Original source text
UNCX 披露 Smart Token Vesting V2 跨链攻击事件,涉损约 80.76 万美元 Live financial news intelligence
Track market-moving stories before they get noisy
Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 5 premium feeds.
Cryptocurrencies
BTC
10,643
ETH
6,835
XRP
5,267
SOL
4,383
HYPE
2,679
USDC
2,446
Commodities
GOLD
790
SILVER
404
OIL
123
PLATINUM
23
PALLADIUM
5
COPPER
3
- FMP Stock News 40s ago
- FMP Forex News 4m ago
- CoinGecko News 4m ago
- FIO Stock News 6m ago
- Patria Stock News 6m ago
- Editorial rewrite 40s ago
- Asset sync 13m ago
Latest coverage
Market News Feed
Scan headlines quickly, then expand any story for source context.
| Details | Date | Content | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Saved
2026-10-17 13:18
7d ago
Published
2026-10-17 12:36
7d ago
|
UNCX 披露 Smart Token Vesting V2 跨链攻击事件,涉损约 80.76 万美元 | CoinGecko News | |
|
|
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-17 13:18
7d ago
Published
2026-10-17 13:13
7d ago
|
UNCX discloses cross-chain attack on Smart Token Vesting V2, resulting in approximately $807,600 in losses. | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
The team behind Trump reaped $779 million to $1.16 billion in profits from crypto buyers, while the buyers have suffered 97% losses.CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju published a post noting that the team behind the TRUMP crypto token generated a profit of $779 million to $1.16 billion from token holders, while buyers of the token incurred a 97% loss. 19 minutes ago Shanghai Solana Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. has been registered, with Du Yanjing, co-head of Solana China, serving as its legal representative. According to Qichacha, Shanghai Solana Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. was registered in June this year with a registered capital of 5 million yuan. Claire Du (Du Yanjing), co-head of Solana China, serves as its legal representative. Separately, Shanghai Yaokun Qiusuo Digital Technology Co., Ltd. was established in August this year with a registered capital of 10 million yuan, with Shanghai Solana Enterprise Management holding a 45% stake in the latter. Even Jiang (Jiang Yiwen), co-head of Solana Foundation’s China region, is chairman of Yaokun Qiusuo, while Du Yanjing acts as a director. Public information indicates Yaokun Qiusuo’s core business includes technical services, development, consulting, exchange, transfer and promotion; computer system services; information system integration services; information technology consulting; data processing services; internet data services; IoT technology services; wholesale of computer software, hardware and auxiliary equipment; information consulting services (excluding licensed services); enterprise management consulting; financial consulting; and conference and exhibition services (overseas exhibitions require approval from relevant authorities). It should be noted that "Solana" is a name adopted by a sole proprietorship, and there is currently no equity evidence linking the two companies to the Solana Foundation. This week, Solana team members shared photos announcing the opening of an office in Shanghai, China. 19 minutes ago Arthur Hayes: The so-called crypto quantum threat is "nonsense", users only need to focus on wallet management. In a recent interview with The Rollup, Arthur Hayes dismissed the so-called crypto quantum threat as "bullshit"—exaggerated and overblown, framing it as a known, manageable risk rather than a reason to sell assets. Hayes emphasized that effective protection hinges on wallet hygiene practices, such as avoiding address reuse and using updated signature types, noting that most risks are concentrated among users with poor address management. He does not view quantum computing as a current catalyst for panic or selling Bitcoin. 19 minutes ago Thai police arrested a Chinese fugitive wanted by China on suspicion of money laundering and crypto transactions in Bangkok. According to Thai media outlet Khaosod English, Thai immigration police recently arrested a 37-year-old Chinese national in Bangkok. The man is wanted by Chinese police on suspicion of involvement in a transnational criminal network and money laundering. Police said the criminal network in question involved transactions exceeding 500 million yuan (approximately 2.485 billion Thai baht). The suspect is alleged to have processed cryptocurrency and foreign exchange transactions for the criminal group via more than 133 accounts, and assisted members of the transnational criminal network in obtaining visas. Police added that the suspect evaded manhunts by falsifying residence registration documents, changing license plates, and altering vehicle appearances, before finally being apprehended at a luxury residence in Bangkok. Thai authorities will handle his overstay issues in accordance with the law and coordinate his deportation back to China for investigation. 