tokens in a compromise scenario is precisely what makes the rail acceptable to auditors and internal risk committees.
The Accounting Question the Press Release Skips Stablecoins are pegged to fiat, but under standard IFRS treatment they are generally not classified as cash equivalents, because they are not central-bank legal tender. The likely accounting path for the $20,000 in the Hyundai pilot is a three-step recognition: short-term digital asset or financial instrument on the sending side, intercompany receivable and payable during the transit window, and cash on the receiving side after reconversion.
The seven-minute transit window is significant, and not merely for its speed. A short window sharply reduces the risk of a realized FX difference materializing between the moment the asset leaves one balance sheet and the moment it arrives on another. In a three-to-four-hour correspondent transfer, that risk is measurable. In a seven-minute settlement, it is close to negligible.
This is where the reduction in settlement time translates into a specific accounting benefit, not merely a convenience.
Phase Two Changes the Test The U.S. to Mexico pilot moved dollar value between two dollar-linked entities. That is the easiest possible test case. The European phase, with Circle and Visa as new partners, changes the economic question.
Circle can support a dual-stablecoin structure using USDC on the dollar side and EURC on the euro side. That opens the possibility of on-chain foreign-exchange conversion through stablecoin liquidity pools or through Circle’s own settlement routes, rather than through bank-provided FX spreads. Visa’s contribution is corporate payout infrastructure: prefunding, fiat exit routes, and integration with local bank account rails.
The real measurement in Phase Two is not settlement speed, which has already been demonstrated. It is whether the total cost of a multi-currency intercompany transfer, including FX conversion, comes in below the equivalent bank-provided route.
The Korean Regulatory Contradiction The pilot’s commercial ambitions must be weighed against South Korea’s regulatory stance, which is where the true tension in this narrative lies.
Korean authorities have moved to exclude dollar-backed stablecoins including USDT and USDC from the recognized scope of corporate digital-asset activity. The Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not formally recognize stablecoins as a legitimate means of cross-border payment. The Bank of Korea has consistently leaned toward a central-bank digital currency and bank-issued deposit tokens as its preferred settlement instruments rather than private stablecoins.
That preference is already operational. The BOK’s Project Hangang has moved into its second phase, expanding to nine commercial banks and adding P2P transfers and AI-agent payment capabilities, while the Digital Asset Basic Act that would govern private stablecoin issuance remains delayed.
Against that backdrop, a Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary is running production-ready stablecoin remittance rails using USDT and preparing to test USDC and EURC. The commercial pull of faster and cheaper settlement is running ahead of the domestic regulatory framework, and the pilot effectively puts corporate weight behind the argument that Korean rules need to be updated.
The framing here is not that Hyundai is defying regulators. It is that a multinational operating under multiple jurisdictions is building infrastructure for a use case its home regulator has not yet blessed, and doing so publicly.
The Limits of a $20,000 Test The pilot proves that a $20,000 intercompany transfer can settle in seven minutes with full compliance review across two jurisdictions. It does not prove that the same architecture scales to hundreds of transfers per day across a dozen currencies with FX efficiency intact. Phase Two is designed to test exactly that.
It also does not resolve the accounting classification question in a way that generalizes to every corporate. IFRS treatment of stablecoins remains an evolving area, and the answer for a Korean conglomerate operating in the U.S. and Mexico may not translate directly to a European manufacturer operating in Asia.
If the European phase shows a favorable cost result once fees, spreads, and reconversion are aggregated, the case for corporate stablecoin treasury rails moves from operational curiosity to competitive necessity. If it does not, the pilot remains a speed story rather than a cost story.
The distinction matters because CFOs approve budgets against cost savings, not against settlement latency.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Always conduct your own research before making decisions related to digital assets or corporate treasury strategies.
Author
Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.
Stablecoinová nabídka na Avalanche za sedm dní vyskočila o 46 % na více než 1,8 miliardy USD. Síť tím přeskočila Plasma i XRP Ledger a posunula se na 11. místo mezi stablecoinovými sítěmi.
Avalanche Stablecoin Supply Jumps 46% in Seven DaysAvalanche's stablecoin supply has posted one of its sharpest weekly gains on record. According to data shared by @BSCNews, the total stablecoin supply on @Avax surged 46% in just seven days, pushing the figure above $1.8 billion at time of writing. The move has lifted $AVAX into 11th place among all stablecoin networks globally, overtaking both @Plasma and @ripple's $XRP Ledger in the process.
The milestone is notable not just for its speed but for the broader trajectory it reflects. According to Token Terminal data, the combined market cap of stablecoins and tokenized funds on Avalanche climbed from roughly $1.2 billion in January 2024 to just above $2 billion in January 2026, representing a roughly 70% increase over two years. The latest weekly spike suggests that pace is now accelerating.
Institutional Momentum and Network Growth Behind the MoveThe stablecoin surge does not exist in isolation. Avalanche has been building institutional momentum across several fronts in 2026. Avalanche formally launched the Avalanche Payments Collective, an alliance of 28 major organisations including Franklin Templeton, VanEck, and Paxos, aimed at unifying stablecoin settlement, treasury infrastructure, and foreign exchange into a single blockchain-based framework spanning more than 150 countries.
Major financial institutions such as J.P. Morgan, Apollo, and Citi are also using Avalanche for real-world asset tokenization and backend infrastructure. That institutional engagement has helped attract deeper stablecoin liquidity to the network, providing a structural foundation beneath the latest supply figures.
On the technical side, Avalanche's C-Chain can process roughly 88% more transaction throughput than Ethereum while pricing transactions at approximately one-fiftieth of the cost, and it can rapidly increase block size during periods of high demand. Those performance characteristics make it a practical choice for stablecoin issuers and settlement-focused applications looking for speed and low cost.
The credit for building the infrastructure that underpins these results sits largely with the @AvaLabs team, whose continued development work has positioned Avalanche as a credible institutional-grade settlement layer heading into the second half of 2026.
Sources:
Yahoo Finance: Avalanche posts 70% surge in stablecoin and tokenized fund market cap in 2 years
VanEck: Avalanche 201, The Institutional Platform
DefiLlama: Avalanche Stablecoin Market Cap and Supply
Gate zaznamenal za 7 dní čisté odlivy 207 milionů USD po tvrzení uživatele o krádeži 1,7 milionu USD. Burza poté vydala omluvu a slíbila plné vyšetření.
The exchange recorded $207 million in net withdrawals over seven days following a high-profile user theft claim that spread rapidly across crypto social media. The outflows came after a verified Gate.io user, posting under the handle @jheioff on X, alleged that $1.7 million had been drained from their account despite having every security layer the platform offers turned on.
What actually happened The user claimed their account was compromised through unauthorized changes to their security settings, even though real-name verification, two-factor authentication, and email notifications were all active. Gate.io’s initial response made things worse, not better. The exchange pushed back, saying the actions on the account appeared to be user-initiated and that no systemic breach had occurred. Gate.io CEO Dr. Han stated publicly that the situation was fully disclosed and that customer assets faced no systemic risk.
Widespread criticism followed across X and other platforms, with users questioning whether the exchange’s security architecture was sound and, more pointedly, whether Gate.io would take any financial responsibility for the alleged loss. The backlash was loud enough that Gate.io eventually reversed course, issued an apology, and committed to a full investigation.
Advertisement
The apology came. The $1.7 million, as far as public reporting shows, did not.
Why users started pulling funds The $207 million in net outflows over seven days is a direct expression of that calculus. This pattern is not new for Gate. In 2023, the exchange experienced withdrawal spikes ranging from $148 million to $176 million, triggered not by a confirmed exploit but by rumors circulating online. The 2026 incident follows a similar script, except this time there is an actual user with an actual claim attached to an actual dollar figure.
Gate.io’s history adds texture to the current anxiety. The exchange has faced scrutiny over a purported 2018 incident that some analysts have connected to roughly $230 million in losses that were never publicly disclosed by the platform. Gate.io has not confirmed that characterization, but the historical narrative exists and resurfaces every time the exchange finds itself in a security headline.
What this means for the broader market For Gate.io specifically, the sustained nature of the outflows, seven days of net withdrawals rather than a single-day panic, suggests this is not pure noise. A one-day spike can be dismissed as overreaction. A week of consistent net outflows is a platform bleeding trust in slow motion.
For traders still holding funds on Gate.io, the investigation timeline is the key variable to watch. If the exchange produces a transparent account of what happened and offers some form of restitution to the affected user, it has a path back to stability. If the inquiry goes quiet, the $207 million in outflows is unlikely to be the final number.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Senátní demokraté požádali o slyšení kvůli Trumpovým kryptoměnovým příjmům přes 1,4 miliardy USD a možnému zapojení SAE. Zpochybňují také 49% podíl ve World Liberty Financial.
Five Democratic senators have formally requested congressional hearings to investigate US President Donald Trump’s extensive cryptocurrency revenues and potentially undisclosed foreign involvement. The senators cited concerns regarding the influence of international investors on American policy and the possibility of national security risks.
Financial disclosures reveal massive crypto earningsThe investigation request follows Trump’s 2025 financial disclosure, which reported a total income of more than $2.24 billion for the year. This included over $1.4 billion related to cryptocurrency activities. His earnings came from dealings with the memecoin sector and World Liberty Financial, a blockchain-focused financial platform.
Detailed figures in the filing attributed roughly $515 million to World Liberty Financial token sales, $65 million to an ownership stake in its parent entity, and $635 million from royalties tied to Trump-branded memecoin initiatives.
Senators Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts), Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), Gary Peters (Michigan), Dick Durbin (Illinois), and Ron Wyden (Oregon) initiated the call for hearings. These five serve as senior members of various Senate committees but lack the authority to organize official hearings without Republican cooperation.
Scrutiny over UAE investment in World Liberty FinancialThe senators drew attention to a United Arab Emirates–linked company’s alleged acquisition of a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial. The transaction reportedly involved an entity connected to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who is the UAE’s national security adviser and an influential figure in the Gulf region.
In their correspondence, the senators demanded full transparency regarding the “Third Parties” named in Trump’s financial disclosures. They also questioned whether foreign interests—including the UAE government—have possibly influenced the shaping of US digital asset regulations.
Earlier this year, Representative Ro Khanna initiated a House inquiry into the UAE’s role, probing whether its investment related to policy changes covering US export restrictions on artificial intelligence chips. World Liberty Financial described that inquiry as politically motivated.
Trump addressed questions about these transactions in a CNBC interview, where he stated that his earnings complied fully with all laws. He said his son Eric is responsible for overseeing business operations, while outside companies manage his portfolio.
The White House maintained that Trump’s assets are contained within a trust managed by his children, a structure designed to prevent conflicts of interest.
Mini dictionary: World Liberty Financial, a blockchain-focused platform known for issuing financial instruments and crypto tokens, operates internationally and has attracted significant investments from global entities.
The senators pointed to foreign ownership stakes and demanded that Trump reveal whether any UAE government or third-party interests have shaped US cryptocurrency policies or legislation.
Upcoming crypto legislation and political falloutThe Democratic lawmakers also highlighted the timing of the anticipated Senate vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. The act, aimed at clarifying the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, is set to move to the Senate floor in the coming weeks.
Senate rules require 60 votes to advance most legislation, making Democratic support essential for Republicans to overcome a filibuster and pass the bill. While some Republicans like Senator Cynthia Lummis support prompt approval, others such as House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill acknowledged that Trump’s deep involvement in cryptocurrency businesses has complicated the legislative process.
