Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Circle's $USDC now accounts for just 46% of Solana's stablecoin supply, its lowest share in more than 2 years.

According to DefiLlama data, $USDC's share has fallen to 46.13%, while $USDT's share has risen to 16.42%. Other stablecoins now collectively account for more than 26% of Solana's stablecoin market, highlighting broader liquidity diversification across the network.

Drift Fallout Changed Community Sentiment The shift follows the April 1 Drift exploit, which sparked widespread criticism of Circle across the Solana ecosystem. After attackers reportedly moved more than $230M via Circle's Cross Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), many ecosystem participants urged DeFi users to swap $USDC for $USDT. Critics argued that Circle should have frozen the stolen funds.

When challenged on the decision, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company would not intercept funds without legal precedent, describing the situation as a "moral quandary." Meanwhile, Tether earned goodwill across parts of the Solana community after supporting Drift during its recovery efforts, strengthening $USDT's standing among many users.

Fresh Legal Challenges Add to Pressure Circle now faces renewed scrutiny following a July 8 report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. According to the report, law enforcement authorities in Wisconsin and New York accused Circle of refusing to assist in freezing or recovering $USDC linked to scams. Wisconsin prosecutors filed a criminal complaint alleging that Circle failed to comply with a court order requiring the recovery of stolen assets.

Although the complaint involves a single misdemeanor count, former FBI financial crime expert Karen Greenway noted that criminal charges against a major financial firm are highly unusual.

Circle rejected the allegations, calling the complaint meritless. The company argued that it lacked the technical ability to comply with the order and maintained that the Wisconsin court lacked jurisdiction.

Stablecoin issuers such as Circle also face pressure from a changing regulatory landscape. Polymarket now places the odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 at 40%, down from 82% in February.

Senator Cynthia Lummis recently warned that failure to pass the CLARITY Act could delay meaningful U.S. stablecoin legislation until 2030, turning what could have been a 1-year delay into a 4-year setback.

Solana's Stablecoin Economy Continues to Expand The decline in $USDC's market share comes even as Solana's stablecoin economy continues to grow at a record pace. During the first half of 2026, Solana recorded $1.12T in peer-to-peer stablecoin volume, up 72%, alongside 83.6M peer-to-peer transactions, up 37%. Active wallets reached an all-time high of 4.3M.

Retail transfers between $100 and $1,000 totaled a record $13.5B. Institutional transfers above $20,000 reached $1.07T, while micropayments between $0.50 and $100 climbed to an all-time high of $1.50B.

Circle has continued to expand its infrastructure despite a decline in market share. Gateway, launched in July 2025 and integrated with Solana in January 2026, allows users and businesses to access a unified $USDC balance across supported blockchains without manual bridging or third-party liquidity. The stablecoin giant recently reported that lifetime Gateway volume has now surpassed $4.5B.

Circle Scores a Major Regulatory Win Despite mounting competitive and legal challenges, Circle recently secured one of its biggest regulatory milestones. The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency granted final approval for Circle to establish Circle National Trust, a national trust bank operating as First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A.

The approval strengthens $USDC infrastructure through federally regulated custody, with reserve management planned as a future capability, while placing Circle's trust operations under direct federal oversight.

Investors welcomed the development, sending Circle's stock, $CRCL, more than 15% higher to around $71 following the announcement before retracing to its current price of $66.

While $USDC remains Solana's largest stablecoin by a wide margin, its share has fallen below 50% for the first time in more than 2 years. With growing competition, evolving regulation, and changing community sentiment, the battle for stablecoin dominance on Solana appears far from over.

Read More on SolanaFloor Claynosaurz’s HEEBOO Studio Introduces $HEEBOO Fan Token’s Public Sale Through Metaplex Genesis
Solana Memecoin Traders Flock to RobinHood - Will it Last?

Solana Joins the Prediction Market Race

@Grayscale has assigned $XRP a single, defining identity: global payments. In a breakdown of what each major crypto asset is actually built for, the world's largest digital asset manager gave Bitcoin the "digital money" label, Ethereum the "world computer" designation, and Solana "high performance." XRP got global payments.

It is a pointed classification. Rather than grouping $XRP alongside smart contract platforms or store-of-value assets, Grayscale has placed it squarely in the cross-border settlement lane, the very use case Ripple has been pushing since the company was founded in 2012.

A Utility Case, Not a Speculation Story Grayscale has categorised $XRP under the "Global Payments" investment narrative, highlighting its role in cross-border payments and digital financial infrastructure. The framing matters because it moves the conversation away from price speculation and toward institutional utility, which is where Ripple has long argued XRP belongs.

XRP focuses on fast, low-cost cross-border payments for financial institutions. Regulatory clarity in the United States has meaningfully boosted its utility and adoption potential. As a result, banks and payment providers increasingly view it as viable settlement infrastructure.

There is a broader narrative developing around XRP as one of the few cryptocurrencies with a clearly identifiable real-world use case. While many digital assets remain heavily dependent on speculation or meme-driven momentum, XRP's value proposition is directly linked to cross-border settlement and liquidity management.

Institutional Adoption Already UnderwayThe Grayscale label arrives as real-world adoption continues to build. XRP now underpins cross-border payments for over 300 institutions in 45 countries, with Ripple's RLUSD stablecoin and BNY Mellon custody deepening institutional adoption.

XRP operates on the XRP Ledger, known for its speed, with transactions finalising in three to five seconds. If a business wants to pay a supplier abroad, dollars are converted into XRP, sent across the globe in seconds, and converted into the destination currency on the other end.

Grayscale's GXRP product allows investors to gain exposure to XRP directly in investment accounts, alongside traditional assets, and is built and managed by Grayscale, the world's largest digital asset-focused investment platform with over a decade of experience operating crypto investment vehicles.

For $XRP, the Grayscale classification is less a revelation than a formal endorsement of the argument its backers have always made. One of the biggest names in institutional crypto asset management is now saying it out loud: XRP is a payments asset, not a speculative one.

Sources
Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) - Grayscale
XRP in 2026: Ripple, ETFs, Regulation and Institutional Growth - IG International
Grayscale Names 8 Crypto With Key Narratives Right Now - BeInCrypto

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Strategy or Binance: Who’s Sitting on More Unrealized Bitcoin Losses? CryptoQuant Weighs In

Optimism says Toss is the fourth regulated financial institution in a year to pick the OP Stack, after Bitpanda, Kraken and Mitsui.

Toss, the South Korean fintech app with roughly 30 million registered users, is testing a Korean won stablecoin on Optimism's OP Stack, Optimism said on X Wednesday. The proof of concept also involves Sunnyside Labs, whose "Privacy Boost" tool is meant to shield transaction data on a public blockchain while preserving compliance access.

Optimism, the company behind the OP Stack framework used to build layer-2 networks, called the tie-up the fourth time in a year a regulated financial institution has adopted the OP Stack in a new market, following Bitpanda's Vision Chain in Europe, Kraken's Ink in the US and Mitsui's Zipangcoin in Japan.

Kyle Jenke, chief business officer at OP Labs, said the pilot is "about demonstrating that the OP Stack can meet the compliance, privacy, and performance standards that regulated financial institutions require." Toss chief business officer Q-Ha Steve Kim said the company aims "to build a highly trusted, compliant digital financial infrastructure tailored to the Korean market," using the same post.

Three-Month TestThe arrangement runs as a three-month proof of concept, according to a post from crypto researcher Jay Chan, covering whether a financial institution can manage settlement, meet KYC and anti-money-laundering requirements, and protect transaction privacy on a public chain at the same time. Toss operates over 500,000 online and offline payment networks, per a summary of Kim's comments on the deal.

Optimism's post frames the collaboration as a test rather than a commitment to launch a stablecoin.

The OP Stack already underpins Sony's Soneium, Uniswap's Unichain and OKX's X Layer, among others, giving Toss an established multi-chain ecosystem to plug into rather than building isolated infrastructure. Whether the pilot converts into a live KRW stablecoin will depend on regulatory sign-off in South Korea, which has not yet finalized its stablecoin licensing framework.

A compromised maintainer account, 18 tainted npm packages, and a payload designed to siphon private keys and mnemonic phrases. That’s what Injective Labs was staring down on July 8, 2026. The good news: the malicious code was live for less than an hour, and by all accounts, nobody lost a dime.

The attack targeted @injectivelabs/sdk-ts, a package that sees roughly 50,000 weekly downloads, making it one of the more widely used tools in the Injective developer ecosystem. The compromised version, 1.20.21, was published through a hijacked GitHub account belonging to a trusted maintainer. It was built to extract wallet credentials and relay them to a fake endpoint cleverly designed to look like Injective’s own infrastructure.

Advertisement

How the attack unfolded Attackers gained access to a maintainer’s GitHub account and used legitimate GitHub Actions to publish the poisoned update. Security firms Socket, OX Security, and StepSecurity identified the breach, which triggered a rapid response from the Injective team. The malicious version was deprecated, access to the compromised account was revoked, and a clean release, version 1.20.23, was pushed out. Total exposure window: approximately 49 minutes.

The compromised version was downloaded over 300 times before it was pulled. Across the @injectivelabs npm scope, 18 packages were affected, with security researchers flagging 87 downstream dependent packages that could theoretically have been exposed. Despite those numbers, Injective reported no actual user impact.

“No funds on the network are at risk,” Injective CEO Eric Chen said.

Why no users were hit The sub-hour exposure window is the single biggest factor. The 300-plus downloads represent a tiny fraction of the package’s typical weekly volume of 50,000. Many of those downloads were likely automated bots, mirror services, or security scanners rather than developers actively integrating the code into live applications.

Suspicious commits tied to the compromise reportedly began as early as June 8, 2026, a full month before the malicious package was published. That gap suggests either a slow-burn reconnaissance phase or early attempts that didn’t trigger automated alerts.

