Ford Motor Company (F 0.36%) stock took off like a rocket last month, climbing 45% in the last two weeks of May. Ford's given back about half those gains in the June stock sell-off, but why did Ford stock put pedal to metal in the first place?
Because all of a sudden, Ford has decided it's an energy stock.
Image source: Getty Images.
Ford Motor is electric A little over three years ago, Ford secured a license from China's Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., or CATL, which permits Ford to manufacture batteries using CATL technology. The original plan, of course, was to make these batteries for Ford electric vehicles (EVs). But now that EV demand in the U.S. has collapsed, and demand for electrical power to run artificial intelligence (AI) data centers has exploded, Ford has struck upon a new idea for how to use its technology license:
Ford will manufacture batteries to store electricity for use by data centers and AI semiconductor factories.
Ford announced the plan in January 2026, promising to build batteries at factories in Kentucky and Michigan, and use them to create a "battery energy storage business." Production would begin in mid-2027, rapidly ramping to produce 20 gigawatt-hours of batteries annually and generating as much as $5 billion in new energy storage revenue by 2030.
Wall Street already loves the idea. In mid-May, Morgan Stanley predicted energy could generate between $500 million and $600 million in annual operating profit for Ford.
Today's Change
(
-0.36
%) $
-0.05
Current Price
$
13.95
General Motors charges in It was this prediction, by the way, that sparked Ford stock's amazing run last month -- and it seems the lesson wasn't lost on Ford archrival General Motors (GM +1.11%). Last week, GM announced it has a few energy ideas of its own.
GM's first idea isn't exactly original: "vehicle-to-grid" electricity in which owners of GM EVs can plug them into the grid to support the grid during peak demand -- essentially a system of distributed energy storage. GM said last week it is seeking to partner with utility companies on such a project and is already in talks with utility companies in California and Michigan.
Separately, GM is partnering with privately held Redwood Materials to reuse or recycle old EV batteries for utility-scale energy storage.
Finally, GM said it's working on a new battery chemistry that centers on more common (and cheaper) sodium rather than lithium. The new sodium-ion technology has other advantages over lithium-ion batteries -- not requiring cooling to operate at full efficiency, for example -- and may also be simpler and more reliable. GM says it's partnering with Denver-based energy storage start-up Peak Energy to produce sodium-ion batteries beginning sometime after 2028.
This all sounds a bit more scattershot than Ford's simple approach: Build a factory to manufacture batteries, then assemble those batteries into energy storage systems. Then again, the more bets GM makes, the more chances that one of them may strike it rich!
Today's Change
(
1.11
%) $
0.88
Current Price
$
79.83
How rich, exactly? Wall Street's optimism aside, though, how does the math on all this work?
Let's take Ford's estimated "$5 billion" in 2030 battery energy storage revenue, for example. According to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, Ford currently earns about a 0.8% operating profit margin on its revenues, implying $5 billion in extra revenue might earn Ford an extra $40 million.
That's hardly a large payoff for a new business that will take five years to build!
GM's 6.6% operating profit margin, in contrast, seems to offer more potential for profit should any of the company's several energy bets pay off. Still, there's the question of whether GM is better advised to keep earning 6.6% margins by selling trucks or try to earn even more by selling energy storage? How good a bet is that?
For context, consider the bet Tesla (TSLA 0.04%) made back when it began its own "energy generation and storage" business by buying SolarCity back in 2016. Over the past decade, this business has grown from $1.1 billion in annual revenue to $12.8 billion while also generating very respectable profit margins. In 2017, Tesla EGS earned a 21.7% gross profit margin that has since grown to nearly 30% in 2025.
Long story short, Tesla's energy business today generates nearly twice the gross margin of its EV business. If Ford and GM can accomplish anything similar, it should be well worth the effort.
CEO Mary Barra dropped a number on General Motors (NYSE:GM | GM Price Prediction) Q1 2026 earnings call that should make every investor in the autonomous vehicle race pay attention. “Today, nearly 90% of the code written by our autonomy team is generated by AI,” the CEO said. She framed it as proof of “how seriously we’re embracing AI across the enterprise.” This is safety-critical software being machine-written at scale.
The 90% applies to GM’s autonomy team specifically, not all of GM’s code base. It powers the next-generation eyes-off, hands-off Super Cruise system targeted to launch on the Cadillac Escalade IQ in 2028. This is pre-launch code, not yet in customer cars. The validation regime is what investors should focus on.
GM’s answer to the “can you trust AI-written autonomy code” question is volume-based testing. Barra told analysts the company is stress testing in a digital environment capable of simulating roughly 100 years of human driving every single day. Supervised on-road testing is underway in California and Michigan.
The leading indicator is Super Cruise. Customers have logged 1 billion hands-free miles, and the product is on pace to exceed 850,000 subscribers by year-end, with renewal trends in the 30% to 40% range. CFO Paul Jacobson said attachment rates after the free trial sit near 40%, calling himself “very optimistic” about the conversion math.
The Financials Back the Bet GM has the cash flow to fund aggressive AI tooling investment. Q1 adjusted EPS came in at $3.70 versus the $2.6393 estimate, a 40% beat, the fourth consecutive quarter beating Wall Street EPS forecasts. EBIT-adjusted hit $4.25 billion, up 22% year over year, with margin expanding 2 percentage points to 10%. Management raised full-year adjusted EPS guidance to $11.50 to $13.50.
Digital services show the same strength. OnStar revenue topped $750 million in Q1, up more than 20% year over year, with calendar-year revenue expected to reach $3.1 billion and deferred revenue approaching $7.5 billion.
The Industry Context Cuts Both Ways Barra’s announcement comes as two U.S. senators are urging NHTSA to review Tesla’s self-published Full Self-Driving crash statistics and European regulators accuse Tesla of “misleading data” on FSD safety. Tesla’s robotaxi fleet in Texas sits at 69 vehicles versus Waymo’s 620. GM is positioning its AI-written, simulation-validated approach as the disciplined alternative, though a single high-profile failure of machine-generated safety code would carry significant reputational risk.
The market has rewarded the pitch. GM shares are up 66% over the past year and 9% in the past month, trading at $80.04 against an analyst target of $94.81 and a forward P/E of 7. The 2028 Escalade IQ launch is the verdict event. Until then, Barra’s question remains open: when 90% of safety-critical autonomy code is machine-written, what is the right confidence threshold?
General Motors has gutted its electric-vehicle ambitions and sidelined more than 1,000 jobs at its flagship Detroit assembly plant — while adding 50 robots, sparking outrage from labor unions.
The “collaborative robots,” or “cobots,” have been installed on the assembly line at GM’s Factory Zero plant in Michigan amid a sharply reduced demand for its EV models and the ensuing push to cut costs, reports said.
The machines are now working alongside the remaining humans there who attach the body panels to vehicles as they move down the track, according to AutoBlog.
“Cobots,” or “collaborative robots,” are now working alongside employees on the assembly line at GM’s flagship Detroit plant. AP The automaker insists the cobots are not replacements to human workers and are actually necessary at the Detroit-Hamtramck electric-truck plant to stay competitive while improving “safety and ergonomics” for the workers, according to Crain’s Detroit Business and a company spokesman.
“We’ve been installing cobots across our manufacturing footprint as part of a broader push to bring more advanced technology into our operations,” spokesman Kevin Kelly said.
“At Factory ZERO, we are implementing them alongside our team — helping improve safety and ergonomics, while keeping our operations flexible and competitive,” he said, adding that the workers let go are only temporarily laid off.
Kelly did not specify when those workers might eventually return to work.
But United Auto Workers Local 22 president James Cotton isn’t buying it, saying the machines are simply a cost-cutting measure that is taking jobs from his union members.
“Our manpower is being taken away from us,” Cotton said, according to Crains.
“From top to bottom, we’re disgusted that they have cobots in our plants,” he said.
Union workers protest being sidelined for machines. AP
More than 1,000 workers were let go while the company installed 50 robots shortly after. Reuters The number of labor hours required to produce a car has declined 50% to 70% since the 1980s, Crains reported.
But that hasn’t stopped UAW wages from going up. The union was able to make historic wage gains in 2023, and the union will likely seek stronger protections in its upcoming 2028 contract negotiations, the outlet said.
Cotton said that despite the company’s claim of the technology making conditions safer, he has safety concerns with robots working next to humans and noted the union has since filed grievances against GM over the cobots.
The automaker claims the cobots are necessary to stay competitive while improving “safety and ergonomics.” AP The cobots arrived as GM is getting hammered by slowing EV demand — largely because of the costs, according to AAA — with the automaker pausing production at Factory Zero multiple times over the past year.
In response to GM’s heavy automation push and cobot installation, UAW president Shawn Fain said workers are “in a fight for humanity,” reported the News Tribune.
“The fruits of our labor have multiplied like never before, but workers aren’t reaping the harvest,” he said, according to the outlet.
“And if AI continues to be used as an accessory to that crime, it has to be stopped — it doesn’t have to be this way — in a just society, when workers create more value, they see more of the benefit.”
In the first quarter of 2026, GM reported $4.25 billion in profits, up 22% from the same period the previous year, according to Yahoo! Finance.
General Motors (GM - Free Report) has been one of the most searched-for stocks on Zacks.com lately. So, you might want to look at some of the facts that could shape the stock's performance in the near term.
Shares of this an automotive manufacturer have returned +0.6% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +2% change. The Zacks Automotive - Domestic industry, to which General Motors belongs, has gained 0.4% over this period. Now the key question is: Where could the stock be headed in the near term?
Although media reports or rumors about a significant change in a company's business prospects usually cause its stock to trend and lead to an immediate price change, there are always certain fundamental factors that ultimately drive the buy-and-hold decision.
Revisions to Earnings EstimatesRather than focusing on anything else, we at Zacks prioritize evaluating the change in a company's earnings projection. This is because we believe the fair value for its stock is determined by the present value of its future stream of earnings.
Our analysis is essentially based on how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to take the latest business trends into account. When earnings estimates for a company go up, the fair value for its stock goes up as well. And when a stock's fair value is higher than its current market price, investors tend to buy the stock, resulting in its price moving upward. Because of this, empirical studies indicate a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and short-term stock price movements.
General Motors is expected to post earnings of $3.11 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +22.9%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate remained unchanged.
The consensus earnings estimate of $12.85 for the current fiscal year indicates a year-over-year change of +21.2%. This estimate has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $14.23 indicates a change of +10.7% from what General Motors is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed +0.2%.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, General Motors is rated Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Revenue Growth ForecastEven though a company's earnings growth is arguably the best indicator of its financial health, nothing much happens if it cannot raise its revenues. It's almost impossible for a company to grow its earnings without growing its revenue for long periods. Therefore, knowing a company's potential revenue growth is crucial.
In the case of General Motors, the consensus sales estimate of $46.65 billion for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of -1%. The $185.27 billion and $191.08 billion estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of +0.1% and +3.1%, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryGeneral Motors reported revenues of $43.62 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of -0.9%. EPS of $3.7 for the same period compares with $2.78 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $43.94 billion, the reported revenues represent a surprise of -0.72%. The EPS surprise was +41.76%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates two times over this period.
ValuationWithout considering a stock's valuation, no investment decision can be efficient. In predicting a stock's future price performance, it's crucial to determine whether its current price correctly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects.
Comparing the current value of a company's valuation multiples, such as its price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), to its own historical values helps ascertain whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, whereas comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of how reasonable its stock price is.
The Zacks Value Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which pays close attention to both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics to grade stocks from A to F (an A is better than a B; a B is better than a C; and so on), is pretty helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
General Motors is graded A on this front, indicating that it is trading at a discount to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
Bottom LineThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about General Motors. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
General Motors (GM - Free Report) ended the recent trading session at $80.43, demonstrating a +1.44% change from the preceding day's closing price. This change outpaced the S&P 500's 0.37% loss on the day. On the other hand, the Dow registered a gain of 0.29%, and the technology-centric Nasdaq decreased by 1.33%.
The an automotive manufacturer's shares have seen an increase of 0.63% over the last month, surpassing the Auto-Tires-Trucks sector's gain of 0.49% and falling behind the S&P 500's gain of 2.02%.
The upcoming earnings release of General Motors will be of great interest to investors. The company's earnings report is expected on July 21, 2026. The company is predicted to post an EPS of $3.11, indicating a 22.92% growth compared to the equivalent quarter last year. Meanwhile, the latest consensus estimate predicts the revenue to be $46.65 billion, indicating a 0.99% decrease compared to the same quarter of the previous year.
For the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $12.85 per share and a revenue of $185.27 billion, representing changes of +21.23% and +0.13%, respectively, from the prior year.
Any recent changes to analyst estimates for General Motors should also be noted by investors. These latest adjustments often mirror the shifting dynamics of short-term business patterns. Therefore, positive revisions in estimates convey analysts' confidence in the business performance and profit potential.
Based on our research, we believe these estimate revisions are directly related to near-term stock moves. To exploit this, we've formed the Zacks Rank, a quantitative model that includes these estimate changes and presents a viable rating system.
Ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), the Zacks Rank system has a proven, outside-audited track record of outperformance, with #1 stocks returning an average of +25% annually since 1988. The Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has moved 0.04% higher within the past month. Right now, General Motors possesses a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold).
In terms of valuation, General Motors is presently being traded at a Forward P/E ratio of 6.17. This indicates a discount in contrast to its industry's Forward P/E of 19.89.
It is also worth noting that GM currently has a PEG ratio of 0.4. The PEG ratio is akin to the commonly utilized P/E ratio, but this measure also incorporates the company's anticipated earnings growth rate. The Automotive - Domestic was holding an average PEG ratio of 0.97 at yesterday's closing price.
The Automotive - Domestic industry is part of the Auto-Tires-Trucks sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 160, positioning it in the bottom 35% of all 250+ industries.
The strength of our individual industry groups is measured by the Zacks Industry Rank, which is calculated based on the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within these groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
To follow GM in the coming trading sessions, be sure to utilize Zacks.com.
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--General Atomics (GA) announced today it has been awarded a $20 million California Competes Tax Credit from the state of California through the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz). The award will support the company’s proposal to design and develop a Blanket Component Test Facility (BCTF) in San Diego.
“With growing support from federal, state and local leaders, I am more optimistic than ever about the future of fusion energy and the role California, San Diego and GA can play in helping move this industry forward."
Share The proposed state-of-the-art facility would be dedicated to testing full-scale fusion blanket components, an essential system that lines the inside of a fusion vessel, captures energy and produces tritium, a fuel needed to sustain fusion reactions. The work would address a major scientific and engineering challenge on the path to the world’s first commercial fusion power plant.
For GA and San Diego, the BCTF would serve as a focal point for scientists and engineers from the public and private sectors to validate blanket designs and develop other critical technologies. The project would also support a growing workforce and further strengthen the region’s role as a fusion innovation hub focused on helping the industry move toward commercialization.
“We are grateful for this award and energized by what it means for the future of fusion in San Diego,” said Anantha Krishnan, senior vice president of the General Atomics Energy Group. “This support will aid General Atomics’ continued investment in the research and capabilities needed to move fusion closer to realization, while strengthening our clean energy future. Facilities like the BCTF are where fusion research begins moving closer to real-world energy, and we are proud to help lead that work in California.”
The California Competes Tax Credit is a statewide income tax credit designed to help businesses grow in California and create quality, full-time jobs. Administered by GO-Biz and approved by the California Competes Tax Credit Committee, the program supports high-value employers that drive investment, strengthen the economy and provide good wages and benefits.
“Through the California Competes Tax Credit, we are doubling down on the ingenuity and innovation that will define the future. By further investing in the fusion sector, we are helping ensure California remains a global leader in both the industries of today and the transformative technologies of tomorrow,” said Dee Dee Myers, senior advisor to Gov. Newsom and director of GO-Biz.
General Atomics first announced earlier this month that it is currently pursuing concept designs for a BCTF in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy. The initiative is part of a public-private partnership that includes Idaho National Laboratory, UC San Diego and other key collaborators across industry and academia.
Fusion is the same process that powers the sun. Instead of splitting atoms, as traditional nuclear power does, fusion combines light atomic nuclei to release large amounts of clean energy without long-lived radioactive waste. Researchers believe fusion could provide virtually limitless, carbon-free electricity to help meet growing global energy demand.
General Atomics helped pioneer fusion research in the United States, establishing its program in 1957. Since then, the company has played a leading role in international fusion research, advancing plasma physics, high-field magnets and precision engineering.
GA also operates the DIII-D National Fusion Facility on behalf of DOE. Located in San Diego, DIII-D is the nation’s largest magnetic fusion user facility and testbed. The region is also home to the Fusion Data Science and Digital Engineering Center, major academic programs at UC San Diego and San Diego State University, and a growing network of private-sector and government collaborators.
California’s growing fusion ecosystem was strengthened last year by Senate Bill 80, which created the California Fusion Research and Development Innovation Initiative, the first state program of its kind focused on accelerating fusion technology development and commercialization. The state also expanded support for fusion technologies through SB 86, which extended the Sales and Use Tax Exclusion Program to fusion technologies. SB 925, currently pending in the California Legislature, would establish a state strategic plan and regulatory roadmap for fusion. Ongoing efforts by the city of San Diego and the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation also continue to highlight the region’s potential as a center for fusion innovation and advanced manufacturing.
“Fusion has always required bold science, sustained commitment and a shared belief in what is possible,” Krishnan said. “With growing support from federal, state and local leaders, I am more optimistic than ever about the future of fusion energy and the role California, San Diego and GA can play in helping move this industry forward. Together, we are closer than ever to turning decades of research into a new source of clean energy that could benefit generations to come.”
For more information about General Atomics’ energy research and technologies, visit https://www.ga.com/about/energy-group.
About General Atomics
Since the dawn of the atomic age, General Atomics innovations have advanced the state of the art across the full spectrum of science and technology from nuclear energy and defense to medicine and high-performance computing. Behind a talented global team of scientists, engineers, and professionals, GA’s unique experience and capabilities continue to deliver safe, sustainable, economical, and innovative solutions to meet growing global demands.
FORT WORTH, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL COMPANY, INC. (“GM Financial” or the “Company”) will release its second quarter 2026 operating results on Tuesday, July 21, 2026.
The press release and earnings presentation for fixed income investors will be posted to the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.gmfinancial.com. Questions on the materials should be directed to GM Financial’s Investor Relations Department.
The Company’s subsequent earnings announcements are scheduled as follows:
Q3 2026 – Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Q4 2026 – Wednesday, January 27, 2027 About GM Financial
General Motors Financial Company, Inc. is the wholly owned captive finance subsidiary of General Motors Company and is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. For more information, visit www.gmfinancial.com.
More News From General Motors Financial Company, Inc.
For new and old investors, taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals. Zacks Premium provides lots of different ways to do both.
Featuring daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, the research service can help you become a smarter, more self-assured investor.
Zacks Premium includes access to the Zacks Style Scores as well.
What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores, developed alongside the Zacks Rank, are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on three widely-followed investing methodologies; they also help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.
Each stock is given an alphabetic rating of A, B, C, D or F based on their value, growth, and momentum qualities. With this system, an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on, meaning the better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform.
The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:
Value ScoreFinding good stocks at good prices, and discovering which companies are trading under their true value, are what value investors like to focus on. So, the Value Style Score takes into account ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and a host of other multiples to highlight the most attractive and discounted stocks.
Growth ScoreWhile good value is important, growth investors are more focused on a company's financial strength and health, and its future outlook. The Growth Style Score takes projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow into account to uncover stocks that will see long-term, sustainable growth.
Momentum ScoreMomentum trading is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook, and these investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." The Momentum Style Score can pinpoint good times to build a position in a stock, using factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates.
VGM ScoreIf you like to use all three kinds of investing, then the VGM Score is for you. It's a combination of all Style Scores, and is an important indicator to use with the Zacks Rank. The VGM Score rates each stock on their shared weighted styles, narrowing down the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum.
How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank The Zacks Rank, which is a proprietary stock-rating model, employs earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings expectations, to make building a winning portfolio easier.
