Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Rome Protocol has published connection details for its Hadrian testnet, giving developers a USDC-funded environment to try Ethereum-style applications inside Solana, while its documentation separately lists a mainnet network called Rubicon.

Summary

Rome’s Hadrian testnet runs on Solana Devnet, while its documentation separately lists Rubicon as mainnet. Compound v3 and Aave v3 implementations remain reference applications, without confirmed official protocol migrations. Hadrian uses test USDC for gas, with transaction pricing controlled through configurable operator settings. Rome reports a Halborn audit, while its documentation lists Ethereum compatibility and execution limits. Rome Protocol’s Oct. 18 post identifies Hadrian as a testnet running on Solana Devnet, with chain ID 200010, an RPC endpoint, an explorer, and instructions for obtaining test USDC. The supplied screenshot directs developers to Circle’s faucet and a bridge interface to fund their wallets.

The project’s developer documentation lists Rubicon separately as mainnet, with chain ID 7531 and a different RPC endpoint. Its introductory page describes Rubicon as using real USDC, distinguishing the production environment from Hadrian’s testing assets.

Rome EVM runs Solidity code within Solana Rome’s execution documentation describes an Ethereum Virtual Machine implemented as a Solana program. A proxy receives signed Ethereum-style transactions, checks them through an offchain emulator, and packages their instructions for execution by Solana validators.

According to the architecture described by the project, Solidity contracts can call native Solana programs through cross-program invocation, or CPI. Developers can use familiar Ethereum tools while their contracts execute within Solana’s runtime.

The documentation describes shared application state between EVM and Solana users. Its statement that no bridge is needed concerns interactions inside that environment; Hadrian’s funding instructions separately direct users to a bridge when bringing test USDC into the network.

Rome’s execution guide distinguishes two processing modes. Operations that fit within one Solana transaction use atomic execution, where the complete transaction succeeds or reverts together.

For more demanding operations, the same guide describes iterative execution across several Solana transactions. Accounts are locked during processing, and cached effects are committed at the end. The project lists a 160-step session limit and restrictions on which Solana program calls can use that mode.

Solana’s transaction capacity has been the subject of separate network changes. In an Aug. 30 report, Jacob Creech outlined a planned move from 1,232-byte transactions to a 4,096-byte format, as crypto.news previously reported. The announcement scheduled Transaction V1 for Sept. 9 and treated slot-time reductions and Alpenglow as separate upgrades.

Compound and Aave implementations remain reference applications Rome’s Hadrian guide names Uniswap, Compound and Aave as reference applications validated first on the testnet.

The project’s Aerarium repository describes a Compound v3 lending application with two wallet routes sharing one lending pool. One route accepts Ethereum-style signed transactions through MetaMask; the other uses Phantom and a Solana-derived identity without requiring an Ethereum key.

According to that repository, both routes access the same Comet market, covering USDC deposits, collateral deposits, borrowing, repayments, and withdrawals. The listed application address uses a devnet domain. GitHub

Rome’s Aave interface repository explicitly calls the product a demo and places it on Hadrian. Its accompanying contract repository describes a fork of Aave’s code.

Those materials establish how Rome presents its implementations. They do not establish that either lending protocol’s governing organization has approved a production deployment or moved existing user positions to Rome.

Rome has pursued other financial applications through partnerships. In March 2025, the project announced work with KiiChain on tokenized assets and cross-chain payment finance for Latin America. Executives described plans involving real estate, agricultural commodities and access to Solana liquidity.

USDC gas payments depend on operator configuration Hadrian’s network guide specifies USDC as its gas token and identifies Circle’s Solana Devnet USDC mint. Developers funding from Solana need test USDC and some devnet SOL, according to the guide.

Circle’s faucet supports both Solana Devnet and Ethereum Sepolia. The provider describes faucet tokens as testing assets without real-world value and currently lists a distribution of 20 test USDC per request, subject to its limits.

Rome’s application-chain documentation allows an operator to select an SPL token for gas payments and route transaction-fee revenue to an application treasury.

The same documentation describes a pricing service that converts the chosen gas token against SOL for underlying Solana transaction costs. Its configuration can draw prices from Meteora pools or a Pyth/Hermes fallback.

Rome’s constraints page lists configurable minimum gas prices and a proxy-level multiplier. The published framework therefore describes configurable pricing, without establishing one universal dollar cost for every application transaction.

Audit and compatibility claims carry defined limits Rome’s EVM repository identifies a mainnet program and says Halborn audited it. The repository provides instructions for rebuilding the program and comparing it with the deployed binary, with build-time and commit-hash metadata masked during comparison.

The project’s compatibility documentation lists differences from Ethereum, including disabled modular-exponentiation functionality and gas behavior that does not reproduce Ethereum’s per-operation schedule.

The constraints page says Rome transactions must declare the Solana accounts they touch before execution. It lists a 64-address transaction cap and approximately 1.4 million compute units per transaction. The guide recommends measuring actual Solana compute consumption from transaction receipts because the EVM gas-used figure does not faithfully represent that resource use.

Its mainnet deployment table names a Squads multisignature wallet as upgrade authority.

Separate interoperability projects have targeted institutional markets. In August, Interstice Digital announced a cross-chain swap engine linking Canton with Ethereum, Solana and Robinhood Chain. FalconX supplies liquidity, while Interstice said it does not hold customer assets or execute transactions on users’ behalf.