What this means for crypto developers and investors For developers building on Injective or any other chain, the practical takeaway is straightforward: pin your dependencies, use lockfiles, enable two-factor authentication on every account that touches your publishing pipeline, and monitor repository commits with the same vigilance you’d apply to your production servers.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Software supply chain attacks have become more common, with attackers increasingly targeting trusted developer tools instead of end users.

In the latest incident, attackers compromised a trusted Injective Labs software package to steal developers’ wallet credentials.

Source: Socket How did Injective SDK attack unfold? The attacker uploaded a malicious version of the TypeScript SDK, @injectivelabs/sdk-ts v1.20.21, to npm. The package was designed for building Injective applications, creating wallets, and signing transactions.

The attacker then gained access to a legitimate Injective Labs contributor’s GitHub account and distributed malicious commits. One test branch was named “test-backdoor-check.”

Under the guise of telemetry, the attacker published the compromised package to npm.

Instead of collecting usage data, the malware extracted private keys and mnemonic seed phrases. That gave attackers everything needed to recreate and seize victims’ crypto wallets.

On top of that, the compromise spread through transitive dependencies in 17 additional Injective packages that relied on the SDK.

The loophole that led to the breach The malicious code remained inactive during installation, helping it evade detection.

Instead, it executed only when developers used the fromMnemonic or fromHex wallet generation functions.

Around 50,000 downloads of the compromised package occurred each week. At least 87 other packages also depended on it directly.

The attacker also released 17 additional Injective packages pinned to the compromised SDK version, expanding the attack’s reach.

Source: Socket What’s more?  Soon after, a clean version, v1.20.23, was made available. However, the compromised version was still available on npm as a deprecated package, and its release artifacts were still available on GitHub.

Hence, to avoid further such incidents, users should rotate all impacted credentials, create new wallets, and move their money.

This coincided with BonkDAO losing $20 million because of a “malicious governance proposal” making them the most recent victim of a crypto hack.

Final Summary The wrongdoer gained access to a legitimate Injective Labs contributor’s GitHub account and used it to distribute malicious commits. Developers were made vulnerable by the attack because of transitive dependencies in 17 additional injective packages. 

GMX: GMX Referral Program Update

Key Highlights The ARB token climbed 19% within a 24-hour period, leading all top 100 digital assets Robinhood’s new blockchain, powered by Arbitrum technology, recorded $568 million in trading activity A revenue-sharing model returns 10% of Robinhood Chain’s net protocol earnings to Arbitrum Memecoin speculation accounted for significant volume, while stablecoin deposits exceeded $260 million Crypto strategist Michaël van de Poppe identified bullish technical signals across ARB trading pairs Arbitrum’s native ARB token experienced a remarkable 19% surge over 24 hours on July 9, claiming the position as the strongest performer within the top 100 cryptocurrency rankings. This upward momentum was fueled by impressive early metrics from Robinhood Chain, which completed its first week of public operation.

Arbitrum (ARB) Price Robinhood Chain operates on Arbitrum’s Layer-2 technology stack. Data from Entropy Advisors revealed that the platform facilitated $568 million in trading volume on Wednesday alone. By Thursday, cumulative volume had surpassed $350 million for the day.

Memecoin speculation dominated transaction activity on the network. Simultaneously, stablecoin deposits grew rapidly, surpassing $260 million within the chain’s inaugural week.

This trading activity is producing tangible financial benefits for the Arbitrum network. According to the partnership terms, Robinhood Chain allocates 10% of its net protocol earnings to Arbitrum, distributed between the DAO treasury and the Developer Guild.

The Robinhood Chain

> Ethereum secures it
> Arbitrum powers it
> Robinhood brings millions onchain

The next chapter of finance is programmable

— Arbitrum (@arbitrum) July 8, 2026

Brendan Ma, who oversees investment strategies at the Arbitrum Foundation, shared on X that Wednesday’s performance alone suggests Robinhood is “run-rating at more than $12.5 million in annualized revenue already.” Ma emphasized that tokenized real-world asset transactions have barely begun on the platform.

Cryptocurrency market analyst Michaël van de Poppe commented on X about being “very pleased to see the strength in $ARB currently.” He highlighted tailwinds from Robinhood Chain’s performance and broader Ethereum ecosystem momentum, noting a “massive bullish divergence” across ARB’s USD and BTC trading pairs. Van de Poppe projected “a lot more momentum coming into the price action” over upcoming weeks.

I'm very pleased to see the strength in $ARB currently.

It's taking some momentum due to the strength on the Robinhood chain and the activity on Ethereum in general.

There's a massive bullish divergence on the USD and $BTC pairs on this one, so I would expect to see a lot more… https://t.co/fyym17tqn0 pic.twitter.com/xKetwE0XNK

— Michaël van de Poppe (@CryptoMichNL) July 9, 2026

Performance Exceeds Initial Projections A FalconX analysis published in April estimated Robinhood Chain would produce approximately $1.1 million in transaction fees during its initial six-month period. The platform has dramatically exceeded that trajectory within its first several days.

FalconX’s research also forecasted potential annual revenue reaching $60 million by 2030 as adoption expands beyond tokenized equities into decentralized finance and additional onchain use cases.

Robinhood revealed the blockchain at a London presentation last week. Concurrent with the launch, the financial services company announced intentions to extend tokenized U.S. stock trading access to clients across more than 120 nations and introduced a DeFi yield product utilizing the Morpho lending protocol.

Critical Price Targets ARB is now approaching a descending trendline that has restricted upward moves since January. Breaking decisively above this resistance could trigger a rally toward the $0.10–$0.11 zone, with $0.14 representing the next major obstacle.

Should the rally lose steam, market participants are monitoring the $0.08 level as a crucial support area where accumulation might resume.

Brendan Ma observed that the majority of tokenized real-world asset transactions associated with Robinhood Chain remain to be deployed on the network.

Robinhood launched its own blockchain in July 2026, an Ethereum layer 2 where tokenized stocks trade around the clock and plug into DeFi as collateral. This guide explains what Robinhood Chain actually is, how it works under the hood, what Stock Tokens are and who can use them, how the chain differs from Base and the other corporate networks, and what it means for users, builders, and the industry’s biggest open questions.

On July 1, 2026, one of the largest retail brokers in the United States switched on its own blockchain. Robinhood Chain launched its public mainnet at a London keynote, carrying 95 tokenized stocks that trade 24 hours a day, a suite of DeFi protocols live from day one, and access wired directly into the Robinhood Wallet used across 120 countries. Within a week the chain had processed roughly 4 million transactions, gathered over $240 million in deposits, and produced a launch statistic, $570 million of day-one volume against $21.68 million of liquidity, that made the entire industry look twice.

A brokerage running a blockchain would have sounded absurd for most of crypto’s history, and it now sounds inevitable: Coinbase runs Base, Stripe backs Tempo, and the era of consumer giants renting neutral rails is visibly ending. But Robinhood Chain is a distinct species within that trend, because it was built around one specific product no other chain ships: real-world equities as native, composable on-chain assets, the thing crypto has promised since the first tokenized-stock experiments and never delivered at brokerage scale.

This guide explains the chain from the ground up: what it technically is and how the Arbitrum-based architecture works, what Stock Tokens are and what holders actually get, the DeFi ecosystem that launched with it and why composability is the entire point, who can access what and where the regulatory lines sit, how the chain compares to Base and the corporate-chain field, the fee economics including the unusual revenue-sharing deal with Arbitrum, and the honest open questions, control, liquidity, and law, that will decide what the chain becomes.

The architecture: an Ethereum layer 2, built to order Robinhood Chain is a layer 2 blockchain: a network that executes transactions on its own fast, cheap environment while posting records to Ethereum, inheriting the base chain’s security for its history. It is built using Arbitrum’s Orbit technology, the chains-as-a-service framework from the team behind Arbitrum One, which means Robinhood did not invent a blockchain so much as commission one: Orbit supplies the rollup machinery, proofs, data posting, Ethereum settlement, and Robinhood configures the network, operates its infrastructure, and decides what it is for.

Three design choices define it. First, it is permissionless: any developer can deploy contracts using standard Ethereum tooling, without Robinhood’s approval, which is why an uninvited memecoin economy appeared on day one and why first-tier DeFi protocols could arrive at launch. That openness distinguishes it sharply from the private bank chains of the last decade and puts it in the same public-network category as Base. Second, it is EVM-compatible: everything built for Ethereum ports over directly, wallets, contracts, developer tools, so the chain starts with the industry’s entire software ecosystem instead of an empty room. Third, it is purpose-tuned for real-world assets: fast block times via Alchemy infrastructure, Chainlink as the official oracle for prices, cross-chain messaging, and proof-of-reserve on Robinhood-issued assets, and BitGo integration on the custody side, the specific plumbing tokenized equities require and general-purpose chains bolt on as afterthoughts.

The trust profile follows from the architecture, and it is the standard corporate-chain bargain. User funds are secured by Ethereum: the sequencer that orders transactions cannot forge them or steal assets, and the chain’s history settles to the base layer. Access and ordering, though, run through infrastructure Robinhood operates, the centralized-sequencer chokepoint every major rollup currently carries, which means outages, ordering policy, and censorship capacity sit with one regulated company. For everyday users the distinction rarely surfaces; for anyone evaluating the chain seriously, it is the first line of the risk section.

Stock Tokens: the product the chain was built around The headline asset class is Stock Tokens: on-chain representations of equities, NVDA, GOOG, AAPL among the 95 at launch, issued by Robinhood, priced by Chainlink feeds, and tradable every hour of every day, not just during exchange sessions. They are the chain’s reason for existing, and understanding precisely what they are, and are not, is the guide’s most practical section.

