Every blockchain transaction begins its life in the mempool, a public waiting area where unconfirmed transactions sit until a block builder decides to include them. Many users assume the network processes transactions on a first-come, first-served basis, yet modern block builders apply far more sophisticated methods that weigh economic value above arrival time.
Specialized block builders on networks like Ethereum compete to assemble the most valuable block possible by selecting and ordering transactions that maximize revenue while staying within protocol rules. Understanding how this competition works explains why some transactions confirm within seconds while others linger, and why transaction fees fluctuate during busy periods on the network.
Key Takeaways Block builders pull transactions from the mempool and private order flow to assemble candidate blocks that fit within each block’s gas limit. Higher priority fees generally improve a transaction’s chance of quick inclusion because they increase the reward the proposing validator collects. Transaction ordering shapes block value as heavily as transaction selection, since execution sequence changes on-chain outcomes. MEV opportunities such as arbitrage and liquidations strongly influence how builders arrange transactions within a block. Proposer-Builder Separation lets specialized builders compete on bids while validators propose the highest-value valid block. How the Mempool Feeds a Block Builder’s Selection Process When a user broadcasts a transaction, it enters the mempool and joins thousands of other pending transactions waiting for a chance at inclusion. Block builders monitor this pool continuously, scanning for valid transactions they can package into a profitable block.
Builders cannot include everything they see because each block carries a fixed gas limit that caps how much computational work it can hold. They evaluate incoming transactions against factors such as offered fees, execution requirements, and overall profitability before assembling a candidate block that fits within that ceiling.
Public mempools supply most of the transactions builders work with, though a growing share now arrives through private order flow routed directly from wallets, decentralized applications, and searchers who want to shield their activity from front-running. This private flow gives builders access to opportunities that never surface on the open network, which shapes both the composition and the value of the blocks they produce.
Fee Prioritization Drives Most of a Builder’s Selection Decisions A block builder works toward one central objective, extracting the maximum economic value from every block it constructs. Transactions that attach higher priority fees usually win inclusion ahead of cheaper ones because they hand the proposing validator a larger reward. Under Ethereum’s fee market, the protocol burns the base fee and lets builders capture the priority fees along with any additional value they generate through ordering, which explains why the tip attached to a transaction carries so much weight in the selection process.
Builders also confirm that every selected transaction satisfies protocol requirements, including valid signatures, sufficient account balances, correct nonces, and appropriate gas limits. Any transaction that fails these checks gets excluded regardless of the fee attached to it, since an invalid entry would waste block space and forfeit the reward it promised.
As congestion builds across the network, competition for limited block space intensifies and pushes users to raise their priority fees in pursuit of faster confirmation. This bidding dynamic accounts for much of the fee volatility traders encounter during market surges, NFT mints, and other moments of concentrated demand.
Transaction Ordering and MEV Shape How Builders Construct Blocks Selecting transactions represents only half of a builder’s job, since the sequence in which those transactions execute carries just as much weight as the decision to include them. Blockchain transactions alter the network’s state as they run, so a different ordering can produce a different set of outcomes and a different total value. Builders arrange their chosen transactions deliberately to draw the highest possible return from each block they assemble.
Maximal Extractable Value stands out as one of the strongest forces shaping this arrangement. Searchers scan the network for profitable openings such as decentralized exchange arbitrage, lending-protocol liquidations, and other market inefficiencies, then submit bundled transactions to builders who weave those bundles into the wider block. MEV introduces a hidden layer of cost and opportunity that affects both traders and protocols, and it has become a defining feature of how Ethereum blocks come together.
MEV improves market efficiency in some situations, yet it has also drawn scrutiny over front-running, sandwich attacks, and transaction censorship. These concerns have pushed researchers toward fairer ordering mechanisms that aim to protect ordinary users without stripping builders of the incentives that keep them competing.
Proposer-Builder Separation Improves Efficiency Across Ethereum Ethereum’s ecosystem leans increasingly on Proposer-Builder Separation, a design that hands block construction and block proposal to different participants. Validators often receive finished block proposals from competing builders instead of assembling blocks themselves. Each builder submits a bid that reflects the value of its proposed block, and the validator selects the highest-paying valid block before proposing it to the network, which lets builders pour resources into sophisticated optimization while validators earn stronger rewards without shouldering the complexity of construction.
This separation has sharpened competition and lifted efficiency, though it has also concentrated influence among a small set of dominant builders. Researchers and core developers continue to explore ways to curb that centralization, and upgrades tied to Proposer-Builder Separation aim to push more of this process into the protocol itself over the coming years.
Conclusion Block builders occupy a central position in the process that determines which transactions join the blockchain and in what order they execute. They monitor mempool activity continuously, prioritize transactions according to economic incentives, optimize ordering to raise block value, and assemble blocks that comply with protocol rules. Proposer-Builder Separation, private order flow, and MEV extraction have each reshaped how this process works, and ongoing research into fairer ordering and reduced builder centralization continues to influence its direction.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is a block builder?
A block builder is a specialized participant that selects, orders, and packages transactions into a candidate block for a validator to propose to the network.
2. Why don’t builders process transactions in the order they arrive?
Builders prioritize the transactions that maximize a block’s total value, which makes fee levels and ordering more decisive than arrival time.
3. What is the mempool?
The mempool is a temporary holding area where valid but unconfirmed transactions wait before a builder includes them in a block.
4. How does MEV affect transaction selection?
MEV encourages builders to reorder and combine transactions so they can capture extra profit from arbitrage, liquidations, and similar opportunities.
5. Does paying a higher fee guarantee inclusion?
Paying more improves the odds of inclusion, though builders still need every transaction to satisfy protocol rules and still optimize the block’s overall value, so a high fee on its own offers no guarantee.
The Ethereum Foundation’s Protocol Security team disclosed a vulnerability on July 9 that could have allowed any random, unauthenticated peer on the network to crash an Ethereum validator node. One message. That’s all it would have taken.
The bug, tracked as CVE-2026-34219, was found in the Rust implementation of libp2p’s gossipsub protocol, the peer-to-peer messaging layer that Ethereum consensus clients use to talk to each other. The kicker: it was an AI agent that flagged the issue first.
What the bug actually does Here’s the technical version: the vulnerability is a remotely triggerable panic caused by an integer overflow in the backoff expiry handling of PRUNE control messages. The CVSS severity score came in at 5.9, which qualifies as “Medium.”
In English: when one Ethereum node tells another to back off for a while (a normal part of network housekeeping), an attacker could craft a message with values large enough to cause an integer overflow. That overflow triggers a panic in Rust, which doesn’t just log an error and move on. It crashes the entire process.
The word “remotely triggerable” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. An attacker didn’t need special permissions, didn’t need to authenticate, didn’t need to be a validator themselves. They just needed to connect as a peer and send one carefully constructed PRUNE message. The target validator goes down.
Advertisement
The AI angle, and its limits The Ethereum Foundation has been exploring AI agents as part of its security research toolkit, and this bug represents one of the clearest wins for that approach so far. An AI agent successfully identified the vulnerability in the gossipsub codebase.
But look, the Foundation was careful not to oversell the achievement. While AI flagged the issue, validating that it was a real, exploitable bug required substantial human effort. Anyone who has worked with AI code analysis tools knows the drill: for every genuine finding, there’s a pile of false positives that need to be manually triaged.
The team emphasized that AI can speed up the search for vulnerabilities but cannot replace the need for reproducible evidence and thorough human review.
The fix and what didn’t happen The patch landed in libp2p-gossipsub version 0.49.4, and the vulnerability was publicly disclosed via a GitHub advisory. The standard responsible disclosure playbook: find the bug, develop a fix, coordinate with affected parties, then go public.
No funds were lost. No user data was exposed. No nodes were actually crashed in the wild by an attacker exploiting this specific vulnerability. The Ethereum Foundation stressed the zero-impact outcome as evidence that proactive security measures are working.
The affected systems include Ethereum consensus clients and validators that rely on the gossipsub protocol for peer-to-peer communication. Practically speaking, that’s a wide blast radius. Gossipsub is how attestations, blocks, and other consensus messages propagate across the network.
What this means for investors Ethereum investors should take two things from this disclosure. First, the good news: the security pipeline, from discovery through patching, functioned properly. A medium-severity vulnerability in critical infrastructure was identified, fixed, and disclosed without any operational disruption.
Second, the more nuanced read: bugs like CVE-2026-34219 are a reminder that Ethereum’s security surface area is enormous. The consensus layer alone involves multiple client implementations, each with their own dependencies, written in different languages. A single library like libp2p-gossipsub can introduce vulnerabilities that affect the entire validator set.
Traders and longer-term holders should pay attention to how quickly consensus clients integrate patches after disclosures like this one. Patch adoption speed across the validator set is a meaningful, if underappreciated, metric for network health. A patched vulnerability that half the network hasn’t updated for is still a vulnerability.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has sparked renewed debate within the technology community after suggesting that a universal kill switch should be implemented for all artificial intelligence applications. His proposal arrives amid ongoing disagreements about the anticipated pace and implications of AI development, particularly concerning its impact on society and the workforce.
Growing divisions among AI expertsButerin’s recent statements on X outlined a divide between those who expect the emergence of “superintelligence” by 2040—often referred to as the “AI 2040” scenario—and skeptics who question the urgency of such concerns. Supporters of the AI 2040 outlook argue that exceptional AI capabilities could develop within the next two decades unless decisive action is taken. Meanwhile, critics contend that this view underestimates humanity’s ability to coordinate and manage risks, while also warning that certain regulatory proposals could restrict freedom without addressing the real dangers.
Acknowledging both perspectives, Buterin admitted uncertainty about which scenario is likely. He wrote that if current-day AI remains similar to existing technologies, he would agree with the skeptics, but that faster-than-expected advances would bring him closer to the AI 2040 camp.
Buterin indicated, “If I was confident that superintelligence is coming in 2030 by default, I would be closer to the AI 2040 camp … But I am open to slowing or pausing AI development if the risks become significant.”
His remarks attracted responses from notable figures, including Meta’s chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, author Daniel Jeffries, and policy analyst Adam Thierer.
The debate over AI safety and governanceLeCun argued that AI safety represents an engineering problem that can be addressed through iterative design, much like how aviation safety progressed over decades. He expressed skepticism toward fears of near-term superintelligence and pointed out that current large language models function as limited “autocomplete machines.”
AI commentator Harry Hawk sided with LeCun, suggesting that, just as aircraft have become safer, future AI systems will be designed for reliability. He pushed back against the belief that advanced AI will eliminate all human jobs.
Buterin countered by highlighting the possibility of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI)—an AI so powerful it could accomplish virtually any task without human intervention. The discussion also engaged AI researcher Yann LeCun, policy analyst Adam Thierer, and others who criticized or supported various ideas on AI regulation and openness.
Part of the debate was prompted by Daniel Kokotajlo’s AI Futures Project, which released the “AI 2040: Plan A” report. The report advocates for collaboration between the United States and China to slow development toward superintelligence, including provisions for open sharing of research and “mutually assured compute destruction.”
Richard Ngo, an AI researcher, claimed the report exaggerates the speed with which powerful AI systems could emerge and does not address the political challenges such technology may create within countries.
Mini dictionary: Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), a hypothetical form of AI that surpasses human intelligence across all domains and could autonomously perform any conceivable task.
ViewpointKey ArgumentMain ProponentAI 2040 ScenarioSuperintelligent AI may emerge by 2040. Strong regulation needed.Daniel Kokotajlo (AI Futures Project), Supported by Buterin (cautiously)Skeptics/CriticsHumanity can control AI risks; focus on freedom and coordination.LeCun, Thierer, JeffriesOpen source as a safeguard?Open source models have become central to the debate. LeCun argued that the true danger lies in the concentration of AI development within a handful of powerful companies, and stated that open source foundation models are crucial for “AI sovereignty.”
LeCun noted, “The only solution to AI sovereignty is open source foundation models,” emphasizing the importance of broad accessibility in AI technology.
Author Daniel Jeffries agreed, warning that efforts by what he called “safetyists and hawks” to restrict open source could stifle innovation. Adam Thierer, a senior fellow at the R Street Institute and key contributor to the US House AI Task Force, labeled the current US legislative process on AI review as disorganized and secretive. He cautioned that increased regulation could harm open source AI, instead supporting “permissionless innovation.”
Thierer recommends using existing laws against harmful applications, creating test zones, mandating openness for certain models, and increasing funding for research, instead of imposing heavy new restrictions.
Mini dictionary: The R Street Institute is a Washington, DC-based think tank that focuses on free markets and limited, effective government, often contributing research and analysis on technology policy issues including AI governance.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ethereum‘s MVRV ratio, a closely watched on-chain metric, has again dropped below the 0.8 threshold, drawing renewed focus to the cryptocurrency’s potential for reversal. This ratio is widely used by market analysts to gauge when an asset enters deep discounted territory, often preceding a significant price bottom for Ethereum.
Historical patterns and analyst observationsCrypto analyst Ali highlighted that Ethereum’s MVRV ratio dipping beneath 0.8 often coincided with major market downturns and subsequent recoveries. In the past, this pattern was observed in December 2018, March 2020, and June 2022. Each occasion marked a local bottom for ETH, followed by a notable bullish phase.
Ali explained that the MVRV drop typically indicates seller fatigue, where Ethereum’s market value falls well under its realized value, increasing the probability of an accumulation phase.
In all three previous instances when Ethereum’s MVRV ratio crossed below 0.8, the market recorded a temporary bottom followed by a sustained price rebound.
Market participants remain alert to whether this setup will once again signal a reversal in the current cycle, as Ethereum continues to test critical technical levels.
Mini dictionary: MVRV Ratio, a metric that compares an asset’s market value to its realized value, showing if it is overvalued or undervalued from a historical cost perspective.
Price action and key resistance levelsEthereum has posted a gain of 1.18% in the past 24 hours, trading around $1,802. The weekly rise totals 1.78%. ETH has outperformed Bitcoin recently, challenging a longstanding pattern of lower highs and lower lows.
Ethereum broke above its daily 50-day moving average at $1,767 for the first time since the middle of May. This momentum follows a recovery from its July 8 low at $1,710 and has seen the token attempt to reach higher resistance levels.
On July 6, ETH climbed to $1,831 before encountering resistance, stalling just above the 50-day moving average. Bulls have yet to secure a sustained rise above this technical barrier, but analyst consensus suggests that maintaining momentum above the MA 50 could pave the way for a move toward $2,000, with the daily MA 200 placed at $2,214 as a longer-term objective.
Technical LevelCurrent Price/ValueStatusMA 50$1,767Recently surpassedJuly 8 Low$1,710SupportShort-term High$1,831ResistanceMA 200$2,214Potential targetThe derivatives market for crypto is stabilizing, with speculative trading abating in favor of positioning that favors longer-term investments. This trend further supports the outlook for Ethereum as traders weigh potential gains against recent corrections.
Electricity usage after The MergeThe Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) released new findings on Ethereum’s energy consumption. The report noted that, as a result of The Merge, Ethereum’s annual electricity consumption has dropped to approximately 7.87 GWh—a reduction exceeding 99.9% compared to pre-Merge levels.
Mini dictionary: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF), a research institution at the University of Cambridge specializing in the study of global financial innovation and blockchain sector trends.
Ethereum, the leading smart contract platform developed by Vitalik Buterin and others, is the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization and frequently leads innovation in decentralized applications and network upgrades.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) reports that Ethereum’s annual energy consumption and carbon emissions have declined by over 99.9% following The Merge in 2022, marking a significant shift in the network’s environmental profile.
Ethereum’s energy demand falls after moving to Proof-of-StakeAccording to the latest CCAF research, Ethereum now consumes around 7.87 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity per year. This represents a dramatic drop from the estimated 8.88 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually prior to The Merge, when Ethereum operated on a Proof-of-Work (PoW) validation system.
The Merge was Ethereum’s transition from the energy-intensive PoW framework, where miners competed using computational power, to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), which relies on validators securing the network by staking ETH. With PoS, energy-hungry mining rigs were eliminated in favor of more sustainable and efficient mechanisms for maintaining network integrity. The report estimates Ethereum’s current continuous power draw at 0.90 megawatts, compared to 2.4 gigawatts immediately before the switch.
