Key HighlightsTech Giant Establishes Frontier Division for Corporate AI SolutionsStrategy Focuses on Multi-Model AI ImplementationShares Rise Amid Intensifying AI Consulting CompetitionGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks Microsoft shares increased 1.86% following the announcement of its Frontier AI business division worth $2.5B.
The division will assist corporate customers in selecting and implementing AI technologies.
6,000 Microsoft employees will be stationed at client locations through this initiative.
The strategy emphasizes adaptable AI frameworks and integration with proprietary client data.
This initiative intensifies Microsoft’s competition in the corporate AI consulting market.
Microsoft (MSFT) shares advanced 1.86% to reach $391.42 as the technology company announced plans to expand its corporate AI offerings. After opening lower, the stock reversed course and maintained gains close to its session peak. The upward movement came after Microsoft revealed its intention to establish a $2.5 billion AI-focused business division.
Microsoft Corporation, MSFT
Tech Giant Establishes Frontier Division for Corporate AI Solutions Microsoft announced the creation of Microsoft Frontier Company, a new operational division designed to assist enterprises in navigating AI technology selection and implementation. The division will serve prominent clients such as Unilever and Novo Nordisk, concentrating on AI frameworks that deliver measurable returns and practical business applications.
The Redmond-based company is allocating $2.5 billion to this initiative as corporate appetite for AI solutions continues expanding. The plan involves deploying 6,000 personnel directly at client sites through a forward deployed engineering model. These deployment teams will comprise technical advisors, customer support professionals, account managers, and vertical market experts.
Rodrigo Kede Lima, previously overseeing Microsoft’s operations across Asia, has been appointed as president of the division. The organization will merge Microsoft’s current AI consulting teams with on-site engineering resources. This shift represents Microsoft’s evolution from merely selling software to actively assisting clients in constructing operational AI infrastructures.
Strategy Focuses on Multi-Model AI Implementation Enterprise organizations increasingly deploy multiple AI frameworks rather than relying exclusively on a single vendor. Numerous corporations now blend Microsoft platforms, third-party models, and open-source solutions tailored to distinct operational requirements. Consequently, AI implementation has become more expensive and complex to administer.
The Microsoft Frontier Company will guide customers through selecting, integrating, and transitioning between various AI frameworks. Additionally, the division will facilitate connections between these frameworks and each organization’s confidential internal information. Importantly, clients will retain ownership of all outputs and associated intellectual property within their own infrastructure.
Microsoft developed this methodology based on lessons learned from Copilot and other enterprise AI offerings. Initially, the company depended substantially on OpenAI’s technology when developing its AI assistant. However, emerging frameworks from Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, and competing providers have driven demand for platform-agnostic solutions.
Shares Rise Amid Intensifying AI Consulting Competition Microsoft’s equity value increased following the disclosure, though shares have struggled year-to-date. The corporation has allocated substantial capital toward data center expansion and generative AI capabilities. Despite these investments, certain AI products have experienced modest uptake among business customers.
This new division positions Microsoft in direct competition with Amazon, Palantir, OpenAI, Anthropic, Accenture, and EY. Amazon recently announced a comparable $1 billion field engineering program targeting AI customers. Palantir has established expertise deploying engineering personnel to serve government agencies and corporate accounts.
Microsoft currently generates income from enterprise consulting and channel partner programs throughout its software portfolio. The company disclosed approximately $2.1 billion in enterprise and partner services revenue during the March quarter. As such, the Frontier division represents an expansion of proven business practices into the broader AI services marketplace.
Oliver Dale
Editor-in-Chief of Blockonomi and founder of Kooc Media, A UK-Based Online Media Company. Believer in Open-Source Software, Blockchain Technology & a Free and Fair Internet for all. His writing has been quoted by Nasdaq, Dow Jones, Investopedia, The New Yorker, Forbes, Techcrunch & More. Contact [email protected]
Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of GoDaddy Inc. (NYSE: GDDY) resulting from allegations that GoDaddy may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.
So What: If you purchased GoDaddy securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
What to do next: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/godaddy-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
What is this about: Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. The Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
Brookfield Corporation remains a top compounder, benefiting from secular trends, strong diversification, and robust capital allocation despite recent share price underperformance. BN is strategically positioned to capitalize on megatrends in AI infrastructure, energy addition, and data sovereignty, leveraging record core liquidity of $188.2 billion. Real estate exposure (34% of target carry) could be a portfolio headwind, yet BN continues to recycle assets and sees long-term value in premium properties.
BiCS10 TLC delivers up to 4.8Gb/s** NAND interface speed, 59 percent bit density improvement compared to BiCS8 and enhanced power efficiency
MILPITAS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sandisk Corporation (Nasdaq: SNDK) today announced it is sampling its BiCS10 1Tb TLC, its 10th-generation 3D NAND flash memory technology. BiCS10 applies advanced lateral scaling techniques to achieve industry-leading 1Tb TLC memory density greater than 29Gb/mm2, improving bit density by 59 percent while delivering up to 4.8Gb/s** interface speed, a 33 percent improvement compared with 8th generation 3D flash memory currently in mass production.
Built on Sandisk’s proven Bit-Cost Scalable (BiCS) 3D NAND architecture and CMOS directly Bonded to Array (CBA) technology, BiCS10 TLC also enhances data input/output power efficiency, reducing power consumption by 10 percent for input and 34 percent for output compared to the previous BiCS8 generation.
“As the world becomes more connected, data-intensive and intelligent, NAND plays an increasingly mission-critical role in delivering the performance, efficiency and scale modern computing requires,” said Alper Ilkbahar, CTO at Sandisk. “BiCS8 set a new benchmark for 3D NAND by combining our wafer bonding capabilities with meaningful gains in density, performance, and efficiency. With BiCS10 TLC, we build upon that proven foundation to deliver faster interface speeds, higher bit density and improved power efficiency for our customers.”
NAND flash memory is one of the most scalable semiconductor technologies today, and the foundation of what Sandisk builds. BiCS10 advances Sandisk’s long-term roadmap for scaling NAND through continued innovation in density, power efficiency, and architecture. It builds upon Sandisk’s CBA technology, which fabricates CMOS logic and the memory array on separate wafers before bonding them together with high-precision wafer-to-wafer alignment. BiCS10 TLC increases the number of memory layers to 332 and incorporates Toggle DDR6.0, SCA protocol and PI-LTT technology to support high-speed, low-power operation.
The sampling milestone extends Sandisk’s BiCS roadmap with advancements that push density, power efficiency, and endurance in ways designed to support the next generation of data-intensive and AI-driven workloads. Key BiCS10 TLC technology highlights include:
Up to 4.8Gb/s** NAND interface speed, a 33 percent improvement.* 332 memory layers with optimized floor plan efficiency, improving bit density by 59 percent.* Enhanced data input/output power efficiency, reducing power consumption by 10 percent for input and 34 percent for output.* Support for Toggle DDR6.0, SCA protocol1 and PI-LTT technology2 to enable high-speed, low-power operation. Sandisk leads the way in flash innovation, from increasing bits per cell over time to advancing technologies in controller architecture, firmware, packaging, and system flash that improve the performance, efficiency, and utility of flash at scale. With a unique portfolio of leading IP and global manufacturing footprint, Sandisk controls its entire production lifecycle from design to manufacturing to final assembly with global operations, resulting in exceptional quality control, cost efficiency, faster time to market, and strong supply chain resilience.
About Sandisk
Sandisk (Nasdaq: SNDK) delivers innovative Flash solutions and advanced memory technologies that meet people and businesses at the intersection of their aspirations and the moment, enabling them to keep moving and pushing possibility forward. Follow Sandisk on Instagram, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, YouTube. Join TeamSandisk on Instagram.
*Compared with 8th-generation 3D flash memory currently in mass production (BiCS8).
** 1Gb/s is calculated as 1,000,000,000 bits/second. This value is obtained under specific our test environment and may vary depending on use conditions.
1 Technology wherein the bus for Command/Address input and the bus for data transfer are completely separated into different buses and are used in parallel. This reduces data input/output time.
2 Technology wherein power sources for existing 1.2V and additional lower voltage are utilized for the NAND interface power source. This reduces power consumption during data input/output.
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. federal securities laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding the expected performance, enhanced capabilities, and industry-leading positioning of Sandisk’s BiCS10 TLC technology; the role of NAND flash memory as a highly scalable, mission‑critical technology for modern computing; Sandisk’s continued advancement of its long-term roadmap; and the impact, advancements and efficiency of Sandisk’s flash solutions in supporting next-generation data-intensive and AI-driven workloads. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.
Key risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include: adverse changes in global or regional economic conditions, including the impact of evolving trade policies, tariff regimes and trade wars; volatility in demand for Sandisk’s products; pricing trends and fluctuations in average selling prices; exposure to execution, financial and market risks due to long-term agreements; inflation; changes in interest rates and a potential economic recession; the impact of business and market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; the development and introduction of products based on new technologies and management of technology transitions; risks associated with strategic initiatives, including restructurings, acquisitions, divestitures, cost saving measures and joint ventures; risks related to product defects; difficulties or delays in manufacturing or other supply chain disruptions; reliance on strategic relationships with key partners, including Kioxia Corporation; the attraction, retention and development of skilled management and technical talent; risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence in business operations; changes to relationships with key customers or consolidation among the customer base; compromise, damage or interruption from cybersecurity incidents or other data system security risks; reliance on intellectual property; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; actions by competitors; risks associated with compliance with changing legal and regulatory requirements; and other risks and uncertainties listed in Sandisk’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on August 21, 2025 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 1, 2026, to which your attention is directed. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and Sandisk undertakes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new information or events, except as required by law.
