Circle has launched Circle Wrapped Bitcoin (cirBTC), a 1:1 BTC-backed token that brings native Bitcoin onto programmable networks with segregated custody and verifiable onchain reserve data. Announced on 4 September 2026, cirBTC is live on Ethereum today, with native support planned for Circle’s Arc layer-1 blockchain once its mainnet launches.
How cirBTC’s Backing Is Structured Every cirBTC token is backed one-to-one by native Bitcoin and redeemable one-to-one for it, a wrapped token rather than a staked or derivative product. The underlying BTC is held through a Circle affiliate and custodied by Circle National Trust, a federally chartered national trust bank supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Reserves sit in accounts segregated from Circle’s corporate assets and held for the exclusive benefit of cirBTC holders, keeping the collateral legally and operationally separate from the issuer’s balance sheet. The token is issued by Circle International Bermuda Limited, a Class F Digital Asset Business licensed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority.
Chainlink Proof of Reserve for Verifiable Backing Circle pairs segregated custody with observable backing by connecting three data points: native BTC held in disclosed reserve addresses, the onchain reserve value published through Chainlink Proof of Reserve, and the circulating cirBTC supply across supported chains. When cirBTC is redeemed, the corresponding tokens are removed from circulation and native BTC is released, so tokens in circulation should not exceed the BTC held in reserve. Circle is careful to note that proof of reserve does not replace custody, redemption, or smart-contract diligence, but it lets lending protocols, market makers, and asset managers inspect the collateral without relying solely on an issuer’s statement.
Ethereum Now, Arc and More Later cirBTC enters an already competitive wrapped-Bitcoin market, where custody and reserve transparency have become the key differentiators for institutions deciding how to put BTC to work in decentralized finance. The launch also extends Circle’s reach beyond its USDC stablecoin franchise, following moves such as bringing USDC to Hyperliquid. Native cirBTC support on Arc is expected at mainnet launch, subject to applicable regulatory approvals, with additional blockchain integrations planned over time. For holders, the pitch is straightforward: a way to use Bitcoin in onchain markets, as it did when WBTC exchange outflows recently hit a six-week high, while keeping the reserve side of that exposure observable.
AUTHOR
A freelance writer with a passion for crypto, delivering insightful and accurate content on blockchain and fintech. With a knack for translating complex concepts into accessible content, Eric produces well-researched articles, blog posts, and thought leadership pieces that cover the latest trends and developments in the digital finance space. His writing is aimed at educating and engaging both newcomers and industry experts, offering fresh insights into the world of cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance (DeFi), and blockchain innovations. Eric’s dedication to quality and accuracy makes him a trusted voice in the fintech and crypto communities
Before a wrapped BTC asset becomes inventory, collateral, or treasury infrastructure, it should pass a basic institutional test: can your risk committee understand how it works under stress? This includes Circle Wrapped Bitcoin (cirBTC), now available on Ethereum. Arc support is upcoming, subject to applicable regulatory approvals.
Wrapped BTC exists to bring BTC-backed liquidity into smart contract environments (like onchain lending, trading, and settlement markets) where bitcoin cannot natively settle. It gives bitcoin holders additional ways to deploy BTC without selling their underlying positions.
The market already has numerous tokenized BTC options. For institutions, more choice is useful only if it is paired with a strong due diligence process. Before assessing and implementing any wrapped asset or product, institutions need to define clear standards and requirements.
Start with a wrapped BTC checklist
“Where does it trade?” is not the first question institutions should be asking. It should be “What has to remain true for this asset to work?” You need to evaluate not only how it operates under ideal conditions, but also under market stress. While true for all onchain tokens, this assessment is especially critical for tokenized BTC and other wrapped tokens.
A wrapped BTC product depends on multiple systems: reserve assets, custody, issuance, redemption, smart contracts, supported chains, and liquidity venues. Each layer can introduce wrapped token risk. If one layer is opaque or operationally fragile, the asset may function in normal markets but become difficult to trust during market volatility.
Institutions use wrapped BTC as market infrastructure, so it needs to be reliable. Market makers need predictable inventory movement. OTC desks need assets clients can trust. Lending protocols need collateral they can monitor. Asset managers, prop firms, and BTC miners need liquidity access without unclear counterparty risk.
Reserve design: Is it actually 1:1 backed by BTC?A serious wrapped BTC asset should have a clear and transparent reserve model. Institutions should be able to confirm whether each token is backed 1:1 by native BTC and whether the product is a straightforward wrapper rather than a staked or derivative BTC product.
Reserve design defines the risk perimeter. A 1:1 wrapped BTC token, a BTC derivative, and a yield product may all reference bitcoin, but they are not the same collateral instrument. The same principle applies in stablecoin evaluation: the label matters less than what the reserve actually contains and how it behaves under pressure. Just as fiat-backed, crypto-backed, and algorithmic stablecoins have markedly different reserve models and risk profiles, so too do wrapped BTC products with different underlying structures.
Crypto custody: Who holds the BTC?Institutions should understand who custodies the underlying BTC, what legal entities are involved, whether reserves are segregated from corporate assets, and whether the BTC is held for the benefit of wrapped bitcoin holders.
Strong crypto custody design reduces ambiguity about control, segregation, and protection from commingling risk. Institutions should be able to verify, not merely trust, that underlying BTC is being safeguarded appropriately.
BTC redemption: Can the asset exit cleanly?Redemption is where a wrapped BTC product proves whether it is durable infrastructure or just normal market liquidity. Institutions should evaluate who can mint and redeem, what operational steps are required, expected timing, and whether redemption is available through a known institutional workflow.
Historical examples of bitcoin-linked products trading at a discount, shutting down, or being unredeemable has left institutions hesitant to move forward — and with good reason. BTC redemption assumptions affect pricing, inventory management, collateral parameters, and stress modeling. If redemption mechanics are unclear, the asset is harder to use as institutional collateral.
Transparency: Can reserves be continuously verified?Diligence should move beyond periodic comfort. Onchain markets operate continuously, and risk teams need reserve data that can be observed and integrated into persistent monitoring systems. Institutions should look for independent, onchain reserve verification, transparent reserve-address practices where applicable, and a process that allows counterparties to compare token supply against BTC holdings.
Transparency should be operational. Lending protocols need collateral data. Market makers need confidence in inventory. Risk desks need evidence they can review without waiting for a monthly report.
Chain support and integrations: Where can the asset work?A wrapped BTC product becomes more useful when it can move where liquidity, credit, and settlement activity already thrive. Institutions should evaluate current chain support, planned expansion, transfer architecture, and whether liquidity is concentrated in one ecosystem.
Ethereum support matters because it has deep DeFi liquidity and established institutional workflows. Arc matters because it is being built as the Economic OS for internet-native financial markets, with cirBTC expected to be an important collateral asset there. Multichain support matters because liquidity shifts across chains and markets over time. Collateral that cannot reach the venues and protocols where counterparties need it can lose utility or value, so evaluating a product's expansion roadmap is as important as its current chain footprint.
Issuer neutrality: Is the provider also a competitor?Institutions should examine the issuer’s business model. Does the issuer operate a competing centralized exchange (CEX), decentralized exchange (DEX), or lending protocol? Does it benefit if liquidity stays inside a preferred venue?
Institutional wrapped bitcoin should operate as shared collateral infrastructure. Strategic neutrality means the incentive is broad token distribution, not steering activity into issuer-controlled venues.
Applying the checklist: How Circle Wrapped Bitcoin stacks upApplying this framework to a specific product illustrates what institutional-grade design looks like in practice. Circle Wrapped Bitcoin (cirBTC) is designed for institutions evaluating wrapped BTC through a diligence lens, and is subject to applicable regulatory approvals.
Every cirBTC is 1:1 backed by native BTC. The underlying BTC is held through Circle’s Bermuda affiliate and custodied by Circle National Trust, a federally chartered national trust bank and qualified custodian under the supervision and examination of the OCC, for the exclusive benefit of cirBTC holders. Designed as a 1:1 wrapped token, cirBTC is not a staked or derivative version of BTC.
For transparency, Circle uses Chainlink Proof of Reserve to support real-time onchain verification of cirBTC reserves rather than monthly reserve attestations. Circle also uses multi-address transparency, allowing counterparties to independently review BTC holdings on the Bitcoin blockchain.
Now available on Ethereum with an Arc launch on the horizon, cirBTC is architected for multichain expansion over time, in keeping with the historical and ongoing multichain growth of USDC and EURC. It is also expected to fit into the broader Circle stack alongside Circle Mint, giving institutions a more unified workflow for minting, redemption, and access to supported third-party DeFi markets.
Circle does not operate a competing CEX, DEX, or lending protocol. For market makers, OTC desks, exchanges, and lending protocols, that neutrality is key. Circle’s incentive is for cirBTC to work across venues and protocols, not to compete for trading flow or users.
The institutional wrapped bitcoin standard is the strategyInstitutional wrapped bitcoin will play a larger role as institutions look for disciplined ways to use BTC in onchain markets. The question is not whether institutions will use wrapped BTC, but rather which products will earn the trust required to become durable collateral and inventory infrastructure. That trust is built through diligence: a wrapper that can be interrogated, verified, and stress-tested before it is deployed. The institutions that define this standard early will be better positioned as the asset class matures.
cirBTC on Arc is coming soon, subject to applicable regulatory approvals. Learn more.
cirBTC is issued by Circle International Bermuda Limited, a Class F Digital Asset Business licensed and regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority. Circle Mint and related distribution services are provided by Circle Internet Financial, LLC, NMLS # 1201441.
Arc testnet is offered by Circle Technology Services, LLC (“CTS”). CTS is a software provider and does not provide regulated financial or advisory services. You are solely responsible for services you provide to users, including obtaining any necessary licenses or approvals and otherwise complying with applicable laws.
Arc has not been reviewed or approved by the New York State Department of Financial Services.
The product features described in these materials are for informational purposes only. All product features may be modified, delayed, or cancelled without prior notice, at any time and at the sole discretion of Circle Technology Services, LLC. Nothing herein constitutes a commitment, warranty, guarantee or investment advice.
USDC is issued by regulated affiliates of Circle. See Circle’s list of regulatory authorizations.
EURC is issued by regulated affiliates of Circle. See Circle’s list of regulatory authorizations.
Circle Mint and money transmission services are provided by Circle Internet Financial, LLC. Circle Internet Financial, LLC, NMLS # 1201441, is a licensed provider of money transmission services. See Circle’s licenses here. Circle Mint is currently available only to institutions and is not available to individuals.
Bitcoin (BTC) was designed to be used on the Bitcoin blockchain. Onchain credit markets, however, run across smart contract environments such as Ethereum, where assets move through lending protocols, collateral systems, trading venues, and settlement workflows.
Bitcoin holders who want to participate in those markets need wrapped bitcoin infrastructure they can trust and use at scale. Circle brought Circle Wrapped Bitcoin (cirBTC) to market as a wrapped BTC product for institutional markets.
The next phase of tokenized bitcoin utility will not revolve around a single venue, chain, or issuer relationship. It will be defined by secure, transparent, and strategically neutral infrastructure.
The problems are structuralThe digital asset market already has several forms of tokenized bitcoin, with more than a dozen listed on CoinGecko as of May 2026 and a combined $15 billion market cap. However, these existing wrapped bitcoin options do not address all of the roadblocks faced by institutions.
For market makers, OTC desks, lending protocols, cryptocurrency asset managers, and institutional trading firms, the wrapper represents market infrastructure. It determines who holds the underlying BTC, how reserves are verified, how redemption works, and which chains and venues get liquidity.
For those same market participants, it’s critical to evaluate whether the wrapped-asset issuer has competitive tension with the institutions using that asset. Many existing wrapped BTC options require institutions to accept fundamental trade-offs that make it difficult to treat the asset as neutral collateral. Some rely on complex governance or management structures. Others are issued by companies that also operate trading venues, lending businesses, or other services.
That is the core tension. Many BTC holders want access to expanded onchain utility, so they need a wrapped version of the digital asset. But institutions need a wrapper that can support broad distribution without embedding strategic conflicts into the collateral layer itself.
A wrapped token becomes more valuable as more exchanges, protocols, market makers, and allocators are able to use it without wondering whether the issuer is also competing with them for order flow, users, or liquidity.
That strategic neutrality is key. It requires a digital asset issuer’s incentives to align with the asset working wherever counterparties need reliable, interoperable, and multichain Bitcoin collateral — not only on a preferred exchange, inside one lending venue, or within one closed ecosystem.
In practice, neutrality matters because wrapped BTC has to serve many workflows at once. Lending protocols need collateral they can monitor, price, and liquidate with confidence. OTC desks, market makers, and exchanges need an asset that can move across clients, trading pairs, chains, and counterparties without creating venue conflicts or dependence on a competitor’s product. Bitcoin miners, funds, and asset managers need to borrow against BTC exposure without being forced to sell the underlying asset. The common requirement: the wrapper should deepen bitcoin’s onchain utility without pushing participants into one issuer-controlled market structure.
That distinction matters because wrapped bitcoin neutrality is not the same thing as commercial disinterest. The test is whether the issuer’s incentives depend on broad market adoption, or on routing activity into a venue or protocol it controls.
Circle is building Arc, and cirBTC on Arc support is coming soon. But Circle does not operate a competing CEX, DEX, or lending protocol. That means cirBTC’s success depends on adoption across chains, venues, and protocols, not on steering activity toward a Circle-operated trading or lending ecosystem.
cirBTC is designed for institutionscirBTC has been designed as institutional-grade wrapped BTC for counterparties that need security, transparency, and neutrality in the same asset. Every cirBTC is backed 1:1 by native BTC. The underlying BTC is held through Circle’s Bermuda affiliate and custodied by Circle National Trust, a federally chartered national trust bank and qualified custodian under the supervision and examination of the OCC, for the exclusive benefit of cirBTC holders.
Reserve visibility is central to cirBTC’s design. Rather than relying on a monthly attestation model, Circle uses Chainlink Proof of Reserve to verify cirBTC reserves with onchain data in real time. Circle also uses multi-address transparency to allow counterparties to verify BTC holdings through block explorers. This approach reflects the same operating discipline Circle has developed for USDC and EURC.
Beyond reserve transparency, cirBTC is designed to support high-velocity minting, redemption, settlement, and risk monitoring alongside deep dollar liquidity. Circle reported more than $75 billion in USDC in circulation and more than $20 trillion in USDC transaction volume during the first quarter of 2026, enabling cirBTC minting and redemption at scale.
What cirBTC changes in practiceThe clearest place to see cirBTC’s role is in onchain credit markets, where bitcoin collateral and dollar liquidity meet.
USDC is the natural borrow asset for that workflow, and with cirBTC, an institution can post the collateral and source the borrow asset from the same issuer — with the same custody, redemption, and reserve disciplines on either side of the trade. For the funds and prop firms supplying USDC into those markets, the appeal is clear: the BTC counterparty asset, issued by an operator that is not also routing their flow into a competing venue, has reserves they can verify onchain in real time.
That is what makes neutrality commercially load-bearing. The more workflows a wrapper can serve without forcing participants into someone else’s market structure, the easier it is to standardize on — and standardization is what turns wrapped bitcoin from an instrument into infrastructure.
Starting with Ethereum and ArcNow on Ethereum with Arc support forthcoming, cirBTC is designed to support a multichain future. Ethereum provides access to established DeFi liquidity and existing institutional workflows. Arc will give cirBTC an important role where USDC, Circle Mint, CCTP, and onchain markets work together through Circle-designed infrastructure.
On Arc, cirBTC is positioned to become a cornerstone collateral asset for borrowing, lending, trading, and settlement activity as the ecosystem develops. But the long-term objective is not to confine cirBTC liquidity to Ethereum and Arc. It is to make BTC more useful across onchain markets while preserving confidence in the issuer, reserves, and redemption model.
A new standard for wrapped bitcoin neutralityWrapped BTC should be neutral collateral infrastructure. For institutions, that standard requires more than liquidity. Wrapped bitcoin neutrality requires a clear reserve model, independent onchain verification, disciplined custody, reliable minting and redemption, and an issuer whose incentives are aligned with broad distribution.
That is the role cirBTC is intended to serve. Circle’s objective is not to compete for trading flows or replace the venues institutions already use. It is to provide institutional wrapped bitcoin infrastructure that can work across them. Now on Ethereum, cirBTC on Arc is coming soon, subject to applicable regulatory approvals.
To learn more visit the cirBTC landing page.
cirBTC is issued by Circle International Bermuda Limited, a Class F Digital Asset Business licensed and regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority. Circle Mint and related distribution services are provided by Circle Internet Financial, LLC, NMLS # 1201441.
Arc testnet is offered by Circle Technology Services, LLC (“CTS”). CTS is a software provider and does not provide regulated financial or advisory services. You are solely responsible for services you provide to users, including obtaining any necessary licenses or approvals and otherwise complying with applicable laws.
Arc has not been reviewed or approved by the New York State Department of Financial Services.
The product features described in these materials are for informational purposes only. All product features may be modified, delayed, or cancelled without prior notice, at any time and at the sole discretion of Circle Technology Services, LLC. Nothing herein constitutes a commitment, warranty, guarantee or investment advice.
Altcoin piyasasında büyük yatırımcıların işlem hareketliliği dikkat çekici şekilde artıyor. Santiment verilerine göre 100 bin dolar ve üzerindeki balina işlemlerinin haftalık artışında 10 token öne çıktı. Listenin zirvesindeki Humanity Protocol (H) ise yüzde 500’lük sıçramayla dikkat çekti.
Santiment’in son yedi günlük verileri, büyük yatırımcı işlemlerindeki değişimi ortaya koyuyor. Verilere göre H işlemlerinde yüzde 500, WBTC’de yüzde 440, MKR ve TUSD’de ise yüzde 400 artış yaşandı.
Ancak bu veri doğrudan balinaların bu tokenları satın aldığı anlamına gelmiyor. Santiment‘in ölçtüğü gösterge, 100 bin doların üzerindeki işlemlerin sayısındaki haftalık değişimi gösteriyor.
Dolayısıyla listedeki tokenlarda asıl dikkat çeken konu, büyük işlemlerin belirgin şekilde artması.
