Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

BitGo has secured VASP registration acceptance in South Korea just as the country is raising the bar for crypto firms. The approval gives BitGo Korea a local path to serve institutions, while its direct entry could also show how global crypto companies are preparing for stricter rules in one of Asia’s biggest digital asset markets.

South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit has accepted BitGo Korea’s VASP registration, allowing the company to provide crypto custody and transfer services to institutional and enterprise clients.

What makes the move different is how BitGo entered the market. While competitors like Binance and OKX entered South Korea by purchasing stakes in existing local exchanges (Gopax and Coinone).

Instead of buying an existing Korean VASP, the company created BitGo Korea and built its local compliance and security systems from the start.

🇰🇷 한국, 안녕하세요!

BitGo Korea has received acceptance of its VASP registration from the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit.

We are excited to be the first newly established Korean entity of a global digital asset company to achieve this milestone, establishing a local,… pic.twitter.com/y5gQuIWzM9

— BitGo (@BitGo) August 20, 2026 This makes it the first newly established local subsidiary of a global digital asset firm to secure a VASP license directly from regulatory authorities rather than acquiring an existing licensed business

BitGo Korea is also backed by two major Korean companies, Hana Financial Group and SK Telecom. Their involvement gives BitGo more than a local office. It connects the company’s global crypto infrastructure with Korean financial and technology networks.

BitGo plans to focus on banks, asset managers, companies, public-sector groups and other institutional clients rather than mainly targeting retail traders.

Approval Comes as Korea Tightens Crypto RulesThe timing of the approval is also important. From August 20, South Korea is introducing stronger VASP registration and anti-money laundering rules. The new rules will bring closer checks on major shareholders, financial health, management, staff and internal controls.

With the new registration, BitGo Korea can now officially offer crypto custody and transfer services to corporate clients, asset managers and financial institutions.

BitGo CEO Mike Belshe welcomed the approval from KoFIU, saying the company is

“Excited and proud to announce BitGo Korea!  2 yrs in the making – bringing regulated, cold storage to market.”

BitGo already operates regulated businesses in major markets, including the U.S., Singapore, Germany and Dubai. The Korean approval now adds another key market to its global network.

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

XRP Ledger ile Coreum’u birbirine bağlayan köprü, yaklaşık 200 bin XRP’nin çalındığı bir saldırıyla karşı karşıya kaldı. Saldırgan, gerçek bir XRP yatırımı yapmadan köprünün doğrulama sistemini kandırarak sahte bir yatırımı gerçekmiş gibi gösterdi. Daha sonra karşılığında gerçek XRP çekildi.

Olayın ardından köprü durdurulurken, geliştirici ekip açığın XRP Ledger’dan değil, Coreum tarafındaki yazılımdan kaynaklandığını açıkladı. Zincir üstü incelemelere göre saldırganın elde ettiği 198.715,88 XRP, ETH’ye çevrildi, THORChain üzerinden yönlendirildi ve sonrasında Tornado Cash’e gönderildi.

XRP Köprüsüne Saldırı Nasıl Gerçekleşti? Saldırgan, XRP Ledger’ın kendisini doğrudan ele geçirmek yerine köprünün para yatırma doğrulamasındaki açığı kullandı.

Teknik incelemeye göre saldırgan, köprünün ihraç ettiği wrapped token’ları kendi kontrolündeki iki cüzdan arasında transfer etti. İşleme ayrıca normal bir köprü yatırımı gibi görünmesini sağlayan bir deposit memo eklendi.

Sorun tam burada ortaya çıktı. Köprü yazılımı, kendi ihraç ettiği tokenın işlem geçmişinde görünmesini gerçek bir XRP yatırımı olarak değerlendirdi. Oysa saldırgan bu sırada köprüye herhangi bir gerçek XRP göndermemişti.

Relayer’lar sahte yatırımı onayladı. Bunun ardından sistem, XRP ile desteklenmeyen yeni varlıkların Coreum tarafında üretilmesine izin verdi.

Saldırgan da oluşturulan bu karşılıksız varlıkları kullanarak köprüden gerçek XRP çekti.

Daha sonraki zincir üstü incelemede, aynı sahte yatırımı 21 ayrı Coreum relayer’ının doğruladığı ortaya çıktı. Saldırgan yöntemi daha büyük miktarlarla tekrarladı ve toplamda 198.715,88 XRP elde etti.

Çalınan XRP daha sonra ETH’ye çevrildi, THORChain üzerinden yönlendirildi ve sonunda Tornado Cash’e gönderildi.

Sorun XRP Ledger’da mı? Hayır.

Saldırıya ilişkin ilk uyarı, playa adlı traderın köprüye ait XRPL hesabındaki bakiyenin birkaç dakika içinde 93.700 XRP’den 77.200 XRP’ye gerilediğini fark etmesiyle geldi. Ancak bu ilk gözlem, daha sonra 97 dakika sürdüğü belirlenen saldırının yalnızca 11 dakikalık bölümünü kapsıyordu. İlk etapta DefaultRipple ayarından şüphelenilse de sonraki incelemeler asıl sorunun Coreum köprüsündeki yazılım açığı olduğunu ortaya koydu.

Ancak işlem verileri incelendikten sonra bu açıklamanın saldırının gerçek mekanizmasını açıklamadığı ortaya çıktı. Native XRP’nin kendisi bu şekilde bir trust line üzerinden aktarılmıyor. Söz konusu ayar, köprünün ihraç ettiği tokenlarla ilgili.

Köprü operatörü tx, yazılımın gerçekte XRP göndermeyen işlemleri yanlış biçimde kaydettiğini doğruladı.

Bu nedenle saldırının temelinde XRP Ledger’ın kendisinden ziyade köprünün Coreum tarafındaki doğrulama mantığının bulunduğu belirtiliyor.

hey @CoreumOfficial your xrpl bridge issuer rxXXXeMX8Gy5YvibvGLnQJ1XKKD7UswM1 is leaking. defaultripple is on and two wallets are draining native xrp through it via partial-payment loops. balance went 93.7k → 77.2k in minutes, ~1.65k xrp per cycle, every 30s.

this isn't…

— playa (@playaxrpl) August 9, 2026

XRP Köprüsü Şimdi Ne Durumda? Saldırının ardından köprü durduruldu.

tx ekibi açığın tespit edildiğini ve sistem üzerinde çalışıldığını açıkladı. Ayrıca olayla ilgili FBI’ın Internet Crime Complaint Center’ına (IC3) rapor sunuldu.

Şu ana kadar diğer köprülenmiş varlıkların etkilenmediği belirtildi. Kullanıcıların zararlarının nasıl karşılanacağına ilişkin plan ise henüz netleşmiş değil.

XRP Fiyatı Saldırıdan Etkilendi mi? Saldırı, XRP’nin zaten zayıf seyrettiği bir dönemde gerçekleşti.

XRP yaklaşık 1,02 dolar seviyesinde işlem görürken son yedi günde yaklaşık %4,4 değer kaybetmiş durumda. Aynı süreçte Bitcoin yaklaşık 64 bin dolara gerilerken, kripto piyasasının toplam değerinden yaklaşık 40 milyar dolar silindi.

Bu nedenle XRP’deki düşüşün tamamını köprü saldırısına bağlamak mümkün değil. Saldırı, tokenın zaten baskı altında olduğu bir döneme denk geldi.

XRP Yatırımcıları İçin Asıl Risk Ne? Bu saldırıda dikkat çeken nokta, XRP Ledger’ın doğrudan ele geçirilmemiş olması.

Saldırgan, köprü yazılımındaki doğrulama açığını kullanarak gerçekte var olmayan bir yatırımı gerçekmiş gibi gösterdi. Ardından köprünün kendi doğrulama mekanizması üzerinden gerçek Ripple XRP çekti.

Bu olay, zincirler arası köprülerde yalnızca blockchain’in güvenliğinin değil, varlıkların yatırıldığını doğrulayan yazılım ve relayer sistemlerinin de kritik olduğunu gösteriyor.

Köprü yeniden açılmadan önce açığın tamamen giderilip giderilmediği ve kullanıcı zararlarının nasıl karşılanacağı XRP yatırımcılarının yakından izleyeceği başlıklar arasında olacak.

Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Menu

Edited by

StatusCore contributors identified a critical vulnerability affecting the V5 Alpha proving system on 27 July 2026 through internal AI-assisted auditing.

V5 remains Alpha software. Critical findings can arise during this phase, and the audit process exists to identify them before broader deployment. This finding places V5 funds, applications, and contract state at risk.

Treat funds and applications on V5 as exposed to a protocol-level failure until contributors complete incident response work and operators carry out the required network actions.

‍

What we are disclosingAn attacker may be able to exploit a flaw in the current V5 proving system by constructing a proof that passes verification for a transaction the network should reject. If accepted, that transaction could produce a state transition outside the rules V5 intends to enforce.

Contributors cannot determine whether anyone exploited the flaw before this finding. The affected system lacks the information needed to distinguish ordinary accepted transactions from transactions accepted through the flawed proving path. Historical chain activity cannot establish whether exploitation occurred or quantify its impact.

‍

Application safeguardsWe expect application teams to prepare safeguards in the coming weeks.

Those safeguards may include changes to application controls, deployment procedures, user flows, and migration plans. We expect each team to assess its contracts and determine which protections fit its architecture and users.

We expect teams planning a V5 deployment to pause that work until contributors publish further guidance. We expect teams with live contracts to review their ability to limit user exposure, isolate affected functionality, and move users to fresh deployments if needed.

We expect applications that maintain administrative or emergency controls to assess whether those controls can reduce user risk during the incident timeframe.

‍

Next stepsCore contributors are working with operators, application teams, and bridge operators as applications add security guards around affected flows.

The findings from this incident will inform the V6 release, including circuit updates that prevent the network from accepting proofs tied to an affected proving system.

V5 launched as Alpha software, with V6 planned for later in 2026. Contributors will publish a security roadmap covering the remaining work and release path.

‍

Known vulnerability statusReviewers have not identified other high-severity or critical V5 Alpha vulnerabilities at this time.

Internal and external human audits have completed, and contributors continue AI-assisted auditing. Alpha is the period for identifying faults before production deployment.

‍

Read more

Community

Community

4 Aug

•

xx min read

Dark Forest Aztec Game Goes LiveDark Forest is a real-time strategy game played across a procedurally generated universe where most of the map is hidden. You cannot see rival players, their planets, or their fleets. You only know what you have explored. Everyone shares one universe, and nobody has the full picture.

In most onchain games, every position and every move is public, because the chain is public. Dark Forest used zero-knowledge proofs to break that assumption: players prove their moves are valid without revealing where those moves came from. The result is a game of hidden information running on a public network.

Dark Forest Aztec ports the original Dark Forest 0.6 to Aztec. It keeps the gameplay from the original and rebuilds the privacy layer on Aztec's programmable privacy.

A note before diving in: this is early, experimental software on Aztec Alpha V5. Treat it as an alpha and play accordingly.

The universe you cannot seeYou start on a single home planet with almost the entire map dark. To find anything you mine the universe, running a client that explores coordinates and reveals what sits there: unclaimed planets, resources, and eventually the edges of other players' territory.

You are never handed a view of the board. You earn it one region at a time, and everyone else works under the same fog.

