Ethereum layer-2 network Starknet has launched Shadow Accounts, a new privacy feature that allows users to trade, lend and manage decentralized finance (DeFi) positions without publicly connecting their activity to their main cryptocurrency wallets.
Summary
StarkWare launched Shadow Accounts on Starknet, allowing separate application identities without exposing users’ wallet links.
Shadow Accounts keep transactions and balances publicly visible while obscuring connections to users’ primary wallets.
Users fund their Shadow Accounts through STRK20 shielded balances and maintain positions across multiple transactions.
Developers can integrate the privacy feature into existing applications through the Starknet Wallet API interface.
StarkWare introduced STRK20 privacy tools in June, followed by demonstrations of private identity verification technology.
StarkWare announced the launch on October 13, introducing a system that creates separate blockchain addresses for individual DeFi applications. Built on the network’s STRK20 privacy framework, the feature lets users maintain ongoing positions under different identities while keeping their main wallet addresses obscured. The company confirmed that Shadow Account balances and transactions remain visible onchain.
Starknet Shadow Accounts separate DeFi activity from wallets
With Shadow Accounts, users can interact with supported decentralized applications through dedicated addresses that are not publicly linked to their primary wallets. Each application receives a separate, persistent identity, allowing users to return to existing positions without revealing connections to other activities.
StarkWare explained that using the same public wallet across multiple platforms allows blockchain observers to examine transactions, holdings and trading strategies associated with that address. Shadow Accounts are designed to prevent observers from easily combining those activities into a single publicly connected wallet history.
1/ Every app should have a private mode. So we shipped it 🥷
Introducing Shadow Accounts, now live on Starknet.
A new STRK20 privacy primitive that lets apps offer a Public → Private switch, without publicly linking users' activity to their main wallets 🧵 pic.twitter.com/YjKbHX1i0d
— StarkWare (@StarkWareLtd) October 13, 2026
Unlike temporary wallet addresses, Shadow Accounts remain available across multiple interactions with the same application. Users can maintain lending positions, accumulate rewards or manage other financial arrangements through a consistent address.
The system derives each account from information associated with the user, the selected application and a unique identifier known as a nonce. According to the official Starknet.js documentation, users can generate multiple Shadow Accounts for one application, allowing them to separate different activities within the same service.
However, the protection has defined limits. StarkWare states that Shadow Accounts hold public ERC-20 assets, meaning their balances and transaction histories remain accessible through blockchain explorers. The privacy protection concerns the connection between those addresses and the user’s main wallet.
The feature therefore does not make every trading position, token transfer or financial activity invisible. Once an observer identifies a particular Shadow Account, its publicly recorded operations can still be examined.
Shadow Accounts use STRK20 to fund DeFi transactions
The system works alongside STRK20, Starknet’s privacy framework for cryptocurrency transfers and shielded balances. Users deposit supported assets into a shared privacy pool, where their balances are represented through encrypted records.
According to StarkWare’s technical explanation, a user connecting to a compatible application can select a private operating mode before making a deposit. The wallet then moves the required assets from the shielded balance to the designated Shadow Account.
Once funded, the account can interact with the application and maintain an ongoing position. For example, a user participating in a lending platform could deposit assets through a Shadow Account and return later to adjust the position.
The process allows the application to recognize the same account across multiple transactions. However, the user’s original wallet address is not publicly attached to those activities through the Shadow Account mechanism.
When users decide to withdraw, supported proceeds can move back into their shielded STRK20 balances. The wallet manages the required transaction data and generates zero-knowledge proofs used to validate operations through the privacy system.
Starknet’s documentation identifies several ways to collect assets from a Shadow Account. Developers can configure transactions to return the entire token balance, only amounts received during the latest interaction or a specified amount.
The mechanism uses a Shadow Account anonymizer, which can create and operate the account through the privacy pool. The official documentation identifies an anonymizer contract deployed on Starknet mainnet, alongside a separate deployment on the Sepolia test network.
StarkWare opens privacy tools to DeFi developers
StarkWare has made Shadow Accounts available through the Starknet Wallet API, allowing developers to connect existing applications to the privacy system.
The company identified the shadow_account_invoke method as the main integration tool. Through this operation, developers can submit application calls using a user’s Shadow Account without directly managing the account’s private state.
According to the launch announcement, the wallet handles proof generation, transaction submission and the data required to manage the user’s shielded balances. Developers do not need access to users’ viewing keys to enable the feature.
The announcement identified Starknet Wallet API version 0.10.4 and starknet.js version 10.8.0 or newer as supported integration options. Wallet compatibility remains necessary, meaning the feature will depend on whether individual wallets and applications implement the relevant interfaces.
StarkWare said the design could eventually support additional services, including liquidity provision, borrowing, staking, recurring purchases, derivatives, prediction markets and NFT marketplaces.
The developer documentation distinguishes Shadow Accounts from single-use transaction helpers. Shadow Accounts are designed for positions held over time, while helper-based interactions can complete a transaction without maintaining a persistent user-specific address.
No figures were disclosed for the number of applications that had integrated Shadow Accounts at launch. StarkWare did not publish adoption targets or transaction volumes associated specifically with the new feature.
Starknet expands privacy services after STRK20 launch
Shadow Accounts extend StarkWare’s existing work on blockchain privacy, which received a major update in June 2026.
On June 9, StarkWare introduced STRK20, a framework designed to provide shielded balances and private transfers for supported ERC-20 assets on Starknet. The system uses zero-knowledge proofs to validate transactions without publicly exposing all the underlying financial information.
The earlier STRK20 privacy framework for Ethereum tokens introduced encrypted balances, private transfers and viewing keys for controlled disclosure. Through its shared privacy pool, users can move supported assets between public and shielded states while remaining on Starknet.
Subsequently, StarkWare demonstrated a Private Know Your Customer system on June 23. The technology was designed to allow users to verify selected personal information without providing companies with complete copies of their identity documents.
The Private KYC system developed by StarkWare uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify specific information, such as age or eligibility, while limiting exposure of other personal details. The demonstration involved passport verification using mobile devices and encrypted identity information.
StarkWare’s official STRK20 website identifies Ready and Xverse among the wallets supporting its privacy infrastructure. The platform describes existing integrations involving decentralized exchanges, lending applications and other financial services.
Its documentation explains that privacy protections do not cover every part of a blockchain transaction. Public deposits, withdrawals, transaction timing and external application activity can remain visible, depending on the wallet and integration.
The framework provides a mechanism for authorized auditing through encrypted viewing keys. According to StarkWare, this allows designated auditors to inspect an individual’s private transfer records without gaining control of their assets.
The latest developer documentation identifies WalletAccountV6 as the recommended interface for new Starknet applications using STRK20 features. It specifies compatibility with get-starknet version 6.0.6 or later and describes support through compatible wallets, including Ready and Xverse.
Ripple’s RLUSD mint activity is picking up pace, and the timing is no coincidence.
On-chain data from the Ripple Stablecoin Tracker shows that Ripple Treasury executed two back-to-back RLUSD mints on Ethereum totaling $38.6 million.
At the same time, three separate burns worth $50.6 million hit the XRP Ledger. The net result: a $12 million reduction in circulating RLUSD supply.
What the On-Chain Numbers Actually Tell Investors
The RLUSD mint split across two Ethereum transactions, one for 19.6 million tokens and another for 19 million.
Treasury mints like these typically follow real customer USD deposits. They are not a signal of free supply inflation. They represent freshly demanded liquidity.
This multi-chain treasury activity arrives just days after Standard Chartered launched institutional custody for RLUSD through its Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) branch.
A milestone that Standard Chartered Launches Custody for Ripple’s RLUSD Stablecoin marked as a watershed moment for enterprise adoption.
The Ethereum side gained $38.6 million in new RLUSD. The XRP Ledger lost $50.6 million across three burns of 13 million, 18 million, and 19.6 million.
Combined, that is a net $12 million drawn out of circulation. This points to active rebalancing, moving liquidity from XRPL to Ethereum, likely to meet DeFi demand or satisfy institutional counterparties who operate on Ethereum rails.
RLUSD holds a market capitalization near $2.42 billion as of this reporting. It has maintained its dollar peg throughout.
Earlier this year, RLUSD Hit a Fresh Market Cap ATH Near $2.5B While XRPL Stables Jumped 6%, underscoring how quickly the stablecoin has scaled since its 2024 launch under NYDFS regulation.
The cross-chain pattern is not new. Ripple Expanded RLUSD to Ethereum Layer-2 Networks and an XRPL Sidechain via Wormhole, giving it wider reach across DeFi ecosystems.
What changes now is that bank-grade custody is live, and that raises the strategic stakes of every treasury move.
💵💵💵💵💵💵💵 19,600,000 $RLUSD minted at RLUSD Treasury.https://t.co/GORFFengfn
— Ripple Stablecoin Tracker (@RL_Tracker) October 13, 2026
Standard Chartered Custody and the LMAX Collateral Play: Why It Changes the Game
Standard Chartered launched its RLUSD custody service on October 12, 2026. It operates through the bank’s DIFC branch in Dubai, regulated by the DFSA.
Jack McDonald, Ripple’s SVP of Stablecoins, put it plainly: “RLUSD was built for exactly this kind of institutional use case.”
What makes this more than a custody announcement is the planned LMAX collateral integration. Under the model, institutions keep their RLUSD with Standard Chartered.
The value is then mirrored to LMAX’s trading systems. Tokens never leave the custodian. That removes transfer-related counterparty risk, a real pain point for institutional desks trading digital assets at scale.
Luke Dorney, Head of Custody at LMAX Group, called RLUSD “an increasingly important component of institutional digital asset markets.”
The collateral integration is still pending final documentation, testing, and regulatory approval. But the direction is clear. Ripple has been building institutional rails aggressively.
Ripple Partnered With Privy to Expand XRPL Access for XRP and RLUSD Payments, opening RLUSD to agentic and AI-driven payment flows.
Separately, Ripple Rolled Out a New Mint Platform to Expand RLUSD Access for Institutions, giving qualified institutions a direct route to mint and redeem at scale.
Dubai is not an isolated bet either. Ripple Flagged Turkey as a Digital Assets Hub With Garanti BBVA Custody and RLUSD Rails, layering on further bank custody coverage across emerging markets.
Meanwhile, the XRP Ledger itself is growing as a settlement layer. X402 AI Payments on XRPL Topped 10 Million, a milestone that makes every unit of RLUSD liquidity on the ledger more strategically relevant.
On-chain yield demand is also rising. Doppler’s XRP Vault Hit $125M, putting yield-seeking capital firmly in the XRPL ecosystem.
And with BNY Mellon Eyeing 24/7 Tokenized U.S. Treasuries Settlement, RLUSD could soon serve as settlement infrastructure for tokenized traditional assets.
For investors, the read is straightforward. These are not pump signals. They are plumbing signals.
The mint-and-burn cycle is treasury management responding to real institutional demand. The custody launch is the infrastructure that makes that demand sustainable at scale.
Watch circulating supply trends, Standard Chartered and LMAX implementation updates, and further bank custody announcements for the next leg of this story.
Ethereum price has struggled to sustain a recovery above $2,500 on October 14 as persistent ETF withdrawals, weak market sentiment, and technical resistance continue to limit buying interest.
Summary
Ethereum price continues to struggle near $2,500 as persistent spot ETF withdrawals and weak market sentiment limit recovery attempts.
U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $542.2 million in net outflows during the week ending October 9, adding to selling pressure.
Daily Bollinger Bands and Aroon readings favor sellers, with ETH trading below the middle Bollinger Band at $2,617.99.
The four hour MACD shows improving momentum, but ETH must clear resistance at $2,543 and $2,580 to strengthen its recovery.
A break below $2,449 could expose support near $2,425 and $2,409, while a sustained recovery could bring $2,618 into focus.
According to TradingView data, Ethereum (ETH) traded at $2,508.58 at the time of writing, up 0.43% on the day after moving between $2,497.94 and $2,522.63.
The second largest cryptocurrency has been trying to recover from last week’s selloff, which pushed prices toward $2,400. However, ETH remains below important resistance levels on the daily chart, while the 4-hour timeframe shows that buyers have yet to establish a convincing recovery.
Ethereum price faces pressure from ETF withdrawals and market selling
Institutional demand has remained weak throughout October, with U.S. spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds recording $542.2 million in net withdrawals during the trading week ending October 9.
According to Farside Investors, the funds recorded five consecutive sessions of outflows during the week, including $201.9 million on October 6 and $160.9 million on October 7.
The withdrawals formed part of a longer selling streak that began on September 29. As crypto.news reported on October 12, cumulative redemptions had reached $697.4 million across nine consecutive negative sessions through October 9.
BlackRock’s ETHA was responsible for a substantial portion of the selling, particularly during the two largest withdrawal sessions.
Institutional outflows have coincided with selling across the cryptocurrency market, where leveraged positions have contributed to recent price swings.
Ethereum was trading near $2,718 on October 6 before losing the $2,600 level during the following session. Geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz accompanied the market decline, with Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies recording losses.
The selling pushed ETH toward $2,409 before buyers stepped in, although subsequent recovery attempts have struggled to move decisively beyond the $2,500 region.
Derivatives positioning has created another obstacle. CoinGlass liquidation data cited in October 12 market coverage identified overhead liquidation concentrations around $2,585, $2,635 to $2,640, and $2,740.
A recovery into these regions could trigger short liquidations, but the same areas may attract traders looking to exit positions following the recent decline.
Meanwhile, corporate Ethereum accumulation has continued despite the weaker market.
BitMine Immersion Technologies purchased another 12,532 ETH during the week ending October 11, bringing its reported holdings to 6,028,946 tokens, or approximately 4.9% of Ethereum’s supply.
The company’s chairman, Tom Lee, has warned that selling in South Korea’s stock market could spread into cryptocurrency markets through liquidations. The warning followed a decline of more than 6% in South Korea’s KOSPI index on October 13.
BitMine’s continued purchases have provided a source of institutional demand, although they have not prevented ETH from trading below its recent highs.
Daily indicators favor sellers
On the daily ETH/USDT chart, Ethereum is trading below the middle Bollinger Band, indicating that sellers continue to have the upper hand despite the latest recovery attempt.
ETH/USDT 1-day price chart. Source: crypto.news
The middle band currently stands at $2,617.99, nearly $110 above the prevailing market price.
A recovery toward this level would require ETH to overcome several resistance areas established during the recent decline. Until then, the middle band remains a potential ceiling for any rebound.
The lower Bollinger Band sits at $2,425.34, close to the area where buyers entered the market during the latest selloff.
A move below $2,425 could expose the recent swing low near $2,409. Sustained selling below that level would leave the $2,350 to $2,380 region as a possible next downside target.
The upper Bollinger Band, meanwhile, stands at $2,810.63. However, a move toward that level would first require Ethereum to recover above the middle band and overcome resistance around $2,700.
The Aroon indicator provides another view of the prevailing trend.
On the daily chart, Aroon Down stands at 57.14%, while Aroon Up is considerably lower at 14.29%.
The difference indicates that recent lows have been more influential than recent highs, although the Aroon Down reading has not reached levels normally associated with a particularly strong downtrend.
Aroon Up would need to recover and cross above Aroon Down to indicate that buyers are beginning to establish a stronger trend.
Until such a crossover develops, the daily readings leave Ethereum vulnerable to renewed selling, particularly if the price fails to hold above $2,450.
The 4-hour chart presents a somewhat different picture, with momentum beginning to improve following the decline toward $2,409.
ETH/USDT 4-hour price chart. Source: crypto.news
Ethereum’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator shows the MACD line at -8.68, above the signal line at -10.01.
The histogram has turned positive at 1.33, indicating that bearish momentum has eased and that buyers have regained some short-term ground.
However, both the MACD and signal lines remain below zero, meaning the recovery has not yet developed into a confirmed bullish trend.
The histogram has also narrowed following its earlier expansion, suggesting that the initial recovery is losing momentum as ETH trades near $2,500.
Fibonacci retracement levels drawn between the recent swing low of $2,409.09 and swing high of $2,579.88 place immediate resistance around $2,514.54, corresponding to the 0.618 retracement.
A sustained move above this level could allow ETH to challenge $2,543.33, the 0.786 retracement, before attempting to revisit $2,579.88.
A breakout above $2,580 would bring the daily Bollinger middle band near $2,618 into focus.
If buyers manage to reclaim that level, the next resistance areas would lie near $2,685 and $2,700, although such a recovery would require stronger momentum than the current 4-hour readings suggest.
On the downside, initial support lies around $2,494, followed by the Fibonacci levels at $2,474.33 and $2,449.40.
A breakdown below $2,449 would raise the possibility of another move toward $2,409, particularly if the 4-hour MACD crosses back below its signal line.
For a stronger recovery, the 4-hour MACD would need to move above zero while ETH reclaims $2,543 and subsequently $2,580. On the daily timeframe, $2,618 remains the next significant resistance level before buyers can challenge the $2,700 region.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
A major Ethereum whale, identified as a significant over-the-counter (OTC) investor, has completed a full exit from their position, selling a total of 52,001 ETH and securing a $24.5 million profit, according to data compiled by blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain.
Whale’s liquidation strategy and profitThe investor initiated their divestment in September, liquidating 42,005 ETH—then valued at approximately $111.89 million—amid broader weakness in cryptocurrency markets. They retained a balance of 9,996 ETH after that sale, which were held until a final transaction reported this week.
This latest sale involved moving the remaining 9,996 ETH, worth around $25 million, from the wallet address 0x8c58. With this final move, the whale has completely closed out the original 52,001 ETH position.
Lookonchain calculated the whale’s average acquisition price at $2,162 per ETH, resulting in a total initial outlay of roughly $112.4 million. The total portfolio was sold at an average price of $2,632 per coin, generating a realized profit of $24.48 million.
By unwinding the entire 52,001 ETH stake at higher average prices than acquired, the whale achieved a profit margin of nearly $24.5 million.
Mini dictionary: Over-the-counter (OTC), A method of trading assets directly between parties rather than through a centralized exchange. OTC desks are often used for large trades to minimize price slippage and market impact.
TransactionETH AmountUSD Value at SaleFirst major sale (Sep 24)42,005 ETH$111.89 millionFinal sale9,996 ETH$25 millionTotal position52,001 ETH~$136.89 millionOther whale activity in the marketWhale activity has diverged in recent weeks, with some investors reducing their Ethereum exposure while others are increasing holdings. On October 12, Lookonchain identified a different large investor actively shifting capital from Bitcoin to Ethereum in rapid succession.
The unidentified whale first sold 410.14 BTC, valued at $34.16 million, and subsequently purchased 14,341 ETH for $36.14 million on various decentralized exchanges. Later, the same investor sold an additional 229 BTC, worth $19.1 million, and acquired 7,469.8 more ETH.
Several whales appear to be repositioning aggressively, with some rotating assets from Bitcoin into Ethereum while others realize profits on existing ETH holdings.
ActionAsset SoldAsset PurchasedValueFirst rotation410.14 BTC14,341 ETH$36.14 million (ETH)Second rotation229 BTC7,469.8 ETHUnspecifiedEthereum market performanceDespite significant whale moves within the market, Ethereum has maintained relative price stability. The latest data from CoinGecko shows that ETH is currently trading at $2,507.47, marking a 0.7% increase over the past 24 hours.
These substantial transactions underline the continued influence of large investors in cryptocurrency markets, particularly in shaping liquidity and short-term price movements.
An Ethereum wallet associated with sven.eth has reportedly lost 9.1231 ETH, valued at approximately $22,770, and 1.69271471 TAPEETH tokens after an attacker used a malicious EIP-7702 authorization to gain control of the account.
Summary
Security firm ExVul reported that an Ethereum wallet lost 9.1231 ETH through malicious account delegation.
The reported attack involved 1.69271471 TAPEETH tokens alongside Ethereum valued at approximately $22,770 at detection.
A sponsored EIP-7702 transaction reportedly enabled attacker controlled code to execute through the victim’s wallet.
ExVul attributed the theft to malicious wallet authorization, not a vulnerability in PodMining or TAPEETH.
The security firm warned that the malicious delegation remained active at Ethereum block 26,188,153 afterward.