Balina İşlemleri En Çok Hangi Tokenlarda Arttı? Santiment’in piyasa değeri en az 100 milyon dolar olan projeleri kapsayan verilerine göre ilk 10 şöyle:
Sıra Token Balina işlemlerindeki haftalık artış 1 Humanity Protocol (H) %500 2 Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) %440 3 Maker (MKR) %400 4 TrueUSD (TUSD) %400 5 SPX6900 (SPX) %237,5 6 SwissBorg (BORG) %200 7 Rocket Pool ETH (rETH) %200 8 Worldcoin (WLD) %123,08 9 Cronos (CRO) %122,22 10 Ethereum Name Service (ENS) %116,67 Liste, farklı sektörlerden tokenların aynı anda büyük işlem hareketliliği yaşadığını gösteriyor.
Humanity Protocol Neden Listenin Zirvesinde? Listenin en dikkat çekici tokenı Humanity Protocol (H) oldu.
Santiment verilerine göre H’de 100 bin dolar üzerindeki balina işlemlerinin sayısı son yedi günde yüzde 500 arttı. Böylece Humanity Protocol, incelenen varlıklar arasında açık ara en yüksek artışı kaydetti.
İkinci sırada ise Optimism ağı üzerindeki Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) bulunuyor. WBTC’deki büyük işlemlerin sayısı aynı dönemde yüzde 440 yükseldi.
Bu iki tokenın ardından MKR ve Ethereum üzerindeki TUSD yüzde 400’lük artışla geliyor.
Balina İşlemlerindeki Artış Ne Anlama Geliyor? Burada önemli nokta, büyük işlemlerdeki artışın tek başına yükseliş sinyali olarak yorumlanmaması.
100 bin dolar üzerindeki işlemlerin artması, büyük yatırımcıların piyasada daha aktif hale geldiğini gösteriyor. Ancak bu işlemlerin alım mı yoksa satış mı olduğunu yalnızca bu veri üzerinden söylemek mümkün değil.
Bu nedenle listedeki tokenlar için daha doğru ifade, “balina hareketliliği arttı” şeklinde.
Özellikle stablecoin olmayan varlıklarda artan büyük işlem sayısı, önümüzdeki dönemde daha yüksek fiyat oynaklığı ihtimalini de gündeme getiriyor.
Yapay Zekaya Göre Yeni Boğada Hangi RWA Tokenı Öne Çıkacak?
Hangi Altcoinlerde Volatilite Artabilir? Santiment, listedeki stablecoin dışındaki varlıkların yakın gelecekte özellikle yüksek fiyat volatilitesi görme ihtimalinin daha fazla olduğunu belirtiyor.
Bu açıdan H, WBTC, MKR, SPX6900, BORG, rETH, WLD, CRO ve ENS yatırımcıların takip edebileceği başlıca varlıklar arasında yer alıyor.
TUSD ise bir stablecoin olduğu için diğer tokenlardan farklı değerlendirilmeli. Buradaki yüzde 400’lük artış, fiyat yükselişinden ziyade büyük işlem aktivitesindeki değişimi gösteriyor.
Özetle Santiment’in verileri, altcoin piyasasında büyük yatırımcı işlemlerinin bazı tokenlarda hızla arttığını ortaya koyuyor. Humanity Protocol, yüzde 500’lük yükselişle listenin başında yer alırken, WBTC ve MKR de güçlü işlem artışlarıyla öne çıkıyor. Ancak bu veriler doğrudan balina alımı anlamına gelmediği için fiyat yönü konusunda tek başına kesin bir sinyal olarak değerlendirilmemeli.
Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Chainlink is strengthening its position in cross-chain infrastructure after BitGo selected its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) as the exclusive provider for Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC). This decision shifts around $7.4 billion worth of tokenized Bitcoin onto Chainlink’s infrastructure. Furthermore, it brings the total value of publicly announced migrations from LayerZero to CCIP to roughly $14.6 billion.
Speaking about the development, Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov said the network’s growth is being driven by three factors: security, reliability, and connectivity. He added that BitGo’s migration reflects increasing demand for secure cross-chain infrastructure. Additionally, he expects similar adoption across other tokenized assets.
NOTICIA: @BitGo (NYSE: BTGO) migra más de 7.7 mil millones de dólares en Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) a Chainlink CCIP.
Tras una revisión rigurosa, BitGo dejó de utilizar su proveedor de puentes anterior y eligió CCIP como su infraestructura exclusiva para operaciones cross-chain, ya… https://t.co/XV2fU4xUIL pic.twitter.com/FxIbtD0fTR
— Chainlink – Cuenta oficial en español ⬡ (@chainlinkesp) August 4, 2026 Why BitGo SwitchedWBTC is the largest tokenized version of Bitcoin, allowing BTC to be used across decentralized finance applications on multiple blockchains.
Under the new setup, BitGo will standardize WBTC using Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard. In addition, CCIP will become the default cross-chain protocol for future digital assets issued by the company. The company also cited Chainlink’s SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, issuer-controlled transfer limits, and automatic circuit breakers. Furthermore, BitGo highlighted the ability to retain complete ownership of token contracts without relying on CCIP-specific smart contract code.
BitGo said the structure allows it to maintain direct control over token contracts, transfer limits, and operational settings. Therefore, it does not need to rely on an external bridge provider.
Migration Wave ContinuesThe latest move follows a series of similar decisions made after the $292 million exploit involving Kelp DAO’s LayerZero-powered bridge earlier this year.
Since then, projects including Mantle, Lombard, Kelp DAO, Solv Protocol, Virtuals, Re, Kraken, and Aave have either announced or started migrating their cross-chain infrastructure to Chainlink CCIP.
Following the announcement, Chainlink now supports roughly 70% of wrapped Bitcoin infrastructure after BitGo’s migration.
BitGo Expands Institutional ServicesThe migration comes as BitGo continues expanding its institutional business with products like BitGo Link, treasury management tools, and quantum-risk protection for Bitcoin wallets. It is also offering controlled DeFi custody for platforms including Aave, Spark, and Tesseract. Neither BitGo nor Chainlink has shared a timeline for completing the WBTC migration across supported blockchains. At the time of writing, LINK traded around $8.18. According to DefiLlama, LayerZero’s total value secured was $6.66 billion and has declined about 12% since projects began moving to Chainlink CCIP.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov has long argued that security, reliability, and connectivity are what set Chainlink apart. BitGo's decision to move its Wrapped Bitcoin infrastructure to Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) is making that case harder to argue against.
The BitGo Move and What It Means BitGo is migrating its $7.4 billion worth of $WBTC, the largest wrapped Bitcoin token, from LayerZero to Chainlink's CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain standard. The switch pushes the total value migrating from LayerZero to Chainlink near $15 billion and sets CCIP as the default for all future BitGo-issued assets.
BitGo CEO Mike Belshe said the firm's guiding principle has always been that security comes first, adding that Chainlink CCIP provides "a proven, institutionally adopted interoperability standard that aligns with the controls, reliability, and risk management" its clients expect.
Industry tallies now put close to $16 billion of wrapped Bitcoin on CCIP, representing roughly 70% of all wrapped Bitcoin by circulating value. That dominance is what Nazarov has pointed to as proof of the network's growing role as essential infrastructure, and he expects the same adoption pattern to play out across other asset classes.
A Broader Migration Away From LayerZero The move forms part of a migration wave that started following the $292 million exploit of Kelp DAO's LayerZero-powered bridge earlier this year, which increased scrutiny of LayerZero bridge configurations. Various other projects, including Mantle, Kelp, Lombard, Solv Protocol, Virtuals, Re, and Kraken have since announced moves to Chainlink's CCIP.
Chainlink's infrastructure has supported over $30 trillion in cross-chain transaction value to date. For Nazarov, BitGo's switch is less a one-off win and more a signal of where institutional cross-chain infrastructure is heading.
BitGo confirmed it will route all future BitGo-issued assets through CCIP by default, turning a single product choice into a company-wide standard.
Sources:
The Block: BitGo moves $7.4 billion Wrapped Bitcoins to Chainlink CCIP
CoinDesk: BitGo's WBTC move pushes LayerZero-to-Chainlink tally near $15 billion
Genfinity: BitGo Names Chainlink CCIP Its Exclusive Cross-Chain Provider
Whale 0x2684 Pushes Total Deployment Past $230MA cryptocurrency whale tracked under the address 0x2684 has purchased an additional 3,960 $ETH for approximately $7.4M, its latest move in a sustained accumulation campaign that began on June 30. The transaction pushes the entity's total capital deployment to roughly $230.21M across Ethereum and Wrapped Bitcoin.
On-chain data shows the wallet now holds 79,216 $ETH acquired at an average price of $1,777, alongside 1,400 $WBTC at an average cost of $63,887. The combined position spans both of the two largest cryptocurrency networks through a single Ethereum address, with the $WBTC holdings representing Bitcoin exposure via its ERC-20 equivalent.
A Pattern of Consistent BuyingThe scale and consistency of the purchases have drawn significant attention from on-chain analysts. The wallet, identified at address 0x2684, drew attention from on-chain tracking accounts after building positions across both Wrapped Bitcoin and Ether in a short timeframe, with no prior transaction history before this accumulation period, suggesting it was created specifically for this capital deployment.
Large withdrawals from centralized exchanges are widely interpreted by analysts as a signal of long-term holding intent. When assets are moved to self-custodial wallets, they are less likely to be sold in the short term, reducing available exchange supply.
The positions were earlier reported to be showing an estimated $10 million in unrealized profit, according to on-chain data. As buying has continued since that report, the total position size and any associated gains have grown further.
Movements of this size from individual wallets are routinely tracked by on-chain monitoring services because they can reflect institutional-scale positioning or large individual holders adjusting exposure. The identity behind the address remains unknown, and the wallet could belong to an institutional investor, a high-net-worth individual, or a fund rebalancing its portfolio.
Sources:
The Crypto Basic: Crypto Whale Accumulates $184M in WBTC and Ether
Coincu: New Address Builds $41.5M in WBTC and ETH Positions
Ainvest: 0x2684 Withdraws $100M in ETH and WBTC From Binance
@BitGo has named @Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive cross-chain infrastructure for its Wrapped Bitcoin ($WBTC) treasury, replacing its previous bridging arrangement and standardizing the multi-billion-dollar asset on a new security framework.
A Migration With Broader ContextThe move is part of a wider industry shift away from LayerZero. BitGo is set to replace LayerZero with Chainlink as the exclusive cross-chain provider for $WBTC, a move that follows broader scrutiny of LayerZero bridge configurations after the $292 million exploit of Kelp DAO's LayerZero-powered bridge earlier this year. The decision pushes the total value covered by announced LayerZero-to-Chainlink migrations to nearly $15 billion.
BitGo said it will standardize $WBTC deployments using Chainlink's Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard and use CCIP by default for future assets it issues, while retaining control of its token contracts and the ability to set rate limits and other transfer controls between blockchains.
Compliance-Grade InfrastructureThe compliance credentials of CCIP appear central to BitGo's decision, particularly given the firm's national trust bank charter. Chainlink is the only data and interoperability oracle platform meeting key institutional security standards, including SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, validated by Big Four accounting firm Deloitte and Touche LLP.
CCIP supports the Cross-Chain Token standard, which allows self-serve deployments with full control and ownership for developers, enhanced programmability, and zero-slippage transfers, all backed by CCIP's defense-in-depth security architecture. The CCT standard also eliminates vendor lock-in by granting token issuers autonomy and ownership over their token contracts without inheriting or relying on any specific CCIP libraries or functions.
BitGo's adoption of CCIP reflects a broader institutional trend. Chainlink says more than $7 billion in token value moved onto its cross-chain infrastructure in the second quarter of 2026, as security concerns and tokenized-market growth expanded its role beyond price feeds.
Sources:
CoinDesk: BitGo's WBTC move pushes LayerZero-to-Chainlink tally near $15 billion
Chainlink: CCIP Cross-Chain Standard and Security Certifications
CryptoSlate: $7 billion mass migration to Chainlink CCIP
BitGo has named Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) as its exclusive cross-chain infrastructure provider, the company said Tuesday.
The crypto custodian plans to transition its Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), which has a market capitalization exceeding $7.7 billion, from LayerZero, its legacy interoperability solution and standardize future cross-chain asset transfers on Chainlink CCIP.
BitGo said Chainlink CCIP’s institutional-grade security, compliance certifications and built-in risk controls were key factors behind the decision.
Advertisement
“BitGo has long been built around a simple principle: security comes first. As we expand support for BitGo-issued assets across more chains, Chainlink CCIP gives us a proven, institutionally adopted interoperability standard that aligns with the controls, reliability, and risk management our clients expect from BitGo,” Mike Belshe, CEO and co-founder of BitGo, stated.
BitGo will also leverage Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard to create unified canonical WBTC deployments across supported blockchain networks.
The companies said the infrastructure combines decentralized validation, issuer-managed transfer controls, and institutional security certifications to improve cross-chain asset management.
The collaboration aims to help institutions operate in an increasingly multi-chain environment by providing stronger security, greater operational consistency, and enhanced control over digital asset transfers.
“We’re proud to support BitGo in this defining moment for our industry where one of its most long-standing leaders doubles down on security. Cementing Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive cross-chain infrastructure for WBTC and future BitGo-issued assets is another major milestone towards establishing the secure DeFi ecosystem users demand,” Chainlink Labs’s Johann Eid commented.
BitGo previously worked with LayerZero to expand WBTC across BNB Chain and Avalanche, leveraging LayerZero’s Omnichain Fungible Token standard for native cross-chain transfers.
Following the KelpDAO bridge exploit in April, which targeted a LayerZero off-chain single-verifier DVN configuration, BitGo has now joined a growing number of protocols transitioning their cross-chain infrastructure to Chainlink’s CCIP.
The total value of assets migrated has approached $15 billion, while the latest adoption of Chainlink’s CCT standard is expected to bring nearly 70% of wrapped Bitcoin under CCIP, representing around $16 billion in circulating value.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
BitGo will move Wrapped Bitcoin and every future BitGo-issued asset onto Chainlink CCIP, dropping the provider it chose in September 2024. The announcement never uses the word LayerZero.
BitGo will make Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol the exclusive cross-chain infrastructure for Wrapped Bitcoin, the custodian said on Aug. 4, taking what it describes as more than $7.7 billion of the token off the provider it selected in 2024. All future BitGo-issued assets will use CCIP by default.
WBTC is the largest asset to leave LayerZero since the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit in April, and the framing makes the reason explicit: verifier configuration is now something a regulated issuer defends to clients rather than an implementation detail. BitGo opened its post on X with "Security comes first. Always has."
BitGo calls WBTC the largest omnichain fungible token by market capitalization, at more than $7.7 billion. OFT is LayerZero's token standard. Neither BitGo's blog post nor its X post names LayerZero, referring throughout to a "legacy solution." DefiLlama puts WBTC's value at $7.29 billion; CoinGecko puts circulating supply at 116,132 WBTC and market capitalization at $7.42 billion.
"BitGo has long been built around a simple principle: security comes first," said Mike Belshe, chief executive and co-founder of BitGo. "As we expand support for BitGo-issued assets across more chains, Chainlink CCIP gives us a proven, institutionally adopted interoperability standard that aligns with the controls, reliability, and risk management our clients expect from BitGo."
Sixteen Node Operators MinimumBitGo listed four reasons for the switch. Every CCIP bridge lane is secured by a minimum of 16 independent node operators diversified across regions, organizations and hosting environments. CCIP holds SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, which BitGo says no other cross-chain protocol has. CCIP supports issuer-managed rate limits and configurable transfer controls that BitGo describes as automatic circuit breakers. And BitGo keeps full ownership of its token deployments, with "no reliance on CCIP-specific code within its smart contracts."
BitGo also plans to use Chainlink's Cross-Chain Token standard to establish unified canonical WBTC deployments across supported blockchains. Neither a chain list nor a completion date appears in the announcement.
The Configuration That BrokeBitGo made WBTC natively omnichain with LayerZero in September 2024, using a setup in which BitGo's own decentralized verifier network had to sign every cross-chain transfer, plus one of two optional verifiers, LayerZero Labs and Polyhedra. Verifier configuration is exactly what broke for Kelp.
In its incident report, dated May 18, LayerZero wrote that the loss of 116,500 rsETH "was made possible by the affected OApp's single-verifier configuration. Because no second independent DVN was required to attest, the destination contract accepted the single valid attestation and unlocked rsETH."
LayerZero has since committed that its own verifier "will refuse to sign as the sole required attestor on any channel," and said on July 10 it had completed a move of Endpoint v2 defaults to a minimum 3-of-3 configuration, with roughly 0.5% of pathways still to update. The equivalent change to Endpoint v1 defaults was rescheduled to Aug. 4 — the day BitGo announced its migration.
LayerZero's handling of the disclosure cost it more than the code did. Kelp accused it of deflecting blame in early May, before the full report was out, and on May 8 LayerZero published a post stating: "We've done a terrible job on comms over the past three weeks." LayerZero had not publicly responded to BitGo's announcement as of publication.
Fifteen Billion And CountingChainlink now counts $15 billion in value migrated to its infrastructure across 13 teams, per its own tally, which was first published May 20 and lists BitGo first with "$7.7+ billion migrated." Twelve of the 13 named LayerZero explicitly in their own announcements.
Lombard wrote that "CCIP will replace LayerZero as the cross-chain infrastructure across Solana, Etherlink, Berachain, Corn, and TAC." Virtuals Protocol wrote: "For agent infrastructure, 99% security is not enough."
CCIP volume reached $4.9 billion in the second quarter, a 353% year-over-year increase, according to Chainlink's quarterly review published July 24, which put migrated cross-chain token value for the quarter at over $7 billion. The Defiant covered Kraken's move and Lido's earlier this year.
"Cementing Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive cross-chain infrastructure for WBTC and future BitGo-issued assets is another major milestone towards establishing the secure DeFi ecosystem users demand," said Johann Eid, chief business officer at Chainlink Labs, in BitGo's release.
LINK traded at $8.14 on Aug. 4, down 1.3% over 24 hours and 1.9% over the week, per CoinGecko. ZRO traded at $0.77, up 5.8% on the day but down 8.4% over the week and 15.8% over 30 days.
LayerZero V2's total value secured stands at $6.66 billion, per DefiLlama, against $7.58 billion on May 20 — a decline of about 12% across the period in which the migrations were announced.
BitGo has replaced LayerZero with Chainlink CCIP for $7.3 billion WBTC cross-chain transfers.