A Stock Token delivers price exposure to the underlying equity in a token that behaves like any other crypto asset: hold it in the Robinhood Wallet or self-custody, trade it around the clock on the chain’s exchanges, transfer it, and, most consequentially, use it inside DeFi. What it does not deliver is shareholder status: token holders do not vote, and corporate rights stay with the issuance structure, with dividend economics passed through per the product’s terms, the standard trade-off of every tokenized-equity model. The tokens descend from Robinhood’s 2025 European pilots, which tokenized exposure to private names like SpaceX and OpenAI as proof of concept, and the lineage matters: the legal wrappers were tested under European rules before the chain bet on them.

Availability is the sharpest edge. Stock Tokens ship through the Robinhood Wallet in more than 120 countries, and conspicuously not to United States users, where the line between a compliant synthetic instrument and an unregistered security remains undrawn. The result is one of the strangest compliance objects in crypto: a permissionless network, built by an American broker, whose flagship assets are geofenced away from Americans, with enforcement living at the issuance and app layers while the rails underneath stay open. Whether that architecture satisfies regulators, or attracts them, is among the chain’s defining open questions.

The 24/7 dimension carries its own mechanics worth knowing. When the underlying stock market is closed, nights, weekends, holidays, the tokens keep trading, drifting on expectation with no live reference price, then reconverging when the real market opens. Weekend token prices function as forecasts of Monday’s open, gaps can be violent when news breaks during the closure, and anyone using the tokens in leveraged or collateralized positions inherits that gap risk in full.

The DeFi layer: why composability is the point Tokenized stocks existed before Robinhood Chain. What the chain adds, and what its launch ecosystem was assembled to prove, is composability: the tokens plug into open financial protocols as first-class assets, which converts a brokerage line item into a programmable building block.

The day-one roster was deliberately first-tier. Uniswap deployed a dedicated AMM as the chain’s core public liquidity venue; Arcus, built by the team behind dYdX, runs a zero-fee exchange purpose-built for the stock tokens; 1inch, Rialto, and Lighter round out trading, with Lighter adding perpetual futures and pledging $11 million of its token to Robinhood users; Pleiades operates a proprietary market-making AMM; and Morpho’s lending markets opened the loop that matters most: stock tokens as loan collateral. That last integration is the chain’s genuinely novel product, a holder borrowing stablecoins against tokenized NVDA, automatically, no paperwork, with liquidation machinery enforcing the loan against oracle prices, and it is also the chain’s most delicate engineering: equity collateral marked by feeds from a market that closes means health factors computed against stale or reconstructed prices for two-thirds of every week, gap-risk liquidations at Monday opens, and corporate-action handling no DeFi risk framework has stress-tested at scale.

The deposits that flowed in during week one, past $240 million, concentrated in exactly these venues, drawn by a 7% yield incentive and points programs, and the composition question, how much collateral is actually stock tokens versus recycled farm assets, is the single best indicator of whether the composability thesis is converting, the launch-week forensics this publication’s feature examined in depth.

Using the chain: access, wallets, and what a first session looks like For a user, the chain’s front door is the Robinhood Wallet, the company’s self-custody app, which added native Robinhood Chain support at launch: bridging assets in from Ethereum and other networks, swapping tokens, and reaching the chain’s applications happen from inside an interface tens of millions of people already carry. That distribution is the launch’s real innovation, one tap from an existing consumer app to an on-chain economy, no seed-phrase ceremony, no network-configuration ritual, and it is why the chain gathered users at a pace organic launches never match.

Nothing about the chain requires Robinhood’s app, though, and the permissionless design means the standard crypto path works identically: add the network to any EVM wallet, bridge funds across, and interact with the protocols directly. A typical first session looks like any L2’s, bridge a stablecoin or ETH, pay negligible fees, swap or deposit into a venue, with two chain-specific wrinkles worth knowing in advance. The first is that asset availability depends on who you are and where: the DeFi protocols and general tokens are open, while Stock Tokens and certain products check jurisdiction at the issuance and interface layers, so two users on the same chain can see different shelves. The second is incentives literacy: the launch period’s yields and points programs are bootstrap subsidies with published terms and step-down schedules, and treating them as permanent rates is the classic new-chain mistake, since incentive-driven deposits reprice the day the programs do.

Builders face an even lower bar: the chain is standard EVM, deploys with familiar tooling, and offers what no other network can, proximity to a brokerage user base and an asset class, the stock tokens, that exists nowhere else as a composable primitive. The day-one protocol roster arrived for exactly that reason, and the open question for every subsequent builder is the same one the chain itself faces: whether the mission assets acquire the liquidity that makes building against them worthwhile.

The launch by the numbers, and how to read them The chain’s opening week produced statistics worth recording precisely, because they will be the baseline every future assessment measures against. Day-one volume of $570 million against $21.68 million of total value locked, a 26-to-1 turnover ratio without precedent at scale, driven overwhelmingly by speculative memecoin trading rather than the stock tokens the chain was built for. Roughly 4 million transactions in the first week against about $57,000 of protocol revenue, deliberately subsidized throughput. Deposits growing past $240 million within days, concentrated in Morpho and Ethena strategies farming a 7% incentive. And an 8% rally in HOOD stock on launch, the equity market pricing the option the chain represents.

Read together, the numbers say the launch proved distribution and deferred everything else: the crowd arrived instantly, the crowd was the wrong crowd by the mission’s definition, and the company visibly did not mind, because speculative bootstrap is how every successful chain, Base included, actually started. The figures to watch from here are the boring ones, stock-token volume as a share of activity, collateral composition in the lending markets, deposit retention through incentive step-downs, and they will decide, over quarters rather than weeks, whether the launch statistics were a foundation or a fireworks show.

Fees, economics, and the Arbitrum deal The chain’s business model is subsidy now, franchise later. Transaction fees are deliberately negligible, roughly $57,000 of protocol revenue against the first week’s 4 million transactions, because the chain is priced as customer acquisition: Robinhood monetizes the surrounding stack, wallet, custody, order flow, spreads, and the eventual financialization of assets its 28 million customers already hold. The structure echoes the company’s zero-commission brokerage playbook precisely.

The launch’s most consequential economic detail belongs to someone else: 10% of Robinhood Chain’s fees flow to the Arbitrum ecosystem, with 8% going directly to the treasury controlled by ARB token holders, confirmation that sent ARB up double digits. The deal matters twice over: it prices Orbit’s chains-as-a-service model with its biggest customer to date, and it sets the template every future corporate chain will negotiate against, the sell-shovels economics underneath the land grab, whose full competitive map this publication has drawn.

One further piece of the economics deserves its own paragraph because it inverts the usual chain-token question: Robinhood Chain has no token, and the company has signaled nothing about one. The network’s fees are paid in ETH-denominated gas, its incentives are paid in dollars and partner tokens, and the value the chain generates is designed to accrue to HOOD equity through the brokerage’s ordinary lines rather than to a new crypto asset. The choice is strategically legible, a token would add regulatory surface exactly where the company has least room, and it makes the chain a useful natural experiment: the corporate-chain model’s economics, tested without the token variable that confounds every other network’s numbers. It also concentrates the ecosystem’s token exposure in unexpected places, ARB through the fee-sharing deal, and the partner protocols’ tokens through their deployments, which is why the launch’s clearest market beneficiaries were assets Robinhood does not issue.

How it compares: Robinhood Chain versus the field Against Base, the reigning corporate chain, the comparison clarifies both. Base is a general-purpose network that grew an economy organically, memecoins first, then consumer apps, then everything, monetized through sequencer margin at enormous scale; its differentiation is Coinbase’s distribution applied to an open playground. Robinhood Chain is a product-led network: the stock tokens are the anchor tenant, the DeFi roster was recruited around them, and the bet is that one asset class nobody else ships outruns a general platform’s breadth. Base runs on the OP Stack, Robinhood on Arbitrum Orbit, a meaningful choice mostly for the fee-sharing counterparty and the proving roadmap. Against Tempo, Stripe’s payments-first chain, the contrast is anchor product again, payments versus equities, and against the neutral L1s both compete with, the corporate chains share the same offer and the same objection: distribution no neutral chain can match, control no neutral chain would accept.

Where the chain came from: the two-year assembly The launch’s polish reflects deliberate sequencing worth knowing, because it explains both the chain’s capabilities and its ambitions. Robinhood spent 2025 acquiring the pieces: Bitstamp, one of the oldest crypto exchanges, for trading and institutional infrastructure; WonderFi for Canadian licensing; and the European tokenized-equity pilots, including exposure products on private names like SpaceX and OpenAI, as legal and product rehearsal. Early 2026 brought the quiet phase: a public testnet from February that processed millions of transactions, and the European expansion of crypto perpetuals that became one of the company’s fastest-growing lines. The July launch composed the pieces into one architecture, assets tokenized on its own network, traded through its own wallet and partnered venues, financed through integrated lending, custodied through its own stack, and the composition, more than any single component, is the product: a vertically integrated on-chain brokerage, with each layer feeding the others.

The assembly also explains the chain’s geography. The launch happened in London, the stock tokens ship internationally first, and the European perps expansion runs under MiCA-era rules, because the regulatory groundwork was laid where frameworks exist. The United States, the company’s home market, receives the chain, the wallet, and the crypto products, and waits on the equity tokens until American classification law settles, a sequencing that reads as strange until it reads as strategy: build the global product under workable rules, and let the home market’s framework catch up to a working precedent instead of a proposal.

The honest open questions Three questions will decide what the chain becomes, and none is answerable yet. Control: a permissionless network whose sequencing, issuance, and flagship interface all route through one regulated broker is decentralized at exactly one layer, and the pressure point regulators or litigants would reach for first is obvious. Liquidity: 24/7 equity trading and stock-collateral lending are only as real as their depth, and week-one depth in the mission assets was thin against the speculative noise; the products exist as listings and must become markets. And law: the geofence paradox, the CLARITY-era classification of the tokens, and the first serious corporate action or exploit on tokenized equities are all uncharted, and each is capable of reshaping the chain’s product overnight.