CCAF also says Ethereum’s annual greenhouse gas emissions have dropped to about 2.37 kilotonnes of CO₂ equivalent (ktCO₂e), reflecting a near-total decline from previous levels.
To provide further context, CCAF compared Ethereum’s electricity usage to that of the British Museum, which consumes about 16.18 GWh per year. Ethereum’s current figure is less than half of that, illustrating how significantly the network’s power consumption has fallen.
The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance assessed Ethereum’s new energy profile, noting its “electricity consumption and carbon emissions have fallen by more than 99% since it migrated to Proof-of-Stake, transforming its environmental footprint to a level well below that of small public institutions.”
MetricBefore The Merge (PoW)After The Merge (PoS)Annual electricity use8.88 TWh7.87 GWhContinuous power demand2.4 GW0.90 MWCO₂ emissionsApprox. 10,000 ktCO₂e2.37 ktCO₂eInfrastructure and node distribution dataThe CCAF report is based on a comprehensive audit of about 8,522 Ethereum nodes distributed globally. This analysis focuses on actual hardware and internet hosting, rather than theoretical assumptions.
Ethereum nodes act as data processors, maintaining the ledger’s integrity and sharing updates. These differ from the network’s roughly 894,000 validators, who secure Ethereum by locking up staked ETH and confirming transactions.
The study determined that the average energy use per node is approximately 105 watts. For residential setups, the median is 18 watts. Energy requirements increase with larger and enterprise-level deployments.
Mini dictionary: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF), an academic research institute at Cambridge Judge Business School focusing on global financial technology, digital assets, and alternative finance trends.
Carbon intensity depends on grid and hostingThe United States currently hosts 31% of Ethereum’s full nodes, followed by Germany with 16%, Finland with 8%, and France with 6%. Together, these four countries account for about 62% of the network’s full nodes.
CCAF estimates that 36% of nodes run on residential hardware, while the remaining 64% are hosted in cloud or enterprise data centers. In particular, Hetzner, Amazon Web Services, and OVH collectively account for approximately 40% of all node hosting.
The study shows that 56.4% of Ethereum’s electricity is sourced from sustainable energy, with 39.4% coming from renewables and 17.0% from nuclear power. The largest single contributor remains natural gas at 27.7%.
According to the report, the main factor influencing Ethereum’s carbon footprint now is the carbon intensity of local power grids serving the nodes. This means network location has become more important than the underlying consensus protocol for determining environmental impact.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
BitMine Continues Ethereum Buying as ETF Inflows JumpEthereum price continued its recent recovery this week, helped by the ongoing accumulation by American investors. Data shows that spot Ethereum ETFs have added over $84 million in assets this week.
While a $84 million increase is not big, it is notable because it happened after these funds experienced net outflows for eight consecutive weeks. They are also happening even as Ethereum remains near its lowest level this year.
Ethereum is also rising as the Crypto Fear and Greed Index moved from the extreme fear zone of 15 to the current 31. In most cases, Ethereum, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), and other cryptocurrencies rally whenever the index is rising.
Notably, the coin is rising despite the elevated volatility in the market, with fear that the US and Iran will restart the war. These fears have pushed crude oil prices higher, raising concerns about inflation.
Ethereum Price Has Formed a Double-Bottom PatternTechnicals suggest that Ethereum may continue rising in the coming days or weeks. It has formed a double-bottom point at $1,517 and a neckline at $1,815, its highest point on June 15. This pattern often leads to more gains over time.
Ethereum has also moved slightly above the 25-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), while the two lines of the Percentage Price Oscillator (PPO) have risen and are about to cross the zero line.
Therefore, because of the double-bottom pattern, there is a likelihood that the coin will continue rising, potentially to the psychological level of $2,000. This view will be confirmed if it jumps above the crucial resistance level of $1,817.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
U.S. spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded a net inflow of $18.4 million on July 10, as institutional appetite for the asset appears to be gaining momentum after weeks of varied activity.
BlackRock leads inflowsThe majority of the day’s inflows came from BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager. BlackRock clients contributed $16.2 million out of the total, accounting for more than 90% of the Ethereum purchased through these ETF products. Other issuers saw relatively minor activity by comparison.
Recent data covers only primary market creations, which means it tracks funds moving in and out of ETFs rather than secondary market trading volumes on exchanges.
Mini dictionary: BlackRock, based in New York, is a global asset management company recognized for its influence in traditional and alternative asset classes, including cryptocurrency ETFs.
ETF IssuerNet Inflow (July 10)BlackRock$16.2 millionOther Issuers$2.2 millionTotal$18.4 millionInstitutional exposure to EthereumSpot Ethereum ETFs offer institutional investors direct exposure to the underlying asset rather than derivatives. This structure links traditional capital markets to the Ethereum blockchain and may affect the wider financial ecosystem, especially asset management firms, exchanges, and custodians.
Continued inflows into spot Ethereum ETFs signal ongoing validation from institutional investors, which could drive issuers to expand product offerings and further integrate crypto assets into mainstream portfolios.
Over the past months, the pattern of flows has fluctuated. While the recent surge may build confidence for new product launches, inconsistent demand could return flow trends to a neutral position.
Market implications and upcoming developmentsFor developers and participants in the crypto ecosystem, sustained inflows from institutions can help deepen market liquidity and potentially reduce volatility. However, analysts caution that these effects are expected to play out gradually over time rather than deliver immediate change.
The months ahead may bring further shifts as upcoming Ethereum network upgrades, growth in Layer-2 solutions, and quarterly ETF portfolio rebalancing shape investor strategies. Should the upward demand persist, issuers are likely to explore education initiatives and product wrappers tailored to registered investment advisors (RIAs).
Institutional inflows to spot Ethereum ETFs could indirectly support long-term market stability, although their full impact may not be felt immediately.
If investor interest wanes, ETF flows could become neutral again, interrupting the recent positive trend.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Why Is Ethereum Using AI Agents for Security Testing? Developers at the Ethereum Foundation recently used AI agents to test the software that Ethereum runs on, part of an ongoing effort to strengthen the largest blockchain by value locked.
The exercise found real bugs, but it also showed a harder problem for protocol security teams: AI agents can produce convincing vulnerability reports even when the underlying issue is not real. Human reviewers still had to separate genuine software flaws from false positives that appeared technically sound on the surface.
The Ethereum Foundation’s Protocol Security team published field notes from the process, using the exercise to outline how other teams should handle AI-assisted security workflows. The main conclusion was not that AI agents can replace manual review. It was that they can expand the search surface while increasing the need for disciplined verification.
Ethereum depends on thousands of nodes, ordinary computers running network software, each maintaining a copy of the blockchain and passing messages to neighboring nodes. Validators sit on top of that layer, staking ether and voting on valid blocks. If network messages fail to reach validators, the validator layer can be disrupted even if the broader chain remains intact.
What Bug Did The AI Workflow Find? The bug identified by the engineers sat in gossipsub, the messaging layer used by Ethereum clients to distribute information across the network. The flaw allowed a remote system to trigger a crash in node software. When the crash occurred, the node hit an impossible calculation, stopped running, and took the validator offline until an operator restarted it.
The issue was quickly fixed and disclosed as CVE-2026-34219, with credit given to the team involved. The immediate technical risk was addressed, but the broader lesson came from the review process around the finding.
“The surprise was how little of the work went into finding them, and how much went into telling the real bugs from the ones that just looked real,” wrote Nikos Baxevanis, who authored the Foundation’s post.
That distinction matters for Ethereum because client software is high-stakes infrastructure. A bug that can crash nodes remotely may not directly steal funds, but it can affect validator uptime, network participation, and confidence in client resilience. For validators, downtime can translate into missed rewards and operational risk.
Investor Takeaway AI security tools are becoming useful for finding bugs in blockchain infrastructure, but the Ethereum test shows they are not yet reliable enough to stand alone. The value is in faster discovery, while the bottleneck remains human confirmation.
Why Are AI-Generated Bug Reports Hard To Trust? The problem starts with the kind of output an AI agent produces. A traditional fuzzer sends malformed data into software until something breaks. When it finds a crash, it returns the crash and a trace showing where the failure occurred. An engineer can often confirm the issue quickly.
An AI agent produces something different. It builds a narrative. It explains how the flaw might be reached, argues why it matters, proposes a severity rating, and supplies working code that appears to demonstrate the attack. The report can read fluently whether the bug is genuine or invented.
The Foundation said 3 types of false positives kept appearing. The first involved crashes that only occurred in test builds, where compiler safety checks were enabled but would not exist in shipped software. In those cases, the reported crash did not affect real users.
The second involved attacks that only worked if a dangerous value was manually inserted inside the program. If every external route rejected that value before it reached the vulnerable code path, the attack could not be executed by an outside actor. The third came from formal verification, where a proof passed by showing something trivially true, offering no meaningful evidence that the software behaved correctly.
Each case produced the appearance of a test without proving a real security issue. The concern for protocol teams is that AI agents can generate these empty findings with the same confidence and structure as a valid report.
What Does This Mean For Crypto Security? The Ethereum Foundation also warned that agents are stronger at reasoning about a single moment than they are at identifying bugs that emerge across a sequence of valid actions. That weakness is especially relevant to decentralized finance, where many exploits are not caused by one broken transaction but by a sequence of ordinary steps arranged in a harmful order.
Several recent attacks fit that pattern. In the Edel Finance exploit, an accurate Chainlink price feed was sidestepped through the wrapping layer above it. In the BONK governance attack, buying tokens, voting, and executing a passed proposal were each normal transactions. The exploit came from how those actions combined.
That creates a different testing challenge. A tool that checks whether one function fails may miss a vulnerability that appears only after several legitimate functions are executed in sequence. For crypto protocols, that is a material gap because attackers often exploit economic design, governance mechanics, or wrapper logic rather than a simple coding error.
The Foundation’s proposed workflow is to use agents to suggest which sequences are worth testing, then run the tests independently. That approach treats AI as a way to widen the search for possible attack paths, not as the final judge of whether a vulnerability exists.
For Ethereum and the broader crypto market, the lesson is practical. AI agents can help security teams move faster, especially across complex codebases. But in systems securing billions of dollars, speed is not enough. The real security gain comes when AI-generated findings are paired with reproducible tests, human review, and a clear process for rejecting bugs that only look real.
The numbers were positive but offered no fireworks. On July 10, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs pulled in $90.44 million in net new capital while their Ethereum counterparts added a modest $18.43 million, according to the original report citing SoSoValue data. The flows arrived during a stretch when crypto markets have drifted sideways, and institutional allocators appear to be favoring incremental exposure over bold positioning.
The subdued pace is less about disinterest and more about the regulatory fog hanging over Washington. With a landmark crypto bill facing last‑minute resistance from traditional banking interests, some fund managers are reluctant to increase digital asset weightings until the Senate votes. The fight over the biggest crypto bill in US history has turned into a wire‑to‑wire drama, and even a single large ETF order can be influenced by the perceived odds of tighter or looser rules.
Ethereum’s $18.43 million inflow, while small in absolute terms, is still a signal. It shows that accredited investors and fund managers are not pulling back from ETH exposure entirely, even as fee competition among ETF issuers intensifies. The network itself continues to attract builders: recent metrics on developer engagement highlight that Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon dominate the rankings, with Solana and Arbitrum close behind. Ethereum’s developer ecosystem remains robust, which adds a layer of conviction for longer‑term ETF holders who track fundamentals rather than daily price action.
A snapshot, not a trend Single‑day flow data can be noisy. July 10’s Bitcoin ETF inflow was decent but well below the hundreds of millions that characterized earlier buying waves. That could be a mid‑summer lull, or it could be a reflection of positioning ahead of second‑quarter corporate earnings and central bank commentary. What’s clearer is that the ETF complex has matured: volume is no longer driven by a handful of early‑mover whales but by a broader distribution of institutional and quasi‑institutional participants. The steady drip of inflows contrasts with the boom‑and‑bust cycles that defined crypto’s previous ETF attempts in other jurisdictions.
Where institutional interest is deepening Separately, the institutional pipeline is not limited to ETFs. Tokenization of real‑world assets has crossed $20 billion on‑chain, and deals like Bullish’s $4.2 billion acquisition of Equiniti signal that large financial players are embedding blockchain into their core infrastructure. The tokenization of real-world assets is no longer a proof‑of‑concept; it is a parallel track of adoption that will eventually pull ETF demand along with it, especially as more familiar assets like Treasuries settle on‑chain.
What remains uncertain The direction of net flows over the next two weeks will depend heavily on whether the Senate passes the crypto bill and what the Fed signals about rate cuts. A rejection or a delay could push daily flows back toward breakeven or negative territory, simply because compliance desks will stay in neutral. The Ethereum ETF category is particularly sensitive: its lower baseline means that even a $20 million swing can look dramatic, but the structural story is about whether issuers can convince RIAs and pension consultants that ether is a distinct asset class rather than an appendage to bitcoin.
For now, the market is in a holding pattern. The inflows are real but restrained, and that is entirely consistent with an institutional crowd that wants more clarity before committing larger slices of a portfolio. The next couple of data points, set against the legislative calendar, will reveal whether this is a temporary pause or the new steady state.
AUTHOR
Kester is an experienced freelance content writer. His focus is primarily on blockchain technology and cryptocurrency. One might even refer to him as a "blockchain enthusiast." He has been following advancements in the crypto and blockchain area for several years, researching and writing his insights in the media. In addition to being a skilled content writer, Mushumir is also knowledgeable in SEO and digital marketing. He aspires to succeed as a content creator in the digital realm, dealing with customers in the finance and tech industries to generate traffic through engaging taglines and content. Mushumir enjoys traveling, reading, and playing cricket when he is not writing. He now works as a news and article writer for BlockchainReporter.
Ethereum investors are closely watching the cryptocurrency’s price movement as it approaches a major technical juncture, with short-term momentum revealing strong buying activity but uncertainties remaining about the next move.
Price Recovers, Markets Monitor Key ZonesEthereum is currently priced at $1,799.52, generating a 24-hour trading volume of $13.50 billion and a market capitalization of $217.18 billion. Data from CoinMarketCap show that ETH has gained 0.99% over the last 24 hours, following a recovery from earlier declines.
On July 11, 2026, the crypto analyst known as More Crypto Online stated that despite the recent rally from June’s lows, Ethereum’s price still fits within a large corrective structure. The analyst highlighted that recent gains are likely part of an ongoing Elliott Wave correction, rather than the beginning of a new lasting bull market. More Crypto Online asserted that the first downtrend may have concluded, and the current movement could represent a wave-two rally, possibly to be succeeded by another decline in July or August.
The analyst pointed out that if Ethereum remains under certain resistance thresholds, the market could see further declines. A sustained break above these resistance levels, meanwhile, might trigger a larger upward move.
Critical resistance levels identified include $1,815, $1,926, $2,045, and $2,226. If ETH surpasses these points, bearish sentiment could be reversed, increasing the likelihood of a rally.
On the downside, Ethereum holds support at $1,550, $1,400, $1,060, and $900. If the price faces renewed selling pressure, these levels could attract buying interest.
Recent price action, according to More Crypto Online, represents a three-wave corrective structure rather than the five-wave formation typically indicative of an uptrend.
Technical Indicators Signal Short-Term StrengthShort-term technical indicators confirm that buyers currently control the market. Ethereum’s price sits above the mid-Bollinger band at $1,687.45, signaling persistent buying demand. Should the current recovery continue, the upper Bollinger band at $1,865.98 is expected to serve as a key resistance level for ETH.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator further supports the bullish outlook with its line at 9.99566, above the signal line at -12.57129. The histogram remains positive at 22.56694, reflecting improving buying strength in the market.
The upcoming trading sessions may prove decisive. If bulls can push Ethereum’s price above the $1,815 resistance and maintain this level, market attention may shift towards higher barriers at $1,926 and $2,045.
If Ethereum does not break through resistance, market watchers anticipate renewed attention to the $1,550 support zone, which could determine whether the current rally continues or the cryptocurrency resumes a deeper correction.
Ethereum’s near-term direction is therefore likely to be determined by buyers’ ability to clear key resistance levels in the coming days.