Summary
BitGo has selected Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive cross chain provider for its $7.3 billion Wrapped Bitcoin ecosystem, replacing LayerZero. The migration brings the total value of announced LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP transitions to about $14.6 billion. BitGo said the new setup lets it retain control over WBTC token contracts, transfer limits and cross chain settings. According to CoinDesk, crypto infrastructure company BitGo has selected Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) as the exclusive cross-chain provider for Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), replacing LayerZero in a move that brings the total value of publicly announced migrations from LayerZero to Chainlink’s infrastructure to roughly $14.6 billion.
BitGo said the migration will standardize WBTC deployments around Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard while using CCIP by default for future digital assets it issues. The company added that the design allows it to retain direct control over token contracts, transfer limits and other operational settings instead of handing those functions to an external bridge provider.
WBTC is the largest tokenized version of Bitcoin, with a market capitalization of about $7.4 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. Because the token is widely used across decentralized finance applications outside the Bitcoin network, the migration represents one of the largest cross-chain infrastructure changes announced this year.
Chainlink CCIP expands after industry migrations The latest announcement follows a series of similar moves made after the $292 million exploit involving Kelp DAO’s LayerZero-powered bridge earlier this year. Following that incident, several crypto projects disclosed plans to replace LayerZero with Chainlink CCIP for their cross-chain infrastructure.
Earlier migration announcements came from Mantle, Lombard, Aave, and Kraken, among others. With BitGo now adding WBTC to the list, the combined value of assets covered by announced migrations has climbed to nearly $15 billion.
Chainlink’s directory already lists CCIP-enabled WBTC pools on Ethereum and Ronin. Neither BitGo nor Chainlink disclosed when the migration across all supported blockchain networks will be completed.
Before the switch, BitGo had adopted LayerZero in 2024 to expand WBTC onto Avalanche and BNB Chain. Under that arrangement, each cross-chain transfer required approval from BitGo’s own verifier together with either LayerZero or Polyhedra before a transaction could proceed.
BitGo keeps operational control over WBTC BitGo said its new setup is designed to preserve operational control while simplifying cross-chain deployments. Under the CCT standard, the company will continue managing token contracts, configure transfer rate limits and adjust cross-chain settings directly.
The announcement comes as BitGo continues expanding services for institutional digital asset clients beyond traditional custody.
Earlier this week, the company introduced BitGo Link, a treasury management platform that gives institutional clients a single dashboard to monitor balances and move assets across BitGo custody accounts and connected cryptocurrency exchanges. The platform also routes transfers through BitGo’s Policy Engine, allowing firms to apply internal approval workflows and permission controls across participating venues.
Separately, BitGo has continued adding security-focused products to its institutional offering. In July, the company launched four quantum-risk management tools for supported Bitcoin multisignature wallets, including a Quantum Risk Score, an exposed-address remediation workflow, updated UTXO selection and new default address controls to help institutions measure and reduce public-key exposure before quantum computing becomes a practical threat.
Migration follows BitGo’s institutional infrastructure push Recent product launches indicate that BitGo has been adding new infrastructure around custody, settlement and asset management while continuing to expand its institutional business.
BitGo Link complements the company’s existing Go Network and BitGo Prime services by helping treasury teams manage capital distributed across external exchange accounts instead of limiting workflows to assets held within qualified custody. Earlier this year, the company also expanded controlled custody access to decentralized finance protocols including Aave, Spark and Tesseract.
The WBTC migration fits into that strategy by replacing one part of the company’s cross-chain infrastructure while maintaining direct oversight of asset transfers.
BitGo did not announce any changes for existing WBTC holders beyond the migration to CCIP, nor did it disclose whether additional assets currently using LayerZero will also move to Chainlink in the future.
The company has also not provided a rollout schedule for the migration, leaving the timing of full deployment across supported blockchain networks undisclosed.
Kripto para piyasasında büyük yatırımcıların zincir üstü (on-chain) hareketleri yakından izlenmeye devam ediyor. Temmuz ayı boyunca Ethereum (ETH) ve Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) biriktiren büyük bir balina yatırımcı, son gerçekleştirdiği işlemle yeniden dikkatleri üzerine çekti. On-chain verilere göre yatırımcı, yalnızca son birkaç saat içerisinde milyonlarca dolar değerinde WBTC’yi merkezi borsadan çekerek özel cüzdanına aktardı.
Balina Yatırımcıdan Milyon Dolarlık WBTC Hamlesi On-chain analiz platformu Ai Yi’nin paylaştığı verilere göre söz konusu balina, son iki saat içinde bir kripto para borsasından 120 WBTC çekti. Yaklaşık 7,8 milyon dolar değerindeki transferin doğrudan özel cüzdana yapılması, yatırımcının uzun vadeli birikim stratejisini sürdürdüğü şeklinde yorumlandı. Bu işlem, temmuz ayı boyunca devam eden agresif alımların son halkası olarak değerlendiriliyor.
Ai Yi’nin verilerine göre balina yatırımcı, temmuz ayının başından bu yana toplam 59.404,19 ETH ve 820 WBTC satın aldı. Güncel piyasa değerleriyle bu varlıkların toplam büyüklüğü yaklaşık 156 milyon dolara ulaşıyor. Bu rakam, son haftalarda zincir üzerinde kaydedilen en büyük bireysel kripto para birikimlerinden biri olarak öne çıkıyor ve büyük yatırımcıların Ethereum ile Bitcoin’e olan ilgisinin sürdüğünü gösteriyor.
Portföy Şimdiden Milyonlarca Dolar Karda Analize göre yatırımcının Ethereum için ortalama maliyeti 1.742 dolar, Wrapped Bitcoin için ise yaklaşık 64.329 dolar seviyesinde bulunuyor. Kripto para piyasasında son dönemde yaşanan yükselişin ardından söz konusu balina cüzdanının yaklaşık 8,93 milyon dolar gerçekleşmemiş kâr elde ettiği hesaplanıyor. Bu durum, yatırımcının doğru zamanlamayla yaptığı alımların şimdilik önemli bir getiri sağladığını ortaya koyuyor. On-chain veriler, büyük yatırımcıların varlıklarını merkezi borsalardan özel cüzdanlara çekmesinin çoğu zaman uzun vadeli saklama eğilimiyle ilişkilendirildiğini gösteriyor.
Bu nedenle son WBTC transferi, bazı piyasa katılımcıları tarafından Ethereum ve Bitcoin’e yönelik kurumsal güvenin sürdüğüne işaret eden olumlu bir gelişme olarak değerlendiriliyor. Bununla birlikte uzmanlar, tek bir balina cüzdanının hareketlerine bakılarak piyasanın genel yönü hakkında kesin sonuçlara varılmaması gerektiğini vurguluyor. Büyük ölçekli transferlerin portföy yeniden dengelenmesi, saklama altyapısının değiştirilmesi veya farklı yatırım stratejileri gibi çeşitli nedenlerle gerçekleştirilebileceği ifade ediliyor.
Değerlendirme Son on-chain veriler, büyük yatırımcıların özellikle Ethereum ve Wrapped Bitcoin tarafında birikim yapmaya devam ettiğini gösteriyor. Her ne kadar balina hareketleri tek başına piyasanın yönünü belirlemese de, merkezi borsalardan özel cüzdanlara gerçekleşen yüksek tutarlı transferler uzun vadeli güvenin sürdüğüne yönelik önemli sinyaller verebiliyor. Önümüzdeki dönemde benzer zincir üstü hareketler, yatırımcılar tarafından yakından takip edilmeye devam edecek.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
The crypto market has absorbed weeks of geopolitical jolts, ETF flow whipsaws, and choppy Bitcoin price action. Against that backdrop, a single on-chain signal from Wrapped Bitcoin’s Ethereum rails is catching attention. According to the Santiment update, 326 WBTC left exchanges in one day—the largest net outflow since early June.
WBTC outflows matter because coins sitting on trading platforms are effectively available for sale. When Bitcoin’s tokenized version on Ethereum exits exchanges, the immediate selling pressure on those assets declines. More importantly, WBTC is built to move Bitcoin liquidity into DeFi, where it can be deployed as collateral, lent out, or used in liquidity pools. So a 6-week high in outflows isn’t just a simple holder withdrawal—it points to capital rotating back into on-chain yield strategies or serving as a foundation for decentralized borrowing and trading.
What the Outflow Signal Suggests The timing aligns with a market that has been starved for durable risk appetite. Bitcoin has struggled to hold momentum through repeated macro tremors. Exchange flow balance has often been a short-term tell: when outflows spike during consolidation phases, it frequently signals that large market participants are moving coins into longer-term holding or productive DeFi use cases rather than preparing to dump.
At the same time, wrapped Bitcoin is no longer the only way to bring BTC exposure onto Ethereum or other chains. Coinbase’s cbBTC and Circle’s newly live cirBTC are giving institutions and DeFi users alternative rails. Their presence could actually amplify the WBTC outflow story. If more users are migrating BTC into on-chain environments via multiple wrapped versions, the overall pool of idle Bitcoin on centralized exchanges shrinks, and that’s typically supportive for spot prices.
Meanwhile, Ethereum itself remains a developer magnet. Recent data on developer activity, as tracked by services like Top 10 Blockchains by Developer Activity This Week, shows the network maintaining a strong lead, which underpins the smart contract infrastructure that makes wrapped Bitcoin useful. Without a vibrant DeFi ecosystem, WBTC would be less attractive as a yield-generating asset.
The Next Unknowns One large outflow event doesn’t guarantee sustained bullish momentum. Traders will want to see whether this becomes a trend over several days or remains an outlier. Also, some of the outflow could reflect a one-off rebalancing by a single fund or protocol. Without knowing the precise wallet identities, it’s impossible to distinguish between a few whales and broad market behavior.
The broader tokenization trend adds another layer. With real-world assets crossing $20 billion on-chain and major financial players executing live tokenized settlements, as covered in the Weekly Tokenization Roundup, the movement of wrapped assets is increasingly tied to institutional plumbing rather than purely retail speculation. So the WBTC outflows may be part of a deeper structural shift, not just a market-timing signal.
For now, the Santiment data adds another layer of evidence that selling appetite is thinning, even as Bitcoin navigates a difficult macro environment. The next few days will show whether the rotation back into DeFi has real legs.
AUTHOR
Max delves deep into the cryptocurrency realm, with a passion for altcoins and NFTs. Convinced of crypto's transformative potential, he envisions a decentralized financial future. Max's background in the financial sector grants him unique insights into global monetary systems. In his leisure, Max embraces the thrill of adventures and is an avid sports enthusiast, finding balance and rejuvenation away from work.
A sharp drop in WBTC held on exchanges could be a positive sign for Bitcoin.
326 Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) tokens on Ethereum were withdrawn from exchanges in a single day. According to fresh data shared by Santiment, this is the largest net exchange outflow since early June.
This transfer of coins has reduced the amount of WBTC immediately available on trading platforms.
Exchange Outflow The latest outflows come as Bitcoin continues to trade through a “risk-heavy stretch.” Even as the crypto asset briefly climbed to $65,000 on Wednesday, market pressure from geopolitical tensions and ETF flow swings persists, Santiment stated in its findings. The large exchange withdrawals, however, could potentially serve as a positive signal for the broader crypto market recovery. The analytics platform added,
“Wrapped Bitcoin’s 6-week high exchange outflows provide more good news to crypto’s rebound “
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) was launched in 2019 following a joint initiative by BitGo, Kyber Network, and Ren. It remains the largest tokenized version of Bitcoin, with a market capitalization of about $7.6 billion. Coinbase entered the space with cbBTC in 2024, which has grown to nearly $6 billion in market value. This space has become increasingly competitive in 2026.
Last month, stablecoin issuer Circle expanded the market by launching cirBTC on Ethereum.
Recovery Near? As for Bitcoin’s price, the crypto asset moved higher after the latest US inflation report came in cooler than expected. Consumer prices fell 0.4% in June, bringing annual inflation to 3.5%. Economists had expected a 0.2% monthly decline and a 3.8% annual rate.
Meanwhile, Bitfinex analysts said that the asset is approaching what has historically been the final stage of its typical bear market period. According to the report, the BTC often spends five to six months trading below the Short-Term Holder Realized Price before entering a broader recovery. With July being identified as the fifth month of the current cycle, analysts believe the market could be closing in on a significant rebound.
You may also like: Why Strategy’s Tiny 32 BTC Sale Changed How Investors View Corporate Bitcoin Buying Bitcoin Nears Final Stage of Bear Market Window – Is a Broader Recovery in Sight? Bitcoin Brace for US CPI Report as Fed Rate Fears Grow They still warned that history alone does not guarantee a recovery. While July has traditionally been a favorable month for Bitcoin, broader macroeconomic conditions will also play a crucial role.
Bitcoin is the largest pool of value in crypto, but on its own, it cannot touch Ethereum’s world of lending, borrowing, and yield. Wrapped Bitcoin is the bridge. This guide explains how WBTC works, the mint-and-burn model behind it, the alternatives, and the custodial risks that set it apart from holding real BTC.
Summary
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is an ERC-20 token on Ethereum backed 1:1 by real Bitcoin held in reserve by a custodian, letting Bitcoin’s value be used inside Ethereum’s decentralized finance ecosystem. It exists because native Bitcoin cannot operate inside Ethereum smart contracts, so WBTC bridges the largest pool of crypto value into the largest arena for DeFi. WBTC works through a mint-and-burn model run by three parties: custodians who hold the Bitcoin, merchants who handle verification and distribution, and users, all overseen by the WBTC DAO. WBTC tracks Bitcoin’s price and can be used for lending, borrowing, yield farming, and as collateral, but it is not the same as holding native BTC because it adds custodial, smart contract, and bridge risks. Alternatives such as Coinbase’s cbBTC and the more decentralized tBTC offer different custody models, and the choice among them comes down to which trust assumptions you are comfortable with. Table of Contents
Why Bitcoin needs wrappingHow the mint-and-burn model worksWho governs WBTC, and why it mattersA worked example: putting Bitcoin to workWBTC versus native Bitcoin and the alternativesRisks and what to check before wrappingFrequently Asked Questions Wrapped Bitcoin, known by its ticker WBTC, is an ERC-20 token that runs on the Ethereum blockchain and is backed 1:1 by real Bitcoin held in reserve, so that one WBTC is always meant to equal one Bitcoin. Its entire purpose is to solve a fundamental incompatibility in crypto: Bitcoin, the largest and most valuable cryptocurrency, lives on its own blockchain and cannot natively participate in the decentralized finance applications built on Ethereum, because those applications run on smart contracts that Bitcoin’s design does not support.
An enormous amount of crypto wealth sits in Bitcoin, while an enormous amount of programmable financial activity happens on Ethereum, and for years, there was no way to bring the two together. Wrapped Bitcoin is the bridge. By locking real Bitcoin with a custodian and issuing an equivalent Ethereum token against it, WBTC lets Bitcoin holders put their Bitcoin’s value to work inside Ethereum’s ecosystem, lending it, borrowing against it, trading it, supplying it to liquidity pools, and using it as collateral, all without selling their Bitcoin exposure. It was the first widely adopted way to do this, and it remains one of the most integrated.
The idea is simple, but the details are where the important nuances live, and they are worth understanding before using WBTC, because the convenience comes with trade-offs that holding plain Bitcoin does not have. A wrapped token introduces extra parties and extra trust assumptions, and the question of who holds the underlying Bitcoin, and whether you can always get it back, sits at the center of the whole arrangement.
This guide explains what WBTC is, why it is needed, exactly how the mint-and-burn mechanism works, who the custodians and merchants are, and why they matter, a concrete example of using WBTC in practice, how it compares to native Bitcoin and to newer alternatives like cbBTC and tBTC, and the specific risks that come with holding a wrapped asset rather than the real thing. The aim is to let you decide whether wrapped Bitcoin fits your needs or whether plain Bitcoin is the cleaner choice.
Why Bitcoin needs wrapping To understand why WBTC exists, you have to understand a basic limitation of Bitcoin. Bitcoin was designed as a secure, decentralized system for holding and transferring value, and it does that job extremely well, but its scripting language is deliberately limited and is not built to run the complex, self-executing programs known as smart contracts.
Ethereum, by contrast, was built specifically to run smart contracts, and decentralized finance, the ecosystem of lending protocols, decentralized exchanges, and yield platforms, is constructed almost entirely on Ethereum and similar smart-contract blockchains.
The consequence is that Bitcoin, despite being the largest store of value in crypto, simply cannot plug into these applications directly. A Bitcoin holder who wanted to earn yield or use their holdings as collateral in DeFi had no native way to do so.
This is the gap wrapping fills. The core problem is one of interoperability, the ability to use an asset from one blockchain on another, and wrapping is one of the earliest and most widely used solutions to it. By representing Bitcoin as a token that conforms to Ethereum’s technical standards, specifically the ERC-20 standard that Ethereum applications are built to recognize, wrapped Bitcoin makes Bitcoin-linked value fully usable inside the Ethereum environment.
The ERC-20 standard is a set of rules that makes a token fully compatible and interchangeable across Ethereum’s smart contracts, so a wrapped Bitcoin token can be lent, borrowed, swapped, and used as collateral exactly like any other Ethereum token.
Wrapping, therefore, reduces the fragmentation between Bitcoin’s huge liquidity and Ethereum’s rich application layer, turning Bitcoin from an asset that sits outside DeFi into one that can be put to work within it. That is the entire reason wrapped Bitcoin was created, and why it found immediate demand.
How the mint-and-burn model works The mechanism that keeps wrapped Bitcoin backed 1:1 by real Bitcoin is called mint and burn, and it relies on a three-party system of custodians, merchants, and users.
The custodian is a regulated entity that holds the actual Bitcoin in secure reserve; for WBTC, this role has been played by the digital-asset custody firm BitGo. The merchant is an intermediary, such as an exchange or crypto business, that interacts with users, performs the necessary identity and compliance checks, and distributes the wrapped tokens. The user is the person who wants to convert between Bitcoin and wrapped Bitcoin. These three parties, coordinated by a set of smart contracts, keep the supply of WBTC matched to the Bitcoin held in reserve.
The process works in two directions. To create, or mint, wrapped Bitcoin, a user requests WBTC from a merchant, who carries out know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering checks to verify the user’s identity. The merchant then sends the corresponding Bitcoin to the custodian, who holds it in reserve and mints an equal amount of WBTC on Ethereum, which makes its way to the user.
To reverse the process, or burn the tokens, a user who wants their Bitcoin back submits a redemption request, the WBTC is destroyed in what is called a burn transaction, and the custodian releases the equivalent Bitcoin from reserve. Because every WBTC in existence is meant to correspond to a Bitcoin locked with the custodian, the token maintains its 1:1 peg, and its price tracks Bitcoin’s price closely.