What is not in question is significance. A top American broker building a public blockchain around real-world assets, and populating it with DeFi’s first tier on day one, is the clearest single marker yet of traditional finance and crypto converging on shared rails, and whichever way the open questions resolve, the experiment’s data, on tokenized-equity demand, on corporate-chain economics, on regulated assets in permissionless systems, will shape what every institution builds next.

A short reader’s guide to following the chain closes the picture, because the story is young and the sources are all public. The chain’s explorer and the standard TVL dashboards carry the activity and deposit series; the incentive programs publish their terms and step-down dates; the stock-token venues report the volumes that measure the mission; and Robinhood’s quarterly disclosures will, over time, reveal what the company chooses to say about economics it is currently subsidizing in silence. The corporate-chain era is being decided by exactly this kind of unglamorous series, retention curves and collateral mixes, not keynotes, and Robinhood Chain, whatever it becomes, has committed to being graded in public. For a technology that spent a decade arguing about whether traditional finance would ever really arrive on-chain, the most informative thing about this chain may simply be its existence: the argument is over, the arrival is operational, and the remaining questions, control, liquidity, and law, are the practical kind that get answered by data, not debate.

And a sizing footnote for perspective: a week after launch, the chain’s deposits already exceeded what most of the previous cycle’s venture-funded L2s gathered in their lifetimes, and its flagship product had transacted less than its accidental memecoin economy, both facts true at once, which is the corporate-chain era in a single sentence.

The chain is a week old; this guide will age accordingly, and its framework, architecture, assets, access, economics, questions, is built to be refilled with each quarter’s numbers.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset markets are volatile and you can lose your entire investment. Product availability varies by jurisdiction, and details are current as of July 9, 2026, and changing quickly. Always do your own research.

Frequently asked questions What is Robinhood Chain in simple terms? Robinhood Chain is a public blockchain launched by the brokerage Robinhood in July 2026. It is an Ethereum layer 2 built with Arbitrum’s technology, designed for tokenized real-world assets: its flagship product is Stock Tokens, on-chain versions of equities like NVDA and AAPL that trade 24/7 and plug into DeFi applications. Anyone can build on it, and users access it primarily through the Robinhood Wallet.

Is Robinhood Chain its own blockchain or part of Ethereum? Both, in the way all layer 2 networks are: it executes transactions on its own fast, cheap network, and it posts records to Ethereum, inheriting the base chain’s security for its history. It is built on Arbitrum Orbit, the same technology family as Arbitrum One, and is fully compatible with Ethereum wallets, tools, and smart contracts.

What are Stock Tokens and do they make me a shareholder? Stock Tokens are Robinhood-issued tokens tracking specific equities, tradable around the clock and usable in DeFi as collateral. They deliver price exposure and pass through dividend economics per their terms, but holders are not shareholders of record: no voting rights, and corporate rights remain with the issuance structure. They are exposure instruments, not shares.

Can US users trade Stock Tokens on Robinhood Chain? No. Stock Tokens are available through the Robinhood Wallet in more than 120 countries, with availability varying by jurisdiction, and the United States is excluded pending regulatory clarity on how such tokens are classified. US users can access the chain itself, which is permissionless, but not its flagship equity products.

What DeFi protocols run on Robinhood Chain? The launch ecosystem included Uniswap with a dedicated AMM as core public liquidity, Arcus, a zero-fee stock-token exchange from the dYdX team, 1inch, Rialto, and Lighter for trading and perpetuals, Pleiades as a proprietary market-making venue, and Morpho for lending, where stock tokens can serve as loan collateral. Chainlink provides the oracle and cross-chain infrastructure throughout.

What happens to Stock Tokens when the stock market is closed? They keep trading. With no live reference price overnight and on weekends, the tokens float on traders’ expectations of the next open and reconverge when the real market resumes, sometimes with sharp gaps if news broke during the closure. Anyone borrowing against stock-token collateral carries that gap risk, since positions can be liquidated against prices that jump at the open.

How is Robinhood Chain different from Coinbase’s Base? Base is a general-purpose corporate chain that grew a broad economy organically and runs on the OP Stack. Robinhood Chain is product-led: built on Arbitrum Orbit specifically around tokenized real-world assets, with the stock tokens as anchor tenant and a DeFi roster recruited to serve them. Base sells an open playground with Coinbase’s distribution; Robinhood sells an asset class nobody else ships.

Who controls Robinhood Chain? The network is permissionless to build on and its assets are secured by Ethereum, but Robinhood operates the core infrastructure, including the sequencer that orders transactions, issues the flagship assets, and controls the primary wallet interface. Funds cannot be stolen by the operator, but access, uptime, and ordering depend on it, the standard trade-off of the corporate-chain model.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Yield optimizers have one core promise: take the tedious work of manual compounding off your plate and put those gains back to work automatically. Beefy Finance just made that promise a lot more interesting for Aave users, rolling out new single-asset autocompounding vaults on Aave’s Monad deployment with stablecoin yields sitting around 9% APY.

The vaults cover four assets: AUSD, USDC, USDT, and WETH. The stablecoin vaults are advertising roughly 9% APY, while the WETH vault comes in around 4% APY. For context, earning 9% on a dollar-pegged asset in a protocol with over $100M in deposits is the kind of number that makes traditional savings accounts look embarrassing.

What Beefy is actually doing here Aave distributes lending incentives to depositors on top of the base borrowing yield. Without automation, you would need to manually claim those incentives, swap them, and redeposit. Beefy’s vaults harvest the accumulated Aave incentives on your behalf, reinvest them back into the same position, and your balance compounds over time without you lifting a finger.

Advertisement

The single-asset structure is worth emphasizing. These are not liquidity pool vaults, which means depositors are not exposed to impermanent loss, the mechanism where providing two-sided liquidity to a pool can leave you holding less value than if you had just kept the assets. Single-asset vaults carry a cleaner risk profile, which matters for anyone deploying significant capital into stablecoins.

The timing is deliberate. Aave’s Monad market went live around July 2, 2026, and crossed $100M in total deposits within the first two days of operation.

Beefy’s position in the yield aggregator landscape Beefy operates on over 20 chains and runs hundreds of individual vaults, with total value locked ranging between $197M and $420M depending on market conditions.

For Aave specifically, this is a meaningful integration. Aave is one of the largest and most battle-tested lending protocols in DeFi. Beefy layering autocompounding on top of that foundation gives users a way to extract more value from an already trusted venue.

What this means for investors watching DeFi yields A 9% APY on stablecoins is not guaranteed to last forever. Lending incentive rates fluctuate based on utilization, the size of the incentive pool, and how many depositors pile in. What the vaults do offer is a maximally efficient way to capture whatever yield is available at any given moment. If the rate sits at 9% today and drifts to 6% in three months, autocompounding means you will have locked in more of the 9% period than a manual depositor who only reinvested once a month.

The WETH vault at around 4% APY tells a slightly different story. ETH holders using this vault are earning a yield on an asset they might otherwise simply hold. The 4% figure is more modest, but for long-term ETH holders who were not going to sell anyway, it represents pure incremental return without adding significant complexity.

Aave’s Monad market pulling in over $100M in deposits within two days signals genuine appetite for yield on this chain. As of July 10, 2026, mainstream outlets like CoinDesk and The Block have not extensively covered Beefy’s announcement, suggesting the launch has so far been communicated primarily through Beefy’s own social media channels, targeted at its existing user base.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

10h05 ▪ 7 min read ▪ by Ariela R.

Summarize this article with:

Facing profitability under pressure since the last halving in April 2024, bitcoin mining companies have made a strategic pivot towards AI. Enough to excite Wall Street. However, a report from Blocksbridge Consulting published on July 9, 2026, paints an alarming reality. It highlights massive stock sales by executives and board members of some companies. More details in the following paragraphs!

In Brief Bitcoin miners accelerate their diversification towards AI infrastructures to offset the drop in mining profitability after the halving. Several mining company executives sold shares after the rise in BTC prices. The current situation fuels questions about corporate governance and investor confidence. An industrial pivot forced by the realities of the Bitcoin network At the end of 2025, the global Bitcoin network hashrate had reached a historic peak of 1,160 EH/s. This intensified competition. According to sector reports from CoinShares, the weighted average cost to validate a single BTC was about $80,000 in Q4 2025 for publicly listed entities. Result: 15 to 20% of the global fleet of obsolete ASIC machines were forced to operate at a loss.

To improve their cash flows, major players in bitcoin mining chose to convert their energy capacities to power supercomputers. A striking example: the signing of a 20-year lease contract between TeraWulf and Anthropic. The deal is valued at nearly $19 billion.

For many, this diversification attests to the transformation of the BTC mining industry’s business model. Some analysts nonetheless raise a fundamental point: this requires significant capital. This explains why many firms have had to liquidate their own bitcoin reserves. This is notably the case for Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA), which sold more than 15,000 BTC from its institutional treasury. The latest bitcoin sale dates back to April 2026.

Bitcoin and insider sales: the TeraWulf case closely scrutinized by crypto investors On June 29, Beowulf E&D Holdings, an entity managed by CEO Paul Prager, declared the sale of 275,000 TeraWulf shares. The weighted average price stands at $26.596. This represents about $7.3 million in gross proceeds. This operation attracts particular attention as it occurs one week before the announcement of a 20-year lease with Anthropic for AI infrastructure.

According to data, Prager and his entity have sold a total of about 1.59 million bitcoin-linked shares since the end of March. This equals approximately $32.7 million, with an average price of about $20.55.

On July 6, TeraWulf confirms its lease with Anthropic. According to the official press release, it is expected to generate nearly $19 billion in contractual revenue on 401 megawatts of critical load. At the same time, the company sold its 50.1% stake in the Abernathy joint venture for about $450 million.

The TeraWulf case is not isolated in the bitcoin miners universe engaged in AI CEO of Cipher Digital, Tyler Page, filed a transfer request for 112,500 shares worth $2.38 million on July 8. This action is part of a Rule 10b5-1 plan adopted in December 2025.

