Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Ben Chow, co-founder of Meteora, has stepped down from his role at the Solana-based DeFi project amid the scandal surrounding LIBRA.

Meow, the pseudonymous founder of Solana decentralized exchange (DEX) Jupiter, announced on Monday that Chow resigned amid the controversy.

“While I am 100% confident about Ben’s character, as a project lead he has also shown a lack of judgement and care about some of the core aspects of the project,” Meow tweeted.

Hi, I’m meow from Jupiter, and I also cofounded Meteora.

Firstly, I’d like to reiterate my confidence that no one at Jupiter or Meteora committed any insider trading or financial wrongdoing, or received any tokens inappropriately.

Secondly, we are hiring an independent 3rd…

— meow (🐱, 🐐) (@weremeow) February 18, 2025 Chow's decision comes as Meteora faces scrutiny over its involvement with the token, which experienced a meteoric rise and collapse following an endorsement and subsequent distancing from Argentina’s President Javier Milei.

In a recent interview, Milei stated that shared information about $LIBRA in good faith, believing it could benefit Argentine entrepreneurs.

“I shared this the same way I’ve shared hundreds of things,” he explained, emphasizing that his message was one of disseminating information not endorsement.

Milei acknowledged the fallout as a "slap in the face" and a learning experience but downplayed the impact on Argentine investors while claiming that the majority of those affected were from the U.S. and China.

Javier Milei Denies LIBRA Involvement, Onchain Data Reveals MELANIA Link, Argentinian Market Tanks

Argentina’s President Javier Milei denies actively promoting memecoin LIBRA, while its founder reveals a sniping link to MELANIA

BlockheadBlockhead

Milei’s connection to $LIBRA stems from his meetings with Hayden Davis, CEO of Kelsier Ventures, the market maker behind the token. According to reports, Davis met with Milei at least ten times since October 2024.

Davis then admitted in a video interview with YouTuber Coffeezilla that the Libra team had engaged in “sniping” and revealed that  his team bought $LIBRA and $MELANIA tokens immediately after launching them.

1/ How $LIBRA was created by the same team behind MELANIA and other short-lived coins

Featuring new onchain evidence

A thread with Coffeezilla 🧵 ↓ pic.twitter.com/gNwj97KapF

— Bubblemaps (@bubblemaps) February 17, 2025 The $LIBRA team had created liquidity pools for the token on Meteora, linking it to the platform at the center of the scandal but Chow denied any involvement.

In a statement on X, he said, “For $LIBRA, although we were made aware of the possibility of it several weeks ago by Hayden, we had no involvement in the project at all beyond providing IT support.” He emphasized, “Neither I nor the Meteora team compromised the $LIBRA launch by leaking information, nor did we purchase, receive, or manage any tokens.”

Hey everyone, I want to clear up some things.

The Meteora team was not involved in the deploy, the market making, or determining the launch of $LIBRA.

The $LIBRA team used Meteora, which is a permission-less platform. We never had any access to the tokens or to Milei.

Many…

— benchow.sol (@hellochow) February 15, 2025 However, Chow acknowledged that he had referred Davis to other projects looking to launch memecoins. “When we launched our new memecoin AMM platform in December 2024, I asked Hayden and Kelsier Ventures if they would be interested in launching a token on the M3M3 platform in order to provide an initial case study on how it worked,” he admitted.

Chow went on to explain that his interactions with Davis and Kelsier Ventures led him to believe they were "trustworthy" and that he "referred them to a handful of other projects that had inquired with us about deployer firms, which included the team behind $MELANIA."

🚨NEW: DefiTuna founder Moty reveals how over $200M was siphoned through a market manipulation scheme involving Kelsier Ventures, Meteora, and M3M3 across projects like AIAI, MATES, ENRON, Melania, and Libra.pic.twitter.com/5NzDzkwyv9

— Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) February 18, 2025 In a video that surfaced on X, DefiTuna founder Dhirk is seen talking Chow, accusing Davis and Kelsier Ventures of engaging in insider trading during memecoin launches, claiming to have witnessed such activity firsthand during a trip to Barcelona.

Chow who appeared sad in the video, said: “I feel so sick, because I gave him MELANIA," adding, “I fucked up because I enabled the guy that should not have been enabled …I’m going to have to step down, I’m going to have to quit.”

Jupiter Announces Major Acquisitions, Token Buyback Program, Platform Overhaul at Catstanbul Conference

By aligning acquisitions, tokenomics strategies, and platform advancements, the DEX is poised to strengthen its position as a key player in the Solana ecosystem and the broader crypto industry.

BlockheadBlockhead

Meteora has since hired an independent third-party firm, Fenwick & West, to investigate the allegations. The law firm, which has been accused of helping crypto FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried defraud the exchange's customers, will assess whether any insider trading occurred within the project.

Meteora has since seen its Total Value Locked (TVL) drop to $1.02 billion from $1.52 billion in January, while Jupiter's token, JUP, slipped 15% to $0.68 within 24 hours, bringing its market capitalization down to $1.7 billion.

Solana-based Rollbit coin has recently come under fire for its promotion methods involving social media influencers. Critics argue that these methods are questionable and potentially violate advertising regulations. This article takes a closer look at Rollbit's controversial promotion tactics and the concerns that have been raised.

Background on Rollbit Coin

Rollbit coin (RLB) is a digital asset created on the Solana blockchain, primarily used as a utility token for the Rollbit platform. The platform aims to become a crypto casino, offering a diverse range of gambling opportunities, including 1000x trading, traditional casino games, and NFT gambling.

Promotion Methods

In a bid to increase awareness and adoption of its coin, Rollbit has partnered with several influential social media personalities, commonly known as "crypto influencers." These influencers receive payment in the form of RLB tokens in exchange for promoting the coin on their social media channels. Rollbit's tactics have included sponsored posts, interviews, and even giving away RLB tokens to followers through contests and giveaways.

Critics have raised concerns about the potential manipulation of their audiences and whether these influencers are properly disclosing their partnerships with Rollbit. The undisclosed promotions could mislead followers into believing that the influencers' endorsements are genuine opinions, which might not be the case.

Advertising Regulations and Rollbit's Promotion Tactics

Rollbit's promotion methods have come under scrutiny, as regulators worldwide are increasingly cracking down on undisclosed and misleading endorsements in the cryptocurrency space. Regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States require influencers to clearly disclose their partnerships with brands and the nature of their compensation.

Failure to comply with advertising regulations can lead to legal consequences for both the influencer and the company sponsoring them. With Rollbit's promotion methods under investigation by the community, it remains to be seen whether the company and its partners will face penalties from regulators.

Community Reaction

The reaction from the crypto community has been mixed, with some users voicing their support for Rollbit's aggressive marketing campaign, claiming it is necessary for a new coin to gain traction in the highly competitive market. Others are concerned that undisclosed partnerships and potentially misleading promotions undermine the credibility of the cryptocurrency industry and may hurt the public's trust in digital assets.

You see Twitter posts from a broad range of accounts for countless months, shilling the RLB token as an "underpriced" investment.

Meanwhile, these accounts claim to not be affiliated with the website and are non-sponsored.

Except, as we know now, there are backdoor deals. pic.twitter.com/tVMpTQXdv0

— Grizzly (@Gr1zzlyTrades) April 2, 2023 Conclusion

Rollbit's promotion tactics involving crypto influencers have raised important questions about the ethical and legal implications of influencer marketing in the cryptocurrency industry. As the space continues to grow and mature, it is crucial that companies and influencers alike maintain transparency and adhere to moral advertising to protect consumers and maintain the credibility of the industry.