What is hidden on AztecYour home coordinates and your fleet movements are private state, expressed as first-class private notes on Aztec. Your location and where you send energy stay hidden, enforced in the contracts by zero-knowledge cryptography.

What sits onchain is a set of cryptographic commitments. Instead of storing every planet's full details in the open, the contracts store Poseidon2 hashes of entity state. When you make a move, your client supplies the full state, the contract checks it against the stored hash, applies the change under zero-knowledge constraints, and writes a new hash back. Full game state lives offchain and gets rebuilt from public logs by an indexer, which is what renders your map without exposing every player's position.

So you can prove you made a legal move from a planet you own without revealing where that planet is. Aztec applies the same principle to private payments and private contracts.

How you playFour actions carry the game.

Explore. Your explorer sits in the bottom left. Set it running and it uncovers the map around you, surfacing planets, resources, and other players.

Send energy. Most planets produce energy. Click and drag from a planet you own toward a target to capture or weaken it.

Route silver. Asteroid fields produce silver. Move it to your planets and spend it on upgrades, or send it to a Spacetime Rip to convert it into score.

Hunt artifacts. Some planets hold artifacts. Your Gear ship discovers them. Once harvested, you deposit them on planets to boost stats.

Four stats drive most decisions.

Energy is the core resource. Planets generate it over time up to a capacity, and you spend it on everything: claiming planets, reinforcing your own, attacking rivals. Two details matter. Moves are taxed, so a flat percentage of a planet's total capacity burns every time you send energy, which discourages small frequent moves. And energy decays over distance, so send it too far and almost nothing arrives. A common rule of thumb is to let a planet fill to about 75%, then send it down to about 25%.

Defense reduces the damage incoming energy does when it lands. Higher-level planets often have lower defense, but they hold much more energy, so they still take more to capture. Defense matters most on front lines.

Range sets how far a planet can send energy. It governs how fast you expand and how efficiently you move energy inside your own empire, since shorter relative distances mean less decay. Good range also lets you strike deep into an opponent's territory.

Speed sets how quickly a move arrives. Usually secondary, though a fast strike can land before a rival reacts, and some playstyles reward capturing many nearby planets quickly.

Planets can also be upgraded with silver and enhanced with artifacts. Space types carry different multipliers, from mild Nebula to punishing Dead Space, so where a planet sits changes how it plays.

How scoring worksThere is a scoreboard, and territory alone does not win it. This round scores two activities: discovering artifacts with your Gear ship, and withdrawing silver through Spacetime Rips.

Point values from the in-game help page:

Each unit of silver withdrawn: 1Common artifact: 2,000Rare: 10,000Epic: 200,000Legendary: 3,000,000Mythic: 20,000,000Silver accrues one point at a time. A single Mythic artifact is worth twenty million of them, so artifact hunting decides rounds and silver withdrawal sets your floor.

Silver has two competing uses. Spend it on upgrades and your planets get stronger, extending range and hardening defense. Withdraw it through a Spacetime Rip and it becomes scored points, but it is gone. Every unit is a choice between building the empire and banking points.

Upgrades tend to win early, since a stronger empire reaches more asteroid fields and finds more artifacts. Late in a round that calculation flips, because a planet you never use is worth less than points already scored.

Artifacts do both jobs at once. They score on discovery, and once deposited they boost a planet's stats, which makes the next expedition easier.

Why you exploreNothing happens until you find something to act on. Your explorer turns dark space into planets you can capture, asteroid fields you can mine, and artifact-bearing planets you can raid. Sitting still means no new energy, no silver, no score.

Exploring also buys information. The map you have uncovered is an advantage nobody else holds. Knowing where high-level planets sit, which asteroid fields are unclaimed, and where space types shift lets you plan further ahead than someone still working through their starting region.

You find other players as a byproduct. There is no player list. You explore outward until your revealed region touches territory someone already owns: a planet in another player's colors, sitting where you were about to expand. Their home coordinates stay private, so you learn something narrow. Someone is here, roughly this direction, holding this much. You infer the rest, and you have no way of knowing whether they found you first.

What happens when you run into someoneYou have three broad options.

Stay quiet and keep growing. Nothing forces you to engage. Keep exploring elsewhere, keep routing silver, keep upgrading. Your positions stay private, so silence costs you only time, which is what you want if they are stronger. The risk is that they are doing the same thing faster.

Fortify the border. If the contact sits somewhere you cannot lose, spend energy hardening the planets facing them. Defense is worth most where an attack will actually land. This keeps the option to fight without committing to one.

Attack. Send enough energy to overwhelm the target's defense and the planet becomes yours, along with its production and its position as a staging post. Higher-level planets are the prize and take proportionally more to crack.

Attacking costs more than energy. A move that lands tells your rival where you strike from, and that you are close enough to be worth answering. Retaliation can then come from directions you have not explored, launched from planets you cannot see.

Multiplayer in practiceEveryone plays one shared universe in real time. No turns, no lobbies. Energy regenerates whether you are watching or not, moves stay in flight while you sleep, and rivals expand while you are away from the screen.

Most strategy games let you watch a threat approach. Here you tend to see the consequences: a planet you owned this morning in someone else's colors, an incoming move you notice once it is already close.

That produces a particular kind of paranoia. You are trying to find everyone else while avoiding being found, and every expansion is a strategic bet that the space ahead is empty.

Information becomes tradeable, because it is scarce. Players compare notes, warn each other about aggressive neighbors, and agree who expands where, then break those agreements when the scoreboard makes it worth breaking.

Why it matters beyond the gameA fully onchain game where players cannot see each other's positions is hard to build, and building it well says something about the platform underneath.

Hidden state, private notes, and client-side proving are the same building blocks behind private applications across Aztec. Dark Forest is a way to watch them work.

Getting startedDark Forest Aztec is playable now as an alpha. Expect a learning curve; the original was famous for it. DFArchon maintains onboarding material and a community for new players. Round One is live. The universe is dark, and everyone else is out there somewhere. Go find them, quietly.

Play Now‍

Follow the BuildersDFArchon on X‍

Source and docs

Aztec Network

Aztec Network

22 Jul

•

xx min read

How Gas Works on AztecGas on AztecGas on Aztec is known as Fee Juice and is used to pay for transaction costs. This is the same as $ETH on Ethereum. Some apps will handle transaction costs for you under the hood, but if you are using a browser extension wallet, you will not be able to send transactions without it. Fee Juice can be obtained by bridging the $AZTEC token on Ethereum to the Aztec Network L2. This means that under the hood, all activity that happens on Aztec is underpinned by the $AZTEC token bridged into the network. Some bridges like Shield (by human.tech) handle this for you, allowing you to allocate a portion of your bridged transaction to convert into Fee Juice and land in your wallet automatically.

Public vs Private AssetsAssets and transactions on the Aztec Network can be either public or private. If you bridge publicly, your tokens will arrive as public, traceable tokens visible to all. Privately bridging, on the other hand, will give you private assets that are visible only to you. These assets can then be sent privately to another user or wallet without ever revealing who you are, what tokens were sent, how many, or who the recipient is.

Public vs Private GasLike tokens on the Aztec Network, Fee Juice (gas) can also be public or private. The reason for this is that even if what you are sending is private, the gas you spend to execute that transaction could still be visible if you are using public Fee Juice, potentially revealing transaction patterns and activity. Private Fee Juice keeps your entire transaction footprint hidden. When you send a private transaction, you can use private Fee Juice, and when you send a public transaction, you can use public Fee Juice, which means your transaction costs are always aligned with the type of transaction you're making.

Fee Juice in AppsAztec has native fee abstraction, which means apps could let you pay for transactions in any token you want, or cover your fees entirely. Apps like Nyx may choose to cover part or all of a user's transaction costs, or allow you to pay in tokens that are convenient for you. This means you will most likely never see Fee Juice in an app; instead, you'll pay in whatever makes sense for what you're doing, on your terms. Similarly, you might never even see an Aztec wallet at all, because the app itself becomes your interface that you connect to using your MetaMask wallet.

Fee Juice in Browser WalletsIf you're using a browser extension like Azguard, you'll manage Fee Juice directly in your wallet alongside your private and public balances, converting between tokens as needed to cover transaction costs.

When you bridge tokens in, you'll need enough Fee Juice to cover the cost of your first transaction, then you'll need to monitor how much Fee Juice you have available to make transactions. Browser wallets will allow you to send either publicly or privately to other users and will default to using either public or private Fee Juice depending on the type of transaction. Both private Fee Juice and public Fee Juice will appear by default in your token list.

Wrapping upHow you handle Fee Juice depends on where you're transacting: apps can abstract it away entirely and let you pay in any token, while a browser wallet like Azguard puts it in your hands to manage across public and private balances. Match your gas to your transaction, keep private activity private down to the fee, and you move on your terms.

Aztec Network

Aztec Network

21 Jul

•

xx min read

Introducing Alpha V5The Aztec Network today activated Alpha V5, a major protocol upgrade passed by token-holder governance and executed onchain. Alpha V5 reduces private-transaction proving times by more than 2x compared to the previous version, lowers the cost of a fully private transaction by roughly 50%, resolves the critical issues found in V4, and sees the first wave of apps go live. Users can now send private transactions and earn yield on Aave simply by connecting their Ethereum wallets on Nyx, bridge from Ethereum to Aztec using Shield or TRAIN, privately collect NFTs on RavenHouse, or play Dark Forest Aztec, a hidden-information strategy game in a universe that lives entirely onchain. 

"Alpha V5 continues Aztec's work at the frontier of client-side proving, with cryptographic breakthroughs that cut proving times by more than half this release," said Zac Williamson, Co-founder, Aztec Foundation. "We believe Aztec is now the fastest system in the world for proving a fully private transaction entirely on a user's own device, and every release moves the industry closer to private transactions at public transaction speeds."

As the only decentralized privacy L2, Aztec is the credibly neutral privacy layer for Ethereum. Aztec allows anyone to write smart contracts that include both private and public aspects – every private transaction is proven on the user's own device, so no operator, sequencer, or intermediary can see the data. The Alpha V5 proving improvements come from cryptographic advances that make this client-side proving faster than any prior release. The network remains in alpha, but with V5 it is ready for teams to begin building and deploying applications.

Performance - 2.5 second fully private transactions Making private transactions practical comes down to how quickly a proof can be generated on a user's own device, without offloading that work to a server that would learn what the user is doing. On Alpha V5, proving a private token transfer natively now takes approximately 2.5 seconds on a consumer laptop, down from 5.2 seconds on V4, and about 6.8 seconds in a browser, down from 12.5 seconds. Across every measured transaction flow, client-side proving times improved by approximately 2x compared with V4.

‍

Bench machine: an M2 MacBook (12 cores, throttled to 8). "Native" runs Aztec's C++ proving binary; "WASM" runs the same prover in a browser engine (Node on V8).‍

Alpha V5 lowers ECDSA signature-verification cost by approximately 2x, speeds up Poseidon2 hashing by approximately 3x, and reduces the protocol circuit gate count by approximately 50% (gate count is the number of individual operations a proving circuit must perform, and it is the main driver of how long a proof takes to generate). Each of these lowers the amount of work a device performs to prove a transaction, and the reduction in gate count in particular compounds across every proof the network generates.

