Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

dYdX Labs Announces August Product Roadmap Update and Rebrand

3 Altcoins To Watch This Weekend | September 6 – 7

PANews reported on June 11th that Raydium, a decentralized exchange within the Solana ecosystem, announced that a vulnerability in its deprecated AMM V3 program resulted in the theft of approximately $1.34 million in assets from five inactive liquidity pools. Affected pools included trading pairs such as RAY-SOL, USDC-RAY, and SRM-SOL. Attackers stole approximately 150,000 RAY, 5,600 SOL, and nearly 900,000 USDC. Raydium stated that all losses will be covered by its treasury, and current users are unaffected. The AMM program was deprecated in 2021, and the vulnerability stemmed from insufficient validation of LP mint, allowing attackers to bypass expected ratio checks. Raydium's current mainnet program is unaffected and is undergoing a separate security review.

The Power of Crypto Wealth: How New Millionaires Are Redefining Global Giving

Crypto and money laundering: What you need to know

Two Major Crypto Hacks Kick Off June with Over $15 Million in Losses

Hero.io: A 2024 Guide to the AI-Powered Web3 Platform

AI agents can now access 0x Protocol's Swap API by paying $0.01 per request in USDC directly from their own wallets, with no API key required, via the HTTP 402 and x402 standard built with Alchemy AgentPay.

AI agents can now access 0x Protocol's Swap API by paying $0.01 per request in USDC from their own wallets, with no API key or account setup required. The integration, built with Alchemy AgentPay, runs on the HTTP 402 standard and extends the protocol's DeFi liquidity aggregation to autonomous software agents for the first time.

The mechanism follows the x402 protocol flow: an agent sends an HTTP request to the 0x endpoint, the server returns a 402 Payment Required response, the agent signs a USDC payment on-chain, and a proxy verifies the transaction before releasing swap data. Payment is accepted via x402 on Base and Solana, or via the Machine Payment Protocol (MPP), per the 0x thread on X Tuesday.

Why Agents Need ThisTraditional API access requires an account, a credit card, a key, and a billing cycle. None of those map cleanly to an autonomous process that may need to execute a single swap query before spinning down. The pay-per-request model lets an agent call the endpoint when it needs it and pay only for what it consumes, at $0.01 per call.

0x's Swap API aggregates liquidity across major DEX venues, making it one of the more practical data sources for any agent that needs onchain pricing or routing. Opening it to API-keyless access removes the setup step that would otherwise require human intervention before an agent can run.

Growing StackThe launch adds 0x to a stack of AI-agent payment infrastructure that has grown quickly since early June. AWS plugged Coinbase's x402 into CloudFront on June 19, letting any site behind Amazon's CDN charge agents per request in USDC. Coinbase for Agents launched standalone agent accounts on June 11. Mastercard's Agent Pay for Machines (AP4M) and Ripple's XRPL AI Starter Kit both launched June 10.

The x402 network has processed 75.41 million transactions totaling $24.24 million in volume over the past 30 days, per x402.org. 0x has not disclosed how many agent requests its Swap API has received since the feature launched, and the announcement includes no volume projections.

Crypto Investor Positions for Possible Altcoin Season with These 6 Tokens

What to Know:

BlackRock’s stance remains constructive: adoption curves, liquidity depth, and regulated rails underscore a long-term bet on Bitcoin, despite sluggish price movements. Institutional flows remain sticky, with IBIT’s rapid AUM ascent reinforcing the ‘allocators aren’t leaving’ narrative during macro turbulence. In sideways majors, capital is watching utility-first plays where tokens power real-world activity (content, payments, or AI), and not just emissions. SUBBD Token is a project that tokenizes content in the first AI agent creator platform that uses blockchain technology. The presale has currently raised over $1.3M. Bitcoin’s cooled off after ripping to six figures, and macro noise from Washington’s prolonged shutdown hasn’t helped risk appetite.

Yet the world’s largest asset manager (BlackRock) isn’t blinking. Instead, it frames Bitcoin as a long-duration, structural bet anchored by network adoption, deeper liquidity, and the slow erosion of legacy money systems.

That’s not the tone you hear during a flash dump, but the pitch you use when you’re allocating for years to come, not weeks.

And flows back it up. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) became the fastest U.S. ETF to surpass roughly $80B in assets and has since solidified its position at the top of the spot $BTC ETF stack.

Translation: despite choppier price action, institutions are still dollar-cost-averaging Bitcoin via regulated rails. And with the U.S. shutdown now trudging toward a resolution, the policy overhang looks more like a speed bump than a trend shift.

And over a week ago, BlackRock’s IBIT surpassed Coinbase’s Deribit platform and became the largest Bitcoin options venue in the world.

For traders watching risk rotations, that matters. When majors grind sideways but the strategic case remains intact, capital looks at early-stage projects with promising utility.

We’re talking about a bid on the best altcoins, and that’s where SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) is trying to earn attention: a content-and-AI play that leans into content tokenization and the creator commerce industry, with fan engagement mechanics.

SUBBD Token ($SUBBD): AI-Powered Creator Monetization & Access SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) isn’t just another presale pitch; it’s a creator toolkit built to do real work. The platform integrates AI assistants, voice cloning, and automated livestreaming into a single workflow, allowing you to script, produce, and publish with fewer tabs and fewer late nights.

Fans receive clean, token-gated access to premium drops and livestreams, while you set flexible pricing, bundles, and perks that align with how your audience engages.

On-platform mechanics keep the loop tight. Discounts on subscriptions, tipping, and pay-per-view unlocks let you experiment with revenue without rebuilding your stack.

Engagement feeds XP multipliers slot into raffles and simple games, turning passive viewers into committed members. You spend less time juggling calendars and more time shipping content: the AI helpers handle repetitive admin, so a larger share of each subscriber dollar lands where it should.

The payoff is practical: faster production cycles, smoother paywalls, and stickier communities that come back for access, not hype. In a market tired of promises, a platform that saves time and deepens fan relationships is the utility that travels in any cycle.

Plus, there’s a lot to look forward to, like strategic partnerships for marketing, enhanced AI image generation, the HoneyHive, and the release of the Creators mobile app.