Market sentiment toward the Avalanche ecosystem has weakened recently, influenced by ongoing debates across the broader cryptocurrency market. According to Santiment Intelligence data, what was once an optimistic outlook in earlier months has shifted to a more cautious and bearish tone in recent sessions. Avalanche, widely known as a layer 1 blockchain that enables the creation of application-specific subnets, now faces heightened scrutiny.

Participants in the market have raised pressing questions about developer activity, user growth, and the overall momentum of the ecosystem. These concerns have become especially prominent when Avalanche is compared to rival layer 1 networks such as Solana and Sui. Social media commentary has increasingly centered on whether Avalanche can sustain its growth trajectory.

Despite an overall uptrend in the crypto market on Monday, conversation around Avalanche surged, driven by rising skepticism and making it one of the most discussed assets.

Data shared by Santiment Intelligence shows a gradual decline in sentiment indicator levels for Avalanche. The index, which had shown strong positive levels earlier in the year, has now moved closer to negative territory. Even so, AVAX has remained one of the top tokens on watch as the market reconsiders the ecosystem’s momentum.

Mini glossary: Santiment Intelligence is an analytics platform that tracks on-chain metrics and social media trends to measure sentiment around crypto assets. These sentiment data points help investors monitor the positive and negative tones circulating in online discussions.

Developer activity and competitive dynamics in focusRecent negative discussions surrounding Avalanche have concentrated mainly on developer engagement and the long-term strength of the ecosystem. These issues have dominated various crypto community channels tracked by sentiment tools. As a result, market players are closely assessing whether network growth metrics can counterbalance the newfound pressure.

According to Santiment, periods of excessively negative sentiment sometimes precede trend reversals in the market.

Avalanche’s subnet architecture continues to be a core element in its approach to scaling. This structure remains fundamental in both its design and ecosystem expansion strategy. Institutional partnerships and collaborations with public agencies are further enhancing the visibility of the Avalanche ecosystem.

In recent months, developer activity and ecosystem growth metrics have become the most widely referenced benchmarks for evaluating Avalanche against its competitors. Comparisons—particularly with Solana and Sui—have injected added volatility into discussions surrounding AVAX.

Element ComparedKey Highlight from the NewsAvalanche sentimentShifted from the year’s strong optimism to a more bearish outlookMain points of discussionDeveloper activity, user growth, ecosystem momentumRival networksFrequent comparisons with Solana and SuiAVAX price edges up, trading volume exceeds 223 million dollarsCoinGecko data shows AVAX trading at $6.80 at the time of reporting. The token’s 24-hour trading volume reached $223,571,040. Over the last 24 hours, AVAX price climbed by 0.46 percent, and it registered a 2.30 percent increase week over week.

Although the price has seen only modest gains, discussion on social media continues to reflect a cautious market mood. As a result, investors are tracking both price action and fresh signals on network growth and competitive strength with keen interest.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

This week’s $453M release forms part of $4.7B in scheduled September unlocks, a pace that could keep volatility elevated across majors.

A fresh wave of token releases is set to hit the crypto market this week, with more than $453 million worth of major assets scheduled to enter circulation.

Data from the Tokenomist website shows significant cliff unlocks for Ethereum Name Service (ENS), Immutable X (IMX), and Elixir (ELX), alongside daily linear distributions impacting heavyweights like Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), and Avalanche (AVAX).

Unlocks Add Supply Pressure Across Key Projects ENS leads this week’s unlocks, with about $213 million worth of tokens scheduled to hit the market, an amount that makes up just over 3% of its circulating supply. It is followed by IMX with an upcoming release valued at about $55 million, accounting for slightly more than 1%of its supply.

Among projects experiencing steady daily linear releases, Solana will see close to $100 million added to its supply, while the Worldcoin project is set to make available around $32 million worth of its native WLD token.

Meanwhile, DOGE will activate more than 96 million new coins valued at $19.79 million, with Celestia preparing to introduce an additional 6.96 million TIA tokens priced at about $13 million.

Avalanche will also expand its supply by roughly $16 million, and Sui will contribute 3.01 million coins worth just under $10 million. Combined, these events form part of the broader $4.7 billion in token unlocks expected throughout September.

Historically, cliff unlocks often lead to volatility when sudden supply hits the market without matching demand. On the other hand, linear schedules can provide a more gradual release, and with multiple high-value unlocks overlapping this week, traders are advised to keep an eye out for short-term turbulence, especially in lower-liquidity tokens.

You may also like: Mining Profits Dry Up Across Bitcoin, DOGE, LTC, and BCH Worldcoin Rival Humanity Protocol’s Token Crashes 88% as $30M Wallet Drain Sparks Security Panic Could Dogecoin (DOGE) Be Setting Up for Its Next Big Move? Analysts Think So Market Impact: Eyes on Solana and Dogecoin Solana stands out as both a beneficiary of bullish technical momentum and a project facing a notable unlock.

As recently reported by CryptoPotato, on-chain data shows nearly $4 billion worth of SOL accumulated around $180, with additional treasury purchases adding support. Analysts suggest the golden cross could fuel further upside if buying pressure absorbs the fresh supply, though resistance near $0.002 BTC remains a test.

Elsewhere, Dogecoin’s outlook is less clear. The OG meme coin is consolidating below $0.23, a breakout level that analyst Ali Martinez has flagged as pivotal for short-term rallies. And with close to $20 million in new tokens entering circulation this week, the added supply could weigh on the asset unless bullish sentiment returns.

Tags:

Ripple CEO Praises Mastercard Deal as Industry Copies the XRP Vision It Once Mocked

Price analysis 1/26: BTC, ETH, BNB, SOL, XRP, ADA, AVAX, DOGE, DOT, LINK

OpenSea Users Urged to Link EVM Wallets Before SEA Airdrop Deadline

Reason to trust

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed

The highest standards in reporting and publishing

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.

The price of Shiba Inu might be currently declining, but an analyst says the meme coin is gearing up for a bullish run as it is currently flashing a buy signal. According to Cantonese Cat, SHIB is now flashing a strong buy signal based on the L3 Banker Fund Flow Trend Oscillator, a relatively lesser-known indicator. 

In a detailed breakdown shared via a YouTube video, Cantonese Cat explored SHIB’s recent price action in conjunction with this oscillator, revealing that it is ready for at least a 5x move to its all-time high, up until a bigger 2430% increase to a target of $0.00047.

Shiba Inu Flashes Buy Signal Cantonese Cat’s latest analysis on Shiba Inu offers an interesting angle to the meme coin’s price action alongside other altcoins. The video in which he shared his analysis covers the current SHIB movement in relation to the larger altcoin market. As such, the analyst notes that Shiba Inu is one of ten cryptocurrencies among Optimism, Avalanche, Cardano, Chainlink, Boba Network, COTI, Amp, Cartesi, and Injective, which are all flashing a buy signal with the L3 Banker Fund Flow Trend Oscillator. 

The L3 Banker Fund Flow Trend Oscillator is a technical indicator used to analyze the flow of capital in and out of cryptocurrencies among large market participants. A detailed analysis of SHIB’s price action with this indicator shows that this buy signal is extremely rare. The last time it flashed a buy signal for SHIB was in July 2023.

At that time, SHIB was trading below $0.000008. What’s more interesting is that even though the buy signal appeared then, SHIB’s price continued to consolidate for another six months before finally experiencing a strong rally in February 2024 during the broader crypto market upturn. Fast forward to October 2024, and SHIB is now showing another sign of a bullish rally with the L3 Banker Fund Flow Trend Oscillator.