Apps - send, receive, and earn privately on EthereumAlpha V5 launches the first wave of apps on a network where privacy is built into the protocol rather than managed by an operator. On other networks that claim privacy, transactions still pass through an operator or node that reads them in plaintext, or depend on a viewing key that a third party holds, so users rely on someone else to protect their data and to decide when it gets disclosed. On Aztec, every private transaction is proven on the user's own device, so the app, the sequencer, and any operator never need to see the underlying data. Nyx is one of these apps, allowing users to privately send transactions and privately earn yield on Aave. 

"On Ethereum, everything you do is public. That's why we built Nyx: a private account governed by your Ethereum wallet", said Nikhil, Co-founder of Nyx. "Now you can send, receive and earn in private. Nyx was the first app live on the Aztec Alpha, and we're excited to expand participation to more users with the added stability of Alpha V5."

Other apps on Alpha V5 include Azguard and Nethermind (wallets), Shield, TRAIN, and RavenHouse (bridges), and the Aztecscan block explorers. Also launching is Dark Forest Aztec, a game where users explore a universe, control planets, manage planetary energy, expand territory, and launch attacks through strategic play with private state and hidden actions.

Dark Forest Aztec private universe-building gameplayLower costs, higher security Transaction fees on Aztec come from two main sources: the cost of proving a transaction and the cost of verifying the rollup proof on Ethereum. Alpha V5 reduces both. It lowers the network's proving-cost parameter by 50%, and it reduces the L1 gas required to verify a rollup proof by approximately 40%. Because rollup proofs are verified on Ethereum and that cost is shared across all transactions in a batch, the L1 reduction lowers fees for every user, while the lower proving-cost parameter reduces the per-transaction proving fee directly. Together, these bring the average cost of a fully private token transfer to under a $0.05 transaction cost.

Alpha V5 also hardens the network on several fronts. It resolves critical vulnerabilities found in Alpha V4 along with additional bugs discovered since launch. Aztec's bug bounty program on Cantina also drew more than 234 security researchers to participate. The network remains in alpha, and further bugs may surface as usage grows, but each release has closed the issues found in the last and strengthened the protocol against new ones. With the critical V4 issues resolved and these safeguards in place, Alpha V5 is stable enough for teams to begin building and deploying applications.

AvailabilityAlpha V5 is live now, view the Alpha V5 landing page for a full list of features, performance updates, and live apps to explore. 

About AztecAztec is the only decentralized, privacy-first Layer 2 on Ethereum. Developers write private and public logic in the same smart contract, and private functions are executed and proven on the user's own device, so no operator sees the underlying data. The protocol is upgraded through onchain governance, and the network settles to Ethereum. For more information, visit aztec.network.

Aztec Network

Aztec Network

30 Jun

•

xx min read

Inside an Aztec TransactionOn Ethereum today, each transaction reveals everything publicly. The token you moved, the size, the timing, the wallet it came from, every action you take. Given the limitations of this type of transparent network, the industry is now focusing on bringing privacy onchain as a top priority. The response to this has mostly been to enable private transactions that shield transfers in various ways. But when we look at how privacy works on Web2, it’s clear that users and developers need granular privacy controls: the ability to decide what is public or private and who is able to see different types of data.

Aztec was built so that one transaction can carry two halves. A private half that runs on your own device and never leaves it, and a public half that the network runs in the open. Apps can choose which aspects are private or public, and users can choose what they want to reveal and when.

This article will follow an example transaction on Aztec: a vote in an onchain election built on Aztec, where who you are and which candidate you chose stay private, while the running tally for each candidate stays public for anyone to verify.

Public and private in one movePicture the vote you cast in our example as two aspects that seamlessly weave together. In the first step, you act in private: an app records your vote on your device and hands the network a proof that the vote is valid without revealing it. In the second, the network acts in public: it checks that proof, then adds one to the chosen candidate's public tally. It is one transaction: one part stays with you, one part goes to the network. Both parts end up recorded onchain, in two separate state trees, one private and one public. The walkthrough below follows how these two aspects work together and what this means for how your transaction lands onchain. 

It starts on your deviceYou open the voting app and connect an Aztec wallet. That first step looks like any onchain app. The difference is inside the wallet. An Aztec wallet carries a private execution environment, the PXE, pronounced "pixie", which runs on your phone or in your browser. The PXE is where the private half of your transaction executes, and where the proof of that work gets made, on your hardware, under your exclusive control.

Every account on Aztec is a smart contract rather than a bare key. That design, account abstraction, allows a wallet to authorize a transaction however its owner chooses without writing an identity onto the network for everyone to read. The wallet is the front door, and on Aztec you can decide if the door is open or closed, who you share your information with. 

The private half runs on your deviceThe voting app is a smart contract with two kinds of functions. The private functions run first, and they run inside your PXE. Your identity and the candidate you picked are the private inputs, and they stay on your device.

The only thing to leave your device is a proof confirming the legitimacy of your vote. Aztec's client-side proving system, Chonk, takes the private execution and produces a zero-knowledge proof: a compact cryptographic receipt that your vote followed the rules, that you are eligible, and have not voted before, while revealing nothing about who you are or who you voted for. Think of it as a sealed ballot the network can confirm is valid without opening it. The network learns only that a legitimate vote happened. It does not learn how you voted, or even which account voted. 

This is the part that used to be too slow to be practical. Generating a proof on a phone was the bottleneck every privacy app hit. Aztec’s Chonk is purpose-built for fast proving on low-memory devices, both natively and in the browser, so the private half runs on the device in your hand instead of on someone else's server.

The public half runs in the openSome elements of a vote should be public. The tally is shared infrastructure, the number everyone relies on to trust the result. Thanks to programmable privacy on Aztec, the app marks that part public. Public functions live on the network and run in the open, the way functions do on Ethereum.

On Aztec, private and public logic live in the same contract, and the developer decides which is which, function by function and variable by variable. Programmable privacy is a dimmer, not a switch. The voting app turns it up on the individual ballot and turns it down on the running tally. That boundary is a design decision written into the contract, and it is the thing no transparent chain and no fixed-privacy chain can offer.

The network checks the proof and runs the public partYour vote leaves your device as a bundle: the zero-knowledge proof of the private half, plus the call to the public function that updates the count. It goes to Aztec's sequencers, a decentralized set of thousands of independent operators, with more than 3,500 of them running the network today.

The sequencers do two jobs at once. They verify the proof of your private vote, confirming it is valid and eligible without seeing the choice behind it, and they run the public function that adds one to the chosen candidate and updates the public tally. Your ballot stays sealed. The count goes up by one for everyone to see. The same proof guarantees you cannot vote twice, even though no one learns which ballot is yours.

Two state trees, both onchainAztec has two main state trees, and both live onchain. One holds private state, the other holds public state, so the full record of what happened sits on the network rather than on any one person's laptop. The two trees store each record in two different ways depending on if it needs to be private or public. 

The private tree uses a UTXO model, the same note-based design used by Zcash. In this model, state is written as commitments: each entry is a sealed record that a valid vote was cast, with the voter and the choice kept private. Just like with Zcash or Bitcoin, you do not edit a private entry in place. You write a new one, and the design stops the same vote from being cast twice (old state is nullified). The vote stays private, and the record of a legitimate vote happening is onchain for the network to check.

The public tree uses an account-based model, the same shape Ethereum uses: values that update in place, readable by anyone. This is where each candidate's tally lives.

One transaction wrote information to both trees. The private tree recorded that you voted, sealed. The public tree recorded the new totals, in the open. Everything is onchain. The difference between the two trees is how much each one reveals.

Every private app on Aztec writes into that same private tree. A vote, a payment, and a payroll run all land in one shared record of activity, so each user's privacy grows stronger as the network grows, instead of splitting into a separate pool for every app.

A block is proposed, and Ethereum records itAztec is an L2 on Ethereum, so everything settles to Ethereum L1. A sequencer on Aztec gathers transactions into a proposed block. Other sequencers validate it before it goes to Ethereum's pending chain. At that point the block sits on Ethereum, ordered and recorded, waiting for its proof. The network has agreed on what happened and the proposed block is just waiting a final proof. 

Anyone can prove itProving a block is its own job, and on Aztec, it belongs to no one in particular. A decentralized, permissionless set of provers competes to take a full epoch, a 32-block stretch of the chain, and compresses it into a single zero-knowledge proof of the entire epoch. Anyone with the hardware can run a prover and bid for the work. There is no privileged operator, no committee you have to trust, no outside network holding a key.

That openness is the whole point of a privacy layer. A system that protects your data but routes it through one trusted server has only moved the exposure rather than removed it. Aztec keeps proving permissionless and your private inputs on your device, thereby avoiding any exposure.

The economics land in the voter's favor too. As an L2 network, Aztec spreads the cost of that one L1 proof across thousands of transactions in the rollup, so a vote costs pennies, not the millions of gas a private proof would cost verified alone on Ethereum.

‍

Settled on Ethereum, verifiable by anyoneA prover then posts the epoch proof to Ethereum's proven chain, and the Aztec state is final. Ethereum verifies one proof and inherits the correctness of everything inside it. Aztec extends Ethereum and settles to Ethereum, so your hybrid transaction carries Ethereum's security without carrying Ethereum's enforced transparency.

Anyone can now verify that the result is valid and that every counted vote was legitimate. No one can see how any individual voted. The tally is on the shared ledger where it belongs, and your ballot stayed yours the whole way through.

What this unlocksFor the voter, their ballot was never a broadcast. The candidate you chose stayed yours, with no record tying your wallet to a name for anyone to read later, and you can still check that your vote was counted and the result is honest. You took part without your choice becoming data for systems built to act on it.

For a founder, the election app in this walkthrough is easy to implement without needing to build extensive custom code. Secret ballots with a public, verifiable count, in one contract, is a product category that opens up only because the boundary is programmable. You can build governance, elections, and polls where people vote without fear and the result still proves itself. And of course you can build anything that requires both public and private state to work seamlessly together. 

For an infrastructure provider, the same machinery serves clients who need a result they can stand behind without exposing the people who produced it. Selective disclosure lets a client prove exactly what a counterparty needs to see, the count and the integrity of the process, and protect everything else, on their own terms. That is a guarantee a transparent chain cannot make.

A real vote needs two things at once: a secret ballot and a count anyone can check. A transparent chain makes you give up the first to get the second. On Aztec, you get both. The tally settled on Ethereum for anyone to verify, and how you voted stayed yours. The infrastructure is in place, what will you create with it? 
‍

->Review the Aztec Basics ->Head to the docs and start building today
‍

Gümüş ne kadar sorusu, hem emtia hem de kripto para piyasası yatırımcılarının yakından takip ettiği başlıklar arasında yer alıyor. Orta Doğu’da jeopolitik tansiyonun düşmesine yönelik gelişmeler ve petrol fiyatlarında yaşanan sert gerileme, gümüş fiyatlarını destekleyen önemli unsurlar oldu. Aynı zamanda yatırımcıların gözü yaklaşan Fed toplantısına çevrilirken, faiz beklentilerindeki değişim de değerli metaller üzerinde etkisini sürdürüyor.

Gümüş Fiyatlarında Son Durum Ne? Güncel verilere göre ons gümüş 59,30 dolar seviyesinden işlem görüyor. Ons fiyatı günlük bazda %2,09 yükselirken, aylık performansı ise %1,50 artış gösterdi.