#1 (Strong Buy) stocks have produced an unmatched +24% average annual return since 1988, which is more than double the S&P 500's performance over the same time frame. However, the Zacks Rank examines a ton of stocks, and there can be more than 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, and another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.
With more than 800 top-rated stocks to choose from, it can certainly feel overwhelming to pick the ones that are right for you and your investing journey.
That's where the Style Scores come in.
To have the best chance of big returns, you'll want to always consider stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B, which will give you the highest probability of success. If you're looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, it's important they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.
Since the Scores were created to work together with the Zacks Rank, the direction of a stock's earnings estimate revisions should be a key factor when choosing which stocks to buy.
A stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, for instance, even one with Scores of A and B, will still have a declining earnings forecast, and a greater chance its share price will fall too.
Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.
Stock to Watch: General Motors (GM - Free Report) One of the world’s largest automakers, General Motors held the largest share of the U.S. auto market at 16.5% in 2024. Headquartered in Detroit, the auto giant has had a long and checkered history. Founded in 1908, the company rose to dominate the U.S. industry. However, hit by the financial crisis, General Motors filed for bankruptcy on Jun 1, 2009. Just within 40 days, the firm emerged from bankruptcy. In 2010, the company launched its IPO – the biggest in U.S. history at that time – and has been steadily profitable since then. From going bankrupt in 2009 to becoming one of the world’s best-run car companies, General Motors has indeed come a long way.
GM is a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of A.
Additionally, the company could be a top pick for growth investors. GM has a Growth Style Score of B, forecasting year-over-year earnings growth of 21.2% for the current fiscal year.
10 analysts revised their earnings estimate upwards in the last 60 days for fiscal 2026. The Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.42 to $12.85 per share. GM boasts an average earnings surprise of +20.3%.
With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Growth and VGM Style Scores, GM should be on investors' short list.
The giants of Detroit's automaking industry may have struck gold, and the potential fortune has very little to do with cars. Ford Motor Company (F +0.04%) and General Motors (GM +1.11%) are repurposing inventory and facilities to capitalize on the demand for electricity from AI and data centers. It's a fast-growing segment and a potentially massive moneymaker for both. With their newfound purposes, which stock will win?
Today's Change
(
0.04
%) $
0.01
Current Price
$
14.01
Ford was the first to move, and it did so decisively. Ford Energy was launched in May of this year, and it will convert plants in Kentucky and Michigan to build battery energy storage systems. Ford Energy could generate as much as $500 million in operating profits by 2030.
Image source: Ford.
GM is converting one of its plants in Tennessee to produce cheaper sodium-ion cells, expand battery recycling, and expand vehicle-to-grid capabilities. Through strategic partnerships, the retooling of existing assets will be much less expensive than Ford's estimated $2 billion investment. While GM's strategy is broader, it won't start generating much new revenue until 2028.
Which automaker is the better energy stock? As it stands right now, Ford has a clearer path to generating significant new revenue and to do so imminently. The new revenue stream also looks profitable. GM is diversifying its energy strategy, but I'm not sure it's as clear-cut as Ford's. Ford already has a five-year supply framework deal signed with EDF Power Solutions, giving it a powerful head start.
Today's Change
(
1.11
%) $
0.88
Current Price
$
79.83
In the short- to intermediate-term, Ford will win, but over the course of a decade or more, GM's broader strategy could pay off; there's too much uncertainty today to make that call. Both companies are making smart moves here by pivoting away from the hefty losses and tepid demand from electric vehicles to capture the surging energy needs of the AI industry.
Catie Hogan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Ford Motor Company (F +0.04%), General Motors (GM +0.89%), and Stellantis (STLA 1.09%) were all too glad to feed America's seemingly insatiable appetite for larger vehicles such as full-size trucks and SUVs. It's well known in the industry that these larger vehicles, often packed with technology and premium options, cost only marginally more to produce than a sedan but can generate much better margins. The market demand became so strong for such vehicles that Ford all but ended making sedans for the U.S. market, unless you count the iconic Mustang. The bad news, however, is that executives are growing concerned about the lucrative full-size truck and SUV segments -- but is it just a speed bump?
What's going on? There are a couple of trends developing currently that won't favor Detroit automakers' bottom lines. The first is that fuel prices have surged because of the latest Middle East conflict, and while in the past it has taken roughly six months of prolonged high gas prices to really shift demand in favor of smaller, more efficient vehicles, it's happening more quickly this time.
"I'm not going to sit here and say it's permanent yet," GM North America President Duncan Aldred said, according to Automotive News. "But we are seeing somewhat of a shrinking of pickup trucks, full-size utilities, and some of the heavier [vehicles] and an increase in the more affordable segments of the industry."
Image source: Ford Motor Company.
It's true that fuel prices have increased noticeably: A year ago, gasoline averaged about $3.14 per gallon, according to AAA, but it spiked to $4.51 by the middle of last month. Before investors press the panic button, there's already been some relief, as over the past month that average price has dipped back down to just above $4 per gallon, but there's no guarantee this trend will become permanent. Uncertainty surrounding the Middle East conflict will continue to add volatility to gasoline prices.
That said, compounding the issue is that the average price for a new vehicle in the U.S. continues to hover above $50,000, which has put additional pressure on consumers considering vehicle purchases. Some analysts have gone as far to call it an affordability crisis, and it's fair to say that full-size trucks are carrying price tags of luxury vehicles these days and are climbing beyond the reach of some consumers.
What's the solution? How automakers go about solving this riddle could vary. Stellantis has opted to attack the affordability headwinds as a cornerstone of its broader $70 billion turnaround plan. More specifically, Stellantis will launch nine vehicles priced under $40,000 by the end of this decade in North America, and two of those vehicles will be priced lower than $30,000.
One of Ford's solutions is a bit more forward looking, as it plans to drive electric vehicle (EV) sales higher with its upcoming midsize EV truck priced around $30,000. It'll be the first of many vehicles to incorporate the automaker's new Universal EV Platform, which will also use Ford's recently developed "assembly tree" production system. The combination of those development factors should enable the EV truck to be profitable early in its lifecycle.
Which brings us to another potential speed bump. Currently, EV batteries are still the most expensive component of the vehicle and, because trucks need to be capable of towing, require larger and more expensive batteries. That could erode some of the juicy margins automakers have grown accustomed to with full-size truck gasoline counterparts.
GM, which has navigated the past few years better than its Detroit rivals, is more confident that its current approach can handle the fluctuation in segment demand. Already GM has seven models starting at $30,000 or less and sold a significant amount of them last year -- about 700,000.
Today's Change
(
0.89
%) $
0.70
Current Price
$
79.65
What it all means Ultimately, if significant demand permanently shifts and the vast volume of high-margin full-size trucks and SUVs begins to decline, it will mean lower profits in the near term until automakers can innovate and/or improve the supply chain and production efficiency. Investors shouldn't panic, and history tells us that it will take more prolonged high gasoline prices to drive such a shift, but it's absolutely worth keeping an eye on for your investment thesis, especially at a time when automakers are still battling profitability with EVs -- potentially losing some full-size truck sales would be a full-size problem.
Two energy leaders to support decarbonization and energy transition objectives in Italy
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, June 24, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- General Fusion Inc. (“General Fusion” or the “Company”), a leader in the global race to commercialize fusion energy, and Renexia S.p.A. (“Renexia”), a Toto Group company specializing in renewable energy, today announced a framework agreement (the “Agreement”) to advance the commercial deployment of General Fusion’s fusion energy technology in Italy. General Fusion previously announced its plans to go public through a business combination (the transactions contemplated by the business combination, collectively, the “Proposed Business Combination”) with Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ: SVAC) (“SVAC”).
Through the Agreement, General Fusion and Renexia have established a milestone-based framework for collaboration on the commercial deployment of General Fusion’s technology in Italy through potential siting, development, funding, construction, and commissioning of one or more Magnetized Target Fusion (“MTF”) power plants. The collaboration is intended to support the country’s decarbonization and energy transition objectives. The Agreement defines multiple potential phases of collaboration, beginning with site evaluation and selection, and continuing through identification of commercial opportunities, offtake agreements, permitting and construction, with multiple milestone-based definitive agreements contemplated. Collaborative work related to site feasibility is expected to begin immediately, with further phase one work expected to begin in 2026 subject to agreement on related definitive terms.
“This agreement with Renexia represents another meaningful step toward exporting our practical fusion energy technology, developed in Canada, to the world,” said General Fusion CEO Greg Twinney. “As a clean energy leader in Italy and around the world, and an early member of our Market Development Advisory Committee, Renexia brings valuable insight into the energy sector and what it takes to bring innovative technologies to market. We are excited to continue working with their expert team to engage key stakeholders in Italy and build the capabilities needed to deploy commercial fusion energy.”
“Fusion has the potential to have a transformational impact on our future energy mix. We’re thrilled to expand on several years of collaboration with General Fusion with this new agreement to advance commercial fusion energy deployment,” said Renexia CEO Riccardo Toto. “As a member of General Fusion’s Market Development Advisory Committee, we’ve had the opportunity to see firsthand the progress the company has made in developing its Magnetized Target Fusion approach, and we look forward to furthering our collaboration to explore opportunities for siting, development, and construction of a fusion power plant in Italy. Energy demand is surging, and as Italy experiences high power costs, General Fusion’s Magnetized Target Fusion has the potential to provide economical clean power and is an important technology to pursue on its path to commercialization.”
General Fusion previously announced its plans to go public through a Proposed Business Combination with Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. III (“Spring Valley” or “SVAC”). At the closing of the Proposed Business Combination, Spring Valley will be renamed “General Fusion Group Ltd.,” and the combined company’s shares and warrants are expected to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker symbols “GFUZ” and “GFUZW,” respectively, subject to approval of its listing application. Spring Valley set a record date of June 12, 2026, and a meeting date of July 6, 2026, for its extraordinary general meeting of shareholders. If the Spring Valley shareholders and General Fusion securityholders approve the Proposed Business Combination, the transaction is expected to close shortly thereafter, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.
Quick Facts:
General Fusion’s Magnetized Target Fusion (“MTF”) is designed to solve significant barriers to commercializing fusion energy at a time when electricity demand is surging, and nations around the world are racing to commercialize fusion power.As a technology, MTF aims to achieve fusion in a practical way, avoiding superconducting magnets and high-powered lasers, while enabling the use of existing materials for durable machines that would produce cost-effective energy. In early 2025, General Fusion announced that it had designed, built, and begun operating its world-first Lawson Machine 26 (“LM26”) fusion demonstration machine in under two years. LM26 is the first MTF demonstration machine to be built at a commercially relevant scale. It mechanically compresses plasma with a lithium liner at 50% commercial-scale diameter, based on current design parameters.LM26 aims to achieve key fusion technical milestones: plasma heating to 1 keV (10 million degrees Celsius), then 10 keV (100 million degrees Celsius), and ultimately the Lawson criterion, the combination of fusion parameters that can produce net fusion energy in the plasma. General Fusion’s Market Development Advisory Committee membership spans North America, Europe, and Asia and guides the design and development of a practical MTF power plant that will meet users’ needs. For a complete list of committee member companies, please visit https://generalfusion.com/path-to-commercialization/partners-early-adopters-facilities/. About General Fusion
General Fusion is pursuing a fast and practical approach to commercial fusion energy and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. The Company was established in 2002 and has been funded by a global syndicate of leading energy venture capital firms, industry leaders, and technology pioneers. Learn more at www.generalfusion.com.
About Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. III
Spring Valley is a part of a family of investment vehicles formed for the purpose of acquiring or merging with a business focused on the Power Infrastructure and Decarbonization sectors. Over the past five years, Spring Valley vehicles have raised $920 million in four IPOs. Spring Valley completed a business combination with NuScale Power Corporation, a leading U.S. small modular reactor technology company, and Spring Valley II completed a business combination with Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp., a next-generation nuclear energy company with rights to the largest open pit-constrained measured and indicated uranium deposit in the United States. SVAC maintains a corporate website at https://sv-ac.com.
About Renexia
Renexia is the Toto Group company specializing in the development and operation of energy infrastructure, with a strong focus on renewable energy projects. Building on the experience gained through its subsidiary US Wind on the East Coast of the United States, the Group in Italy has introduced a first-mover approach based on rigorous environmental compatibility assessments and the active involvement of local communities, ensuring full respect for the environment and the adoption of best-in-class technological solutions.
In addition to its leadership in renewable energy, Renexia is progressively expanding its activities across the wider energy value chain, including new initiatives in strategic infrastructure, such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), with the aim of supporting energy security, system flexibility, and the transition toward a more sustainable and diversified energy mix.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements included in this document are not historical facts but are forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this document are forward-looking statements.
Any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are also forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “may,” “target,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “preliminary,” or similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding (i) the potential benefits of the Agreement potentially supporting Italy’s decarbonization and energy transition objectives and a means of exporting General Fusion’s technology; (ii) the settlement and execution of definitive agreements for future stages of the work program contemplated under the Agreement; (iii) the intended roles and contributions of Renexia and General Fusion under the Agreement; (iv) the possible siting, development, funding, construction, and commissioning of one or more MTF power plants including the evaluation, selection, and potential use of a site for an MTF power plant; (v) the closing of the Proposed Business Combination; (vi) SVAC’s, General Fusion’s, or their respective management teams’ expectations concerning General Fusion’s plan to go public through the Proposed Business Combination and expected benefits or timing thereof; and (vii) the outlook for General Fusion’s business, including its ability to commercialize MTF or any other fusion technology on its expected timeline or at all; and (viii) statements regarding the current and expected results of General Fusion’s LM26 program; as well as any information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of General Fusion.
The forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of the respective management teams of SVAC and General Fusion, as applicable, and are inherently subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstance and their potential effects. There can be no assurance that future developments will be those that have been anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties, or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk that the parties are unable to agree on the terms of a definitive agreement for the identification and evaluation of a potential site; the parties are unable to complete the due diligence and the acquisition or leasing of any proposed site; the risk that the parties are thereafter unable to agree on the scope, timing, budgets and other terms for the development, permitting, funding, construction, and commissioning of an MTF power plant in Italy; the parties are unable to negotiate and enter into definitive agreements with any third parties in connection with the funding, permitting, construction, commissioning, and operation of an MTF power plant in Italy; the parties are unable to secure required capital, permits, approvals, equipment, and services for an MTF power plant in Italy; the risk that the demand and interest and regulatory environment for fusion energy in Italy in a manner adverse to the objectives of the Agreement, the Proposed Business Combination may not be completed in a timely manner or at all, which may adversely affect the price of SVAC’s securities; the risk that the conditions to the consummation of the Proposed Business Combination, including the adoption of the business combination agreement, dated January 21, 2026, among General Fusion, SVAC, and the other party thereto (as amended the “Business Combination Agreement”) by the shareholders of SVAC and General Fusion and the receipt of regulatory approvals are not satisfied or waived; the risk that there occurs any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Business Combination Agreement; the risk that the announcement or pendency of the Proposed Business Combination has a negative effect on General Fusion’s business relationships, performance, and business generally; the risk that the Proposed Business Combination disrupts current plans of General Fusion and potential difficulties in its employee retention as a result of the Proposed Business Combination; the risk of legal proceedings against General Fusion or SVAC related to the Proposed Business Combination; the risk that the anticipated benefits of the Proposed Business Combination are not realized; the risk that the combined entity is unable to maintain the listing of SVAC’s securities or to meet listing requirements and maintain the listing of the combined company’s securities on Nasdaq; the risk that the Proposed Business Combination may not be completed by SVAC’s business combination deadline and the potential failure to obtain an extension of the business combination deadline if sought by SVAC; the risk that the price of the combined entity’s securities may be volatile due to a variety of factors, including changes in laws, regulations, technologies, natural disasters, national security tensions, and macro-economic and social environments affecting its business; the risk of changes in the laws and regulations governing General Fusion’s research and development activities; the risk that General Fusion fails to commercialize MTF on the expected timeline or at all, including any failure to achieve the objectives of the LM26 program; the risk of the effects of climate change, extreme weather events, water scarcity, and seismic events, and that strategies to deal with these issues are not effective; the risk of fluctuations in currency markets; the risk that General Fusion is unable to complete and successfully integrate any future acquisitions; the risk of increased competition in the fusion industry; the risk of supply chain disruptions and that materials are in limited supply; and the risk that the proposed private placement of convertible preferred shares and warrants by General Fusion (the “PIPE Financing”) may not be completed, or that other capital needed by the combined company may not be raised on favorable terms, or at all, including as a result of the restrictions agreed to in connection with the PIPE Financing.
The foregoing list is not exhaustive, and there may be additional risks that neither SVAC nor General Fusion presently know or that SVAC and General Fusion currently believe are immaterial. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors, any other factors discussed in this document and in the other filings and potential filings by General Fusion, SVAC or the combined entity resulting from the proposed transaction with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) including under the heading “Risk Factors.”
General Fusion and SVAC caution you against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect current beliefs and are based on information currently available as of the date a forward-looking statement is made. Forward-looking statements set forth in this document speak only as of the date of this document. Neither General Fusion nor SVAC undertakes any obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances, or changes in beliefs, except as required by applicable securities laws. In the event that any forward-looking statement is updated, no inference should be made that General Fusion or SVAC will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statements.
Important Information for Investors and Shareholders
In connection with the Proposed Business Combination, General Fusion and SVAC jointly filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-4 (the “Registration Statement”), which includes a preliminary prospectus with respect to SVAC’s securities to be issued in connection with the Proposed Business Combination and a preliminary proxy statement in connection with SVAC’s solicitation of proxies for the vote by SVAC’s shareholders with respect to the Proposed Business Combination and other matters described in the Registration Statement. On June 12, 2026, the SEC declared the Registration Statement effective and SVAC filed the definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) with the SEC. SVAC mailed copies of the Proxy Statement to SVAC’s shareholders as of the record date of June 12, 2026. Before making any investment or voting decision, investors and security holders of SVAC and General Fusion are urged to read the Registration Statement and the Proxy Statement, and any amendments or supplements thereto, as well as all other relevant materials filed or that will be filed with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Business Combination as they become available because they will contain important information about General Fusion, SVAC and the Proposed Business Combination. Investors and security holders are able to obtain free copies of the Registration Statement, the Proxy Statement and all other relevant documents filed or that will be filed with the SEC by SVAC through the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. In addition, the documents filed by SVAC may be obtained free of charge from SVAC’s website at https://sv-ac.com or by directing a request to Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. III, Attn: Corporate Secretary, 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1675, Dallas, Texas 75201. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, the websites referenced in this document is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this document.
Participants in the Solicitation
General Fusion, SVAC and their respective directors, executive officers and other members of management and employees may, under the rules of the SEC, be deemed to be participants in the solicitations of proxies from SVAC’s shareholders in connection with the Proposed Business Combination. For more information about the names, affiliations and interests of SVAC’s directors and executive officers, please refer to the Final Prospectus and the Registration Statement, Proxy Statement and other relevant materials filed or to be filed with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Business Combination when they become available. Shareholders, potential investors and other interested persons should read the Registration Statement and the Proxy Statement carefully, when they become available, before making any voting or investment decisions. You may obtain free copies of these documents from the sources indicated above.
No Offer or Solicitation
This document shall not constitute a “solicitation” as defined in Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or exchange, the solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation to purchase, any securities, or a solicitation of any vote, consent or approval, nor shall there be any sale, issuance or transfer of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale may be unlawful under the laws of such jurisdiction. No offering of securities in the Proposed Business Combination shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an exemption therefrom.
Investor Relations Contact:
You can contact General Fusion’s Investor Relations team by email at: [email protected].
If you are based in North America, you may also leave a toll-free voicemail at +1 (833) 717-1519. Callers outside North America can reach us at +1 (236) 253-6968.
General Fusion Media Relations Contact: [email protected]
1-866-904-0995
The US automakers are trying to turn things around on Wednesday, as we may have gotten a little oversold. At this point, the market continues to see value in these dips.