At Riot Platforms, CEO Jason Les sold:

175,000 shares for $4.2 million in May; an additional 250,000 shares for $7.03 million on June 22. As for Core Scientific, its legal officer sold 140,000 shares for $3 million on July 6. This brings his total sales to about 260,000 shares and $5.9 million.

That’s not all! At Hut 8, a director also sold 20,000 shares on May 21 for about $2 million. Admittedly, these transactions were executed under pre-established plans, but they still fuel doubt about the alignment between bitcoin mining executives and public shareholders.

The bitcoin mining sector faces another major challenge An analysis by VanEck published on June 16 estimates the short-term funding deficit at about $50 billion. However, this figure could rise to $221 billion to cover all future AI infrastructure needs.

Source: VanEck Research To bridge this gap, bitcoin miners have three options:

dilute shareholders through new share issuances; incur debt in a still high interest rate environment; sell part of their bitcoin reserves. Some have already started liquidating positions. If projections hold, AI could represent up to 70% of some bitcoin miners’ revenues by the end of 2026. Raising questions about the future role of BTC mining in their business model.

Bitcoin and governance: the IREN case and the question of stock tokens On June 30, the board of the former bitcoin miner turned AI cloud actor IREN approved the grant of over 18 million free shares in total to its two co-CEOs, William and Daniel Roberts, over a combined lock-up period of six years. The company assures that no other grants will be made before 2031.

The decision is not unanimous within the crypto community. Many point to the extent of dilution for bitcoin mining shareholders. Yet, IREN’s AI strategy has not yet proven sustainable profitability. Result: the stock price has fallen considerably.

What consequences for investors? For holders of shares linked to bitcoin mining, three points deserve particular attention:

the recurrence of insider sales during uptrends, an indicator of confidence; the method chosen to bridge the funding gap identified by VanEck; the real economics of signed contracts, beyond announcement figures. Dilution, debt or bitcoin sale? Each option will have a different impact on shareholder value.

Tether, for example, reduced its exposure to Bitdeer after increasing it during a market dip. This illustrates growing caution among strategic investors regarding AI-version bitcoin. If miners continue selling their reserves to finance AI infrastructure, this would indeed remove a historical buying pressure source from the bitcoin market.

Anyway, the technological transformation of bitcoin mining companies towards artificial intelligence is redefining industry standards. The current debate on governance and gain allocation could extend throughout the AI-backed crypto ecosystem.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Ariela R.

My name is Ariela, and I am 31 years old. I have been working in the field of web writing for 7 years now. I only discovered trading and cryptocurrency a few years ago, but it is a universe that greatly interests me. The topics covered on the platform allow me to learn more. A singer in my spare time, I also cultivate a great passion for music and reading (and animals!)

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

DeXe [DEXE] extended its rally, defended the $30 level, and surged to a new all-time high of $35.5.

At press time, DEXE traded around $34 after rising 17.9% over the past day. Trading Volume jumped 161% to $128 million, while Market Cap climbed 16%, reflecting strong market participation.

So, why did DEXE rally? DeXe emerged as one of the best-performing tokens in 2026. In fact, the altcoin has gained 962% year-to-date.

The rally came as traders sought exposure to decentralized governance and AI-linked infrastructure. That trend kept demand elevated. Over the past week, DEXE also recorded strong Spot accumulation.

Source: Coinalyze Buyers dominated the market for eight consecutive days, according to Coinalyze data. Spot buy-and-sell volume maintained a positive delta throughout the period, with Buy Volume exceeding 1 million.

A sustained positive buy-and-sell delta indicated aggressive Spot accumulation.

However, Spot demand was not the only driver.

According to CoinGlass, Open Interest rose 18% to $160 million, while Derivatives Volume climbed 146% to $210 million.

Source: CoinGlassThe sharp rise in Open Interest and Derivatives Volume suggested traders actively opened new positions. That alignment showed both Spot and Derivatives traders supported the rally. If demand remains elevated, DEXE could extend its gains.

Can DEXE climb above $40? Buyers retained firm control of the market, strengthening DEXE’s upward momentum.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) climbed to 76, approaching overbought territory. The reading reflected strong buying pressure rather than weakening momentum.

Even so, another indicator supported the trend.

The Average Directional Index (ADX) showed the Positive Directional Indicator (+DI) rising to 37, above both the ADX reading of 33 and the Negative Directional Indicator (-DI).

Source: TradingView Together, these indicators suggested the uptrend could continue if buying demand remained intact.

If buyers continued accumulating, DEXE could move above $40 while holding the $30 support level. Failure to defend $30 could send the altcoin toward its next support near $27.

Final Summary DeXe [DEXE] rallied nearly 18% to a new all-time high of $35.5 before easing to around $34 at press time. Strong Spot accumulation and rising Open Interest suggested buyers remained firmly in control as DEXE targeted $40.

Circle's euro stablecoin $EURC logged its highest daily active addresses and new wallet creation since its launch four years ago, according to Santiment data. On July 9, daily active wallets reached 1,760, a milestone that underscores accelerating demand for regulated euro-denominated digital assets.

MiCA Clears the Field for EURCThe timing of the spike is no coincidence. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation transition period ended on July 1, 2026, requiring all crypto firms serving EU clients to be licensed. That deadline reshaped the competitive landscape sharply. Tether chose not to apply, with CEO Paolo Ardoino calling MiCA's reserve rules "dangerous," leading major exchanges including Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken to delist USDT for European users. With the market's dominant stablecoin removed from regulated European venues, liquidity has had to go somewhere.

EURC, issued by Circle, held the highest average market capitalisation among MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins at $430.4 million across the past year and led in average weekly trading volume at $34.0 million. Circle's EURC has emerged as the dominant euro stablecoin, holding approximately 41% of total euro stablecoin market capitalisation, up from 17% market share over the past 12 months.

Compliance as a Competitive AdvantageThe primary driver behind the surge in EURC activity is the enforcement of MiCA's stablecoin provisions, which require issuers to hold specific reserves and obtain licenses to operate within the EU. Circle was among the first global firms to secure an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license, making EURC the first major MiCA-compliant stablecoin.

The leading euro stablecoin for crypto capital markets, EURC is MiCA-compliant, redeemable 1:1 for euro, and accessible globally on Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, Solana, and Stellar. That multi-chain presence matters: several high-profile centralised exchanges have started restricting non-compliant stablecoins for European users, naturally funnelling liquidity into EURC.

Total market capitalisation of MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins rose 128%, climbing from $295.6 million to $673.9 million across the 52 weeks to June 28, 2026. The broader trend points to Europe consolidating its stablecoin market around a small group of fully licensed tokens, with EURC currently leading that pack by a wide margin.

Sources:
Cryptonomist: MiCA Euro Stablecoins Surge Post Transitional Period
Circle: EURC Official Page
Utila: Euro Stablecoin Landscape Report 2026

Circle (NYSE: CRCL) stock dropped by 1.65% on July 9, to close trading at $63. The drop mirrored the downturn seen with other crypto stocks like MSTR and COIN that also closed lower on July 9 after the broader crypto market dropped.

But that drop moved ARK Invest to buy the dip, with the fund manager arguing that Circle’s USDC stablecoin will retain its share in the stablecoin market despite the launch of the OUSD stablecoin on June 30.

ARK Invest Buys the CRCL Dip, Reiterates Bullish Outlook Data from the Ark Invest tracker shows that ARK Invest purchased $13.7 million worth of CRCL shares on July 9. The firm purchased 159,404 of these shares through its ARKK ETF, while 40,685 and 18,807 CRCL stock were purchased through the ARKW and ARKF ETFs, respectively.

This purchase comes barely two weeks after ARK Invest purchased another $17.8 million worth of CRCL shares on July 1.

The fund manager is making these buys despite a previous warning by Jefferies, saying that people might abandon Circle’s USDC for the OUSD stablecoin that claimed to have partnered with 140 institutions when it launched on June 30.

However, ARK Invest analyst Lorenzo Valente has dismissed this warning, saying that OUSD might not replace USDC because firms like Binance will not overhaul their entire operations and go for a new stablecoin.

“OUSD is not insignificant… But the market has overestimated the speed at which the shared profit model can break existing liquidity barriers,” the analyst said.

While CRCL stock did not rally after ARK Invest’s $13 million purchase or analyst Valente’s bullish thesis, technical analysis suggests that bulls still have a good grip.

CRCL Stock Price Defends Key Support Level as Bullish Momentum Fades CRCL stock price has touched the support of $61 three times since June 30. But each time the price dropped to this support, it bounced back up, suggesting that this is where buyers are entering the market.

If this crypto stock closes above this support of $61 for three straight days, the price could gain and reach the resistance of $84.

The AO bars that are negative but green suggest that bears are losing control. These AO bars support that the CRCL stock price could move from $61 to the June 22 high of $84.

However, the RSI reading of 34 suggests that the momentum is still bearish. This RSI reading needs to move above 50 to confirm that CRCL stock could move to $84.

CRCL Stock Price But if this bullish thesis fails and CRCL stock price closes below the support of $61, it might drop to the February low of $50.

CLARITY Act Nears Crucial Deadline A previous report by CoinGape stated that the final draft for the CLARITY Act could be released before August 7, when the US Congress breaks for the summer recess.

This final draft could remove regulations around stablecoin yield after banks fought back, saying that allowing Coinbase and Circle to pay out yields on stablecoins would reduce the deposits made with banks.

Besides CLARITY, financial regulators in the US will release GENIUS Act rules on July 18 that will guide stablecoin issuers like Circle on how they will issue and manage stablecoins.

Cathie Wood's ARK Invest executed a notable portfolio shift on July 9, acquiring 217,896 shares of Circle Internet Group ($CRCL) at a cost of roughly $13.7 million, while simultaneously offloading 85,319 shares of Robinhood Markets ($HOOD) worth approximately $9.8 million.