Resources Investor Relations Journalists Agencies Client Login Send a Release News Products Contact , /PRNewswire/ -- S&P Dow Jones Indices will make the following changes to the S&P SmallCap 600:
Midera Food Processing Inc. (NASD: MFP) will replace Redwood Trust Inc. (NYSE: RWT) effective prior to the opening of trading on Wednesday, July 8. S&P MidCap 400 constituent The Middleby Corp. (NASD: MIDD) is spinning off Midera Food Processing in a transaction that is expected to close July 7. Redwood Trust is no longer representative of the small cap market space. Centrus Energy Corp. (NYSE: LEU) will replace Whitestone REIT (NYSE: WSR) effective prior to the opening of trading on Tuesday, July 14. S&P 500 constituent Ares Management Corp. (NYSE: ARES) is acquiring Whitestone REIT in a deal expected to close on or about that date, pending final closing conditions. Following is a summary of the changes that will take place prior to the open of trading on the effective date:
Effective Date
Index Name
Action
Company Name
Ticker
GICS Sector
July 8, 2026
S&P SmallCap 600
Addition
Midera Food Processing
MFP
Industrials
July 8, 2026
S&P SmallCap 600
Deletion
Redwood Trust Inc
RWT
Financials
July 14, 2026
S&P SmallCap 600
Addition
Centrus Energy
LEU
Energy
July 14, 2026
S&P SmallCap 600
Deletion
Whitestone REIT
WSR
Real Estate
ABOUT S&P DOW JONES INDICES
S&P Dow Jones Indices is the largest global resource for essential index-based concepts, data and research, and home to iconic financial market indicators, such as the S&P 500® and the Dow Jones Industrial Average®. More assets are invested in products based on our indices than products based on indices from any other provider in the world. Since Charles Dow invented the first index in 1884, S&P DJI has been innovating and developing indices across the spectrum of asset classes helping to define the way investors measure and trade the markets.
S&P Dow Jones Indices is a division of S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI), which provides essential intelligence for individuals, companies, and governments to make decisions with confidence. For more information, visit www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/.
New York, New York and New Orleans, Louisiana--(Newsfile Corp. - July 2, 2026) - Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC ("KSF") and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., remind investors with substantial losses that they have until August 25, 2026 to file lead plaintiff applications in a securities class action lawsuit against Futu Holdings Limited ("Futu" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FUTU), if they purchased or otherwise acquired the Company's securities between May 24, 2023 and May 27, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Cannot view this video? Visit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmjc32xVGrk
What You May Do
If you purchased securities of Futu as above and would like to discuss your legal rights and how this case might affect you and your right to recover for your economic loss, you may, without obligation or cost to you, contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-877-515-1850 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgm-futu/ to learn more. If you wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in this class action, you must petition the Court by August 25, 2026.
>>>CLICK HERE for more information
About the Lawsuit
Futu and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.
The alleged false and misleading statements and omissions include, but are not limited to, that: (i) the Company was not in compliance with the requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, including because it continued to conduct securities business, public fund sales business and futures business in mainland China without obtaining the requisite licenses or approval; (ii) as a result, the Company was reasonably likely to face regulatory penalties, including the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and other penalties; (iii) as a result of the foregoing, the Company's financial results were overstated; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
The case is Tang v. Futu Holdings Limited, et al, 26-cv-05453.
>>>To Learn More, Click HERE
About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.
TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms - According to ISS Securities Class Action Services
To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.
>>>For More Information about the case, Click HERE
Founder's ClubSwingTraderLeaderboardMarketSurgeeIBDIBD DigitalIBD LiveCustomer Center
My Stock Lists
Email Preferences
Help & Support
Sign Out
Search stocks or keywords
Sections
My IBD
MARKET TREND
STOCK LISTS
STOCK RESEARCH
NEWSECONOMY
VIDEOS & PODCASTS
HOW TO INVESTEDUCATIONAL RESOURCESStoreMy Products
Founder's ClubSwingTraderLeaderboardMarketSurgeeIBDIBD DigitalIBD Live
Recently Searched
Morgan Stanley, Dell, Other Rising Leaders Join IBD Top Stock Screens
Signal Or Noise? Deciphering The Fed's New Direction.
Stock Market Skids As Trump Makes This Trade Call; Jobs Report Due SpaceX stock's stratospheric potential could be just that — potential — as the AI and rockets company reaches the harder limits of reality. The stock may see limited upside due to its lengthy tenure as a private company. As a result, SpaceX (SPCX) stock may be considered a high-risk, high-reward asset. After its founding in 2002, SpaceX spent more than 20…
Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX +2.69%) -- commonly called SpaceX -- is probably best known for its Starlink satellite internet and mobile services and its revolutionary reusable rocket technologies that have dramatically lowered the costs for getting satellites and other payloads into orbit. On the other hand, the company is actually positioning artificial intelligence (AI) technologies as the most important part of its growth strategies.
In the S-1 prospectus the company published prior its initial public offering (IPO) in June, it said that roughly $26.5 trillion of its $28.5 trillion total addressable market comes from AI technologies and services. On the other hand, the company's AI segment accounted for only roughly 17% of the $18.7 billion in revenue that it recorded in 2025. With that in mind, could SpaceX really be the ultimate AI infrastructure play for long-term investors?
Image source: Getty Images.
What is SpaceX cooking up in the AI space? Shortly before SpaceX went public, the company announced that it had landed a major AI processing contract with Alphabet's Google division. The deal will see SpaceX providing $920 million a month in AI processing services to Alphabet starting this October, and the contract lasts for three years.
Starting from SpaceX's base of roughly $3.2 billion in AI segment revenue in 2025, the company already looks poised for dramatic growth over the next year just from the Alphabet contract alone. SpaceX's wealth of AI processing technologies built around GPUs from Nvidia allowed it to win a large long-term contract with Alphabet -- and that's a great sign that the company is in good position to win other big deals with leading tech customers.
SpaceX is also aiming to revolutionize the AI infrastructure market with its construction of orbital data centers. By putting data centers in space, the company could be able to leverage more direct and reliable access to solar energy and dramatically cut down on the high electricity expenses needed to run data centers.
Today's Change
(
-1.39
%) $
-2.75
Current Price
$
194.84
On the other hand, there are heat diffusion engineering problems associated with orbital data center technologies -- and other challenges as well. For starters, the data center hardware will need to be shipped into space. As the leader in low-cost rocket launches, SpaceX is uniquely positioned to handle the costs associated with the task.
There are also other big challenges involved. While orbital data centers may offer some substantial efficiency improvements when it comes to power sources, they may also be far more complicated and difficult when it comes to maintenance. Hardware components including GPUs, hard drives, and motherboards can wear out and need to be replaced, and it's currently far easier to do that on Earth than in space.
While it's possible that SpaceX will be able to leverage robotics technologies to make completing those kinds of tasks far more feasible, there are still a lot of operational obstacles involved in building and maintaining a thriving orbital data center at scale. They are a promising concept and could turn SpaceX into a huge winner in the AI infrastructure space, but investors should understand that the category is still speculative and could take a long time to come to fruition.
Since Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX +2.69%), aka SpaceX, conducted its initial public offering (IPO) early last month, shareholders have been on a nonstop thrill ride. The rocket launch, satellite communications, and artificial intelligence (AI) company opened above its offering price, surging 19% on its first day of trading. SpaceX stock gained as much as 50% before falling back to Earth and now trades below its first day closing price of about $161.
History shows that the stock's erratic price movements will likely continue. Next week, that volatility could reach new heights as SpaceX faces its biggest hurdle yet.
Image source: Getty Images.
A busy daySome of Wall Street's biggest analysts have yet to issue a rating on SpaceX, and with good reason. Investment banks that were part of the IPO underwriting process are bound by a "quiet period," in which they refrain from publishing any research, commentary, ratings, or price targets on companies they have underwritten.
SpaceX was an historic IPO in many ways. One of which was that it attracted a syndicate of 23 underwriters for its record-breaking $85.7 billion listing. As a result, many of the investment banks that would have chimed in by now with their opinions have been silent due to the aforementioned quiet period. However, that silence will no doubt be broken on Tuesday, July 7, when the quiet period officially ends, freeing analysts to release their estimates on SpaceX stock.
That's not to say there haven't been any opinions issued. The most bullish comes courtesy of Arete Research analyst Andrew Beale, who issued a buy rating and a Street-high price target of $401, suggesting potential upside for investors of 154% compared to Wednesday's close. The analyst argues that investors don't yet fully appreciate the magnitude of the opportunity represented by the upcoming Starship rocket and StarlinkV3, the company's next-generation satellite. This one-two punch could open the door for SpaceX to compete for suburban broadband -- but neither the rocket nor the next-gen satellite is yet airborne.
On the opposite end of the spectrum is Morningstar analyst Nicolas Owens, who issued a sell rating on SpaceX with a price target of $62, suggesting potential downside of 61% compared to Wednesday's closing price. The analyst argues that much of SpaceX's future growth will likely depend heavily on the company's reusable Starship rockets and its ability to effectively execute and commercialize its plan for orbital data centers -- of which there are simply no guarantees.
Today's Change
(
2.69
%) $
4.24
Current Price
$
161.78
Thus far, 13 analysts in all have issued opinions on SpaceX stock, according to The Wall Street Journal: Seven of those, or 63%, have a buy or strong buy rating; four analysts rate the stock a hold; and two have sell ratings. The average analyst price target is roughly $229, suggesting potential upside of 45%. So while Wall Street is largely positive about SpaceX's future, investors can expect an avalanche of new coverage when the quiet period ends on Tuesday.
Some investors might be tempted to buy SpaceX ahead of its big reveal. Others might be tempted to sell. I generally stay away from date- and event-driven buying and selling, as that type of short-term thinking is detrimental to maintaining a long-term outlook.
There's no way to know for sure how one analyst -- let alone 23 analysts -- will interpret the same information. As shown in the examples above, two of Wall Street's finest -- with access to the same data -- came to very different conclusions about what the future holds for SpaceX.
I'm watching the stock closely, but I haven't yet put down any of my hard-earned money to buy shares. In my opinion, it's still too early to do so with any degree of certainty. I plan to wait until after SpaceX's first (or even second) financial report before I feel I'll have enough information to make an informed decision. Given what we know and what we don't know, I don’t think SpaceX is a buy -- at least not yet.