The market for Tesla looks like we are just simply hanging around a pretty significant support level. I think at this point, though, we are likely to see an attempt to go higher. The market is showing plenty of support right around the $3.80 level, with the $400 level offering a bit of a target. If the market were to break down from here, then the $365 level should be targeted. Ultimately, any bounce from here, I think, gets people jumping.
F Technical Analysis The market for Ford looks like it is starting to turn things around and rally back towards the $15 level. We are hanging around the 50-day EMA, so that’ll be important to watch. If we continue to break down from here, the 200-day EMA is near the $13 level, which would be the next major support level. It’s also where we had a swing low previously that we launched from. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. I do think there’s some value here, and I’ll be watching to see if we can pick up some momentum.
GM Technical Analysis General Motors looks like it is going to jump. We are in the midst of consolidation between roughly $78 and $85. We are bouncing from that $78 region. This makes sense for a bit of a short-term bounce play. Do I think it takes off forever? No, of course not. But I do realize that we’ve gone sideways after we shot higher. The 50-day EMA is coming into the picture, and the employment situation in the United States is good. So, I think all of this could have people looking to buy new vehicles.
General Motors, of course, just recently had a dividend. It’s got its earnings report in the latter half of July, so we’ve got about a month before we have to worry about that. We may just go sideways between now and then.
If you’d like to know more about technical analysis and how traders use it, please visit our educational area.
Company details efforts across its Mission: Electrify the Planet to Thrive and Decarbonize.
Highlights include:
2025 step change advancements across a range of breakthrough technologies, including small modular reactors, carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, and hydrogen and ammonia as fuels. Bringing 26 gigawatts (GW) of new generating capacity online in 2025, with a carbon intensity ~31% below the global average carbon intensity of the existing grid. Of that new capacity added, 47% was deployed in developing and emerging economies. 64% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 operational emissions since 2019. Our overall product coverage under the 4R circularity framework reached 53%, an increase from 38% in 2024. GE Vernova’s newly launched Electrification Impact Tracker released alongside report illustrates the company’s global impact electrifying the planet and supporting people and communities so everyone can thrive. CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GE Vernova today released its 2025 Sustainability Report, demonstrating continued progress toward its mission to electrify the world to thrive and decarbonize, with an emphasis on moving bold and innovative breakthrough technologies from concepts to reality.
The company’s annual sustainability reporting highlights milestones for bringing new global power generation online the world needs to expand energy access, including in developing and emerging economies, while doing so at a lower carbon intensity than the global grid average. The annual summary also noted additional investments around the world in workforce training for the energy sector’s next generation of leaders and continued reductions to the company’s Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
“At its core, our work is not only about electrons and emissions,” said Scott Strazik, GE Vernova CEO. “Energy is about people, and we’re working to electrify the planet in a way that enables individuals, communities, and economies to thrive, every day.”
“The story of GE Vernova is one of an unrelenting focus on delivering the technologies the world needs not just today, but importantly for the decades ahead,” said Roger Martella, Chief Corporate Officer and Chief Sustainability Officer. “I have never been more optimistic about our ability to help meet not only the needs of today, but of the generations that follow.”
The new Sustainability Report showcases the company's comprehensive sustainability strategy based on a refreshed sustainability framework which is underpinned by 5 Charges, the bold ambitions driving how the company delivers impact to achieve its sustainability goals. Progress on these goals is driven by the four strategic pillars of the sustainability framework: Electrify, Decarbonize, Conserve, and Thrive.
2025 Progress includes:
ELECTRIFY: Catalyze access to more secure, sustainable, reliable, and affordable electricity, and help drive global economic development
In 2025, GE Vernova brought 26 GW of new generating capacity online, the approximate equivalent of the installed generating capacity of the U.S. state of Louisiana, with 47% deployed in developing and emerging economies. Across grid infrastructure, 68 GW of new power transformers were energized, equivalent to the approximate installed generating capacity of Egypt, with 33% in developing and emerging economies. Approximately 10,700 students and learners have been reached through the GE Vernova Foundation’s workforce development programs since the beginning of 2024, with an overall goal to reach 30,000 learners by 2030. DECARBONIZE: Invent, deploy, and service the technology to help decarbonize our world
New power generating capacity of our equipment brought online is ~31% below the global average carbon intensity of the existing grid, demonstrating that electrification with our equipment has an impact on reducing the carbon intensity of the grid. 22 million metric tons of CO₂ avoided last year by deploying technologies with lower carbon emissions than the current standard for the relevant grid. This is the equivalent to 5.1 million gasoline-powered passenger vehicles driven in one year. This is a relevant data point for how we deploy technologies with favorable emissions profiles as compared to what may otherwise be deployed. We document 2025 step change progress on our breakthrough technologies, including small modular nuclear reactors, carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, and ammonia and hydrogen as fuels. Breakthrough technologies moving from concept to reality:
As part of the company’s focus on innovating for the future, the 2025 Sustainability Report highlights step change progress on breakthrough technologies:
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): In April 2025, GE Vernova Hitachi received the first license issued to construct an SMR in Canada. Construction on the GE Vernova Hitachi (GVH) BWRX-300 at Ontario Power Generation’s (OPG) Darlington site in Clarington, Ontario started in May 2025. The project will deliver the first operating commercial SMR in the Western world. Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS): Construction began on the Net Zero Teesside (NZT) Power station in the United Kingdom in 2025 – once completed, it is expected to be the world's first commercial-scale gas power plant equipped with carbon capture and storage. The facility is expected to generate over 740 MW of lower-carbon power. Direct Air Capture (DAC): The company’s 10-ton-per-year DAC pilot system at its Advanced Research Center in Niskayuna, New York is now operational, capturing CO₂ directly from ambient air across a wide range of operating conditions. Our DAC system will soon be deployed at Deep Sky Alpha in Alberta, Canada, becoming the world’s first cross-technology CO₂ removal hub. Ammonia and Hydrogen Fuel Capabilities: GE Vernova and IHI completed a new Large-scale Combustion Test (LCT) facility engineered to test advanced ammonia combustion systems at GE Vernova’s F-class gas turbine operating conditions. Also, GE Vernova successfully completed the validation test campaign of a hydrogen Dry Low Nox (DLN) combustor for B- and E-class gas turbines, demonstrating robust operations on natural gas and hydrogen blends and on 100% hydrogen with dry emissions below 25 ppm NOx. CONSERVE: Innovate more, while using less, safeguarding natural resources
In 2025, GE Vernova reduced its Scope 1 and 2 (market based) greenhouse gas emissions footprint by 27% year-over-year across our operations, with a 64% reduction since 2019. GE Vernova’s Circularity Brochure details the company’s Circularity efforts, highlights include: 53% of GE Vernova's top products are now covered by its 4R circularity framework (Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle), with 76% of products covered by Life Cycle Assessments or Environmental Product Declarations. THRIVE: Advance safe, responsible, and fair working conditions in our operations and across our value chain
GE Vernova’s 2025 Human Rights Statement provides detailed information on the company’s efforts to enhance due diligence processes, risk assessments, and other actions taken in 2025 across the human rights program. GE Vernova’s new Code of Conduct marks a significant milestone for the evolution of the ethics and compliance program, shifting from a rules-based framework to a values-based foundation. The GE Vernova Foundation helped support thriving people and communities by distributing $12.8 million in total GE Vernova family giving, and $800,000 in disaster relief and recovery aid to communities affected by global disasters in 2025. The company achieved recognition for its inclusion efforts, earning "Best Company: Culture" and "Best Company: Work-Life Balance" honors from Comparably. Empowering AI For Customers, Company and Communities
As AI transforms how the world works, GE Vernova is using the power of automation and Artificial Intelligence to transform energy into solutions. The company is working to drive greater efficiency, higher quality, and innovation that can improve outcomes for our customers, company, and communities.
The report details how GE Vernova is scaling AI infrastructure for customers, pursuing AI as a key area of growth and innovation within the company, and establishing key partnerships with organizations in our communities to explore and evaluate potential solutions that aim to use AI for sustainability-related use cases.
Electrification Impact Tracker
Released alongside the 2025 Sustainability Report today is GE Vernova’s newly launched Electrification Impact Tracker, available on GE Vernova’s sustainability website. By visualizing the gigawatts of new power generating capacity added and technologies deployed to power homes in various regions, the Impact Tracker illustrates our company's global impact electrifying the planet and supporting people and communities so everyone can thrive.
A New Way of Solving Energy Access
In April 2025, GE Vernova hosted the first-of-its kind Mendoza Collective Action Summit. Over three days in Mendoza, Argentina, 15 global leaders from across the public, private, and academic sectors came together to confront a shared challenge: how to accelerate access to affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy for all.
What emerged was a shared sense of urgency that we need new ways of working together, which led to the development of a set of shared foundational values to guide this work, known as the Mendoza Principles. The report outlines the principles and actions that the energy industry must take to meet rapidly growing energy demand while delivering sustainable development for the benefit of our communities. Read the Mendoza Report here.
“2025 marks the transformative moment where GE Vernova’s story became squarely focused on serving the future. The world’s growing needs are changing, and we need to change to be ahead of it,” Martella said.
GE Vernova is a signatory of, and participant in, the UN Global Compact (UNGC). The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) provide 17 objectives to help address the most pressing global challenges. Our sustainability efforts align with ten of the 17 SDGs.
The full 2025 Sustainability Report is available at https://www.gevernova.com/sustainability/reports-data.
Key Takeaways GE's Q1 operating profit rose 18%, though operating margin declined 200 basis points to 21.8%.GE saw higher cost of sales, SG&A and R&D expenses tied to growth investments and production.GE expects 2026 operating profit of $9.85-$10.25 billion, aided by LEAP and service demand. GE Aerospace (GE - Free Report) recorded an operating profit of $2.5 billion in first-quarter 2026, an increase of 18% year over year. However, the company's operating profit margin was 21.8%, reflecting a decrease of 200 basis points (bps). The decline was attributable to the impacts of growth investments and inflation.
In the first quarter, GE’s cost of sales (comprising costs of equipment and services sold) surged 32% year over year to $7.9 billion. While selling, general and administrative expenses increased 23.7% to $1.08 billion, research and development expenses rose 22.6% to $440 million. The company is incurring high costs and expenses related to certain projects and increased production activities.
Nevertheless, GE Aerospace’s persistent strength across both commercial and defense aerospace sectors, driven by a strong pipeline of projects, is expected to drive its growth. Also, its focus on effective cost management and backlog conversion is expected to improve its margin performance. For 2026, the company expects to generate operating profit in the range of $9.85-$10.25 billion, indicating year-over-year growth of 10.4% at the mid-point.
For the year, GE expects its top-line and margin performance to benefit from higher LEAP engine deliveries, strong demand for aftermarket services and focus on operational execution. It's worth noting that the company expects more than 15% growth in LEAP deliveries this year.
Peer’s Margin performanceAmong its major peers, RTX Corporation’s (RTX - Free Report) total costs and expenses increased 7.2% year over year to $19.59 billion in first-quarter 2026. Despite the rise in costs, RTX Corp.’s adjusted operating profit margin expanded 60 basis points (bps) to 13.7% in the quarter. RTX is benefiting from rising aerospace deliveries, growing aftermarket revenues and declining geared turbofan (GTF) engine-related cash costs.
Textron Inc.’s (TXT - Free Report) total costs and expenses rose 11.8% year over year in first-quarter 2026. Textron’s gross profit margin declined 100 bps to 17.8% in the quarter. The decline in Textron’s margin was due to the adverse impact from the mix of military programs and lower commercial volume in the Bell segment.
GE's Price Performance, Valuation and EstimatesShares of GE Aerospace have gained 16.8% in the past three months against the industry’s 4.4% decline.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, GE is trading at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 43.83X, above the industry’s average of 33.06X. GE Aerospace carries a Value Score of D.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GE’s 2026 and 2027 earnings has increased over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Key Takeaways GE Aerospace repurchased $2.2 billion in shares and paid $381 million in dividends in Q1 2026.GE raised its dividend 30.6% and expects $8.0-$8.4 billion in free cash flow for 2026.GE's $11 billion cash position supports its shareholder-friendly policies and capital returns. GE Aerospace (GE - Free Report) is a leading designer, developer and producer of jet engines, components and integrated systems for military, commercial and business aircraft. Its products and services range from jet engines like LEAP, GE9X & GEnx, airframes, engine gear, and transmission components and services, among others.
The company’s commitment to reward its shareholders through dividends and share buybacks is encouraging. In first-quarter 2026, it bought back shares for $2.2 billion and paid dividends of $381 million, up 26.2% year over year, to its shareholders. In addition, in 2025, it rewarded its shareholders with a dividend payment of $1.45 billion and repurchased shares for $7.6 billion. After the first quarter of 2026, share repurchases are made under a new $20 billion authorization approved in December 2025.
GE Aerospace raised its dividend by 30.6% to 36 cents per share in February 2026. It expects to generate a free cash flow of $8.0-$8.4 billion in 2026. Also, the company earlier announced its plan to boost total shareholder returns by 20% to approximately $24 billion from 2024 to 2026, through a mix of dividends and share repurchases.
The company’s strong liquidity also supports its shareholder-friendly policies. Exiting the first quarter, GE’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash were $11 billion, much higher than the short-term borrowings of $2.1 billion. This implies that the company has sufficient cash to meet its short-term debt obligations.
Do GE’s Peers Focus on Returning Capital to Shareholders?Honeywell International Inc. (HON - Free Report) paid out dividends worth $781 million and repurchased shares worth $1 billion in first-quarter 2026. In September 2025, Honeywell hiked its quarterly dividend by approximately 5% to $1.19 per share (annually: $4.76). This marks Honeywell’s 16th consecutive dividend hike since 2010.
Howmet Aerospace (HWM - Free Report) remains focused on rewarding its shareholders handsomely through dividends and share buyback programs. In the first three months of 2026, Howmet paid dividends of $48 million and repurchased shares worth $300 million. In August 2025, Howmet hiked its dividend by 20% to 12 cents per share (annually: 48 cents), marking its second dividend hike in 2025.
GE's Price Performance, Valuation and EstimatesShares of GE Aerospace have gained 12.1% in the past six months against the industry’s decline of 8%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, GE is trading at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 44.14X, above the industry’s average of 33.01X. GE Aerospace carries a Value Score of D.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GE’s earnings has increased for both 2026 and 2027 over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
As the aerospace frontier expands, investors are weighing the explosive potential of AST SpaceMobile (ASTS 4.50%) against the established industrial dominance of GE Aerospace (GE +1.33%) to determine which better fits a 2026 portfolio.
AST SpaceMobile is pioneering a satellite-based cellular network designed to connect existing smartphones anywhere on Earth without special hardware. In contrast, GE Aerospace serves as a global backbone for aviation by manufacturing and maintaining engines for commercial and military aircraft. While both occupy the skies, they offer vastly different risk profiles and growth trajectories.
The case for AST SpaceMobileAST SpaceMobile sells space-based cellular broadband connectivity by partnering with existing mobile network operators rather than competing with them. The company aims to eliminate cellular dead zones for nearly three billion potential subscribers through its proprietary satellite constellation and manufacturing facilities in Midland, Texas. It maintains key partnerships with major carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and Vodafone to provide direct-to-device services for standard smartphones.
During FY 2025, revenue reached nearly $70.9 million, which represented growth of approximately 1,505.2% over the prior year. Despite this massive top-line expansion, the business recorded a net loss of close to $341.9 million. This negative result led to a net margin of negative 482.2%, indicating that expenses significantly exceeded revenue as the company built out its network.
As of its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio was roughly 1.2x. This ratio measures total debt relative to shareholder equity, meaning the company carries $1.20 in debt for every dollar of equity. The current ratio was approximately 16.4x, while free cash flow was nearly negative $1.1 billion as the company invests in its future as one of the emerging tech stocks in the satellite space.
The case for GE AerospaceGE Aerospace operates as a world-leading provider of jet and turboprop engines for commercial and military aviation with more than 53,000 employees worldwide. The company generates revenue through the sale of new engines and long-term service contracts that keep those engines flying for decades. It supports diverse programs, including recent initiatives like the STARLAUNCH 1 design review and high-performance power electronics for future flight.
In FY 2025, the company reported revenue of close to $45.9 billion, a growth rate of nearly 18.5% compared to the previous fiscal year. Net income for the period was approximately $8.7 billion, resulting in a net margin of roughly 19.0%. This net margin shows the percentage of revenue remaining as profit after all operating expenses, interest, and taxes are paid.
The balance sheet for December 2025 showed a debt-to-equity ratio of nearly 1.1x. This metric compares total debt to shareholder equity to show how the company funds its operations and strategic acquisitions. The current ratio was approximately 1.0x, and free cash flow reached nearly $7.3 billion after paying for the capital investments necessary to maintain its global fleet.
Risk profile comparisonAST SpaceMobile faces significant regulatory risks because it must obtain global approvals for the radio spectrum it uses to provide satellite services. The company also handles execution risks related to the manufacturing and launching of its Block 2 satellites. Furthermore, it faces intense competition from well-funded rivals like SpaceX, and any failure to meet production targets could result in cost overruns or missed commercial service rollouts.
GE Aerospace deals with complex regulatory compliance, evidenced by a recent $36 million settlement with the U.S. Department of State regarding export control violations. The business must also manage operational safety risks where any incident could damage its reputation or lead to legal liabilities. Continuous innovation is required to maintain an edge against competitors such as RTX or Safran, which requires constant capital investment and strategic partnerships.
Valuation comparisonGE Aerospace offers a more established valuation based on Forward P/E and earnings estimates compared to the speculative P/S ratio of AST SpaceMobile.
Metric AST SpaceMobile GE Aerospace Sector Benchmark Forward P/E 74.2x 47.4x 37.6x P/S ratio 462.8x 8.1x Sector benchmark uses the SPDR XLK sector ETF.
Valuation metrics sourced from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.
I'd go with GE Aerospace, and it's not a particularly close call. AST SpaceMobile’s plan for a space-based cellular network is certainly fascinating. The long-term vision is exciting, and the company is making progress. But it's also deeply unprofitable, burning through cash, and diluting shareholders along the way. The technology still has to prove itself at scale, and that could take years.
GE Aerospace, meanwhile, is one of the strongest industrial companies in the market right now. Orders are surging, its commercial services backlog is enormous, and the company is trending toward the high end of its already-raised 2026 guidance. Every time a LEAP engine powers a flight, GE collects aftermarket revenue. And that installed base is expected to grow substantially over the next several years. There's some geopolitical uncertainty to watch, but the underlying business is executing at a high level.
For a long-term investor, owning a proven, cash-generating industrial giant is often better than betting on a moonshot.
NEW YORK, June 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) (NYSE, Nasdaq: VZ) today announced the expiration and final results, as of 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on June 16, 2026 (the “Expiration Date”), which was also the Any and All Notes Extended Early Participation Date (as defined in Verizon’s press releases relating to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations dated June 2, 2026 (collectively, the “June 2026 Press Release”) of its previously announced 11 separate offers, on behalf of certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, to purchase for cash any and all of the debt securities listed in Table 1 below (the “Any and All Notes” and such offers, the “Any and All Tender Offers”) as well as solicit consents (the “Consent Solicitations”) to the proposed amendments to the indentures governing the Any and All Notes issued by such subsidiaries (with respect to each series of Any and All Notes, the “Proposed Amendments”) in order to, among other things, eliminate certain of the restrictive covenants and other provisions contained therein on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement dated May 11, 2026 (the “Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement” and, together with the accompanying letter of transmittal, the “Offer Documents”), as amended by the June 2026 Press Release.
As previously announced, Verizon accepted for purchase all of the Waterfall Notes (as defined in the June 2026 Press Release) (together with the Any and All Notes, the “Notes”) validly tendered at or prior to the Waterfall Notes Early Participation Date (as defined in the June 2026 Press Release) in connection with its 9 separate Waterfall Tender Offers (as defined in the June 2026 Press Release) (together with the Any and All Tender Offers, the “Tender Offers”) on behalf of itself and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries in accordance with the Acceptance Priority Procedures (as defined in the June 2026 Press Release) described in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement, as amended. Because the aggregate purchase price to be paid for the Waterfall Notes validly tendered at or prior to the Waterfall Notes Early Participation Date was equal to the increased Waterfall Cap, no additional Waterfall Notes tendered after the Waterfall Notes Early Participation Date were accepted for purchase.