In a market that’s increasingly allergic to vapor, this is the kind of utility-first framing that can still resonate even when $BTC cools off.

Visit the $SUBBD presale page to join.

Presale Is Burning Red-Hot with $1.3M Raised & 20% Fixed APY Presales live or die on incentives and clarity. In $SUBBD’s case, transparency is evident – over $1.3M has been raised so far, with the current stage pricing at $0.0569.

Staking is another hook: tokens staked during the sale earn a fixed 20% APY for the first year per the whitepaper, shifting to platform-benefit staking thereafter. That’s high, but as always, view it as an early-stage incentive to bootstrap participation rather than a permanent yield regime.

To join the presale, follow our $SUBBD buying guide. The presale accepts $USDT, $BNB, $ETH, $USDC, and fiat via a debit card.

If BlackRock’s steady-hand view maintains a constructive backdrop while $BTC fluctuates, presales with immediate product hooks, such as $SUBBD, have a cleaner path to narrative alignment.

➡️ Grab your $SUBBD now.

This article is informational only, not financial advice. Presales are high-risk; tokens may be illiquid and their values are volatile. Do your own research.

Authored by Aaron Walker, NewsBTC – https://www.newsbtc.com/news/blackrock-bullish-bitcoin-best-altcoins-like-subbd-token-soar/

7 Underrated Bear Market Signs That Smart Traders Catch Early

Binance Leverage will remove some trading pairs, including LSK/USDC and HEI/USDC.

PANews reported on May 11 that, according to an official announcement, Binance Leverage will remove the following leveraged trading pairs on May 15, 2026 at 14:00 (UTC+8):

Full margin leveraged trading pairs: LSK/USDC, HEI/USDC, GMX/USDC, BIGTIME/USDC, MAV/USDC; Isolated margin trading pairs: HEI/USDC, BIGTIME/USDC.Share to:

Author: PA一线

This content is for market information only and is not investment advice.

Follow PANews official accounts, navigate bull and bear markets together

Recommended Reading

Related Topics

Popular Articles

Industry News

Market Trends

Curated Readings

Subscribe

A new wallet withdraws 17,700 ETH from Binance, worth $28.58 million

PANews Newsflash5 minutes ago

OKX Announces Delisting of 5 Altcoins, Sparking Market Volatility

Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently offloaded billions in meme coins. This has brought back memories of how Buterin handled the Shiba Inu tokens that SHIB’s founder Ryoshi sent to him back in 2021. 

Ethereum Founder Offloads Billions Of Meme Coins On-chain analytics platform Onchain Lens revealed in an X post that the Ethereum founder had sold 150 billion PUPPIES for 28.58 ETH ($114,480) and 1 billion ERC20 for $13,889 USDC. These are tokens that Vitalik received for free, as meme coin teams and the community are known for sending coins to the Ethereum founder. 

This practice dates to as far back as 2021, when the Shiba Inu founder Ryoshi sent 500 trillion SHIB tokens, which represented half of the meme coin’s total supply. The Ethereum founder famously burned 450 trillion coins by sending them to a dead wallet, while he donated the remaining 50 trillion coins to help fight the COVID-19 pandemic at the time. 

Since then, Vitalik has adopted a similar approach for every meme coin he receives. The Ethereum founder usually sells these coins and then donates the proceeds to charity. He had mentioned last year that he would truly prefer if these coins were sent directly to charity. Vitalik further advised community members to consider setting up a DAO and getting community members directly involved in decision-making. 

The Ethereum founder added that the best thing for meme coins is if they can be maximally positive-sum for the world, and that it will be great to see moments when that actually happens. However, these transfers to Vitalik are often viewed as a means for these meme coins to increase their visibility. 

Vitalik’s move with the SHIB tokens undoubtedly contributed to putting Shiba Inu in the spotlight. He burned those tokens just as the meme coin went on its legendary run in 2021, reaching its current all-time high (ATH) of $0.00008845 in the process. 

A Peek Into Vitalik’s Public Wallet Arkham data shows that the Ethereum founder still has more meme coins in his pubic wallet, which he received from community members. His largest meme coin holding is currently Moodeng, which he holds 30 billion coins worth $518,000. Meanwhile, his largest crypto holding in value remains ETH. Vitalik holds 240,000 ETH worth just over $1 billion. 

The Ethereum founder regained his on-chain billionaire status following ETH’s break above $4,000 last month. ETH eventually reached a new ATH in the process, which caused Vitalik’s wealth to surge briefly. However, the largest altcoin is currently struggling to hold above the psychological $4,000 level amid the recent crypto market downtrend. 

At the time of writing, the Ethereum price is trading at around $4,200, up over 2% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

ETH trading at $4,181 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Medium, chart from Tradingview.com

June 10: On-chain investigator Specter has issued a security advisory flagging a potential exploit in an older liquidity pool of Solana’s DeFi protocol Raydium. The attacker stole approximately $1.34 million worth of assets—including USDC, RAY, and wSOL. The hacker then transferred the stolen funds to Ethereum via a bridge before depositing them into Tornado Cash to protect their privacy.

Relevant content

Preview: The U.S. May core PCE data will be released at 20:30 tonight, and is projected to hit its highest level since October 2023.

The Fed’s key inflation gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, will be released at 20:30 tonight, with markets expecting a sharp rise in May inflation that could reignite rate hike bets. The headline PCE year-over-year growth rate is projected to hit 4.1% in May, up from 3.8% in April and marking its highest level since 2023. Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, is forecast to rise to 3.4% year-over-year, up from 3.3% in April and its highest reading since October 2023. Core PCE has remained above the Fed’s 2% inflation target since 2021. The recent short-term inflation uptick was driven mainly by surging gasoline prices amid the Iran conflict in May. Oil prices have since edged lower following the signing of a peace deal between the U.S. and Iran, but core inflation has strengthened in tandem, indicating that price pressures are not solely tied to geopolitical oil shocks. Data from the CME FedWatch Tool shows that as of Wednesday, markets are pricing in a 34% probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in July. Aditya Bhave, U.S. economist at Bank of America Securities, noted that the recent inflation rebound stems in part from tariffs and one-off disruptions, but successive supply shocks have eroded the Fed’s patience, while deflationary room in the housing sector has largely been exhausted. Data shows that core PCE dipped to 2.6% in April, its lowest level since 2022, but annualized core PCE growth over the past three and six months has hovered near 3.8%.