As I've pointed out before, at roughly 46 times forward sales, SpaceX is pricey, particularly for a company with a limited public track record. To be clear, next week will be a busy one for the company. Not only is the quiet period over, but SpaceX stock is being added to the Nasdaq-100 and the associated index funds on Tuesday.
When you don’t know what to do, sometimes the best thing to do -- is nothing. That’s exactly what I plan to do.
Tesla, Inc. beat Q2 delivery estimates with 480,000 vehicles, mainly Model 3 and Y, but shares slumped 8% post-report. TSLA's inventory drawdown supports cash flow amid $25B+ capital spending, yet cheap financing may pressure margins and profits. Despite solid delivery growth, TSLA trades at 190x forward earnings, making its valuation difficult to justify versus peers.
A display of a Tesla Model 3 using Full Self-Driving Supervised on a highway in San Diego, California, U.S., April 15, 2026. Picture taken with a long exposure. REUTERS/Mike Blake//File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesJuly 2 (Reuters) - A Texas man has been charged with manslaughter after driving a Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab operating with its automated driving assistance system into a suburban Houston home, killing a 76-year-old grandmother, court papers show.
Michael David Butler, 44, told police he was operating his Model 3 in Full Self-Driving mode on June 19 when he plowed into Martha Avila's home in Katy, Texas, and told paramedics "the car was on 'Autopilot,'" according to court papers. Avila died later at a nearby hospital.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
According to an arrest affidavit, Butler said he was making a DoorDash delivery run when he changed the music on the Tesla's touch screen, and eventually "passed out."
His speed reached 73 miles per hour, more than double the legal limit, and the brake pedal wasn't used in the minute before the crash, the affidavit said. Butler denied having felt ill, and no alcohol or common street drugs were in his system, the affidavit said.
A lawyer for Butler did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Harris County prosecutors did not immediately respond to a similar request.
Tesla has disputed Butler's recollections, with Chief Executive Elon Musk saying a vehicle in Full Self-Driving mode "drives slowly through neighborhood streets" and a software vice president saying Butler manually overrode that mode by flooring the accelerator.
According to KHOU television, Butler appeared in probable cause court on Thursday where bail was set at $150,000, with requirements that he wear an ankle monitor and not drive.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been investigating the crash, and has since 2016 opened nearly 50 special investigations of Tesla crashes believed to involve advanced driver assistance systems. About two dozen deaths were reported.
Tesla has said its Autopilot system enables vehicles to steer, accelerate and brake within their lanes, while Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes. Both require "fully attentive" drivers, it has said.
Avila's family sued Tesla last week, saying her wrongful death reflected the electric vehicle maker's gross negligence and failure to warn that its self-driving systems were defective.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Diana Novak Jones in Chicago; Editing by Stephen Coates
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
On July 02, 2026, Coca-Cola Co (KO) shares rose 3.5% to a current price of $84.14. This price marks the 52-week high, with the shares having fluctuated between
Shares of Amazon (AMZN +0.55%) have nearly doubled since the company's 20-for-1 stock split in 2022. The split made the share price more affordable for more investors, but it wasn't the reason for the stock's climb. Amazon made its retail business more efficient, boosted margins, and continued to grow its cloud business. The more important point for investors today isn't what the stock has already done, but where it's headed next.
The clearest reason the stock looks like an even better buy now is Amazon's rapidly expanding AI infrastructure capabilities. Operating cash flow has climbed to record levels over the past year, giving the company more internally generated capital to fund its next leg of growth.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Amazon's most profitable business is on fire While the retail business has become more efficient thanks to robotics and cost-control initiatives, the main catalyst for long-term growth is Amazon Web Services (AWS). The cloud business is seeing strong revenue growth and accounts for most of Amazon's operating profit.
Across retail, cloud, and other services, Amazon generated $148 billion in trailing 12-month operating cash flow (cash from operations). This level of cash generation is a competitive advantage in AI. Training and deploying models requires massive investment in data centers, networking, and specialized chips. Amazon's investment in chips is already becoming a large business in its own right.
Within AWS, Amazon's Trainium AI accelerators and Graviton central processing units (CPUs) are now generating more than $20 billion in annualized revenue. Enterprises are increasingly seeking cost-efficient compute, and custom chips can materially reduce the cost of running AI workloads at scale. Amazon says it has more than $225 billion in commitments tied to Trainium usage from major AI players, including Anthropic and OpenAI.
This momentum points to enormous upside in Amazon's most profitable business. AWS revenue grew 28% year over year in the first quarter. On a trailing 12-month basis, this segment alone now generates $137 billion in revenue and $48 billion in operating income.
Today's Change
(
0.55
%) $
1.34
Current Price
$
243.04
Why the stock is a better buy than in 2022 Free cash flow is down because Amazon is spending aggressively on AWS capacity -- a common cash sink in this era of massive AI data center builds. That's exactly why cash from operations (CFO) is a more useful metric for valuing the stock right now -- it better reflects the business's earning power while investment ramps up.
On a per-share basis, the stock trades at about 18 times CFO, cheaper than at the time of the 2022 stock split, when it traded at 32 times. Given Amazon's stronger profitability, higher cash generation, and much deeper AI capabilities today, the stock looks more attractive now than it did just after the split.
Amazon has enough satellites in orbit to begin rolling out Amazon Leo, the company’s broadband service, Bloomberg reported Thursday (July 2).
The company gained another 29 satellites, bringing the total deployment to more than 390, when a United Launch Alliance rocket delivered them into orbit, according to the report.
The report cited a post on X in which Chris Weber, vice president of business and product for Amazon Leo, said the satellite deployment means that Amazon has “completed enough launches for initial service” this year.
“Still lots of work ahead — including raising all these new satellites to their assigned altitude — but we’ve completed enough launches for initial service this [year], and future missions just add coverage and capacity,” Weber said in the post.
Amazon Leo was formerly known as Project Kuiper. The company changed its name about seven months ago while retaining the same mission, it said at the time in a post on LinkedIn.
“Follow along as we prepare to deliver fast, reliable internet beyond the reach of existing networks,” the company said in the post.
Amazon announced in October 2023 that it launched the first prototypes for its Project Kuiper satellite internet system and was moving forward in its plan to create a global satellite internet network.
In April, the company said it plans to expand the capabilities of Amazon Leo by acquiring mobile satellite services operator Globalstar.
United Launch Alliance announced the latest launch in a Thursday press release and said it has delivered 224 of the more than 375 satellites Amazon Leo has in place.
Amazon said in a Thursday press release that Amazon Leo began full-scale deployment of its satellite constellation in April 2025 and now has the third-largest constellation in orbit.
Melissa Wuerl, director of launch systems for Amazon Leo, said in the release: “With hundreds of flight-ready satellites standing by at the Cape and a new, dedicated vertical integration facility ready to support Leo Vulcan 1 and subsequent missions, we have a clear path to increase launch and deployment cadence, helping us quickly expand network coverage following an initial service rollout later this year.”
Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) announced a $2.5 billion investment to launch Microsoft Frontier Company, a new operating business focused on helping organizations deploy artificial intelligence at scale by embedding engineering and industry experts directly within customer operations.
The company said it will place 6,000 engineers, consultants, customer support specialists and industry-focused sales professionals with customers to co-design, deploy and continuously improve AI systems tailored to their businesses. Microsoft said the initiative expands on the industry's "forward-deployed engineering" model by combining AI engineering expertise with industry knowledge and change management capabilities.
Rodrigo Kede Lima, who currently leads Microsoft's Asia business, will serve as president of Microsoft Frontier Company.
According to Microsoft, the new unit is intended to help customers move beyond AI experimentation and focus on measurable business outcomes and returns on investment while protecting proprietary data and intellectual property.
The company said the platform will allow customers to use AI models from multiple providers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft AI, open-source models and industry-specific models, rather than requiring a single vendor. Microsoft also emphasized that customer data and intellectual property will not be used to train AI models in ways that could diminish a company's competitive advantage.
Microsoft cited early deployments with organizations including London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), Land O'Lakes, Unilever and Novo Nordisk (NYSE:NVO), saying the projects have produced measurable business outcomes by integrating AI into business workflows.
The company added that it will work with global systems integration partners, including Accenture, Capgemini, EY, KPMG and PwC, to expand the initiative worldwide.
The announcement comes as competition among major technology companies to help enterprises implement AI continues to intensify. Earlier this week, Amazon announced a $1 billion AI implementation initiative, while OpenAI and Anthropic have also established customer deployment teams this year aimed at accelerating enterprise AI adoption.
Microsoft is expected to lay off up to 2.5% of its workforce as early as next week.
The cuts, which could affect 5,000 employees, may impact sales, consulting and the Xbox gaming unit, according to a report from Business Insider Tuesday.
The layoffs would mark the latest round of restructuring in the tech sector as companies continue to cut costs while directing more resources toward artificial intelligence (AI).
Last summer, Microsoft laid off roughly 4% of its workforce, or about 9,000 employees, in one of the company's largest rounds of job cuts in recent years.
MICROSOFT ANNOUNCES ANOTHER ROUND OF LAYOFFS AFFECTING THOUSANDS OF WORKERS
A Microsoft office in New York in July 2025 ahead of the company hitting $4 trillion in market cap. (Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)
According to Microsoft's latest annual filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the company employed roughly 228,000 full-time workers worldwide as of June 30, 2025.
A 2.5% reduction in that workforce would amount to approximately 5,700 job cuts.
Sources said some employees affected by the latest round of layoffs will be offered new roles within the company immediately, Business Insider reported.
MICROSOFT WILL LAY OFF NEARLY 6,000 EMPLOYEES IN PUSH FOR EFFICIENCY
A pedestrian walks past a sign on the Microsoft campus July 17, 2014, in Redmond, Wash. (Stephen Brashear/Getty Images / Getty Images)
In the past month, Microsoft’s stock slumped about 19%, marking one of its worst monthly performances since the dot-com crash.
Investor concerns have risen as Wall Street analysts warn that AI could eventually replace certain software services, which may include offerings from Microsoft.
