SK Group Chairman Choi Tae-won: Even if SK Hynix speeds up its factory construction, memory shortages will persist. (Jinshi)
8 minutes ago
Former meme stock 'BB' (BlackBerry) rallied 270% in March, with one trader netting a 318% return by taking a long position.
According to Hyperinsight’s monitoring, BlackBerry (BB) has continued to attract capital inflows, rising 40% cumulatively over the past seven days and 270% since its early April low. On Hyperliquid, BB is currently priced at $11.6, up 3.4% intraday. A trader with the wallet address starting with 0xa5fd has maintained a 10x long position on BB’s contract since the first day it was listed on trade.xyz (32 days ago). The trader allocated $58,000 to build the position, which now has an unrealized profit of $186,000, representing a return of approximately 318%. The average entry price was $8.8, with the position size totaling $770,000. Additional notes: In recent years, BlackBerry has completed its transition to a software-centric business, with its core product—the QNX real-time operating system—widely applied in smart vehicles, autonomous driving, robotics and other fields. The recent sharp rally in its stock is mainly driven by factors including the market’s revaluation of its Physical AI concept, sustained growth of the QNX business, better-than-expected Q1 results, and an upward revision to its full-year earnings guidance. BlackBerry was once a global leader in business smartphones. After its mobile phone business declined, it gained renewed attention during the 2021 U.S. retail investor vs. Wall Street meme stock craze. There remains market division over this latest rally: some hold that its improving fundamentals provide support, while others view it as a resurgence of meme stock momentum.
8 minutes ago
ANSEM surged nearly 600-fold in three days, with 12 addresses accumulating positions worth nearly $2 million in the past 24 hours.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (X handle @ai_9684xtpa), Solana meme coin ANSEM has surged nearly 600 times in the three days since its launch, with its market capitalization quickly exceeding $100 million. Over the past 24 hours, a total of 12 addresses have cumulatively invested $1.985 million to establish new positions in ANSEM (only counting addresses with single buy transactions of over $100,000), further pushing up the token's price.
8 minutes ago
South Korea unveils a massive semiconductor and AI investment plan: it plans to invest 800 trillion won to build four chip plants and double its DRAM production capacity within five years.
The South Korean government today unveiled its latest industrial plan, with President Lee Jae-myung stating that South Korea must promptly advance the construction of chip production facilities, as existing industrial parks are approaching their carrying limits in terms of water resources and infrastructure. Going forward, the country will focus on expanding semiconductor supply capacity through investments in its southwestern region. Under the plan, South Korea plans to build four chip manufacturing plants in the southwestern region, with a total investment of about 800 trillion won, and aims to invest at least 30 trillion won in semiconductor fields including next-generation memory, edge AI, and defense over the next 15 years. Additionally, the chip packaging cluster in the Chungcheong region is projected to receive an investment of 81 trillion won, AI data center construction is expected to draw around 550 trillion won, new industrial projects in the southwestern region will see investments ranging from 5 trillion to 20 trillion won, and the overall project scale in Gwangju and Jeolla regions could reach up to 520 trillion won. The South Korean government also stated its goal of doubling DRAM production capacity within the next five years and increasing South Korea’s share of the global humanoid robot market. Officials project that the global memory chip market will grow approximately fourfold over the next five years. In reaction to the news, the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) turned from negative to positive in the afternoon, after falling more than 3% at one point during the session.
8 minutes ago
The A-share semiconductor equipment sector strengthened in the afternoon session, with multiple stocks rising sharply.
China's A-share semiconductor equipment sector rallied again in the afternoon. As of press time, Huahai Qingke and Jingyi Equipment surged more than 11%, Jinhaitong and Huaya Smart had earlier hit their daily limit, while stocks such as Huafeng Measurement & Control and Core Source Micro rose in tandem. (Jinshi)
8 minutes ago
Serenity: The decade from 2020 to 2030 may be the fastest period of technological progress in human history.
Serenity stated in a report that the decade from 2020 to 2030 is poised to be the fastest period of technological advancement in human history. Reusable rockets are driving rapid development of orbital computing infrastructure, with firms like Rocket Lab and SpaceX continuously enhancing their launch capabilities; Anthropic and OpenAI are advancing artificial intelligence (AI) toward general artificial intelligence (AGI) and even more advanced stages. Humanoid robots from companies including Boston Dynamics and Unitree are making steady progress, and are expected to gradually replace some labor tasks. Additionally, high-energy laser technology is expanding from the defense sector to AI data centers, autonomous driving technologies from Waymo and Tesla continue to be deployed commercially, and quantum computing is also expected to achieve breakthroughs by the end of this decade. Multiple cutting-edge technologies are advancing toward industrialization in parallel, making the current period a highly historically significant investment cycle.
SK Group Chairman Choi Tae-won: Even if SK Hynix speeds up its factory construction, memory shortages will persist. (Jinshi)
8 minutes ago
Former meme stock 'BB' (BlackBerry) rallied 270% in March, with one trader netting a 318% return by taking a long position.
According to Hyperinsight’s monitoring, BlackBerry (BB) has continued to attract capital inflows, rising 40% cumulatively over the past seven days and 270% since its early April low. On Hyperliquid, BB is currently priced at $11.6, up 3.4% intraday. A trader with the wallet address starting with 0xa5fd has maintained a 10x long position on BB’s contract since the first day it was listed on trade.xyz (32 days ago). The trader allocated $58,000 to build the position, which now has an unrealized profit of $186,000, representing a return of approximately 318%. The average entry price was $8.8, with the position size totaling $770,000. Additional notes: In recent years, BlackBerry has completed its transition to a software-centric business, with its core product—the QNX real-time operating system—widely applied in smart vehicles, autonomous driving, robotics and other fields. The recent sharp rally in its stock is mainly driven by factors including the market’s revaluation of its Physical AI concept, sustained growth of the QNX business, better-than-expected Q1 results, and an upward revision to its full-year earnings guidance. BlackBerry was once a global leader in business smartphones. After its mobile phone business declined, it gained renewed attention during the 2021 U.S. retail investor vs. Wall Street meme stock craze. There remains market division over this latest rally: some hold that its improving fundamentals provide support, while others view it as a resurgence of meme stock momentum.
8 minutes ago
ANSEM surged nearly 600-fold in three days, with 12 addresses accumulating positions worth nearly $2 million in the past 24 hours.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (X handle @ai_9684xtpa), Solana meme coin ANSEM has surged nearly 600 times in the three days since its launch, with its market capitalization quickly exceeding $100 million. Over the past 24 hours, a total of 12 addresses have cumulatively invested $1.985 million to establish new positions in ANSEM (only counting addresses with single buy transactions of over $100,000), further pushing up the token's price.
8 minutes ago
South Korea unveils a massive semiconductor and AI investment plan: it plans to invest 800 trillion won to build four chip plants and double its DRAM production capacity within five years.
The South Korean government today unveiled its latest industrial plan, with President Lee Jae-myung stating that South Korea must promptly advance the construction of chip production facilities, as existing industrial parks are approaching their carrying limits in terms of water resources and infrastructure. Going forward, the country will focus on expanding semiconductor supply capacity through investments in its southwestern region. Under the plan, South Korea plans to build four chip manufacturing plants in the southwestern region, with a total investment of about 800 trillion won, and aims to invest at least 30 trillion won in semiconductor fields including next-generation memory, edge AI, and defense over the next 15 years. Additionally, the chip packaging cluster in the Chungcheong region is projected to receive an investment of 81 trillion won, AI data center construction is expected to draw around 550 trillion won, new industrial projects in the southwestern region will see investments ranging from 5 trillion to 20 trillion won, and the overall project scale in Gwangju and Jeolla regions could reach up to 520 trillion won. The South Korean government also stated its goal of doubling DRAM production capacity within the next five years and increasing South Korea’s share of the global humanoid robot market. Officials project that the global memory chip market will grow approximately fourfold over the next five years. In reaction to the news, the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) turned from negative to positive in the afternoon, after falling more than 3% at one point during the session.
8 minutes ago
The A-share semiconductor equipment sector strengthened in the afternoon session, with multiple stocks rising sharply.
China's A-share semiconductor equipment sector rallied again in the afternoon. As of press time, Huahai Qingke and Jingyi Equipment surged more than 11%, Jinhaitong and Huaya Smart had earlier hit their daily limit, while stocks such as Huafeng Measurement & Control and Core Source Micro rose in tandem. (Jinshi)
8 minutes ago
Serenity: The decade from 2020 to 2030 may be the fastest period of technological progress in human history.
Serenity stated in a report that the decade from 2020 to 2030 is poised to be the fastest period of technological advancement in human history. Reusable rockets are driving rapid development of orbital computing infrastructure, with firms like Rocket Lab and SpaceX continuously enhancing their launch capabilities; Anthropic and OpenAI are advancing artificial intelligence (AI) toward general artificial intelligence (AGI) and even more advanced stages. Humanoid robots from companies including Boston Dynamics and Unitree are making steady progress, and are expected to gradually replace some labor tasks. Additionally, high-energy laser technology is expanding from the defense sector to AI data centers, autonomous driving technologies from Waymo and Tesla continue to be deployed commercially, and quantum computing is also expected to achieve breakthroughs by the end of this decade. Multiple cutting-edge technologies are advancing toward industrialization in parallel, making the current period a highly historically significant investment cycle.
Predict.fun’s first World Cup knockout match: Canada vs South Africa, with Canada holding a 58% win probability.
Data from prediction market platform Predict.fun indicates that the first knockout match of the 2026 Canada-Mexico-USA World Cup’s 32-team knockout stage is approaching. The clash between Canada and South Africa will kick off at 3 a.m. Beijing time today. Current predicted win probabilities stand at 58% for Canada (CAN), 16% for South Africa (RSA), and a 27% chance of a draw. The data shows that the market has given higher support to the Canadian national team’s overall strength ahead of the match.
4 hours ago
Predict.fun Launches World Cup 32-Team Knockout Stage Event, Remaining Prize Pool Exceeds $1.1 Million
According to an official announcement from Predict.fun, the knockout stage of the World Cup’s 32-team tournament has officially launched, with the platform simultaneously upgrading its Predict Cup event mechanism. For this knockout round, Predict.fun will open 11 prediction markets per match and boost Fan Points rewards. The official added that the ongoing event still has a prize pool of over $1.1 million up for grabs, with rewards disbursed immediately after each knockout match’s conclusion. Notably, the Canada vs. South Africa match is set to kick off in under 3 hours, with a direct $25,000 reward allocated for this fixture, giving users more frequent chances to participate and win. Predict.fun stated that as the knockout stage commences, the platform will incentivize users to actively join World Cup prediction markets and compete for subsequent prize pool rewards via more markets, higher point rewards, and a more frequent reward distribution system.
4 hours ago
Predict.fun World Cup Group Stage $840,000 Event Rewards Now Available for Claiming
According to official announcements from Predict.fun, rewards for the World Cup group stage event are now available for collection, with the current prize pool totaling $840,000. The platform noted that users who participated and secured rewards during the group stage can now claim them via the platform. With the conclusion of the 32-team group stage, the number of World Cup-related markets on Predict.fun has risen from the initial 6 to 11, providing more trading and points-chasing opportunities for new participants. For the upcoming knockout stage, the platform will release over $1 million in additional event rewards, giving users ongoing opportunities to compete for leaderboard positions and split the subsequent prize pool.
4 hours ago
South Korean investors' borrowings for stock trading hit an all-time high, with record leverage exacerbating volatility in South Korean equities.
South Korean investors’ margin lending for stock trading hits an all-time high: South Korea’s margin loans have reached a record of approximately $26 billion, doubling since the start of 2025. However, when measured as a share of South Korea’s free-float market capitalization, margin lending currently makes up only around 0.8% — the lowest level since the 2020 pandemic low. This is because the sharp rise in South Korea’s total stock market capitalization has far outpaced the growth of leverage. Meanwhile, during the recent market correction, the daily forced liquidation ratio surged to 4-5% of total outstanding margin loans, far exceeding the normal level of roughly 1%. This means that leveraged investors unable to meet margin call requirements are forcing brokers to liquidate 4-5% of all margin positions in a single day. Record leverage is exacerbating volatility in the South Korean market.
4 hours ago
Samson Mow asserts that Bitcoin has reached its bottom, as analysts’ views on the market outlook have grown increasingly divergent.
Jan3 CEO Samson Mow today asserted that Bitcoin has reached its bottom. His core argument is that Bitcoin hit its then all-time high 37 days before the April 2024 halving, an anomaly indicating the traditional four-year halving cycle has accelerated, rendering historically reliable timing patterns no longer applicable. “Even if you believe in the cycle, you should conclude that it has accelerated.” However, the market is far from reaching a consensus: Markus Thielen, founder of 10x Research, believes the bottom is more likely at $55,000, with a time window between August and October; BitMex co-founder Arthur Hayes is more bearish, predicting Bitcoin will hit roughly $40,000 within six months; senior analyst James Van Straten notes that Bitcoin is currently testing its 200-week moving average, with on-chain data suggesting the $50,000–$54,000 range could be the next key battleground. Since 2011, every major Bitcoin bear market has only confirmed its cycle bottom after falling below its realized price, and this signal has not yet emerged in the current cycle.
4 hours ago
Galaxy CEO: MicroStrategy has evolved into a key confidence signal for the overall Bitcoin market, with $59,000 serving as a critical support level.
Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz stated that the core reason for Bitcoin’s recent decline is a "confidence collapse triggered by Strategy". The issue extends beyond Bitcoin’s price itself: concerns over Strategy’s financing model are spreading across the market. As the world’s largest public corporate holder of Bitcoin, Strategy’s stocks and senior securities have become key metrics for traders to gauge Bitcoin market risk. Earlier, the company’s Bitcoin flywheel effect came under pressure, with its stock once trading below the value of its Bitcoin holdings—meaning its years-long reliance on the "issuing stock at a premium to raise funds for Bitcoin purchases" model is now facing challenges. Novogratz bluntly noted that STRC (Strategy’s ticker) is trading weakly, and it should have held steady around $100. Currently, Strategy’s annual dividend obligations have risen to roughly $1.2 billion, and shrinking cash reserves have cut the dividend coverage period to just about 14 months. On the macro front, Bitcoin also faces pressure. Novogratz summed up the current market logic as "a strong dollar means a weak Bitcoin": hawkish central bank signals and a strengthening US dollar are suppressing demand for risk assets. Technically, the $59,000 to $60,000 range has become a critical support level for Bitcoin; a break below could open downside space to $45,000. Novogratz also admitted the current situation is complex, with an equal 50/50 probability of a rebound or deep correction. ETF outflows, weak liquidity, and cautious positioning in the options market further confirm the market’s fragile sentiment. Today, Strategy’s balance sheet health, STRC’s price performance, and cash position are no longer just company-level issues—they have evolved into a confidence signal for the entire Bitcoin market.
TLDR:Hyper Foundation Unveils $10M USDH Migration Grant ProgramUSDH Holders Receive Migration Options as Ecosystem Shifts to USDC Hyper Foundation committed about $10 million to support USDH migration across affected ecosystem projects. Eligible builders must complete migration or orderly shutdown activities before the end of July deadline. USDH holders can swap tokens for USDC through supported HyperCore and HyperEVM migration pathways. Grant allocations depend on deployment costs or affected USDH total value locked across supported protocols. Hyper Foundation has introduced a grant program worth approximately $10 million to support projects affected by the USDH sunset. The initiative targets builders migrating away from the stablecoin or winding down USDH-dependent services before the end of July.
Eligible teams have already been contacted as the network moves through an organized transition process. The funding aims to reduce migration costs while helping maintain continuity across the Hyper ecosystem.
Hyper Foundation said the grants will support builders whose products relied on USDH before its retirement. According to the foundation, eligible recipients include HIP-1 spot deployers, HIP-3 perpetual deployers, HyperEVM protocols, dedicated USDH: USDC bridge operators, and Native Markets.
The grants fall into two categories. Migration grants support teams replacing USDH with USDC, while wind-down grants assist projects ending USDH-related operations. The foundation noted that wind-down grants remain smaller than equivalent migration awards.
According to Hyper Foundation, every recipient has committed to completing migration or orderly shutdown activities before the end of July. The program seeks to minimize disruption while encouraging structured transitions across supported applications.
Grant calculations also differ between ecosystem participants. HIP-1 and HIP-3 recipients receive allocations based on auction deployment costs, while HyperEVM protocol grants depend on the amount of USDH total value locked affected by the sunset.
USDH Holders Receive Migration Options as Ecosystem Shifts to USDC Hyper Foundation also outlined the migration process for users holding USDH. The organization encouraged users to follow instructions directly from the protocols where their assets remain deployed.
Users can exchange USDH for USDC through the HyperCore spot order book. The foundation also confirmed that HyperEVM users can swap USDH for USDC at a one-to-one ratio through Across without paying transaction fees.
Hyper Foundation Allocates $10M in Grants to Support USDH Migration
Hyper Foundation announced approximately $10 million in grants to help builders affected by the USDH sunset, covering migration and wind-down costs. Grants will be distributed to eligible HIP-1 and HIP-3… pic.twitter.com/Hwy7ZNwswz
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) June 28, 2026
Wu Blockchain highlighted the announcement shortly after the grant program became public. The report noted that the funding package covers both migration expenses and wind-down costs for affected ecosystem participants.
Hyper Foundation also acknowledged the contribution of builders, users, and Native Markets throughout the USDH rollout. The organization credited community participation and direct coordination with helping the migration process progress smoothly during the transition period.
Tokenized Stocks Aim to Unlock Global Equity Access“There’s actually about four billion people in the world today who are unbrokered,” Armstrong said in an episode of Sourcery with Molly O’Shea that aired on Saturday. “Half the planet basically can’t get access to any high-quality U.S. companies to invest in. They’re stuck holding cash and lower-quality investments.”
“That’s going to totally change the world,” Armstrong said of the shift to tokenized equities on modern financial rails.
Armstrong pointed to the pending Clarity Act, which he described as "right on the horizon," as the next crypto bill expected to speed up adoption of tokenized equities, similar to how the Genius Act supported stablecoins.
“If you survey Americans, something like 83% of them say that the financial system is not currently working for them,” Armstrong said, highlighting that the access issue extends beyond emerging markets.
Recent market data also supports Armstrong’s point, indicating tokenized stock trading volumes have reached record levels, signaling growing institutional and retail interest in blockchain-based equity exposure.
Photo Courtesy: Shutterstock By Thrive Studios ID
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Circle Stock is Facing Major Risks as USDC Supply DipsCRCL, which operates USD Coin (CRYPTO: USDC) and EURC, is confronting several major risks as the crypto winter continues.
A key risk is that the supply of USDC has continued to drop this month, which will hurt its revenue growth. CoinMarketCap data shows that the market capitalization of USDC has dropped to $73.7 billion from the year-to-date high of $80 billion. Similarly, EURC’s valuation has dropped to $426 million from the year-to-date high of $467 million.
At the same time, US bond yields have continued falling recently as crude oil prices fall after the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Brent and the West Texas Intermediate have fallen to $72.6 and $69, respectively. As a result, the two-year yield has dropped to 4.09% from the year-to-date high of 4.235%.
A combination of falling stablecoin supply and US bond yields is that its revenue growth will deteriorate in the near term. That’s because Circle’s business model involves investing its stablecoin reserves in short-term government bonds. Its revenue does well when these reserves and short-term bond yields are in an uptrend.
Analysts expect that Circle’s business will remain under pressure in the near term. The expectation is that its annual revenue will jump by 11% this year to $3.07 billion. Its annual revenue jumped by over 60% last year as its USDC assets jumped.
Circle Internet Group Stock Has Formed a Double-Top PatternCRCL is also facing some technical risks, which may drive it lower in the near term. It formed a double-top pattern at $135.70, its highest point in March and May this year. It has now dropped below the neckline of $84, its lowest point on April 9.
The stock has slumped below the 50-day moving average, while the two lines of the MACD indicator have continued falling. Therefore, the stock will likely continue falling, initially to the all-time low of $49. This view is in line with the recent CRCL stock downgrade by Mizuho, who lowered their target to $85.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
1024EX, an on-chain crypto trading platform, has announced support for $USDC deposits on two more networks. 1024EX now supports $USDC deposits on Ethereum and Base blockchain networks. As per 1024EX’s official social media announcement, these deposits are live now. Moreover, $USDC withdrawals on Base, Solana, and Ethereum are already live. The update highlights 1024EX’s plan to make stablecoin transfers less fragmented and more rapid.
1024EX now supports USDC deposits via Base and Ethereum.
Withdrawals are available via Base, Ethereum, and Solana.
Coming soon: TRON support.
More chains. Smoother deposits. Easier withdrawals.
— 1024EX (@1024EX) June 27, 2026 Supporting USDC deposits on Ethereum and Base is highly important for any crypto platform and its users. It improves user experience, boosts platform competitiveness, and supports broader stablecoin adoption.
How USDC Deposits on Base and Ethereum Can Improve User Experience The launch of the $USDC deposits on Base and Ethereum permits 1024EX to improve the user experience. Base enables fast finality as well as low-fee transactions. At the same time, Ethereum provides comprehensive liquidity as well as wide wallet compatibility. Keeping this in view, the rollout provides traders with two additional ways for account funding via $USDC without depending on a single blockchain. Additionally, the $USDC deposit support minimizes congestion risk when it comes to increased network activity.
Coming to withdrawals, 1024EX users are permitted to withdraw capital via Solana, Base, and Ethereum. Withdrawals support on Solana is of great importance because Solana delivers a high-throughput option for minimal fees and sub-second settlement. This benefits consumers who look for funds transfers to other platforms, DeFi protocols, or wallets quickly.
1024EX Targets TRON as Next Integration for Wider Access In addition to this, the platform has also unveiled plans to support the TRON network to further facilitate its users. The potential inclusion of TRON would broaden 1024EX’s access to consumers who focus on minimal network fees in the case of $USDC transactions. Ultimately, this development gives consumers more control over $USDC withdrawals and deposits.
To sum up, 1024EX considers this 3-chain withdrawal framework as a key move to let consumers pick ecosystem compatibility, cost, or speed in line with their individual requirements.
AUTHOR
Umair Younas is a cryptocurrency-related content writer linked with this work since 2019. Here, at Blockchainreporter, he serves as a news and article writer. He is a crypto, blockchain, NFTs, DeFi, and FinTech enthusiast. He has strong command over writing authentic reviews about brokers and exchanges and he has collaborated with our education team to write educational content as well. He has a dream to raise awareness among people about digital currencies. His works are well-researched and brimmed with information hence they provide fresh insights. Stay tuned to his posts if you want to stay up-to-date with the crypto-verse.
Michael Saylor issued a statement noting that Bitcoin is operating normally, and so are we (Strategy).
2 minutes ago
A renowned Chinese hedge fund manager has warned that global AI stocks have formed a "super bubble".
Two renowned Chinese hedge fund managers have warned that global AI stocks have formed a "super bubble" and are on the verge of bursting. Yang Dong, founder of Ningquan Asset, explicitly warned in the "2026 Semi-Annual Investment Report" released on June 23 that a "super bubble" has formed in global AI stocks, and a crash may be imminent. The report bluntly stated that a large number of hot A-share stocks are very likely to drop by 80% or even over 90% in the future, adding that "if one lacks the ability to pull chestnuts out of the fire and emerge unscathed, taking such risks would be irresponsible to investors." Yang Dong accurately predicted the peak of the 2007 bull market. Separately, Li Bei, founder of Shanghai-based Banxia Investment, noted in her June 21 monthly report "To Banxia Investors" that "the triggering conditions for the AI bubble to burst have emerged." Taking Anthropic's ARR (Annualized Run Rate) as an example, she argued that revenue growth at downstream model companies has slowed significantly, their full-year results are likely to fall well short of market expectations, and a subsequent decline in capital expenditure is highly probable.
2 minutes ago
An address linked to Vitalik has transferred 7,000 ETH, and is likely to deposit the funds into a centralized exchange (CEX).
According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a wallet linked to Vitalik, labeled "0xD04", transferred 7,000 ETH (valued at $11.06 million) to a new wallet. Based on the address’s historical transaction records, the ETH is highly likely to be deposited into a centralized exchange (CEX). Earlier, the same wallet transferred 1,300 ETH (worth $31.6 million), which was subsequently deposited into Paxos. The wallet currently holds 20,001 ETH, valued at $31.6 million.
2 minutes ago
Hong Kong government: Regulated stablecoins are expected to launch between mid-year and the second half of this year.
Hong Kong’s government stated in a written response to the Legislative Council that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) granted stablecoin issuer licenses to two bank-backed institutions in April 2026. Per the institutions’ existing business plans, Hong Kong’s regulated stablecoins are projected to launch between mid-year and the second half of this year. The government added that the HKMA has sent notices to unregulated entities conducting stablecoin issuance in the market to clarify legal requirements, and will continue to follow up on related matters; individual cases may be referred to the police or the Department of Justice if necessary. Additionally, the government will submit a bill to the Legislative Council this year to establish a regulatory regime for virtual asset trading, custody, advisory and management service providers.
2 minutes ago
The Israeli military will reduce its forces stationed in southern Lebanon.
According to Israel's Army Radio, the Israeli military will reduce its forces stationed in southern Lebanon and withdraw several combat brigades.
2 minutes ago
Serenity's trade calls push CBRS to a short-term sharp rally, with a significant premium over post-market prices on TradFi platforms.
Serenity's bullish calls drive Cerebras' short-term sharp surge. As of press time, the stock contract is trading at $188.26 on trade.xyz, up over 5% in the past hour. Meanwhile, the stock's after-hours price (markets are now closed) stands at just $182.3. Earlier reports noted that Serenity said it first bought Cerebras stock in the $170 range, citing a valuation premium from its OpenAI partnership, though it pointed out the current valuation is slightly higher than profitable firms like JBL, while remaining bullish on Cerebras' potential as an AI inference leader.
PANews, June 27 news, according to official data, in the 7 days up to June 25, Circle issued about 6 billion USDC, redeemed about 7.1 billion USDC, and the circulating supply decreased by about 1.1 billion tokens. USDC's total circulating supply is 73.6 billion tokens, with reserves of approximately $73.9 billion, including about $52.2 billion in overnight reverse repurchase agreements on government bonds; about $10 billion in Treasury securities with maturities less than 3 months; about $11 billion in deposits at systemically important institutions; and about $0.7 billion in other bank deposits.
Polymarket said it successfully contained a security breach after discovering a third-party vendor had been compromised on Thursday morning.
Polymarket Refunding ‘Users In Full’Polymarket Traders, an X handle with an official Polymarket Traders badge, first disclosed that the breach injected a “malicious script” into the frontend for some users.
“We’ve contained it & removed the affected dependency. We’re contacting impacted users & refunding them in full,” Polymarket Traders said.
Polymarket’s Growth Lead, William LeGate, confirmed the hack and the refund process. Benzinga reached out to Polymarket for more details on the breach.
On-Chain Sleuths Point To Millions In TheftBlockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps said that the attacker drained nearly $3 million from under 15 wallets, although the damage has been “largely contained.”
“Great response by Polymarket,” the on-chain sleuth added.
Specter, another on-chain investigator, stated that the victim wallets held PUSD, a collateral token backed by USDC (CRYPTO: USDC) used for all trading on Polymarket.The stolen assets were then swapped for Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) and consolidated into a single address.
Polymarket On Hackers’ Radar?The latest security breach comes barely a month after Polymarket revealed that the wallet its employees used to top up accounts and pay user rewards had been hacked. On-chain analysts estimate the exploit at close to $700,000.
