An anonymous GTA 6 leaker known as CyberLeek has threatened to release the entire game before its November 19 launch if a Solana-based meme coin reaches a $30 million market capitalization, according to a statement published on October 10.
Summary
CyberLeek claims a complete GTA 6 build could be released after CYBERLEEK reaches $30 million. The anonymous account demanded physical game discs and a public apology from publisher Take-Two Interactive. Rockstar has scheduled GTA 6 for November 19, 2026, on PlayStation 5 and Xbox consoles. CyberLeek previously circulated gameplay footage, including approximately 25 minutes of clips released on October 8. No independent evidence has established that CyberLeek possesses a complete playable version of the game. According to an October 11 report by Wolf’s Gaming Blog, the individual or group behind CyberLeek claims to possess a complete playable version of Grand Theft Auto VI, including its main storyline. The account offered to withhold the alleged release if publisher Take-Two Interactive agrees to distribute physical game discs and issues a public apology. No independent evidence has confirmed that CyberLeek possesses the full game.
The GTA 6 hacker is threatening to leak the entire game if his memecoin hits a $30M market cap!$CYBERLEEK is pumping again after the hacker promised to release GTA 6's full story mode, including the ending and credits, if his token reaches $30M$CYBERLEEK previously hit a $25M… pic.twitter.com/TBD4EjtPuJ
— Goaty (@goatyishere) October 11, 2026 The statement follows the circulation of additional unreleased gameplay footage on October 8, when the same online identity published approximately 25 minutes of material reportedly showing characters, vehicles and activities from the upcoming title.
GTA 6 leaker makes $30 million cryptocurrency demand CyberLeek outlined the proposed arrangement in an October 10 statement titled The Offer, which appeared on a website associated with the anonymous account.
The message links the release of a purported complete GTA 6 build to the market value of CYBERLEEK, a cryptocurrency created on the Solana blockchain. The account claims that reaching a $30 million market capitalization would trigger the release of material containing the entire single-player campaign.
In the statement, CyberLeek wrote: “CYBERLEEK hits 30 million marketcap, the build goes out.” The account further claimed that the material would include the game’s storyline through its ending and credits.
However, the statement does not clearly establish whether the promised release would be a downloadable, playable game or recorded footage showing the campaign. CyberLeek offered to provide additional footage requested by viewers as supposed evidence of access to the complete game.
According to an October 10 report by Dot Esports, the anonymous account offered Take-Two an alternative to the cryptocurrency target.
Dot Esports The publisher could avoid the threatened release by committing to distribute GTA 6 on physical discs and issuing a public apology. CyberLeek has made similar demands about physical game ownership since footage first appeared in August.
Rockstar’s official support documentation confirms that the physical edition of GTA 6 contains a download code instead of a game disc. Rockstar Games Customer Support The company has not publicly agreed to change that arrangement in response to CyberLeek’s demands.
CYBERLEEK meme coin remains below the stated target The cryptocurrency connected to the alleged leaker had a reported market capitalization of approximately $2.87 million on October 11, according to Wolf’s Gaming Blog.
The figure was substantially below the $30 million level specified in CyberLeek’s statement. The reported valuation is a snapshot from October 11 and has not been independently verified against a live Solana liquidity pool or token supply record.
Market capitalization generally represents a token’s circulating supply multiplied by its trading price. It does not indicate how much cash buyers have invested or how much an individual holder could withdraw. CyberLeek previously used footage attributed to GTA 6 to advertise the token.
According to Dot Esports, the account published 15 gameplay clips during August, with some videos containing cryptocurrency promotional material and QR codes. The account reportedly encouraged token holders to participate in polls determining which clips would appear next.
During the August campaign, CYBERLEEK’s market value reportedly reached approximately $23.4 million before falling. Dot Esports reported that the valuation declined to approximately $11 million by August 26 and to roughly $3.2 million the following day.
The publication further reported that the account had withdrawn approximately $250,000 in trading fees during the earlier promotional campaign. That amount has not been independently verified through identified on-chain transactions.
The October 10 announcement introduced another cryptocurrency-related condition, this time linked to the alleged release of the complete game. No verified statement from Rockstar or Take-Two confirms that the token has any official connection to GTA 6.
Earlier GTA 6 footage prompted legal action from Take-Two CyberLeek first attracted attention in August after distributing footage presented as unreleased GTA 6 gameplay.
The material reportedly included scenes involving the game’s two protagonists, Jason Duval and Lucia Caminos. Following the initial releases, Take-Two began pursuing legal measures intended to identify the source of the footage.
According to an August 23 investigation by TorrentFreak, Take-Two requested subpoenas involving Microsoft, Discord, X and Google.
The publisher sought records that could help identify individuals associated with distributing copyrighted game material.
Documents filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York described requests for account records, device information and identifying details associated with the CyberLeek name.
The filings followed copyright removal requests targeting videos circulated through online platforms. TorrentFreak reported that the footage included advertisements promoting CYBERLEEK on Solana.
The publisher’s legal actions concern the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material. They do not independently establish that the account controls a complete version of GTA 6.
In a later August 31 report, TorrentFreak described additional efforts by Take-Two to obtain Discord records while requesting confidentiality around parts of the investigation.
The publisher said the inquiry was continuing and sought additional information connected to accounts involved in distributing footage. Take-Two’s legal filings have not resulted in a publicly confirmed identification of the person controlling the CyberLeek website.
New GTA 6 footage appeared before the latest crypto demand After several weeks without a major public release, CyberLeek circulated approximately 25 minutes of purported GTA 6 gameplay footage on October 8.
The new material reportedly showed first-person driving, vehicle activities, cutscenes and character interactions. An October 9 report by GamesRadar described the footage as the account’s largest recent release.
The publication reported that the clips contained scenes involving Jason and Lucia, including sequences not shown in Rockstar’s promotional trailers.
However, short gameplay clips do not demonstrate that the person distributing them possesses the entire completed game. Footage can originate from a development build containing only selected environments, missions or testing tools.
There has been no public independent examination confirming that CyberLeek can play through GTA 6’s complete campaign. Rockstar has not authenticated the October 10 claim that the leaker possesses the entire game.
The account’s identity remains unconfirmed, and the announcement does not establish whether the person operating its website is the same individual responsible for every earlier video.
Rockstar keeps GTA 6 release scheduled for November 19 Despite the latest claims, Rockstar continues to list November 19, 2026, as the release date for Grand Theft Auto VI. The company announced the date on November 6, 2025, after moving the launch from its earlier schedule.
The game is scheduled for PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S. Rockstar’s official store currently lists the game for preorder, with Lucia and Jason as the central characters in a story set in the fictional state of Leonida.
The developer has provided official trailers, screenshots and information about the game’s setting and characters. Customers purchasing the physical edition are expected to receive a download code, with preloading scheduled to begin November 12.
According to Rockstar’s published purchasing guidance, the physical package will not include a game disc.
The company has not announced a change to the release date or physical distribution plans following CyberLeek’s October 10 statement. Take-Two has not publicly accepted the anonymous account’s demands for physical discs or a formal apology.
Its existing legal investigation has centered on identifying those responsible for distributing unreleased gameplay footage.
According to GMGN data, Solana-based meme coin Super Inu (SI) has surpassed $30 million in market capitalization, with a 24-hour gain of 32.1% and trading volume of $4.3 million. The development comes as SpaceXAI’s official X account—another entity under Elon Musk, following Tesla—has been renamed. The account is now called SpaceX Super Intelligence, with its handle changed from @SpaceXAI to @SpaceXSI, and Musk himself shared a screenshot of the updated account. On October 4, Musk publicly stated, “No longer called AI, SI is better.” He later promised netizens he would rename SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI, and just six days after that announcement, the account has officially been updated. The move follows an executive order signed by Trump earlier, which requires U.S. federal agencies to replace “artificial intelligence” (AI) with “superintelligence” (SI) in official use. While the mandate does not apply to private companies, the official accounts of Tesla and SpaceXAI have already made the switch sequentially. BlockBeats reminds users that related tokens are highly volatile, so investors should exercise caution.
An anonymous leaker known as CyberLeek has claimed possession of a complete, playable build of Grand Theft Auto 6 (GTA 6), alleging that they have access to the full storyline and gameplay features. This follows a series of unauthorized leaks and mounting anticipation ahead of the game’s official launch.
Leaker’s demands linked to CYBERLEEK tokenCyberLeek announced on October 10 that the complete GTA 6 build would be publicly released if the CYBERLEEK token, a Solana-based meme coin associated with the leaker, achieves a $30 million market capitalization. As of now, the token is valued at approximately $2.87 million, falling significantly short of the stated target.
The leaker also addressed GTA 6 publisher Take-Two Interactive, stating that to prevent the full game leak, the company must distribute physical discs of the game and issue a formal apology. Take-Two Interactive is a leading video game publisher, best known for franchises like Grand Theft Auto and Red Dead Redemption. There has been no verification of CyberLeek’s claims about possessing a finalized, playable version of the game.
The CYBERLEEK token was highlighted in the leaks, with watermarked footage and embedded promotional links directing attention to the asset.
Mini dictionary: Solana meme coin, a type of cryptocurrency token launched on the Solana blockchain, often inspired by internet culture or trending topics.
CyberLeek claimed they would release the entire GTA 6 build “when the CYBERLEEK token reaches a $30 million market cap,” demanding specific concessions from Take-Two Interactive to avoid a mass leak.
Escalation of GTA 6 leaksThe ongoing leak saga intensified on August 18, when CyberLeek began sharing snippets of GTA 6 gameplay featuring characters Jason and Lucia. These leaks included in-game activities and new gameplay footage, suggesting access to a development build rather than previously seen material.
Rockstar Games, the developer behind GTA 6, eventually acknowledged the situation, expressing disappointment at the unauthorized distribution and describing the leaks as distressing for the development team.
Take-Two Interactive pursued subpoenas directed at technology companies such as Microsoft and Discord in an attempt to uncover the identity of those behind the breaches.
On October 8, CyberLeek released roughly 25 minutes of additional gameplay, including unseen cutscenes, new first-person driving segments, and other unreleased content.
The footage released included never-before-seen sequences, raising further concerns within the development community and among fans awaiting the official release.
Remaining uncertaintiesDespite the bold claims, there is still no independent confirmation that CyberLeek possesses a full version of GTA 6 or the complete story mode in a functional format. The authenticity and scope of the leaker’s access remain in question.
Grand Theft Auto 6, developed by Rockstar Games, is scheduled to launch on November 19 for PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S.
11 October 2026 | 16:57 A token in a wallet can track Apple or Nvidia one-for-one while the company’s official shareholder register carries a different name. Securitize’s new stock tokens place both parts of that arrangement in view.
Key Takeaways Securitize launched tokenized security entitlements for 12 U.S. stocks on Solana. The company says each token is backed 1:1 by an underlying share. Holders own a security entitlement through Securitize Markets. Dividends and applicable voting rights are designed to pass through that structure. Direct registration depends on a later issuer and transfer-agent process. The words behind Securitize’s new stock tokens On October 8, Securitize launched Securitize Stocks, a Solana-based offering tied to 12 U.S. equities, including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Tesla, Amazon and Netflix. Trading begins through the company’s registered broker-dealer platform for eligible users in permitted jurisdictions, with settlement in USDC.
The significant detail sits in the product’s legal description. Securitize Stocks are security entitlements backed one-for-one by the relevant underlying shares. The company’s disclosure says that holders are not registered shareholders of Apple, Nvidia or the other issuers unless they complete a supported conversion process.
That does not reduce the token to a simple price bet. Securitize says the entitlement is structured to preserve the applicable economic benefits of the underlying security, including dividends and, where the share class carries them, voting rights. It does, however, define the route through which those benefits reach the investor.
Layer one
The token in the wallet
The investor controls a blockchain-issued instrument, subject to the product’s transfer, eligibility and compliance terms.
Layer two
The security entitlement
Securitize Markets maintains the legal claim linking the holder to the underlying stock position and its stated rights.
Layer three
The issuer’s share record
The underlying company’s transfer agent does not automatically record the token holder as a shareholder in the investor’s own name.
The entitlement links the wallet to the share A security entitlement is a familiar part of the U.S. securities system. Many conventional investors also hold shares through a broker or custodian instead of appearing directly on a company’s register. Their economic position depends on a recognised claim maintained through that intermediary.
Securitize applies that model to a blockchain token. The token can move through an onchain environment, while the broker-dealer and related market infrastructure maintain the link to the supporting share. The product therefore combines a wallet-based instrument with the legal framework that normally sits behind a brokerage position.
That arrangement gives the holder more than exposure to a price chart, but it also means the investor should read the entitlement terms as closely as the token’s backing claim. A one-for-one reserve answers one question: whether a corresponding share supports the token. It does not answer every question about corporate actions, transfer restrictions or the investor’s status on the issuer’s books.
Dividends and votes travel through the same structure Securitize says its stock tokens carry applicable economic benefits, including dividends and voting rights where the underlying share class provides them. Those benefits pass through the entitlement structure rather than arising from a wallet address appearing directly on an issuer’s shareholder list.
That becomes relevant whenever the underlying company takes an action beyond ordinary trading. Stock splits, cash or stock dividends, tender offers, mergers, delistings and trading halts all require an operational process. The token holder needs to know who receives the corporate-action notice, how instructions are collected, and how the resulting cash, shares or voting rights are delivered.
These are not unusual concerns created by blockchain. They exist across conventional broker-held securities as well. Tokenization adds another record—the token on the blockchain—which makes it easier for buyers to assume that wallet control alone settles every ownership question.
A wallet key controls the token, not the whole system Private-key control and shareholder registration describe different parts of the same investment. A private key can establish control over a token where the product permits wallet transfers. It cannot, on its own, replace the broker-dealer, custodian, clearing arrangements or transfer agent that support the underlying security.
Securitize’s release places those institutions inside the product’s design. Trading remains subject to onboarding, KYC and AML checks, securities laws and jurisdictional eligibility. The offering is therefore built for regulated securities markets, even though the investor-facing position can sit on Solana.
The company also describes future venues connected to the New York Stock Exchange and OKXICE, where wider trading hours and self-custody are among the intended features. Those venues have not launched, and their operation remains subject to regulatory and operational conditions. They should be treated as part of Securitize’s wider plan rather than as features available to every holder today.
Conversion is possible only under specific conditions Securitize calls its design a convertible entitlement token, or CET. The term matters because it describes a possible route from an intermediary-held entitlement to direct ownership recorded on an issuer’s transfer-agent books.
That route requires the underlying company to adopt issuer-sponsored tokenization and make the relevant transfer-agent process available. Until then, the investor holds the security entitlement described in Securitize’s documentation. Buying a token linked to Apple or Tesla does not create an automatic right to demand direct registration immediately.
Two products carrying the same ticker can therefore give their holders very different rights. A token may track a share price through a derivative, represent a certificate backed by stock, provide a security entitlement, or be issued directly by the company as its own share record. The ticker tells readers which company the token references; the legal terms explain what the investor owns.
That is why disclosure has become central to tokenized securities. The developing U.S. debate is increasingly focused on whether a blockchain balance represents direct ownership, a security entitlement or a separate contractual claim, as seen in the discussion around tokenized-stock investor rights and ownership disclosures.
Before buying a tokenized stock, check this The ticker is only the start of the due diligence.
Read the legal description. Confirm whether the token is a direct share, an entitlement, a certificate or a derivative. Identify the institutions behind it. The broker-dealer, custodian and transfer agent determine how the underlying position is maintained. Check corporate-action procedures. Product terms should explain how dividends, votes, mergers and stock splits reach the holder. Confirm conversion rights today. A future pathway to direct registration differs from a currently available conversion process. Review failure and transfer risks. Read the provisions on custody, insolvency, redemption, smart contracts, liquidity and restricted transfers. The token tells only part of the ownership story Securitize’s launch gives tokenized equities a stronger legal structure than a product designed only to mimic a stock price. One-for-one backing and a defined security entitlement can connect an onchain position to dividends, voting rights and established securities-market infrastructure.
The investor’s wallet still represents only one link in that chain. Before treating a tokenized stock as equivalent to a conventional share, buyers should identify the claim behind it, the institutions responsible for honouring it, and whether direct registration is available under the product’s current terms.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. Tokenized securities may involve market, liquidity, custody, counterparty, smart-contract and regulatory risks. Investors should review the applicable product disclosures before investing.
Author
Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem. To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem. His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
In brief U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are down a net $386.3 million for October after Wednesday’s $484.9 million exit, their worst day since June, despite a $21.1 million inflow on Friday. Ethereum ETFs extended their outflow streak to nine days, losing $635 million in October and nearly $700 million over the full streak. Solana ETFs are also negative for the month, at a loss of $24.8 million after five straight days of outflows “Uptober” isn’t living up to its name for crypto ETFs.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $21.1 million on Friday, according to Decrypt’s ETF tracker. That’s a modest bounce after back-to-back outflows of $484.9 million on Wednesday and $244.1 million on Thursday. Even so, the funds are down a net $386.3 million through the first seven trading days of October.
Myriad: How low will Bitcoin go? Click to make your prediction.Bitcoin and other crypto asset ETFs allow investors to gain exposure to digital currencies without using crypto exchanges or wallets. These funds track the price of the asset and trade like stocks on a brokerage app. They’ve been very successful since their launch, and flows in and out of the funds have become a reliable measure of current market sentiment.
The month started strong, with $292.6 million in inflows across Oct. 1 and 2. A $118.8 million inflow on Oct. 6 couldn’t offset the selling that followed, and Wednesday’s exit was the funds’ worst day since June.
Bitcoin ETF flows. Image: DecryptThat’s a sharp reversal from September. After the Senate’s failed cloture vote on the Clarity Act triggered heavy outflows in mid-September, Bitcoin ETFs reeled off a nine-session inflow streak worth roughly $3 billion. That run pushed 2026’s year-to-date flows back into positive territory.
Ethereum ETFs have fared worse. The funds shed $56.1 million on Friday, extending their outflow streak to nine straight trading days.
Ethereum ETF flows. Image: DecryptThey’ve lost $635 million so far in October and nearly $700 million over the full streak, with the heaviest single-day exit, $201.9 million, coming on Oct. 6. Cumulative net inflows since launch stand at $13.2 billion, and total net assets are $14.5 billion.
Solana ETFs are also in the red for October, though on a much smaller scale. The funds lost $3.8 million on Friday, their fifth straight day of outflows, bringing October’s net total to a loss of $24.8 million. Their only inflow this month was $1.3 million on Oct. 2. Cumulative net inflows stand at $137.9 million.
For Bitcoin ETFs, cumulative net inflows since launch total $57.6 billion, and the funds hold $100.6 billion in total net assets, according to Decrypt’s tracker.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
In brief U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are down a net $386.3 million for October after Wednesday’s $484.9 million exit, their worst day since June, despite a $21.1 million inflow on Friday. Ethereum ETFs extended their outflow streak to nine days, losing $635 million in October and nearly $700 million over the full streak. Solana ETFs are also negative for the month, at a loss of $24.8 million after five straight days of outflows “Uptober” isn’t living up to its name for crypto ETFs.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $21.1 million on Friday, according to Decrypt’s ETF tracker. That’s a modest bounce after back-to-back outflows of $484.9 million on Wednesday and $244.1 million on Thursday. Even so, the funds are down a net $386.3 million through the first seven trading days of October.