SHIB Price Targets To Expect Although the buy signal is derived from the banker fund oscillator, the analyst uses Fibonacci levels to predict potential targets when the breakout eventually occurs. The first target is the 1 Fibonacci extension level, which aligns with SHIB’s current all-time high of $0.0000884. He also noted an ultimate “crazy target” for those anticipating a bigger surge. This ultimate target is at the 1.618 Fibonacci extension level, which aligns with $0.00047. 

Source: X Reaching this price would require SHIB to break through multiple resistance levels, both before and after surpassing its all-time high. Achieving this “crazy target” would represent a 2,430% increase or approximately a 30x jump from the current price level. Cantonese Cat suggests that this target could be achieved by August or September 2025, although he admits this is a highly ambitious target. According to him, a more feasible target is a 10x run from the current SHIB price.

At the time of writing, SHIB is trading at $0.00001733 and is down by 6% in 24 hours. 

SHIB price still holding up | Source: SHIBUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Disclaimer: The information found on NewsBTC is for educational purposes only. It does not represent the opinions of NewsBTC on whether to buy, sell or hold any investments and naturally investing carries risks. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use information provided on this website entirely at your own risk.

Thu 24 Jul 2025 ▪ 5 min read ▪ by Mikaia A.

Summarize this article with:

In the crypto universe, whether novices or veterans, all players seek to attract with the promise of disruption. New solutions emerge every day, shaking up a market in full mutation. It is in this context that MoonPay launches into Solana liquid staking with an offer of 8.49% annual yield. This initiative aims to simplify access to decentralized finance for a wide audience. A bold but logical bet as Solana experiences incredible growth and appetite for on-chain yields grows ever stronger.

In brief MoonPay simplifies staking: minimum deposit of 1 USD, with a reward every two days. Solana surpasses Ethereum with over 53 billion dollars staked, attracting strong demand. Maximum flexibility: no lock-up and the ability to withdraw at any time, without constraints. Solana on the rise: liquid staking becomes a lever of choice Solana, which has recently surpassed Ethereum in terms of total value staked (53.9 billion dollars versus 53.7 billion for Ethereum), establishes itself as a key player in staking. Indeed, Solana offers an annual yield of 8.3%, much higher than Ethereum’s (3.2%). A differential that appeals both to experienced crypto investors and newcomers to the decentralized finance universe.

This liquid staking, where users can deposit SOL without a lock-up period, fits into a growing trend. According to Ivan Soto-Wright, CEO of MoonPay, the goal is to make staking as simple as a traditional savings account while offering attractive yields thanks to blockchain. In his words:

We have created a product that reflects the ease of a savings account, but with the potential of blockchain networks behind it.

Launched from July 23, this feature, available in more than 100 countries, offers an 8.49% yield for Solana holders. Users can stake starting from 1 USD and receive rewards every two days.

An offer adapted to the general public: MoonPay simplifies staking MoonPay stands out through its desire to make liquid staking as accessible as possible. While players like Marinade and Jito already dominate the Solana market, MoonPay bets on simplicity to capture a wider audience, especially non-technical investors. The one-tap interface allows users to participate in staking without having to interact directly with tokens or complex protocols.

With a minimal entry of 1 USD, MoonPay allows a broad audience to benefit from blockchain rewards while simplifying the interface. This offer echoes MoonPay’s goal to make decentralized finance accessible to all, including those with little experience in the field. The objective: to democratize on-chain rewards and attract a wider audience, including those who had never considered investing in crypto assets before.

MoonPay has also played a key role in integrating a staking product that allows total flexibility. Users can withdraw their funds at any time, unlike other products that impose lock-up periods. This makes the offer particularly attractive to occasional investors who seek profitability without taking too many risks.

Growth and competition: MoonPay facing the giants of crypto While Solana attracts users due to higher yields, the competition in the liquid staking domain is fierce. Platforms like Marinade and Jito also offer competitive yields, but MoonPay’s flexibility and ease of use could allow it to stand out. Indeed, MoonPay’s goal is not just to compete with these platforms but to simplify the access process to Solana and its yields.

Staking platforms like Marinade and Jito offer similar yields and flexible liquidity, but they often address a more knowledgeable audience due to the complexity of their interfaces. MoonPay, with its one-tap solution and low entry threshold, targets the general public market directly, which could attract a significant number of investors who have not yet taken the crypto staking step.

Key figures:

Solana surpasses Ethereum: In April 2025, Solana exceeded Ethereum with 53.9 billion dollars staked.; Attractive yield: Solana staking offers an annual yield of 8.3%, versus 3.2% for Ethereum; An accessible product: Staking from 1 USD, with rewards distributed every two days; Institutional adoption: Companies like DeFi Development Corp and Upexi have acquired millions of SOL. Thanks to its ease of use and low entry threshold, MoonPay succeeds in capturing a share of the growing market, while offering a flexible and accessible alternative to Solana staking.

In an environment where crypto staking platforms are flourishing, MoonPay stands out with a smooth and accessible solution. However, competition remains fierce. For example, Kraken recently launched a groundbreaking BTC staking service, allowing its users to put their BTC to work for passive yield. This illustrates the strong demand for innovative staking services.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Mikaia A.

La révolution blockchain et crypto est en marche ! Et le jour où les impacts se feront ressentir sur l’économie la plus vulnérable de ce Monde, contre toute espérance, je dirai que j’y étais pour quelque chose

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

Nick Sawinyh on 11 Mar 2026

Stablecoins are blockchain tokens pegged 1:1 to a fiat currency, usually the U.S. dollar. They give you the programmability and speed of crypto without the price swings. That simple combination has turned them into plumbing for DeFi, cross-border payments, remittances, treasury management, and on-chain settlement.

The market crossed $250 billion in total supply by mid-2025 and has continued growing. As of early 2026, total stablecoin market capitalization is above $310 billion according to DefiLlama data. Tether’s USDT sits around $183-187B (roughly 60% of the market), Circle’s USDC around $74-76B. Growth has been driven by regulatory clarity in the U.S. and EU and a wave of institutional adoption.

This article is for anyone considering issuing a stablecoin, evaluating the infrastructure to do so, or trying to map the competitive field. It covers issuance models, regulatory frameworks, technical architecture, service providers, the new “stablechains,” step-by-step launch guidance, and the risks worth planning for.

How stablecoin issuance works Issuing a stablecoin means designing, launching, and operating a token where new units are minted only when equivalent reserves or collateral are locked up. Tokens can be burned (destroyed) when someone redeems. The issuer’s job is keeping that mint-burn cycle trustworthy, transparent, and compliant.

You can either build it yourself with custom smart contracts, banking partnerships, and compliance infrastructure, or use a turnkey platform (often called “Stablecoin-as-a-Service”). Most organizations in 2026 choose the turnkey route, at least to start. But understanding both matters. Even turnkey solutions force architectural decisions that stick with you for years.

Which issuance model fits? Every stablecoin starts with a model decision. Your choice determines capital requirements, regulatory burden, revenue mechanics, and risk profile.

Fiat-backed (custodial / off-chain reserves) The dominant model, accounting for over 90% of the market. Also the one regulators prefer.

Users or institutions deposit fiat (USD cash, Treasuries, repos, money market funds, or insured bank deposits) with the issuer or a qualified custodian. The issuer mints an equivalent number of tokens on-chain. When someone redeems, the tokens get burned and the reserves are released. Reserves sit in segregated, audited accounts.