Source: Binance EN

This is a general announcement. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region. Terms and conditions apply. Fellow Binancians, Binance is excited to introduce Binance Pick, a flagship campaign that rewards your trading activity. Early Bird reservation opens on 2026-10-19, while the campaign officially launches on 2026-10-21 (UTC). The more users who reserve during Early Bird, the larger the prize pool unlocked, up to 1,000,000 USDC. Eligible users can start completing tasks and making predictions for a share of the prize pool. Join Now Promotion Period： Reservation Period: 2026-10-19 to 2026-10-20 23:59:59 (UTC)Prediction Period: 2026-10-21 00:00:00 to 2026-11-15 23:59:59 (UTC) How It Works: Step 1. Join the Campaign Visit the Binance Pick campaign page and select [Join Now]. Reserve during Early Bird to earn bonus Scores. Eligible new users who join the campaign earn additional bonus Scores. Step 2. Complete Tasks to Earn Scores Complete the tasks available to you to earn Scores. Tasks include Join Campaign / Early Bird reservation, New User Welcome, referrals, daily check-in, Spot/Convert/Futures Trading Task, post on Square and the Refill Station. Step 3. Use Your Scores to Predict in Binance Pick For users who are from an eligible jurisdiction, use your Scores to join available markets in Binance Pick. Close your position before it ends or hold until settlement. A correct prediction increases your Scores. Please note that Scores are campaign-only points used only for campaign ranking and reward allocation. They have no monetary value and cannot be redeemed, transferred, or exchanged for cash. Scores reset at the end of the season under the Campaign Terms. Step 4. Climb the Leaderboard and Win Rewards Track your ranking on the Leaderboard page. Rewards are distributed across three pools: Season Leaderboard — 500,000 USDC: The top 20,000 participants on the leaderboard after the campaign ends can share rewards. Participants must have more than 0 Season Scores to be eligible.The Season Leaderboard closes on 2026-11-15 at 23:59:59 (UTC).Weekly Leaderboard — 400,000 USDC in total (100,000 USDC/week): The top 8,000 participants on the leaderboard at the end of each weekly ranking period can share rewards. Participants must have a Weekly PnL greater than 0 from predictions made with Scores. The Weekly Leaderboard closes every Sunday at 23:59:59 (UTC).Participation Reward — 100,000 USDC: Participants who are not ranked on the Season Leaderboard or any Weekly Leaderboard and have completed at least 5 check-ins during the season can share rewards, with a maximum of 5 USDC per eligible participant. *Complete Prediction Market Bonus Trading Task to Earn Scores The Prediction Market Trading Task is offered by Binance Wallet and available to eligible Binance Wallet users in selected regions only. Binance Wallet’s Prediction Market is an independent product powered by Predict.fun, whose features, terms and regional availability are subject to Binance Wallet’s own terms. Notes: Due to compliance requirements, available tasks may vary by region. Please refer to the tasks shown on your campaign page.Due to the scale of this rollout, there may be a brief delay before the feature appears in users' accounts.Scores are campaign-only points used only for campaign ranking and reward allocation. They have no monetary value and cannot be redeemed, transferred, or exchanged for cash. Scores reset at the end of the season under the Campaign Terms.Leaderboard data is based on the total of your Available Scores and Open Orders Frozen shown on your Portfolio page. Position Value is not included. The snapshot time of the Scores displayed on the leaderboard is subject to the leaderboard system update time.Season Leaderboard rewards will be distributed within 7 business days after the season ends; Weekly Leaderboard rewards within 3 business days after each week ends; and the Participation Reward within 14 business days after the season ends.Any unclaimed rewards will expire according to the Campaign Terms.This Campaign and all rewards are subject to the Campaign Terms and Conditions. Please refer to the full Campaign Terms and Conditions for details.There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise. Terms & Conditions: These terms and conditions (“Promotion Terms”) govern users’ participation in the promotion above (“Promotion”). By participating in this Promotion, users agree to these Promotion Terms, and the following additional terms: (a) Binance Terms and Conditions for Prize Promotions; (b) Binance Terms of Use; and (c) Binance Privacy Notice; all of which are incorporated by reference into these terms and conditions. In the case of any inconsistency or conflict between these Promotion Terms, and any other incorporated terms, the provisions of these Promotion Terms shall prevail, followed by the following in this order of precedence, and to the extent of such conflict: (a) Binance Terms and Conditions for Prize Promotions; (b) Binance Terms of Use; and (c) Binance Privacy Notice.Only users who complete identity verification and confirm their participation during the Promotion Period can qualify for rewards in the Promotion. The products or features referred to above may not be available in your region. Users are responsible for informing themselves about and observing any restrictions and/or requirements imposed with respect to the access to and use of Binance services in each country from which the services are accessed.All participants are subject to periodic risk assessment. Failure to pass the risk review may result in ineligibility for rewards.This campaign is not open to residents or citizens of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Economic Area (all 30 member states), Hong Kong, Singapore, or any other jurisdiction on Binance's List of Prohibited Countries. For the avoidance of doubt, any content, posts, entries, or submissions made by users from these jurisdictions — however submitted or tagged — will not be counted, considered, or eligible for any reward, recognition, or prize. Binance reserves the right to verify the jurisdiction of any participant and to disregard any entry at its sole discretion.During the Promotion Period, users may earn "Scores" by completing designated tasks, such as sign-up, daily check-in, referrals, trading, prediction, and posting on Binance Square, as described on the Promotion page. Scores are virtual points used solely within this Promotion for gameplay and leaderboard ranking; they have no monetary value, are non-transferable and non-redeemable, and cannot be redeemed or exchanged for any value outside this Promotion. Users may spend Scores to make predictions on a virtual, simulated market involving no real funds, with their Scores balance changing based on prediction outcomes. Rewards are distributed by leaderboard ranking rather than by redeeming Scores, with the reward pool, tiers, and distribution as displayed on the Promotion page. Certain tasks, including the live prediction task, are available only in jurisdictions where permitted. Task details, score values, thresholds, and rewards may vary by region and are subject to adjustment as set out on the Promotion page. Binance Square Terms apply.Binance reserves the right to disqualify a user’s reward eligibility if the account is involved in any dishonest behavior (e.g., wash trading, illegally bulk account registrations/logins, self dealing, or market manipulation). Binance further reserves the right to disqualify any participants who tamper with Binance program code, or interfere with the operation of Binance program code with other software.Binance reserves the right at any time in its sole and absolute discretion to determine and/or amend or vary these terms and conditions without prior notice, including but not limited to canceling, extending, terminating or suspending this Promotion, the eligibility terms and criteria, the selection and number of winners, and the timing of any act to be done, and all Participants shall be bound by these amendments. There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise. Thank you for your support! Binance Team 2026-10-19 USDC is an e-money token issued by Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS (https://www.circle.com/). USDC’s whitepaper is available here. You may contact Circle using the following contact information: +33(1)59000130 and [email protected]. Holders of USDC have a legal claim against Circle SAS as the EU issuer of USDC. These holders are entitled to request redemption of their USDC from Circle SAS. Such redemption will be made at any time and at par value. Trade on-the-go with Binance's crypto trading app (iOS/Android) Find us on TelegramWhatsAppXFacebookInstagramDiscord Binance reserves the right in its sole discretion to amend or cancel this announcement at any time and for any reasons without prior notice. Disclaimer: Prediction Markets are not provided by Binance ADGM entities and can only be accessed if you hold a Binance Wallet. The Binance Wallet Services are provided by Binance Barbados Limited. The Binance Wallet Services are not under the supervision of the Financial Services Regulatory Authority or any other regulatory authority. Binance Wallet does not sponsor, endorse, or guarantee such third-party services. Binance does not act as the counterparty in any investments in the Prediction Markets feature. Investment using the Prediction Markets feature comes with significant risk, including financial risk, market volatility, regulatory risk, third-party risks. You may lose part or all of what you have invested through the Prediction Markets feature. For more information, see our Terms of Use and Risk Warning. Digital asset prices are subject to high market risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may go down or up, and you may not get back the amount invested. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and Binance is not liable for any losses you may incur. Past performance is not a reliable predictor of future performance. You should only invest in products you are familiar with and where you understand the risks. You should carefully consider your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives and risk tolerance and consult an independent financial adviser prior to making any investment. This material should not be construed as financial advice. For more information, see our Terms of Use and Risk Warning.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Deutsche Bank targets Asia crypto custody expansion in 2027 as German launch nears

Even a tiny rise in bank deposit rates could slow stablecoin growth significantly. According to a recent study by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), a one basis point increase in bank interest rates reduces the growth in market capitalization of stablecoins by about 3% over ten weeks.

Given that the overall growth is at approximately 15% annually, this decrease would reduce the amount of growth to be approximately 12% annually. USD Coin [USDC] shows greater sensitivity, with growth declining 4.8 percentage points, compared with USDT’s 1.9-point reduction.

Source: BIS This difference highlights USDC’s closer ties to U.S. users and institutions. Moreover, higher bank yields make deposits more attractive relative to stablecoins. Yet, the effect remains specific to stablecoins, as researchers found no significant link with other cryptocurrencies.

Therefore, increasing interest rates may slow down the growth of new stable coins but will not eliminate the current supply of stablecoins.

Visa expands USDC payment rails On the other hand, while bank rates challenge stablecoin demand, Visa’s stablecoin expansion highlights growing real-world payment utility.

For example, Visa Direct currently allows payment of wages or purchases made using USDC-funded cross-border payouts in more than 180 countries. Inyo Global is their first partner.

This feature may provide a method for obtaining additional demand for stablecoins beyond simply trading or using decentralized finance.

It should also allow businesses to draw upon available funds at any time, avoiding reliance on banking hours or correspondent networks.

Source: Businesswire At present, there are still over $300 billion in outstanding stablecoin capitalization. If Visa continues to expand its service to include more countries and/or additional banks, it appears possible that additional demand for stablecoins may develop.

However, if the rate of adoption is slower than expected, stablecoin holders who do not earn interest on their stablecoins may need to consider alternative forms of stablecoins. Some of these alternative forms of stablecoins are already paying interest on idle money.

USDC payment activity accelerates Visa’s dollar-based stablecoin settlement volume is already at an annualized run rate of $20 billion. That represents more than a 15-fold increase compared with last year.

That data suggests that stablecoins are shifting from purely speculative holdings to being used for actual payments.

Still, according to DeFiLlama data, USDC total circulating supply stands at $72.6 billion. That said, measuring how much USDC is involved in transactional activity is key to determining whether stablecoins are actually supporting commerce or simply accumulating wealth.

Source: DeFiLlama If the amount of USDC used in settlements grows faster than the circulating supply of USDC, it could begin to counteract some of the loss in demand due to increasing deposit rates at banks.

For this trend to continue, merchants and others will need to continue processing multiple transactions using prefunded USDC balances.

Final Summary Stablecoin growth faces pressure as rising bank deposit rates make traditional savings more attractive, slowing market capitalization expansion.

USD Coin [USDC] payment adoption could support stablecoin demand as Visa’s settlement volume exceeds a $20 billion annualized run rate.

Running a compliant stablecoin turns out to be an expensive business. Circle, the issuer of USDC, disclosed that for the first half of 2026 it retained just 7 cents of net profit for every dollar in revenue, a figure the company is presenting not as an apology but as a feature.