4 minutes ago

SK Hynix plans to list on NASDAQ on July 10: A crypto whale opens 90% of its bullish positions in a single day, with all $21.27 million in long positions in unrealized profit.

According to Hyperinsight’s monitoring, SK Hynix officially announced its U.S. listing date today, targeting a July 10 debut on the NASDAQ. The company had previously disclosed a over $29 billion listing fundraising plan yesterday afternoon. Driven by listing optimism, SKHX surged 14% intraday, hitting $1930 at press time, with a daily trading volume of $407 million and open interest of $237 million. Since the news broke yesterday, 10 whales have built positions in SKHX on Hyperliquid, 9 of which opened long positions totaling around $21.27 million, at an average entry price of ~$1797.8 and average unweighted liquidation price of ~$1390.6. With price gains, all 9 long positions are now in unrealized profit. Market data shows that positions of over $1 million amount to roughly $140 million, with a long-short ratio (longs/shorts) of ~0.715. The average entry price for longs is ~$1672, while shorts average ~$1640. The nearest short liquidation threshold stands at $2149, just $200 away from the current price, mounting short-side pressure. -HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group, set it as admin (enable message sending permission) to auto-sync on-chain updates.

4 minutes ago

The "Retail vs. Wall Street" concept-linked token WEN continues its strong run, rising over 18% in after-hours trading.

According to Bitget market data, Wendy's (WEN) rallied 25.66% in the regular trading session, then climbed an extra 18.96% in after-hours trading, now changing hands at $9.35. Earlier reports noted that Serenity took to Twitter to mock the latest meme stock movement unfolding on Reddit's high-risk trading communities, targeting U.S. fast-food chain Wendy's. The Reddit community's meme warning reads: "If Wendy's goes bankrupt, we'll all be out of jobs, and after losing all our trading money, we'll have to work behind Wendy's trash cans." Serenity later clarified that they hold no positions, only found the activity amusing, and added they were unsure if the campaign would succeed. Wendy's holds a special cultural status on Reddit's WallStreetBets community; for years, "working behind Wendy's trash cans" has been a staple joke among retail investors mocking their trading losses.

4 minutes ago

Danske Bank: Federal Reserve may raise interest rates at least twice

Danske Bank senior analyst Kirstine Kundby-Nielsen and chief analyst Jens Peter Sorensen stated in a report that they expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to raise interest rates twice, in December 2026 and March 2027 respectively, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00%-4.25%. "However, we emphasize there is a risk that rate hikes could come earlier and that the number of hikes may exceed two," they said. The first Federal Reserve meeting led by Kevin Warsh sent a clear signal that the Fed is increasingly moving away from forward guidance surrounding future monetary policy decisions. "All signs indicate that (the Fed) is leaning toward having greater discretion in future policy decisions," the Danske Bank analysts added. Source: Jin10

4 minutes ago

SK Hynix's stock price rise widened to 15.4%, while Samsung Electronics gained 6.3%.

According to Bitget data, SK Hynix’s stock price gain has widened to 15.4%, with Samsung Electronics up 6.3%.

4 minutes ago

The entire cryptocurrency market is down across the board; funding rates indicate BTC remains in bearish territory, while ETH’s bullish sentiment is significantly stronger than BTC’s.

According to HTX market data, Bitcoin is currently trading at $61,684.51, down 1.88% in the past 24 hours; Ethereum is at $1,647.36, down 1.48% over the same period. Current funding rates on major centralized exchanges (CEXs) show a clear divergence between BTC and ETH: BTC rates across all platforms have fallen back into bearish territory, while ETH rates on most platforms remain above the neutral range, indicating significantly stronger bullish sentiment for ETH than BTC. BlockBeats Note: Funding rates are fees set by cryptocurrency trading platforms to maintain the balance between contract prices and underlying asset prices, typically applicable to perpetual contracts. They serve as a fund exchange mechanism between long and short traders; platforms do not collect these fees, instead using them to adjust the cost or return of traders holding contracts, so that contract prices stay close to the underlying asset prices. A funding rate of 0.01% is the benchmark. A rate above 0.01% indicates broad bullish market sentiment, while a rate below 0.005% signals widespread bearish sentiment.

4 minutes ago

Polkadot Aims to Unlock DeFi Potential With Native pUSD Stablecoin

TLDR The Polkadot community is currently voting on the proposal to launch a native stablecoin backed by DOT tokens. Bryan Chen, co-founder of Acala, introduced the pUSD stablecoin proposal to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC. The pUSD proposal has gained 74.6% support but requires 79.7% approval to pass in the ongoing referendum. Community members remain divided over Acala’s involvement in the pUSD project due to the failure of aUSD Gavin Wood outlines a broader vision for stablecoins within Polkadot, emphasizing the benefits of using pUSD for validator rewards. The Polkadot community is currently voting on a major proposal to launch a native stablecoin, pUSD. This stablecoin would be entirely backed by DOT tokens, the network’s native cryptocurrency. The proposal has sparked a heated debate, drawing strong opinions both in favor and against the initiative. At present, the vote is ongoing, and it could significantly influence the future of the Polkadot network.

Polkadot’s Push for a Native Stablecoin Bryan Chen, co-founder of Acala, introduced the proposal for pUSD. The plan suggests launching the stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub using the Honzon protocol. Honzon had previously been used in Acala’s aUSD project, which faced a failed launch due to an exploit. Despite the past failure, Chen has emphasized the importance of Polkadot having a decentralized stablecoin to reduce its reliance on USDT and USDC.

Chen stated, “A native stablecoin will prevent Polkadot from losing liquidity to other chains that already have one.” He believes pUSD can maintain the network’s strategic advantage in the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem. Although over 74.6% of the votes are in favor of the stablecoin, the measure requires 79.7% approval to pass. With over $5.6 million in DOT already committed to the vote, the outcome remains uncertain.

