Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

The crypto market is rallying sharply despite interest rate hike expectations, with Bitcoin topping $79,000 and DeFi sector tokens leading gains in the altcoin market.

Chainlink falls below $12 as $26 million whale deposit hits Coinbase

Kalshi settles bets with a rulebook and a person applying it. Polymarket settles them with a token-holder vote. World settles them with a data feed, no panel, no dispute window, nobody to call. Three live models now, and each one fails differently.

Summary

World opened its standalone platform at world.xyz on September 9 to more than one million waitlisted users, after operating inside the Phantom wallet since the summer. More than 150,000 markets have been created across sports, crypto, politics, finance, economics, and culture, with the initial lineup covering every NFL regular-season game, seven soccer leagues, Formula 1, the 2026 midterms, and Federal Reserve policy decisions. Resolution runs through Chainlink Data Streams and the Chainlink Runtime Environment, with no human resolution panel, no token-holder vote, and no dispute window delaying payouts. The protocol is non-custodial, holds no customer funds, routes orders to liquidity providers on Solana, settles in CASH, and requires no brokerage account or exchange registration. The site went offline on launch day under traffic from the waitlist before returning. Every argument about prediction markets this year has been about who is allowed to run one. New York suing for billions. A dozen state gaming regulators issuing orders. Three California tribes at the Ninth Circuit. A bill to ban sports contracts outright.

Almost none of it touches the question that decides whether these things work at all: how does the market know who won?

Until this week there were two answers shipping in production. Kalshi settles with a rulebook, applied by a licensed operator with a regulator behind it. Polymarket settles with an optimistic oracle, where an outcome is proposed, challenged and, if contested, voted on by people holding a governance token.

On September 9, World shipped a third. Chainlink data feeds settle the contract automatically the moment the game ends. No panel. No vote. No dispute window. Nobody to appeal to, because the settlement is a program that already ran.

It launched to a waitlist of over a million people and took its own website down.

Worth understanding what that third model buys and what it gives up, because it is not obviously better or worse than the other two. It is differently broken, which is the only honest thing anyone can say about resolution mechanisms.

What World actually is None of the individual pieces is novel. The combination is.

World launched inside the Phantom wallet during the summer and opened a standalone site at world.xyz on September 9, extending access to a waitlist exceeding one million users. More than 150,000 markets have been created since the Phantom integration went live, spanning sports, crypto, politics, finance, economics, and culture.

The opening lineup is broad: every NFL regular-season game, seven soccer leagues, Formula 1 races, binary contracts on the 2026 United States midterm elections, and contracts on Federal Reserve policy decisions. Equity, commodity, and weather markets are planned.

JUST IN: Kalshi has raised roughly $1.12 billion via a private equity offering

About $380 million remains available under the same SEC notice after the prediction market platform’s earlier Series F at a $22 billion valuation pic.twitter.com/dg6mrk4XMb

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) August 27, 2026 Mechanically, each market issues yes and no contracts priced between zero and one dollar, and the verified outcome settles one side at a dollar. That is the standard binary event contract structure our guide to the instrument covers.

Three structural properties distinguish it. It is non-custodial: the protocol holds no customer funds, and assets move only when a user enters a market. Orders route to liquidity providers on Solana, not through an off-chain order book. And settlement is in CASH, the dollar-backed stablecoin used inside Phantom, with winning positions redeemed automatically in the wallet.

No brokerage account is required. No exchange registration is required. Users pay network fees to open and close positions.

The three resolution models Nobody has put the three side by side, so here they are.

Kalshi: rulebook resolution by a regulated operator. Contracts settle according to criteria published in advance, applied by an exchange holding designated contract market status. A named entity makes the determination, a federal regulator supervises it, and participants have a complaints path. Our guide to that licence sets out the obligations. The operator can correct errors, and the operator exercises discretion, which are the same property viewed from two angles.

Polymarket: optimistic oracle with token-holder voting. An outcome is proposed, a challenge window opens, disputes escalate to a vote by holders of the oracle’s governance token, and the result finalises on chain. Our guide to that mechanism explains the stages. Nobody can unilaterally decide an outcome, and nobody can correct one after finality, which is again the same property from two angles.

JUST IN: Polymarket World Cup Winner market closes at $4.3 billion

The volume on Polygon rails sets a new record as the largest onchain prediction market pic.twitter.com/bZnH86dOjR

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) July 29, 2026 World: automated data feeds with no dispute stage. Chainlink Data Streams supply the market data and the Chainlink Runtime Environment executes settlement once a game concludes or a defined event reaches its deadline. The published description is explicit that there is no human panel, no token-holder vote, and no dispute window delaying payouts.

The tradeoff runs consistently across all three and is worth stating as a principle. Every mechanism that removes discretion also removes correction. Kalshi can fix a mistake and can also make a discretionary call you dislike. Polymarket cannot make an arbitrary call and cannot fix one either, which is precisely the tension our guide to delisted and voided markets examines. World removes the most discretion of the three and therefore removes the most correction.

What automated settlement is good at Inside a specific range this design is clearly better than the alternatives, and the case deserves its strongest form.

Objective outcomes settle instantly. A football match ends with a score. A Bitcoin price at a stated timestamp is a number. A Federal Reserve rate decision is a published figure. For contracts resolving on unambiguous, machine-readable data, a dispute window is pure latency, delaying payout to accommodate an argument nobody will make. Automated resolution pays immediately, which is a real user benefit and the clearest competitive advantage the design has.

It removes the failure mode that has damaged the category most. Contested resolutions on the oracle-based venue have produced the most reputational damage prediction markets have suffered, because a market resolving against what most observers believed happened is the single thing that destroys confidence in a forecasting instrument. Removing the discretionary stage removes that possibility for contracts where the data is unambiguous.

And it scales. A resolution process requiring human attention constrains how many markets can exist. More than 150,000 markets created since the summer is a number that would be operationally impossible under rulebook administration, and it is achievable precisely because resolution costs nothing per market.

Polymarket has moved in the same direction for price-based markets, adopting oracle-based settlement where the data permits, which is confirmation that the design is correct for that category, not a criticism of World for adopting it.

What automated settlement is bad at The limits are just as specific, and they sit in exactly the markets people care about most.

Ambiguous events have no data feed. A contract on whether an official will resign, whether a conflict qualifies as a ceasefire, or whether a statement constitutes an endorsement cannot be settled by a price feed, because the disputed element is the definition and not the measurement. These are also disproportionately the markets people care about, which is why the oracle-based venue’s most contested resolutions have involved exactly this category.

Data feed failure has no remedy. If a feed reports incorrectly, reports late, or reports a value that does not reflect what happened, an automated system settles on it. With no dispute window there is no stage at which anyone can say the input was wrong before money moves. The integrity of the entire system rests on the integrity of the data source, and the participant has no mechanism to contest it.

Edge cases resolve mechanically. A postponed match, an abandoned race, a rescheduled announcement, a data source that stops publishing. Rulebooks handle these with voiding provisions. An automated system handles them according to whatever the contract specified in advance, and contracts cannot anticipate everything.

And there is nobody to appeal to. This is the practical consequence of the architecture. A participant who believes a market settled wrongly on Kalshi can complain to an exchange and to a regulator. On the oracle-based venue they can, in principle, participate in a dispute. On World, the settlement is the output of a program that already ran.

None of this makes the design wrong. It makes it correct for a specific class of contract and unsuitable for another, and the honest question is which class dominates the platform’s 150,000 markets.

The regulatory position Here is the part nobody covering the launch has touched.

World lists contracts on every NFL regular-season game, the 2026 United States midterm elections, and Federal Reserve policy decisions. Those are precisely the contract categories currently under attack in the United States. Our status page on the sector maps the fights: state gaming regulators contending that sports event contracts are wagers requiring state licensing, California tribes litigating under federal Indian gaming law, and a bipartisan bill that would prohibit sports contracts on regulated exchanges outright.

The venues fighting those battles hold federal licences. Kalshi is a designated contract market. Polymarket operates domestically through an exchange it acquired. Both submitted to registration, and both are being sued anyway.

World requires no brokerage account and no exchange registration, holds no customer funds, and routes orders to liquidity providers on a public blockchain. That is a structurally different posture, and it raises the question the coverage has not: what happens when a non-custodial protocol lists the same contracts the licensed venues are being sued over.