Yurt içinde ise gram gümüş 90,45 TL seviyesine ulaştı. Küresel piyasalarda yaşanan gelişmelerin yanı sıra döviz kuru hareketleri de gram gümüş fiyatlarının şekillenmesinde önemli rol oynuyor.

Değerli metallerde görülen bu hareketlilik, yalnızca emtia yatırımcılarının değil, portföy çeşitlendirmesi yapmak isteyen yatırımcıların da ilgisini çekmeye devam ediyor.

Petrol Fiyatları Gümüşü Nasıl Destekledi? Son günlerde gümüş fiyatlarına en fazla katkı sağlayan gelişmelerden biri petrol piyasasında yaşandı. Orta Doğu’da gerilimin azalabileceğine yönelik açıklamalar enerji fiyatlarını aşağı çekti.

Reuters’a konuşan üst düzey bir İranlı yetkili, ABD’nin saldırıları durdurması halinde İran’ın da askeri operasyonlarını askıya alabileceğini ifade etti. ABD tarafında ise Başkan Donald Trump’ın danışmanlarının operasyonların büyük ölçüde tamamlandığını ve mühimmat stoklarına ilişkin endişelerin arttığını belirtmesinin ardından bombardıman faaliyetlerine ara verildi.

Jeopolitik risklerin azalmasıyla birlikte petrol fiyatları gün içerisinde %4’ün üzerinde geriledi. Enerji maliyetlerindeki bu düşüş, enflasyon baskısının hafiflemesine katkı sağlayarak gümüş fiyatlarını destekleyen önemli bir unsur haline geldi.

Enflasyon Beklentileri Neden Değişti? Yılın ilk aylarından itibaren devam eden bölgesel çatışmalar petrol fiyatlarını yukarı taşımış, bu durum da küresel enflasyon beklentilerini artırmıştı. Artan enflasyon endişeleri ise merkez bankalarının daha uzun süre yüksek faiz politikası uygulayabileceği beklentisini güçlendirmişti.

Ancak petrol fiyatlarında görülen son geri çekilme, piyasalarda enflasyon baskısının azalabileceği yönünde yeni beklentiler oluşturdu. Faiz baskısının hafiflemesi, gümüş gibi değerli metallere olan ilgiyi yeniden artırırken yatırımcıların piyasa analizi süreçlerinde de önemli bir değişime işaret ediyor.

Fed Toplantısı Gümüş İçin Neden Kritik? Piyasaların bir diğer önemli gündem maddesi ise 28-29 Temmuz tarihlerinde gerçekleştirilecek Fed toplantısı olacak. Yatırımcılar, ABD Merkez Bankası’nın bu toplantıda politika faizini sabit bırakmasını bekliyor.

Bununla birlikte CME FedWatch Tool verilerine göre piyasalar, eylül ayında faiz artırımı ihtimalini %76 seviyesinde fiyatlamaya devam ediyor. Bu beklenti, önümüzdeki dönemde hem değerli metaller hem de kripto yatırımı yapan yatırımcılar açısından yakından takip ediliyor.

Fed’in faiz kararı ve toplantı sonrasında yapılacak açıklamalar, gümüş fiyatlarının kısa vadeli yönü üzerinde belirleyici olabilir.

Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Bitcoin Course at Risk in El Salvador? 2027 Election Rivals Challenge Nayib Bukele

CLARITY Act, ABD’de kripto para sektörüne yönelik kapsamlı düzenleyici çerçeve oluşturmayı hedefleyen en önemli yasa tasarılarından biri olarak görülüyor. Ancak Senato‘nun yaz tatiline yaklaşmasıyla birlikte tasarının kısa vadede yasalaşma ihtimali önemli ölçüde zayıfladı. Sürecin uzaması, hem kripto para piyasası hem de kurumsal yatırımcılar tarafından yakından takip ediliyor.

Kripto sektörü, düzenlemenin 2026 yılı içinde tamamlanabilmesi açısından yaz dönemini kritik bir eşik olarak değerlendiriyordu. Son açıklamalar ise beklentilerin sonbahar aylarına kayabileceğine işaret ediyor.

CLARITY Act İçin Süreç Neden Yavaşladı? ABD Senatosu Çoğunluk Lideri John Thune, CLARITY Act’in yaz tatiline girilmeden önce nihai oylamaya sunulmasının zor göründüğünü ifade etti. Buna rağmen Thune, tasarının en azından Senato Genel Kurulu’nda görüşülmeye başlanmasını umut ettiğini belirtti.

Sektör temsilcileri daha önce 7 Ağustos tarihini kritik bir dönüm noktası olarak görüyordu. Ancak takvimin sonbahara sarkması halinde Kongre’nin daha sınırlı çalışma süresi nedeniyle düzenlemenin yıl sonuna kadar tamamlanması zorlaşabilir.

Bu nedenle yasa sürecindeki her gelişme, dijital varlık ekosistemi açısından büyük önem taşıyor.

Beyaz Saray Ve Senato Cephesinde Son Beklentiler Beyaz Saray’ın kripto danışmanlarından Patrick Witt, Senato’nun ağustos ayının ilk haftasında tasarıyla ilgili yeni adımlar atabileceğini düşünüyor. Buna karşın temmuz ayı içerisinde nihai oylamanın gerçekleşme olasılığını düşük görüyor.

Bu değerlendirme, piyasalarda kısa vadede kesin bir düzenleme beklentisinin zayıflamasına neden oldu. Özellikle kurumsal yatırımcılar ve sektörde faaliyet gösteren şirketler, yeni takvimin nasıl şekilleneceğini yakından izliyor.

ABD’de hazırlanacak kapsamlı düzenlemeler, yalnızca yerel piyasaları değil küresel kripto yatırımı ortamını da etkileyebilecek potansiyele sahip bulunuyor.

Taslakta Hangi Maddeler Tartışılıyor? Senatör Cynthia Lummis tarafından paylaşılan güncellenmiş CLARITY Act taslağında müşteri varlıklarının korunmasına yönelik daha güçlü düzenlemeler yer aldı. Bu değişiklikler yatırımcı güvenliğini artırmayı amaçlıyor.

Ancak bazı başlıklarda uzlaşma henüz sağlanabilmiş değil. Kamu görevlilerinin kripto faaliyetlerine ilişkin etik kurallar, stablecoin ödüllerine yönelik hükümler ve çeşitli düzenleyici maddeler üzerinde taraflar arasında görüş ayrılıkları devam ediyor.

Bu anlaşmazlıkların çözülmesi, tasarının Senato’dan geçiş sürecini doğrudan etkileyebilecek en önemli unsurlar arasında gösteriliyor.

CLARITY Act Kripto Para Piyasası İçin Neden Önemli? Galaxy Research Araştırma Başkanı Alex Thorn, Kongre’nin daralan çalışma takvimi nedeniyle CLARITY Act’in 2026 yılı içinde yasalaşma ihtimaline ilişkin tahminini yüzde 50’den yüzde 30’a düşürdüğünü açıkladı.

Bu değerlendirme, düzenlemenin beklenenden daha uzun sürebileceğine yönelik endişeleri artırdı. Yasanın kabul edilmesi halinde kripto para sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketler için daha net bir hukuki çerçeve oluşturulması bekleniyor. Ayrıca düzenleyici belirsizliğin azalması, uzun vadede kurumsal yatırımcı ilgisini destekleyebilecek gelişmeler arasında değerlendiriliyor.

Önümüzdeki haftalarda Senato’dan gelecek açıklamalar ve yasa takvimine ilişkin yeni gelişmeler, hem ABD finans piyasaları hem de küresel kripto ekosistemi açısından belirleyici olmaya devam edecek.

Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Crypto expert Dr Altcoin has alleged that Pi Network is facing a supply crisis tied to a wave of token unlocks scheduled for the second half of 2026.

According to the post, pioneers who locked their Pi for three years are now seeing large amounts of that supply released. Roughly 775.8 million Pi tokens are set to unlock between now and December 2026. That works out to an average of 129.3 million Pi tokens unlocked each month now. Dr Altcoin argued that a significant portion of this unlocked supply is likely to reach exchanges, adding further selling pressure to the market.

Calls for the Pi Core Team to respond

The post argued that no single announcement, ecosystem update, or exchange listing would be enough to stabilize price without the Pi Core Team directly addressing supply, demand, and liquidity concerns. It called for the team to publicly acknowledge the situation and discuss potential solutions with the community, framing continued silence as a failure of leadership.

Proposed steps, according to the post

Dr Altcoin outlined several measures that could be considered if the Core Team continues its current communication approach:

Burning a substantial portion of remaining supply, potentially as much as 50%, drawing a comparison to Stellar’s historical token burn.Allowing major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase, to list Pi.Introducing a transparent and verifiable buyback-and-burn mechanism.Price risk raised in the post

The post also warned that if Pi falls below $0.01, it could lose its position among the top 100 cryptocurrencies by market cap, and that a sustained price decline could pressure the project financially, potentially forcing spending cuts or restructuring.

Community reaction

Replies to the post were mixed. Some users voiced support for the criticism, while others questioned Dr Altcoin’s own past promotional activity around Pi. Several replies echoed concerns about token distribution, with some users arguing that a small number of wallets, including the Core Team’s own holdings, control a disproportionate share of total supply.

The Pi Core Team has not publicly responded to these specific allegations as of now. These claims reflect one crypto expert’s analysis and have not been independently verified.

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

Back to top button

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Key Highlights Privacy-focused Venice AI secured $65 million in Series A funding, achieving a $1 billion unicorn valuation Dragonfly spearheaded the investment round, with participation from Coinbase Ventures, Morgan Creek, F-Prime, and North Island Ventures The funding deal included 8.98% company equity, 1.5 million VVV token grants, and warrants for an additional 5 million tokens The platform provides access to over 200 AI models with privacy protections, boasting a user base of 3.5 million Capital will finance Venice’s proprietary data center construction and aggressive user acquisition strategy Venice AI, the privacy-centric artificial intelligence platform created by cryptocurrency pioneer Erik Voorhees, has successfully closed a $65 million Series A investment round. This landmark funding propels the startup to unicorn status with a $1 billion valuation, marking its inaugural external capital raise since its May 2024 debut.

https://twitter.com/ErikVoorhees/status/2072336114950545755?s=20

Dragonfly served as the lead investor in this financing round. Additional participants included Coinbase Ventures, North Island Ventures, F-Prime, Archetype, Liquid2 Ventures, and Morgan Creek.

Investment Structure and Token Allocation The $65 million investment package granted backers an 8.98% ownership position in Venice AI. Investors also secured a vesting allocation of 1.5 million Venice (VVV) tokens. Additionally, they obtained warrants enabling them to purchase another 5 million VVV tokens during an eight-year window at approximately $66.5 million.

Both the token allocation and warrant instruments carry a one-year lock-up period, followed by a three-year vesting schedule.

Venice deliberately opted to sell company equity instead of directly offering its VVV tokens. Voorhees revealed that the company maintains a treasury of over 30 million VVV tokens, none of which have been liquidated despite the token’s impressive 700% price surge this year.

Privacy-First Philosophy Drives Platform Design Venice AI markets itself as a privacy-respecting counterpart to mainstream platforms like [[LINK_START_0]]ChatGPT[[LINK_END_0]]. The service implements a zero-storage policy for user queries and applies encryption to all requests before directing them through external proxy servers.