Acala’s Memories and Community Doubts Despite the potential benefits of a native stablecoin, memories of Acala’s previous failure have caused skepticism. The aUSD project’s collapse in 2022 due to an exploit left a lasting impact on the community. Some members argue that Acala should not be entrusted with launching another stablecoin, given the risks involved.

A group known as TheGlobedotters expressed concerns, urging that Acala’s involvement should be avoided. Others, like The White Rabbit, have said they could support the proposal if Acala were excluded from its development. They also call for strict governance safeguards before any stablecoin is deployed.

Gavin Wood Outlines the Broader Vision for Polkadot Polkadot’s founder, Gavin Wood, has also weighed in on the stablecoin debate. He outlined a broader strategy that includes both fully collateralized stablecoins like pUSD and more flexible “stable-ish” assets. Wood believes a multi-approach strategy is necessary to address Polkadot’s volatility issues while stabilizing the network’s validator rewards.

Wood suggested that validators could be paid in pUSD instead of volatile DOT, which would stabilize their income. He argued that such a move would attract institutional participants and enhance Polkadot’s long-term security. “A DOT-backed stablecoin like pUSD could be key to strengthening Polkadot’s position,” Wood added.

ONDO Flat on MetaMask Tokenized Securities Integration Following 37% Monthly Drop

Nick Sawinyh on 16 Mar 2026

Yearn Finance launched yvUSD on January 19, 2026. It’s a V3 cross-chain, cross-asset stablecoin vault, not a simple USDC-only vault, with zero management fees, zero performance fees, and two deposit modes. At the time of writing it runs nine active yield strategies, though that number is dynamic and managed by the vault operator. If you’ve been watching the stablecoin yield space this year, those numbers alone probably caught your attention. Zero fees on a yield aggregator is unusual. Strategies spanning lending, fixed income, and points farming is ambitious. And the two-mode system (unlocked vs. locked) is a design choice I haven’t seen done quite this cleanly before.

This article breaks down how the vault actually works, where the yield comes from, what the risks look like in practice, and how it stacks up against the alternatives. I’ve tried to write the kind of analysis I’d want to read before putting real money into this thing.

What yvUSD is, mechanically At the contract level, yvUSD is a Yearn V3 Allocator Vault. That means it’s an ERC-4626 compliant smart contract that accepts USDC deposits on Ethereum mainnet, mints shares proportional to your deposit, and then deploys that capital across a portfolio of yield-generating strategies spanning multiple stablecoins and chains. Yearn’s own announcement describes it as “a cross-chain, cross-asset vault for best in class stablecoin yield.” The deposit token is USDC, but the vault’s strategies convert into sUSDS, siUSD, and other stablecoin derivatives as part of normal operation.

ERC-4626 matters here because it’s become the standard interface for tokenized vaults in DeFi. Any protocol that supports 4626 can plug into yvUSD without custom integration work. Your shares are yield-bearing ERC-20 tokens, which means they’re transferable, composable, and can be used as collateral elsewhere if a lending market accepts them.

The V3 architecture is a big upgrade from Yearn’s V2 system. In V2, strategies were locked to a single vault in a one-to-one relationship. In V3, strategies are themselves standalone ERC-4626 compliant contracts, Yearn calls them “Tokenized Strategies.” Per Yearn’s V3 docs: “strategies are now fully ERC-4626 compliant, stand-alone vaults” that “can now be connected to many different vaults simultaneously and can also be deposited into directly by an end user.” This is a meaningful architectural change: strategies can serve multiple allocator vaults, and users can deposit into individual strategies directly if they want to bypass the allocator entirely.

The practical implication: yvUSD’s current strategies are modular. They can be added, removed, or rebalanced without migrating the entire vault. The Debt Allocator contract handles capital distribution across strategies based on target allocations set by the vault manager, and an on-chain APR Oracle helps inform those allocation decisions.

Vault specs as of March 13, 2026:

Asset: USDC (Ethereum mainnet, cross-chain via Circle’s CCTP) TVL: $3.02M Fees: 0% management, 0% performance Risk score: 3/5 (Yearn’s self-assessment) Contract: 0x696d02Db93291651ED510704c9b286841d506987 (per the Yearn UI vault page; note that yvUSD may use multiple contracts across its allocator and strategy architecture, always verify the address you’re interacting with on yearn.fi directly) The unlocked/locked design This is the architectural decision that distinguishes yvUSD from a standard Yearn vault. When you deposit, you choose between two modes.

Unlocked gives you withdrawal access at any time, subject to the vault’s liquidity buffer. At the time of writing, the displayed estimated APY is around 7.14%, but this number is a trailing estimate that fluctuates based on strategy performance, incentive programs, and capital allocation. The Yearn UI may show substantially different numbers depending on the calculation window (7-day, 30-day, inception). Don’t treat any displayed APY as a fixed rate. The vault ensures it always has enough capital parked in short-duration, liquid strategies (sUSDS, basic Morpho lending) so that unlocked depositors can exit without delay.

Locked imposes a 14-day cooldown period after you signal your intent to withdraw, followed by a 5-day window during which you can actually pull your funds. In exchange, the vault can deploy your capital into longer-duration positions that pay more, things like Pendle principal tokens with fixed maturities, deeper leverage loops on Morpho, and cross-chain L2 plays.

The idea borrows from a concept that InfiniFi (one of the protocols integrated into the vault) has been developing: depositor-directed duration matching. Traditional banks take deposits and invest them into long-duration assets while hoping everyone doesn’t withdraw at once. yvUSD instead lets depositors explicitly reveal their liquidity preferences, then builds the portfolio accordingly. Locked capital funds the higher-yield, longer-duration strategies. Unlocked capital stays in liquid backstops. The vault knows exactly how much of its capital has a 14-day minimum lockup, which means it can allocate with more precision than a vault that has to assume 100% of deposits might leave tomorrow.

It’s a clean tradeoff, and worth thinking through carefully. If you’re not sure you’ll need the money in the next three weeks, locked mode is strictly better. If there’s any chance you’ll need fast access, stay unlocked and accept the lower rate.