LevelPrice ($)SignificanceResistance 11,815First barrier to bullish momentumResistance 21,926Secondary upside targetResistance 32,045Potential launch point for further rallySupport 11,550Key level if price declinesSupport 21,400Zone for potential buyer interestMini dictionary: Elliott Wave correction, a technical analysis principle suggesting that price movements occur in repetitive wave patterns, with corrective waves typically made up of three phases, and motive or impulsive waves comprising five phases. Used by traders to interpret potential price reversals or continuations.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ethereum’s Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) Ratio fell below the critical 0.8 threshold, placing the altcoin in a historically rare accumulation zone.
The on-chain metric suggested ETH traded below its realized value, a condition that previously appeared during major market bottoms.
According to the data, similar readings emerged in December 2018, March 2020, and June 2022 before Ethereum established cycle lows. That historical context renewed attention among long-term investors despite the absence of an immediate bullish catalyst.
However, the metric reflected valuation rather than future price direction. Instead, it suggested seller exhaustion had intensified after months of weakness.
As a result, Ethereum entered another period where long-term value investors historically became active, while broader market participants continued weighing macroeconomic uncertainty against improving blockchain fundamentals.
Inflows outweighed withdrawals despite recovery Spot flow data showed Ethereum recorded Exchange Netflows of approximately $62.64 million during the latest session. That reading indicated more ETH entered exchanges than left them, even as price stabilized above recent lows.
Such activity often reflected investors preparing assets for trading rather than demonstrating outright accumulation through exchange withdrawals.
However, the inflow remained relatively modest compared with larger historical spikes visible on the chart, suggesting exchange activity had not reached panic levels.
Meanwhile, Ethereum maintained its recovery without triggering aggressive selling pressure across spot markets.
The combination revealed a market that continued supplying exchanges with liquidity while buyers absorbed available inventory.
That balance prevented excessive downside pressure, although it also suggested traders remained willing to reposition holdings instead of committing entirely to long-term storage.
Source: CoinGlass Leveraged traders increased their exposure despite softer funding Derivatives activity strengthened as market participation expanded across perpetual futures.
Open Interest climbed 3.25% to $11.1092 billion, showing traders increased outstanding positions while Ethereum stabilized near current levels.
Funding Rates remained positive at 0.00699, although the metric declined 25.41% over the previous 24 hours. The combination indicated long traders still paid a premium to maintain positions, but bullish conviction eased compared with the prior session.
Instead of unwinding exposure, participants continued adding contracts while accepting a lower funding environment.
The derivatives market, therefore, reflected measured optimism rather than aggressive speculation.
Source: CryptoQuant Can Ethereum hold above reclaimed support? Ethereum [ETH] reclaimed the $1,800 region after recovering sharply from its early June low near $1,560.
Buyers repeatedly defended higher lows throughout July, allowing the price to consolidate just beneath the next resistance around $2,000.
The Relative Strength Index also recovered to 57.16, while its moving average stood at 49.84, confirming that buying strength improved after emerging from deeply oversold territory.
Even so, RSI remained below overbought conditions, leaving room for either continued stabilization or renewed consolidation.
Price also continued trading below the major $2,000 resistance that previously acted as support before June’s decline.
If buyers maintain control above $1,800, Ethereum would continue preserving its improving technical structure.
However, failure to defend that level would likely return focus to the lower support around $1,564, where buyers previously regained control.
Source: TradingView What does it all mean? To sum up, Ethereum presented conflicting signals rather than a one-sided narrative.
The historically low MVRV ratio strengthened the long-term valuation case, while rising Open Interest reflected sustained trader participation.
However, exchange inflows showed more ETH returned to trading venues instead of leaving them for long-term holding.
The combination suggests confidence improved, yet caution still shaped market positioning as investors balanced attractive valuation against lingering uncertainty.
Final Summary Ethereum looked historically undervalued, but Exchange Netflows suggested investors still preferred flexibility over long-term conviction. ETH’s setup improved, but holding above $1,800 could decide whether buyers keep control.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has raised concerns that the centralization of power over artificial intelligence could pose a greater risk to humanity than the technology’s own intelligence.
Power concentration poses core AI threatButerin argued that public debate around AI too often centers on whether advancing machine intelligence itself will endanger society, rather than examining the implications if control of these systems falls into the hands of a few entities.
He stated that if AI eventually outperforms humans at all critical tasks, humanity’s collective bargaining power could fall to zero, fundamentally shifting the balance of power worldwide. Buterin pointed out that scenarios in which a small number of AI laboratories dominate development and deployment should be a source of widespread concern.
He highlighted that, in any context outside the tech sector, a few organizations holding disproportionate power would be considered dangerous and unacceptable.
Buterin warned against complacency, noting that assuming a smooth and equitable transition toward advanced AI is, in itself, a risky and underexamined belief. He questioned why calls for open discussion and potential acceleration of AI receive greater skepticism compared to assumptions that centralized governance will safely manage future risks.
Open-source mandates seek to prevent dominanceThe Ethereum co-founder referenced updated provisions in major AI roadmaps mandating open-source access in AI development as an important step to reducing the risk of monopolization. By allowing broader access to foundational AI models and code, these changes are intended to prevent a handful of companies from controlling transformative technologies.
Buterin also pointed to the concept of “mutually assured compute destruction,” a proposed collective safeguard which would enable multiple parties to agree in advance to halt large-scale AI computation under specific conditions. This mechanism is designed to balance intervention powers and prevent any single actor from disenfranchising others.
He emphasized that such systems are preferable to frameworks allowing select groups to exclude opponents or dissenting voices from key governance decisions.
Mini dictionary: Mutually assured compute destruction is a governance mechanism where several actors hold the power to pause or slow global AI operations collectively, reducing individual dominance and enforcing checks on potentially dangerous technology escalation.
Buterin backs decentralized defense against AI risksButerin outlined his support for d/acc, a decentralized defensive strategy focused on countering AI-related existential threats. This approach gives priority to formal verification, advanced cryptography, secure open hardware, pandemic readiness, and food security.
Additional components include improving public epistemics—systems that support reliable shared facts—and preparing for risks that may surface regardless of whether AI develops as quickly as predicted.
He suggested that pre-agreed triggers, such as the onset of severe pandemics or unemployment rising above 25%, could mediate disputes between those favoring rapid AI progress and those urging caution. Once these conditions are met or fail to occur, legitimacy may shift toward whichever group’s predictions prove correct, making debates more fair and inclusive.
Buterin expressed that direct involvement in these decisions should extend beyond governments and executives, inviting wider community participation through public platforms and social media.
He acknowledged that every proposal, no matter how well-designed, contains elements critics might label as unrealistic. Yet, he stressed the importance of engaging openly with efforts to address the unique challenges that AI presents to society.
Buterin ultimately maintained that while a perfect governance scheme does not yet exist, he welcomes ongoing proposals—especially those that aim to reduce concentrated control over AI development.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
The Ethereum Foundation’s Protocol Security team just made something clear: AI isn’t just a research toy anymore. In experiments published July 9, 2026, the team confirmed that coordinated AI agents identified genuine vulnerabilities in Ethereum’s core protocol code, including a bug serious enough to earn its own CVE designation.
The bug that could have taken validators offline The confirmed vulnerability lived inside libp2p’s gossipsub implementation, which is part of the networking layer Ethereum nodes use to communicate with each other. The specific issue was a remotely triggerable panic, meaning an attacker could send a specially crafted message that caused a validator node to crash outright. The bug was assigned CVE-2026-34219 and was fixed before it could be exploited in the wild.
Advertisement
What the AI actually did, and where it fell short The experiment used coordinated AI agents to scan critical components of the Ethereum protocol, including systems software and cryptographic code. The agents were capable of surfacing potential vulnerabilities at a pace that would be difficult for human auditors to match on their own.
A significant portion of the AI’s outputs turned out to be false positives, things like non-reproducible crashes and issues that only appeared in debug builds and would never surface in production. Each of those still required a human auditor to examine, test, and discard. The actual time spent confirming genuine vulnerabilities was far smaller than the time spent sorting through junk.
The Foundation concluded that reproducible proof-of-concept artifacts are essential for any AI-assisted audit to be useful. Without a working demonstration that a bug actually does what the AI claims, the finding is just a hypothesis. The broader takeaway from the experiments is that structured validation pipelines matter as much as the AI models themselves.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE has held firm above key support levels, with analysts pointing to strong breakout potential if current momentum continues. The project, an on-chain perpetual trading platform, has gained attention for its aggressive buyback and token burn strategy, which has significantly reduced circulating supply and reinforced long-term value for investors.
Technical strength and support levelsAt $67.53, HYPE has seen $268.62 million in 24-hour trading volume and holds a market capitalization of $17.08 billion. Despite largely stable movements in recent sessions, technical indicators suggest upward momentum could strengthen if buying pressure persists.
Crypto analyst Umair Orakzai described HYPE’s price consolidation as being within an ascending triangle pattern, which typically favors a continuation of the current trend. Orakzai highlighted the importance of maintaining support at $62 and closing above the key $68.60 resistance level to confirm a breakout.
Analysts note that securing a close above $68.60 could drive momentum toward the $80 mark, while losing the $62 support might prompt a retracement to the $57 range, aligning with the current value area low (VAL).
LevelPriceImplicationSupport$62Drop below may signal decline to $57Resistance$68.60Breakout above may target $80Market Cap$17.08 billionCurrent capitalizationDeflationary tokenomics and buybacksHyperliquid stands out among decentralized perpetual trading platforms for its strongly deflationary token model. The protocol dedicates nearly 97% of trading revenue to buy back and permanently remove HYPE tokens from circulation through burns, significantly outpacing the deflation rates of most major cryptocurrencies.
Live supply data shows the annual growth rate for HYPE is just 0.14%. For comparison, Ethereum’s supply increases by 0.83% per year, while Solana adds 3.76%.
The project’s statistics indicate that nearly 45 million HYPE tokens have already been burned through ongoing buybacks. This mechanism creates what is commonly referred to as a flywheel effect, where increased trading activity results in larger revenues, fueling more aggressive buybacks and accelerating supply reduction.
Mini dictionary: Hyperliquid is a decentralized perpetuals trading platform offering high-speed, on-chain order books and unique tokenomics based on real trading revenue.
Future outlook and market contextDespite bullish forecasts and the ongoing buyback program, HYPE’s price has recently remained range-bound. However, market sentiment across the crypto sector has shifted positive as Bitcoin extends its advance, and many traders are closely watching for a decisive move in HYPE’s price action.
Whether HYPE maintains its floor at $62 and surpasses $68.60 is expected to determine its next major move, with a potential run to $80 if momentum resumes. Conversely, a break below support could see prices test the $57 level.
Hyperliquid’s sustained buybacks and token burns are designed to support its future valuation, with many market participants seeing this model as a key factor in its appeal. The next trading sessions are considered crucial for HYPE’s direction.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
A new International Monetary Fund (IMF) working paper finds dollar stablecoins can amplify currency runs in economies defending an overvalued fixed exchange rate, turning fragmented parallel-market prices into a single signal that lets households exit at once.
IMF researcher Brandon Joel Tan describes a state-dependent effect. Stablecoins raise welfare during calm periods but deepen crisis risk once a peg becomes badly misaligned, the paper argues.
How Stablecoins Turn Scarcity Into a Public SignalWhen a government holds an official rate away from the market level, foreign currency gets rationed. Buyers then turn to parallel markets for dollars.
Those markets stay fragmented. Street dealers, brokers, and banks quote different prices, and no single figure captures true scarcity. The IMF research shows that stablecoins change that.
A dollar-pegged token such as Tether (USDT) trades against local currency on exchanges. That price is visible and updates constantly, so it becomes a common reference for the parallel dollar.
Better price discovery helps households hedge. However, the same public price can coordinate an exit, because everyone reacts to the same number at the same time.
“Stablecoins generate a state-dependent welfare effect. They expand access to foreign-currency and can improve allocation by making beliefs about misalignment more informative, but the same public price can also coordinate runs by making beliefs and actions more synchronized,” the abstract reads.
Bolivia illustrates the shift. The central bank lifted restrictions on virtual-asset transactions in June 2024. Such transactions in the financial system then multiplied twelvefold from July 2024 to May 2025.
The USDT to boliviano rate then became the everyday reference for the parallel dollar. The central bank even began publishing USDT prices on its website.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
What the Model Shows and What Tan RecommendsTan simulates three economies to isolate the effect. He compares three setups. The first is a cash-only market. The second is a stablecoin market that only cuts access costs. The third also sharpens the public price.
Average crisis exposure rises from 3.9% in the cash-only economy to 7.4% in the full stablecoin economy. At the most severe misalignment, it climbs from 4.8% to 12.9%.
That gap between the second and third economies is Tan’s key point. Cheaper access makes exit easier to execute. A precise public price makes exit coordination easier, and the coordination effect drives most of the added risk.
Welfare tells a two-sided story. The gain peaks near 1.2% during calm conditions. It then turns negative past a misalignment threshold around 0.59. It reaches-6.3% at the extreme.
Therefore, Tan says broad restrictions can be regressive, since they remove a low-cost dollar option from unbanked households. Meanwhile, he stresses that stablecoin rules cannot replace macroeconomic adjustment.
“The model points to a state-contingent approach: preserve low-cost access in normal states, and use temporary, targeted frictions on large or run-like flows when misalignment is high,” he said.
IMF working papers reflect the author’s research, not the institution’s official position. Still, the analysis adds weight to a live regulatory debate as governments draft stablecoin frameworks.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
Unusual transactions at Tether’s Bitcoin reserve address have sparked speculation that the company may have paused its Bitcoin purchases or altered its accumulation pace for the second quarter of 2026.
According to on-chain data, approximately 4 BTC were sent to Binance about five hours ago from Tether’s reserve address, which is known to allocate 15% of its quarterly profits to Bitcoin purchases. The transfer, believed to be a test transaction, is estimated to be worth approximately $250,000.
Data shows that the same address also transferred 204.3 BTC to Bitfinex approximately a month ago. This transaction, which took place when the Bitcoin price was around $70,000, was worth approximately $14.36 million. However, there is no confirmed information yet on whether the transferred Bitcoins were sold.
Another development that caught the market’s attention was that Tether has not yet transferred the Bitcoins it is thought to have purchased in the second quarter of 2026 to its reserve address. In the past, the company usually transferred the BTC purchases it made during the quarter to its reserve address on the last day of that quarter.
However, more than ten days after the end of the second quarter, no new BTC transfers have been made to Tether’s reserve address. This has raised questions about whether the company has changed its Bitcoin accumulation strategy or postponed its second-quarter purchases.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
BNB Chain reported that its Binance Smart Chain (BSC) network has achieved a benchmark throughput of approximately 5,200 transactions per second (TPS) by June 2026, almost doubling its TPS from 2,800 at the beginning of the year. BNB Chain is a leading blockchain platform recognized for prioritizing scalability and speed across its ecosystem.
BSC performance improves in 2026The network reduced its block interval from 750 milliseconds to 450 milliseconds in the first half of 2026, decreasing the time users wait for new blocks to be added and resulting in faster transaction confirmations for developers and applications. BNB Chain also reported that its memory finality improved from 1,125 milliseconds to 650 milliseconds, further reducing the time required to consider transactions as finalized.
BNB Chain highlighted a significant year-to-date rise: “Block intervals: 750 ms to 450 ms, memory finality: 1,125 ms to 650 ms, benchmark throughput: 2,800 to 5,200 TPS. H2 goes further, targeting another 2x throughput increase.”
In parallel, network throughput reached the 5,200 TPS milestone, allowing the BSC to process far more transactions per second than at the start of 2026. This growth serves BNB Chain’s growing user and developer base, which requires higher performance for both decentralized applications and token transfers.
Mini dictionary: Block interval refers to the time between the creation of two consecutive blocks in a blockchain, impacting how quickly new transactions can be processed. Memory finality is the time it takes for a transaction to be confirmed as irreversible on the network.
MetricJanuary 2026June 2026Block Interval750 ms450 msMemory Finality1,125 ms650 msBenchmark TPS2,8005,200Key engineering upgrades fuel gainsBNB Chain attributed its recent performance improvements to a series of technical upgrades. Key enhancements included the Block-Level Access List (BAL), which enables transaction data to be prepared before execution, increasing efficiency and laying the groundwork for parallel processing in future updates.