Photo: PJ McDonnell / Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
This is a general announcement. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region. Fellow Binancians, This Summer, Binance introduces a brand-new interactive campaign designed to reward meaningful participation across trading, staking, and referrals. Welcome to the MENA Spin & Win, where completing missions unlocks spins, and every spin brings the chance to win and share 50,000 USDC in rewards. By taking part in high-intent actions on Binance, eligible users can earn attempts to play and win rewards throughout the month. Join Here Activity Period: 2026-06-25 00:00 (UTC) - 2026-07-31 23:59 (UTC) How to Participate: Only users from the MENA and Pakistan regions are eligible for this campaign. Visit the MENA Spin & Win Game of Chance campaign page.Click [Join Now] to confirm participation.Complete eligible missions during the Activity Period to unlock spins.Use your spins to play the Game of Chance and reveal your reward outcome instantly.All tasks are segmented, except for the Referral task. Users will only be able to participate in the tasks for which they meet the eligibility criteria.Only actions completed via the campaign page during the Activity Period will be considered valid.All rewards would be distributed after the campaign ends by 2026-08-15. How to Earn Spins: Eligible users can unlock attempts by completing one or more of the following missions: Successfully refer friends who complete account verification (KYC) and trades at least 5 USDT equivalent to unlock attempts. For each successful referral the inviter gets 2 spins and the invitee gets 1 spin. Each inviter can refer a maximum of 30 invitees (only successful referrals will be counted).Complete your first trade on Binance of ≥ $5 on Spot, Convert or Futures to Unlock 2 spins.Available for existing users only.Complete your first trade on Binance of ≥ $5 on Spot, Convert or Futures to Unlock 2 spins.Available for new users only.Subscribe 5 USDT equivalent or more in supported products for 1 day or longer to unlock 1 attempt.Available to users who have never used Earn products before the Activity Period.Complete your first Spot trade of at least 5 USDT equivalent to unlock 1 attempt. Available to users who have never traded on Spot before the Activity Period.Complete your first Futures trade of at least 10 USDT equivalent to unlock 1 spin Available to users who have never traded on Futures before the Activity Period. Each mission may only be completed once, unless otherwise specified on the campaign page. Rewards: Each game attempt gives users a chance to win rewards from the prize pool of 50,000 USDC. Reward values may vary, and outcomes are determined at random upon each successful attempt.Rewards are on a first-come, first-served basis and will be distributed in 2 weeks after the campaign ends by 2026-08-15 in USDC tokens. Rewards will be issued in the form of USDC tokens, which needs to be claimed within 14 days of disbursement. Terms and Conditions: Only regular and VIP 1 - 3 users who complete identity verification and click "Join Now" on the Activity page during the Activity Period, will be eligible for rewards from the overall prize pool.Eligible Spot/Convert trading pairs include all available trading pairs on Binance Exchange, except BTC/TUSD, BTC/ARS, BNB/FDUSD, stablecoin-to-stablecoin, BUSD trading pairs, and 0 fee pairs. Only trades on eligible trading pairs will count toward the calculation of users’ total trading volume during the Activity Period. Binance reserves the right to disqualify user’s reward eligibility if the account is involved in any dishonest behavior (e.g., wash trading, illegally bulk registered accounts, self dealing, or market manipulation).USDC token rewards will be distributed by 2026-08-15, which needs to be claimed within 14 days of disbursement.Binance reserves the right to cancel or amend any Activity or Activity Rules at its sole discretion.Binance reserves the right to disqualify any participants who tamper with Binance program code, or interfere with the operation of Binance program code with other software. The Binance Terms and Conditions for Prize Promotions apply to this Activity.There may be discrepancies in the translated version of this original article in English. Please reference this original version for the latest or most accurate information where any discrepancies may arise. Thank you for your support! Binance Team 2026-06-26
PANews, June 26 – Tether-backed Hyperliquid mobile interface and non-custodial trading platform Dreamcash announced it will gradually shut down its CASH perpetual contract markets based on Hyperliquid HIP-3, citing that USDC is now natively integrated on the platform, placing USDT markets at a user experience disadvantage. According to the announcement, all CASH markets will be settled sequentially on a preset schedule between June 30 and July 2, with positions automatically closed at external oracle prices upon settlement, and funding rates will be set to 0 during this period. Dreamcash emphasized that the platform uses a non-custodial architecture, so user account balances and rewards will not be affected; only the relevant USDT-denominated underlying perpetual markets (such as TSLA, NVDA, GOLD, etc.) will cease trading. The team will subsequently focus on developing and promoting its crypto trading mobile application.
PANews June 26 news, USDC announced on X that USDC privacy features are now live on Starknet, enabled by STRK20 — Starknet's privacy feature for ERC-20 tokens with built-in compliance capabilities. Users can shield, send, and unshield USDC while maintaining privacy of balances, amounts, and counterparty information on the public ledger. USDC remains a USD-denominated stablecoin, and the new privacy features are suitable for payments, fund flows, payroll, and on-chain financial activities on Starknet.
PANews June 25 news, according to The Block, Kraken has partnered with decentralized lending platform Maple to launch the first fully on-chain digital asset loan warehouse facility, providing USDC liquidity for its OTC lending business for institutional and high-net-worth clients. Maple funds the facility through a revolving financing vehicle similar to traditional asset-backed securities (ABS) and establishes a bankruptcy-remote SPV structure to protect asset safety. Kraken acts as loan originator, servicer, and subordinate capital provider bearing first loss, while its Wyoming SPDI institution, Kraken Financial, holds the collateral assets.
There is a hint of support and reluctance in Russia's attitude toward Bitcoin. Recently, that extended to USDC.
Ivan Chebeskov, Russia's Deputy Finance Minister, told Expert.ru in early June that the controlled whitelist will include Circle's stablecoin in addition to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT.
Here are the assets that, when Russia's new digital-asset law goes into effect, non-qualified retail investors will be able to trade.
He explained that the criteria are methodical and stated that the options can only be those four names that are already well-liked by traders, provided that their average market value is more than 5 trillion rubles (~$70 billion) during a two-year period.
That kind of thinking ensured that USDC would qualify.
It simply won't meet the criteria effectively. Shortly after Chebeskov's remarks, the structure that was intended to allow USDC entry transformed into one aimed at imposing taxes on it.
By the time of June's SPIEF forum in St. Petersburg, the same official characterized USDC, along with USDT and Binance's BNB, as a "unfriendly" asset that necessitates commissions, technical hurdles, and "advice" to encourage citizens to consider alternatives.
The retail whitelist that once featured four assets has, in just two weeks, effectively been reduced to three: BTC, ETH, and USDT, while USDC now finds itself in a distinct, penalized category.
The narrative isn't that Russia is embracing USDC. It appears that Russia has established a market-cap filter that mandates the acceptance of USDC, while simultaneously implementing a sanctions-logic filter to discourage participation.
The Legal Mechanism Behind the Flip-Flop
The anomaly is a direct result of the way the Russian government is structuring its digital currency and digital rights law, which made it through the State Duma on April 22 with 327 out of 340 votes and must be finalized by July 1, 2026.
The law achieves two goals simultaneously, and they are purposefully incompatible with one another.
The retail whitelist is first established with particular eligibility requirements, such as a market capitalization greater than 5 trillion rubles and a daily trading volume greater than 1 trillion rubles, both of which must be maintained continuously for a period of two years.
No geopolitical assessment is being made here; this is a quantitative study.
If you implement it now, the only stablecoins and large assets that qualify are Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, and USDC. This is why Chebeskov confirmed USDC's inclusion almost as a formality.
Second, the Law and its Regulatory Framework empower the Russian Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance to impose "economic incentives, such as commissions or recommendations" on assets owned by companies registered in "unfriendly" jurisdictions, a categorization that Russia has maintained since 2022 and encompasses the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom.
Circle was founded in the United States.
The British Virgin Islands-based Tether has spent the last three years crafting a geopolitical position that is intentionally vague.
Interestingly, it has granted US law enforcement demands to freeze wallets, including a substantial $344 million freeze, as reported by Izvestia, suggesting that it is not exempt from the hazards linked with such measures.
According to reports, USDT was almost banned by authorities until the industry rallied and had it added to the authorized list; USDC and BNB are still being investigated.
The main reason USDT is able to avoid taxes while USDC is subject to them appears to have less to do with the technical risk of asset freezing – since both issuers can do it – and more to do with Tether's track record of enabling transactions linked to Russia, in contrast to Circle's considerably stricter stance on sanctions compliance.
What The Fees Would Actually Look Like
Officials and experts who have been apprised of the draft are starting to provide some ideas, although the law has not yet defined a particular figure.
The friction associated with "unfriendly" tokens, according to Freedom Global analyst Vladimir Chernov, ranges from 0.5% to 2%. For dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDC, the friction increases significantly to 3%.
Assuming a retail investor is not qualified and has an annual purchase limit of 300,000 rubles, or about $4,000, the numbers soon start to add up: a 3% cut on an already small allocation puts a heavy strain on the one asset, a dollar stablecoin, that retail Russians have used to protect themselves from ruble volatility.
That is the part of the story that the audience should think about. Russia isn't trying to drive USDC prices down by prohibiting it; it did it for years with larger crypto restrictions, yet adoption still increased.
The process involves presenting USDC inside a well-thought-out framework that brings about controlled obstacles in a newly regulated setting, all the while retaining the alluring headline – "USDC is approved!" – as an assertion of truth.
This type of regulatory capture differs from others in that it allows for future adjustments to be made through "commissions or recommendations" rather than legislation.
This keeps the limitations out of the slower three-reading legislative process and under the control of ministerial discretion.
Why Tether Wins This Round And Circle Doesn't
This disparity is important for reasons that go well beyond Russia. Chebeskov reported over 50 billion rubles, or around $650-700 million, in daily crypto transactions overall, indicating a high daily volume of USDT in Russia.
Chainalysis also estimates that between July 2024 and June 2025, Russia processed $376 billion worth of cryptocurrency, more than any other European country.
An integral aspect of this process is stablecoins, the most prominent of which is USDT. These allow Russian importers and exporters to transact cross-border with clients in China, the UAE, Turkey, and other countries.
There has never been much of a chance that Moscow will reduce USDC's stake in that channel because Circle was never a good candidate for avoiding sanctions because to its adherence to rules and ties to the US.
Moscow is putting the finishing touches on an informal market hierarchy that has already formed: USDT for trading, BTC and ETH for value storage, and USDC as the secondary choice that satisfies the paper market-cap criterion.
Even if Circle's hands-on experience is limited, the symbolic weight of it makes some people uneasy.
When US-regulated issuers are subject to scrutiny from OFAC and Treasury for infrastructure compliance with sanctioned states, having their stablecoin designated as the "taxed" version inside the G20 regulatory framework is hardly the kind of recognition they seek.
In contrast to Tether's opaque operation, Circle has built its whole value proposition and public listing story on being a trustworthy, validated, US-aligned alternative.
What makes USDC attractive to regulators in Washington, Brussels, and Singapore – its transparency and local presence – are precisely what cause the "unfriendly asset" fee in Moscow, according to the Russian framework, which basically flips that premise on its head.
The Ruble-Stablecoin Endgame
Not the penalty on USDC, but the replacement he suggested is the most important thing to remember from Chebeskov's remarks at SPIEF. The perfect option for diverted capital, according to him, would be stablecoins tied to the ruble or instruments tied to the dirham from "friendly" countries.
There is no abstraction in that.
As per CertiK's reporting, the Kyrgyzstan-issued stablecoin A7A5 has handled more over $110 billion in transactions since the beginning of 2025. With this, it surpasses all other non-dollar stablecoins in terms of worldwide market capitalization.
In addition, Moscow formally acknowledged it in September 2025 as a digital currency for international commerce. Because of its role in helping sanctions evaders, it is now under direct sanctions from the United States and the United Kingdom. Another exchange that was most associated with it, Grinex, shut down in April after a hack.
Taken as a whole, the structure in place is less concerned with consumer protection and more of a strategic move toward lessening the retail sector's dependence on the dollar.
Since neither Bitcoin nor Ethereum has an issuer that may be subject to penalties, they continue to play an important role as politically neutral assets.
The infrastructure for trade settlement is already reliant on USDT, thus its removal would create major disruption, hence it remains in place, albeit grudgingly.
Since USDC and BNB are functionally equivalent and have symbolic value in relation to the Western financial system, they are taxable.
Regulatory backing for stablecoins like the ruble and dirham makes them more secure since they allow for the transfer of value through tools that can be easily controlled or shielded from sanctions by countries like Russia, the UAE, and others in the BRICS.
The Outlook
The likelihood that something will stick depends on three things. It is anticipated that adjustments will be proposed soon after the vote, following the second reading in the Duma.
Russian financial institutions have previously pushed for the whitelist's limits to be loosened and for transfers to non-custodial wallets abroad to be permitted via their organization. There is still time to make modifications to the final version before July 1st, the deadline.
The second point is the cost structure; there are no official rules in place at the moment, but a 0.5% charge isn't much of an issue, and a 3% fee is getting close to becoming serious.
Lastly, the capacity to implement regulations, according to reports, Roskomnadzor is planning to implement DNS-level filtering in order to combat unlicensed foreign exchanges.
That shows Moscow is serious about backing the fee structure with technical blocking measures, not just a pricing signal that smart users can get around.
Russia included USDC on its whitelist, as the headline states. Contrary to popular belief, Russia is bound by law to admit USDC while simultaneously erecting obstacles to prevent it from staying.
Key HighlightsCRCL Shares Rebound on Strategic Japan ExpansionNomura Collaboration Focuses on Real-Time Currency ExchangeJapan Strengthens Digital Currency Regulatory FrameworkGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks Circle (CRCL) stock gains momentum following Nomura collaboration announcement for Japan market. Partnership aims to deliver instant foreign exchange settlement infrastructure by 2027. USDC stablecoin technology positioned to reduce cross-border transaction times for Japanese businesses. Nomura Securities to oversee client relations and regulatory compliance locally. Japan’s progressive stablecoin framework enables institutional blockchain integration. Shares of Circle Internet Group experienced a pre-market rally as the digital currency firm progressed with its strategic entry into the Japanese market. CRCL climbed 1.67% to reach $72.17 during early trading, recovering from a 6.21% decline that brought the stock to $70.98 in the prior session. Market enthusiasm grew following confirmation of a stablecoin-based settlement collaboration with financial giant Nomura.