MICROSOFT PLANS ‘SUBSTANTIAL’ JOB CUTS ACROSS XBOX DIVISION
Ticker Security Last Change Change % MSFT MICROSOFT CORP. 390.49 +6.21 +1.62% Last month, Xbox CEO Asha Sharma sent a memo to employees calling for a "reset" of the business after months of uneven performance.
The Verge on Tuesday also reported that the gaming division is planning layoffs starting next week. The cuts are expected to be significant, with reductions to marketing and budgets, according to Bloomberg early last month.
The restructuring could lead to studio closures, mergers, spin-offs and canceled game projects, the Verge reported.
Xbox also recently raised prices on its gaming consoles by an additional $100 to $150 worldwide, citing increased demand for memory and storage driven by the AI boom.
Visitors walk past the Xbox booth at the Gamescom video games trade fair in Cologne, Germany, Aug. 22, 2024. (Ina Fassbender/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
Sources said the 2026 round of layoffs appears to be smaller after the company earlier this year introduced a voluntary retirement buyout program, which led to a significant number of employees exiting, according to BI.
Roughly one-third of eligible employees reportedly opted in.
Last year, Microsoft reportedly eliminated roughly 15,000 roles across multiple rounds of layoffs, including about 6,000 positions in May followed by 9,000 employees in July.
FOX Business reached out to Microsoft for more information.
As enterprise AI systems scale to handle complex workflows, practitioners face the challenge of routing subtasks to the right tools and skills. Agents can have hundreds of tools and skills and get confused on which one to use for each step of a workflow.
Nike’s earnings results suggest brands are rethinking how they measure D2C success.
The next phase of D2C centers on loyalty, payments and customer relationships that extend across every shopping channel.
As consumers become more selective, retailers are prioritizing reach and convenience alongside first-party data.
The shorthand of direct-to-consumer (D2C) might boil down to selling through a brand’s own website or brick-and-mortar location. But writ large, the model is about controlling the customer relationship.
Consumer brands poured resources into owned channels, betting that higher margins, richer customer data and stronger loyalty would outweigh the costs of acquiring customers themselves.
Recent events across retail suggest that calculation is changing. Several of the companies that helped define the D2C era have spent the past few years abandoning the idea that growth depends on steering every customer into owned channels.
By way of example, mattress seller Casper ultimately agreed to go private after years of struggling to produce sustainable returns as a public company.
SmileDirectClub entered bankruptcy.
Most recently, Allbirds agreed to sell assets and focus on artificial intelligence.
While each company faced its own challenges, together they illustrate a broader lesson. Building a recognizable brand and building an efficient distribution model are not necessarily the same exercise.
Nike’s fourth-quarter earnings results released Tuesday (June 30) provided the latest and perhaps clearest indication that even the industry’s largest brands are recalibrating the balance between owned channels and wholesale distribution. During the quarter, Nike Direct revenue fell 9%, including a 12% decline in Nike Digital, while wholesale revenue increased 1%. In North America, wholesale revenue climbed 10% as the company continued rebuilding relationships with retail partners.
“The integrated marketplace is one of our most important areas of transformation,” Nike President and CEO Elliott Hill said during a Tuesday earnings call. “We’ve been rebuilding our wholesale relationships, expanding our outreach and improving how we show up across channels.”
Hill outlined a strategy in which owned stores, digital channels and wholesale partners each contribute to the customer relationship. He also said Nike is “discounting less on Nike Digital” while continuing to invest in stores that fit its long-term strategy.
The broader read-across extends beyond Nike. As digital advertising costs have increased and consumers have become more willing to compare prices across retailers, marketplaces and brand sites, the economics of insisting that every purchase occur through an owned channel have become less compelling.
Brands still want first-party data. They still want loyalty. They still want recurring engagement. However, they arguably appear less concerned about whether the transaction itself occurs on a proprietary website.
Relationships Matter More Than Channels PYMNTS Intelligence’s latest “Global Digital Shopping Index,” commissioned by Visa Acceptance Solutions, found that merchants’ own mobile apps remain their strongest individual growth channel, with 57% reporting higher sales over the past year. At the same time, websites, physical stores, third-party marketplaces and delivery platforms all generated growth for roughly half of merchants surveyed.
The message is that consumers are buying wherever it is most convenient, and merchants are adapting by investing across all of them.
Merchants’ mobile apps generally offer a better shopping experience. Merchants are more likely to provide biometric authentication, digital wallet autofill, stored credentials, one-click checkout and QR code payments inside their apps than on their websites. Those capabilities reduce friction, shorten checkout and make repeat purchases easier. Ensuring that loyalty accounts, payment credentials and personalized offers recognize the customer are critical wherever that customer chooses to shop.
Consumers are growing more deliberate about spending. PYMNTS Intelligence’s latest research on household spending found that roughly two-thirds of consumers are trimming purchases or actively looking for ways to reduce everyday expenses. Under these conditions, shoppers are less inclined to remain loyal to a single retailer or website. They compare prices, search across multiple merchants, and expect checkout to be fast and familiar regardless of where they complete the purchase.
Brands face changing D2C economics. Customer acquisition costs have risen, and forcing every shopper into an owned channel risks sacrificing reach at a time when consumers are moving fluidly among retailer websites, marketplaces, social commerce and physical stores. The objective becomes preserving first-party relationships even when distribution broadens.
On July 02, 2026, Netflix Inc NFLX shares rose 4.7% today, bringing the current price to $77.65. The stock has fluctuated between a 52-week high of $130.23 and a low of $70.86, indicating significant volatility over the past year.
GF Value™ verdict: Current price is $77.65, which is 21.3% below the GF Value™ of $98.70.GF Score™ of 95/100 indicates a strong potential for long-term returns.Notable signal: Insiders sold $82.9 million in stock over the last three months, with no purchases recorded. Is NFLX Overvalued or Undervalued? The current price of Netflix Inc NFLX at $77.65 is significantly below its GF Value™ estimate of $98.70, suggesting the stock is 21.3% undervalued. This indicates a potential opportunity for investors looking for growth, as the margin of safety is considerable. The GF Valuation label classifies the stock as modestly undervalued, which aligns with the perspective that there is room for price appreciation. However, potential investors should be cautious, as the recent insider selling may signal a lack of confidence among executives regarding the company's short-term prospects. GF Value™ is GuruFocus' proprietary measure of intrinsic value, calculated from historical trading multiples, past business growth, and future performance estimates.
How Does NFLX's Valuation Compare to Its History? Metric Current Historical P/E (TTM) 25.1x 43.1x Forward P/E 21.7x N/A Currently, Netflix's P/E (TTM) of 25.1x is 42% below its 5-year median of 43.1x, indicating that the stock is trading at a lower valuation compared to its historical averages. This P/E analysis agrees with the GF Value™ verdict of being undervalued, further supporting the notion that NFLX may present a buying opportunity for those willing to navigate the inherent risks.
What Does NFLX's GF Score™ Tell Us? Metric Rating GF Score™ 95 Financial Strength 8/10 Profitability 10/10 Growth 10/10 Valuation 8/10 Momentum 4/10 The GF Score™ of 95/100 indicates that Netflix is positioned strongly across multiple metrics, particularly in Profitability and Growth, where it received perfect scores of 10/10. However, the Momentum Rank of 4/10 suggests that the stock may be experiencing challenges in maintaining upward price movements. Overall, this score reflects a company with solid fundamentals, yet it also highlights areas where investor sentiment may be less favorable.
What Are Insiders Doing with NFLX Stock? Over the last three months, insiders have sold a substantial $82.9 million worth of Netflix shares, with no buying activity reported. This trend of selling could imply a lack of confidence by insiders in the company’s near-term growth potential or a strategic move to capitalize on current share prices. The absence of insider buying may further raise concerns among potential investors regarding the company's prospects.
What This Means for Investors Based on the current analysis, Netflix Inc NFLX appears to be undervalued according to the GF Value™ estimates. While potential opportunities exist for price appreciation, investors must weigh the risks associated with recent insider selling and the company's overall momentum challenges.
For the complete analysis, visit the Netflix Inc NFLX stock page. You can also explore the GF Value™ page for detailed valuation methodology, or use the GuruFocus Stock Screener to find similar opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions What is NFLX's GF Score™?
NFLX's GF Score™ is 95/100, indicating a strong potential for long-term returns based on key financial metrics.
Is NFLX overvalued or undervalued?
NFLX is considered undervalued, with a GF Value™ of $98.70 compared to its current price of $77.65, suggesting a significant upside opportunity.
What is NFLX's P/E ratio?
NFLX's P/E (TTM) is 25.1x, which is considerably lower than its 5-year median of 43.1x, indicating it is trading at a discount relative to its historical valuation.
This stock alert was generated using automated technology and GuruFocus financial data to provide readers with timely and accurate market reporting. This content was reviewed by GuruFocus editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Disclosures I/We may personally own shares in some of the companies mentioned above. However, those positions are not material to either the company or to my/our portfolios.
Charlie Javice, founder of Frank, was convicted of defrauding JPMorgan Chase. Adam Gray/Bloomberg/Getty Images JPMorgan Chase must keep paying the legal fees of convicted fraudster Charlie Javice, a Delaware judge ruled Thursday.
The ruling came after the bank accused Javice, who was convicted last year of defrauding JPMorgan, of accumulating "astronomical" legal fees, including expenses such as $530 for gummy bears and a $581 dinner for two with a $161 seafood tower.
"We respectfully disagree with the Delaware decision about the bounds of reasonableness and are considering next steps," Pablo Rodriguez, a spokesperson for JPMorgan, said in a statement shared with Business Insider.
Javice was convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison for using inflated data to trick JPMorgan into paying $175 million for her fintech startup, Frank. She and co-defendant Olivier Amar, who was chief growth officer at Frank, were also ordered to pay $288 million in restitution to JPMorgan.
JPMorgan has been ordered to pay Javice's legal fees while the litigation plays out, under the terms of its contract with Frank.