When utilizing models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, Venice masks users’ IP addresses and session information. Enhanced privacy features are accessible when using alternative models available through the platform.

The company reports a user community of 3.5 million and disclosed annualized revenue exceeding $70 million. According to Venice, the company achieved profitability during the first quarter of 2026.

This capital infusion arrives amid mounting concerns about AI privacy practices. A California class-action complaint targeted OpenAI for allegedly integrating Meta Pixel and Google Analytics into ChatGPT.com, purportedly transmitting user information to Meta and Google along with advertising cookies.

Earlier in the year, legal professionals cautioned that conversation histories from AI-powered legal advice tools could potentially be admitted as evidence in legal proceedings.

Strategic Allocation of Capital Voorhees outlined that the investment proceeds will primarily fund the construction of Venice’s inaugural data center, enabling the company to control its GPU infrastructure instead of relying on leased capacity.

Remaining funds will support customer base expansion, team recruitment, geographic market penetration, and strategic acquisitions of synergistic companies.

“We are making Venice a mass market consumer app for at least a few hundred million people and several billion AI agents,” Voorhees said.

The company’s VVV token appreciated 6% following the funding announcement.

Venice operates a dual-token ecosystem that includes DIEM. Platform users can stake VVV tokens to generate DIEM, with each DIEM token providing $1 worth of API credits for platform usage.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Shrikar Parashar Posted On May 11, 2019

Crypto wallet and trading platform Abra recently enabled access to 17 Altcoins.Abra which is led by Bill Barhydt added native support to 17 altcoins including Digibyte (DGB), Dogecoin (DOGE), Dash (DASH), Basic Attention Token (BAT), Neo (NEO), 0x (ZEX), OmiseGo (OMG), Qtum (QTUM), Vertcoin (VTC), Zcash (ZEC), Golem (GNT), Stratis (STRAT), Augur (REP), Ethereum Classic (ETC), TRON (TRX), Lisk (LSK) and Status (SNT).

In addition to Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) users will soon be able to deposit and withdraw an additional 17 Crypto assets.

Native withdrawals for the other cryptocurrencies will be turned on in the coming days.

— Abra (@AbraGlobal) May 8, 2019

Abra is a non-custodial wallet meaning the private keys will not be held by the company but within the user’s device instead. The firm has also previously announced that it will enable users to buy synthetic equivalents of stocks and ETFs using Bitcoin smart contracts.

Abra Partners with Plaid to connect to “Thousands of banks”Abra has partnered with San Francisco based Fintech firm Plaid to connect user accounts to thousands of US banks. App users had to use bank transfers to deposit into their wallets, but with the new feature, they will able to connect to their bank accounts directly in-app using their API.

Bill Barhydt, CEO of Abra said:

“The addition of these new liquidity enhancements in our app gives users more ways to move between crypto and fiat. We’re particularly excited about our partnership with Plaid, which brings thousands of additional financial institutions into the Abra ecosystem for US customers.”

Discuss this news on our Telegram Community. Subscribe to us on Google news and do follow us on Twitter @Blockmanity

Did you like the news you just read? Please leave a feedback to help us serve you better

Disclaimer: Blockmanity is a news portal and does not provide any financial advice. Blockmanity's role is to inform the cryptocurrency and blockchain community about what's going on in this space. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment. Blockmanity won't be responsible for any loss of funds.

Author

Shrikar Parashar Shrikar is a Blockchain evangelist. He is a die-hard fan of security tokens. He follows the market closely but does not trade. He believes in Hodling.

Trending NowYou may also like

[the_ad id=”36860″]

As promised, the leading US crypto exchange Coinbase has dramatically increased the number of coins supported on its platform. The company just added Stellar (XLM), a few weeks after the long-rumored debut of XRP.

So which coins will land the coveted Coinbase listing next?

Back in December, Coinbase revealed it’s taking a hard look at 31 additional cryptocurrencies. The platform now supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Stellar, Ethereum Classic, Zcash, 0x, Basic Attention Token and USD Coin.

That leaves 28 coins on Coinbase’s list of prospects.

• Cardano
• Aeternity
• Aragon
• Bread Wallet
• Civic
• Dai
• District0x
• Enjin Coin
• EOS
• Golem
• IOST
• KIN
• Kyber Network
• ChainLink
• Loom Network
• Loopring
• Decentraland
• Mainframe
• Maker
• NEO
• OmiseGo
• Po.et
• QuarkChain
• Augur
• Request Network
• Status
• Storj
• Tezos

Coinbase Pro, the company’s professional trading platform, already supports a handful of the coins on the list above: Civic, Dai, District0x, Golem, Loom, Decentraland and Zcash.

[the_ad id=”36860″][the_ad id="42537"] [the_ad id="42536"]

In March, NewsBTC sat down with Max Kordek, the founder of Lisk, to pick his brain about his project, the broader crypto and blockchain industry, and the future of Bitcoin.

Related Reading: HTC Exec: Facebook Coin is like the Intranet, Bitcoin is like the Internet The Latest On Lisk NewsBTC: Thanks for sitting down with us. For those who don’t know Lisk, can you give us a 30 second to a one-minute explanation of your project in general?

Max Kordek: Lisk is a blockchain application platform with its own crypto asset, LSK. We aim to enable devs and entrepreneurs to create their own blockchain, which is fully independent and customizable to a large degree. The second step will be interoperability, so that these independent blockchains become sidechains, which then interact with the mainchain and each other, becoming an independent part of the bigger internal ecosystem of Lisk. Our tools are based on JavaScript which taps into a fast evolving programming language, rich developer base, and open source culture. We’ve also recently diversified a section of our code to TypeScript, which will support larger application building.

NewsBTC: Cool. So why did Lisk decide to go with DPoS instead of PoW? Were there centralization risks?

Max: My journey in blockchain first began with the purchase of a Litecoin miner in 2012. Back then, I was living in this very small student apartment in Germany, which was only about 20 square meters. The small space made the miner run super hot, and after two months I had enough. Through this experience, I’ve started to develop a dislike against the kind of inefficiency and this waste of electricity that Proof of Work systems create. I then began to look into alternatives to mining. I stumbled across NXT, then Peercoin, the first viable Proof of Stake coin in existence, which I fell in love with. It was amazing to have a server, which cost $10 to $20 a month to maintain and run the network from. I got really active in that community. Eventually, Peercoin fell apart, mainly because they failed to establish an organization to actually push the technology forward.

After Peercoin, I found Crypti, which provided that central business pushing the protocol forward. It was also the first organization where I discovered the Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). However, Crypti also had its own issues with a very small team and even lower levels of funding. I decided to create something new with my partner Oliver Beddows. From the get-go, we knew it shouldn’t have anything to do with PoW. That’s how Lisk and Lightcurve came about. There are many benefits of our form of DPoS, but one of the main ones is that it is beneficial to what we specifically are building. If you want to create a blockchain platform where people can just spin up their own chains, DPoS is much easier to kickstart and safer to maintain than normal PoS. If you rely only on pure PoS, it may not be very secure, so it’s better to have delegates you can trust.

Max Kordek Delegates on the Lisk network know the codebase and the network through and through. Many of them build open source solutions and products, spot bugs on our Testnet, or migrate to critical releases in an extremely timely manner! It depends on what use case you want to implement, but having a secure network is what most of our stakeholders can agree on. As to centralization risks, there is a degree of fluidity to our network with some individuals entering and falling out of the delegated 101. We’ve also recently opened up the Lisk Improvement Proposals where both Lightcurve and community authors can submit their own proposals for how to make our consensus algorithm even better.

NewsBTC: With DPoS, EOS enlists 21 delegates and Ark, 51 delegates. So how did you come with the 101 delegate number?

Max: Dan Larimer runs EOS. Before EOS he ran Steemit and Bitshares, which utilized 101 delegates. We took the same number, which both he and Charles Hoskinson used back in the day, because it is a good balance between centralization and decentralization. 21 delegates are too few. Sure, the network is high-performance, but 21 entities controlling the network could be dangerous. 500 or 1,000, on the other hand, is too much, as such a number of delegates would cause too many inefficiencies in the network. So to put it simply, for us 101 delegates sits right in the sweet spot of the number of nodes necessary to move our blockchain forward, while the odd number gets rid of the ties by ensuring there’s always a majority on the network.

NewsBTC: What’s your vision for Lisk Academy? Do you guys want to spark adoption through education?

Max: Even after the bull market of 2017, only a few people on the street know what Bitcoin is, let alone the underlying technology of blockchain. We need to educate those who have the power to interact with blockchain, whether its building or investing. Right now, it’s not even about Lisk, but just blockchain as a technology. The next step is accessibility, meaning that we should ramp down the complexity of the blockchain ecosystem to aid the user experience. Once you educate people and they have access to the ecosystem, then you onboard them onto projects like Lisk and our SDK.

This is why we don’t attend as many conferences as Token2049 anymore. It sounds a bit bad, but we don’t want to constantly be in this kind of a crypto bubble. We need people from outside of the industry to enter. But they won’t enter without education. We just need to have a go-to place for people to learn about blockchain and Lisk. We also provide educational marketing content and documentation for developers wanting to take the next step and experiment with our technology.

Kordek’s Thoughts On The Crypto Industry NewsBTC: So do you think that education is the one thing holding back crypto adoption right now?

Max: I think many things are holding it back currently. One is definitely education. If we just don’t know or understand what it is, we won’t adopt it. Right now we need builders, who harness this technology to come up with viable use cases. And they, of course, need to know how this technology works. My mother doesn’t need to know about blockchain. But my developer colleagues who actually have the power to build need to know the ins and outs of not only blockchain technology, but also blockchain building and everything else needed to get them coding.  Another problem is use cases. People still ask, ‘what can we really achieve with this technology?’ People have no clue yet. Building on Ethereum is tough right now, but it’s the best experience in the industry by far. It isn’t optimal, so we need much better tooling and use case inspiration for developers. That, in my opinion, is why adoption has been pretty much slow.

NewsBTC: What is your end vision for this ecosystem? Do you see a world where everything is based on these technologies?

Max: I don’t think that everything will be based on blockchain. Yesterday I was on a panel discussion covering a very interesting topic — Web 3.0. It was said that blockchain is one technological level above texting (Web 3.0 v.s. 2.0). The Internet as a whole still has Web 1.0 applications, including simple internet pages and so on. Those don’t go away. And why should they? We have Web 2.0 pages, like Facebook, Twitter, etc. They will not disappear because of blockchain. So not everything will be run on blockchain, but there are quite a few processes that can be optimized with this technology. I’m a strong advocate for sure, but I just don’t see it as the golden technology that will disrupt absolutely everything. Right now, we don’t even have one use case that has reached 100,000 daily active users. Facebook, on the other hand, has one billion active users. So in the end, I see a world where blockchain really helps people in very specific industries and solutions.

NewsBTC: So you’re saying that I guess there have been there’s been very little adoption right now, but what’s one application for one use case that you think has a lot of potential?