Myriad: How low will Bitcoin go? Click to make your prediction.Bitcoin and other crypto asset ETFs allow investors to gain exposure to digital currencies without using crypto exchanges or wallets. These funds track the price of the asset and trade like stocks on a brokerage app. They’ve been very successful since their launch, and flows in and out of the funds have become a reliable measure of current market sentiment.
The month started strong, with $292.6 million in inflows across Oct. 1 and 2. A $118.8 million inflow on Oct. 6 couldn’t offset the selling that followed, and Wednesday’s exit was the funds’ worst day since June.
Bitcoin ETF flows. Image: DecryptThat’s a sharp reversal from September. After the Senate’s failed cloture vote on the Clarity Act triggered heavy outflows in mid-September, Bitcoin ETFs reeled off a nine-session inflow streak worth roughly $3 billion. That run pushed 2026’s year-to-date flows back into positive territory.
Ethereum ETFs have fared worse. The funds shed $56.1 million on Friday, extending their outflow streak to nine straight trading days.
Ethereum ETF flows. Image: DecryptThey’ve lost $635 million so far in October and nearly $700 million over the full streak, with the heaviest single-day exit, $201.9 million, coming on Oct. 6. Cumulative net inflows since launch stand at $13.2 billion, and total net assets are $14.5 billion.
Solana ETFs are also in the red for October, though on a much smaller scale. The funds lost $3.8 million on Friday, their fifth straight day of outflows, bringing October’s net total to a loss of $24.8 million. Their only inflow this month was $1.3 million on Oct. 2. Cumulative net inflows stand at $137.9 million.
For Bitcoin ETFs, cumulative net inflows since launch total $57.6 billion, and the funds hold $100.6 billion in total net assets, according to Decrypt’s tracker.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
MAJURO, Marshall Islands, Oct. 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Remittix has opened PayFi access to 1,000 invited RTX holders, moving its crypto-to-bank payment platform into a hands-on testing phase ahead of the scheduled November 24, 2026 token launch.
Invited participants can test EUR and USD routes while Remittix prepares additional currencies, assets and networks. The rollout lets users experience crypto-to-bank settlement before wider availability.
The milestone arrives as Bitcoin price prediction models extend toward $200,000 and Solana completes a major speed upgrade targeting 200-millisecond block times. Both developments reflect the scale of crypto’s next adoption cycle, but Remittix offers an earlier opportunity through a utility ecosystem approaching its first public-market launch.
Remittix Opens PayFi to 1,000 Invited Holders
Remittix PayFi is designed to remove the complexity that often separates cryptocurrency from everyday financial activity. A sender can fund an eligible transaction with supported digital assets while the intended recipient receives conventional currency through a compatible bank account.
The current testing phase supports crypto-to-fiat and fiat-to-crypto activity through EUR and USD routes. USDT and USDC are available across selected networks including Ethereum, Celo, Base and Polygon, with wider asset and currency support planned.
This model could serve freelancers, overseas suppliers, families sending remittances and crypto holders withdrawing portfolio value. Recipients do not need to manage tokens, exchanges or complicated off-ramps.
A Connected Ecosystem Strengthens the RTX Story
The Remittix ecosystem extends beyond payments. Its iOS wallet has recorded over 10,000 downloads, an Android edition is awaiting approval and a planned rebuild will connect the project’s major products.
Its trading platform, Remittix Markets, is already used by thousands of traders, offers hundreds of perpetual pairs and has processed more than $50 million in volume. Remittix Earn is approaching release with advertised yields of up to 22% APY on eligible crypto and stablecoin holdings.
Combining payments, asset management, derivatives trading and earning could give RTX multiple sources of recurring demand. A user entering the ecosystem to make a transfer could remain to trade, hold assets or access earning opportunities without moving capital between separate platforms.
Bitcoin Price Prediction Hits $200,000 as Solana Targets $300
Bitcoin recently traded near $83,000 after rebuilding liquidity and institutional demand during 2026. A $200,000 Bitcoin price prediction implies approximately 141% upside from that level and reflects an aggressive scenario driven by ETF adoption, corporate treasury demand and Bitcoin’s fixed supply.
Solana recently traded near $110, making $300 a potential 173% move. Its 200-millisecond block-time upgrade completes a series of cuts from 400 milliseconds and creates up to five block-production opportunities per second.
Bitcoin and Solana require substantial capital to deliver those returns. Remittix enters the same market from a much earlier stage, with PayFi already being tested before RTX reaches public exchanges.
The RTX Pre-Launch Window Is Narrowing
Remittix has raised more than $32 million from over 40,000 participants toward its $36 million hard cap. RTX is currently available at $0.23, while $0.46 is the announced final presale price and planned minimum exchange launch price.
With the November 24 date locked and invited users now testing PayFi, the remaining presale allocation represents the final entry period before open-market trading begins. Remittix is approaching that moment with payments, Markets, wallet adoption and Earn converging around a single token economy.
About Remittix
Remittix is developing a connected PayFi ecosystem for crypto-to-bank and bank-to-crypto transactions. Its products include international payment settlement, a mobile wallet, Remittix Markets and the forthcoming Remittix Earn service.
Website: https://remittix.io
X: https://x.com/remittix
Media Contact
Company: Remittix
Email: [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is provided by Remittix. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.
Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an "as-is" basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/481c0c35-6504-400d-bb42-f3138d394f9a
U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded significant outflows this month, marking a notable shift in sentiment among crypto investors. Data from Decrypt’s ETF tracker shows these funds faced back-to-back redemptions, including a $484.9 million exit on Wednesday, their steepest daily withdrawal since June.
Bitcoin ETFs reverse course in OctoberDespite a brief recovery with $21.1 million in inflows on Friday, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs finished the first seven trading days of October with a net outflow of $386.3 million. The modest gain failed to compensate for large withdrawals earlier in the week, particularly following Wednesday’s sizable exit and an additional $244.1 million lost on Thursday.
Bitcoin ETFs provide a way for investors to participate in the digital asset market without directly holding cryptocurrencies or managing private wallets. The products mirror the price of Bitcoin and are traded on regular brokerage platforms, attracting both institutional and retail investors since their debut.
October began on a positive note, as the ETFs attracted a combined $292.6 million on the first two days. Another $118.8 million flowed in on October 6. However, these early inflows were overshadowed by the subsequent downturn, erasing previous gains for the month.
ETFOctober Net FlowsLargest Single-Day OutflowCumulative Net InflowsTotal Net AssetsBitcoin-$386.3 million-$484.9 million (Wed.)$57.6 billion$100.6 billionEthereum-$635 million-$201.9 million (Oct. 6)$13.2 billion$14.5 billionSolana-$24.8 million-$3.8 million (Fri.)$137.9 millionNot disclosedETF flows reflect shifting investor sentimentAfter a strong September, the landscape changed abruptly. In mid-September, following the U.S. Senate’s failed cloture vote on the Clarity Act, Bitcoin ETFs experienced a series of outflows. However, they quickly rebounded with nine straight sessions of inflows totaling roughly $3 billion, which returned year-to-date figures into positive territory for 2026.
Flows in and out of crypto ETFs have become a reliable gauge of market sentiment, as they reflect the willingness of investors to take on or shed digital asset exposure through regulated investment vehicles.
However, the reversal so far in October suggests caution and profit-taking may be returning to the market as uncertainty persists around regulatory and macroeconomic developments.
Ethereum and Solana ETFs deepen lossesEthereum ETFs have recorded a more severe downturn. The funds posted a $56.1 million outflow on Friday, extending their loss streak to nine consecutive trading days in October. During this period, cumulative withdrawals reached nearly $700 million, with the largest single-day loss of $201.9 million taking place on October 6. Despite these losses, Ethereum ETFs still hold $14.5 billion in total net assets and have attracted $13.2 billion in net inflows since their introduction.
Solana ETFs also faced negative flows this month, though on a much smaller scale compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum. Outflows for Solana ETFs totaled $3.8 million on Friday, the fifth straight day of net redemptions. The funds’ only inflow for October, $1.3 million, occurred on October 2. Overall, Solana ETFs have lost $24.8 million so far this month, while cumulative net inflows since launch stand at $137.9 million.
Solana, a blockchain known for its fast transaction speeds and lower fees compared to some other networks, continues to attract investor attention through ETF products, but recent flow data suggests more caution among holders.
Bitcoin ETFs, despite recent negative momentum, remain the largest by net inflow at $57.6 billion since launch and currently manage $100.6 billion in assets.
Mini dictionary: Cloture vote — A cloture vote is a procedure used in the U.S. Senate to end debate on a legislative issue and bring it to a final vote. Reaching cloture usually requires a supermajority, which can be a significant hurdle for passing contentious bills.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
September may have been the turning point for Solana’s Q4 rally.
Historically, a strong fundamental performance has not always translated into a robust technical performance for SOL. However, September was nothing short of remarkable, with the altcoin recording more than 14% in price gains. It almost doubled Ethereum’s returns, while also crossing the psychological $120-barrier on its way for the first time since early Q1.
The key takeaway? This gain did not come out of nowhere. As shown in the graph below, SOL’s monthly transaction count climbed to a whopping 10.7 billion in September, the highest since May 2025.
To put this in perspective, SOL’s price performance finally caught up with the network’s adoption growth.
Source: Token Terminal However, the momentum does not stop there.
Based on Solana Hub’s X post, September marked another milestone for tokenized stocks on the network. The supply of tokenized equity reportedly crossed $780.5 million as spot trading volume reached $4.25 billion, with the number of holders surpassing 1 million. This is yet another positive development for SOL, as the network’s activity is gaining traction and its tokenized equity market is growing exponentially. This bodes well for the fundamentals heading deeper into October.
According to AMBCrypto, this is where September’s rally get interesting.
SOL gained by over 14% for the month, having regained its position on-chain in terms of value. Now, given the signs of strength on both fronts, can Solana [SOL] sustain the September rally through October and the rest of Q4?
Solana’s faster network fuels bullish hopes A significant upgrade could explain why September’s bullish momentum is critical.
As previously mentioned, the network’s on-chain activity was at a multi-month high as transaction numbers peak and tokenized equity supply reached a record level. These factors contributed to SOL’s outperformance over ETH in the last risk-on period. The crucial question is whether the altcoin can replicate the success.
Notably, Solana’s developers have reduced the time between slots by half, from 400 ms to 200 ms. In simple terms, the network can produce more blocks in a given time period.
Therefore, it should be able to process more transactions quickly. And, with the rise of tokenized stocks and on-chain trading, this could prove advantageous to the network and allow it to gather more activity.
Source: X If September’s trend persists, then the altcoin could gain further ground in the rest of Q4.
With Ethereum’s block time of 12 seconds, Solana’s 200 ms slots will allow faster block production time and, therefore, faster transactions. The rise of tokenized stocks and on-chain trading will drive adoption, which should boost the demand for the native asset and eventually, its price. In a risk-on environment, faster block time is an attractive feature that can draw new traders and developers to the ecosystem.
Thus, Solana can be expected to break the $125-barrier and stage a powerful rally in Q4.
Final Summary Solana hit 10.7 billion transactions in September, boosting its bullish outlook. Solana’s 200 ms slot time could drive adoption and help SOL break above $125 in Q4.
Solana token holders recorded a net income above $400,000 for two straight weeks, marking a significant shift after three weeks of negative results. Data from SolanaFloor attributed the improvement to stronger aggregate net income, benefiting both stakers and non-stakers on the network.
Solana net income turns positiveSolanaFloor reported that aggregate net income for token holders stayed above $400,000 for the past two weeks. Previously, the network had endured three consecutive weeks of negative net income. This latest turnaround suggests that Solana’s overall economic performance is showing early signs of stabilization across its user base.
Net income for token holders tracks the value created by network activity, beyond associated operating costs. Consistent positive results in this metric can be interpreted as a sign of improved network economics, especially after a prolonged downturn.
The change follows a difficult period for the Solana ecosystem. If positive net income persists, some market participants believe it could signal that the network’s economic health is beginning to recover.
SolanaFloor observed that, “Aggregate token holder net income has exceeded $400,000 for two straight weeks, indicating early improvement after a run of negative results.”
SOL price at a critical junctureSOL currently trades near $109 after experiencing a steep selloff. According to crypto analyst BitGuru, the $107 level serves as an immediate support zone and will likely influence the short-term direction of the token.
Market watchers are analyzing whether buyers can keep SOL above this support, which could open a path to higher resistance levels at $113 and $118. Alternatively, renewed selling pressure below $107 may intensify the recent decline.
BitGuru identified $113 as the next potential resistance if bulls take control, but cautioned that a fall below $107 would be an invitation for more sellers. As a result, the $107 mark remains a major focus in the current technical outlook.
BitGuru stated that SOL’s trajectory depends on its ability to hold $107, with buyers needing to sustain momentum for a push toward the $113-$118 range.
Still, technical analysis should be viewed as conditional, with price action depending on the level of buying interest and broader market sentiment. The interplay of support and resistance levels will remain relevant for traders as they monitor potential reversals or deeper declines.
Network data and meme token trendsEncouraging signs in Solana’s net income provide fundamental support for ongoing consolidation in SOL, supplementing technical indicators. The next weeks will indicate whether token holders can maintain positive results and whether network activity strengthens further.
In the context of market monitoring and trend analysis, attention has also turned toward the meme token sector. A single internet trend can quickly drive millions of dollars of activity. Data from Fomo App highlighted a recent trade in the “Niu Lai” meme token, where an initial investment of $99 grew to roughly $370,000. The evolution of such trades demonstrates the value of tracking not just prices but also investor timing and token selection. Fomo App integrates real-time token discovery and trading, featuring social feeds, investor rankings, and trade notifications, offering insight into the rapidly changing world of meme tokens and enabling users to monitor investor activity closely.
For now, all eyes remain on Solana’s ability to sustain positive net income and defend short-term support. If both technical and fundamental conditions improve, further gains toward $113 and $118 remain possible. A break below $107 would undermine this scenario and shift focus to renewed downside risks.
Circle, the issuer of USDC, has minted an additional 250 million USDC on the Solana blockchain. This development, reported by Cointelegraph, indicates a significant increase in USDC supply on Solana, though it does not necessarily imply immediate circulation or new demand. The minting activity highlights ongoing liquidity expansion and stablecoin issuance on the network, which may be seen as supportive of broader network usage and growth.
The market for Solana price predictions in October 2026 reflects a mixed response. Some markets saw a slight increase in the probability of Solana reaching specific price targets, while others remained stable or showed modest declines. The most active market, predicting whether Solana will reach $140 in October, showed a slight uptick to 9% YES from 8% a day ago. However, the overall probability of Solana hitting $190 remains low, at 1% YES.
The activity surrounding Circle’s minting of USDC is consistent with scenarios where increased liquidity could bolster Solana’s network activity. Market participants may view this as a positive indicator for Solana’s potential to reach higher price thresholds, although current pricing suggests cautious optimism.
Key Takeaways
Circle’s minting of 250 million USDC on Solana appears to indicate increased liquidity and potential network usage.
Market pricing suggests a slight positive shift in the probability of Solana reaching $140 in October, now at 9% YES.
The probability of Solana reaching $190 remains low, reflecting market caution despite increased USDC supply.
What to Watch
The impact of increased USDC supply on Solana’s price will be a key factor to monitor. Future announcements from Solana Labs or regulatory developments, particularly from the SEC, could influence market perception and pricing. Additionally, any major technological updates or network usage metrics could provide further indications of Solana’s potential performance in the coming weeks. Market observers will be keen to see if liquidity translates into increased Solana adoption and price movement.
Spot ETFs backed by ether recorded $542.1 million in net outflows last week. This is their worst weekly performance since January. The trend is also continuing on Solana, whose ETFs have just ended fourteen consecutive weeks of net inflows.
In brief Ether ETFs lost $542.1 million in one week, a record since the week ended January 23. Withdrawals extend over nine sessions and reach $697.2 million since September 29. BlackRock’s ETHA fund accounts for 88% of outflows. Solana ETFs lost $24.8 million, while Bitcoin funds also ended their inflow streak. Nine consecutive sessions of outflows The reversal occurred at the end of September. On the 28th, Ether ETFs were still attracting $17.1 million. The very next day, investors changed course. This shift coincides with the end of the nine-day inflow streak of Bitcoin funds.
Since September 29, withdrawals have reached $697.2 million over nine sessions. Last week alone concentrated $542.1 million in net outflows. You have to go back to the week ended January 23, marked by $611.2 million in withdrawals, to find such a negative record (SoSoValue data). Tuesday was particularly heavy in this result, with $201.9 million in outflows.
This series is now among the longest since the launch of spot Ether ETFs. It ties the one observed from June 17 to 30. The record remains seventeen consecutive sessions, between May 11 and June 3, totaling $900.1 million withdrawn.
BlackRock concentrates the bulk of withdrawals Not all funds are under the same pressure. ETHA, BlackRock’s product, recorded $477 million in outflows over the week, about 88% of the total. This is its worst weekly performance since mid-December 2025 and the third worst since its launch in July 2024.
The fund lost capital in five sessions. On Tuesday, withdrawals reached $201.9 million, its worst daily result since January 21. For comparison, Grayscale’s ETHE fund recorded $31.9 million in outflows.
ETHA now manages $8.64 billion in net assets, compared to $12.79 billion cumulative inflows since its creation. Thus, the gap reaches $4.15 billion. Meanwhile, the total assets under management of all Ether ETFs declined by 10% over the week to $15.71 billion. Cumulative net inflows since January also dropped to $931.8 million, versus $1.47 billion a week earlier.
Trading volume, however, rose to $5.18 billion. This pressure on Ether ETFs is part of a larger move, as Bitcoin funds also recorded significant outflows.
Solana ETFs lose their momentum Solana is not exempt from this trend. Its ETFs recorded outflows during all five sessions of the week, a first streak of this length since their launch. In total, they lost $24.8 million, nearly three times their previous weekly outflow record, set at $8.9 million in early February (SoSoValue data).
Bitwise’s BSOL fund accounts for the bulk of these withdrawals, with $20.9 million, or 84% of the total. This development also ends fourteen consecutive weeks of net inflows, the longest streak since these products arrived in October 2025.
The reversal comes two weeks after a peak of $188.2 million of weekly inflows. At the same time, assets under management fell back to $1.73 billion, compared to a record of $1.96 billion reached on September 25. In total, the Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana ETFs lost about $1.25 billion last week.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Fenelon L.
Passionné par le Bitcoin, j'aime explorer les méandres de la blockchain et des cryptos et je partage mes découvertes avec la communauté. Mon rêve est de vivre dans un monde où la vie privée et la liberté financière sont garanties pour tous, et je crois fermement que Bitcoin est l'outil qui peut rendre cela possible.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
CZ releases crypto asset custody guide, advises choosing custody methods based on asset size and technical capabilities.