Blockchain security firm ExVul reported the incident on October 14, identifying an attacker-sponsored transaction that activated malicious code previously authorized by the wallet owner. The firm attributed the theft to an unsafe delegation, explaining that the attacker drained the wallet without exploiting the underlying DeFi protocol.
The reported incident involved the wallet linked to sven.eth and an attacker-controlled address beginning with 0x9208. According to ExVul’s investigation, the authorization allowed code installed through Ethereum’s EIP-7702 mechanism to operate with the wallet’s permissions.
Ethereum EIP-7702 attack drains ETH and TAPEETH
The reported theft involved 9.1231 ETH and 1.69271471 TAPEETH, with the ETH portion valued at approximately $22,770 when ExVul published its findings. The security firm did not provide a separate dollar valuation for the TAPEETH tokens.
ExVul identified the transaction hash as 0x36e0d1491c14e3d8e50bc70d73675b89d2d4712814d16f808f957c84fde820ee, linking the activity to a sponsored type-4 Ethereum transaction. Such transactions support EIP-7702 authorizations, which allow ordinary wallet addresses to execute smart contract code.
The investigation attributed the attack to 0x9208097c007be15e28b20e94e66870a3f9f820bc. The victim’s wallet was identified as 0xd8ba9e5886b7000bace2c9dbdd0be98ac77d4a28, while the malicious delegation pointed to 0x0366b55f948a688888ca6e029ad0831f6ec260d1.
🚨 ALERT — EIP-7702 Wallet Drain on Ethereum
sven.eth was drained for 9.1231 ETH net (~$22.77K) plus 1.69271471 TAPEETH.
No flash loan or AMM manipulation was involved: the attacker sponsored a type-4 transaction carrying the victim's valid EIP-7702 authorization, then swept…
— ExVul (@exvulsec) October 14, 2026
According to the security alert, the attacker submitted a transaction containing an EIP-7702 authorization signed by the victim. Once Ethereum processed that authorization, subsequent calls to the affected wallet executed the delegated contract’s instructions within the victim account.
The attacker-controlled code reportedly contained a fixed address authorized to operate the wallet. The controller then invoked the PodMining.claim() function, transferred the resulting TAPEETH rewards and withdrew the wallet’s ETH balance.
ExVul emphasized that “No flash loan or AMM manipulation was involved.” Its findings identified the account authorization as the entry point, with no evidence in the supplied analysis of an exploit involving liquidity pools or price manipulation.
How malicious wallet delegation enabled the theft
EIP-7702 is part of Ethereum’s account abstraction development, allowing externally owned accounts to temporarily gain smart contract functionality through delegated code.
Under the official Ethereum specification, a user signs an authorization identifying the smart contract that will control the account’s execution behavior. Once submitted through a compatible transaction, Ethereum records the delegation and runs the designated code when the wallet receives relevant calls.
The feature supports legitimate applications, including sponsored transactions, transaction batching and more flexible wallet permissions. A user can authorize multiple actions through a single transaction or allow a third party to cover the network fee.
However, the same mechanism carries security risks when an account delegates execution to malicious code. Ethereum’s EIP-7702 specification explains that poorly designed or malicious delegation contracts can grant an outside party extensive control over the account.
In this incident, the attacker reportedly paid the transaction fee and submitted the signed authorization. The wallet owner did not need to fund or broadcast the transaction that activated the malicious delegation.
The signature supplied authority for the wallet to execute the attacker’s code. Once activated, the code operated under the victim’s account context, allowing the controller address to initiate the reported asset transfers.
ExVul stated that the exploit “is not a TAPEETH / PodMining bug.” The conclusion distinguishes the authorization mechanism from a vulnerability in the token or the reward contract.
The firm did not establish how the attacker obtained the victim’s authorization. Its public findings do not identify a specific phishing website, malicious application or compromised signing interface.
Malicious authorization could threaten future deposits
After the reported theft, ExVul warned that the wallet’s malicious delegation remained active at Ethereum block 26,188,153.
The warning concerns a feature of EIP-7702: setting a delegation does not automatically remove it when the transaction finishes. The authorized contract can remain associated with the wallet until the account owner replaces or clears the delegation.
Ethereum’s official security guidance explains that a wallet owner retains control through the original private key, including the ability to reset delegation by authorizing the zero address. However, malicious delegated code may remain dangerous until the change is successfully processed.
ExVul warned users against transferring new assets into the affected address while the suspicious delegation remained active. Newly deposited funds could face the same exposure if the attacker’s code continued to control spending permissions.
The firm recommended clearing or replacing the authorization and moving remaining assets to a secure wallet. Such recovery actions require care because the affected address may execute malicious instructions while the delegation persists.
The warning was based on the delegation status observed at block 26,188,153. ExVul’s original alert did not establish whether the victim had subsequently removed the malicious code or recovered any assets.
No reimbursement arrangement, recovery transaction or law enforcement action was identified in the supplied investigation.
EIP-7702 has raised similar security concerns before
The latest reported attack follows previous warnings from blockchain security researchers about malicious account delegations.
In May 2025, crypto market maker Wintermute identified widespread use of EIP-7702 contracts designed to automatically drain funds from compromised Ethereum wallets.
Wintermute’s research found that more than 97% of observed EIP-7702 delegations at that stage pointed to contracts using identical code. Its analysis associated many of those delegations with automated sweepers that could transfer incoming ETH to attacker-controlled addresses.
The earlier security concerns surrounding Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade centered on attackers abusing wallet delegation features introduced through EIP-7702. Security researchers warned that malicious code could remain connected to accounts after victims completed the initial authorization.
A separate incident involving World Liberty Financial tokens in September 2025 raised similar concerns. Blockchain investigator Yu Xian reported that attackers were using compromised wallet permissions and EIP-7702 delegation to target holders after token transfers became available.
The phishing attacks against WLFI token holders involved malicious delegation contracts that allowed attackers to execute unauthorized transactions. Investigators linked the activity to compromised wallet credentials and fraudulent authorizations.
In July 2026, another Ethereum phishing incident involving nearly $1 million demonstrated how dangerous wallet approvals can expose cryptocurrency holdings. That case involved malicious transaction permissions and was not established as the same exploit method reported against sven.eth.
Ethereum’s EIP-7702 specification identifies several safeguards for developers building delegation contracts, including replay protection, authenticated transaction parameters and secure initialization procedures.
The specification warns that poorly implemented delegation contracts may give malicious actors nearly complete control over the affected account. It recommends carefully verifying the permissions granted to delegated code, particularly when external parties can submit transactions on behalf of wallet owners.
ExVul’s October 14 alert identified the malicious contract, controller address and affected account, but did not disclose whether the victim had since replaced the authorization. The investigation recorded the suspicious delegation as active at block 26,188,153.
Strive increases its Bitcoin holdings by another 2,822 coins at an average price of approximately $83,266.
Bitcoin treasury firm Strive filed an 8-K document today disclosing that it added 2,822 Bitcoin to its holdings between October 12 and 13, at an average price of approximately $83,266 per coin. The acquisition cost $235 million, bringing its total Bitcoin position to 35,600 coins.
2 minutes ago
Tether AI Research has unveiled its on-device speech recognition model TranscribePsy, designed for smart glasses and humanoid robots.
Tether AI Research has released an open-source multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) model named QVAC TranscribePsy, which has around 254 million parameters and can run fully on-device—no audio upload to the cloud required. The company noted the model can process audio from smart glasses connected via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi in near real time, and also operate on onboard processors of humanoid robots. On the Core ML version for iPhone 17 Pro Max, transcribing 10 minutes of audio takes roughly 1.65 seconds. According to its published benchmark data, TranscribePsy achieves a word error rate (WER) of 8.02% on the Open ASR Leaderboard, 6.58% on Multilingual LibriSpeech, and 21.56% on Common Voice. Among six tested smartphones, it is the fastest in speed, approximately 2.6 times faster than the second-fastest model. The model supports 25 European languages for laptops and 8 European languages for mobile phones, with model weights and builds in formats including GGUF and Core ML released under the Apache 2.0 license. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that he hopes advanced speech AI can run locally on users’ own devices, ensuring data does not leave the device.
2 minutes ago
Physical Intelligence opens its robot model API: Picking strawberries, assembling servers, new actions can be trained in just 4 days.
Beating AI News Flash: U.S.-based robotics AI firm Physical Intelligence (Pi) has launched the beta version of its Pi API, opening access to its foundational robotics model to more enterprises. Developers only need to upload robot operation data to fine-tune the model on Pi’s cloud computing power, then control their own robots via the API. There’s no need to train models from scratch or build complex training and inference infrastructure independently. Pi showcased real-world use cases from multiple partners, including AgRobotics’ strawberry-picking robots, autonomous loaders for self-driving trucks, and robots for food processing and server assembly. Among these, startup Almond used the Pi API to get its dual-arm robot to learn polishing the parts required for its own assembly after just 4 days of iterative training and testing. Pi had previously open-sourced robotics models such as π0 and π0.5, but developers still had to deploy and train them on their own. This time, the company has further packaged model fine-tuning, computing power, and inference services into an API, aiming to become a shared intelligent foundation for various robots. However, test access is still by application only, and pricing has not been announced yet.
2 minutes ago
Spark: Q3 Net Protocol Revenue Surpasses $4 Million, Stablecoin Swap Layer Hits Over $14 Billion in Trading Volume in Its First Month
DeFi lending protocol Spark has disclosed that its net protocol returns exceeded $4 million in the third quarter of 2026. In the first half of the year, DeFi lending spreads narrowed significantly, with lending capital profitability turning negative in the second quarter. After driving growth for Spark Savings USDT in Q3, related returns rebounded above capital costs. During the same period, Spark partnered with Uniswap and Sky to launch a stablecoin swap layer, which went live with $150 million in USDS liquidity, offering stablecoin swap services to banks, fintech firms and payment companies, and recorded over $14 billion in trading volume in its first month.
2 minutes ago
Morgan Stanley's Q3 net revenue hit $20.34 billion, exceeding the consensus estimate of $19.89 billion.
Morgan Stanley released its third-quarter financial results, reporting net revenue of $20.34 billion, exceeding the consensus estimate of $19.89 billion. The firm posted earnings per share of $3.03 for the quarter, while net interest income came in at $3.25 billion, beating the forecast of $2.78 billion.
2 minutes ago
Dutch central bank approves Qivalis' electronic money institution license, bringing euro stablecoin issuance a step closer.
Qivalis, an alliance backed by 37 major European banks, has secured an electronic money institution (EMI) license from De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB, the Dutch central bank), bringing it closer to issuing euro-denominated electronic money tokens (EMT), a regulated stablecoin format. The firm still needs to fulfill remaining requirements under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, including publishing a whitepaper, and plans to distribute the tokens via banks, crypto exchanges, and payment service providers over the coming months rather than directly to consumers. Under the EU MiCA framework, EMTs must be pegged to a single fiat currency, issued by authorized credit institutions or EMIs, redeemable at par at any time, and non-interest bearing. Since its launch in September 2025, the Qivalis alliance has expanded to include 37 European banks including BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING, and DZ Bank, and has selected Fireblocks to provide digital asset infrastructure.
Standard Chartered has unveiled a new crypto trading service that lets eligible affluent clients buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum directly through their existing bank accounts. This marked a first for the bank and for an international lender in the UAE.
Standard Chartered Enables Direct Bitcoin and Ethereum Trading Standard Chartered launched a first-of-its-kind crypto trading solution for affluent clients, according to an official announcement on October 14. Eligible professional clients in the UAE can now buy and sell Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) directly through their existing bank accounts.
It becomes possible through a strategic collaboration between the bank’s Wealth and Retail Banking (WRB) and Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) businesses, alongside SC Ventures-backed Zodia Markets, and regulation by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA).
The crypto trading solution integrates institutional-grade custody, liquidity, and client access within a single, end-to-end digital asset ecosystem. Transactions will run within the bank’s ecosystem under a closed-loop model, reducing wallet risks.
This will enable clients to access crypto assets with their existing banking relationship while benefiting from institutional-grade custody and operational safeguards.
Samir Subberwal, Global Head of Wealth Solutions, Retail Products, Data & Analytics at Standard Chartered, described the launch as a significant milestone that brings crypto assets into the bank’s core wealth offering. He added that clients demand secure, regulated access as digital assets move into the mainstream.
“We are proud to be the first international bank in the UAE to launch a cryptocurrency trading offering,” said Rola Abu Manneh, CEO for UAE, Middle East and Pakistan at Standard Chartered.
Expanding Crypto Capabilities Across UAE Institutional and Wealth Services The launch builds on Standard Chartered’s broader crypto assets activities in the UAE and other key regions. This builds on Standard Chartered’s launch of spot crypto trading in Bitcoin and Ethereum for institutional clients in the UAE last month.
The service lets eligible institutional clients trade deliverable BTC/USD and ETH/USD through familiar electronic FX platforms, with settlement options including the bank’s own digital asset custody.
As CoinGape reported earlier, Standard Chartered launched institutional USDC minting and redemption through DIFC, becoming the first G-SIB to offer institutional access to USDC through a regulated banking channel.
Recently, Standard Chartered announced institutional custody support for Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin on the XRP Ledger. The bank also joined Ripple and LMAX Group to enable RLUSD as eligible collateral.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Ethereum trades near $2,505 today. To reach $3,000 by December, it needs a gain of approximately 20% in 3 months. That is possible in crypto, but the chart makes it a difficult climb. ETH has dropped approximately 7% since October 6, when it sat near $2,697.
In late September, it moved sideways between support near $2,620 and resistance near $2,800. Now, the price is below that range, and the $2,650 area has turned from support into a ceiling. The 50-day average near $2,492 is the next floor to watch, with the 100-day near $2,321 below it. The 200-day sits near $2,272.
Scenario 1: BreakoutBuyers reclaim $2,650, then push through the $2,775 to $2,825 zone and hold it. That could open a clean path to $3,000, especially if the Federal Reserve decision on October 28 is friendly.
HOT Stories
ETH/USDT Chart by TradingViewScenario 2: Range and driftETH remains between $2,300 and $2,800 through December. Rallies fade near $2,700, and dips get bought near $2,500. It ends the year without touching $3,000.
Scenario 3: Breakdown A close below $2,492 sends the price toward $2,321, and then toward the 200-day near $2,272. A drop that deep could push $3,000 well into 2027.
You Might Also Like
Apart from technical factors, the spot Ether ETFs lost $85.4 million on October 12, extending a streak of daily outflows. That is a sharp turn from September, when these funds took in approximately $445 million. ETFs are a large source of steady demand, so this matters.
There is also a supply issue. Fee burns offset only approximately 2% of new ETH issued, so supply continues to grow by roughly 0.64%. More coins are being created than destroyed, which adds selling pressure when demand is weak.
Reaching $3,000 by December is possible, but it is not the most likely outcome. ETH needs ETF inflows to return and a close above $2,825 first. Until then, the odds lean toward a range or a dip.
Ethereum‘s derivatives market has witnessed a notable decline in leverage, as persistent outflows from institutional products and weak US trading activity weigh on the cryptocurrency’s recovery prospects.
Leverage and institutional flows weakenRecent data from on-chain analytics provider CryptoQuant indicates that Ethereum’s Estimated Leverage Ratio (ELR) has declined to 0.62. This marks its lowest reading since November 2025, pointing to a reduction in the use of leverage by traders in the ETH market.
The Estimated Leverage Ratio is calculated by comparing open interest in derivatives to the amount of an asset held in spot exchange reserves. It provides insights into how much of the market’s activity is driven by leverage versus actual holdings.
Mini dictionary: Estimated Leverage Ratio (ELR), a metric that assesses the proportion of leverage used in the derivatives market by comparing derivatives open interest with spot exchange reserves.
The drop in leverage has coincided with declining open interest on Ethereum derivatives exchanges. This trend indicates that traders have generally adopted a more cautious stance, preferring not to expand leveraged positions despite recent price movements.
In addition, the Net Taker Volume for Ethereum remains negative, reflecting ongoing sell-side pressure in perpetual futures trading. This metric highlights that market-order selling currently exceeds buying across these instruments.
The cautious sentiment was further underscored by the Coinbase Premium Index, which recently fell to -0.117. This negative value means that Ethereum is currently trading at a discount on Coinbase compared to other major exchanges, suggesting more muted demand from US-based buyers.
Ethereum’s market data continues to highlight cautious behavior from traders, as the decline in leverage and persistent negative taker volume signal that participants remain wary of new long positions.
Institutional flows have also been under pressure. Data from SoSoValue shows that US-listed spot Ethereum ETFs reported $85.4 million in net outflows on Monday. Although there was a modest inflow of $24.84 million on Tuesday, the 10-day net redemption streak is now the longest since mid-May to early June.
DateETH ETF Net FlowsMonday$85.4 million outflowTuesday$24.84 million inflowPrevious 10 daysConsecutive outflowsTechnical outlook for ETHTechnically, Ethereum has been consolidating on its daily chart as it attempts to build support near its 50-day exponential moving average (EMA), which sits around $2,501.
The immediate challenge for buyers lies at the $2,548 resistance level. A successful move above this first barrier would bring the 20-day EMA, currently at about $2,578, into focus as the next key resistance.
If bullish momentum strengthens, traders may watch for targets at $2,636 and $2,781, with further resistance identified at $3,075 and $3,253.
Momentum indicators remain subdued. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is hovering near 43, below the neutral 50 midpoint, while the Stochastic Oscillator has dropped to 27, which signals weak momentum and nears oversold territory.
On the downside, initial support can be found at $2,413. Further declines could expose Ethereum to support at $2,355 and its 100-day EMA. Deeper pullbacks would likely bring $2,204 and $1,971 into view as additional support areas.
Ethereum must clear the $2,548 and $2,578 barriers to shift momentum in favor of buyers, while sustained ETF outflows and sluggish US demand create challenges for a robust recovery.
Leading cryptocurrencies posted steady gains on Tuesday as investors awaited September’s consumer inflation data against a backdrop of elevated oil prices.
Crypto Market SteadyBitcoin crossed $84,000 but failed to sustain the rally, while Ethereum consolidated around the $2,500 region. XRP and Dogecoin recorded noticeable spikes.
Cryptocurrency-related stocks also dipped, with Strategy Inc. (NASDAQ:MSTR) and Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc. (NYSE:BMNR) closing down 0.33% and 1.43%, respectively.
More than $190 million was liquidated across the cryptocurrency market in the last day, largely from bearish short positions, according to Coinglass data.
Bitcoin’s open interest rose by a modest 0.34% over the last 24 hours, matching the movement in spot price. Derivatives traders were net short on BTC as the Long/Shor Ratio slipped below 1.
"Greed" sentiment persisted in the market, according to the Crypto Fear & Greed Index.
Top Gainers (24 Hours)
The global cryptocurrency market capitalization stood at $2.908 trillion, following an increase of 1.20% from the previous day.
Read Next
Stock Market Feels the StrainStocks ended in the red on Tuesday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 180.45 points, or 0.35%, to close at 51,670.10. The S&P 500 closed 0.02% lower at 7,805.45, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 0.15% to end at 27,204.38.
The United States Oil Fund (NYSE: USO), which tracks WTI crude oil, rose 1.36% to $153.09 as Iran reportedly outlined new tactics to disrupt shipping and keep global oil prices elevated.
All eyes will be on Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index report as investors look for clues on the future path of monetary policy.
Bitcoin FOMO FadesAli Martinez, a widely followed cryptocurrency analyst and trader, highlighted a setup similar to a previous bounce, in which holding the 200-Day Simple Moving Average and closing above the 50-Day Simple Moving Average triggered a rally for Bitcoin.
“The key level to watch is $84,000, where the 50 SMA currently sits. A 4-hour close above it could confirm the next leg higher to $93,000,” the analyst added.
On-chain analytics firm Santiment reported Ethereum leading in social sentiment, with 2.05 bullish comments per bearish one across X, Reddit, and Telegram, while commentary for Bitcoin turned predominantly bearish.
Strike Finance integrates RealFi yields into its liquidity vaults.
Advertised returns approach 50% APR but remain variable.
ADA trades near $0.235, with support around $0.228.
Open interest reaches $239.7 million after a modest daily increase.
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has praised Strike Finance following its integration of RealFi yield into the platform’s liquidity vaults, a development that expands the use of real-world asset-backed products within Cardano’s decentralized finance ecosystem.