Two readings are available. The optimistic one is that a non-custodial protocol with no operator holding funds is genuinely outside the frameworks being applied to exchanges, which are built around intermediaries. The sceptical one is that the same argument was made by offshore venues before 2022 and produced a settlement and a geoblock, and that regulators reach operators of protocols when they can find them.

Nothing in the launch materials addresses geographic restriction, and that absence is the most significant unexamined fact about this launch.

Why Solana, and why now Solana is not an accident and neither is the timing.

Solana spent the year as the dominant venue for memecoin activity, and the network has been pushing into prediction markets as the next consumer application category. The Solana Foundation’s head of decentralised finance framed World as introducing a new asset class while keeping liquidity fully on chain, which is the strategic pitch: a network that captured speculative trading volume wants the next category of speculative trading volume.

Phantom’s role is the distribution mechanism. It is among the most used wallets on Solana, World operated inside it before going standalone, and settlement in CASH ties the product tightly to Phantom’s ecosystem. A million-person waitlist is what wallet-native distribution produces, and it is a channel neither licensed competitor has.

Chainlink’s position is the infrastructure play. The same Data Streams and Runtime Environment combination was adopted by another prediction market earlier in the year for automated creation, resolution, and settlement of crypto price markets, which suggests a standardising pattern instead of a bespoke integration.

So the launch is the intersection of three strategies: a network seeking its next consumer category, a wallet monetising distribution, and an oracle provider becoming the settlement layer for a market type. None of those three is primarily a bet on prediction markets being legal in the United States.

The market that breaks it Pick a real example and the limits stop being theoretical.

Take a contract on whether a ceasefire holds. The data feed needs a number, and there is no number. Somebody has to decide what counts as a violation, whether a single incident breaks it, whether a disputed report is credible. Kalshi’s rulebook answers this in advance, badly or well, and a person applies it. Polymarket’s oracle answers it through a challenge and a vote, slowly and sometimes contentiously. An automated feed cannot answer it at all, because the thing in dispute is the definition and a feed only measures.

Now take a contract on whether an official resigns by a date. Clean, until the official announces an intention to resign effective later, or is removed, or resigns and then withdraws it. Every one of those has happened in politics and each produces a different answer depending on wording nobody wrote carefully enough.

These are not edge cases. They are the markets that make prediction markets interesting, and they are also the markets that have generated every reputational disaster the category has suffered. The oracle-based venue’s worst moments have all involved exactly this kind of contract.

So World has two options with its 150,000 markets. Either the contested-definition contracts are a small fraction of the book, in which case the design fits and the reputational risk sits mostly with the competitors. Or they are not, and the first genuinely disputed settlement arrives with no mechanism at all for handling it, which is worse than either alternative, not better.

Which one is true is checkable from the market list, and it is the single most useful piece of due diligence available on this platform.

What the incumbents should be worried about Not the technology. The distribution.

Kalshi and Polymarket have both spent heavily on advertising, sports partnerships and corporate deals to acquire users. That is the normal cost of building a consumer financial product and it is enormous.

World got a million-person waitlist by existing inside a wallet people already had open. Phantom is among the most used wallets on Solana, World ran inside it before going standalone, and settlement happens in Phantom’s own stablecoin with winning positions landing back in the wallet automatically. No app to download, no account to open, no deposit to make, no identity check.

That is a distribution channel neither licensed competitor can replicate, and it did not cost a marketing budget. It cost an integration.

The uncomfortable part for the incumbents is that the thing making World’s distribution cheap is the same thing making its regulatory position ambiguous. No brokerage account means no onboarding friction and no registered intermediary. No identity check means faster signup and no way to screen prohibited participants, which is the entire surveillance apparatus the licensed venues built at considerable expense after the insider trading scandals.

So the competitive question is not whether automated settlement beats rulebook settlement. It is whether a product that skips registration, custody and identity can out-distribute products that did not skip them, and whether regulators reach it before the answer becomes obvious.

The category has run this experiment before, offshore, and it ended in a settlement and a geoblock. What is different this time is that the thing being regulated is a protocol on a public chain rather than a company with a bank account, and nobody has tested whether the old tools reach the new structure.

Chainlink is the real winner here Follow the infrastructure and a different story appears.

World runs on Chainlink Data Streams and the Chainlink Runtime Environment. Earlier this year another prediction market adopted the same combination to automate creation, resolution and settlement of crypto price markets, with stated plans to extend into stocks, commodities and other real-world assets. That is two venues on one stack in a single year, which is how a standard forms.

The position is worth understanding. An oracle provider that supplies price feeds is a utility, paid per call, substitutable if someone builds a cheaper one. An oracle provider that supplies settlement for an entire market category is something else: it becomes the arbiter of outcomes for every contract built on it, and switching costs rise with every market that depends on its determinations.

Polymarket runs its own oracle mechanism with a governance token attached. Kalshi has an exchange rulebook and a regulator. Both built their resolution layer in-house because resolution is the product. World rented it, which is faster and cheaper and means the most consequential function in the business belongs to someone else.

There is a market-structure question buried in that which nobody has asked. If prediction markets standardise on one settlement provider, the failure mode of the entire category becomes correlated. A rulebook venue and an oracle venue fail independently, because their resolution mechanisms have nothing in common. Two venues on the same data infrastructure do not.

None of which is a criticism of the technology, which by all accounts works. It is an observation about concentration, and it is the kind of thing that looks like efficiency right up until the moment it looks like systemic risk.

What this means if you are actually trading on it Practical, because the architecture changes what you should check before entering a position.

Read the resolution source, not the market title. On an automated venue this matters more than anywhere else, because there is no stage at which a human reconciles the title with the feed. If the market says one thing and the data source measures something slightly different, the data source wins and nobody reviews it.

Understand that settlement is final the moment it happens. No challenge window means no window. On a rulebook venue you can complain. On an oracle venue you can, in principle, dispute. Here the transaction has cleared and the funds have moved before anyone has formed an opinion about whether it was right.

Check what happens to postponed and abandoned events. Sports contracts are the bulk of the book and postponements are routine. A rulebook handles this with voiding provisions written by people who have seen it happen. An automated system does whatever the contract specified in advance, and you want to know what that is before a rain delay decides your position.

Size for the absence of recourse. This is the practical version of everything above. On a venue with no operator to appeal to and no regulator supervising the outcome, the correct position size is smaller than on a venue that has both. That is not a criticism of the design, it is what the design implies.

And know which entity you are dealing with. The protocol is non-custodial and holds no funds, which is good for counterparty risk. It also means there is no counterparty, and no counterparty means nobody to make you whole if something goes wrong that is not covered by the code.

The trade-off is the same one that runs through all of decentralised finance. You give up recourse and you get access, speed and no permission required. Whether that is a good trade depends entirely on how much you were going to need the recourse, and most people find out the answer at the worst possible time.

What to watch The composition of the 150,000 markets. How many resolve on unambiguous machine-readable data and how many on contested definitions. That ratio determines whether the resolution model fits the product.

The first contested settlement. Every prediction market eventually produces a resolution a large number of participants believe is wrong. With no dispute window, what happens next is the question the architecture has not been tested on.

Whether geographic restriction appears. Nothing in the launch materials addresses it, and the contracts listed are the ones under active litigation in the United States.

Whether the licensed venues adopt the same model. Polymarket has already moved toward oracle-based settlement for price markets. If rulebook resolution retreats to only the contracts that require judgment, the category will have converged on a hybrid.

Volume against markets created. More than 150,000 markets is a supply figure. How much of it trades is the demand figure, and only the second one matters.

Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. The legal status of event contracts varies by jurisdiction and is subject to active litigation, and availability of any platform depends on where you are. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any service. Information is accurate as of September 10, 2026.

What is World? A prediction market protocol on Solana that opened its standalone site at world.xyz on September 9 to more than one million waitlisted users, after operating inside the Phantom wallet since the summer. More than 150,000 markets have been created across sports, crypto, politics, finance, economics, and culture, with equity, commodity, and weather markets planned.

How does World resolve markets? Through Chainlink Data Streams and the Chainlink Runtime Environment, which supply market data and settle contracts automatically once a game ends or a defined event reaches its deadline. The design has no human resolution panel, no token-holder vote, and no dispute window delaying payouts.