Active strategies: where the yield comes from Everything is published on-chain, and the DeBank bundle shows live positions in real time. The vault currently runs nine strategies (this count is dynamic and managed by the vault operator). Here’s the approximate allocation as of March 13, 2026.

Morpho Yearn OG USDC Compounder (28% allocation, ~3.81% APY) This is the vault’s largest single position and its most conservative strategy. It deposits USDC into Morpho Blue’s isolated lending markets, specifically into markets curated by Yearn’s own risk team.

Morpho Blue, for those unfamiliar, is a permissionless lending primitive that launched as an evolution of Morpho’s original peer-to-peer optimization layer. Each Morpho Blue market is an isolated pair (one collateral asset, one loan asset) with immutable parameters. Risk doesn’t bleed between markets the way it can in pooled protocols like Aave. The tradeoff is that you need to pick your markets carefully, or delegate that decision to a curator.

The 3.81% APY comes from borrower interest. It’s real yield in the most traditional DeFi sense: someone is paying to borrow USDC, and you’re earning a share of that interest. Conservative, predictable, and the risk profile is well-understood after years of lending protocol history.

USD3 Pendle PT Maxi (20% allocation, ~7.99% APY) This is where the vault’s yield starts to get interesting. The strategy buys Pendle Principal Tokens (PTs) denominated in USD3 at a discount to face value and holds them to maturity.

A quick primer on how Pendle PTs work. Pendle splits a yield-bearing asset into two tokens: a Principal Token (PT) that’s redeemable 1:1 for the underlying at maturity, and a Yield Token (YT) that captures all the variable yield until that date. If you buy PT at a discount before maturity, you’ve effectively locked in a fixed yield, the spread between your purchase price and the redemption value.

So if PT-USD3 trades at $0.96 with a 6-month maturity, buying it and holding to expiration gives you roughly 8% annualized. No variable rate risk, no dependency on borrow demand staying high. The yield is encoded in the purchase price.

The risk here is duration. If the vault needs to exit this position before maturity, it has to sell the PT on the open market, potentially at a loss if rates have moved against it. This is one of the key reasons the locked/unlocked design exists. Locked capital can ride PTs to maturity. Unlocked capital stays out of these positions (or the vault maintains enough liquid buffer to cover unlocked withdrawals regardless).

Pendle has become a dominant venue for this kind of fixed-income DeFi. According to CoinMarketCap’s Pendle analysis, stablecoins now account for roughly 83% of Pendle’s TVL. The protocol also transitioned from vePENDLE to a liquid staking model (sPENDLE) on January 20, 2026, replacing multi-year lock-ups with a 14-day withdrawal period and directing up to 80% of protocol revenue to PENDLE buybacks for sPENDLE holders.

InfiniFi sIUSD Morpho Looper (19% allocation, 0% base APY) This is the most unusual position in the vault, and the one that confuses people when they look at the strategy list. It shows 0% APY. Why would the vault put 19% of its capital into something earning zero?

The answer is points farming.

InfiniFi is a DeFi protocol that replicates fractional reserve banking on-chain. Users deposit USDC, mint iUSD receipt tokens, then choose between liquid staking (siUSD) or locked positions (liUSD) with different yield profiles. Per DefiLlama, InfiniFi holds roughly $170M in TVL, and Messari reports $175M. The protocol is heading toward a token generation event (TGE) expected in early-to-mid 2026.

The vault deposits into InfiniFi, receives siUSD, then loops that position through Morpho to amplify its exposure. The 0% base APY is accurate in that no interest is being paid right now. But InfiniFi Points are accruing on the position, with enhanced multipliers for the strategies involved. Pendle’s siUSD pools are offering up to 4.5x point multipliers on YT positions.

When InfiniFi’s TGE happens, Yearn will monetize the accumulated points, likely through their signature permissionless Dutch auction system or OTC deals, and funnel the proceeds back into the vault. Your price-per-share goes up, and the retroactive APY on this strategy could end up being substantial. Or it could be modest. Nobody knows what InfiniFi tokens will be worth at launch.

This is the speculative component of the vault, and you should be clear-eyed about it. About 19% of the vault’s capital is sitting in a position that earns nothing today, betting on future token value. Yearn has historically been good at monetizing these positions (they’ve been doing it since the Curve wars era), but it’s still a bet, not a guaranteed yield stream.

USDC to sUSDS Depositor (10% allocation, ~3.82% APY) This strategy converts USDC to USDS, Sky Protocol’s stablecoin, and deposits it into the Sky Savings Rate module, receiving sUSDS in return. USDS is positioned as the successor to DAI within the Sky ecosystem (formerly MakerDAO), with a 1:1 upgrade path from DAI to USDS. Both tokens still exist; DAI has not been retired or renamed, but USDS is where Sky Protocol is directing new development and integrations.

The Sky Savings Rate is funded by Sky Protocol’s revenue, which comes from crypto collateralized loans, U.S. Treasury bill investments, and liquidity provisioning into SparkLend. As of March 2026, sUSDS yields around 4% APY. Sky Frontier Foundation’s own press release from March 6, 2026 describes sUSDS as having “+$10 Billion in supply,” making it the largest yield-generating stablecoin by market cap. (Note: this $10B figure refers to total sUSDS tokens in circulation, not to be confused with the larger DAI/USDS base stablecoin supply.)

For the vault, sUSDS serves a dual purpose. It generates reliable baseline yield (Sky Protocol’s revenue model is diversified and has operated for years under its prior MakerDAO branding), and it’s highly liquid with no withdrawal constraints. This is part of the vault’s liquidity buffer, the safe money that ensures unlocked depositors can always exit.

The risk here is mostly stablecoin peg risk: USDS could theoretically depeg from the dollar, or the conversion path USDC to USDS could involve slippage. In practice, USDS has maintained its peg reliably through years of market stress as DAI, and the conversion path is well-established.

syrupUSDC/USDC Morpho Looper (10% allocation, 0% base APY) Similar to the InfiniFi strategy, this position earns 0% in direct interest but farms points from Maple Finance’s syrupUSDC program. It’s a leveraged lending position on Morpho that amplifies exposure to Maple’s rewards program.