Alright Cardano, RealFi is open for business through Strike. One of the best DApps on Cardano
— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) October 14, 2026
Strike says the integration allows users to access returns associated with RealFi alongside its existing vault strategies. The platform is advertising annual percentage rates approaching 50%, although those figures are variable and should not be confused with the returns generated by RealFi’s underlying assets.
Hoskinson welcomed the development, describing Strike as one of Cardano’s best applications.
The announcement comes less than two weeks after RealFi launched on Cardano mainnet on October 1. ADA, however, continues to face technical resistance, trading around $0.235 in the October 14 market snapshot.
Strike Adds Real-World Yield to Its Vault Strategies
RealFi brings a different source of returns to Cardano’s DeFi market.
Its two-token system consists of USDrf, a dollar-denominated stablecoin backed by a portfolio of financial assets, and sUSDrf, a yield-bearing token that provides exposure to returns generated by the underlying portfolio.
According to RealFi’s documentation, the portfolio includes U.S. Treasury bills, money-market funds, investment-grade credit instruments and private lending.
The structure is designed to separate liquidity needs from yield generation. USDrf serves as the more liquid base asset, while sUSDrf carries additional exposure to investment performance and potential losses.
Strike’s integration introduces these returns into a separate DeFi strategy.
Under its documented vault model, depositors allocate funds to managed trading accounts, where profits and losses are reflected in the value of their vault shares.
The latest promotional figures include:
49.27% APR for sUSDrf-linked positions.
37.03% APR for ADA-backed positions.
Up to 50% APR across selected vault strategies.
Strike also advertises borrowing against eligible collateral at 0% interest.
These figures were presented in the October 14 announcement and are not independently verified realized returns. The available information does not establish how much of each vault’s advertised APR comes from RealFi, trading performance or other strategy components.
That distinction is central to evaluating the integration.
Why a 50% APR Does Not Mean RealFi Earns 50%
RealFi’s own product information advertises up to 10% APY for its staked token, substantially below the figures associated with Strike’s selected vault strategies.
The difference is not necessarily contradictory. The products operate at different levels and involve different sources of return.
RealFi’s yield originates from financial assets supporting its token system. Strike’s vault performance can also depend on trading activity and how capital is deployed within its strategies.
APR and APY also use different annualization conventions. APR generally excludes compounding, while APY incorporates it.
Neither measure guarantees that the quoted return will persist.
For example, a strategy displaying 49.27% APR could subsequently produce a much lower return or record a loss. Its advertised rate should not be treated as a fixed payment obligation.
The risks extend beyond changing yields.
Collateral liquidation. Borrowers may lose pledged assets if their collateral falls below the required threshold.
Trading losses. Vault positions can decline in value, reducing depositor balances.
Credit exposure. RealFi’s underlying portfolio includes assets that may experience defaults or valuation losses.
Liquidity restrictions. Withdrawals and redemptions may depend on market depth, available funds and applicable waiting periods.
RealFi’s redemption disclosures distinguish institutional redemption arrangements from retail exits through decentralized exchanges. Retail holders are not guaranteed immediate liquidity or an exit at the token’s target value.
Geographic eligibility is another limitation. RealFi states that USDrf and sUSDrf are unavailable to persons in the United States, United Kingdom, European Union and certain other jurisdictions.
These restrictions mean the new integration should not be interpreted as universally accessible across Cardano’s user base.
ADA Tests a Support Zone Near $0.228
The latest price chart shows that Cardano’s broader market performance remains weaker than the optimism surrounding the RealFi integration.
At the time of writing ADA trades at $0.23480 on Coinbase, according to the TradingView chart from October 14, representing a daily decline of 0.38%.
Cardano trades within a rising price channel.
The token remained below its 20-day simple moving average at $0.24861.
That level closely matches the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement at $0.24863, creating a resistance area near $0.249.
A sustained move above that region would improve the short-term technical outlook and bring the recent trading area around $0.26 into focus.
Support is closer to the current price.
The 50-day moving average stands at $0.22813, just above the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement at $0.22740. The chart’s rising trendline also approaches this zone.
Together, these indicators make $0.227–$0.228 an important area to monitor.
A sustained break below it would weaken the ascending price structure. The next technical references are the 200-day moving average at $0.21251 and the 50% Fibonacci retracement at $0.21024.
The 100-day moving average, currently near $0.20410, provides a lower reference if selling pressure continues.
Momentum indicators support a cautious interpretation.
The 14-day Relative Strength Index stood at 47.26, below the neutral 50 level and its signal average of 55.94.
That suggests momentum has weakened, although ADA is not yet in traditionally oversold territory.
These levels describe potential market reactions rather than guaranteed support or resistance. The chart also does not establish a direct relationship between Strike’s announcement and ADA’s price movements.
ADA Derivatives Show Limited New Positioning
Derivatives data provide little indication of a major speculative buildup around the announcement.
ADA open interest reached approximately $239.7 million on October 14, according to information from Coinalyze, increasing 0.62% over the preceding 24 hours.
The figures cover perpetual contracts, with most outstanding positions concentrated across Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid and OKX.
Cardano / Derivatives
ADA Open Interest by Exchange
Total Open Interest
$239.7M
+0.62% / 24h
Exchange
OI (USD)
Share
1
Binance
$93.8M
39.1%
2
Bybit
$68.6M
28.6%
3
Hyperliquid
$36.1M
15.1%
4
OKX
$33.7M
14.1%
+
Others
~$7.5M
3.1%
Market Concentration
Top four exchanges
96.9%
Most reported ADA perpetual exposure is concentrated on four venues. Open interest does not indicate whether positioning is bullish or bearish.
The concentration shows where leveraged exposure is held, but it does not establish whether traders expect prices to rise or fall.
Every derivatives contract has both a long and a short side. Open interest alone cannot determine which group is driving the market.
Funding rates, trading volume and liquidation data would be needed to assess positioning more thoroughly.
The modest daily increase therefore suggests limited expansion in outstanding contracts rather than a decisive shift in market sentiment.
RealFi’s Next Test Is Sustained Vault Performance
Strike’s integration gives RealFi another distribution channel shortly after its mainnet launch.
Separately, Cardano has brought CIP-0113 programmable tokens to mainnet, introducing conditional transfers designed for regulated financial assets.
The more meaningful measures of adoption will be sustained deposits, realized returns after fees and the ability of vault strategies to withstand unfavorable market conditions.
For Cardano, the development broadens the practical use of its real-world asset infrastructure. Whether that translates into lasting DeFi activity will depend on the performance of the products themselves, not their advertised annualized yields.
Alexander Zdravkov is a crypto journalist and market analyst specializing in digital assets, blockchain technology, and the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market. He entered the industry more than four years ago, drawn to the speed of innovation in crypto and the potential of blockchain-based financial systems to reshape traditional markets.
His work focuses on understanding the forces behind crypto market movements, from Bitcoin and altcoin cycles to institutional adoption, regulation, exchange-traded products, stablecoins, DeFi, and emerging blockchain ecosystems. Rather than simply following price action, Alexander looks at liquidity, investor positioning, market structure, and macroeconomic conditions to identify developing trends and explain what they could mean for digital assets.
With a degree in International Relations, he brings a broader perspective to cryptocurrency coverage by connecting developments in the sector with monetary policy, geopolitics, regulation, and global capital flows. This allows him to examine crypto not as an isolated market, but as an increasingly interconnected part of the global financial system.
Over the course of more than five years in financial journalism, Alexander has written over 5,000 articles covering cryptocurrencies, blockchain, traditional markets, and the global economy. His reporting spans Bitcoin, Ethereum and altcoins, DeFi protocols, institutional crypto adoption, regulation, market infrastructure, security incidents, and major developments shaping the wider digital asset industry.
His approach is centered on giving readers context behind the numbers and headlines, explaining not only what is happening in crypto markets, but why it matters and what could come next.
Tether has invested in Latin American financial technology company EFY Finance through its seed funding round, seeking to expand institutional access to USDT and USAT stablecoin payments across 17 countries.
Summary
Tether invested in EFY Finance’s seed round to expand institutional stablecoin services across Latin America. EFY Finance supports local account settlement across 17 countries and reports more than 25,000 accounts. EFY offers stablecoin payments, custody, wallets, cards, and conversion services across multiple Latin American markets. Tether did not disclose its investment amount, EFY Finance’s valuation, or the total seed funding. Chainalysis recorded nearly USD 1.5 trillion in Latin American cryptocurrency transactions across three reporting years. Tether announced the investment on October 13, confirming that the funding would support EFY Finance’s infrastructure for international payments, digital asset custody and connections to local banking systems. The company serves more than 25,000 active individual and business accounts and operates across several Latin American markets. Financial details, including Tether’s investment amount and EFY’s valuation, were not disclosed.
Tether investment targets stablecoin payments in Latin America According to the announcement, EFY Finance provides payment infrastructure that allows businesses and financial institutions to move funds using dollar-backed stablecoins. Its services connect digital assets with traditional bank accounts, enabling customers to receive, convert and settle payments through local financial networks.
The company supports transactions involving USDT and USAT, with conversion services across more than 12 currencies and payment corridors. Customers can access digital wallets, payment cards, over-the-counter trading services and infrastructure for converting conventional money into stablecoins or exchanging stablecoins for local currencies.
EFY’s settlement network currently reaches local accounts in 17 countries, according to figures disclosed by Tether. Its established markets include Bolivia, Colombia, Mexico, El Salvador, Panama and Ecuador, where the company intends to develop additional institutional services.
The funding forms part of EFY Finance’s seed round, although Tether did not identify other investors or specify how much capital the round raised. Neither company announced a timetable for launching new products or entering additional countries.
EFY Finance operates under a Digital Asset Service Provider license in El Salvador. Tether identified the company’s existing customer relationships, banking connections and regulatory arrangements as reasons for supporting its expansion.
The investment follows Tether’s previous involvement in Latin American financial technology investments, including its reported USD 20 million investment in Argentine digital bank Ualá in July 2026. That investment formed part of a larger funding round involving institutional investors and financial services companies.
EFY Finance plans to connect stablecoins with banking services EFY Finance focuses on making digital assets usable through familiar financial services, including corporate accounts, local payment networks and international transfers.
The company’s infrastructure allows customers to exchange stablecoins for traditional currencies and settle funds into local accounts. Its custody services support institutions handling digital assets, while its payment tools provide access to services used by businesses and individuals.
EFY Finance co-founder and CEO Andrés Tobón said the company’s priority is connecting digital currencies with the banking systems businesses already use. He described the work as linking stablecoins to accounts, cards and cross-border settlement arrangements.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino pointed to inflation and capital controls as reasons some Latin American customers seek access to U.S. dollar-backed assets. He said EFY Finance was positioned to improve access through regulated infrastructure and existing financial networks.
The proposed expansion involves two different stablecoins. USDT is Tether’s established dollar-pegged cryptocurrency, while USAT is a U.S.-focused stablecoin issued by Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A., with Tether’s support.
Tether’s official announcement identifies Anchorage as a federally chartered bank. It states that USAT is not legal tender, is not guaranteed by the U.S. government and does not carry Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance protection.
In September, Anchorage Digital selected LayerZero as an interoperability provider for its bank-issued stablecoins, including USAT. The Anchorage Digital stablecoin infrastructure agreement involved technology intended to support transfers across multiple blockchain networks.
The October 13 announcement did not identify which blockchains EFY Finance would use for new payment products. It did not disclose projected transaction volumes, institutional customer commitments or expected revenue from the investment.
Latin America recorded nearly USD 1.5 trillion in crypto activity The investment comes after several years of cryptocurrency growth across Latin America, where stablecoins have become a widely used option for international payments and access to dollar-denominated assets.
Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis reported that Latin America recorded nearly USD 1.5 trillion in cryptocurrency transaction volume between July 2022 and June 2025. Its October 2025 study identified inflation, currency volatility and capital controls among the factors associated with cryptocurrency adoption.
The report found that Brazil accounted for USD 318.8 billion in cryptocurrency value received during its regional measurement period. Argentina recorded USD 93.9 billion, followed by Mexico at USD 71.2 billion, Venezuela at USD 44.6 billion and Colombia at USD 44.2 billion.
Stablecoins accounted for more than half of exchange purchases involving the Colombian peso, Argentine peso and Brazilian real between July 2024 and June 2025. Chainalysis based those figures on exchange order-book data, which does not represent every cryptocurrency transaction conducted in those countries.
Separate industry data has shown continued demand for stablecoin purchases through regional exchanges. Bitso’s 2025 adoption report, examined in coverage of stablecoin purchases across Latin America, found that dollar-backed tokens represented 40% of cryptocurrency purchases on its platform, compared with Bitcoin’s 18%.
The Chainalysis figures describe regional cryptocurrency activity and do not measure EFY Finance’s transaction volume or the expected financial return from Tether’s investment.
Tether continues expanding business payment infrastructure Tether has pursued other institutional payment arrangements involving cross-border settlement and corporate treasury services.
In July 2026, Hyundai Motor’s U.S. and Mexican operations completed a pilot using USDT to transfer USD 20,000 over the Avalanche blockchain. The reported transaction settled in approximately seven minutes, according to the companies.
The Hyundai stablecoin payment trial involved converting U.S. dollars into USDT before transferring the tokens between participating business entities. The receiving operation converted the stablecoins back into conventional currency.
Tether’s October 13 investment provides financial backing to an existing payments business serving Latin American customers. Unlike the Hyundai pilot, which involved a defined transaction, the EFY agreement concerns funding for infrastructure and future institutional services.
The companies have not disclosed implementation deadlines, additional regulatory approvals or new products scheduled to launch under the agreement.
EFY Finance said it would continue developing connections between digital dollar payments, banking accounts and local settlement networks. Tobón identified institutional access to USDT and USAT as an area for expansion, while the company’s existing services include custody, accounts, wallets, cards and currency conversion across its supported markets.
Russia continues the integration of cryptocurrencies in its financial system, with a growing role for traditional banks. Sberbank, the largest banking institution in the country, has just obtained authorization to trade digital assets. The bank is already preparing operations on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT in its application. This advance accompanies the establishment of a market regulated by the Russian authorities, who want to organize the exchange and custody of cryptocurrencies.
In brief Sberbank obtains authorization to trade cryptocurrencies in Russia. The bank tests transactions in bitcoin, ether and USDT in its application. The launch of the first products is scheduled for December 1st. Starting next July, cryptocurrency transactions will have to go through authorized intermediaries. Sberbank gets the green light to trade cryptocurrencies The Bank of Russia has registered Sberbank in the register of authorized providers to exchange cryptocurrencies, according to the Interfax agency. This decision follows the bank’s registration as a digital custodian at the beginning of the month. It can thus prepare services covering two distinct activities: trading and custody of digital assets.
The register now includes nine organizations, including VTB and T-Invest Lab. This evolution marks a change of direction compared to the project presented by the central bank in 2022. At that time, the institution planned to ban national exchange platforms and block the operations of Russian financial intermediaries on cryptocurrencies.
However, a law that came into force on September 1st now establishes a regulated framework. It provides for the participation of banks, brokers, exchange platforms, and digital custodians. In this system, authorized traders can buy and sell cryptocurrencies with their own funds, without going through an organized platform. According to the Bank of Russia, custodians are responsible for recording asset ownership and transfers.
Bitcoin, ether and USDT: the first tests in the application Thanks to these two authorizations, Sberbank will be able to combine trading services with custody services. The bank has also been working on a cryptocurrency wallet since the beginning of the year. According to Interfax, it plans to launch its first products on December 1st, directly from the interfaces its clients already use.
The institution is currently testing transactions on several digital assets in its application. The trials focus notably on Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, and other major tokens. However, the Bank of Russia still needs to define the final list of authorized cryptocurrencies, as indicated by Sberbank to the media Vedomosti. This decision will therefore determine the assets accessible to future users of banking services.
This openness remains subject to precise restrictions. National payments in cryptocurrencies remain prohibited in Russia. In addition, the central bank plans that from next July, transactions will have to go through authorized intermediaries. This rule would effectively exclude peer-to-peer exchanges settled by means of Russian bank accounts.
In the short term, Sberbank must finalize its services while respecting regulatory requirements. The launch announced for December 1st will mark a new stage in crypto regulation in Russia. The final list of authorized assets and the access modalities will then specify the scope of this offer. The evolution of the system will depend notably on the rules set by the central bank and their application to client operations.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Ghiles A.
Journaliste et rédacteur web passionné par l’univers des cryptomonnaies et des technologies Web3. J’y traite les dernières tendances et actualités afin de proposer un contenu de haute qualité à un large public du secteur.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Tether invested in EFY Finance’s seed round to grow institutional USDT and USAT stablecoin payments in Latin America.
EFY Finance settles payments to local accounts in 17 countries and serves more than 25,000 active accounts.
Neither company disclosed the investment amount, EFY Finance’s valuation, or the total seed round size.
USAT is a U.S.-focused stablecoin issued by Anchorage Digital Bank with Tether’s support.
Chainalysis data shows Latin America recorded nearly $1.5 trillion in crypto transaction volume between July 2022 and June 2025.
Tether has invested in EFY Finance, a Latin American financial technology company, as part of its seed funding round. The goal is to expand institutional access to USDT and USAT stablecoin payments across 17 countries.
Tether announced the deal on October 13. Neither company disclosed the investment amount, EFY Finance’s valuation, or the total size of the seed round.
How EFY Finance Works
EFY Finance builds payment infrastructure that lets businesses and financial institutions move money using dollar-backed stablecoins. Its services link digital assets with traditional bank accounts.
The company offers wallets, payment cards, custody services, and over-the-counter trading. It supports conversion across more than 12 currencies and payment corridors, with settlement to local accounts in 17 countries.
EFY Finance serves more than 25,000 active individual and business accounts. It holds a Digital Asset Service Provider license in El Salvador.
Its established markets include Bolivia, Colombia, Mexico, El Salvador, Panama, and Ecuador. The company plans to grow institutional services in these countries.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said the U.S. dollar is “a lifeline against inflation and capital controls” across Latin America. He said EFY Finance is positioned to make dollar access easier through regulated infrastructure.
EFY Finance co-founder and CEO Andrés Tobón said stablecoins are already part of the region’s financial system. He said the challenge is connecting them with bank accounts, local payment networks, cards, and cross-border settlement.
The expansion involves two tokens. USDT is Tether’s established dollar-pegged stablecoin.
USAT is a U.S.-focused stablecoin issued by Anchorage Digital Bank, a federally chartered bank, with Tether’s support. Tether states that USAT is not legal tender, is not guaranteed by the U.S. government, and is not insured by the FDIC.
In September, Anchorage Digital chose LayerZero as an interoperability provider for its bank-issued stablecoins, including USAT. The October announcement did not say which blockchains EFY Finance will use for new products.
Latin America Records Nearly $1.5 Trillion in Crypto Activity
Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis reported that Latin America recorded nearly $1.5 trillion in crypto transaction volume between July 2022 and June 2025. The firm linked adoption to inflation, currency swings, and capital controls.
Brazil led with $318.8 billion in crypto value received. Argentina followed with $93.9 billion, then Mexico at $71.2 billion, Venezuela at $44.6 billion, and Colombia at $44.2 billion.
Stablecoins made up more than half of exchange purchases involving the Colombian peso, Argentine peso, and Brazilian real between July 2024 and June 2025. Bitso’s 2025 report found dollar-backed tokens made up 40% of crypto purchases on its platform, compared with 18% for Bitcoin.
The EFY deal follows other Tether moves in the region. In July 2026, Tether reportedly invested $20 million in Argentine digital bank Ualá.
That same month, Hyundai Motor’s U.S. and Mexican operations completed a pilot using USDT to send $20,000 over the Avalanche blockchain. The transfer settled in about seven minutes, according to the companies.
The companies have not shared timelines for new products, expansion into more countries, or expected transaction volumes. Tobón said institutional access to USDT and USAT remains a focus as EFY Finance builds links between digital dollars and local banking networks.
Tether, the company behind the world’s most widely traded stablecoin USDT, invested in EFY Finance as part of the fintech firm’s seed funding round, aiming to strengthen institutional access to digital dollar payments across Latin America. The size of Tether’s investment, EFY Finance’s valuation, and the full amount raised were not disclosed by either party.