How is that different from Polymarket and Kalshi? Three distinct models. Kalshi settles through an exchange rulebook administered by a regulated operator with a complaints path. Polymarket uses an optimistic oracle with proposal, challenge, and token-holder voting, finalised on chain. World removes both the human panel and the dispute stage entirely. Each mechanism that removes discretion also removes the ability to correct errors.

What are the advantages of automated resolution? Speed and scale for objective outcomes. A match score or a price at a timestamp needs no argument, so a dispute window is pure latency. It also removes the contested-resolution failure mode that has damaged the category most, and it makes 150,000 markets operationally possible because resolution costs nothing per market.

What are the risks? Ambiguous events have no data feed, and those are disproportionately the markets people care about. If a feed reports incorrectly or late, an automated system settles on it with no stage at which anyone can contest the input. Edge cases such as postponements or abandoned events resolve mechanically according to what the contract specified in advance. And there is no operator or regulator to appeal to.

Is World available in the United States? Nothing in the launch materials addresses geographic restriction, which is notable because the listed contracts include every NFL regular-season game, the 2026 midterms, and Federal Reserve decisions, all categories currently subject to litigation in the United States. The protocol requires no brokerage account or exchange registration and holds no customer funds.

What does it cost to use? Positions settle in CASH, the dollar-backed stablecoin used inside Phantom, with winning positions redeemed automatically in the wallet. Users pay Solana network fees to open and close positions. The protocol is non-custodial, so funds move only when a user enters a market.

Why did the site go offline at launch? Traffic. More than a million waitlisted users arrived at a standalone site on its first day and the platform briefly went down before returning. That is a capacity event rather than a protocol failure, since the settlement and custody layers run on chain independently of the website. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.

Three days after its debut on @Sunrise, the Solana-native version of $DOGE is sustaining real trading interest. The asset recorded $8.83M in 24-hour volume across 143,779 individual trades, and cumulative volume since listing has now reached $46.33M, with 15,047 unique on-chain holders.

How DOGE Arrived on Solana The integration is native rather than synthetic.

What the Numbers Show Activity has held up since. The $8.83M recorded in the most recent 24-hour window, spread across nearly 144,000 trades, suggests demand is not simply a launch-day spike.

With more than 15,000 unique holders already on-chain and cumulative volume approaching $50M, the early data points to genuine user uptake. Whether the momentum holds will likely depend on how deeply $DOGE embeds itself across Solana's lending, swapping and liquidity protocols in the weeks ahead.

Sources:
Crypto Briefing: Wormhole connects Dogecoin to Solana via Sunrise
AMBCrypto: Dogecoin goes live on Solana as volume hits $19M
COINOTAG: Sunrise Brings Dogecoin to Solana via Wormhole NTT

Jump Crypto’s Firedancer team is pulling the plug on Frankendancer, the hybrid Solana validator client that has been running on mainnet since September 2024. The cutoff comes when Alpenglow, Solana’s next major consensus upgrade, activates on mainnet in October 2026.

The move signals a clean break from the transitional architecture that helped bootstrap Firedancer’s presence on the network. With the full Firedancer client already live on mainnet since December 2025, the hybrid version has outlived its usefulness.

What Frankendancer actually was Frankendancer was exactly what it sounds like: a Frankensteined validator client stitched together from two different codebases. It paired Firedancer’s high-performance networking and block production components with the runtime and consensus layers from Agave, the other major Solana client maintained by Anza.

As of mid-to-late 2026, the combined stake represented by Firedancer-family clients (both the full version and Frankendancer) sits between 14% and 26% of total Solana stake. The full Firedancer client alone accounts for roughly 11% to 14% in recent snapshots, meaning a meaningful chunk of validators are still running the hybrid version.

Why Alpenglow changes everything The timing of Frankendancer’s retirement isn’t arbitrary. Alpenglow represents the most significant consensus-layer overhaul Solana has attempted, and it fundamentally changes how the network reaches agreement on transactions.

Currently, Solana uses a combination of Proof of History and Tower BFT for consensus. Alpenglow replaces both with a new protocol called Votor, which brings transaction finality down to approximately 150 milliseconds. For context, the current setup takes about 12.8 seconds to reach finality.

The upgrade is being spearheaded by the Anza team and will ship through Agave 4.3. Feature gates are expected to open in late September, with full activation following in October. Validators will need to upgrade during that window.

Because Alpenglow rewrites the consensus layer entirely, maintaining a hybrid client that depends on Agave’s old consensus code becomes impractical. The Frankendancer architecture, by definition, borrows its consensus from Agave. When that consensus mechanism gets replaced, the hybrid loses its foundation.

What this means for Solana’s validator ecosystem Validators currently running Frankendancer face a clear migration path: upgrade to full Firedancer or switch back to Agave before October.

Validators and stakers should watch the September feature gate timeline closely. The window between feature gates opening and full activation will be the critical period for ensuring a smooth transition, both away from Frankendancer and onto the new Alpenglow consensus.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Bitcoin rallied more than $3,000 after the CPI release, breaking above $79,000.

Per HTX market data, Bitcoin rallied more than $3,000 after the CPI release, breaking through the $79,000 threshold to currently trade at $79,301, with a 2.68% 24-hour gain. Earlier, it experienced a short-term pin dip to $76,046.

3 minutes ago

The crypto market is rallying sharply despite interest rate hike expectations, with Bitcoin topping $79,000 and DeFi sector tokens leading gains in the altcoin market.

Per HTX market data, after today's CPI release, the crypto market has rallied strongly following a sharp trading "pin" despite markets pricing in a nearly 90% chance of an interest rate hike next week. Bitcoin is now at $79,300, having rebounded more than $3,000; Ethereum broke above $2,600, surging 8.8% in 24 hours; SOL trades above $105, BNB above $740, ZEC above $1,200, and HYPE at $83.5. DeFi sector tokens are leading gains in the altcoin market, with Solana and Ethereum-based DeFi tokens posting the largest increases. Key gainers include: RAY up over 28% at $1.65, MET up over 23% at $0.266, LSK up over 20% at $0.131, MARSCOIN up over 19% at $0.134, THETA up over 18% at $0.203, DOGS up over 12% at $0.00000518, EIGEN up over 11% at $0.225, SYRUP up over 10% at $0.226, AERO up over 9% at $0.600, UNI up over 9% at $6.49, and NEAR up over 9% at $2.66.

3 minutes ago

BREW's market cap surges past $28 million, approaching its previous all-time high, with a single-day gain of over 83%

According to GMGN data, BREW, the token of new BSC chain launch platform Brew, has surged past a $28 million market cap, approaching its previous high of $32 million, with a daily gain of over 83% and trading volume of $11.9 million. The Brew platform supports pairing and issuing tokens using meme coins, altcoins, and stock tokens as liquidity pools. Since its launch on September 7, the platform token has experienced extreme volatility, hitting a low of below $4 million. Public information shows that Nina Rong, Executive Director of Growth at BNB Chain, recently followed the official X account of Brew, the new launch platform on BSC chain. BlockBeats reminds users that the relevant tokens have high price volatility and significant uncertainty, urging caution for investment decisions.

3 minutes ago

Two months after leaving OpenAI due to illness, Fidji Simo, the former No. 2 at OpenAI, has joined Nscale as a board member.

News Flash from Insight Beating AI: Fidji Simo, OpenAI’s former second-in-command, has joined the board of AI cloud firm Nscale. She left OpenAI’s full-time position in July this year due to a worsening neuroimmune disease, and remains a part-time advisor. Nscale, a compute partner of OpenAI, recently signed a 6-year, $45 billion compute deal with Anthropic. Simo will recuse herself from Nscale board matters involving OpenAI. Nscale is preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) as early as this month. Prior to this, Simo led Instacart to go public in 2023. Nscale director Sheryl Sandberg invited her to join the board after her departure from OpenAI.

3 minutes ago

Ethereum breaks through $2,600, surging 6.75% in 24 hours.

According to HTX market data, Ethereum has surpassed $2,600, jumping 6.75% in 24 hours.

3 minutes ago

US pre-market trading sees strong performance from optical communication concept stocks, with MRVL, AAOI, and COHR rising more than 3%.