Circle's stock closed at $63.01 on the day of the trade, down 1.65%, while Robinhood finished the session at $115.11, up 1.39%. In effect, ARK was selling into $HOOD strength and buying $CRCL weakness, a move consistent with the firm's long-standing approach of accumulating positions in high-conviction names during periods of price softness.

A Sustained Bet on CircleThe July 9 purchase was not a one-off. When combined with the most recent acquisition, ARK has committed more than $37 million to Circle within roughly eight weeks. Wood has backed the stablecoin issuer since its debut, purchasing shares on its launch day.

Circle serves as the primary issuer of USDC, a leading stablecoin in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Following its 2025 public market debut, the company's shares surged nearly 300% from their initial offering price before experiencing a significant correction, and the stock remains substantially below those peak valuations at $63.01.

The decision to sell $HOOD comes even as the brokerage has gained more than 21% in the past year, far outperforming $CRCL's 68% decline. Robinhood is on track for a fourth consecutive year of gains, even as Circle ended last year in the red and appears set to do the same this year. Despite that underperformance, ARK continues to add to its $CRCL position.

Why ARK Keeps Buying the DipARK's decision to purchase during the downturn aligns with the firm's established strategy of accumulating positions in companies it views as long-term opportunities during periods of weakness. The investment firm also actively adjusts its ETF holdings so that no single stock exceeds 10% of a fund's portfolio, meaning ARK rebalances weightings when the value of certain assets fluctuates significantly.

Circle's business model relies significantly on interest income generated from USDC reserve holdings, meaning declining interest rates would directly impact this revenue stream, a key risk to monitor as the Federal Reserve's rate path remains uncertain.

Sources:
MoneyCheck: ARK Invest Pours $13.7M Into Circle (CRCL) While Dumping Robinhood (HOOD) Stock
Stocktwits: Cathie Wood's ARK Is Buying CRCL Stock's Slump While Selling HOOD's Gains
The Block: Ark Invest buys more Coinbase, Circle, Bullish, Robinhood shares amid stock declines

The analysis found that between 2023 and 2026, Hyperliquid’s Bitcoin perpetuals produced an average annualized financing premium of 7.17% above Binance, while Ether perpetuals displayed a premium of 5.31%. The report looks at how funding rates, which maintain perpetual swaps in line with underlying spot prices, may differ dramatically amongst contracts that are otherwise comparable. In its Q2 2026 Derivatives Report, which was issued today, BitMEX identified three structural factors that contribute to financing rate discrepancies in perpetual futures markets and highlighted trading possibilities that result from variations in exchange demography, margin design, and oracle mechanisms.

The report looks at how funding rates, which maintain perpetual swaps in line with underlying spot prices, may differ dramatically amongst contracts that are otherwise comparable. These variations are often caused by market structure rather than short-term emotion, according to BitMEX’s report, giving traders repeated opportunities.

“Funding rates are often viewed as a simple indicator of market sentiment, but the reality is more nuanced,” said Peter Wilkinson, CEO at BitMEX. “Our research shows that structural factors such as collateral type, exchange participant profiles, and index construction can create persistent funding rate differences that traders may be able to identify and exploit strategically.”

BitMEX discovered that Bitcoin perpetual contracts with various forms of collateral may result in funding rate environments that range significantly, which is one of the report’s main conclusions. The financing gap between BitMEX’s bitcoin-margined XBTUSD contract and its USDT-margined XBTUSDT contract, according to historical data, averaged around 3.93% annualized over the previous three and a half years, remained negative in 94% of rolling 90-day periods.

The research also examined variations in financing rates across exchanges. The study found that between 2023 and 2026, Hyperliquid’s Bitcoin perpetuals produced an average annualized financing premium of 7.17% above Binance, while Ether perpetuals displayed a premium of 5.31%. The operational obstacles that restrict institutional arbitrage activity on decentralized venues and variations in trading demographics are mostly responsible for the discrepancy, according to BitMEX.

The expanding market for tokenized commodities perpetuals was a third area of interest. As futures-based indices rolled between contracts during times of market stress, financing rates on crude oil (WTI) perpetual contracts reached very high levels. According to the report, during a futures roll in April 2026, BitMEX’s WTIUSDT funding rate momentarily dropped to about -531% annualized. This shows how a venue’s index construction for more recent digital asset types, such as WTI, can affect funding rate behavior independently of overall market sentiment.

Cross-margin funding arbitrage, cross-exchange funding spreads, and possibilities related to futures-roll mechanics in commodities perpetuals are among the possible tactics identified by the research as a result of these structural insights. In order to differentiate between long-term structural possibilities and shorter-term event-driven dislocations, it suggests that traders should concentrate on determining the fundamental cause of funding rate disparities before trying to capitalize it.

You can see the whole BitMEX Q2 2026 Derivatives Report, “Three Sources of Funding-Rate Alpha,” at the BitMEX Blog.

The OG cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, BitMEX, offers experienced traders a platform that meets their demands with minimal latency, deep cryptocurrency native, particularly BTC liquidity, and unparalleled dependability.

A crypto enthusiast. Loves to write. Gives full dedication to every task assigned. Specializes in delivering on tight deadlines. An animal lover, especially dogs.

Key Highlights Bitcoin surged 3.5% to approach $64,000, closing the week with a 4.2% gain Major altcoins including Ether, XRP, Dogecoin, and Solana saw positive Friday sessions The Nasdaq outperformed with a 1.3% increase, while the S&P 500 advanced 0.8% Memory chip manufacturers like Micron and Sandisk dominated S&P 500 gains Dollar depreciation combined with robust AI semiconductor demand fuels coordinated crypto and stock market advances The leading cryptocurrency bounced back toward the $64,000 threshold on Friday, shaking off mid-week declines triggered by escalating geopolitical concerns. This resurgence coincided with substantial rallies across Asian trading floors and continued weakness in the U.S. dollar.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Digital gold experienced a 3.5% upward movement after temporarily sliding to approximately $61,850 in response to President Trump’s statements regarding potential expanded military operations against Iran. Trading volume reached $28 billion over a 24-hour period. Bitcoin concluded the trading week with a cumulative 4.2% increase.

Ether advanced 2.6% to reach $1,760, recording a weekly gain of 4%. XRP climbed 2.2% while TRON emerged as the week’s strongest performer among major cryptocurrencies with a 4.7% seven-day increase. Dogecoin posted a 2.6% daily gain but remained marginally negative for the week. Solana stood as the lone major token unable to secure weekly profits, rising 2.6% on Friday while maintaining a 2.1% weekly deficit.

Market observers highlighted leveraged trading as a critical element behind the rapid price recovery. Traders liquidated positions following geopolitical headlines, then quickly re-entered the market within hours.

“When liquidation cascades begin influencing price movements, markets can accelerate beyond what fundamental demand would support,” explained Shawn Young, chief analyst at MEXC Research.

Semiconductor Sector Powers Wider Market Momentum The cryptocurrency rebound occurred in tandem with robust equity market performance. Across Asia, South Korea’s Kospi index soared 4%, partially fueled by memory chip producer SK Hynix, which successfully priced $26.5 billion in American depositary shares, marking one of this year’s most significant equity offerings.

MSCI’s Asia Pacific stock index advanced 1.4%, narrowing its weekly decline to below 1%. The Japanese yen appreciated 0.6% while Japanese government bond yields contracted following statements from Japan’s Finance Minister advocating for increased domestic asset allocations by pension funds.

American Markets Mirror Technology Sector Strength U.S. equity indexes concluded Thursday’s session in positive territory with technology stocks spearheading the advance. The Nasdaq climbed 1.3%, the S&P 500 rose 0.8%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 129 points, representing a 0.3% gain.

E-Mini S&P 500 Sep 26 (ES=F) Approximately two-thirds of S&P 500 constituents finished higher. Memory chip producers Micron and Sandisk ranked among the session’s top gainers, accompanied by optical technology firms Lumentum and Corning.

The greenback declined for its second consecutive week. Bitcoin market watchers emphasize this development’s significance. Cryptocurrency appreciation this week occurred as dollar valuations decreased, indicating the movement represents partially a foreign exchange dynamic rather than exclusively a crypto phenomenon.

No cryptocurrency-specific catalysts propelled Bitcoin’s weekly performance. Major ETF flows remained absent, no protocol developments emerged, and exchange platforms operated without disruption. Bitcoin weathered oil price volatility, bond market turbulence, and two separate rounds of American military action against Iran, yet still secured weekly gains.

Should dollar weakness persist and artificial intelligence chip demand maintain current levels, market analysts anticipate cryptocurrency markets will continue correlating with semiconductor industry cycles.

Analysts at Watcher Guru, a US-based cryptocurrency and whale tracking platform, say that due to changing market conditions, it seems unlikely that XRP will repeat its 500% surge.

As is known, XRP experienced one of the most remarkable price increases in the market in 2024. Trading at around $0.50 in July 2024, XRP rose to approximately $2.40 by the end of the year, gaining nearly 500% in value in six months.

This strong performance has generated significant profits for investors, making XRP one of the key altcoins in the market once again.

At that time, Bitcoin also surpassed $100,000 for the first time, boosting the cryptocurrency market in general, including XRP. Analysts at this point noted that this rise in XRP and the market was largely driven by expectations of US President Donald Trump’s re-election and moderate policies supporting cryptocurrencies.

However, analysts argue that current conditions are very different from those supporting the 2024 rally. Global economic uncertainties, geopolitical risks stemming from US-Iran tensions, and a more cautious approach from investors are among the factors limiting optimism in the crypto market.

It is also argued that global capital is now concentrated in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, which is causing other asset classes, such as cryptocurrencies, to underperform.