19 minutes ago The case of Holograph’s illegal additional issuance of 1 billion tokens has opened in Paris, involving approximately $14 million. Holograph (HLG)’s 2024 illegal issuance of 1 billion tokens went to trial on October 16 in Paris, with the case involving approximately $14 million at the time. Among the three defendants, the main suspect is a Ukrainian former Holograph employee residing in France, accused of modifying token creation conditions to illegally mint 1 billion HLG, transferring them to a personal wallet, and moving the funds via multiple exchange accounts with accomplices. A lawyer for the Holograph Foundation told the court that the incident caused the project to lose client trust, has now come to a complete halt, and the foundation is preparing for liquidation. 19 minutes ago Analysis: Crypto hackers, including those involved in the Ledger case, are actively using ZEC to transfer funds. According to crypto analyst Specter, since the Bitget attacker transferred stolen funds via Zcash’s privacy features, other stolen funds have also started flowing into ZEC, including funds from the Cryptobills Ledger incident and the $12 million Triple-A hack. 19 minutes ago |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-16 07:37
8d ago
Published
2026-10-16 03:29
9d ago
|
UNCX Vesting V2 Exploit Drains $1.49M Across Four Chains | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
Table of contentsUNCX Network’s Vesting V2 contracts were exploited for roughly $1.49 million across four blockchains, blockchain security firm Blockaid reported on October 15, 2026, after an initial $86,000 drain on Ethereum grew more than 17-fold as copycat wallets and trading bots joined the attack. The vesting platform, formerly known as Unicrypt, disclosed the incident in an official statement and said it is coordinating with law enforcement and SEAL 911 toward a recovery plan. UNCX lets crypto projects lock liquidity and schedule token vesting so team and investor allocations cannot be sold at once. Blockaid attributed the drain to an accounting flaw in the VestingManager contract, the shared pool that governs those schedules. How the Accounting Flaw Was Exploited The flaw involved how the contract tracked released and canceled vesting shares. Security researchers at ExVul, who examined the first Ethereum transaction, said the release() function reduced the global share total without removing released shares from a position’s recorded deposit, so a later cancellation deducted the same shares a second time. By creating vesting positions, releasing a large one, donating tokens back, and then canceling a topped-up position, the attacker produced a tiny leftover position that could withdraw tokens backing other users’ deposits. No private keys were compromised; the contract’s own bookkeeping enabled the drain. Scope and Containment Across Four Chains Blockaid put losses at roughly $969,000 on BNB Smart Chain, $242,000 on Ethereum, $169,000 on Robinhood Chain, and $114,000 on Base, across 11 drain transactions that included copycats and MEV bots. UNCX said the incident involves 10 tokens: pepecoin, EDGEN, ZC, X, LO0P, and PAAL on Ethereum; IMO on Base; BTCLE on BNB Chain; and CASHCAT and RKST on Robinhood Chain. UNCX said its liquidity lockers and legacy vesting contracts remain unaffected. To contain the exploit it raised flat fees above 1,000 ETH per new lock, removed paths that bypassed fees, and lifted token fees to the 5% contract maximum. About $3.25 million was still in the affected Ethereum contract when Blockaid identified the attack. What Happens Next No funds have been returned by the original attacker or copycats on any chain, UNCX said, and it advised against trading in affected pools until the respective token teams issue guidance. A comprehensive incident report covering technical findings, financials, and a proposed recovery plan is expected this week. The incident is the latest reminder that shared smart contracts, including token vesting infrastructure, can be drained without a wallet being breached, a risk examined in wider blockchain security coverage. AUTHOR Mysterious crypto writer with expertise in blockchain, offering deep insights that captivate and intrigue readers. With a unique ability to uncover hidden insights and trends, Samuel delivers in-depth analysis and thought-provoking content that keeps readers on the edge of their seats. His writing style is engaging and informative, blending technical knowledge with a sense of intrigue, making complex crypto topics accessible to both newcomers and seasoned industry professionals. Samuel’s work continues to capture the attention of the crypto community, solidifying his reputation as a trusted voice in the space. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-14 18:56
10d ago
Published
2026-10-14 16:38
10d ago
|
UNCX Network vesting pool exploited for $86,000, Blockaid reports | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