According to market data from BIT (bit.com), optical communication concept stocks performed strongly in early US stock trading: Pure Photonics ETF FOTO rose 2.82%; Marvell Technology (MRVL) rose 3.75%; Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) rose 3.67%; Lumentum Holdings (LITE) rose 1.51%; Coherent Corp. (COHR) rose 3.56%; Ciena Corporation (CIEN) rose 3.69%; Fabrinet (FN) rose 2.30%; AXT Inc. (AXTI) rose 3.89%; and Nokia (NOK) rose 2.50%.

3 minutes ago

2 hours ago

According to GMGN market data, the market capitalization of EMBER, the token of Solana-based platform Ember Curve, has crossed $40 million. The token has rallied 170% in nearly 40 minutes, 730% in 24 hours, with a 24-hour trading volume of $29.6 million. Ember Curve is a new token launch platform on Solana built on Meteora. Prominent trader Bonk Guy stated that he purchased EMBER, his first Solana ecosystem token in a long while, noting it is one of the token launch platforms with the strongest fundamentals currently, backed by Meteora with robust resources and endorsements. Bonk Guy forecasts EMBER’s market cap will exceed $100 million. On-chain data shows Bonk Guy’s public address holds EMBER worth $1.16 million, posting an unrealized profit of 180%. BlockBeats reminds users that token prices are highly volatile, so investment should be approached with caution.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

Bitcoin rallied more than $3,000 after the CPI release, breaking above $79,000.

Per HTX market data, Bitcoin rallied more than $3,000 after the CPI release, breaking through the $79,000 threshold to currently trade at $79,301, with a 2.68% 24-hour gain. Earlier, it experienced a short-term pin dip to $76,046.

3 minutes ago

The crypto market is rallying sharply despite interest rate hike expectations, with Bitcoin topping $79,000 and DeFi sector tokens leading gains in the altcoin market.

Per HTX market data, after today's CPI release, the crypto market has rallied strongly following a sharp trading "pin" despite markets pricing in a nearly 90% chance of an interest rate hike next week. Bitcoin is now at $79,300, having rebounded more than $3,000; Ethereum broke above $2,600, surging 8.8% in 24 hours; SOL trades above $105, BNB above $740, ZEC above $1,200, and HYPE at $83.5. DeFi sector tokens are leading gains in the altcoin market, with Solana and Ethereum-based DeFi tokens posting the largest increases. Key gainers include: RAY up over 28% at $1.65, MET up over 23% at $0.266, LSK up over 20% at $0.131, MARSCOIN up over 19% at $0.134, THETA up over 18% at $0.203, DOGS up over 12% at $0.00000518, EIGEN up over 11% at $0.225, SYRUP up over 10% at $0.226, AERO up over 9% at $0.600, UNI up over 9% at $6.49, and NEAR up over 9% at $2.66.

3 minutes ago

BREW's market cap surges past $28 million, approaching its previous all-time high, with a single-day gain of over 83%

According to GMGN data, BREW, the token of new BSC chain launch platform Brew, has surged past a $28 million market cap, approaching its previous high of $32 million, with a daily gain of over 83% and trading volume of $11.9 million. The Brew platform supports pairing and issuing tokens using meme coins, altcoins, and stock tokens as liquidity pools. Since its launch on September 7, the platform token has experienced extreme volatility, hitting a low of below $4 million. Public information shows that Nina Rong, Executive Director of Growth at BNB Chain, recently followed the official X account of Brew, the new launch platform on BSC chain. BlockBeats reminds users that the relevant tokens have high price volatility and significant uncertainty, urging caution for investment decisions.

3 minutes ago

Two months after leaving OpenAI due to illness, Fidji Simo, the former No. 2 at OpenAI, has joined Nscale as a board member.

News Flash from Insight Beating AI: Fidji Simo, OpenAI’s former second-in-command, has joined the board of AI cloud firm Nscale. She left OpenAI’s full-time position in July this year due to a worsening neuroimmune disease, and remains a part-time advisor. Nscale, a compute partner of OpenAI, recently signed a 6-year, $45 billion compute deal with Anthropic. Simo will recuse herself from Nscale board matters involving OpenAI. Nscale is preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) as early as this month. Prior to this, Simo led Instacart to go public in 2023. Nscale director Sheryl Sandberg invited her to join the board after her departure from OpenAI.

3 minutes ago

Ethereum breaks through $2,600, surging 6.75% in 24 hours.

According to HTX market data, Ethereum has surpassed $2,600, jumping 6.75% in 24 hours.

3 minutes ago

US pre-market trading sees strong performance from optical communication concept stocks, with MRVL, AAOI, and COHR rising more than 3%.

According to market data from BIT (bit.com), optical communication concept stocks performed strongly in early US stock trading: Pure Photonics ETF FOTO rose 2.82%; Marvell Technology (MRVL) rose 3.75%; Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) rose 3.67%; Lumentum Holdings (LITE) rose 1.51%; Coherent Corp. (COHR) rose 3.56%; Ciena Corporation (CIEN) rose 3.69%; Fabrinet (FN) rose 2.30%; AXT Inc. (AXTI) rose 3.89%; and Nokia (NOK) rose 2.50%.

3 minutes ago

Solana just flipped the switch on step two of its five-part plan to slash account storage costs by 90%. The second activation, hitting mainnet around September 11, 2026, drops the rent parameter from 6,333 lamports per byte down to 5,080, making up to 612,000 SOL available for users to reclaim.

What rent actually means on Solana On most blockchains, storing data on-chain costs something. Solana’s version of this cost is called “rent,” though the name is a bit misleading. It’s not a recurring charge. It’s a fully refundable deposit that accounts must hold to keep their data stored on the network.

The original rate was 6,960 lamports per byte. Under proposal SIMD-0437, the network is cutting that in five planned steps to just 696 lamports per byte. That’s a 90% reduction, rolled out gradually to avoid any surprises in how the blockchain’s state grows.

Step one landed on September 3, 2026, trimming the rate to 6,333 lamports per byte. Step two takes it to 5,080. Together, those two moves represent a cumulative 27% cut from the original cost.

Advertisement

Where the 612K SOL comes from When the per-byte deposit requirement drops, every existing account on Solana suddenly has more lamports locked up than it needs. That excess becomes reclaimable.

Users don’t need to close their accounts to get the SOL back. Solana provides a dedicated instruction called WithdrawExcessLamports that lets account holders pull out just the surplus without disrupting anything. Of course, closing the account entirely works too, if someone wants to go that route.

The 612,000 SOL figure represents the estimated excess across all accounts after step two takes effect. Across the full five-step rollout, the total reclaimable amount is expected to exceed 3 million SOL.

It’s worth noting that this SOL isn’t newly minted. It already existed on-chain, just sitting in account deposits where users couldn’t touch it. The rent reduction doesn’t inflate supply. It just unlocks funds that were already there.

The full roadmap and what’s still pending Steps three through five are where things get ambitious. The plan aims to reach the final target of 696 lamports per byte by November 2026, but those later phases aren’t guaranteed to run on autopilot.

Each subsequent activation depends on the Solana core team monitoring state growth, essentially making sure the cheaper storage costs aren’t causing the blockchain’s data footprint to balloon uncontrollably. The later steps are also tied to the release of Agave 4.4, the next major version of Solana’s validator client.

Why this matters beyond the numbers Account rent has been one of Solana’s quiet friction points for years. Every token account, every NFT, every DeFi position requires a minimum deposit just to exist on-chain. For a single account, the cost is trivial. But for protocols that create thousands or millions of accounts (think token airdrops, gaming items, or order books), those deposits add up fast.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Solana fiyatı son yükselişinde 110 dolar bölgesine kadar ulaşmasının ardından güçlü satış baskısıyla karşılaşarak 99,68 dolar seviyesine geriledi. Yaklaşık 100 dolarlık psikolojik sınırın yeniden test edilmesi, SOL için kısa vadeli görünümü kritik hale getiriyor. Son geri çekilmeyle birlikte yükseliş momentumu belirgin şekilde zayıflarken, yatırımcıların odağı 98 dolar çevresindeki destek bölgesine yöneldi. Bu bölgenin korunması Solana’nın yeniden toparlanması açısından önemli olurken, aşağı yönlü kırılması düzeltmenin daha düşük seviyelere doğru devam etmesine neden olabilir.