The disclosure came via a blog post from Chief Commercial Officer Kash Razzaghi, published October 16, 2026, and it reads as a direct counter-punch to a new wave of stablecoin competitors promising to hand partners a much bigger slice of the economics.

Where the money actually goes Circle reported approximately $1.4 billion in revenue and reserve income for H1 2026. Of that, $819 million, roughly 59 cents per dollar, went to distribution partners and transaction costs.

Another $473 million, or 34 cents per dollar, was reinvested into operations: licensing, banking relationships, compliance infrastructure, and product development.

Razzaghi framed the breakdown as evidence of a sustainable model rather than a stingy one. Circle’s pitch is that rivals distributing a higher percentage of revenue to partners are doing so by skimping on the underlying infrastructure that keeps a stablecoin trustworthy, and eventually redeemable.

The company backs its argument with a regulatory footprint that includes more than 55 licenses and partnerships with over 25 banks. It also counts more than 150 partners sharing in USDC’s economics, with Coinbase holding the largest single share of that revenue distribution.

The transaction volume case USDC processed more than $36 trillion in on-chain transaction volume during H1 2026.

USDC’s share of global stablecoin transaction volume reached 77% in June 2026, up from 60% the prior year.

What the competition is offering The most direct competitive pressure cited in the disclosure is Open USD, launched in June 2026. Its pitch centers on free minting and redemption and a model that passes reserve income directly to participants rather than absorbing it into operational costs.

What this means for the broader stablecoin market Circle’s disclosure does two things simultaneously. It defends the current model to existing partners, particularly Coinbase, which takes the largest distribution share and has a direct financial interest in how USDC’s economics evolve. It also sets up a competitive frame: compliant infrastructure versus higher short-term partner payouts.

Whether the 7-cent margin holds as competition intensifies is the actual question for Circle’s business. A company retaining that little per dollar has limited buffer to absorb pricing pressure. With $36 trillion in H1 transaction volume already behind it, Circle is betting scale can do the work that margin cannot.

Disclosure: This article was edited by John Chen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

In brief
A new BIS working paper using U.S. data from 2019 to 2025 found that higher bank deposit rates predict slower stablecoin market growth.
The effect was stronger for Circle’s USDC than for Tether’s USDT, which the authors tied to USDC’s closer links to U.S. users.
The authors said regulators should weigh whether issuers can pay yield. The paper reflects their views, not necessarily the BIS’s.
Banks worried about losing customers to stablecoins may already have a counterweight: the interest rate on a savings account.

That’s the takeaway from a new working paper published by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel-based bank for central banks. Using weekly U.S. data from January 2019 through June 2025, BIS economist Iñaki Aldasoro and Rashad Ahmed of the Andersen Institute for Finance and Economics found that stablecoin growth slows when banks raise deposit rates.

Myriad: What will the Fed do next? Click to make your prediction.Stablecoin market capitalization grew by about 15% over a typical 10-week span in the sample used by the researchers. A one-basis-point bump in deposit rates, a sizable weekly move for slow-moving savings rates, cut that to roughly 12% under the authors’ baseline estimate. Under a second method designed to isolate cause and effect, it fell to about 6%. Stablecoins kept growing, just more slowly.

To separate cause from coincidence, the authors relied on a quirk in bank behavior. Lenders barely raise savings rates until the federal funds rate passes about 3%, and then they reprice much faster.

The link was stronger for Circle’s USDC than for Tether’s USDT, which the authors attribute to USDC’s closer ties to U.S. users. The paper concludes that banks “retain some influence over the pace of that adoption through deposit pricing.”

The findings come with caveats. Working papers reflect the authors’ views, not necessarily the BIS’s, and the sample spans a single high-rate cycle in which stablecoins paid holders no interest.

The authors said regulators should weigh whether stablecoin issuers may pay holders yield, along with the trade-offs of requiring issuers to keep part of their reserves in bank deposits.

That debate is live in Washington. Banks have lobbied to keep stablecoin yield off the table, a fight that loomed over the Clarity Act’s failed Senate vote. Meanwhile, the OCC, FDIC, and Treasury are writing rules to implement the GENIUS Act, which takes effect in January. The GENIUS Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump in July of last year, essentially legalized stablecoins in the United States and set rules of the road for their issuance, use, and custody.

The BIS has long scrutinized stablecoins and the cryptocurrency space more broadly. In 2021, it argued the rise of blockchain-based digital dollars made central bank digital currencies more urgent, and a 2023 BIS survey warned they could threaten financial stability if widely adopted.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Join 72,000+ readers

Create an account to save your articles.

Add on Google

Add Decrypt as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.

2 min read

(Nikhilesh De/CoinDesk)Summary

Circle said it kept about 7 cents of profit per revenue dollar in the first half of 2026, after $819 million of $1.4 billion went to distribution and transaction costs.Coinbase, Circle’s largest USDC partner, also backs Open USD, a rival network that passes reserve income to partners after a management fee.Circle argued reserve income must also fund redemption, compliance and liquidity, and says standard USDC redemptions remain free.Stablecoin issuer Circle CRCL$82.25·Market Closed is defending its business model as Coinbase, its largest distribution partner, backs a rival that aims to give businesses more income from stablecoin reserves.

In a blog post on Friday, Chief Commercial Officer Kash Razzaghi wrote that Circle kept about 7 cents in net profit for each dollar in revenue made during the first half of 2026. The firm brought in about $1.4 billion, while distribution and transaction costs totaled $819 million.

The post puts the figures at the center of a dispute over who gets the interest earned on assets backing stablecoins.

Circle said the remaining $473 million covered compliance, liquidity and product development. That figure also included about $214 million in stock-based compensation and related costs.

Coinbase is Circle’s largest USDC partner, but is also a backer of Open USD, along with Stripe and BlackRock. Open USD, unveiled in June, aims to let businesses mint and redeem stablecoins without fees, while passing off reserve income minus a management fee to participants.

Circle's post did not name Open USD, whose OUSD token is now live, directly, and there are other competitors like the Paxos-led Global Dollar Network (USDG) that also share reserve income with participants.

"The costs of redemption, compliance, and resilience don't disappear just because the issuer declined to pay them," Razzaghi wrote.

Circle has also been working to secure additional distribution partners. In September, Binance bought a $100 million stake in the firm under a five-year deal that includes a fee tied to USDC held through Circle's wallet service.

Circle said standard USDC redemptions remain free and "typically settle in up to two business days." Qualifying platform customers and payment flows through Circle Payments Network can now access near-real-time redemptions at no cost, it said.

Related Stocks

Market Closed

12345678910

5 hours ago

According to Lookonchain's monitoring, crypto figure "Big Brother Ma Ji" (Huang Licheng) had all his long positions liquidated again four hours ago. The 250,000 USDC he deposited just two days ago has now been almost entirely wiped out. A year ago, he earned $44.84 million on Hyperliquid; he has since not only given back all those profits but also suffered an additional loss of $36.85 million.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Table of contents

USDC issuer Circle generated roughly $1.4 billion in revenue in the first half of 2026 while settling more than $36 trillion in onchain transactions, the company disclosed on October 16 in a post laying out the economics behind its stablecoin.

The figures come from a company blog post by Chief Commercial Officer Kash Razzaghi, who framed the disclosure as an answer to newer stablecoin issuers that claim incumbents keep too much of the economics.

How USDC’s Revenue Is Distributed Of the roughly $1.4 billion in first-half revenue, Circle paid about $819 million, or roughly 59 cents of every dollar, to USDC distribution partners and transaction costs. About $473 million, or 34 cents per dollar, went toward licenses, banking relationships, settlement liquidity, compliance programs, and blockchain integrations, the post said. Circle reported about 7 cents of net profit per dollar of revenue.

Circle also said it minted and redeemed more than $315 billion of USDC in the period, about $1.7 billion every day, and that USDC carried roughly 77% of global stablecoin transaction volume in June, up from 60% a year earlier.

Why Circle Is Publishing the Numbers Razzaghi positioned the disclosure as a rebuttal to new entrants that promise to share a “substantial majority” of their economics with partners. A stablecoin “that distributes everything but funds nothing” leaves out the cost of redemption, compliance, and resilience, he wrote, adding that without that foundation a stablecoin “is not a digital dollar; it is a token.”