Importantly, both the minting and the burning are recorded publicly on the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains, so anyone can verify the activity, and the system is periodically subjected to proof-of-reserve checks that confirm the Bitcoin backing actually exists. This transparency is meant to give holders confidence that the wrapped tokens are genuinely backed, though, as the risks section explains, it does not remove the reliance on the custodian.
Who governs WBTC, and why it matters A wrapped token raises an obvious question: who controls the system, decides which custodians and merchants are trusted, and can change how it works. For WBTC, the answer is a decentralized autonomous organization known as the WBTC DAO, a governing body made up of a group of stakeholders that has included prominent names in the crypto space.
The DAO operates through a multi-signature wallet, meaning that changes require the agreement of multiple keyholders rather than any single party, and its members can vote to add or remove custodians and merchants and to make changes to the smart contracts on which the system runs. This governance structure exists specifically to reduce the centralization risk that would come from a single company controlling the entire arrangement, spreading authority across a set of stakeholders instead.
Why this matters became vivid in 2024, in what served as the clearest real-world stress test of WBTC’s governance. The custodian BitGo announced a change to its custody arrangements involving a partnership with another firm, and that change sparked significant concern across decentralized finance because of the new partner’s perceived links to a controversial figure and ecosystem.
The episode mattered because it went to the heart of the trust assumption underlying WBTC: holders were trusting that the Bitcoin backing their tokens was held safely and by parties they considered reliable, and a change in who effectively controlled that custody was enough to shake confidence and prompt many users and protocols to reconsider. It also accelerated the rise of alternative wrapped Bitcoin products with different custody models.
The lesson is that the governance and custody arrangements of a wrapped token are not background details; they are central to its safety, because the whole value of WBTC rests on the Bitcoin being there and being controlled by trustworthy parties. Who governs the system, and how, is therefore something a prospective holder should actually look into rather than take for granted.
A worked example: putting Bitcoin to work A concrete example shows why someone would bother wrapping their Bitcoin in the first place. Imagine a person named Ezra who holds $2,000 worth of Bitcoin and believes in it as a long-term holding, but who also wants to earn a return on that value instead of letting it sit idle. The problem is that the lending protocol Ezra wants to use, which would pay interest on deposited assets, runs on Ethereum, and Ezra’s Bitcoin cannot be deposited there directly because it lives on a different blockchain that the protocol cannot interact with. Without wrapping, Ezra’s only options would be to sell the Bitcoin for an Ethereum-native asset, giving up his Bitcoin exposure, or to leave it earning nothing.
Wrapping solves this. Ezra converts his Bitcoin into wrapped Bitcoin, either by going through a merchant to mint it directly or, more commonly for an ordinary user, by simply swapping his Bitcoin for WBTC on an exchange or decentralized exchange, which avoids the need to interact with the custodians himself. Now holding WBTC, which is an Ethereum token tracking Bitcoin’s price 1:1, Ezra can deposit it into the lending protocol and earn interest, all while his position still rises and falls with the price of Bitcoin. He has kept his Bitcoin exposure and put it to work at the same time. Beyond lending, WBTC opens the same doors that any Ethereum token enjoys: Ezra could supply it to a liquidity pool on a decentralized exchange to earn trading fees, use it as collateral to borrow other assets, or deposit it into yield strategies.
A further practical benefit is speed, since transactions in WBTC settle on Ethereum, which produces blocks far more frequently than Bitcoin, so moving wrapped Bitcoin between Ethereum wallets and applications is quicker than moving native Bitcoin. This is the everyday appeal of wrapped Bitcoin: it lets Bitcoin holders participate in the full range of Ethereum-based finance without selling the Bitcoin they want to keep.
WBTC versus native Bitcoin and the alternatives It is essential to be clear that wrapped Bitcoin is not the same as holding native Bitcoin, even though the two share a price.
With native Bitcoin, the only real question about safety is whether you control your own private keys; if you do, the Bitcoin is yours, secured by the Bitcoin network itself. With WBTC, the question expands considerably, because you are now also relying on the custodian to actually hold the backing Bitcoin, on the integrity of the reserves, on the governance of the system, and on the redemption process working when you want to convert back.
You may hold the WBTC token in your own wallet, but the wrapped asset still depends on institutional actors operating correctly behind the scenes. WBTC tracks Bitcoin’s market value, but it does not inherit Bitcoin’s trust model, and that difference is the single most important thing to understand about it. If your only goal is to hold Bitcoin for the long term and you have no interest in DeFi, native Bitcoin is the cleaner and simpler choice.
The 2024 custody controversy spurred the growth of alternative tokenized Bitcoin products, and they are worth knowing because they offer different trade-offs. One prominent alternative is cbBTC, issued by the exchange Coinbase, which appeals to users who already trust Coinbase’s custody and operate within its ecosystem. Another is tBTC, built by the Threshold Network, which is designed to avoid reliance on a single custodian in favor of a more decentralized model, appealing to users for whom minimizing custodial trust matters more than convenience.
There are others as well, and the broader point is that the tokenized Bitcoin market has become fragmented, offering distinct choices for different priorities. The decision among them is fundamentally about trust model and use case instead of price, since they all track Bitcoin: choose WBTC for the deepest liquidity and the widest integration across established DeFi protocols, choose cbBTC if you prefer Coinbase’s custody, choose tBTC if avoiding a single custodian is your priority, and choose native Bitcoin if you do not need DeFi at all. Wrapped Bitcoin products are tools for a specific purpose, not upgrades to Bitcoin.
Risks and what to check before wrapping The risks of wrapped Bitcoin all stem from the fact that it adds layers of trust on top of simply holding Bitcoin, and understanding them is essential before wrapping any meaningful amount. The primary risk is custodial centralization. Because the wrapped token is only as good as the Bitcoin held in reserve, the failure of the custodian, whether through a hack, insolvency, mismanagement, or loss of access, could impair the backing and leave holders with tokens that no longer correspond to real Bitcoin.
This is not a theoretical concern: history offers cautionary examples of wrapped or bridged Bitcoin products that became impossible to redeem after the entity backing them failed, turning Bitcoin-backed tokens supposedly into worthless or stranded assets. The custody arrangement is the foundation, and if it fails, everything built on it fails with it.
Several other risks compound the custodial one. Smart contract risk means that bugs or vulnerabilities in the Ethereum-side code, or errors in governance, could affect the token. Bridge risk arises when wrapped Bitcoin is moved onto other networks, such as Ethereum layer-two chains, through additional bridges, since each bridging layer adds another set of trust assumptions and another potential point of failure, and you may encounter bridged representations that wrap an already-wrapped token, compounding the risk further. Governance risk means that the parties controlling the system could make decisions, such as the contested custody change, that holders dislike or distrust. And regulatory risk means that official actions could affect redemptions or lead to address restrictions.
The practical advice that follows from all this is to verify before you wrap: check which specific wrapped token and contract you are holding, understand its custody model and who controls the reserves, confirm that proof-of-reserve attestations are current, and make sure you understand the redemption path back to native Bitcoin.
Reviewing the custodian’s transparency, the governance records, and any reputable audits or incident reports before committing meaningful funds is simply prudent. Wrapped Bitcoin is a useful tool that fills a real gap, but it should never be treated as identical to the Bitcoin it represents, because the trust model behind it is fundamentally different.
Frequently Asked Questions What is Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) in simple terms? Wrapped Bitcoin is an Ethereum token backed one-to-one by real Bitcoin held in reserve by a custodian, so one WBTC is meant to always equal one Bitcoin. It exists because native Bitcoin cannot be used inside Ethereum’s decentralized finance applications, which run on smart contracts that Bitcoin does not support. By locking real Bitcoin and issuing an equivalent Ethereum token against it, WBTC lets Bitcoin holders use their Bitcoin’s value for lending, borrowing, trading, and collateral within Ethereum’s ecosystem, without selling their Bitcoin exposure. It tracks Bitcoin’s price closely because every WBTC corresponds to a Bitcoin in reserve.
How does Wrapped Bitcoin work? It works through a mint-and-burn model involving three parties: custodians who hold the Bitcoin, merchants who handle verification and distribution, and users. To create WBTC, a user requests it from a merchant who performs identity checks, the corresponding Bitcoin is sent to the custodian, and an equal amount of WBTC is minted on Ethereum. To convert back, the user submits a redemption request, the WBTC is burned, and the custodian releases the Bitcoin. Both minting and burning are recorded publicly on both blockchains, and proof-of-reserve checks confirm the backing exists. The whole system is overseen by the WBTC DAO.
Is Wrapped Bitcoin the same as Bitcoin? No, and this distinction is crucial. WBTC tracks Bitcoin’s price and can be redeemed one-to-one for Bitcoin, but it is not the same as holding native Bitcoin. With native Bitcoin, your only real concern is controlling your private keys. With WBTC, you also depend on the custodian actually holding the backing Bitcoin, on the reserves being intact, on the governance functioning, and on redemption working. WBTC shares Bitcoin’s price but not its trust model. If you only want to hold Bitcoin long term and do not need decentralized finance, native Bitcoin is the cleaner, simpler choice.
What can you do with Wrapped Bitcoin? WBTC opens up the full range of Ethereum-based decentralized finance to Bitcoin’s value. Because it behaves like any Ethereum token, it can be lent out to earn interest, used as collateral to borrow other assets, supplied to liquidity pools on decentralized exchanges to earn trading fees, and deposited into yield strategies. This lets a Bitcoin holder earn returns or access liquidity while keeping their Bitcoin exposure, instead of selling. WBTC transactions also settle on Ethereum, which produces blocks far more frequently than Bitcoin, so moving wrapped Bitcoin between Ethereum wallets and applications is faster than moving native Bitcoin.
What are the alternatives to WBTC? The main alternatives are other tokenized Bitcoin products with different custody models. cbBTC, issued by Coinbase, suits users who trust Coinbase’s custody and ecosystem. tBTC, built by the Threshold Network, is designed to avoid reliance on a single custodian in favor of a more decentralized model, appealing to those who prioritize minimizing custodial trust. The tokenized Bitcoin market is fragmented, and the choice among options comes down to trust model and use case instead of price. WBTC offers the deepest liquidity and widest DeFi integration, cbBTC offers Coinbase custody, tBTC offers more decentralization, and native Bitcoin is best if you do not need DeFi.
What are the risks of Wrapped Bitcoin? The main risk is custodial centralization: because WBTC is only as good as the Bitcoin held in reserve, the failure of the custodian through a hack, insolvency, or loss of access could impair the backing, and history includes wrapped Bitcoin products that became unredeemable after their backers failed. Additional risks include smart contract vulnerabilities, bridge risk when WBTC is moved to other networks, governance decisions that holders may distrust, and regulatory actions affecting redemption. Before wrapping, verify which token and contract you hold, understand the custody model and reserves, confirm proof-of-reserve attestations, and make sure you understand the redemption path back to native Bitcoin.
This article is educational information, not financial advice. Wrapped Bitcoin and decentralized finance involve significant risks, including custodial failure, smart contract vulnerabilities, and loss of funds. Details of custodians, governance, and alternatives reflect information available as of June 26, 2026, and can change. Verify the current custody model, reserves, and redemption process of any wrapped token from primary sources, and consider your own circumstances before making any decision.
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed
The highest standards in reporting and publishing
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
According to the latest on-chain data, the Layer-1 network Solana has hit a significant milestone in terms of the transfer volume of stablecoins this month.
Solana Overtakes Tron In Stablecoin Transfer Volume Data from the blockchain analytics platform Artemis shows that the stablecoin transfer volume on Solana has already surpassed $300 billion in January. This is the largest transfer volume recorded by stablecoins on the Layer-1 blockchain in a single month.
To put this figure into context, the Solana network registered $297 billion in stablecoin volume in the entire December. Meanwhile, the blockchain’s stablecoin transfer volume was about $11.56 billion in January 2023, reflecting an over 2,500% growth in the past year.
Stablecoin transfer volume across various blockchains in the past year | Source: Artemis From the chart above, it is clear that Solana’s stablecoin activity has been on a steady rise since October, increasing by more than 650% in the past few months. This growth has also impacted the network’s share in the stablecoin market, with Solana now boasting about 32% market share.
Unsurprisingly, Ethereum leads the market for stablecoins, with its transfer volume already reaching almost $317 billion in January. Meanwhile, the Tron network trails Solana in third place, with a stablecoin volume of roughly $240 billion.
On Thursday, January 18, Paxos revealed the launch of its regulated stablecoin, USDP, on the Solana network. According to DefiLlama data, USDC remains the dominant stablecoin on the Layer-1 network, with a market cap of over $1 billion.
Paxos is thrilled to share our regulated stablecoin USDP is now live on the @solana blockchain! This integration makes it easier for anyone to access and use the safest, most reliable stablecoins in the market. Learn more here: https://t.co/0j4Kj0yyPk pic.twitter.com/1doexKvVmY
— Paxos (@Paxos) January 18, 2024
SOL Price Overview Despite Solana’s burgeoning network activity, the price performance of its native token SOL has somewhat dampened in the past few weeks. As of this writing, the Solana token is valued at $92, reflecting a 0.6% decline in the last 24 hours.
This sluggish performance in the past day underscores the altcoin’s challenges since the turn of the year. After reaching a multi-month high of $124 at the end of 2023, the SOL price has largely struggled to hold above the $100 mark.
According to data from CoinGecko, the Solana token is down by more than 5% in the past week. Meanwhile, the coin has declined by about double that figure since the beginning of 2024.
Nevertheless, SOL maintains its position as the fifth-largest cryptocurrency in the sector, with a market capitalization of more than $40 billion.
Solana price faces downward pressure on the daily timeframe | Source: SOLUSDT chart on TradingView Featured image from Dreamstime/Aivaras Sakurovas, chart from TradingView
Disclaimer: The information found on NewsBTC is for educational purposes only. It does not represent the opinions of NewsBTC on whether to buy, sell or hold any investments and naturally investing carries risks. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use information provided on this website entirely at your own risk.
Key HighlightsEntering a Competitive LandscapeBridging Institutional Bitcoin to DeFiGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks Circle unveils cirBTC, a Bitcoin-backed wrapped token with 1:1 BTC reserves for institutional markets The token will debut on Ethereum, Circle’s Arc blockchain, and the Circle Mint platform Primary target audience includes OTC trading desks, market makers, and DeFi lending platforms BitGo’s WBTC dominates with approximately $8B market cap; Coinbase’s cbBTC holds $5.9B Circle joins an increasingly competitive field featuring Kraken, Binance, OKX, and additional players The stablecoin powerhouse Circle, known for issuing USDC, is expanding its product lineup with a wrapped Bitcoin offering. The firm revealed Thursday its intention to introduce cirBTC — a digital asset with 1:1 Bitcoin backing — on Ethereum’s blockchain infrastructure.
🗞️📲 Circle is launching cirBTC, a 1:1 backed wrapped #Bitcoin designed for institutions.
It will launch on Ethereum & Arc and integrate with Circle's infrastructure, offering institutional-grade security. pic.twitter.com/kwn20o9qUt
— Bitcoin.com News (@BitcoinNews) April 2, 2026
The initiative specifically targets institutional market participants: over-the-counter trading desks, liquidity providers, and DeFi lending platforms. Circle positions the product as a “highly secure and neutral version of wrapped BTC.”
Wrapped Bitcoin tokens enable BTC to operate across alternative blockchain networks such as Ethereum, providing asset holders entry into decentralized finance ecosystems that remain inaccessible with standard Bitcoin.
Beyond Ethereum, cirBTC deployment will extend to Circle’s proprietary layer-1 blockchain called Arc, along with integration across the Circle Mint infrastructure.
This development represents Circle’s inaugural venture into wrapped digital assets — a sector the company has avoided until now, despite its position as a leading cryptocurrency infrastructure provider.
Entering a Competitive Landscape The wrapped Bitcoin sector currently features two dominant players. BitGo’s WBTC commands the leading position with approximately $8 billion in market capitalization and roughly 119,000 tokens currently circulating — representing about 50% of its November 2021 all-time high.
Coinbase launched cbBTC in September 2024, achieving rapid expansion to a $5.9 billion market cap with approximately 88,800 tokens in circulation.
Together, WBTC and cbBTC represent approximately 208,000 BTC in aggregate supply, based on CoinGecko data.
Numerous cryptocurrency exchanges have introduced competing products — including Kraken’s kBTC, Binance’s BBTC, OKX’s okBTC, and Bitget’s BGBTC — though their market capitalizations remain significantly smaller than the top two contenders.
Circle faces the challenge of penetrating a market with established competitors and a defined hierarchy. The critical question remains whether cirBTC can attract meaningful institutional adoption.
Bridging Institutional Bitcoin to DeFi Financial institutions have accumulated Bitcoin positions at significant scale. Many now seek methods to deploy this capital within DeFi ecosystems — creating demand for wrapped asset solutions.
By enabling BTC functionality on Ethereum’s infrastructure, wrapped tokens allow institutions to access lending protocols, liquidity mechanisms, and additional DeFi services without liquidating their Bitcoin holdings.
Circle markets cirBTC as the neutral, institutional-quality solution for this use case.
The company has not yet disclosed custody frameworks or proof-of-reserve verification systems. Cointelegraph contacted Circle for additional details but has not received a response.
Circle clearly identifies an opportunity to become the trusted issuer for institutional clients — mirroring the strategy that elevated USDC to stablecoin market leadership.
No specific launch date has been announced. Circle confirmed plans to release cirBTC across Ethereum, Arc, and Circle Mint platforms without providing a definitive timeline.
According to Circle, the asset’s primary goal is to provide institutions with a neutral, highly secure alternative to wrapped Bitcoin. The most popular wrapped Bitcoin token, wBTC, is offered by BitGo and has 119,157 tokens in circulation. Its market cap is at $8 billion. Circle, a stablecoin issuer, has announced its intention to offer a wrapped Bitcoin, positioning itself to compete with BitGo and Coinbase among institutional customers. On Thursday, the asset cirBTC was revealed. It will debut on Ethereum and will be backed 1:1 by bitcoin. It is designed for OTC desks, market makers, and lending protocols.
According to Circle, the asset’s primary goal is to provide institutions with a neutral, highly secure alternative to wrapped Bitcoin. Many banks and other financial organizations have started to invest heavily in Bitcoin and are looking at decentralized finance. Wrapped Bitcoins would make DeFi available on other chains like Ethereum by making the asset usable on other chains.