In a separate development, a law blocking the Federal Reserve from introducing a central bank digital currency until the end of 2030 has advanced. Trump did not veto the legislation or hold the planned signing event, allowing the measure to automatically become law after a ten-day period.
IssueCurrent StatusImpacted PartiesTrump’s crypto earnings$1.4 billion for 2025Trump, World Liberty FinancialUAE investment49% stake in World Liberty FinancialUAE-linked entity, Trump portfolioCBDC BanEnacted, in effect until Dec 31, 2030Federal Reserve, US consumersClarity ActAwaiting Senate voteLawmakers, crypto industryRepublicans continue to control both chambers of Congress and, so far, have not answered requests from Democratic senators to hold investigative hearings into these matters.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Bitcoin Policy Institute se připojil k obraně v žalobě o údajně „opuštěné“ bitcoiny spojené se Satoshi Nakamotem a chce, aby soud celý spor zamítl. Případ může vytvořit precedent ohrožující dlouhodobou self-custody.
PANews July 11 news, Galaxy research head Alex Thorn stated that the “abandoned Bitcoin” case surrounding “Noah Doe’s” attempt to obtain ownership of Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin through legal proceedings has seen a major development. The Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) has formally applied to intervene as a defendant in the case and seeks to have the court dismiss the entire lawsuit. It is learned that a defendant under the pseudonym “John Doe 33” had previously appeared in court as an individual, denying the plaintiff’s attempt to link him to an address holding 5,000 BTC. Additionally, The Digital Chamber has also submitted an amicus brief opposing the legal theories advanced by the plaintiff.
Alex Thorn said that BPI, represented by the law firm White & Case, has not only applied to intervene in the case but has also submitted a proposed answer, 15 affirmative defenses, and plans to file a motion to dismiss.
BPI argues that it has standing to intervene because the organization self-custodies a portion of its Bitcoin reserves intended to be held indefinitely, and the plaintiff’s theory that “long-term inactivity constitutes abandonment” could precisely sweep similar assets into future litigation. It contends that merely discovering a public address is like obtaining someone’s bank account number and does not confer ownership of the assets therein; the wallet itself does not exist on-chain; and holding coins for more than five years should not be deemed “abandonment,” but rather the “HODL” strategy long practiced by the Bitcoin community.
Alex Thorn stated that if the legal logic of the “Noah Doe” case is ultimately upheld by the court, it could become a precedent to deprive long-term self-custody users of asset ownership in the future. Therefore, this litigation concerns not only assets related to Satoshi Nakamoto, but also the legal foundation of the entire Bitcoin self-custody ecosystem.
Previous news, a plaintiff under the pseudonym “Noah Doe” filed a lawsuit in a New York court, seeking ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin wallets, including addresses attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto. These wallets are estimated to hold approximately 3.7 million BTC, worth around $290 billion. The plaintiff, through two Wyoming shell companies ABC Company and XYZ Company, submitted a 901-page complaint on May 1, claiming these Bitcoins qualify as “abandoned property” under New York’s lost property law.
XRP vzrostl o 1,27 % na $1,10, ale zůstává pod resistance na $1,12. ETF na XRP mezitím přilákaly kumulativně $1,48 miliardy a spravují čistá aktiva ve výši $989,46 milionu.
Key Takeaways XRP registered a 1.27% gain to reach $1.10, with critical resistance positioned at $1.12 The CLARITY Act successfully cleared the House and progressed through the Senate Banking Committee A procedural Senate vote could occur during the July 13–17, 2026 window Market experts EGRAG CRYPTO and Crypto Patel both highlight $0.85–$1.20 as a strategic accumulation range XRP ETF products recorded $1.48 billion in cumulative inflows, with combined net assets reaching $989 million XRP posted gains on Friday, reaching $1.10 with a 1.27% increase while the cryptocurrency market overall expanded by 1.54% to achieve a $2.19 trillion aggregate market capitalization. Bitcoin advanced 1.48% to settle at $64,002, while Ethereum demonstrated stronger momentum with a 3.03% climb to $1,790.
XRP Price Technical analysis of the four-hour timeframe reveals purchasing activity returning to the market, though upward momentum remains constrained beneath the $1.12 resistance threshold. The Relative Strength Index registers at 47.48, positioned marginally below the neutral 50 benchmark. The MACD histogram has shifted into positive territory at 0.0018, with the MACD line executing an upward cross above the signal line, suggesting potential price recovery.
A decisive breach above $1.12 would establish a pathway toward $1.15, subsequently targeting $1.20. Conversely, $1.07 represents the critical support foundation. Should this level fail to hold, XRP faces potential downward pressure toward $1.05 or the psychologically significant $1.00 threshold.
Market analyst Celal Kucuker shared insights via Twitter, emphasizing that “smart money accumulates when everyone is bored.” His technical framework identifies $0.85–$1.20 as the accumulation territory, $1.65 as the momentum inflection point, $3–$3.50 as the macro breakout region, and establishes a cycle objective of $15. His core thesis: strategic patience outweighs reactive trading.
CLARITY Act Legislative Timeline The CLARITY Act secured House approval on July 17, 2025, garnering 294 affirmative votes. The Senate Banking Committee pushed the legislation forward on May 14, 2026, through a 15-9 decision. The Senate reconvenes following its recess on July 13, with procedural voting potentially scheduled between July 13 and July 17.
House-Senate reconciliation proceedings may commence during the July 20–24 period. Should both legislative chambers approve identical versions, the legislation could land on President Trump’s desk before August concludes. Failure to meet this timeline would shift expectations to September.
Senate Democrats have voiced apprehensions regarding Trump’s cryptocurrency investments and are demanding committee hearings, pointing to potential conflict-of-interest complications connected to the CLARITY Act. The ethics component continues to represent a contentious negotiation point.
The proposed legislation would establish a comprehensive national infrastructure for digital asset commerce and oversight, distributing regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC. Enhanced regulatory clarity could diminish ambiguity surrounding XRP’s asset classification and facilitate expanded institutional market participation.
Expert Accumulation Price Targets Cryptocurrency analyst EGRAG CRYPTO has designated $0.85–$1.20 as a historically significant macro support band. According to his assessment, XRP could retreat to $0.85 while preserving its long-term structural integrity. His price objectives include $1.65 for momentum confirmation, $3.00–$3.50 as substantial resistance barriers, and $15 as the complete cycle destination.
#XRP – BENT FORK 🍴 – $15 (Accumulation Band):
Right now, $XRP is sitting near the historical accumulation band around:
▫️ $0.85–$1.20
This zone has acted as macro support in previous cycles.
Can $XRP wick lower toward $0.85? Yes.
But as long as this band holds, the macro… pic.twitter.com/LQ6mMPdcUb
— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) July 10, 2026
Analyst Crypto Patel establishes the accumulation window between $0.70 and $1.10. His MACD technical evaluation indicates an emerging bullish crossover pattern. Patel referenced comparable technical configurations that preceded price surges exceeding 1,000%, projecting a trajectory toward $9 or beyond if XRP maintains present support levels and penetrates the $3 threshold.
Regarding exchange-traded fund developments, XRP products registered zero net daily inflows on July 9. Aggregate inflows total $1.48 billion, while combined net assets measure $989.46 million. Bitwise commands the leading position with $308.15 million in assets under management, trailed by Canary at $252.97 million and Franklin at $249.54 million.
CryptoQuant uvedl, že spotová likvidita XRP rychle roste, zatímco otevřený zájem na Binance klesl z více než 500 milionů USD v polovině června na 399 milionů USD k 10. červenci. Funding rate přitom vzrostla o 266 % mezitýdně na 0,007.
On-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant reported that spot liquidity in the XRP market is rapidly increasing, but the delegitimization process in derivatives trading, which has been ongoing since mid-June, has not yet ended.
According to CryptoQuant data, Binance experienced a significant increase in XRP spot trading activity between July 4th and 8th. Specifically, on July 7th, 64.9 million XRP were injected into the exchange, while 49.2 million XRP were withdrawn on the same day.
The analysis added that this volatility in the spot market was not the factor that triggered the closing of positions in derivative markets. It was noted that the size of open XRP positions on Binance decreased from over $500 million in mid-June to $431 million by July 4th, and further to $399 million by July 10th.
During the same period, long position liquidations increased by 94 percent on a weekly basis. While long position liquidations were reported to be 172 percent above the average of the last three months, short position liquidations decreased by 53 percent.
CryptoQuant stated that the high inflows and outflows in the spot market indicate investors repositioning their capital rather than anticipating a new and strong direction. The continued decline in open positions suggests that leveraged capital continues to exit the XRP derivatives market.
In contrast, a different trend was observed in funding rates. Binance XRP funding rate, which briefly turned negative at the end of June, increased by 266 percent on a weekly basis, rising to 0.007.
According to CryptoQuant, as open positions decline while funding rates rise and long position liquidations increase, it indicates that remaining or newly opened long positions in the market are paying increasingly higher premiums. This suggests that despite a decrease in the total derivatives market capitalization, a segment of investors still maintains a bullish outlook.
On-chain data, however, presents a more balanced picture compared to the derivatives market. The number of active addresses on the XRP network remains 11 percent below the average of the last three months, indicating that broad-based network participation has not yet fully recovered.
However, the number of transactions increased by approximately 3-4 percent on both a weekly and monthly basis. Nevertheless, the total number of transactions remains 21 percent below the three-month average.
During the same period, a decline in the NVT ratio, which measures the relationship between XRP’s network value and transaction volume, suggested that the previous decline in network usage may have slowed and usage may have begun to stabilize.
CryptoQuant stated that the market becomes more vulnerable to funding rate corrections during periods when long position liquidations continue, funding rates rise, and the derivatives market size shrinks.
If this trend continues, funding rates may fall again as overly optimistic leveraged positions are liquidated. However, strengthening spot demand and a continued recovery in network activity could limit the impact of any potential correction.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Sněmovní výbor pro finanční služby naplánoval na 17. července terénní slyšení v New Yorku k CLARITY Act. XRP na to reaguje jen mírným růstem a trh čeká na vyšší volatilitu.
Ripple (XRP) price is up slightly by 0.02% today, July 11, to trade at $1.10 at the time of writing. The slight gain comes as trading volumes cool into the weekend, with CoinMarketCap showing that XRP’s volume are down by 25% to $762 million.
Traders are now bracing for volatility in the coming week with the CLARITY Act coming back in focus as the US Congress resumes sessions on July 13 after the July 4 recess.
Congress Schedules CLARITY Act Hearing Data from the US Congress website shows that the House Financial Services Committee will have a field hearing in New York regarding the CLARITY Act on July 17.
CLARITY Act Hearing This hearing was even confirmed by Congressman French Hill during an interview with FOX, where he said that lawmakers want to ensure that CLARITY can be merged with old legislation.
“We’ve got to get this market framework in place to be combined with the GENIUS Act”,” Hill said.
The Congressman’s remarks come after a CoinGape report revealed that the final draft for the CLARITY Act could drop between July 13 and July 17 and potentially move the XRP price.
Pro-crypto senators like Cynthia Lummis say that this final draft will be the last chance that the CLARITY Act has to pass before the mid-term elections happen in November.
The resumption of the US Senate from the July 4 holiday recess has also caused a slight increase in the odds of the CLARITY Act being approved from 40% on July 8 to 44% today, July 11.
XRP Price Eyes Wedge Breakout as Bearish Momentum Fades The price of XRP trades within a falling wedge pattern. This pattern has a depth of 22%, and it usually appears when the trend is about to change from a bearish one to a bullish one.