In conclusion, analysts argue that while a 500% increase in XRP by the end of 2026 is theoretically possible, the 2024 surge may be behind us due to changing market conditions. They believe that the gloomy market sentiment makes a repeat of the 2024 surge in 2026 highly unlikely.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Key Highlights Meta is set to launch production of its proprietary AI chip, dubbed “Iris,” this September Semiconductor equipment manufacturers Applied Materials, Lam Research, and KLA each climbed more than 4% following the announcement Lumentum dominated S&P 500 gains with a 12% surge Wall Street analysts boosted price targets for Applied Materials and Lam Research in response Industry forecasts predict the wafer fabrication equipment sector will expand from $145 billion in 2025 to $250 billion by 2028 Meta Platforms revealed its intention to commence production of “Iris,” a custom-designed AI processor, beginning in September. The disclosure triggered a substantial rally in semiconductor equipment manufacturers on Thursday.

Applied Materials, Lam Research, and KLA—all major suppliers of wafer fabrication equipment used to transform silicon wafers into functional microchips—experienced gains exceeding 4% during the trading session.

Applied Materials, Inc., AMAT

Lumentum, which specializes in optical networking solutions, jumped 12%, ranking among the day’s top S&P 500 performers. Vertiv Holdings climbed 2.8%.

When contacted by Barron’s regarding the initial Reuters report, Meta representatives declined to provide commentary.

The Chip Equipment Industry’s Growth Opportunity Applied Materials, Lam Research, and KLA serve as critical suppliers to semiconductor manufacturing operations. When major technology firms like Meta opt to develop proprietary chip designs, it generates substantial demand for the specialized equipment these manufacturers provide.

Year-to-date performance for all three companies has been remarkable, with each stock appreciating more than 90%. Market participants have maintained optimistic forecasts regarding sustained demand for chip fabrication equipment.

Citi Research values the current wafer fab equipment market at approximately $145 billion for 2025. Their projections indicate expansion to $200 billion by 2027, ultimately reaching $250 billion in 2028.

According to Citi’s estimates, hyperscale cloud providers—including Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Oracle—will increase capital expenditures by 84% this year. This group’s combined spending is anticipated to exceed $1.1 trillion by 2027, representing a significant jump from this year’s $650 billion.

Stifel’s research team noted that “agentic AI has steepened the demand curve for memory and logic chips.” Their forecasts predict wafer fab equipment expenditures will reach $192 billion in 2027 and $225 billion by 2028.

Wall Street’s Take on the Developments Mizuho Securities increased its price target for Lam Research from $380 to $400 and elevated Applied Materials’ target from $540 to $650. Both companies retained their Outperform ratings.

TD Cowen significantly raised its Applied Materials price objective to $700, up from $525.

Morgan Stanley maintained its $404 price target for both Lam Research and KLA, preserving Overweight ratings on each stock.

Stifel boosted its price targets substantially: Applied Materials from $530 to $650, KLA from $191 to $270, and Lam Research from $325 to $425. All three maintain Buy ratings from Stifel.

Morgan Stanley’s Shane Brett indicated expectations for Lam Research to deliver fourth-quarter results that exceed consensus estimates when reported at the end of July, accompanied by upward guidance revisions.

Regarding KLA, Brett expressed optimism about long-term prospects while adopting a more measured stance on near-term performance. He observed that market expectations already incorporate potential earnings outperformance.

Stifel additionally increased price targets on smaller industry participants Ichor Holdings and Cohu, assigning Buy ratings to both.

The semiconductor equipment sector’s next significant event will be Lam Research’s fourth-quarter earnings announcement, scheduled for late July.

TLDR BTC recovered above the $63,000 mark with approximately 1.5% gains following Trump’s statement about Iran seeking negotiations Market participants are closely monitoring $64,700 as a critical daily closing threshold that could trigger a substantial relief rally Short position liquidations in the cryptocurrency market reached approximately $100 million over a 24-hour period Blockchain analytics reveal short-term holder losses matching patterns typically observed near historical cycle bottoms Large-scale holders accumulated 10,000 BTC during the current month, suggesting an accumulation period may be underway Bitcoin pushed back above the $63,000 threshold this Thursday following remarks from US President Donald Trump indicating that Iran is seeking diplomatic engagement. The leading cryptocurrency posted gains of roughly 1.5% during the trading session.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Equity markets in the United States also experienced an upward swing, providing support to digital asset prices following the previous day’s downturn. Trump had previously announced the termination of the Iran ceasefire on Wednesday, triggering concern among investors in risk-oriented assets.

According to data from CoinGlass, liquidations of cryptocurrency short positions approached $100 million within a 24-hour window. This development caught numerous market participants who had positioned themselves for declining prices off guard.

Market analyst Daan Crypto Trades identified $64,700 as the crucial threshold for observation at the daily market close. “A daily close above $64,700 flips the story and would make for a larger relief rally across the board,” he communicated via X.

$BTC is ranging $61.3K-$64.7K range and spent this morning climbing back up after yesterday's risk-off flush.

A daily close above $64.7K flips the story and would make for a larger relief rally across the board.

A close under $61.3K opens the road to the lows again and kills… pic.twitter.com/QbTVhEMVWa

— Daan Crypto Trades (@DaanCrypto) July 9, 2026

He additionally cautioned that closing beneath $61,300 “opens the road to the lows again and kills the momentum.” Bitcoin has been trading within this defined range.

Trader Killa expressed they are “not bearish at all” regarding the present market structure. They’re targeting $68,000 as a prospective short position entry point and anticipate several additional months of volatile price movement.

Trader Jelle highlighted the $65,000–$70,000 range as the subsequent objective should bullish forces recapture key thresholds. He noted that a rejection at these levels might drive BTC back under $60,000.

Market analyst Ted (@TedPillows) noted unexpected BTC purchasing activity on Binance and suggested that if Bitcoin successfully reclaims $65,000, a recovery rally targeting $72,000–$74,000 might materialize within a three to four-week timeframe.

Blockchain Metrics Indicate Potential Cycle Bottom Formation Analytics from Glassnode demonstrate that short-term holder (STH) realized losses have surged to levels documented only six times throughout Bitcoin’s trading history. In each of those six instances, BTC was positioned near or at a cyclical bottom.

Source: Glassnode The most recent occurrence of this pattern was in January of this year, when Bitcoin reached $60,000 before climbing to $82,000.

Large holder wallets have accumulated 10,000 BTC throughout the current month. The preceding two months similarly recorded positive net additions, which market analysts view as indicators of a probable accumulation phase.

BTC Must Surpass $66,000 to Validate Chart Formation A double-bottom or W-shaped configuration has emerged on the daily timeframe chart. This technical pattern frequently precedes substantial upward price movements.

Bitcoin must secure a close above $66,000 to validate this structure. The Relative Strength Index stays below the 50 level, indicating no bullish confirmation has materialized at this stage.

Market analysts suggest a decline toward $60,000 remains possible before any more significant upward movement develops. Should BTC fall below that threshold, $50,000 is referenced as the subsequent major support level.

If Bitcoin maintains levels above $60,000, a retest of the 200-day exponential moving average positioned near $74,000 represents the scenario analysts are forecasting.

Current price data reflects BTC trading between the $61,300 and $64,700 boundaries, with market participants closely observing the daily close for directional confirmation.

Oklo just went shopping again. The nuclear energy company completed its acquisition of Creative Engineers, Inc. (CEI) on June 30, bringing aboard roughly 20 engineers, fabricators, and welders who specialize in exactly the kind of sodium and alkali-metal systems that Oklo’s Aurora reactor technology depends on.

This is Oklo’s second acquisition in a matter of weeks. Stock reaction was mixed, with some price slips observed around the announcement.

Why sodium experts matter for a nuclear startup Oklo’s Aurora reactor is a compact, modular design that uses liquid sodium as a coolant instead of water. CEI has been doing alkali-metal work for nuclear-related projects for years, and the acquisition brings liquid-metal handling, safety training, and reactor component development capabilities in-house rather than relying on external contractors.

Advertisement

CEI has reportedly been generating positive free cash flow for over five years, which makes this more than a talent acquisition. It’s a profitable business being folded into Oklo’s operations, adding manufacturing capability and applied R&D capacity. The financial terms of the deal remain undisclosed.

The broader Aurora timeline is taking shape On June 18, Oklo announced a letter of intent with Centrus Energy to secure high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel supply for upcoming Aurora units. Initial fuel deliveries are projected for 2029, timed to support what Oklo has described as a 1.2 GW clean energy campus.

The company is targeting its first operational Aurora unit at Idaho National Laboratory by late 2027 or early 2028.

What this means for investors watching the nuclear-AI energy nexus Oklo’s chairman is Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI. The company has been positioned at the intersection of nuclear energy and AI infrastructure.

Oklo hasn’t generated meaningful revenue yet, and its first reactor is still at least 18 months from operation. Nuclear regulatory approval processes are famously unpredictable, and the HALEU fuel supply chain remains nascent. Investors should watch regulatory milestones over the next 12 months, the progression of the Centrus Energy fuel supply arrangement toward binding commitments, and whether Oklo announces additional acquisitions ahead of the 2027-2028 launch window.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

TLDR Midnight Foundation reopened the Glacier Drop redemption portal after completing a security review linked to the SecondFi incident. The Foundation confirmed its infrastructure remained secure and unaffected by the breach involving 16 million ADA. NIGHT token redemptions resumed on June 9, with all thawed tokens now available for eligible users. The Glacier Drop distribution schedule remains unchanged despite the temporary suspension of the portal. The program continues in its third phase, with the final redemption window set to end in December 2026. The Midnight Foundation has reopened its Glacier Drop redemption portal for Cardano users after completing a security review. The decision follows a temporary suspension linked to a security incident affecting certain wallets connected to SecondFi. Midnight Foundation confirmed that redemptions resumed without any impact on its infrastructure or user allocations.