Tough Competition Ahead The new asset will debut on Ethereum, Circle Mint, and their layer-1 blockchain Arc, according to Circle. The new wrapped Bitcoin from Circle follows in the footsteps of BitGo’s Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) and Coinbase’s Wrapped Bitcoin (cbBTC), which are the market leaders at the moment. With an initial quantity of 88,800 tokens and a market cap of $5.9 billion, Coinbase’s cbBTC debuted in September 2024.
The most popular wrapped Bitcoin token, wBTC, is offered by BitGo and has 119,157 tokens in circulation. Its market cap is at $8 billion. But that’s just half of what it was in November 2021, when Bitcoin reached its all-time high for the cycle.
Wrapped Bitcoin variants have been introduced by a number of cryptocurrency exchanges, including as Kraken (KBTC), Gate (GTBTC), Binance (BBTC), Huobi (HBTC), and OKX (XBTC), but their market capitalization pale in comparison to those of the two front-runners. Based on data provided by CoinGecko, the combined supply of wBTC and cbBTC is around 208,000 BTC.
Highlighted Crypto News Today:
IMF Flags Financial Stability Risks Amid Growing Tokenization Boom
A trader himself, Rossi has 7 years of experience trading in the forex market and the passion for writing has brought him to Newscrypto. He is the perfect combination of market knowledge and writing skills, making him one of the most sought-after writers on cryptocurrency.
In brief Circle is launching cirBTC, a wrapped Bitcoin alternative designed to unlock Bitcoin utility for institutions and investors. The token will first launch on Ethereum mainnet and Arc, Circle's stablecoin focused blockchain. cirBTC will join notable wrapped Bitcoin products like BitGo's WBTC and Coinbase's cbBTC. Publicly traded stablecoin issuer Circle wants to unlock utility for the world’s largest crypto asset. Its solution? A new wrapped Bitcoin token—cirBTC—backed 1:1 with native on-chain Bitcoin reserves.
“Bitcoin is sitting on the sidelines of DeFi. Not because people don't want yield or liquidity—it's because they don't trust the wrapper,” Rachel Mayer, VP of product at Circle and the Arc blockchain, posted on X.
“cirBTC is Circle's answer: 1:1 backed, on-chain-verifiable, and built on infrastructure the market already trusts,” she added.
Circle claims its “proven credibility” and “full-stack flexibility” will make cirBTC an attractive alternative for institutions looking to add utility to BTC.
In other words, the firm expects that users want to put their Bitcoin to work, like via lending or borrowing in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. Using a wrapped Bitcoin product allows them to engage with DeFi protocols and smart contracts on networks beyond the native Bitcoin blockchain.
The token will first launch on Ethereum mainnet and Arc, the stablecoin-focused blockchain incubated by the firm, with ready-made integrations with its dollar-backed stablecoin USDC and Circle Mint, its stablecoin issuance platform.
“We are bringing the same infra that supports USDC, EURC, and USYC to the largest digital asset, creating a neutral infrastructure for new applications for on-chain BTC,” Circle co-founder and CEO Jeremy Allaire posted on X.
Circle’s wrapped alternative joins existing wrapped Bitcoin tokens like BitGo’s Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) and cbBTC, a similar token offered by Coinbase that can be used on multiple blockchains.
But the alternative options are not free of controversy.
In August 2024, the custodian of WBTC announced it was partnering with BiT Global, a firm with connections to Tron founder Justin Sun. That invited criticisms from some in the crypto community, who were wary of the connection to Sun.
Following that move, Coinbase launched cbBTC, earning its own criticisms from Sun, who mocked the asset as the “central bank of Bitcoin.”
Following the launch of its own wrapped Bitcoin product, Coinbase ultimately delisted WBTC from its crypto exchange, leading to a lawsuit from BiT Global that alleged a “predatory and unfair move.” That suit was eventually dropped.
At the time of writing, BitGo’s WBTC remains the largest wrapped Bitcoin alternative, maintaining a market cap of nearly $8 billion at the time of writing. Coinbase’s cbBTC has nearly a $6 billion market cap.
Shares in Circle (CRCL) closed down 0.53% on Thursday, recently changing hands around $90.26. They have now fallen nearly 40% in the last six months.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC), one of the most widely used Bitcoin derivatives across the Ethereum ecosystem, has announced security measures amid ongoing DeFi contagion fears.
On Thursday, the project said it is upgrading its cross-chain DVN configurations, which would be done by Sunday, 26 April. It added, “These updates are precautionary and reflect our ongoing approach to maintaining robust security standards across integrations.”
For perspective, DVN (decentralized verification network) is the system that the attacker exploited on LayerZero, exposing the Kelp DAO protocol to lose $293 million.
However, the KelpDAO had a simplified DVN set-up that needed only a single verifier. This made it easier for the attacker to exploit the flaw.
As such, the wBTC team may be upgrading to a multi-signature system that needs more than two verifiers before assets move across chains.
Beyond hardening security systems, the project also placed a temporary pause on transfers across LayerZero.
WBTC OFT service via LayerZero will be temporarily paused. Service will resume once the root cause is identified and it is confirmed safe to proceed.
Why a secure wBTC is crucial For clarity, the KelpDAO exploit leveraged rsETH, a low-quality collateral, and swapped it for other higher-quality assets. Despite targeting a low-quality asset that is not widely used, the impact has been significant.
KelpDAO lost $293 million while contagion fears across lending markets triggered over $15 billion outflows from Aave. Before the attack, KelpDAO restaked ETH (rsETH) had a market cap of $1.6B and 22.8K holders.
On the other hand, WBTC has 180K holders, including major tier-1 exchanges like Binance. It has a market supply of $9.2 billion. Besides, it is the most liquid and widely used in DeFi platforms across Ethereum and Solana DeFi ecosystems, commanding a 44% market share.
Coinbase’s wrapped Bitcoin [cbBTC] comes in second with about 28% market share.
Source: Dune Over 70% of wBTC supply is locked in lending protocols and standalone buy-and-hold. In other words, a similar exploit would trigger a deeper DeFi run, noted analyst Ignas.
Got chills down my spine thinking if wBTC got hit with DVN attack. That would’ve touched every DeFi protocol as well as multiple CEXs who store wBTC.
That said, wBTC only saw about $400 million in outflows in the first two days after the KelpDAO exploit. Since 21 April, Tuesday, it has seen net inflows, underscoring resilience.
Source: DeFiLlama Final Summary Wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC) continues to harden its security systems to minimize the risk that exploited KelpDAO. The product has been relatively resilient despite broader DeFi outflows led by Aave’s $15B bleed out.
Another multi-million-dollar attack has hit the DeFi sector after liquidity provider and market maker TrustedVolumes fell victim to a smart contract exploit on Thursday night.
TrustedVolumes Hit By $6.7M Hack On Thursday, DeFi platform TrustedVolumes, one of 1inch liquidity providers and market makers, suffered a new exploit that drained millions of dollars in multiple assets from the project.
According to reports from blockchain security firms PeckShield and Blockaid, the attacker stole approximately $6 million in Wrapped Ethereum (WETH), Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), USDT, and USDT after exploiting a vulnerability in the protocol’s core signature validation logic, which allowed them to bypass authorization checks and forge trading orders.
Notably, the hacker quickly exchanged all assets for 2.513 ETH on a Decentralized Exchange (DEX) and distributed them across three addresses. In an X post, TrustedVolumes confirmed the incident, sharing the addresses currently holding the stolen funds and updating the estimated loss to roughly $6.7 million.
TrustedVolumes confirms exploit. Source: X The vulnerability was a TrustedVolumes-controlled custom RFQ (request for quote) swap proxy. Crypto researcher Humphrey explained that “the Custom RFQ Swap Proxy contract contains a function designed to manage the ‘authorized order signer’ whitelist. Such whitelist mechanisms are common in DeFi—only addresses on the whitelist can issue valid transaction instructions on behalf of the protocol.”
However, he noted that “this registration function is public and lacks any permission modifiers.” As a result, the attacker exploited this public function within the contract, registering themselves as an authorized order signer.
“Since any external address can call this function, it is equivalent to giving everyone the ability to make a copy of the safe’s key,” the researcher continued.
Same Hacker, Different Attack The online reports revealed that the attacker was the same hacker responsible for the $5 million 1inch Fusion V1 Settlement contract exploit in March 2025, which TrustedVolumes was the primary victim.
Humprey highlighted that while the same individual carried out both attacks, they were significantly different on a technical level. According to the post, the 2025 vulnerability involved low-level EVM memory manipulation in the 1inch Fusion V1 Settlement contract.
At the time, the hacker “proactively initiated on-chain negotiations,” offering to return the stolen assets for a white hat bounty. The DeFi platform accepted the proposal, and most of the funds were safely returned.
Now, TrustedVolumes affirmed that it is “open to constructive communication regarding a bug bounty and a mutually acceptable resolution.”
Decentralized exchange aggregator 1inch clarified that there was no impact on its systems, infrastructure, or user funds, explaining that “TrustedVolumes operate independently as a liquidity provider, used by multiple protocols across the industry, and are not exclusive to 1inch.”
DeFi Exploits See Historic Surge This attack follows a wave of exploits that has shaken the DeFi sector over the past month. Last week, PeckShield revealed that the crypto space saw 40 major hacks in April, which drained approximately $647 million.
This figure represents a 1,140% Month-over-Month (MoM) increase from March’s $52.2 million. It also represents a 292% surge from the $165 million the DeFi sector lost during the first quarter of 2026.
Notably, the top two incidents of the month, Drift Protocol’s $285 million and KelpDAO’s $290 million exploits, accounted for 91% of the funds lost last month. In addition, they now rank among the Top 10 hacks since 2021.
ETH’s performance in the one-week chart. Source: ETHUSDT on TradingView Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
In brief Kraken will migrate its wrapped Bitcoin product, kBTC, from LayerZero to Chainlink's interoperability protocol. The asset maintains a market cap of more than $260 million, and Kraken said it will use Chainlink for future wrapped assets, as well. LayerZero admitted it "made a mistake" with Kelp DAO's setup, which was exploited for $292 million in April. Crypto exchange Kraken is the latest firm to ditch LayerZero’s cross-chain interoperability technology following its role in last month’s $292 million Kelp DAO exploit.
As a result, the firm will migrate its existing wrapped Bitcoin product, kBTC, to Chainlink’s cross-chain interoperability protocol (CCIP). In the future, any wrapped Kraken products will also make use of Chainlink’s technology.
“Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure with strict security & risk management requirements,” the exchange posted on X.
Holders of the firm’s kBTC token, which is backed 1:1 by Bitcoin held in custody by Kraken, do not need to take any action at this time. The token holds a market cap of around $266 million at the time of writing.
Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to @Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) & all future Kraken Wrapped Assets.
Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure…
— Kraken (@krakenfx) May 14, 2026
Kraken’s migration extends the list of major crypto firms which have announced their intentions to detach themselves from LayerZero’s cross-chain tech after the interoperability protocol team admitted it “made a mistake” that led to the Kelp DAO exploit.
Prior to Kraken’s departure, Kelp DAO announced its intentions to shift to Chainlink’s technology and was followed by Solv Protocol, which said it would migrate the tech backing $700 million worth of Bitcoin-related assets to CCIP as well. Last week, on-chain reinsurance protocol Re also announced plans to make the switch from LayerZero to Chainlink.
“Together, Chainlink and Kraken can help accelerate the global adoption of crypto by unlocking utility and distribution for all Kraken Wrapped Assets across DeFi,” Kraken said.
Although the firm did not mention the Kelp DAO exploit, Kraken’s decision and those of the other crypto firms migrating away from LayerZero come after the April 18 exploit that was later attributed to Lazarus Group, the notorious North Korean state-sponsored hacker group.
Attackers from Lazarus were able to drain 116,500 rsETH liquid staking tokens from Kelp DAO’s infrastructure after "poisoning" internal RPCs used by LayerZero Labs, according to a postmortem from the interoperability firm.
Last week, the protocol said no other applications have been impacted and funds are not at risk.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
In brief Kraken will migrate its wrapped Bitcoin product, kBTC, from LayerZero to Chainlink's interoperability protocol. The asset maintains a market cap of more than $260 million, and Kraken said it will use Chainlink for future wrapped assets, as well. LayerZero admitted it "made a mistake" with Kelp DAO's setup, which was exploited for $292 million in April. Crypto exchange Kraken is the latest firm to ditch LayerZero’s cross-chain interoperability technology following its role in last month’s $292 million Kelp DAO exploit.
As a result, the firm will migrate its existing wrapped Bitcoin product, kBTC, to Chainlink’s cross-chain interoperability protocol (CCIP). In the future, any wrapped Kraken products will also make use of Chainlink’s technology.
“Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure with strict security & risk management requirements,” the exchange posted on X.
Holders of the firm’s kBTC token, which is backed 1:1 by Bitcoin held in custody by Kraken, do not need to take any action at this time. The token holds a market cap of around $266 million at the time of writing.
Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to @Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) & all future Kraken Wrapped Assets.
Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure…
— Kraken (@krakenfx) May 14, 2026
Kraken’s migration extends the list of major crypto firms which have announced their intentions to detach themselves from LayerZero’s cross-chain tech after the interoperability protocol team admitted it “made a mistake” that led to the Kelp DAO exploit.
Prior to Kraken’s departure, Kelp DAO announced its intentions to shift to Chainlink’s technology and was followed by Solv Protocol, which said it would migrate the tech backing $700 million worth of Bitcoin-related assets to CCIP as well. Last week, on-chain reinsurance protocol Re also announced plans to make the switch from LayerZero to Chainlink.
“Together, Chainlink and Kraken can help accelerate the global adoption of crypto by unlocking utility and distribution for all Kraken Wrapped Assets across DeFi,” Kraken said.
Although the firm did not mention the Kelp DAO exploit, Kraken’s decision and those of the other crypto firms migrating away from LayerZero come after the April 18 exploit that was later attributed to Lazarus Group, the notorious North Korean state-sponsored hacker group.
Attackers from Lazarus were able to drain 116,500 rsETH liquid staking tokens from Kelp DAO’s infrastructure after "poisoning" internal RPCs used by LayerZero Labs, according to a postmortem from the interoperability firm.
Last week, the protocol said no other applications have been impacted and funds are not at risk.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain infrastructure and moving exclusively to Chainlink CCIP to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) and all future wrapped assets.
Kraken announced it is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infrastructure for Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) and all future Kraken Wrapped Assets. The migration leverages Chainlink's enterprise-grade infrastructure, which includes ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications, secure-by-default architecture, 16 independent nodes, and native rate limits.
No action is required from kBTC customers during the migration. Kraken said additional details on the migration process will follow through official Kraken channels.
The partnership aims to accelerate global crypto adoption by unlocking utility and distribution for Kraken Wrapped Assets across decentralized finance. Chainlink CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol) provides cross-chain messaging and token transfers with security oversight designed to meet institutional standards.
Sources: Kraken
This article was produced with the help of AI flows.
TLDR: Kraken migrates kBTC and all future wrapped assets to Chainlink CCIP, citing enterprise-grade security. The $292M Kelp DAO exploit, tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, triggered a broad LayerZero exit across DeFi. Solv Protocol, Kelp DAO, and Re also left LayerZero for Chainlink CCIP following critical cross-chain security reviews. Kraken’s kBTC holds a $266M market cap; holders require no action as the backend migration proceeds. Kraken has announced it will migrate its wrapped Bitcoin product, kBTC, from LayerZero to Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP).
The move follows the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit in April, which was later linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Kraken cited enterprise-grade security and strict risk management as the driving reasons.
The token holds a market cap of approximately $266 million, and future wrapped assets will also use Chainlink.
Kraken Moves Away From LayerZero Infrastructure Kraken announced the deprecation of its LayerZero-based cross-chain provider this week. The crypto exchange will now use Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infrastructure.
The decision covers kBTC and all future Kraken Wrapped Assets. Holders of kBTC do not need to take any action at this time.
Kraken explained its reasons on X, formerly Twitter, in a public post. The exchange stated that Chainlink CCIP offers ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications.
Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to @Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) & all future Kraken Wrapped Assets.
Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure…
— Kraken (@krakenfx) May 14, 2026
It also noted the protocol’s secure-by-default architecture and 16 independent nodes. Native rate limits were also listed among the key security features.
The exchange wrote: “Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra.”
The post also referenced enterprise-grade infrastructure as a priority. Kraken confirmed that more details on the migration process will follow on official channels.
Kraken also noted a broader goal behind the migration. The exchange said both firms can help accelerate the global adoption of crypto.
By using CCIP, Kraken aims to unlock utility and distribution for its wrapped assets across DeFi. No specific timeline for the full migration was given.
LayerZero Fallout Spreads Across the Industry Kraken joins a growing list of firms exiting LayerZero’s technology following the Kelp DAO incident. On April 18, attackers drained 116,500 rsETH liquid staking tokens from Kelp DAO’s infrastructure.
LayerZero later admitted it made a mistake in setting up Kelp DAO’s configuration. The Lazarus Group, a North Korean state-sponsored hacker group, was attributed to the exploit.
Kelp DAO was the first to announce it would move to Chainlink CCIP after the incident. Solv Protocol followed, saying it would migrate infrastructure backing over $700 million in Bitcoin-related assets.
On-chain reinsurance protocol Re also announced plans to leave LayerZero last week. Each departure has added to the scrutiny around cross-chain bridge security.
The Kelp DAO postmortem revealed that attackers poisoned internal RPCs used by LayerZero Labs. This allowed them to drain tokens without triggering standard security alerts.
The vulnerability was specific to how Kelp DAO’s setup was configured, according to LayerZero. However, the event prompted a wider review of cross-chain security practices across the industry.
Chainlink CCIP has emerged as the preferred alternative for firms reassessing their interoperability stack. Multiple protocols have now committed to the technology within weeks of the exploit.
The migration trend shows how a single security event can quickly shift infrastructure preferences in crypto. For Kraken, the move is part of a longer-term strategy to secure all its wrapped asset offerings.
The US stock market's optical communication sector rises across the board in pre-market trading, with Corning up 9.28%.
According to Bitget market data, the U.S. stock market's optical communication sector saw broad pre-market gains, with MRVL rising 4.99%, LITE up 3.24%, Nokia up 3.11%, Corning up 9.28%, and AXTI up 6.69%.
1 seconds ago
US-listed AI chip stocks saw mixed pre-market performance, with Qualcomm surging 13%.