The RSI reading of 47 also suggests that bears might be losing their grip. This RSO has moved from 32 on June 30 to 47 on July 11, suggesting that buyers are slowly replacing sellers.
This RSI needs to make a higher high above 50 to confirm that the momentum has changed to bullish.
XRP value faces resistance at $1.16. Moving above this obstacle could pave the way for a 22% gain to $1.42.
XRP Price Chart But if XRP fails to close above $1.16, bears might force it back into consolidation within the falling wedge pattern, and the price could drop to the support of $1.03.
XRP Ledger Activity Hits Rare Lows SWIFT recently partnered with several banks affiliated with Ripple, but that did not increase network activity like is usually the case.
Instead, data from Santiment shows that the level of activity on the XRP Ledger is at the second-lowest level in 2026.
XRP Ledger saw only 25,350 active wallets on July 11 and 2,130 new wallets.
The number of new wallets on XRP Ledger is at the lowest point since November 2024, with Santiment saying that buyers are hesitating until there is a real catalyst that can push the price up.
Tom Lee has reaffirmed that Ethereum will play the central role as traditional finance and cryptocurrency converge into a single market.
Summary
Tom Lee says traditional finance and crypto will eventually merge into one market, with Ethereum at the center. His comments come as Bitmine’s Ethereum treasury has grown to 5.74 million ETH, equal to 4.8% of the total supply. Lee also links Ethereum’s outlook to the CLARITY Act and expanding layer-2 payment activity involving Visa and Shopify. According to a post published by Bitmine chairman Tom Lee on X, he believes the line separating traditional financial markets and digital assets will eventually disappear, with Ethereum positioned at the center of that transition.
— Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com (@fundstrat) July 10, 2026 Lee shared the view while responding to a post from Fundstrat Capital head of distribution Carrie Presley, who recalled telling him during an interview nearly six years ago that she was highly optimistic about Ethereum and blockchain technology. Lee acknowledged the exchange and reiterated that he remains bullish on Ethereum.
His latest comments arrive as Bitmine continues expanding one of the largest corporate Ethereum treasuries in the market. The company said last week that it held 5,742,237 ETH, equal to about 4.8% of Ethereum’s circulating supply of roughly 120.7 million ETH. Bitmine added that its combined crypto holdings, cash, marketable securities, and other investments were valued at about $11.1 billion.
Bitmine continues expanding its Ethereum treasury Recent disclosures show Bitmine has steadily increased its Ethereum holdings throughout the year. Crypto.news previously reported that the company added another 27,084 ETH in its latest weekly purchase, pushing its treasury above 5.7 million ETH before the newest holdings update confirmed the total at more than 5.74 million ETH.
Beyond Ethereum, Bitmine reported holding 206 Bitcoin alongside $527 million in cash and marketable securities. The company also disclosed equity investments in Beast Industries and Eightco Holdings as part of its balance sheet.
Lee has repeatedly linked Ethereum’s long-term outlook to changing U.S. crypto regulation. In earlier comments released by Bitmine, he said investors had become more optimistic about the chances of the CLARITY Act advancing through Congress, arguing that clearer rules could support smart contract platforms as digital assets become more integrated into payment systems and financial services.
Ethereum adoption continues to expand into financial services While discussing Ethereum’s role in financial infrastructure, Lee pointed to existing commercial activity already taking place on Ethereum layer-2 networks. According to his earlier remarks, companies including Shopify and Visa already process USDC-related activity through Ethereum scaling networks, demonstrating practical use beyond speculation.
Presley’s recent reminder of their conversation from nearly six years ago also highlighted how long Lee has maintained his positive view on Ethereum. Responding publicly on X, Lee confirmed that his conviction has remained unchanged, adding that he still expects Ethereum to become the foundation connecting traditional finance with the crypto economy as both markets continue moving closer together.
At press time, Ethereum (ETH) was trading at around $1,800, little changed over the past 24 hours and up 2.2% over the previous seven days.
Cambridge audit uvádí, že spotřeba elektřiny Ethereum po The Merge klesla na 7,87 GWh ročně, tedy o více než 99,9 %. Zároveň ale upozorňuje na koncentraci uzlů u několika poskytovatelů a v několika zemích.
The sheer scale of Ethereum’s energy reduction after The Merge is no longer just a community talking point — it now has the weight of a Cambridge audit behind it. The latest figures from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) put annual electricity use at just 7.87 GWh, a decline of more than 99.9%. Emissions have followed a similarly dramatic path downward, settling around 2.37 ktCO₂e annually. For a network that once drew comparisons to medium-sized countries, the numbers represent a complete re‑write of the environmental script.
But the report, built from an infrastructure audit of roughly 8,522 nodes, doesn’t stop at the headline drop. It surfaces a structural reality that market participants and regulators will need to weigh carefully: how the network’s remaining footprint is distributed and who ultimately controls the hardware.
The numbers that reset the conversation Before The Merge, Ethereum’s proof‑of‑work consensus consumed power at a level that made institutional ESG committees uncomfortable. The 99.9% cut changes the calculus for any fund or corporate treasury that had dismissed ether exposure on environmental grounds. The CCAF’s estimate of 56.4% sustainable electricity sourcing further strengthens a story that is increasingly about grid mix rather than the consensus mechanism itself. That subtlety matters because it shifts the burden of scrutiny from the protocol to the geographies where validators operate.
The emissions figure — roughly 2.37 kilotonnes of CO₂‑equivalent — is so low that it practically invites comparisons to small‑scale data centre operations rather than global financial infrastructure. And yet, Ethereum’s developer activity remains among the highest in the industry, as recent ecosystem metrics continue to show. That gap between environmental cost and economic output is precisely the kind of metric that draws serious institutional capital over time.
Provider concentration and geographic clustering The audit’s infrastructure mapping is where the comfort zone narrows. The United States, Germany, Finland, and France host approximately 62% of Ethereum full nodes. Even more concentrated is the service provider layer: Hetzner, Amazon Web Services, and OVH together run roughly 40% of all nodes the researchers examined. For a network that prizes decentralisation as a security property, that level of physical co‑location on a small set of commercial cloud operators raises non‑trivial tail‑risk questions.
A coordinated outage or a regulatory intervention at one of those providers could temporarily reshape network participation. The Dencun upgrade cycle has already sharpened the focus on client diversity; node hosting geography now joins that conversation. The CCAF data makes it explicit that the environmental victory is partly built on layers that are not themselves permissionless.
What the shift means for institutional positioning ESG dynamics in crypto have often been reduced to a binary: Bitcoin’s energy hunger versus everything else. The Cambridge study gives asset allocators a concrete figure to slot into sustainability reports. It also arrives at a moment when on‑chain real‑world asset volumes are swelling beyond $20 billion, a trend documented in a recent tokenisation roundup. Most of that activity lives on Ethereum or its layer‑2 networks, meaning the updated energy footprint directly undercuts a longstanding objection to deploying regulated instruments on public rails.
Policymakers in Washington have been wrestling with crypto market structure legislation, and banking interests are pushing against a landmark Senate bill that could reshape the regulatory perimeter. In that context, verifiable environmental data is not decorative — it is ammunition. A network that can demonstrate a 99.9% energy reduction with audited, third‑party data is harder to dismiss on the basis of vague climate concerns.
What remains uncertain The CCAF report rightly emphasises that the remaining footprint is now a function of local grid carbon intensity. That implies energy‑mix volatility: a shift in the sourcing profile of a single large cloud region could measurably change Ethereum’s overall environmental scorecard. The research does not, however, model how liquid staking protocols or restaking layers might redistribute the validator set across providers and jurisdictions over the next 12 months. The interaction between infrastructure concentration and the rapid evolution of the staking industry is still poorly mapped.
Nor does the report address the energy footprint of layer‑2 rollups posting blobs to mainnet, an increasingly relevant variable as activity migrates off the base layer. For now, the headline is clear: Ethereum’s energy era has ended. The harder conversation about who runs the nodes and where they plug in is just beginning.
AUTHOR
With over five years of experience in crypto, blockchain, and tech content, Ishtiyaq makes complex topics easy to understand. He simplifies blockchain and digital currency concepts for a wide audience, ensuring that beginners and experts alike can grasp key ideas. His clear and engaging writing helps readers stay informed about the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the crypto space. Whether explaining blockchain technology, digital assets, or DeFi, Ishtiyaq breaks down complicated ideas into simple, digestible content. His goal is to help people navigate the fast-changing world of cryptocurrency with confidence, clarity, and a deeper understanding.
Nová studie Cambridge ukazuje, že 31 % uzlů sítě Ethereum běží v USA a 39 % v EU bez Velké Británie. Síť může přestat finalizovat transakce, pokud současně vypadne více než třetina validátorů.
The Ethereum network continues to evolve, but its geographical distribution remains a subject of monitoring for researchers. A new study from the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance shows that a significant share of nodes operates in North America and Europe. This snapshot of the network highlights several technical and legal issues. It also reminds us that the location of infrastructures can influence the protocol’s resilience. The updated data finally sheds new light on the network’s energy consumption after the merge.
In brief 31% of Ethereum nodes are hosted in the United States, compared to 39% in the European Union excluding the United Kingdom. The network can stop finalizing its transactions if more than a third of validators become simultaneously inactive. The concentration of infrastructures and client software remains a major issue for Ethereum’s resilience and decentralization. Ethereum’s energy consumption has dropped by about 99.98% since the merge, according to the new Cambridge study. Ethereum’s Geographic Distribution Is Dominated by the United States and Europe The new study indicates that 31% of Ethereum activity is now hosted in the United States. The European Union, excluding the United Kingdom, concentrates about 39% of this activity. In a statement attributed to the daily show The Starting Block, Alexander Neumuller, head of research at the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance, estimates that the distribution remains heavily oriented towards Western countries. However, it does not indicate excessive concentration in a single state.
Researchers also observe that nodes rely heavily on three major hosting providers: Hetzner, AWS, and OVH. Alexander Neumuller recalls that Hetzner’s terms of use previously prohibited operating blockchain services. However, he notes that this policy may have evolved. This concentration of infrastructures therefore deserves ongoing attention, even if the data do not show a unique national imbalance.
The study also emphasizes that the relationship between nodes and validators remains difficult to measure precisely. The same access point can indeed host several validators. Researchers explain that it is therefore impossible to know exactly the number of validators associated with each infrastructure.
The One-Third Threshold Remains a Key Concern for the Network The analysis conclusions remind us of an important characteristic of Ethereum’s operation. Contrary to some misconceptions, the network does not need to lose half of its validators to encounter a problem. As soon as more than a third of validators simultaneously cease their activity, checkpoint finalization may be interrupted.
This situation explains why the distribution of Ethereum nodes represents a strategic element for the network’s stability. An interruption affecting a widely used infrastructure could slow down overall operation. However, Alexander Neumuller specifies that the available data do not allow a direct link to be established between each node and the exact number of validators it hosts.
Concentration concerns not only physical infrastructures. According to the researcher, client software diversity also plays a crucial role. A technical defect affecting a dominant client could quickly spread to a large part of the network. The report thus presents detailed data on the distribution of consensus clients and execution clients to illustrate this other risk factor.
A New Energy Estimate and Ongoing Legal Challenges The location of nodes goes beyond the simple technical framework. In 2022, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) estimated that it could claim jurisdiction over Ethereum. The authority notably relied on the fact that a majority of the network’s infrastructure was then hosted on U.S. soil. This issue therefore continues to fuel reflections on the legal framework applicable to transactions.