Expansion of Stablecoin Payments in the RegionEFY Finance is a financial technology company focused on building infrastructure for cross-border payments and digital asset transactions throughout Latin America. The firm allows businesses and financial institutions to settle transactions using USDT and USAT stablecoins while integrating digital wallets, payment cards, and custody services. EFY Finance holds a Digital Asset Service Provider license in El Salvador and operates active local payment corridors in 17 countries, including Bolivia, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, and El Salvador.
Currently, EFY Finance serves over 25,000 retail and institutional accounts, offering conversion between more than 12 currencies and enabling direct payments to local bank accounts. The company plans to expand its institutional offerings in the region, leveraging Tether’s support to increase access to regulated digital dollar infrastructure.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino highlighted the significance of the U.S. dollar in Latin America, citing its role as “a lifeline against inflation and capital controls” and emphasizing the need for enhanced access through regulated platforms.
Paolo Ardoino described the U.S. dollar as vital for those facing currency instability in Latin America and noted that EFY Finance could help make dollar-denominated digital assets more accessible across regulated networks.
EFY Finance’s co-founder and CEO Andrés Tobón stated that the main challenge is connecting stablecoins with the traditional banking system, including local payment rails, cards, and cross-border settlements, to strengthen their role within the mainstream financial landscape.
The expansion plans involve USDT, Tether’s established stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, and USAT, a newer U.S.-focused stablecoin issued by Anchorage Digital Bank with backing from Tether. According to Tether, USAT is not legal tender, is not guaranteed by the U.S. government, and does not carry FDIC insurance.
Mini dictionary: Anchorage Digital Bank is a federally chartered digital asset bank in the United States that provides custody and settlement services for cryptocurrency and issues specific stablecoins such as USAT under U.S. regulatory oversight.
In September, Anchorage Digital selected LayerZero as the interoperability provider for its bank-issued stablecoins, including USAT. The companies have not detailed which networks or blockchains EFY Finance will utilize for these new products.
Growth of Crypto Transactions in Latin AmericaBlockchain analytics company Chainalysis reports that nearly $1.5 trillion in crypto transaction volume was recorded in Latin America from July 2022 to June 2025. In this period, Brazil led the region with $318.8 billion in received crypto value, followed by Argentina with $93.9 billion, Mexico with $71.2 billion, Venezuela at $44.6 billion, and Colombia at $44.2 billion.
CountryCrypto Value ReceivedBrazil$318.8 billionArgentina$93.9 billionMexico$71.2 billionVenezuela$44.6 billionColombia$44.2 billionChainalysis attributes the region’s rising crypto adoption to persistent inflation, currency volatility, and recurring capital controls. Within certain countries, stablecoins accounted for the majority of exchange purchases involving national currencies such as the Colombian peso, Argentine peso, and Brazilian real. According to Bitso’s 2025 report, dollar-backed tokens represented 40% of all crypto purchases on its platform, outpacing Bitcoin at 18%.
Tether’s deal with EFY Finance comes after previous moves in Latin America, including a $20 million investment in Argentine digital bank Ualá in July 2026. That same month, Hyundai Motor’s U.S. and Mexican operations transferred $20,000 via USDT on the Avalanche blockchain, completing the transaction within about seven minutes.
EFY Finance and Tether have not released specific timelines for new financial products, further expansion plans, or projected volumes. Andrés Tobón emphasized that streamlining institutional access to USDT and USAT remains a priority as EFY Finance continues building connections between digital dollars and traditional banking systems in the region.
Stablecoins have become part of Latin America’s financial ecosystem, but linking them to traditional banking and payment networks will determine their broader impact, according to EFY Finance CEO Andrés Tobón.
Physical Intelligence opens its robot model API: Picking strawberries, assembling servers, new actions can be trained in just 4 days.
Beating AI News Flash: U.S.-based robotics AI firm Physical Intelligence (Pi) has launched the beta version of its Pi API, opening access to its foundational robotics model to more enterprises. Developers only need to upload robot operation data to fine-tune the model on Pi’s cloud computing power, then control their own robots via the API. There’s no need to train models from scratch or build complex training and inference infrastructure independently. Pi showcased real-world use cases from multiple partners, including AgRobotics’ strawberry-picking robots, autonomous loaders for self-driving trucks, and robots for food processing and server assembly. Among these, startup Almond used the Pi API to get its dual-arm robot to learn polishing the parts required for its own assembly after just 4 days of iterative training and testing. Pi had previously open-sourced robotics models such as π0 and π0.5, but developers still had to deploy and train them on their own. This time, the company has further packaged model fine-tuning, computing power, and inference services into an API, aiming to become a shared intelligent foundation for various robots. However, test access is still by application only, and pricing has not been announced yet.
7 minutes ago
Spark: Q3 Net Protocol Revenue Surpasses $4 Million, Stablecoin Swap Layer Hits Over $14 Billion in Trading Volume in Its First Month
DeFi lending protocol Spark has disclosed that its net protocol returns exceeded $4 million in the third quarter of 2026. In the first half of the year, DeFi lending spreads narrowed significantly, with lending capital profitability turning negative in the second quarter. After driving growth for Spark Savings USDT in Q3, related returns rebounded above capital costs. During the same period, Spark partnered with Uniswap and Sky to launch a stablecoin swap layer, which went live with $150 million in USDS liquidity, offering stablecoin swap services to banks, fintech firms and payment companies, and recorded over $14 billion in trading volume in its first month.
7 minutes ago
Morgan Stanley's Q3 net revenue hit $20.34 billion, exceeding the consensus estimate of $19.89 billion.
Morgan Stanley released its third-quarter financial results, reporting net revenue of $20.34 billion, exceeding the consensus estimate of $19.89 billion. The firm posted earnings per share of $3.03 for the quarter, while net interest income came in at $3.25 billion, beating the forecast of $2.78 billion.
7 minutes ago
Dutch central bank approves Qivalis' electronic money institution license, bringing euro stablecoin issuance a step closer.
Qivalis, an alliance backed by 37 major European banks, has secured an electronic money institution (EMI) license from De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB, the Dutch central bank), bringing it closer to issuing euro-denominated electronic money tokens (EMT), a regulated stablecoin format. The firm still needs to fulfill remaining requirements under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, including publishing a whitepaper, and plans to distribute the tokens via banks, crypto exchanges, and payment service providers over the coming months rather than directly to consumers. Under the EU MiCA framework, EMTs must be pegged to a single fiat currency, issued by authorized credit institutions or EMIs, redeemable at par at any time, and non-interest bearing. Since its launch in September 2025, the Qivalis alliance has expanded to include 37 European banks including BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING, and DZ Bank, and has selected Fireblocks to provide digital asset infrastructure.
7 minutes ago
DigUp Overhauls Mac Search With Google’s New Model: Locate a Specific Shot in a Video Even If You Forget the Filename
Dongcha Beating AI News Flash: Finding files on Mac typically requires remembering names or keywords. If you only recall a zebra appearing in a video segment, or a podcast episode discussing sleep, traditional file search tools are of little help. Independent developer Abdur Rahim’s open-source tool DigUp solves this by enabling direct content-based file searches. Type in "zebra in video" and it will jump to the exact frame where the zebra appears; search for "segment discussing sleep" and it will pinpoint the relevant timestamp in the podcast. It can also search photos, PDFs, and even open the exact page of a specific clause in a contract. DigUp leverages Google DeepMind’s EmbeddingGemma 2 model, released on October 6. This model converts text, images, audio, and video into comparable numerical features, allowing users to find corresponding visuals or audio based on a text description. DigUp pre-indexes selected folders, and during searches, it can also precisely match details like invoice numbers and error codes. All indexing and search processes run locally on Mac, eliminating the need to upload private files to the cloud. Free and open-source, DigUp has earned over 3,000 GitHub stars in less than a week since its launch. It currently only supports Macs with Apple’s custom silicon, requiring macOS 14 or later. First-time use requires downloading an approximately 865 MB model and spending time building the index.
7 minutes ago
During the afternoon US trading session ahead of the CPI release, new positions are heavily concentrated in the storage sector, with bulls dominating.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, at least 14 accounts (with positions exceeding $100,000) opened new U.S. stock positions in the afternoon session. Among these, 12 accounts opened long positions totaling approximately $3.2081 million, while the other 2 accounts opened short positions totaling around $725,500. The new long positions are concentrated in the storage sector. Micron Technology (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), and SK Hynix (SKHY) accounted for about $2.6695 million in new long positions, making up roughly 83.2% of the total long position volume in this round. Specifically, Micron attracted 5 accounts to open new long positions, totaling approximately $1.384 million, with a volume-weighted average price of $947.99. SanDisk saw 2 accounts opening long positions totaling around $678,200, at a weighted average price of $1,455.36. SK Hynix had 1 new long account buying about $607,300. Short positions also centered on semiconductors and storage: one account opened a new short position of roughly $379,000 in SOXL in the afternoon, then closed it entirely; another account opened short positions of approximately $181,100 in SanDisk and $165,300 in Micron respectively. The remaining new long positions are distributed across Applied Materials (AMAT), Microsoft (MSFT), Nebius (NBIS), Broadcom (AVGO), and the Korean stock leverage ETF (KORU), with total position amounts of about $118,700, $103,900, $102,600, $103,300, and $110,100 respectively. Positions in Broadcom and KORU have since been exited.
Physical Intelligence opens its robot model API: Picking strawberries, assembling servers, new actions can be trained in just 4 days.
Beating AI News Flash: U.S.-based robotics AI firm Physical Intelligence (Pi) has launched the beta version of its Pi API, opening access to its foundational robotics model to more enterprises. Developers only need to upload robot operation data to fine-tune the model on Pi’s cloud computing power, then control their own robots via the API. There’s no need to train models from scratch or build complex training and inference infrastructure independently. Pi showcased real-world use cases from multiple partners, including AgRobotics’ strawberry-picking robots, autonomous loaders for self-driving trucks, and robots for food processing and server assembly. Among these, startup Almond used the Pi API to get its dual-arm robot to learn polishing the parts required for its own assembly after just 4 days of iterative training and testing. Pi had previously open-sourced robotics models such as π0 and π0.5, but developers still had to deploy and train them on their own. This time, the company has further packaged model fine-tuning, computing power, and inference services into an API, aiming to become a shared intelligent foundation for various robots. However, test access is still by application only, and pricing has not been announced yet.
3 minutes ago
Spark: Q3 Net Protocol Revenue Surpasses $4 Million, Stablecoin Swap Layer Hits Over $14 Billion in Trading Volume in Its First Month
DeFi lending protocol Spark has disclosed that its net protocol returns exceeded $4 million in the third quarter of 2026. In the first half of the year, DeFi lending spreads narrowed significantly, with lending capital profitability turning negative in the second quarter. After driving growth for Spark Savings USDT in Q3, related returns rebounded above capital costs. During the same period, Spark partnered with Uniswap and Sky to launch a stablecoin swap layer, which went live with $150 million in USDS liquidity, offering stablecoin swap services to banks, fintech firms and payment companies, and recorded over $14 billion in trading volume in its first month.
3 minutes ago
Morgan Stanley's Q3 net revenue hit $20.34 billion, exceeding the consensus estimate of $19.89 billion.
Morgan Stanley released its third-quarter financial results, reporting net revenue of $20.34 billion, exceeding the consensus estimate of $19.89 billion. The firm posted earnings per share of $3.03 for the quarter, while net interest income came in at $3.25 billion, beating the forecast of $2.78 billion.
3 minutes ago
Dutch central bank approves Qivalis' electronic money institution license, bringing euro stablecoin issuance a step closer.
Qivalis, an alliance backed by 37 major European banks, has secured an electronic money institution (EMI) license from De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB, the Dutch central bank), bringing it closer to issuing euro-denominated electronic money tokens (EMT), a regulated stablecoin format. The firm still needs to fulfill remaining requirements under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, including publishing a whitepaper, and plans to distribute the tokens via banks, crypto exchanges, and payment service providers over the coming months rather than directly to consumers. Under the EU MiCA framework, EMTs must be pegged to a single fiat currency, issued by authorized credit institutions or EMIs, redeemable at par at any time, and non-interest bearing. Since its launch in September 2025, the Qivalis alliance has expanded to include 37 European banks including BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING, and DZ Bank, and has selected Fireblocks to provide digital asset infrastructure.
3 minutes ago
DigUp Overhauls Mac Search With Google’s New Model: Locate a Specific Shot in a Video Even If You Forget the Filename
Dongcha Beating AI News Flash: Finding files on Mac typically requires remembering names or keywords. If you only recall a zebra appearing in a video segment, or a podcast episode discussing sleep, traditional file search tools are of little help. Independent developer Abdur Rahim’s open-source tool DigUp solves this by enabling direct content-based file searches. Type in "zebra in video" and it will jump to the exact frame where the zebra appears; search for "segment discussing sleep" and it will pinpoint the relevant timestamp in the podcast. It can also search photos, PDFs, and even open the exact page of a specific clause in a contract. DigUp leverages Google DeepMind’s EmbeddingGemma 2 model, released on October 6. This model converts text, images, audio, and video into comparable numerical features, allowing users to find corresponding visuals or audio based on a text description. DigUp pre-indexes selected folders, and during searches, it can also precisely match details like invoice numbers and error codes. All indexing and search processes run locally on Mac, eliminating the need to upload private files to the cloud. Free and open-source, DigUp has earned over 3,000 GitHub stars in less than a week since its launch. It currently only supports Macs with Apple’s custom silicon, requiring macOS 14 or later. First-time use requires downloading an approximately 865 MB model and spending time building the index.
3 minutes ago
During the afternoon US trading session ahead of the CPI release, new positions are heavily concentrated in the storage sector, with bulls dominating.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, at least 14 accounts (with positions exceeding $100,000) opened new U.S. stock positions in the afternoon session. Among these, 12 accounts opened long positions totaling approximately $3.2081 million, while the other 2 accounts opened short positions totaling around $725,500. The new long positions are concentrated in the storage sector. Micron Technology (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), and SK Hynix (SKHY) accounted for about $2.6695 million in new long positions, making up roughly 83.2% of the total long position volume in this round. Specifically, Micron attracted 5 accounts to open new long positions, totaling approximately $1.384 million, with a volume-weighted average price of $947.99. SanDisk saw 2 accounts opening long positions totaling around $678,200, at a weighted average price of $1,455.36. SK Hynix had 1 new long account buying about $607,300. Short positions also centered on semiconductors and storage: one account opened a new short position of roughly $379,000 in SOXL in the afternoon, then closed it entirely; another account opened short positions of approximately $181,100 in SanDisk and $165,300 in Micron respectively. The remaining new long positions are distributed across Applied Materials (AMAT), Microsoft (MSFT), Nebius (NBIS), Broadcom (AVGO), and the Korean stock leverage ETF (KORU), with total position amounts of about $118,700, $103,900, $102,600, $103,300, and $110,100 respectively. Positions in Broadcom and KORU have since been exited.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
This is a general announcement and marketing communication. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region.
Fellow Binancians,
Binance Earn presents to you new offers that are newly added to Yield Arena this week. Stay tuned for more campaigns in Yield Arena to earn rewards from Simple Earn, ETH Staking, SOL Staking, Dual Investment, and more.
Earn Spotlight Limited-Time Offers
USDe:Eligible users who hold at least 0.01 USDe for 24 hours can enjoy 4.75% APR rewards from 2026-10-09 00:00 (UTC) to 2026-10-15 23:59 (UTC). Simple Earn:From 2026-10-09 00:00:00 (UTC) to 2026-11-07 23:59:59 (UTC), users who subscribe to USDC Flexible Products may enjoy up to 4% APR, including exclusive Bonus Tiered APR. VIP users can enjoy up to 5% APR on the first 200,000 USDC subscribed.From 2026-10-13 00:00:00 (UTC) to 2026-11-11 23:59:59 (UTC), users who subscribe to KGST Flexible Products may enjoy up to 14% APR, including exclusive Bonus Tiered APR. Dual Investment:
Join the Dual Investment October Monthly Leaderboard to earn up to 5,888 USDC from 2026-09-29 02:00 (UTC) to 2026-10-30 23:59 (UTC).
ProductOfferingsDurationAPRMin. Subscription Limit per UserMax. Subscription Limit per User Flexible ProductsUSDTFlexibleReal-Time APR (Approximately 2.3%)+4% Bonus Tiered APR(Tier 0 - 500 USDT)0.01 USDTUnlimitedUFlexibleReal-Time APR (Approximately 0.8%)+6% Bonus Tiered APR(Tier 0 - 8,000 U)0.01 U10,000,000 UETHFlexibleReal-Time APR (Approximately 1.2%)+0.1% Bonus Tiered APR(Tier 0 - 0.2 ETH)0.002 ETHUnlimitedSOLFlexibleReal-Time APR (Approximately 2.2%)0.01 SOLUnlimitedPLUMEFlexibleReal-Time APR (Approximately 1.8%)+8% Airdrop APR0.1 PLUME9,000,000 PLUMELocked ProductsBNB90 Days0.3%+Airdrop Rewards (where applicable)0.05 BNB1,000,000 BNBSOL90 Days4.1%0.01 SOL500,000 SOLSOL (VIP Users)60 Days4.3% (VIP Exclusive)1 SOL2,000,000 SOLBTC (VIP Users)60 Days0.30% (VIP Exclusive)0.01 BTC10 BTCBABY90 Days4.5%1 BABY10,000,000 BABY0G90 Days5.5%1 0G200,000 0GSSV90 Days12% (ETH Rewards)1 SSV2,000,000 SSVGRAM90 Days7.2%0.1 GRAM1,000,000 GRAMETH StakingETHFlexibleDynamic APR(Up to 2.2%)0.0001 ETHUnlimitedSOL StakingSOLFlexibleDynamic APR(Up to 4.49%)0.01 SOLUnlimitedDual InvestmentBTCMultiple Settlement Dates15% or more0.00001 BTC200 BTC per SubscriptionETHMultiple Settlement Dates15% or more0.0001 ETH4,000 ETH per Subscription
Check Out All Binance Earn Opportunities!
Please Note:
Flexible and Locked ProductsBinance reserves the right to adjust APRs at any time without prior notice.Offers are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Once subscribed, users can view their assets by going to Assets > Earn.Users may choose to redeem their assets in advance in Simple Earn Locked Products. After choosing early redemption, the principal will be returned to their Spot Accounts, and the distributed interest will be deducted from the refunded principal. Due to differing global time zones, it may take up to 72 hours to receive the tokens. However, in the case of exceptional circumstances the return of such assets may be delayed further. Please see our terms and risk warning for more details.Users will automatically receive rewards from ongoing Launchpools when they hold BNB Flexible Products and/or BNB Locked Products positions. Refer to this announcement for more information.Users may also accrue scores and qualify for Megadrop rewards with active BNB Locked Products positions. For more details, please refer to the FAQ. On top of that, users who subscribe to BNB Simple Earn products (Flexible and/or Locked) with their BNB holdings can receive airdropped tokens via HODLer Airdrops.
**********
About Simple Earn
Simple Earn products provide a simple and effortless way to earn rewards through either flexible or locked terms – designed for steady, passive rewards. Learn more here.
About Dual Investment
Dual Investment is a high-yield structured product that allows users to buy or sell cryptocurrency at their desired price and date in the future while earning rewards no matter which direction the market goes. Learn more here.
About BTC Yield
BTC Yield is a BTC-denominated yield product. Depositors receive BTCY, representing their strategy value. The primary strategy is covered calls—selling call options on BTC holdings, collecting premiums, and distributing them. Learn more here.
About VIP Earn
VIP Earn is a dedicated destination for Binance VIP users, bringing together selected Simple Earn Locked and On-Chain Yield Products with VIP-exclusive APRs and higher subscription quotas. Eligible users can explore enhanced earning opportunities across a range of digital assets in one place. Learn more here.