Verizon today also announced the final results of its separate, previously announced exchange offers and consent solicitations (such consent solicitations, the “Separate Consent Solicitations”), on behalf of certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, to exchange the Any and All Notes for new notes issued by Verizon, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement dated May 11, 2026 (the “Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement”), as amended by Verizon’s press release relating to the exchange offers and Separate Consent Solicitations dated June 2, 2026. Consents delivered for a series of Any and All Notes in connection with the Tender Offers were cumulated with the consents delivered for such series of Any and All Notes in connection with the Separate Consent Solicitations. The exchange offers are separate and distinct from the Tender Offers, and neither the Tender Offers nor the separate exchange offers are conditioned upon the consummation of such other offers.
As of the Expiration Date, all conditions to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations were deemed satisfied or waived by Verizon. The requisite consents to effect the applicable Proposed Amendments were received in connection with the Consent Solicitations and Separate Consent Solicitations with respect to the 6.860% Debentures due 2028, 6.730% Debentures, Series G due 2028, 8.375% Debentures due 2029, 7.875% Debentures due 2029, 8.625% Debentures due 2031 and 7.875% Senior Notes due 2032. The aggregate principal amount of the Notes accepted by Verizon (not including accrued and unpaid interest on such Notes) in connection with the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations is $1,857,563,000.
Verizon has accepted all Notes (and, with respect to the Any and All Notes, the related consents) validly tendered and not validly withdrawn at or prior to the Expiration Date. The tables below set forth, among other things, the principal amount of each series of Notes that has been accepted for purchase:
Table 1Any and All of the Outstanding Any and All Notes and related Consent Solicitations Listed Below: CUSIP
Number Issuer(1) Title of Security Maturity Date Principal
Amount
Outstanding Principal
Amount
Outstanding
Accepted Percentage of
Principal
Amount
Outstanding362333AH9 Frontier Florida LLC 6.860% Debentures due 2028 2/1/2028 $282,289,000 $234,260,000 82.99%362337AK3 Frontier North Inc. 6.730% Debentures, Series G due 2028 2/15/2028 $200,000,000 $157,217,000 78.61%020039AJ2 Alltel Corporation 6.800% Debentures due 2029 5/1/2029 $38,098,000 $634,000 1.66%165087AL1 Verizon Virginia LLC 8.375% Debentures due 2029 10/1/2029 $8,993,000 $2,756,000 30.65%165069AP0 Verizon Maryland LLC 8.000% Debentures due 2029* 10/15/2029 $19,981,000 $1,498,000 7.50%645767AW4 Verizon New Jersey Inc. 7.850% Debentures due 2029 11/15/2029 $44,704,000 $4,739,000 10.60%644239AY1 Verizon New England Inc. 7.875% Debentures due 2029* 11/15/2029 $133,077,000 $20,467,000 15.38%165069AQ8 Verizon Maryland LLC 8.300% Debentures due 2031 8/1/2031 $21,111,000 $305,000 1.44%252759AM7 Verizon Delaware LLC 8.625% Debentures due 2031 10/15/2031 $2,381,000 - 0.00%020039DC4 Alltel Corporation 7.875% Senior Notes due 2032 7/1/2032 $55,847,000 $4,349,000 7.79%92344WAB7 Verizon Maryland LLC 5.125% Debentures due 2033 6/15/2033 $139,085,000 $20,369,000 14.65% Table 2Outstanding Waterfall Notes in the Waterfall Tender Offers Listed Below: Acceptance
Priority
Level CUSIP
Number Issuer(1) Title of Security Maturity Date Principal
Amount
Outstanding Principal
Amount
Outstanding Accepted Percentage of
Principal
Amount
Outstanding 1 362311AG7 Frontier California Inc. 6.750% Debentures due 2027 5/15/2027 $200,000,000 $109,112,000 54.56% 2 650094CJ2 Verizon New York Inc. 6.500% Debentures due 2028 4/15/2028 $34,773,000 $1,899,000 5.46% 3 07786DAA4 Verizon Pennsylvania LLC 6.000% Debentures due 2028 12/1/2028 $44,079,000 $9,237,000 20.96% 4 165123AM2 Frontier West Virginia Inc. 8.400% Debentures due 2029* 10/15/2029 $50,000,000 $48,516,000 97.03% 5 078167AZ6 Verizon Pennsylvania LLC 8.350% Debentures due 2030 12/15/2030 $31,140,000 $8,642,000 27.75% 6 078167BA0 Verizon Pennsylvania LLC 8.750% Debentures due 2031 8/15/2031 $34,923,000 $24,279,000 69.52% 7 92344XAB5 Verizon New York Inc. 7.375% Debentures due 2032 4/1/2032 $99,437,000 $17,551,000 17.65% 8 362320BA0 Verizon Communications Inc. 6.940% Notes due 2028 4/15/2028 $249,838,000 $48,752,000 19.51% 9 92343VGH1 Verizon Communications Inc. 2.100% Notes due 2028 3/22/2028 $2,068,135,000 $1,142,981,000 55.27% _______________________
(1) See Annex A of the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement for a list of original issuer names, as applicable.
* Denotes a series of Notes, a portion of which is held in physical certificated form (such portion, the “Certificated Notes”) and is not held through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Such Certificated Notes may only be tendered in accordance with the terms and conditions of the accompanying Letter of Transmittal. With respect to the Certificated Notes, all references to the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement herein shall also include the Letter of Transmittal.
On June 22, 2026 (the “Settlement Date”), holders whose Notes have been accepted for purchase will receive the applicable Total Consideration, which is based on the previously announced pricing terms for the Tender Offers and includes the Early Participation Payment (each as defined in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement, as amended), in cash. Such holders will also receive an additional cash payment equal to accrued and unpaid interest on such Notes to, but not including, the Settlement Date.
Verizon retained Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC to act as lead dealer managers and lead solicitation agents for the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, CIBC World Markets Corp., Intesa Sanpaolo IMI Securities Corp. and NatWest Markets Securities Inc. as co-dealer managers and co-solicitation agents for the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations.
Global Bondholder Services Corporation has acted as the Tender Agent and the Information Agent for the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations. Questions or requests for assistance related to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations or for additional copies of the Offer Documents may be directed to Global Bondholder Services Corporation at (855) 654-2015 (toll-free) or (212) 430-3774 (collect). You may also contact your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee for assistance concerning the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations.
Holders are advised to check with any bank, securities broker or other intermediary through which they hold Notes as to when such intermediary would need to receive instructions from a beneficial owner in order for that Holder to be able to participate in, or (in the circumstances in which revocation is permitted) revoke their instruction to participate in, the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations before the deadlines specified herein and in the Offer Documents. The deadlines set by any such intermediary and DTC for the submission and withdrawal of tender instructions may be earlier than the relevant deadlines specified herein and in the Offer Documents.
This announcement is for informational purposes only. This announcement is not an offer to purchase or a solicitation of an offer to purchase any Notes. The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations have been made solely pursuant to the Offer Documents and related documents. The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are not being made to Holders of Notes in any jurisdiction in which the making or acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the securities, blue sky or other laws of such jurisdiction. In any jurisdiction in which the securities laws or blue sky laws require the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations to be made by a licensed broker or dealer, the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations will be deemed to be made on behalf of Verizon by the dealer managers or one or more registered brokers or dealers that are licensed under the laws of such jurisdiction.
This communication and any other documents or materials relating to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations have not been approved by an authorized person for the purposes of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (the “FSMA”). Accordingly, this announcement is not being distributed to, and must not be passed on to, persons within the United Kingdom save in circumstances where section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply. Accordingly, this communication is only addressed to and directed at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom, or (ii) persons falling within the definition of investment professionals (as defined in Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Financial Promotion Order”)), or (iii) within Article 43 of the Financial Promotion Order, or (iv) high net worth companies and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Financial Promotion Order (such persons together being “relevant persons”). Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on any document or material relating to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations or any of their contents.
This communication and any other documents or materials relating to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are only addressed to and directed at persons in member states of the European Economic Area (the “EEA”), who are “Qualified Investors” within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129. The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are only available to Qualified Investors. None of the information in any document or material relating to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations should be acted upon or relied upon in any member state of the EEA by persons who are not Qualified Investors.
In this communication Verizon has made forward-looking statements, including regarding the conduct and completion of the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but only predictions and generally can be identified by use of statements that include phrases such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “appear,” “project,” “estimate,” “hope,” “intend,” “target,” “forecast,” or other words or phrases of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals also are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, including those discussed in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement under the heading “Risk Factors” and under similar headings in other documents that are incorporated by reference in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement. Holders are urged to consider these risks and uncertainties carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this press release are made only as of the date of this press release, and Verizon undertakes no obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events might or might not occur. Verizon cannot assure you that projected results or events will be achieved.
This announcement was originally published by Verizon. Read the original press release.
June 17, 2026 07:47 ET | Source: Verizon Communications, Inc.
NEW YORK, June 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) (NYSE, Nasdaq: VZ) today announced the expiration and final results, as of 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on June 16, 2026 (the “Expiration Date”), which was also the Extended Early Participation Date (as defined in Verizon’s press release relating to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations dated June 2, 2026 (the “Early Results Press Release”), of its previously announced (i) offers to exchange (the “Exchange Offers”), on behalf of certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, any and all of the outstanding series of debt securities listed below (the “Old Notes”) for specified series of newly issued notes of Verizon (collectively, the “New Notes”) and (ii) solicitations of consents (the “Consent Solicitations”), on behalf of such subsidiaries, to the proposed amendments to the indentures governing the Old Notes (with respect to each series of Old Notes, the “Proposed Amendments”) in order to, among other things, eliminate certain of the restrictive covenants and other provisions contained therein, each on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement dated May 11, 2026 (the “Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement” and, together with the accompanying letter of transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal”) and eligibility letter, the “Exchange Offer Documents”), as amended by the Early Results Press Release.
Verizon today also announced the final results of its separate, previously announced cash tender offers, for its own account and on behalf of certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, to purchase 20 series of outstanding notes, including the Old Notes, and consent solicitations for the Old Notes (the “Separate Consent Solicitations”), on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement dated May 11, 2026, as amended by Verizon’s press releases relating to the tender offers and Separate Consent Solicitations dated June 2, 2026. Consents delivered for a series of Old Notes in connection with the Exchange Offers were cumulated with the consents delivered for such series in connection with the Separate Consent Solicitations. The cash tender offers are separate and distinct from the Exchange Offers, and neither the Exchange Offers nor the separate cash tender offers are conditioned upon the consummation of such other offers.
Verizon’s obligation to accept Old Notes (and the related consents) tendered in the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations was subject to the terms and conditions described in the Exchange Offer Documents, as amended. As of the Expiration Date, the requisite consents to effect the applicable Proposed Amendments were received in connection with the Consent Solicitations and Separate Consent Solicitations with respect to the 6.860% Debentures due 2028, 6.730% Debentures, Series G due 2028, 8.375% Debentures due 2029, 7.875% Debentures due 2029, 8.625% Debentures due 2031 and 7.875% Senior Notes due 2032. The completion of any Exchange Offer with respect to a series of Old Notes was not conditioned on the receipt of the requisite consents in the related Consent Solicitation. All conditions to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations were deemed to be satisfied or waived by Verizon as of the Expiration Date.
Verizon has accepted all Old Notes (and the related consents) validly tendered and not validly withdrawn at or prior to the Expiration Date. The table below sets forth, for each series of Old Notes, the principal amount accepted for exchange and the previously announced Total Consideration (as defined in the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement, as amended), which includes the Early Participation Payment and the separate cash Consent Payment (each as defined in the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement, as amended), payable on June 22, 2026 (the “Settlement Date”).
CUSIP
Number Subsidiary Issuer(1) Title of Security Principal
Amount
Outstanding Aggregate Principal Amount Outstanding Accepted Percentage of Principal Amount Outstanding Accepted362333AH9 Frontier Florida LLC 6.860% Debentures due 2028 $282,289,000 $2,903,000 1.03%
362337AK3 Frontier North Inc. 6.730% Debentures, Series G due 2028 $200,000,000 $8,404,000 4.20%020039AJ2 Alltel Corporation 6.800% Debentures due 2029 $38,098,000 $600,000 1.57%165087AL1 Verizon Virginia LLC 8.375% Debentures due 2029 $8,993,000 $3,595,000 39.98%165069AP0 Verizon Maryland LLC 8.000% Debentures due 2029* $19,981,000 $4,875,000 24.40%645767AW4 Verizon New Jersey Inc. 7.850% Debentures due 2029 $44,704,000 $11,770,000 26.33%644239AY1 Verizon New England Inc. 7.875% Debentures due 2029* $133,077,000 $69,235,000 52.03%165069AQ8 Verizon Maryland LLC 8.300% Debentures due 2031 $21,111,000 $6,346,000 30.06%252759AM7 Verizon Delaware LLC 8.625% Debentures due 2031 $2,381,000 $2,045,000 85.89%020039DC4 Alltel Corporation 7.875% Senior Notes due 2032 $55,847,000 $32,064,000 57.41%92344WAB7 Verizon Maryland LLC 5.125% Debentures due 2033 $139,085,000 $19,555,000 14.06% (1)See Annex A of the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement for a list of original issuers, as applicable.*Denotes a series of Old Notes, a portion of which is held in physical certificated form (such portion, the “Certificated Notes”) and is not held through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Such Certificated Notes may only be tendered in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Transmittal. With respect to the Certificated Notes, all references to the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement herein shall also include the Letter of Transmittal. When issued, each series of New Notes will have the same economic terms as the corresponding series of Old Notes, including maturity date, interest rate, and interest payment dates, and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or any state securities laws. Therefore, such New Notes may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws. Verizon will enter into a registration rights agreement with respect to such New Notes on the Settlement Date.
Only holders who duly completed and returned an eligibility letter certifying that they were either (1) “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act or (2) non-“U.S. persons” (as defined in Rule 902 under the Securities Act) located outside of the United States and who were “Non-U.S. qualified offerees” (as defined in the eligibility letter) were authorized to receive the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement and to participate in the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations (each such holder, an “Eligible Holder”). Eligible Holders of Old Notes accepted for exchange will receive the Total Consideration on the Settlement Date.
Global Bondholder Services Corporation has acted as the Exchange Agent and Information Agent for the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations. Questions or requests for assistance related to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations, or for additional copies of the Exchange Offer Documents may be directed to Global Bondholder Services Corporation at (855) 654-2015 (toll-free) or (212) 430-3774 (collect). You may also contact your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee for assistance concerning the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations.
This announcement is for informational purposes only. This announcement is not an offer to exchange or a solicitation of an offer to exchange any Old Notes. The Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations have been made solely pursuant to the Exchange Offer Documents. The Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations have not been made to holders of Old Notes in any jurisdiction in which the making or acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the securities, blue sky or other laws of such jurisdiction. In any jurisdiction in which the securities laws or blue sky laws require the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations to be made by a licensed broker or dealer, the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations will be deemed to be made on behalf of Verizon by the dealer managers or one or more registered brokers or dealers that are licensed under the laws of such jurisdiction.
This communication and any other documents or materials relating to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations have not been approved by an authorized person for the purposes of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (the “FSMA”). Accordingly, this announcement is not being distributed to, and must not be passed on to, persons within the United Kingdom save in circumstances where section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply. Accordingly, this communication is only addressed to and directed at persons who are outside the United Kingdom and (i) persons falling within the definition of investment professionals (as defined in Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Financial Promotion Order”)), or (ii) within Article 43 of the Financial Promotion Order, or (iii) high net worth companies and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Financial Promotion Order, or (iv) to whom an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA) in connection with the issue or sale of any securities may otherwise lawfully be communicated or caused to be communicated (such persons together being “relevant persons”). The New Notes are only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such New Notes will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on any document or material relating to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations or any of their contents.
This communication and any other documents or materials relating to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations are only addressed to and directed at persons in member states of the European Economic Area (the “EEA”), who are “Qualified Investors” within the meaning of Article 2(e) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129. The New Notes are only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such New Notes, will be engaged in only with, Qualified Investors. The Exchange Offers are only available to Qualified Investors. None of the information in any document or material relating to the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations should be acted upon or relied upon in any member state of the EEA by persons who are not Qualified Investors.
In this communication Verizon has made forward-looking statements, including regarding the conduct and completion of the Exchange Offers and Consent Solicitations. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but only predictions and generally can be identified by use of statements that include phrases such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “appear,” “project,” “estimate,” “hope,” “intend,” “target,” “forecast,” or other words or phrases of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals also are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, including those discussed in the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement under the heading “Risk Factors” and under similar headings in other documents that are incorporated by reference in the Exchange Offer and Consent Solicitation Statement. Eligible Holders are urged to consider these risks and uncertainties carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this press release are made only as of the date of this press release, and Verizon undertakes no obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events might or might not occur. Verizon cannot assure you that projected results or events will be achieved.
This announcement was originally published by Verizon. Read the original press release.
Earned income disappears the moment you stop showing up. Dividend income does not. That asymmetry is why so many investors over the past two years have shifted serious capital into companies that mail a check every 90 days regardless of layoffs, headlines, or a University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment reading of 49.8 that sits firmly in recessionary territory.
The appeal sharpens when you compare alternatives. Rental property locks up capital and demands midnight phone calls. Private credit funds gate your money for years. High-yield dividend stocks pay you in cash, settle in two days, and let you walk away anytime. With the 10-Year Treasury at 4.48%, any equity yield above that bar earns its keep, and the three names below clear it by a wide margin.
The market routinely mispriced mature cash-cow businesses whenever growth narratives dominate. We screened our 24/7 Wall St. dividend equity research database, looking for stocks that pay massive dividends, and we found a collection of companies that, combined, can generate over $1,100 a year in passive annual income if you invest just $6,667 in each stock at the time of this writing.
AT&T Stock #3: AT&T Yield: 4.83% Shares for $6,667: ~286 Annual Passive Income: ~$322 AT&T (NYSE:T | T Price Prediction) has become a focused converged-connectivity operator after years of media misadventures. The $23.29 share price reflects the market’s lukewarm view of a slow-growth telecom carrying $138.4 billion in total debt, but the cash machine underneath is humming. Q1 2026 produced $31.51 billion in revenue and adjusted EPS of $0.57, with management guiding to $18 billion-plus in free cash flow this year.
The yield is elevated because AT&T cut its payout after the Warner spin-off and the market has yet to forgive the move. The quarterly dividend has held steady at $0.2775 per share since 2022, and CEO John Stankey is funneling capital into roughly $8 billion of buybacks planned for 2026. Institutions own 69.3% of the float, with Vanguard and BlackRock leading the register.
Altria Stock #2: Altria Yield: 5.88% Shares for $6,667: ~96 Annual Passive Income: ~$406 Altria (NYSE:MO) is the Marlboro parent and a textbook example of a melting ice cube that still throws off enormous cash. Cigarette volumes shrink every year, yet pricing power keeps the profit pool intact. Q1 2026 delivered $5.43 billion in revenue and adjusted diluted EPS of $1.32, with smokeable products carrying a 65.1% adjusted OCI margin.
The dividend payout drives the entire return profile. Altria just raised its quarterly payout to $1.06 per share and paid out $1.8 billion in Q1 2026 alone. Years of returning nearly every dollar to shareholders have produced negative shareholders’ equity of $3.2 billion, which is unusual but functionally irrelevant as long as the cash keeps flowing. Institutions hold 63.5% of the stock.
Verizon Stock #1: Verizon Yield: 5.89% Shares for $6,667: ~142 Annual Passive Income: ~$401 Verizon (NYSE:VZ) just closed the Frontier Communications acquisition on January 20, 2026, pushing fiber connections to roughly 10.8 million. Q1 produced its first positive Q1 postpaid phone net adds since 2013, and adjusted EBITDA grew 6.7% to $13.39 billion.