Max: Right now, we’re still heavy in the R&D regarding which use case will be most suitable for our technology. One industry we want to start off with is definitely gaming. That’s an obvious use case right there, given opportunities for tokenization and so forth. Governmental work like notarization or traveling documentation is a pain right now that could easily be improved by blockchain. These processes can be optimized with a digital identity system that automatically checks you and is stored on the blockchain for secure and cross-border access. There are many use cases out there. In the end, we are creating technology that is customizable and scalable enough to allow many of these to be explored.

NewsBTC: How has this bear market been compared to ones seen previously?

Max: The previous ones were much worse. Bitcoin went from like $1,000 to $150, and people were saying that you should pack your bags and say your goodbyes. At that time, there was no development happening. There weren’t these global conference chains with thousands of attendees. It was really dark on Reddit. And now, we’re potentially just coming out of another crypto winter, but there are 20 to 30 meetups happening in Hong Kong this week, even more across the world. If you go on our GitHub, subscribe to Crypto Twitter, or check out big crypto publications, you can see there’s a wide range of activity going on amongst the projects that survived this crash.

There’s so much that is happening. There’s seriously much more development than any other point in blockchain’s history. So for me, the ones before were much worse economics-wise, activity-wise, and sentiment-wise. The thing is, we are patient because we see a big future ahead of this technology. This is just part of normal market cycles. The companies are getting more serious, and the first iterations of products are beginning to pop up. For example, we’re about to release our Alpha SDK, the first version of our blockchain-building toolkit that will allow developers to create proof-of-concept applications aligned with our codebase.

NewsBTC: Do you think that the crypto market is oversaturated at the moment?

Max: Well, I made my own altcoin, so it’s very hard to comment on that one. What I think is that the market overall regulates itself, especially when it feels oversaturated. You see crypto assets that are dropping lower and lower on CMC, as they have no activity, no trading volume, and that’s totally fine by me. That’s a sign that it’s oversaturated. And I assume that is why projects are dying as the market stabilizes and matures. There’s still potential for thousands and thousands more crypto assets and projects around them. I just want to see projects with an actual use case and a true focus on development. In our case, Lisk will be used for registering a sidechain. In Ethereum’s case, it can be used for smart contract execution. But why do all these other apps need a token? Status, for example, a messenger project, doesn’t really need a token. I have not looked into it in-depth, but that raises a question mark. So yeah, I think it’s saturated, but it’s regulating itself in time and legitimate technology with a good business backing stays afloat.

NewsBTC: How has the Lisk team been doing in this market cycle?

Max: Lisk is always progressing at a sustainable pace. The technology is going forward as I mentioned before with the upcoming release of our Alpha SDK. Things on the business side are playing support to the constant development – we were lucky enough to have a professionalized financial team to help us diversify our holdings. This gave us a healthy balance of fiat and crypto, which resulted in extra stability throughout this bear market. We’re also continuing to grow our business and fostering a global developer community. Our community members actually started physical developer spaces across the globe, including the Netherlands, Japan, and China. There’s a lot of activity happening on GitHub and real life!

The Future Of Bitcoin  NewsBTC: How do you expect for the crypto market to play out over 2019?

Max: I really have no idea. It could go up or down. But right now, it seems to be stabilizing very slowly. Eventually, though, there could be another, let’s call it, wick lower. I assume personally that it will continue to go up towards the end of next year. In 1.5 years is the Bitcoin halving, so the market could go up because of that. But I don’t care really. It’s not only about the money.

NewsBTC: What do you see Bitcoin as? Is it an SoV, MoE, or anything else?

Max: I think of it mainly as a store of value with complete independence of any other market. That means you can just fill up your portfolio with 1% to 2% with it, and it can act as a secure investment next to gold. I also tend to see it as a means of exchange, I bought some stuff online with BTC recently. Yesterday, I went to the Lotus Bar in Hong Kong, which accepts Bitcoin. It’s a nice thing, but I’m not going to go there every time just to use BTC. So in end, it’s more of a store of value. It’s important to add that I also see it as a stepping stone for blockchain technology overall. It may not be the most scalable, but it’s inspiring. It may not be a world currency, but it should become a means of exchange in one way or another.

NewsBTC: What do you think of the whole JP Morgan Coin or FBCoin? Do you like what they bring to the table?

Max: I know many many people who hate Mark Zuckerberg in the industry, but it’s important to remember Facebook is a tech company at the end of the day. When your company grows as large as Facebook did, it’s hard to stay true to your original ethos. Many things can go wrong. And maybe Facebook had many things go wrong this year, but it isn’t the fault of Mark Zuckerberg alone. I still think Zuckerberg has the best things in mind. I see FBCoin as an interesting concept. I’m not too sure how scalable it will be, as WhatsApp or Facebook itself has billions of users. But why not? I think it will be pretty cool, no matter if it’s decentralized, centralized, etc. As long as it uses blockchain technology, that is exactly what we want and need. JP Morgan Coin, on the other hand, is something I hate. First, they say Bitcoin is a scam, then they were revealed to have participated in the Bitcoin market, and then they suddenly come up with their own coin. At the end of the day, JP Morgan isn’t a technology company, so they shouldn’t do that. This project is just for their monetary gain. They should stick with the old economy and do their crap there. They don’t really belong here.

NewsBTC: It’s my final question. Can crypto succeed without institutional involvement, like investments from those on Wall Street?

Max: Yeah definitely. I think people are more powerful than institutions. With blockchain and Bitcoin, we’re going towards true peer-to-peer transactions and exchanges. On a global scale, this will be much more powerful than any institution in the world. Still, financial institutions are great leverage, as they can give people the power to make this whole movement. We can utilize those institutions, but we don’t need them in the end.

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Today, the Kava Coalition welcomed an important update from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), which revised its Consumer Fact Sheet for Kava to clearly recognize traditionally prepared kava as a lawful single ingredient conventional food when steeped in water.

Following input by the Kava Coalition and ongoing dialogue with state regulators, CDPH updated its guidance to explicitly state that kava steeped solely in water and prepared as a single ingredient beverage is not regulated as a food additive. The updated Consumer Facts Kava 2026 document now reads: “Kava would generally not be regulated as a food additive if kava is steeped in only water to brew tea and consumed as a single ingredient conventional food.”

In addition to this clarification, CDPH materially revised the summary section of the fact sheet. While the earlier version referenced only the absence of regulatory limitations for kava as a dietary supplement, the updated document now states that “there are currently no regulatory limitations regarding the use of kava as a single ingredient conventional food or dietary supplement.” This change explicitly expands lawful use beyond supplements and directly affirms the legitimacy of traditional water-based kava preparation.

“This update provides long-needed clarity for consumers, businesses, and regulators alike,” said Douglas La Rose, Executive Director of the Kava Coalition. “For more than a year, the Kava Coalition has worked closely with kava bars across California to petition for clear guidance, and the state has now provided that clarity. We also consulted extensively with Pacific Islander communities who were deeply concerned about California’s position on kava as a conventional food. Traditional kava preparation has profound cultural significance and a long history of safe use, and we are encouraged to see California’s guidance now clearly reflect that reality.”

California is home to one of the largest Pacific Islander populations in the continental United States, including communities from Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, and other kava-producing cultures. For these communities, kava is not only a social beverage but a cornerstone of cultural practice, ceremony, and identity. The updated CDPH guidance provides meaningful cultural recognition while also supporting small businesses and community spaces that contribute to local economies throughout the state.

The Kava Coalition views this update as a significant step forward for public understanding, regulatory consistency, and cultural recognition in California. After a period of uncertainty, the revised guidance offers a more stable and accurate framework for how kava is prepared and consumed across the state.

The Coalition expressed appreciation for the engagement of CDPH staff and acknowledged the persistence and collaborative efforts of its members and partners who contributed to this outcome.

Copies of the prior and updated fact sheets are available upon request from CDPH.

About Kava Coalition

The Kava Coalition is an alliance of noble kava consumers, experts, and industry leaders committed to advancing kava education, advocacy, and choice. By promoting responsible consumption, market transparency, and cultural respect, the Coalition works to ensure that noble kava is widely recognized, accessible, and valued as a safe, pro-social beverage. For more information, visit www.kavacoalition.org.

Media Contact

Douglas La Rose
[email protected]

7 Crypto Firms Targeted by 11 Lawsuits in New York

Several juggernauts of the crypto-industry were named in a class action lawsuit for the alleged sale of unregistered securities. Those mentioned include Binance, BitMEX, Tron, Block.one, Kyber Network, and KuCoin, among dozens of others.

Crypto’s Biggest Companies Face Class-Action Lawsuits According to OffShoreAlert, 11 class action lawsuits were filed against 42 defendants in the Southern District of New York Court on April 3 for the sale of unregistered securities. The lawsuits have separately named industry giants such as Binance, BitMEX operator HDR Global Trading, Tron, Civic, Block.one, Kyber Network, Status, Bibox, Quantstamp, and KuCoin.

Apart from companies, the lawsuit also named several of their executives. Changpeng Zhao of Binance, Brendan Blumer and Larimer of Block.one (EOS), Vinny Lingham of Civic, and Arthur Hayes of BitMEX, to name a few.

All of the lawsuits were brought by Roche Freedman LLP, a law firm based in New York and Miami. The law firm is famous in the crypto industry for representing the estate of Dave Kleiman in its lawsuit against Craig Wright.

Judgement Day for ICO Issuers? Since 2017, ICO investors have collectively lost hundreds of millions of dollars after their investments lost 80% or more of their value. Under law, U.S. investors are entitled to a certain degree of transparency through financial disclosures mandated by the Securities Exchange Commission.

Advertisement

During the mania, the crypto entrepreneurs who raised these millions often overlooked the legal implications. Cryptocurrency was an entirely new asset. Many played it fast and loose, and made off with huge sums of money with little accountability. A large number of these companies failed.

But, the handful that succeeded were wildly successful, and these are likely the ones worth suing. For these companies, their success might be catching up with them.

Legality of ICOs in Question The lawsuits were filed on behalf of several individuals, including Chase Williams, Alexander Clifford, Eric Lee, and William Zhang, but also include “all others similarly situated.” That is, other people who invested in these projects.

The plaintiffs have alleged that all of the 11 companies included in the lawsuit violated federal securities laws. These companies unlawfully created and issued securities, circumventing regulations through the use of tokens. Exchanges were also implicated for their role in selling these assets to investors in the United States.

What’s surprising is that it’s not just companies. The executives and directors of these industry juggernauts were also named. However, it’s expected that most of the companies included in the lawsuit will outright dismiss the assertions.

But, dismissing all the claims might be difficult. This case is not without precedent.

A judge in the Southern District of New York recently ruled that the tokens issued by Telegram were securities and should have been registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Commission itself has said many times in the past that most ICOs are assumed to be securities, until proven otherwise. The burden of proof rests on the issuers.

Nevertheless, this lawsuit will put U.S. courts to the test. The 42 defendants named in the case reside in 16 different countries, many of which are lightly regulated. To further complicate matters, some of these companies do not even have bank accounts or established offices, making enforcement a herculean task.