Maple has been rebuilding after its 2022 credit crisis, and syrupUSDC represents their new institutional lending product. The points here are a bet on Maple’s token economics and the value of being early to their relaunched ecosystem.

Same logic as the InfiniFi position: no yield today, speculative upside tomorrow. Same honest assessment: it could pay off well, or it could amount to very little.

PT siUSD March Morpho Looper (6% allocation, ~10.8% APY) This is the highest-APY strategy in the vault. It buys Pendle PT-siUSD tokens (which mature March 26, 2026) and leverages the position through Morpho to amplify the fixed yield.

The base PT yield is attractive on its own, around 9% fixed according to InfiniFi’s Pendle V2 pool data. The Morpho loop borrows against the PT position to buy more PTs, stacking the fixed yield. If the PT yield is 9% and you can borrow USDC at 4%, the spread gets amplified through leverage.

The risk here is compounded: you have PT duration risk, Morpho liquidation risk if collateral ratios move unfavorably, and the underlying InfiniFi counterparty risk, all stacked. At only 6% of the vault, this is sized as a satellite position rather than a core holding, which seems appropriate given the risk stack.

Smaller allocations (remaining ~7%) Three additional strategies round out the portfolio. The exact compositions shift as the vault rebalances, but they generally involve smaller Morpho lending positions and additional PT exposures across different maturities. They provide diversification within the strategy mix without materially changing the overall risk profile.

Where the APY numbers actually come from Here’s the honest version of what to expect.

Sustainable baseline (unlocked): roughly 6-8% APY, estimated. This range is derived from the combination of Morpho lending (~3.8%), Pendle PT strategies (~8-10%), and sUSDS (~3.8%), blended across the portfolio. Even if every points program goes to zero, this baseline should hold because it’s driven by real borrow demand, fixed-income instruments, and protocol revenue. It already beats Aave’s 3-5% and Morpho direct lending’s 4-8% after their respective fee structures. But this is an estimate based on current allocations. It is not a guaranteed rate, and it will shift as strategies are rebalanced and market conditions change.

Points premium: highly variable. The InfiniFi and syrupUSDC strategies (about 29% of the vault combined) are currently earning zero direct yield. Their eventual contribution depends entirely on token launch valuations and Yearn’s monetization execution. In a good scenario, this could add several percentage points to the annualized return. In a disappointing scenario, it might add very little.

The 54.4% 30-day APY on the vault page is misleading. It includes temporary launch incentives and early points monetization events that won’t recur. If you’re making a deposit decision based on that number, recalibrate. Plan around 6-8% and treat anything above that as a bonus.

How Yearn monetizes points (and why it matters that you don’t have to) This is one of the smartest parts of the design, and it’s worth understanding.

When you deposit into yvUSD, all points and reward tokens accrue to the vault’s contract address, not to your wallet. You never claim anything. You never pay gas to harvest. You never have to research which airdrop campaigns are running or track eligibility criteria.

When a points program converts to tokens (at TGE or during a liquidity event), Yearn’s system handles monetization. They typically use one of two mechanisms: OTC deals with market makers who want early token access, or their permissionless Dutch auction system where tokens are sold on-chain in a declining-price auction until clearing.

The proceeds flow back into the vault as additional USDC. Your share of that USDC shows up as an increase in the vault’s price-per-share (PPS). From your perspective, your yvUSD tokens are simply worth more when you redeem them.

The tradeoff is real, though. If InfiniFi’s token launches and immediately does a 50x, you don’t capture that upside, because Yearn sold the tokens at whatever price cleared the auction. You traded potential token moonshot exposure for guaranteed passivity. For most people holding stablecoins, that’s the right tradeoff. But if you’re the type who wants to hold and time individual airdrops, yvUSD isn’t designed for you.

Risk analysis Yearn rates yvUSD at 3/5 on their internal risk scale. That’s an honest number, not a conservative one. Here’s what’s driving it.

Smart contract risk: medium-high Multiple strategies (nine at the time of writing, subject to change) means a large set of smart contracts interacting with the vault. Each strategy interfaces with at least one external protocol (Morpho, Pendle, InfiniFi, Sky). The total smart contract surface area is large. Yearn’s V3 codebase has been audited and has processed hundreds of millions in TVL across other vaults, but the specific strategies in yvUSD are newer and less battle-tested.

A bug in any single strategy could result in losses to the portion of capital deployed there. Yearn’s architecture does provide some containment, since strategies can be revoked and capital recalled if issues are detected, but forced revocation during an exploit can still crystallize losses.

Leverage risk: present The Morpho looper strategies (InfiniFi looper, syrupUSDC looper, PT siUSD looper) use leverage. They borrow against their positions to amplify exposure. In normal markets, this amplifies yield. In stressed markets, it amplifies losses and can trigger liquidation.

Morpho’s isolated market design means a liquidation in one market doesn’t cascade into others, which is meaningfully better than pooled alternatives. But if a borrowed position hits its LLTV (Liquidation Loan-to-Value) threshold at oracle prices, the collateral gets sold. For looped positions, this can unwind rapidly.

Duration risk: present (especially in locked mode) Pendle PT strategies have fixed maturities. The USD3 Maxi position and the PT siUSD looper are both committed to specific expiry dates. If conditions change and the vault needs to exit early, it has to sell at market prices, which may be unfavorable.

The locked/unlocked design mitigates this significantly. Locked capital is deployed into duration-sensitive strategies with the explicit understanding that it won’t be withdrawn for at least 14 days. Unlocked capital avoids these positions. But if a large amount of unlocked capital tries to exit simultaneously and the liquid buffer is insufficient, there could be withdrawal delays.

Counterparty risk: moderate The vault depends on InfiniFi, Sky Protocol, Pendle, and Morpho functioning correctly. Each of these is a separate protocol with its own governance, codebase, and risk profile.

InfiniFi, in particular, is the youngest and least proven of the group. It has roughly $170M TVL per DefiLlama and a pre-TGE token, meaning its incentive structures are still evolving. Sky Protocol (the rebranded MakerDAO ecosystem) is at the opposite end of the spectrum, one of the most established DeFi protocols in existence.