The yield is structurally high because Verizon carries $172.5 billion in total debt and trades at a discount to slower-growing utilities. The payoff is one of the most reliable dividends in the S&P 500: 19 consecutive years of increases, most recently to $0.7075 per quarter. Institutional ownership sits at 70.4%.
The Combined Income Picture Combined, these 3 positions generate $1,129 in annual passive income on a $20,001 investment, a blended yield of 5.6%. Altria contributes $406, Verizon adds $401, and AT&T rounds out the portfolio with $322.
Ticker Annual Income Share of Total MO $406 36% VZ $401 36% T $322 28% The quiet magic of a portfolio like this is what happens when you flip the dividend reinvestment switch on. Every quarterly check buys fractional shares at whatever price the market offers that day, which means down moves accelerate your share count instead of scaring you out of the position. Five years of that mechanic, applied to yields north of 5%, can quietly double the income stream without a single additional dollar of fresh capital.
Verizon Communications (VZ - Free Report) ended the recent trading session at $45.84, demonstrating a -1.9% change from the preceding day's closing price. The stock's change was less than the S&P 500's daily loss of 1.22%. Meanwhile, the Dow lost 0.98%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, lost 1.35%.
The largest U.S. cellphone carrier's shares have seen a decrease of 2.12% over the last month, not keeping up with the Computer and Technology sector's gain of 1.19% and the S&P 500's gain of 1.56%.
The investment community will be closely monitoring the performance of Verizon Communications in its forthcoming earnings report. The company is scheduled to release its earnings on July 24, 2026. It is anticipated that the company will report an EPS of $1.27, marking a 4.1% rise compared to the same quarter of the previous year. Simultaneously, our latest consensus estimate expects the revenue to be $35.41 billion, showing a 2.62% escalation compared to the year-ago quarter.
For the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $4.96 per share and a revenue of $142.7 billion, representing changes of +5.31% and +3.26%, respectively, from the prior year.
Investors should also pay attention to any latest changes in analyst estimates for Verizon Communications. These latest adjustments often mirror the shifting dynamics of short-term business patterns. As a result, upbeat changes in estimates indicate analysts' favorable outlook on the business health and profitability.
Our research reveals that these estimate alterations are directly linked with the stock price performance in the near future. To take advantage of this, we've established the Zacks Rank, an exclusive model that considers these estimated changes and delivers an operational rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), possesses a remarkable history of outdoing, externally audited, with #1 stocks returning an average annual gain of +25% since 1988. Within the past 30 days, our consensus EPS projection has moved 0.14% higher. Verizon Communications is currently a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
With respect to valuation, Verizon Communications is currently being traded at a Forward P/E ratio of 9.41. This denotes a discount relative to the industry average Forward P/E of 11.73.
We can also see that VZ currently has a PEG ratio of 1.14. The PEG ratio bears resemblance to the frequently used P/E ratio, but this parameter also includes the company's expected earnings growth trajectory. As of the close of trade yesterday, the Wireless National industry held an average PEG ratio of 1.11.
The Wireless National industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. At present, this industry carries a Zacks Industry Rank of 174, placing it within the bottom 29% of over 250 industries.
The Zacks Industry Rank assesses the strength of our separate industry groups by calculating the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks contained within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
You can find more information on all of these metrics, and much more, on Zacks.com.
It's hard to find more attractive investments than healthy dividend-paying stocks, because they offer a win-win-win proposition: Over time their stock prices should rise, plus they pay dividends to shareholders regularly, plus those dividends tend to be increased over time, too.
That's a winning combination! Note, too, that these dividend payments tend to keep being made no matter whether the economy is booming or ailing. Here, then, is one attractive dividend payer to consider: Verizon Communications (VZ 1.75%).
Image source: Getty Images.
Why Verizon Communications? Let's start with Verizon's dividend, because it may be the most compelling thing about the stock. It recently yielded a hefty 6%. It's also a growing dividend, though it hasn't been growing super briskly. Over the past five years, for example, it has increased at an average annual rate of 2.4%. The most recent increase, announced in February, was a 2.5% hike.
That modest growth rate may be disappointing, but remember that while other dividend payers may yield, say, 3.5% and be hiking their payouts rapidly, it can still take a while to get to Verizon's current yield of 6%. And Verizon has been upping its payout for 20 consecutive years. Better still, its payout ratio was recently around 67%, meaning that it's only paying out about 67% of its earnings in dividends, leaving plenty of room for further growth.
Here are some more reasons, beyond its dividend yield, to consider Verizon Communications for your portfolio:
The company is well established, with close to 150 million wireless retail connections and serving 99% of Fortune 500 companies. Its beta is low, currently at 0.22%. That should appeal to anyone worried about a looming market crash, because the low beta means Verizon is much less volatile than the overall market. If the market drops by, say, 10%, Verizon's history suggests it might fall by just 2.2%. The high dividend yield can help fight inflation. It has a new CEO, Dan Schulman, who is turning away from price hikes and focusing on adding value -- while laying the foundation for future growth. The company is already performing reasonably well, posting 2.9% year-over-year revenue growth in its first quarter, with non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share (EPS) rising 7.6%. Management hiked its full-year adjusted EPS growth guidance from between 4% to 5% to between 5% to 6%. It also reaffirmed its 2026 free cash flow outlook of $21.5 billion or more, which amounts to growth of at least 7%.
Today's Change
(
-1.75
%) $
-0.82
Current Price
$
45.91
Verizon stock isn't for everyone. If you favor fast-growing stocks, look elsewhere. But fast growers can fall harder in market downturns, and in some years, they may not grow much. Verizon delivers 6% no matter whether the market is up or down.
Its stock price will likely grow over time, too. Over the past decade, it averaged 3.2% annual growth, and over the past 15 years, 5.9%. Over the past three years, it's been growing more briskly, averaging 14.8%. So give this stock, and other compelling dividend payers, some consideration.
Verizon Communications (VZ - Free Report) has been one of the most searched-for stocks on Zacks.com lately. So, you might want to look at some of the facts that could shape the stock's performance in the near term.
Over the past month, shares of this largest U.S. cellphone carrier have returned -6.2%, compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +2% change. During this period, the Zacks Wireless National industry, which Verizon falls in, has lost 7.6%. The key question now is: What could be the stock's future direction?
Although media reports or rumors about a significant change in a company's business prospects usually cause its stock to trend and lead to an immediate price change, there are always certain fundamental factors that ultimately drive the buy-and-hold decision.
Revisions to Earnings EstimatesHere at Zacks, we prioritize appraising the change in the projection of a company's future earnings over anything else. That's because we believe the present value of its future stream of earnings is what determines the fair value for its stock.
Our analysis is essentially based on how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to take the latest business trends into account. When earnings estimates for a company go up, the fair value for its stock goes up as well. And when a stock's fair value is higher than its current market price, investors tend to buy the stock, resulting in its price moving upward. Because of this, empirical studies indicate a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and short-term stock price movements.
Verizon is expected to post earnings of $1.27 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +4.1%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed -0.7%.
For the current fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $4.96 points to a change of +5.3% from the prior year. Over the last 30 days, this estimate has changed +0.1%.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $5.25 indicates a change of +5.7% from what Verizon is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed -0.1%.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, Verizon is rated Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Projected Revenue GrowthWhile earnings growth is arguably the most superior indicator of a company's financial health, nothing happens as such if a business isn't able to grow its revenues. After all, it's nearly impossible for a company to increase its earnings for an extended period without increasing its revenues. So, it's important to know a company's potential revenue growth.
In the case of Verizon, the consensus sales estimate of $35.41 billion for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of +2.6%. The $142.7 billion and $145 billion estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of +3.3% and +1.6%, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryVerizon reported revenues of $34.44 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +2.9%. EPS of $1.28 for the same period compares with $1.19 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $35.03 billion, the reported revenues represent a surprise of -1.7%. The EPS surprise was +4.92%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates two times over this period.
ValuationWithout considering a stock's valuation, no investment decision can be efficient. In predicting a stock's future price performance, it's crucial to determine whether its current price correctly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects.
While comparing the current values of a company's valuation multiples, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), with its own historical values helps determine whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of the reasonability of the stock's price.
As part of the Zacks Style Scores system, the Zacks Value Style Score (which evaluates both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics) organizes stocks into five groups ranging from A to F (A is better than B; B is better than C; and so on), making it helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
Verizon is graded A on this front, indicating that it is trading at a discount to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
ConclusionThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Verizon. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
Alphabet will replace Verizon in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P Global said Tuesday, further expanding mega-cap technology's presence in the blue-chip average.
S&P Global said the Google parent's A shares — which trade under the ticker GOOGL — would take the spot in the 30-stock index ahead of the start of Monday's trading. Shares of the online search giant rose about 1% after the bell on Tuesday following the announcement.
The California-based company will join mega-cap tech peers Nvidia, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft in the blue-chip index. S&P Global said Alphabet's inclusion would bolster the Dow's exposure to themes like artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure and advertising.
Alphabet has been spending heavily on AI, including raising $141 billion in debt and equity since October. The company has been trying to prove that its vertically integrated AI stack can generate returns.
But investors have grown weary recently, with Alphabet on Monday closing its worst day on the stock market in more than a year. The stock underperformed both the Nasdaq and the other tech mega-caps in the session.
Google A shares, 1-year
Before the Alphabet selloff, the company came off highs from the spring time, when Google had its best month on Wall Street since 2004. That came after Alphabet reported better-than-expected results, driven by soaring cloud revenue.
Despite recent volatility, Alphabet's A shares are up more than 10% in 2026. The stock is on track for its fourth straight winning year and seventh positive year of the last eight.
Verizon had represented just around one-half of a percentage point in the index because of its low share price, S&P Global said. The Dow is a price-weighted index, meaning that each member stock is weighted based on its share price. As a result, a company with a higher price per share will have more sway over the index.
Honeywell International will remain in the Dow under its new name, Honeywell Technologies, following the completion of its spin off of Honeywell Aerospace, S&P Global said. But the spun-off company would not be in the index, according to the firm.
The rally in artificial intelligence (AI) chip stocks ran out of steam on Tuesday, driving investors to seek refuge in steadier, dividend-paying stocks.
By the close of trading, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ +1.52%), Altria (MO 0.01%), and Verizon (VZ 1.75%) all enjoyed share price gains of at least 3%.
Image source: Getty Images.
Defensive stocks are becoming popular again With many AI stocks up sharply over the past year, concerns of a possible bubble in tech stock valuations are mounting. Even massively popular stocks like SpaceX have pulled back from their highs in recent days.
That's forcing short-term focused traders to dial back the risk profiles of their portfolios. Yet traditional safe havens like gold are also underperforming, due in part to fears that persistent inflation could force the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.
Investors seeking to prudently manage risk are thus beginning to allocate more capital to blue chip dividend stocks, as their appreciation for the steady cash-generating capabilities of defensive giants like J&J, Altria, and Verizon grows.
3 solid dividend stocks for your watch list If you think Johnson & Johnson is just some stodgy drugmaker, think again. The healthcare titan also offers investors diversified exposure to innovative medical devices and advanced technologies, such as robotic surgery. J&J has raised its dividend for a remarkable 64 straight years.
Altria is battling declining smoking rates with consistent price increases and cost reductions. At the same time, oral nicotine pouches like on! and other smoke-free products are providing new sources of growth. Altria's stock sports a hefty dividend yield of nearly 6%.
Verizon's new marketing strategy is designed to eliminate customer pain points by offering simple, cost-effective wireless and home internet plans. The telecom leader, in turn, expects to gain up to 1 million new retail postpaid phone subscribers in 2026. And its shares are trading for less than 10 times its projected earnings for this year.
Joe Tenebruso has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Johnson & Johnson and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Energy Transfer and Verizon are the only two Fortune 500 industry leaders currently meeting the 'dogcatcher' ideal of fair-priced, safer high-yield dividend stocks. Analyst projections suggest the top ten F500IL dividend dogs could deliver an average net gain of 25.41% by June 2027, with volatility 30% below the market. Five F500IL stocks—ET, VZ, International Paper, Dow, and Ford—offer annual dividends from $1,000 invested that exceed their single share prices.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 is a stock market index that tracks the performance of the 500 biggest companies in the United States. It is considered a top indicator of the U.S. stock market’s health. It is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 leading publicly traded companies in the U.S. Typically, larger companies significantly impact the index. As we have seen over the last year, technology stocks in the index have accounted for a large share of the index’s gains. In fact, the information technology and communication services sectors were responsible for 63.1% of the S&P 500’s total return in 2025. Without those two sectors, the index would have returned just 6% rather than its actual 17.9%.
Given those results, we decided to screen the S&P 500 for quality, well-known companies that pay substantial dividends but trade at a major discount to their intrinsic value. As we suspected, some top names are trading at significant discounts for various reasons, offering growth and income opportunities for investors and creating intriguing entry points. Five companies that investors are very familiar with look like outstanding total return candidates. All are rated Buy at top Wall Street firms that we cover here at 24/7 Wall St.
Why do we cover high-yielding S&P 500 dividend stocks?
Since 1926, dividends have accounted for approximately 32% of the S&P 500’s total return, while capital appreciation has accounted for 68%. Therefore, sustainable dividend income and the potential for capital appreciation are essential to total return expectations. A study by Hartford Funds, in collaboration with Ned Davis Research, found that dividend stocks delivered an annualized return of 9.18% over the past 50 years (1973 to 2023). Over the same timeline, this was more than double the annualized return for non-payers (3.95%).
Clorox With products that never go out of style, and a massive 5.22% dividend, this is the perfect buy for conservative investors. Clorox (NYSE: CLX | CLX Price Prediction) is a multinational manufacturer and marketer of consumer and professional products. Despite some earnings turbulence in recent years, Clorox has maintained its dividend streak and is expected to cross the 50-year mark in 2026. Clorox trades at a 45% discount to Morningstar’s $163 fair value estimate, with mid-single-digit annual dividend growth expected over the next decade. An ERP transition and weak near-term sales guidance have weighed on the stock. Still, the final phase of the U.S. ERP implementation was completed in January 2026, and a deal to acquire GOJO Industries (maker of Purell) opens up a new growth avenue.
The company operates through four segments:
Health and Wellness Household Lifestyle International The Health and Wellness segment consists of cleaning, disinfecting, and professional products marketed and sold under these brands:
Clorox Clorox2 Pine-Sol Scentiva Tilex Liquid-Plumr Formula 409 Its Household segment consists of bags and wraps, cat litter, and grilling products marketed and sold under the Glad, Fresh Step, Scoop Away, and Kingsford brands in the United States. The Lifestyle segment consists of food, water-filtration, and natural personal care products marketed and sold under the Hidden Valley, Brita, and Burt’s Bees brands. International products consist of those sold outside the United States. Its products in this segment include laundry additives, home care products, bags and wraps, cat litter, water filtration products, and others.
Jefferies has a Buy rating with a $125 target price.
Healthpeak Properties This leading company invests in real estate in the healthcare industry, including senior housing, life sciences, and medical offices, and is trading at a 40% discount to fair value. Healthpeak Properties (NYSE: DOC) is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (REIT) with a solid 6.29% dividend. Morningstar’s chief U.S. market strategist recommends it as a 5-star stock trading at a discount to fair value with a highly dependable yield.
The company acquires, develops, owns, leases, and manages healthcare real estate across the U.S. It owns, operates, and develops real estate focused on healthcare discovery and delivery. Healthpeak Properties segments include:
Lab Outpatient medical Continuing care retirement community (CCRC) The Outpatient medical segment owns, operates, and develops outpatient medical facilities, hospitals, and laboratory facilities. The Lab segment properties contain laboratory and office space, and are leased primarily to:
Biotechnology Medical device and pharmaceutical companies Scientific research institutions Government agencies Organizations involved in the life science industry Its CCRC segment comprises a retirement community offering independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing units, providing a continuum of care within an integrated campus.
BMO Capital Markets has an Outperform rating with a $24 target price.
McCormick Home cooks are very familiar with this company’s products, and investors enjoy a tasty 3.82% dividend. McCormick (NYSE: MKC) manufactures, markets, and distributes herbs, spices, seasonings, condiments, and flavors to the entire food and beverage industry, including retailers, food manufacturers, and foodservice businesses. The shares have fallen nearly 39% over the past year, creating a significant discount to intrinsic value. FY2026 guidance calls for net sales growth of 13% to 17%, and the dividend has grown without interruption for over 25 years.
It operates through two segments. The Consumer segment sells to retail channels, including grocery, mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, discount and drug stores, and e-commerce under the McCormick brand and a variety of brands around the world, including:
French’s Frank’s RedHot Lawry’s Zatarain’s Simply Asia Thai Kitchen Ducros Vahine Cholula Schwartz Club House Kamis DaQiao La Drogheria Stubb’s OLD BAY Gourmet Garden In its Flavor Solutions segment, it provides a range of products to multinational food manufacturers and foodservice customers. The company supplies foodservice customers with branded, packaged products both directly and indirectly through distributors.
J.P. Morgan has an Overweight rating with a $63 target price.
Realty Income Realty Income (NYSE: O) is a real estate investment trust that has paid monthly dividends consistently for years. It owns over 15,000 properties leased primarily to defensive retailers. This is an ideal stock for growth and income investors seeking a safer contrarian idea for the rest of 2026, trading at a 20% discount to fair value and yielding 5.20%. Realty Income is an S&P 500 company that acquires and manages freestanding commercial properties that generate rental revenue under long-term net lease agreements with its commercial clients.
It is engaged in a single business activity: leasing property to clients, generally on a net basis. This business activity spans various geographic boundaries and encompasses a range of property types and clients across multiple industries. Widely considered the gold standard of monthly dividend stocks, Realty Income has been paying dividends since 1969. It has paid 667 consecutive monthly dividends as of early 2026 and increased its dividend 132 times since its 1994 IPO.
The company owns or holds interests in approximately 15,621 properties in all 50 U.S. states and:
United Kingdom France Germany Ireland Italy Portugal Spain With clients operating in 89 industries, its property types include retail, industrial, gaming, and other categories such as agriculture and office. Its primary industry concentrations include:
Grocery stores Convenience stores Dollar stores Drug stores Home improvement stores Restaurants Quick service Jefferies has a Buy rating with a $69 target price.
Verizon Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) is an American multinational telecommunications company that continues to offer tremendous value. It trades at 9.13 times its estimated 2026 earnings and at a 25% discount to intrinsic value, and pays a 6.03% dividend. Verizon provides a range of communications, technology, information, and entertainment products and services to consumers, businesses, and government entities worldwide.
Verizon’s trailing 12-month interest coverage ratio is 4.6× to 5×, providing ample cushion for dividend payments. With a highly predictable revenue stream from telecom services, the company has less exposure to commodity cycles. In addition, the large scale helps in financing and absorbing shocks.
It operates in two segments. The Consumer segment provides wireless services across the United States through Verizon and TracFone networks, as well as through wholesale and other arrangements. It also provides fixed wireless access (FWA) broadband through its wireless networks and related equipment and devices, such as:
Smartphones Tablets Smartwatches Other wireless-enabled connected devices The segment also offers wireline services in the Mid-Atlantic and northeastern United States through its fiber-optic network, Verizon Fios product portfolio, and copper-based network.
The Business segment provides wireless and wireline communications services and products, including:
FWA broadband Data Video and conferencing Corporate networking Security and managed network Local and long-distance voice Network access services to deliver various IoT services and products to businesses, government customers, and wireless and wireline carriers in the United States and internationally.
Raymond James has an Outperform rating with a $56 target price.
People shop for lumber from a Home Depot store in Alhambra, California on April 10, 2025. Lumber tariffs are already impacting businesses from home remodeling to construction projects as about 70-80 percent of the lumber imported by the United States comes from Canada. (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP) (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)
AFP via Getty Images
Once again, the mainstream crowd is wrong—this time on real estate. And they’re wrong for the same reason they always are: They’re looking at the wrong numbers.