Another key upgrade, Incremental Snapshot, allows new or delayed nodes—computers responsible for helping operate the blockchain—to synchronize more quickly with the active chain. Enhancements to the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), known as EVM SuperInstruction, seek to reduce unnecessary repeat executions, boosting overall throughput. The introduction of Extended Voting Rules is designed to maintain transaction finality even under challenging network conditions.
Mini dictionary: BSC, or Binance Smart Chain, is a blockchain network built for running smart contract-based applications with high throughput and lower transaction fees, operating alongside Binance Chain.
H2 roadmap aims for further scalingFor the second half of 2026, BNB Chain is targeting another twofold increase in throughput on BSC’s mainnet, forming part of a broader multi-year strategy to achieve a tenfold performance boost. The roadmap outlines plans to implement BEP-675 upgrades and additional fine-tuning of the BAL to further raise network capacity.
Additional roadmap goals include more robust congestion control measures to ensure stable network performance during periods of high demand. The decision to introduce dedicated lanes aims to limit interference between different applications operating on the blockchain.
BNB Chain is also preparing new gas fee models designed for specific business segments, aiming to optimize transaction cost structures for various user groups. The team is developing a new Layer 1 chain architecture with the ambition of reaching over 100,000 TPS and achieving sub-50 millisecond transaction preconfirmation times.
Mini dictionary: BEP-675 is a proposed protocol enhancement for the BSC, aiming to optimize transaction execution and throughput by enabling improved parallel processing and resource management.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
The United Nations has formally expanded its use of blockchain technology to deliver humanitarian aid, implementing a broad deployment of digital payment solutions based on the Stellar network. The initiative transitions from initial pilot programs into live, real-world implementation across multiple countries.
UNDP adopts Stellar for global aid deliveryThe United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), a leading agency focused on poverty reduction and sustainable development, has introduced blockchain-based payment pilots in 17 countries. Five of these pilots—in Haiti, Syria, Kenya, Guatemala, and Gambia—are actively facilitating aid distribution and cross-border remittance flows via the Stellar network.
The next step for UNDP is to integrate these digital payments with over 170 of its country-level programs or representative offices. This move could significantly expand the organization’s reach and efficiency in distributing assistance.
The UNDP aims to standardize digital aid flows using Stellar’s blockchain, setting a benchmark for transparency, speed, and cost-effectiveness in humanitarian finance.
Partnerships and platform benefitsStellar, developed by the Stellar Development Foundation, is a decentralized blockchain designed to facilitate affordable, fast, and auditable financial transactions globally. It enables instant payments, supports stablecoins and asset issuance, and is particularly suited to emerging markets with its 3-5 second transfer completion times and minimal transaction fees.
Key partners in the project include UNDP itself, the Stellar Development Foundation, local non-governmental organizations, and various regional payment gateways. Their collaboration seeks to deliver not only humanitarian aid but also a model for compliant wallets, robust KYC/AML protocols, and the availability of stablecoins on the Stellar network.
Mini dictionary: Stellar Development Foundation, the non-profit behind Stellar, works to expand access to low-cost global payments and financial services using blockchain technology.
Developers working with Stellar view this partnership as an opportunity to further deploy tailor-made wallets, introduce compliance tools, and issue local stablecoins for direct aid transfers.
Impact on stakeholders and regulatory frameworkFor financial institutions, custodians, and exchanges, the initiative promises new fiat channels as on and off-ramps in regions with previously limited digital infrastructure. This gives real-world credibility and measurable use cases for public blockchain payments in the humanitarian sector.
At the same time, investors and institutional players can track transparent and auditable streams of aid, enhancing trust in the system. Regulators also gain a model for supervised digital asset payments within an established global framework.
Bringing digital payments to over 170 UNDP offices could create a unified standard for humanitarian aid, potentially inspiring other agencies to adopt similar systems.
CountryStatusMain Use CaseHaitiActive pilotHumanitarian aid distributionSyriaActive pilotAid payments/remittancesKenyaActive pilotHumanitarian remittancesGuatemalaActive pilotAid distributionGambiaActive pilotRemittance paymentsChallenges and future outlookUNDP’s move with Stellar marks a departure from earlier periods of retail-driven blockchain adoption, which focused largely on speculative trading. Instead, the current shift is driven by direct use-value and the goal of global financial inclusion.
Despite the positive momentum, several challenges remain. These include ensuring compliance with varied local laws, overcoming barriers in internet access, and maintaining liquidity for widespread, effective use.
If the Stellar network is successfully rolled out across most UNDP programs, it could establish a standard for digital payments throughout the United Nations system. Other agencies might then replicate this approach for more transparent and efficient aid delivery worldwide.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Chainlink (LINK) is showing signs of bullish momentum, supported by strengthening technical indicators and consistent pattern formations. Analysts are closely watching a potential breakout above a critical resistance level, which could reinforce a continued upward move. Meanwhile, maintaining key support levels is considered essential for sustaining any positive momentum.
LINK price stability and market overviewAs of the latest session, LINK is trading at $7.99. The token has registered a minimal increase of 0.07% over the past 24 hours, reflecting a period of stable price action. Its current market capitalization stands at $5.82 billion, with a 24-hour trading volume reported at $178.34 million. This relative stability in LINK’s price comes amid widespread market uncertainty, positioning the token as a focal point for traders seeking resilience during volatile conditions.
Analyst perspective: Key resistance and supportTechnical analyst CRYPTOWZRD observed that LINK’s daily candle has closed above a bullish threshold, which could pave the way for further gains. The analyst emphasized the importance of the LINK/BTC trading pair, noting its improved strength and the potential breakout from a long-term daily wedge formation.
CRYPTOWZRD highlighted that if LINK/BTC breaks out from its pattern, it may drive LINK’s momentum against the USD and push the price toward the $10.00 target. However, before initiating significant upside movement, LINK needs to maintain support at $7.65. A sustained position above this level keeps the overall bullish structure intact, while a decisive break above $8.20 would further validate an upside scenario.
According to the latest daily chart, LINK is currently trading above the middle line of the Bollinger Bands, at $7.64. This middle band typically serves as a dynamic support during bullish trends. The upper band is observed at $8.25, which now acts as the immediate resistance.
Price LevelSupport/Resistance$7.04Key support$7.64-$7.65Current support region$8.20Breakout resistance$8.25Upper Bollinger Band$10.00Potential targetTechnical outlook: Momentum and indicatorsMomentum indicators further support the positive trend. The MACD—a momentum oscillator commonly used in market analysis—shows the MACD line at -0.0332 and the signal line at -0.1083, producing a positive histogram value of 0.0751. This configuration points to growing buying interest and may indicate that LINK could extend its recovery if the trend remains intact.
Mini dictionary: MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) is a commonly used trading indicator that helps identify changes in momentum, direction, and duration of a price trend. It consists of a MACD line, a signal line, and a histogram reflecting the difference between the two lines.
If LINK breaks above the $8.20–$8.25 resistance region, analysts believe further upside is likely. Conversely, a move below the middle band of the Bollinger Bands could open the door for a decline toward the next key support at $7.04.
Buyer interest and upcoming price levelsMarket participants are monitoring whether LINK can sustain its current bullish structure or experience a short-term pullback. The supportive technical setup suggests that so long as buyers remain engaged, the potential for a continued recovery remains viable.
In the upcoming sessions, traders are expected to focus on whether LINK can break through the $8.20 barrier and make a run toward the $10.00 level, or if it will retest support before resuming an upward trajectory. The performance of the LINK/BTC pair is also expected to influence these movements.
A continued defense of support and a successful breakout above resistance levels would strengthen the bullish trend, while any retreat below support could indicate the potential for a short-term correction.
Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network designed to connect smart contracts with real-world data, and its native token LINK serves as a core asset within the protocol.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Circle, the company behind the USDC stablecoin, paid Coinbase $908 million in distribution costs and revenue sharing during 2024. That figure represents roughly 54% of Circle’s total revenue for the year, making Coinbase less of a distribution partner and more of a landlord collecting majority rent.
The arrangement, formalized through a Collaboration Agreement that took effect on August 18, 2023, is approaching its first major renewal window in August 2026.
The economics of a lopsided partnership Coinbase earns 100% of the reserve interest generated on USDC held directly on its platform. For USDC held anywhere else in the world, Coinbase still collects 50% of that interest income.
Advertisement
For Coinbase, stablecoin-related revenue is projected to reach approximately $1.35 billion in 2025. USDC-related activities accounted for roughly 13.8% of Coinbase’s total revenue in 2024, a figure large enough that any disruption to the partnership would show up clearly in quarterly earnings.
How we got here The current arrangement replaced a previous structure called the Centre Consortium, a joint venture that both companies operated together. When they restructured in August 2023, Circle took sole governance and issuance control of USDC.
As part of that restructuring, Coinbase also took an equity stake in Circle. The Collaboration Agreement runs on an initial three-year term through August 2026, with automatic three-year renewals that depend on performance metrics.
Coinbase’s wandering eye In June 2026, Coinbase endorsed Open USD, a rival stablecoin project. The market reaction was swift: Circle’s stock price dropped more than 17%.
What this means for investors The August 2026 renewal window is the most important date on the calendar for anyone with exposure to either company or to USDC itself. A renegotiation that shifts more revenue toward Circle would hurt Coinbase’s stablecoin income, while a deal that maintains the current structure keeps Circle’s margins under pressure.
For Coinbase investors, the $1.35 billion in projected stablecoin revenue for 2025 represents a substantial revenue stream. Stablecoin demand tends to persist even during bear markets, since traders use stablecoins to park capital, making this revenue line more resilient than Coinbase’s trading fee income.
If Coinbase actively promotes rival stablecoins on its platform, the 50% revenue share on off-platform USDC becomes less valuable as total USDC circulation potentially shrinks. Circle would then face the worst of both worlds: paying high distribution costs on a shrinking asset base.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
11 July 2026 | 19:38 Zcash trades near $504 on July 11 after completing a breakout above its 50-day moving average, while Santiment's development ranking and the Ironwood upgrade due July 28 give the move two catalysts beyond the chart.
Key Takeaways ZEC is now climbing inside a rising channel. Zcash climbed to fifth among privacy projects by development activity with a 23.2 notable GitHub score, per Santiment. The Ironwood upgrade (NU6.3) activates at block height 3,428,143, expected around July 28. The ZEC daily chart, shared by the owner of Coindoo, has delivered the three-step structure traders wait through: a breakout above the 50-day SMA at $476, a successful retest of the average as support, and confirmation with continuation. Price is now advancing inside a rising channel from the sub-$380 June base, and the intraday gain keeps the sequence intact without the vertical extension that typically invites a pullback.
zcash:native is showing exactly what bulls wanted to see.🚀
1. Breakout above the 50 SMA✅
2. Successful retest as support✅
3. Confirmation of the move✅
Price is now climbing inside a rising channel, with the next resistance sitting at the Fibonacci level around $520.🚀… pic.twitter.com/TL7rV2ZIbK
— Filip Vantchev (@FilipVantchev) July 11, 2026
The next obstacle sits close. The Fibonacci resistance around $520 is roughly 3% above the current price ($504 at the time of writing), and it marks the first level where the recovery meets sellers positioned from the spring decline that ran from the $688 high down to $250. A daily close through $520 leaves little dense resistance until the $600 supply zone visible from the March distribution range. Rejection there, with a slide back below the 50-day, might retire the breakout and reclassify the channel as a bear-market rally, so the average that launched the move is also its invalidation line.
Developers Are Active Ahead of Ironwood Behind the price action, the builder data has improved. Santiment Intelligence wrote on X that Zcash climbed to fifth place among privacy-focused projects by development activity, posting a 23.2 notable GitHub activity score over the past 30 days, one of the gainers in the ranking since the previous update.
🧑💻 Here are crypto’s top 10 privacy coin projects by development. Directional indicators represent each project’s ranking positioning since last update:
— Santiment Intelligence (@SantimentData) July 10, 2026
Development metrics carry no direct price signal, but rising repository activity in the weeks before a network upgrade indicates the work behind the release is happening on schedule rather than slipping.
That upgrade is the date on the calendar. Ironwood, the NU6.3 network release, is set to activate at block height 3,428,143, expected around July 28. Upgrade anticipation has historically drawn speculative positioning into ZEC in the preceding fortnight, and the current setup mirrors that pattern: the breakout confirmed roughly two weeks before activation, leaving the event itself as the moment the market decides whether to hold the gains or sell the news.
The measurable conditions from here are compact. A daily close above $520 before activation could put ZEC’s rally ahead of the event with room toward $600. Holding the 50-day on any pre-upgrade dip keeps the structure bullish even without the breakout extending. The combination to avoid is a failure at $520 followed by a post-Ironwood close below $476, which may mark the entire July advance as positioning that could not survive its own catalyst.
The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry a high level of risk, and readers should conduct their own research and consult a professional advisor before making any investment decisions. Coindoo is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of actions taken based on the content of this article.
Author
Alexander Zdravkov is a market analyst and crypto journalist with interests in economics, broader financial markets and digital assets. His journey into crypto began more than four years ago, driven by a fascination with the rapid evolution of blockchain technology and the transformative potential of decentralized finance. He began analyzing market cycles and identifying emerging trends before they reach the mainstream. He holds a degree in International Relations - a background that helped shape his broader perspective on global economics, geopolitics, and the interconnected nature of modern financial markets. Whether covering the latest developments in the crypto sector or exploring broader macroeconomic themes, Alexander focuses on giving readers context rather than simply repeating headlines. During his career, he has authored more than 5,000 articles covering cryptocurrencies, traditional finance, and global market developments. His work spans everything from Bitcoin and altcoins to macroeconomic trends influencing risk assets worldwide.
Bonzo Lend lost approximately $9.05 million after an attacker exploited a verification flaw in a third-party Supra oracle contract on the Hedera network.The attacker deposited low-value SAUCE tokens and submitted a manipulated price update to inflate the tokens' value, enabling them to borrow assets well beyond their collateral.Following the exploit, Hedera's total value locked (TVL) fell by nearly 40% in 24 hours, while Bonzo's TVL plummeted by 77%.Bonzo Lend, a decentralized lending protocol on the Hedera network, suffered an estimated $9.05 million loss after an attacker exploited a verification flaw in a third-party Supra oracle contract, allowing them to borrow assets far exceeding the value of their collateral.
The attacker deposited 250 SAUCE tokens with little value, before submitting a manipulated price update that inflated the token’s HBAR-denominated value, according to a preliminary incident report from Bonzo.
The protocol said the account subsequently borrowed 6.63 million USDC and 34.52 million wrapped HBAR. At the report’s reference HBAR price of $0.06998, the two withdrawals were worth approximately $9.05 million.
A second wallet, the report adds, borrowed roughly $1 million of additional assets while the abnormal price remained active. The wallet later contacted Bonzo through Discord, identified itself as a white-hat responder to the incident and said it intended to return the funds.
Bonzo excluded those assets from its headline loss estimate, placing total principal borrowed during the incident at approximately $10.06 million before recovery.
Hedera, according to DeFLlama data, now has $25.7 million in total value locked (TVL). The figure dropped nearly 40% in the last 24 hours after the exploit. With Bonzo’s TVL
12345678910
Digital Assets: Quarterly Review and Outlook Q2
Digital Assets: Quarterly Review and Outlook Q2
Digital assets posted a third consecutive quarter of losses in Q2 2026, the longest losing streak since the 2022 bear market, as institutional capital rotated into AI equities and Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest quarterly outflow since launch. Our report examines what drove the divergence, where structural adoption continued regardless, and what Q3 signals to watch.
Jul 10, 2026
Digital assets posted a third consecutive quarter of losses in Q2 2026, the longest losing streak since the 2022 bear market, as institutional capital rotated into AI equities and Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest quarterly outflow since launch. Our report examines what drove the divergence, where structural adoption continued regardless, and what Q3 signals to watch.
Why it matters:
Digital assets posted a third consecutive quarter of losses in Q2 2026, the longest losing streak since the 2022 bear market, as institutional capital rotated into AI equities and Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest quarterly outflow since launch. Our report examines what drove the divergence, where structural adoption continued regardless, and what Q3 signals to watch.
An attacker has stolen over $5 million from the Hedera network in a significant exploit on July 11, with the majority of the stolen assets already transferred to the Ethereum blockchain, according to multiple blockchain analysts.