Decentralization is a tenet in the world of Bitcoin. As such, the courts in New York may find it difficult to pin these companies down if they are found culpable.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Priyeshu Garg. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Bullish ENJ price prediction for 2025 is $0.1188 to $0.1866. Enjin Coin (ENJ) price might reach $1 soon. Bearish ENJ price prediction for 2025 is $0.0355. In this Enjin Coin (ENJ) price prediction 2025, 2026-2030,  we will analyze the price patterns of ENJ by using accurate trader-friendly technical analysis indicators and predict the future movement of the cryptocurrency.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Enjin Coin (ENJ) Current Market StatusWhat is Enjin Coin (ENJ)?Enjin Coin (ENJ) 24H TechnicalsENJIN COIN (ENJ) PRICE PREDICTION 2025

Enjin Coin (ENJ) Support and Resistance LevelsEnjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA & RSIEnjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVIComparison of ENJ with BTC, ETHENJIN COIN (ENJ) PRICE PREDICTION 2026, 2027-2030CONCLUSIONFAQ Enjin Coin (ENJ) Current Market Status Current Price $0.06680 24 – Hour Price Change 1.17% Down 24 – Hour Trading Volume $10.1M Market Cap $125.41M Circulating Supply 1.87B ENJ All – Time High $4.85 (On Nov 25, 2021)   All – Time Low $0.01562 (On Nov 03, 2017)   ENJ Current Market Status (Source: CoinMarketCap) What is Enjin Coin (ENJ) TICKERENJBLOCKCHAINEthereumCATEGORYERC-20 TokenLAUNCHED ONJune 2018UTILITIESGovernance, Fast Transactions, gas fees & rewards Enjin Coin (ENJ) is an ERC-20 token native to the Enjin platform, a gaming community platform. The transactions of ENJ are secured in the network by the proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism.  

ENJ is used to buy, sell and trade NFTs in the Enjin ecosystem. Thus, these tokens serve primarily as utility tokens for backing NFTs. Users and developers can use Enjin (ENJ) to mint and create unique in-game NFTs. Along with ENJ, the Enjin ecosystem also has another token called Efinity token (EFI) which is the governance token of the native decentralized Enjin metaverse.

Enjin ecosystem enables users to utilize its native blockchain products to create unique NFTs for businesses, especially in the gaming industry.

Enjin Coin 24H Technicals
(Source: TradingView)

Enjin Coin (ENJ) ranks 307th on CoinMarketCap in terms of its market capitalization. The overview of the Enjin Coin price prediction for 2025 is explained below with a daily time frame.

ENJ/USDT Descending Channel Pattern (Source: TradingView)

In the above chart, Enjin (ENJ) laid out a descending channel pattern. Descending channel patterns are short-term bearish in that a stock moves lower within a descending channel, but they often form longer-term uptrends as continuation patterns. Higher prices often follow the descending channel pattern. But only after an upside penetration of the upper trend line. A descending channel is drawn by connecting the lower highs and lower lows of a security’s price with parallel trendlines to show a downward trend.

A trader could make a selling bet within a descending channel when the security price reaches its resistance trendline. An ascending channel is the opposite of a descending channel. Both ascending and descending channels are primary channels followed by technical analysts.

At the time of analysis, the price of Enjin Coin (ENJ) was recorded at $0.06680. If the pattern trend continues, then the price of ENJ might reach the resistance levels of $0.1203 and $0.1622. If the trend reverses, then the price of ENJ may fall to the support of $0.0862 and $0.0589.

Enjin Coin (ENJ) Resistance and Support Levels The chart given below elucidates the possible resistance and support levels of Enjin Coin (ENJ) in 2025.

ENJ/USDT Resistance and Support Levels (Source: TradingView)

From the above chart, we can analyze and identify the following as resistance and support levels of Enjin Coin (ENJ) for 2025.

Resistance Level 1$0.1188Resistance Level 2$0.1866Support Level 1$0.0596Support Level 2$0.0355 ENJ Resistance & Support Levels

Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI The technical analysis indicators, such as Relative Volume (RVOL), Moving Average (MA), and Relative Strength Index (RSI) of Bitcoin (ENJ), are shown in the chart below.

ENJ/USDT RVOL, MA, RSI (Source: TradingView)

From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the current Enjin Coin (ENJ) market in 2025.

INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCE50-Day Moving Average (50MA)Nature of the current trend by comparing the average price over 50 days50 MA = $0.0826Price = $0.0909
(50MA < Price)Bullish/UptrendRelative Strength Index (RSI)Magnitude of price change;Analyzing oversold & overbought conditions63.9425
<30 = Oversold
50-70 = Neutral>70 = OverboughtNeutralRelative Volume (RVOL)Asset’s trading volume in relation to its recent average volumesBelow cutoff lineWeak volume Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVI In the below chart, we analyze the strength and volatility of Enjin Coin (ENJ) using the following technical analysis indicators — Average Directional Index (ADX) and Relative Volatility Index (RVI).

ENJ/USDT ADX, RVI (Source: TradingView)

From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the price momentum of Enjin Coin (ENJ).

INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCEAverage Directional Index (ADX)Strength of the trend momentum58.6050Strong TrendRelative Volatility Index (RVI)Volatility over a specific period54.12<50 = Low
>50 = High

HIgh volatility Comparison of ENJ with BTC, ETH Let us now compare the price movements of Enjin Coin (ENJ) with those of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

BTC Vs ETH Vs ENJ Price Comparison (Source: TradingView)

From the above chart, we can interpret that the price action of ENJ is similar to that of BTC and ETH. That is, when the price of BTC and ETH increases or decreases, the price of ENJ also increases or decreases respectively.

Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030 With the help of the aforementioned technical analysis indicators and trend patterns, let us predict the price of Enjin Coin (ENJ) between 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, and 2030.

Year Bullish Price Bearish PriceEnjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2026$3$0.03Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2027$5$0.02Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2028$6$0.01Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2029$9$0.009Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2030$10$0.008 Conclusion If Enjin Coin (ENJ) establishes itself as a good investment in 2025, this year would be favorable to the cryptocurrency. In conclusion, the bullish Enjin Coin (ENJ) price prediction for 2025 is $0.1866. Comparatively, if unfavorable sentiment is triggered, the bearish Enjin Coin (ENJ) price prediction for 2025 is $0.0355. 

If the market momentum and investors’ sentiment positively elevate, then Enjin Coin (ENJ) might hit $1. Furthermore, with future upgrades and advancements in the Enjin Coin ecosystem, ENJ might surpass its current all-time high (ATH) of $4.85. and mark its new ATH. 

FAQ 1. What is Enjin Coin (ENJ)? Enjin Coin (ENJ) is the native cryptocurrency of the Enjin Coin Network. It was launched as an ERC-20 token in 2017. It majorly is deployed in backing the NFTs in the gaming platform associated with Enjin.

2. Where can you purchase Enjin Coin (ENJ)? Enjin Coin (ENJ) has been listed on many crypto exchanges which include Binance, OKX, WEEX, Deepcoin, and Bybit.

3. Will Enjin Coin (ENJ) reach a new ATH soon? With the ongoing developments and upgrades within the Enjin platform, ENJ  has a high possibility of reaching its ATH soon.

4. What is the current all-time high (ATH) of Enjin Coin (ENJ)? On November  25, 2021 Enjin Coin (ENJ) reached its new all-time high (ATH) of  $4.82.

5. Is Enjin Coin (ENJ) a good investment in 2025? Enjin Coin (ENJ) seems to be one of the top-gaining cryptocurrencies this year. According to the recorded achievements of Enjin in the past few months, ENJ  is considered a good investment in 2025.

6. Can Enjin Coin (ENJ) reach $1? Enjin Coin (ENJ) is one of the active cryptos that continues to maintain its bullish state. Eventually, if this bullish trend continues then Enjin Coin (ENJ) will hit $1 soon.

7. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2026?  Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $3 by 2026.

8. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2027?  Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $5 by 2027.

9. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2028?  Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $6 by 2028.

10. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2029?  Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $9 by 2029.     

Top Crypto Predictions

Cardano (ADA) Price Prediction 

Bitcoin SV (BSV) Price Prediction 

Litecoin (LTC) Price Prediction 

Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in this chart is solely the author’s. It does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto team encourages all to do their own research before investing.

Bullish LPT price prediction for 2025 is $14.3253 to $47.7815. Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $60 soon. Bearish LPT price prediction for 2025 is $1.0828. In this Livepeer (LPT) price prediction 2025, 2026-2030,  we will analyze the price patterns of LPT by using accurate trader-friendly technical analysis indicators and predict the future movement of the cryptocurrency.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Livepeer (LPT) Current Market StatusWhat is Livepeer (LPT)? Livepeer (LPT) 24H Technicals LiIVEPEER PRICE PREDICTION 2025

Livepeer (LPT) Support and Resistance Levels Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVIComparison of Livepeer with BTC, ETH LPT PRICE PREDICTION 2026, 2027-2030CONCLUSIONFAQ Livepeer (LPT) Current Market Status Current Price $7.75 24 – Hour Price Change 9.07% Down 24 – Hour Trading Volume $233.19M Market Cap $319.96M Circulating Supply 41.22M LPT All – Time High $100.24 (On Nov 09, 2021)   All – Time Low $0.4206 (On Mar 13, 2020 )   LPT Current Market Status (Source: CoinMarketCap) What is Livepeer (LPT) TICKERLPTBLOCKCHAINEthereumCATEGORYWeb3LAUNCHED ONMay 2018UTILITIESStaking, Governance, Transcoding, Incentivization, and Delegation Livepeer (LPT) is a decentralized video infrastructure protocol built on the Ethereum blockchain, designed to provide scalable and cost-efficient video streaming and transcoding services. It aims to disrupt traditional video delivery systems by enabling anyone to contribute computing power to process video, thereby reducing costs for developers and platforms. The native token, LPT, is used for staking and governance within the network. Token holders can delegate their tokens to orchestrators, who perform video transcoding and earn rewards in return. This staking mechanism helps secure the network and incentivizes participation. Livepeer has recently expanded into AI workloads, offering decentralized computing power for tasks like text-to-image generation and video inference. This strategic move diversifies its utility beyond video and positions Livepeer as a competitive infrastructure layer for Web3 media applications. With its open-source model and emphasis on decentralization, Livepeer offers a censorship-resistant, efficient, and community-driven alternative to traditional video streaming services.

Livepeer 24H Technicals
(Source: TradingView)

Livepeer (LPT) ranks 152nd on CoinMarketCap in terms of its market capitalization. The overview of the Livepeer price prediction for 2025 is explained below with a daily time frame.

LPT/USDT Horizontal Channel  Pattern (Source: TradingView)

In the above chart, Livepeer (LPT) laid out a Horizontal channel pattern. The Horizontal channel pattern is also known as the sideways trend. In general, the horizontal channel is formed during the price consolidation. In this pattern, the upper trendline, the line that connects the highs, and the lower trendline, the line that connects the lows, run horizontally parallel, and the price action is contained within it. 

A horizontal channel is often regarded as one of the suitable patterns for timing the market, as the buying and selling points are in consolidation.

At the time of analysis, the price of Livepeer (LPT) was recorded at $7.75. If the pattern trend continues, then the price of LPT might reach the resistance levels of $9.63, $12.35, and $20.56. If the trend reverses, then the price of LPT may fall to the support of $0.5916 and $7.50.

Livepeer (LPT) Resistance and Support Levels The chart given below elucidates the possible resistance and support levels of Livepeer (LPT) in 2025.

LPT/USDT Resistance and Support Levels (Source: TradingView)

From the above chart, we can analyze and identify the following as resistance and support levels of Livepeer (LPT) for 2025.