**********
Note: There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2026-10-14
Disclaimers:
APR rewards are distributed from Binance’s own funds, and are determined based on the assessment and evaluation of prevailing market conditions. This Promotion is not associated with the issuer of USDT/USDC in any manner.USDC is an e-money token issued by Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS (https://www.circle.com/). USDC’s whitepaper is available here. You may contact Circle using the following contact information: +33(1)59000130 and [email protected]. Holders of USDC have a legal claim against Circle SAS as the EU issuer of USDC. These holders are entitled to request redemption of their USDC from Circle SAS. Such redemption will be made at any time and at par value.For clarity, references to “U” , “ USD1” in the content above are not direct acronyms of the “United States Dollar” fiat currency unless otherwise specified.
South Korea has decided to block access to the websites of 27 foreign cryptocurrency platforms that it identified as operating in the country without registration.
South Korean authorities have taken a new step against cryptocurrency platforms targeting users in the country without proper registration. The Financial Intelligence Unit announced that access to the websites of 27 foreign virtual asset service providers will be blocked from within the country.
The list includes internationally known platforms such as KuCoin, MEXC, Phemex, Bitrue, BitMart, BingX, CoinW, BTCC, XT.com, and DigiFinex. The decision was approved following reviews conducted by the Korea Media and Communications Standards Commission on October 6 and 7.
According to South Korean legislation, foreign companies wishing to offer cryptocurrency services to investors in the country must register with the Financial Intelligence Unit. Authorities may consider elements such as operating a Korean-language website, marketing to users in the country, or offering services backed by the won as signs of targeting the local market.
Access restrictions do not automatically mean that user accounts or assets on the platforms in question are frozen. However, authorities acknowledge that users unable to access the websites may experience difficulties withdrawing funds. It has been stated that investors experiencing problems can seek assistance from the Digital Asset Exchanges Association, an organization comprised of the country’s major cryptocurrency exchanges.
South Korea has previously targeted mobile applications from similar platforms. In April 2025, Apple’s app store and Google Play imposed download and update restrictions on 14 and 17 unregistered crypto applications respectively. The new decision expands the control to include websites as well.
The decision does not mean that KuCoin or MEXC will be shut down worldwide. The access restriction applies to users in South Korea and to services that are reportedly operating without registration in the country.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
A Korean media regulator's ruling extends the crackdown on unregistered operators from app stores to websites, and the FIU says future blocks will not wait for victim reports or court rulings.
South Korea moves to block 27 unregistered crypto exchange websites
Posted October 14, 2026 at 6:32 am ET.
KuCoin, MEXC, BitMart, Phemex and BingX are among 27 unregistered crypto platforms whose websites will be blocked for users in South Korea, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) announced on Oct. 13. It is the first measure against such operators to target their websites; earlier steps included referrals to investigators and limits on paying them by credit card.
According to the FSC, South Korea’s media and communications standards regulator reviewed block requests from the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), which sits inside the FSC, over two sessions on Oct. 6 and 7 and approved them. Overseas-run sites face an access block; Korea-based ones face termination of service.
The list also names XT.com, Bitrue, Poloniex, BTCC, Pionex, WEEX and six sites listed under Korean names. The FIU did not say when the blocks take effect.
Get Unchained’s crypto news in your inbox with the free Unchained Daily newsletter.
Blocking Before Losses Are Reported The FIU said it now plans to request a block as soon as it detects unregistered activity, without first waiting for investigation results, a judicial ruling or confirmed customer losses. It added that it will keep checking for replacement sites that operators open under new addresses and send those for review as well.
Under Korea’s Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, any firm offering crypto services to Korean residents must register with the FIU, which requires ISMS security certification among other conditions. Foreign firms are covered if they run a Korean-language site, market to Korean customers or accept won payments. Operating without registration carries up to five years in prison or a fine of up to 50 million won.
The FIU counts 28 registered virtual asset service providers and has reported 44 unregistered operators to investigative agencies so far. The regulator also pointed to a June joint investigation by the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) and registered firms, which found unregistered operators charging average trading fees of 1.5% to 10%, against an average of 0.16% at Korea’s five won-trading exchanges.
From App Stores to Websites Google and Apple, acting on FIU requests, already block new installs of and updates to unregistered operators’ apps for Korean users. With the new decision, the FSC said, websites are now covered as well.
The FIU told customers of unregistered operators to withdraw their assets immediately and said DAXA will guide users through withdrawal steps with the operators’ cooperation. It also warned that sharing referral links for such platforms could be treated as helping run an unregistered business, exposing the referrer to criminal penalties.
The blocks land as the FSC also weighs changes to how exchanges are supervised, including whether to allow crypto market making.
Related Listen: How Asia’s Crypto Communities View the Tariffs and Trump’s Embrace of Crypto
AI-assisted content: This article was produced with the assistance of AI tools and was reviewed, edited, and fact-checked by a member of the Unchained editorial team before publication.
After being convicted in 2023, losing his appeal to a Second Circuit court in 2026 and awaiting a decision on a presidential pardon that may never come, former FTX CEO Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried is hoping to take his criminal case to the US Supreme Court.
Jeffrey Fisher, counsel at the law firm Hecker Fink LLP and representing Bankman-Fried in his Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) appeal, spoke to Cointelegraph about the potential timeline surrounding the former FTX executive’s case and what onlookers could expect to see should the justices choose to accept his petition for a writ of certiorari, possibly resulting in a new trial.
Bankman-Fried is pursuing the high court’s review while also seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump. According to Fisher, SCOTUS rules require SBF to file a petition for a writ of certiorari within 90 days of a decision from an appellate court, requesting that the justices consider the case.
The Supreme Court initially gave the US government until Oct. 15 to respond to SBF’s petition, but it already granted an extension to Nov. 16, which could allow the justices to decide whether to hear the case in late 2026 or early 2027. If the court grants review of his client’s case, it could issue a decision in the current term, which ends in June 2027, or during its next term, which begins a year from now.
Bankman-Fried was convicted on seven felony fraud counts related to the misuse of customer funds by FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange he founded and led, and which filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison and ordered to pay $11 billion in forfeiture.
‘Assets are fine’: Why FTX’s losses and recoveries were irrelevant at trialBankman-Fried’s petition to the Supreme Court presents two main arguments for justices, should they consider the case, based on lower courts weighing “evidence indicating victims lost money” and that the $11 billion forfeiture order following his conviction violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on “excessive fines.”
“The Supreme Court has expressed concern over the years for prosecutorial overreach in criminal fraud prosecutions,” Fisher told Cointelegraph. “This kind of evidence introduced in this prosecution raises a real question about prejudice to the defendant.”
The argument presented by prosecutors at SBF’s criminal trial and reiterated by the Second Circuit ruling found it was “immaterial as a matter of law” whether the former CEO had the funds and planned to repay FTX’s victims for their losses at the crypto exchange.
“As the district court made clear, FTX customers were defrauded as soon as Bankman-Fried transferred their money to Alameda regardless of how strongly he believed he might later return the money,” the Second Circuit said in its June 2026 decision.
According to Fisher, this theory differs from many fraud cases in which a defendant “swindled people out of money and enriched himself at their expense.”
“Our whole point is the theory the government chose makes it irrelevant whether any customers lost money or, if so, how much,” the lawyer said.
The Supreme Court petition noted that the highest court had ruled in Kousisis v. United States in 2025 that prosecutors could “seek decades-long prison sentences anytime people are induced by misrepresentations to part with their money — even if they suffer no pecuniary harm.”
SBF’s lawyers instead argued the 2007 ruling by the First Circuit in United States v. Carpenter, in which a defendant “intended all along to ensure his customers suffered no financial losses,” was more applicable to the FTX case. The appellate court initially ruled in that case that a jury’s decision may have been based on “moral disapproval“ rather than evidence related to fraud.
Mark Bini, a former federal and state prosecutor and currently a partner at Reed Smith, told Cointelegraph he believed that the chance that the court would accept SBF’s arguments and grant a new trial “seems low,“ but the conditions around forfeiture were “really interesting“ based on the size: $11 billion. He called reliance on United States v. Carpenter instead of Kousisis v. United States an “uphill battle“ for Bankman-Fried, legally.
While many FTX users were eventually paid out for their losses at the exchange beginning in 2025, the token values were based on the price at the time of the 2022 collapse, meaning many could have missed gains in the three years between bankruptcy and repayments.
How forfeiture could affect SBF’s ‘future livelihood’Bankman-Fried’s forfeiture order could follow him long after his release from prison, potentially allowing the government to make claim on his future earnings. The former FTX CEO is expected to remain in prison until 2043.
“He has no money to pay it,” said Fisher. “Under the terms of the penalty, it is an $11 billion debt for the rest of his life, to the government. Any dime he would ever make upon release would have to be turned over to the government [...] There’s rules, maybe he gets to keep a dime.”
If the court accepts the forfeiture argument but rejects the claim that SBF had a right to present evidence related to repaying users, Bini said it’s more likely to reduce the forfeiture amount than to warrant a new trial.
“It’s a huge forfeiture amount and there is this tension because the case law is such that the government is entitled to seek both forfeiture and restitution,” said the Reed Smith lawyer, adding: “It’s a very unusual case where the defense is arguing that ‘gosh, everyone is being made whole’ [...] yet you have this tremendous forfeiture.”
Cointelegraph reached out to the Justice Department for comment on the case but did not receive a response.
Caroline Ellison now employed at a charitable organizationFormer Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, one of the central figures tied to the downfall of FTX, has been working at Manifund, a charitable fundraising organization connected to the effective altruism movement, after serving time in prison as part of a plea agreement with US authorities.
According to Manifund co-founder and CEO Austin Chen, Ellison began on a work trial at the company on July 13, about six months after she was released from federal custody. She accepted a full-time role on Aug. 10.
“I believe in redemption,” said Chen. “Caroline has admitted her faults, worked to make creditors whole, and served her time in prison. I’d like to give her the opportunity to contribute back to the world; I hope that the world will concur.”
In a rare public statement, Ellison said that she was “grateful to Austin for giving me a second chance, and judging me on my current work performance rather than my past.”
Many of the comments on Chen’s Substack post were extremely negative, ranging from calling Ellison’s hiring an “extremely rogue move” to an action showing “truly terrible judgment.”
“[Ellison is] a cynical opportunist who stole billions, and got a sweetheart deal because prosecutors were willing to give everything up to get Sam,” said Coin Metrics co-founder Nic Carter. “She was extremely lucky that she got such a light sentence. The utmost shame on you for attempting to rehabilitate her.”
Magazine: Could THORChain face prosecution over stolen Bitget funds? Legal opinion
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
Aave announced at 15:47 UTC on October 13, 2026 that its DAO had approved incentives for the Coinbase Tokenized Stocks market on Base. The published program terms say rewards began that day, are paid in $USDC through Merkl, and continue until the budget runs out. They do not state a campaign-specific budget.
The campaign covers supply positions in AAPLc, AMZNc, GOOGLc, METAc, MSFTc, NVDAc, and TSLAc. The rate is variable and not guaranteed. Aave can modify, pause, or end the program early, while rewards accrued before a change remain claimable for eligible users.
Access follows the issuer’s jurisdictional restrictions. The terms exclude US persons and anyone located in the United States. They also exclude people in jurisdictions where Coinbase does not offer the tokens, comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions, listed persons and addresses, and anyone whose participation would violate local law.
Claiming rewards amounts to a representation that the claimant is eligible, acquired the tokens under the issuer’s terms, and complies with applicable law. The terms say rewards accrued by an ineligible person are not validly earned and may be withheld. This makes eligibility part of the claim process rather than a promise that every address supplying collateral will receive rewards.
The DAO approved the incentive budget through a broader funding update. TokenLogic said rewards are drawn only against live campaigns and that it will report incentive spending through its governance updates. The incentive post does not identify how much of the broader allowance is assigned to this campaign, so its end date cannot be calculated from the published terms.
What the incentives pay for
The incentives sit on top of an isolated lending market rather than turning the stocks into borrowable assets. Aave’s Base market specification places the seven stocks in a dedicated Equities Hub. Users can post any combination as collateral and borrow $USDC. The equities themselves cannot be borrowed.
That separation matters to $USDC suppliers. Joining the hub explicitly opts them into lending against tokenized equity collateral, and the exposure does not extend to Aave’s other Base markets. The hub also includes a supply-only tokenized $USDC spoke for vaults and aggregators.
Pooling lets one borrower use a combination of supported stocks in one position. Each asset keeps its own collateral factor, so the composition of the account determines borrowing capacity. A diversified basket does not receive a separate borrowing multiplier. The market’s separation also means a problem with this collateral set does not automatically spread its exposure to lenders in other Aave markets.
Borrowing power varies by stock. The approved collateral factors are 78% for AAPLc, 73% for AMZNc, 76% for GOOGLc, 65% for METAc, 79% for MSFTc, 70% for NVDAc, and 65% for TSLAc. The market uses a 5.5% maximum liquidation bonus and a 10% liquidation fee. Its $USDC reserve has a 32 million add cap and a 21 million draw cap.
The token structure adds risks that do not exist for ordinary crypto collateral. LlamaRisk’s technical assessment says each token is a certificate over shares held in segregated custody under a bare trust governed by Abu Dhabi Global Market law. Secondary-market buyers initially have economic exposure but no redemption right until they complete the issuer’s vesting process. The program terms also say Coinbase, not Aave DAO, TokenLogic, or Aave Labs, issues the tokens.
The price feed includes an issuer multiplier as well as the underlying share price. The multiplier begins at 1.0 and changes for corporate actions. A reinvested dividend raises it after fees and withholding tax, while a stock split changes it by the split ratio. During a corporate action, the issuer pauses its registry flag, minting and redemption stop, and the feed holds its last value until the adjusted price is confirmed. Token transfers can continue during that window.
The price feed stops when stocks stop trading
The market operates continuously, but its equity prices do not. Chainlink’s tokenized equity feeds publish from Sunday evening through Friday evening in US Eastern time and hold their last value during weekends and market holidays. The feeds use a 0.5% deviation threshold and a 24-hour heartbeat while sessions are open.
A frozen feed means a position’s reported collateral value does not move during a closure. Its health factor can still fall as interest accrues. When the feed resumes, news accumulated during the closure can appear in one price update and push a position below its liquidation threshold. LlamaRisk modeled the collateral factors around that gap, including a historical closure lasting 92 hours and 35 minutes and a 24% stressed debt rate.
Liquidators may also face a delay after taking collateral. The assessment says issuer redemption is available only to vested holders and settles during regular market hours. Base secondary liquidity can be thin, while an off-hours liquidator may need to hedge until the underlying market opens. The maximum liquidation bonus is designed around redemption, secondary-market sale, and perpetual-hedge routes.
For stock holders, the immediate change is a variable $USDC subsidy on collateral they could already use to borrow $USDC. The reward is not a contractual entitlement, and its rate can fall as participation grows. A supplier also remains exposed to the issuer, custody arrangement, price feed, smart contracts, and liquidation process.
For $USDC suppliers, the campaign may bring more collateral into the isolated hub, but it does not remove weekend repricing or liquidation-path risk. They have opted into that risk by supplying to this hub rather than another Aave market.
The next milestone is not dated. The campaign ends when its budget is exhausted unless Aave modifies, pauses, or stops it earlier. The figure to watch is whether borrowing demand remains after the variable subsidy changes or disappears.
DigUp Overhauls Mac Search With Google’s New Model: Locate a Specific Shot in a Video Even If You Forget the Filename
Dongcha Beating AI News Flash: Finding files on Mac typically requires remembering names or keywords. If you only recall a zebra appearing in a video segment, or a podcast episode discussing sleep, traditional file search tools are of little help. Independent developer Abdur Rahim’s open-source tool DigUp solves this by enabling direct content-based file searches. Type in "zebra in video" and it will jump to the exact frame where the zebra appears; search for "segment discussing sleep" and it will pinpoint the relevant timestamp in the podcast. It can also search photos, PDFs, and even open the exact page of a specific clause in a contract. DigUp leverages Google DeepMind’s EmbeddingGemma 2 model, released on October 6. This model converts text, images, audio, and video into comparable numerical features, allowing users to find corresponding visuals or audio based on a text description. DigUp pre-indexes selected folders, and during searches, it can also precisely match details like invoice numbers and error codes. All indexing and search processes run locally on Mac, eliminating the need to upload private files to the cloud. Free and open-source, DigUp has earned over 3,000 GitHub stars in less than a week since its launch. It currently only supports Macs with Apple’s custom silicon, requiring macOS 14 or later. First-time use requires downloading an approximately 865 MB model and spending time building the index.
8 minutes ago
During the afternoon US trading session ahead of the CPI release, new positions are heavily concentrated in the storage sector, with bulls dominating.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, at least 14 accounts (with positions exceeding $100,000) opened new U.S. stock positions in the afternoon session. Among these, 12 accounts opened long positions totaling approximately $3.2081 million, while the other 2 accounts opened short positions totaling around $725,500. The new long positions are concentrated in the storage sector. Micron Technology (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), and SK Hynix (SKHY) accounted for about $2.6695 million in new long positions, making up roughly 83.2% of the total long position volume in this round. Specifically, Micron attracted 5 accounts to open new long positions, totaling approximately $1.384 million, with a volume-weighted average price of $947.99. SanDisk saw 2 accounts opening long positions totaling around $678,200, at a weighted average price of $1,455.36. SK Hynix had 1 new long account buying about $607,300. Short positions also centered on semiconductors and storage: one account opened a new short position of roughly $379,000 in SOXL in the afternoon, then closed it entirely; another account opened short positions of approximately $181,100 in SanDisk and $165,300 in Micron respectively. The remaining new long positions are distributed across Applied Materials (AMAT), Microsoft (MSFT), Nebius (NBIS), Broadcom (AVGO), and the Korean stock leverage ETF (KORU), with total position amounts of about $118,700, $103,900, $102,600, $103,300, and $110,100 respectively. Positions in Broadcom and KORU have since been exited.
8 minutes ago
Data: More than half of Bitcoin's supply remains unaccounted for, with the majority likely held in personal self-custody.
Galaxy Research Head of Research Alex Thorn noted in a recent post that despite the growth of institutional and centralized Bitcoin holdings in recent years, more than half of the cryptocurrency’s supply remains in addresses with unknown ownership. He argues that a significant portion, possibly even the majority, of Bitcoin is still held by individuals via self-custody. Per Galaxy Research’s supply attribution map, based on block height 971,382 and an unspent Bitcoin supply of roughly 20.098 million BTC, "unattributed" addresses account for 55.1% (about 11.1 million BTC). Among attributed holdings, exchanges make up 17.9%, ETFs and funds 6.0%, Patoshi (linked to Satoshi Nakamoto’s early mining patterns) 5.6%, followed by custodial institutions, miners, and corporations, among others. Top attributed holders include Coinbase, BlackRock’s IBIT, Binance, Fidelity Custody, and Strategy.
8 minutes ago
Shipping risks resurface in the Strait of Hormuz, with WTI crude oil's daily trading volume rising 16% month-on-month.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, Houthi forces have recently carried out continuous attacks on key Saudi facilities. This morning, Saudi Aramco's headquarters complex in Dhahran was hit by a missile, triggering a limited fire in an administrative building, with no casualties reported. The complex hosts a critical operations center responsible for coordinating Saudi oil fields, pipelines, refineries, and export facilities. Meanwhile, transportation risks in the Strait of Hormuz have been escalating recently. The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that an oil tanker and a container ship were each struck by unidentified projectiles; the incidents remain under investigation, and market concerns over tightening crude oil supplies have intensified. Per TradingBeats' data, as of 18:00 Beijing time, WTIOIL on Hyperliquid traded at approximately $94.24, rising around 1.2% following the news release and about 3.4% higher than the same time the previous day. Its 24-hour trading volume reached roughly $136 million, with a day-over-day increase of around 16.2%.
8 minutes ago
A $15 million ETH long position exited at break-even, and a certain account fully liquidated all positions ahead of the CPI announcement.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, a whale address starting with 0x4ff9 closed out 6,000 ETH long positions in the past hour, worth approximately $14.979 million, exiting nearly at break-even. All positions in the account have now been cleared. The long position was opened on October 9, held for nearly five days, with an average entry price of around $2,491.34 and an average exit price of roughly $2,496.51. The trade generated a gross profit of about $31,100; after deducting bilateral trading fees and funding fees, the net profit stood at only approximately $9,753.
8 minutes ago
In September, DEX spot trading volume was approximately 26% of CEX spot trading volume, while 86% of RWA perpetual contracts were traded on-chain.