According to Bitget market data, U.S. AI chip stocks posted mixed pre-market performance: Qualcomm (QCOM.O) surged 13%, Intel (INTC.O) rose nearly 6%, AMD (AMD.O) gained nearly 4%, and Google (GOOG.O) declined 1.4%.
1 seconds ago
Micron Technology surges 18% in pre-market trading on US stocks
According to Bitget market data, the US stock storage sector is seeing broad pre-market gains. Micron Technology (MU.O) jumps 18% in pre-market trading, as its strong earnings significantly exceeded expectations, with multiple major banks raising the stock’s target price. SanDisk (SNDK) rises 12.25%, Western Digital (WDC) gains 12.05%, and Seagate Technology (STX) climbs 8.63%.
1 seconds ago
SBI announced it will acquire cryptocurrency trading platform Bitbank for 46.7 billion yen.
According to Nikkei News, Japanese financial group SBI Holdings announced on the 25th that it will acquire cryptocurrency exchange platform bitbank for 46.7 billion yen (approximately $288 million). Upon completion of the transaction, SBI Group’s crypto asset custody scale is expected to exceed 1 trillion yen, making it one of the largest operators in Japan’s crypto industry. Per the plan, a subsidiary under SBI Holdings will acquire Bitbank shares from individual shareholders including its founders as early as August this year. Bitbank will then repurchase shares held by existing shareholders MIXI and Ceres by the end of October. If combining data from SBI’s own crypto exchange SBI VC Trade and Bitbank, as of April this year, the two firms had a total of around 2.92 million accounts and total custody assets of approximately 1.1 trillion yen. While different crypto exchanges disclose custody assets at varying time points, among Japan’s major industry competitors, bitFlyer held about 960 billion yen in custody assets as of the end of December 2025, and Coincheck had around 800 billion yen as of the end of March 2025.
TLDR: Kraken DeFi Earn has surpassed $300M in total deposits, with the Bitcoin Vault alone crossing $70M shortly after launch. The vault uses a single-cycle supervised borrow strategy, eliminating recursive leverage and maintaining full market neutrality at all times. Sentora’s three-layer risk framework has recorded zero liquidations across more than three years of live vault operation since January 2021. kBTC, Kraken’s wrapped Bitcoin token, enables BTC collateral deployment across Ethereum’s DeFi infrastructure with a one-to-one redemption guarantee. Kraken DeFi Earn has crossed $300 million in total deposits, with its Bitcoin Vault contributing over $70 million. The vault converts idle BTC into structured yield positions through vetted DeFi protocols.
It operates using a supervised loan strategy, avoiding directional speculation entirely. Yield comes from the spread between borrowing costs and returns on deployed stablecoins.
The vault requires no active management from depositors at any stage.
How the Bitcoin Vault Generates Yield Without Directional Risk The vault supplies BTC as collateral to lending protocols, then borrows stablecoins against it. Those stablecoins are deployed into pre-approved yield strategies across onchain markets.
Target venues include Aave, Euler, and Morpho for stablecoin lending. Real-world assets and market-neutral AMM pairs on platforms like Curve also receive allocations. Each strategy is chosen because expected returns exceed borrowing costs.
Sentora Research flagged the vault’s milestone on X recently. SentoraHQ noted that the Bitcoin Vault alone surpassed $70 million shortly after launch.
That growth reflects strong depositor interest in BTC-based yield strategies. The vault’s design focuses on productivity without requiring price speculation. Idle BTC holdings are put to work through a constrained, structured process.
Leverage is used in this vault, but its application differs from typical margin trading. CEX margin trading often involves 5x to 100x leverage on directional bets.
The Bitcoin Vault uses a single supervised borrow with a 10–20% buffer below maximum collateral ratios. The strategy maintains market neutrality throughout its operation. If BTC falls in value, automated systems deleverage before liquidation thresholds are approached.
The vault does not use recursive leverage or looping strategies. BTC collateral is deposited once, stablecoins are borrowed once, and capital is deployed into approved venues.
There is no re-deposit cycle that compounds BTC price exposure across multiple loops. This single-cycle structure limits overall risk significantly. It keeps leverage defined, traceable, and governed by automated rebalancing at all times.
The vault uses kBTC, Kraken’s wrapped Bitcoin token on Ethereum, as its collateral format. Native BTC cannot operate directly on Ethereum’s lending and liquidity infrastructure. kBTC is redeemable one-to-one for Bitcoin with no fees attached.
For existing Kraken users, this wrapper does not introduce new custodial risk. It simply extends an existing trust relationship into the onchain environment.
Three-Layer Risk Framework Supports Vault’s Clean Liquidation Record Sentora applies a three-layer risk management model across all vault operations. The first layer involves formal research and due diligence before any capital is deployed.
Over 60 protocols across 17 networks have undergone technical and economic review. Audit history, oracle dependencies, and liquidation mechanics are all examined. No protocol enters the approved list without completing this review process.
The second layer is an automated on-chain system that acts as a 24/7 circuit breaker. It continuously tracks collateral ratios, borrow costs, and liquidation thresholds in real time.
If safety thresholds are breached, the vault autonomously recalls capital and repays debt. This process can occur within the same block when market conditions require it. Since January 2021, the vault has recorded zero liquidations across all deployments.
The third layer consists of quantitative off-chain monitoring across six risk categories. These include concentration, liquidity, interest rate, duration, leverage, and correlation. Metrics like Val01 and Exit Maturity help stress-test positions against worst-case market scenarios.
Available liquidity is evaluated to confirm clean exit conditions for each position. Large-holder movements that could shift market conditions are also tracked continuously.
Withdrawals from the vault are available through a standard five-day window. This period allows the system to exit multiple strategies while minimizing slippage costs.
The withdrawal timeline is expected to shorten as deposits scale and flows deepen. Independent audits by Spearbit and 0xMacro have reviewed the vault’s infrastructure. Sentora’s stated philosophy remains return of capital before return on capital.
The US stock market's optical communication sector rises across the board in pre-market trading, with Corning up 9.28%.
According to Bitget market data, the U.S. stock market's optical communication sector saw broad pre-market gains, with MRVL rising 4.99%, LITE up 3.24%, Nokia up 3.11%, Corning up 9.28%, and AXTI up 6.69%.
1 seconds ago
US-listed AI chip stocks saw mixed pre-market performance, with Qualcomm surging 13%.
According to Bitget market data, U.S. AI chip stocks posted mixed pre-market performance: Qualcomm (QCOM.O) surged 13%, Intel (INTC.O) rose nearly 6%, AMD (AMD.O) gained nearly 4%, and Google (GOOG.O) declined 1.4%.
1 seconds ago
Micron Technology surges 18% in pre-market trading on US stocks
According to Bitget market data, the US stock storage sector is seeing broad pre-market gains. Micron Technology (MU.O) jumps 18% in pre-market trading, as its strong earnings significantly exceeded expectations, with multiple major banks raising the stock’s target price. SanDisk (SNDK) rises 12.25%, Western Digital (WDC) gains 12.05%, and Seagate Technology (STX) climbs 8.63%.
1 seconds ago
SBI announced it will acquire cryptocurrency trading platform Bitbank for 46.7 billion yen.
According to Nikkei News, Japanese financial group SBI Holdings announced on the 25th that it will acquire cryptocurrency exchange platform bitbank for 46.7 billion yen (approximately $288 million). Upon completion of the transaction, SBI Group’s crypto asset custody scale is expected to exceed 1 trillion yen, making it one of the largest operators in Japan’s crypto industry. Per the plan, a subsidiary under SBI Holdings will acquire Bitbank shares from individual shareholders including its founders as early as August this year. Bitbank will then repurchase shares held by existing shareholders MIXI and Ceres by the end of October. If combining data from SBI’s own crypto exchange SBI VC Trade and Bitbank, as of April this year, the two firms had a total of around 2.92 million accounts and total custody assets of approximately 1.1 trillion yen. While different crypto exchanges disclose custody assets at varying time points, among Japan’s major industry competitors, bitFlyer held about 960 billion yen in custody assets as of the end of December 2025, and Coincheck had around 800 billion yen as of the end of March 2025.
In This Article cirBTC Explained: What 'Wrapped Bitcoin' Actually MeansCircle's Institutional Play: Why cirBTC Is Different From WBTCRotation, Not Revolution: How cirBTC Fits Into the Wrapped Bitcoin Market Circle, the regulated financial infrastructure company behind USDC, launched cirBTC on Ethereum on June 8, 2026, adding a new 1:1 BTC-backed wrapped Bitcoin token to a market already anchored by WBTC at roughly $8Bn in market capitalization and Coinbase’s cbBTC at approximately $5.9Bn.
Each cirBTC token is backed by native Bitcoin held in segregated, regulated custody and verified in real time through Chainlink Proof of Reserve. That is a meaningful structural claim in a category where custody transparency has not always been the default.
Here is the central tension this article unpacks: wrapped Bitcoin has existed since 2019, yet most crypto holders have never had to think about it. So why does Circle’s entry into this market matter, and does its regulated approach actually change anything for the people who would use it?
cirBTC is live on @ethereum.
Circle helped establish the institutional standard for dollar collateral with USDC.
Now cirBTC brings that same approach to Bitcoin, bringing 1:1 BTC-backed collateral to institutional DeFi markets with neutrality, transparency, and Circle…
— Circle (@circle) June 8, 2026
cirBTC Explained: What ‘Wrapped Bitcoin’ Actually Means Think of wrapped Bitcoin like a coat-check counter at an exclusive club. You hand over your actual coat – your real Bitcoin – and the attendant gives you a numbered ticket.
That ticket represents your coat inside the venue. You can trade the ticket, use it to get a drink tab, or hand it to someone else. But the coat itself stays safely in the back room, and you can always redeem the ticket to get it back.
That is exactly how tokenized Bitcoin works. Real BTC goes into custody with a regulated entity, in cirBTC’s case, a Circle group company with assets kept explicitly separate from Circle’s corporate holdings. In exchange, an ERC-20 token is issued on Ethereum that represents the BTC at a 1:1 ratio.
The token can then move freely through Ethereum DeFi apps, smart contracts, and lending protocols. When you want your BTC back, you burn the token, and the custodian releases the underlying Bitcoin.
Why does any of this matter? Bitcoin cannot natively run smart contracts or act as collateral inside Ethereum-based lending protocols. Wrapping solves that. It is the bridge that allows Bitcoin’s roughly $1.7 trillion in value to participate in decentralized finance without the underlying asset ever leaving the Bitcoin blockchain.
Chainlink Proof of Reserve is the accountability layer; it continuously verifies on-chain that the number of circulating cirBTC tokens matches the BTC held in custody, so anyone can check the math without relying on a periodic third-party audit.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coin ICOs to Invest in 2026
Circle’s Institutional Play: Why cirBTC Is Different From WBTC
(SOURCE: CoinGecko)
Circle is not just a crypto startup; it has established USDC as a key player in institutional digital finance and is now applying that compliance to Bitcoin collateral with cirBTC. This new offering aims to set an institutional standard for Bitcoin similar to what USDC achieved for dollar liquidity, emphasizing transparency and regulated custody.
While BitGo’s WBTC, the market leader, has around $8Bn in wrapped Bitcoin, its custodial model has faced scrutiny. Coinbase’s cbBTC, launched in September 2024, reached $5.9Bn in market cap but benefits significantly from Coinbase’s distribution.
cirBTC, however, positions itself with a compliance-focused approach while avoiding competition, appealing to institutions like OTC desks and corporate treasuries that want to leverage Bitcoin as collateral.
Despite its strengths, cirBTC faces challenges, including WBTC’s established liquidity and integrations, as well as cbBTC’s distribution advantages. While Circle’s compliance reputation is strong, it may not be enough to drive DeFi liquidity on its own.
EXCLUSIVE: Earn $10 USDC Via Binance Sign-Up
Rotation, Not Revolution: How cirBTC Fits Into the Wrapped Bitcoin Market $BTC short-term momentum is still bearish.
If we want a potential trend reversal, the first step is to have a clean break of $64k and $66k.
If $BTC doesn't manage to do that within a few days, the bearish momentum is probably going to continue.
I think in that case we… pic.twitter.com/qRIGnNPRLf
— Quinten | 048.eth (@QuintenFrancois) June 9, 2026
The wrapped Bitcoin market is poised for growth rather than disruption. The rise of corporate Bitcoin treasuries has created demand for efficient collateral deployment in institutional DeFi, a need cirBTC aims to meet.
Bull case: Circle’s compliance and USDC distribution position cirBTC well for institutional adoption, especially with integrations into major lending platforms like Aave and Morpho, creating significant liquidity and a unique cross-collateral workflow. This could lead to a substantial market share within 12 to 18 months.
Base case: cirBTC becomes the go-to wrapped Bitcoin product for compliance-focused institutions, while WBTC maintains dominance due to liquidity; cirBTC may serve as a solid third option as overall institutional demand for Bitcoin collateral rises.
Bear case: Slow integration with DeFi protocols and regulatory challenges could hamper cirBTC’s expansion, leaving it a niche product without the network effects needed to compete with established providers.
The competition is heating up as traditional finance explores tokenized products alongside crypto options, making Circle’s reputation as a regulated issuer increasingly important.
#Bitcoin News Today
Why you can trust 99Bitcoins
10+ Years
Established in 2013, 99Bitcoin’s team members have been crypto experts since Bitcoin’s Early days.
90hr+
Weekly Research
100k+
Monthly readers
50+
Expert contributors
2000+
Crypto Projects Reviewed
Follow 99Bitcoins on your Google News Feed
Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now!
Subscribe now
Alex Ioannou
On-Chain Journalist
Alex is a seasoned cryptocurrency trader and market analyst with over seven years of active experience in the digital asset space. Since entering the markets in 2017, Alex has specialized in identifying emerging "meta" trends and high-volatility narratives. Notably, Alex... Read More
Free Bitcoin Crash Course Enjoyed by over 100,000 students. One email a day, 7 days in a row. Short and educational, guaranteed!
The US stock market's optical communication sector rises across the board in pre-market trading, with Corning up 9.28%.
According to Bitget market data, the U.S. stock market's optical communication sector saw broad pre-market gains, with MRVL rising 4.99%, LITE up 3.24%, Nokia up 3.11%, Corning up 9.28%, and AXTI up 6.69%.
1 seconds ago
US-listed AI chip stocks saw mixed pre-market performance, with Qualcomm surging 13%.
According to Bitget market data, U.S. AI chip stocks posted mixed pre-market performance: Qualcomm (QCOM.O) surged 13%, Intel (INTC.O) rose nearly 6%, AMD (AMD.O) gained nearly 4%, and Google (GOOG.O) declined 1.4%.
1 seconds ago
Micron Technology surges 18% in pre-market trading on US stocks
According to Bitget market data, the US stock storage sector is seeing broad pre-market gains. Micron Technology (MU.O) jumps 18% in pre-market trading, as its strong earnings significantly exceeded expectations, with multiple major banks raising the stock’s target price. SanDisk (SNDK) rises 12.25%, Western Digital (WDC) gains 12.05%, and Seagate Technology (STX) climbs 8.63%.
1 seconds ago
SBI announced it will acquire cryptocurrency trading platform Bitbank for 46.7 billion yen.
According to Nikkei News, Japanese financial group SBI Holdings announced on the 25th that it will acquire cryptocurrency exchange platform bitbank for 46.7 billion yen (approximately $288 million). Upon completion of the transaction, SBI Group’s crypto asset custody scale is expected to exceed 1 trillion yen, making it one of the largest operators in Japan’s crypto industry. Per the plan, a subsidiary under SBI Holdings will acquire Bitbank shares from individual shareholders including its founders as early as August this year. Bitbank will then repurchase shares held by existing shareholders MIXI and Ceres by the end of October. If combining data from SBI’s own crypto exchange SBI VC Trade and Bitbank, as of April this year, the two firms had a total of around 2.92 million accounts and total custody assets of approximately 1.1 trillion yen. While different crypto exchanges disclose custody assets at varying time points, among Japan’s major industry competitors, bitFlyer held about 960 billion yen in custody assets as of the end of December 2025, and Coincheck had around 800 billion yen as of the end of March 2025.
The US stock market's optical communication sector rises across the board in pre-market trading, with Corning up 9.28%.
According to Bitget market data, the U.S. stock market's optical communication sector saw broad pre-market gains, with MRVL rising 4.99%, LITE up 3.24%, Nokia up 3.11%, Corning up 9.28%, and AXTI up 6.69%.
1 seconds ago
US-listed AI chip stocks saw mixed pre-market performance, with Qualcomm surging 13%.
According to Bitget market data, U.S. AI chip stocks posted mixed pre-market performance: Qualcomm (QCOM.O) surged 13%, Intel (INTC.O) rose nearly 6%, AMD (AMD.O) gained nearly 4%, and Google (GOOG.O) declined 1.4%.
1 seconds ago
Micron Technology surges 18% in pre-market trading on US stocks
According to Bitget market data, the US stock storage sector is seeing broad pre-market gains. Micron Technology (MU.O) jumps 18% in pre-market trading, as its strong earnings significantly exceeded expectations, with multiple major banks raising the stock’s target price. SanDisk (SNDK) rises 12.25%, Western Digital (WDC) gains 12.05%, and Seagate Technology (STX) climbs 8.63%.
1 seconds ago
SBI announced it will acquire cryptocurrency trading platform Bitbank for 46.7 billion yen.
According to Nikkei News, Japanese financial group SBI Holdings announced on the 25th that it will acquire cryptocurrency exchange platform bitbank for 46.7 billion yen (approximately $288 million). Upon completion of the transaction, SBI Group’s crypto asset custody scale is expected to exceed 1 trillion yen, making it one of the largest operators in Japan’s crypto industry. Per the plan, a subsidiary under SBI Holdings will acquire Bitbank shares from individual shareholders including its founders as early as August this year. Bitbank will then repurchase shares held by existing shareholders MIXI and Ceres by the end of October. If combining data from SBI’s own crypto exchange SBI VC Trade and Bitbank, as of April this year, the two firms had a total of around 2.92 million accounts and total custody assets of approximately 1.1 trillion yen. While different crypto exchanges disclose custody assets at varying time points, among Japan’s major industry competitors, bitFlyer held about 960 billion yen in custody assets as of the end of December 2025, and Coincheck had around 800 billion yen as of the end of March 2025.
Update: Following the publication of this article, Huobi has updated its transparency page to include new addresses that contain the collateral for all of the wrapped tokens mentioned. These show that all of the tokens are fully collateralized.