We’re fine with that. We saw it coming.
And we’re ready to profit through an overlooked dividend grower that throws off $14 billion in yearly cash flow. It hands much of that to us as share buybacks and a dividend that’s jumped 11% annualized in the last five years.
We haven’t seen an opportunity like this since 2021. Back then, pandemic restrictions kicked off a home-renovation bonanza. Another one is getting started now.
Welcome to “Home Reno Boom 2.0”Today, six years after COVID forced me to turn my patio into Puerto Backyarda (complete with a “misting fan” from Home Depot—hint!), homeowners are pouring another wave of cash into their abodes.
Thankfully, it’s for a different reason: Mortgage rates are high, and those who did buy homes in the rock-bottom-rate days of 2020 and 2021 are loath to move—and lose their bargain-basement 30-year mortgage rates.
MORE FOR YOU
The answer? Stay put—and reno your current place.
Many of those folks have also built up a lot of equity since 2021, and they’re tapping it to remodel that kitchen or bathroom they’re tired of looking at.
Last year, for example, they were busy setting up home-equity lines of credit (HELOCs), the number of which jumped 14.3% in the fourth quarter. This year, the total spend on remodeling is projected to jump to $518 billion.
So the money is there. The motivation is there. Now here’s the real trigger for Reno Boom 2.0: The typical American home is now 44 years old.
These houses need new roofs. They need new pipes. The HVAC is about to wheeze its last breath. None of these problems care about interest rates, Middle East conflicts or AI. They need to be fixed—stat.
That’s where Home Depot (HD), the world’s largest home-improvement retailer, comes in.
As I write, little to none of this reno demand is priced into the stock, which has fallen as the crowd assumes HD is going nowhere until home sales pick up. The reno story? They missed the memo.
That’s okay—we’re happy to fill them in!
Another reason why HD is a buy now is that the stock’s decline has sent its dividend yield higher (as yields and prices move in opposite directions). As I write, it’s just below 3% and near a peak we haven’t seen since, yes, the 2020 COVID crash:
HD Yield Chart
Ycharts
A buy now locks in that yield, which is nearly triple what the typical S&P 500 stock pays. Doing so also gives us a nice yield on cost to build from, with HD’s payout hikes averaging 11% annualized over the past five years.
And no, I don’t expect that yield to stick around, for another reason: AI. As it marches through the economy, it’s weighing on hiring and capping wage growth. That’s already happening, with wages gaining 3.6% in April, well behind the May CPI print of 4.2%.
In other words, AI is a deflation machine. As it spreads, CPI—and rates—will likely fall.
Renos Now, a New Address LaterHomeowners, by the way, are somewhat insulated here, as they tend to have higher incomes than the public-at-large.
As lower rates arrive, they’ll tempt more homeowners to move, as the “rate penalty” for ditching their current mortgage eases. That sets up a tidy “2-step” catalyst for HD: a reno boom now, followed by a “handoff” to a fresh round of homebuying as rates fall.
And, again, none of this is priced into the stock.
As I write this, HD is more than 25% off the all-time high it hit in late 2024. That’s absurd for a company generating $14 billion in yearly free cash flow—a total that’s been growing strongly in the last decade:
HD Cash Flow
Ycharts
Management, meanwhile, is returning as much of that cash as possible: In the last decade, HD has bought back 17% of its outstanding shares and hiked the dividend a rich 238%. Thanks to that growth, an investor would be yielding 7.3% on a buy made then.
That sturdy payout growth has fueled HD’s “Dividend Magnet”—or the tendency of a rising dividend to pull the share price higher. You can see that in the chart below.
HD Dividend Magnet
Ycharts
You can also see that the orange line (the share price) has split from the purple staircase since about last fall. That’s our upside: When that gap closes, we collect the difference.
Meantime, HD is catching a lot more of what contractors spend on projects through its Pro Desk, which, thanks to a couple of recent acquisitions, makes the company a top-to-bottom supplier for contractors.
That’s a big deal: Five years back, a contractor who’d just, say, landed a big kitchen job would have had to call three or four different suppliers to get what they needed. Now they can wander into the local Home Depot’s Pro Desk (or better yet order through the online platform) and everything arrives from one source, on one truck.
Contractors need these materials whether the housing market is booming or busting, especially as American homes age. That alone makes Home Depot’s revenue base stickier—and more recession-resistant—than Wall Street gives it credit for.
AI-Powered Tools Make Contractors Faster (and Home Depot Busier)Let’s wrap with another way AI is speeding up HD’s business: The company recently rolled out AI-powered tools that convert construction blueprints into material lists in days rather than weeks.
Voice prompts, uploaded documents, text descriptions—throw anything at it and the system spits out a shopping list ready for checkout and delivery. This means AI isn’t replacing contractors—it’s making them faster. And the faster they work, the more projects they take on, and the more materials they order from … you guessed it.
Add it up and you get a company that’s building resilience and growth at the same time. That sets us up for faster payout hikes and Dividend Magnet–powered price gains. And thanks to the lack of love from Wall Street, we’re getting in at a bargain, to boot.
Brett Owens is Chief Investment Strategist for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, get your free copy his latest special report: Your Early Retirement Portfolio: Huge Dividends—Every Month—Forever.
It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Home Depot (HD - Free Report) . Shares have added about 5.4% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500.
Will the recent positive trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Home Depot due for a pullback? Well, first let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the recent catalysts for The Home Depot, Inc. before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late.
Home Depot's Q1 Earnings Beat Estimates, Comparable Sales Up 0.6%Home Depot delivered first-quarter fiscal 2026 results that topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate on both the top and bottom lines. Adjusted earnings were $3.43 per share, down 3.7% from the year-ago quarter but came above the consensus mark of $3.40.
Net sales rose 4.8% year over year to $41.77 billion and beat the consensus estimate of $41.49 billion. Customer transactions totaled 391.1 million, down 0.9% year over year, while average ticket increased 2.3% to $92.76. The underlying business demand has been relatively similar to the trends seen throughout fiscal 2025, amid consumer uncertainty and housing affordability pressure.
Comparable sales (comps) increased 0.6% in the quarter, with U.S. comps up 0.4%. Foreign exchange rates provided an additional lift, contributing roughly 55 basis points (bps) to comps.
Home Depot’s Costs & Margin DetailsGross profit increased 2.4% to $13.78 billion, supported by the higher sales. However, the cost of sales rose faster than revenues, putting gross margin under pressure compared with the prior-year period. The gross margin was 33%, down 80 bps year over year. Our model predicted a 90-bps year-over-year decline in the gross margin to 32.9% for the fiscal first quarter.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses of $7.77 billion increased 5.7% from $7.96 billion in the year-ago quarter. As a percentage of sales, SG&A was 19.1%, up roughly 20 bps year over year.
Adjusted operating income was $5.15 billion, down 2.3% year over year, while the operating margin of 12.3% contracted 90 bps year over year.
HD’s Other Financial UpdatesHome Depot ended first-quarter fiscal 2026 with cash and cash equivalents of $1.60 billion, long-term debt (excluding current installments) of $44.8 billion and stockholders’ equity of $13.9 billion. In first-quarter fiscal 2026, the company generated $6.03 billion of net cash from operating activities.
Merchandise inventories were $27.28 billion and net receivables were $6.62 billion at quarter-end. The company reinvested $844 million in capital expenditures during the quarter and spent $286 million, net, on businesses acquired. Home Depot returned cash to shareholders through dividends, paying $2.32 billion in the period.
Home Depot Reaffirms Fiscal 2026 OutlookManagement reaffirmed its fiscal 2026 framework, calling for total sales growth of approximately 2.5-4.5% and comparable sales growth of roughly flat to 2%. The company also expects to open about 15 stores this year.
For fiscal 2026, Home Depot continues to project gross margin around 33.1% and operating margin of approximately 12.4-12.6%, with adjusted operating margin expected in the 12.8-13.0% range. It expects capital expenditures of roughly 2.5% of total sales. The company anticipates an effective tax rate of about 24.3%, net interest expense of roughly $2.3 billion, and earnings per share growth of approximately flat to 4.0% from $14.23 in fiscal 2025.
How Have Estimates Been Moving Since Then?It turns out, estimates revision have trended downward during the past month.
VGM ScoresCurrently, Home Depot has a nice Growth Score of B, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with a D. Following the exact same course, the stock has a grade of D on the value side, putting it in the bottom 40% for this investment strategy.
Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of D. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in.
OutlookEstimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, Home Depot has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months.
Home Depot (HD - Free Report) has recently been on Zacks.com's list of the most searched stocks. Therefore, you might want to consider some of the key factors that could influence the stock's performance in the near future.
Shares of this home-improvement retailer have returned +6.5% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1.4% change. The Zacks Retail - Home Furnishings industry, to which Home Depot belongs, has gained 10.3% over this period. Now the key question is: Where could the stock be headed in the near term?
While media releases or rumors about a substantial change in a company's business prospects usually make its stock 'trending' and lead to an immediate price change, there are always some fundamental facts that eventually dominate the buy-and-hold decision-making.
Earnings Estimate RevisionsHere at Zacks, we prioritize appraising the change in the projection of a company's future earnings over anything else. That's because we believe the present value of its future stream of earnings is what determines the fair value for its stock.
Our analysis is essentially based on how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to take the latest business trends into account. When earnings estimates for a company go up, the fair value for its stock goes up as well. And when a stock's fair value is higher than its current market price, investors tend to buy the stock, resulting in its price moving upward. Because of this, empirical studies indicate a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and short-term stock price movements.
Home Depot is expected to post earnings of $4.71 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +0.6%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed -0.2%.
For the current fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $15.01 points to a change of +2.2% from the prior year. Over the last 30 days, this estimate has changed +0.1%.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $16.21 indicates a change of +8% from what Home Depot is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed -0.5%.
With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool -- the Zacks Rank -- is a more conclusive indicator of a stock's near-term price performance, as it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for Home Depot.
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
12 Month EPS
Revenue Growth ForecastEven though a company's earnings growth is arguably the best indicator of its financial health, nothing much happens if it cannot raise its revenues. It's almost impossible for a company to grow its earnings without growing its revenue for long periods. Therefore, knowing a company's potential revenue growth is crucial.
For Home Depot, the consensus sales estimate for the current quarter of $47.5 billion indicates a year-over-year change of +4.9%. For the current and next fiscal years, $171.65 billion and $178.54 billion estimates indicate +4.2% and +4% changes, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise HistoryHome Depot reported revenues of $41.77 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +4.8%. EPS of $3.43 for the same period compares with $3.56 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $41.49 billion, the reported revenues represent a surprise of +0.67%. The EPS surprise was +0.88%.
Over the last four quarters, Home Depot surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. The company topped consensus revenue estimates three times over this period.
ValuationNo investment decision can be efficient without considering a stock's valuation. Whether a stock's current price rightly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects is an essential determinant of its future price performance.
Comparing the current value of a company's valuation multiples, such as its price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), to its own historical values helps ascertain whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, whereas comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of how reasonable its stock price is.
The Zacks Value Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which pays close attention to both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics to grade stocks from A to F (an A is better than a B; a B is better than a C; and so on), is pretty helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
Home Depot is graded D on this front, indicating that it is trading at a premium to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
ConclusionThe facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Home Depot. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
With $41.8 billion in first-quarter 2026 (ended May 3) revenue, Home Depot (HD +3.21%) dominates the home improvement market. Its leadership position has allowed it to earn consistent profits through various economic cycles. This has directly benefited investors who receive steady income from their positions.
Here's how many shares of this top retail stock you'd need to generate $10,000 in yearly dividends.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Home Depot pays a quarterly dividend of $2.33 per share, for a total of $9.32 annually. This means that investors need 1,073 shares to collect $10,000 in dividends over a full year.
The stock's 2.77% dividend yield is strong. It's nearly three times larger than what the S&P 500 index provides, and the payout has increased 238% in the past decade.
Today's Change
(
3.21
%) $
10.41
Current Price
$
334.86
Investors should come away impressed by Home Depot's commitment to shareholders. The business has now paid a dividend for 157 straight quarters (just over 39 years). This presents a compelling opportunity for market participants seeking a dependable income stream.
The macro environment has been a headwind for Home Depot, though. Its same-store sales trends have been soft, as households aren't inclined to spend on costly renovation projects during a period of above-normal inflation and elevated interest rates.
However, the fact that the company is still able to continue returning capital to investors is a sign of its healthy financial position.
Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Home Depot. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Home Depot remains a "Hold" as shares appear fairly valued with technicals signaling a challenging setup. Q1 results beat expectations, but guidance was uninspiring; currency headwinds and tepid EPS growth outlook persist. HD's strategic shift toward the pro market may drive higher average tickets but increases cyclicality and risk exposure.
Key Takeaways Home Depot's Q1 sales rose 4.8% y/y to $41.8B, while comps inched up 0.6% amid subdued demand.Home Depot's gross margin fell 75 bps to 33%, but management reaffirmed its full-year margin guidance.Pro sales outpaced DIY demand, supported by digital growth, market-share gains and acquisitions. The Home Depot Inc.’s (HD - Free Report) ability to sustain margin strength is becoming increasingly important as demand across the home improvement sector remains subdued. In the first quarter of fiscal 2026, the company reported sales growth of 4.8% to $41.8 billion, while comparable sales inched up 0.6%, reflecting a demand environment that management described as largely unchanged from fiscal 2025. Housing affordability pressures, elevated mortgage rates, and muted large-scale remodeling activity continue to weigh on customer spending.
Despite these headwinds, Home Depot is demonstrating resilience through operational execution and strategic investments. The company continues to gain market share, supported by strength in professional customers, digital sales growth exceeding 10% and expanding capabilities through acquisitions such as SRS, GMS and Mingledorff’s. Management highlighted that Pro sales outperformed DIY demand, with complex purchase occasions showing strongest growth, underscoring the effectiveness of its “winning the Pro” strategy.
From a margin perspective, the fiscal first-quarter gross margin declined 75 basis points (bps) to 33% due to the GMS acquisition and pricing investments at SRS. However, management emphasized that the core Home Depot business maintained a stable margin profile, while reaffirming its full-year gross margin guidance of 33.1% and the adjusted operating margin outlook of 12.8-13%.
The key question is whether margin stability can compensate for sluggish demand. While disciplined cost management, operational efficiencies and a richer Pro mix can help protect profitability, sustained earnings growth will ultimately require stronger project demand. For now, Home Depot’s margin resilience, market-share gains and strategic expansion provide a meaningful buffer against demand challenges, allowing the company to navigate a prolonged housing downturn while positioning itself for growth.
How Are LOW & WSM Faring in Terms of Profit Margins?While Home Depot has long been known for its strong profitability, investors are also closely watching how peers Lowe’s Companies Inc. (LOW - Free Report) and Williams-Sonoma Inc. (WSM - Free Report) are performing on the margin front amid a challenging demand environment.
Lowe’s is facing weak DIY demand, elevated rates and low housing turnover, but margin discipline is helping cushion the pressure. In first-quarter fiscal 2026, comps rose 0.6%, while the gross margin fell 70 bps to 32.7% due mainly to acquisition dilution. SG&A leveraged 17 bps, supported by cost controls and productivity initiatives. Management reaffirmed its 11.6-11.8% adjusted operating margin outlook, signaling confidence despite demand challenges.
Williams-Sonoma is demonstrating that strong margins can help offset broader demand uncertainties. In first-quarter fiscal 2026, the company posted a 4.8% comps increase and delivered an operating margin of 16.2%, exceeding expectations despite absorbing higher tariffs and fuel costs. Supply-chain efficiencies, disciplined cost management and strong full-price selling helped mitigate margin pressures. While management remains cautious about the macro environment, its profitability and execution provide a meaningful cushion against demand volatility.
HD’s Price Performance, Valuation & EstimatesShares of Home Depot have lost 3.1% in the past six months versus the industry’s decline of 4.9%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, HD trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 21.6X compared with the industry’s average of 19.95X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for HD’s fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 EPS implies year-over-year growth of 4.2% and 2.2%, respectively. The company’s EPS estimates for fiscal 2026 and 2027 have moved down 0.3% and 0.9%, respectively, in the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Home Depot currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Goldman Sachs has crossed more than $1 trillion in announced M&A advisory volume in the first half of 2026, setting the fastest pace ever recorded by an investment bank.
The milestone, based on Dealogic data cited by Goldman Sachs, comes during a powerful rebound in dealmaking and capital markets activity.
It also lands days after Goldman served as lead-left underwriter on SpaceX’s blockbuster market debut, which pushed the Elon Musk-led company’s valuation past $2 trillion.
For Goldman, the story is more about whether a historic investment-banking boom can justify a stock already trading ahead of much of Wall Street’s target-price range.
Goldman’s $1 trillion-plus M&A haul reflects a sharp revival in boardroom confidence after a quieter stretch for global deals.
The bank has advised on some of the year’s largest transactions, including Dominion Energy’s $66.8 billion sale to NextEra Energy, Unilever’s $44.8 billion combination of its foods business with McCormick, and the $33.4 billion acquisition of AES by a consortium led by BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners and EQT.
SpaceX is not an M&A transaction, but it adds to the same investment-banking momentum.
Goldman won the prized lead-left role on the rocket and satellite company’s IPO, the most influential spot on an offering’s front page.
SpaceX priced at $135 a share and surged past a $2 trillion market value on its debut, giving Goldman both fees and prestige in one of the most closely watched listings in market history.
The underwriting payday is also meaningful.
Goldman and Morgan Stanley are each expected to earn roughly $100 million from the SpaceX IPO, according to reports citing the company’s regulatory filing.
Goldman CEO David Solomon said in a LinkedIn post that global M&A volumes have already exceeded $2.6 trillion this year, as artificial intelligence and strategic consolidation reshape industries.
Matt McClure, Goldman’s global co-head of investment banking, told Reuters that “CEOs and Boards are taking a long-term strategic view” despite a complex backdrop.
The tension is that Goldman’s operating momentum has not fully translated into analyst enthusiasm at current prices.
JPMorgan recently raised its price target on Goldman Sachs to $900 from $826, but kept a Neutral rating.
Morgan Stanley has also been around the $900 mark, while CICC Research is more constructive, lifting its target to $980 with an Outperform rating.
DBS Bank and BofA Securities are more bullish, with targets around $1,050, while Zacks Research earlier downgraded Goldman from Strong Buy to Hold.
That still leaves a gap. Goldman shares have recently traded around $1,090, above the average analyst target of about $942.
In plain English, the market has already priced in a lot of good news. The stock is being rewarded for stronger trading, revived M&A, higher IPO activity and the SpaceX halo.
But several analysts appear reluctant to chase it further at this valuation.
JPMorgan’s Rob Dwyer and Ayano Tsunoda, in a note cited by MarketWatch, said investors may be underestimating “a multiplier effect from IPOs and financing deals” on Wall Street banks.
Their point is that a mega-listing does not just produce underwriting fees, but can also drive secondary trading, financing activity, hedging and client flows.
That is the bull case. The cautious view is simpler: Goldman has already rallied hard, and even strong deal flow may not be enough if investors believe earnings are peaking.
Key Takeaways Goldman has advised on a record more than $1 trillion worth of M&A deals so far in 2026.Many announced deals are likely to close in 2H 2026, supporting Goldman's advisory fee growth.Goldman's IB fees rose 48% year over year in Q1'26, driven by stronger advisory activity. The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s (GS - Free Report) investment banking (IB) business is regaining momentum as global dealmaking activity continues to recover.
According to Dealogic data, Goldman has advised more than $1-trillion worth of announced mergers and acquisitions (M&A) so far in 2026, marking a record pace for any investment bank within a half-year period. This represents a 71% increase from the comparable period in 2025, underscoring the sharp rebound in corporate transaction activity after several years of subdued dealmaking.
Global M&A activity reached $2.73 trillion so far this year, up 38% year over year, with Goldman advising on deals representing more than 40% of the total announced transaction value. JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) and Morgan Stanley (MS - Free Report) ranked second and third, respectively JPMorgan advised on $687.5 billion of transactions, whereas Morgan Stanley followed with $575.9 billion of deals.