Binance founder CZ has released a simplified crypto asset custody guide, advising users to match security measures based on their own holdings size and technical capabilities, with a focus on three key issues: preventing asset theft, avoiding accidental loss, and planning for asset inheritance in advance. For self-custody, CZ recommends users store private keys on offline devices, use reliable hardware wallets, verify transaction addresses, and set up multiple off-site backups. He also warns users against saving keys via photos or screenshots to prevent leaks from syncing to cloud storage. Regarding asset inheritance, users should develop a secure recovery plan in advance, avoiding direct sharing of keys or storing recovery information in unencrypted form. For centralized trading platforms, CZ advises users to evaluate the platform’s reputation, security capabilities, and business model, and strengthen account protection through measures such as independent email addresses, strong passwords, two-factor authentication, hardware security keys, and withdrawal address whitelisting. He also cautions users to be wary of phishing attacks and API credential leaks. CZ further suggests that users allocate their assets reasonably between centralized trading platforms and personal wallets based on their technical capabilities, security management level, and fund usage needs. Self-custody means users bear sole responsibility for protecting private keys and asset recovery, while platform custody involves platform credit and counterparty risks. Additionally, maintaining an independent wallet helps preserve access to assets during platform maintenance or service interruptions.
17 minutes ago
Nvidia in talks to acquire U.S. AI startup Reflection AI
Sources familiar with the matter told the Financial Times that Nvidia (NVDA.O) is in talks to acquire U.S. startup Reflection AI or boost its investment in the open-weight model developer. Negotiations remain in the early stages, and a potential deal could take multiple forms, including a so-called "talent acquisition"—a move where Nvidia hires Reflection’s staff and secures its technology license, bypassing the lengthy regulatory reviews usually required for a full acquisition. Nvidia is already one of Reflection’s largest shareholders; it could also deepen the pair’s relationship via additional equity investment or an agreement to supply more chips and computing power to the startup. The sources noted that a deal could be struck between the two firms in the coming weeks. Reflection was valued at $25 billion in a financing round this March. (Financial Times UK)
17 minutes ago
Ledger confirms unauthorized hardware implants on affected users’ devices, dealer CryptoBilis suspends sales of its inventory.
Ledger Support has released an update confirming an unauthorized hardware implant was discovered in one affected user’s device. The company is currently contacting impacted users and continuing its investigation. Ledger is calling on anyone with relevant information to come forward, and states it is cooperating with law enforcement to hold those responsible accountable. Out of caution, CryptoBilis has confirmed it is suspending sales of all hardware wallet inventory until the investigation concludes, with Ledger actively communicating with the dealer on next steps. Ledger adds there are currently no signs its security infrastructure, systems or services have been breached. For users who purchased Ledger devices from this dealer: if you have not completed initialization, do not set up the device yet; if you have already set it up, consider transferring your assets to a new Ledger signing device with a new recovery phrase. Ledger emphasizes that security threats are evolving, and the company is continuously improving its security protections and advancing more advanced tamper-resistant solutions. It also reminds users to be vigilant against scams taking advantage of this situation, and to only access the latest information through Ledger’s official channels. Ledger will never request users’ 24-word recovery phrases.
17 minutes ago
POAP founder transfers 4,000 ETH to Gemini, worth approximately $10.02 million.
According to Yu Jing On-Chain Monitor, POAP founder worthalter made a further transfer of 4,000 ETH (valued at approximately $10.02 million) to crypto exchange Gemini six hours ago. Over the past six days, he has offloaded 8,000 ETH (around $20.81 million), and currently holds 51,468 ETH worth $129 million.
17 minutes ago
Papertrade announced it has contacted Nasdaq to explore the possibility of implementing 1000x leverage.
According to official announcements, Papertrade, a synthetic perpetual protocol built on HyperEVM, has announced that its daily notional trading volume has surpassed that of Nasdaq. Following this milestone, the protocol has contacted Nasdaq to explore the possibility of implementing 1000x leverage, with the goal of further boosting its trading volume.
17 minutes ago
Attack on Saudi Arabia's Riyadh Airport Kills 12, Injures 309
According to a statement from Saudi Arabia's General Authority of Civil Aviation, King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh was attacked on Saturday, leaving 12 people dead and 309 others injured.
U.S. crypto ETFs tracked across Farside Investors’ Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Hyperliquid and Zcash tables recorded combined net outflows of $1.29 billion during Oct. 5–9, with Bitcoin and Ether funds accounting for most withdrawals.
Summary
Bitcoin ETFs lost $678.9 million despite returning to net inflows on Friday. Ethereum ETFs recorded $542.2 million in withdrawals across five consecutive negative sessions. Solana ETFs shed $25 million, with Bitwise’s BSOL accounting for most weekly redemptions. Zcash and Hyperliquid products posted respective weekly outflows of $30.8 million and $9.4 million. Farside Investors’ daily figures put combined Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF withdrawals at $1.22 billion for the five trading sessions. The other three tracked categories added $65.2 million in net outflows, leaving all five groups negative for the week.
Calculated from those tables, the five categories had attracted a combined $29.2 million during Sept. 28–Oct. 2. Bitcoin’s earlier inflows had offset withdrawals elsewhere, but its reversal pushed the latest aggregate sharply into negative territory.
Bitcoin ETFs lose $678.9 million despite Friday inflows Farside’s Bitcoin table recorded three negative sessions and two positive sessions during Oct. 5–9. Funds lost $89.8 million on Monday before attracting $118.8 million on Tuesday.
Wednesday brought the largest daily withdrawal at $484.9 million, followed by another $244.1 million on Thursday. Friday’s $21.1 million inflow reduced the weekly loss to $678.9 million, compared with $241.1 million in inflows the previous week.
At fund level, Fidelity’s FBTC led withdrawals with $380.3 million, followed by ARK 21Shares’ ARKB at $207.2 million. Bitwise’s BITB lost $45.3 million, while Grayscale’s GBTC shed $47.5 million.
BlackRock’s IBIT finished marginally positive at $1.1 million. Monday and Tuesday inflows totaled $191.9 million, but Wednesday’s $207.7 million withdrawal erased that gain. Thursday brought a further $5.5 million exit before Friday added $22.4 million.
Morgan Stanley’s MSBT gained $7.8 million, and Franklin Templeton’s EZBC added $4.7 million. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust lost $11 million, while VanEck’s HODL finished $1.2 million lower.
Ethereum ETFs record five straight days of withdrawals Farside’s Ethereum figures showed $542.2 million in weekly net outflows, up from $138.1 million during Sept. 28–Oct. 2. Every session in the latest reporting period ended negative.
Monday’s $50.8 million withdrawal was followed by $201.9 million on Tuesday, the largest daily exit. Funds then lost $160.9 million on Wednesday, $72.5 million on Thursday and $56.1 million on Friday.
BlackRock’s ETHA accounted for $477.1 million, or approximately 88% of the weekly total. Its Tuesday withdrawal matched the entire category’s $201.9 million outflow that day.
Grayscale’s ETHE lost $31.9 million, while Fidelity’s FETH recorded $13.4 million in net withdrawals. Bitwise’s ETHW shed $5.9 million, and 21Shares’ TETH lost $7.5 million.
VanEck’s ETHV and Invesco’s QETH posted respective exits of $3.7 million and $2 million. Grayscale’s Ethereum Mini Trust also lost $2 million.
Morgan Stanley’s MSSE added $1.3 million on Thursday, making it the only Ethereum fund in the table with positive net flows for the week. BlackRock’s ETHB and Franklin Templeton’s EZET recorded no net flows.
Solana ETFs shed $25 million across five negative sessions Farside’s Solana table showed withdrawals on every trading day, totaling $25 million. The previous week had ended with a much smaller $800,000 net inflow.
Monday’s $9.2 million exit was the largest daily withdrawal. Tuesday recorded $3.7 million in outflows, followed by $4.8 million on Wednesday, $3.5 million on Thursday and $3.8 million on Friday.
Bitwise’s BSOL accounted for $21 million in weekly withdrawals, with negative flows on four sessions. Farside recorded no net movement for the fund on Tuesday.
The FSOL product lost $2.1 million on Monday, while Grayscale’s GSOL shed $3.7 million on Tuesday. Morgan Stanley’s MSOL partly offset those exits with $1.8 million in Thursday inflows.
VSOL, TSOL and SOEZ recorded no net flows during the period. Farside’s cumulative total for the Solana category stood at approximately $1.58 billion after Friday’s session.
Zcash and Hyperliquid funds add $40.2 million in exits Farside’s Zcash table recorded $30.8 million in weekly withdrawals from ZCSH. Monday brought a $3.6 million exit, Wednesday added $8.5 million, and Thursday recorded $18.7 million. Tuesday and Friday showed no net flows.
The latest loss followed $77.6 million in withdrawals during Sept. 28–Oct. 2. Across the two five-session periods, the table therefore recorded combined redemptions of $108.4 million.
Hyperliquid products lost $9.4 million during Oct. 5–9, reversing the previous week’s $3.4 million inflow, according to Farside’s separate table.
THYP accounted for $12.4 million in withdrawals, split between $2.7 million on Monday and $9.7 million on Thursday. Tuesday’s inflows of $1 million into BHYP and $2 million into HYPG partly offset those redemptions. Wednesday and Friday recorded no net flows across the three products.
Solana generates $38.2 million in revenue on dApps in seven days, compared to Ethereum’s poor performance which no longer holds up, even when adding up its entire ecosystem. Are we witnessing the beginning of a new era in the crypto market?
In brief $38.2 million revenue on dApps for Solana in seven days, compared to $11.7 million for Ethereum. Ethereum, Base, Polygon and OP Mainnet combined make $21.2 million, compared to $38.2 million for Solana. In August 2026, Solana was already number 1 for the month with $143 million, or 38% of the total onchain according to DefiLlama. See you on October 31, 2026, for the month’s closing which will tell if this crypto lead still holds. Solana Outperforms Ethereum on dApps in 7 Days Solana earns more than three times what Ethereum earns on dApps in 7 days, $38.2 million versus $11.7 million according to Token Terminal, in a ranking published by Solana Hub on October 10, 2026. Hyperliquid, a very fast crypto trading platform, comes second with $14.8 million. Ethereum still makes the podium but not on the highest step.
Why follow this figure? Because it can signal strong activity that generates money for the crypto network, beyond the tokens we buy hoping for an increase. However, it does not count the number of orders placed. Also watch the scope because the ranking follows entities of different natures (blockchains, platforms, ecosystems), it does not compare ten identical blockchains.
RankNetworkApplication revenue over 7 days (million dollars)1Solana38.22Hyperliquid14.83Ethereum11.74BNB Chain6.65Base4.36Robinhood4.27Polygon4.08OP Mainnet1.29Avalanche0.87410Near0.665Source: Token Terminal, ranking published by Solana Hub on X, data from the last 7 days as of October 10, 2026. Why do Crypto Users and Developers Choose Solana? Because crypto transactions cost very little there and go through quickly, which allows trading applications to operate at large scale. In August 2026, two trading terminals, Axiom (about $24 million) and FOMO (about $14.6 million), generated nearly $38.6 million of the $143 million of application revenue for the month, according to DefiLlama. According to our calculations, that represents 27% of the total.
The effect is like a snowball because the more crypto traders trade, the more applications (dApps) earn. The more they earn, the more other teams come to build in the same place. Solana is also called monolithic; everything happens on a single chain, with a single reserve of money available for exchange. This can facilitate liquidity flow and transaction execution.
Is the Ethereum Ecosystem Underestimated by its Main Network? Partly. Over seven days, Ethereum with its $11.7 million, represents only a part of its ecosystem’s activity. Base ($4.3 million) and OP Mainnet ($1.2 million) are Ethereum Layer 2s, and Polygon ($4.0 million) is a neighboring network, whose PoS network has a distinct technical status from a classic Layer 2. According to our calculations, this extended scope totals $21.2 million. But even with this extended scope, Solana still holds a $17 million lead.
Crypto : Has Solana Definitively Beaten Ethereum? Not yet… A seven-day ranking does not prove a lasting reversal. Except that Solana is not new to success against Ethereum because in August 2026, it was already number 1 in dApp revenues, and the official crypto network account made this known on X:
Solana is number 1 for application revenues in August with $143M. 38% of all onchain application revenues.
But revenues don’t tell everything. They do not measure liquidity, security, value locked in applications (TVL), or the number of active users. Especially since Solana still has points to prove. These revenues mainly come from trading, so from an activity that follows the appetite for risky assets. So these performances will have to be watched over three to six months to know if they last.
The competition between Solana and Ethereum pushes the entire crypto sector to move faster, and Solana is no longer a mere challenger on dApp revenues. The real test will come at the month’s close, October 31, 2026. In your opinion, will Ethereum regain first place thanks to its Layer 2s, or is SOL the new king of dApps?
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Eddy S.
The world is evolving and adaptation is the best weapon to survive in this undulating universe. Originally a crypto community manager, I am interested in anything that is directly or indirectly related to blockchain and its derivatives. To share my experience and promote a field that I am passionate about, nothing is better than writing informative and relaxed articles.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Over the last few days, momentum across the broad crypto market has turned extremely bearish and Solana has also had its share of the downturn.
Amid the sudden market volatility, Solana and other major crypto assets have continued to record notable sell-off activity. Whale Alert has showcased data for one of such transactions, which may have just been a massive whale sellout.
Solana demand stallsAccording to the data, an unknown address has moved a total of 470,087 SOL worth over $51 million at Solana's current price to leading U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase.
HOT Stories
The large Solana transaction, which happened in a single transfer, did not go unnoticed, especially considering its timing, drawing attention from market analysts.
You Might Also Like
Although the intention behind the transfer was not stated, market participants perceive the move as an attempt to sell, as tokens are often transferred to trading platforms like Coinbase for selling purposes.
The timing of the transfer also stirred speculation that the trader may be exiting the market out of caution amid the ongoing market volatility.
Solana remains under $110Despite surging to a high of around $123 earlier this month, momentum in the Solana ecosystem has weakened significantly after its price suddenly saw a sharp downturn, causing it to fall as low as $105 about two days ago.
Since this massive price drop, Solana has continued to trade below the $110 mark, as the sudden price reversal has stirred fear among traders who have continued to exit their positions.
While the market has continued to see large and small amounts of Solana returned to exchanges, Solana's chances of reclaiming its recent highs keep getting slimmer.
Spot ether ETFs shed $542.1 million last week, their worst week since January, while Solana funds posted the largest weekly outflow since they launched. Bitcoin funds also snapped a 3-week inflow run.
U.S. spot ether (ETH) ETFs recorded $542.1 million in net outflows last week, their worst week since January, while spot Solana (SOL) ETFs ended a record 14-week inflow streak, according to The Block's analysis of SoSoValue data.
The ether funds have now posted outflows for nine consecutive trading days, a run worth $697.2 million that began on Sept. 29.
Spot Solana ETFs lost $24.8 million over the week, the largest weekly outflow since the products launched in late October 2025.
Combined with bitcoin ETF redemptions, the three categories lost about $1.25 billion last week.
Ether funds post second straight losing week BlackRock's ETHA, the largest ether fund by assets under management, lost $477.0 million over the week, about 88% of the category's total, per SoSoValue data. It was the fund's largest weekly outflow since mid-December 2025 and its third-largest since launching in July 2024. Grayscale's ETHE had the second-largest weekly outflow among ether funds, at $31.9 million.
Tuesday was the heaviest single trading day for the ether products, with $201.9 million in redemptions, all from ETHA. That was the fund's largest single-day outflow since Jan. 21 of this year. Tuesday's outflow came on the day ETHA's 1-for-3 reverse share split took effect.
ETHA posted outflows in all five sessions. The fund holds $8.64 billion in net assets, about $4.15 billion less than its $12.79 billion in cumulative net inflows.
The category's weekly total outflows were the largest since the week ending Jan. 23, when the funds lost $611.2 million. It was also the second straight negative week for ether ETFs, after $138.0 million left the funds the week before. Fidelity's FETH accounted for $74.1 million of that prior-week total, per the data.
Daily ether ETF flows have been negative in every session since Sept. 28, when the funds took in $17.1 million. The ether outflows began on Sept. 29, one day before bitcoin ETFs ended a nine-day, $3.1 billion inflow streak. ETHA accounted for $506.1 million of the nine-day streak's outflows.
The run ties a June 17-30 streak as the third-longest in the funds' history. The record is a 17-day stretch from May 11 to June 3 of this year, which pulled about $900.1 million from the products.
Spot Ethereum ETF Total Net Flows, via The Block's data Spot ether ETF net assets fell 10% over the week to $15.71 billion. Cumulative net inflows since launch stand at $13.26 billion. The funds are still positive for 2026, with $931.8 million in net inflows year to date, down from $1.47 billion a week earlier.
Trading volume rose to $5.18 billion from $3.57 billion the previous week.
Solana funds end record inflow run The Solana products recorded outflows in all five sessions last week, their longest daily outflow streak on record, per SoSoValue's data. Their previous longest outflow streak was three days.
Bitwise's BSOL, the largest Solana fund with $1.20 billion in net assets, lost $20.9 million over the week, about 84% of the category's outflows, per the data. It was BSOL's largest weekly outflow on record, topping a $17.0 million outflow in the week ending July 31.
Monday's $9.2 million outflow was the largest of the week. Morgan Stanley's MSOL and Invesco's QSOL were the only Solana funds to post weekly inflows, taking in a combined $2.0 million.
The $24.8 million weekly outflow is roughly three times the previous record of $8.9 million, set in the week ending Feb. 6. The funds had not posted a negative week since the week ending June 26, when they lost $1.8 million. The 14-week inflow streak topped a 13-week run that started at launch and ended in late January.
The reversal comes two weeks after the Solana funds drew a record $188.2 million in weekly inflows.
Spot Solana ETF Total Net Flows, via The Block's data Spot Solana ETF net assets fell to $1.73 billion from $1.90 billion a week earlier. The funds held a record $1.96 billion on Sept. 25. Cumulative net inflows stand at $1.58 billion, including $816.8 million so far in 2026.
Bitcoin funds snap three-week inflow streak Spot bitcoin (BTC) ETFs lost $681.1 million last week, ending three straight weeks of inflows, per SoSoValue data. It was their worst week since the week ending June 26, when they shed $1.79 billion.
Wednesday accounted for most of the outflows, with $487.1 million leaving the funds. The products returned to inflows on Friday with $21.1 million.
The bitcoin funds' 2026 net inflows fell to $494.1 million from $1.18 billion a week earlier. The category turned positive for the year in late September.
Bitcoin ETFs hold $105.84 billion in net assets and have drawn $57.11 billion in cumulative net inflows since launch.
Ether traded near $2,506 on Saturday morning, while SOL changed hands around $110.50 and bitcoin sat near $82,900.
Solana has faced intensified selling pressure in recent days as the broader crypto market turned sharply bearish, causing the digital asset’s momentum to weaken. The trend has also heightened volatility and spurred notable transactions on major exchanges.
Major whale transaction draws attentionOnchain data from Whale Alert flagged a significant movement involving Solana. An unidentified address transferred 470,087 SOL, valued at over $51 million at prevailing prices, directly to Coinbase, the US-based cryptocurrency trading platform. This transfer was executed in a single transaction, drawing significant interest from market watchers due to both its size and timing.
Though the owner of the address was not publicly disclosed, analysts noted that moving a large volume of tokens to an exchange often signals an intent to sell, especially amid turbulent market conditions.