Circle Internet Group, CRCL
CRCL Shares Rebound on Strategic Japan Expansion Circle’s stock demonstrated resilience as investors evaluated the firm’s expanding footprint in Japan’s foreign exchange infrastructure. This collaboration represents a significant opportunity to integrate Circle’s stablecoin technology into high-value corporate payment channels and global trade transactions. The initiative reinforces the company’s competitive standing within compliant digital payment ecosystems.
Circle maintains USDC, the globe’s second-most valuable dollar-pegged stablecoin measured by total market capitalization. Businesses leverage USDC across multiple functions including payment processing, digital asset trading, treasury management, and blockchain-enabled financial clearing. Circle’s growth trajectory centers on collaborations with licensed financial entities to broaden stablecoin adoption internationally.
The firm’s market penetration strategy emphasizes alliances with banking institutions, cryptocurrency platforms, and payment service providers. Circle delivers the underlying USDC infrastructure, while regional collaborators manage customer relationships, regulatory adherence, and fiat currency exchanges. Consequently, this framework enables Circle to access strictly regulated territories through trusted financial intermediaries.
Nomura Collaboration Focuses on Real-Time Currency Exchange Circle and Nomura are working toward launching their foreign exchange settlement platform in Japan’s commercial market by early 2027. Circle will supply the USDC blockchain payment infrastructure, whereas Nomura Securities will handle corporate customer engagement and compliance obligations. The platform will primarily serve trade financing needs, international investment flows, and substantial cross-border remittances.
The envisioned system would enable businesses to transform Japanese yen into USDC tokens before transmitting value across blockchain networks. A designated financial intermediary would subsequently exchange the stablecoins into destination currencies. Such transactions could potentially execute within minutes rather than spanning multiple business days.
Conventional correspondent banking networks frequently introduce delays as financial institutions navigate disparate technological systems, operational schedules, and geographic time differences. Blockchain-powered settlement mechanisms could eliminate these bottlenecks while minimizing counterparty risk associated with large-value transfers. Nevertheless, both organizations must upgrade operational infrastructure and obtain necessary regulatory permissions before commercial deployment.
Japan Strengthens Digital Currency Regulatory Framework Circle initially accessed the Japanese market through strategic partnerships that aligned USDC operations with domestic stablecoin legislation. These arrangements established compliant pathways for digital payment execution, transaction settlement, and enterprise treasury applications. The Nomura initiative represents an expansion of this regulatory foundation into corporate currency exchange services.
Nomura has conducted multiple blockchain technology pilots focused on institutional financial applications and securities processing. Earlier experiments encompassed government bond collateralization and stablecoin-facilitated securities clearing mechanisms. This new partnership advances Nomura toward operational blockchain-based settlement offerings.
Japan administers stablecoin operations under its Payment Services Act, restricting issuance authority to authorized financial service providers. Regulatory authorities have additionally explored incorporating digital assets under frameworks governing conventional financial instruments. These regulatory developments may facilitate expanded institutional participation while preserving rigorous supervision of digital asset operations.
Circle and Japan’s leading investment bank Nomura have announced a strategic partnership to develop an instant foreign exchange settlement service tailored for Japanese corporations. According to a Thursday report by Nikkei, the joint service is targeted for launch as early as 2027.
Cross-border payments set for transformationThe planned settlement infrastructure will allow companies to convert funds into new US dollar stablecoins for use in cross-border transactions. This model aims to reduce delays caused by traditional banking hours and time zone differences. The report highlights that accelerating the settlement process could bring major efficiency gains, particularly for corporate payments.
The report notes that the upcoming service could enable Japanese firms to convert funds into new dollar-based stablecoins and settle cross-border payments instantly.
This initiative signals the entry of one of the world’s largest dollar stablecoins into Japan’s institutional foreign exchange markets. As a result, the use of stablecoins in intercompany international payments could see significant expansion in the coming years.
Glossary: A stablecoin is a digital asset whose value is typically pegged to a fiat currency such as the dollar or yen. Settlement refers to the final completion of a payment, where funds are definitively transferred between parties.
Circle, the issuer of USDC with a market capitalization of $73.8 billion, is currently recognized as the world’s second largest stablecoin provider. As this article was being prepared, neither Circle nor Nomura had issued an official statement regarding the partnership.
Rapid progress on stablecoin regulation in JapanJapan has accelerated its progress in the stablecoin sector as financial institutions evaluate regulatory-compliant, blockchain-based settlement solutions. On Wednesday, SBI Holdings and Startale Group introduced JPYSC, a yen-backed stablecoin designed for corporate use and cross-border settlements, supported by a trust bank. Over the same period, Ripple USD also became officially available for use in Japan.
Japan has become one of the first major economies to establish a legal framework for stablecoins, enabling banks, trust companies, and licensed money transfer operators to issue regulated tokens.
The legal foundation for stablecoins in the country is shaped by the Payment Services Act, which allows banks, trust companies, and licensed payment institutions to issue regulated tokens. This framework is credited with enabling swift innovation in the sector.
Taxation and ETF reforms in focus for digital assetsJapanese regulators are also reassessing the legal status of crypto assets. While currently governed by the Payment Services Act, there are steps underway to bring digital assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. Such a shift could align crypto assets with the regulatory framework of traditional financial products.
Among the proposed reforms is a reduction of the capital gains tax on crypto assets from the current high of 55% to a flat rate of 20%. These changes are seen as crucial for attracting corporate interest and expanding investment vehicles related to digital assets in Japan.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
MiCA is the European Union’s first comprehensive rulebook for crypto, and on July 1, 2026, its transition period ends for good. This guide explains what MiCA does, why USDT got delisted while USDC did not, and what the hard deadline means for exchanges and users.
Summary
MiCA becomes fully enforceable across the European Union on July 1, 2026, after which crypto firms without a MiCA license can no longer legally serve EU users. The regulation introduced a single framework for crypto across all EU member states, with strict rules for stablecoins, exchanges, and other crypto service providers. MiCA compliance kept USDC listed on regulated European exchanges, while USDT was delisted after its issuer chose not to seek authorization. Table of Contents
What MiCA actually regulatesThe stablecoin rules and why USDT got delistedCASPs: the rules for exchanges and service providersThe July 2026 deadline and the great narrowingA worked example: what a token and an exchange each faceWhat MiCA leaves unsettledMiCA in the global pictureWhat it means for everyday usersFrequently Asked Questions MiCA, short for Markets in Crypto-Assets, is the European Union’s first comprehensive law governing crypto-assets and the companies that deal in them, creating one common rulebook across all twenty-seven member states in place of the patchwork of national approaches that came before. Formally known as Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, it entered into force in mid-2023 and has rolled out in phases ever since, and it now sits at a decisive moment: on July 1, 2026, the transition period that let existing crypto firms keep operating under old national rules expires for good, and Europe’s market supervisor has been blunt that there will be no extensions.
After that date, any company offering crypto services to European Union clients without a proper MiCA license is simply breaking the law. This guide explains what MiCA is, the categories it creates, why some stablecoins survived in Europe while others were delisted, what a crypto company must do to comply, and what the hard 2026 deadline means for exchanges and ordinary users alike.
The significance of MiCA is hard to overstate, because the European Union is one of the largest economic blocs on earth and MiCA is the most ambitious attempt yet to bring crypto fully inside a traditional financial-regulation framework. Before MiCA, a crypto exchange or token issuer operating in Europe faced a confusing mix of national rules, with one regime in Germany, another in France, another in Malta, and gaps everywhere in between.
MiCA replaces that fragmentation with a single, harmonized system: get authorized once, and you can passport your services across the entire bloc. The trade-off is that the bar to get authorized is high, the obligations are heavy, and the deadline to clear them is now days away rather than years off. The result is a market being reshaped in real time, with a small number of licensed winners, a large number of firms facing exit, and a stablecoin landscape that already looks very different inside Europe than outside it.
What MiCA actually regulates MiCA divides the crypto world into categories and applies different rules to each, so the first step in understanding it is learning what those categories are. At the top level, MiCA governs two kinds of actors: the issuers of crypto-assets and the providers of crypto-asset services. For issuers, MiCA sorts tokens into three buckets.
The first is electronic money tokens, or EMTs, which are stablecoins pegged to a single official currency, such as a euro-pegged or dollar-pegged coin. The second is asset-referenced tokens, or ARTs, which are stablecoins backed by a basket of things, multiple currencies, commodities, or other assets, rather than a single currency. The third is a catch-all category of other crypto-assets, which covers utility tokens, governance tokens, and unbacked cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether, the assets most exchanges handle every day.
Each bucket carries different obligations. The two stablecoin categories face the strictest treatment, because regulators view stablecoins as the part of crypto most capable of threatening the wider financial system, a concern sharpened by the 2022 collapse of the TerraUSD algorithmic stablecoin that wiped out tens of billions of dollars. EMT and ART issuers must hold proper reserves, grant holders redemption rights, and meet governance and disclosure standards.
The other crypto-assets face lighter rules, mainly requirements to publish an honest whitepaper before offering a token to the public and to avoid market abuse. Notably, MiCA largely excludes non-fungible tokens, unless they are issued in a large fungible series that makes them function more like ordinary tokens, and it excludes assets already covered by existing financial law, such as securities. The category a token falls into determines almost everything about how MiCA treats it, which is why getting the classification right is the starting point for any issuer.
The stablecoin rules and why USDT got delisted The most visible effect of MiCA so far has been on stablecoins, and the clearest way to understand the rules is through what happened to the two largest dollar stablecoins. Under MiCA, a stablecoin can only be offered by European Union-regulated platforms if its issuer is authorized, which for a single-currency stablecoin means holding an e-money or credit institution license and meeting MiCA’s reserve, redemption, and governance requirements.
The reserve rules are strict: an EMT must back its tokens fully, holding one hundred percent of reserves in safe, segregated accounts, while an ART must keep at least a substantial portion segregated at regulated credit institutions. MiCA also bars stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders, a deliberate choice to stop stablecoins from competing with bank deposits and drawing money out of the banking system.
This is where the two giants diverged. Circle, the issuer of USDC, pursued authorization through a European subsidiary and obtained MiCA approval for USDC and its euro stablecoin EURC, making them compliant and freely offered across European Union exchanges. Tether, the issuer of USDT, the largest stablecoin in the world, did not apply for MiCA authorization and confirmed its token was not compliant. The consequence was swift: major European Union-regulated exchanges, including the regional arms of the largest global platforms, delisted USDT and other non-compliant stablecoins for their European users.
The nuance worth understanding is that USDT is not banned from existence in Europe; users can still hold it in self-custody and trade it on decentralized exchanges. What changed is that a MiCA-licensed exchange can no longer offer it, which fragments liquidity and pushes European users toward compliant alternatives like USDC. Every stablecoin authorized under MiCA so far has been an EMT, a single-currency token, and USDC’s compliance versus USDT’s non-compliance has become the textbook illustration of the rules in action.
CASPs: the rules for exchanges and service providers Beyond token issuers, MiCA’s other major target is the companies that provide crypto services, which the regulation calls crypto-asset service providers, or CASPs. This category is broad: it covers exchanges, brokers, custodians, wallet providers that hold customer assets, trading platforms, and firms that advise on or place crypto-assets.
If your business touches customer crypto in almost any commercial way, you likely need a CASP authorization to keep serving European Union clients. The obligations that come with that authorization are extensive and closely mirror those imposed on traditional financial firms, which is the entire point: MiCA aims to make crypto service providers behave like regulated financial institutions rather than lightly governed startups.
A CASP must meet requirements covering customer identity verification and anti-money-laundering controls, the safekeeping and segregation of customer assets, governance and capital standards, market-conduct rules that prohibit insider trading and market manipulation, and clear disclosure of risks to customers. Authorized CASPs also become subject to the European Union’s operational-resilience framework, which mandates cybersecurity and incident-reporting standards, and to the crypto travel rule, which requires them to pass along sender and recipient information on transfers, the same obligation that has applied to bank wires for decades.
The reward for shouldering all of this is passporting: once a firm is authorized in any one member state, it can offer its services across all twenty-seven without seeking separate licenses in each, turning a fragmented continent into a single market. The burden is that running these programs at scale, across a global customer base, is expensive and demanding, which is exactly why so many firms are struggling to clear the bar before the deadline.
The July 2026 deadline and the great narrowing Everything about MiCA now points toward a single date, and understanding the phased rollout explains why that date matters so much. MiCA did not arrive all at once. The stablecoin rules for EMTs and ARTs took effect in mid-2024. The full CASP authorization regime took effect at the end of 2024, the point from which firms needed a MiCA license to operate.
But MiCA included a grandfathering provision, a transition period that let firms already operating legally under their national rules continue doing so while they applied for full MiCA authorization. Member states set their own transition windows within the limits MiCA allowed, ranging from short windows ending in 2025 to the full eighteen-month period ending on July 1, 2026. That final date is the bloc-wide cutoff, the moment the transition ends everywhere at once.
What makes the deadline dramatic is how few firms have actually cleared the bar. As the cutoff approached in 2026, roughly a couple of hundred firms held some form of full MiCA authorization across the entire union, but the number cleared to run an actual crypto trading platform was strikingly small, in the low double digits, with a number of member states having issued zero trading-platform licenses at all. Industry executives openly warned that a large majority of exchanges currently operating may fail to secure a license and be forced to exit the European market, and reports emerged of major global exchanges facing rejection in specific countries.
Europe’s market supervisor reinforced the message with no room for ambiguity: no member state may extend the transition beyond July 1, 2026, and after that date, operating without authorization is a breach of European Union law, not a paperwork gap. The picture, then, is of a great narrowing, a market being compressed from a crowded field into a small set of licensed survivors, with the rest required to wind down their European operations or leave.
A worked example: what a token and an exchange each face To make the rules concrete, it helps to walk through how MiCA treats two typical cases, a stablecoin issuer and an exchange, because the abstract categories become much clearer in motion. Imagine a company issuing a euro-pegged stablecoin and wanting European users to hold and trade it on regulated platforms.