Alexander Neumüller nonetheless presents the current geographical distribution as a balance he considers positive, while specifying that it is his personal assessment. According to him, better geographical distribution is an advantage for a decentralized network.
Geographical distribution is a real asset for the network’s resilience, even if the community must continue to monitor its evolution. At the same time, a strong concentration of client software could amplify the consequences of a bug affecting the most used client.
Alexander Neumuller, Head of Research at the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance, Source: The Block. He also believes that a strong concentration of client software risks quickly spreading the effects of a bug affecting the network’s main client. On this, the community must continue to closely follow this development.
The report also updates Ethereum’s energy estimates thanks to a new methodology. Researchers now use empirical data on node distribution between residential and commercial hosting, rather than theoretical assumptions. This approach takes into account software changes made after the merge, which can modify equipment consumption.
The new estimates assess the annual network consumption at about 7.9 gigawatt hours, equivalent to a continuous power of one megawatt. This corresponds to the consumption of about 2,000 British households. The study also estimates that this consumption remains about 99.98% lower than levels observed before the merge. Finally, the share of sustainable energy used by the network now exceeds 56%, compared to an estimated global average of 43%.
Researchers also estimate the theoretical cost of fully offsetting annual emissions through high-quality carbon credits. This would be between 25,000 and 55,000 pounds sterling, an amount Alexander Neumuller compares to the price of a car. He indicates that this estimate is the result that surprised him most. The Ethereum Foundation supported this study, while researchers specify that their analyses on decentralization reflect their own interpretation. Upcoming observations will measure whether this geographical distribution continues to evolve while preserving network resilience.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Ghiles A.
Journaliste et rédacteur web passionné par l’univers des cryptomonnaies et des technologies Web3. J’y traite les dernières tendances et actualités afin de proposer un contenu de haute qualité à un large public du secteur.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Hedera’s native token HBAR has fallen more than 2% after blockchain security researchers reported that a suspected exploit had moved more than $5.8 million in assets from the Hedera network to Ethereum.
Summary
Suspected Hedera exploit moved more than $5.8 million in assets to Ethereum, according to blockchain security researchers. Specter and PeckShield said the attacker bridged funds through LayerZero before swapping WBTC for ETH. HBAR fell more than 2%, trading near $0.069 as the reported exploit unfolded. According to blockchain security researcher Specter, the suspected attacker had already bridged more than $3.7 million worth of assets from Hedera to Ethereum before continuing to move additional funds.
There appears to be an ongoing hack involving @hedera Network, with over $3.7M already bridged to Ethereum by the attacker.
The stolen funds are currently being swapped from WBTC for ETH after being bridged from the Hedera network via Layerzero.
Theft addresses:… pic.twitter.com/KSxd3K2vlu
— Specter (@SpecterAnalyst) July 11, 2026 Specter said the stolen assets were being swapped from Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) into Ether (ETH) after crossing chains through LayerZero. The researcher also published two wallet addresses believed to be linked to the incident.
At the time of writing, CryptoBull360 reported that the wallet’s estimated value had increased to roughly $5.8 million, indicating that more assets had reached Ethereum after the initial transfers. The shared wallet data showed holdings of about 3,203 ETH, representing nearly 80% of the portfolio, alongside roughly 20% in WBTC.
According to data from crypto.news, Hedera (HBAR) price traded around $0.069, down more than 2% following the reports of the suspected exploit.
Cross-chain transfers have continued after the initial breach As additional transactions appeared on-chain, blockchain security firm PeckShield said the suspected exploit had already transferred approximately $5.25 million from the Hedera mainnet to Ethereum. The firm added that the wallet held around 2,360 ETH, valued at roughly $4.25 million, and 15.58 WBTC, worth about $1 million, at the time of its analysis.
PeckShield also reported that the wallet had originally been funded with 1 ETH from Tornado Cash, citing on-chain transaction history. The observation identifies the source of the wallet’s initial funding but does not establish who controls the address or who carried out the alleged attack.
The wallet screenshots shared by both Specter and PeckShield showed a series of inbound transfers arriving within a short period before the assets were converted into ETH.
Investigation remains ongoing as official details are limited Neither Specter nor PeckShield identified the party responsible for the suspected exploit, and no official estimate of the total losses had been released at the time of writing. The reported value of the stolen assets continued to change as additional funds were observed moving through the wallet.
The incident is still developing, with blockchain security researchers continuing to monitor the addresses and publish updates as new transactions appear on-chain. Meanwhile, market participants are watching for an official statement from the Hedera team regarding the reported exploit and any measures taken to contain its impact.
The Hedera incident comes amid a series of security-related developments reported by crypto.news in recent weeks. Blockaid recently said it detected an active exploit targeting Summer.fi, estimating losses of about $6 million at the time of its alert.
Separately, Ctrl Wallet announced it will permanently shut down after a security exploit affecting some Cardano wallets, giving users until Aug. 3 to withdraw their assets. Meanwhile, crypto.news also reported that Secret Network has proposed migrating SCRT from Cosmos to Arbitrum, with the team citing security risks, weaker liquidity, and an aging codebase in its July 7 governance proposal.
Z Hedera Network bylo po exploitu Sauce Protocol odcizeno více než 5,25 milionu USD a HBAR po zprávě klesl asi o 3,5 % na téměř 0,0670 USD. Útočník využil manipulaci s cenovým orákulem a prostředky přesunul na Ethereum.
More than $5 million has been stolen from the Hedera Network after hackers exploited the DeFi lending platform Sauce Protocol. The attack caused the HBAR coin price to fall by nearly 3% as the stolen crypto was quickly moved to Ethereum.
So far, the attacker has not been identified, and the Hedera Network team has not released an official statement.
Sauce Protocol Exploit Drains Over $5 MillionAccording to PeckShield, the attacker exploited the Sauce Protocol by manipulating its price oracle after depositing collateral into the lending platform.
By changing asset prices, the hacker borrowed nearly 6.6 million USDC and 35 million HBAR before swapping the stolen tokens on SaucerSwap.
The attacker then used LayerZero to bridge the stolen funds from the Hedera Network to Ethereum, making it more difficult to recover the assets.
The total loss is estimated at more than $5.25 million, with the funds already transferred off the Hedera Network.
Stolen Funds Moved to EthereumOn-chain investigator Specter said the hacker first stole the funds from Sauce Protocol on the Hedera network. After that, the attacker used LayerZero to transfer the stolen crypto from Hedera to Ethereum, where it is easier to swap and move the funds.
The hacker’s Ethereum wallet now holds around 2,068 ETH, worth nearly $3.7 million, along with 15.58 WBTC, bringing the total stolen assets to more than $5 million.
Blockchain records also show the attacker making several transactions, repeatedly moving Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) to another wallet, likely an attempt to hide the money trail.
More than $5 million has been stolen from Hedera’s DeFi ecosystem after hackers exploited Sauce Protocol in an oracle manipulation
Before carrying out the exploit, the hacker funded the wallet 0x9A4…6a494 with just 1 ETH from Tornado Cash. Attackers often use Tornado Cash to cover their tracks before launching an exploit.
HBAR Coin Price Falls After AttackFollowing the news, HBAR dropped around 3.5%, falling to nearly $0.0670 as investors feared a more serious breach.
Although the exploit targeted Sauce Protocol rather than the Hedera network itself, the incident has raised concerns across decentralized finance (DeFi) applications built on the blockchain.
The investigation is still ongoing, yet there is no official announcement or post from the Hedera network team.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Bonzo Lend na Hedera přišel o zhruba 9 milionů USD po oracle exploitu, kdy útočník manipuloval cenou SAUCE jako kolaterálu a vybral 6,63 milionu USDC a 34,5 milionu wrapped HBAR.
Hedera-based lending protocol Bonzo Lend lost about $9 million after an attacker manipulated the price of SAUCE used as collateral, allowing the account to borrow assets far beyond the value deposited.
In a preliminary incident report published Saturday, Bonzo said the attacker deposited 250 SAUCE, worth only a few dollars, before submitting a price update that inflated the token’s value by roughly 12 orders of magnitude. The wallet then borrowed 6.63 million USDC and 34.5 million wrapped HBAR from the lending pool.
The case illustrates how oracle failures can turn low-value collateral into a tool for draining large amounts of liquidity from lending protocols, even when the application and underlying network continue operating as designed.
Bonzo attributed the incident to a flaw in Supra’s on-chain oracle verifier, which accepted a manipulated SAUCE price carrying a zeroed signature. The protocol said Supra acknowledged the issue and deployed a fix, while stressing that the incident was not a vulnerability in Bonzo Lend’s contracts or Hedera’s core network.
Estimated economic impact of the incident. Source: Bonzo Finance
DeFi hacks continue to pressure the sector The incident adds to a growing number of exploits targeting decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols in 2026.
The second quarter had become the most-hacked quarter on record by incident count, with 83 exploits and about $755 million stolen. Cross-chain bridge exploits accounted for $351 million, while compromised administrator attacks and fake token price manipulation represented 37% of quarterly losses.
In 2026, DeFi’s total value locked (TVL) had fallen 39% to over $70 billion in June from about $115 billion in January. CryptoRank recorded 121 hacks and roughly $942 million in losses over the period, saying repeated security incidents likely weighed on user confidence and reinforced capital outflows.
The Bonzo incident also follows a similar collateral-pricing exploit on Stellar. In February, attackers drained roughly $10 million from a YieldBlox DAO-managed lending pool after manipulating the price path used to value USTRY collateral, allowing them to borrow assets beyond the token’s real worth.
Magazine: Will the crypto lobby's $189M campaign get CLARITY over the line?
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
Na síti Hedera bylo při podezření na exploit odcizeno 5,25 milionu USD a prostředky se přes LayerZero přesunuly na Ethereum. Hedera incident zatím nepotvrdila.
Someone just walked off with $5.25 million from the Hedera network, and they didn’t exactly try to be subtle about it. Blockchain security firms PeckShield and Specter flagged the suspicious activity on July 11, tracking a trail of funds that moved from Hedera’s mainnet to Ethereum through a cross-chain bridge powered by LayerZero technology.
The timing is particularly awkward for Hedera. Just weeks after the network celebrated the launch of the first US spot HBAR ETF, it’s now dealing with a significant security incident.
How the exploit unfolded The attacker funded an Ethereum wallet with 1 ETH routed through Tornado Cash, the privacy mixing service. From there, the attacker bridged assets from Hedera to Ethereum using LayerZero’s cross-chain infrastructure. Once the funds landed on Ethereum, the attacker swapped Wrapped Bitcoin for Ether, consolidating the stolen haul into more liquid assets.
Advertisement
At the time security researchers flagged the incident, the attacker’s Ethereum wallet held approximately 2,360 ETH, valued at about $4.25 million, along with 15.58 WBTC worth roughly $1 million. The wallet addresses involved have been identified as 0x9A4966152F6e10b33Cb7a37975e8619816d6a494 and 0xaf20D792A19fD42dCf697ceBa6100291D96dD93e.
Hedera itself has not confirmed the exploit. On-chain investigators are still picking through the transaction data to determine exactly what vulnerability was exploited and how the attacker gained access to the funds in the first place.
A pattern that should worry everyone This isn’t Hedera’s first brush with a security breach. Back in March 2023, the network experienced an exploit that affected decentralized exchange liquidity pools through a bug in Hedera Token Service transfers.