A shared token vesting pool run by UNCX Network was exploited on Ethereum, with roughly $86,000 in tokens pulled out in a single transaction, according to security firm Blockaid.The more uncomfortable number is the one left behind. The affected contract still held approximately $3.25 million in assets after the drain, and Blockaid flagged the attack as ongoing when it was detected. How the vesting pool exploit worked Blockaid reported the incident on October 14, 2026. The firm said one identified transaction took five different tokens out of the pool. The method relied on bending the contract’s own vesting logic. Per Blockaid, the attacker opened fresh vesting positions, released and donated tokens in a deliberate sequence, then canceled those positions. That cancellation step is where other people’s money walked out the door. The process let the attacker withdraw assets that other users had locked in the same pool. Blockaid made the exploiter addresses and a sample transaction public. That gives other security teams and onchain sleuths something concrete to trace, though publishing them does not, by itself, recover anything. UNCX’s track record and what was hit UNCX Network has operated since 2020 as a multi-chain platform for liquidity locking and token vesting. The protocol has reported over $164 million in total value locked since 2020 and more than 74,000 locks created. The exploit targeted a shared vesting pool, not the individual locks or the core liquidity features UNCX is best known for. That distinction matters for users trying to work out whether they are exposed. There was no immediate public response from the UNCX team at the time of Blockaid’s report. What this means for token teams and DeFi users The immediate concern is the approximately $3.25 million still sitting in the affected contract. If the attack path remained open, as Blockaid indicated it was at detection, the $86,000 drained so far may describe the opening act rather than the full bill. Projects that use UNCX for vesting should check which contract their tokens sit in. Individual locks and liquidity locks were not the reported target, but teams will want confirmation rather than assumptions. Five tokens were taken in the identified transaction. For smaller projects with thin liquidity, even a modest unscheduled release can weigh on price, though the effect would depend on each token’s market depth. The broader lesson is structural. Shared contracts trade isolation for convenience, and this incident shows the cost of that trade when the internal bookkeeping can be gamed. Create, release, donate, cancel: none of those actions sounds hostile on its own, which is exactly what made the sequence dangerous. The role of real-time monitoring also stands out. Blockaid caught the activity while it was still unfolding and published addresses and a transaction sample. What to watch next: whether UNCX issues a statement explaining the flaw, whether the remaining balance in the contract is secured or migrated, and whether affected projects receive any form of reimbursement. Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-14 18:56
10d ago
Published
2026-10-14 16:51
10d ago
|
Hacker Pulls $86,000 in Locked Tokens From a Shared Crypto Vault | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
A hacker drained about $86,000 from UNCX Network’s shared token vesting pool on Ethereum on Wednesday, taking tokens other projects had locked away. Security firm Blockaid said the attack was still running.UNCX, formerly UniCrypt, sells crypto projects a way to lock up their own tokens so insiders cannot sell early. Its contracts hold about $179.7 million across blockchains, with $111.4 million on Ethereum. How Did the Attacker Withdraw Tokens Belonging to Others?Blockaid said the loss came through a single draining transaction. Many projects’ locked tokens sit together in the same pool. The attacker first opened several vesting positions there. A vesting position is a slot that holds tokens and releases them on a set schedule. Next, the attacker released one large position and sent extra tokens into the pool. They then cancelled a position that had been topped up. That move left behind a tiny leftover position. According to Blockaid, that small slot could then withdraw tokens owned by other users. UNCX’s own guide describes vested tokens as time-locked in an audited contract. “cannot be sent, sold, added to liquidity or staked,” an excerpt in the guide reads. Blockaid named two exploiter wallets. Etherscan showed one of them holding about $5,874 across eight transactions. 🚨 Blockaid detected an ongoing exploit on @UNCX_token on ethereum. ~$86k drained from the shared vesting pool so far across 1 drain tx. Attack still ongoing. 🧵 — Blockaid (@blockaid_) October 14, 2026 Why an $86,000 Loss Still Matters for Small ProjectsUNCX had not posted a public statement on the UNCX exploit by publication time. The platform’s own token barely reacted. UNCX Network (UNCX) traded at $24.80, up 0.16% in 24 hours, according to BeInCrypto data. Its total market value stands near $905,000. UNCX Network (UNCX) Price Performance. Source: BeInCryptoSmall losses can still sink a project. Decentralized exchange Full Sail wound down after a hack that cost roughly $91,000 in August. Older contract code has also been hit. Notional Finance lost $1.73 million through an integer overflow bug in legacy contracts in September. Token lockers exist so buyers can check that insiders cannot dump supply. The open questions are which projects lost tokens and whether UNCX can halt the pool before further withdrawals. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-06-25 06:20
3mo ago
Published
2026-05-12 17:30
5mo ago
|
SkyFleetDash: The New Crypto Presale You Need to Know About in 2026 | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