Bridge risk: low Cross-chain activity uses Circle’s CCTP (Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol), which burns and mints native USDC rather than relying on wrapped tokens or bridges with independent validator sets. CCTP is widely regarded as the safest cross-chain mechanism for stablecoins, since it leverages Circle’s own attestation network. The risk isn’t zero (Circle is a centralized entity), but it’s meaningfully lower than most bridge alternatives.

Competitive landscape   Aave V3 Morpho direct yvUSD (unlocked) yvUSD (locked) Expected APY 3-5% 4-8% 6-8% sustainable Higher (not disclosed) Fees Variable Curator-dependent 0% / 0% 0% / 0% Withdrawal Instant Instant Instant (with buffer) 14-day cooldown Smart contract risk Very low Low-medium Medium-high Medium-high Leverage exposure None None Yes (partial) Yes (more) Effort required None Low None None Points/airdrop exposure None Possible (via curator) Yes (passive) Yes (passive) Aave remains the obvious choice if you want the simplest, most proven option. Five years of operation, enormous TVL, instant withdrawals. The yield reflects that safety, you’re paying for simplicity with lower returns. Currently around 3-5% on USDC after the protocol’s fee cut.

Morpho direct lending (via curated MetaMorpho vaults) gives you 4-8% with more granular risk selection. You choose which vault, which curator, which risk profile. The recent Telegram integration and institutional partnerships suggest Morpho’s distribution is expanding, which should sustain borrow demand. But you’re trusting a curator’s allocation decisions, and the newer isolated markets have a shorter track record.

yvUSD sits at the higher end of both yield and complexity. The 6-8% sustainable baseline comes from combining multiple yield sources that individually would be accessible but tedious to manage. The zero-fee structure means every basis point of yield goes to depositors, which is rare for an aggregator. Yearn’s V2 vaults charged 2% management and 20% performance fees. The V3 yvUSD vault charges nothing.

The competitive question is whether the additional 2-4% yield over Aave justifies the additional risk surface. For someone sitting on stablecoins they don’t need for three months, I think the answer is probably yes, especially in unlocked mode where you retain withdrawal flexibility. For someone who can’t tolerate any smart contract risk beyond the most battle-tested protocols, Aave is still the right call.

Projected returns on $100K Assuming daily compounding:

Timeframe Conservative 7% APY Boosted ~40% APY (temporary) 1 month ~$583 ~$3,300 3 months ~$1,750 ~$10,000 6 months ~$3,500 ~$20,000 12 months ~$7,000 N/A (won’t persist) The 7% column is your planning number. The boosted column is useful for understanding what the first few weeks or months might look like while incentive programs are active, but don’t build a financial plan around it.

Getting started Navigate to yearn.fi/v3/1/0x696d02Db93291651ED510704c9b286841d506987 Connect your wallet Choose unlocked or locked mode Deposit USDC and receive yvUSD shares There is no step 5. No claiming, no harvesting, no rebalancing. Your PPS increases as the vault accrues yield. To monitor positions: DeBank transparency bundle

What’s next: yvBTC Yearn has signaled that yvBTC is coming, following the same zero-fee, cross-chain, delta-neutral philosophy applied to Bitcoin. If yvUSD proves the model works for stablecoins, yvBTC would extend it to the most held crypto asset. Worth watching, though no timeline has been confirmed.

Where I land yvUSD is a well-designed product for a specific user: someone holding USDC who wants more than money-market rates, doesn’t want to actively manage positions across five different protocols, and is comfortable with a 3/5 risk profile in exchange for 6-8% passive yield.

The zero-fee structure is the detail that moves it from “interesting” to “worth seriously considering.” In most yield aggregators, fees eat 20% or more of your returns. Here, every basis point goes to depositors. That’s a meaningful edge over time.

The risk is real. Multiple strategies, leverage in the mix, points bets on pre-TGE tokens, duration exposure in Pendle PTs. None of this is Aave-simple, and the vault page doesn’t hide that (the 3/5 self-rating is refreshingly honest). But the risks are transparent, verifiable on-chain, and sized proportionally within the portfolio. The conservative core (Morpho lending + sUSDS) accounts for nearly 40% of the vault. The speculative tail (points farming) accounts for about 29%. The fixed-income middle (Pendle PTs) fills the rest.

If you’re comfortable with that structure, deposit what you can afford to have illiquid for a couple of weeks in the worst case. Start with unlocked mode if you’re cautious. And check the DeBank bundle periodically to verify the vault’s positions match what’s described here, because in DeFi, the ability to verify is the whole point.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct your own research and understand the risks before making any investment decisions.

Top 3 Crypto Airdrops For The Fourth Week of April

NEAR Protocol DeFi Hub Rhea Finance Loses $7.6 Million in Oracle Exploit

New $FUN/USDC Pair Goes Live on MEXC With Zero Fees

TLDR: Angle Protocol’s AIP-112 vote approved an orderly wind down of both EURA and USDA stablecoins. EURA and USDA holders can redeem tokens 1:1 for EURC and USDC until March 1, 2027, on Ethereum. Remaining reserves after redemption will be airdropped pro-rata to eligible Ethereum-based holders. The Angle team now operates Merkl, a leading DeFi incentive platform, as their primary focus.
Angle Protocol is officially winding down its EURA and USDA stablecoins following a community governance vote. The decision, passed under AIP-112, brings the decentralized stablecoin project to a close.

Holders of both tokens have a structured, two-year window to recover their funds at full value. The team now focuses on Merkl, a DeFi incentive platform, as its next major project. Acting quickly remains the most important step for all current holders.

What Holders Need to Know About the Redemption Period The wind-down plan begins with a one-year redemption period running until March 1, 2027. During this time, EURA holders can redeem their tokens 1:1 for EURC on Ethereum.

USDA holders can redeem 1:1 for USDC through the Angle Transmuter on the Angle App. Holders on other chains must bridge their funds back to Ethereum before initiating any swap.