The post also detailed redemption terms: all Circle customers can redeem USDC for free through standard banking rails, settling in up to two business days, while payment flows on the Circle Payments Network and platform customers can now redeem free in near real time.

USDC’s Scale and the Partner Network The disclosure underlines USDC’s distribution footprint. Coinbase, Circle’s largest partner, reported average USDC balances of $20 billion in the second quarter, up 44% year over year, while Binance in September signed a five-year commercial agreement and invested $100 million in Circle. More than 150 partners hold an economic interest in USDC’s growth, according to the post.

Circle said it holds more than 55 licenses and registrations, including an OCC national trust bank charter and MiCA compliance, and operates natively on more than 35 blockchains. Its partner network spans wallets, exchanges, banks, and payment networks, a group that includes Coinbase, which recently expanded enterprise stablecoin payments with Marqeta.

AUTHOR

Entrepreneur and freelance writer based in Nakuru, Kenya. I cover cryptocurrency, the Blockchain technology, and financial topics. It’s my joy to transform the simplest phrases in a way they reach a reader’s heart to help them discover how crypto is disrupting the world as we have known it. I believe in transforming the world, one word at a time.

Could Circle’s USDC be the key catalyst for crypto’s Q4 cycle?

So far, Q4 has started with the stablecoin market cap struggling to break above the $310 billion-mark, suggesting that liquidity across the crypto market remains too weak to fuel breakout rallies.

Bitcoin’s 2.5% correction and failure to reclaim the $90K-range further reinforced this trend. So, with limited liquidity, buying pressure is low, possibly limiting the upside for the market.

Additionally, the persistent selling pressure across key Bitcoin market segments could trigger a demand-supply imbalance. With low liquidity on one side, and sell-pressure on the other, the market might find it difficult to generate enough buying power to recover strongly. 

Source: DeFiLlama Meanwhile, DeFi activity has been flashing another warning sign.

As seen in the chart above, total value locked (TVL) across DeFi protocols has dropped by over $6 billion so far this month. This, after a $30 billion jump in Q3, sending TVL to a multi-month high of $98 billion in late September. The recent sell-off suggested that DeFi liquidity may be cooling, raising concerns about whether the market has enough fresh capital to support a “sustained” Q4 rally.

According to AMBCrypto, this is where Circle’s latest report gains credibility. The stablecoin issuer allocated around $1.4 billion in revenue in the first half of 2026. Of this, $819 million went towards USDC distribution partners and transaction costs, while $473 million was invested in infrastructure, compliance, and product development. The key takeaway? Circle is clearly investing its revenues in order to increase the adoption of USDC and strengthen its business.

So naturally, if Circle [USDC] boosts the use cases for the stablecoin and attracts more users to the ecosystem, it might drive fresh liquidity into the crypto market. The key question now is whether the “renewed” attention to the stablecoin prompts a Q3-style rally in the fourth quarter.

Can Circle’s USDC become the liquidity catalyst crypto needs in Q4? Despite a bearish start to Q4, Circle is already using its resources to scale the adoption of USDC.

According to CEO Jeremy Allaire, the company is set to enter around 40 emerging markets in Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East, fueled by the rising organic demand for stablecoins. His remarks were supported by the data published in the company’s report, which revealed that USDC processed over $36 trillion in on-chain transaction value and around 77% of total stablecoin transaction volumes in June, compared to 60% at the same time last year.

So, as USDC adoption grows, Circle’s expansion into new markets is likely to drive its popularity.

That is why the chart below is so important. USDC market cap rose by $3 billion in the Q3, while USDT market value decreased by a half a percent. This divergence is evidence of the increasing dominance of USDC.

Source: TradingView However, this trend didn’t play out in isolation. 

Rather, USDC growth coincided with Circle’s 31% hike over the same period. This demonstrates that the two factors, namely the increase in demand for stablecoins and the development of the company’s own business, reinforce each other.

With Circle now building a similar growth narrative, a repeat of this cycle seems extremely plausible. Back then, USDC’s momentum coincided with the total crypto market cap increasing by 40%, illustrating how a rise in the usage of stablecoins can drive a bull run.

Final Summary Circle’s expansion into 40 new markets could bring more liquidity into crypto.

USDC’s growth coincided with a 40% rise in total crypto market cap, raising hopes for another rally.

Analysis

The world's largest payment network has moved stablecoin prefunding from pilot to production via Inyo Global, making USDC a live funding source for payouts across 180-plus countries.

On October 15, 2026, Visa announced that its stablecoin capabilities are moving from pilot stage to commercial deployment. That sentence reads like a press release, but the structural shift underneath it is real. The world’s largest payment network is now accepting USDC as a production-grade funding source for cross-border payouts, not running another controlled test.

The first enabler to cross this threshold is Inyo Global, a Visa Direct processor that serves money transmitters, fintechs, banks, and payment businesses. Through the integration, these institutions can prefund cross-border payouts with USDC in near real time, around the clock, across more than 180 countries. The stablecoin sits on the funding leg; recipients get settled in local fiat on the other end.

The mechanics are deliberately unglamorous. As Robson Dantas, CPTO and co-founder at Inyo Global, put it: No infrastructure overhaul. No new compliance stack for the client. Just a faster way to fund the existing pipes.

That ordinariness is exactly what makes this significant. We have covered this exact beat moving from speculative to structural over the past two months. In August, Visa deployed stablecoin capabilities through Zero Hash across 18 billion endpoints, which at the time looked like a production-grade integration. We also tracked the company searching for a new settlement partner after Mastercard acquired BVNK for roughly $1.8 billion, pulling the rug out from under Visa’s existing infrastructure.

What changes now is the status. Inyo Global is not a pilot partner running a sandbox test. It is a commercial enabler with a client base that can access stablecoin prefunding through production APIs today. And the model is repeatable: plug a processor into Visa Direct’s stablecoin prefunding capability, and every business on that processor’s platform gets access without doing any technical work themselves. Visa has made clear it intends to bring additional enablers online.

The regulatory timing is not accidental. With the GENIUS Act’s effective date of January 18, 2027 approaching, institutions need production track records, not pilot announcements. The agencies missed their rulemaking deadlines; the industry is building the infrastructure anyway and letting the compliance layer catch up.

Vira Platonova, Global Head of Visa Direct, framed the moment plainly: It is a dry, professional way of saying that the technology is no longer the interesting part. The deployment is. Platonova will discuss stablecoins reshaping global money movement at Money20/20 USA sessions next week, where the question will shift from whether stablecoin settlement works at scale to how fast the next enablers come online.

Ethoswarm Tessa Vaughn works for Forkast.
Minds can also work for you.

Minds are persistent AI beings with instincts, identity, and a job.
Awaken one on Ethoswarm.

Awaken your mind →

Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC hold about 60% and 24% of the stablecoin market, while Ethena's USDe and World Liberty Financial's USD1 remain below $5B.

No alternative stablecoin is close to challenging Circle and Tether. @Tether's $USDT and @Circle's $USDC hold market caps of roughly $183B and $73B, and no other stablecoin has a market cap above $5B.

A two-issuer marketAccording to DefiLlama, the total stablecoin market cap stood at about $302.5B on October 17, 2026. USDT's dominance was 60.63%, with $183.4B in supply, while USDC held $72.7B.

The nearest challengers are far smaller. DefiLlama lists @ethena's $USDe at $4.7B and @worldlibertyfi's $USD1 at about $4B. CoinGape, citing DefiLlama data, puts Sky Dollar ($USDS) at $6.8B, PayPal's PYUSD at $2.8B and Ripple's RLUSD at $2.4B. Sky's USDS is the one token that sits above $5B in that dataset.

Concentration has stayed high for months. A Crypto Briefing analysis from September found that USDT and USDC together control about 85% of supply. It put the market's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index at roughly 4244, where a reading above 2500 is generally considered highly concentrated.

Is there room for alternatives?The case for newer stablecoins rests on differences in design and use. Ethena's $USDe is a synthetic dollar, which DefiLlama-based trackers classify separately from fiat-backed tokens such as USDT and USDC. Others are backed by fiat reserves, as with $USD1, and compete mainly on distribution and partnerships.

The market also shows how hard it is to break the duopoly. In the Crypto Briefing analysis, USDC captured between 60% and 70% of on-chain transaction volume in recent periods despite holding less than half of USDT's supply. USDT circulates widely on chains such as Tron and Ethereum, where it often serves as a dollar substitute.