Solana 110 Dolardan Neden Geri Çekildi? SOL fiyatı 110 dolar bölgesine yaklaşmasının ardından bu seviyelerde güçlü satışlarla karşılaştı. Yükseliş sonrasında gelen kar satışları ve kripto piyasasındaki genel zayıflık, fiyatın yeniden 100 dolar çevresine çekilmesinde etkili oldu. 110 dolar bölgesinden 99,68 dolara yaşanan geri çekilme yaklaşık yüzde 9,4’lük bir düşüş anlamına geliyor. Özellikle 100 doların altındaki hareketlerin devam etmesi, kısa vadede satıcıların piyasadaki kontrolünü artırabilir.

İlginizi Çekebilir: Arthur Hayes Bu Altcoin’i Topluyor: Yüklü Alım Geldi!

Teknik görünümde SOL için ilk önemli destek 98,19 ile 98,47 dolar arasında bulunuyor. Solana’nın bu bölge üzerinde tutunması halinde fiyatın yeniden 100 doların üzerine çıkmak için güç toplaması mümkün olabilir.

Kritik seviyeler şu şekilde öne çıkıyor:

İlk destek: 98,19 – 98,47 dolar İkinci destek: 97,07 – 97,52 dolar Güçlü destek: 94,81 – 95,46 dolar İlk direnç: 100,07 – 100,47 dolar İkinci direnç: 101,58 – 102,42 dolar Güçlü direnç: 110 dolar SOL Yeniden 110 Dolara Yükselebilir mi? Solana’nın yeniden 110 doları hedefleyebilmesi için öncelikle 100 doların üzerinde kalıcılık sağlaması gerekiyor. Ardından 102 dolar ve 105,20 dolar bölgelerinin aşılması, alıcıların yeniden güç kazandığına yönelik daha olumlu bir sinyal oluşturabilir. Özellikle 105 dolar üzerindeki güçlü kapanışlar, SOL’un yeniden 110 dolar direncini test etme ihtimalini artırabilir. Ancak 110 dolar bölgesi daha önce güçlü satışların geldiği seviye olduğu için olası yeni yükselişte de önemli bir direnç olarak takip edilecek.

Aşağı yönlü senaryoda en önemli bölge 98 dolar çevresi olarak öne çıkıyor. SOL’un 98,19 doların altında kalması, mevcut düzeltmenin henüz tamamlanmadığına yönelik bir sinyal oluşturabilir. Bu durumda ilk olarak 97 dolar, ardından 95 dolar çevresindeki destek bölgeleri gündeme gelebilir. Özellikle 95 doların da kaybedilmesi, kısa vadeli teknik görünümün daha fazla zayıflamasına ve satış baskısının derinleşmesine neden olabilir.

Değerlendirme Solana’nın 110 dolardan 99,68 dolara gerilemesi kısa vadeli yükseliş momentumunun önemli ölçüde zayıfladığını gösteriyor. Ancak mevcut hareketin daha büyük bir düşüş trendine dönüşüp dönüşmeyeceği konusunda 98 dolar çevresindeki fiyat hareketi belirleyici olabilir. SOL bu desteği koruyarak yeniden 100 doların üzerine çıkarsa 102 dolar, 105 dolar ve ardından 110 dolar seviyeleri yeniden gündeme gelebilir. Buna karşılık 98 dolar desteğinin kaybedilmesi halinde 97 ve 95 dolar bölgelerine doğru yeni bir geri çekilme riski artabilir. Bu nedenle Solana açısından önümüzdeki fiyat hareketinde 98 ile 100 dolar arasındaki mücadele kısa vadeli yönün belirlenmesinde kritik olacak.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Yesterday, Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net outflow of $282.7 million, while Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of $29.9 million.

According to monitoring by Farside Investors, Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $282.7 million yesterday. Breakdown: ARKB recorded a net outflow of $164.3 million, GBTC a net outflow of $36.4 million, and FBTC a net outflow of $33.6 million. Ethereum ETFs posted a net outflow of $29.9 million, with FETH logging a net outflow of $25.2 million, ETHA a net outflow of $18.6 million, while ETHB and ETH registered net inflows of $13.9 million and $7.7 million respectively.

10 minutes ago

A Brevo vulnerability has affected 138 client accounts, with 347,000 Trezor users receiving phishing emails.

Email marketing platform Brevo has disclosed that attackers exploited an authorization boundary vulnerability in its login system to access 138 customer accounts. Among these accounts, 6 were used to send phishing emails, 43 had their contact information exported, and 93 showed no signs of valid misuse. Brevo did not clarify whether there was overlap between these account categories. Affected clients include crypto hardware wallet manufacturers Trezor and BitBox, as well as crypto portfolio and tax reporting platform CoinTracking. Attackers used Trezor’s Brevo account to send phishing emails titled “Critical Security Alert: STM32 Entropy Vulnerability” to around 347,000 newsletter subscribers, directing users to a malicious application to submit wallet backup information. Trezor blocked the relevant domain at the DNS layer within 20 minutes, but approximately 2,500 users had already accessed the link by then. Trezor stated that its Brevo account only stored subscribers’ email addresses, not other customer data, but is currently treating all roughly 347,000 email addresses as compromised by attackers, which could be used for subsequent phishing activities. BitBox has not yet found evidence of leaked funds or recovery phrases; CoinTracking users received fake emails asking them to refresh their API keys.

10 minutes ago

Maji’s total long position has increased to $107 million, with a $5.6 million loss over the past week.

Per TradingBeats monitoring, the total long position of "Ma Ji" has expanded to $107 million, with an unrealized profit of roughly $80,000 as of now, while the trader has incurred a $5.6 million loss over the past week. The position breakdown is as follows: · 40,650 ETH long positions with 25x leverage, valued at approximately $99.971 million; · 50 BTC long positions with 40x leverage, worth around $3.856 million; · 42,950 HYPE long positions with 10x leverage, totaling about $3.406 million.

10 minutes ago

Cursor launches Projects: An Agent acts as the project manager, overseeing thousands of Agents.

Beating AI Express News: Cursor has launched Projects, upgrading from a single Agent working model to an "Agent managing Agents" framework. Each project features a coordinating Agent that does not write code itself; instead, it is responsible for breaking down tasks, formulating plans, and distributing work to thousands of sub-Agents for parallel execution. Projects permanently store codebases, research findings, and user preferences, enabling work to resume even after months of pause. Tasks run on the cloud by default, so they won’t stop even when your computer is powered off; when local testing is required, it automatically spins up local Agents. The tool can also monitor Slack and pull requests (PRs), automatically fix CI issues, and kick off new tasks on its own without users needing to send additional prompts. This marks the official productization of Cursor’s earlier multi-Agent experiments. Back in January this year, Cursor demonstrated hundreds of Agents collaborating simultaneously, even building a browser from scratch with over 1 million lines of code. Now Projects is in beta and gradually rolling out to all users.

10 minutes ago

Binance's US stock trading will be suspended starting at 18:50 on September 12, and is expected to last approximately 2 hours and 40 minutes.

According to an official announcement, Binance will temporarily suspend U.S. stock trading to carry out system upgrades for its partner broker program. During this period, users will be unable to submit stock trading orders. The system upgrade is scheduled from 18:50 to 21:30 on September 12, 2026 (GMT+8).

10 minutes ago

Iran and Gulf countries to hold meeting to advance Strait of Hormuz agreement.

According to a report by the Financial Times, foreign ministers of Gulf countries plan to meet with their Iranian counterpart in response to an initiative by Oman and Iran, to secure support for a temporary agreement on managing shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, regional nations are seeking ways to ease tensions surrounding the key waterway. Proposed by Oman, the meeting will mark the first gathering between senior diplomats from the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Iranian officials since the outbreak of US-Iran tensions in late February. Sources said the meeting is scheduled for next Monday in the Omani coastal city of Salalah. While details have not been finalized, multiple countries have confirmed the meeting is expected to proceed as planned. If held, the talks will underscore the region’s urgency to try to reopen the Strait and de-escalate US-Iran hostilities. (Jinshi)

10 minutes ago

1 hours ago

According to GMGN market data, the token STONK of Solana-based token launch platform StonkFun has hit a new all-time high, with its market cap exceeding $250 million and currently standing at $251 million, up 40.06% in the past 24 hours. StonkFun is an innovative launchpad on Solana, with its core narrative being "truly bridging memes and real-world assets (RWA)". The platform allows users to launch tokens with one click and freely select paired assets, including tokenized stocks like xStocks (e.g., SPYx tracking the S&P 500), pre-IPO shares, fiat currencies, commodities, other mainstream cryptocurrencies, and even another StonkFun token. STONK acts as a utility token for "all leveraged launch platforms with liquidity pools that can pair real assets", aiming to directly link Solana ecosystem meme culture with RWA liquidity. BlockBeats reminds users that most meme coins lack practical use cases, are highly volatile, and investors should exercise caution.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

In the first week of September, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) traded in a tight range while XRP (CRYPTO: XRP), Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) and Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) outperformed as leverage shifted towards altcoins ahead of a busy macro week.