Angle Protocol has been clear about what happens if holders miss this window. After March 1, 2027, the protocol will cease active operations entirely.

Both EURA and USDA are expected to depeg once the redemption mechanism is turned off. Taking action well before the deadline is the safest course for current token holders.

VaultManager position holders are included in the redemption plan as well. They can close their positions and recover collateral during the active period.

All actions must be completed through the Angle App on Ethereum. No other platforms or channels have been announced for these transactions.

The team confirmed the decision through their official channel, noting: “the Angle community has voted in favor of an orderly wind down of the EURA and USDA stablecoins (AIP-112).” This confirms the move was driven by formal governance, not a unilateral team decision.

Final Settlement and the Extended Claim Window After the redemption period ends, the protocol moves into Phase 2 for final settlement. The guardian multisig will recover all reserves remaining within the protocol at that stage.

Those reserves will then be distributed pro-rata to the EURA and USDA holders still on Ethereum. Only holders who have bridged back to Ethereum before this stage will qualify for the distribution.

The airdrop will be executed and distributed through Merkl, the incentive platform run by the Angle team. After the airdrop goes live, recipients will have one additional year to claim their EURC or USDC.

Claims can be made directly through the Merkl platform during this period. Together, both phases create a total two-year window for holders to recover funds.

The reasoning behind the wind-down traces back to declining activity on Angle Protocol stablecoins over time. The team noted that yield-bearing stablecoins now exist natively across vaults and lending protocols available everywhere.

Running dedicated infrastructure for a shrinking user base creates unnecessary smart contract risk. Operational overhead with little benefit to a diminishing community was another factor in the decision.

The Angle team now builds Merkl full-time and encourages the community to follow that project. Holders are advised to act early and not delay until deadlines approach.

Curators may now create custom lending markets by using this distinctive, institutional-grade lending infrastructure . Over the course of seven months, Gearbox users have created $2.8 billion in trading volume across Ethereum DEXs. Gearbox Protocol, which has a USDC vault curated by Re7 Labs, has debuted on Etherlink. The deployment uses treasury-backed tokens like mTBILL, mBASIS, and mRe7YIELD to provide institutional-grade strategies to the Tezos Layer 2.

As DeFi’s credit layer, Gearbox links customers looking for composable leverage across return-generating options with passive liquidity providers. Curators may now create custom lending markets by using this distinctive, institutional-grade lending infrastructure thanks to the introduction of permissionless.

“We’ve been looking for the right L2 to expand Gearbox Permissionless, and Etherlink’s performance metrics and ecosystem convinced us,” said Mikhail Lazarev, Founder and CTO at Gearbox Protocol. “When you can get soft confirmations in under 500ms with fees that are negligible, combined with well-known DeFi protocols, it opens up entirely new possibilities for capital efficiency in leveraged strategies.”

As a vault curator, Re7 Labs contributes substantial experience, overseeing more than 700 million TVL over more than 100 pools on 14 blockchains. Re7, one of the leading DeFi curators in the world, uses unique risk management frameworks to generate profits. In order to increase underlying returns while upholding cautious risk criteria, the vault technique loops return-bearing tokens against USDC.

Evgeny Gokhberg, Managing Partner at Re7 Capital, said: “Etherlink’s infrastructure and Gearbox’s credit layer give us the ideal foundation to scale our strategies. We’re bringing institutional-grade yield to a new audience with the same discipline and risk management we apply across $1B+ in DeFi capital.”

Incentives from Apple Farm Season 2 and GEAR token payouts from the Gearbox DAO will also help the vault. Over the course of seven months, Gearbox users have created $2.8 billion in trading volume across Ethereum DEXs, and the protocol’s TVL increased by 230% to $400 million in H1 2025.

“Having Gearbox launch on Etherlink was a big win for us,” said Anthony Hayot, Head of DeFi Adoption at Nomadic Labs. “They bring serious institutional credibility, four years, zero hacks, $400 million TVL, and a product that will give real value to Etherlink users.”

For more over four years, Gearbox has had a perfect security record with no vulnerabilities or bad debt. The protocol operates under stringent governance mechanisms with 24-hour timelocks for vault parameter changes, and it has made large investments in audits by respectable firms.

Following the successful launch of Apple Farm Season 2 with over $3 million in incentives, the integration of Curve Finance to enable low-slippage stablecoin swaps, the launch of Liquid Bitcoin (LBTC) by Lombard Finance, and a 68.4% TVL increase in July that placed Etherlink among the fastest-rising Layer 2s, the Gearbox deployment comes after a period of significant momentum for Etherlink.

Through Credit Accounts and carefully chosen vaults overseen by knowledgeable asset managers, the decentralized credit layer known as Gearbox Protocol makes it possible to use composable leverage across DeFi possibilities.

A devoted content writer having 3 years of crypto trading experience. Loves cooking and swimming. Stays up to date with the latest developments on blockchain technology.

PANews reported on May 27th that the Resolv Foundation announced a comprehensive recovery path for the USR security incident on March 22nd . This incident resulted in illegally minted USR tokens entering the market, forcing the protocol to suspend operations and enter recovery mode. The recovery framework follows the protocol's design principles: USR acts as the priority layer, with RLPs acting as the secondary layer to absorb the losses. The recovery plan is differentiated by user category, covering direct holders of USR/wstUSR, LP positions, lending market users, RLP holders, USR Yield Maxi vaults, Pendle positions, and other structured products. Specifically, USR/wstUSR held before the incident will be exchanged for USDC at a 1:1 ratio, while USR/wstUSR acquired after the incident will be exchanged for USDC at a 1:0.5 ratio. The RLP reference price has been reset to 55% of the last reference price before the incident, meaning 1 RLP is exchanged for 0.71 USDC, plus 2.71 RESOLV tokens per RLP.

The foundation will allocate 10% of the total RESOLV token supply for recovery, with 70% distributed to affected RLP holders. Eligible users can claim recovery payments between May 26 and August 26. Simultaneously, Resolv launched a new business line, Vault Street, focusing on the distribution of tokenized real-world assets. Its first product, primeUSD (a leveraged RWA product), has entered private testing and is expected to be fully launched publicly in June.