Exploit details and fund movementsOnchain analyst Specter was among the first to report the ongoing attack, promptly flagging suspicious activity involving large sums moved from Hedera. Initial tallies from Specter estimated losses at $3.7 million, which soon increased to over $5 million as further transactions were tracked over several hours.
Specter indicated that the attacker bridged the funds to Ethereum via LayerZero, a protocol that enables interoperability between blockchain networks. The perpetrator then converted Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) into Ether (ETH) after the funds arrived on Ethereum.
Blockchain security firm PeckShieldAlert later confirmed the incident, revealing that $5.25 million had already been moved from Hedera to Ethereum. Investigators traced the initial capital to 1 ETH withdrawn from Tornado Cash, a crypto mixing protocol. At the time of reporting, the attacker’s Ethereum wallet held approximately 2,360 ETH, valued at roughly $4.25 million, alongside 15.58 WBTC, worth about $1 million.
Onchain observer @0xNox also noted more than $4 million was bridged to Ethereum through LayerZero, with funds being cycled through WBTC-to-ETH swaps.
Mini dictionary: LayerZero is an interoperability protocol designed to allow seamless transfers of assets and data across multiple blockchain networks, linking ecosystems such as Ethereum and non-EVM chains.
AssetAmountValue (approximate)ETH2,360$4.25 millionWBTC15.58$1 millionPeckShieldAlert confirmed that $5.25 million was transferred from Hedera Mainnet to Ethereum, with the attacker’s wallet containing both ETH and WBTC after the swap process.
Transparency concerns on HederaHedera, founded by Dr. Leemon Baird and Mance Harmon, operates on a unique hashgraph consensus system rather than a traditional blockchain. Its native token, HBAR, is used for transaction fees and securing the network through staking. However, auditing incidents on the platform has proven challenging.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT commented on social media that Hedera’s lack of a reliable block explorer effectively turns it into a “privacy chain,” since tracking and tracing suspicious transactions is particularly difficult for third parties.
ZachXBT remarked that limited block explorer functionality on Hedera poses challenges for transparency, especially during active security incidents.
Mini dictionary: Hashgraph is a consensus algorithm distinct from traditional blockchains, enabling faster and fairer transaction ordering and increased throughput, but often making third-party transaction tracing more complex.
Potential impact and market reactionHedera is governed by a council consisting of major global enterprises. In 2026, the platform attracted members such as McLaren Racing and Accenture, both citing the network’s enterprise-focused governance and infrastructure as key benefits. Hedera markets itself as the chosen trust layer for large organizations worldwide.
Despite these endorsements, the exploit has raised questions about network security and transparency. As of now, Hedera has not released any official statement regarding the exploit, but users and industry participants are awaiting further clarification and a detailed investigation.
HBAR, Hedera’s native cryptocurrency, is currently priced near $0.068, marking a 4% drop in the past 24 hours. The token’s market capitalization has fallen to around $2.98 billion, down just under 4% over the same period, according to CoinMarketCap data.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
TLDR: Bonzo Lend confirmed a $9.05 million loss after Supra’s oracle verifier accepted a zeroed signature. A manipulated SAUCE price update let Wallet A borrow far beyond its actual posted collateral value. Wallet B, a self-identified white-hat responder, borrowed $1M and pledged to return the funds soon. Bonzo Vaults, Bridge, and staking remained unaffected; only the Lend pool and Points were paused. Bonzo Lend, Hedera’s largest lending protocol, has confirmed a loss of approximately $9.05 million following an oracle exploit. The incident occurred on July 11, 2026, when an attacker manipulated the price feed for SAUCE tokens.
Bonzo Finance Labs, working alongside the Bonzo Finance Foundation, traced the breach to a verification flaw in Supra’s oracle contracts. The lending pool has been paused while the teams investigate recovery options and next steps.
How the Oracle Verification Failure Unfolded The exploit targeted Supra’s on-chain oracle verifier, not Bonzo Lend’s own contracts. An account known as Wallet A submitted a price update carrying a zeroed BLS signature. That update should have been rejected, yet the verifier accepted it as genuine.
Supra’s oracle publishes signed price updates for protocols like Bonzo Lend to read. Because both the signature and referenced committee key were zero, the pairing calculation returned true. The precompile answered that narrow question correctly, but the verifier misread it as a valid signature.
The manipulated update inflated SAUCE’s recorded price by roughly twelve orders of magnitude. SAUCE was trading near 0.2 HBAR when the falsified figure landed on-chain. Eight seconds later, Wallet A used that inflated collateral to borrow far beyond its real worth.
Bonzo Finance Labs stressed that its lending contracts functioned exactly as designed throughout the episode. The pool calculated collateral value and borrowing capacity using the price the oracle supplied. Given a manipulated input, the protocol simply produced the output its code specifies.
Wallet Activity and the White-Hat Response Wallet A deposited 250 SAUCE tokens, worth only a few dollars, before the manipulated update landed. Once the false valuation went live, it borrowed 6,634,528 USDC and over 34.5 million WHBAR within the same minute.
A separate account, called Wallet B, borrowed roughly $1 million while the false price stayed active. Wallet B later contacted the Bonzo team directly through its Discord channel. The account identified itself as a white-hat responder and said it intends to return the funds.
Because those assets are expected to be returned, Bonzo Finance Labs classified the amount as a recovery item. That figure was excluded from the headline loss total of $9.05 million. Should the promised return not occur, the reported accounting will be updated accordingly.
Legitimate oracle publishing restored SAUCE to its normal value near 0.1964 HBAR by 01:36 UTC. Bonzo Lend was paused five minutes later, at 01:41 UTC, as a precaution. Bonzo Points, a related rewards feature, was paused later that same morning.
Protocol Status and Coordinated Recovery Efforts Bonzo Finance Labs confirmed several protocol components remained unaffected throughout the incident. Bonzo Vaults, the Bonzo Bridge, and single-sided staking for BONZO and XBONZO continued operating normally. Only the lending pool and its points program were paused.
Supra acknowledged the flaw and has since deployed a fix to the affected contract. That patch let investigators reconstruct how the zeroed signature bypassed verification. The exploit transaction and its internal trace remain publicly viewable on Hedera mainnet.
Bonzo Finance Labs and the Bonzo Finance Foundation are coordinating on next steps for the paused pool. Officials have not yet outlined conditions for lifting the pause or resuming withdrawals. Further updates on remediation are expected in a separate communication.
The team also acknowledged support from ecosystem partners across multiple time zones during the investigation.
Coordination with Wallet B on the fund return remains an active, ongoing process. Bonzo Finance Labs said it remains focused on transparency as recovery efforts continue.
10 July 2026 | 19:31 Hyundai Card settled a $20,000 intercompany transfer between U.S. and Mexico affiliates in about seven minutes using USDT on Avalanche, with a European pilot involving Visa and Circle scheduled for late July 2026.
The pilot matters not because of the amount moved, but because it treats stablecoins as corporate treasury infrastructure rather than as a crypto investment product.
Key Takeaways $20,000 converted to USDT on Avalanche, settled in an average of 7 minutes, versus 3 to 4 hours through interbank rails. Participants included Hyundai Card, Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Mexico, Tether, Ava Labs, and Axiym. European subsidiaries, multi-currency, with Circle (USDC/EURC) and Visa as partners, scheduled to begin end of July 2026. South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not recognize stablecoins as a legitimate cross-border payment instrument. Seven Minutes From Dollars to Dollars Hyundai Motor America converted $20,000 into USDT, transferred the tokens over Avalanche to Hyundai Motor Mexico, and the Mexican entity converted the stablecoin back into fiat on arrival. End-to-end, including verification and reconversion, the process averaged seven minutes. The same transaction routed through correspondent banking would ordinarily require three to four hours at minimum, with additional intermediary hops and per-hop fees.
The important qualifier from Hyundai Card is that this was an actual intercompany settlement, not a sandbox test with synthetic funds. Real corporate money moved between real subsidiaries for a real reconciliation purpose. That distinction is what separates this from the dozens of blockchain proofs of concept that never leave a lab environment.
Why Avalanche, and Why It Matters for Enterprises Hyundai is not using Avalanche the way a retail wallet user would. The architecture Ava Labs offers to corporates is the Subnet, a permissioned environment where only approved validators process transactions and where the parent company can dictate the rules of the network.
For a multinational, three properties of this design carry weight: Validator geofencing. European transactions can be routed exclusively through validators located in approved jurisdictions, which addresses data-residency requirements under EU compliance frameworks. Gas abstraction. Instead of forcing every subsidiary to hold AVAX to pay for transactions, the parent can operate a corporate-funded or zero-gas model. Subsidiaries interact with the rail as if it were an internal system. Access control. Whitelisted wallets and pre-approved smart contract interactions replace open-network exposure. Few, if any, of these features exist in the same form on an unpermissioned public chain. They are the reason enterprise stablecoin pilots have tended to converge on subnet-style or permissioned architectures rather than on unmodified Layer 1 rails.
The Compliance Layer Is the Real Product The technology piece of a seven-minute cross-border transfer is not, on its own, novel. What Hyundai Card actually built, and the reason the pilot is being treated as significant, is the compliance scaffolding around the transfer.
According to the company’s disclosure, Hyundai Card led reviews of accounting treatment, tax exposure, legal standing, and internal-control frameworks across both jurisdictions before running the transfer. The design depends on whitelisted corporate wallets, KYC and AML controls at the entity level, pre-approved smart contract access, and stablecoins whose issuers, Tether and Circle, can freeze tokens if a compliance event occurs.
That last property is a feature for a corporate treasurer and a bug for a decentralization purist. For Hyundai, the ability to freeze tokens in a compromise scenario is precisely what makes the rail acceptable to auditors and internal risk committees.
The Accounting Question the Press Release Skips Stablecoins are pegged to fiat, but under standard IFRS treatment they are generally not classified as cash equivalents, because they are not central-bank legal tender. The likely accounting path for the $20,000 in the Hyundai pilot is a three-step recognition: short-term digital asset or financial instrument on the sending side, intercompany receivable and payable during the transit window, and cash on the receiving side after reconversion.
The seven-minute transit window is significant, and not merely for its speed. A short window sharply reduces the risk of a realized FX difference materializing between the moment the asset leaves one balance sheet and the moment it arrives on another. In a three-to-four-hour correspondent transfer, that risk is measurable. In a seven-minute settlement, it is close to negligible.
This is where the reduction in settlement time translates into a specific accounting benefit, not merely a convenience.
Phase Two Changes the Test The U.S. to Mexico pilot moved dollar value between two dollar-linked entities. That is the easiest possible test case. The European phase, with Circle and Visa as new partners, changes the economic question.
Circle can support a dual-stablecoin structure using USDC on the dollar side and EURC on the euro side. That opens the possibility of on-chain foreign-exchange conversion through stablecoin liquidity pools or through Circle’s own settlement routes, rather than through bank-provided FX spreads. Visa’s contribution is corporate payout infrastructure: prefunding, fiat exit routes, and integration with local bank account rails.
The real measurement in Phase Two is not settlement speed, which has already been demonstrated. It is whether the total cost of a multi-currency intercompany transfer, including FX conversion, comes in below the equivalent bank-provided route.
The Korean Regulatory Contradiction The pilot’s commercial ambitions must be weighed against South Korea’s regulatory stance, which is where the true tension in this narrative lies.
Korean authorities have moved to exclude dollar-backed stablecoins including USDT and USDC from the recognized scope of corporate digital-asset activity. The Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not formally recognize stablecoins as a legitimate means of cross-border payment. The Bank of Korea has consistently leaned toward a central-bank digital currency and bank-issued deposit tokens as its preferred settlement instruments rather than private stablecoins.
That preference is already operational. The BOK’s Project Hangang has moved into its second phase, expanding to nine commercial banks and adding P2P transfers and AI-agent payment capabilities, while the Digital Asset Basic Act that would govern private stablecoin issuance remains delayed.
Against that backdrop, a Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary is running production-ready stablecoin remittance rails using USDT and preparing to test USDC and EURC. The commercial pull of faster and cheaper settlement is running ahead of the domestic regulatory framework, and the pilot effectively puts corporate weight behind the argument that Korean rules need to be updated.
The framing here is not that Hyundai is defying regulators. It is that a multinational operating under multiple jurisdictions is building infrastructure for a use case its home regulator has not yet blessed, and doing so publicly.
The Limits of a $20,000 Test The pilot proves that a $20,000 intercompany transfer can settle in seven minutes with full compliance review across two jurisdictions. It does not prove that the same architecture scales to hundreds of transfers per day across a dozen currencies with FX efficiency intact. Phase Two is designed to test exactly that.
It also does not resolve the accounting classification question in a way that generalizes to every corporate. IFRS treatment of stablecoins remains an evolving area, and the answer for a Korean conglomerate operating in the U.S. and Mexico may not translate directly to a European manufacturer operating in Asia.
If the European phase shows a favorable cost result once fees, spreads, and reconversion are aggregated, the case for corporate stablecoin treasury rails moves from operational curiosity to competitive necessity. If it does not, the pilot remains a speed story rather than a cost story.
The distinction matters because CFOs approve budgets against cost savings, not against settlement latency.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Always conduct your own research before making decisions related to digital assets or corporate treasury strategies.
Author
Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.
A $20,000 treasury transfer between a US entity and its Mexico operations would normally crawl through correspondent banking rails for several hours. Hyundai Motor, South Korea’s largest automaker, just did it in about seven minutes—using Tether’s USDT on Avalanche. According to the original report, the company completed the first stablecoin-powered internal cross-border payment among major Korean enterprises.
The pilot is more than a speed trick. It is a controlled experiment that replaces SWIFT messages, intermediary bank fees, and float time with a direct on-chain settlement that settles immediately and costs dramatically less. For a multinational manufacturer with complex supply chains and cash pools in multiple jurisdictions, moving treasury operations onto stablecoins could remove friction that has been built into the global dollar system for decades.
Hyundai sent USDT from its US entity to its entity in Mexico. The transfer avoided foreign exchange conversion at the point of payment because USDT is dollar-denominated and widely accepted by local counterparties or easily converted in Mexican crypto markets. The company said the mechanism will expand to more countries and local currencies. That points to a strategy where USDT acts as an intermediary currency, not just a dollar substitute, potentially bypassing volatile emerging-market forex pairs.
Why Avalanche Was the Chosen Network Avalanche may seem like an unexpected choice given that most stablecoin volume lives on Ethereum and Tron. But its sub-second finality, low transaction fees, and compatibility with Ethereum tooling make it suitable for enterprise-grade transfers that need speed without sacrificing settlement certainty. The network continues to hold a spot among the top blockchains by developer activity, which suggests a resilient technical foundation behind the public ledger.
Hyundai’s treasury team likely required a chain with high throughput, reliable uptime, and native support for USDT across multiple validators. Avalanche’s C-Chain delivers all three while allowing the company to custody keys through institutional-grade wallet infrastructure. It also avoids the congestion and fee spikes that can hit Ethereum during NFT minting waves or DeFi volatility.
The seven-minute settlement mark includes on-chain confirmation time plus internal reconciliation, meaning the end-to-end process is competitive with—or faster than—systems like FedNow for domestic transfers. For cross-border flows, the difference is starker still, because SWIFT-based wires often involve extended cut-off windows and manual review.
From Pilot to Live Rails: The European Expansion Hyundai is not treating this as a one-off. The company plans a second pilot this month for its European subsidiaries, involving two heavyweights: Circle and Visa. Circle operates USDC, the second-largest regulated stablecoin, and Visa has been steadily building rails that connect digital currency settlement to its card network. The jump from USDT to a potential multichain, multi-issuer framework hints that Hyundai is testing not just one stablecoin, but a treasury architecture that could plug into different regulated tokens depending on jurisdiction.
This echoes a broader corporate trend where tokenization and stablecoin settlement are moving beyond crypto-native firms. The tokenization of real-world assets exceeded $20 billion on-chain recently, and institutional adoption now includes everything from BlackRock’s tokenized money market fund to JPMorgan’s programmable payments. Hyundai’s pilot fits into that pattern, but with a focus on operational treasury instead of financial product structuring.