According to Unfolded data, DEX spot trading volume in September reached approximately 26% of CEX trading volume, a sharp rise from around 18% a year ago. In September 2026, DEX spot trading volume hit roughly 26% of CEX volume (compared to about 18% a year prior), with a significant rebound since June. Meanwhile, 86% of RWA perpetual contracts are traded on-chain.
OpenAI is holding preliminary discussions to buy Trail of Bits, a cybersecurity and security-research company that specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source software, The Information reported Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.
The talks come as OpenAI seeks to develop a substantial cybersecurity business. The potential transaction’s value is unknown, and the discussions are ongoing and may not result in a deal, the people said.
Based in New York, Trail of Bits provides security audits, adversarial testing, vulnerability discovery and security engineering tools. It examines software for exploitable weaknesses and works with developers to fix them, particularly in widely used open-source projects.
The firm is also known in the crypto industry for auditing protocols and projects such as Uniswap, Aave and Worldcoin.
The two companies launched Patch the Planet in June to use AI to find open-source software vulnerabilities, have security experts review the results and help develop and publicly release fixes. Trail of Bits has also applied OpenAI security-oriented models, including Codex, to speed up vulnerability remediation.
Buying the firm would give OpenAI access to experienced security researchers, established audit capabilities and expertise in open-source security response, supporting its efforts to expand its cybersecurity business and address threats enabled by AI.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
StonkBrokers announced Pair Tokens on October 13 at 17:37 UTC as part of a package of official Uniswap v4 hooks built with Hookr. The product turns two deposited assets into one ERC-20 representing a full-range liquidity position on Robinhood Chain.
The live Pair Tokens interface lets users mint with both underlying tokens or enter with one token through a zap. Holders can transfer or trade the resulting ERC-20, then burn it for both assets or zap out to one. The documentation says there is no lockup and no administrative path to the liquidity.
How the position works
Each Pair Token is a proportional claim on a full-range Uniswap v4 pool. StonkBrokers gives $SPY and $NVDA as an example: the two assets become $SPYNVDA, a fungible token backed by that pair’s liquidity position. Other examples shown in the interface include $ETHSPCX, $GMETSLA and $USOGLD.
Swaps through a Pair Token pool pay a 1% fee. The product compounds accumulated fees into the underlying position whenever a user deposits, zaps or redeems. Anyone can also call the compound function, according to the launch statement. Compounding carries a 10% charge on the LP fees generated, with that charge used for $STONKBROKER buybacks. Minting and redemption have no protocol fee.
The resulting token remains a standard ERC-20. A holder can send it to another address, keep it in a wallet or use it on a venue that supports the asset. StonkBrokers also says Pair Tokens can themselves be supplied as liquidity or paired with a launchpad. That structure gives other applications a fungible token to integrate instead of requiring them to manage a position NFT.
StonkBrokers contrasts the product with a Uniswap v2 LP token. A v2 receipt represents liquidity in a pool with fixed rules. Pair Tokens wrap v4 positions whose hooks can execute logic on swaps and liquidity changes. The team’s documentation lists dynamic fees, custom swap logic, automated compounding, token buybacks and incentive rules as possible pool-level functions.
The specific rules depend on how a pair was created. The documentation says factory pairs currently trade through a hookless 1% pool. Programmable rules apply to pairs launched through Hookr with the StonkFeeHook. Those rules can include a decaying snipe tax, an allowlist for adding liquidity and fee routing to Clock In, $STONKBROKER buybacks or a partner.
The interface’s comparison with Uniswap v2 makes the boundaries explicit. Both receipts are plain ERC-20 tokens. A v2 position requires both assets for entry, while a Pair Token can zap one asset in or out with price guards. A v2 pool has one fixed fee and no programmable fee routing. The Pair Token hook can tax, route or gate transactions. Launcher pairs can also use a decaying snipe tax and an LP allowlist. These controls sit in the pool hook rather than in the Pair Token contract.
What changes for liquidity providers
The main operational change is that LP fees do not wait in the reserves until the holder exits. A deposit, zap or redemption folds the fees back into the position. Each asset pair has one canonical Pair Token address, so wallets and applications can identify the same fungible receipt for later mints.
That canonical address also separates the token from the route used to acquire it. A user can mint, receive or buy the same ERC-20 and later redeem it through the Pair Token interface. Integrators can track a conventional token balance rather than a separate NFT position for each holder. The underlying exposure still consists of the two pool assets, and the full-range position remains active across the pool’s entire price curve.
One-sided zaps remove the need to arrive with both assets in the pool ratio. StonkBrokers says those zaps include price guards. On exit, a holder can redeem the pair or request one asset. This reduces the number of transactions a user must arrange outside the product, although the swap inside a zap still changes the user’s execution exposure.
The economic risk remains that of a liquidity position. As the relative prices of the two assets move, the position’s composition shifts. The product page says fees may offset that effect over time but do not guarantee it. Automatic compounding increases the token quantities behind each share; it does not guarantee a higher value in a user’s chosen unit of account.
The fee path also matters. Pool swaps charge 1%, while the compounding action takes 10% of the LP fees being reinvested. Holders therefore receive the remaining compounded fees after the stated charge. Programmable launcher pairs may route additional slices under their hook configuration, so users need to inspect the rules for the specific pair rather than treating every Pair Token as identical.
Deployment status and the next check
The product interface lists a factory at 0x282c4815F30abc1D0A8eB810c7309140d35a5B38 and displays canonical addresses for stock-token pairs. The launch announcement says Pair Tokens are available for any pair on Robinhood Chain through the StonkBrokers website.
Hookr’s official StonkBrokers hooks page adds an important qualification. It lists six official hook surfaces and says the Pair Token Hook deployment is on hold. The same page says the planned Hookr version leads with $WETHNVDA and is intended to open $WETHNVDA markets against $HOOKR and $STONKBROKER. It also says Hookr earns part of the fee taken at each compound on preset pools.
Users can access factory Pair Tokens now, but the status of the separately programmable Hookr deployment remains the open question. The next verifiable milestone is a live Pair Token Hook contract and pools on Hookr, replacing the current on-hold notice with contract addresses and executable markets.
Open interest on NEAR-related futures contracts hit a record $1.92 billion on October 12, while the token benefited from a rotation into cryptos associated with artificial intelligence. This peak reflects strong speculative activity, but not the arrival of $1.92 billion in fresh capital.
In brief
Open interest on NEAR futures contracts hit a record $1.92 billion on October 12.
The token benefits from renewed interest in cryptos related to artificial intelligence.
According to Wintermute, NEAR benefits from a capital rotation towards crypto projects associated with AI.
The development of AI agents and post-quantum technologies strengthens its positioning in this market.
The drop in open interest to $1.56 billion underscores the fragility of the movement and the risks related to leverage.
NEAR’s open interest quadruples in two months
Open interest on NEAR derivative contracts fluctuated between $300 and $450 million in July and August. It started to increase rapidly in mid-September before surpassing one billion dollars and then reaching $1.92 billion on October 12.
The price followed a similar trajectory. NEAR was worth about $1.60 in August, compared to nearly $6 at the time of the record. This represents an increase of more than 260% in a few weeks.
Open interest measures the notional value of contracts that have not yet been closed. It does not correspond to amounts actually deposited as margin nor to direct purchases of the token on the spot market.
Its increase can come from several factors: creation of new positions, increase in NEAR’s price, or increased use of leverage. In September, open interest expressed in dollars had thus increased much faster than the number of tokens represented by the contracts.
This record confirms the exceptional attention from traders, but does not reveal their direction. Each contract pits a long position against a short position. High open interest can accompany either a rise or a future liquidation cascade.
Wintermute sees a crypto capital rotation towards AI
The record occurred during a difficult week for the crypto market. Bitcoin fell by 3.2% and Ethereum by 7%, while only 11 of the 66 main altcoins ended in positive territory. Their median decline reached 3.7%.
US bitcoin ETFs recorded about $679 million in net outflows over the week. Ethereum funds lost $542 million, while $1.19 billion in crypto positions were liquidated within 24 hours around the weekly low.
In this context, Wintermute describes NEAR as the main beneficiary of a rotation towards projects related to artificial intelligence. The market maker notes that capital left some large caps and the DeFi sector to focus on this new narrative.
Its October 12 report summarizes :
Capital that exited liquid DeFi and large caps moved towards AI-related assets, with NEAR as the main winner.
Wintermute mentions two possible explanations for this outperformance: the arrival of post-quantum signatures and a short squeeze. However, the group specifies it was unable to confirm that these two elements were indeed the causes of the movement.
NEAR builds its positioning around AI agents
NEAR does not only benefit from a label added by traders. The project has been developing for several months an infrastructure dedicated to autonomous agents, confidential inference, and interactions between different blockchains.
NEAR AI has notably integrated OpenRouter into its confidential inference platform. This setup aims to allow the use of AI models without exposing certain sensitive data to providers executing the calculations.
The project is also working on tools enabling AI agents to manage accounts and perform operations across multiple networks. This direction places NEAR at the intersection of two trends sought by investors: automation through AI and abstraction of exchanges between blockchains.
The network has moreover introduced support for post-quantum signatures. This development comes at a time when several researchers question the future ability of artificial intelligence and quantum computers to weaken current cryptographic systems.
These developments provide a technological basis for the narrative. However, they do not yet demonstrate that NEAR dominates the AI application market, whose uses and revenues remain limited.
The drop in open interest signals still fragile leverage
After reaching $5.88, NEAR quickly corrected. The token now trades around $5, while open interest has dropped back to $1.56 billion.
This decline of nearly $360 million since the record indicates that positions have been closed voluntarily or liquidated. It confirms that the peak on October 12 partly relied on significant leverage.
The daily volume of futures contracts still reaches about $2.4 billion, versus nearly $440 million on the spot market. This difference shows that derivatives play a central role in the current price formation.
The zone between $4.60 and $4.30 now constitutes the main technical support. A return above $5.50 would allow the token to target $6 again.
NEAR thus benefits from a credible positioning in AI, but its record remains primarily that of derivatives contracts. The network’s ability to turn this attention into users, activity, and revenue will determine if the movement can surpass speculation.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Luc Jose A.
Diplômé de Sciences Po Toulouse et titulaire d'une certification consultant blockchain délivrée par Alyra, j'ai rejoint l'aventure Cointribune en 2019.
Convaincu du potentiel de la blockchain pour transformer de nombreux secteurs de l'économie, j'ai pris l'engagement de sensibiliser et d'informer le grand public sur cet écosystème en constante évolution. Mon objectif est de permettre à chacun de mieux comprendre la blockchain et de saisir les opportunités qu'elle offre. Je m'efforce chaque jour de fournir une analyse objective de l'actualité, de décrypter les tendances du marché, de relayer les dernières innovations technologiques et de mettre en perspective les enjeux économiques et sociétaux de cette révolution en marche.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
PancakeSwap wants to give liquidity providers a much bigger slice of the pie. A new discussion-stage proposal would send 88% of trading fees from its v3 and Infinity pools directly to the people supplying the liquidity.
The rest would flow to the protocol treasury. Meanwhile, the CAKE emissions picture is getting leaner too, with the plan framed around a roughly 69% total cut to emissions.
What the proposal actually changes
PancakeSwap’s newer pool designs, v3 and Infinity, use concentrated liquidity. That means LPs can park their capital in specific price ranges instead of spreading it thin across every possible price.
Under the plan, 88% of the fees those pools generate would go to LPs. The remaining share would be directed to the treasury rather than elsewhere in the system.
The older v2 pools are left alone. Their existing fee structure, which includes a mechanism that buys back CAKE and burns it, stays intact.
The emissions side ties back to earlier changes. Tokenomics 3.0, introduced in April 2025, reduced daily CAKE emissions by roughly 44%, from about 40,000 tokens to around 22,500. Factoring in the latest proposal, the cumulative reduction comes to roughly 69%.
It is worth stressing that this is still at the discussion stage. Nothing has been voted through yet.
The deflation scoreboard so far
As of October 2026, the protocol reports a net CAKE supply reduction of roughly 15-16%. Supply has fallen from about 392 million tokens in September 2023 to around 330 million.
The protocol has recorded 37 consecutive months of net burns since September 2023, meaning more CAKE has been destroyed than created every single month in that stretch.
Weekly data from mid-October 2026 points the same direction, with approximately 529,000 CAKE burned in a recent period against lower emissions.
The broader framework behind all this goes by the name “The Kitchen.” Tokenomics 3.0 set a target of around 4% yearly deflation, funded by buybacks drawn from protocol revenue.
On the product side, Infinity has become a serious volume engine. Its pools have logged cumulative trading volume of more than $150 billion.
On some chains, Infinity already hands LPs up to 90% of fees. Robinhood Chain is one example. So the 88% figure for v3 and Infinity is less a radical leap and more a move toward standardizing a generous split across the board.
Background: from farm token to fee machine
PancakeSwap is one of the largest decentralized exchanges operating mainly on BNB Chain. For years, the main lever protocols pulled to attract LPs was token emissions. PancakeSwap’s recent tokenomics overhauls have been an attempt to replace that subsidy with real trading fees.
What this means for LPs, CAKE holders and the treasury
For CAKE holders, cutting emissions reduces new supply hitting the market, which supports the deflationary narrative. Keeping the v2 burn intact preserves at least one direct link between trading activity and token destruction.
Sending the non-LP share of v3 and Infinity fees to the treasury, rather than into buybacks, is a choice worth watching. A treasury can fund development, partnerships, or future burns, but holders will want clarity on how those funds get used.
Lower emissions mean fewer token rewards for LPs, so the higher fee share partly compensates for that lost income. Whether the trade is a net gain for LPs depends heavily on how much volume the pools keep generating.
The key things to watch are the governance discussion itself, any changes to the 88% figure as the community weighs in, and whether a formal vote follows. After that, the real test is whether LP deposits and trading volume in v3 and Infinity pools respond to the new split.
The 37-month net burn streak is the other number to keep an eye on. With v2 still handling the burn, a meaningful shift of volume toward v3 and Infinity could change how quickly CAKE supply shrinks from here.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
At 07:48 UTC on October 14, 2026, PancakeSwap’s Kitchen opened forum post 3031 with The Flip proposal. It would give liquidity providers 88% of swap fees on v3 and Infinity, leave 12% for the Treasury, and cut daily $CAKE emissions from 22,500 to 7,000.
The proposal is still a discussion draft. The Kitchen plans to review forum feedback before publishing a final proposal for a Snapshot vote. No fee split or emissions change has passed yet.
The design joins two decisions that PancakeSwap previously handled with separate incentives. One reallocates trading revenue from the protocol to LPs. The other removes most of the token emissions now used after veCAKE. LPs would rely more heavily on fees generated by actual swaps, while the Kitchen would retain a smaller protocol share and a new emissions budget for ecosystem spending.
The 88/12 fee split
Every v3 fee tier and Infinity pool on PancakeSwap’s 11 supported chains would move to an 88/12 split. LPs on most pools currently retain around two-thirds of the fees they generate. The proposal therefore moves roughly one-third more fee revenue to LPs at the same trading volume.
The change would apply automatically to every v3 and Infinity position. LPs would not need to claim, stake or lock anything new. Fees would continue accruing to positions through the existing process, but a larger portion would go to the LP.
PancakeSwap illustrates the split with a pool that generates $1,000 in swap fees. Under The Flip, its LPs would keep $880. The Kitchen estimates that v3 and Infinity LPs would have received about $62M more if the proposed split had applied to PancakeSwap’s 2025 volume. That estimate is a historical simulation, not a forecast of future revenue. It depends on future volume and liquidity being comparable with the period PancakeSwap used.
The redistribution also changes which part of the system pays for liquidity. Under the proposed split, the Treasury accepts a smaller portion of swap fees so positions receive more of the revenue already produced by trading. The separate emissions cut then reduces the amount of newly minted $CAKE available as an incentive. PancakeSwap describes the combined goal as funding growth through platform activity instead of new supply. This makes pool volume more important to LP compensation and leaves the Treasury with the stated 12% protocol share on v3 and Infinity.
The automatic application matters operationally. A v3 or adjustable Infinity LP would not have to exit a position, enter a new staking contract or make a separate claim to receive the new share. The proposal says fees would accrue as they do now. That removes a migration step, but it does not make every position equally profitable. The Kitchen’s $62M estimate aggregates the result across the prior year’s volume. It does not allocate that amount among fee tiers, chains or individual LP ranges.
The proposal keeps the published fee tiers unchanged for new and adjustable pools, so a trader using those pools would pay the same listed fee. PancakeSwap argues that the richer LP share could support up to 30% more liquidity because providers add capital until returns return to a competitive level. It projects that deeper pools could cut price impact by as much as 20% to 25% for the same trade. Those outcomes are estimates in the proposal, not guaranteed consequences of the fee switch.
Existing Infinity pools need separate treatment. Their LP fees were fixed when each pool was created. For those pools, lowering the protocol fee would lower the total swap fee instead of increasing the LP portion. PancakeSwap gives the example of a pool with a 1% fee falling to about 0.76%, with 0.67% going to LPs and about 0.091% going to the protocol. The proposal does not say that existing positions in those pools will be recreated with a higher LP rate.
PancakeSwap v2 would remain outside the change because its fees are hard-coded. The proposal says v2 sends 23% of swap fees to burn and remains the protocol’s main $CAKE burn engine. Keeping v2 unchanged preserves that burn route while v3 and Infinity move to the new split.
For LPs, the immediate mechanism is clear: eligible positions receive a greater share of each fee without a migration or a new lock. Actual dollar income would still depend on pool volume, capital concentration, position range and the amount of competing liquidity. The proposal supplies a protocol-wide historical estimate, not a return estimate for any position.
For traders, the direct effect differs by pool. Published fee tiers stay the same where the split can be adjusted, while qualifying legacy Infinity pools may have a lower total fee. Any reduction in price impact depends on LPs adding enough capital after the economics change. PancakeSwap also expects deeper pools to leave less room for sandwich attacks and similar MEV because those strategies profit from price impact.
Emissions move to the Pantry
The Flip would cut post-veCAKE emissions by about 69%. Daily issuance would fall from 22,500 $CAKE to 7,000 $CAKE, reducing minting by 15,500 $CAKE per day and about 5.7M $CAKE per year. The remaining daily emissions would go to a new ecosystem fund called the Pantry rather than being distributed through the current emissions program.
The Kitchen says it would deploy the Pantry flexibly for marketing, partnership deals and bootstrapping liquidity in new pools. The draft does not set fixed allocations among those uses. It also does not describe spending caps, recipient-selection rules or a separate Pantry approval process. Those omissions matter because the proposal would concentrate the remaining emissions in a fund administered by the Kitchen. The final governance text can answer whether Pantry spending will require public proposals, reporting or other controls.
The emissions cut is paired with the larger fee share on purpose. PancakeSwap’s stated model is to make trading fees the primary way it attracts liquidity instead of minting more $CAKE for that role. LP compensation would therefore become more sensitive to organic trading activity. The Pantry would preserve a smaller token budget for pools or partnerships that the Kitchen decides need direct support.
The proposal places the cut against Tokenomics 3.0, which passed in April 2025 and targeted a roughly 20% supply reduction by 2030. PancakeSwap says supply has declined 11.5% in the 18 months since that vote. Using the average net burn from the previous 10 weeks, it reports a decline of about 190,000 $CAKE per week after emissions, equivalent to about 9.9M $CAKE or 3% per year.
That burn rate is backward-looking. PancakeSwap projects that maintaining it would remove the remaining 31.6M $CAKE needed to reach the Tokenomics 3.0 target around the end of 2029. The calculation depends on v2 activity, burns and the proposed emissions level continuing at the assumed pace. The draft says v2 alone would keep supply net deflationary, but the realized path will vary with usage.
For $CAKE holders, the change would reduce new supply while creating a discretionary destination for all remaining daily emissions. That trade is different from a complete end to issuance. The Pantry would still receive 7,000 $CAKE each day, and the value of that budget would depend on how the Kitchen deploys it. Holders assessing the proposal need both sides of the mechanism: less minting overall and more centralized discretion over what is still minted.