Under MiCA, that token is an electronic money token, so the issuer must hold an e-money or credit institution license, back every token fully with reserves held in safe, segregated accounts, grant holders the right to redeem their tokens for the underlying currency on demand, publish a compliant whitepaper, and accept that it cannot pay holders any interest or yield. If the company does all of this and secures authorization, its stablecoin can be offered across the bloc; if it does not, regulated exchanges must refuse to list it, exactly the fork in the road that separated the compliant dollar stablecoin from the non-compliant one. The token’s fate under MiCA is decided entirely by whether its issuer accepts this package of obligations.
Now imagine an exchange that wants to keep serving European customers. Its path runs through CASP authorization. It must apply to a national regulator in some member state, prove it meets MiCA’s standards for governance, capital, and the safekeeping and segregation of customer assets, stand up the identity-verification and anti-money-laundering machinery that turns it into an obliged entity under European law, implement the travel rule so it passes sender and recipient information on transfers, meet the operational-resilience and cybersecurity requirements, and submit to ongoing supervision and market-conduct rules. If the regulator grants authorization, the exchange can passport that single license across all twenty-seven member states and operate bloc-wide.
If it cannot meet the bar or applies too late, it must stop serving European Union clients once the transition ends, winding down in an orderly way. The two journeys share a logic: MiCA offers a single, valuable prize, legal access to the entire European market, in exchange for accepting obligations modeled on those that govern banks and regulated financial firms.
What this worked example reveals is the deeper character of MiCA. It is not a light-touch registration that lets crypto firms keep operating much as before with a new label. It is a serious authorization regime that demands real reserves, real controls, real segregation of customer money, and real accountability, and it forces every issuer and service provider to decide whether the prize of European market access is worth the cost of meeting those demands.
For well-resourced firms with a long-term commitment to Europe, the answer is often yes, and they have built the compliance machinery to clear the bar. For many smaller or offshore operators, the cost is too high or the timeline too short, which is why the market is narrowing toward a smaller set of licensed survivors. The categories and rules described earlier are not bureaucratic abstractions; they are the concrete hurdles that decide, token by token and firm by firm, who gets to operate in Europe after the transition closes.
What MiCA leaves unsettled For all its ambition, MiCA leaves important questions open, and the gaps are as revealing as the rules. The largest unsettled area is decentralized finance. MiCA is built around identifiable issuers and service providers, the companies it can authorize and supervise, but a genuinely decentralized protocol has no company at its center, no firm to hold a license or answer to a regulator. MiCA states that fully decentralized arrangements, those provided without any intermediary, fall outside its scope, which sounds clean until you ask what “fully decentralized” actually means.
The market supervisor has not yet defined the term precisely, and most real protocols sit somewhere in the middle, with a governance token, a development team, a foundation, or a front-end operator that a regulator might decide counts as an intermediary. The result is genuine uncertainty about which DeFi protocols MiCA captures and which it does not, a gap that will be filled by future guidance and enforcement instead of the text itself.
Other tensions are surfacing as the rules meet reality. MiCA places caps on how widely very large stablecoins denominated in non-European currencies, such as dollar stablecoins, can be used as a means of payment within the bloc, a provision aimed at protecting European monetary sovereignty but one that complicates life for a market where most trading is dollar-denominated.
There are overlaps with other European financial laws, such as payment services rules, that can double the compliance burden for some stablecoin activities and have prompted worries about the competitiveness of euro stablecoins. And politically, the dossier has grown charged, with some member states floating the idea of a mechanism to switch off foreign stablecoins seen as a systemic threat.
None of these unsettled questions undermines MiCA’s core achievement of creating a single framework, but they are reminders that a law this sweeping cannot anticipate everything, and that MiCA will keep evolving through guidance, enforcement, and amendment for years after the headline deadline passes.
MiCA in the global picture MiCA does not exist in isolation, and seeing it alongside parallel efforts elsewhere reveals where global crypto regulation is heading. The same years that produced MiCA also produced the United States’ first comprehensive federal stablecoin law, the United Kingdom’s move toward its own crypto regime under its financial regulator, and Hong Kong’s stablecoin ordinance, among others.
These frameworks differ in detail, but they converge on a striking number of core principles: stablecoin issuers should hold full, high-quality reserves; they should be licensed and supervised; holders should have clear redemption rights; service providers should enforce identity checks and anti-money-laundering controls; and the whole apparatus should be brought inside the regulatory perimeter that governs traditional finance. MiCA, having arrived early and comprehensively, has functioned as something of a reference point that later frameworks echo and respond to.
This convergence matters for anyone trying to understand the trajectory of the industry. The era in which crypto operated in a regulatory vacuum, where an exchange could serve a global audience with minimal oversight, is closing, and MiCA is one of the clearest markers of that shift. The picture that emerges is of a maturing market in which access increasingly depends on compliance, in which the same stablecoin can be freely available in one jurisdiction and delisted in another based purely on its issuer’s regulatory posture, and in which the cost of operating legally has risen sharply.
For Europe specifically, MiCA’s promise is a safer, more transparent market with clear rules and a public register of authorized firms and tokens that anyone can consult. Its cost is a heavier compliance burden, a narrower field of providers, and reduced access to some popular global assets. Whether that trade favors consumers or stifles innovation is the live debate, but the direction is set: in Europe, crypto is now a regulated activity, and after July 1, 2026, that is true without exception.
What it means for everyday users For an ordinary person using crypto in Europe, MiCA changes the landscape in concrete ways worth understanding before the deadline instead of after. The most immediate effect is on which platforms and tokens you can use. If you rely on an exchange that has not secured a MiCA license, that platform may be forced to stop serving European Union clients after July 1, 2026, which in practice can mean frozen new deposits, halted trading features, and eventually a forced withdrawal of your funds, sometimes during a period of low liquidity and high fees. The protective move is to check, today instead of on July 2, whether the platforms you use have secured or are clearly on track to secure authorization, and to favor those that have. An unauthorized service operating after the deadline offers reduced legal protection and potential restrictions on access to your own assets.
The second effect is on stablecoins. If you hold a non-compliant stablecoin on a European Union-regulated exchange, you may find it delisted, with trading pairs removed and liquidity drying up, which is why many European users have shifted toward MiCA-authorized options. You can still self-custody whatever you like, but the convenient on-ramps and trading pairs increasingly favor compliant tokens. The broader takeaway is that MiCA, for all its complexity, ultimately aims to make the European crypto market safer and more transparent for users by ensuring the exchanges they trust meet real standards and the stablecoins they hold are genuinely backed. The cost of that safety is fewer choices and more friction, and a transition period that, for some platforms and tokens, ends abruptly.
The practical wisdom is simple: understand which of your platforms and assets are compliant, make any moves before the deadline instead of during the disruption, and treat MiCA authorization as a meaningful signal that a service has accepted real regulatory accountability.
Frequently Asked Questions What does MiCA stand for and what is it? MiCA stands for Markets in Crypto-Assets. It is the European Union’s first comprehensive law for crypto-assets and the companies that deal in them, formally Regulation (EU) 2023/1114. It replaces the previous patchwork of national rules with one harmonized framework across all twenty-seven member states, covering token issuers and service providers like exchanges, custodians, and wallet providers. Its goals are to protect consumers, prevent market abuse, ensure stablecoins are properly backed, and bring crypto inside the same kind of regulatory perimeter that governs traditional finance, while letting authorized firms operate bloc-wide.
Why was USDT delisted in Europe but not USDC? Under MiCA, a stablecoin can only be offered by European Union-regulated platforms if its issuer is authorized and meets MiCA’s reserve, redemption, and governance rules. Circle pursued authorization through a European subsidiary and obtained MiCA approval for USDC and its euro stablecoin EURC, so they remain available. Tether did not apply for MiCA authorization and confirmed USDT was non-compliant, so European Union-regulated exchanges delisted it. USDT is not banned outright; it can still be self-custodied and traded on decentralized exchanges, but licensed European platforms can no longer offer it.
What happens on July 1, 2026? That is when MiCA’s transition period ends across the entire European Union. The transition, or grandfathering, let firms already operating under national rules keep going while they applied for full MiCA authorization. After July 1, 2026, any company providing crypto services to European Union clients without a proper MiCA license is breaking European Union law. The market supervisor has stated there will be no extensions. Because relatively few firms have secured licenses, especially to run trading platforms, many exchanges may be forced to exit the European market or wind down their services there.
What is a CASP under MiCA? A CASP is a crypto-asset service provider, MiCA’s term for companies that offer crypto services such as exchanges, brokers, custodians, wallet providers holding customer assets, and trading platforms. To serve European Union clients, a CASP needs MiCA authorization, which comes with obligations modeled on traditional finance: identity checks and anti-money-laundering controls, segregation and safekeeping of customer assets, governance and capital standards, market-conduct rules against manipulation and insider trading, operational-resilience requirements, and the crypto travel rule. Once authorized in one member state, a CASP can passport its services across all twenty-seven.
Does MiCA regulate DeFi and NFTs? Only partly, and with significant uncertainty. MiCA largely excludes non-fungible tokens unless they are issued in a large fungible series that makes them behave like ordinary tokens. For decentralized finance, MiCA says fully decentralized arrangements provided without any intermediary fall outside its scope, but it has not precisely defined “fully decentralized.” Since most protocols have a governance token, a development team, a foundation, or a front-end operator, regulators may decide some of them have an intermediary that MiCA captures. So the treatment of many DeFi protocols remains unsettled and will be clarified through future guidance and enforcement.
How does MiCA affect ordinary crypto users in Europe? Mainly through which platforms and tokens you can use. If an exchange you use has not secured a MiCA license, it may have to stop serving European Union clients after July 1, 2026, which can mean halted deposits and trading and eventually forced withdrawals. Non-compliant stablecoins may be delisted from regulated exchanges, with liquidity shifting to compliant ones like USDC. The protective steps are to check whether your platforms are authorized, move before the deadline instead of during any disruption, and treat MiCA authorization as a signal that a service has accepted real regulatory accountability. You can still self-custody assets freely.
This article is educational information, not legal or financial advice. MiCA implementation, license counts, stablecoin compliance status, and deadlines can change, and details reflect reporting available as of June 25, 2026. Confirm current requirements and the status of specific platforms and tokens through official sources such as the European Securities and Markets Authority register before relying on anything described here.
Skip to contentHow STRK20 brings confidential stablecoin payments to DeFi
Stablecoins have become the unit of account for onchain finance. They settle trades, move treasury, pay contributors, and back most of the liquidity that DeFi runs on. But every one of those transfers carries a cost that rarely gets named: it is permanently, irreversibly public.
On Starknet, this has changed with privacy features for USDC, built with STRK20. With STRK20, Starknet’s native privacy framework, USDC on Starknet gains confidential capabilities: shieldable, privately transferable, and usable across DeFi, without leaving the standard ERC-20 behind.
The transparency problem with blockchain transactionsSend stablecoins on any chain and you broadcast the full transaction to anyone watching: the sender, the recipient, the exact amount, and the timestamp, all written to a public ledger forever. For a base layer that’s a feature. For the entity actually moving the money, it’s an exposure.
A treasury rebalance reveals position size and intent. A market-making wallet leaks its strategy with every fill. Counterparties can map your entire balance history before you’ve signed a single agreement, and MEV searchers can reconstruct your behaviour from a single linked address. The transparency that makes the network trustworthy makes its most important asset hostile to anyone who needs discretion, which is to say most enterprises, most institutions, and a fair number of individuals who simply expect their finances to be their own.
Workarounds exist, but they fragment liquidity, demand new tokens, or wrap privacy in a separate app users have to trust and migrate to. None of that is the same thing as privacy on the asset you already hold.
Introducing USDC privacy features with STRK20STRK20 is a privacy framework for all ERC-20 tokens on Starknet. It lets any ERC-20 support shielded balances and private transfers without altering the token contract and without asking wallets or apps to rebuild from scratch. USDC is among the first stablecoins on Starknet to have these privacy capabilities.
The model is:
– Shield USDC to hold a private balance, invisible to outside observers on the public ledger.
– Unshield at any time to return to standard, fully transparent ERC-20 behaviour.
– Transfer shielded USDC privately, with asset type, amount, and participating wallets all hidden from outside view.
Crucially, this is privacy at the protocol level, not an app integration. It’s the same USDC, in the same wallet, private when you need it to be and visible when you don’t. There’s no second token, no bridge into a walled garden, no duplicated balance to reconcile.
How it worksShielding moves USDC into a privacy pool where balances and transfers are protected by zero-knowledge proofs rather than published in the clear. A private transfer proves the transaction is valid (funds exist, the sender is authorised, nothing is double-spent) without revealing what moved, how much, or between whom.
Proof generation happens operator-side; verification happens at the sequencer level, using the same infrastructure Starknet already uses to prove its own blocks. Unshielding reverses the process, returning USDC to the public ledger whenever the user chooses.
And it won’t price privacy as a tax. Unlike approaches that skim a percentage of transaction value, STRK20 charges a fixed fee per transaction, closer to a gas fee than a toll. That flat cost is what makes private stablecoin payments viable at real volume rather than only for the largest transfers.
Confidential DeFi on Ready X and XversePrivacy that strands your assets isn’t very useful, so STRK20 is built for assets to stay composable. From the privacy pool, users will be able to swap in and out of USDC confidentially on Ready and XVerse wallets
That means you can hold a private balance and still participate in onchain markets without re-exposing yourself the moment you want to do something with it. These are the first integrations, not the last; more DeFi venues will follow as the framework rolls out.
Compliance architecture and viewing keysPrivacy and auditability are usually framed as a trade-off. STRK20 is designed to deliver both, by building compliance rather than bolting it on.
When a user shields, they automatically register a viewing key. The key is scoped to that user and that user alone. If a legitimate legal request is made, a designated third-party auditing entity can use it to reconstruct *that specific user’s* transaction history, and nothing else. No other participant in the pool is affected, and access sits with authorised bodies under legal process, never with counterparties, observers, or the users themselves peering into one another.
The result is privacy for users by default, with a clean, scoped path to auditability for regulators when the law requires it.