"For months, JPMorgan waged a public campaign built around sensational headlines about Charlie's legal expenses, including claims that were inaccurate, misleading, or didn't even involve her," Juda Engelmayer, a spokesperson for Javice, said in a statement provided to Business Insider.
"Today's ruling is a reminder that public narratives don't override contractual obligations," he added.
Convicted in March 2025, Javice has been free on $2 million bail while her case goes through appeals. Javice has tried and failed several times to get her ankle bracelet removed.
A New York judge this week denied Javice's request to have her court-mandated GPS ankle monitor removed in exchange for doubling her bond to $4 million.
The judge said the prospect of over seven years in prison and the large restitution she owes meant her new proposal "does not mitigate the risk of flight," adding that $4 million "pales in comparison to Javice's multimillion-dollar restitution and forfeiture obligations."
Read next
Kelsey Vlamis You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email.
Kelsey is a senior reporter for Business Insider, where she covers business and tech news as well as stories about travel, luxury, and consulting.Her feature story "Disaster at 18,200 feet" received awards from the New York Press Club and the North American Travel Journalists Association, as well as honorable mention from the Society of American Travel Writers. It was also included on Longreads' and Pocket's best of 2022 lists. She has also received an American Journalism Online Award for her coverage on missing and murdered Indigenous people in Wyoming.She's appeared on CBS, NPR, NBC, and other outlets to discuss her work. She previously worked on the world news desk at the BBC in London and received a master's in journalism from Northwestern University.She can be reached by email at [email protected] or via the encrypted-messaging app Signal @kelseyv.21.Popular storiesDisaster on Denali: Inside a 1,000-foot fall on America's highest peakThrifting is more popular than ever. It's also never been worse.Rolex wouldn't service the vintage watch my mom inherited. Watchmakers say it happens all the time.A tiny, invasive bug and the climate crisis are changing how guitars are made, and shifting the course of music historyThe tourism free-for-all is overGovernment-run boarding schools were founded to 'civilize' Native Americans. Hundreds of dead children remain buried in the schoolyard graves.Meet the Texas minister who helps fly dozens of women to New Mexico every month to get abortionsPeople are flocking to Colorado for the great outdoors, but the air pollution is so bad, it's forcing many to stay insideInside Kabul: An aid worker reveals the devastating chaos that erupted during the US exit from Afghanistan
The Arbitrum Foundation just put a $43.5 million price tag on keeping the lights on through 2027. The formal governance proposal, submitted on May 22, requests $16 million in real-world assets and stablecoins, 1,740 ETH, and 230 million ARB tokens to fund everything from core infrastructure to ecosystem development.
Here’s the thing: the Arbitrum DAO only generated $23.49 million in gross profit during 2025. Asking for roughly 1.85 times your annual revenue to cover next year’s expenses is, to put it mildly, a conversation starter.
The numbers that matter The Foundation projects $27.6 million in operating expenses for 2027, plus an additional 244.9 million ARB tokens earmarked for various costs. More than half of the budget, about 54%, goes toward technical infrastructure, security, and hosting for the Arbitrum One and Nova networks.
Advertisement
The 2025 revenue of $23.49 million came from transaction fees, a mechanism called Timeboost, and expansion programs. One DeFi analyst flagged that the Foundation would effectively be operating at approximately 2.3 times its 2025 revenue level if the proposal passes.
An on-chain vote is scheduled to begin on June 8, giving ARB token holders the final say. This funding request goes beyond the initial AIP 1.1 allocation, meaning the Foundation is coming back to the well for more than originally planned.
Why Offchain Labs looms large Buried in the proposal is a detail that adds urgency to the timeline. Offchain Labs, the primary developer behind Arbitrum’s core technology, has its current funding arrangement through the Foundation set to expire in January 2027. Without a new deal, the team building the actual protocol could theoretically need to seek DAO funding directly.
The Foundation positions itself as a cost center designed to let the DAO maximize revenue, handling operational work so the broader ecosystem can focus on generating value.
Growth metrics vs. financial reality Daily transactions on Arbitrum have increased over 270% since early 2023, and the network’s stablecoin supply has tripled over the same period.
The 230 million ARB tokens requested represent meaningful dilution pressure. When a DAO allocates hundreds of millions of its native token for operational expenses, those tokens eventually hit the market in some form, whether through direct spending, grant distributions, or contractor payments.
The 2.3x revenue-to-expense ratio is the number to watch. If Arbitrum’s transaction fee revenue scales meaningfully through 2027, possibly driven by that 270% transaction growth trend, the spending could look prescient. If revenue flatlines or L2 fee compression continues across the industry, this proposal could become exhibit A in a case study about DAO fiscal discipline.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
The third quarter of 2026 is shaping up to be one of the busiest periods for crypto presales in recent years. Instead of chasing short-lived hype, investors are increasingly comparing projects based on utility, development progress, and the problems they aim to solve after launch.
AI, Layer-2 scaling, payments, and blockchain infrastructure have become the dominant themes as capital continues rotating into early-stage opportunities.
Among the projects attracting the most attention are MemeToro ($MT), Bitcoin Hyper, Little Pepe, Remittix, and Maxi Doge. Although all five remain in their presale phases, each targets a completely different segment of the crypto market.
1. MemeToro ($MT) MemeToro earns the top position because its ecosystem extends well beyond a traditional memecoin launch.
The platform combines artificial intelligence with several blockchain products, including automated memecoin creation, decentralized prediction markets, SocialFi participation, behavioral finance, and staking. Rather than relying on a single feature, the ecosystem is designed around continuous user engagement.
Its AI Agent remains the project’s biggest differentiator.
Instead of requiring manual developer launches, the system continuously analyzes online discussions, market narratives, cultural trends, and community activity before autonomously supporting fair no-code token launches.
That automation is paired with decentralized prediction markets covering cryptocurrencies, politics, sports, entertainment, and global events, allowing users to participate using both $MT and BNB.
For investors looking beyond launch-day speculation, the combination of AI utility and multiple ecosystem products has helped keep MemeToro near the top of many Q3 watchlists.
2. Bitcoin Hyper Bitcoin Hyper approaches the market from an infrastructure perspective.
The Layer-2 project has already raised more than $32.9 million, making it one of the largest crypto presales currently underway. Its token is priced at $0.01368, while development focuses on improving Bitcoin scalability without abandoning the network’s security model.
Rather than competing with AI-focused ecosystems, Bitcoin Hyper appeals to investors who believe Bitcoin’s long-term growth depends on faster and more efficient Layer-2 infrastructure.
Its strong fundraising reflects continued demand for Bitcoin-focused blockchain expansion.
3. Little Pepe Little Pepe combines meme culture with Ethereum Layer-2 technology.
The project has attracted more than $28.29 million during its presale, with tokens currently priced at $0.0022 as fundraising enters its final stages.
Instead of focusing exclusively on branding, the project aims to provide a dedicated Layer-2 environment for meme-related blockchain activity.
That combination of infrastructure and community engagement has helped Little Pepe remain one of the strongest-performing meme-focused presales this year.
4. Remittix Remittix targets an entirely different market.
Rather than AI or Layer-2 development, the project focuses on cross-border payments, allowing users to move between fiat currencies and cryptocurrency through a decentralized framework.
The presale has already entered its distribution phase, with early participants now able to register for the upcoming RTX token airdrop. Investors are also watching closely as the project prepares to announce its official launch price within the coming days.
For investors interested in payment infrastructure instead of AI applications, Remittix offers a very different investment thesis.
5. Maxi Doge Maxi Doge rounds out the list with a community-driven approach.
The project has raised more than $4.8 million, combining meme branding with staking incentives that currently advertise rewards of up to 65% APY through its smart contract system.
Rather than emphasizing infrastructure or artificial intelligence, Maxi Doge focuses on community participation and passive reward mechanisms.
Its simpler strategy has continued attracting investors looking for high-yield opportunities within the meme sector.
Why MemeToro Still Offers an Earlier Entry Unlike several projects on this list that are approaching their final fundraising milestones, MemeToro remains earlier in its development cycle.
The project is currently progressing through Stage 3, where $44,914.54 has already been raised toward its $80,644.11 target. The current presale price is $0.00154 per $MT, with pricing scheduled to increase as future milestones are completed.
The token has a fixed supply of 1.2 billion, with 71% allocated directly to public participants. Investors can join the presale through the official MemeToro portal using BNB, ETH, USDT, USDC, or a bank card.
More Information on MemeToro ($MT) Presale Here:
Website: https://memetoro.com/
X: https://x.com/memetoro_mt
Telegram: https://t.me/memetoro_mt
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
The market spent the first half of 2026 rewarding Intel (INTC 5.61%) for a manufacturing comeback that is still, in large part, a promise. On Wednesday, it took a meaningful piece of that reward back.
Shares of the chipmaker ended June at $139.63 -- up about 270% for the first half of 2026, within reach of their 52-week high of $142.35 and a world away from their 52-week low of $18.97. Then, on Wednesday, the stock sank 9% to $127.02 as investors dumped chip stocks broadly. And the selling continued on Thursday, with shares falling another 5% to $120.35. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF fell more than 5%, one day after closing out its best quarter on record with a 71% gain, after a report that Meta Platforms may sell excess artificial intelligence (AI) computing capacity raised questions about how scarce AI computing will stay.
With Intel scheduled to report second-quarter results on July 23, the question is whether this pullback is the entry point latecomers have been waiting for -- or a warning about how much success the price already assumes.
Image source: Getty Images.
How the comeback was built Intel entered 2026 already flush with new backers. The U.S. government took a roughly 10% stake in the company last August through an $8.9 billion investment, and Nvidia followed with a $5 billion investment at $23.28 per share -- a deal completed in December -- alongside plans to co-develop products.
Then the fundamentals started to turn. First-quarter revenue rose 7% year over year to $13.6 billion, and non-GAAP gross margin improved 1.8 percentage points to 41%. Intel's foundry business -- the operation that manufactures chips -- grew revenue 16% year over year to $5.4 billion.