The timing and scale of the 470,087 SOL transfer to Coinbase have led many traders to interpret it as a strategic move by a major holder, possibly reacting to the sudden increase in market volatility.
This transfer occurred amid a wave of market uncertainty and growing risk aversion among digital asset investors. Many traders reportedly viewed the movement as a potential signal that large holders are taking steps to exit the market, at least temporarily, in response to sudden price fluctuations.
Mini dictionary: Whale Alert — A blockchain tracking service that monitors and reports large cryptocurrency transactions across major networks, providing transparency and real-time updates for market participants.
Solana price struggles after sharp downturnEarlier this month, Solana climbed as high as $123, supported by optimistic investor sentiment. However, a steep drop soon followed, with the price plunging to $105 within the past two days. Since then, Solana has struggled to recover, remaining below the $110 threshold.
The recent reversal has contributed to heightened anxiety among traders, prompting a series of liquidations and position exits as Solana continued to lose ground. The increasing flow of SOL tokens back to exchanges, especially involving large transactions, has intensified concerns over the asset’s short-term outlook.
EventDate/PeriodPrice/ValueRecent highEarlier this month$123Recent lowTwo days ago$105Current price rangeLatestBelow $110Whale transfer to CoinbaseLatest470,087 SOL ($51 million)With ongoing return of both large and smaller amounts of SOL to exchanges, analysts see limited immediate prospects for Solana to rebound to its recent peak values. The persistent market retreat and continued sell-side activity have reduced optimism among holders looking for a swift recovery.
Since the reversal, Solana has continued to trade under pressure, with traders closely monitoring exchange inflows and the behavior of major token holders for further clues on market direction.
Solana’s token holders are getting paid again. According to analytics from Blockworks, daily token holder net income on the network has stayed above $400,000 for two straight weeks.
That streak follows three weeks of decline.
What the number actually measures Blockworks starts with a metric called Real Economic Value, or REV. It captures what users pay to use the network, including transaction fees and tips.
From there, Blockworks subtracts operator payments, meaning the costs tied to validators and the operators who run the network’s infrastructure. The formula is simple: Token Holder Net Income = REV minus Operator Payments.
What’s left is the return flowing to SOL holders, both those who stake their tokens and those who don’t.
Advertisement
The quarterly picture is messier Zoom out, and the story gets less tidy. Blockworks’ quarterly figures show just how much Solana’s holder economics can swing.
During strong stretches of network activity in 2025, quarterly token holder income landed somewhere between $50 million and $100 million.
Q2 2026 looked very different. Token holder income for that quarter came in at approximately -$3.5 million, according to Blockworks data.
Why Blockworks’ framing matters Blockworks has built dashboards that track Solana’s financials in this income-statement style, covering both daily earnings and quarterly results. The approach treats a blockchain less like a tech project and more like a business with revenue, costs, and margins.
What this means for SOL holders Two weeks above $400,000 a day suggests user activity has picked back up, and that the network is generating more value than it spends on operators.
For stakers in particular, this is the metric that connects network usage to their returns.
Still, quarterly results remain well below the $50 million to $100 million range Solana posted during its stronger 2025 periods. And the Q2 2026 loss is a fresh reminder that this number can turn negative when conditions sour.
There are two levers worth watching. The first is demand: whether transaction fees and tips keep climbing as users return. The second is cost: whether operator payments to validators and infrastructure providers stay in check, or grow faster than revenue.
Solana has positioned itself as a high-throughput, low-fee chain. Low fees attract users, but they also mean the network needs a lot of activity to generate meaningful revenue for holders. The swings in Blockworks’ data reflect that trade-off in real time.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Token holder net income for the Solana network has surpassed $400,000 for a continuous two-week period, according to data from @SolanaFloor. This comes after a previous three-week decline, indicating a potential turnaround in the network’s financial performance. The Solana token (SOL) has been in the $109 to $111 range, reflecting a stable phase in its market activity. The increase in net income is seen as a sign of resilience in the Solana ecosystem, which has been experiencing fluctuations in network economics and market sentiment.
Advertisement
Market participants appear to interpret these developments as supportive of a positive outlook for Solana’s future price movements. Current pricing in prediction markets suggests cautious optimism regarding Solana’s potential to reach higher price thresholds by the end of October. However, the market remains vigilant due to the influence of external factors such as regulatory developments and network performance metrics.
Key Takeaways Market activity appears consistent with YES outcome support regarding Solana’s potential to maintain a positive trend due to the reported increase in net income. Prediction markets have shown a slight increase in optimism regarding Solana’s price reaching higher levels by the end of October 2026. The stability in Solana’s price range appears to indicate a period of consolidation before potential further movements. What to Watch Future developments that could impact Solana’s market dynamics include potential regulatory changes, network performance updates, and broader cryptocurrency market trends. Specific attention should be given to announcements from Solana Labs and any significant changes in decentralized exchange volumes or active addresses. Monitoring these factors will be crucial in assessing whether Solana can sustain its current trajectory and achieve higher price targets.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h November 1 2026 1.2% — — View market → November 1 2026 8.5% — — View market → November 1 2026 15% — — View market → November 1 2026 5.1% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → November 1 2026 1.2% — — View market → November 1 2026 2.2% — — View market →
Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) slid with the rest of the digital asset market this week as risk appetite cooled across major tokens. The decline was not confined to ether. Solana (SOL), Binance Coin (BNB), and Cardano (ADA) all gave back ground in a broad correction that hit larger altcoins harder than bitcoin, a familiar pattern when leveraged positions are forced out and traders rotate toward the most liquid names.
Market summaries from October 8 and 9 described a session in which bitcoin itself was under pressure, with several trackers placing it well below recent highs of around $87,000, while ether posted a steeper daily loss and traded near or under widely watched support of $2,500.
Solana and Cardano were among the names that lost technical footing after failed attempts to hold recent ranges, and BNB moved lower with the rest of the large-cap complex.
Total crypto capitalization shed a sizable amount in a short window, and derivatives desks reported heavy liquidations skewed toward long positions. Spot products tied to ether also saw outflows, adding to the selling rather than cushioning it.
The move sits inside a wider financial backdrop shaped by the unresolved conflict involving Iran.
Reports on October 8 that Washington had asked the Pentagon to prepare strike options that could be used before the November midterms pushed oil higher and weighed on equities.
Brent crude briefly traded above $105 a barrel before settling near $104, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished the day lower.
Bond yields have already been elevated for months as markets price the inflationary risk of disrupted Gulf supply, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz.
Stocks have not collapsed—the AI-heavy indexes have often limited the damage—but the latest headlines showed how quickly energy shocks still transmit into equities, rates, and sentiment.
That combination leaves global investors without a clean script for the months ahead.
The conflict has already run long enough to reshape energy prices and regional markets, and fresh talk of escalation suggests a workable settlement is not close.
Heading into 2027, global traders are now weighing whether higher oil and tighter financial conditions will eventually slow growth, or whether markets will continue to look through the war so long as corporate profits hold up.
Crypto, which has traded as a high-beta risk asset through much of the episode, is exposed to both the liquidity impulse from rates and the broader mood in equities.
Running in the opposite direction is the scale of artificial-intelligence spending.
The 2026 State of AI Report, published October 8 by Air Street Capital, put the combined annualized revenue run rates of OpenAI and Anthropic at about $105 billion by late summer, up from roughly $30 billion at the start of the year.
Nvidia remains the central supplier of the chips and systems that fund that build-out, and hyperscaler capital expenditure plans for the year run into the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Cheaper inference has widened adoption even as total spending has surged, giving the digital economy a growth engine that has helped offset geopolitical drag in equity indexes.
The near-term picture is therefore split.
Digital assets are digesting a correction led by ether and the major altcoins, traditional markets are still pricing an Iran conflict with no clear exit, and AI infrastructure continues to absorb capital at a pace that few other sectors match. How those forces net out into 2027 is the question portfolios are being built around.
Solana is about to complete an acceleration that began in August. The crypto network must reduce its target time between two blocks from 250 to 200 milliseconds during epoch 1053, expected on October 9. At this pace, five block production opportunities can appear each second, compared to 2.5 when Solana still operated at 400 ms. The blockchain is faster, but its overall theoretical capacity does not double.
In Brief Solana must go from 250 to 200 milliseconds per slot. The network will target five block production opportunities per second. Each block will be smaller to maintain an overall capacity close to the current level. The Crypto Solana Finishes Its Race to 200 Milliseconds The last step arrives three weeks after Solana moved from 300 to 250 milliseconds. This new reduction is set to take effect at the boundary of epoch 1053, around 3 PM UTC according to Anza, the team developing the Agave validator client. The timeline has been quick. Solana still operated with a 400 ms target before August 21. The network then moved to 350 ms, then 300 ms on August 28 and 250 ms on September 18.
200 ms is the final stage of the SIMD-0525 plan. A slot corresponds to the short period during which a designated validator can produce a block. By reducing this window, wallets, trading applications, and exchanges receive new information from the blockchain more frequently.
At 400 ms, Solana targeted about 2.5 block opportunities per second. At 200 ms, this figure rises to five. Twice as often.
Twice as Many Blocks, but Not Twice the Capacity This is the most important nuance of the upgrade. Solana is not simply doubling everything. When the network operated with 400 ms slots, each block could contain up to 60 million compute units. At 250 ms, this ceiling had already fallen to 37.5 million.
At 200 ms, it drops to 30 million. Blocks arrive twice as often as with the old setup, but each has about half the computing capacity. The total theoretical amount of work done per second thus remains close to its previous level.
The crypto network primarily aims to reduce latency. This effort accompanies other recent changes. In September, Solana also increased the maximum size of certain transactions from 1,232 to 4,096 bytes, allowing better handling of some zero-knowledge proofs and multisignature operations.
However, real performance remains slightly behind theoretical values. With a 250 ms target, Solana Compass observed average times around 266 to 269 ms over several recent epochs. The network was thus about 16 to 19 ms slower than its nominal goal. The first full epoch at 200 ms will reveal if this gap persists.
Validators Will Have to Keep Up With the New Pace Speeding up Solana’s clock also imposes more constraints. Validators will continue to produce blocks in groups of four consecutive slots. Their continuous production window thus decreases from 1.6 seconds under the old setup to only 800 milliseconds.
Less time to organize transactions. This could limit some strategies of delaying a transaction or exploiting a momentary price difference with another platform. But validators will also have to vote more often. Those submitting a vote each slot might see their costs rise sharply, while needing network connections capable of keeping pace.
Wallets also have less time to use a recent blockhash before it expires. Operations requiring manual validation or offline signatures might thus become a bit more tricky.
Solana already has significant activity to support. At the end of September, the value of tokenized assets on the network reached a record 4.6 billion dollars. The move to 200 ms does not directly create more capacity to absorb this activity. It mainly gives a faster rhythm to the existing infrastructure. From 400 to 200 milliseconds in less than two months. For Solana, the next test will no longer be about reducing the displayed number. It will be to actually hold the 200 ms.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Lydie M.
Enseignante et ingénieure IT, Lydie découvre le Bitcoin en 2022 et plonge dans l’univers des cryptomonnaies. Elle vulgarise des sujets complexes, décrypte les enjeux du Web3 et défend une vision d’un futur numérique ouvert, inclusif et décentralisé.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Ethereum rose 71% in Q3, with its profit supply ratio still not entering the warning zone.
Coinbase Institutional issued a report noting that ETH rallied 71% in the third quarter, yet on-chain metrics show no clear signs of overheating in its price action. Data indicates the share of ETH supply in profit has exited the accumulation range, but remains well below the warning threshold, signaling the current market has not reached the overextended levels flagged by historical metrics.
4 hours ago
Hacker who stole funds from Ledger transferred $1.07 million worth of ETH to Tornado Cash, with some of the funds flowing into Binance’s hot wallet.
According to Onchain Lens monitoring, the suspected hackers linked to the recent crypto heist involving Ledger reseller CryptoBillis — with the stolen amount reportedly nearly $90 million — have transferred 430.2 ETH, valued at around $1.07 million, to Tornado Cash via four wallets. After Tether froze some of the related funds, the suspects reportedly began converting USDT to USDD via SUN.io and USDD’s Peg Stability Module (PSM), while another portion of the funds flowed into Binance’s hot wallet. The suspected wallets flagged by Onchain Lens currently hold approximately $70.6 million in assets, including 11,406 ETH (worth ~$28.35 million), 213.371 BTC (~$17.65 million), 13.646 million USDD (~$13.65 million), and 10.909 million USDT (~$10.91 million). As on-chain funds continue to move, the above tracking data and suspect associations remain to be further verified.
4 hours ago
Former Mt.Gox CEO claims to have discovered Ledger hardware wallets implanted with spy modules, which can send mnemonic phrase information via LTE.
Former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès revealed in a post that a Ledger hardware wallet he received is suspected to have an implanted spy module. The device originated from Malaysia; its outer packaging’s heat-shrink film was intact, and anomalies were not immediately noticeable upon opening. The implant was hidden in the position of the screen’s original buffer pad. Karpelès further detailed that the module contains LTE communication components, an antenna, eSIM, and a microcontroller connected to Ledger’s SPI bus. It can analyze characters displayed on the device to users and exfiltrate relevant data after the mnemonic phrase is configured. Attackers may subsequently monitor the victim’s wallet address and transfer assets at an opportune moment. He urged users to inspect their devices in accordance with Ledger’s official guidance.
4 hours ago
MAGIC rose over 60% in 24 hours, pushing its market capitalization to $33 million.
According to HTX market data, MAGIC has surged over 60% in the past 24 hours, currently trading at $0.0992, with its market cap rising to $33 million.
4 hours ago
某用户6月抄底80枚BTC浮盈138万美元，一周前存入Ledger现已全部被盗
According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a user purchased 80 BTC for approximately $65,000 around four months ago, with a total investment of about $5.2 million. The user once recorded an unrealized profit of roughly $1.38 million. However, the user bought a Ledger hardware wallet from third-party dealer CryptoBillis a week ago and transferred all 80 BTC into it, only to have the entire funds stolen now. This incident is linked to recent fund thefts involving multiple CryptoBillis clients, though whether the devices were tampered with, the specific attack method, and the attacker’s identity remain unconfirmed.
4 hours ago
Investor Loses 80 $BTC ($5.2M) After Buying Compromised Ledger From Reseller
Poor guy! 4 months ago, he bought 80 $BTC ($5.2M) at a low price of ~$65,000 and was sitting on a $1.38M profit. But a week ago, he bought a Ledger device from reseller CryptoBillis and deposited all 80 $BTC into it. Now he's lost everything.
Solana’s network just had its busiest stretch in over a year. Unique active addresses on the blockchain reached 1.88 million as of October 9, 2026, the highest reading in 13 months, according to on-chain data from SolanaFloor and the Blockworks analytics dashboard.
Not every number is pointing the same way, though. While users are piling onto the chain, US spot SOL ETFs have been watching money walk out the door.
The numbers behind the surge Santiment reported that Solana’s network growth has accelerated by 124% since early September 2026. That growth works out to approximately 1.71 million new wallets created each day.
Advertisement
Daily active addresses also climbed sharply, rising 58% to roughly 4.27 million unique wallets. That figure and the 1.88 million reading come from different trackers, so they shouldn’t be read as the same measurement.
Funded wallets, meaning addresses that actually hold a balance, rose 38.5% month-over-month to a total of 16.1 million.
Builders and stablecoins are showing up too The network logged over 8,400 monthly active programs in September 2026, a new record. Programs are Solana’s version of smart contracts: the software that runs apps, exchanges, games and payment tools on the chain.
Daily active stablecoin addresses on Solana hit 888,000 in September, a 269% increase from the same month a year earlier. Total stablecoin supply on the network has also climbed past $15 billion, spread across more than 14 million addresses.
The ETF wrinkle US spot SOL ETFs recorded net outflows of more than $22 million through early October. That reversal followed a September marked by strong inflows into the same products.
What this means for SOL holders and the ecosystem The stablecoin data may be the most important thread to follow. A 269% year-over-year jump in daily active stablecoin addresses, alongside more than $15 billion in supply, suggests Solana is increasingly being used for moving dollars, not just trading tokens.
The key things to track from here: whether unique active addresses hold near the 1.88 million mark, whether funded wallet growth continues at anything close to its 38.5% monthly pace, and whether ETF flows flip back to positive.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Solana has moved closer to halving its block production time as developers prepare to activate the final stage of a network upgrade targeting 200 millisecond slots on Friday, Oct. 9.
Summary
Solana is preparing to reduce its target block time to 200 milliseconds on Friday, doubling block production frequency from its original configuration. The upgrade will shorten validator production windows to 800 milliseconds, while reducing the computing capacity allowed in each block. SOL price indicators remain mixed, with the RSI near 44 and the token trading below its 20 day exponential moving average. Developers have tested the final upgrade on testnet and devnet, with mainnet activation depending on validator performance and network conditions. According to Anza, the developer behind Solana’s Agave validator software, the reduction from 250 milliseconds is scheduled for epoch 1053, expected around 15:00 UTC.
The upgrade would allow Solana to target five block production opportunities per second, twice the frequency supported by its original 400 millisecond configuration.
The change follows three reductions completed since August under SIMD-0525, a proposal designed to improve network response times while keeping overall computing capacity relatively stable.
Solana prepares final slot time reduction under SIMD-0525 Solana began reducing its target slot times on Aug. 21, when the network moved from 400 milliseconds to 350 milliseconds. A second reduction to 300 milliseconds followed on Aug. 28, before the target reached 250 milliseconds on Sept. 18.
The latest stage would complete the planned sequence and reduce the time available for each validator to produce a block.
A slot represents a short period during which an assigned validator can process transactions and propose a block. With shorter slots, wallets, exchanges and decentralized applications can receive new transaction information more frequently.
The Solana Foundation’s upgrade documentation describes the reduction as an effort to improve latency and limit how long individual validators control block production.
Under the existing arrangement, validators produce blocks across four consecutive slots. At 400 milliseconds per slot, each validator previously had a 1.6 second window to order transactions.
Once the 200 millisecond target takes effect, the same four slot window will last just 800 milliseconds.
A shorter production window could limit the time validators have to delay transactions or take advantage of price differences between Solana and other trading venues.
The network will maintain controls on the amount of computing work allowed in each block.
At 250 milliseconds, a block can carry up to 37.5 million compute units. Under the final configuration, the limit falls to 30 million compute units.
Although blocks are expected to arrive more frequently, each will contain proportionally less computing work. The adjustment is intended to keep theoretical processing capacity roughly unchanged.
As crypto.news previously reported, the staged rollout includes safeguards that can stop further slot reductions if skipped block rates exceed the permitted threshold.
Faster Solana blocks bring new demands for validators The shorter slot duration will require validators to operate on a tighter schedule, particularly those submitting votes during every available slot.
Under the original 400 millisecond configuration, the network targeted 2.5 slots per second. At 200 milliseconds, the target rises to five.
Validators voting on every slot would consequently need to submit votes twice as frequently, potentially raising operating expenses and placing more pressure on network connections.
Transaction processing presents another consideration for wallets and applications.
Solana transactions include a recent blockhash, which helps prevent previously processed transactions from being replayed.