Why StarknetNone of this is incidental to Starknet; it’s a direct consequence of what the network was built on. Years of zero-knowledge research and engineering by StarkWare produced a STARK-based proving and verification stack efficient enough to make private payments both cheap and scalable, rather than a premium feature reserved for whales.
That same efficiency is why STRK20 can support complex private payments at scale where other privacy designs hit a wall. And it isn’t experimental: verification runs on the very infrastructure Starknet has used to prove its own blocks in production for over five years. Shielded USDC inherits that foundation.
Stablecoins gave onchain finance a unit of account. STRK20 is set to give it a private one.
—
Confidential stablecoin payments are here on Starknet. Follow the rollout and get the technical details at strk20.starknet.io
Join our newsletterReceive notifications on Starknet updates
0x Protocol just made its liquidity aggregation infrastructure accessible to AI agents, charging a flat $0.01 in USDC per API request. No API key. No account creation. No subscription. Just a wallet and a penny.
The integration, built on top of Alchemy’s AgentPay middleware, uses the HTTP 402 Payment Required standard, a long-dormant corner of the HTTP specification that was literally designed for digital payments decades ago and is only now finding its moment. In English: AI agents can now tap into 0x’s DeFi swap infrastructure autonomously, paying as they go from their own wallets.
How it works and why it matters 0x’s approach strips all of that away. An autonomous agent can hit the Swap API endpoint, attach a $0.01 USDC micropayment, and get back a quote or execute a swap across more than nine chains and over 130 liquidity sources covering more than 9 million tokens. The agent handles its own wallet, its own payments, and its own execution logic.
Advertisement
Alchemy’s AgentPay serves as the payment layer making this possible. It entered private beta in April 2026 as a protocol-agnostic middleware solution, meaning it doesn’t custody funds or lock developers into a single ecosystem. AgentPay is designed to be compatible with systems from Coinbase, Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, and Circle, which gives it a broad interoperability surface across both crypto-native and traditional payment rails.
The HTTP 402 standard is the quiet star here. When the internet’s architects wrote the HTTP specification, they reserved status code 402 for “Payment Required” but never fully defined how it should work. It sat unused for years while the internet built advertising-funded business models instead. Now crypto micropayments are giving it a second life, and 0x is among the first to deploy it at scale for agent-to-service commerce.
Building the agentic infrastructure stack The protocol has published dedicated documentation for AI agents, including guidance on using the Swap API programmatically and a framework called “0x Skills” tailored specifically for AI coding agents.
There’s also the 0x Cross-Chain API, which entered beta in February 2026 and was designed explicitly for agentic swaps. It’s compatible with various agent payment standards, including x402, the emerging specification built around that same HTTP 402 concept.
What this means for investors 0x is essentially betting that removing all friction from the onboarding process, no keys, no accounts, just pay-per-use, will make it the path of least resistance for agent developers.
The partnership with Alchemy adds credibility. Alchemy is one of the most widely used blockchain infrastructure providers, and its decision to build AgentPay as a protocol-agnostic layer suggests it sees agent-to-service payments as a large enough market to warrant dedicated middleware. The compatibility with major payment networks like Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe hints at ambitions beyond crypto-native use cases.
The risk side is worth noting too. Micropayment models have a history of sounding elegant in theory and struggling with adoption in practice. The internet tried micropayments for content in the early 2000s and mostly abandoned them in favor of subscriptions.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
TLDR: Zilliqa launches zUSDC via XBridge, shifting USDC liquidity from third-party bridges to native network infrastructure. The zUSDC contract is live at 0xe59f97Fac09ee00AEEF320485ee45D5CcfbBC1E9, supporting DEX pools and stablecoin trading pairs. Debridge support on Zilliqa permanently ends March 31, 2026, requiring all legacy USDC holders to act immediately. XBridge receives a full UI overhaul as Zilliqa works toward automated, seamless cross-chain token transfer processing. zUSDC is now live on Zilliqa through the network’s native XBridge system. This change moves USDC liquidity away from third-party bridging toward Zilliqa-operated infrastructure.
The transition is designed to improve long-term reliability and give Zilliqa direct control over stablecoin operations.
Users currently holding USDC on Zilliqa must act before March 31, 2026. After that date, Debridge support on the network will permanently end, affecting all remaining legacy USDC holders.
Zilliqa Transitions USDC Liquidity to Its Own XBridge Infrastructure zUSDC is a USDC representation bridged to Zilliqa through the network’s own XBridge system. Its contract address is 0xe59f97Fac09ee00AEEF320485ee45D5CcfbBC1E9.
The token supports stablecoin trading, DEX liquidity pool participation, and arbitrage across pairs such as kUSDC and zUSDT. Zilliqa now holds direct operational control over this stablecoin liquidity within its ecosystem.
Previously, USDC liquidity on Zilliqa depended on external bridging infrastructure from third-party operators. Most of that liquidity was concentrated in DEX pools supporting trading and arbitrage activity.
Running external infrastructure under those conditions created an operational dependency. That dependency came without proportional benefit to the broader network, making this transition a practical move for the ecosystem.
The migration followed a phased process. Existing USDC was first bridged back to Ethereum as the starting point. It was then minted as zUSDC under Zilliqa-managed infrastructure and re-bridged through XBridge.
From there, funds were redeployed into ecosystem trading pools, with each phase structured to keep disruption low throughout.
Zilliqa shared the update on its official channel, stating it was “introducing zUSDC via XBridge on Zilliqa” and that the move improves reliability while keeping “stablecoin liquidity flowing across the ecosystem.”
We’re introducing zUSDC via XBridge on Zilliqa.
This moves USDC liquidity onto Zilliqa-operated infrastructure, improving reliability while keeping stablecoin liquidity flowing across the ecosystem.
Here’s what’s changing and what it means for USDC users:… pic.twitter.com/PnvXIACWOQ
— Zilliqa (@zilliqa) March 5, 2026
As part of the Phase 3 ecosystem rollout, a zUSDC trading pair also launched on Plunderswap. Additionally, XBridge received a full UI overhaul, with the refreshed interface now available at xbridge.zilliqa.com.
Users Face March 31 Deadline as Debridge Support on Zilliqa Ends Users holding USDC on Zilliqa must bridge their assets out through Debridge before March 31, 2026. Two options are currently available for doing so.
The Plunderswap bridge widget is accessible at plunderswap.com/bridge, while the StakeZIL bridge is available at stakezil.com. Both remain operational until the sunset date arrives.
After March 31, Debridge will no longer function on Zilliqa. Users who still hold legacy USDC beyond that point will need to reach out to Zilliqa directly for assistance. The team can be contacted at [email protected] for support with any remaining holdings.
This transition does not remove stablecoin liquidity from the Zilliqa ecosystem. Rather, that liquidity is being moved to infrastructure that Zilliqa directly owns and operates.
The network frames this as a long-term step toward institutional-grade financial rails that the network itself controls.
Alongside the zUSDC launch, Zilliqa is also improving XBridge’s processing efficiency. The team is actively developing automation for bridge transaction processing.
This effort is aimed at making token transfers faster and more seamless across all chains that XBridge supports.
The leading crypto exchange Binance has removed 30 trading pairs from its platform.
Binance says it axed the pairs to “improve liquidity and user trading experience among our wide range of available assets.”
The sweep included the removal of BitTorrent Token’s (BTT) relatively recent pairing with Bitcoin. BTT remains paired with Binance Coin, Tether (USDT), Paxos Standard (PAX), TrueUSD (TUSD) and USD Coin (USDC).
Here’s a look at all of the pairs on the chopping block.
Back in April, Binance delisted Bitcoin SV (BSV) from its platform entirely.
At the time, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao denounced the rhetoric of BSV creator Craig Wright and called him a “fraud.”
The exchange also removed Bytecoin (BCN), ChatCoin (CHAT), Iconomi (ICN) and Triggers (TRIG) in October of last year, citing a broad list of criteria required for coins to remain on the platform.
Commitment of team to project Quality and level of development activity Network/smart contract stability Level of public communication and activity Responsiveness to our periodic due diligence Evidence of unethical/fraudulent conduct Contribution to a healthy and sustainable crypto ecosystem [adinserter block="1"] [the_ad id="42537"] [the_ad id="42536"]
Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (“CZ”) has commented on Twitter about the Department of Financial Services’ (NYDFS) directive to Paxos Trust Co. to stop minting new BUSD. As reported by the Wall Street Journal today, Paxos will continue to manage redemptions of the product.Existing BUSD’s remain fully-backed and redeemable through at least February 2024.
CZ explained that Paxos is regulated by the NYDFS and BUSD is a stablecoin wholly owned and managed by Paxos. As a result, BUSD’s market capitalization will only decrease over time.
Regarding the alleged lawsuit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against Paxos, the Binance CEO has no inside information, although CZ did announce product changes on Binance regarding BUSD.
Binance CEO Is Puzzled Rumors are currently circulating in the crypto community that U.S. authorities SEC and NYDFS could target stablecoins, attacking a cornerstone of the crypto ecosystem. Crypto journalist Frank Chaparro tweeted:
SEC is on an absolute warpath. […] I wouldn’t be surprised if they are reviewing USDC, specifically. One senior executive at an exchange told me a few days ago that the SEC was effectively embarking on its own crypto version of the ‘Night of the Long Knives.’
Whether the situation is really as dramatic and U.S. authorities want to put an end to stablecoins per se, remains to be seen and is not really clear at the moment. Binance CEO Zhao, for example, said that while he is “not an expert on U.S. laws,” but agrees with Miles Deutscher’s opinion in a tweet that stablecoins cannot be a security themselves.
“The SEC has labeled BUSD as an ‘unregistered security,’ and is suing its issuer, Paxos. But how on earth is a STABLECOIN considered a security, when it clearly doesn’t meet the Howey Test criteria. No one has ever had ‘the expectation of profit’ when buying BUSD,” Deutscher wrote.
Are US Authorities Starting A War On Stablecoins? This argument will be difficult for the SEC to refute, which illustrates that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission may not have a problem with stablecoins per se, but with the issuers’ interest products.
This is further evidenced by the SEC suing Kraken over its interest product, which was not a “true on-chain” staking product, as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong explained. Another hint is that Paxos’ USDP stablecoin is not included in the announcement, and that the SEC’s crackdown on BUSD may be solely related to its deposit and interest product.
And Circle has a similar product that earns interest. Presumably that’s why the USDC issuer could come under SEC scrutiny, but not because of the stablecoin itself.
It is hard to imagine how a stablecoin can be classified as a security, otherwise the US dollar would have to be. But since Paxos and Circle operate on U.S. soil and offer interest products, they are easy targets for U.S. authorities.
Therefore, the current news and rumors must be considered carefully. Nevertheless, the attack by the U.S. authorities is of course a risk that stablecoin issuers will have to cope with.
In the long run, however, the current situation should pass and stablecoins should continue to flourish and serve as a cornerstone of the crypto ecosystem, even in the US.
At press time, Bitcoin was dragged down by the news and traded at $21,560. For the moment, BTC was able to stay above the support at $21,465 in the 1-hour chart, although the price saw a dip to a new February low at $21,429.
Bitcoin price, 1-hour chart | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView.com Featured image from Edwin Hooper / Unsplash, Chart from TradingView.com
TUSD and USDP gained popularity in market share, with TUSD leading the race. The mean dollar invested age, market capitalization, and exchange reserve metrics show TUSD and USDP’s steady growth. Recently, the stablecoin market experienced significant changes, creating an opportunity for other stablecoins, such as Pax Dollar [USDP] and TrueUSD [TUSD], to grab the market share. Since Binance’s [BUSD] decline following CFTC’s allegations, there has been a vacancy at the top of the list. Which of these stablecoins can take over the top spot?
USDP and TUSD mean dollar invested declines According to recent findings from Santiment, TUSD, and USDP have been significantly impacting the stablecoin market of late. The data revealed that TUSD’s mean dollar invested age stood at 159.39 at press time, the lowest it had been in the past 14 months. Similarly, the mean dollar invested age for USDP was 78.75, representing the lowest figure in the past 21 months.
Source: Santiment A high mean dollar invested age in the stablecoin market could be a positive sign, indicating that investors were confident in the long-term potential of cryptocurrencies and were holding onto them for extended periods. It could also imply a limited supply of sellers, leading to increased prices.
In contrast, a low mean dollar invested age may indicate new investors entering the market, driving the demand for stablecoins.
USDP and TUSD market capitalization CoinMarketCap‘s data revealed that TUSD had a robust market presence at press time, with a market cap exceeding $2 billion and a 24-hour trading volume over $531 million. During this time, TUSD ranked as the 13th-largest coin by market cap and the fifth-largest stablecoin by market cap. Interestingly, TUSD’s 24-hour trading volume surpassed that of Maker [DAI], despite DAI being the fourth-largest stablecoin by market cap.
In contrast to TUSD, USDP had a relatively smaller market presence, with its market cap exceeding $877 million and a 24-hour trading volume of over $22 million. USDP ranked as the 58th-largest coin by market cap and the sixth-largest stablecoin by market cap. While USDP’s press time market cap was impressive, its lower 24-hour trading volume suggested it may not be as actively traded as other stablecoins.
Analyzing the exchange reserve Exchange reserve is another important metric that indicates the popularity of stablecoins in the crypto space. According to CryptoQuant, USDP’s exchange reserve had seen mixed fortunes, but it has recently been on an uptrend, reaching over 115 million as of this writing.
Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant’s data further suggested that TUSD has had a better exchange reserve run than USDP. The stablecoin’s exchange reserve has been relatively steady since its rise in January, with its press time value exceeding 513 million. This indicated that TUSD was being traded actively and held by investors on exchanges at the time of writing, reflecting its growing popularity in the crypto market.
Source: CryptoQuant Additionally, the growth of this metric meant that more investors were using these stablecoins to trade, indicating their importance as a reliable trading pair.
TUSD leads the stable race… for now The current regulatory issues surrounding BUSD and the recent bank run that impacted USDC have led investors to look for alternative stablecoins that offer greater stability and security. In this context, TUSD and USDP have emerged as potential contenders for the top spot among stablecoins.