The 2026 landscape has been particularly brutal. A $6 million exploit hit Summer.fi, and a governance attack on BONK DAO resulted in $20 million in losses. The suspected Hedera incident slots neatly into this growing catalog of multi-million-dollar security failures.
What this means for HBAR and its new ETF In June 2026, Canary Capital launched the first US spot HBAR ETF, which debuted with $52.6 million in assets under management. Now, barely a month later, the network is associated with a multi-million-dollar theft.
The exploit appears to involve assets bridged off the Hedera network rather than a compromise of the network’s core consensus mechanism. The use of Tornado Cash to fund the initial wallet suggests the attacker was prepared for scrutiny, which typically makes fund recovery significantly more difficult.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Uniswap na Robinhood Chain překročil kumulativní objem obchodů 1 miliardu USD za devět dní a denní počet aktivních obchodníků přesáhl 220 000. UNI během růstu objemu vzrostl až o 14 %.
Uniswap just crossed $1 billion in cumulative trading volume on Robinhood Chain. It took nine days.
To put that in perspective, the chain’s public mainnet launched around July 1, and by July 10 the leading decentralized exchange had already processed a billion dollars in trades. Daily active traders surpassed 220,000 during the same stretch.
The numbers behind the surge The trajectory was steep from the start. Uniswap racked up roughly $250 million in trading volume during its first week on Robinhood Chain, then saw a single-day explosion to approximately $500 million on July 8. That one-day spike ranked the chain’s Uniswap activity second only to Ethereum mainnet.
Advertisement
Uniswap’s total value locked on Robinhood Chain topped $30 million by July 10. The broader chain’s TVL cleared $106 million during the same window.
All four of Uniswap’s protocol versions, v2, v3, v4, and UniswapX, were live from day one as the primary public automated market maker.
The trading activity wasn’t driven by a single catalyst. Two categories dominated: tokenized stocks and memecoins.
Why Robinhood Chain matters for DeFi Robinhood Chain is built on Arbitrum’s Layer 2 technology, giving it 100-millisecond block times.
The UNI governance token responded accordingly, climbing as much as 14% during the volume surge.
What this means for investors The tokenized stocks angle deserves particular attention. If traders on Robinhood Chain can seamlessly swap between memecoins and tokenized equities using the same DEX interface, that blurs the line between traditional brokerage services and DeFi in ways regulators will almost certainly want to examine.
The $106 million in total chain TVL is still modest compared to established L2s like Arbitrum One or Base, which hold billions.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Shiba Inu community veteran Mazrael highlighted Japan's latest crypto push, which stands to benefit Shiba Inu.
According to Mazrael, Japan just took another major step toward becoming one of the world's most crypto-friendly economies.
🇯🇵 Japan just took another major step toward becoming one of the world's most crypto-friendly economies.
• Crypto is being recognized as regulated financial products.
• The government is moving toward legalizing crypto ETFs.
• SHIB is already on Japan's JVCEA Green List,… https://t.co/A05BOgkjdc pic.twitter.com/Gkxqam60kJ
— Mazrael.Shib (@Mazrael_shib) July 11, 2026 This comes as cryptocurrencies are recognized as regulated financial products in the country. Last month, Japan's House of Representatives passed a bill that moves crypto regulation from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.
You Might Also Like
HOT Stories
The new rules, due to come into force next year, would treat crypto assets as financial instruments, subjecting them to lower taxes and stricter trading rules. They also open the door to new products such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
Mazrael also highlighted Japan's push toward legalizing crypto ETFs. Japan is getting closer to bringing cryptocurrency further into its mainstream financial system after indicating support for crypto exchange-traded funds. Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama stated the government is working on a legal framework to allow these investment products in the domestic market.
Big win for SHIB?Japan has over 14 million open cryptocurrency accounts, with low- to middle-income retail customers driving the growth.
You Might Also Like
Shiba Inu is positioned to benefit from this growing market as it is already on Japan's JVCEA Green List, which makes it easier for regulated platforms in the country to list. JVCEA said it had added Shiba Inu to the Green List last November. This is significant as being on the list is like getting a fast pass for Japanese exchanges.
SHIB is also available through Mercoin, a Tokyo-based subsidiary of Japan's massive e-commerce and marketplace app Mercari, thus expanding access across Japan.
Japan opened a major door for SHIB in April with its listing on Rakuten Wallet, a cryptocurrency trading platform owned by Japan's Rakuten Group. Shiba Inu is now utilized in the ecosystem, which includes Rakuten Pay with 44 million users, allowing SHIB to reach people who have never even thought about crypto.
Pendle oznámil upgrade Bungee Exchange V3, který přináší rychlejší routing, nižší poplatky a cross-chain swapy jedním kliknutím bez nutnosti držet nativní gas tokeny na cílovém řetězci.
Pendle just made cross-chain DeFi a whole lot less painful. The yield-trading protocol announced a full upgrade to BungeeExchange V3, bringing faster routing, lower fees, and a feature that sounds almost too convenient: single-click cross-chain token swaps that don’t require users to hold native gas tokens on the destination chain.
In English: you can now swap any token on any chain directly into Pendle’s principal tokens (PT) or yield tokens (YT) without first scrambling to acquire ETH, MATIC, or whatever gas currency the receiving network demands. The protocol picks up that tab automatically.
Advertisement
What the upgrade actually changes Bungee, powered by SOCKET infrastructure, functions as a bridge aggregator, scanning multiple bridges and DEX routes to find the cheapest and fastest path for a swap. Pendle describes it as “the most powerful bridge aggregator,” and the numbers offer some backing for that claim: Bungee has facilitated over $25 billion in cumulative transaction volume across its lifetime.
The V3 upgrade specifically improves three areas. Routing speed has been enhanced, meaning the protocol can find optimal swap paths more quickly. Transaction fees have been reduced, though Pendle hasn’t disclosed specific percentage improvements. And the gasless execution feature eliminates what has long been one of the most annoying onboarding hurdles in multi-chain DeFi.
Why Pendle is betting big on cross-chain Pendle’s core product lets users split yield-bearing assets into two components: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). PT represents the underlying asset’s value at maturity, while YT captures the yield generated over a given period.
By embedding a bridge aggregator directly into the swap flow, Pendle removes the multi-step process that previously required users to leave the platform, bridge manually, and return. The entire journey from holding Token A on Chain X to holding PT or YT on Chain Y now happens in one click.
Prior to this upgrade, community-built tools had already started enabling PT token trading through Bungee’s SOCKET infrastructure. The V3 release formalizes and expands that functionality.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Morgan Stanley za poslední dva týdny přidal téměř 1 000 BTC a jeho sledovaná držba vzrostla na 5 761 BTC. Podle Arkham má nyní bitcoin v hodnotě zhruba 369,9 milionu USD.
Morgan Stanley has increased its Bitcoin holdings by nearly 1,000 BTC over the past two weeks, lifting its tracked balance above 5,700 BTC, according to on-chain data.
Summary
Morgan Stanley added nearly 1,000 BTC over the past two weeks, pushing its tracked holdings to 5,761 BTC. Arkham data shows the accumulation came through multiple large transfers from Coinbase Prime rather than a single purchase. The latest buying follows Morgan Stanley’s June crypto expansion with Galaxy Digital, allowing eligible clients to convert crypto into spot investment products. According to blockchain intelligence platform Arkham, the investment bank continued adding Bitcoin through its spot Bitcoin investment product during the recent market pullback. Arkham’s latest portfolio data shows Morgan Stanley now holds 5,761 BTC worth roughly $369.9 million, making it one of the larger institutional Bitcoin holders tracked on the platform.
Source: Arkham The latest increase follows a series of transfers recorded over the past two weeks instead of a single purchase. Arkham’s transaction history shows several large inflows from Coinbase Prime wallets, including transfers of 495.8 BTC, 171.9 BTC, 166.2 BTC, 154.8 BTC, 143.3 BTC, 126.1 BTC, 120.4 BTC, and another 34.4 BTC within the last 14 hours. The activity also includes minor operational transfers and a 1 BTC movement back to Coinbase Prime, leaving the firm’s net increase at roughly 1,000 BTC.
Source: Arkham Latest purchases have come through multiple large transfers Recent Arkham data indicates Morgan Stanley accumulated Bitcoin in stages rather than executing a single large transaction. Most of the recorded inflows originated from Coinbase Prime custody and deposit addresses, suggesting institutional settlement activity linked to its Bitcoin investment product.
At current market prices shown on Arkham, the firm’s Bitcoin holdings are valued at nearly $370 million. Arkham also classifies the entity as a fund, an exchange-traded product, and a Bitcoin whale, while linking the portfolio to 11 tracked wallet addresses.
The latest buying extends a pattern of adding exposure during price weakness. Although Arkham describes the activity as another instance of Morgan Stanley “buying the dip,” the platform does not disclose whether the transactions represent direct purchases, client subscriptions, or other operational inflows into the investment vehicle.
Crypto investment services have expanded for wealthy clients The recent accumulation follows Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s June announcement that it had expanded its digital asset offering through a referral arrangement with Galaxy Digital.
Under the program, eligible high-net-worth clients can lend cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana to Galaxy Digital and receive shares in spot crypto investment products, including the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust. According to the companies, the structure allows investors to move crypto exposure into regulated investment vehicles without first selling their digital assets.
Morgan Stanley and Galaxy Digital also said the arrangement can reduce in-kind crypto-to-exchange-traded product onboarding times by as much as 75%, making transfers into regulated investment products faster than conventional processes.
The expanded client offering and the latest on-chain accumulation come as institutional participation in spot Bitcoin investment products continues to grow. While Arkham’s wallet data tracks assets associated with Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin product, the platform does not identify the underlying investors or distinguish between firm-owned holdings and assets managed on behalf of clients.
Hyperliquid spustila obchodování futures na meme coin CASHCAT na Robinhood Chain s pákou až 3x. Po zalistování se objevil i velrybí short na 1,11 milionu CASHCAT.
Hyperliquid announces the launch of contract trading for the meme coin CASHCAT on Robinhood Chain, with support for up to 3x leverage.
Relevant content
A whale shorted 1.11 million CASHCAT tokens on Hyperliquid.
According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a whale deposited approximately $450,000 into Hyperliquid. Within one hour of CASHCAT’s listing on Hyperliquid, the whale shorted 1.11 million CASHCAT tokens with 3x leverage, valued at $222,200. The entry price was $0.195336, liquidation price $0.531304, resulting in an unrealized loss of $4,400.
Per GMGN market data, CASHCAT, a meme coin on Robinhood Chain, briefly hit an all-time high in market capitalization, currently trading at $200 million with an intraday increase of over 20%. Meme coins are highly volatile, so investors should exercise caution regarding associated risks.
11 minutes ago
The White House confirms Trump has 'emptied' the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
The White House confirmed on the 10th that U.S. President Donald Trump has removed two incumbent members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from their posts. In a statement sent to media on the same day, the White House said the president "reserves the right to remove relevant personnel who may not be fully committed to safeguarding U.S. election security and ensuring every legal vote is counted." The statement did not give a specific reason for Trump's move. However, U.S. media reported that the Election Assistance Commission had rejected an executive order signed by Trump, which required voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship on the national voter registration form. (Xinhua News Agency)
11 minutes ago
A crypto whale shorted Ethereum (ETH) with 25x leverage, holding a position worth $12.43 million.