Blockhashes remain valid for a limited number of recent blocks. As the network produces slots more frequently, the amount of real time available to submit a transaction using a particular blockhash becomes shorter.
Transactions requiring manual authorization, multiple signatures or offline approval could face tighter deadlines.
Actual network performance will depend on how validators respond to the faster schedule.
Solana Compass data from recent epochs showed average slot durations of approximately 266 to 269 milliseconds under the previous 250 millisecond target.
The difference between the configured target and observed performance indicates that the network has not consistently achieved its intended slot duration.
Developers have already deployed the 200 millisecond configuration on testnet and devnet, but mainnet performance will depend partly on how frequently validators miss their assigned production slots.
Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade remains a separate development Solana’s latest slot reduction is taking place while developers prepare another network change focused on transaction finality.
The Alpenglow consensus upgrade has reached Solana’s devnet and testnet, where developers are evaluating a system intended to reduce finality from approximately 12.8 seconds to around 150 milliseconds.
Unlike SIMD-0525, which changes the frequency of block production, Alpenglow changes how validators reach agreement that a block is final.
The proposed consensus system replaces TowerBFT with Votor, a voting mechanism designed to finalize blocks through one or two rounds of direct validator communication.
Solana’s existing mainnet continues to use TowerBFT, and the Foundation has not confirmed a fixed activation date for Alpenglow.
In September, developers prepared Agave 4.3 for the consensus tests, while the slot reduction proceeded under a separate activation schedule.
The two upgrades address different parts of transaction processing. A faster slot target does not automatically mean transactions achieve finality in 200 milliseconds.
SOL price indicators remain mixed ahead of the upgrade Solana’s native token was trading near $110.30 on Friday, down approximately 1.96% over the previous 24 hours and 7.16% over seven days.
Despite the planned network upgrade, technical indicators showed mixed momentum for Solana, with eight bullish signals, eight bearish signals and six neutral readings.
The 14 day relative strength index stood near 44, below the neutral midpoint of 50 but above the commonly watched oversold threshold of 30.
Moving averages presented a divided picture. SOL was trading below its 20 day exponential moving average near $115.14, while remaining above its 50 day EMA at approximately $107.31 and 200 day EMA near $97.07.
The readings indicated weaker short term momentum despite the token remaining above its longer term moving averages.
Immediate resistance stood around $113.99, followed by another level near $119.82. On the downside, the indicators identified support around $97.94.
A sustained move above the first resistance level would put the next level in focus, while a drop below support could leave SOL exposed to further selling.
Institutional demand has been another factor in SOL’s recent market performance.
An October price analysis noted that U.S. Solana exchange traded funds attracted approximately $800,000 during the preceding week, compared with $188.1 million in the week before.
The slower inflows followed a period of stronger institutional buying, with the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF having surpassed $1 billion in assets in August.
Meanwhile, Solana’s 200 millisecond configuration has completed deployment on its testing networks. Developers have made the mainnet rollout conditional on network conditions, including validator block skip rates, with activation scheduled at the epoch 1053 boundary.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Ethereum rose 71% in Q3, with its profit supply ratio still not entering the warning zone.
Coinbase Institutional issued a report noting that ETH rallied 71% in the third quarter, yet on-chain metrics show no clear signs of overheating in its price action. Data indicates the share of ETH supply in profit has exited the accumulation range, but remains well below the warning threshold, signaling the current market has not reached the overextended levels flagged by historical metrics.
4 hours ago
Hacker who stole funds from Ledger transferred $1.07 million worth of ETH to Tornado Cash, with some of the funds flowing into Binance’s hot wallet.
According to Onchain Lens monitoring, the suspected hackers linked to the recent crypto heist involving Ledger reseller CryptoBillis — with the stolen amount reportedly nearly $90 million — have transferred 430.2 ETH, valued at around $1.07 million, to Tornado Cash via four wallets. After Tether froze some of the related funds, the suspects reportedly began converting USDT to USDD via SUN.io and USDD’s Peg Stability Module (PSM), while another portion of the funds flowed into Binance’s hot wallet. The suspected wallets flagged by Onchain Lens currently hold approximately $70.6 million in assets, including 11,406 ETH (worth ~$28.35 million), 213.371 BTC (~$17.65 million), 13.646 million USDD (~$13.65 million), and 10.909 million USDT (~$10.91 million). As on-chain funds continue to move, the above tracking data and suspect associations remain to be further verified.
4 hours ago
Former Mt.Gox CEO claims to have discovered Ledger hardware wallets implanted with spy modules, which can send mnemonic phrase information via LTE.
Former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès revealed in a post that a Ledger hardware wallet he received is suspected to have an implanted spy module. The device originated from Malaysia; its outer packaging’s heat-shrink film was intact, and anomalies were not immediately noticeable upon opening. The implant was hidden in the position of the screen’s original buffer pad. Karpelès further detailed that the module contains LTE communication components, an antenna, eSIM, and a microcontroller connected to Ledger’s SPI bus. It can analyze characters displayed on the device to users and exfiltrate relevant data after the mnemonic phrase is configured. Attackers may subsequently monitor the victim’s wallet address and transfer assets at an opportune moment. He urged users to inspect their devices in accordance with Ledger’s official guidance.
4 hours ago
MAGIC rose over 60% in 24 hours, pushing its market capitalization to $33 million.
According to HTX market data, MAGIC has surged over 60% in the past 24 hours, currently trading at $0.0992, with its market cap rising to $33 million.
4 hours ago
某用户6月抄底80枚BTC浮盈138万美元，一周前存入Ledger现已全部被盗
According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a user purchased 80 BTC for approximately $65,000 around four months ago, with a total investment of about $5.2 million. The user once recorded an unrealized profit of roughly $1.38 million. However, the user bought a Ledger hardware wallet from third-party dealer CryptoBillis a week ago and transferred all 80 BTC into it, only to have the entire funds stolen now. This incident is linked to recent fund thefts involving multiple CryptoBillis clients, though whether the devices were tampered with, the specific attack method, and the attacker’s identity remain unconfirmed.
4 hours ago
Investor Loses 80 $BTC ($5.2M) After Buying Compromised Ledger From Reseller
Poor guy! 4 months ago, he bought 80 $BTC ($5.2M) at a low price of ~$65,000 and was sitting on a $1.38M profit. But a week ago, he bought a Ledger device from reseller CryptoBillis and deposited all 80 $BTC into it. Now he's lost everything.
Kripto para piyasasında Solana tabanlı meme coin projelerine yönelik ilgi devam ederken Super Inu (SI), işlem hacmi ve piyasa verileriyle dikkat çekiyor. Yaklaşık 999,4 milyon token arzına sahip olan Super Inu, topluluk ilgisi ve sosyal medya odaklı piyasa hareketleriyle öne çıkıyor. Paylaşılan verilere göre SI token, yaklaşık 6,34 milyon dolarlık piyasa değerine, 811.900 dolarlık likiditeye ve 8 milyon dolarlık günlük işlem hacmine ulaştı. Peki, Super Inu (SI) coin nedir, hangi ağda çalışıyor ve yatırımcıların dikkat etmesi gereken riskler neler?
Super Inu (SI), Solana blockchain ağı üzerinde oluşturulan ve meme coin kategorisinde yer alan bir kripto para birimidir. Bitcoin ve Ethereum gibi köklü projelerden farklı olarak Super Inu’nun piyasa değeri, ağırlıklı olarak topluluk faaliyetleri, sosyal medya ilgisi ve spekülatif yatırımcı hareketlerinden etkileniyor. Projenin mevcut yapısında belirgin bir merkeziyetsiz finans hizmeti veya geleneksel kullanım alanı öne çıkmıyor. Bunun yerine Super Inu, meme coin kültürünü ve çevrimiçi toplulukların oluşturduğu ilgiyi temel alan bir dijital varlık olarak konumlanıyor.
Super Inu Neden Solana Ağında Çalışıyor? Super Inu (SI), yüksek işlem hızı ve düşük transfer maliyetleriyle öne çıkan Solana blockchain ağı üzerinde faaliyet gösteriyor. Solana ekosistemi, özellikle meme coin projelerinin geliştirilmesi, piyasaya sürülmesi ve merkeziyetsiz borsalarda işlem görmesi açısından önemli platformlardan biri haline geldi.
Solana altyapısının Super Inu gibi meme coin projelerine sağladığı başlıca avantajlar şunlardır:
Hızlı işlemler: Solana ağı, token transferlerinin kısa sürede gerçekleştirilmesine olanak tanıyor. Düşük işlem ücretleri: Kullanıcılar, birçok blockchain ağına kıyasla daha düşük maliyetlerle SI token transferi gerçekleştirebiliyor. Merkeziyetsiz borsa erişimi: Super Inu, desteklenen Solana tabanlı merkeziyetsiz işlem platformlarında alınıp satılabiliyor. Cüzdan uyumluluğu: SI tokeni, ilgili token standardını destekleyen Solana cüzdanlarında saklanabiliyor. Geniş meme coin ekosistemi: Solana’nın aktif meme coin piyasası, yeni projelerin yatırımcılar tarafından keşfedilmesini kolaylaştırabiliyor. Bu avantajlar, Super Inu’nun teknik altyapı açısından erişilebilir olmasına katkı sağlasa da tokenin güvenilirliğini veya uzun vadeli fiyat performansını garanti etmiyor. Bu nedenle yatırımcıların yalnızca Solana ağının sunduğu özelliklere değil, projenin likiditesine, sözleşme güvenliğine ve token dağılımına da dikkat etmesi gerekiyor.
Super Inu ve Süper Zeka Anlatısı Arasındaki Bağlantı Super Inu’nun (SI) dikkat çeken özelliklerinden biri, token sembolünün İngilizcede “Super Intelligence” yani “Süper Zeka” ifadesinin kısaltmasıyla örtüşmesi. Yapay zeka teknolojilerinin gelişmesi ve süper zeka kavramının teknoloji dünyasında daha fazla tartışılması, benzer temalara sahip meme coin projelerine yönelik spekülatif ilgiyi artırabiliyor. Super Inu’nun süper zeka anlatısıyla ilişkilendirilmesinde öne çıkan başlıca faktörler şunlardır:
SI sembolü: Super Inu’nun token sembolü, Super Intelligence ifadesinin baş harfleriyle örtüşüyor. Yapay zeka ilgisi: Yapay zeka ve süper zeka alanındaki gelişmeler, bu kavramlarla ilişkilendirilen kripto paralara yönelik ilgiyi artırabiliyor. Sosyal medya etkisi: Teknoloji dünyasındaki açıklamalar ve popüler paylaşımlar, SI gibi meme coinlerin daha fazla konuşulmasına katkı sağlayabiliyor. Spekülatif yatırımcı talebi: Yapay zeka temalı piyasa anlatıları, kısa vadeli fiyat hareketlerini ve işlem hacmini etkileyebiliyor. Topluluk odaklı büyüme: Super Inu’nun bilinirliği, sosyal medya etkileşimleri ve topluluk faaliyetlerine bağlı olarak değişebiliyor. Ancak SI sembolünün süper zeka kavramıyla örtüşmesi, Super Inu’nun herhangi bir yapay zeka şirketi, teknoloji kuruluşu veya resmi kurum tarafından desteklendiği anlamına gelmiyor. Ayrıca tokenin yapay zeka teknolojilerindeki gelişmelerden doğrudan ekonomik fayda sağladığını gösteren doğrulanmış bir bilgi bulunmuyor. Bu nedenle yatırımcıların Super Inu’yu teknolojik bir yapay zeka projesinden ziyade, popüler kavramlar ve topluluk ilgisi etrafında şekillenen spekülatif bir meme coin olarak değerlendirmesi önem taşıyor.
Super Inu ile Nvidia Arasında Bağlantı Var mı? Super Inu, bazı piyasa anlatılarında Nvidia ve yapay zeka temalı dijital varlıklarla birlikte anılıyor. Bunun nedenlerinden biri, süper zeka kavramının yüksek işlem gücü ve yapay zeka donanımlarıyla ilişkilendirilmesi. Ayrıca bazı işlem platformlarında SI tokeninin, tokenize edilmiş Nvidia hisselerini temsil eden NVDAx gibi varlıklarla eşleştirilebileceği belirtiliyor. Ancak böyle bir işlem çiftinin bulunması, Super Inu yatırımcılarının Nvidia hisselerine sahip olduğu anlamına gelmiyor. SI tokeni ile Nvidia şirketinin hisseleri birbirinden tamamen farklı finansal varlıklar olarak değerlendirilmeli.
Super Inu (SI) Coin Yatırımı Riskli mi? Super Inu, yeni ve spekülatif meme coin projelerinde görülen çeşitli riskleri barındırıyor. Token fiyatı, sosyal medya ilgisinin değişmesi veya büyük yatırımcıların işlem gerçekleştirmesi sonucunda kısa sürede sert yükselişler ve düşüşler yaşayabilir. Özellikle yaklaşık 811.900 dolarlık bildirilen likidite, büyük ölçekli alım ve satım işlemlerinde fiyat kaymalarının yaşanabileceğini gösteren önemli bir unsur olarak değerlendiriliyor. Ayrıca tokenin mint ve freeze yetkileri, büyük cüzdanların toplam arzdaki payı, likidite havuzlarının güvenliği ve bildirilen işlem vergileri yatırım öncesinde incelenmesi gereken faktörler arasında bulunuyor.
Super Inu (SI) Coin Geleceği Nasıl Görünüyor? Super Inu’nun geleceği büyük ölçüde topluluk ilgisinin devamına, işlem hacmindeki değişimlere ve likidite koşullarına bağlı olabilir. Yeni meme coin projelerinde sosyal medya etkileşimi ve yatırımcı ilgisi kısa sürede güçlü fiyat hareketleri oluşturabiliyor. Ancak bu tür yükselişlerin sürdürülebilir olması için piyasa katılımının devam etmesi ve likidite koşullarının sağlıklı kalması önem taşıyor. Super Inu’nun uzun vadeli performansını değerlendirmek isteyen yatırımcılar, token sahiplerinin sayısını, büyük cüzdanların hareketlerini, günlük işlem hacmini ve projenin gelişimine ilişkin duyuruları takip edebilir.
Super Inu (SI), Solana ekosisteminde faaliyet gösteren ve topluluk odaklı meme coin kategorisinde yer alan spekülatif bir kripto para projesi olarak öne çıkıyor. Paylaşılan verilere göre yaklaşık 6,34 milyon dolarlık piyasa değeri ve 8 milyon dolarlık günlük işlem hacmi, token etrafındaki piyasa hareketliliğini ortaya koyuyor. Bununla birlikte Super Inu’nun uzun vadeli değerini destekleyecek somut kullanım alanları ve sürdürülebilir talep koşulları henüz netlik kazanmış değil. Bu nedenle yatırımcıların SI tokeniyle işlem gerçekleştirmeden önce sözleşme güvenliğini, likidite durumunu, token dağılımını ve piyasa risklerini dikkatle değerlendirmesi önem taşıyor.
Resmi Bağlantılar Website Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Remittix establishes a firm route to public trading as Ethereum’s institutional story and Solana’s next consensus upgrade fuel ambitious market forecasts.
MAJURO, Marshall Islands, Oct. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Remittix has confirmed November 24, 2026 as the scheduled market-launch date for RTX, placing a firm deadline on the final phase of a presale that has raised more than $32 million.
The announcement gives over 40,000 participants a defined transition from presale funding to public trading. It follows the opening of PayFi testing to 1,000 invited holders.
The countdown begins as Ethereum price prediction discussions explore $8,000 and Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade supports a renewed $250 target. Remittix enters that bullish conversation with something large-cap assets cannot offer: a first launch cycle backed by working products and an expanding financial platform.
November 24 Becomes the Central RTX Catalyst
The confirmed launch date transforms the Remittix roadmap into a time-bound market event. RTX is currently available at $0.23, with $0.46 announced as the final presale price and planned minimum exchange launch price.
Remittix is advancing toward a $36 million hard cap after crossing $32 million. The remaining allocation creates a narrowing pre-launch window before broader market access begins.
This timeline is reinforced by product progress. One thousand invited holders can test EUR and USD PayFi routes, including crypto-to-fiat and fiat-to-crypto functions. USDT and USDC are supported across selected networks such as Ethereum, Celo, Base and Polygon, with more currencies and assets planned.
Remittix Is Preparing an Ecosystem, Not a Standalone Token
The Remittix platform is being built as a single destination for holding, transferring, trading and earning with digital assets. PayFi forms the practical settlement layer, helping users move value from crypto into compatible bank accounts for personal or commercial use.
The iOS wallet has already recorded more than 10,000 downloads, and an Android version is awaiting approval. Remittix Markets is live with hundreds of perpetual trading pairs and has processed over $50 million in volume across thousands of active users.
Remittix Earn is approaching release with advertised yields of up to 22% APY on eligible assets. The planned wallet rebuild will connect PayFi, Markets and Earn, potentially allowing each product to introduce users and liquidity to the others.
Ethereum Price Prediction Eyes $8,000 as Solana Targets $250
Ethereum recently traded near $2,500. An $8,000 Ethereum price prediction implies more than threefold upside and reflects a high-conviction bull case based on ETF demand, staking, stablecoin settlement, tokenized assets and continued institutional adoption.
Solana has been trading near $110 after retreating with the wider market. A $250 target would require an advance of roughly 125%, with network upgrades strengthening the long-term case. Alpenglow is designed to replace TowerBFT and reduce targeted finality from approximately 12.8 seconds to around 150 milliseconds.
Ethereum offers established smart-contract scale, while Solana is pursuing faster settlement. Remittix is focused on the consumer-facing gap between blockchain value and everyday banking, giving RTX a distinct route into the wider adoption cycle.
A Defined Launch Could Concentrate Market Attention
The November 24 debut will bring Remittix’s payment, trading, wallet and earning products into public markets together, providing RTX with several potential sources of demand.
As the presale approaches its hard cap, the project’s combination of a fixed launch date, live trading activity, wallet adoption and active PayFi testing could place Remittix among the most closely watched new crypto launches of the final quarter.
About Remittix
Remittix is building a connected PayFi and digital-asset ecosystem focused on crypto-to-bank and bank-to-crypto payments. Its products include Remittix Markets, a mobile wallet and the forthcoming Remittix Earn service.
Disclaimer: This content is provided by Remittix. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.
Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an "as-is" basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/102eab00-26f6-4f3e-b32b-33435bfac389
Circle has reportedly minted approximately 750 million USDC on the Solana blockchain within the past 24 hours, according to data shared by @SolanaFloor. This minting activity suggests an increase in USDC liquidity on Solana, a network that has become the second-largest holder of USDC by supply. As of early October, Solana had about $7.3–$7.45 billion in native USDC, highlighting the significance of this recent mint. While this increase in stablecoin reserves on Solana could indicate potential demand for the network’s native token SOL, it remains uncertain whether this newly minted USDC has been actively circulated or deployed in markets. The information comes from a Tier 3 social media source, which may impact its reliability.