However, based on the metrics discussed earlier, TUSD is better positioned to take the top spot if it becomes available. TUSD’s higher market cap and trading volume, coupled with its steady growth in exchange reserve, suggest it has a more established presence in the stablecoin market.
In contrast, while USDP has shown growth in some metrics, it may not be as established as TUSD.
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed
The highest standards in reporting and publishing
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
According to the latest on-chain data, the Layer-1 network Solana has hit a significant milestone in terms of the transfer volume of stablecoins this month.
Solana Overtakes Tron In Stablecoin Transfer Volume Data from the blockchain analytics platform Artemis shows that the stablecoin transfer volume on Solana has already surpassed $300 billion in January. This is the largest transfer volume recorded by stablecoins on the Layer-1 blockchain in a single month.
To put this figure into context, the Solana network registered $297 billion in stablecoin volume in the entire December. Meanwhile, the blockchain’s stablecoin transfer volume was about $11.56 billion in January 2023, reflecting an over 2,500% growth in the past year.
Stablecoin transfer volume across various blockchains in the past year | Source: Artemis From the chart above, it is clear that Solana’s stablecoin activity has been on a steady rise since October, increasing by more than 650% in the past few months. This growth has also impacted the network’s share in the stablecoin market, with Solana now boasting about 32% market share.
Unsurprisingly, Ethereum leads the market for stablecoins, with its transfer volume already reaching almost $317 billion in January. Meanwhile, the Tron network trails Solana in third place, with a stablecoin volume of roughly $240 billion.
On Thursday, January 18, Paxos revealed the launch of its regulated stablecoin, USDP, on the Solana network. According to DefiLlama data, USDC remains the dominant stablecoin on the Layer-1 network, with a market cap of over $1 billion.
Paxos is thrilled to share our regulated stablecoin USDP is now live on the @solana blockchain! This integration makes it easier for anyone to access and use the safest, most reliable stablecoins in the market. Learn more here: https://t.co/0j4Kj0yyPk pic.twitter.com/1doexKvVmY
— Paxos (@Paxos) January 18, 2024
SOL Price Overview Despite Solana’s burgeoning network activity, the price performance of its native token SOL has somewhat dampened in the past few weeks. As of this writing, the Solana token is valued at $92, reflecting a 0.6% decline in the last 24 hours.
This sluggish performance in the past day underscores the altcoin’s challenges since the turn of the year. After reaching a multi-month high of $124 at the end of 2023, the SOL price has largely struggled to hold above the $100 mark.
According to data from CoinGecko, the Solana token is down by more than 5% in the past week. Meanwhile, the coin has declined by about double that figure since the beginning of 2024.
Nevertheless, SOL maintains its position as the fifth-largest cryptocurrency in the sector, with a market capitalization of more than $40 billion.
Solana price faces downward pressure on the daily timeframe | Source: SOLUSDT chart on TradingView Featured image from Dreamstime/Aivaras Sakurovas, chart from TradingView
Disclaimer: The information found on NewsBTC is for educational purposes only. It does not represent the opinions of NewsBTC on whether to buy, sell or hold any investments and naturally investing carries risks. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use information provided on this website entirely at your own risk.
Blockchain security company PeckShield compiled on-chain data showing a wallet address, identified as 0x09a5…a87f, was liquidated following a significant price increase in Pax Dollar (USDP). The liquidation of the wallet address caught the attention of the crypto world, and according to the data, the investor lost approximately $529,000.
$529,000 Liquidation ProcessPeckShield reported that the wallet address holding approximately $529,000 in USD Coin (USDC) faced a shocking liquidation. The liquidation occurred after USDP’s peg to the US dollar was lost, rising from $1 to $1.18.
According to on-chain data, the wallet address was liquidated after USDP rose to $1.18, resulting in a loss of approximately $529,000 during this liquidation process.
It is assessed that the rise in USDP’s price to $1.18 likely triggered automatic liquidation mechanisms, resulting in the sale of the USDC held in the affected wallet address. While such automatic processes can sometimes lead to unexpected outcomes for individual users or wallet addresses, they are designed to maintain stability and manage risk in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.
Reminder of Risks in the Crypto MarketThis liquidation event serves as a new example of the high volatility and potential risks associated with sharp price movements in the crypto market. The approximately $529,000 incident uncovered by PeckShield is just one of many unsettling liquidations in the crypto market, underscoring the need for investors to always be cautious.
This particular event reminds us of the risks inherent in the crypto market, where severe price fluctuations and rapid market movements can have sudden and significant consequences for investors and users. Therefore, individuals and organizations trading in cryptocurrencies should always be cautious and adopt appropriate risk management strategies to minimize potential losses.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
The value of the stablecoin Pax Dollar (USDP), issued by the Paxos Trust Company, experienced a surge to a high of $1.28, triggering the liquidation of $529,000 in USDC for a market participant.
Like regular stablecoins, USDP is designed to maintain a stable value equivalent to a U.S. dollar, providing a safe haven for traders against the volatility often associated with cryptocurrencies. However, the recent unexpected increase in price, spotlighted by PeckShield, has raised concerns.
The stablecoin uncharacteristically spiked to $1.2848 yesterday at 16:10 UTC before eventually witnessing a subsequent drop to its usual price of $1 four hours later. While the depeg went unnoticed by most, it had far-reaching effects on a trader’s loan position, triggering liquidations.
USDP price – April 17 | Source: Trading View The liquidation occurred on the decentralized finance (defi) platform Aave, where the trader had used USDP as collateral to secure a loan in USDC. Notably, in the defi ecosystem, loans are backed by other assets, with mechanisms in place to manage sudden shifts in market dynamics.
On-chain data confirms that the trader lost the 529,000 USDC across sixteen uneven transactions from 16:16 to 20:09 UTC, coinciding with the period USDP lost its peg. The transaction label indicates that the liquidation process was automatically initiated by Aave’s built-in risk management algorithms.
While the USDP value spiked, the platform likely predicted a possible correction or a return to its normal pegged rate. Such a forecast can prompt preemptive liquidation to mitigate potential losses, especially if the borrower’s loan-to-value (LTV) ratio becomes unfavorable.
Issued by Paxos, USDP has faced certain setbacks in recent times, marked by occasional depegs. A 2023 research from SP Global suggested that USDP records the highest deviations from the U.S. dollar among the top stablecoins, having witnessed 7,581 mild depeg events in the 24 months leading to June 2023.
PANews reported on February 2nd that, based on recent review results, Binance will remove and cease trading the following spot trading pairs on February 3rd, 2026 at 16:00 (UTC+8):
Circle partners with Nomura Securities to enter the Japanese yen foreign exchange settlement service market.
Stablecoin issuer Circle plans to collaborate with Nomura Securities to launch instant foreign currency settlement for Japanese corporate clients as early as 2027. The initiative will enable large cross-border transactions to be completed immediately, aiming to boost cross-border investment and trade. This will mark the first entry of a major stablecoin issuer into Japan’s corporate transaction market, allowing companies to convert yen into US dollar-denominated stablecoins for investment and instant transfers.
12 minutes ago
Institutions' Preview: Overview of US May Core PCE Price Index Monthly Rate
The US May core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index monthly rate will be released tonight at 20:30 (UTC+8). Below are the forecasts from multiple institutions: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation: 0.2%; Royal Bank of Canada: 0.2%; JPMorgan Chase: 0.3%; Goldman Sachs Group: 0.3%; Bank of Montreal: 0.3%; Moody's Corporation: 0.3%; Standard Chartered: 0.3%; UniCredit: 0.3%; ING Group: 0.3%; HSBC Holdings: 0.3%; BNP Paribas: 0.4%; Wells Fargo: 0.4%; Capital Economics: 0.4%; Citigroup: 0.4%; Deutsche Bank: 0.4%; Nomura Securities: 0.4%; Pantheon Macroeconomics: 0.4%; Société Générale: 0.4%; Scotiabank: 0.4%; Morgan Stanley: 0.4%
12 minutes ago
DA Davidson Raises Micron’s Price Target to $2,000, Retains Buy Rating
U.S. investment bank DA Davidson released a research note stating that Micron Technology has entered a new phase with one of the best performance visibility in the semiconductor industry, a stark contrast to its past standing in the sector. Driven by another quarter of results that handily exceeded expectations and positive forward guidance, Micron’s stock price surged sharply. These signals indicate that the current memory chip boom cycle is far from over. While the company is ramping up capacity investments (with capital expenditure (CAPEX) projected to hit $10 billion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, which will bring additional supply), management expects the memory market to remain tight on supply and demand at least through 2027. Against this backdrop, DA Davidson reiterated its "Buy" rating on Micron and raised its price target from $1,500 to $2,000, equivalent to a 20x price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio based on the company’s 2026 calendar year expected earnings per share (EPS).
12 minutes ago
Morgan Stanley raises Micron's price target to $1,200, maintains 'Overweight' rating.
Morgan Stanley released a report raising Micron Technology (MU.O)’s price target from $1,050 to $1,200, while maintaining an "Overweight" rating. The investment bank lifted its fiscal 2027 earnings per share (EPS) forecast for the chipmaker by roughly 40% to $168, and upgraded its free cash flow (FCF) projection from $104 billion to $140 billion. Aligning with Micron’s management, the bank holds that AI will push DRAM demand to consistently outpace supply significantly after 2027. Micron’s last fiscal quarter results matched this trend, with both its quarterly performance and outlook showing notable upside potential.
12 minutes ago
US officials: Israel has withdrawn troops from parts of the buffer zone in southern Lebanon.
A U.S. State Department official said Israel has withdrawn from parts of the buffer zone in southern Lebanon, describing the move as a "goodwill gesture" toward the Lebanese government.
12 minutes ago
CBRS trades below IPO price post-earnings: Erases all gains six weeks after listing, two smart money firms net $5.8 million from first-day IPO shorts.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Cerebras (CBRS), the AI chip firm previously dubbed "Nvidia’s strongest challenger", saw its stock price fall in stages after reporting its first quarterly results since going public, as negative guidance overshadowed better-than-expected performance. The stock has dropped roughly 22% since the earnings release and officially broke below its IPO price today. On-chain whales are overall bearish. CBRS trades at $184 on the Hyperliquid platform, down 7.7% in 24 hours. Large-scale short positions (million-dollar level) total around $11.62 million, 2.39 times the long positions ($4.87 million). Two major short positions were placed precisely at high levels as early as the IPO day or even before the IPO: - Whale 0xe0ff: Shorted at $284.51 on May 14 with a 3x leveraged position of $6.13 million, generating an unrealized profit of $3.24 million (+104%); - Whale 0x9996: Shorted at $275.92 on May 11 with a 5x leveraged position of $5.48 million, generating an unrealized profit of $2.64 million (+162%). It is learned that both addresses currently hold short positions in both CBRS and SPCX, and have recorded substantial unrealized profits, preferring to place short positions at high levels before or on the day of major stock listings. With the realization of negative earnings news in this round, the combined unrealized profit of the two positions is around $5.88 million. Currently, the average entry price of CBRS short whales is around $275, and the current price is over 30% lower than that. The nearest short liquidation line is at $200.13, about 7% away from the current price.
Three DeFi protocols across NEAR, Base, and Sui were drained on Tuesday. One of them, a $3.46 million Sweat Economy incident, later turned out to be a foundation rescue.
Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart used the cascade to needle Crypto Twitter’s AI-versus-crypto debate. He suggested the bigger threat to digital assets is the same one as always.
Tuesday’s Drain CascadeBlockaid raised the alarm at around 1.36 p.m. UTC. Roughly 13.71 billion Sweat Economy (SWEAT) tokens, about 65% of total supply, moved through an attacker address.
🚨Community Alert: Ongoing exploit on @SweatEconomy on @NEARProtocol.
Largest exploit tx:
DvrSMfY85Anc6AuLUmoEDkDdab7qX5NUZLu76HN8NoPn
— Blockaid (@blockaid_) April 29, 2026 On-chain analysts including former NEAR core contributor Zacodil traced the activity to an April 27 contract redeploy. The redeploy added refund_first and refund_second methods.
A single refund_second call returned 13.63 billion SWEAT, worth about $2.63 million, to 53 addresses.
Hours earlier, the Syndicate Commons bridge on Base lost 18.5 million SYND tokens worth $330,000 to $400,000. The proceeds were bridged to Ethereum.
We are investigating unusual movements in SYND tokens that may indicate a possible security issue.
We recommend avoiding provisioning any liquidity until this is resolved.
— Syndicate (@syndicateio) April 29, 2026 On Sui, Aftermath Finance paused its perpetuals protocol after losing roughly $1.14 million USDC.
Total damage is 1.14m.
We are now focused on recovery.
— Aftermath Finance (🥚, 🥚) (@AftermathFi) April 29, 2026 Seyffart Pushes Back on the AI vs Crypto FrameCrypto Twitter has spent April arguing that AI will end crypto. AI agents and AI infrastructure are absorbing the venture capital that altcoins once drew.
Attention has rotated to AI projects, leaving alts without a narrative driver. And on-chain AI agents will eventually make human-led crypto projects redundant, the more aggressive version of the thesis goes.
People are asking — Is AI the end of crypto? quipped James Seyffart, an ETF analyst at Bloomberg.
The implied point is that crypto’s chronic problem is not external competition. The same protocol-level vulnerabilities that drained SYND, USDC, and SWEAT in one afternoon are arguably the bigger threat.
Sweat Economy operates the move-to-earn ecosystem behind Sweatcoin, competing with STEPN. The token price held steady through the episode.
Sweat Economy’s X account stayed silent all day, and the team has not yet explained what vulnerability prompted the redeploy.
On June 24, SBI Group and Startale Group launched JPYSC, the country’s first trust-based yen stablecoin. The launch comes as countries and financial institutions worldwide race to build regulated stablecoin infrastructure.
While most of the stablecoin market is dominated by dollar-backed tokens like USDT and USDC, Japan is now making a serious push for the digital yen economy.