Security Review Confirms Platform Integrity The Midnight Foundation halted NIGHT token redemptions after reports of a breach involving SecondFi-linked wallets. Hackers stole approximately 16 million ADA from hundreds of affected wallets during the incident. As a result, the Midnight Foundation temporarily closed the redemption portal to assess potential exposure.

The investigation focused on whether the exploit extended to Glacier Drop systems or participant accounts. However, the Midnight Foundation found no evidence that its infrastructure was compromised during the breach. The review confirmed that the redemption platform remained isolated from the affected systems.

Following these findings, the Midnight Foundation restored access to the portal and resumed all redemption operations. The organization stated that all eligible users can now claim tokens that completed thawing during the suspension period. This ensured continuity for participants without altering the program’s operational structure.

Glacier Drop Timeline Continues Without Changes The Midnight Foundation maintained the original Glacier Drop schedule despite the temporary pause in redemptions. The program distributes NIGHT tokens through a phased mechanism across four separate quarterly windows. Each phase unlocks 25% of allocated tokens as part of a structured release model.

The first redemption phase ran between December 10, 2025, and March 9, 2026, under the established framework. The second phase followed from March 10 through June 7, 2026, with participants accessing newly thawed tokens. The Midnight Foundation confirmed that these earlier phases proceeded without disruption before the incident.

The program has now entered its third phase, which started on June 8 and continues until September 5, 2026. A fourth and final redemption window will run from September 6 to December 4, 2026. The Midnight Foundation emphasized that all timelines remain unchanged despite the earlier suspension.

Guidance Issued for SecondFi-Affected Users The Midnight Foundation advised users connected to SecondFi wallets to follow official recovery guidance issued by that platform. This recommendation applies only to users potentially affected by the breach and not to Glacier Drop participants broadly. The Midnight Foundation clarified that its own systems did not require user-side remediation.

SecondFi introduced a phased response plan to address the security incident and support affected users. The process begins with a Quarantine Mode designed to secure compromised accounts and prevent further exposure. This step aims to stabilize impacted wallets before additional recovery actions proceed.

Your Options for Securing Assets, and What’s Next

We recognize that some users may not have completed all steps in the Hardware Wallet Guidance posted in our knowledge base. If you are not technically proficient, we recommend waiting for the secure wallet export functionality,…

— SecondFi (@secondfiapp) July 8, 2026

The response plan will include a secure wallet export process scheduled for the following week. A final recovery phase may follow, depending on investigation outcomes and asset retrieval efforts. Meanwhile, the Midnight Foundation confirmed that its portal remains fully operational for eligible users.

The reopening of the Glacier Drop portal marks the resumption of normal operations after the review. Midnight Foundation confirmed that its infrastructure remained secure and unaffected throughout the incident. Eligible users can now redeem thawed NIGHT tokens according to the established schedule.

Hyperliquid Policy Center and Phantom have urged the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to update its rulebook for onchain trading, arguing that existing regulations built for traditional financial markets do not fit decentralized infrastructure.

Summary

Hyperliquid Policy Center and Phantom have asked the CFTC to create rules tailored for onchain trading instead of applying legacy market regulations. The groups said developers of decentralized trading software and non custodial wallet providers should not face the same registration requirements as traditional intermediaries. The proposal comes as U.S. regulators review derivatives rules and CME continues its legal challenge over the CFTC’s treatment of crypto perpetual futures. According to a joint comment letter submitted on Thursday by the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and Phantom, the current regulatory framework assumes a market structure where brokers, exchanges and clearinghouses control customer funds throughout the trading process. The organizations said onchain markets operate differently because users retain control of their own assets.

The submission responds to a joint Request for Information (RFI) issued last month by the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which invited public feedback on regulations that may be slowing financial innovation and making it harder for new technologies to work with CFTC-regulated firms. As previously reported by crypto.news, the agencies are also reviewing whether existing definitions for swaps and related derivatives remain suitable for newer financial products.

HPC and Phantom seek tailored rules for decentralized markets In their filing, HPC and Phantom argued that developers of onchain trading software should not automatically be required to register as exchanges or clearinghouses simply because they build decentralized infrastructure. They also said non-custodial wallet interfaces such as Phantom should not be treated as introducing brokers.

The organizations argued that blockchain-based software cannot be regulated in the same way as centralized intermediaries because, unlike traditional market operators, code cannot enter contracts, respond to regulators or exercise legal responsibilities.

Alongside those proposals, the letter said companies already registered with the CFTC should be allowed to use blockchain technology for trading and clearing without facing unnecessary regulatory barriers.

The recommendations arrive as U.S. regulators continue examining how decentralized finance fits within existing derivatives rules. CFTC Chair Michael Selig previously said the agency’s joint review with the SEC could help resolve longstanding uncertainties under the Dodd-Frank Act, while SEC Chair Paul Atkins has called for clearer definitions covering newer financial products.

Filing comes as CME challenges crypto perpetual futures The proposal also lands while the CFTC faces legal action from CME Group over its approval of regulated crypto perpetual futures.

As previously reported by crypto.news, CME sued the regulator in June after it approved perpetual futures products from platforms including Kalshi and opened a regulated path for similar offerings. The exchange argues that perpetual contracts should be classified as swaps rather than futures under the Dodd-Frank framework and claims the regulator bypassed the legal process required for swap products.

The dispute gained additional attention after Kalshi expanded beyond Bitcoin perpetuals to list contracts linked to Ethereum, XRP and Hyperliquid, while Coinbase also secured a regulated route to offer certain crypto perpetual futures through infrastructure connected to Deribit.

HPC founder Jake Chervinsky has publicly opposed CME’s lawsuit, describing it as a serious mistake and accusing the exchange of trying to block new competitors. One day after CME filed its case, the CFTC and SEC published their joint request for public comment, which specifically asked whether the legal definition of swaps should be updated to account for emerging products such as crypto perpetual contracts.

Robinhood Chain surpassed Hyperliquid in 24-hour decentralized exchange trading volume on July 8, a striking early milestone for the newly launched Ethereum Layer 2 as speculative activity rushed into one of the newest networks backed by a major U.S. brokerage.

According to DeFiLlama data cited by market reports, Robinhood Chain recorded roughly $560 million to $570 million in daily DEX volume on July 8, exceeding Hyperliquid’s 24-hour figure and briefly placing the chain among the most active DeFi trading venues by volume. DeFiLlama’s live dashboard later showed Robinhood Chain with more than $400 million in 24-hour DEX volume, reflecting the fast-moving nature of the metric.

The surge came about a week after Robinhood launched the public mainnet of Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum-compatible Layer 2 built using Arbitrum’s technology stack. Robinhood describes the network as a permissionless blockchain built for financial services and real-world assets, with tokenized stocks, 24/7 trading, self-custody and DeFi composability as central parts of its strategy.

The main driver of the volume spike was not tokenized equities, but memecoin speculation. Reports pointed to Cash Cat, a WETH-paired memecoin trading on Uniswap, as the largest catalyst. The token reportedly generated close to $100 million in 24-hour trading volume and briefly reached a market capitalization above $100 million, drawing liquidity and arbitrage activity to the new chain.

Memecoin Frenzy Drives Early Adoption Robinhood Chain’s rapid rise shows how quickly DeFi activity can migrate when a new network combines strong brand recognition, major infrastructure partners and speculative incentives. Uniswap is already live on the chain, giving traders a familiar venue for token swaps and creating an immediate liquidity layer for new assets.

The volume surge also highlights a recurring pattern in crypto market structure. New chains often gain early traction not through institutional use cases or carefully designed financial products, but through volatile retail assets that attract high turnover. Memecoins can generate large trading volume quickly because they are easy to launch, simple to understand and heavily driven by social momentum.

That dynamic creates both opportunity and risk for Robinhood. High DEX volume gives the chain visibility and can attract builders, liquidity providers and market makers. But if activity is dominated by thinly traded speculative tokens, it may not translate into durable adoption for Robinhood’s core thesis around tokenized real-world assets and onchain finance.

The comparison with Hyperliquid is also important. Hyperliquid has become one of DeFi’s most successful trading venues, particularly in perpetual futures, with deep liquidity, high-frequency trading activity and a dedicated user base. Robinhood Chain surpassing it on a 24-hour DEX volume metric is notable, but it does not yet mean Robinhood has matched Hyperliquid’s sustained liquidity, derivatives infrastructure or trader retention.

Robinhood Pushes Deeper Into Onchain Finance The milestone comes as Robinhood accelerates its broader crypto strategy. The company has been expanding tokenized stock access for international users, building onchain infrastructure and positioning crypto as a core part of its global financial-services roadmap. Its official launch announcement said Robinhood Chain is intended to provide a turnkey environment for builders and is natively connected to Robinhood’s onchain users.

For Robinhood, the strategic opportunity is to convert its mainstream brokerage brand into blockchain-native distribution. Unlike most new Layer 2 networks, Robinhood already has a large retail user base, regulated financial-services infrastructure and a recognized consumer brand. If it can connect those advantages with DeFi liquidity, tokenized assets and self-custody products, it could become a meaningful competitor in onchain markets.

Regulatory and reputational risks remain. Tokenized stocks, memecoin trading and open DeFi activity all sit in areas that can attract scrutiny, especially when linked to a brokerage known to retail investors. Robinhood will need to manage the gap between permissionless blockchain activity and the consumer-protection expectations attached to its brand.

For now, the July 8 volume spike is best viewed as an early market signal rather than proof of long-term dominance. Robinhood Chain has shown that it can attract significant trading activity almost immediately after launch. The harder test will be whether that activity persists once the memecoin cycle cools and whether the chain can shift volume toward tokenized assets, lending, stablecoins and other financial applications with more durable demand.

Robinhood Chain’s brief lead over Hyperliquid shows that the boundary between retail brokerage and decentralized trading is narrowing. The next phase will determine whether that convergence produces sustainable onchain finance or simply another short-lived liquidity boom.