There are signs competition is building. Benzinga, citing Reuters, reports that banking coalitions in the US and Europe are moving to develop and deploy their own stablecoins. Total supply has also eased from its May 2026 peak of about $322B, according to Stablecoin.nyc, which leaves little room for newcomers to grow simply by riding a rising market.

For now, the data points to scale and network effects favouring the two incumbents. Whether alternatives can win meaningful share will likely depend on whether they offer something USDT and USDC do not.

Sources: DefiLlama stablecoin market data, CoinGape on stablecoin rankings, Crypto Briefing on stablecoin concentration

The stablecoin market has never looked more lopsided. Data from DefiLlama shows that Tether’s USDT ($183.4B) and Circle’s USDC ($72.7B) together hold roughly $256B, more than 85% of the total $302B stablecoin market.

No other issuer comes close to the $5B threshold. The gap is not narrowing. It is widening.

A Two-Horse Race With a Cliff After the Second Runner
The numbers from DefiLlama as of October 17, 2026, tell a stark story. USDT leads at $183.4B, commanding 60.6% of the stablecoin market alone. USDC follows at $72.7B, driven heavily by institutional and regulated demand.

Then comes the cliff. Sky Dollar (USDS) sits at $6.8B. Ethena’s USDe follows at $4.7B. World Liberty Financial’s USD1 holds $4B. PayPal’s PYUSD sits at $2.8B. Ripple’s RLUSD trails at $2.4B.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has pointed to AI agents as the next frontier for USDT adoption.

He predicts as many as one trillion AI agents will transact in USDT within 15 years.

Agents spending USDT is the future. https://t.co/2HLBrmG3DA

— Paolo Ardoino 🤖 (@paoloardoino) October 15, 2026

Ethena is making calculated moves to escape the challenger trap. The protocol recently entered crypto neobanking with a new app to take USDe beyond DeFi.

It also teamed with FalconX on a $1 billion secured facility for USDe backing assets. Both moves signal that USDe is building real-world utility, but at $4.7B, it remains a fraction of the giants.

USD1 is pursuing a payments angle. Mesh recently acquired Bluvo after a WLFI partnership, a deal designed to deepen USD1’s payment rails. Yet at $4B, USD1 still sits well below the threshold that could threaten the two leaders.

Why Flipping the Duopoly Remains Nearly Impossible
Trust and liquidity are the core barriers. USDT dominates trading pairs and emerging-market corridors. USDC leads in regulated, institutional contexts.

Circle’s distribution strategy is accelerating that lead. Visa recently moved USDC prefunding into live operations on Visa Direct.

Circle paid out $819M to distribution partners in H1 2026 alone, reinforcing network lock-in.

Payment infrastructure is also expanding. Coinbase expanded its Marqeta partnership to bring stablecoin-backed payment cards to businesses. These rails make USDC harder to displace in corporate finance.

Traditional finance is circling the space. Wells Fargo’s CEO confirmed the bank is preparing for potential stablecoin opportunities in the US. New bank-issued stablecoins, however, are more likely to deepen USDC’s institutional moat than challenge it.

Regulatory scrutiny adds another layer. A US Senate probe recently found USDT present in 84% of sanctioned Iran’s wallets. Tether has since defended its compliance posture.

The controversy has not dented USDT’s dominance, but it gives regulators a lever that could reshape the stablecoin market in ways no competitor currently can.

For now, the data is unambiguous. Breaking through the $5B ceiling requires more than innovation.

It demands liquidity, regulatory trust, and distribution at a scale that only two issuers have built, and neither shows signs of giving ground.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, plans a major expansion into approximately 40 emerging and developing countries. CEO Jeremy Allaire revealed these plans during the IMF and World Bank meetings in Bangkok, describing the move as part of a broader effort to drive adoption of digital dollars in regions with growing demand for blockchain-based financial services.

Growth in stablecoin adoptionAllaire highlighted increased organic demand for stablecoins, particularly in Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East. He pointed to people and businesses in these regions seeking reliable entry points to the internet-based economy and stated that blockchain is moving out of its early adopter phase and entering a period of mainstream growth.

Stablecoins are digital tokens pegged to traditional assets, often the US dollar, providing a comparatively stable bridge between traditional finance and cryptocurrencies. Circle holds about 25% of the global stablecoin market through USDC, while Tether‘s USDT accounts for nearly 60%. USDC’s circulation rose 19% year over year to $73.3 billion in the second quarter.

Circle’s CEO emphasized, “The technology is moving from the early adopter phase of blockchain technology into the mainstream scaling phase,” while also describing growing trust in stablecoin solutions worldwide.

The company’s expansion drive is backed by recent strategic moves, including a $400 million acquisition of payments firm Tazapay and a $100 million investment from cryptocurrency exchange Binance. Circle also recently secured a federal banking charter in July and is pursuing a New York trust charter to bolster its regulatory standing.

Regulatory environment and competitionLegislative shifts are providing additional momentum for Circle’s strategy. The GENIUS Act, the upcoming US stablecoin law, is scheduled to take effect in January. Allaire described the law as a turning point that will introduce legal digital dollars worldwide.

The introduction of the GENIUS Act, Allaire noted, represents “a watershed moment” by legitimizing digital dollars through clear regulations.

The CEO acknowledged growing competition from banks, many of which are currently developing their own stablecoins. Allaire characterized this rivalry as positive for the industry. He remarked that established financial players once blocked new entrants, but now, innovators like Circle have a seat at the table.

Circle is a technology firm specializing in blockchain-based payments and digital currencies. The company is primarily known for issuing USDC, one of the world’s most widely used stablecoins.

Mini dictionary: GENIUS Act – US federal legislation designed to regulate stablecoin issuers and establish clear legal frameworks for digital dollar assets.

IssuerStablecoinMarket ShareCirculation (Q2)CircleUSDC25%$73.3 billionTetherUSDT60%Not disclosedAI integration and new initiativesIn further developments, Circle unveiled tools enabling artificial intelligence agents to manage and spend USDC. The company launched Circle Agent Stack, its suite of developer offerings aimed at expanding machine-driven, agentic use cases in digital finance. Allaire credited these AI-driven microtransactions with spurring additional demand for USDC.

Circle’s Arc network, now valued at $3 billion following a $222 million token sale, has seen adoption from major financial institutions such as BlackRock, Visa, and Standard Chartered, according to Reuters. These moves further support Circle’s ambition to make USDC the favored currency for AI-powered transactions.

Despite these advances, Allaire expressed concern that artificial intelligence also introduces new security risks to financial infrastructure. He warned that the risks posed by AI in financial systems require active attention, stating, “If you’re not concerned about it, then your head is in the sand, right?”

Mini dictionary: Circle Agent Stack – A set of developer tools from Circle designed to let artificial intelligence agents open crypto wallets, initiate payments, and interact autonomously with the USDC stablecoin ecosystem.

Circle plans to enter around 40 emerging markets, with USDC’s circulating supply rising 19% year-over-year.

Analysis: GENIUS Act paves way for Samsung's stablecoin payments, set to reach 82 million Galaxy users in the US.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Visa Direct moved stablecoin-enabled prefunding from pilot to commercial deployment on October 15, 2026. Visa named Inyo Global, a Visa Direct processor, as the first company enabling the production service for eligible clients and partners. The initial implementation lets businesses served by Inyo prefund cross-border payouts with $USDC in near real time.

The launch changes the funding side of a Visa Direct payout. An eligible business can send $USDC to prefund payment activity instead of relying only on traditional funding windows. Inyo has added the option to the same platform its customers already use for onboarding, fraud and compliance management, payment acceptance, and domestic or international payouts. Recipients do not need a new integration described in the announcement because the stablecoin function sits on the prefunding side of Inyo’s connection to Visa Direct.

What moved from pilot to production Visa introduced stablecoin prefunding and payout pilots through Visa Direct in 2025. Those pilots tested cross-border funding, liquidity management, and global money movement for eligible clients. The October release brings the prefunding capability into day-to-day commercial operations through a named processor rather than announcing another test.

Inyo is a payments infrastructure provider for money transmitters, fintechs, banks, and payment businesses. Its platform provides one connection for user onboarding, fraud and compliance controls, payment acceptance, and payouts. Visa says those payouts reach more than 180 countries through Visa Direct. The new $USDC option is part of that existing connection.