"To enhance HBTC holders’ confidence, we have been gradually migrating HBTC assets to Huobi Trust Company Limited for digital asset custody," said a spokesperson for Huobi via email.
Huobi’s version of wrapped bitcoin isn’t living up to the transparency that it promised. The $800 million of assets that are backing the crypto exchange’s token are supposed to be sitting in clearly market wallets; except they’re not.
Instead, the money appears to have been spread among other exchange wallets, also owned by Huobi. The problem here is not that the money is necessarily gone; it’s plausible that Huobi is using its exchange hot wallets to make it easier to process transactions. The issue is that market observers cannot see for themselves whether the token is still backed.
For all we know — from checking Huobi’s official transparency page — the $800 million of outstanding Huobi Bitcoin (HBTC) is backed by less than $30,000.
The Block reached out to Huobi for comment but — after an initial response — the exchange stopped replying to follow up emails. The exchange did not provide any explanation for why the bitcoin was moved, nor would answer whether HBTC was still fully backed.
'Transparent and verifiable’ Huobi created HBTC in February 2020 as its proprietary form of wrapped bitcoin. Wrapping bitcoin is a process where you take bitcoin on the Bitcoin blockchain, lock it up in a wallet and issue a tokenized version of it on another chain, in this case on Ethereum.
At the time, Huobi said HBTC would be “transparent and verifiable,” enabling anyone to authenticate the assets on both the Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains.
For a while, it seemed that this was the case. In early August 2021, the supply of HBTC was around 31,000 and Huobi’s two official wallets contained around 39,700 bitcoin.
Yet between August 20 and August 26 of last year, practically all of this collateral was moved out of both wallets. The funds were split into three sums and all were sent to this wallet. Each was then repeatedly shifted to new wallets, with small amounts siphoned off at each turn.
Huobi also created wrapped assets for six other cryptocurrencies: bitcoin cash (BCH), polkadot (DOT), tezos (XTZ), bitcoin satoshi’s vision (BSV), filecoin (FIL) and litecoin (LTC). Out of these, only Huobi’s version of BSV (HBSV) is fully backed by collateral in the official wallets. The transparency page shows no data for its version of filecoin at time of writing.
All the assets have a combined total supply worth $865 million but yet just $5.5 million in collateral in the official transparency wallets.
How this compares to others HBTC is failing to offer the transparency provided by Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), the most common form of wrapped bitcoin.
WBTC is run by a conglomerate of crypto businesses, including Compound and BitGo. The project’s website provides a list of 268 bitcoin wallets that contain its $4.8 billion of bitcoin — and these wallets do indeed contain that amount of the cryptocurrency. This enables those using the wrapped token to know that it’s fully backed.
Still, not all wrapped bitcoin projects offer this level of transparency. RenBTC, another version of wrapped bitcoin with a market cap of $100 million, initially used the crypto data service Chainlink to show its proof of reserves. But it now just has a statement on its dashboard that says how much it has in reserve — a sum equal to the amount issued on its network — and doesn't provide any links to where the money is kept.
What's complicated about the way renBTC looks after its collateral is that every time some of the collateral is redeemed, it sends that person those funds and sends the remaining assets to a new wallet. As a result, it can’t simply provide a list of wallets where the funds are stored, since it would have to be constantly updating the list.
This may shed some light on Huobi’s processes, as it also constantly spreads the funds to new addresses while siphoning off a little each time. Perhaps the exchange adopted this system but failed to implement a way to track the collateral, since it requires either using Chainlink or setting up an automated system.
Either way, Huobi is — for now at least — failing to offer the transparency it originally promised.
Threshold Network has proposed to acquire BitGo‘s Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) product, offering $36.4 million worth of their native T tokens.
The move aims to transition WBTC from centralized custody to Threshold's decentralized model, merging it with their tBTC Bitcoin (BTC) bridge.
The proposal was presented by NuCypher's co-founder and Threshold contributor MacLane Wilkison and involves minting additional T tokens, equivalent to 15% of its current fully diluted supply, as a grant to BitGo.
This would make BitGo the largest stakeholder in the Threshold Network while maintaining the bridge's decentralized nature.
Moreover, the proposed acquisition would combine WBTC's $9 billion market cap and widespread adoption with tBTC's permissionless bridging mechanism. Wilkinson argues this approach better achieves BitGo's goal of multi-jurisdictional and multi-institutional custody.
If accepted, the merger would be implemented in stages. Threshold would gain merchant privileges for WBTC and gradually transfer the existing WBTC supply to decentralized custody, with deposits spread across multiple wallets to ensure security.
Should BitGo decline, Wilkison claims that the DeFi ecosystem will “require a safe and orderly offboarding of WBTC.”
In this case, the additional minting of the T token could be used to subsidize the costs of offboarding WBTC from the ecosystem and migration to alternatives like tBTC and cbBTC.
CryptoSlate Daily Brief
Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.
5-minute digest 100k+ readers
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
Addressing the controversyNotably, the proposal comes following BitGo's recent announcement that it would adopt a multi-jurisdictional custody model to accelerate its global expansion plan. This would be achieved by transferring WBTC's control to a joint venture with BiT Global.
This movement raised concerns in the crypto community due to TRON founder Justin Sun‘s involvement, especially after 12,000 BTC were removed from USDD's backing. USDD is the stablecoin tied to the Tron ecosystem.
Despite BitGo's CEO Mike Belshe assuring the market that Sun would not be able to move funds, major DeFi protocols, including MakerDAO and Aave, have already taken steps to limit their exposure to WBTC.
Threshold's proposal aims to address these concerns and ensure the continued stability of WBTC in the crypto ecosystem.
If traditional finance got a blockchain makeover, DeFi protocols would inevitably be the result. Here, decentralized apps (DApps) and smart contracts reign supreme, offering you control over your financial future.
From staking your digital assets for crypto yield to conducting anonymous crypto swaps, this guide introduces you to the top DeFi protocols to keep an eye on in 2026.
In This Guide:
12 Top DeFi protocols in 2026 DeFi protocols comparedWhat are DeFi protocols?How do DeFi protocols work?Should you use DeFi protocols?Could DeFi replace traditional finance?Frequently asked questions12 Top DeFi protocols in 2026
1. dYdX
Best DeFi protocol for liquid staking
Token
dYdX
Token max supply
1,000,000,000 DYDX
Market cap
$1.499B
TVL
$401.81M
The dYdX protocol provides advanced financial instruments like perpetual and margin trading within the DeFi ecosystem. The leading exchange operates without KYC, allowing for anonymous, trustless trading. It supports perpetual and margin trading, alongside lending and borrowing, and offers competitive fee structures and gas-free trading experiences.
The platform provides lower collateralization levels compared to competitors, increasing accessibility. dYdX also utilizes StarkWare for increased efficiency and lower transaction fees and allows for community contributions and governance.
Notably, dYdX also transitioned to an independent blockchain within the Cosmos ecosystem, enhancing performance and furthering decentralization.
Pros
Advanced trading options No KYC required Low fees Layer-2 scalability Dynamic interest rates Interoperability with Cosmos Cons
Complex for beginners Dependent on Ethereum Limited spot trading New chain transition challenges Ecosystem adaptation required Trade features: Perpetual trading, margin trading, decentralized order book, layer-2 scalability, cross-margin capabilities.
Security features: Self-custodial security, third-party audits, secured by Ethereum protocol.
Platform and ecosystem features: No KYC, open-source code, integration with Cosmos ecosystem, decentralized governance, off-chain order matching.
2. PancakeSwap
Best DeFi protocol for cost-effective transactions
Token
CAKE
Token max supply
450,000,000 CAKE
Market cap
$974.4M
TVL
$2.224B
PancakeSwap is a top-tier DeFi protocol. It focuses on the Binance Smart Chain blockchain, but supports a total of eight networks, including Ethereum.
PancakeSwap’s native crypto is CAKE, which has a total supply of 450 million tokens. This decentralized exchange leverages an automated market maker (AMM) model, allowing for direct, wallet-to-wallet trades without intermediaries, enhancing user control and security.
Moreover, it offers a range of services beyond simple trades, such as yield farming, staking, and lotteries, enabling users to earn rewards in various ways. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for beginners, while its innovative features, like the zkBridge technology, ensure secure and efficient transactions across different blockchain networks.
PancakeSwap’s growth is underscored by its status as the first billion-dollar project on the Binance Smart Chain and its continual upgrades, such as the current PancakeSwap V3, demonstrating its commitment to improving functionality and user experience.
Pros
Intuitive interface High APY for liquidity providers (LPs) Supports staking and farming NFT marketplace Cons
No mobile app No native crypto wallet Trade features: Instant crypto trading, liquidity pools, asset bridging, perpetual trading, and cryptocurrency purchasing.
Game and NFT features: Gaming marketplace, prediction market, NFT marketplace for NFTs on BNB Chain.
DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance, initial farm offerings (IFOs), gauge voting and revenue sharing, and farm booster.
3. De.Fi
Best DeFi protocol for monitoring
Token
DEFI
Token max supply
1,000,000,000 DEFI
Market cap
n/a
TVL
n/a
De.Fi provides detailed smart contract analysis to detect potential vulnerabilities and assign security scores. It offers an extensive dashboard for monitoring wallet transactions and balances, alongside powerful investment tools for analyzing and controlling positions in DeFi protocols, NFT collections, and lending markets.
Additionally, De.Fi includes specialized security features like the De.Fi Shield and Scanner for thorough contract examination. It also comes with user-friendly transaction tools such as secure crypto sending and De.Fi Swap for easy cryptocurrency exchanges across various blockchains, making it a well-rounded solution for utilizing the DeFi space safely and effectively.
Uniswap is another leading decentralized exchange. The native token is UNI, which has a total supply of 1 billion tokens.
Governed by its users through the UNI token, it offers a community-driven experience, unlike centralized platforms. Uniswap’s liquidity pools facilitate secure and direct token swaps, ensuring users maintain complete control over their funds. Originally built on Ethereum, it now supports other Ethereum-compatible networks like Polygon and Optimism, offering lower transaction costs.
Uniswap’s simplicity makes it accessible for beginners while providing advanced features for experienced users. This is rare when it comes to DEXs, which can often be tricky to use and less straightforward than their CEX counterparts. Uniswap also boasts broad token availability and deep liquidity, reducing price impact on large trades.
Additionally, the DEX has integrated NFT trading, enhancing its offerings. With nearly 5 million unique wallet addresses and surpassing $1 trillion in trading volume, its popularity and reliability are evident.
Finally, Uniswap’s swap fees are competitive, especially when compared to centralized exchanges, and users can choose cheaper networks to avoid high Ethereum gas fees.
Game and NFT features: NFT marketplace, prediction market.
DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance, concentrated liquidity, transaction fee structure.
5. Curve Finance
Best DeFi protocol for stablecoins
Token
CRV
Token max supply
2,091,644,627 CRV
Market cap
$730.32M
TVL
$2.486B
Curve Finance is a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) on the Ethereum blockchain, specializing in the efficient trading of stablecoins and wrapped tokens like wBTC, renBTC, and sBTC. Founded by Michael Egorov, it has quickly risen to prominence, and is particularly famed for its innovative use of liquidity pools and automated market maker (AMM) systems. These allow users to earn high annual interest rates — over 300% in some pools — on deposited cryptocurrency.
The platform distinguishes itself with its unique bonding curve. This is optimized for stablecoins to reduce slippage, allowing significant trades with minimal price impact. This has positioned Curve as a vital component in the DeFi space, especially for those interested in liquidity mining and yield farming.
Curve Finance operates as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), with its governance token CRV enabling holders to vote on changes and proposals. This shift to a DAO structure allows Curve to operate with enhanced transparency and community-driven development. Despite its complexity and the potential for impermanent loss, Curve Finance offers significant opportunities for liquidity providers and traders, underlined by security measures including multiple code audits and bug bounties to safeguard user assets.
Pros
Specializes in stablecoins Reduced slippage Governed by DAO Multiple security audits Bug bounties for added safety Cons
Complex for beginners Focused mainly on stablecoins and wrapped tokens Reliance on Ethereum blockchain, leading to potential high gas fees Trade features: Stablecoin specialization, efficient liquidity pools, unique bonding curve, minimal slippage in trades.
Earning features: High annual interest rates from liquidity pools, rewards in CRV tokens, participation in yield farming.
DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance via CRV token, high total value locked (TVL), support for various wrapped tokens.
6. Balancer
Best DeFi protocol for multi-tokens pools
Token
BAL
Token max supply
62,244,253 BAL
Market cap
$268.21M
TVL
$1.242B
Balancer is a versatile and innovative DeFi platform that redefines the concept of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) by combining elements of automated market makers (AMMs) and index funds.
Unlike traditional DEXs — which typically focus on two-token liquidity pools — Balancer’s USP lies in its ability to maintain a balanced portfolio through automatic rebalancing, adjusting the pool’s asset allocations in response to market price changes.
Balancer supports three types of pools: public pools, where anyone can add liquidity and earn trading fees; private pools, where only the creator can contribute liquidity and set parameters; and smart pools, which are private pools with adjustable parameters controlled by a smart contract. This flexibility caters to a wide range of user preferences and risk tolerances.
Furthermore, Balancer’s architecture is designed to function on Ethereum and also on six additional blockchain networks, expanding its accessibility and interoperability within DeFi ecosystems. By providing a decentralized platform for multi-asset liquidity, Balancer contributes significantly to the efficiency of the cryptocurrency market.
Complex for beginners Limited on smaller chains Trade features: Multi-token pools, automated portfolio rebalancing, customizable pool types (public, private, smart), wide asset variety, minimal slippage through dynamic trading fees.
Earning features: Rewards in BAL tokens, high yield from liquidity provision, participation in liquidity mining, diversified income streams through various pool types.
DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance via BAL token, significant total value locked (TVL), interoperability across multiple blockchains, support for a variety of digital assets and wrapped tokens.
7. Summer.fi
Best DeFi protocol for services
Token
Summer.fi
Token max supply
N/A
Market cap
N/A
TVL
$5.345b
Summer.fi, initially known as Oasis.app and one of the earliest MakerDAO projects from 2016, has evolved significantly beyond its original scope.
After Maker became fully decentralized, Summer.fi emerged as a standalone platform, dedicated to establishing a highly trusted application for DeFi capital deployment.
It now transcends being merely an interface for the Maker Protocol. It aims to be the most secure place for engaging with DeFi, providing users with advanced automation features like stop-loss, auto-buy, and auto-sell, as well as strategies such as Constant Multiples for optimizing Vault performance. If your Vault’s collateralization ratio hits your Sell Trigger, Constant Multiple will execute.
Summer.fi prioritizes user experience, offering clear insights into positions, returns, and associated risks, backed by a comprehensive knowledge base reflecting community feedback.
Pros
Comprehensive DeFi services Advanced automation features, (stop-loss, take-profit, auto-buy, etc.) User-friendly interface Integration with multiple protocols (Aave and Maker) Cons
Complex for new users Limited to ERC-20 tokens Borrowing features: Flexible repayment schedules, diverse collateral types, integrated with multiple protocols like Aave and Ajna, protection against market volatility through the Oracle Security Module and constant updates from Chainlink.
Multiplying features: Increase or decrease collateral exposure in one transaction, use borrowed funds to buy more collateral, integration with liquid platforms and the 1inch DEX aggregator for best execution prices, dedicated interface for managing positions.
Earning features: Self-custody solutions for yield earning, compatibility with Aave and Maker protocols, increase yield from StETH, participate in the Dai Savings Rate for passive income.
Automation features: Stop-loss to prevent liquidations, take-profit for efficient exits, auto-buy and auto-sell for Vault management, Constant Multiple to maintain predefined exposure levels.
Integration and partnerships: Support for various wallets like MetaMask and Ledger, integration with the 1inch Network for efficient token swaps, launched on Optimism layer-2 for reduced transaction costs, Ajna Protocol integration for curated borrowing and lending pools.
8. Aave
Best DeFi protocol for liquidity
Token
AAVE
Token max supply
16,000,000 AAVE
Market cap
$1.711B
TVL
$10.564B
Aave (AAVE) is a pioneering entity in the DeFi sector. The comprehensive lending platform boasts a significant Total Value Locked (TVL), which surpasses $10 billion in crypto collateral.
Aave enables users to lend and borrow a wide array of tokens across multiple ecosystems, ensuring a versatile and inclusive financial experience.
The platform’s latest iteration, Aave V3, expands its reach beyond Ethereum to include 10 different blockchain networks, further solidifying its position as a key player in DeFi by enhancing accessibility and providing a range of options for its diverse user base.
Pros
High TVL Wide range of tokens Multi-chain accessibility Flash loans availability Governance via AAVE token Cons
Complexity for beginners High gas fees on Ethereum Risk of liquidation Trade features: Flash loans, real-time interest accrual, stable and variable interest rates, Ethereum network integration, multi-asset collateral support.
Earning features: aTokens for deposit interest, decentralized lending and borrowing, yield optimization strategies, liquidity mining.
Security features: Over-collateralization of loans, smart contract audits, safety module for risk mitigation, bug bounties for platform integrity.
Platform and ecosystem features: Governance via AAVE tokens, layer-2 solutions for reduced fees, decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) structure, no KYC requirements, multi-chain accessibility.
9. MakerDAO
Best DeFi protocol for generating a stablecoin
Token
MKR
Token max supply
1,005,577 MKR
Market cap
$2.686B
TVL
$7B
MakerDAO is a pioneering DeFi platform that has revolutionized the way users engage with digital assets. The platform provides a decentralized borrowing and lending system with its stablecoin, DAI, at the core.
Built on the Ethereum blockchain, it allows users to leverage a variety of cryptocurrencies as collateral to generate DAI, maintaining stability through rigorous governance by MKR token holders.
The platform distinguishes itself with features like over-collateralization to ensure loan security, and a dual-rate model offering users the choice between stable and variable interest rates. However, users must navigate complexities such as liquidation risks and market volatility.
As MakerDAO evolves, it continues to solidify its status as a cornerstone of the DeFi landscape with the introduction of upgrades like V3 and the addition of the GHO stablecoin — balancing user empowerment with the intricate dynamics of decentralized finance.
Pros
Decentralized lending DAI stability Ethereum-based Governance by MKR Over-collateralization Variable interest rates Cons
Complexity High gas fees Liquidation risks Trade features: Flash loans, stable and variable interest rates, real-time aTokens, multi-currency collateral, governance-driven updates.