Key Takeaways The minting of 750 million USDC on Solana appears to suggest increased liquidity on the network. Market pricing implies that participants may view this development as supportive of a potential increase in SOL demand. While the minting is significant, it is unclear how much of this USDC will enter active circulation. What to Watch Observers will be monitoring how the newly minted USDC impacts Solana’s economic activity, particularly whether it translates to increased demand for SOL. Key developments could include announcements from Solana Labs regarding new projects or partnerships that leverage this liquidity. Additionally, any regulatory changes or shifts in the broader cryptocurrency market could influence Solana’s price movements. Market participants are also likely to watch for any significant changes in decentralized-exchange volume and active addresses on the Solana network.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h November 1 2026 1.1% — — View market → November 1 2026 8.5% — — View market → November 1 2026 15% — — View market → November 1 2026 5% — — View market → November 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → November 1 2026 1.2% — — View market → November 1 2026 2.3% — — View market →
Baton Coin (BATON), Solana ekosisteminde yer alan ve Pump.fun platformunun geçmişine gönderme yapan bir meme coindir. Proje, Pump.fun’ın ilk dönemlerinde kullandığı Baton ismini yeniden gündeme taşıyarak bu ismi bir köpek karakteri üzerinden blokzincir dünyasında yaşatmayı amaçlar. BATON, teknik bir altyapı çözümü veya belirli bir finansal hizmet sunan token olmaktan ziyade, internet kültürüne, meme topluluklarına ve kripto para tarihine dayanan bir projedir.
Baton’un hikâyesini diğer meme coinlerden ayıran temel unsur, Pump.fun ile kurduğu tarihsel bağlantıdır. Solana ağında meme coin üretimini ve piyasaya sürülmesini kolaylaştıran Pump.fun, bonding curve mekanizmasıyla çok sayıda tokenın oluşturulmasına öncülük etti. BATON ise platformun bugünkü kimliği ortaya çıkmadan önceki ismine odaklanarak bu geçmişi topluluk odaklı bir meme coin anlatısına dönüştürür.
Projenin yaklaşımı oldukça basittir: BATON bir teknoloji tokenı, haber tokenı veya karmaşık bir kullanım alanına sahip dijital varlık olarak konumlandırılmaz. Bunun yerine, elinde cop bulunan bir köpek karakteri üzerinden mizah, topluluk kültürü ve Pump.fun ekosistemiyle bağlantı kurar. Projenin temel fikri, bu karakteri ve temsil ettiği geçmişi blokzincir üzerinde kalıcı hâle getirmektir.
Baton Coin Hikâyesi Ve Pump.fun İle Bağlantısı Baton Coin’in ortaya çıkışını anlamak için Pump.fun’ın ilk dönemlerine bakmak gerekir. Pump.fun, Solana ağı üzerinde kullanıcıların kendi tokenlarını kolayca oluşturmasına ve işlem görmeye başlamasına imkân tanıyan bir platform olarak öne çıktı. Platformun yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte meme coin üretimi, kripto para piyasasının dikkat çeken faaliyetlerinden biri hâline geldi.
Ancak Baton anlatısının merkezinde Pump.fun’ın bugünkü adı değil, platformun daha önce kullandığı Baton ismi bulunur. Projenin kendi anlatımına göre Baton, NFT staking protokolü olarak başlayan ve daha sonra meme coinlerin piyasaya sürülmesine odaklanan bir yapıyla ilişkilidir. Ardından platform, bugün bilinen Pump.fun markasına geçiş yaptı.
Bu tarihsel bağlantı, BATON’un temel hikâyesini oluşturur. Proje, platformun geçmişteki ismini yalnızca hatırlatmakla kalmayıp onu bir meme karakteri aracılığıyla yeniden yorumlar. Böylece Baton adı, geçmişte kalmış bir marka unsurundan çıkarılarak topluluk tarafından sahiplenilebilecek bir kripto para anlatısına dönüştürülür.
Burada önemli bir ayrım bulunur: BATON, Pump.fun platformunun kendisiyle aynı şey değildir. Pump.fun, token oluşturma ve işlem süreçleriyle ilişkilendirilen bir platformken BATON, bu platformun geçmişine atıfta bulunan bağımsız bir meme coin projesi olarak ele alınmalıdır. Bu tarihsel ilişki, iki yapının aynı hukuki veya ekonomik varlık olduğu anlamına gelmez.
Baton Coin (BATON) Ne Amaçlıyor? BATON’un temel amacı, karmaşık bir teknolojik problemi çözmekten çok, belirli bir internet ve kripto para kültürünü temsil etmektir. Proje, Pump.fun’ın gelişim sürecinde geride kalan Baton ismini yeniden gündeme getirerek bu isme ait hikâyeyi topluluk kültürü üzerinden sürdürmeyi hedefler.
Bu yaklaşım, meme coin piyasasında sıkça karşılaşılan bir modele dayanır. Bazı projeler merkeziyetsiz finans, blokzincir altyapısı veya uygulama geliştirme gibi alanlarda belirli işlevler sunarken bazıları mizah, karakter tasarımı, topluluk etkileşimi ve internet kültürü üzerinden şekillenir. BATON ikinci grupta yer alır.
Projenin öne çıkardığı unsurlar şunlardır:
Tarihsel anlatı: Pump.fun’ın önceki Baton ismini temel alması. Meme kültürü: Elinde cop bulunan köpek karakterini projenin merkezine yerleştirmesi. Topluluk odaklılık: Teknik işlevlerden çok karakterin ve hikâyenin etrafında bir kimlik oluşturması. Pump.fun ekosistemiyle bağlantı: Solana üzerindeki meme coin üretim kültürüne atıfta bulunması. Basit konumlandırma: Tokenın belirli bir teknoloji hizmeti sunma iddiası taşımaması. Bu özellikler, BATON’un değer önerisinin büyük ölçüde anlatısına ve topluluk ilgisine bağlı olduğunu gösterir. Dolayısıyla projenin benimsenmesi, geleneksel bir yazılım projesinde olduğu gibi yalnızca teknik performans üzerinden değerlendirilemez.
Baton Coin Bir Meme Coin Mi? Evet. Projenin kendi açıklamasına göre BATON, işlevsel bir teknoloji tokenından ziyade bir köpek temalı meme coindir. Projenin tanıtımında sıfır kullanım alanı, tamamen köpek karakteri üzerine kurulu bir kimlik ve derin bir hikâye vurgulanır. Bu yaklaşım, tokenın öncelikli amacının belirli bir hizmetin kullanımını sağlamak olmadığını ortaya koyar.
BATON’un karakteri, elinde cop tutan ve hem tehditkâr hem de sevimli bir görünüme sahip köpek figürü etrafında şekillenir. Projenin mizahi anlatımı, bu karakteri yalnızca görsel bir unsur olarak değil, tokenın kimliğini oluşturan temel sembol olarak kullanır.
Meme coinlerde bu tür semboller, toplulukların ortak bir kimlik geliştirmesine yardımcı olabilir. Bir karakterin kolay tanınması, sosyal medyada paylaşılabilmesi ve belirli bir hikâyeyle ilişkilendirilmesi, projenin görünürlüğünü artırabilir. Bununla birlikte, görünürlük ve topluluk ilgisi kalıcı talep veya fiyat artışı garantisi sunmaz.
BATON’un teknik kullanım alanının bulunmaması da yatırım değerlendirmesinde dikkate alınmalıdır. Tokenın değerini destekleyebilecek unsurlar, öncelikle topluluk katılımı, piyasa likiditesi, işlem talebi ve Pump.fun anlatısına gösterilen ilgi gibi değişkenlerdir. Bunların hiçbiri tek başına sürdürülebilir değer oluşacağını garanti etmez.
Proje Nasıl Çalışır? BATON’un çalışma mantığı, belirli bir yazılım hizmetine erişim sağlamaktan ziyade Solana üzerindeki token alım satım mekanizmalarına dayanır. Tokenın alınıp satılabilmesi, kullanılan piyasa ve likidite altyapısına bağlıdır.
Pump.fun ekosisteminde bonding curve modeli, yeni tokenların ilk aşamadaki fiyat oluşumunda kullanılan mekanizmalardan biridir. Bu modelde token fiyatı, akıllı sözleşmede tanımlanan eğri ve gerçekleşen işlemler doğrultusunda değişebilir. Bir tokenın işlem görmesi ve likiditesinin gelişmesi, piyasadaki alım satım talebiyle yakından ilişkilidir.
Bununla birlikte, BATON’un Pump.fun ile tarihsel bir anlatı üzerinden ilişkilendirilmesi, tokenın Pump.fun platformunun resmî tokenı olduğu anlamına gelmez. Projenin kendi internet sitesinde de Pump.fun ile kurumsal bir bağlantısı bulunmadığı belirtilir. Dolayısıyla BATON’u platformun yerel tokenı veya platform gelirlerine hak kazandıran bir varlık olarak değerlendirmek doğru değildir.
BATON’un fiyatı; alıcı ve satıcıların davranışları, likidite derinliği, işlem hacmi ve projeye yönelik ilgi gibi faktörlerden etkilenebilir. Meme coin piyasasında bu değişkenler kısa sürelerde önemli ölçüde farklılaşabilir.
Baton Hangi Ağda Yer Alıyor? BATON, Solana ekosistemiyle ve Pump.fun platformuyla ilişkilendirilen bir meme coin olarak tanıtılır. Solana, hızlı işlem gerçekleştirme kapasitesi ve görece düşük işlem maliyetleri sayesinde meme coin projelerinin yoğun olarak faaliyet gösterdiği blokzincir ağlarından biridir.
Pump.fun da Solana ekosisteminde token oluşturma ve piyasaya sürme süreçleriyle tanınır. Bu platformun bonding curve tabanlı modeli, yeni tokenların ilk aşamadaki fiyat oluşumunu ve alım satım mekanizmasını belirleyen sistemlerden biridir. BATON’un hikâyesi bu ekosisteme dayansa da tokenın belirli bir platformda anılması, otomatik olarak o platform tarafından resmen desteklendiği anlamına gelmez.
BATON satın almak isteyen kullanıcıların doğru tokenı belirlemek için güncel sözleşme adresini doğrulaması gerekir. Aynı veya benzer isimleri kullanan tokenlar farklı adreslerde bulunabilir. Yalnızca token adı, sembolü veya sosyal medya paylaşımları üzerinden hareket etmek, yanlış varlığın satın alınması riskini doğurabilir.
Baton Coin Tokenomics: Arz Ve Dağılım BATON’un token ekonomisi, projenin teknik bir kullanım alanından çok meme kültürüne odaklanan yapısıyla uyumludur. Projenin tanıtım sayfasında toplam arz, işlem ücretleri ve likidite havuzunun durumu hakkında üç temel bilgi paylaşılır.
Token adı: Baton Sembol: BATON Blokzincir ekosistemi: Solana Toplam arz: 1 milyar BATON İşlem ücreti: Yaklaşık %1 olarak belirtiliyor Likidite: Toplam arzın havuzda bulunduğu belirtiliyor Likidite sağlayıcı tokenları: Yakıldığı ifade ediliyor
Resmi Bağlantılar Website X (Twitter) Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Renowned crypto investment firm Fidelity has continued to expand its crypto portfolio, adding more Bitcoin amid growing demand for its ETF product.
Apart from its Bitcoin fund, the firm also issues both Ethereum and Solana ETFs, and it has recorded modest purchases for both over the same period.
Fidelity buys $354 million of Bitcoin Latest onchain data from Arkham Intelligence shows that Fidelity has purchased a total of $438.9 million worth of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana through its ETF products over the past 20 trading days.
HOT Stories
While this signals continued buying activity across the three major crypto assets, it shows that the firm has seen sustained demand for nearly all its crypto ETF offerings, especially Bitcoin.
You Might Also Like
Nonetheless, the data shows that the firm saw more demand for its Bitcoin product, as the Fidelity spot Bitcoin ETF recorded the largest purchases.
As such, FBTC has accumulated up to $354.1 million worth of BTC over the stated period. Meanwhile, it acquired only lesser amounts of ETH and SOL.
More specifically, Fidelity has bought $66.6 million worth of Ethereum and another $18.2 million worth of Solana over the same period.
Bitcoin loses momentum While the massive Bitcoin purchase from Fidelity signals sustained institutional demand for the leading crypto asset over the past week, Bitcoin has suddenly witnessed a sharp price reversal.
Retracing from a high of around $87,000 back to its multi-week low of around $81,000, Bitcoin appears to be facing increased sell-off pressure from traders, especially retail traders.
With momentum on the leading asset currently down, it remains uncertain whether Fidelity and other major Bitcoin funds will be able to sustain their Bitcoin buying spree for much longer.
Securitize, Inc. (NYSE:SECZ) shares are trending on Thursday night
Securitize Launches 12 Tokenized US Stocks On SolanaShares of the Miami-based tokenization company jumped 9.92% to $13.92 in after-hours trading on Thursday, following its announcement that it is bringing 12 major U.S. stocks onchain through a new product called "Securitize Stocks."
According to the company, Securitize has chosen Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) as the first network for launching Securitize Stocks, with transactions settled in USDC (CRYPTO: USDC). The tokens are backed 1:1 by underlying shares and will trade on Securitize’s registered broker-dealer platform for eligible investors in the U.S., the EU and other permitted jurisdictions.
The initial lineup includes Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Nvidia Corp., Alphabet Inc., Tesla Inc., Meta Platforms Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Netflix Inc., Circle Internet Group Inc., Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Strategy Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.
Carlos Domingo, Chairman and CEO of Securitize, said, "Tokenized stocks should give investors more than a price on a wrapper that tracks a stock and is only offered offshore."
Trading Metrics, Technical AnalysisSecuritize has a market capitalization of $2.07 billion, a 52-week high of $17.01 and a 52-week low of $5.14.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) of SECZ stands at 54.58.
The stock has gained 16.79% over the past 12 months.
SECZ is currently trading at 63.35% of its 52-week trading range.
Price Action: Shares closed on Thursday at $12.66, up 11.05%, according to Benzinga Pro data.
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
Solana is about to halve its block times as final 200-millisecond upgrade nears. (Solana)Summary
Solana plans to reduce its target block time from 250 milliseconds to 200 milliseconds at epoch 1053 on Friday, completing a series of cuts from 400 milliseconds since August.The upgrade will create five block-production opportunities per second, potentially speeding transaction updates, while lowering each block’s computing limit to keep overall processing capacity roughly unchanged.Faster blocks could reduce transaction delays and trading exploits, but they will increase validator voting demands, strain network connections and shorten the validity window for transactions.Solana is preparing to cut the time between blocks to 200 milliseconds on Friday, completing a series of upgrades that has halved the network's target block production time since August.
The final reduction, from 250 milliseconds, is scheduled to take effect at epoch 1053, expected around 15:00 UTC, according to Anza, the developer of Solana's widely used Agave validator software.
The change would allow the blockchain to target five block-production opportunities every second, compared with 2.5 under the original 400-millisecond configuration.
A slot is the short window in which a designated validator can add transactions to the blockchain. Shorter slots mean trading applications, wallets and exchanges can receive updated information more frequently, reducing the time a submitted transaction may spend waiting to be processed.
The changes began Aug. 21, when Solana moved to 350 milliseconds, followed by reductions to 300 milliseconds on Aug. 28 and 250 milliseconds on Sept. 18.
The technical proposal, known as SIMD-0525, also limits how much computing work validators can pack into each block.
At 200 milliseconds, each block can carry a maximum of 30 million compute units, down from 37.5 million at 250 milliseconds. Blocks arrive more frequently, but each carries proportionally less work, keeping the network's theoretical processing capacity roughly unchanged.
Read More: Solana transactions just got more than 3 times bigger, narrowing the gap with Ethereum
Validators will continue producing blocks in groups of four consecutive slots. Their uninterrupted window to order transactions will consequently shrink from 1.6 seconds under the original configuration to 800 milliseconds.
That could reduce opportunities to delay transactions or exploit prices that have moved on other exchanges before Solana catches up.
The faster clock also comes with costs. Validators that submit votes on every slot will need to do so about twice as frequently as under the original configuration, increasing voting expenses and placing greater pressure on network connections.
Wallets and other applications also have less time to use a recent blockhash, a reference included in transactions to prevent them from being replayed. The shorter validity window could complicate transactions requiring manual approval or offline signatures.
Actual network performance remains a testSolana Compass data shows the previous 250-millisecond configuration delivered average slot times of approximately 266 to 269 milliseconds across recent epochs, slightly slower than its target.
The final reduction has already been deployed on Solana's testnet and devnet. Developers have said the mainnet rollout depends on network conditions, particularly the rate at which validators miss their assigned block-production opportunities.
The transition is expected to occur at the epoch 1053 boundary on Friday.
12345678910The Definitive Stablecoin Landscape Series: Asia Pacific
The Definitive Stablecoin Landscape Series: Asia Pacific
As stablecoins move into regulated finance, APAC is becoming a key proving ground. This report maps the region’s rules, use cases, and RLUSD’s role.
Sep 15, 2026
As stablecoins move into regulated finance, APAC is becoming a key proving ground. This report maps the region’s rules, use cases, and RLUSD’s role.
Why it matters:
As stablecoins move into regulated finance, APAC is becoming a key proving ground. This report maps the region’s rules, use cases, and RLUSD’s role.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko said that the Netflix FTX series fused three crypto founders into one person. By his account, the blend covers him, fellow co-founder Raj Gokal, and Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.
He shared the remark on X hours after the first trailer dropped. Yet Netflix built the drama around Sam Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison, and no announced cast member plays a Solana or Ethereum founder.
The Netflix FTX Series Centers on 2 Insiders, Not Blockchain FoundersNetflix confirmed the cast in a post on X. Julia Garner plays Ellison, while Anthony Boyle portrays Bankman-Fried in The Altruists, which premieres November 19.
All in. Every time. Julia Garner and Anthony Boyle star as Caroline Ellison and Sam Bankman-Fried in this limited series about the love scorned prodigies behind the FTX scandal.
The Altruists premieres November 19. pic.twitter.com/YOZILT9P5S
— Netflix (@netflix) October 8, 2026 Graham Moore and Jacqueline Hoyt run the series. Barack and Michelle Obama’s Higher Ground serves as a producer, and the scripts draw on New York Magazine reporting.
Solana also has its own FTX history. Before 2022, FTX and its sister trading firm, Alameda Research, ranked among the network’s best-known backers.
Yakovenko did not say which character he meant. However, he opened his post by saying the result was worse than he had expected.
Meanwhile, the real Ellison has kept a low profile. She recently resurfaced in a quiet charity job under a different first name.
The title nods to effective altruism, a movement that urges people to earn money and give it away. Bankman-Fried publicly cast his career as a way to fund that cause.
In contrast, prosecutors said Alameda took about $8 billion in FTX customer funds.
Industry Veterans Brace for a Glossy RetellingOther industry figures reacted to the Netflix FTX series in more personal terms. Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at crypto financial firm Galaxy, admitted he will likely enjoy the dramatization.
Yet Thorn also called the FTX collapse the worst experience he has ever had in markets.
the sick thing is that i will definitely enjoy watching this glossy and entertaining dramatization of the most awful experience i’ve ever had in markets
what is wrong with me 🫠 https://t.co/r3v8R4SXaf
— Alex Thorn (@intangiblecoins) October 8, 2026 His mixed feelings reflect a saga that has not ended. A New York court sentenced Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison in 2024. Now he has petitioned the Supreme Court to review his fraud conviction.