Robson Dantas, Inyo Global’s chief product and technology officer and co-founder, said the service gives customers a funding method that is available around the clock. He also said it runs through the same Inyo APIs they already use. That detail matters operationally: customers using Inyo do not need to build a separate API surface simply to access stablecoin prefunding. Eligibility and geography still determine availability.

The production service is for prefunding cross-border payouts. Visa’s release does not say that payout recipients receive $USDC, nor does it describe recipients using wallets. The stablecoin is the asset used by the eligible business to supply funds for payment activity. Visa Direct remains the payout network in the announced implementation.

The distinction from Visa’s 2025 pilots is narrow but concrete. The earlier programs included both prefunding and payout experiments. The production announcement names stablecoin prefunding as the capability Inyo has put into commercial use. It does not announce production access to every function tested in those pilots. Operators should therefore evaluate the service as a new funding rail for an existing payout workflow, not as a general promise of stablecoin delivery to recipients.

The operating model Traditional cross-border payment providers keep funds available in the places and currencies where they expect to make payouts. Funding windows can constrain when those balances are replenished. Inyo’s integration gives eligible businesses another route: they can use $USDC to prefund Visa Direct payouts in near real time instead of relying solely on those windows.

The announcement does not claim instant delivery to the final recipient. Its near-real-time language applies to prefunding. The release also does not publish fees, supported originating markets, settlement chains, custody arrangements, or the conversion path between $USDC and the currency delivered to a recipient. Visa directs prospective users to a representative because availability varies by eligibility and geography.

For treasury teams, the concrete change is the timing of available funding. Inyo says its customers can fund payouts around the clock through their existing APIs. That can reduce dependence on a bank’s operating window when an eligible business needs to replenish funds, although the release does not quantify any reduction in working capital or cost.

For compliance and payment operators, the stablecoin route does not remove the controls already attached to Inyo’s platform. The same connection handles onboarding, fraud and compliance management, payment acceptance, and payouts. Visa limits the offer to eligible clients and partners, and both footnotes in the release make availability conditional.

The announced customer set is also specific. Inyo serves money transmitters, fintechs, banks, and payment businesses. Visa does not describe a direct product for retail users or a self-service route for companies outside Inyo. The first deployment reaches eligible Visa Direct clients and partners through a processor that has already integrated the capability. Other businesses need both commercial access and confirmation that their payment corridor qualifies.

What users and operators should check A business evaluating the service first needs to confirm that Inyo and Visa Direct support its geography and use case. The public release gives the network reach as more than 180 countries, but that is the reach of Inyo’s payout platform powered by Visa Direct, not a promise that $USDC prefunding is available in every one of those markets. Visa explicitly says availability varies by eligibility and geography.

Treasury teams also need the missing implementation details before comparing this route with bank prefunding. The release does not identify the supported blockchain, required wallet or custodian, cutoff rules for converting prefunded value, or fees. It does not state whether a business can redeem unused prefunding back to $USDC through the same API. Those questions determine how much operational change sits behind the simple promise of around-the-clock funding.

Visa Direct head Vira Platonova described the launch as the point where earlier experiments became live implementations. The company plans to discuss stablecoins at Money20/20 USA in the week after the announcement. The next useful disclosure will be the precise eligibility, geography, chain, custody, and pricing terms that turn the first Inyo implementation into a service other payment businesses can evaluate.

Circle’s plan to pursue approximately 40 emerging and developing markets has put a measurable question behind its global expansion: where can a business receive USDC and turn it into spendable local money today? The answer changes depending on whether a market means a wallet can hold USDC, a licensed company can issue or redeem it, or a payment provider can deliver a local currency payout. Circle has published evidence for some of those routes, but no country list or opening dates for the 40-market plan.

Summary

Circle’s chief executive described a push into approximately 40 emerging and developing markets on October 16. USDC circulation stood at $72.7 billion on Circle’s October 12 reserve page. Circle’s pending Tazapay purchase would add payout rails spanning more than 100 markets if it closes in 2027. Circle Payments Network reported 175 enrolled financial institutions and $14.7 billion in annualized volume at the end of June. European supervisors will assume part of USDC’s oversight on November 12 after its significant token designation. Circle has outlined an expansion into approximately 40 emerging and developing markets, putting a fresh number on its effort to distribute the dollar stablecoin USDC outside its established routes.

In a Reuters interview published October 16, chief executive Jeremy Allaire identified Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East as regions where he sees demand. He did not provide the 40 countries, their licensing status, a sequence for entering them, or a timetable for individual payment corridors. The missing details are material to a payment business that must connect a digital dollar to banks, exchanges and domestic settlement systems.

Forty prospective markets are not forty live corridors The statement describes where Circle intends to expand. It is not a list of newly launched products. A person with a blockchain wallet can generally receive a token over a supported network; that does not give the person a direct account with the issuer, a lawful retail offer in every jurisdiction, or a way to redeem dollars at a local bank. Even a licensed payout provider may serve a limited set of customers and transaction types within the country where it operates.

Circle’s own USDC product page says the coin is available in more than 185 countries. The figure describes potential geographic reach of the token. It cannot be subtracted from, or added to, the 40-market target to calculate newly accessible payment markets. The issuer has not published a common definition linking those two numbers. Its first-party minting and redemption products, commercial network memberships and third-party availability each have different eligibility rules.

Its September agreement to buy Singapore-based Tazapay supplies another number that could easily be mistaken for the new plan. Circle said Tazapay had local payout rails in more than 100 markets and more than 60 banking and fintech partners. The acquisition is subject to conditions, including Singapore regulatory approval, and is expected to close in 2027. Tazapay’s existing coverage therefore cannot be presented as 100 new Circle-owned payment markets in October. The parties said Tazapay customers would see no interruption to their existing service during the transaction. A prior account of the $400 million stock deal sets out the announced price and the prospective payment footprint.

The same announcement puts Tazapay’s annualized payment volume above $25 billion and says approximately 60% of its transaction volume already includes stablecoins. Neither statistic measures dollars of new USDC demand caused by the acquisition. The first is a run-rate measure of Tazapay’s payment activity. The second is a share of its existing throughput, which may involve different stablecoins and business uses. Circle did not publish a before-and-after conversion forecast for each corridor.

The most concrete list of working routes is narrower. In an earlier corridor announcement, Circle identified payouts to India through Saber, Singapore and the United States through Tazapay, the Philippines through Coins.ph, the United Arab Emirates through LuLu, and the European Union through Saber. Circle named domestic rails, including India’s IMPS and RTGS, Singapore’s FAST and Europe’s SEPA. Those are named integrations; their existence does not establish identical access, transaction limits or settlement speed for every user within those places.

JUST IN: Visa moves USDC-powered cross-border payouts from pilot to production

Through Inyo Global, eligible businesses can now pre-fund Visa Direct payouts using $USDC, enabling near-real-time funding for international transfers. pic.twitter.com/hXUPMU1S9U

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) October 16, 2026 A payment has at least two separate legs Consider a company that holds dollars in one country and pays a supplier in another. A participating financial institution can obtain USDC, transfer it across a supported blockchain, and instruct a receiving provider to deliver local currency. The token may settle between institutions while the supplier sees only a bank deposit. A recipient who accepts USDC directly follows a different route and takes responsibility for holding or disposing of the token. The availability of one route says little about the other.

The payment also has two prices. USDC aims to retain a one-dollar value against dollars, but the amount of local currency received depends on foreign exchange pricing, fees and the provider executing the payout. A quoted transfer time might measure blockchain confirmation while excluding onboarding, compliance review or the domestic payment rail. Without a standard transaction example in each proposed market, the 40-market announcement cannot tell readers the final sum received or the full time to funds.

Regulated counterparties have practical jobs along this chain. An originator screens the sender, a liquidity provider supplies the token or local currency, and a receiving institution meets the destination country’s requirements. A payment can fail at any of those handoffs despite a successful onchain transfer. The claim that a coin is transferable around the clock establishes the availability of the digital leg; it does not make every bank account or domestic system operate on the same schedule.

Circle’s second-quarter report offers a measure of its existing commercial network. At the end of June, Circle Payments Network had 175 enrolled financial institutions, up 29% from the previous quarter, with $14.7 billion in annualized transaction volume based on the trailing 30 days, up 76%. Both are company-defined operating figures. An enrolled institution is not necessarily an active participant in every corridor, and annualizing a recent month is not the same as reporting a completed year’s volume.