The economics: issuers earn yield on reserves, primarily from short-term Treasuries. That’s how Circle, Tether, and Paxos make money.

The trade-off is centralization. You depend on banks and custodians, you need licenses, and you’re subject to ongoing audits. But for most businesses, this is the right starting point. USDC, USDT, PayPal’s PYUSD, and newer entrants like KlarnaUSD (issued via Bridge) all use this model.

Crypto-collateralized (on-chain, over-collateralized) Users deposit volatile crypto (typically ETH) into smart contracts at 120-200% collateralization ratios. Price oracles are central to this model. They’re external data feeds (Chainlink is the most widely used) that supply real-time asset prices to on-chain contracts. If oracle data is stale, manipulated, or delayed, liquidations can misfire or fail entirely, potentially threatening the peg. Oracle risk is one of the less-discussed but more dangerous failure modes in crypto-collateralized stablecoins. If the collateral ratio drops below a threshold, automatic liquidation kicks in. Minting and burning happen entirely through smart contracts.

This model is fully transparent and doesn’t need traditional banking relationships. The downside is capital inefficiency: you lock up significantly more value than you mint. Liquidation risk during volatile markets is real. MakerDAO’s DAI is the best-known example. Ethena’s USDe is a newer hybrid.

Revenue comes from stability fees and liquidation penalties rather than reserve yield.

Algorithmic / hybrid Pure algorithmic stablecoins use smart contracts to expand and contract supply through incentive mechanisms, with little or no collateral backing. After the TerraUSD collapse in 2022, this model is largely discredited. Most regulators have banned or restricted it. The EU’s MiCA framework prohibits purely algorithmic stablecoins outright.

Hybrids like FRAX combine partial reserves with algorithmic mechanisms, but adoption remains niche. Unless you have a very specific reason, avoid this model in 2026.

Tokenized deposits / bank-integrated Tokens represent direct claims on insured bank deposits or tokenized reserves on permissioned or public chains. JPMorgan’s JPM Coin (now JPMD) is the primary example. These stablecoins integrate directly with traditional banking rails.

The advantage is deposit insurance and the trust infrastructure of established banks. The downside is ecosystem lock-in and limited multichain reach. This model works best for large financial institutions that already have a banking charter and want to extend their rails onto blockchain.

Regulatory frameworks in 2026 Regulation is simultaneously the biggest barrier and biggest enabler of stablecoin issuance. If you don’t understand the regulatory environment, the rest of this article won’t matter much.

The global picture has converged around a few core requirements: 1:1 reserves in high-quality liquid assets, licensing, redemption rights at par, regular audits, and AML/KYC compliance. Most frameworks also restrict or prohibit yield payments directly to stablecoin holders, keeping the instrument classified as a payment tool rather than a security. But the specifics vary by jurisdiction, and the debate around yield-bearing stablecoins is active (the White House held closed-door meetings on this topic as recently as February 2026).

United States: the GENIUS Act and federal/state oversight The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created the first comprehensive federal framework for stablecoin issuance. Only “permitted” issuers can operate: FDIC-insured banks and their subsidiaries, or federally/state-qualified non-bank issuers.

An important structural detail: oversight is split between federal and state regulators depending on issuer type and size. Non-bank issuers with under $10B in circulation can be regulated at the state level under existing money transmitter frameworks. Larger issuers and bank-affiliated issuers fall under federal oversight via banking regulators, with the OCC playing a role for non-bank issuers at the federal level. It’s not a single-regulator model.

Requirements: 1:1 reserves in cash, Treasuries, repos, and insured deposits. Monthly attestations and annual audits for large issuers. Redeemable at par. No interest payments to holders under the current framework. Foreign issuers face restrictions unless their home jurisdiction has equivalence arrangements.

European Union: MiCA The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation took effect across 2024-2025 and creates two categories: e-money tokens (EMTs, pegged to a single currency) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs). Issuers must be EU credit institutions or authorized electronic money institutions. Reserves must be held in high-quality liquid assets at EU banks.

Pure algorithmic stablecoins are banned. Redemption at par is mandatory, often without fees. The ECB has oversight authority for systemically important stablecoins. Full authorization is required by July 1, 2026 for all issuers operating in the EU.

Other jurisdictions The UK is building its framework through FCA and Bank of England e-money rules, with caps for systemic stablecoins. Singapore requires a MAS license and full backing. Japan restricts issuance to banks and trust companies. Hong Kong has introduced HKMA licensing for HKD-pegged stablecoins.

The pattern across all of these: convergence on reserves, redemption rights, and licensing. Differences mainly come down to issuer eligibility and acceptable reserve assets. The U.S. favors Treasuries, the EU favors bank deposits.

Technical architecture: what a modern stablecoin stack looks like Whether you build or buy, you need to understand the components.

Core smart contracts Deployed on one or more blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Algorand, others), these handle minting, burning, and transfer logic. For 2026 compliance, your contracts need role-based access control (minter, burner, pauser, blacklister, clawback roles), pause and freeze functionality for AML and sanctions enforcement, and blacklisting and clawback for court orders.

Most teams start with audited frameworks like OpenZeppelin’s ERC-20Upgradeable combined with Pausable, AccessControl, and UUPS proxy patterns for upgradeability. Some blockchains offer built-in compliance controls at the protocol level. Algorand, for instance, has native freeze and clawback functions that make it attractive for institutional issuers without requiring custom contract logic.

Advanced standards like Tempo’s TIP-20 (on their payments-first L1) add native protocol-level features: built-in mint/burn/transfer restrictions, RBAC, transfer memos for reconciliation, and native yield distribution, all without extra contract complexity.

Issuer backend system A secure, centralized system (typically API-driven) that authorizes minting and burning events. It verifies that fiat deposits arrived before instructing the smart contract to mint, and confirms burn events before releasing fiat for redemption. This is the operational core that ties on-chain activity to off-chain banking.

Custody and reserve layer Fiat and other reserve assets sit in custody accounts at regulated banks or trust companies. Qualified custodians provide regular attestations. Typical reserve composition includes cash, short-term U.S. Treasuries, repos, money market funds, and insured bank deposits. Increasingly, reserves also include tokenized Treasuries from providers like BlackRock, WisdomTree, and Superstate, which generate yield while maintaining liquidity. As a point of reference, Tether’s Q4 2025 attestation reported $141 billion in total U.S. Treasury exposure (direct holdings plus overnight reverse repos), making it one of the largest holders of U.S. sovereign debt globally.

Compliance and identity layer KYC/AML checks and transaction monitoring tools integrate with the issuance and redemption flow. Only verified users can mint or redeem. All on-chain activity gets screened for illicit finance. Blockchain analytics providers like Chainalysis and Blockaid are standard parts of the stack.

Fiat on/off-ramps The bridges between blockchain and traditional finance. Licensed money services businesses like Coinme provide the infrastructure to move funds between bank accounts, cards, and on-chain stablecoins.

Multichain deployment Most stablecoins in 2026 operate across multiple chains. You can deploy natively on each chain, use cross-chain bridges or interoperability protocols (Axelar, LayerZero, Circle’s CCTP), or issue on specialized payment-focused L1s. The choice depends on your target users and use cases.

Security Multiple independent audits are table stakes. Beyond that: timelocks on critical contract functions, multi-sig governance, invariant checks, and HSM or MPC-based key custody. Daily reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves is standard practice, along with monthly attestations.

Stablecoin-as-a-Service providers Most businesses in 2026 use a turnkey provider rather than building from scratch.