As a result, the Netflix FTX series arrives while the legal story stays open. From November 19, viewers can test Yakovenko’s claim for themselves.
FTX customers, however, had to wait until 2025 for their first repayments. Their claims were also valued at 2022 prices, even though crypto has climbed since then. For many of them, a glossy retelling of the collapse may be far harder to enjoy than for casual viewers.
Securitize’s new stock tokens represent security entitlements backed by shares, while the companies whose stock appears on the tokens have not sponsored the offering.
Summary
Securitize launched tokens linked to 12 U.S. equities on Solana through its registered broker dealer, with trading initially during extended hours. The company says each token has one underlying share and carries applicable economic benefits, but a holder is not registered on the issuer’s shareholder list unless conversion occurs. The planned NYSE and OKXICE trading venues have not launched, and eligibility, liquidity and corporate actions depend on offchain arrangements. Securitize says backing shares will not be lent, while USDC serves as the settlement asset for the Solana trades. Dividend payments, voting instructions and conversion to direct ownership require processes beyond the token transfer. An Apple stock token on Solana can move through a blockchain transaction, but its legal claim runs through a securities intermediary. In its October 8 product announcement, Securitize says a token represents an Article 8 security entitlement backed one for one by an underlying U.S. share. Its disclosure is explicit: token holders are not registered shareholders of Apple or another underlying company unless they convert, and those companies have not endorsed the product.
The distinction changes what an investor needs to inspect. A blockchain can record the transfer of a token; a broker and its custody chain must preserve the matching claim on the stock. Dividends, voting, conversion and insolvency treatment follow contracts and securities law as well as code. The product’s launch is a practical way to examine where ownership sits in a market that promises shares onchain.
JUST IN: Securitize brings 12 major U.S. stocks onchain through Securitize's existing Solana PropAMM
Securitize launched Securitize Stocks on Oct. 8, giving eligible investors access to tokenized U.S. stocks, including Apple, Nvidia, Tesla and Amazon, backed 1:1 by underlying… pic.twitter.com/oEKPxg9lc4
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) October 9, 2026 Twelve stock entitlements launch on Solana Securitize Stocks initially includes security entitlements tied to Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Tesla, Meta, Amazon, Netflix, Circle, SpaceX, Strategy and Palantir, according to the company. SpaceX is not an ordinary public stock and its presence calls for careful attention to the precise underlying interest and eligibility terms. The release labels the initial products as entitlements to shares under its offering; readers should inspect product documentation for each ticker rather than infer identical market access from a list.
The launch uses Solana and settles transactions in USDC. Securitize Markets, a registered broker dealer, offers the initial trading service; the firm says its Solana PropAMM infrastructure and Jump Trading will support market making. Trading begins during extended hours, with around the clock access described as a plan. Eligible investors in the U.S., EU and other permitted markets must pass onboarding, identity and sanctions checks.
The company says the token is backed by a share, is not a price only synthetic instrument, and carries applicable economic rights. It says the backing shares will not be lent. Investors may eventually be able to convert an entitlement to direct ownership on an issuer’s register when an issuer adopts sponsored tokenization and the necessary transfer agent arrangements exist. A planned route should not be described as universal instant convertibility on launch day.
Securitize expects its tokens may trade on a proposed NYSE digital venue and the OKXICE venue in the future. Its own legal disclosure says neither venue has launched and trading there remains subject to reviews and approvals. A reader should separate the live broker dealer offering from future market structure announcements.
A claim through the brokerage system In the conventional U.S. indirect holding system, many investors do not appear as individual names on a public company’s shareholder register. They hold securities through a broker and receive a protected entitlement against the intermediary. Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code supplies the legal framework for that relationship. Securitize says its token represents such an entitlement held through Securitize Markets, rather than direct registration in Apple’s books.
The SEC staff’s January statement on tokenized securities distinguishes securities tokenized by issuers from those tokenized by unaffiliated third parties. In one third party model, an underlying share sits in custody and a token represents an indirect interest via a security entitlement. In another, a third party issues a separate product that merely gives synthetic exposure to a stock price. The rights can differ considerably even if both tokens display the same ticker.
A holder of a backed entitlement has a claim arising from the intermediary’s duty to maintain the corresponding securities and honour instructions under applicable rules and agreements. The blockchain entry may be integrated into the intermediary’s official entitlement records or may trigger an offchain update. The SEC staff describes both possibilities. Securitize’s exact recordkeeping and reconciliation procedures are essential details; a token balance alone cannot explain all legal steps between the customer and issuer register.
Earlier coverage of another Article 8 tokenization proposal described how a customer can have an entitlement even though a nominee remains the registered owner. Securitize’s arrangement needs to be judged by its own custody documents. The familiar securities law term does not mean the customer has become a direct registered Apple shareholder.
Who owns the actual Apple share? Securitize says each token is backed by an underlying share and held through its brokerage structure. Its disclosure says the entitlement holder is not on the underlying issuer’s shareholder register before a conversion. The legal chain can include brokers, custodians and clearing arrangements. Identifying the precise registered holder and how shares are segregated requires the product’s customer agreement and clearing disclosures.
A one for one backing claim is stronger than an unsecured bet on price, but its effectiveness depends on ongoing reconciliation. The intermediary must ensure tokens outstanding do not exceed the underlying positions attributable to holders. It must account for minted and burned tokens as shares enter or leave custody, address failed settlements and correct operational errors. A public blockchain can show token supply; it cannot alone prove the offchain custody account contains the matching shares at every moment.
If the intermediary or a custodian fails, the customer would rely on the legally recognised security entitlement and applicable protections, not a magical right to take a certificate from a blockchain validator. Brokerage custody and investor protection rules may apply; their exact operation depends on the legal entity, customer account, location and cause of loss. Securitize Markets identifies itself as a FINRA member and SIPC member in its release, but SIPC coverage has limits and is not insurance against a market decline.
The underlying issuers have not sponsored or endorsed these Securitize tokens, according to the company’s disclosure. Apple is not promising to monitor the Solana smart contract or redeem a token directly from an unknown wallet. The tokenization provider is responsible for the bridge between the token holder and the conventional rights attached to shares.
Dividends and votes require an intermediary Securitize says the entitlements preserve applicable economic benefits, including dividends and, where the class carries them, voting rights. Cash paid by an issuer enters the securities infrastructure and must be passed through the intermediary chain to the entitled customer under the product terms. A token transfer close to a record date introduces questions about how the intermediary identifies the holder entitled to receive a dividend or give voting instructions.
Corporate actions are more varied than quarterly dividends. Stock splits require an adjustment in the number of shares and corresponding tokens. A merger may deliver cash, securities of another issuer or a choice between them. Spin offs and tender offers can produce rights that do not immediately fit an existing token format. The operator needs a policy for each event and a way to communicate instructions to the person legally recognised as holding the entitlement at the relevant time.
Voting can depend on an intermediary collecting customer instructions, submitting them through the chain and reporting the outcome. A governance button inside a wallet would not by itself establish that Apple received a shareholder vote. The article should distinguish an entitlement to transmit voting instructions from the practical mechanism through which instructions reach the company.
A product linked to a private company may have additional transfer limitations, valuation questions and eligibility requirements. SpaceX is an example where the name alone cannot tell a buyer how the underlying interest is held. Marketing language that groups public stocks and private shares together can hide material differences in liquidity and shareholder rights. Each instrument’s offering documents should control the description.
Extended hours come before 24 hour trading No. Securitize says launch trading is during extended hours, with a move toward 24/7 availability planned. Users face onboarding, KYC, sanctions and jurisdiction checks. A compatible Solana wallet does not grant everyone a lawful brokerage account or permit unrestricted secondary trading of a regulated security.
A market maker can provide quotes outside the primary exchange’s regular hours, but price discovery may be thinner when the underlying share is not trading. Earlier analysis of tokenized stock pricing gaps described how quotes may widen around company news, exchange halts or periods when the provider cannot hedge its inventory. A token’s blockchain transfer might settle quickly while the economic price still depends on conventional stock market information and offchain risk management.
Securitize’s launch market uses a proprietary automated market maker with Jump Trading. The term automated does not remove the need for a broker, eligibility controls or a supply of underlying securities. Liquidity depends on capital, market maker obligations and customers on both sides. A venue can record trades transparently while spreads and inventory constraints remain substantial.
The SEC’s September innovation exemption establishes conditional relief for qualifying tokenized securities venues, including limits on symbols and volume, issuer notice for unaffiliated tokenization, rights parity and trading halts linked to the underlying stock. Earlier reporting on the five year SEC exemption describes its temporary scope. Securitize says initial trading on its registered broker dealer platform does not depend on that exemption. Its planned venue participation remains a separate future matter.
What if trading in the underlying share halts? A token may still exist onchain during a stock exchange halt, but a regulated trading venue has to consider the underlying halt and investor protection. The SEC’s conditional venue exemption requires a participating venue to stop tokenized stock trading when the underlying NMS stock stops on its primary listing market. Initial broker trading may have its own applicable controls. Anyone promising continuous trading needs to state how suspensions and corporate events are handled.
A transfer between eligible parties during a halt is conceptually distinct from a venue matching trades at a quoted price. Token contract rules and broker account records may restrict both. Permissioned access can allow compliance checks and corrections, while reducing the open transferability familiar from ordinary crypto tokens. A journalist should ask whether off platform wallets can hold and transfer the token, and what happens when an ineligible recipient receives one.
If a customer loses a private key, a recovery process may involve freezing or reissuing an entitlement after legal and identity checks. The exact mechanism is not stated in the company release. It cannot be assumed that losing a wallet permanently destroys the underlying share, nor that a support desk can effortlessly reverse an onchain trade. The customer agreement and smart contract design determine what can be repaired and who has authority to do it.
The product settles in USDC, introducing a payment asset distinct from the stock. A trading interruption, depeg or custody problem with settlement funds would be a separate operational risk. Investors should understand whether proceeds remain in a brokerage cash account, a token wallet or a third party stablecoin arrangement after a sale.
Direct registration remains a future route Securitize describes a convertible entitlement token, or CET. If the underlying issuer later adopts issuer sponsored tokenization, a holder may be able to exchange the entitlement for shares recorded directly on the company’s books through transfer agent partnerships. The conditions matter: issuer participation, eligible investor status, settlement arrangements and the availability of a live conversion route.
Issuer sponsored tokenization differs from a third party entitlement. The company’s own register, or a system integrated with its transfer agent, would reflect the shareholder position. An entitlement token backed by conventional stock instead represents a claim through an intermediary. Both can be securities; neither is defined merely by the blockchain chosen to record it.
The SEC taxonomy explains why one token’s transfer can change the issuer’s master shareholder file while another token’s transfer changes an intermediary’s entitlement ledger. Securitize’s promise of future conversion is therefore not a cosmetic wallet update. It changes the legal record and perhaps the party responsible for communicating investor rights.
A conversion might require surrendering or burning the entitlement token and delivering a registered position. The operator would need to prevent simultaneous claims on a backing share. It would also have to reconcile fractions, pending trades and corporate actions. Until product terms specify the operational route, the safe description is that conversion is contemplated when available, not that every token currently redeems directly at Apple’s transfer agent.
JUST IN: Securitize partners with KB Securities and Optimism to explore tokenized securities in South Korea
The partnership aims to combine KB Securities’ distribution network, Securitize’s regulated tokenization infrastructure and Optimism’s blockchain technology to expand… pic.twitter.com/IvDffLfrrt
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) September 23, 2026 Can the token be used as DeFi collateral? Securitize says the tokens are designed for potential use in supported lending and collateral markets, including Aave. Potential is the important word. A lender would need an asset it can legally take, price and liquidate if a borrower defaults. Eligibility restrictions, possible trading halts and the relationship between the token and an offchain share complicate an automatic liquidation.
A liquidator may be able to seize an onchain token but unable to sell it through a regulated venue without completing onboarding. A smart contract might price the token from the underlying stock, yet the live market could be closed or thin. Risk parameters would need to reflect weekend price gaps, corporate actions, transfer restrictions and the solvency of the intermediary holding shares. Aave’s expression of interest in Securitize’s announcement does not establish that every listed token is already accepted as collateral.
Backpack’s separate plan for Solana stock tokens illustrates the industry’s interest in bridging brokerage accounts and DeFi. Different legal wrappers can assign different redemption rights and transfer restrictions, even on the same blockchain. Securitize’s entitlement should not be conflated with a token from another issuer that merely tracks Apple’s price.
Backing needs reconciliation and records A strong disclosure package would identify the holder of record for each underlying share, the custody chain, how many tokens exist and how often reconciliation occurs. It would describe what happens after insolvency, a mistaken token transfer, a market halt and a split. Investors would need to know which legal entity owes them performance in each jurisdiction and where a complaint can be made.
Actual corporate action records could demonstrate how dividends are paid and votes transmitted. A published policy can promise rights; the first dividend, proxy vote and conversion will show whether the operational route works at scale. Researchers should compare claims in marketing materials with customer agreements, broker statements and the underlying share inventory disclosures when available.
The distinction matters because Robinhood has discussed adding voting and in kind redemption to its own stock tokens. A feature about ownership should describe the rights of the specific product on launch, rather than assume every provider offers the same bundle. Stocks onchain are a category of structures, not a single legal instrument.
Where can a token holder challenge an error? A blockchain explorer can show an event, but a customer dispute can involve more than whether a transfer reached a wallet. A mistaken account credit, a missing dividend or an incorrect corporate action belongs in the broker’s records and complaint process. The intermediary should be able to reconcile the onchain balance with the legally recognised entitlement and correct records where the governing rules permit. An independent explorer cannot adjudicate the customer’s contractual claim.
A failed broker or custodian would trigger questions about segregation, records and the location of backing shares. The relevant rights arise under securities and insolvency law, not from Solana consensus alone. A visible token does not grant priority over a properly documented claimant if the intermediary’s ledger and token balances conflict. Conversely, an enforceable entitlement can survive an outage of a display service if records can be reconstructed. Product disclosures should explain which record is authoritative.
Cross border customers face another layer. Securitize says offerings are available in the United States, European Union and other permitted jurisdictions, subject to restrictions. The legal entity, governing law, transfer agent route and complaint venue can differ. The phrase global access cannot be read as identical treatment for every wallet worldwide. Restricted persons and locations remain excluded even if tokens are visible on a public network.
Solana settlement still relies on brokers A blockchain can speed the transfer of a token and settlement asset between eligible participants. It does not eliminate the need to hold the underlying share, route dividends, process splits, screen users and comply with securities rules. Securitize names broker dealer, clearing, custody, market making and transfer agent functions in its own product description. Investors gain a different transfer interface while continuing to rely on identifiable firms.
Solana fees and transaction times describe one leg of the process. The underlying stock may settle, transfer or convert through systems with other timetables. A token appearing in a wallet need not mean a backing share moved between registered holders at the same moment. Reconciliation links the two. Investors should distinguish token finality from completion of every contractual and custody obligation attached to the entitlement.
The proposed NYSE digital market and OKXICE venue could change access and hours if launched. Both plans require their own review, and the company warns trading there may not occur. OKXICE has separately sought approval for tokenized stock listings. The product currently available should be assessed using its live broker terms, not a forecast of future exchange infrastructure.
What to watch Custody records. Look for disclosures showing where backing shares sit, who holds them and how outstanding tokens are reconciled with those positions. Dividends and votes. The first corporate actions will show how Securitize passes economic benefits and voting instructions through its brokerage structure. Conversion terms. Check whether any underlying issuer adopts direct registration and which token holders can use the conversion route. Trading conditions. Compare spreads and available liquidity during extended hours with the underlying stock market, especially around earnings and halts. Venue approvals. NYSE and OKXICE trading remain planned; published approvals and launch notices would establish whether either route becomes available. FAQs Is the token an actual Apple share? It is a token representing a backed security entitlement to an underlying share through an intermediary. A holder is not directly registered with Apple by holding it.
Is it only a synthetic price bet? Securitize says each token is backed one for one by a share and carries applicable rights, unlike a product that merely tracks price.
Can anyone with a Solana wallet buy it? No. Access requires eligibility, identity checks and compliance with applicable securities rules.
Is trading available 24 hours a day? Initial trading is during extended hours. Around the clock trading is planned, not established at launch.
Does the token pay dividends? Securitize says applicable dividends pass through, subject to the product’s terms and recordkeeping.
Can I vote at Apple’s annual meeting? The company says voting rights follow where applicable; practical voting requires intermediary instructions and a functioning proxy process.
Can I convert it into a directly registered share today? The company describes a future route where available through issuer sponsored tokenization. Its announcement does not establish universal immediate conversion.
Has the NYSE digital venue launched? No. Securitize’s announcement says planned NYSE and OKXICE venues have not launched and may not receive all needed approvals.
Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Figures reflect regulatory filings and reporting available at the time of writing and change with each disclosure. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or asset. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of October 9, 2026.
Solana (SOL) traded near $110.46 on October 9, slipping approximately 4% in the past 24 hours. The cryptocurrency briefly touched an intraday low of $105.87 before paring some losses, according to data from Investing.com.
Standard Chartered revises price targetsStandard Chartered, a major international banking group based in London, reaffirmed its year end target of $250 for SOL in its latest digital asset outlook. The projection implies a gain of about 126% from its current price, indicating significant upside in less than three months.
The bank’s digital-assets research division, led by Geoffrey Kendrick, adjusted its 2026 target for Solana earlier in the year, reducing it from $310 to $250. Despite this short-term downgrade, the team increased long-term expectations for the token.
Standard Chartered now forecasts SOL to reach $400 in 2027, $700 in 2028, $1,200 in 2029, and $2,000 by 2030. Kendrick and his team noted that Solana is evolving away from a reliance on memecoin trading, shifting toward a focus on stablecoin-driven micropayments.
Mini dictionary: Standard Chartered is a multinational banking and financial services company headquartered in London and operates in more than 60 countries globally. Its digital-assets team provides specialized research and forecasts on cryptocurrency markets.
Standard Chartered anticipates that Solana will shift from memecoin trading activity toward increased adoption of stablecoin-based micropayments in the coming years, with long-term targets as high as $2,000 by 2030.
Short-term price action and technical levelsSOL’s recent decline has pushed the coin below technical support levels in the $117 to $120 range, which had previously acted as a key area for buyers. On October 8, the latest selloff drove Solana under $110 before rebounding slightly amid renewed buying interest near $106.
During the session, SOL fell by 5.79%, following a 3.67% decline the previous day. The $110 level has emerged as a critical zone for traders as bulls and bears contest short-term market direction.
If Solana succeeds in regaining the $117 threshold, market observers believe sentiment could improve, and a return above $120 may open the door for retesting September’s highs. The area between $117 and $120 remains a key technical resistance that traders are watching closely after SOL’s earlier breakout above $110.
YearStandard Chartered Target ($)20262502027400202870020291,20020302,000Standard Chartered’s technical analysts emphasized that a sustained recovery above $117 would strengthen the outlook for SOL, while a move above $120 could bring previous highs back into focus.
As market volatility persists, traders continue to monitor key support and resistance levels for Solana while weighing Standard Chartered’s upward targets for the coming years.