Unlike most stablecoins, JPYSC is issued by SBI Shinsei Trust Bank, with reserves held and managed through a trust structure.
According to SBI, JPYSC is the first trust-based yen stablecoin recognized as an “electronic payment method” under Japan’s Payment Services Act.
More importantly, there are no limits on transaction size or account balances, making it suitable for large institutional transfers, tokenized asset settlements, and corporate transactions.
SBI Holdings Chairman Yoshitaka Kitao called the launch a necessary step as financial markets increasingly move on-chain.
“The transition of financial functions to on-chain is irreversible, creating payment methods that can be used on-chain is a challenge that must be addressed as quickly as possible.”
Use Cases of JPYSC Expected After Public MigrationMeanwhile, SBI and Startale are not just positioning JPYSC as another payment token. Instead, they want it to become the settlement layer for Japan’s growing tokenization market.
Planned use cases of JPYSC include:
Yen-to-dollar liquidity pools for on-chain foreign exchange markets.Lending and borrowing markets for institutional investors.Settlement of tokenized stocks, bonds, real estate, and fund shares.Business payments and merchant settlements.Cross-border remittances with lower costs and faster settlement.Large OTC transactions and institutional trading.This means that SBI wants JPYSC to become the digital version of the yen for blockchain-based finance.
Startale Group: Launch Is Just the BeginningAt launch, JPYSC can only be used within SBI VC Trade accounts and cannot yet move to external wallets.
However, Startale CEO Sota Watanabe said,
“On-chain finance is a global trend, and we recognize it as an extremely important strategic area for Japan.”
The technical infrastructure for public blockchain transfers is already complete. The remaining hurdles involve taxation rules and regulatory approvals. That matters because tokenization is rapidly expanding worldwide, while stablecoins already process trillions of dollars annually.
With the U.S. advancing stablecoin legislation and institutions increasingly exploring tokenized assets, Japan is racing to ensure the yen remains relevant in the next generation of financial infrastructure.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Agora’s AUSD stablecoin has roughly doubled its circulating supply on the Monad blockchain in a single week, climbing approximately 124% to reach $72.68 million.
The surge positions AUSD as the largest stablecoin on Monad, a high-performance blockchain that launched its foundation in mid-June 2026. AUSD quickly surpassed $1B in transfer volume with over 3,000 active addresses in the aftermath.
What’s driving the growth Two catalysts stand out. The first is the Monad Foundation’s launch itself, which opened the floodgates for DeFi activity on the network. The second is Pendle, which launched on Monad around June 19, rolling out AUSD yield pools that offer up to $100K in weekly rewards.
Advertisement
Across all chains, AUSD’s total supply sits at roughly $181M. The Monad deployment alone now accounts for about 40% of that figure, making it the token’s single largest venue by a wide margin.
Agora’s institutional playbook AUSD is fully backed at a 1:1 ratio by US dollar reserves that include cash equivalents and Treasury securities. Those reserves are managed by VanEck and custodied at State Street.
The New York-based company initially launched AUSD on July 7, 2024, alongside a $12M seed funding round led by Dragonfly. A year later, in July 2025, Agora closed a $50M Series A led by Paradigm.
On June 23, Agora hired Tanya Denisova as head of operations. Denisova previously served as COO of Robinhood Crypto. Her role at Agora will also encompass serving as COO for a proposed National Trust Bank charter.
What this means for investors The Pendle integration is worth watching closely. Yield pools with $100K in weekly incentives are generous, but they’re also temporary by nature. Stablecoins that maintain deep liquidity without subsidies are the ones that become infrastructure.
If Agora successfully obtains a National Trust Bank charter, it would operate under a regulatory framework that most crypto-native stablecoin issuers haven’t attempted. That could unlock banking relationships, fiat on-ramp partnerships, and enterprise integrations that purely DeFi-focused competitors can’t access.
AUSD’s concentration on Monad — now 40% of total supply — means that any technical issues or liquidity crises on Monad would disproportionately affect the token’s overall health. Circle has been aggressively expanding USDC to new chains, and Tether rarely leaves a growing ecosystem uncontested for long.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
PANews June 25 news, according to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, whale @0xbilly cut losses and liquidated 2,409 ETH ($3.78 million) at ETH's lowest point of $1,569.5 in the early hours today, taking a loss of $220,000. These ETH were bought just one day earlier with 4 million USDC at a price of $1,660.2. In March, this whale also chased the rally and bought 7,768.5 ETH ($17.51 million) at $2,254, only to cut losses four days later with an $800,000 loss.
Circle partners with Nomura Securities to enter the Japanese yen foreign exchange settlement service market.
Stablecoin issuer Circle plans to collaborate with Nomura Securities to launch instant foreign currency settlement for Japanese corporate clients as early as 2027. The initiative will enable large cross-border transactions to be completed immediately, aiming to boost cross-border investment and trade. This will mark the first entry of a major stablecoin issuer into Japan’s corporate transaction market, allowing companies to convert yen into US dollar-denominated stablecoins for investment and instant transfers.
6 minutes ago
Institutions' Preview: Overview of US May Core PCE Price Index Monthly Rate
The US May core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index monthly rate will be released tonight at 20:30 (UTC+8). Below are the forecasts from multiple institutions: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation: 0.2%; Royal Bank of Canada: 0.2%; JPMorgan Chase: 0.3%; Goldman Sachs Group: 0.3%; Bank of Montreal: 0.3%; Moody's Corporation: 0.3%; Standard Chartered: 0.3%; UniCredit: 0.3%; ING Group: 0.3%; HSBC Holdings: 0.3%; BNP Paribas: 0.4%; Wells Fargo: 0.4%; Capital Economics: 0.4%; Citigroup: 0.4%; Deutsche Bank: 0.4%; Nomura Securities: 0.4%; Pantheon Macroeconomics: 0.4%; Société Générale: 0.4%; Scotiabank: 0.4%; Morgan Stanley: 0.4%
6 minutes ago
DA Davidson Raises Micron’s Price Target to $2,000, Retains Buy Rating
U.S. investment bank DA Davidson released a research note stating that Micron Technology has entered a new phase with one of the best performance visibility in the semiconductor industry, a stark contrast to its past standing in the sector. Driven by another quarter of results that handily exceeded expectations and positive forward guidance, Micron’s stock price surged sharply. These signals indicate that the current memory chip boom cycle is far from over. While the company is ramping up capacity investments (with capital expenditure (CAPEX) projected to hit $10 billion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, which will bring additional supply), management expects the memory market to remain tight on supply and demand at least through 2027. Against this backdrop, DA Davidson reiterated its "Buy" rating on Micron and raised its price target from $1,500 to $2,000, equivalent to a 20x price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio based on the company’s 2026 calendar year expected earnings per share (EPS).
6 minutes ago
Morgan Stanley raises Micron's price target to $1,200, maintains 'Overweight' rating.
Morgan Stanley released a report raising Micron Technology (MU.O)’s price target from $1,050 to $1,200, while maintaining an "Overweight" rating. The investment bank lifted its fiscal 2027 earnings per share (EPS) forecast for the chipmaker by roughly 40% to $168, and upgraded its free cash flow (FCF) projection from $104 billion to $140 billion. Aligning with Micron’s management, the bank holds that AI will push DRAM demand to consistently outpace supply significantly after 2027. Micron’s last fiscal quarter results matched this trend, with both its quarterly performance and outlook showing notable upside potential.
6 minutes ago
US officials: Israel has withdrawn troops from parts of the buffer zone in southern Lebanon.
A U.S. State Department official said Israel has withdrawn from parts of the buffer zone in southern Lebanon, describing the move as a "goodwill gesture" toward the Lebanese government.
6 minutes ago
CBRS trades below IPO price post-earnings: Erases all gains six weeks after listing, two smart money firms net $5.8 million from first-day IPO shorts.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Cerebras (CBRS), the AI chip firm previously dubbed "Nvidia’s strongest challenger", saw its stock price fall in stages after reporting its first quarterly results since going public, as negative guidance overshadowed better-than-expected performance. The stock has dropped roughly 22% since the earnings release and officially broke below its IPO price today. On-chain whales are overall bearish. CBRS trades at $184 on the Hyperliquid platform, down 7.7% in 24 hours. Large-scale short positions (million-dollar level) total around $11.62 million, 2.39 times the long positions ($4.87 million). Two major short positions were placed precisely at high levels as early as the IPO day or even before the IPO: - Whale 0xe0ff: Shorted at $284.51 on May 14 with a 3x leveraged position of $6.13 million, generating an unrealized profit of $3.24 million (+104%); - Whale 0x9996: Shorted at $275.92 on May 11 with a 5x leveraged position of $5.48 million, generating an unrealized profit of $2.64 million (+162%). It is learned that both addresses currently hold short positions in both CBRS and SPCX, and have recorded substantial unrealized profits, preferring to place short positions at high levels before or on the day of major stock listings. With the realization of negative earnings news in this round, the combined unrealized profit of the two positions is around $5.88 million. Currently, the average entry price of CBRS short whales is around $275, and the current price is over 30% lower than that. The nearest short liquidation line is at $200.13, about 7% away from the current price.
PANews, June 25 - According to monitoring by on-chain analyst Ai Yi, the "iron-headed bull long 120,000 ETH" added $8 million in margin early this morning, with unrealized losses now exceeding $77.047 million. The liquidation prices for the four addresses (Bit-associated entities) are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6, respectively, with an entry level around $2,265. Despite the heavy unrealized loss, there is still significant distance from liquidation, and over 6 million USDC remains on-chain that can be used as margin.
Circle partners with Nomura Securities to enter the Japanese yen foreign exchange settlement service market.
Stablecoin issuer Circle plans to collaborate with Nomura Securities to launch instant foreign currency settlement for Japanese corporate clients as early as 2027. The initiative will enable large cross-border transactions to be completed immediately, aiming to boost cross-border investment and trade. This will mark the first entry of a major stablecoin issuer into Japan’s corporate transaction market, allowing companies to convert yen into US dollar-denominated stablecoins for investment and instant transfers.
6 minutes ago
Institutions' Preview: Overview of US May Core PCE Price Index Monthly Rate
The US May core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index monthly rate will be released tonight at 20:30 (UTC+8). Below are the forecasts from multiple institutions: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation: 0.2%; Royal Bank of Canada: 0.2%; JPMorgan Chase: 0.3%; Goldman Sachs Group: 0.3%; Bank of Montreal: 0.3%; Moody's Corporation: 0.3%; Standard Chartered: 0.3%; UniCredit: 0.3%; ING Group: 0.3%; HSBC Holdings: 0.3%; BNP Paribas: 0.4%; Wells Fargo: 0.4%; Capital Economics: 0.4%; Citigroup: 0.4%; Deutsche Bank: 0.4%; Nomura Securities: 0.4%; Pantheon Macroeconomics: 0.4%; Société Générale: 0.4%; Scotiabank: 0.4%; Morgan Stanley: 0.4%
6 minutes ago
DA Davidson Raises Micron’s Price Target to $2,000, Retains Buy Rating
U.S. investment bank DA Davidson released a research note stating that Micron Technology has entered a new phase with one of the best performance visibility in the semiconductor industry, a stark contrast to its past standing in the sector. Driven by another quarter of results that handily exceeded expectations and positive forward guidance, Micron’s stock price surged sharply. These signals indicate that the current memory chip boom cycle is far from over. While the company is ramping up capacity investments (with capital expenditure (CAPEX) projected to hit $10 billion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, which will bring additional supply), management expects the memory market to remain tight on supply and demand at least through 2027. Against this backdrop, DA Davidson reiterated its "Buy" rating on Micron and raised its price target from $1,500 to $2,000, equivalent to a 20x price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio based on the company’s 2026 calendar year expected earnings per share (EPS).
6 minutes ago
Morgan Stanley raises Micron's price target to $1,200, maintains 'Overweight' rating.
Morgan Stanley released a report raising Micron Technology (MU.O)’s price target from $1,050 to $1,200, while maintaining an "Overweight" rating. The investment bank lifted its fiscal 2027 earnings per share (EPS) forecast for the chipmaker by roughly 40% to $168, and upgraded its free cash flow (FCF) projection from $104 billion to $140 billion. Aligning with Micron’s management, the bank holds that AI will push DRAM demand to consistently outpace supply significantly after 2027. Micron’s last fiscal quarter results matched this trend, with both its quarterly performance and outlook showing notable upside potential.
6 minutes ago
US officials: Israel has withdrawn troops from parts of the buffer zone in southern Lebanon.
A U.S. State Department official said Israel has withdrawn from parts of the buffer zone in southern Lebanon, describing the move as a "goodwill gesture" toward the Lebanese government.
6 minutes ago
CBRS trades below IPO price post-earnings: Erases all gains six weeks after listing, two smart money firms net $5.8 million from first-day IPO shorts.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Cerebras (CBRS), the AI chip firm previously dubbed "Nvidia’s strongest challenger", saw its stock price fall in stages after reporting its first quarterly results since going public, as negative guidance overshadowed better-than-expected performance. The stock has dropped roughly 22% since the earnings release and officially broke below its IPO price today. On-chain whales are overall bearish. CBRS trades at $184 on the Hyperliquid platform, down 7.7% in 24 hours. Large-scale short positions (million-dollar level) total around $11.62 million, 2.39 times the long positions ($4.87 million). Two major short positions were placed precisely at high levels as early as the IPO day or even before the IPO: - Whale 0xe0ff: Shorted at $284.51 on May 14 with a 3x leveraged position of $6.13 million, generating an unrealized profit of $3.24 million (+104%); - Whale 0x9996: Shorted at $275.92 on May 11 with a 5x leveraged position of $5.48 million, generating an unrealized profit of $2.64 million (+162%). It is learned that both addresses currently hold short positions in both CBRS and SPCX, and have recorded substantial unrealized profits, preferring to place short positions at high levels before or on the day of major stock listings. With the realization of negative earnings news in this round, the combined unrealized profit of the two positions is around $5.88 million. Currently, the average entry price of CBRS short whales is around $275, and the current price is over 30% lower than that. The nearest short liquidation line is at $200.13, about 7% away from the current price.