The presence of Visa adds a compliance layer. Rather than moving stablecoins purely on public rails and managing off-ramps independently, Hyundai appears to be testing a flow where Visa provides connectivity to regulated banking endpoints. That addresses the biggest barrier for corporates: what happens after the stablecoin lands. Without a clear path to fiat and a compliant record of the transaction, treasury departments remain skeptical. Circle’s involvement also suggests that issuers with full reserve attestations and regulatory engagement will have an edge as demand shifts from speculation to real settlements.
Market Implications and What Remains Unclear If Hyundai scales the pilot, the impact could extend beyond one company. Large Korean exporters—including other vehicle manufacturers and electronics firms—might follow, creating a new demand corridor for stablecoins on networks like Avalanche. That would change the liquidity profile of USDT and USDC, shifting them further toward being working capital instruments rather than just trading collateral on exchanges.
Still, the pilot size is tiny—$20,000—and no public timeline exists for moving into production volumes. Corporate treasurers are conservative by nature. They will need proof that stablecoin transfers remain compliant across both jurisdictions, that the coins can be reliably redeemed for fiat without delay, and that audit trails satisfy local tax and foreign exchange controls. The regulatory landscape for stablecoin payments remains unsettled in major markets, including the United States, where pending legislation could reshape the entire ecosystem.
Another open question is whether Hyundai eventually uses stablecoins for supplier payments or customer-facing transactions. Internal treasury is the safest starting point because it avoids counterparty onboarding risk. But the real prize lies in shrinking working capital cycles with suppliers in countries where dollar liquidity is expensive. That use case is still unproven in a high-volume industrial setting.
For Avalanche, hosting a marquee enterprise pilot bolsters its case as a network that can support real-world settlement, not just DeFi and gaming. The challenge is translating a single proof-of-concept into sustained on-chain activity that meaningfully contributes to network fees and validator incentives. For now, the pilot stands as a small but concrete data point that stablecoins can compress settlement time in corporate treasury so dramatically that CFOs will have to take notice.
AUTHOR
Max delves deep into the cryptocurrency realm, with a passion for altcoins and NFTs. Convinced of crypto's transformative potential, he envisions a decentralized financial future. Max's background in the financial sector grants him unique insights into global monetary systems. In his leisure, Max embraces the thrill of adventures and is an avid sports enthusiast, finding balance and rejuvenation away from work.
Avalanche (AVAX) is currently trading near $6.71, down about 1% over the past 24 hours, as the cryptocurrency faces renewed pressure from both technical signals and negative sentiment following its removal from the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF.
Bitwise ETF Removes AVAX Amid Market WeaknessBitwise Asset Management, a company known for managing some of the largest cryptocurrency index funds, recently excluded AVAX from its flagship Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF. At the same time, Bitwise added HYPE to the index. This adjustment has drawn attention from market participants, as index membership often helps maintain institutional visibility for the included coin.
While removal from the ETF does not erase Avalanche’s long-term potential, it arrives at a time when AVAX is already under pressure. Traders are now more cautious, with the ETF change adding to the existing negative momentum.
Bitwise replaced AVAX with HYPE in its top 10 index, a move that has added to AVAX’s near-term challenges as it trades around key support levels.
Avalanche is a blockchain platform designed for decentralized applications and custom blockchain networks. Its native asset, AVAX, has established a reputation for high throughput and rapid finality.
Mini dictionary: Bitwise Asset Management is a digital asset manager specializing in index and thematic funds for cryptocurrencies, including the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF, one of the earliest and largest crypto index funds. It plays a major role in shaping institutional crypto exposure.
Technical Analysis: Downside Risks DominateAVAX is trading in a narrow range between $6.68 and $6.79, with every rally facing strong resistance below the $6.90 to $7.00 area. If buyers are unable to push the price back above $6.90, the bearish structure remains intact. A recovery above $7.00 would be required to alleviate the selling pressure amid several negative technical setups.
ZoneRoleImplication$6.90 – $7.00Resistance/BreakoutRecovery only if surpassed$6.65 – $6.60Short-term supportVulnerable, likely to be tested$6.50 – $6.30Key downside zonesPotential next reaction areaSeveral chart analysts have highlighted that if AVAX loses the $6.60 to $6.50 support, the next stop could fall to $6.30 or even below. Sideways movement and weak volume suggest that sellers still dominate the market, while buyers have struggled to sustain rebounds.
Emergence of Bearish PatternsMultiple technical traders, including Crypto Nuclear, indicate that AVAX is currently forming bearish patterns on the 8-hour chart. Any breakdown below $6.00 could trigger a fresh leg down, with targets as deep as $5.65 if current supports fail. This assessment aligns with the broader trend of declining momentum in the token.
Another recent observation from Crypto With Gopal points to a potential head-and-shoulders pattern, which typically signals waning bullish momentum. The right shoulder forms near $6.80 to $6.90, and if the price drops below the neckline, further downside may follow.
Chart setups show AVAX facing risk of a deeper decline if it cannot reclaim $7.00, with multiple bearish patterns pressuring the short-term outlook.
Support and Resistance Levels to WatchAVAX is currently positioned at a fragile point, with both sides of the market testing key short-term zones. The critical levels for traders are $6.70 to $6.65 on the upside, where buyers are trying to establish a base, and $6.50 to $6.30 on the downside, which could attract new demand if tested further.
Any sustained move below $6.55 would likely lead to increased selling pressure, pushing AVAX into deeper support regions. Conversely, a move above $6.85 could set up a potential short-term recovery if buyers regain momentum.
Outlook: Critical Days Ahead for AvalancheAVAX remains in a cautious territory, with the latest Bitwise ETF exclusion amplifying bearish signals from the charts. Until AVAX closes consistently above $6.90 and reclaims $7.00, downside risks are likely to persist. If sellers maintain control, price targets of $6.50 and $6.30 could be tested, with $5.65 as a potential lower target on further weakness.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Avalanche Stablecoin Supply Jumps 46% in Seven DaysAvalanche's stablecoin supply has posted one of its sharpest weekly gains on record. According to data shared by @BSCNews, the total stablecoin supply on @Avax surged 46% in just seven days, pushing the figure above $1.8 billion at time of writing. The move has lifted $AVAX into 11th place among all stablecoin networks globally, overtaking both @Plasma and @ripple's $XRP Ledger in the process.
The milestone is notable not just for its speed but for the broader trajectory it reflects. According to Token Terminal data, the combined market cap of stablecoins and tokenized funds on Avalanche climbed from roughly $1.2 billion in January 2024 to just above $2 billion in January 2026, representing a roughly 70% increase over two years. The latest weekly spike suggests that pace is now accelerating.
Institutional Momentum and Network Growth Behind the MoveThe stablecoin surge does not exist in isolation. Avalanche has been building institutional momentum across several fronts in 2026. Avalanche formally launched the Avalanche Payments Collective, an alliance of 28 major organisations including Franklin Templeton, VanEck, and Paxos, aimed at unifying stablecoin settlement, treasury infrastructure, and foreign exchange into a single blockchain-based framework spanning more than 150 countries.
Major financial institutions such as J.P. Morgan, Apollo, and Citi are also using Avalanche for real-world asset tokenization and backend infrastructure. That institutional engagement has helped attract deeper stablecoin liquidity to the network, providing a structural foundation beneath the latest supply figures.
On the technical side, Avalanche's C-Chain can process roughly 88% more transaction throughput than Ethereum while pricing transactions at approximately one-fiftieth of the cost, and it can rapidly increase block size during periods of high demand. Those performance characteristics make it a practical choice for stablecoin issuers and settlement-focused applications looking for speed and low cost.
The credit for building the infrastructure that underpins these results sits largely with the @AvaLabs team, whose continued development work has positioned Avalanche as a credible institutional-grade settlement layer heading into the second half of 2026.
Sources:
Yahoo Finance: Avalanche posts 70% surge in stablecoin and tokenized fund market cap in 2 years
VanEck: Avalanche 201, The Institutional Platform
DefiLlama: Avalanche Stablecoin Market Cap and Supply
Why Is Hyundai Testing Stablecoins for Internal Payments? Hyundai has moved a stablecoin-based internal remittance system into production readiness on the Avalanche blockchain, marking one of the clearest enterprise uses of stablecoins for cross-border treasury management by a major industrial company.
The system is designed for internal transfers between Hyundai entities rather than customer payments or crypto trading. In its first phase, Hyundai Motor America sent $20,000 to Hyundai Motor Mexico by converting dollars into Tether’s USDT stablecoin, transferring the value onchain, and converting the funds back into dollars.
The test is small in dollar terms but significant in operating context. Hyundai is the world’s third-largest carmaker by vehicle sales, and its use of stablecoins places blockchain infrastructure inside a corporate treasury workflow tied to multinational operations. That makes the project different from earlier crypto pilots focused on branding, consumer rewards, or limited proof-of-concept experiments.
Justin Kim, head of APAC at Ava Labs, said Hyundai is the first major enterprise to publicly announce this type of implementation on Avalanche. “This is already a real treasury management use case, not a sandbox — the pilot moved live USD and USDT between Hyundai Motor’s U.S. and Mexico entities,” he said.
How Does The Avalanche-Based Transfer Work? The first transfer used a simple stablecoin remittance path. Hyundai converted dollars into USDT, moved the stablecoin between corporate entities, and then converted the funds back into dollars at the receiving end. The process was led by Hyundai Card, the carmaker’s credit card unit.
Hyundai Card said the transfer took an average of 7 minutes. That compares with the 3 to 4 hours typically required through traditional banking networks. For a multinational company, the time difference can matter when moving liquidity between subsidiaries, managing working capital, or reducing delays in cross-border settlement.
The pilot also shows why stablecoins are gaining attention outside crypto-native markets. Large companies are testing whether tokenized dollars can reduce transfer times, lower payment friction, and simplify internal treasury movement across borders. The focus is not speculation. It is whether blockchain-based settlement can compete with bank rails for specific corporate finance tasks.
Avalanche’s role is to provide the blockchain network used for the transfer. Ava Labs, which develops and supports the platform, said the project is expected to expand into additional corridors and currencies as Hyundai evaluates whether the model can scale across more enterprise use cases.
Investor Takeaway Why Does This Matter for Stablecoin Adoption? Stablecoins have long been used in crypto markets for trading, liquidity, and dollar exposure. Hyundai’s project shows how the same infrastructure can be applied to corporate payments, especially where companies operate across multiple jurisdictions and currencies.
The internal remittance model could be attractive for large enterprises because it keeps the use case inside the company. That reduces some external payment complexity while still allowing the firm to test settlement speed, conversion costs, operational controls, and treasury reporting. It also gives companies a way to compare stablecoin rails against existing bank networks without immediately exposing customers or suppliers to the process.
For stablecoin issuers and blockchain networks, enterprise treasury is a high-value market because corporate payments involve large flows, recurring transactions, and strict requirements around reliability and compliance. A successful model could support demand for regulated stablecoins, blockchain settlement networks, custodial services, and foreign exchange infrastructure connected to onchain transfers.
The next phase will test whether those advantages hold beyond a single U.S.-Mexico transfer. Hyundai plans to explore additional cross-border corridors and local currencies, which should provide a clearer view of how stablecoin transfers perform when foreign exchange costs, local settlement rules, and treasury controls become more complex.
What Comes Next for Hyundai’s Stablecoin Project? A second pilot involving Hyundai’s European subsidiaries is scheduled to begin later this month. That phase will test local currency transfers and evaluate foreign exchange conversion costs in partnership with Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, and Visa.
The European pilot is important because it broadens the project beyond USDT and the U.S.-Mexico corridor. Testing local currencies, USDC infrastructure, and Visa’s payment network involvement could show whether stablecoin settlement can work alongside established financial firms rather than operate as a separate crypto rail.
For Avalanche, Hyundai’s move gives the network an enterprise case study at a time when blockchains are competing for stablecoin and real-world payment activity. For Hyundai, the test creates an option to modernize internal cross-border transfers without committing the full treasury system to blockchain settlement immediately.
The broader implication is that stablecoins are moving into a more serious enterprise evaluation phase. Companies are not only asking whether tokenized dollars can move faster. They are testing whether those transfers can meet corporate standards for cost, compliance, liquidity, auditability, and scale.
Avalanche (AVAX) is positioned at a potential turning point, as technical indicators hint at a bullish breakout while strategic partnerships drive the network’s expansion beyond digital assets.
AVAX price moves within narrow band, key technical level in focusAVAX is currently priced at $6.76, supported by a 24-hour trading volume of $152.62 million and a market capitalization of $2.92 billion. Price action in recent sessions has been relatively stable, as traders monitor the asset near a significant technical pattern.
Crypto analyst Umair Orakzai has observed that the AVAX price is shaping an inverted head and shoulders pattern, a chart formation often associated with bullish reversals. According to Orakzai, the $6.327 support level is critical for maintaining this bullish scenario. If AVAX remains above this threshold, the likelihood of an upward breakout increases; dropping below it could nullify the pattern and shift sentiment bearish.
The asset is trading within a tight range, encountering resistance at $6.90 to $7.09, the approximate neckline of the inverted head and shoulders pattern. Sustained movement above this range could increase buying pressure and validate the positive outlook, while failure to hold support may lead to further losses.
LevelSupportResistanceKey zone$6.327$6.90–$7.09Movement in the broader cryptocurrency market, especially Bitcoin’s recent upward trend, adds to the cautious optimism among AVAX traders. The upcoming sessions are expected to play a significant role in determining the asset’s short-term direction.
Ava Labs teams up with NEC to enhance blockchain-based identityAva Labs, the core development team behind the Avalanche blockchain, has announced a major partnership with NEC, a global leader in biometric identity technology. The initiative will see both companies work together to develop blockchain-based identity verification tools, merging NEC’s expertise in digital ID systems with Avalanche’s highly scalable network.
NEC has deployed more than 1,000 biometric identity systems across over 70 countries, giving the company a robust track record in the digital identity sector.
Mini dictionary: NEC – A multinational information technology and electronics company based in Japan, specializing in biometric security, communications, and digital identity systems. It has implemented large-scale biometric ID solutions globally across the public and private sectors.
The collaboration aims to advance the use of blockchain for secure digital identification, targeting improved transaction security and expanding enterprise or government applications on Avalanche’s platform.
The synergy between NEC’s biometric expertise and Avalanche’s blockchain infrastructure is intended to create digital identity solutions that strengthen security and trust in digital transactions.
AVAX price movement remains within a neutral zone despite bullish technical signals and active network evolution. Traders are closely watching the $6.90–$7.09 resistance for a decisive move to confirm renewed upside momentum, while a drop below $6.327 could trigger further declines. Long-term investors are also focused on the progress of the Ava Labs–NEC alliance as a signal for broader platform adoption.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Erling Haaland is having the kind of World Cup that makes you wonder if the tournament’s scriptwriters have been watching too many sports movies. Seven goals in five matches, a round-of-16 win over Brazil, and Norway in the quarterfinals for the first time in the country’s history. But the most interesting ripple effect isn’t happening on the pitch. It’s happening on the Solana blockchain.
The $HAALAND meme token and Sorare NFTs linked to the Manchester City striker have seen significant trading surges as Norway’s improbable tournament run captures global attention. None of it is officially endorsed by Haaland.
From the pitch to the blockchain The $HAALAND meme token, trading on Solana, has experienced rising valuations that track almost perfectly with Norway’s advancement through the tournament bracket.
Sorare NFTs featuring Haaland have followed a similar trajectory, with trading activity climbing as his goal tally grows. The fantasy football platform’s digital cards have become collector targets, driven by the same impulse that makes people bid up rookie baseball cards during a hot streak.
Advertisement
The critical detail that investors need to internalize: Haaland has no official connection to any of these assets. The price action is entirely fan-driven speculation.
Norway’s fairy tale campaign Haaland, who captains the Norwegian side, has been the engine behind everything. His 7 goals in 5 matches place him at the top of the tournament’s scoring charts, and his 59 goals in 52 total appearances for Norway reflect a player operating at a level that most international strikers never reach. He’s scored in each of Norway’s last twelve competitive matches.
The round-of-16 victory over Brazil was the moment that turned casual interest into full-blown hysteria.
Now Norway faces England in the quarterfinals in Miami. Both coaches, Thomas Tuchel for England and Ståle Solbakken for Norway, have pointed to the striker matchup between Haaland and Harry Kane as the defining subplot.