Earning features: Interest on deposits, participation in governance, yield farming opportunities, dynamic interest rates.
Security features: Over-collateralization, liquidation mechanisms, community governance for risk management, security modules for asset protection.
Platform and ecosystem features: Decentralized borrowing and lending, Ethereum-based, MKR token for governance, integration with multiple crypto assets, open-source development, Maker Vaults for asset management.
10. Compound Finance
Best DeFi protocol for staking
Token
COMP
Token max supply
10,000,000 COMP
Market cap
$487.27M
TVL
$2.668B
Compound Finance is a prominent decentralized lending platform operating on the Ethereum blockchain, known for pioneering the DeFi lending space.
Established by Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes in 2018, Compound simplifies the process of borrowing and lending cryptocurrencies without intermediaries, allowing over $2 billion in assets to be locked on its platform.
Unique for its innovations, such as yield farming and governance through COMP tokens, the platform aims to provide financial inclusion, eliminating traditional transaction minimums and credit checks.
While offering competitive returns through real-time interest rates, users engaging with Compound and its governance token, COMP, must be cautious of market volatility and conduct in-depth research prior to investment.
Pros
Decentralized borrowing and lending No transaction minimums User-friendly interface Supports multiple ERC-20 assets Yield farming opportunities Cons
Market volatility risks Requires over-collateralization Complexity for new users High gas fees on Ethereum Trade features: Real-time interest rate adjustments, supports diverse ERC-20 tokens, and a user-centric lending and borrowing system.
Earning features: Yield farming with COMP tokens, competitive APR for lenders, dynamic interest rates based on market conditions.
Security features: Extensive security audits (Trail of Bits, OpenZeppelin), economic risk analysis by Gauntlet, transparent and verifiable contracts.
DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Decentralized governance with COMP tokens, financial inclusion without traditional verifications, continuous platform innovation and updates.
11. Lido
Best DeFi protocol for ETH staking
Token
LDO
Token max supply
1,000,000,000 LDO
Market cap
$2.215B
TVL
$34.445B
Lido Finance is a DeFi staking protocol offering user-friendly, semi-custodial staking services across multiple cryptocurrencies. Known for its simple interface and decentralized structure, Lido allows users to stake their assets and receive liquid staking tokens, such as stETH, which can be utilized in the broader DeFi ecosystem for yield farming.
Supported by major players in DeFi and endorsed for its reasonable fees and rewarding referral program, Lido maximizes decentralization through its governance token, LDO, allowing stakeholders to partake in decision-making. While Lido streamlines the staking process, users should consider the semi-custodial nature, the staking rewards fees, and potential tax implications associated with rewards.
Semi-custodial service Staking rewards fees Potential tax implications Staking features: Easy and unrestricted staking, maximized earning potential, liquid staking tokens for yield farming.
Earning features: Daily staking rewards, assets used as collateral for lending and yield farming, participation in governance for reward optimization.
Security features: Smart contracts audited by Quantstamp and Sigma Prime, semi-custodial nature maintains user control.
DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance via LDO tokens, broad DeFi integration, supports multiple blockchains including Ethereum.
DeFi protocols comparedProtocolTypeTVLTokenNo. of blockchains supportedPancakeSwapDEX$2.224BCAKE9UniswapDEX$5.543BUNI8CurveDEX$2.486BCRV14BalancerDEX$1.242BBAL8Summer.fiDEX$5.345bsummer.fi4AaveLending$10.564BAAVE12MakerDAOLending$7BMKR1CompoundLending$2.668BCOMP4dYdXDEX$401.81MdYdX1LidoStaking$34.445BLDO5De.FiTracker and walletn/aDEFI15What are DeFi protocols?DeFi protocols are sets of rules, procedures, and codes that govern decentralized finance (DeFi) systems, enabling users to engage in activities such as trading, lending, and staking tokens within blockchain ecosystems.
DeFi represents a paradigm shift leveraging blockchain technology, primarily Ethereum, to cultivate an open, permissionless, and borderless financial ecosystem. Unlike traditional systems, developers write smart contracts to deploy DeFi protocols that enable peer-to-peer interactions without intermediaries. By adhering to the same set of rules, DeFi protocols ensure a standardized experience for all participants.
An example of a DeFi protocol is MakerDAO. The popular DeFi lending platform allows users to borrow against their crypto assets by locking them in exchange for a stablecoin, DAI, thus offering more predictable repayment terms despite the volatility of crypto markets.
Other protocols allow you to earn a passive income by generating yield from your staked assets. One popular example is the Lido protocol, which allows you to earn on stETH. Platforms like Lido aim to offer the highest APY on crypto staking, allowing users to maximize returns on their staked assets within the Ethereum ecosystem.
The total value locked (TVL) is often used as a metric to gauge a protocol’s adoption and utility, with MakerDAO being one of the largest by TVL, highlighting its significant role in DeFi.
In 2026, new and more efficient technologies are being developed. For instance, some protocols incorporate asynchronous smart contracts, which allow transactions and agreements to be executed without needing all parties to be present or online simultaneously. This helps streamline operations within networks like Ethereum.
According to DeFiLlama, the top protocol categories are lending, DEXs, bridges, CDP (protocols that mint their own stablecoin using collateralized lending), and restaking.
Protocol categories: DeFiLlamaWhy do you need DeFi protocols?DeFi allows decentralized apps (DApps) and platforms to provide services like crypto lending and crypto yield earning through staking. Users can participate in AMM (automated market maker) systems to improve liquidity.
These features offer a fertile ground for startups to innovate beyond conventional financial products, fostering rapid experimentation and potential disruption. The global accessibility facilitated by DeFi platforms makes them a significant tool for financial inclusion, allowing startups to reach a worldwide audience.
The interoperability among various DeFi protocols enhances this further, enabling seamless integration of services like web3 gaming and metaverse tokens, broadening the scope of what blockchain startups can achieve.
The total value locked (TVL) in DeFi platforms serves as a metric of trust and utility, indicating the number of cryptocurrencies staked, lent, or committed to liquidity pools, highlighting the ecosystem’s growth and stability.
By eliminating intermediaries, DeFi significantly lowers transaction costs, making it an attractive model for startups, especially in crypto lending and yield generation. Instead of being worried about your credit score, you can apply for a crypto loan with fewer restrictions than in TradFi. This reduction in costs, combined with the potential for high crypto yield through mechanisms like staking, positions DeFi as an increasingly popular option for both entrepreneurs and investors in the crypto market.
How do DeFi protocols work?DeFi protocols function by leveraging blockchain technology. While most of them are based on Ethereum, some may also support other networks. At the heart of these services are smart contracts, self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code, which facilitate, verify, and enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract.
DeFi, however, requires thorough research and understanding of several factors, including security, liquidity, and the platform’s governance structure. It’s important to assess the user experience, the degree of interoperability with other DApps and blockchain systems, and the level of community involvement in decision-making processes.
1. Decentralized apps (DApps)Users can engage with various DeFi platforms or DApps to access a wide range of financial services.
One common way to participate is through crypto lending on platforms. Protocols such as Aave or Compound allow you to deposit cryptocurrencies to earn interest. The earnings are measured as Annual Percentage Yield (APY), which is a volatile percentage that corresponds to the market’s demands.
2. Liquidity miningAnother popular DeFi activity is liquidity mining. You can provide liquidity to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) by depositing your assets into liquidity pools. This deposit is usually made for a pair of assets, such as ETH-USDT, but it can be anything else.
In return, you earn rewards, often in the platform’s native tokens. This process is critical for ensuring there is enough market liquidity for trading and is facilitated by AMMs, algorithms used by DEXs to determine the price of tokens and facilitate trades.
3. Swaps (trading)Trading on DEXs is another key function of DeFi protocols. These platforms allow users to trade cryptocurrencies directly with others in a more private and accessible manner than on centralized exchanges.
This not only supports the decentralized ethos of blockchain but also contributes to the Total Value Locked (TVL).
Should you use DeFi protocols?Pros Earn money: You can make your crypto work for you. Put your assets in DeFi platforms to earn interest or rewards. Trade easily: Swap cryptocurrencies directly with others. No need for a middleman. More control: You’re in charge of your money. No bank or institution can block your transactions. Open to everyone: Anyone with an internet connection can join. It’s global and inclusive. Transparent: Everything is recorded on the blockchain. You can see all transactions. New opportunities: Explore new financial services like crypto lending or web3 gaming. Cons Risky: Crypto values can change fast. Your investments can shrink quickly. Complicated: Some DeFi stuff is hard to understand. It’s not always beginner-friendly. Security issues: Hacks happen. If a DeFi platform gets attacked, you might lose your money. No customer support: If you have a problem, there’s no customer service to call. Research needed: You need to do your homework before investing. Not all platforms are safe. High fees: Sometimes, you’ll pay a lot to make transactions, especially when the network is busy. Could DeFi replace traditional finance?Decentralized finance has the potential to usurp traditional institutions, specifically TradFi. Decentralized finance enables users to transact securely, anonymously, and efficiently and is thus likely to gain popularity as web3 and crypto adoption grows. From crypto lending to staking to market makers, DeFi is exciting but also risky.
Do not interact with any DeFi protocols until you have developed a solid plan and are entirely comfortable with the mechanisms of the platform. Always be aware of the potential for losses, and never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Frequently asked questions What is the most popular DeFi protocol? The most popular DeFi protocol is often considered to be MakerDAO. It frequently leads in terms of Total Value Locked (TVL) and has a wide usage across the DeFi ecosystem. MakerDAO’s platform revolves around the generation of DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, and enables decentralized borrowing and saving. Its popularity stems from its innovative approach to maintaining currency stability and providing a decentralized credit service.
What are the top five DeFi tokens? The top five DeFi tokens typically include Maker (MKR), Aave (AAVE), Compound (COMP), Uniswap (UNI), and PancakeSwap (CAKE), based on their market capitalization and impact on the DeFi space. These tokens facilitate governance of their respective platforms, offering holders voting rights on decisions and upgrades. They are integral to the operations of these platforms, from lending and borrowing to providing liquidity and facilitating decentralized trading.
What is TVL in DeFi protocols? Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols refers to the total amount of assets currently being staked, lent, or deposited within a DeFi protocol’s smart contracts. It serves as a metric to gauge the overall health and growth of the DeFi market, indicating how much money is actively used in these decentralized financial services. A higher TVL suggests greater user trust and utility of the DeFi ecosystem.
How many DeFi protocols are there? The number of DeFi protocols is constantly growing as the space evolves and new projects are launched. There are hundreds of DeFi protocols across various blockchains, catering to different aspects of decentralized finance such as lending, borrowing, trading, and liquidity provision. The exact number can vary daily due to the dynamic nature of the crypto and DeFi industries.
How many DeFi protocols are there? The number of DeFi protocols is constantly growing as the space evolves and new projects are launched. There are hundreds of DeFi protocols across various blockchains, catering to different aspects of decentralized finance such as lending, borrowing, trading, and liquidity provision. The exact number can vary daily due to the dynamic nature of the crypto and DeFi industries.
Is TVL a good metric? TVL is a good metric for understanding the scale and usage of a DeFi protocol, as it reflects the total capital committed by users. However, it should not be the sole metric for assessing a protocol’s value or success, as it does not account for risks, decentralization level, or liquidity. It’s best used in combination with other factors like user growth, transaction volume, and protocol governance for a comprehensive evaluation.
What is a good FDV TVL ratio? A good FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) to TVL (Total Value Locked) ratio for a DeFi project is typically below one, indicating that the project’s market valuation is not excessively higher than the value of assets locked in the protocol. Lower FDV/TVL ratios suggest that the protocol is undervalued or efficiently using its capital, which can be attractive to investors. However, this ratio should be considered alongside other metrics and project fundamentals for a complete analysis.
What is the TVL formula? The TVL formula in DeFi protocols calculates the total value of all assets deposited in the protocol’s smart contracts, which can include cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and other tokens. It aggregates the value of these assets, often converting them to a common currency like USD for a standardized measure. The formula is the sum of the value of each type of asset multiplied by its current market price.
How to calculate FDV? The Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) is calculated by taking the total supply of a token (both circulating and non-circulating) and multiplying it by the current price of the token. This gives an idea of what the market cap would be if all tokens were in circulation and trading at the current price. It’s an important metric for understanding the potential market size and investment risk of a cryptocurrency or DeFi project.
Stargate Finance, a prominent cross-chain asset bridging and liquidity protocol, has announced its collaboration with Aptos, a cutting-edge L1 blockchain prioritizing scalability, security, and performance. The partnership is focused on launching Wrapped Bitcoin ($WBTC) on Aptos through Stargate and LayerZero, an advanced omnichain interoperability platform. The platform took to social media to announce this initiative.
Stargate Finance Partners with LayerZero to Release $WBTC on Aptos With this partnership, Startgate Finance and LayerZero have officially launched Wrapped Bitcoin ($WBTC) on Aptos. Hence, more than $15B in $WBTC is currently in circulation. This integration leverages Stargate to enable the native movement of Bitcoin ($BTC) between ten linked blockchains and Aptos. This ensures transactions with zero fees and zero slippage when routed through the omnichain protocol of Stargate.
Apart from that, $WBTC’s launch underscores an exclusive chapter in the journey of Bitcoin beyond the native blockchain thereof. This reportedly offers comprehensive liquidity while also improving Aptos’ DeFi capabilities. Aptos also plays a crucial role in this development with the provision of modular architecture, parallel execution, and scalability. Additionally, this makes it the perfect hub to broaden the use cases of Bitcoin ($BTC) in decentralized finance (DeFi).
Now, on Aptos, $WBTC has already witnessed integrations with a broad range of DeFi entities. They include Hyperion XYZ, Kofi Finance, Cellana Finance, Tapp Exchange, Moar Market, Kanalabs, Pandora Exchange, Thala Labs, Echelon Market, and Aries Markets. Hence, the respective ecosystem-wide support delivers rapid liquidity of Bitcoin ($BTC) across Aptos-based yield farming, trading, and lending platforms.
By utilizing the Omnichain Fungible Token standard of Stargate, Bitcoin ($BTC) can smoothly move across diverse networks without facing liquidity fragmentation. This development also provides consumers with access to new DeFi opportunities in the Aptos ecosystem. At the same time, this also maintains unparalleled interoperability with the rest of the blockchains.
Strengthening Users and Developers with Comprehensive Liquidity, Security, and Speed According to Stargate, the release of $WBTC on Aptos in collaboration with LayerZero advances BTCfi. Thus, this move allows users and developers to delve into the latest financial products that merge the liquidity and security of Bitcoin with the low-latency and high-speed infrastructure of Aptos. Overall, this unlocks wider liquidity, improved efficiency, as well as additional opportunities to benefit $BTC holders working across ecosystems.
AUTHOR
Umair Younas is a cryptocurrency-related content writer linked with this work since 2019. Here, at Blockchainreporter, he serves as a news and article writer. He is a crypto, blockchain, NFTs, DeFi, and FinTech enthusiast. He has strong command over writing authentic reviews about brokers and exchanges and he has collaborated with our education team to write educational content as well. He has a dream to raise awareness among people about digital currencies. His works are well-researched and brimmed with information hence they provide fresh insights. Stay tuned to his posts if you want to stay up-to-date with the crypto-verse.
Satoshi Protocol, a prominent stablecoin protocol that gets support from Bitcoin, has announced an exclusive collaboration with Soveryn. The partnership between Satoshi Protocol and the BOB chain-based DeFi protocol Sovryn will unveil a SAT-wBTC pool to boost the utility and liquidity of SAT in the BOB ecosystem. The platform disclosed the development on its official account on X.
Partnership with @SovrynBTC
Our collaboration introduces a new SAT-wBTC liquidity pool, boosting $SAT utility and trading options on BOB.
Thrilled to announce our partnership with @SovrynBTC, the leading BTCfi Hub on the BOB chain. They offers secure, fast Bitcoin trading… pic.twitter.com/hV6n4rWj2K
— Satoshi Protocol (@Satoshi_BTCFi) July 31, 2024 Satoshi Protocol Commences an Exclusive Collaboration with Sovryn In its latest X post, the company mentioned that Sovryn operates as a decentralized finance protocol on the BOB chain. It reportedly offers several financial services taking into account liquidity provision and trading. Sovryn benefits from the security of Bitcoin along with the smart contract flexibility to deliver resilient financial instruments. Sovryn has additionally attained crucial landmark achievements.
They include more than $85M in its total value locked part from more than $2B worth of cumulative trading volume. Additionally, the total consumer base of the platform has reportedly reached 60,000. Sovryn is integrated with the BOB chain, expanding its platform with diverse integrations and financial services. Moreover, Sovryn delivers decentralized trading, margin trading, borrowing, and lending tools.
Bitcoin network secures all of these products. This partnership will permit the development of a Sovryn-based SAT-wBTC pool. The integration will chiefly enhance liquidity for SAT. As a result of this, the consumers can conveniently trade between the SAT token and the rest of the Sovryn-based coins. This takes into account the well-known tokens such as USDC, ETH, SOV, wBTC, DLLR stablecoin of Sovryn, and so on.
Improved liquidity signifies that the clients can conduct trades more effectively with decreased slippage and enhanced pricing. The integration of SAT within the ecosystem of Sovryn broadens its utility. It provides additional opportunities to facilitate the consumers in engaging with assets. The inclusion in the extensive DeFi package of Sovryn lets SAT holders take part in a broad series of financial operations.
The Development Enhances Liquidity, Capital Efficiency, and Utility in the BTC Ecosystem It includes generating yields via liquidity provision and using SAT in the form of collateral concerning loans. Ingamar Ramirez, Sovryn’s Head of Ecosystem Growth, stated that this collaboration will let them offer additional options regarding decentralized stablecoins. Satoshi Protocol asserted that the partnership will combine the strengths of both entities to capital efficiency, liquidity, and utility in the BTC ecosystem.
AUTHOR
Umair Younas is a cryptocurrency-related content writer linked with this work since 2019. Here, at Blockchainreporter, he serves as a news and article writer. He is a crypto, blockchain, NFTs, DeFi, and FinTech enthusiast. He has strong command over writing authentic reviews about brokers and exchanges and he has collaborated with our education team to write educational content as well. He has a dream to raise awareness among people about digital currencies. His works are well-researched and brimmed with information hence they provide fresh insights. Stay tuned to his posts if you want to stay up-to-date with the crypto-verse.