Global M&A Advisor Ranking
Image Source: Dealogic
Last month, at the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference, Goldman indicated that it expects global M&A volume in 2026 to exceed the 2021 record and reach $3.8 trillion. The optimistic outlook reflects improving corporate confidence, easing financing conditions and renewed boardroom appetite for strategic growth. A broader return of private equity activity could provide an additional boost, as sponsors look to deploy capital, pursue portfolio exits and monetize assets after a slower transaction environment.
Stronger Fee Pipeline for GoldmanGS’s large M&A advisory pipeline is particularly important because investment banks typically earn advisory fees when transactions close. While fee rates vary based on deal size, complexity and client relationships, large-scale transactions can generate significant advisory revenues. Therefore, the firm’s more than $1 trillion in announced advised M&A volume provides a visible pipeline of potential fee income over the coming quarters. This commanding lead is translating directly into higher advisory revenues.
The timing of fee realization is important. Announced deal volume does not translate immediately to revenues, as advisory fees are generally recognized upon deal completion. However, with many of Goldman’s advised transactions expected to close during the second half of 2026, the current pipeline offers meaningful visibility into future investment banking revenues. This could help sustain advisory fee growth even if the pace of new deal announcements moderates later in the year.
The recovery is already visible in Goldman’s recent results. In the first quarter of 2026, advisory revenues rose 89% year over year on higher completed M&A volumes, supporting investment banking fee growth of 48%. If the current announced-deal pipeline converts into completed transactions, advisory revenues could remain a meaningful growth driver through the remainder of 2026, supporting profitability and top-line growth.
Goldman’s Price Performance & Zacks RankGS shares have gained 71.7% in a year compared with the industry growth of 32.7%.
Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Goldman currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Parafin, a leading embedded financial infrastructure company named to the 2026 Forbes Fintech 50, today announced a new credit facility led by Goldman Sachs, alongside One William Street Capital Management, L.P.
The new facility will help extend access to embedded lending for more small businesses through the platforms they already use, including Amazon, DoorDash, Gusto, TikTok Shop, Walmart, and many others.
ShareBuilding on Parafin's recent warehouse credit facility expansion with Silicon Valley Bank, EverBank, and Trinity Capital, the new facility will help extend access to embedded lending for more small businesses through the platforms they already use, including Amazon, DoorDash, Gusto, TikTok Shop, Walmart, and many others. The additional capacity will support financing products that help businesses manage cash flow, invest in growth, and navigate day-to-day operating needs.
The growth in financing capacity reflects consistent demand from small businesses that return to Parafin’s products as they grow: the majority of Parafin’s fundings go to repeat borrowers. With over 50,000 businesses funded to date¹, that repeat usage underscores the role embedded capital plays in helping businesses invest in growth and manage cash flows.
“Small businesses increasingly expect financial products to be built into the software and platforms they already use to run their businesses,” said Sahill Poddar, cofounder and CEO of Parafin. “Embedded lending is becoming a critical part of how businesses access capital, and this facility strengthens our ability to meet that demand at scale. Through our expanded financing capabilities, we are accelerating the delivery of flexible financing to small businesses from every part of the economy, supported by this credit facility from Goldman Sachs and One William Street."
As the leader in embedded lending, Parafin has extended over $35 billion in offers to small businesses across the United States and Canada to date¹. Learn more about how Parafin helps platforms deliver financing at the point of need at parafin.com.
¹ Parafin internal data, as of June 2026
About Parafin
Parafin is a financial infrastructure company that provides platforms with embedded financing products for their small businesses by abstracting the complexity of capital markets, underwriting, servicing, compliance, and customer support. By powering the financial services of marketplaces, vertical SaaS platforms, and payment processors, small businesses can run and grow despite uncertain economic conditions. Parafin powers platforms such as Amazon, Walmart, DoorDash, Gusto and many more and serves tens of thousands of businesses. Parafin was founded in 2020 by Sahill Poddar, Vineet Goel, and Ralph Furman, and is backed by Ribbit Capital, Thrive Capital, GIC, Notable Capital, and Redpoint Ventures. For more information, visit parafin.com or contact [email protected].
About Goldman Sachs
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is a leading global financial institution that delivers a broad range of financial services to a large and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and individuals. Founded in 1869, the firm is headquartered in New York and maintains offices in all major financial centers around the world. For more information, visit goldmansachs.com.
About One William Street Capital Management
One William Street Capital Management, L.P. ("OWS") is a premier alternative investment manager offering clients investment solutions across public and private asset-based, structured, and opportunistic credit. Founded in 2008, OWS and its affiliates manage in excess of $8.0 billion in assets under management. OWS’ Private Asset-Based Finance strategy provides capital and risk solutions to specialty finance companies, fintechs and other asset owners and originators via unitranche and mezzanine facilities, forward flow agreements, portfolio acquisitions, and other bespoke asset acquisition and financing structures. On behalf of its investors, the firm invests in both public and private format across a range of asset classes and geographies, with a focus on North America and Europe. For more information, please visit https://onewilliamstreet.com
Goldman Sachs has already advised on more than $1 trillion of mergers and acquisitions so far this year, the fastest any bank has ever reached the milestone. Stephan Feldgoise runs the team and says it's been an intense first half, driven by big deals.
Key Takeaways Bank groups urged regulators to revise Basel market-risk rules over Treasury liquidity fears.Industry groups said that the current rules could lift trading capital needs by 30% to 89%.The March 2026 revisions may cut capital needs for major lenders like JPM by 4.8%. Wall Street’s campaign to reshape the final U.S. implementation of Basel banking rules has gained fresh momentum. Several leading financial industry groups have recently urged regulators to revise the market-risk portion of the Basel Endgame framework, warning that the current approach could unintentionally weaken liquidity in the U.S. Treasury market. The news was first reported by the Financial Times.
The latest appeal was made by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and the Institute of International Finance.
In a joint letter to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, these organizations argued that parts of the proposal do not accurately capture the underlying economic risks associated with Treasury and repo trading.
Banking groups said that the existing framework could increase capital requirements tied to certain trading activities by 30% to 89%. They believe that these higher requirements may discourage banks from providing liquidity in one of the world's most important fixed-income markets.
Treasury Clearing Rules Add to ConcernsA key issue centers on the upcoming transition to mandatory central clearing for Treasury securities and repurchase agreements. Central clearing is intended to improve market stability and lower collateral demands for market participants.
However, banks contend that the Basel proposals would simultaneously raise capital charges linked to counterparty credit risks, offsetting much of the benefits gained from lower margin requirements.
Industry representatives have cautioned that if these concerns remain unresolved, banks could scale back their involvement in Treasury market-making activities, potentially reducing trading depth and increasing volatility during periods of stress.
Regulators Have Already Softened Their ApproachThe current debate follows a significant shift in the regulatory stance earlier this year. In March, the Federal Reserve unveiled revised Basel Endgame proposals that, when combined with other regulatory adjustments, are expected to reduce capital requirements for the largest U.S. lenders like JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) and Bank of America (BAC - Free Report) by 4.8%.
This marked a substantial departure from earlier plans that were projected to raise capital levels meaningfully. The changes were viewed as a major victory for the banking industry, with Goldman Sachs’ (GS - Free Report) chief executive, David Solomon, stating that he was encouraged by the Fed's updated position.
Despite these concessions, banks are pressing regulators for additional modifications, particularly regarding the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, the section governing market-risk calculations.
How Could Banks Be Affected?The above-mentioned banks like JPM, Goldman Sachs and BAC have the most at stake as these are trading-oriented institutions. These firms play an important role in Treasury market intermediation and maintain sizable fixed-income trading operations.
If regulators further ease the Basel market-risk rules, these banks could benefit from lower capital consumption, improved trading economics and greater flexibility to deploy balance sheets in Treasury and repo markets.
Conversely, retaining the existing proposal may require them to hold more capital against trading exposures, potentially reducing profitability in these businesses.
If there's one constant in the stock market, it is change. When the year began, Wall Street was expecting rate cuts. Rising inflation and a strong employment picture shifted that view, with the outlook now including rate increases later in the year. Or at least that's the big picture takeaway from new Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh's first Fed meeting.
While it isn't exactly good news that inflation is high, at least partly due to high energy prices driven by the conflict in the Middle East, it isn't fully bad news, either. In fact, steady to higher rates could actually be a net benefit for big banks. Here's why.
Image source: Getty Images.
No change is good for now The big, headline-grabbing finance story lately was the initial public offering (IPO) of SpaceX (SPCX 1.46%). The company raised a record amount of cash through a public offering, and the stock rose sharply following its debut. There are other big-name technology stocks lining up to go public as well, including artificial intelligence (AI) leaders like Anthropic and OpenAI.
The Federal Reserve's decision to hold rates steady rather than raise them is a net positive for investment banks like Goldman Sachs (GS 1.83%) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM 1.23%), both of which played a role in the SpaceX IPO. These companies need investors to be positive about the future as they try to sell shares in new companies. If the Fed had raised rates, it could have led to a negative outlook for investors and less willingness to buy IPOs. Indeed, IPOs often get called off during bear markets.
Today's Change
(
-1.83
%) $
-20.05
Current Price
$
1074.39
So there's a longer window of opportunity for investment banks to bring big deals to market. But that window may not be long, as the Fed's bias appears to be for higher rates in the future.
Higher rates can help banks in other ways Looking at the more traditional banking business of taking deposits and making loans, steady to higher rates is likely to be a net positive. If higher rates trigger a recession and/or bear market, that would clearly be a negative, of course. However, banks like Citigroup (C 0.42%) and Bank of America (BAC 0.69%) can charge higher rates on the loans they make if interest rates rise. When rates fall, they earn less in interest. So stable-to-higher rates are good news.
In fact, rising rates would be even better than stable rates. That's because banks can raise loan rates quickly, but they can slow walk the interest they pay depositors. The end result is a widening in the spread they earn, since their profit, in simple terms, is the difference between what they charge on loans and what they pay on deposits.
Today's Change
(
-0.69
%) $
-0.40
Current Price
$
57.51
Eventually, Bank of America and Citi will have to increase what they pay depositors, of course, but if rates rise over several meetings, the runway for near-term profits could be quite strong. Unless, of course, rate increases trigger a recession, in which case the economic slowdown would likely reduce demand for loans and could even result in an uptick in loan defaults. There's a balance here, which the Fed is well aware of as it attempts to cool inflation without tanking the economy.
This isn't new territory for big banks While the current economic situation is unique in its own way, rates go up and down all the time. Banks are used to dealing with the directional shifts. While Kevin Warsh is new to the Federal Reserve, banks aren't new to the rate change game. And, thus, they aren't likely to have been surprised by the Fed decision or the fact that rates now look more likely to increase in the future. While this meeting garnered extra attention from Wall Street, it isn't really that big a story if you are a long-term investor. Well-run banks should still have a place in your portfolio.
Goldman Sachs (GS) analysts have lowered their year-end gold forecast by $500 an ounce as the Federal Reserve is no longer expected to cut rates in 2026. The re
HomeMarketsNeed to KnowNeed to KnowStrategists say it’s time investors protect against downsideLast Updated: June 23, 2026 at 9:33 a.m. ET
First Published: June 23, 2026 at 6:49 a.m. ET
Goldman Sachs warns that investor expectations for the artificial-intelligence trade may be racing ahead of reality. Photo: AFP via Getty ImagesA previous version of this column inaccurately described the effect of SpaceX’s share-price decline. The stock did not close Monday below its IPO price but below its closing level in its first post-IPO trading session. The story has been corrected.
A summer swoon for tech stocks may be taking hold, as another bumpy ride is underway Tuesday after South Korea’s red-hot stock market slumped 10%.
Here at Zacks, we offer our members many different opportunities to take full advantage of the stock market, as well as how to invest in ways that lead to long-term success.
The Zacks Premium service, which provides daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank; full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List; Equity Research reports; and Premium stock screens like the Earnings ESP filter, makes these more manageable goals. All of the features can help you identify what stocks to buy, what to sell, and what are today's hottest industries.
Also included in Zacks Premium is the Focus List. This is a long-term portfolio of top stocks that have all the traits to beat the market.
Breaking Down the Zacks Focus ListIf you could get access to a curated list of stocks to kickstart your investment portfolio, wouldn't you jump at the chance to take a peek?
That's what the Zacks Focus List, a portfolio of 50 stocks, offers investors. Not only does it serve as a starting point for long-term investors, but all stocks included in the list are poised to outperform the market over the next 12 months.
One thing that makes the Focus List even more advantageous is that each pick comes with a full Zacks Analyst Report. This helps explain why each stock was selected and why we believe it's a good pick for the long-term.
The portfolio's past performance only solidifies why investors should consider it as a starting point. For 2020, the Focus List gained 13.85% on an annualized basis compared to the S&P 500's return of 9.38%. Cumulatively, the portfolio has returned 2,519.23% while the S&P returned 854.95%. Returns are for the period of February 1, 1996 to March 31, 2021.
Focus List MethodologyWhen stocks are picked for the Focus List, it reflects our enduring reliance on the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Earnings estimates, or expectations of growth and profitability, come from brokerage analysts who track publicly traded companies; these analysts work together with company management to analyze every aspect that may affect future earnings, like interest rates, the economy, and sector and industry optimism.
What a company will earn down the road also needs to be taken into consideration, and this is why earnings estimate revisions are so important.
Stocks that receive upward earnings estimate revisions are more likely to receive even more upward changes in the future. For example, if an analyst raised their estimates last month, they're more likely to do it again this month, and other analysts are likely to do the same.
Harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions is where the Zacks Rank comes in. The Zacks Rank is a unique, proprietary stock-rating model that utilizes changes to a company's quarterly earnings expectations to help investors build a winning portfolio.
Four primary factors make up the Zacks Rank: Agreement, Magnitude, Upside, and Surprise. Each is given a raw score that's recalculated every night and compiled into the Rank, and with this data, stocks are then classified into five groups, ranging from "Strong Buy" to "Strong Sell."
The Focus List is comprised of stocks hand-picked from a long list of #1 (Strong Buy) or #2 (Buy) ranked companies, meaning that each new addition boasts a bullish earnings consensus among analysts.
Because stock prices react to revisions, buying stocks with rising earnings estimates can be very profitable. Focus List stocks offer investors a great opportunity to get into companies whose future earnings estimates will be raised, potentially leading to price momentum.
Focus List Spotlight: Goldman Sachs (GS - Free Report) Founded in 1869, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is a leading global financial holding company providing IB, securities, investment management, and consumer banking services to a diversified client base. The company is headquartered in New York, with offices in major financial centers globally.
GS, a #3 (Hold) stock, was added to the Focus List on July 11, 2018 at $226.85 per share. Since then, shares have increased 387.71% to $1.
For fiscal 2026, two analysts revised their earnings estimate upwards in the last 60 days, and the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.52 to $59.6. GS boasts an average earnings surprise of 13.1%.
Additionally, GS's earnings are expected to grow 16.1% for the current fiscal year.
Reveal Winning StocksUnlock all of our powerful research, tools and analysis, including the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research Reports, Zacks Earnings ESP Filter, Premium Screener and more, as part of Zacks Premium. You'll quickly identify which stocks to buy, hold and sell, and target today's hottest industries, to help improve the performance of your portfolio. Gain full access now >>
Key Takeaways Goldman's equities trading revenues are projected to stay above $5B in Q2'26 after a record Q1.GS is benefiting from market volatility, institutional activity and stronger capital market trends.Goldman expects trading momentum, improving M&A pipeline and capital markets to support Q2 results. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS - Free Report) appears well-positioned to deliver another solid quarter, with its equities trading business continuing to benefit from elevated market volatility and strong institutional client activity. According to a Seeking Alpha report published on MSN, following the strong first quarter, current trends indicate that equities trading revenues will likely remain above the $5-billion mark in the second quarter of 2026, reinforcing the strength of the company’s core Global Banking & Markets business.
Goldman entered 2026 with significant strength in its Global Banking & Markets segment. In the first quarter, equities trading revenues jumped 27% year over year to a record $5.33 billion. The rise was driven by heightened market volatility, which accelerated client demand for hedging strategies, portfolio repositioning, prime brokerage services and equities financing. Unlike more cyclical businesses, trading operations benefit directly from increased market activity, allowing Goldman to capitalize on higher client volumes across institutional segments.
The exceptional performance in equities trading was the primary contributor to the 19% year-over-year increase in Global Banking & Markets revenues, which reached $12.74 billion in the first quarter. Importantly, market conditions that supported this performance have largely persisted into the second quarter. Institutional investors have been active amid macroeconomic uncertainty, while AI-related investment themes continue to generate strong trading volumes, particularly across Asian markets, where hedge fund participation has been elevated.
A second consecutive quarter with equities trading revenues above $5 billion would be notable, given the business's operating leverage. Increased client activity typically drives revenue growth without a corresponding rise in expenses, supporting margin expansion and earnings growth.
Overall, Goldman is benefiting from multiple growth drivers, including sustained trading momentum, improving capital market activity and a strengthening M&A pipeline. These trends are expected to support revenue growth, enhance profitability and reinforce the firm's earnings outlook, positioning second-quarter 2026 to be another strong quarter for the company.
Major Banks See Rebound in IB & Markets ActivitiesSimilar to Goldman, JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) and Wells Fargo (WFC - Free Report) expect their investment banking (IB) and trading businesses to perform well in the second quarter of 2026, driven by improving deal pipelines and stronger capital market activity.
JPMorgan indicated that second-quarter IB fees could rise 10% or more year over year. JPMorgan noted that its markets business is also on track to grow 11% in the second quarter and could perform "a little better" than that forecast.
Wells Fargo’s IB and trading revenues are projected to increase year over year in the mid-teen percentage range in the second quarter of 2026. Wells Fargo expects wealth management revenues to grow year over year in the low-double-digit percentage range.
Goldman’s Price Performance & Zacks RankGS shares have surged 63.4% in the past year compared with the industry’s growth of 29.2%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Goldman currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Investment follows a year of strong commercial momentum, with Behavox growing its customer base 86% to more than 100 major financial institutions across five continents
LONDON & MONTREAL--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Behavox, the AI-native controls platform for global banks, asset managers, hedge funds, and commodity firms, today announced a $175 million preferred equity investment from investment funds and accounts managed by HPS Investment Partners, a leading global credit investment firm and a part of BlackRock (“HPS”). The completed investment positions Behavox to accelerate global growth, expand its Unified Controls Platform, and pursue disciplined M&A.
Behavox set out to give the world’s most demanding institutions a single, AI-native platform to manage risk and meet regulatory obligations. HPS brings the scale, sophistication, and long-term perspective to help us reach more institutions in more markets.
Share With this investment, HPS joins a roster of leading institutional investors on Behavox's cap table, including SoftBank, Citigroup, Index Ventures, and Hoxton Ventures.
“Behavox set out to give the world’s most demanding institutions a single, AI-native platform to manage risk and meet regulatory obligations,” said Erkin Adylov, Founder and CEO of Behavox. “HPS brings the scale, sophistication, and long-term perspective to help us reach more institutions in more markets. Their investment recognizes the strong platform we have built and positions us to pursue strategic acquisitions that expand our capabilities and accelerate global growth.”
As part of the completed transaction, Behavox fully repaid and retired its $70 million venture-debt facility with Hercules Capital Inc. (NYSE: HTGC), further strengthening its balance sheet. Behavox secured a $70 million credit facility from Hercules Capital in autumn 2024 to support strategic expansion, including its acquisition of Mosaic Smart Data and its strategic investment in b-next. Together, those transactions accelerated Behavox’s move into trade surveillance by adding FICC front-office analytics and deep capital markets trade surveillance expertise.
“Our partnership with Behavox has been highly successful,” said Ruslan Sergeyev, Managing Director at Hercules Capital. “We congratulate Behavox and HPS on this transaction and look forward to future opportunities to partner.”