Haaland has been vocal about what this tournament means to him personally, describing it as the fulfillment of a long-held dream after Norway missed previous World Cups entirely.
What this means for crypto investors The $HAALAND token is a textbook case of attention-driven trading. Its value correlates with Norway’s results, which means investors are essentially betting on match outcomes through a crypto instrument that has zero connection to the actual player or team.
The Sorare NFTs carry slightly more structural value because they’re tied to a functioning fantasy sports platform, but even those prices are inflated beyond normal levels by World Cup fever.
The absence of any official Haaland endorsement makes this particularly risky, as there’s no underlying partnership, revenue stream, or utility anchoring the token’s price.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
A George Costanza-themed meme coin launched on @solana has surged 100% in a single day, drawing a wave of Seinfeld memes across crypto social media and prompting traders to declare the arrival of "The Summer of George." The token, $george, has quickly become one of the more talked-about plays in the @solana trenches as the broader Solana meme coin scene heats up again.
Pop Culture Meets the Solana Trenches The token's rapid rise fits a familiar pattern in Solana's fast-moving meme economy. Meme coins typically attract attention because they move faster than larger cryptocurrencies and rely heavily on online momentum. In this case, the catalyst is a recognisable face from mainstream pop culture. George Costanza, the iconic Seinfeld character played by Jason Alexander, carries instant recognition well beyond the typical crypto crowd, giving the token a narrative hook that traders can rally around.
Social media continues to play a major role in that cycle. A tweet from the right influencer or a well-orchestrated meme campaign can transform a coin from a mere digital doodle into a sought-after play in the blink of an eye. The $george coin is a textbook example: coordinated meme posting on X and elsewhere appears to have driven the initial price spike, with community members leaning hard into the "Summer of George" framing, a reference to a beloved Seinfeld episode in which Costanza resolves to live life entirely on his own terms.
Wider Solana Meme Coin Momentum The token's breakout is landing at a moment when Solana's meme market is broadly back in form. Solana meme coin activity is accelerating again, with wallet creation, token launches, and trading volumes all increasing during recent months, highlighting how internet-driven trading culture continues to shape activity across the ecosystem. Platforms like Pump.fun, where $george originated, have made launching a new coin almost frictionless. Pump.fun's platform simplifies the token creation process, allowing anyone to launch their own meme coin with no coding experience necessary and for just a few dollars.
That accessibility cuts both ways. Meme coins live and die by sentiment, and a 100% single-day move is eye-catching, but traders in the Solana trenches know these gains can evaporate just as fast. Many meme coins still carry major risks, including scams, volatility, and rapid collapses. Between July and August 2025, only 0.7 to 0.8% of token launches on Pump.fun made it onto a major crypto exchange. The vast majority simply fade away within hours.
For now, $george is capturing the moment. Whether it can hold the community's attention long enough to extend the "Summer of George" beyond a single news cycle remains the key question.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.
Sources:
Memeburn: Solana Meme Coin Trading Rebounds as Pump.fun Activity Climbs Again
BeInCrypto: Pump.fun DEX Volume Hits a New ATH as Solana Meme Coins Rebound
Solana has a token problem, and it’s not exactly a secret. Between memecoins that evaporate overnight and project treasuries that seem to exist primarily for insider enrichment, the ecosystem has developed a reputation that makes institutional capital nervous. MetaDAO thinks it has a fix.
The Solana-based governance platform held its inaugural Owners Meeting on July 10 at Colosseum HQ in San Francisco, gathering founders, investors, and even futarchy theorist Robin Hanson to discuss a concept called “ownership coins.” The pitch is straightforward: tokens that give holders actual, enforceable control over project treasuries, intellectual property, and operations, rather than the usual governance theater that most DAOs deliver.
Decision markets over ballot boxes Instead of traditional token-weighted voting, MetaDAO uses decision markets. Rather than voting yes or no on a proposal, participants put money where their mouths are. The market prices in whether a decision will actually benefit token holders. Larger expenditures and token issuances need market approval before they go through.
This mechanism is designed specifically to address the alignment problems that have plagued Solana token launches. When a project’s treasury can’t be raided without the market pricing in that destruction, the economics of rug-pulling get significantly less attractive. The pre-commitment structure MetaDAO is building aims to tie token values directly to the performance of the underlying businesses they represent.
Advertisement
The META token and market reaction MetaDAO’s own META token has been trading recently between $3.6 and $3.8. The token saw a 27% surge following its Coinbase listing in May 2026, which gave it the kind of liquidity access that smaller governance tokens typically dream about.
That listing matters beyond just the price bump. Coinbase adding META signals a level of institutional validation for the futarchy governance model that MetaDAO has been developing since the project’s founding, which occurred between 2022 and 2024 with early investment support from Paradigm.
Why Solana specifically needs this The core issue is misalignment. Project founders issue tokens, accumulate treasury funds, and then face minimal accountability for how those funds get deployed. Traditional DAO voting mechanisms haven’t solved this because they’re trivially gameable by insiders who hold large token allocations from the start.
MetaDAO’s ownership coins attempt to solve this by making the governance mechanism itself resistant to capture. When every significant financial decision has to survive the scrutiny of a decision market, insiders can’t simply vote themselves favorable outcomes using their own token allocations.
The Owners Meeting brought together builders who are already working on real-world asset tokenization, indicating that the model isn’t purely theoretical. This event follows MetaDAO’s prior engagement with the broader Solana community through events like Breakpoint and partnerships supporting hackathon-to-ICO initiatives.
What investors should watch For traders watching META specifically, the Coinbase listing has established a liquidity baseline that didn’t exist before. The token’s relatively tight trading range between $3.6 and $3.8 suggests the market is still pricing in what the Owners Meeting and its ownership coin framework actually mean for long-term value.
MetaDAO needs other projects to actually use its framework for ownership coins to matter beyond its own ecosystem. The Owners Meeting’s attendee list included active builders rather than just spectators, indicating that adoption pipeline is forming.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Solana on-chain activity has dropped to a level never seen since late 2023, further underscoring the structural factor that could derail a strong price recovery.
According to a recent DeFi Report, the Solana network did $51M in total fees in Q2 2026, marking a 43% drop from Q1 and 78% on a year-on-year (YoY) basis. Compared to past quarters, this was the lowest fees since Q4 2024.
Source: Blockworks Since fees track the value paid by users transacting on the chain, it meant the network activity had dropped too. This was not surprising given the broader crypto market downturn since last October.
With the downturn, Solana’s traction as a ‘homebase for speculation’ also contracted over the period. But the report projected that the bear market bottom may have bottomed out in Q2, citing stablecoin growth, tokenization, and perpetual volume surge.
However, it looks like this may have bottomed in Q2. We’re now beginning to see some green shoots within the ‘trenches.’
Despite the said recovery in new narratives, capital inflows into the SOL token were still at a two-year low.
Solana: Assessing SOL’s price recovery According to Glassnode, SOL’s Realized Cap, which tracks on-chain capital inflows into the SOL market, has dropped from a record $97B last year to $73B in 2026. This was the lowest level the metric has dropped since late 2024.
Source: Glassnode In other words, SOL saw $24B in capital outflows in the past few months. The bearish trend is yet to reverse despite the recent 28% relief recovery.
During the broader recovery in early June, SOL bounced from $60 to $84, effectively reclaiming its 2026 range-low of $75 (orange channel). Since February, SOL has been range-bound between $98 and $75.
Source: SOL/USDT, TradingView It broke below the range after broader market risk-off triggered by Strategy’s BTC sale in early June. If the recent momentum holds, bulls could defend $75 and eye the mid-range level at $88 or the upside target at $92 (200-day Moving Average, blue line).
If so, that would imply a 13% to 20% upside potential assuming BTC does not post more losses in early Q3.
Separately, Web3 researcher Zach XBT reported that an early Solana whale has been exploited and 180.9K SOL ($14.2M) stolen. Should the hacker cash out the funds, it could trigger a short-term sell-off and test the $75 support.
Final Summary Solana fees plunged 78% YoY to $51M, the worst since late 2023 SOL reclaimed the 2026 price range, but $75 support could be tested if $14M stolen funds hit the market
Norway hasn’t been to a World Cup quarterfinal in 28 years. Now, with Erling Haaland leading the charge into a July clash against England at Miami’s Hard Rock Stadium, the football world is paying attention. So is the crypto market.
Solana-based meme tokens tied to the Norwegian striker and Viking culture have seen sharp surges in trading volume, riding the wave of global attention that comes with a cinematic underdog story.
Viking chants meet speculative charts The tokens in question, $HAALAND and $VIKINGROW, are exactly what they sound like: meme coins built on hype rather than utility. Their trading volumes have spiked in direct correlation with Norway’s match results during the tournament.
Advertisement
The “Viking Row” chant, which Norway’s supporters have turned into a viral phenomenon across Miami Beach, has apparently done double duty as both a fan ritual and an informal marketing campaign for the $VIKINGROW token.
Haaland’s NFT market gets a second wind The NFT market around football collectibles has seen renewed interest, particularly on Sorare, the fantasy football platform built on blockchain technology. Sorare lets you buy, sell, and trade digital player cards that function like traditional trading cards but live on the Ethereum blockchain.
Haaland’s digital collectibles on the platform have drawn fresh attention during the World Cup. One notable Haaland NFT previously sold for 265.1 ETH, which at the time was worth over $600,000. Trading volumes on Sorare have climbed during the tournament.
Sorare occupies a unique position in the NFT landscape because it combines actual game mechanics with collectibility. You’re not just buying a JPEG. You’re buying a card you can use in fantasy competitions.
Kraken’s big stage Behind all the meme coin chaos and NFT trading sits a more institutional story. Kraken, the crypto exchange, is FIFA’s official crypto partner for this tournament cycle. That means the exchange’s branding is woven into broadcasts, stadium signage, and digital content reaching billions of viewers worldwide.
For Kraken, a Norway-England quarterfinal is close to a best-case scenario. Two European teams with massive, crypto-curious fan bases playing in Miami, a city that has aggressively positioned itself as America’s crypto capital.
Crypto exchanges have pulled back significantly on sports partnerships since the FTX collapse made the entire category radioactive. Kraken maintaining its FIFA relationship signals both financial health and a long-term bet that mainstream sports audiences remain the most efficient path to retail adoption.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
England midfielder Jordan Henderson called Erling Haaland one of the best in the world ahead of their July 11 quarterfinal clash in Miami Gardens.
The $HAALAND token and Solana’s meme coin machine A Solana-based meme token trading under the ticker $HAALAND has gained noticeable traction during the tournament. It has no official connection to the Manchester City striker.
Haaland’s tournament appearances have corresponded with trading momentum in these meme tokens. The tokens don’t represent equity, utility, or any claim on Haaland’s earnings.
These unofficial athlete tokens have become increasingly popular as speculative instruments during major sporting events. They operate in a gray zone: not explicitly illegal in most jurisdictions, but carrying zero endorsement from the players whose names they borrow.
Advertisement
Sorare NFTs and the Haaland premium Sorare, the fantasy football platform built on blockchain, has seen renewed interest in Haaland-linked NFTs during the 2026 World Cup. His digital cards previously generated sales totaling 265.1 ETH during the 2022-2023 period, and the current tournament has reignited demand.
Unlike meme tokens, Sorare NFTs carry actual utility within the platform’s fantasy game ecosystem. Owning a Haaland card lets you field him in competitions, but secondary market pricing still tracks real-world performance.
Prediction markets feel the Henderson effect Reports of an injury to Henderson during the tournament triggered increases in betting volumes on Polymarket, the decentralized prediction platform. When Henderson’s fitness came into question, traders rapidly adjusted their positions on England’s quarterfinal prospects.
What this means for crypto traders watching the World Cup The 2026 World Cup has intensified fan engagement with crypto platforms in a way that previous tournaments only hinted at. Sorare’s fantasy game, Polymarket’s prediction contracts, and Solana’s meme token ecosystem are all feeding off the same attention economy.
Unofficial tokens like $HAALAND can surge on a single goal and collapse just as fast when the final whistle blows. There is no fundamental floor under an asset whose entire value proposition is borrowed celebrity.
Sorare NFTs offer a slightly more grounded play, given their utility within the platform’s game mechanics. A Haaland card bought at peak World Cup hype may not hold its value once club football resumes and attention disperses.
Polymarket presents perhaps the most intellectually honest version of sports-crypto convergence. You’re making a prediction, staking capital on it, and the outcome is binary.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
In brief Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum layer-2 blockchain built using Arbitrum technology. The network handles tokenized real-world assets, including stocks and ETFs. It works with DeFi applications, including decentralized exchanges and lending protocols. Robinhood Chain is a blockchain network developed by Robinhood, the financial services company behind the stock and crypto trading platform.
Launched in mainnet on July 1, 2026, Robinhood Chain—a network built with Ethereum technology—brings together tokenized assets, decentralized finance (DeFi), and smart contracts that can power crypto applications.
“Decentralized finance unlocks possibilities beyond what traditional finance can offer, but historically, it has required technical expertise to navigate,” Johann Kerbrat, SVP and general manager of crypto and international at Robinhood, said in a statement. “We’re bringing the best of traditional finance and DeFi together, and in doing so, expanding financial ownership to every corner of the globe.”
What is Robinhood Chain?Robinhood Chain gives developers a network for building applications involving financial assets, including tokenized stocks, ETFs, and other real-world assets.
A layer-2 network is a blockchain built on top of another blockchain. Instead of processing every transaction directly on Ethereum’s main network, layer-2 networks handle transactions separately before sending data back for settlement.
This helps reduce fees and typically increases the number of transactions the network can process compared to a layer-1 network like Ethereum.
Robinhood Chain uses ETH as its native gas token, meaning users pay network fees using Ethereum. It also works with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), the software environment used to run Ethereum smart contracts. Developers can use existing Ethereum programming languages and tools to build applications on the network.
Robinhood Chain uses the Arbitrum Dedicated Blockchains framework, a customizable layer-2 system created by Offchain Labs.
Wallets and applications that support Ethereum connections can interact with the network through JSON-RPC, a standard communication method used by Ethereum applications.
How are transactions processed?Robinhood Chain uses a first-come, first-served sequencing model.
A sequencer orders transactions before they are added to a blockchain. On Robinhood Chain, transactions are processed based on when they arrive, rather than allowing users to pay higher fees for priority placement.
Transactions move through several stages:
The sequencer receives and processes the transaction. Transaction batches are posted back to Ethereum. The transaction reaches final settlement. What are Robinhood Stock Tokens?Stock Tokens are blockchain-based assets issued by Robinhood that provide exposure to real-world assets (RWAs), including stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
RWAs are tokens connected to assets outside crypto, such as stocks, bonds, commodities, or real estate. Because they exist on-chain, they can interact with applications including trading platforms, lending protocols, and other smart contract-based tools.
Stock Tokens are not the same as owning company shares. They provide exposure to an underlying asset but do not provide legal ownership rights, including shareholder voting rights. They also are not available to U.S. users, as of this writing.
“Stock Tokens are not registered under U.S. securities laws and may not be offered, sold, or delivered, directly or indirectly, in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons,” Robinhood wrote on its website. Offers and sales of Stock Tokens are subject to restrictions in other jurisdictions, including, without limitation, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.”
Which applications run on Robinhood Chain?Robinhood Chain works with decentralized exchanges, lending protocols, oracle services, and infrastructure providers.
Decentralized exchanges, or DEXs, allow users to trade blockchain assets through smart contracts instead of traditional intermediaries. Many DEXs use automated market makers (AMMs), which rely on pools of assets instead of traditional order books. Uniswap is among the exchanges available on the network.
Lending protocols allow users to supply assets through smart contracts that others can borrow from. Robinhood’s DeFi products include integrations with Morpho, a decentralized lending protocol.
Oracles connect blockchains to external information, such as asset prices. Robinhood Chain uses Chainlink price feeds to provide market data to applications. Other infrastructure providers include Alchemy for developer tools, BitGo for institutional custody, and Paxos for USDG stablecoin support.
What happened after launch?Following its mainnet rollout, Robinhood Chain saw a surge of activity from traders and decentralized applications.
In its first week, the network recorded more than 17 million transactions, nearly 350,000 addresses, and more than $1 billion in decentralized exchange volume. While internal company metrics estimated the protocol's total value locked (TVL) at $250 million, independent data from DefiLlama tracked the core protocol TVL at roughly $94 million, with network stablecoin balances climbing past $260 million.