Why Is BTC Rangebound?Bitcoin has traded between $77,100 and $81,300 over the past 20 trading sessions, with most recent activity concentrated near the middle of the range.

The $77,100 level is now key support making it one of Bitcoin’s highest-volume trading levels of 2026. It is also where BTC broke down in May.

A drop below could weaken the medium-term uptrend. A break above $81,300 could quickly push Bitcoin toward $86,500.

Trending

Bitcoin has seen little trading between $81,300 and $86,500, creating a potential "volume vacuum," Bitfinex said on Sept. 9

Selling pressure has also been well absorbed, with aggregate Spent Output Profit Ratio, near 1.002, indicating Bitcoin is broadly changing hands around break-even.

About 69%-71% of Bitcoin’s supply is in profit, still below the 74.7% level that has historically signaled a shift from bear to bull market.

That suggests the current move remains a bear-market relief phase until the threshold is decisively crossed.

XRP, SOL, DOGE Join Altcoin RotationBitcoin’s subdued volatility has created a much different environment across the broader crypto market.

All 29 of the largest liquid crypto pairs gained between Sept. 1 and Sept. 8, delivering a median return of 10.2% compared with Bitcoin’s 1.4% gain.

Dogecoin climbed 10.3%, while XRP gained 4.9% and Solana advanced 3.4%. Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) rose 2.8%.

Polkadot led major altcoins with a 43% surge, followed by Zcash at 42%, Kaspa at 28.8%, Near at 23% and Bittensor at 17.4%.

The rotation pushed Bitcoin dominance down from 60.4% to 59.2% since the beginning of September.

More importantly, aggregate open interest in altcoin perpetual futures surpassed Bitcoin open interest this week for the first time since December 2024.

The combination of sideways Bitcoin prices, neutral funding and rising altcoin leverage has historically created favorable conditions for speculative capital to move further out on the risk curve.

But that comes with a warning.

A similar setup emerged in December 2024 when altcoin open interest overtook Bitcoin’s. A subsequent market decline triggered $1.7 billion in liquidations in a single day, with altcoins accounting for 91% of the positions wiped out.

That makes the current rise in altcoin breadth both an indication of improving risk appetite and a potential leverage warning.

Image: Shutterstock

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Leading asset management firm Bitwise has sparked discussions after buying heavily into Solana despite the slow momentum in the Solana ETF market.

Latest data from Arkham Intelligence shows that the firm has made the purchase after its fund saw a steady flow of fresh capital over the past month.

Solana sees rising institutional interest With the broad crypto market consistently facing market volatility, it appears that institutional investors are utilizing the recent weakness in Solana's price as an entry point to access the Solana investment product.

HOT Stories

You Might Also Like

Notably, the data shows that Bitwise has bought a massive $107.4 million of SOL after its Solana ETF recorded steady modest inflows over the last 20 trading sessions.

Although the fund did not see a complete stretch of steady inflows all month, only two of those sessions saw outflows. As such, the Bitwise Solana ETF saw positive flows on most trading days during the period.

Bitwise's Solana holdings near $1 billion Following this substantial Solana purchase, the asset management firm is approaching a major milestone in its Solana holdings as institutions continue to demand its product.

Further data shows that the recent purchases have boosted Bitwise's holdings while expanding its Solana exposure. As of Thursday, September 10, Bitwise now holds over 9,030,000 SOL.

Per Solana's current trading price of around $101, the Bitwise Solana holdings are currently worth about $918 million, suggesting that it may soon reach a massive $1 billion milestone in its Solana holdings.

The Solana network reached an all-time high in daily token issuance, surpassing the number of new coins issued during the peak of the memecoin cycle in late 2024.

More than 263,000 new Solana Program Library (SPL) tokens were minted on the Solana blockchain on Wednesday, marking a new record high, according to Solscan. Some 40,000 to 50,000 daily tokens were issued on Solana at the peak of the memecoin cycle in December 2024. 

Of the total 40,360 tokens issued through launchpads, memecoin platform Pump.fun accounted for the majority, or 34,184 coins, according to Blockworks’ dashboard.

A launchpad enables creators to easily design, launch and trade memecoins without needing extensive technical skills. They automate the token creation process and provide immediate liquidity and visibility for new tokens.

Pump.fun ranks as the leading Solana-native protocol by daily revenue, with $1.8 million generated in the past 24 hours, according to DefiLlama. Last Friday, Pump.fun’s daily revenue was briefly overtaken by trading app Fomo, which combines cryptocurrency trading with social features resembling a social media feed.

Pump.fun accounted for one-third of Solana’s first-quarter revenue in 2026, or $124 million out of the total $342 million, despite cooling memecoin activity.

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Bitwise, a leading asset management firm, has significantly increased its exposure to Solana, with its holdings nearing the $1 billion mark following a substantial purchase of SOL tokens. The move comes as institutional interest in Solana continues to rise, despite the relatively subdued performance in the Solana ETF market.

Data from Arkham Intelligence revealed that Bitwise acquired $107.4 million worth of SOL over the past month. This large purchase followed a period during which the Bitwise Solana ETF experienced a steady influx of new capital. Despite ongoing volatility across the broader crypto sector, institutional investors appear to be taking advantage of Solana price dips to expand their positions in Solana-focused investment products.

The ETF experienced positive inflows during 18 out of the last 20 trading sessions, showing sustained interest from investors. Only two sessions recorded outflows, indicating consistent demand for the Solana product managed by Bitwise.

After the most recent acquisition, Bitwise’s Solana holdings reached a notable milestone in both quantity and value. As of Thursday, September 10, the firm holds more than 9,030,000 SOL. At Solana’s current trading price of approximately $101, these assets are valued at $918 million, placing Bitwise on the verge of crossing the $1 billion mark in Solana exposure.

Institutional interest in Solana remains strongMarket observers noted the sustained institutional demand for Solana despite modest performance in Solana ETF trading volumes. The latest flows into the Bitwise Solana ETF highlight how major institutions are taking a longer-term view on the asset, responding to perceived value during periods of heightened volatility.

Bitwise’s consistent accumulation of Solana occurred as institutional investors made use of recent market pullbacks as an opportunity for strategic entry. With two sessions of outflows compared to 18 days of positive inflows, the ETF’s robust demand signals growing institutional confidence in Solana as part of diversified crypto portfolios.

This accumulation strategy points to a shift in institutional tactics, as they seek to balance portfolio risk and capture potential upside in high-conviction digital assets. Bitwise’s growing stake in Solana also reflects broader confidence in the potential growth of blockchain ecosystems outside of Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Expanding access to tokenized assetsAlongside this institutional momentum, the crypto sector is witnessing a wider transformation. While traditional markets rely on complex brokers and intermediaries, recent advancements are enabling investors to access a broader range of assets via blockchain. Wall Street is actively moving towards Web3 solutions, with platforms such as 1stepSwap allowing investors to hold shares of leading U.S. companies, gold, and silver directly in their crypto wallets.

This process involves tokenizing Real-World Assets (RWAs), which are then distributed through decentralized protocols. By doing so, platforms can automatically source the most competitive market prices in seconds, eliminating the need for traditional intermediaries and streamlining access for both institutional and retail investors.

As a result, asset managers like Bitwise are not only enhancing their crypto allocations but are also looking to the future of cross-asset investing through Web3 infrastructure. The ongoing accumulation of SOL and expansion into tokenized RWAs underline a market shift that could redefine how institutions approach digital asset strategies.

Regulated prediction markets are coming to Solana, and the structure holding them together is more interesting than the headline suggests. Agg Market, a prediction market aggregator that launched in April 2026, has partnered with ProphetX to tokenize the latter’s sports prediction market contracts on Solana, opening up programmatic access through Agg’s API infrastructure.