According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited approximately $500,000 into Hyperliquid to open a short position of 6,914 ETH (valued at $12.43 million) with 25x leverage. The entry price was $1,790.36, liquidation price stands at $1,825.58. The position currently has an unrealized loss of around $50,700, with only a 1.55% gap to liquidation.
11 minutes ago
A trader has earned more than $1 million in profits on CASHCAT, achieving a staggering return of up to 1183 times.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, a trader has reaped over $1 million in profits from CASHCAT. The trader spent 0.49 ETH (valued at $838) to purchase 15.04 million CASHCAT tokens, then sold them for 580 ETH (worth $1.04 million), generating a profit of over $1 million (a 1183x return). Had the trader held the tokens until now, the profit would have reached $2.9 million.
11 minutes ago
A crypto whale bought the dip, acquiring 14,007 ETH valued at approximately $25.18 million.
According to monitoring by OnchainLens, a whale purchased 14,007 ETH at an average price of $1,798, with a total value of approximately $25.1 million.
Tether podle EmberCN poslal z rezervní adresy na Binance testovací transakci 4 BTC za zhruba 250 000 USD. Zároveň se po konci Q2 zatím neobjevily nové on-chain vklady BTC.
According to monitoring by EmberCN, Tether allocates 15% of its quarterly profits to its Bitcoin reserve address. Approximately 5 hours ago, this address made a test transfer of 4 BTC to Binance, valued at roughly $250,000. EmberCN stated that this same address previously transferred 204.3 BTC to Bitfinex a month ago, worth approximately $14.36 million at the time, when Bitcoin’s price stood at around $70,000. It remains unclear whether these assets have been sold. Additionally, Tether appears to have not yet completed the on-chain withdrawal of new Bitcoin for Q2 2026. Per its usual practice, Tether typically transfers BTC purchased in the quarter to its reserve address on the last day of each quarter. However, more than 10 days have elapsed since the end of Q2, and no new Bitcoin deposits to this reserve address have been observed on-chain, sparking market concerns over whether it has adjusted its Bitcoin accumulation pace.
Relevant content
A whale shorted 1.11 million CASHCAT tokens on Hyperliquid.
According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a whale deposited approximately $450,000 into Hyperliquid. Within one hour of CASHCAT’s listing on Hyperliquid, the whale shorted 1.11 million CASHCAT tokens with 3x leverage, valued at $222,200. The entry price was $0.195336, liquidation price $0.531304, resulting in an unrealized loss of $4,400.
Per GMGN market data, CASHCAT, a meme coin on Robinhood Chain, briefly hit an all-time high in market capitalization, currently trading at $200 million with an intraday increase of over 20%. Meme coins are highly volatile, so investors should exercise caution regarding associated risks.
2 minutes ago
The White House confirms Trump has 'emptied' the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
The White House confirmed on the 10th that U.S. President Donald Trump has removed two incumbent members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from their posts. In a statement sent to media on the same day, the White House said the president "reserves the right to remove relevant personnel who may not be fully committed to safeguarding U.S. election security and ensuring every legal vote is counted." The statement did not give a specific reason for Trump's move. However, U.S. media reported that the Election Assistance Commission had rejected an executive order signed by Trump, which required voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship on the national voter registration form. (Xinhua News Agency)
2 minutes ago
Hyperliquid launches CASHCAT futures trading, supporting up to 3x leverage.
Hyperliquid announces the launch of contract trading for the meme coin CASHCAT on Robinhood Chain, with support for up to 3x leverage.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale shorted Ethereum (ETH) with 25x leverage, holding a position worth $12.43 million.
According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited approximately $500,000 into Hyperliquid to open a short position of 6,914 ETH (valued at $12.43 million) with 25x leverage. The entry price was $1,790.36, liquidation price stands at $1,825.58. The position currently has an unrealized loss of around $50,700, with only a 1.55% gap to liquidation.
2 minutes ago
A trader has earned more than $1 million in profits on CASHCAT, achieving a staggering return of up to 1183 times.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, a trader has reaped over $1 million in profits from CASHCAT. The trader spent 0.49 ETH (valued at $838) to purchase 15.04 million CASHCAT tokens, then sold them for 580 ETH (worth $1.04 million), generating a profit of over $1 million (a 1183x return). Had the trader held the tokens until now, the profit would have reached $2.9 million.
Spotové Bitcoin ETF v USA zaznamenaly 12. června příliv zhruba 86 milionů USD po více než 1,67 miliardy USD čistých odlivů. BlackRockův IBIT přilákal asi 57,7 milionu USD.
After weeks of watching money walk out the door, US spot Bitcoin ETFs finally caught a break. On June 12, roughly $86 million flowed back into the funds, with BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) doing most of the heavy lifting.
IBIT alone pulled in approximately $57.7 million of that total, accounting for nearly two-thirds of the day’s inflows. In Bitcoin terms, the collective haul translated to about 1,350 BTC purchased across all spot ETFs, with IBIT responsible for roughly 907 of those coins.
The $86 million came after a stretch of more than $1.67 billion in net outflows from Bitcoin ETFs.
Advertisement
BlackRock’s growing Bitcoin empire IBIT isn’t just the biggest Bitcoin ETF. The fund now holds over $46 billion in assets under management.
BlackRock recently launched BITA, a Bitcoin Income ETF designed to generate yield from Bitcoin exposure.
What this means for investors The single-day inflow reversal carries a few implications worth unpacking for anyone with skin in the Bitcoin game.
First, institutional demand hasn’t evaporated. BlackRock’s $57.7 million purchase on a single day suggests otherwise.
Third, BlackRock’s expansion into yield-generating Bitcoin products like BITA signals that the firm is building infrastructure for long-term holders, not just speculators chasing momentum.
One green day doesn’t constitute a trend reversal. A single $86 million inflow following $1.67 billion in outflows is encouraging but mathematically modest. That’s about 5% of the outflow recouped in a day.
IBIT’s dominance in capturing nearly two-thirds of the day’s inflows suggests that capital is consolidating around the BlackRock brand.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Americké spotové Bitcoin ETF 10. července přilákaly čistý příliv 90,4 milionu USD a Ethereum ETF přidaly 18,4 milionu USD. Po červnovém odlivu se tak kapitál vrací do regulovaných krypto produktů.
US spot Bitcoin ETFs pulled in $90.4 million in net inflows on July 10, while their Ethereum counterparts added $18.4 million. That translates to roughly 1,791 BTC and 10,550 ETH worth of fresh capital flowing into regulated crypto investment products in a single day.
The recovery after a record-breaking exodus June 2026 set an unwelcome record: approximately $4 billion in net outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs. That’s the largest monthly withdrawal since these products launched in January 2024.
A 10-day consecutive outflow streak from Bitcoin ETFs finally snapped on July 2, after hemorrhaging a cumulative $2.73 billion during that stretch alone.
Earlier in the month, Bitcoin ETFs recorded a single-day inflow of $265.7 million, driven primarily by BlackRock’s IBIT. The $90.4 million on July 10 is more subdued, but it reinforces the narrative that capital is rotating back in rather than continuing to flee.
Advertisement
Who’s winning the ETF fee war BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC continue to dominate inflows on the Bitcoin side. On the Ethereum front, BlackRock’s ETHA and Fidelity’s FETH have carved out similar positions.
Grayscale’s higher-fee products have faced persistent outflows as investors migrate to cheaper alternatives. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust, which converted from a closed-end fund, carried significantly higher fees than competitors who entered the market with aggressive pricing, resulting in a steady asset transfer from Grayscale to BlackRock and Fidelity.
Since spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in January 2024, total net inflows have surpassed $50 billion, reaching approximately $51.3 billion by July 2026.
Macro backdrop and what’s driving sentiment Bitcoin prices have been hovering between $56,000 and $64,000 in early July. Easing inflation expectations have provided some tailwinds for risk assets broadly, and crypto ETFs appear to be catching that breeze.
The $18.4 million flowing into Ethereum ETFs is notable because Ethereum ETFs have historically struggled to match Bitcoin’s momentum in attracting capital. The fact that both products are seeing positive flows simultaneously suggests the recovery isn’t limited to Bitcoin; it’s a broader re-engagement with crypto as an asset class.
What this means for investors For investors watching the competitive landscape, the continued dominance of BlackRock and Fidelity products is worth tracking. The earlier $265.7 million inflow day in July shows the capacity for larger moves when conditions align.
A $4 billion monthly outflow in June demonstrates how quickly sentiment can reverse. With Bitcoin trading between $56,000 and $64,000, investors should watch whether the July inflow trend accelerates or fizzles. If daily inflows consistently stay positive and gradually increase, it would mark a meaningful shift in the institutional positioning that drove the June selloff.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Cardano za posledních sedm dní zaznamenalo 233 commitů a patřilo mezi nejaktivnější projekty Layer-1. Cardano Foundation zároveň připravuje nové otevřené fórum pro správu sítě.
Cardano has emerged as one of the most active networks in blockchain development, recording 233 GitHub code commits over the past seven days. This activity placed Cardano among the leading Layer-1 projects according to data from Token Terminal, which showed that the network accounted for approximately 6.2% of all code contributions across Layer-1 blockchains, a segment that gathered a total of 3,700 commits during this period.
Rising Developer Activity and Ecosystem GrowthEverstake, a prominent staking service provider, recognized Cardano as having one of the most stable foundations in the cryptocurrency sector. The company highlighted increasing engagement from developers, improved project metrics, and sustained ecosystem expansion as factors that could push Cardano back into the ranking of the world’s top ten cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.
Despite Cardano’s smaller market cap compared to some major competitors, the project continues to maintain strong interest from the developer community. Such activity is seen as a significant indicator of potential network growth and innovation.
Ongoing developer engagement, ecosystem expansion, and improved on-chain metrics may support Cardano’s efforts to reclaim a spot among the top ten digital assets.
Analysis of weekly activity showed that Cardano’s development efforts were not uniformly distributed. The number of code commits began relatively high on July 2, tapered to a low point by July 4, then rose sharply to reach the week’s peak on July 6 before leveling off. This pattern of fluctuations corresponds with open-source development cycles, where activity often varies depending on scheduled releases and coordinated team efforts.
Notably, despite these mid-week dips, the network’s daily commits did not fall below previous weekly lows, highlighting persistent developer commitment. Similar trends were also observed in other leading Layer-1 blockchain networks during the week.
BlockchainWeekly Code CommitsShare of Total (%)Cardano2336.2Other Layer-1s (aggregate)3,46793.8Total3,700100Cardano Foundation Advances Governance InitiativesBeyond development statistics, Cardano has been advancing its governance structure. The Cardano Foundation, a non-profit supporting the Cardano protocol, is developing an open, off-chain discussion forum to encourage better collaboration among governance participants. This initiative follows the adoption of the Cardano Constitution, scheduled for implementation in February 2025.
Foundation representatives described the importance of building a transparent and inclusive platform that allows verified users to interact through identity credentials tied to on-chain data. Features under consideration include independent moderation, publicly accessible communication channels, and compliance with open standards for interoperability.
The proposed forum would support separate spaces for ADA token holders, Delegated Representatives (DReps), proposal authors, and committee members. Optional user profiles could include individuals’ voting records and declared governance interests, aiming to improve transparency and stakeholder engagement.
The foundation suggested that selecting the platform for this forum could be achieved via on-chain voting, reflecting Cardano’s ongoing move toward decentralized decision-making and active community involvement.