"The next wave of AI will bring intelligence closer to the end user, moving from foundational models to inference to agentic," said CEO Lip-Bu Tan in the company's first-quarter earnings release. "This shift is significantly increasing the need for Intel's CPUs and wafer and advanced packaging offerings."
The biggest catalyst, though, came in May, when The Wall Street Journal reported that Apple and Intel had reached a preliminary agreement for Intel to manufacture some chips for Apple devices. But it's worth emphasizing what the deal is and isn't: It's reportedly preliminary, neither company has formally confirmed it, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing would likely remain Apple's main chip main chipmaker. But as a signal that Intel's manufacturing has become credible again, it's hard to top -- and the market repriced the stock accordingly.
Today's Change
(
-5.61
%) $
-7.12
Current Price
$
119.90
What July 23 has to prove The math behind all that enthusiasm is uncomfortable: Intel now carries a market capitalization of about $638 billion -- roughly 12 times its revenue run rate -- for a business that isn't yet profitable. The company posted a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) loss of $0.73 per share in the first quarter, and its foundry segment alone posted an operating loss of $2.4 billion in the period, though that loss is narrowing.
Most telling of all: External foundry revenue -- sales of manufacturing services to customers other than Intel itself -- was just $174 million in the first quarter. The entire rerating rests on the belief that this small number becomes an enormous one.
That's why July 23 matters so much. Investors should watch for progress on 18A yields and volumes, evidence that reported customer interest is converting into formal commitments -- management has said those could come in the second half of the year -- and continued narrowing of foundry losses. Management's guidance calls for second-quarter revenue of $13.8 billion to $14.8 billion, so the headline numbers should grow. The stock's fate rests more on the proof points underneath.
So, should investors buy the dip before July 23?
I personally wouldn't. Even after the two-day drop, the stock is still up well over 200% this year. And its valuation already assumes the foundry bet largely succeeds -- even after a roughly 14% two-day pullback. If the July 23 report shows external revenue inflecting and commitments firming, I might change my mind.
Daniel Sparks and his clients have positions in Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Intel, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
On July 02, 2026, Merck and Co Inc (MRK) shares rose 3.3% today, currently priced at $129.56. The stock has experienced significant price appreciation, trading wi
Both iconic brands are trading near their respective 52-week lows, prompting some investors to wonder whether the recent weakness has created an attractive buying opportunity.
Grand Theft Auto 6 is the most anticipated game of the year (and perhaps of the decade, given the agonizing wait since the franchise’s last entry in 2013). But earlier this week, rumors started swirling that Rockstar Games would release the title via digital download only, with physical copies of Grand Theft Auto 6 being reduced to a box with a download code inside rather than a game disc.
Then, on July 1, Sony dealt an even more devastating blow to lovers of physical media: Starting in 2028, new games on PlayStation consoles will only be released digitally, with all physical disc production being discontinued.
Rockstar’s and Sony’s decisions suggest that game lovers are no longer interested in physical discs—but the swift backlash on social media tells a different story.
“A natural direction”: Why Sony nixed the discIn a post on the official PlayStation blog, Sony explained why it’s doing away with discs.
Subscribe to the Daily newsletter.Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day
“This is a natural direction for Sony Interactive Entertainment to adapt to consumer trends as the general preference for digital media significantly outpaces physical discs,” reads the post. “This transition will enable us to align more closely with how most of our community prefers to access and play games today.”
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, Sony reported that 85% of full-game software sales on PlayStation 4 and PlayStation 5 were digital downloads, with just 15% of sales being physical copies.
“We’ll continue to prioritize our resources to drive innovation in how players can access games and provide choices as to where players prefer to purchase new games, whether that’s at retailers or PlayStation Store,” the blog post continues. “We remain committed to delivering a world-class gaming experience to our fans, and we thank you for your continued support.”
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR) between February 26, 2025 and February 24, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important August 24, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased First Solar securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the First Solar class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/first-solar-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 24, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants had overstated First Solar’s capacity to manage the impact of U.S. tariff policy on First Solar’s business; (2) defendants understated the extent to which its responses to U.S. tariff policy, including the intentional underutilization of production facilities in Malaysia and Vietnam, and attempted relocation of production to the U.S., were likely to negatively impact First Solar’s projected performance in the 2026 fiscal year; and (3) as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the First Solar class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/first-solar-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
Memory stocks were among the S&P 500's (SPX) worst performers this week causing investors to step away from names like Micron (MU). Meta Platforms (META) shined this week as the company announced its plans to sell excess compute capacity and Palantir (PLTR) rallied big after announcing its new partnership with Nvidia (NVDA).
HomeIndustriesMediaWhile some collectors may plan to hoard their physical media, one Columbus gamer decided to liquidate his collectionJuly 2, 2026, 5:57 p.m. ET
Just days after Sony announced it would be killing off its physical videogame discs by 2028 in favor of digital-only alternatives, one player raced to liquidate his collection.
GameStop said Thursday that one gamer in Columbus, Ohio, visited one of its locations to trade in some of his old physical games for store credit. GameStop GME, a company that is known in the gaming industry for giving cash or store credit for used games, outlined the transaction in a social-media post, and later confirmed to MarketWatch that the transaction took place.
After years of lagging broader equities, Teladoc Health (TDOC +1.10%) is finally bouncing back. The company's shares are up by 28% to date, while the S&P 500 has climbed just 9%. The telemedicine specialist still has plenty of work to do, but could it finally be on the road to full recovery? Let's see whether Teladoc can maintain the momentum it has had this year.
Why Teladoc is bouncing back At first glance, Teladoc doesn't seem to be doing that much better. In the first quarter, the company's revenue declined 2% year over year to $613.8 million. Sales from its BetterHelp virtual therapy division fell 9% year over year to $218.4 million, while the number of paying users on BetterHelp also fell 9%. Further, Teladoc remains unprofitable. It posted a net loss per share of $0.36, which, in fairness, was much better than the $0.53 loss per share it recorded in the year-ago period.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Still, overall, Teladoc's financial results look mediocre. Why is the stock performing well? Part of the answer is that the market is paying attention to several developments that could help fix some of the company's issues. Consider BetterHelp, which was once Teladoc's biggest growth driver. For years, the company tried to get health insurance coverage for this unit. It has finally done so in many U.S. states thanks to an acquisition. Teladoc is seeing clear evidence that this is helping.
As the company reported, virtual therapy users who benefit from insurance coverage averaged about 20% more sessions than cash-paying patients in their first 90 days. Teladoc also expects to end 2026 with an annual run rate of at least $125 million for the company's BetterHelp insurance-covered sessions -- a meaningful improvement over the $75 million it had as of the end of the first quarter. Teladoc is also making progress elsewhere.
Notably, the company's international expansion is still going well. In the first quarter, Teladoc's international revenue grew by 17% year over year to $122.3 million. Meanwhile, Teladoc is implementing various artificial intelligence (AI)-powered initiatives across its business that could have a meaningful impact over the long run. For instance, the company has reduced the administrative work that BetterHelp's therapists do through AI-assisted documentation, allowing them to spend more time focusing on patients.
This is good for everyone involved. Teladoc could continue to see much-improved financial results and stock price performance if it can keep launching initiatives like these.
Today's Change
(
1.10
%) $
0.10
Current Price
$
9.20
Although Teladoc has addressed some of the issues it has encountered in recent years, it isn't out of the woods just yet. Here are several things that could go wrong for the telemedicine company. First, although it is making some progress with BetterHelp, thanks to third-party coverage, the virtual therapy space is very competitive. That's one reason why Teladoc faced -- in the company's own words -- "mounting pressure" within its direct-to-patient cash-paying virtual therapy business.
Insurance coverage is helpful, but even with that, BetterHelp's upside might be limited by the increasingly competitive nature of this industry. Second, although Teladoc's international revenue has been growing faster than the rest of the business, the company's global ambitions may eventually backfire. Managing legal and regulatory requirements, insurance rules and regulations, prescriptions, and many other matters that Teladoc engages in across different countries could turn into a nightmare.
We might see Teladoc's expenses rise significantly as the company continues its expansion plans abroad. As a result, it may be difficult for the company to turn profitable. Lastly, although Teladoc's AI-related work looks promising, it is unlikely to give it a significant advantage over most of its competitors, many of whom are also likely implementing similar strategies. The bottom line is that Teladoc has yet to demonstrate it can perform consistently, while it still faces significant headwinds. So, even with the progress it has made, its shares look fairly risky. Investors should keep that in mind before initiating a position. And only those comfortable with volatility should consider doing so.
New York, New York and New Orleans, Louisiana--(Newsfile Corp. - July 2, 2026) - Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC ("KSF") and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., remind investors with substantial losses that they have until August 10, 2026 to file lead plaintiff applications in a securities class action lawsuit against Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZG) (NASDAQ: Z) ("Zillow" or the "Company"), if they purchased or otherwise acquired Zillow Class A or Class C common stock between February 11, 2025 and May 7, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.
Cannot view this video? Visit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIyQUNEoCGc
What You May Do
If you purchased shares of Zillow as described above and would like to discuss your legal rights and how this case might affect you and your right to recover for your economic loss, you may, without obligation or cost to you, contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-877-515-1850 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-zg-z/?prs=nf to learn more. If you wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in this class action, you must petition the Court by August 10, 2026.
CLICK HERE for more information
About the Lawsuit
Zillow and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.
The alleged false and misleading statements and omissions include, but are not limited to, that: (i) Zillow's agreement with Redfin was not a "partnership," but rather an acquisition of Redfin's business; (ii) as a result of the Redfin Agreement, Zillow faced a materially heightened risk of regulatory scrutiny and liability under federal antitrust laws; (iii) upon the filing of an antitrust lawsuit, Zillow continued to downplay its legal exposure; and (iv) as a result, Defendants' statements about Zillow's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
The case is Breidert v. Zillow Group, Inc., et al., 26-cv-02016.
To Learn More, Click HERE
About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors, in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.
TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms - According to ISS Securities Class Action Services
To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.