Part of that initial momentum was due to the meme coin Cash Cat (CASHCAT), which saw a surge in value as crypto traders attempted to ride the wave of hype around the newly launched network. Other meme coins on the network have seen growing demand following Cash Cat's rapid rise to prominence.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
The exchange recorded $207 million in net withdrawals over seven days following a high-profile user theft claim that spread rapidly across crypto social media. The outflows came after a verified Gate.io user, posting under the handle @jheioff on X, alleged that $1.7 million had been drained from their account despite having every security layer the platform offers turned on.
What actually happened The user claimed their account was compromised through unauthorized changes to their security settings, even though real-name verification, two-factor authentication, and email notifications were all active. Gate.io’s initial response made things worse, not better. The exchange pushed back, saying the actions on the account appeared to be user-initiated and that no systemic breach had occurred. Gate.io CEO Dr. Han stated publicly that the situation was fully disclosed and that customer assets faced no systemic risk.
Widespread criticism followed across X and other platforms, with users questioning whether the exchange’s security architecture was sound and, more pointedly, whether Gate.io would take any financial responsibility for the alleged loss. The backlash was loud enough that Gate.io eventually reversed course, issued an apology, and committed to a full investigation.
Advertisement
The apology came. The $1.7 million, as far as public reporting shows, did not.
Why users started pulling funds The $207 million in net outflows over seven days is a direct expression of that calculus. This pattern is not new for Gate. In 2023, the exchange experienced withdrawal spikes ranging from $148 million to $176 million, triggered not by a confirmed exploit but by rumors circulating online. The 2026 incident follows a similar script, except this time there is an actual user with an actual claim attached to an actual dollar figure.
Gate.io’s history adds texture to the current anxiety. The exchange has faced scrutiny over a purported 2018 incident that some analysts have connected to roughly $230 million in losses that were never publicly disclosed by the platform. Gate.io has not confirmed that characterization, but the historical narrative exists and resurfaces every time the exchange finds itself in a security headline.
What this means for the broader market For Gate.io specifically, the sustained nature of the outflows, seven days of net withdrawals rather than a single-day panic, suggests this is not pure noise. A one-day spike can be dismissed as overreaction. A week of consistent net outflows is a platform bleeding trust in slow motion.
For traders still holding funds on Gate.io, the investigation timeline is the key variable to watch. If the exchange produces a transparent account of what happened and offers some form of restitution to the affected user, it has a path back to stability. If the inquiry goes quiet, the $207 million in outflows is unlikely to be the final number.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Sui Network just posted a number that would make Visa’s infrastructure engineers do a double take. During a live experiment on July 4, the blockchain hit a peak of 6,086,766 transactions per second, driven entirely by autonomous AI agents trading and transacting with each other.
The test, dubbed “Sui Tunnels,” was originally designed to crack the 1 million TPS barrier. It overshot that goal by more than six times. For context, the network’s previous controlled benchmark sat at 297,000 TPS, meaning this experiment produced roughly 20x the throughput of its own prior record.
How programmable tunnels actually work Sui Tunnels use what the team calls “programmable tunnels,” which are essentially off-chain payment and state channels. Transactions happen off the main road at blazing speed, then get batched together and settled on the actual mainnet in bulk.
Advertisement
In English: millions of individual agent-to-agent interactions were processed off-chain, with only the final settlement hitting Sui’s Layer 1. The raw throughput number reflects the total activity across these tunnels, not transactions individually confirmed on the public blockchain in real time.
This distinction is critical. Independent analyses have pegged Sui’s real-world mainnet peaks closer to 1,000 TPS, a far cry from 6 million.
The experiment kicked off around 12:30 PM ET and was livestreamed publicly. Sui made the event accessible through a dedicated explorer using zkLogin, a privacy-preserving authentication method, for secure access. The setup facilitated millions of interactions between autonomous AI agents, each executing microtransactions and trading operations without any human intervention.
The machine economy thesis Sui isn’t running these experiments for bragging rights alone. The broader play here is positioning the network as foundational infrastructure for what crypto builders increasingly call the “machine economy,” a future where AI agents, not humans, drive the majority of blockchain transactions.
Programmable tunnels attempt to solve this by moving the high-frequency grunt work off-chain while preserving the security guarantees of on-chain settlement.
What this means for investors The bearish case is worth considering. The verified mainnet throughput sitting around 1,000 TPS tells a very different story about day-to-day network capacity. Investors should be clear-eyed about what was actually demonstrated: an off-chain scaling solution performing well in a staged environment, not the base layer processing 6 million transactions per second.
What to watch next is whether Sui can deploy tunnels in production with the same reliability. The key metrics will be sustained throughput under organic load, settlement latency between tunnels and mainnet, and whether third-party developers actually build on the architecture.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Key Takeaways Five Democratic senators are requesting congressional hearings to examine Trump’s cryptocurrency investments and potential foreign influence concerns Trump disclosed approximately $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency-related earnings for 2025, spanning his memecoin venture and World Liberty Financial A UAE-connected entity allegedly acquired a 49% ownership position in World Liberty Financial Senate Democrats seek clarity on whether international investors shaped American cryptocurrency regulations, including pending legislation Legislation prohibiting a central bank digital currency will take effect after Trump allowed it to pass without his signature Five Democratic senators are pushing for formal congressional hearings to investigate President Donald Trump’s extensive cryptocurrency portfolio, citing concerns about potential foreign interference and national security implications.
🟡 Exclusive: Top Democrats slam Trump over crypto ahead of vote:
“The disclosures heighten concerns about the president pushing Congress to pass crypto legislation in favor of the very industry he’s cashing in on,” Senators Elizabeth Warren, Richard Blumenthal, Gary Peters,…
— Semafor (@semafor) July 10, 2026
The call for investigation emerged following the release of Trump’s 2025 financial disclosure documents on June 30. The filing revealed total revenues exceeding $2.24 billion for the previous year, with more than $580 million connected to cryptocurrency ventures.
The crypto-related earnings breakdown includes approximately $515 million from World Liberty Financial token transactions, $65 million from ownership stakes in its parent company, and $635 million in royalty payments associated with his memecoin operations.
The group of senators initiating this request consists of Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts, Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut, Gary Peters from Michigan, Dick Durbin from Illinois, and Ron Wyden from Oregon.
These lawmakers serve as ranking members across five different Senate committees and subcommittees. However, as minority party members, they lack the authority to convene hearings independently without gaining Republican backing.
United Arab Emirates Investment Under Scrutiny The senators’ correspondence highlights an alleged 49% ownership stake in World Liberty Financial acquired by an entity associated with Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who serves as the UAE’s national security adviser.
The lawmakers also expressed concern about unnamed “Third Parties” referenced in Trump’s financial disclosure. They are demanding transparency regarding whether these entities, or the UAE government, played any role in shaping American policy decisions.
Earlier this year, Representative Ro Khanna initiated a House investigation into the UAE investment, questioning potential connections to modifications in U.S. restrictions governing AI chip exports. World Liberty Financial characterized that investigation as politically driven.
Trump addressed his financial gains during a CNBC interview, asserting there was “nothing illegal” about his earnings. He explained that his son Eric supervises his business holdings and that external firms handle his investment portfolio.
The White House maintains that Trump’s financial assets are managed through a trust overseen by his children, arguing this arrangement prevents any conflicts of interest.
Crypto Legislation Faces Uncertain Path The Democratic senators’ letter also challenges the timing and motivations behind the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which is anticipated to reach the Senate floor for a vote within the coming weeks.
Senate procedural rules mandate 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, requiring Republicans to secure Democratic cooperation to advance the legislation.
Certain Republicans, including Senator Cynthia Lummis, are advocating for swift passage of the bill. However, Representative French Hill, who leads the House Financial Services Committee, acknowledged that Trump’s cryptocurrency business interests have made legislative progress “more complicated.”
In related developments, legislation prohibiting the Federal Reserve from launching a central bank digital currency through December 31, 2030, is proceeding toward enactment. Trump scrapped the planned signing ceremony but chose not to veto the measure, enabling it to become law automatically after a 10-day period.
Republicans, who maintain control of both congressional chambers, have not scheduled any hearings in response to the Democratic senators’ requests.
Five Democratic senators have formally requested congressional hearings to investigate US President Donald Trump’s extensive cryptocurrency revenues and potentially undisclosed foreign involvement. The senators cited concerns regarding the influence of international investors on American policy and the possibility of national security risks.
Financial disclosures reveal massive crypto earningsThe investigation request follows Trump’s 2025 financial disclosure, which reported a total income of more than $2.24 billion for the year. This included over $1.4 billion related to cryptocurrency activities. His earnings came from dealings with the memecoin sector and World Liberty Financial, a blockchain-focused financial platform.
Detailed figures in the filing attributed roughly $515 million to World Liberty Financial token sales, $65 million to an ownership stake in its parent entity, and $635 million from royalties tied to Trump-branded memecoin initiatives.
Senators Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts), Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), Gary Peters (Michigan), Dick Durbin (Illinois), and Ron Wyden (Oregon) initiated the call for hearings. These five serve as senior members of various Senate committees but lack the authority to organize official hearings without Republican cooperation.
Scrutiny over UAE investment in World Liberty FinancialThe senators drew attention to a United Arab Emirates–linked company’s alleged acquisition of a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial. The transaction reportedly involved an entity connected to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who is the UAE’s national security adviser and an influential figure in the Gulf region.
In their correspondence, the senators demanded full transparency regarding the “Third Parties” named in Trump’s financial disclosures. They also questioned whether foreign interests—including the UAE government—have possibly influenced the shaping of US digital asset regulations.
Earlier this year, Representative Ro Khanna initiated a House inquiry into the UAE’s role, probing whether its investment related to policy changes covering US export restrictions on artificial intelligence chips. World Liberty Financial described that inquiry as politically motivated.
Trump addressed questions about these transactions in a CNBC interview, where he stated that his earnings complied fully with all laws. He said his son Eric is responsible for overseeing business operations, while outside companies manage his portfolio.
The White House maintained that Trump’s assets are contained within a trust managed by his children, a structure designed to prevent conflicts of interest.
Mini dictionary: World Liberty Financial, a blockchain-focused platform known for issuing financial instruments and crypto tokens, operates internationally and has attracted significant investments from global entities.
The senators pointed to foreign ownership stakes and demanded that Trump reveal whether any UAE government or third-party interests have shaped US cryptocurrency policies or legislation.
Upcoming crypto legislation and political falloutThe Democratic lawmakers also highlighted the timing of the anticipated Senate vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. The act, aimed at clarifying the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, is set to move to the Senate floor in the coming weeks.
Senate rules require 60 votes to advance most legislation, making Democratic support essential for Republicans to overcome a filibuster and pass the bill. While some Republicans like Senator Cynthia Lummis support prompt approval, others such as House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill acknowledged that Trump’s deep involvement in cryptocurrency businesses has complicated the legislative process.
In a separate development, a law blocking the Federal Reserve from introducing a central bank digital currency until the end of 2030 has advanced. Trump did not veto the legislation or hold the planned signing event, allowing the measure to automatically become law after a ten-day period.
IssueCurrent StatusImpacted PartiesTrump’s crypto earnings$1.4 billion for 2025Trump, World Liberty FinancialUAE investment49% stake in World Liberty FinancialUAE-linked entity, Trump portfolioCBDC BanEnacted, in effect until Dec 31, 2030Federal Reserve, US consumersClarity ActAwaiting Senate voteLawmakers, crypto industryRepublicans continue to control both chambers of Congress and, so far, have not answered requests from Democratic senators to hold investigative hearings into these matters.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
JPMorgan Chase is testing an AI investment agent that can autonomously adjust stock and bond allocations.
JPMorgan Chase is testing AI agents that can autonomously adjust the proportion of stock and bond investments to dynamically rebalance portfolios based on changes in market conditions. Test results show that in a 20-year historical backtest, the best-performing AI model delivered an annualized return 0.7 percentage points higher than the traditional "60/40" stock-bond portfolio, while also boasting lower volatility. All 8 AI agents tested by JPMorgan achieved higher risk-adjusted returns. However, the bank noted that the results are still based on simulated tests and do not represent actual investment performance. JPMorgan also warned that large-scale adoption of AI could lead to convergence of trading strategies, increase crowded trades, and amplify market volatility under stressed conditions.
30 minutes ago
Yangtze Memory Technologies announced its IPO advisory team, comprising a total of 31 members from CITIC Securities and China Securities Co., Ltd.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) official website updated the first-phase progress report on Changjiang Storage’s IPO counseling work on July 10. A total of 31 personnel from two securities firms, CITIC Securities and China Securities Construction Investment, form the counseling team. The current counseling period runs from May 19 to June 30, 2026, with work carried out via multiple methods including on-site due diligence, centralized training sessions, and targeted issue communications. The next phase of counseling will focus on two areas: First, for issues identified during the process, coordinate timely discussions between intermediaries and the company, develop standardization plans, and urge the counseled entity to fully implement rectification requirements. The working group will also continue to push the company to improve its corporate governance and internal control systems, enhancing its standardized operation level. Second, urge the company to thoroughly understand laws, regulations and rules related to issuance, listing and standardized operation, and clarify its responsibilities and obligations in areas such as information disclosure and fulfillment of commitments. (Jinshi)
30 minutes ago
Analyst: Bitcoin may be entering the final stage of a bear market, projected to rise to $250,000 over the next two to three years.
Real Vision’s chief crypto analyst Jamie Coutts has stated that Bitcoin may be entering the late stages of its current bear market. While the bear market is not yet over, downward momentum has begun to weaken. The current BTC price is roughly 50% lower than its all-time high of $126,100 set in October 2025. Coutts described the current trend as a “typical bear market,” pointing out that Bitcoin’s volatility has fallen by around 50% compared to the previous cycle, suggesting this downturn may not be as severe as prior bear markets. However, he cautioned that all current trend indicators remain clearly bearish, and markets do not mechanically replicate historical cycles. He noted that longer-term momentum indicators are starting to show bullish divergence, signaling that negative momentum is decelerating—but this does not mean Bitcoin has technically exited the bear market. Beyond tightening global liquidity, deteriorating on-chain demand was a key factor driving Bitcoin’s earlier decline. On long-term price projections, Coutts is cautious about Bitcoin reaching $1 million by 2030; instead, he forecasts BTC will rise to $200,000–$250,000 over the next two to three years. He also warned that the Bitcoin community needs to address the potential threat of quantum computing more definitively by 2027, as major protocol upgrades could take approximately five years to complete.
30 minutes ago
The probability that Bitcoin will rise to $70,000 this year has climbed to 79%.
Prediction market platform Polymarket now puts the probability of Bitcoin rising to $70,000 this year at 79%, up from 54% as of June 26. Additionally, the odds of Bitcoin hitting $80,000 stand at 32%, while the probability of it reaching $90,000 is 19%.
30 minutes ago
An alleged insider address of LAB has transferred $9.15 million worth of tokens to Aster again.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (@ai_9684xtpa), a suspected insider address of LAB has transferred 10.5 million LAB tokens to Aster again. Calculated at the $0.872 price at the time of transfer, the move is worth roughly $9.15 million. This marks the address’s second transfer of LAB in the same fashion in about 22 hours. Over the past 24 hours, the address has moved a total of LAB worth approximately $18.69 million to Aster. Earlier, after the address completed the transfer last night, LAB’s price once plummeted sharply.
30 minutes ago
US-listed ETFs' assets under management climbed to $15.6 trillion, notching a new all-time high.
The Kobeissi Letter noted that the assets under management (AUM) of U.S.-listed ETFs have climbed to a record $15.6 trillion, doubling over the past 30 months. Year-to-date, investors have allocated more than $1 trillion to U.S.-listed ETFs, nearly double the year-to-date record set in 2025. At the current pace, full-year inflows are on track to top $2 trillion for the first time, roughly 33% higher than last year’s all-time high. In June alone, U.S. ETFs pulled in around $193 billion in inflows, marking the second-highest monthly inflow on record. Demand has been concentrated in U.S. large-cap, semiconductor, AI, and South Korea-focused ETFs, with the U.S. ETF market’s growth accelerating.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