A new crypto presale is opening its first public round on BNB Smart Chain with a CertiK-audited contract, a hardcoded 2% burn on every transfer, and a commitment to lock token allocations on Team Finance or UNCX Network at exchange listing — three structural commitments most 2026 presales still fail to make on day one.SkyFleetDash, the play-to-earn space-racing platform behind the SFDT token, has confirmed a three-round public presale ahead of its Q3 token generation event. It follows a closed private round that placed 17 million SFDT with strategic backers, and arrives with a finished smart contract, a completed audit, and a playable build already in front of press for hands-on review. What the SFDT Presale Actually Looks Like Table of Contents What the SFDT Presale Actually Looks LikeIs SkyFleetDash an Audited Project?What Is SkyFleetDash Beyond the Token?Why This Matters for the Best Crypto Presale 2026 Shortlist The SFDT presale is a three-round public sale priced at $0.05, $0.06, and $0.07, opening into a $0.10 public launch — early conviction is paid for, not promised. Round 1 opens at $0.05 per SFDT — a 50% discount to the $0.10 public launch price. Round 2 lifts to $0.06 (40% off), and Round 3 closes at $0.07 (30% off). Together the three rounds release 100 million SFDT — exactly 10% of the fixed 1 billion total supply — for a presale hard cap of $6.05 million, with another 10% reserved for the $0.10 public launch. Round Price Tokens Raise Round 1 $0.05 30,000,000 SFDT $1.50M Round 2 $0.06 35,000,000 SFDT $2.10M Round 3 $0.07 35,000,000 SFDT $2.45M Public launch $0.10 — — Per-wallet entry is capped at $25,000 with a $50 minimum. Round 1 accepts BEP-20 USDT only; additional payment options (BNB, BUSD) will be added in later rounds as the community grows. Presale allocations unlock 20% at TGE, with the remaining 80% released monthly across four months — fully vested five months after TGE. Round 1 opening will be announced by the community; Rounds 2 and 3 follow sequentially. Is SkyFleetDash an Audited Project? Yes, SkyFleetDash has completed a full CertiK smart-contract audit and holds CertiK team KYC verification. The audit report is publicly available on CertiK. The wider trust stack is unusually well-assembled for a project entering its first public round: Token locks — allocations will be secured on Team Finance or UNCX Network (industry-standard EVM locking platforms), with liquidity locked at exchange listing. The Reserve Fund sits in a 3-of-5 multisig, with milestone-gated releases and monthly transparency reports. The 2% burn tax is hardcoded into the SFDT smart contract — immutable, applied on every transfer, trade, and conversion. Quarterly burn events are planned on top of the per-transfer burn, with on-chain transaction hashes published each cycle for transparency. The official SFDT contract address will be published on skyfleetdash.com at TGE. Readers should verify the contract directly through the official site before sharing or interacting with it. What Is SkyFleetDash Beyond the Token? SkyFleetDash is a skill-based competitive spacecraft-racing platform built on a dual-token economy, with customizable spacecraft, player-built tracks, and NFT-tradable rare items. Players race customisable spacecraft across cosmic tracks, build and sell their own Sky Tracks, and convert race-earned GameCoin (the in-game currency) into SFDT through a KYC-gated conversion system. Tournament wagering is structured as skill-based competition, not gambling. A playable build is available at game.skyfleetdash.com for hands-on press review. Most space-themed crypto projects today are exploration sims or strategy games. SkyFleetDash’s differentiator is real-time competitive racing combined with a deflationary dual-token economy. Why This Matters for the Best Crypto Presale 2026 Shortlist Most new presales hitting the market in 2026 still arrive without an audit, without a credible token-locking commitment, and without a hard-capped public allocation. SkyFleetDash flips that default. At the $0.10 launch price, initial market cap lands at ~$13.5 million against a $100 million fully diluted valuation — a tight float by GameFi standards, with continuous deflationary pressure baked into every on-chain transfer. The presale itself is hard-capped at $6.05 million across 100 million SFDT, with no further minting permitted post-launch. For investors mapping the new crypto presale landscape ahead of Q3 TGE, SkyFleetDash is one of the few names entering public rounds with the audit and vesting structure already in place, and a clear locking commitment via Team Finance or UNCX at exchange listing. Learn more at skyfleetdash.com. The official contract address will be published on the site at TGE. Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-06-25 00:09
4mo ago
Published
2025-09-16 06:29
1yr ago
|
HELLO Labs returns with Season 2 of ‘Killer Whales’ on Global Platforms including APPLE TV and Amazon Prime | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
HELLO Labs returns with Season 2 of ‘Killer Whales’ on Global Platforms including APPLE TV and Amazon Prime |
|||
|
Saved
2026-06-25 00:09
4mo ago
Published
2025-10-15 06:19
1yr ago
|
Killer Whales’ Season 2 Brings Web3 to the Mainstream, Now Streaming on Amazon Prime and Apple TV | CoinGecko News | |
|
Original source text
Killer Whales’ Season 2 Brings Web3 to the Mainstream, Now Streaming on Amazon Prime and Apple TV |
|||