Mini dictionary: Cardano Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting the Cardano blockchain ecosystem, facilitates sustainable development, governance initiatives, and educational programs to foster ecosystem growth.
Cardano’s governance system continues to evolve as the foundation explores new platforms for community discussion and transparent voting, aiming for a more advanced phase of decentralized oversight.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Velcí držitelé SHIB už osmý den po sobě stahují tokeny z burz do cold peněženek, čímž dál snižují nabídku k okamžitému prodeji. CryptoQuant uvádí, že čistý odtok je rekordně záporný od 3. července.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Large Shiba Inu coin holders have staged a systematic exodus from exchanges, moving tokens into long-term storage. According to analytics platform CryptoQuant, SHIB's net flow on trading platforms has remained negative for a record eight consecutive days since July 3.
So-called smart money, which controls up to 94.5% of the token's supply, has reduced selling and withdrawn hundreds of billions of tokens to "cold" wallets over this period.
The movement of tokens over the past 24 hours is reflected in the following metrics:
HOT Stories
Massive outflow: 226.3 billion SHIB left exchange accounts for private addresses.Modest inflow: Around 131 billion SHIB was deposited on trading platforms for potential sale.Net deficit: Exchange order books lost a net 95.35 billion SHIB in just one day.Reserves near the bottom: Total SHIB holdings on centralized platforms fell to 86.69 trillion tokens.The meme coin's price stabilized near $0.00000438 as exchange supply continued to decline. SHIB has gained approximately 4.12% since the beginning of July, but it remains trapped in a narrow range after a difficult June, when the asset lost 24%.
Large transfers slow, but reserves keep fallingThe seven-day average number of SHIB deposits to exchanges fell by 69%, while the equivalent figure for withdrawals declined by 78%. This means overall large-transfer activity weakened significantly compared with the previous week.
At the same time, the negative netflow shows that exchange reserves continue to shrink despite the lower number of transactions. The amount of SHIB available for immediate sale on centralized platforms is gradually decreasing.
Shiba Inu (SHIB) exchange netflow since July 3 2026, Source: CryptoQuant You Might Also Like
One important detail is that token withdrawals alone do not prove that all transfers are related to accumulation. Some of the activity may involve funds being redistributed between custodial wallets, internal exchange operations, or changes in storage structure.
What this means for the SHIB priceA decline in exchange supply could reduce potential selling pressure. If demand begins to rise, the smaller amount of available tokens may amplify the price response to new buying activity.
However, the eight-day outflow streak does not yet confirm the beginning of a new uptrend. Trading activity and the number of large transfers are declining alongside exchange reserves, meaning the market will need stronger spot volume to break out of the current consolidation range.
In the coming days, the main indicators for the Shiba Inu coin will be exchange reserves, daily netflow, and trading volume. Continued withdrawals combined with stronger buying activity would provide more reliable confirmation of a shift in the market balance than negative netflow alone.
Oficiální účet Shiba Inu na X se 3,8 milionu sledujících začal nečekaně propagovat nízkokapové meme coiny a launchpad místo vlastního ekosystému. Zatím není jasné, zda jde o dohodu, zneužití účtu, nebo kompromitaci.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
The official Shiba Inu (SHIB) token account on X, which has an audience of 3.8 million followers, has suddenly shifted away from its usual focus. Instead of covering the SHIB token and the development of its own ecosystem, the project's media infrastructure has begun actively promoting third-party meme tokens with extremely low market capitalizations.
Two unusual posts appeared on the profile one after another. In a reply beneath another account's post, the Shiba Inu account left a brief comment openly claiming that a new, little-known frog-themed token was superior to PEPE, a genuinely major project. The post it replied to included the micro-token's smart contract address.
Official X account of Shiba Inu (SHIB) cryptocurrency project, Source: XShortly afterward, another promotional reply appeared on the account, this time supporting a third-party meme coin launchpad and its native token. The publication was presented in SHIB's signature style, including grandiose slogans about a "mission to save meme culture" and emojis.
HOT Stories
The attention economy and three possible scenariosAmid fierce competition for liquidity, particularly during the summer slump, the entire crypto industry operates according to the rules of the attention economy. Major projects usually try to keep their audience focused on their own products rather than direct valuable traffic toward third-party assets, especially competing meme tokens.
The promotion of micro-cap assets to an audience of 3.8 million followers by a multibillion-dollar giant appears highly unusual and fits three possible scenarios:
Because this third-party launchpad has appeared in Shiba Inu's feed more than once, the publications may be part of an official commercial agreement. However, this raises the question of why the account's management would deliberately dilute its community's attention to promote highly speculative assets.It is also possible that individual SHIB developers or managers with access to the main account decided to monetize the project's enormous audience for personal gain.The possibility of an account compromise also cannot be ruled out. Publishing contract addresses in replies and encouraging users to buy new tokens are classic warning signs of a hacker attack. You Might Also Like
At the time of publication, official ecosystem representatives, including lead developer Shytoshi Kusama, had not commented on the situation. Until the context of these publications is clarified, SHIB investors and holders should exercise extreme caution and avoid rushing to follow links posted through the project's account.
Injective spustila sekci Institutional Infrastructure, která má podnikům usnadnit piloty, tokenizaci aktiv a nasazení kapitálu v řízených onchain prostředích. Platforma zdůrazňuje soulad s KYC/AML pravidly, kontrolovaný přístup a custody přes BitGo a Fireblocks.
Injective has launched a dedicated Institutional Infrastructure section on its website designed to walk enterprises through the process of piloting projects, tokenizing assets, and deploying capital in controlled onchain environments.
What the institutional page actually offers The new page outlines a four-step process for institutions: design pilots, launch in permissioned environments, tokenize assets with controlled access, and operate with institutional custody partners.
The compliance angle is front and center. Injective is highlighting KYC/AML-compliant programmable compliance, jurisdiction-based access controls, and fully configurable real-world asset markets.
Advertisement
On the custody side, Injective is leaning on partnerships with BitGo and Fireblocks. Both firms already custody billions in digital assets for hedge funds, asset managers, and corporate treasuries.
The platform also supports a native Real-World Asset module, letting institutions tokenize everything from debt instruments to commodities within Injective’s ecosystem. Paired with native Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility launched in November 2025, developers familiar with Ethereum’s tooling can build on Injective without learning an entirely new tech stack.
The network under the hood The blockchain reports over 2.94 billion onchain transactions processed to date, with a block time of 0.64 seconds. Ethereum’s block time hovers around 12 seconds.
The median transaction cost sits at $0.0001. Injective also claims over 500 onchain assets and a reported RWA volume of $6.8 billion.
The native token, INJ, serves as the backbone for governance and staking within the ecosystem.
Broader strategic context This infrastructure page is part of a broader refresh of Injective’s platform, which now features dedicated sections for institutions, developers, and the community.
Injective established the Injective Policy Institute in July 2026 specifically for US regulatory engagement.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Ethena’s USDe na Morpho nasbíral za necelé čtyři týdny vklady ve výši 323,7 milionu USD, což představuje zhruba 40% růst. Coinbase navíc na Morpho spustila výnosový USDC vault využívající USDe.
Ethena’s synthetic dollar token USDe has accumulated $323.7 million in deposits on the Morpho lending protocol in under four weeks. The number represents a substantial jump from the $225 million to $235 million in Ethena-related total value locked on Morpho that was recorded between March and April 2026. In other words, deposits have grown by roughly 40% in a matter of weeks.
What’s actually driving the growth Morpho’s integration with Ethena dates back to March 2024. That early partnership gave the protocol a head start in building curated lending markets around USDe and its staked counterpart, sUSDe. The staked version acts as productive collateral, meaning it generates yield while simultaneously backing borrowing positions.
In June 2026, Coinbase launched a high-yield USDC vault on Morpho that leverages USDe, giving retail users access to lending strategies that were previously the domain of institutional desks. Ethena has also been strategically allocating its backing assets, including USDT, into Morpho vaults. When the issuer of a synthetic dollar is actively deploying its reserves into the same protocol where users are depositing, it creates a self-reinforcing loop of liquidity and confidence.
Advertisement
The bigger picture for USDe supply Ethena’s total USDe supply has stabilized between $4.5 billion and $6 billion in 2026. The token previously peaked above $10 billion, meaning current supply levels still represent a roughly 40% to 55% drawdown from all-time highs.
USDe maintains its dollar peg through a delta-neutral strategy: Ethena holds spot crypto positions and simultaneously shorts equivalent futures contracts. The spread between those positions generates yield. When funding rates are positive, this works well; when they’re not, it gets complicated.
Ethena forged a partnership with Janus Henderson in June 2026, bringing traditional asset management credibility to a protocol that lives entirely on-chain.
What this means for DeFi investors The Coinbase USDC vault integration creates a bridge between traditional stablecoin holders and USDe’s yield mechanics. Users deposit USDC, the vault strategy interacts with USDe on Morpho, and retail participants capture returns they couldn’t easily access before.
USDe’s yield depends on funding rates remaining positive across perpetual futures markets. During sustained bearish periods, those rates can flip negative, compressing or eliminating the protocol’s yield advantage. Ethena’s decision to diversify backing assets by deploying USDT into Morpho vaults reflects an awareness of concentration risk.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Empery Digital prodala od 7. května 1 400 BTC za zhruba 87,1 milionu USD a snížila držbu na 1 514 BTC. Výnosy používá na splátku dluhu, financování dříve oznámené akvizice nemovitosti, úhradu právních výdajů spojených s probíhajícím sporem akcionářů a provoz.
The Nasdaq listed company said it sold 1,400 BTC since May 7 at an average price of $62,200 per Bitcoin, generating about $87.1 million in gross proceeds. The sale left Empery with 1,514 BTC and about $73.9 million in cash as of July 10.
Advertisement
The proceeds are being used to repay debt, fund a previously announced property acquisition, cover legal expenses tied to ongoing stockholder litigation and support operations. Empery said it repaid $10 million of outstanding debt on July 7 and still has $45 million outstanding on its debt facility.
The move marks a sharp reversal for a company that adopted a Bitcoin treasury strategy last year. Empery, formerly Volcon, said in August 2025 that it held more than 4,018 BTC and described its strategy as becoming a low cost, capital efficient aggregator of Bitcoin.
The company had already disclosed that Bitcoin sales could be part of its capital strategy. In its annual report, Empery said it had sold 722 BTC for $50 million from January 1 through March 25, 2026, and warned that future Bitcoin sales could affect its results and financial condition.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
CEO Strive Matt Cole uvedl, že firma může Bitcoin prodat, pokud to bude ve prospěch akcionářů. Zároveň chce být dlouhodobě čistým nakupujícím a překonat samotný Bitcoin.
Strive CEO Matt Cole just said something you almost never hear from a corporate Bitcoin maximalist: he’s willing to sell.
Cole confirmed that Strive is open to offloading Bitcoin if doing so benefits shareholders, even as the firm commits to being a net buyer of the asset over time. The goal, Cole says, is to outperform Bitcoin itself, not just hold it and hope.
Nearly 20,000 BTC and counting Strive, which trades on Nasdaq under the ticker ASST, held 19,882 BTC as of early July 2026. That puts it among the top 10 public corporate holders of Bitcoin globally.
The accumulation has been swift. The company’s stash grew from roughly 5,000 BTC in fall 2025 to nearly four times that amount through a combination of equity raises and structured financial instruments. In early June 2026 alone, Strive scooped up 2,500 BTC for $185 million.