One direct arithmetic check shows the scale distinction. Dividing the stated $14.7 billion annualized network figure by 12 produces an implied monthly rate of $1.225 billion, assuming the 30-day pace persisted. Circle reported $14.8 trillion of USDC onchain transfer volume for the entire second quarter. The measurements cover different activity and periods, so their quotient would not be an adoption rate. The smaller commercial network measure is the more relevant starting point for assessing cross-border payment deployment; the far larger chain number includes token movement outside that specific network.

Circle’s second-quarter disclosure provides all three network inputs, as well as $73.3 billion of USDC in circulation at June 30. The number of coins outstanding can rise through exchange balances, trading collateral and other uses without any corresponding increase in final local-currency payouts. A corridor-level breakdown would be needed to test the specific claim that emerging-market payment demand is driving an expansion.

The unreported unit is a completed local payout An original audit of this plan should count transactions at the destination, not simply supported countries or tokens sent. For each named market it would record the originating entity, licensed receiving partner, eligible customer class, currencies, minimum and maximum amounts, quoted and delivered exchange rates, hours of operation, and whether the beneficiary receives USDC or bank money. A second column would distinguish an announced arrangement from one with observed commercial payouts. Circle has disclosed pieces of that map across releases but not a single verified 40-market table.

The distinction matters even when the technology and counterparties are real. If a company pays an overseas contractor through a licensed institution that accepts USDC, the contractor may never open a crypto wallet. The resulting service can be useful without increasing the number of retail USDC users. Conversely, an individual can hold USDC through an exchange in a country with no Circle Payments Network payout partner. Counting both people under the same definition of availability would obscure what the service actually offers.

Circle’s acquisition plan provides a potential way to supply the missing local end. Tazapay brings bank and fintech relationships, existing customer integrations and payout arrangements, according to Circle’s September release. An agreement to acquire those capabilities is an agreement about future corporate control, not a confirmation that Circle has already integrated every account and corridor. Regulatory approvals and the eventual closing date are observable gates.

The company has a second distribution path through exchanges. Binance made a $100 million equity investment and agreed to a five-year commercial arrangement in September. Its stated goal is to promote and integrate USDC across its platform, especially in emerging markets. Exchange access can deepen liquidity for users buying or selling the coin, but the agreement does not identify a corresponding list of licensed local bank payouts. The reported $100 million investment therefore belongs beside the payment plan without being counted as a new payout corridor.

Exchange distribution and payment use carry different evidence The strongest case for Circle’s expansion is that the necessary pieces are already being assembled. Circle issues a widely traded dollar token, reports substantial reserve assets, operates a network with enrolled financial institutions, and has named bank and payment partners. Tazapay says a majority of its current transaction volume involves stablecoins. Binance has a large international user base and a five-year incentive to make USDC more visible. Each fact supports the feasibility of expansion, even before the company names all 40 places.

The opposing case is about classification and timing, not whether those businesses exist. A token available through an exchange is not a locally regulated payment product. A partner’s coverage can exceed the markets where USDC is the actual funding instrument. A planned acquisition can have a different closing date from a planned market entry. A disclosed annualized run rate can change in the following month. Investors and merchants looking for commercial traction need dated payment evidence for the specific routes under discussion.

Binance and Circle’s company announcement describes equity purchased through a private placement and restrictions on share transfers. It does not commit to a public country-by-country minimum in USDC transactions. The financial investment and commercial contract are related but separate instruments; neither confirms that a consumer in one of the 40 proposed markets can redeem directly with Circle.

There are constraints on the issuer side as well. Circle’s October 12 reserve disclosure showed $72.7 billion of USDC outstanding against $73.0 billion of reserves. It reported $8.6 billion issued and $10.1 billion redeemed over the preceding seven days, a net change of negative $1.5 billion. The date is essential because both circulation and redemption totals move. These figures establish the scale of the existing coin and reserve reporting, not the value transferred to the 40 prospective destinations.

The original arithmetic is straightforward: $10.1 billion redeemed minus $8.6 billion issued equals $1.5 billion more redemptions than issuance during the seven-day window. That movement can coexist with plans to enter new countries. It should not be read as a country-specific verdict because the reserve page does not assign issuance or redemption to individual markets, platforms or payment uses.

Licenses determine who can offer which service Different legal permissions attach to issuance, custody, transfer and local payouts. In the European Union, USDC received the European Banking Authority’s first significant e-money token designation. From November 12, the EBA will directly supervise specified matters including own funds, reserves, liquidity and recovery and redemption plans, while the French authority retains duties in areas such as governance and outsourcing. The European classification changes supervisory responsibilities for an existing token. It does not itself authorize Circle to open 40 new countries.

JUST IN: Circle’s $USDC becomes the EU’s first “significant” e-money token under MiCA

Starting Nov. 12, 2026, the European Banking Authority will directly supervise USDC’s reserves, liquidity and redemption plans, following its assessment under the EU’s crypto rules. pic.twitter.com/5tYj6K4Enn

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) October 15, 2026 The EBA says 45 e-money tokens had been notified under MiCA when it made the decision. USDC was the first it classified as significant. Circle’s European issuance sits with its French company, whereas the U.S. issuance sits with a different legal entity. A merchant or institution examining redemption rights needs to know which issuer and intermediaries are involved. A token ticker alone is an incomplete map of those obligations.

Circle has argued for changes to European stablecoin reserve rules, saying only three of the world’s 30 largest stablecoins met MiCA requirements at the beginning of October. Its position illustrates that a firm can be authorized in a major market and still dispute the design of the applicable rules. In prior comments on MiCA reserves, Circle called for more flexibility in the assets and deposits used to back tokens. The EBA designation does not decide that policy debate.

The U.S. national trust bank charter is another category. Circle received final approval for a trust bank in July, allowing federally supervised custody and related trust functions. The charter does not transform a USDC balance into an insured bank deposit. The trust bank approval matters to institutional infrastructure and reserve management, while local payment service permissions remain separate questions in each destination.

The revenue case depends on use, rates and counterparties USDC circulation generates reserve income for Circle when the backing assets earn interest, subject to arrangements with distribution partners and costs. The second-quarter company results showed $668 million of reserve income, up 5% from a year earlier, while average USDC circulation rose 25%; Circle attributed the slower income growth partly to a 66-basis-point decline in its reserve return rate. Those numbers show why a larger coin balance does not translate mechanically into the same percentage of revenue growth.

Other revenue was $34 million for the quarter, up 41%, and included subscription and service businesses. Payment infrastructure could grow that category, but the current filing does not assign a forecast of fees to the 40-market ambition. Distribution contracts may create costs as well as demand. Circle reported $412 million in distribution, transaction and other costs for the quarter. A commercial agreement that raises USDC use can benefit a partner and require Circle to share economic returns.

Reserve income is tied to outstanding balances over time. A cross-border payment that uses USDC for minutes can create substantial transfer volume while adding little average token balance. A recipient who keeps the digital dollars for months has a different balance-sheet effect. One needs cohort and holding-time data to translate payment growth into reserve income. The company has not published those figures for the planned markets.

The operational question differs from the token price question. USDC seeks to be worth one dollar; the variable here is who earns fees, which users can redeem, and whether the payout chain offers a practical improvement. Comparing a week of token issuance with an annualized payment run rate would mix stocks, flows and periods. Circle’s financial disclosures can establish the baseline; corridor-level results would establish whether the new strategy is working.

The quarter’s reported $701 million in total revenue and reserve income can be decomposed from the company’s figures into $668 million in reserve income and $34 million in other revenue, with the one-million-dollar difference due to rounded line items. The composition illustrates a business still heavily tied to income earned on reserve assets. It would be unsound to assign all the planned market expansion to the smaller services category, since payments can increase outstanding USDC balances and distribution costs at the same time. Circle has not published market-specific contribution margins for the proposed rollout.

Payment growth could instead produce very different outcomes across corridors. A business treasury moving USDC to another institutional account may retain a token balance for a longer period. A remittance company that acquires USDC and immediately sells it to fund a local bank transfer may leave a smaller end-of-day balance. An exchange listing can generate repeated trading of the same outstanding tokens. None of these outcomes can be reconstructed from gross onchain transfer totals alone. The accounting question for a feature is how much new average circulation and fee revenue survive after local liquidity providers and exchange partners receive their share.