The announcement, made on September 10, 2026, is notable for what it preserves as much as what it adds. ProphetX’s existing contract terms, execution processes, and settlement mechanisms remain untouched. The blockchain layer sits on top, not underneath, the regulated plumbing.

What ProphetX actually is ProphetX is not a crypto-native project wearing a compliance hat. It started life in 2022 as Prophet Exchange, a peer-to-peer sports betting exchange launched in New Jersey. By mid-2026, it had earned dual federal recognition from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, operating as both a Designated Contract Market and a Derivatives Clearing Organization.

That dual status matters. A DCM license lets an exchange list and trade commodity futures and options. A DCO license means the platform can also clear those trades. Holding both is the regulatory equivalent of being allowed to run both the casino floor and the cage, under federal supervision.

Advertisement

ProphetX launched its nationwide platform on June 18, 2026, positioning itself as America’s first sports-native federally regulated prediction market. The focus is on major league sports, with NFL and NBA contracts forming the core of the catalog.

The peer-to-peer model ProphetX uses means participants trade against each other rather than against a house. Fees are minimal by design, which makes the platform structurally different from traditional sportsbooks where the margin is baked into every line.

What Agg Market actually does Agg Market functions as an aggregation and routing layer for prediction markets, both on-chain and off-chain. Its infrastructure includes market matching, smart routing, and now the tokenization layer that makes this ProphetX integration possible.

The tokenization layer is the technical bridge. It takes ProphetX’s off-chain event contracts and represents them in a form that Solana-native applications can read, interact with, and build on. Coverage is comprehensive from launch, meaning every ProphetX market is available on-chain from day one, not a curated subset.

Agg’s API is the developer interface. Builders can query markets, pull pricing data, and route orders without needing to directly integrate ProphetX’s native infrastructure.

The Solana grants angle Solana is supporting the buildout through a grants program aimed at financing decentralized applications that use ProphetX markets via Agg. The structure is straightforward: developers get funding to build dApps on top of a regulated data source, accessed through a standardized API, running on a high-throughput chain.

Why this configuration matters The ProphetX and Agg integration takes an already-licensed platform and adds an on-chain access layer. The regulatory foundation is pre-existing. The blockchain component is additive.

For Solana traders, the practical implication is access to a peer-to-peer sports prediction market with federal regulatory backing, accessible through the same wallets and tooling they already use. For developers, it is a regulated data source with an API, backed by a grants program, on a chain with sufficient throughput to handle real-time market activity.

The risk to watch is whether tokenizing contracts from a regulated venue creates new compliance questions for the builders using those contracts. Agg’s infrastructure preserves ProphetX’s settlement mechanics, but the downstream applications developers build on top of that layer will exist in their own regulatory context. A dApp that routes users into tokenized ProphetX contracts may face different scrutiny than ProphetX itself, depending on how it presents and markets that access.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Top Solana Price Predictions as SOL Bulls Battle to Hold the $100 Line

BAM Preconfirmations are now live on Solana via Helius and Triton, bringing low-latency data to the network’s high frequency traders and applications.

Preconfirmations bring a new revenue stream for validators running BAM, joining the Maker Priority Plugin that launched in Q2 2026.

Amassing over $15.95B in network stake, BAM has emerged as Solana’s validator client of choice, constituting 34.1% of all staked $SOL.

BAM Preconfirmations Go Live Solana validators have just unlocked another revenue stream. Jito BAM, Solana’s leading validator client by committed stake, has introduced proconfirmations, a mechanic giving programmatic traders, applications, and searchers faster access to critical market data.

Preconfirmations are effectively a forecast of the transactions a leader can expect to see in incoming shreds. They task validators with streaming out the transactions a leader has already committed to executing.

For Solana’s arbitrageurs and market makers, accessing low-latency transaction data can be the difference between capturing the spread and turning a profit, or getting picked off by toxic flow and suffering losses. 

The BAM Verifier checks finished blocks against what was streamed, and validators caught deviating can be disconnected from the network.

On top of giving operators a competitive edge, BAM preconfirmations also unlock a new revenue stream for Solana infrastructure providers. The payout splits 30% to distributors, 35% to BAM validators and 35% to the Jito DAO, delivered as a stake-weighted priority fee each month.

Over Half of Solana’s Validators Running BAM Since the beginning of 2026, BAM has almost tripled its share of network stake. According to Blockworks data, the BAM client is now being run on 34.1% of staked $SOL, up for just 12% in January.

Of Solana’s 665 active validators, 383 have opted in to running BAM, representing over 50% of the network’s operators. BAM’s popularity among operators is likely driven by its value-add plugins and competitive rewards. 

According to Jito CEO Lucas Bruder, BAM consistently offers the highest compute units and user transactions per block, meaning that validators are able to process more network activity through BAM than rival clients. 

BAM MPP Plugin Proven to Increase Maker Efficiency Since its Q2 launch, the BAM Maker Priority Plugin has made a considerable impact on the efficiency of Solana’s micro market structure. As outlined in a recent article by Jito’s magicdhz, 17 operators, including top prop AMMs like BisonFi, Tessera, and SolFi are now running MPP.

Onchain data indicates the oracle updates running through BAM MPP witness higher success rates in slots led by other clients. In practice, this translates to more landed transactions, more predictable, tighter quoting, and better trade execution for the end user.

After a strong start, the engineers behind BAM MPP now turn their attention to further improving the product. Alongside rolling out MPP usage to more markets, the plugin is expected to introduce an intra-slot clock, offering another countermeasure against toxic flow.

Disclaimer: SolanaFloor is a subsidiary of the Jito Network

Read More on SolanaFloor Long live the Solana launchpad wars

Stonk Flips Pump in Launchpad Revenue, Sets Next Target at Robinhood’s Pons

Crypto is at a Critical Inflection Point

THE STREET: Solana apps top blockchain revenue with $5.09 million

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

8 hours ago

Solana core development team Anza announced on X that Mainnet Beta Transaction V1 will activate starting at Epoch 1035, with an estimated time of approximately 1:20 UTC on September 15. The ecosystem team noted that additional time is required to test and integrate V1 support; V1 is now live on the devnet for integration testing. Compute budget in V1 is set via new transaction configurations. While compute budget instructions remain functional in both legacy and V0 transactions, they will not take effect in V1. Application developers, even those not planning to submit V1 transactions, must verify the impact of these changes on their applications.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

Market news: Nasdaq invests in Payward, the parent company of Kraken, at a $21 billion valuation.

According to market sources, Nasdaq has invested in Payward, the parent company of Kraken, at a valuation of $21 billion.

4 minutes ago

Brent crude tops $102: Iran declares readiness to fight a "high-intensity war"

Brent crude oil prices have surged past $102 per barrel, reviving concerns over a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict. Bloomberg reported that Iranian senior officials stated that with the U.S. continuing its attacks on Iranian territory, Iran has no intention of backing down and is prepared to further escalate its counterattacks. U.S. President Trump meanwhile said the war could last until after the November midterm elections, and gasoline prices are unlikely to drop significantly in the short term, further dimming expectations of an early de-escalation of the conflict. Brent crude has risen nearly 70% so far this year, with its Wednesday physical benchmark price hitting $114 at one point. Meanwhile, U.S. diesel prices are approaching $6 per gallon, and gasoline and diesel prices in Europe have also continued to climb, further intensifying energy inflationary pressures. Market analysts noted that if the conflict further disrupts oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices could continue to rise. Currently, the U.S. is squeezing Iran’s oil exports via maritime blockades, while White House advisors have discussed scenarios where the war could last through the end of Trump’s term. Additionally, a rebound in crude oil purchases by Asian countries has further tightened global supplies, though high oil prices may force some refineries to cut processing volumes. U.S. diesel inventories are projected to fall to their lowest level in over 20 years this month.

4 minutes ago

A source familiar with the matter: The White House’s copper tariff plan has stalled.