Paxos The most established player, operating since 2018. Paxos is the issuer behind PayPal’s PYUSD and has partnerships with Interactive Brokers and other large enterprises. They handle regulatory compliance, reserve custody, and minting/redeeming technology across multiple blockchains.

They’ve processed over $180B in activity and focus on enterprise partnerships. Expect enterprise-level pricing to match.

Circle Circle is first and foremost the issuer of USDC, the second-largest stablecoin. They don’t offer white-label issuance of fully custom-branded stablecoins the way Brale or Bridge do. What they do offer is programmable wallets, Circle Mint for institutional USDC access, and the Circle Payments Network (CPN) for connecting financial institutions. If you want to build payment products on top of an existing, highly regulated stablecoin rather than issuing your own, Circle’s stack is the natural choice.

Circle supports 20+ blockchains, offers API-based integration, and charges transaction-based fees. Their cross-chain transfer protocol (CCTP) is a real differentiator for multichain deployments. Circle also went public on the NYSE in 2025, adding another layer of transparency.

Brale A U.S.-regulated issuance platform that lets businesses create and manage their own fiat-backed stablecoins. Brale acts as the legal issuer under its money transmitter licenses, handling custody, reserve management, and compliance while providing APIs for minting and burning across 20+ blockchains.

Good option for organizations that want a custom-branded stablecoin without building the regulatory infrastructure themselves. Revenue-share pricing model.

Bridge (Stripe-acquired) Bridge offers an Open Issuance API to launch and manage a branded stablecoin with minimal code. They handle reserves, liquidity, compliance, and fiat on/off-ramps. Stripe’s acquisition gives Bridge access to an enormous merchant network.

Bridge has received preliminary approval to establish a national trust bank, which would let them offer regulated custody and reserve management under a federal framework.

Coinbase Custom Stablecoins Launched December 18, 2025, this is Coinbase’s “stablecoin-as-a-service” offering. It lets businesses create custom-branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by USDC and other USD-stablecoins, with Coinbase handling issuance, smart contracts, compliance, and custody. First partners include Flipcash, Solflare, and R2. Separately, Coinbase is also powering stablecoin-denominated institutional funding for Klarna via USDC.

Important nuance: at launch, Custom Stablecoins use USDC as the underlying collateral rather than direct fiat reserves. That means Coinbase is acting as an issuance layer on top of Circle’s stablecoin, not as a direct fiat-to-stablecoin issuer like Paxos or Brale. Coinbase has applied for an OCC national trust charter, which could eventually allow it to custody reserves directly.

Frax Finance Known for its hybrid stablecoin model, Frax now offers “GENIUS-compatible” white-label infrastructure. Per project announcements, Sonic Labs used Frax’s framework to launch a USSD stablecoin backed by tokenized Treasuries. Frax provides modular smart contract infrastructure with built-in composability through LayerZero.

The DeFi-native option, designed for teams comfortable with on-chain tooling.

Stably A primary partner for blockchain platforms like Algorand and Stacks. Stably provides a Stablecoin-as-a-Service suite including fiat on/off-ramps, multi-chain issuance, and compliance. They specialize in stablecoins pegged to various fiat currencies beyond the dollar.

M0 M0 is a programmable stablecoin issuance protocol that separates token logic from reserve custody. It lets businesses build “stablecoin extensions,” which are custom-branded tokens with their own compliance rules, yield mechanics, and access controls, all built on a shared liquidity and interoperability layer. M0 raised a $40M Series B and has over $779M in on-chain supply minted. Bridge (Stripe) uses M0’s protocol under the hood for stablecoin issuance, as confirmed when MetaMask launched mUSD. MoonPay’s PYUSDx framework also runs on M0 infrastructure.

Worth watching closely. M0’s approach of decoupling reserve management from token issuance could become the default pattern for application-specific stablecoins.

Other providers worth noting Agora offers regulated stablecoin issuance with a trust-based approach. Bastion takes a similar regulated trust posture. Anchorage Digital is primarily a federally chartered crypto bank providing qualified custody and regulated banking services. It’s not a full stablecoin issuance platform, but it plays a role in the custody and compliance layer that issuers need. Fireblocks provides infrastructure and custody tooling (MPC wallets, workflow automation, settlement) across 100+ chains. It processes roughly 15% of global stablecoin volume and is used by 300+ banks and payment providers, but it’s infrastructure plumbing, not a legal issuer of stablecoins. BitGo offers qualified custody infrastructure. Cobo provides full-suite payment operations, combining MPC custody, payment APIs, and Wallet-as-a-Service across 80+ chains. Tassat focuses on tokenized deposits and real-time settlement for institutional digital asset operations, including its Link platform for real-time collateral and settlement workflows.

The stablechains: purpose-built L1s for stablecoin payments This is probably the most interesting development in stablecoin infrastructure right now. Starting in 2025, a new category of “stablechains” appeared: Layer-1 blockchains built specifically for stablecoin payments and issuance. Instead of deploying on general-purpose chains like Ethereum or Solana, issuers can use infrastructure where stablecoins are first-class citizens rather than an afterthought.

Three projects lead this category: Tempo, Circle Arc, and Tether Plasma. All three are EVM-compatible, target sub-second finality, and aim to make stablecoin transactions competitive with Visa, ACH, and SWIFT. They differ in philosophy, ecosystem, and who they’re designed for.

A word of caution: this category is very early. As of March 2026, only Plasma has a live mainnet with real production volume. Tempo and Arc are on public testnet with mainnet launches expected later in 2026. Performance claims (TPS targets, finality times) are based on testnet data or design targets, not proven production metrics at scale. Partnership announcements reflect stated intentions and early pilots, not necessarily live integrations processing real money. That said, the backers (Stripe, Circle, Tether) have the resources and distribution to make these projects matter, which is why they’re worth tracking closely.

Tempo Incubated by Stripe and Paradigm with over $500M raised. Tempo is a payments-first L1 that takes a deliberately neutral approach. No native token. Gas fees can be paid in any stablecoin through an enshrined AMM that auto-swaps to validators. Issuers aren’t forced into any single stablecoin ecosystem.

Tempo’s native TIP-20 token standard includes built-in mint/burn restrictions, protocol-level compliance (TIP-403 Policies), delegatable RBAC with on-chain audit logs, transfer memos for off-chain reconciliation, and native yield distribution. Design targets include 100,000+ TPS and roughly 0.6-second deterministic finality (no re-orgs), though these are pre-mainnet projections, not production-verified metrics.

Other protocol primitives: a Fee AMM (pay gas in any stablecoin, creating structural demand), a native stablecoin DEX for on-chain liquidity and FX (on roadmap), dedicated payment lanes with guaranteed blockspace, and account abstraction with passkey support.

Per Tempo’s announcement materials, the ecosystem roster includes Stripe, Shopify, Nubank, Klarna, DoorDash, Deel, Revolut, Visa, Anthropic, and Deutsche Bank. These are announced partnerships, not necessarily confirmed live integrations. Klarna’s involvement is separately confirmed through its Coinbase stablecoin funding announcement.

Status: public testnet live, mainnet expected H1 2026.

Best for issuers who want maximum flexibility, multi-stablecoin support, and deep payments integration with minimal vendor lock-in. Contact: [email protected].

Circle Arc Circle’s own L1, announced August 2025. Arc makes USDC the native gas token, creating a fully dollar-denominated chain. It uses Malachite BFT consensus for sub-second finality (around 780ms) and targets over 50,000 TPS.