Governance and rollout
The forum post starts the governance process rather than completing it. The Kitchen asked LPs, traders and $CAKE holders to submit feedback, then said it would review the comments before publishing the final proposal for a Snapshot vote. The Snapshot text may therefore differ from the current forum draft.
If voters approve the final version, implementation is scheduled to begin in November 2026 within two weeks of passage. PancakeSwap expects a rollout lasting about three months and finishing by the end of January 2027. The team plans to announce each chain as it goes live, so the economics may change network by network rather than at one instant.
That sequence gives operators two checkpoints. The first is the final Snapshot proposal, where the Pantry’s controls and the treatment of existing Infinity pools can be compared with the discussion draft. The second is each chain announcement, which determines when positions on that network begin using the new split. Until the vote passes and a chain goes live, LPs should not model the 88% share as active revenue.
The unresolved governance question is how much discretion the final proposal gives the Kitchen over the Pantry. The forum draft names possible uses but no allocation, reporting or approval rules. The next formal milestone is the Snapshot vote, followed, if approved, by the first chain implementation in November 2026.
Bitcoin (BTC), ABD Merkez Bankası (Fed) yetkilisi John Williams’ın faiz politikasına ilişkin açıklamalarının ardından yükselişe geçti. Lider kripto para birimi yüzde 1,5 değer kazanarak 84.000 dolar seviyesine yaklaşırken, Zcash (ZEC) başta olmak üzere birçok altcoin piyasadaki toparlanmaya eşlik etti. Williams’ın 2027 yılında ek faiz artırımlarına ihtiyaç görmediğini belirtmesi, küresel piyasalarda risk iştahını destekledi. Kripto para yatırımcılarının odağında ise perşembe günü açıklanacak ABD enflasyon verileri bulunuyor. Söz konusu verilerin Bitcoin’in 85.000 dolar seviyesine yönelik olası hareketinde belirleyici olması bekleniyor.
Bitcoin, çarşamba günü Asya işlem saatlerinde yüzde 1,5 yükselerek 83.900 dolar seviyesine yaklaştı. New York Fed Başkanı John Williams’ın 2027 yılında ek faiz artırımlarına ihtiyaç görmediğini belirtmesi, doların zayıflamasına ve Asya borsalarında alımların güçlenmesine katkı sağladı. Williams, bu yıl bir faiz artırımının daha uygun olabileceğini de ifade etti. Buna rağmen açıklamalar, ABD hisse senedi piyasalarındaki kayıpların sınırlanmasına yardımcı olurken kripto para piyasasında da olumlu bir hava oluşturdu. Fed’in gelecek dönemde izleyeceği para politikasına ilişkin beklentiler, Bitcoin başta olmak üzere riskli varlıkların fiyat hareketleri açısından önemini koruyor.
İlginizi Çekebilir: Bu 3 Altcoin İçin Kritik Saatler: Yön Belli Olacak mı?
Kripto para piyasasındaki toparlanmaya Zcash (ZEC) öncülük etti. ZEC, yaklaşık yüzde 7 değer kazanarak 1.270 dolar seviyesine ulaşırken günün en dikkat çeken yükselişlerinden birini gerçekleştirdi. Solana (SOL) ve Dogecoin (DOGE) yüzde 2,5 yükselirken Ethereum (ETH), yüzde 2 artışla 2.520 dolar seviyesine yaklaştı. XRP, BNB ve HYPE yüzde 1 ila yüzde 2 arasında kazanç kaydederken TRX yüzde 1’in altında yükseliş gösterdi. Piyasadaki geniş çaplı toparlanma, yatırımcıların riskli varlıklara yönelik ilgisinin yeniden güçlendiğine işaret ederken Bitcoin’deki pozitif fiyat hareketinin altcoin piyasasını da desteklediği görüldü.
Fed Yetkilisi Williams’tan Faiz Açıklaması New York Fed Başkanı John Williams, 2027 yılında ilave faiz artırımlarına ihtiyaç görmediğini belirterek para politikasının geleceğine ilişkin beklentileri etkiledi.
Williams’ın açıklamalarında öne çıkan değerlendirme şu oldu:
2027 yılında daha fazla faiz artırımına ihtiyaç görmüyorum. Ancak bu yıl bir faiz artırımı daha uygun olabilir.
Bu ifade, kaynak metindeki açıklamanın Türkçe anlam aktarımıdır; birebir doğrulanmış alıntı değildir. Açıklamaların ardından S&P 500 vadeli işlemleri yüzde 0,2 yükselirken Asya-Pasifik hisse senetlerini takip eden MSCI endeksi yüzde 0,7 değer kazandı. Samsung Electronics ve SK Hynix hisseleri de beş günlük düşüş serisini sonlandırdı.
Perşembe günü açıklanacak ABD enflasyon verileri, Bitcoin’in kısa vadeli yönü açısından belirleyici olabilir. Enflasyonun beklentilerden düşük gelmesi, Fed’in ilave faiz artırımı ihtimalini zayıflatabilir. Böyle bir senaryoda Bitcoin’in 85.000 dolar seviyesini yeniden test etmesi mümkün görülüyor. Öte yandan Orta Doğu’daki gerilim nedeniyle Brent petrolün 106 dolar seviyesine yükselmesi, enflasyon üzerindeki risklerin sürdüğüne işaret ediyor.
Değerlendirme Bitcoin fiyatındaki toparlanma, Fed’in faiz politikasına ilişkin beklentiler ve küresel piyasalardaki olumlu görünümle destekleniyor. Lider kripto para biriminin 84.000 dolar seviyesine yaklaşması, yatırımcıların yükseliş beklentilerini güçlendirirken 85.000 dolar seviyesi kısa vadede kritik bir direnç noktası olarak öne çıkıyor. Ancak yükselişin sürdürülebilirliği, ABD enflasyon verilerine ve küresel piyasalardaki risk iştahına bağlı olacak. Beklentilerin altında açıklanacak enflasyon verileri Bitcoin’in yukarı yönlü hareketini destekleyebilirken, olası olumsuz veriler kripto para piyasasında satış baskısını yeniden artırabilir.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
14 October 2026 | 09:10 Solana’s Alpenglow consensus upgrade is expected to begin its mainnet rollout on October 21. It targets finality in roughly 150 milliseconds, but it will also remove validator vote transactions from blocks, meaning Solana’s total transaction and TPS charts may drop without any decline in user activity.
Key Takeaways Alpenglow consensus takes over about 5,000 slots, roughly 18 minutes, after the epoch starts. Votor targets finality of around 150 milliseconds, down from roughly 12.8 seconds under TowerBFT. Vote transactions will leave blocks, requiring transaction-count and TPS dashboards to set new baselines. October 21 starts the rollout, not the instant switch Solana Foundation’s Alpenglow documentation places the start of epoch 1064 at approximately 15:00 UTC on October 21, 2026. Because epoch timing can drift, that clock time is an estimate rather than a fixed activation moment.
The network will continue using TowerBFT for the first 5,000 slots of the epoch, or about 18 minutes. Alpenglow consensus is then scheduled to take over at slot 459,653,000.
The mainnet release covers Votor, the new voting and finality protocol. Rotor, a separate Alpenglow component designed to replace Solana’s Turbine block-propagation system, is planned for a later release and does not yet have a mainnet date.
The upgrade changes different things for different users Who is affected? What changes after Alpenglow Wallet users and ordinary app users Nothing about signing, sending or approving transactions changes. Solana’s transaction format, programs, account model and fees remain the same. Apps waiting for settlement They can use finalized confirmation with far less delay once Alpenglow is live. The old distinction between confirmed and finalized effectively disappears. Indexers, explorers and data providers They must update how they read block data, account for bank_id and re-baseline metrics that included vote transactions. Validator operators They need an Agave-based client and at least 0.8 SOL above the rent-exempt minimum in the vote account for the Validator Admission Ticket fee. This split is important. Alpenglow is designed to leave the ordinary wallet experience intact, but the infrastructure that produces, streams and interprets Solana data will change materially.
Votor replaces vote transactions with direct validator certificates Under Solana’s current TowerBFT consensus, validators cast votes as on-chain transactions. Those votes accumulate across 32 slots before a block reaches finality, creating the roughly 12.8-second wait for the strongest settlement guarantee.
Votor takes those votes out of the block itself. Validators send them directly to one another and aggregate them into certificates, allowing a block to reach finality in one or two voting rounds.
The 150-millisecond target refers to how long a transaction takes to become final. It does not mean Solana will produce a new block every 150 milliseconds. Slot times were reduced separately to 200 milliseconds in October.
For services that wait for finality before crediting a deposit, releasing goods or completing a transfer, the change could remove much of the delay created by Solana’s own consensus process. It does not remove delays imposed by exchange risk checks, bridges, payment providers or other chains.
That matters most in workflows where one party waits for a stronger settlement guarantee before completing the other side of a transaction. Solana’s delivery-versus-payment escrow tool is one example of infrastructure that could benefit from faster finality without requiring users to change how they submit transactions.
Vote removal will change Solana’s transaction data overnight The most visible change for analysts may not be finality at all. Vote transactions will no longer appear in Solana blocks under Votor. Since they have represented a large share of the transactions counted in blocks, total transaction counts and TPS figures can fall sharply after activation.
That would be an accounting change, not evidence that Solana suddenly lost users or application demand. A dashboard that continues to compare post-Alpenglow totals with pre-upgrade figures without adjusting its baseline could falsely report a collapse in network activity.
What not to conclude after October 21
“Solana transactions fell, so Solana usage fell.” First check whether the dashboard includes pre-upgrade validator votes in its historical baseline. If it does, the headline transaction count is no longer directly comparable.
Solana’s own guidance tells indexers and throughput dashboards to re-baseline their data. Tools that previously measured validator participation by parsing Vote Program instructions must also switch to the certificates carried in Alpenglow’s block footer.
Use a basket of activity measures after the upgrade No single metric can describe network demand. Once vote transactions disappear, the cleanest reading will combine several measures rather than treating total TPS as a verdict on its own.
Non-vote transactions: A direct measure of transactions generated outside validator voting. Active fee payers: A better indicator of participation breadth than raw transaction totals alone. Stablecoin transfer count and value: Useful for tracking payment and settlement activity. DEX volume and unique traders: Together, they give more context than volume alone. Fee revenue: Helpful alongside user metrics, though it can also move with fee conditions and trading intensity. That approach makes post-upgrade comparisons more honest. If total TPS falls while non-vote transactions, active fee payers and application volume remain stable, the network has changed its accounting—not necessarily its demand.
What will show whether the rollout worked? The first test is realised finality. The network needs to demonstrate that blocks reach finality close to the stated target without meaningful instability or a rise in skipped slots.
The second is operational readiness. Validators must migrate to supported Agave-based clients; Firedancer and Frankendancer are not supported during the transition. Indexers and RPC/Geyser users also need to handle the new bank_id field, because a slot can contain more than one candidate block.
The third is data continuity. Explorers, analytics platforms and media reports need to distinguish between fewer validator votes and weaker application demand before drawing conclusions from Solana’s post-upgrade transaction charts.
Alpenglow makes Solana faster, and its old TPS baseline obsolete Alpenglow’s immediate promise is much faster finality without changing how ordinary users send transactions. Its less obvious consequence is that familiar Solana activity statistics will need a reset once validator votes disappear from blocks.
After October 21, a fall in headline transaction counts should be treated as a measurement question first. Only a simultaneous decline in non-vote activity, active fee payers and application-level usage would support the conclusion that demand itself has weakened.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Mainnet activation timing and performance depend on network conditions and implementation readiness.
Author
Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem. To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem. His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
DigUp Overhauls Mac Search With Google’s New Model: Locate a Specific Shot in a Video Even If You Forget the Filename
Dongcha Beating AI News Flash: Finding files on Mac typically requires remembering names or keywords. If you only recall a zebra appearing in a video segment, or a podcast episode discussing sleep, traditional file search tools are of little help. Independent developer Abdur Rahim’s open-source tool DigUp solves this by enabling direct content-based file searches. Type in "zebra in video" and it will jump to the exact frame where the zebra appears; search for "segment discussing sleep" and it will pinpoint the relevant timestamp in the podcast. It can also search photos, PDFs, and even open the exact page of a specific clause in a contract.
DigUp leverages Google DeepMind’s EmbeddingGemma 2 model, released on October 6. This model converts text, images, audio, and video into comparable numerical features, allowing users to find corresponding visuals or audio based on a text description. DigUp pre-indexes selected folders, and during searches, it can also precisely match details like invoice numbers and error codes. All indexing and search processes run locally on Mac, eliminating the need to upload private files to the cloud.
Free and open-source, DigUp has earned over 3,000 GitHub stars in less than a week since its launch. It currently only supports Macs with Apple’s custom silicon, requiring macOS 14 or later. First-time use requires downloading an approximately 865 MB model and spending time building the index.
4 minutes ago
During the afternoon US trading session ahead of the CPI release, new positions are heavily concentrated in the storage sector, with bulls dominating.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, at least 14 accounts (with positions exceeding $100,000) opened new U.S. stock positions in the afternoon session. Among these, 12 accounts opened long positions totaling approximately $3.2081 million, while the other 2 accounts opened short positions totaling around $725,500. The new long positions are concentrated in the storage sector. Micron Technology (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), and SK Hynix (SKHY) accounted for about $2.6695 million in new long positions, making up roughly 83.2% of the total long position volume in this round. Specifically, Micron attracted 5 accounts to open new long positions, totaling approximately $1.384 million, with a volume-weighted average price of $947.99. SanDisk saw 2 accounts opening long positions totaling around $678,200, at a weighted average price of $1,455.36. SK Hynix had 1 new long account buying about $607,300. Short positions also centered on semiconductors and storage: one account opened a new short position of roughly $379,000 in SOXL in the afternoon, then closed it entirely; another account opened short positions of approximately $181,100 in SanDisk and $165,300 in Micron respectively. The remaining new long positions are distributed across Applied Materials (AMAT), Microsoft (MSFT), Nebius (NBIS), Broadcom (AVGO), and the Korean stock leverage ETF (KORU), with total position amounts of about $118,700, $103,900, $102,600, $103,300, and $110,100 respectively. Positions in Broadcom and KORU have since been exited.
4 minutes ago
Data: More than half of Bitcoin's supply remains unaccounted for, with the majority likely held in personal self-custody.
Galaxy Research Head of Research Alex Thorn noted in a recent post that despite the growth of institutional and centralized Bitcoin holdings in recent years, more than half of the cryptocurrency’s supply remains in addresses with unknown ownership. He argues that a significant portion, possibly even the majority, of Bitcoin is still held by individuals via self-custody.
Per Galaxy Research’s supply attribution map, based on block height 971,382 and an unspent Bitcoin supply of roughly 20.098 million BTC, "unattributed" addresses account for 55.1% (about 11.1 million BTC). Among attributed holdings, exchanges make up 17.9%, ETFs and funds 6.0%, Patoshi (linked to Satoshi Nakamoto’s early mining patterns) 5.6%, followed by custodial institutions, miners, and corporations, among others. Top attributed holders include Coinbase, BlackRock’s IBIT, Binance, Fidelity Custody, and Strategy.
4 minutes ago
Shipping risks resurface in the Strait of Hormuz, with WTI crude oil's daily trading volume rising 16% month-on-month.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, Houthi forces have recently carried out continuous attacks on key Saudi facilities. This morning, Saudi Aramco's headquarters complex in Dhahran was hit by a missile, triggering a limited fire in an administrative building, with no casualties reported. The complex hosts a critical operations center responsible for coordinating Saudi oil fields, pipelines, refineries, and export facilities.
Meanwhile, transportation risks in the Strait of Hormuz have been escalating recently. The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that an oil tanker and a container ship were each struck by unidentified projectiles; the incidents remain under investigation, and market concerns over tightening crude oil supplies have intensified.
Per TradingBeats' data, as of 18:00 Beijing time, WTIOIL on Hyperliquid traded at approximately $94.24, rising around 1.2% following the news release and about 3.4% higher than the same time the previous day. Its 24-hour trading volume reached roughly $136 million, with a day-over-day increase of around 16.2%.
4 minutes ago
A $15 million ETH long position exited at break-even, and a certain account fully liquidated all positions ahead of the CPI announcement.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, a whale address starting with 0x4ff9 closed out 6,000 ETH long positions in the past hour, worth approximately $14.979 million, exiting nearly at break-even. All positions in the account have now been cleared. The long position was opened on October 9, held for nearly five days, with an average entry price of around $2,491.34 and an average exit price of roughly $2,496.51. The trade generated a gross profit of about $31,100; after deducting bilateral trading fees and funding fees, the net profit stood at only approximately $9,753.
4 minutes ago
In September, DEX spot trading volume was approximately 26% of CEX spot trading volume, while 86% of RWA perpetual contracts were traded on-chain.
According to Unfolded data, DEX spot trading volume in September reached approximately 26% of CEX trading volume, a sharp rise from around 18% a year ago. In September 2026, DEX spot trading volume hit roughly 26% of CEX volume (compared to about 18% a year prior), with a significant rebound since June. Meanwhile, 86% of RWA perpetual contracts are traded on-chain.
Solana (SOL) has fallen 9.34% over the past seven days to approximately $107, as seven consecutive trading days of reported ETF outflows and weakening technical indicators precede the blockchain’s October 21 Alpenglow upgrade.
Summary
Solana traded near $107 after losing 9.34% over seven days, according to supplied market data.
Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade is scheduled for October 21, targeting transaction finality of 150 milliseconds.
Solana ETFs recorded $1.04 million in net outflows on October 13, according to SoSoValue figures.
Technical indicators place immediate SOL support near $105, with stronger selling risks below $100 emerging.
Crypto Patel identified $125 and $150 as potential recovery targets, conditional on bullish confirmation signals.
According to CoinGecko, SOL traded near $107 at press time, with approximately $2.86 billion in daily trading volume and a market capitalization of $63.02 billion. The decline comes as the Solana Foundation prepares to activate Alpenglow, an upgrade designed to reduce transaction finality from approximately 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds.
Despite the approaching launch, SOL remains below important resistance levels around $110 and $115.
Solana price outlook weakens ahead of Alpenglow upgrade
Solana has struggled to maintain its recovery after retreating from late-September highs near $123. The cryptocurrency previously rebounded from August lows around $75, but the latest decline has weakened its short-term price structure.
During the October 14 trading session, SOL hovered around $107.06 after opening near $106.72. Its daily chart recorded an intraday high of $108.20 and a low of $106.68, placing the cryptocurrency close to immediate support between $104 and $105.
Solana remains below its 20-day simple moving average of $115.83. The Bollinger Bands place the upper boundary at $127.20 and the lower boundary at $104.45, with SOL trading closer to the lower end of the range.
A sustained decline below $104.45 could expose the psychological $100 support level. If selling continues below that threshold, the analysis identifies $95–$98 as the next possible support area.
Solana (SOL) price chart, source: TradingView
For a recovery, SOL would need to reclaim $110 before approaching stronger resistance near $115.83. Moving above the 20-day average would improve the short-term technical structure, while $120–$123 remains another resistance zone.
The Relative Strength Index stood at 41.58, below its moving average of 52.41. The indicator’s position below 50 suggested that selling pressure remained stronger than buying momentum, although SOL had not reached the conventional oversold level of 30.
Analyst Crypto Patel identified a similar downside risk on the eight-hour chart. He said SOL had broken below its local price structure and remained under resistance around $112.39.
His analysis placed a potential buying zone between $103 and $96, with particular attention on $95.63–$101.27. The analyst suggested that a decline into this region could precede another recovery if SOL establishes a higher low and confirms a bullish reversal.
Patel identified $125 and $150 as possible upside targets after such confirmation. However, he warned that sustained trading below $95.63 would invalidate his proposed bullish setup.
WILL $SOL SWEEP $100 BEFORE RALLYING TOWARD $150?#SOL has broken down from its local structure and remains under pressure below the $112.39 resistance level on the 8H timeframe.
Solana Alpenglow upgrade scheduled for October 21
While SOL faces selling pressure, the network is preparing for one of its largest technical changes since its launch.
The Solana Foundation confirmed that Alpenglow is scheduled to activate during epoch 1064, beginning around 15:00 UTC on October 21. The upgrade will replace TowerBFT, the consensus mechanism Solana has used since 2020. Its new voting system, Votor, targets transaction finality of approximately 150 milliseconds, compared with the current 12.8 seconds.