Advertisement
Strive carries zero debt. No encumbered holdings. Cole has emphasized that Strive’s balance sheet could theoretically survive Bitcoin dropping to $0.01.
The firm also holds enough reserves to cover 18 months of dividend obligations.
The preferred stock play One of the more interesting tools in Strive’s toolkit is its Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock, trading under the ticker SATA. The instrument currently yields a 13% dividend rate.
Rather than selling Bitcoin to fund operations or pay dividends, Strive uses structured products like SATA to generate capital. That capital then gets deployed to buy more Bitcoin, amplifying the amount of BTC attributable to each common share.
Cole has also set a base case Bitcoin price target of $120,000 by year-end 2026. The firm wants to generate alpha over a simple buy-and-hold Bitcoin strategy. Cole’s background managing large fixed-income portfolios is clearly influencing how he thinks about Bitcoin treasury management, treating Bitcoin as the benchmark against which all capital allocation decisions are measured.
Acquiring the competition Strive made waves earlier by acquiring Semler Scientific, becoming the first public Bitcoin treasury company to buy another listed Bitcoin treasury business.
By absorbing Semler Scientific’s Bitcoin holdings and operations, Strive increased its total BTC position without relying solely on open-market purchases or additional equity raises.
What this means for investors The debt-free approach stands out in a market where several Bitcoin treasury companies have taken on significant leverage. If Bitcoin were to experience a sharp correction, the leveraged players would face margin calls and forced liquidations. Strive’s structure is designed to avoid that entirely.
The 13% yield on SATA preferred stock deserves scrutiny as well. A double-digit yield from a company whose primary asset is a volatile cryptocurrency should raise questions about sustainability, even with the current buffer of 18 months of dividend coverage. Investors should watch whether Strive can maintain that payout without eventually being forced to sell Bitcoin at inopportune times, which would undermine the entire “net buyer” thesis that Cole is pitching.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Japonsko podle ministryně financí Satsuki Katayamy postupuje podle plánu k legalizaci ETF na kryptoaktiva. Nové pravidlo má otevřít cestu k obchodování už příští rok.
Japan’s Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama announced at the Open QUICK 2026 seminar, organized by leading financial information provider QUICK on July 10, that the government is progressing as scheduled in the process to legalize crypto asset exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the country. This development follows growing international interest in similar financial products abroad.
Regulatory shift for crypto assetsRecently, Japan’s House of Representatives approved a regulatory change transferring the oversight of spot crypto assets from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. This move paves the way for crypto assets to be classified as fully regulated financial products, aligning their legal framework more closely with that of equities and bonds.
Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama confirmed that the government is proceeding with the legalization of crypto asset ETFs as originally intended.
The new regulation strengthens the legal basis for crypto asset ETFs to be listed and traded on Japanese exchanges. Under the current timetable, these products may begin trading on Japan’s markets as early as next year.
SBI develops two innovative fund offeringsIn May, SBI Holdings announced the launch of a new crypto asset ETF. The company’s plans include a dual-asset ETF structure that will provide investors with regulated access to both Bitcoin and XRP. As one of Japan’s largest financial groups, SBI operates across banking, brokerage, and asset management services.
In addition, SBI proposed a hybrid investment fund bringing together gold-based ETFs and crypto asset ETFs. In this structure, 51% of the portfolio would be allocated to gold ETFs, while the remaining 49% would be dedicated to crypto assets such as Bitcoin ETFs. This approach targets more cautious institutional and retail investors seeking diversified exposure.
ProductContentTarget audienceDual-asset ETFBitcoin and XRPInvestors seeking regulated crypto accessHybrid fund51% gold-based ETF, 49% crypto asset ETFMore cautious institutional and retail investorsAmbitious asset growth and competitionSBI aims to reach approximately 5 trillion yen, equivalent to $32 billion in assets under management, within three years of launching these products. This target represents a bold step for crypto-themed investment products within Japan’s financial sector and signals significant anticipated demand.
The company also hopes to secure an early market advantage by moving ahead of major Japanese financial groups such as Nomura and Rakuten Securities. With expanding regulatory clarity, competition in the crypto ETF space in Japan is expected to intensify in the coming period.
Ripple partnership comes to the foreSBI’s inclusion of XRP in its ETF plan aligns with its longstanding corporate partnership with Ripple. Known for its XRP-focused payment solutions, Ripple has established close business relationships in the Japanese market, and this collaboration continues to play a significant strategic role for SBI.
SBI is developing a structure uniting Bitcoin and XRP within the same fund, while also introducing a separate model that combines gold and crypto asset ETFs in a single portfolio.
Through these initiatives, SBI seeks to attract both aggressive crypto investors and more risk-averse clients, offering diverse routes to engage with digital assets under a regulated framework.
Market analysts expect SBI’s pioneering approach and regulatory developments to spur wider adoption of crypto ETFs in Japan, potentially altering the landscape for both institutional and retail participation in the coming years.
As Japan prepares to launch crypto asset ETFs, the convergence of traditional finance and blockchain technology is poised to reshape investment options in the country, with major players vying for leadership in a rapidly evolving sector.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ripple tento týden uvolnil z escrow zhruba 1 miliardu XRP, což analytik označil za běžnou měsíční praxi. Zároveň tvrdí, že firma míří k tomu, stát se první digitální bankou v USA a získat bankovní licenci.
Ripple released roughly $1 billion worth of XRP from its escrow this week, an amount large enough to catch the attention of traders watching the token’s price action closely.
Asked how to interpret the timing, given XRP’s recent price weakness, one analyst pushed back on the idea that the unlock signals anything unusual. “This is just the standard playbook for Ripple. We’ve seen this for years,” the analyst said, describing it as part of a broader redistribution of XRP into the hands of people who will actually use the underlying technology.
Ripple unlocks roughly 1 billion XRP tokens from its escrow, every single month. On a high-volume month, the company typically sells between 180 million and 300 million tokens, while Ripple typically relocks 70 to 80 percent of that supply right back into escrow. “It’s not as if Ripple sees the writing on the wall,” the analyst said. “This is standard business practice for the company.”
The bank narrative behind the numbers
The analyst pointed to a bigger story developing alongside the CLARITY Act, the PACE Act, separate legislation that could give Ripple direct access to the Federal Reserve system, too. Citing a previous interview, the analyst argued Ripple has “every incentive in the world” to lock up its remaining escrow and use it as collateral to become the first digital bank chartered in the United States.
A co-host on the discussion noted the relock percentage matters for gauging Ripple’s intent. A 90 percent relock this month would show Ripple is flush with capital, he said, pointing to active ETF inflows and corporate revenue as signs the company does not need to dilute the market by selling more tokens than necessary.
Reading the charts
Beyond the unlock, the hosts flagged a possible technical catalyst: XRP may be breaking out of a year-long descending channel, a move they said could align with historically favorable seasonal trends for the token heading into the fall.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
BlackRock has transferred 8,700 ETH—valued at approximately $15.81 million—to Coinbase Prime in the latest significant move tracked on the blockchain. According to data from Onchain Lens, the transfer originated from wallets linked to BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF, known by its ticker ETHA, coinciding with escalating outflows from the fund.
Transfer coincided with mounting ETF redemptionsOn the same day, BlackRock’s spot Ethereum ETF, ETHA, saw a net outflow of 7,240 ETH, representing around $12.67 million. This continued a trend of weak capital inflows into Ethereum ETFs, underlining continued pressure on the investment products amid challenging investor sentiment.
BlackRock, one of the world’s largest asset managers, remains under close observation in the cryptocurrency ETF sector. Coinbase Prime, on the other hand, serves as a leading platform offering custody, trading, and execution services tailored to institutional clients navigating the digital asset space.
According to Onchain Lens, 8,700 ETH was moved from BlackRock’s ETHA-linked wallets to Coinbase Prime during the exact period when substantial outflows hit ETHA.
Outflows deepen in Ethereum ETFsData for July 9 shows total daily outflows from spot Ethereum ETFs reaching $52.08 million. The largest single-fund withdrawal was recorded in Fidelity’s FETH. These figures highlight persistently weak short-term investor demand across the sector.
ETF flows have become a key barometer of overall market sentiment in recent quarters. June stood out as a period of heightened redemptions, with Ethereum ETFs seeing $690 million in net outflows—extending the negative streak that began in the first quarter of the year.
ItemAmountBlackRock transfer8,700 ETHTransfer value$15.81 millionETHA daily outflow7,240 ETHETHA daily outflow value$12.67 millionTotal daily Ethereum ETF outflow$52.08 millionNet figure after June$690 million net outflowMarket looks to Q3 signalsFollowing a lackluster first half of the year, investors have begun watching for signals that could shape the remainder of 2026. Historical data suggest that the third quarter has sometimes marked the beginning of recovery phases for Ethereum.
Analytics from CoinGlass reveal that since 2016, Ethereum has averaged an 8.08% return in third quarters, finishing seven out of the last eleven Q3 periods in positive territory. Notably, Q3 of 2025 saw a robust 66.55% surge.
Despite prior years hinting at stronger Q3 trends, investors are cautious, noting that a lack of new catalysts means past performance alone might not be enough to spark a sustainable recovery.
It is repeatedly emphasized that historical results are no guarantee of future outcomes. Over the past 24 hours, Ethereum posted a 2.6% gain, outperforming Bitcoin and climbing to $1,790. This price action fuels ongoing debate about whether ETH can break above its pattern of descending highs and lows.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ripple snížil nabídku RLUSD na Ethereu na zhruba 692 milionů USD, protože pokračuje v burnech tokenu. Na XRP Ledgeru je RLUSD stále více než na Ethereu.
Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
According to recent data from Ripple Stablecoin Tracker, Ripple USD (RLUSD) supply on the Ethereum network has shrunk to about $692 million as Ripple continues to adjust the stablecoin's circulating supply through token burns.
At the start of July, RLUSD supply on Ethereum was above $727 million; now this figure has decreased, with millions in Ripple USD burned on the Ethereum network in the last seven days.
$115.4 million was burned on the Ethereum blockchain in the last seven days as seen on the Ripple Stablecoin Tracker website, while $49.3 million was minted in the same timeframe. On July 29 alone, $25.9 million was burned on the Ethereum blockchain while $6.2 million in RLUSD was minted.
HOT Stories
The last 30 days saw significant RLUSD redemptions on the Ethereum blockchain; a total of $369.4 million was burned while $167.6 million was minted.
You Might Also Like
On the XRP Ledger, a total of $324.1 million was minted in the last 30 days and $217.6 million was burned. The total circulating supply of the RLUSD stablecoin is currently $1.556 billion.
RLUSD expands footprint on XRP LedgerWith RLUSD supply on Ethereum shrinking to $692 million, XRP Ledger remains ahead, hosting more RLUSD than Ethereum network. RLUSD's footprint on XRP has increased significantly, overtaking Ethereum supply for the first time in June.
You Might Also Like
RLUSD in circulation on the XRP Ledger grew from roughly $20 million at the end of 2024 to about $800 million by late June 2026, which is a 40-fold rise, with the largest increase occurring in May and June 2026.
Ripple USD is currently one of the most-traded issued assets on XRP. Its share of all on-chain trading climbed from under 1% to about 12% in 2026, and the RLUSD/XRP pair alone has cleared roughly $900 million over the last six months.
This week, Ripple received authorization of its Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license from Luxembourg's Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). The authorization confirms Ripple as fully MiCA-compliant, with its solutions underpinned by XRP and RLUSD made available to financial institutions, corporates and businesses across all 30 countries of the European Economic Area.