The defining feature is a built-in FX engine with on-chain RFQ and PvP settlement, which makes it attractive for cross-currency treasury operations. Arc deeply integrates Circle’s stack: CCTP, native mint/burn, Gateway, and on/off-ramps. It also offers opt-in privacy designed for compliance-ready institutional use.

Partners include BlackRock, Visa, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, HSBC, AWS, Coinbase, and OpenAI.

Status: public testnet with 100+ institutional participants, strong activity since October 2025. Mainnet expected 2026.

Best for institutions already in the USDC ecosystem, or those needing on-chain FX and capital markets infrastructure.

Tether Plasma The only stablechain with a fully live mainnet as of March 2026. Plasma is Tether’s chain, built around USDT with a zero-fee transfer model using a Paymaster contract. Sub-second finality at 1,000+ TPS. Over $373M raised.

Plasma supports 25+ stablecoins but is clearly USDT-centric. Per Tether’s communications, it has attracted significant deposits and become one of the larger USDT networks by balance. It includes a native Bitcoin bridge and optional confidential transactions. The ecosystem spans 100+ DeFi partners (including Aave) per project announcements.

Best for USDT-focused use cases, retail and emerging-market payments, and anyone who wants live production volume today.

How to choose between them The decision comes down to a few questions.

What’s your primary stablecoin? USDT points to Plasma. USDC points to Arc. Multi-stablecoin or custom-branded points to Tempo.

Who are your target users? Retail and emerging-market payments: Plasma. Enterprise and institutional capital markets: Arc. Fintechs, merchants, embedded finance: Tempo.

How much execution risk can you tolerate? Plasma is live but carries heavier regulatory scrutiny as a Tether-affiliated project. Tempo and Arc have strong backers but are pre-mainnet.

Many issuers are hedging by testing or launching on multiple chains simultaneously.

End-to-end launch stacks Several providers bundle token issuance, reserve management, compliance, and payment rails into a single integrated offering.

Polygon’s Open Money Stack bundles blockchain settlement, enterprise-grade wallets, and regulated fiat on/off-ramps (via Coinme) into one API. Transactions settle in under 2 seconds at roughly $0.002 each. Institutions can move money from a bank account into a stablecoin, settle on-chain, and convert back to fiat without juggling multiple vendors.

Cobo combines MPC custody, payment APIs, and Wallet-as-a-Service for high-volume stablecoin operations. It supports 80+ chains and plugs into existing treasury systems.

Brale’s unified platform lets an enterprise launch a stablecoin and have it instantly provisioned with on/off-ramps, pricing, APIs, and reporting, all under Brale’s regulatory umbrella.

Step-by-step: how to issue a stablecoin in 2026 The practical sequence, from concept to production.

1. Define purpose and structure. What is the stablecoin for? Payments, treasury management, loyalty programs, embedded finance? Your answer determines which issuance model, platform, and chain make sense. Fiat-backed is the right choice for most use cases. Pick your platform early since switching later is expensive.

2. Secure banking and reserves. Partner with qualified custodians or banks. Set up segregated 1:1 reserve accounts holding cash, short-term Treasuries, repos, money market funds, or insured deposits. Diversify across custodians where possible. Stress-test your liquidity for redemption spikes. Turnkey providers like Brale or Paxos handle much of this, but you still need visibility into the reserve structure.

3. Develop or integrate the technology. If building custom: write and audit your smart contracts (start with OpenZeppelin frameworks), implement compliance controls (RBAC, pause, freeze, clawback), choose your target chains, and get multiple independent security audits. If using a platform: integrate via API (Bridge, Brale) or deploy using native token standards (TIP-20 on Tempo).

4. Set up issuance and redemption flows. Mint tokens when verified fiat deposits arrive. Burn tokens on redemption and release corresponding reserves. Build continuous reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves. Publish monthly attestations.

5. Ensure compliance and transparency. Obtain the necessary licenses (or confirm your turnkey provider holds them). Implement KYC/AML for all mint and redeem operations. Set up transaction monitoring. Publish reserve reports and audit results. Under the GENIUS Act, large issuers need monthly attestations and annual audits. MiCA requires full authorization by mid-2026.

6. Launch and distribute. Deploy on your target chain(s). Get listed on exchanges and DEXs. Provide initial liquidity. Monitor the peg continuously. Integrate into real payment flows: payroll via Deel on Tempo, merchant checkout through Stripe, remittance corridors.

7. Ongoing operations. This is where most of the work lives. Regular audits, risk monitoring, smart contract upgrades, regulatory reporting, and responding to compliance events (sanctions, court orders, suspicious activity). It never stops.

Provider comparison Provider Core capability Target customers Supported chains Complexity / cost Paxos Regulated issuance, custody, proven at scale Large enterprises, fintechs Ethereum, others Medium. High cost (enterprise contracts) Circle USDC issuer, programmable wallets, CPN, high liquidity Startups to enterprises 20+ chains Low. Transaction-based fees Brale Full-stack issuance, acts as legal issuer, multi-chain Startups to enterprises 20+ chains Low. Revenue-share pricing Bridge (Stripe) Open Issuance API, fiat on/off-ramps, Stripe distribution Enterprises, fintechs Multiple chains + Tempo Low. Transaction-based fees M0 Programmable issuance protocol, shared liquidity layer Developers, fintechs, wallets Ethereum, multi-chain Low-medium. Protocol-based Coinbase Custom Stablecoins Stablecoin-as-a-service, USDC-collateralized branded tokens Enterprises, fintechs Base, Ethereum (expanding) Low. Revenue-share Frax White-label modular infrastructure, RWA backing Blockchain networks, protocols EVM-compatible via LayerZero Medium. Variable cost Polygon End-to-end “Open Money Stack” Institutions, payment companies Polygon, multi-chain via Agglayer Low. Volume-based pricing Cobo Enterprise payments, MPC custody, treasury automation High-volume institutions 80+ chains Medium. Institutional pricing Fireblocks Infrastructure/custody tooling, MPC wallets, settlement (not an issuer) Large institutions 100+ chains Medium. Institutional licensing Stablechains comparison Aspect Tempo Circle Arc Tether Plasma Backing Stripe + Paradigm ($500M+) Circle Tether/Bitfinex ($373M+) Status (March 2026) Public testnet, mainnet H1 2026 Public testnet, mainnet 2026 Mainnet live Performance 100k+ TPS target (unverified), ~0.6s finality (design) 50k+ TPS target, ~780ms finality (testnet) 1k+ TPS, sub-second finality (production) Gas model Any stablecoin (no native token) Native USDC USDT-native + Paymaster (zero-fee USDT) Stablecoin focus Issuer-agnostic, multi-stablecoin USDC-centric USDT-centric (25+ supported) Key primitives Stable DEX, payment memos, dedicated lanes, TIP-20 FX engine, opt-in privacy, CCTP integration Zero-fee USDT, Bitcoin bridge, confidential txs Target users Fintechs, merchants, embedded finance Institutions, capital markets Retail, emerging markets, DeFi Real-world examples A few cases that show how this infrastructure comes together in practice. Note: some of these are announced projects or early-stage deployments, not fully scaled production systems. Where possible, I’ve verified against public announcements and press coverage.

MetaMask USD (mUSD) on M0/Bridge. Announced August 2025 by Consensys, MetaMask’s native stablecoin is the first issued by a self-custodial wallet. It uses Bridge for issuance and reserve management with M0’s protocol for the on-chain infrastructure. Planned to launch on Ethereum and Linea, with spending via MetaMask Card at Mastercard merchants.