On July 02, 2026, RTX Corp (RTX) shares rose 3.9% to a current price of $199.25. The stock has seen a strong performance over the past year, with a 40.1% increa
Jersey Mike's Subs, the sandwich chain backed by Blackstone, has filed for an initial public offering, seeking to capitalize on a rebound in the United States IPO market.
The company plans to list its Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ‘JMKE.’ The offering remains subject to market and other conditions, and there is no assurance regarding its timing or completion.
Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), Jefferies, and JP Morgan are serving as global coordinators and joint bookrunning managers for the proposed transaction.
Jersey Mike's operates more than 3,300 locations across all 50 US states and two international markets, with approximately 99% of its restaurants operated by franchisees.
As of June 30, 2026, the company reported a development pipeline of more than 1,600 additional stores, with over 90% of those projects led by existing franchise owners.
According to its filing, the company sees significant room for expansion in the US, estimating the potential to grow to approximately 7,500 domestic locations. Internationally, Jersey Mike's has partnered with founder and former CEO Peter Cancro to develop 300 stores in the UK and Ireland as part of a long-term goal of reaching approximately 15,000 locations globally.
Earlier reports indicated the company is seeking a valuation of at least $12 billion and expects to raise more than $1 billion through the IPO.
Jersey Mike's highlighted several business metrics in its filing, including a systemwide average unit volume of approximately $1.4 million in fiscal 2025, an asset-light franchised operating model, and continued growth in its digital platform. Its MyMike's loyalty program surpassed 12.5 million active members in 2025.
The company also reported that franchisees generated an average store sales-to-investment ratio of 2.6 times and cash-on-cash returns of approximately 42% during fiscal 2025.
SASKATOON, Saskatchewan--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $CCJ #cameco--Cameco (TSX: CCO; NYSE: CCJ) today announced that the acquisition of TEPCO Resources Inc.'s 5% participating interest in the Cigar Lake Joint Venture by Cameco and Orano Canada Inc. (Orano) has closed. Cameco's ownership stake in the Cigar Lake uranium mine in northern Saskatchewan has now increased by 2.871 percentage points to 57.418%, while Orano's share has risen by 2.129 percentage points to 42.582%. For more information regarding the transaction,.
On July 02, 2026, Dell Technologies Inc (DELL) shares fell 7.3% today, currently priced at $394.32. The stock has experienced a 52-week range between $110.22 an
WSJ: Ronin Ventures Corp. Announces Conditional Acceptance By The Tsx-V Of Previously Announced Qualifying Transaction With 1301756 B.C. Ltd. (Dba) Ocal Financial And Transaction Update
Shares of Rivian Automotive (RIVN +8.41%) jumped on Thursday after the automaker boosted its full-year vehicle delivery target.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Surpassing expectations Rivian produced 12,613 vehicles and delivered 12,194 in the quarter ended June 30. That was well above the company's forecast of 9,000 to 11,000 vehicle deliveries.
The electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer said the "robust growth" in sales of its battery-powered delivery vans and R1 pickup trucks, combined with the launch of its R2 midsize SUV, drove the gains.
Today's Change
(
8.41
%) $
1.45
Current Price
$
18.63
These results and encouraging ongoing sales and production trends prompted Rivian to lift its 2026 full-year delivery target to between 65,000 and 70,000 vehicles, up from a prior estimate of 62,000 to 67,000.
Macroeconomic factors played a part EV sales likely received a boost from the surge in oil and gasoline prices brought about by the conflict in the Middle East earlier this year. Higher fuel prices made the cost of operating EVs more attractive relative to traditional gas-powered vehicles and helped offset the loss of federal tax credits for EV purchases.
Investors can expect to hear more about these and other factors impacting the EV industry when Rivian reports its second-quarter results on July 30. Management is scheduled to conduct a conference call that same day beginning at 5 p.m. ET.
Joe Tenebruso has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Shares of Rivian Automotive (RIVN +8.41%), a maker of electric pickup trucks, SUVs, and delivery vans, jumped to $18.63, up 8.44%. The stock rose after second-quarter deliveries beat its target and management lifted full-year guidance. Investors will be watching R2 SUV deliveries and 2026 delivery momentum next.
Trading volume reached 77.1 million shares, coming in about 155% above its three-month average of 30.2 million shares. Rivian Automotive IPO'd in 2021 and has fallen 82% since going public.
How the markets moved todayThe S&P 500 (^GSPC +0.00%) was unchanged at 7,483, while the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC 0.80%) dropped 0.80% to 25,833. Among automotive manufacturing peers focused on electric vehicles and commercial delivery vans, Tesla (TSLA 7.35%) closed at $393.45, down 7.49%, and Lucid Group (LCID 8.30%) closed at $6.08, down 8.30%.
What this means for investorsRivian Automotive raised its 2026 delivery guidance to 65,000 to 70,000 vehicles after reporting 12,194 deliveries in the second quarter. The EV maker had previously told investors it expected to deliver between 62,000 and 67,000 units this year. The company also announced that it will release its second-quarter 2026 financial results on July 30.
Stronger-than-expected second-quarter demand and the launch of Rivian’s R2 SUV deliveries supported the higher outlook. Investors who hope to see Rivian shares increase in value should be laser-focused on what the company says about production and, especially, demand for the new R2.
Howard Smith has positions in Lucid Group, Rivian Automotive, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Rick Santelli called the June jobs number over CNBC’s floor mic this morning, and if you were half-listening on the Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD | HOOD Price Prediction) app, you probably heard the pause before the number. “Our June release of the job jobs report headline number comes in light change in nonfarm payrolls 57,000. That’s about half of what we were expecting.” Wall Street penciled in roughly 115,000. It got roughly half.
The market’s first instinct on a jobs number like this is to reprice the Federal Reserve. The 10-year Treasury yield sat at 4.44% on June 30, having already drifted down from 4.51% on June 22 as bond traders sniffed out weakness before the official release. The 2s/10s spread compressed to 0.27% on June 22, the tightest reading of the last year, signals the growth story is thinning out.
A big miss on the headline number Fifty-seven thousand jobs is not a recession number by itself. But the context is unfriendly. Santelli noted that this would be “the lightest since it was negative in February… And that was the only negative number going all the way back to December of 2020.” the softest month outside of a one-off contraction earlier this year, which was the first negative reading in roughly five and a half years.
Manufacturing did the ugliest work inside the report. Factory payrolls swung to -2,000 in June from +7,000 in May, which lines up with a jobless claims picture that has quietly deteriorated. Initial claims came in at 215,000 for the week ending June 27, still healthy on the surface, but up from an April low of 190,000. Claims tell you who is losing a job. Payrolls tell you whether anyone is being hired to replace them. Right now, both dials are moving the wrong direction.
One counterweight. The unemployment rate actually ticked down to 4.2% in June from 4.3% in May. That divergence, weak hiring alongside a lower jobless rate, usually means the labor force itself is shrinking.
The revisions made it worse The revision line is where this report went from soft to genuinely concerning. Santelli laid it out. “Last month it was revised from 172 down to 129. So the two month revision now is 93,000. Excuse me, -74,000.” Prior months got marked down by a net 74,000 jobs. The picture the Fed thought it was looking at four weeks ago was better than the picture that actually existed.
Read: Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.
Stack the revisions on top of the June miss and the three-month average payroll gain drops to roughly 110,000. That is well below the pace the economy was running at in early 2026 and closer to the level economists associate with a labor market losing altitude rather than cruising.
What it means for the Fed Wages came in cool. “Average hourly earnings on a month over month basis, up 3/10 exactly as expected… 3.5 on average hourly earnings year over year.” A 3.5% year-over-year wage gain is below the pace Goldman’s economists cite as the roughly 4% “sustainable” rate consistent with 2% inflation. The average workweek held at 34.3 hours, right where it was expected. Employers are not cutting hours yet, but they are not adding much either.
Weaker hiring plus downward revisions plus wage growth softening below trend is the exact cocktail the Fed watches for when deciding whether to keep easing. The fed funds upper bound sits at 3.75% after three 25 basis point cuts since October. The complicating factor is inflation. Core PCE, the Fed’s preferred gauge, sits in the 90.9th percentile of the past year’s readings, still climbing month over month. You can find that data on the St. Louis Fed’s FRED database alongside the yield curve series.
For a regular investor, the labor market is cooling faster than the headline unemployment rate suggests, which gives the Fed cover to cut again. It also means the earnings and consumer-spending assumptions baked into stock prices deserve a second look between now and the next payroll release.
If You’ve Been Thinking About Retirement, Pay Attention (sponsor) Retirement planning doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. The key is finding expert guidance, and SmartAsset’s simple quiz makes it easier than ever for you to connect with a vetted financial advisor. Here’s how:
Answer a Few Simple Questions.
Get Matched with Vetted Advisors
Choose Your Fit
Why wait? Start building the retirement you’ve always dreamed of. Get started today! (sponsor)
UiPath (PATH +1.39%), an agentic automation software platform, closed at $11.69, up 1.21%. The stock was tracking its automation story in premarket trading, and investors are watching the next earnings date as the near-term catalyst.
How the markets moved todayS&P 500 (^GSPC +0.00%) closed at 7,483.24, unchanged from the previous session. The Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC 0.80%) finished at 25,832, down 0.80%. Among enterprise software and business process automation peers, Microsoft (MSFT +1.69%) closed at $390.49, up 1.62%, and Salesforce (CRM +1.65%) ended at $166.11, up 1.76%.
What this means for investorsUiPath’s gain kept investors focused on whether its agentic automation strategy can translate into stronger annual recurring revenue growth, customer expansion, and operating leverage. The company is trying to move beyond traditional robotic process automation and position itself as an orchestration layer for complex enterprise workflows, where AI agents, robots, people, applications, and data can work together inside governed business processes.
The launch of UiPath’s Maestro Case supports its move toward agentic automation. The next earnings update should give investors a clearer read on whether this strategy is supporting durable growth and higher enterprise demand.