According to a Reuters report, two people familiar with the matter said the White House has not yet made a decision on refined copper tariffs. Officials are weighing the potential downsides of rising copper prices pushing up manufacturing costs against the benefits of encouraging domestic mining. This hesitation comes as the administration increasingly focuses on affordability ahead of the November midterm elections, with Trump and Republican lawmakers facing pressure to prove their economic policies are lowering rather than raising costs for U.S. consumers and businesses. Due to expectations that Trump will impose tariffs on refined copper products such as cathode copper and mine-produced copper concentrates, copper prices have surged to record highs. Traders and industrial buyers are scrambling to build up inventories in the U.S. to stockpile ahead of any new tariffs, forming one of the world’s largest copper stockpiles. A White House official stated that the administration has not made a final decision on the tariffs, and confirmed the Commerce Department submitted an update to Trump by the June 30 deadline set by the White House. The official said: "The administration continues to evaluate all options to bring copper and other critical manufacturing back to the U.S." These remarks indicate the tariffs are not a done deal, despite market expectations that the U.S. may expand existing tariffs to cover refined copper.

4 minutes ago

Deepcoin launches global stock perpetual contracts, completes strategic upgrade of its multi-asset trading infrastructure.

Recently, Deepcoin has launched global stock perpetual contracts, further advancing its multi-asset trading infrastructure. Users can trade popular individual stocks and index ETFs including NVIDIA, Tesla, Pop Mart, and Unitree on the platform 24/7. Meanwhile, Deepcoin has also rolled out a sector narrative tool that aggregates hot events, market data, and sentiment information, helping users quickly grasp the market’s main trends and sector dynamics to enable the "understand first, trade later" approach. Through the centralized presentation of market hotspots and sector information, users can more intuitively understand the market background and changes of related assets. In conjunction with the launch of stock perpetual contracts, Deepcoin has launched a series of supporting activities: newly launched stock perpetual contracts offer a limited-time 25% fee discount, alongside three concurrent initiatives—the Stock God Contest, Sector Trading Challenge, and Stock Signal Provider Trading Ranking—further enriching the trading and interactive scenarios for stock perpetual contracts.

4 minutes ago

OpenAI voluntarily asks US regulators to oversee its operations: If AI safety standards are not met, development should be slowed.

Beating AI News Flash: OpenAI is pushing for the establishment of unified mandatory national AI safety rules in the U.S., calling on Congress to directly regulate the most cutting-edge AI firms. The proposed rules cover unified testing, independent security assessments, cybersecurity requirements, and reporting of major incidents. OpenAI hopes the government will further set unified safety thresholds, clarify when AI development must slow down or even halt, and advocate for similar standards to be adopted by other countries. This regulatory framework targets only a small number of major companies developing the most powerful models, excluding regular startups and small-scale developers. Additionally, OpenAI announced its support for four AI safety bills in California, some of which it had not backed previously. The company noted that its stance has shifted amid the rapid advancement of model capabilities.

4 minutes ago

It is rumored that OpenAI is very close to verifying the Hodge conjecture, and AI may solve two additional Millennium Prize Problems.

Beating AI Express News reports that tech industry user Leo posted on X, stating that per his knowledge, OpenAI is very close to verifying the Hodge Conjecture, while either OpenAI or Anthropic may also be near solving the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture. The user stressed that the relevant information is currently just a rumor with unconfirmed authenticity, but if proven true, it would mean three Millennium Prize Problems could be solved in just one month. Both the Hodge Conjecture and the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture remain unsolved Millennium Prize Problems. Prior AI breakthroughs in mathematics have drawn market attention, and prediction markets now rank the two conjectures as the next Millennium Prize Problems that AI may solve.

4 minutes ago

Market news: Nasdaq invests in Payward, the parent company of Kraken, at a $21 billion valuation.

According to market sources, Nasdaq has invested in Payward, the parent company of Kraken, at a valuation of $21 billion.

4 minutes ago

Brent crude tops $102: Iran declares readiness to fight a "high-intensity war"

Brent crude oil prices have surged past $102 per barrel, reviving concerns over a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict. Bloomberg reported that Iranian senior officials stated that with the U.S. continuing its attacks on Iranian territory, Iran has no intention of backing down and is prepared to further escalate its counterattacks. U.S. President Trump meanwhile said the war could last until after the November midterm elections, and gasoline prices are unlikely to drop significantly in the short term, further dimming expectations of an early de-escalation of the conflict. Brent crude has risen nearly 70% so far this year, with its Wednesday physical benchmark price hitting $114 at one point. Meanwhile, U.S. diesel prices are approaching $6 per gallon, and gasoline and diesel prices in Europe have also continued to climb, further intensifying energy inflationary pressures. Market analysts noted that if the conflict further disrupts oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices could continue to rise. Currently, the U.S. is squeezing Iran’s oil exports via maritime blockades, while White House advisors have discussed scenarios where the war could last through the end of Trump’s term. Additionally, a rebound in crude oil purchases by Asian countries has further tightened global supplies, though high oil prices may force some refineries to cut processing volumes. U.S. diesel inventories are projected to fall to their lowest level in over 20 years this month.

4 minutes ago

A source familiar with the matter: The White House’s copper tariff plan has stalled.

According to a Reuters report, two people familiar with the matter said the White House has not yet made a decision on refined copper tariffs. Officials are weighing the potential downsides of rising copper prices pushing up manufacturing costs against the benefits of encouraging domestic mining. This hesitation comes as the administration increasingly focuses on affordability ahead of the November midterm elections, with Trump and Republican lawmakers facing pressure to prove their economic policies are lowering rather than raising costs for U.S. consumers and businesses. Due to expectations that Trump will impose tariffs on refined copper products such as cathode copper and mine-produced copper concentrates, copper prices have surged to record highs. Traders and industrial buyers are scrambling to build up inventories in the U.S. to stockpile ahead of any new tariffs, forming one of the world’s largest copper stockpiles. A White House official stated that the administration has not made a final decision on the tariffs, and confirmed the Commerce Department submitted an update to Trump by the June 30 deadline set by the White House. The official said: "The administration continues to evaluate all options to bring copper and other critical manufacturing back to the U.S." These remarks indicate the tariffs are not a done deal, despite market expectations that the U.S. may expand existing tariffs to cover refined copper.

4 minutes ago

Deepcoin launches global stock perpetual contracts, completes strategic upgrade of its multi-asset trading infrastructure.

Recently, Deepcoin has launched global stock perpetual contracts, further advancing its multi-asset trading infrastructure. Users can trade popular individual stocks and index ETFs including NVIDIA, Tesla, Pop Mart, and Unitree on the platform 24/7. Meanwhile, Deepcoin has also rolled out a sector narrative tool that aggregates hot events, market data, and sentiment information, helping users quickly grasp the market’s main trends and sector dynamics to enable the "understand first, trade later" approach. Through the centralized presentation of market hotspots and sector information, users can more intuitively understand the market background and changes of related assets. In conjunction with the launch of stock perpetual contracts, Deepcoin has launched a series of supporting activities: newly launched stock perpetual contracts offer a limited-time 25% fee discount, alongside three concurrent initiatives—the Stock God Contest, Sector Trading Challenge, and Stock Signal Provider Trading Ranking—further enriching the trading and interactive scenarios for stock perpetual contracts.

4 minutes ago

OpenAI voluntarily asks US regulators to oversee its operations: If AI safety standards are not met, development should be slowed.

Beating AI News Flash: OpenAI is pushing for the establishment of unified mandatory national AI safety rules in the U.S., calling on Congress to directly regulate the most cutting-edge AI firms. The proposed rules cover unified testing, independent security assessments, cybersecurity requirements, and reporting of major incidents. OpenAI hopes the government will further set unified safety thresholds, clarify when AI development must slow down or even halt, and advocate for similar standards to be adopted by other countries. This regulatory framework targets only a small number of major companies developing the most powerful models, excluding regular startups and small-scale developers. Additionally, OpenAI announced its support for four AI safety bills in California, some of which it had not backed previously. The company noted that its stance has shifted amid the rapid advancement of model capabilities.

4 minutes ago

It is rumored that OpenAI is very close to verifying the Hodge conjecture, and AI may solve two additional Millennium Prize Problems.

Beating AI Express News reports that tech industry user Leo posted on X, stating that per his knowledge, OpenAI is very close to verifying the Hodge Conjecture, while either OpenAI or Anthropic may also be near solving the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture. The user stressed that the relevant information is currently just a rumor with unconfirmed authenticity, but if proven true, it would mean three Millennium Prize Problems could be solved in just one month. Both the Hodge Conjecture and the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture remain unsolved Millennium Prize Problems. Prior AI breakthroughs in mathematics have drawn market attention, and prediction markets now rank the two conjectures as the next Millennium Prize Problems that AI may solve.

4 minutes ago