Klarna’s stablecoin initiatives. Klarna partnered with Coinbase in December 2025 for USDC-denominated institutional funding. Separately, Tempo’s announcement materials list Klarna as an ecosystem partner launching “KlarnaUSD” via Bridge on Tempo, but public documentation of that specific deployment is limited beyond Tempo’s own communications. Worth monitoring but not yet a confirmed live product.

Sonic Labs’ USSD via Frax. Per Frax and Sonic project communications, Sonic used Frax’s white-label infrastructure and backed USSD with tokenized Treasuries. Independent documentation is thin, but it illustrates the modular approach: a blockchain network launching a native stablecoin by composing existing infrastructure rather than building from scratch.

Stablecorp’s QCAD. A Canadian dollar stablecoin that uses VersaBank as federally regulated custodian for reserves through VersaBank’s VersaVault platform. Stablecorp manages issuance and compliance while leaning on established banking infrastructure for credibility.

Stable Sea with BitGo. A B2B infrastructure platform that partners with BitGo for regulated custody and trading. Newer platforms can assemble best-in-class services from existing providers rather than building everything internally.

Risks worth planning for Good infrastructure reduces risk. It doesn’t eliminate it. Here’s what actually goes wrong.

Depegging. Market shocks, collateral liquidation cascades, or loss of confidence can push a stablecoin off its peg. Even fiat-backed stablecoins aren’t immune. USDC briefly lost its peg in March 2023 when Silicon Valley Bank failed with a portion of Circle’s reserves held there.

Custody and banking failures. Your stablecoin is only as safe as your custodian. Diversify where possible and understand the insolvency protections (or lack thereof) for your reserve accounts.

Smart contract bugs. A vulnerability in your minting or burning logic can be catastrophic. Multiple independent audits are the minimum. Timelocks, multi-sig controls, and bug bounty programs add layers of defense.

Regulatory changes. The GENIUS Act and MiCA are still relatively new. Rules will evolve. Non-compliance carries real consequences: fines, loss of license, blocked market access. Build compliance into the product from day one, not as an afterthought.

Sanctions and illicit finance exposure. Stablecoins are tools, and bad actors use them. You need transaction monitoring and the ability to freeze or clawback assets when legally required.

Operational risk. Stablecoin operations run around the clock. Reconciliation errors, oracle failures (for crypto-collateralized models), and infrastructure outages compound quickly.

Algorithmic model risk. If you’re considering an algorithmic or lightly collateralized design, this carries the highest systemic risk. The TerraUSD collapse proved that incentive mechanisms alone can’t maintain a peg under stress.

Best practices for 2026 issuers Automate reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves. Manual processes break at scale.

Use bankruptcy-remote structures for reserve accounts. If your company has financial trouble, the reserves should be legally protected for token holders.

Build compliance into the product. Freeze, clawback, and blacklisting capabilities aren’t just regulatory checkboxes. They’re what institutional customers and regulators look for before working with you.

Partner with blockchain analytics providers from day one. Chainalysis, Blockaid, and similar firms provide transaction monitoring that regulators expect.

Publish clear redemption policies. Specify timelines, fees (if any), minimum amounts, and the process for large redemptions. Ambiguity erodes trust.

Start with a USD peg for maximum liquidity and market access. Non-USD pegs have their place, but infrastructure, liquidity, and regulatory clarity are all strongest for dollar stablecoins.

Plan for multichain or dedicated-chain deployment from the start. Retrofitting cross-chain support later is painful.

Consider starting on a turnkey platform or specialized L1 for speed, then evaluate custom infrastructure as you scale.

Where this is heading The infrastructure to launch a compliant stablecoin in 2026 exists. You can go from concept to live product in weeks through turnkey providers and purpose-built L1s. That speed would have been absurd even two years ago.

The decisions you face: which issuance model fits (fiat-backed for almost everyone), which platform or chain to deploy on (determined by your target users and stablecoin preference), and how much infrastructure to own versus rent.

White-label platforms like Bridge, Paxos, Brale, and Coinbase, issuance protocols like M0, or payments-optimized L1s like Tempo, offer the lowest barrier for most businesses. Custom builds still make sense for large institutions that need complete control and have the engineering team to maintain it.

One thing I’d flag: the temptation to over-engineer early is strong, especially for technical teams. The businesses actually getting stablecoins into production in 2026 are the ones that started with a turnkey provider, shipped, and iterated from there. The fundamentals, robust reserves, transparent operations, and clear redemption policies, matter more than the specific technology stack underneath.

The DeFi mullet — Fintech needs DeFi in the back

Crypto Market Price Analysis Today: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Golem (GLM), aelf (ELF), Solana (SOL)

No Ethereum or Solana, Only Bitcoin For Twenty One Capital | US Crypto News

Crypto in 2025: Messari Predicts Key Trends Driving Growth

Top 3 Crypto Airdrops for the Second Week of July

SYRUP Gains Whale Attention — 3 Real World Assets (RWA) Altcoins to Watch in August

Solana Labs, the company behind the Solana blockchain, has partnered with communications startup Dialect to introduce a new product called Actions and Blinks.

According to a June 25 statement, Access Protocol, alongside other notable blockchain projects like Jupiter, Backpack, Tensor, and Sphere Labs, will integrate Solana Actions and Blinks into their operations.

How Access protocol will utilize Actions and BlinksSolana Actions are Application Programming Interfaces (API) facilitating signable transactions for specified programs, while Blinks leverages these APIs to create user-friendly interfaces.

A spokesperson explained:

“Protocols map transaction links to a specific Solana Action. Blinks are the technology that unfurl the links in an easy-to-use interface via browser extensions.”

This technology allows a shareable link to present an interface for a Solana transaction, enabling users to conduct crypto transactions through any website or application. For instance, a link on social media platform X or a publication site would allow users to complete a crypto transaction without leaving the webpage.

Access Protocol will use Actions and Blinks to enable one-click purchases of staked ACS subscriptions for top crypto media platforms like CryptoSlate and The Block, using Solana's native token, SOL. SOL is the fifth-largest digital asset by market capitalization, trading at $137 as of press time.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

Next week, Access Protocol plans to add 20 more creators to its platform to reach all 160 creators eventually.

Andreas Nicolos, CEO of Access Labs, praised the APIs as transformative for Access Protocol and the wider crypto sector. He stated:

“Solana Actions simplify the user onboarding experience while Blinks expand the total surface area for engagement. The impact of these two products combined cannot be overstated.”

Access Protocol aims to revolutionize digital content monetization with a blockchain-based subscription model. By offering ACS subscriptions in SOL tokens, the platform will further broaden the adoption of its subscription model within the crypto community.

Mentioned in this articlePosted in

Access Protocol’s ACX token surged after unveiling Creator Coins on Solana, a new monetization model for digital creators. 

Summary

Access Protocol launched Creator Coins on Solana, powered by Proof of Audience and Raydium Launchlab. ACX surged over 100% intraday, with volume spiking 10,909%. Creator Coins reward early supporters and provide creators with sustainable revenue models. Creator Coins operate like memecoins but are directly tied to individual creators, offering a tokenized way to align incentives between communities and the talent they follow.

The announcement was made on Aug. 25, 2025, in a post on X and an official press release by Access Protocol (ACX).

Unique Proof of Audience Model Unlike speculative launches with no built-in demand, Access has embedded a Proof of Audience system that sets milestones before any coin can go live. These milestones ensure creators show genuine traction.

https://twitter.com/accessprotocol/status/1959974226409959869?s=46&t=nznXkss3debX8JIhNzHmzw

They include a minimum number of stakers, pool scores, and staking thresholds. Once those conditions are satisfied, token allocations are given to supporters, and creators receive their share, which is vested over a two-year period.