Eric Trie has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft, Salesforce, and UiPath. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
A logo of Blackstone is pictured in Manhattan, New York City, U.S. July 29, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Segar/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesJuly 2 (Reuters) - Blackstone's (BX.N), opens new tab QTS said on Thursday it had terminated its planned Digital Gateway data center project in Virginia and withdrawn the associated filings after years of planning and regulatory review.
The data center operator has faced years of local opposition and litigation over the project, despite it being approved by the Prince William Board of County Supervisors.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
Demand for AI and cloud computing has fueled a boom in data center construction across Virginia, home to the world's largest concentration of such facilities.
However, the industry's rapid expansion has drawn increasing scrutiny from local communities and policymakers over its impact on electricity demand, land and water use, and the environment.
QTS said Virginia remains a major part of its business, citing investments in Northern Virginia and the Richmond region, including $5 billion in Central Virginia.
The Digital Gateway project was expected to bring tens of billions of dollars in capital investment, generate substantial annual local tax revenue and create thousands of long-term jobs in Prince William County, according to the company.
Reporting by Dharna Bafna in Bengaluru; Editing by Vijay Kishore
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Starbucks is a gigantic coffee chain with a strong market position. Dutch Bros is a fast-growing coffee chain with a material runway for geographic expansion.
, /PRNewswire/ -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (NYSE: DKS) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders.
According to a federal securities lawsuit, Insiders at Dick's Sporting Goods caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose that (i) demand for products in DKS's Outdoor segment was slowing faster than represented, resulting in excess inventory; (ii) the "structural changes" that were repeatedly touted, including differentiated products, improved pricing technology, and more efficient clearance channels, did not allow the Company to manage its excess inventory without hurting the Company's profitability; (iii) the need to liquidate excess inventory, including in the Outdoor segment, would have a materially negative effect on the Company's profitability; and (iv) as a result of the above, statements about DKS's business condition and prospects were materially false and misleading.
If you currently own DKS and purchased prior to August 23, 2022 please contact Sophia Anne Silayan by email at [email protected] or call (833) 672-0814. Kuehn Law pays all case costs and does not charge its investor clients. Shareholders should contact the firm immediately as there may be limited time to enforce your rights.
Why Your Participation Matters:
As a shareholder your voice matters, and by getting involved, you contribute to the integrity and fairness of the financial markets. Your investment. Your voice. Your future.™
, /PRNewswire/ -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: IRTC) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders.
According to a federal securities lawsuit, Insiders at iRhythm caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose that the Zio AT monitor was a real-time monitor intended for high-risk patients. Specifically, that insiders repeatedly touted the potential growth for the Zio AT as an innovative product that had only just begun to penetrate the market for real-time monitoring, which investors looked upon favorably given the premium selling price associated with devices approved for high-risk patients. As a result of these misrepresentations, the price of iRhythm common stock traded at artificially inflated prices at relevant times.
If you currently own IRTC and purchased prior to November 5, 2021 please contact Sophia Anne Silayan by email at [email protected] or call (833) 672-0814. Kuehn Law pays all case costs and does not charge its investor clients. Shareholders should contact the firm immediately as there may be limited time to enforce your rights.
Why Your Participation Matters:
As a shareholder your voice matters, and by getting involved, you contribute to the integrity and fairness of the financial markets. Your investment. Your voice. Your future.™
, /PRNewswire/ -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Five9, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVN) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders.
According to a federal securities lawsuit, Insiders at Five9 caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose that: (i) Five9's net new business was not "strong irrespective of the macro" and was, in fact, hampered by macroeconomic issues such as constrained and scrutinized customer budgets; (ii) Five9 was in the midst of a challenging bookings quarter due, in part, to sales execution and efficiency issues, and the Company was not "seeing very strong bookings momentum"; and (iii) insiders did not have "enough information in terms of [their] existing customers that are going live" such that the statements that Five9 would see a positive inflection in its dollar-based retention rate lacked a reasonable basis.
If you currently own FIVN and purchased prior to February 21, 2024 please contact Sophia Anne Silayan by email at [email protected] or call (833) 672-0814. Kuehn Law pays all case costs and does not charge its investor clients. Shareholders should contact the firm immediately as there may be limited time to enforce your rights.
Why Your Participation Matters:
As a shareholder your voice matters, and by getting involved, you contribute to the integrity and fairness of the financial markets. Your investment. Your voice. Your future.™
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Robbins LLP informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Insulet Corporation (NASDAQ: PODD) securities between February 21, 2025 and May 26, 2026. Insulet develops, manufactures, and sells insulin delivery systems for people with insulin-dependent diabetes in the U.S. and internationally.
Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Insulet Corporation (PODD) Misled Investors Regarding the Viability of its Products
Share For more information, submit a form, email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003.
The Allegations: Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Insulet Corporation (PODD) Misled Investors Regarding the Viability of its Products
According to the complaint, during the class period, defendants failed to disclose that: (i) Insulet’s manufacturing controls and procedures were defective; (ii) the foregoing created a foreseeable heightened risk that one or more Insulet products would be found to be in violation of applicable safety regulations and/or pose a risk of injury; and (iii) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Plaintiff alleges that on March 12, 2026, Insulet disclosed that it had “initiated a voluntary Medical Device Correction for specific lots of Omnipod® 5 Pods after identifying a manufacturing issue through its ongoing product monitoring” (the “March 2026 MDC”). On this news, Insulet’s stock price fell $16.23 per share, or 6.88%, to close at $219.84 per share on March 13, 2026. Then, on May 26, 2026, Insulet disclosed the “initat[ion]” of another “voluntary Medical Device Correction” (the “May 2026 MDC”), this time “for specific lots of Omnipod® 5, Omnipod Dash®, and Omnipod® Insulin Management System (Omnipod Eros) Pods due to a manufacturing issue, identified through ongoing product monitoring, that could result in insulin under-delivery.” On this news, Insulet’s stock price fell $7.79 per share, or 5.07%, to close at $146.01 per share on May 27, 2026.
What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Insulet Corporation. Shareholders who wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the class should contact Robbins LLP. The lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here.
All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses.
About Robbins LLP: A recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, the attorneys and staff of Robbins LLP have been dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improve corporate governance structures, and hold company executives accountable for their wrongdoing since 2002.
To be notified if a class action against Insulet Corporation settles or to receive free alerts when corporate executives engage in wrongdoing, sign up for Stock Watch today.
Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased Insulet Corporation (“Insulet” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: PODD) securities between February 21, 2025 and May 26, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Insulet investors have until August 31, 2026 to file a lead plaintiff motion.
IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN INSULET CORPORATION (PODD), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT.
Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at [email protected], by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at www.howardsmithlaw.com.
What Happened?
On March 12, 2026, Insulet disclosed that it had “initiated a voluntary Medical Device Correction for specific lots of Omnipod® 5 Pods after identifying a manufacturing issue through its ongoing product monitoring.”
On this news, Insulet’s stock price fell $16.23, or 6.9%, to close at $219.84 per share on March 13, 2026, thereby injuring investors.
Then, on May 26, 2026, Insulet announced the initiation of another “voluntary Medical Device Correction” for “specific lots of Omnipod® 5, Omnipod Dash®, and Omnipod® Insulin Management System (Omnipod Eros) Pods due to a manufacturing issue, identified through ongoing product monitoring, that could result in insulin under-delivery.”
On this news, Insulet’s stock price fell $7.79, or 5.1%, to close at $146.01 per share on May 27, 2026, thereby injuring investors further.
What Is the Lawsuit About?
The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Insulet’s manufacturing controls and procedures were defective; (2) the foregoing created a foreseeable heightened risk that one or more Insulet products would be found to be in violation of applicable safety regulations and/or pose a risk of injury; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Contact Us to Participate or Learn More:
If you purchased Insulet securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us:
Law Offices of Howard G. Smith
3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112
Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020
Telephone: (215) 638-4847
Email: [email protected]
Visit our website at: www.howardsmithlaw.com.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
, /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Insulet Corporation ("Insulet" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PODD) and certain officers. The class action, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, and docketed under 26-cv-13062, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Insulet securities between February 21, 2025 and May 26, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
If you are an investor who purchased or otherwise acquired Insulet securities during the Class Period, you have until August 31, 2026, to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com. To discuss this action, contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.
[Click here for information about joining the class action]
Insulet develops, manufactures, and sells insulin delivery systems for people with insulin-dependent diabetes in the United States ("U.S.") and internationally.
The Company offers, inter alia, its "Omnipod 5" automated insulin delivery ("AID") system, which includes a proprietary AID algorithm embedded in the pod that integrates with a third-party continuous glucose monitor to obtain glucose values through wireless Bluetooth communication; and its "Omnipod Dash", which features a Bluetooth enabled Pod that is controlled by a smartphone-like Personal Diabetes Manager.
Insulet also formerly offered the Omnipod Insulin Management System, its predecessor to the Omnipod 5, prior to the Class Period, but had already begun to phase out the product by the start of the Class Period.
The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Insulet's manufacturing controls and procedures were defective; (ii) the foregoing created a foreseeable heightened risk that one or more Insulet products would be found to be in violation of applicable safety regulations and/or pose a risk of injury; and (iii) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The truth began to emerge on March 12, 2026, when Insulet disclosed that it had "initiated a voluntary Medical Device Correction for specific lots of Omnipod® 5 Pods after identifying a manufacturing issue through its ongoing product monitoring."
On this news, Insulet's stock price fell $16.23 per share, or 6.88%, to close at $219.84 per share on March 13, 2026.
Then, on May 26, 2026, Insulet disclosed the "initat[ion]" of another "voluntary Medical Device Correction", this time "for specific lots of Omnipod® 5, Omnipod Dash®, and Omnipod® Insulin Management System (Omnipod Eros) Pods due to a manufacturing issue, identified through ongoing product monitoring, that could result in insulin under-delivery."
On this news, Insulet's stock price fell $7.79 per share, or 5.07%, to close at $146.01 per share on May 27, 2026.
Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered billions of dollars in damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