Solana is about to finish halving its block time. The network’s target slot time falls from 250 milliseconds to 200 milliseconds Friday, the final step of a staged rollout documented on Solana’s upgrade page, with the change scheduled to take effect at epoch 1053 — expected around 15:00 UTC, according to Anza, the developer of the Agave validator client. SOL was trading near $110, down roughly 4% over the past 24 hours on broader market weakness, according to CoinDesk market data.
The reduction completes a seven-week push that has brought slot times down from 400 milliseconds, doubling how often blocks can be produced. The series began in August, when Solana cut its slot time to 350 milliseconds in its first reduction since genesis.
Four Steps From 400ms to 200ms Solana moved to 350 milliseconds on August 21, then 300 milliseconds on August 28 and 250 milliseconds on September 18. The final 200-millisecond step is the fourth feature gate proposed in SIMD-0525, the network’s improvement document for reduced slot times. At 200 milliseconds, Solana targets five block-production opportunities every second, up from 2.5 under the original 400-millisecond design. Each block, however, carries a lower computing budget — a maximum of 30 million compute units, down from 37.5 million at 250 milliseconds — so overall processing capacity stays roughly unchanged.
Why Shorter Slots Matter A slot is the window in which a designated validator can add transactions to the chain. Shorter slots mean wallets, exchanges, and trading applications receive updated ledger state more frequently, trimming the time a submitted transaction can sit waiting to be processed and narrowing the window in which prices can move on other venues before Solana catches up. Solana’s upgrade page also frames the change as a censorship-resistance measure: validators produce blocks in groups of four consecutive slots, and a leader’s uninterrupted ordering window shrinks from 1.6 seconds to 800 milliseconds.
The move is part of Solana’s push to sharpen its latency edge against competing chains. Solana’s upgrade page describes the reduction as making the protocol more competitive in terms of latency, drawing on performance improvements to validator clients, particularly in Turbine and Replay. Those gains are what allow validators to replay and vote on blocks within the tighter 200-millisecond window.
The Cost to Validators Faster blocks are not free. Validators must vote more often, raising compute and bandwidth demands, and the window for replaying each block tightens. The blockhash expiration window — still 150 blocks — now passes faster in wall-clock terms, falling to roughly 30 seconds at 200 milliseconds from about 60 seconds at 400 milliseconds, leaving less slack for offline signing flows that wait on human confirmation. Because of those trade-offs, each 50-millisecond step has its own feature gate and activates independently, with the network holding the next reduction if block-skip rates climb too high.
What Happens Next Once the 200-millisecond step takes effect, Solana’s block-time reduction is complete. The upgrade does not move SOL’s price by itself: the token’s roughly 4% drop over 24 hours tracks a broader pullback that also sent ether down about 2.5% and bitcoin down about 0.6%. Institutional activity on Solana has kept building, with Securitize putting 12 U.S. equities onchain on Solana this week. No application migration is required, though code that converts slot counts into wall-clock time now converts at a different rate.
Frequently Asked Questions What is Solana’s block time now? Solana’s mainnet slot time is currently 250 milliseconds. It drops to 200 milliseconds in the final step of the rollout, completing a reduction from the original 400 milliseconds.
When does Solana’s 200ms block time go live? The 200-millisecond reduction is scheduled to take effect at epoch 1053, expected around 15:00 UTC on Friday, October 9, according to Anza.
Why is Solana reducing its block time? Shorter slots deliver faster transaction updates to wallets, exchanges, and trading applications, and they narrow the window in which a single validator controls block ordering — a benefit Solana frames as censorship resistance.
Will faster blocks make Solana process more transactions? Not directly. Each block carries a lower compute budget, so although blocks arrive more frequently, the network’s overall theoretical processing capacity stays roughly unchanged.
Does the upgrade affect SOL’s price? The network upgrade is separate from SOL’s market price. SOL traded near $110 on October 9, down roughly 4% over 24 hours on broader market weakness, according to CoinDesk data.
AUTHOR
Tokoni Uti is a Lagos-based writer with several years of experience. Her work has appeared in the Huffington Post, the Los Angeles Free Press and the San Diego Free press among others. She is a graduate of Bowen University.
Kripto piyasasında bazı büyük altcoinler yeniden satış baskısıyla karşı karşıya. Analist Ali Charts, Chainlink (LINK), Cardano (ADA) ve Solana (SOL) için düşüş riskine dikkat çekti. Üç grafikte de farklı bir teknik yapı öne çıkıyor.
LINK tarafında baş-omuz formasyonu, ADA’da yükselen kanalın üst bandından gelen ret, SOL’da ise destek kırılımı dikkat çekiyor. Analist, belirli seviyelerin kaybedilmesi halinde üç coin için de daha derin geri çekilmeler bekliyor.
LINK İçin 12,39 Dolar Riski Var mı? Ali Charts, Chainlink’in dört saatlik grafiğinde baş-omuz formasyonunun boyun çizgisinin altına yaklaşan bir hareket gördü. Analiste göre LINK, 13,56 doların altında kaldığı sürece formasyonun düşüş hedefi çalışabilir.
Grafikte LINK’in güncel seviyesi yaklaşık 13,39 dolar olarak gösteriliyor. Baş-omuz yapısında baş bölgesi 15,86 dolar civarında bulunurken, formasyonun aşağı yönlü hedefleri 12,39 dolar ve ardından 11,98 dolar seviyelerine uzanıyor.
Ali Charts’ın senaryosunda 13,56 doların altında kalıcılık önemli. Satışların hızlanması halinde 12,39 dolar ilk hedef olarak öne çıkıyor. Bu seviyenin de kaybedilmesi, 11,98 doları gündeme getirebilir.
ADA 0,21 Dolara Kadar Gerileyebilir mi? Cardano’da da teknik görünüm zayıflıyor. Ali Charts, ADA’nın günlük grafikte yükselen kanalın üst sınırından reddedildiğini belirtti.
Grafikte ADA yaklaşık 0,256 dolar seviyesinde bulunuyor. Kanalın üst sınırı 0,29 dolar civarında gösterilirken alt sınır yaklaşık 0,21 dolara uzanıyor. Arada 0,23 dolar civarında bir ara bölge de bulunuyor.
Analiste göre üst banttan gelen reddedilme devam ederse fiyat kanalın alt sınırına doğru çekilebilir. Bu senaryoda 0,21 dolar izlenecek ana hedef haline geliyor.
ADA’nın 0,21 dolara kadar gerilemesi için kanal içerisindeki satış baskısının devam etmesi gerekiyor. Grafikte mevcut hareket, yükselen yapının henüz tamamen bozulmadığını ancak üst bantta alıcıların zorlandığını gösteriyor.
Solana’da 117 Dolar Kırılırsa Ne Olur? Solana, Ali Charts’ın dikkat çektiği üçüncü altcoin oldu. Analiste göre SOL, dört saatlik grafikte kanal desteğini aşağı kırıyor.
Grafikte SOL yaklaşık 115,97 dolar seviyesinde. Kritik destek ise 117 dolar olarak gösteriliyor. Analist, dört saatlik kapanışın 117 doların altında gerçekleşmesi halinde kırılmanın teyit edileceğini belirtiyor.
Bu durumda ilk hedef 114 dolar olacak. 114 dolar da korunamazsa sıradaki seviye 111 dolar.
Grafiğin üst tarafında ise 120 ve 124 dolar seviyeleri bulunuyor. Ancak Ali Charts’ın mevcut değerlendirmesi, önce 117 dolar desteğinin geri kazanılıp kazanılamayacağına odaklanıyor.
LINK, ADA ve SOL için analistin işaret ettiği seviyeler farklı olsa da üç grafikte de fiyatın kritik bölgelerde olduğu görülüyor. LINK’te 13,56 dolar, ADA’da yükselen kanalın alt sınırı ve SOL’da 117 dolar kısa vadeli görünümün takip edileceği noktalar arasında.
Özellikle SOL’da 117 doların altında bir dört saatlik kapanış gelmesi, LINK’in 13,56 doların altında kalması ve ADA’daki kanal reddinin sürmesi halinde satış baskısı daha belirgin hale gelebilir.
Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake has urged the crypto industry to start preparing for what he calls “bunker mode,” arguing that rapid advances in AI-driven mathematics could threaten cryptographic systems sooner than the industry expects.
In an October 7 post, Drake recommended a controlled migration of assets to fresh addresses whose public keys remain hidden behind hashes. He specifically urged large holders to consider moving funds to addresses that have never signed transactions and to move remaining funds whenever they sign a transaction.
He warned that the industry should consider the possibility that ECDSA could become breakable within “months, not years,” potentially through classical computing rather than quantum computers.
His argument rests on recent advances in AI for mathematics. Drake pointed to breakthroughs involving problems such as integer multiplication, 3SUM, and the Erdős unit distance conjecture as evidence that AI could uncover mathematical shortcuts that humans have missed.
He argued that elliptic curves deserve particular scrutiny because of their mathematical structure and suggested that the industry should accelerate its move toward hash-based cryptography.
Vitalik Takes the Warning Seriously Ethereum cofounder Vitalik Buterin pushed back against the idea that users should immediately scramble to move their funds, but he agreed that AI-driven advances in mathematics deserve serious attention.
Buterin argued that the industry should consider AI vulnerability alongside quantum vulnerability. He also questioned the assumption that lattice-based cryptography will remain safe simply because elliptic curves face greater scrutiny today.
The programmer still warned users against rushed migrations, warning that he had “lost more money in botched migrations than I have lost in all hacks combined.” He later clarified that multisig users should ideally change signing keys after each operation while continuing to gather signatures offchain where possible.
Not Everyone Sees an Emergency The response from cryptographers has been sharply divided. Yehuda Lindell, head of cryptography at Coinbase, called Drake's argument a bad take, saying that there is currently no evidence that decades-old assumptions behind elliptic curve cryptography have failed.
Lindell argued that AI proving difficult mathematical theorems does not show it can solve problems like elliptic curve discrete logarithms. He also noted that a genuine break of elliptic curve cryptography would create consequences far beyond crypto, affecting bank websites, financial systems, software signing and other internet infrastructure.
Longtime Ethereum developer and researcher Dankrad Feist made an even more direct point. If attackers can immediately compromise any exposed public key, he argued, moving funds into protected addresses wouldn't necessarily save them because the underlying assets could lose all value.
Dragonfly managing partner Haseeb Qureshi took the opposite view, describing Drake's warning as a sober response to rapid mathematical progress and suggesting the industry should temporarily adopt a more defensive approach.
How Much Cryptography Could AI Already Be Hiding? The discussion has also shifted toward a harder question: how many novel attacks on cryptography could already exist but remain undisclosed?
Responding to a question about how many such attacks might emerge, Matthew Green, an associate professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University, raised an even broader concern, saying he thinks the industry could “lose public key cryptography,” particularly public-key encryption.
Solana cofounder Anatoly Yakovenko pushed back on that premise, arguing that AI will not simply solve discrete logarithms, prime factorization, or the P ≠ NP conjecture, but could instead uncover vulnerabilities in specific curve parameters or groups.
That distinction sits at the heart of the debate. AI could potentially discover weaknesses in how cryptographic systems are implemented without overturning their underlying mathematical assumptions.
Solana Says Its Design Offers “A Defined Path Forward” Solana Foundation VP of Technology Jacob Creech rejected the need for Justin Drake’s proposed “bunker mode” on Solana.
Creech argued that Solana's use of Ed25519 gives users a different recovery path if an attacker eventually breaks the underlying elliptic curve. The signing key derives from a secret seed through hashing, while the seed itself never appears onchain.
According to Creech, a network upgrade could let legitimate owners prove knowledge of their seed with a hash-based proof and migrate their accounts to a safer signature scheme. In the unlikely event of a break in Solana’s cryptography, validators, not users, would be responsible for upgrading infrastructure to ensure continuity. Creech also stated that “a working proof of concept already exists”, pointing to Anza’s Proof of Knowledge Seed protocol.
Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz similarly urged users not to follow Drake's recommendation, arguing that careless fund movements could create a more immediate risk than an overnight cryptographic breakthrough.
A Crypto Problem or an Internet Problem? The debate ultimately extends far beyond Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana. If AI genuinely discovers an efficient way to break widely used public-key cryptography, the consequences would reach banking, brokerage platforms, payment networks, TLS, software updates, and other critical internet infrastructure.
However, centralized companies and institutions could potentially respond faster to any threat. Blockchains face a tougher challenge because decentralized networks need coordination and consensus to make fundamental changes. That makes having a contingency plan before such a scenario emerges particularly important.
Solana already has one. Its Ed25519 design allows users to prove control of their underlying seeds and migrate to a safer signature scheme through a network upgrade, with a working proof of concept already available.
There is currently no public evidence that AI has broken ECDSA or another major cryptographic hardness assumption. In a recent tweet, Solana cofounder Anatoly Yakovenko described the panic as “fear based on uncertainty from smart people unable to predict the future,” but urged developers to ship post-quantum cryptography solutions.
For now, the argument centers on how seriously the industry should prepare for a possibility that researchers cannot rule out but also cannot demonstrate.
Read More on SolanaFloor Securitize Launches Tokenized Stocks on Solana Ahead of 24/7 ICE Venue Listings
Jupiter Flips Kamino in Deposit Value to Become Solana’s Largest Lending Market
The current crypto market is experiencing strong selling pressure, but Solana [SOL] has still managed to experience strong growth in network usage, with more users entering the ecosystem.
According to Santiment’s recent data, since early September, the number of new wallets created daily has increased by 124% to around 1.71 million, while daily active addresses have risen 58% to roughly 4.27 million.
Source: Santiment Solana steals the spotlight but… This happened alongside the rise in stablecoin holders on Solana to more than 14 million, compared with fewer than 4 million in late 2024.
Source: Blockworks However, the liquidity data tells a different and more cautious story. According to CoinGecko, SOL’s order-book liquidity has fallen from around $28 million on each side in 2025 to about $20 million in 2026.
In layman’s language, this has in turn increased short-term volatility and made sharp price movements more likely.
At the same time, the distribution of liquidity across exchanges has also changed. Within a narrow ±0.20-dollar range, the combined liquidity across eight centralized exchanges is around $8 million, while MEXC currently has the strongest liquidity close to the market price.
Source: CoinGecko However, across a wider ±2% range, Coinbase becomes more important, with more than $6 million of buy-side depth and $4 million of sell-side depth.
SOL’s price action and more All in all, the current picture of Solana is bullish but not without a pinch of caution. This came as SOL was trading at $115.01 at press time after a drop of 3.1% in the past 24 hours.
Additionally, the RSI lying below the neutral level further suggests that the bears are outpacing bulls. This and the narrowing Bollinger Bands suggest that sellers are currently here to dominate the buyers of SOL.
Source: Trading View Still, not everything is concerning, as Solana entered Q4 with renewed momentum against Ethereum, despite SOL/ETH falling nearly 6% in Q3 as ETH delivered a 73% return versus SOL’s 60%.
At the same time, Solana’s activity appears to be moving beyond memecoin speculation, with quarterly memecoin Spot volume falling from around $260 billion to $57 billion. Meanwhile, tokenized-asset volume surged from $33 million to $8 billion.
Final Summary SOL’s order-book liquidity has fallen from around $28 million on each side in 2025 to about $20 million in 2026. Meanwhile, the price of SOL was trading at $115.01 at press time after a drop of 3.1% in the past 24 hours.
Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) briefly processed more trades than the NYSE in September, according to Citrini Research, as tokenized stocks and real-world assets push deeper into traditional finance.
Why Citrini Says Crypto Finally Found Its PurposeCitrini Research wrote in a Thursday note that crypto spent 15 years building programmable financial infrastructure without a clear use case, until AI agents and tokenized assets gave it one.
The firm argues that as AI agents increasingly manage money and make decisions on behalf of users, financial assets need to become machine-readable and transferable the same way consumer data already has.
The inflection point traces back to March, when the Iran conflict escalated over a weekend and Hyperliquid as measured by Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) became one of the only liquid venues where traders could price crude oil in real time.
Since then, Citrini says tokenized real-world asset adoption has moved into a much higher gear.
How Robinhood, Coinbase and US Regulation Are Shaping Tokenized Stock TradingCitrini pointed to two forces accelerating the move on-chain:
Composable tokenized equities: Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) Chain’s stock tokens let tokenized shares move freely between apps and blockchain rails, rather than staying locked inside a single issuer’s platform, and that model has since spread to more chains Regulatory momentum: two days after the CLARITY Act failed in the Senate, the SEC issued an innovation exemption opening a path for tokenized stock trading, while Coinbase’s (NASDAQ:COIN) proposed US stock perpetual futures product sits with “approval pending” status at the CFTC Which US Stocks Is Securitize Bringing to Solana?Securitize announced Thursday, according to WSJ, that it’s bringing 12 major US stocks onto Solana through a new product called Securitize Stocks. The initial lineup includes:
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) Trading starts on Securitize’s existing Solana platform, with Jump Trading providing liquidity and settlement happening in USDC (CRYPTO: USDC).
Securitize plans to expand the stocks to NYSE’s planned 24/7 digital trading platform and the upcoming OKX-ICE Tokenized Securities Venue, a joint venture between NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange and OKX.
Each token stays backed one-for-one by an actual share and preserves shareholder benefits like dividends and voting rights, according to Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo.
Photo via Shutterstock
Read Next
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Securitize shares climbed about 10% Thursday as the company launched tokenized versions of major US stocks on Solana, offering eligible investors exposure to equities backed by underlying shares with dividend and voting rights.
The new offering, called Securitize Stocks, includes tokenized shares of Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Tesla and eight other US-listed companies. The tokens are backed one-for-one by underlying shares and will initially trade during extended market hours through Securitize’s registered broker-dealer platform, according to Thursday’s announcement.
Securitize (SECZ) stock. Source: Yahoo Finance
Securitize said the tokens represent security entitlements under Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code and preserve applicable shareholder benefits, including dividends and voting rights. The company also plans to make the assets available on tokenized securities platforms being developed by the New York Stock Exchange and OKXICE, though neither has set a launch date.
The tokens will settle in USDC on Solana, with Jump Trading providing liquidity through market-making services.
Trading will begin during extended market hours, with plans to expand to 24/7 trading on an unspecified timeline.
Beyond trading, the company is exploring broader uses for the tokenized equities. According to Securitize, Ripple Prime plans to support the launch and explore incorporating the assets into its institutional trading services, while decentralized lending platform Aave has been identified as a potential venue for using the stocks as collateral.
Ripple Prime did not respond to Cointelegraph’s request for additional details by publication time.
Securitize shares rally twice in one weekThursday marked the second sharp intraday rally for Securitize shares this week. The stock climbed nearly 8% in early trading Tuesday, when the company announced a partnership with South Korean technology firm LG CNS to explore tokenized funds, equities and stablecoins for financial institutions.
The South Korean agreement also covers infrastructure that could connect local financial institutions with global capital markets. It follows a September memorandum of understanding with Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority to support regulated tokenization initiatives in Dubai.
Securitize shares have gained roughly 54% over the past month, according to Yahoo Finance data.
The company’s expansion comes amid broader growth in tokenized real-world assets. RWA.xyz data shows distributed asset value excluding stablecoins reached $38.88 billion as of Thursday, up from $25.36 billion a year earlier.
Source: Magazine: Crypto lending rises again… but have they solved the risks?
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