The goal of this strategy is to balance community benefits with long-term creator income. Tokens are tradeable from day one, while Access has also layered in a Creator Token Incentive Program that sends millions of ACS tokens to creators, stakers, and traders every month.

The launch is supported by Raydium’s (RAY) Launchlab on Solana (SOL), ensuring liquidity and tradability from day one. Creator tokens distribute 10% of the supply to early supporters, while creators receive 20% vested over two years.

Market reaction and ecosystem impact Following the news, ACX price rallied more than 100%, climbing from roughly $0.00108 to a high of $0.00223 before retracing. As of this writing, ACX is still up 16% for the day and has shown comparable gains throughout the week. 

Additionally, trading activity increased significantly. In the last 24 hours, the daily volume increased by 10,909% to $95 million, indicating a renewed interest in the Access Protocol ecosystem.

The market’s reaction shows a high level of interest in both ACX and the larger Creator Coin concept. Access is establishing itself as a competitor to subscription-based platforms such as Patreon by linking token utility to creators and their audiences, while also capitalizing on the trading culture that has propelled Solana’s expansion.

ETH price prospects dim as Ethereum DEX volumes drop 34% in a week

Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy (MSTR), has announced plans to issue 2.5 million shares of 10% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) to raise funds to expand its Bitcoin holdings and support working capital.

The company aims to raise approximately $250 million from this initial public offering (IPO), based on an initial liquidation preference of $100 per share. Meanwhile, other firms are also advancing Bitcoin treasury initiatives across the globe.

Strategy Plans Major IPO to Raise Funds for Bitcoin Expansion According to Strategy’s official announcement, the offering targets institutional and select non-institutional investors. Holders are eligible for non-cumulative dividends, paid quarterly if declared, at a 10% annual rate.

“Strategy will have the right, at its election, to redeem all, but not less than all, of the STRD Stock, at any time, for cash if the total number of shares of all STRD Stock then outstanding is less than 25% of the total number of shares of STRD Stock originally issued in the offering and in any future offering, taken together,” the statement read.

The offering plan follows Strategy’s latest acquisition of 705 BTC for around $75.1 million yesterday. SaylorTracker data shows that the firm holds 580,955 BTC, valued at over $60 billion.

Strategy’s move comes amid a wave of corporate cryptocurrency adoption. On June 2, Hong Kong-based Reitar Logtech Holdings Limited (RITR), a logistics solutions provider, revealed that it is in advanced negotiations to create a strategic Bitcoin treasury. The initiative aims to purchase up to 15,000 BTC, valued at approximately $1.5 billion.

“Management believes this treasury diversification could provide several strategic benefits including enhanced financial resilience through allocation to a non-correlated digital asset, increased financial flexibility for future strategic acquisitions in logistics technology and automation platforms, and positioning for expansion in high-growth Asian markets where demand for smart logistics infrastructure continues to increase,” the filing read.

Similarly, the Norwegian Block Exchange (NBX) made history as Norway’s first listed company to adopt Bitcoin as a treasury asset. The company has acquired 6 Bitcoin and aims to raise its holdings to 10 BTC by June.

In Russia, Sberbank, the country’s largest bank, launched structured bonds tied to Bitcoin. This product is available to a limited group of qualified investors in the over-the-counter market.

Beyond Bitcoin, other digital assets are also gaining traction. BTCS, a blockchain tech firm, acquired 1,000 ETH, bringing its Ethereum holdings to 13,500 ETH.

“Ethereum remains at the core of our blockchain infrastructure strategy. Our expanding ETH position is not simply a treasury play-it’s a strategic byproduct of our NodeOps and high-growth Builder+ activities. We are focused on building highly scalable, revenue-generating infrastructure,” CEO Charles Allen said.

Meanwhile, Classover, an edtech company, is focusing on building a Solana (SOL) treasury reserve. The company previously bought 6,472 SOL for approximately $1.05 million. 

Now, it has entered into an agreement to issue up to $500 million in senior secured convertible notes, with an initial $11 million funding set to close soon. A significant portion of the proceeds, up to 80%, will be allocated to purchasing SOL. 

These developments reflect a broader shift among corporations to diversify treasury assets with cryptocurrencies.

Reason to trust

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed

The highest standards in reporting and publishing

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.

As the United States approaches its presidential election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, the Bitcoin market is bracing for significant volatility. In the lead-up to the election, Bitcoin surged to a high of $73,620 on Tuesday, likely reflecting investor optimism over a potential victory for former President Donald Trump. However, by Friday, the BTC price experienced a correction, dipping to $68,830 amid a more cautious, risk-off sentiment as the election looms.

How To Trade Bitcoin During US Election Alex Krüger, an Argentine economist and renowned crypto analyst, shared his strategic framework on how to trade Bitcoin during the US election period via his X account. Krüger outlined scenarios based on possible election outcomes, highlighting that a Trump victory could propel Bitcoin to $90,000 by year-end with a 55% probability, while a win for Vice President Kamala Harris might see Bitcoin settle around $65,000 with a 45% probability. He emphasized that timing will matter: “Expect the move to be fast if Trump wins. Markets rarely waits for laggards on binary events not largely front-run.”

Krüger also noted that the current Bitcoin price, which he anticipated to be in the $65k-68k range leading up to election night, had “overshot” in alignment with the probabilities favoring a Trump victory. He pointed out the uncertainty surrounding the election results, primarily hinging on the Pennsylvania vote count, which could delay the announcement of a clear winner.

“It largely depends on the Pennsylvania count, if it is lopsided or not. It could be as early as Tuesday evening EST, or days later if the count is very tight. The sooner we get clarity, the easier it gets,” Krüger stated.

Regarding market sentiment, Krüger expressed a bullish outlook on equities regardless of the election outcome, unless there is an unexpected “Blue sweep” where Democrats secure both the presidency and congressional majorities. He explained that “equities drag Bitcoin around.”

In his personal investment strategy, Krüger revealed that he is positioned with long spots in Bitcoin and Nvidia, and plans to go long on Solana (SOL) if Trump wins. With this, Krüger is likely betting on a spot Solana Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) approval in the United States.

Krüger’s analysis suggests that the market has partially priced in a Trump victory, anticipating that a Trump administration could bolster the Bitcoin price. “Markets have partially priced a Trump victory in. We (the market, in aggregate) expect Trump to drive crypto prices higher due to increased regulatory clarity and implementation of pro-crypto policies,” the analyst wrote.

Additionally, he expects that Trump’s focus on increased government spending would stimulate short-term economic growth, positively impacting equities—a sector closely linked to Bitcoin’s performance.

Conversely, a Harris victory would likely represent a continuation of existing policies, barring a significant Democratic sweep. Krüger concluded: “Based on betting markets and various election forecasting models, Trump’s probabilities are in the 50% to 63% range. Ergo, it’s “safe” to assume a GOP victory is far from being fully priced in. Such a contested setup is common going into elections. That is why I do not expect ‘sell the news’.”

At press time, BTC traded at $70,402.

Bitcoin price, 1-day chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Crypto trader turns $2K PEPE into $43M, sells for $10M profit

US crypto funds top $7.5B inflows in 2025 as investor appetite grows

Meteora Co-founder Ben Chow Steps Down Amidst Libra Meme Coin Controversy

XRP and Cardano Dip 20% As Crypto Leaders Questions Trump’s Reserve Plan