Circle’s quarterly report supplies one other check on scale. It counted 175 institutions enrolled in its payment network, yet did not state that all 175 conducted transactions in the trailing 30 days used for the annualized volume figure. Dividing $14.7 billion by 175 would yield $84 million per enrolled institution per year only under an unsupported assumption that each member originated an equal share. The calculation is mathematically possible but commercially misleading, so the feature cannot use it as a measure of typical partner activity. An active-institution count and a distribution of volume by corridor would be more informative.

What the October announcement still leaves open Allaire’s description did not name the 40 countries or a deadline for reaching them. The September Tazapay release anticipates a 2027 closing, so any assumption that the acquisition supplies immediate October coverage would move a future event into the present. Existing network integrations and exchange availability do establish channels for USDC. They do not provide a public reconciliation of how many proposed markets have functioning local payouts today.

There is a strong argument for following the buildout even before every country is named. The existing network has identifiable partners and reported transaction volume; the token has substantial outstanding circulation; the company is spending equity and commercial resources to enlarge distribution. The proposition can be assessed against subsequent disclosures: named countries, eligible clients, local counterparties, transaction volumes and completed payouts. A press release that only expands a geographic total without those details would leave the original claim difficult to measure.

Currency conversion is one remaining uncertainty for the beneficiary. A successful onchain transfer can deliver USDC to a receiving institution in seconds while a bank payout waits for a domestic batch, a compliance decision or liquidity in the recipient currency. A provider might guarantee its quoted exchange rate for a period or pass through changes before execution; those terms have to be read in the actual service agreement. Circle’s description of its India, Singapore and Philippines corridors names the local rails, but it does not provide a universal consumer rate or service guarantee for every institution using the network.

Eligibility is equally specific. The originator might be a licensed payment service provider rather than an individual sender. A destination bank might accept only business beneficiaries or require identity data that a wallet address alone cannot provide. An exchange user who can buy USDC in a country may still be unable to send a payout through a particular network partner. Circle’s regional demand narrative can coexist with those restrictions. A definitive map would state the customer class and recipient type for each route before attaching a country flag to it.

Nor does a partner’s market count establish uniform dollar access. Tazapay’s network covers more than 100 payout markets, according to Circle, while its local bank integrations and permitted transaction structures vary by destination. If Circle later counts some of those markets toward its new 40, the distinction between acquired reach and newly built reach should appear in the company’s reporting. The September acquisition statement gives a closing target and footprint but no allocation of markets to the October plan. Counting the same country under an exchange listing, a pending purchase and a live payout corridor three times would inflate progress without adding a single recipient.

On September 8, Circle said its Tazapay transaction was expected to close in 2027 following customary conditions and approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The company had not identified the prospective 40 markets in its October 16 interview.

What to watch Country list: A dated Circle disclosure naming the approximately 40 target markets and distinguishing planned from live service. Payout evidence: Named local partners, recipient currencies and completed commercial payments in each newly announced corridor. Acquisition closing: Singapore regulatory approval and completion of the Tazapay purchase, which Circle expects in 2027. Network reporting: Updated enrolled institution and transaction volume figures, with the measurement period and definition preserved. Redemption route: Published eligibility for direct minting and redemption, separately from exchange access and partner payouts. FAQ Which 40 countries is Circle entering? Circle’s October 16 interview described approximately 40 emerging and developing markets but did not publish their names. It identified Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East as regions of interest. A region is not a list of launched payment corridors.

Does USDC availability mean Circle offers local payouts? No. Circle says USDC is available in more than 185 countries, a different measure from a named banking route that delivers domestic currency. A user may hold or trade the coin without being eligible for direct redemption or a local payout product.

Has Circle completed its Tazapay acquisition? Circle signed an agreement in September to buy Tazapay for $400 million in stock. The company said it expected closing in 2027, subject to conditions and Singapore regulatory approval. Tazapay’s existing operations should not be counted as a completed acquisition.

How many markets does Tazapay cover? Circle’s acquisition announcement said Tazapay had payout rails spanning more than 100 markets and more than 60 banking and fintech partners. Coverage says nothing by itself about each market’s eligible customers or current USDC-funded transaction volume.

How large is Circle Payments Network? At June 30, Circle reported 175 enrolled financial institutions and a $14.7 billion annualized transaction rate based on the trailing 30 days. Enrollment and annualization do not measure an entire year of settled payments in the proposed 40 markets.

How much USDC was outstanding when Circle announced the plan? Circle’s October 12 reserve page showed $72.7 billion in circulation and $73.0 billion in reserves. The balances change with new issuance and redemption. They cannot identify the markets in which the coin was used.

Does Circle’s U.S. bank charter insure USDC holders? No. Circle’s national trust charter permits specified trust and custody functions; it does not turn a USDC holding into an insured deposit. Redemption rights and intermediaries still need to be checked for the relevant issuer and service.

What would demonstrate that the expansion is working? Named operating corridors, local counterparties, eligible client groups and dated completed payout volume would show commercial activity. Those details would let readers separate 40 prospective entries from functioning services. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.

Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Figures reflect regulatory filings and reporting available at the time of writing and change with each disclosure. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or asset. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of October 16, 2026.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

US stock market sees "Black Friday": Nasdaq falls more than 2%, AI-related stocks decline across the board.

According to BIT (bit.com) market data, the U.S. Nasdaq index’s decline widened to 2.36%, the S&P 500 fell 1.19%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.58%. Individual stocks posted losses: SPCX fell 2.24%, ORCL dropped 4.42%, GOOGL declined 2.27%, NVDA fell 0.95%, and TSLA dropped 2.97%. For other AI-related concept stocks: Optical module stocks: COHR fell 6.26%, LITE dropped 3.87%, AAOI declined 7.89%, NOK fell 2.51%, MRVL dropped 4.2%; Storage stocks: SKHY fell 6.13%, MU dropped 4.33%, SNDK declined 5.3%, WDC fell 5.16%, STX dropped 5.97%.

1 hours ago

The Nasdaq’s decline in US stocks widened to 2.2%, with the S&P 500 falling over 1%.

According to market data from BIT (bit.com), the Nasdaq extended its decline to 2.2%, the S&P 500 fell 1.11%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.54%.

1 hours ago

Bitcoin drops below $81,000, Ethereum falls below $2,400

According to HTX market data, Bitcoin has dropped below $81,000, with a current price of $80,936. Ethereum has fallen below $2,400, now priced at $2,397.

1 hours ago

US crypto-related stocks fell broadly, with Strategy (MSTR) dropping nearly 10%.

According to BIT (bit.com) market data, U.S. crypto-related stocks fell broadly, with individual declines as follows: Strategy (MSTR) down 9.9%, Strive (ASST) down 7.97%, SharpLink (SBET) down 6.46%, Bitmine (BMNR) down 6.87%, Bullish (BLSH) down 7.09%, Gemini (GEMI) down 4.90%, Circle (CRCL) down 5.65%, and Coinbase (COIN) down 4.5%.

1 hours ago

Trump: Oil prices will fall soon, and he hopes the Russia-Ukraine conflict will end.

US President Donald Trump delivered a recent speech on the Russia-Ukraine conflict and Middle East issues, stating: "I know some details of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and I will make them public at some point. I hope it ends. The Biden administration has done a lot of bad things on the Ukraine issue." When asked about inflation, Trump again claimed: "Oil prices will drop soon. Israel has provided very significant assistance to Saudi Arabia, and the Abraham Accords are once again a topic in Saudi Arabia." (Jinshi)

1 hours ago

Strategy (MSTR) shares extend losses to 9%

According to market data from BIT (bit.com), Strategy (MSTR)’s decline has widened to 9.08%, currently trading at $137.5. On the news front, MSCI plans to implement new rules that use operating asset ratios and multiple financial ratio tests to filter out companies whose asset structures and operational characteristics are closer to investment funds than traditional operating enterprises. Strategy, due to its extremely high proportion of Bitcoin assets, has been included in the observation list of potential exclusion candidates. The final affected list is expected to be announced on November 11. Market participants believe that if MSTR is removed from MSCI-related indices, passive funds tracking these indices will be forced to reduce their holdings of its stock, which may generate selling pressure worth billions of dollars and pose a challenge to its model of continuously acquiring Bitcoin through equity financing.

1 hours ago