Transaction finality refers to the point at which a blockchain transaction can no longer be reversed under the network’s consensus rules. Although Solana transactions can appear successful almost immediately, applications currently wait longer for stronger confirmation that settlement is complete.
Alpenglow is designed to reduce that waiting period by changing how validators reach agreement. Instead of submitting voting transactions to the blockchain, validators will exchange votes directly and combine sufficient approvals into certificates that finalize blocks.
According to the Foundation, the upgrade will not change how ordinary transactions execute. Wallets and decentralized applications are expected to continue operating through the transition.
The activation process includes a temporary period during which Solana will continue using TowerBFT for the first 5,000 slots of epoch 1064. Alpenglow will then take over approximately 18 minutes after the epoch begins.
Validator operators must prepare before the activation by using software built on Agave 4.3.0. The Foundation said Firedancer and Frankendancer will not support the initial migration, requiring operators using those clients to switch temporarily.
Another operational change concerns validator expenses. Existing voting transaction costs of approximately 1 SOL per epoch will be replaced with a 0.8 SOL Validator Admission Ticket fee, paid from each validator’s vote account.
The upgrade could change how Solana’s network statistics appear. Because voting transactions will no longer be recorded inside blocks, reported transaction counts may decline even if ordinary user activity remains unchanged.
Earlier Solana Alpenglow development and testing established the network’s October target after developers completed preparatory work through Agave 4.2.
The Foundation has confirmed the activation date, although its 150-millisecond finality target remains dependent on actual network performance following the upgrade.
Solana ETFs record seven consecutive days of outflows
Institutional investment data has provided another source of concern ahead of Alpenglow.
According to the supplied SoSoValue data, U.S. spot Solana ETFs recorded approximately $1.04 million in net outflows on October 13. The latest negative session extended a reported streak of seven consecutive trading days of withdrawals.
Solana (SOL) spot ETF net inflow, source: SoSoValue
The October 13 figures placed cumulative net inflows at approximately $1.58 billion, while total net assets stood near $1.71 billion. Trading volume across the tracked products reached $64.26 million during the session.
The daily net outflow means investors withdrew more capital from the funds than they invested during the reporting period. The figure does not establish that every individual fund experienced withdrawals.
Despite the recent negative flows, cumulative inflows remained positive, indicating that the products had attracted more capital than they had lost since their respective launches.
The reported seven-day streak occurred as SOL declined over the previous week, although the available information does not establish whether ETF redemptions caused the price weakness.
With Alpenglow scheduled for October 21, subsequent ETF flow reports will provide further data on institutional demand before the network activates its new consensus system.
Can Solana recover to $150 after the upgrade?
The technical outlook remains divided between weakening daily indicators and analysts monitoring a possible recovery from lower support.
Crypto analyst Sweep reported a bullish divergence on SOL’s chart, suggesting that selling momentum could be weakening despite the recent price decline.
The analyst compared the formation with an earlier divergence that preceded a 30% price rally. However, the comparison does not establish that Solana will repeat the previous performance.
The supplied daily indicators continued to favor caution. SOL remained below its 20-day moving average, while the RSI at 41.58 suggested that buying pressure had not recovered sufficiently to reverse the prevailing short-term weakness.
Patel’s outlook identified $113 as immediate resistance, followed by possible recovery targets at $125 and $150. His bullish scenario requires a confirmed improvement in market structure after a potential decline into the $96–$103 demand region.
A move above $110 would provide an initial indication of improving momentum, while reclaiming $115.83 would place SOL back above its 20-day moving average. Failure to maintain $104–$105 support would leave $100 exposed.
The Solana Foundation’s October 21 activation schedule identifies epoch 1064 as the starting point for Alpenglow. Validators must complete their software migration before that epoch begins and maintain at least 0.8 SOL above the rent-exempt minimum in their vote accounts.
The Foundation has provided a network verification method through the getAgGenesisCert RPC command, which returns the Alpenglow genesis certificate once migration is complete. Before activation, the command returns null, indicating that the network continues operating under TowerBFT.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
After months of speculation, Anza, Solana’s core developer, has set the 21st of October as the target date for the Alpenglow upgrade.
This consensus upgrade is one of the last significant upgrades for the network and is expected to make transactions more efficient. Alpenglow is projected to reduce transaction finality from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds, an improvement of around 85x faster than the present speed.
From both institutional and on-chain perspectives, this upgrade could be a major catalyst. And the latest trading data adds to the momentum. SPCX has crossed $1.5 billion in Spot trading volume on Solana, hitting $1.58 billion between the 12th of June and the 12th of October.
As a tokenized version of SpaceX shares, SPCX’s rising volume is a sign of growing interest in tokenized stocks on the Solana blockchain.
Source: X What it truly represents, however, is SOL’s traction across both the institutional and on-chain markets.
Now, with Alpenglow approaching, the trend may well accelerate. The update promises to reduce the time needed to finalize transactions to only 150 ms, thus providing faster transactions and attracting more traders and institutions to the chain.
But the bigger question is how this could impact SOL’s technical setup.
Notably, SOL’s 60% rally in Q3 came against the backdrop of a record-breaking number of network transactions on the Solana blockchain, which rose to 29.3 billion, representing the highest quarterly number since Q3 2025.
This highlights how rising on-chain activity can support price momentum.
Now, with the Alpenglow upgrade adding fuel to the trend, could Solana’s [SOL] improving fundamentals translate into a stronger technical breakout?
Can Aplenglow fuel Solana’s rally toward $200? From a technical perspective, the timing of the upgrade makes sense.
Market sentiment is very mixed, and SOL is having difficulty staying above the $100 psychological support level. For now, a move toward $200 looks far too ambitious, but can Alpenglow change the game?
If SOL manages to replicate the Q3-style 60%+ rally, the $200 level might become relevant again, especially if the on-chain activity continues to drive a bull run.
Add to this Solana’s liquidation heatmap. According to this data, over $625 million in long positions could face liquidation if SOL drops below $90. Meanwhile, $1.24 billion in short positions could be wiped out if it climbs above $125.
This shows the possibility of a massive short squeeze in case of a breakout above $125.
Source: X So, in the near term, all eyes are on SOL’s $125 resistance.
As for the year-end target, though, $200 is still in play. If Alpenglow delivers and on-chain activity keeps picking up, SOL could have more room to push higher. For now, all eyes are on the $125 level.
A clean break above it would suggest a new bullish wave is forming and bring a repeat of Q3’s momentum back into focus.
Final Summary Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade aims to make transactions much faster and boost network activity. SOL faces key resistance at $125, but stronger momentum could put $200 back in focus.
DigUp Overhauls Mac Search With Google’s New Model: Locate a Specific Shot in a Video Even If You Forget the Filename
Dongcha Beating AI News Flash: Finding files on Mac typically requires remembering names or keywords. If you only recall a zebra appearing in a video segment, or a podcast episode discussing sleep, traditional file search tools are of little help. Independent developer Abdur Rahim’s open-source tool DigUp solves this by enabling direct content-based file searches. Type in "zebra in video" and it will jump to the exact frame where the zebra appears; search for "segment discussing sleep" and it will pinpoint the relevant timestamp in the podcast. It can also search photos, PDFs, and even open the exact page of a specific clause in a contract.
DigUp leverages Google DeepMind’s EmbeddingGemma 2 model, released on October 6. This model converts text, images, audio, and video into comparable numerical features, allowing users to find corresponding visuals or audio based on a text description. DigUp pre-indexes selected folders, and during searches, it can also precisely match details like invoice numbers and error codes. All indexing and search processes run locally on Mac, eliminating the need to upload private files to the cloud.
Free and open-source, DigUp has earned over 3,000 GitHub stars in less than a week since its launch. It currently only supports Macs with Apple’s custom silicon, requiring macOS 14 or later. First-time use requires downloading an approximately 865 MB model and spending time building the index.
3 minutes ago
During the afternoon US trading session ahead of the CPI release, new positions are heavily concentrated in the storage sector, with bulls dominating.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, at least 14 accounts (with positions exceeding $100,000) opened new U.S. stock positions in the afternoon session. Among these, 12 accounts opened long positions totaling approximately $3.2081 million, while the other 2 accounts opened short positions totaling around $725,500. The new long positions are concentrated in the storage sector. Micron Technology (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), and SK Hynix (SKHY) accounted for about $2.6695 million in new long positions, making up roughly 83.2% of the total long position volume in this round. Specifically, Micron attracted 5 accounts to open new long positions, totaling approximately $1.384 million, with a volume-weighted average price of $947.99. SanDisk saw 2 accounts opening long positions totaling around $678,200, at a weighted average price of $1,455.36. SK Hynix had 1 new long account buying about $607,300. Short positions also centered on semiconductors and storage: one account opened a new short position of roughly $379,000 in SOXL in the afternoon, then closed it entirely; another account opened short positions of approximately $181,100 in SanDisk and $165,300 in Micron respectively. The remaining new long positions are distributed across Applied Materials (AMAT), Microsoft (MSFT), Nebius (NBIS), Broadcom (AVGO), and the Korean stock leverage ETF (KORU), with total position amounts of about $118,700, $103,900, $102,600, $103,300, and $110,100 respectively. Positions in Broadcom and KORU have since been exited.
3 minutes ago
Data: More than half of Bitcoin's supply remains unaccounted for, with the majority likely held in personal self-custody.
Galaxy Research Head of Research Alex Thorn noted in a recent post that despite the growth of institutional and centralized Bitcoin holdings in recent years, more than half of the cryptocurrency’s supply remains in addresses with unknown ownership. He argues that a significant portion, possibly even the majority, of Bitcoin is still held by individuals via self-custody.
Per Galaxy Research’s supply attribution map, based on block height 971,382 and an unspent Bitcoin supply of roughly 20.098 million BTC, "unattributed" addresses account for 55.1% (about 11.1 million BTC). Among attributed holdings, exchanges make up 17.9%, ETFs and funds 6.0%, Patoshi (linked to Satoshi Nakamoto’s early mining patterns) 5.6%, followed by custodial institutions, miners, and corporations, among others. Top attributed holders include Coinbase, BlackRock’s IBIT, Binance, Fidelity Custody, and Strategy.
3 minutes ago
Shipping risks resurface in the Strait of Hormuz, with WTI crude oil's daily trading volume rising 16% month-on-month.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, Houthi forces have recently carried out continuous attacks on key Saudi facilities. This morning, Saudi Aramco's headquarters complex in Dhahran was hit by a missile, triggering a limited fire in an administrative building, with no casualties reported. The complex hosts a critical operations center responsible for coordinating Saudi oil fields, pipelines, refineries, and export facilities.
Meanwhile, transportation risks in the Strait of Hormuz have been escalating recently. The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that an oil tanker and a container ship were each struck by unidentified projectiles; the incidents remain under investigation, and market concerns over tightening crude oil supplies have intensified.
Per TradingBeats' data, as of 18:00 Beijing time, WTIOIL on Hyperliquid traded at approximately $94.24, rising around 1.2% following the news release and about 3.4% higher than the same time the previous day. Its 24-hour trading volume reached roughly $136 million, with a day-over-day increase of around 16.2%.
3 minutes ago
A $15 million ETH long position exited at break-even, and a certain account fully liquidated all positions ahead of the CPI announcement.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, a whale address starting with 0x4ff9 closed out 6,000 ETH long positions in the past hour, worth approximately $14.979 million, exiting nearly at break-even. All positions in the account have now been cleared. The long position was opened on October 9, held for nearly five days, with an average entry price of around $2,491.34 and an average exit price of roughly $2,496.51. The trade generated a gross profit of about $31,100; after deducting bilateral trading fees and funding fees, the net profit stood at only approximately $9,753.
3 minutes ago
In September, DEX spot trading volume was approximately 26% of CEX spot trading volume, while 86% of RWA perpetual contracts were traded on-chain.
According to Unfolded data, DEX spot trading volume in September reached approximately 26% of CEX trading volume, a sharp rise from around 18% a year ago. In September 2026, DEX spot trading volume hit roughly 26% of CEX volume (compared to about 18% a year prior), with a significant rebound since June. Meanwhile, 86% of RWA perpetual contracts are traded on-chain.
The Solana developer says the move off TowerBFT will take place in a single slot and bring finality down to about 150 milliseconds, after Alpenglow ran on testnet and devnet last month.
Anza sets Oct. 21 for Solana's switch to Alpenglow
Posted October 14, 2026 at 6:32 am ET.
Alpenglow, the consensus protocol built to replace Solana’s TowerBFT, will switch on for mainnet-beta on Wednesday, Oct. 21, Solana software developer Anza said on X on Tuesday. Anza put the go-live at about 14:50 UTC.
“18 months of work for a migration that happens in one slot,” the company wrote, adding that finality would fall “from seconds to ~150ms.”
The mainnet date comes after Alpenglow took over consensus on Solana’s testnet on Sept. 24 and on devnet a day later. Anza’s Alpenglow page says the team picked the mainnet date only after a period of watching those earlier networks, and that operators rehearsed the migration numerous times over the last five months.
Get Unchained’s crypto news in your inbox with the free Unchained Daily newsletter.
How the Handoff Works
According to Anza’s page, the process begins when a feature gate, SIMD-0384, turns on at an epoch boundary. That starts a 5,000-slot countdown during which blocks hold nothing but validator votes, so they can be rolled back without losing any user transactions. When the countdown ends, validators certify an Alpenglow genesis block backed by 82% of stake, pass consensus to the new voting component, Votor, and resume processing user transactions. Anza expects that step to take hundreds of milliseconds, after which TowerBFT is retired.
Under Alpenglow, validator votes move off the chain as BLS-signed messages that are combined into a single certificate, which Anza says frees up block space. The page says the network can keep running with up to 40% of stake offline or misbehaving, split evenly between the two, compared with TowerBFT’s tolerance of under 33% adversarial stake.
Anza’s page lists a bug bounty of more than 25,000 SOL, work from 115 security researchers, a simulation across 1,500 nodes and nine at-scale migrations as part of the testing.
The Road to Mainnet
Solana validators approved Alpenglow in September 2025, with more than 98% voting in favor. In May, Anza opened it to a community test cluster, and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko said at the time that mainnet activation could come the following quarter if testing went smoothly. TowerBFT finality runs about 12.8 seconds.
Anza’s page names Rotor, a replacement for the tree that Solana uses to spread block data across the network, along with faster handoffs between block leaders, as later work.
Related Listen: Can Solana Edge Out Ethereum to Win the AI Agent & RWA Race?
AI-assisted content: This article was produced with the assistance of AI tools and was reviewed, edited, and fact-checked by a member of the Unchained editorial team before publication.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, known for his support of cryptocurrencies, particularly Dogecoin (DOGE), has made a new post.
Having targeted various altcoins before, Elon Musk has now set his sights on Claudia, an open-source AI IP.
Elon Musk retweeted and commented on a tweet about Claudia, an open-source AI IP on the X platform.
Musk’s renewed attention to his social media post about Claudia caused a remarkable price surge in the CLAUDIA token, traded on the Solana network. According to data, the token rose by approximately 40 percent in a short period, reaching a market capitalization of $5.86 million.
Musk’s Post About Claudia Causes a Stir! Elon Musk commented on a post about the Claudia project on his X account, reposting it. Musk had also recently shared a Claudia-themed video and stated in an interview that some of the project’s work was among the top 10-20 music videos he had ever seen.
These posts have increased interest in the AI-based project and drawn the attention of investors to the CLAUDIA token. However, Musk’s posts about the project do not officially mean that he supports the token or has invested in it.
Following the announcement, the CLAIDIA token, which had risen to $0.007, subsequently fell back to around $0.006.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
A $15 million ETH long position exited at break-even, and a certain account fully liquidated all positions ahead of the CPI announcement.
According to TradingBeats' monitoring, a whale address starting with 0x4ff9 closed out 6,000 ETH long positions in the past hour, worth approximately $14.979 million, exiting nearly at break-even. All positions in the account have now been cleared. The long position was opened on October 9, held for nearly five days, with an average entry price of around $2,491.34 and an average exit price of roughly $2,496.51. The trade generated a gross profit of about $31,100; after deducting bilateral trading fees and funding fees, the net profit stood at only approximately $9,753.
4 minutes ago
In September, DEX spot trading volume was approximately 26% of CEX spot trading volume, while 86% of RWA perpetual contracts were traded on-chain.
According to Unfolded data, DEX spot trading volume in September reached approximately 26% of CEX trading volume, a sharp rise from around 18% a year ago. In September 2026, DEX spot trading volume hit roughly 26% of CEX volume (compared to about 18% a year prior), with a significant rebound since June. Meanwhile, 86% of RWA perpetual contracts are traded on-chain.
4 minutes ago
Alpha dropped 3% following its launch, while DRV has fallen more than 23% from its October 10 all-time high.
According to market data, Derive’s native token DRV, an on-chain options protocol, has dropped over 3% cumulatively since the announcement of its listing on Binance Alpha. It is down more than 23% from its October 10 all-time high of $0.5631, trading at $0.429 as of press time, with a market capitalization of $85.71 million and a 24-hour trading volume of $3.7 million. BlockBeats previously reported that at the DAS conference hosted by Blockworks, Hyperliquid founder Jeff explicitly stated, “Options are an opportunity worth further development in the on-chain trading space.” He added that options hold a significant position in traditional finance, but on-chain products have not yet reached “escape velocity,” so developers can build products around this market to make it easier for traders to hedge against spot and perpetual contracts. Separately, news from October 8 noted that Citrini Research—the institution behind the “AI Doom Report”—disclosed in a recent article that DRV is one of the largest holdings in its crypto portfolio, making up 10% of the total.
4 minutes ago
US crypto-related concept stocks turned lower in pre-market trading.
According to market data from BIT (bit.com), Bitcoin briefly broke through $84,000 before pulling back, currently trading at $83,145. US-listed crypto-related stocks reversed from rising to falling in pre-market trading, with declines as follows: SBET down 0.48%, BMNR down 1.23%, CRCL down 1.25%, MSTR down 0.28%, COIN down 0.72%, and ASST down 0.72%.
4 minutes ago
Bitget has launched pre-IPO perpetual contracts for JIO (Jio Platforms).
Bitget has now launched Jio Platforms (JIO) IPO pre-market perpetual contracts, providing global users with a channel to access potential pre-IPO returns and capture early market opportunities. The contracts are settled in USDT, support up to 20x leverage, and offer 24/7 trading. Jio Platforms is a digital technology and telecom platform under India’s Reliance Industries. Established in Mumbai in 2019, it operates India’s largest telecom network via its subsidiary Reliance Jio Infocomm, delivering digital services including 5G, broadband, cloud computing, and AI. As of March 2026, it boasts over 524 million users. The company plans to conduct a dual listing on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE).
4 minutes ago
More than 150,000 users have opened AI trading accounts on Robinhood, with the firm’s CEO envisioning integrating retail investors’ strategies into the exchange’s trading systems.
Beating AI News: Robinhood allowed users to access third-party AI Agents for trading via MCP in May this year, and in late September announced it would integrate Agents directly into its app. At that time, over 150,000 customers had opened dedicated trading accounts.
In a recent interview, CEO Vlad Tenev predicted that a large share of retail trading will be initiated by AI in the future. Agents can monitor markets around the clock and execute trades for assets including stocks, options, and cryptocurrencies, though most funds will likely remain held long-term.
Tenev also put forward a bolder vision: enabling retail investors to deploy their trading strategies on servers located near exchanges. Wall Street high-frequency trading firms have long placed servers close to exchange matching systems to cut order latency. He hopes ordinary investors can leverage this infrastructure without needing to understand data centers or network engineering. However, Robinhood has not yet rolled out this service, nor has it disclosed a launch timeline.
On the capital AI can access, Robinhood currently restricts this via separate accounts. Agents can view information from users’ other accounts, but can only place orders within the dedicated account, with funds requiring manual transfer by users. Tenev admitted that technically, direct access to main accounts is not difficult, but the company is opting to gradually expand permissions. Built-in Agents default to requiring users to approve each trade individually (a setting that can be turned off), while external Agents accessed via MCP do not default to individual approvals, so users must enable this feature themselves.