Behavox has been profitable since 2023, using that financial strength to reinvest in R&D, product expansion, and global market growth. The HPS investment is the company's first equity financing since 2020, when SoftBank invested $100 million. Since then, SoftBank has remained a strategic partner as Behavox grew the business sevenfold, with the relationship extending beyond capital to include SoftBank Investment Advisers in the UK and SoftBank Corporation in Japan as Behavox customers.
The HPS investment will support Behavox’s next phase of global expansion, including further M&A and continued investment in Polaris, its trade surveillance product. Behavox introduced Polaris in 2025 as a next-generation trade surveillance platform that supports market abuse detection across all 10 major asset classes on a single AI-native platform. Polaris can operate independently or alongside Quantum, Behavox’s communications surveillance product, using agentic AI to pull related chats, emails, voice, and archive records into a single case.
With pipeline growth of more than 80% since the beginning of the year, Polaris has demonstrated strong market demand for one governed workflow that unifies communications and trade surveillance.
Ardea Partners served as investment advisor to Behavox. Freshfields LLP served as legal counsel to Behavox on the transaction. The Freshfields team was led by London partner Rhys Evans, and associates Jo Lee, Jennifer Okoye, Megan Rodgers and Jonathan Stelzer, with support from Ethan Klingsberg, Co-Head of US Corporate and M&A.
Learn more about the Behavox Unified Controls Platform at www.behavox.com
About Behavox
Behavox is an AI company that helps organizations safeguard and enhance their businesses through a unified controls framework.
Its AI-native platform brings together communications surveillance (Quantum), trade surveillance (Polaris), regulatory data retention (Intelligent Archive), and policy management (Pathfinder) on a single, integrated platform.
Behavox enables firms to detect risk, meet regulatory obligations, reduce operational complexity, and turn enterprise data into revenue. Founded in 2014 and headquartered in London, Behavox serves a global client base across financial services and other regulated industries, with offices in North America, EMEA, and APAC.
Learn more about the Behavox Unified Controls Platform at www.behavox.com
TORONTO, June 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited (“BlackRock Canada”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE: BLK), today announced the June 2026 cash distributions for the iShares ETFs listed on the TSX or Cboe Canada which pay on a monthly, quarterly, or semi-annual basis. Unitholders of record of the applicable iShares ETF on June 25, 2026 will receive cash distributions payable in respect of that iShares ETF on June 30, 2026.
Details regarding the “per unit” distribution amounts are as follows:
Fund NameFund TickerCash Distribution
Per UnitiShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETFCBH$0.051iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETFCBO$0.053iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETFCDZ$0.115iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETFCEW$0.066iShares Global Real Estate Index ETFCGR$0.280iShares International Fundamental Index ETFCIE$0.476iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETFCIF$0.439iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)CJP$0.264iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETFCLF$0.033iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETFCLG$0.037iShares US Fundamental Index ETFCLU$0.209iShares US Fundamental Index ETFCLU.C$0.279iShares Global Agriculture Index ETFCOW$0.405iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETFCPD$0.061iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETFCRQ$0.183iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)CUD$0.089iShares Convertible Bond Index ETFCVD$0.076iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETFCWO$0.694iShares Global Water Index ETFCWW$0.292iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)CYH$0.072iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETFFIE$0.040iShares ESG Balanced ETF PortfolioGBAL$0.331iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF PortfolioGCNS$0.361iShares ESG Equity ETF PortfolioGEQT$0.440iShares ESG Growth ETF PortfolioGGRO$0.391iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETFXAD$0.097iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETFXAGG$0.122iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF(1)XAGG.U$0.089iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XAGH$0.105iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETFXAW$0.388iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF(1)XAW.U$0.278iShares Core Balanced ETF PortfolioXBAL$0.279iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETFXBB$0.081iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETFXBM$0.142iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETFXCB$0.070iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETFXCBG$0.127iShares U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETFXCBU$0.127iShares U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF(1)XCBU.U$0.092iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XCD$0.214iShares Canadian Growth Index ETFXCG$0.122iShares China Index ETFXCH$0.142iShares Semiconductor Index ETFXCHP$0.069iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETFXCLN$0.156iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF PortfolioXCNS$0.210iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETFXCS$0.228iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETFXCSR$0.534iShares Canadian Value Index ETFXCV$0.391iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETFXDG$0.076iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF(1)XDG.U$0.055iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XDGH$0.063iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETFXDIV$0.117iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETFXDNA$0.116iShares Global Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Index ETFXDRV$0.317iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETFXDSR$0.997iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETFXDU$0.067iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF(1)XDU.U$0.049iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XDUH$0.058iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETFXDV$0.191iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XEB$0.058iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETFXEC$0.343iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF(1)XEC.U$0.245iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETFXEF$0.790iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF(1)XEF.U$0.565iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETFXEG$0.150iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XEH$0.772iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETFXEI$0.117iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETFXEM$0.229iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETFXEMC$0.402iShares Jantzi Social Index ETFXEN$0.223iShares Core Equity ETF PortfolioXEQT$0.322iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETFXESG$0.207iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETFXETM$0.206iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETFXEU$0.770iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETFXEXP$0.292iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XFH$0.642iShares Core Canadian 15+ Year Federal Bond Index ETFXFLB$0.116iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETFXFLI$0.182iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF(1)XFLI.U$0.130iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF (CAD-Hedged)XFLX$0.173iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETFXFN$0.167iShares Floating Rate Index ETFXFR$0.042iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETFXGB$0.050iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETFXGD$0.244iShares Global Government Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XGGB$0.042iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XGI$0.277iShares Core Growth ETF PortfolioXGRO$0.287iShares Cybersecurity and Tech Index ETFXHAK$0.011iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETFXHB$0.076iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XHC$0.431iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XHD$0.080iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETFXHU$0.077iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XHY$0.083iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETFXIC$0.291iShares India Index ETFXID$0.127iShares U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XIG$0.070iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XIGS$0.128iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XIN$0.591iShares Core Income Balanced ETF PortfolioXINC$0.183iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETFXIT$0.000iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETFXLB$0.062iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETFXMA$0.100iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETFXMC$0.131iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF(1)XMC.U$0.094iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETFXMD$0.217iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XMH$0.098iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETFXMI$0.721iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XML$0.502iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETFXMM$0.255iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XMS$0.112iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETFXMTM$0.062iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETFXMU$0.265iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF(1)XMU.U$0.190iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETFXMV$0.327iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETFXMW$0.375iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XMY$0.212iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XPF$0.068iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETFXQB$0.054iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETFXQLT$0.056iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XQQ$0.072iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETFXQQU$0.098iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF(1)XQQU.U$0.070iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETFXRE$0.057iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETFXSAB$0.050iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETFXSB$0.069iShares Conservative Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETFXSC$0.053iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETFXSE$0.055iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETFXSEA$0.530iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETFXSEM$0.243iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETFXSH$0.063iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETFXSHG$0.124iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETFXSHU$0.160iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF(1)XSHU.U$0.116iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETFXSI$0.057iShares Core Canadian Short-Mid Term Universe Bond Index ETFXSMB$0.103iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETFXSMC$0.127iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XSMH$0.119iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XSP$0.302iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XSPC$0.349iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETFXST$0.129iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETFXSTB$0.047iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XSTH$0.403iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETFXSTP$0.469iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF(1)XSTP.U$0.335iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XSU$0.178iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETFXSUS$0.099iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XTLH$0.118iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETFXTLT$0.187iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF(1)XTLT.U$0.136iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XTOH$0.106iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETFXTOT$0.109iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF(1)XTOT.U$0.078iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETFXTR$0.040iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)XUH$0.127iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETFXUS$0.250iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF(1)XUS.U$0.179iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETFXUSC$0.275iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF(1)XUSC.U$0.197iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETFXUSF$0.206iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETFXUSR$0.183iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETFXUT$0.087iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETFXUU$0.160iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF(1)XUU.U$0.114iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETFXVLU$0.146iShares MSCI World Index ETFXWD$0.622 (1) Distribution per unit amounts are in U.S. dollars for XAGG.U, XAW.U, XCBU.U, XDG.U, XDU.U, XEC.U, XEF.U. XFLI.U, XMC.U, XMU.U, XQQU.U, XSHU.U, XSTP.U, XTLT.U, XTOT.U, XUS.U, XUSC.U and XUU.U
Estimated June Cash Distributions for the iShares Premium Money Market ETF
The June cash distributions per unit for the iShares Premium Money Market ETF are estimated to be as follows:
Fund NameFund TickerEstimated Cash
Distribution Per UnitiShares Premium Money Market ETFCMR$0.112
BlackRock Canada expects to issue a press release on or about June 24, 2026, which will provide the final amounts for the iShares Premium Money Market ETF.
Further information on the iShares ETFs can be found at http://www.blackrock.com/ca.
About BlackRock
BlackRock’s purpose is to help more and more people experience financial well-being. As a fiduciary to investors and a leading provider of financial technology, we help millions of people build savings that serve them throughout their lives by making investing easier and more affordable. For additional information on BlackRock, please visit www.blackrock.com/corporate.
About iShares ETFs
iShares unlocks opportunity across markets to meet the evolving needs of investors. With more than twenty years of experience, a global line-up of more than 1,700 exchange traded funds (ETFs) and approximately $5.5 trillion in assets under management as of March 31, 2026, iShares continues to drive progress for the financial industry. iShares funds are powered by the expert portfolio and risk management of BlackRock.
iShares® ETFs are managed by BlackRock Canada.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investing in iShares ETFs. Please read the relevant prospectus before investing. The funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional.
Standard & Poor’s® and S&P® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”). Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”). TSX is a registered trademark of TSX Inc. (“TSX”). All of the foregoing trademarks have been licensed to S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed for certain purposes to BlackRock Fund Advisors (“BFA”), which in turn has sub-licensed these marks to its affiliate, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited (“BlackRock Canada”), on behalf of the applicable fund(s). The index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, and has been licensed for use by BFA and by extension, BlackRock Canada and the applicable fund(s). The funds are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, any of their respective affiliates (collectively known as “S&P Dow Jones Indices”) or TSX, or any of their respective affiliates. Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices nor TSX make any representations regarding the advisability of investing in such funds.
MSCI is a trademark of MSCI, Inc. (“MSCI”). The ETF is permitted to use the MSCI mark pursuant to a license agreement between MSCI and BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., relating to, among other things, the license granted to BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. to use the Index. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. has sublicensed the use of this trademark to BlackRock. The ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by MSCI and MSCI makes no representation, condition or warranty regarding the advisability of investing in the ETF.
BlackRock (BLK 2.77%) and Blackstone (BX 1.65%) are the undisputed heavyweights of the investment world, but they operate with very different strategies. Investors often struggle to choose which asset manager offers the better path for long-term growth.
BlackRock focuses on scale and technology, dominating the exchange-traded fund space. Blackstone specializes in alternative assets, managing private funds for institutional clients. Both companies are major players in the financial world, yet they serve different roles in a diversified portfolio.
The case for BlackRockBlackRock operates as a global investment powerhouse, managing a massive range of products from passive index funds to active private equity strategies. The firm is a dominant force among financial stocks, serving a diverse client base that includes pension plans, official institutions, and insurance companies. A major part of its strategy involves its Aladdin technology platform, which provides risk management and investment tools to other large financial institutions.
In FY 2025, revenue reached nearly $24.2 billion, representing an 18.7% increase over the previous year. The company generated a net income of approximately $5.6 billion for the same period. While revenue grew, the net margin, the percentage of revenue retained as profit, was nearly 22.9%, down from 31.2% in the previous fiscal year.
As of its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio is approximately 0.3x. This ratio measures total debt, including short- and long-term borrowings, against shareholders’ equity to indicate how much a firm relies on debt. The current ratio, which measures the ability to cover short-term debts with short-term assets, is close to 0.25x. Free cash flow, or the cash left after capital expenditures, reached nearly $3.6 billion. Note that stock-based compensation (SBC) accounted for roughly 33.3% of operating cash flow, inflating reported cash generation, since SBC is a non-cash expense added back in the cash flow statement.
The case for BlackstoneBlackstone is the global leader in alternative asset management, focusing on areas like real estate, private equity, and credit. The firm serves large institutional clients such as public pension funds and sovereign wealth funds that seek higher returns than traditional markets typically offer. Recently, the company completed the sale of a residential portfolio to Brookfield Asset Management (BAM 0.87%) and is actively pursuing new real estate acquisitions in Canada.
During FY 2025, Blackstone generated approximately $13.1 billion in revenue, marking a 21.6% increase over the prior year. The company reported a net income of $7.1 billion. Its net margin for the period was roughly 54%, an slight improvement from the year earlier.
As of its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio is approximately 1.5x. The company's current ratio is roughly 0.8x, suggesting it has slightly fewer short-term assets than short-term liabilities. Free cash flow for the period reached nearly $4.6 billion. Note that stock-based compensation (SBC) represented roughly 104.7% of operating cash flow, meaning reported cash generation is heavily inflated by this non-cash add-back.
Risk profile comparisonBlackRock faces risks from market volatility, as changes in asset values directly affect the fees it earns from managing those assets. The company also faces pressure to keep its Aladdin platform ahead of competitors and must navigate complex global regulations on sustainability and antitrust. Integrating large acquisitions such as GIP and HPS presents operational challenges that could affect growth if synergies are not realized.
Blackstone is highly sensitive to interest rates, which can lower the value of its real estate holdings and make it harder to sell assets for a profit. The firm relies on its ability to raise new capital from investors, which could become difficult if market performance dips or institutional preferences shift. Additionally, Blackstone must manage risks related to cybersecurity and potential tax changes, such as the Pillar Two global minimum tax.
Valuation comparisonBlackRock appears more attractively priced than Blackstone based on its lower P/S ratio and slightly more conservative Forward P/E multiple.
MetricBlackRockBlackstoneSector BenchmarkForward P/E19.9x20.8x17.2xP/S ratio6.7x7.8xSector benchmark uses the SPDR XLF sector ETF.
Valuation metrics sourced from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.
Blackstone and BlackRock may seem similar — both are financial giants with similar names — but they have some key differences.
Speaking broadly, BlackRock is reliant on retail investors, while Blackstone’s core markets are high-net-worth and institutional clients.
Both businesses have been making money hand over fist, generating billions of dollars in profits thanks to the boom in world markets.
Blackstone is the smaller of the two, though it plays in the more sophisticated private equity and private credit markets. Yet concerns across the opaque private credit market warrant caution regarding BX. Recently, withdrawal requests have exceeded the 5% limit the company has in place, with demand from wealthy clients to pull some money the strongest compared to institutional clients. Still, Blackstone management has spent a lot of time reassuring its investors that it has the issue under control and that the business should see revenue approach $15 billion in 2026, a 15% rise from 2025.
BlackRock has been focused on the ETF market as the core of its business. The company is believed to be the largest operator of bond ETFs in the world. To attract and retain clients as they get wealthier, BlackRock has been pivoting to add private-market wealth management options for those seeking the promise of greater returns often seen in the long-term private equity space. The company also recently acquired Preqin, which it will combine with ASladdin to create a trading platform covering public and private markets.
Taken altogether, management says it has a plan to achieve $35 billion in revenue in 2030, with an operating margin of some 45%, which should translate into huge profits. The fact that it is slightly cheaper on price-to-earnings and price-to-sales ratios than Blackstone makes BlackRock the better pick for those looking to invest in asset management stocks.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
SpaceX shares have surged roughly 50% in their first days of trading (although shares are seeing pressure today), and the predictable response from anyone who missed an IPO allocation is the gnawing sense of having missed it. CNBC personal finance correspondent Sharon Epperson used a recent segment to push back on that anxiety with a specific, actionable claim: the average 401(k) holder almost certainly already owns a slice.
“Millions of investors may soon gain exposure to SpaceX without ever buying a single share. You may already own this high flier, or you may soon in your 401k, IRA, or your brokerage account.”
The stakes are concrete. If you chase SpaceX through a leveraged single-stock ETF because you think you have zero exposure, you may be doubling down on a position you already hold inside a target-date fund or a large-cap growth fund. Understanding the plumbing matters before you act.
The verdict: Epperson is right, and the mechanics are already in motion Her core point holds up. Major mutual fund families have been buying SpaceX in the private market for years, and index inclusion will convert that selective ownership into broad, passive ownership for almost every diversified investor.
Per S&P data cited in the segment, FMR, the parent company of Fidelity Investments, holds just under 1% of existing SpaceX shares across 46 Fidelity funds. Baron Capital Group holds less than a quarter of 1% of outstanding shares across seven funds. That sounds small at the firm level, but the concentration inside specific products matters to an individual account holder. Morningstar data referenced in the segment shows about eight funds, and four Baron funds specifically, hold over 20% of their assets in SpaceX. If one of those is in your IRA, your “missed” trade is already a meaningful position.
The roster of asset managers already holding pre-IPO SpaceX includes Fidelity, Baron Capital, Franklin Resources, BlackRock, and Neuberger Berman, across dozens of actively managed funds. BlackRock (NYSE:BLK | BLK Price Prediction) sits at the center of that list as the world’s largest asset manager, with approximately $13.9 trillion in assets under management and an iShares ETF platform that has crossed $5 trillion in AUM. The firm also placed an order for at least $5 billion in SpaceX shares at the IPO, with the deal pricing at a $1.75 trillion valuation. A chunk of that allocation flows into actively managed BlackRock funds owned by ordinary 401(k) participants.
Another note, Bloomberg ETF reporter Eric Balchunas recently reported that ETFs owning SpaceX has soared from four to 120. At the current time, most funds that own SpaceX are actively managed. JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (Nasdaq: JEPQ) owns roughly $185 million in shares while the AB Disruptors (NYSE: FWD) owns roughly $63 million.
The number of ETFs that held SpaceX went from 4 to 40 to now 120 in a couple days (few billion total). These are all active ETFs choosing to buy, not indexes (they coming later). Here’s a look at the list sorted by new buy, $JEPQ (the 2nd largest active ETF in world) at the top.… pic.twitter.com/KcqbW12B4J
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) June 16, 2026
The accelerant: index inclusion compresses the timeline Two index changes will turn active-fund exposure into universal exposure. SpaceX is set to enter two major indexes, the Russell 1000 and the Nasdaq 100, which recently introduced policies to fast-track mega IPOs. The Russell 1000 can include a massive IPO after as few as five days of trading, which the segment pegged to Thursday evening, June 18. The Nasdaq 100 adds a stock after 15 days, which the segment placed on July 6.
Once SpaceX enters those indexes, every fund tracking them, every S&P 500 retirement option that shares holdings, every Russell 1000 growth ETF, must buy the stock at the prevailing weight. That is mandatory, and it is the rule that built passive investing into a multi-trillion-dollar machine. BlackRock is preparing its own fast-entry vehicles: the firm is launching the iShares Space Technologies UCITS ETF (STAR) for European investors, designed to add newly listed companies within 10 to 30 days of listing.
The variable that decides your real exposure Whether SpaceX matters to your portfolio comes down to one question: do you own actively managed growth funds, or only broad index funds? If your retirement account is heavy in Fidelity Contrafund, Baron Partners, or a BlackRock active equity sleeve, you may already carry single-digit or even double-digit percentage exposure. If you sit in a plain S&P 500 index fund, you have none today, and only a small weight after Russell and Nasdaq 100 inclusion.
What to actually do Pull your fund holdings. Log into your 401(k) and IRA, find each fund’s top 25 positions on the latest fact sheet, and search for SpaceX or Space Exploration Technologies. Check the weight, not just the presence. A 0.3% holding is rounding error. A 12% holding inside a fund that is half your retirement balance is a concentrated bet. Map your index exposure to the inclusion dates. Note Russell 1000 funds for the June 18 add and Nasdaq 100 funds for the July 6 add. Decide if you need more, or less. If your active funds already carry heavy SpaceX weight, layering on a leveraged single-stock ETF compounds your concentration risk. The FOMO trade is usually the worst version of a position you already own. Check the holdings before you chase the headline.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.