Resistance Level 1$14.3253Resistance Level 2$47.7815Support Level 1$3.6117Support Level 2$1.0828 LPT Resistance & Support Levels

Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI The technical analysis indicators such as Relative Volume (RVOL), Moving Average (MA), and Relative Strength Index (RSI) of Livepeer (LPT) are shown in the chart below.

LPT/USDT RVOL, MA, RSI (Source: TradingView)

From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the current Livepeer (LPT) market in 2025.

INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCE50-Day Moving Average (50MA)Nature of the current trend by comparing the average price over 50 days50 MA = $5.940Price = $7.706
(50MA < Price)Bearish/DowntrendRelative Strength Index (RSI)Magnitude of price change;Analyzing oversold & overbought conditions52.908
<30 = Oversold
50-70 = Neutral>70 = OverboughtNeutralRelative Volume (RVOL)Asset’s trading volume in relation to its recent average volumesBelow cutoff lineWeak Volume Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVI In the below chart, we analyze the strength and volatility of Livepeer (LPT) using the following technical analysis indicators — Average Directional Index (ADX) and Relative Volatility Index (RVI).

LPT/USDT ADX, RVI (Source: TradingView)

From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the price momentum of Livepeer (LPT).

INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCEAverage Directional Index (ADX)Strength of the trend momentum54.742Strong TrendRelative Volatility Index (RVI)Volatility over a specific period24.57
<50 = Low
>50 = HighLow Volatility Comparison of LPT with BTC, ETH Let us now compare the price movements of Livepeer (LPT) with that of Bitcoin (BTC), and Ethereum (ETH).

BTC Vs ETH Vs LPT Price Comparison (Source: TradingView)

From the above chart, we can interpret that the price action of LPT is dissimilar to that of BTC and ETH. That is, when the price of BTC and ETH increases, the price of LPT decreases, if the price of BTC and ETH decreases, the price of LPT increases. .

Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030 With the help of the aforementioned technical analysis indicators and trend patterns, let us predict the price of Livepeer (LPT) between, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, and 2030.

Year Bullish Price Bearish PriceLivepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2026$75$1Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2027$89$0.9Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2028$101$0.8Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2029$115$0.7Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2030$120$0.6 Conclusion If Livepeer (LPT) establishes itself as a good investment in 2025, this year would be favorable to the cryptocurrency. In conclusion, the bullish Livepeer (LPT) price prediction for 2025 is $47.7815. Comparatively, if unfavorable sentiment is triggered, the bearish Livepeer (LPT) price prediction for 2025 is $1.0828. 

If the market momentum and investors’ sentiment positively elevates, then Livepeer (LPT) might hit $60. Furthermore, with future upgrades and advancements in the Livepeer ecosystem, LPT might surpass its current all-time high (ATH) of $100.24 and mark its new ATH. 

FAQ 1. What is Livepeer (LPT)? Livepeer (LPT) is a decentralized video infrastructure protocol built on the Ethereum blockchain, designed to provide scalable and cost-efficient video streaming and transcoding services

2. Where can you buy Livepeer (LPT)? Traders can trade Livepeer (LPT) on the following cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance, MEXC Global, Gate.io, Kraken, Huobi, Bitget, Bilaxy, LBank, OrangeX, eToro.

3. Will Livepeer (LPT) record a new ATH soon? With the ongoing developments and upgrades within the Livepeer platform, Livepeer (LPT) has a high possibility of reaching its ATH soon.

4. What is the current all-time high (ATH) of Livepeer (LPT)? Livepeer (LPT) reached its current all-time high (ATH) of $100.24 on November 9, 2021.

5. What is the lowest price of Livepeer (LPT)? According to CoinMarketCap, LPT hit its all-time low (ATL) of $0.4206 on Mar 13, 2020.

6. Will Livepeer (LPT) hit $60? If Livepeer (LPT) becomes one of the active cryptocurrencies that majorly maintain a bullish trend, it might rally to hit $60 soon.

7. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2026? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $75 by 2026.

8. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2027? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $89 by 2027.

9. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2028? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $101 by 2028.

10. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2029? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $115 by 2029.

Top Crypto Predictions

 Pepe (PEPE) Price Prediction

Chainlink (LINK) Price Prediction

Solana (SOL) Price Prediction 

Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in this article is solely the author’s. It does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto team encourages all to do their own research before investing.

Historic Stock Market Crash Patterns Are Back – Will Bitcoin React? | US Crypto News

Nick Sawinyh on 11 Mar 2026

Stablecoins are blockchain tokens pegged 1:1 to a fiat currency, usually the U.S. dollar. They give you the programmability and speed of crypto without the price swings. That simple combination has turned them into plumbing for DeFi, cross-border payments, remittances, treasury management, and on-chain settlement.

The market crossed $250 billion in total supply by mid-2025 and has continued growing. As of early 2026, total stablecoin market capitalization is above $310 billion according to DefiLlama data. Tether’s USDT sits around $183-187B (roughly 60% of the market), Circle’s USDC around $74-76B. Growth has been driven by regulatory clarity in the U.S. and EU and a wave of institutional adoption.

This article is for anyone considering issuing a stablecoin, evaluating the infrastructure to do so, or trying to map the competitive field. It covers issuance models, regulatory frameworks, technical architecture, service providers, the new “stablechains,” step-by-step launch guidance, and the risks worth planning for.

How stablecoin issuance works Issuing a stablecoin means designing, launching, and operating a token where new units are minted only when equivalent reserves or collateral are locked up. Tokens can be burned (destroyed) when someone redeems. The issuer’s job is keeping that mint-burn cycle trustworthy, transparent, and compliant.

You can either build it yourself with custom smart contracts, banking partnerships, and compliance infrastructure, or use a turnkey platform (often called “Stablecoin-as-a-Service”). Most organizations in 2026 choose the turnkey route, at least to start. But understanding both matters. Even turnkey solutions force architectural decisions that stick with you for years.

Which issuance model fits? Every stablecoin starts with a model decision. Your choice determines capital requirements, regulatory burden, revenue mechanics, and risk profile.

Fiat-backed (custodial / off-chain reserves) The dominant model, accounting for over 90% of the market. Also the one regulators prefer.

Users or institutions deposit fiat (USD cash, Treasuries, repos, money market funds, or insured bank deposits) with the issuer or a qualified custodian. The issuer mints an equivalent number of tokens on-chain. When someone redeems, the tokens get burned and the reserves are released. Reserves sit in segregated, audited accounts.

The economics: issuers earn yield on reserves, primarily from short-term Treasuries. That’s how Circle, Tether, and Paxos make money.

The trade-off is centralization. You depend on banks and custodians, you need licenses, and you’re subject to ongoing audits. But for most businesses, this is the right starting point. USDC, USDT, PayPal’s PYUSD, and newer entrants like KlarnaUSD (issued via Bridge) all use this model.

Crypto-collateralized (on-chain, over-collateralized) Users deposit volatile crypto (typically ETH) into smart contracts at 120-200% collateralization ratios. Price oracles are central to this model. They’re external data feeds (Chainlink is the most widely used) that supply real-time asset prices to on-chain contracts. If oracle data is stale, manipulated, or delayed, liquidations can misfire or fail entirely, potentially threatening the peg. Oracle risk is one of the less-discussed but more dangerous failure modes in crypto-collateralized stablecoins. If the collateral ratio drops below a threshold, automatic liquidation kicks in. Minting and burning happen entirely through smart contracts.

This model is fully transparent and doesn’t need traditional banking relationships. The downside is capital inefficiency: you lock up significantly more value than you mint. Liquidation risk during volatile markets is real. MakerDAO’s DAI is the best-known example. Ethena’s USDe is a newer hybrid.

Revenue comes from stability fees and liquidation penalties rather than reserve yield.

Algorithmic / hybrid Pure algorithmic stablecoins use smart contracts to expand and contract supply through incentive mechanisms, with little or no collateral backing. After the TerraUSD collapse in 2022, this model is largely discredited. Most regulators have banned or restricted it. The EU’s MiCA framework prohibits purely algorithmic stablecoins outright.

Hybrids like FRAX combine partial reserves with algorithmic mechanisms, but adoption remains niche. Unless you have a very specific reason, avoid this model in 2026.

Tokenized deposits / bank-integrated Tokens represent direct claims on insured bank deposits or tokenized reserves on permissioned or public chains. JPMorgan’s JPM Coin (now JPMD) is the primary example. These stablecoins integrate directly with traditional banking rails.

The advantage is deposit insurance and the trust infrastructure of established banks. The downside is ecosystem lock-in and limited multichain reach. This model works best for large financial institutions that already have a banking charter and want to extend their rails onto blockchain.

Regulatory frameworks in 2026 Regulation is simultaneously the biggest barrier and biggest enabler of stablecoin issuance. If you don’t understand the regulatory environment, the rest of this article won’t matter much.

The global picture has converged around a few core requirements: 1:1 reserves in high-quality liquid assets, licensing, redemption rights at par, regular audits, and AML/KYC compliance. Most frameworks also restrict or prohibit yield payments directly to stablecoin holders, keeping the instrument classified as a payment tool rather than a security. But the specifics vary by jurisdiction, and the debate around yield-bearing stablecoins is active (the White House held closed-door meetings on this topic as recently as February 2026).

United States: the GENIUS Act and federal/state oversight The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created the first comprehensive federal framework for stablecoin issuance. Only “permitted” issuers can operate: FDIC-insured banks and their subsidiaries, or federally/state-qualified non-bank issuers.

An important structural detail: oversight is split between federal and state regulators depending on issuer type and size. Non-bank issuers with under $10B in circulation can be regulated at the state level under existing money transmitter frameworks. Larger issuers and bank-affiliated issuers fall under federal oversight via banking regulators, with the OCC playing a role for non-bank issuers at the federal level. It’s not a single-regulator model.

Requirements: 1:1 reserves in cash, Treasuries, repos, and insured deposits. Monthly attestations and annual audits for large issuers. Redeemable at par. No interest payments to holders under the current framework. Foreign issuers face restrictions unless their home jurisdiction has equivalence arrangements.

European Union: MiCA The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation took effect across 2024-2025 and creates two categories: e-money tokens (EMTs, pegged to a single currency) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs). Issuers must be EU credit institutions or authorized electronic money institutions. Reserves must be held in high-quality liquid assets at EU banks.

Pure algorithmic stablecoins are banned. Redemption at par is mandatory, often without fees. The ECB has oversight authority for systemically important stablecoins. Full authorization is required by July 1, 2026 for all issuers operating in the EU.

Other jurisdictions The UK is building its framework through FCA and Bank of England e-money rules, with caps for systemic stablecoins. Singapore requires a MAS license and full backing. Japan restricts issuance to banks and trust companies. Hong Kong has introduced HKMA licensing for HKD-pegged stablecoins.

The pattern across all of these: convergence on reserves, redemption rights, and licensing. Differences mainly come down to issuer eligibility and acceptable reserve assets. The U.S. favors Treasuries, the EU favors bank deposits.

Technical architecture: what a modern stablecoin stack looks like Whether you build or buy, you need to understand the components.

Core smart contracts Deployed on one or more blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Algorand, others), these handle minting, burning, and transfer logic. For 2026 compliance, your contracts need role-based access control (minter, burner, pauser, blacklister, clawback roles), pause and freeze functionality for AML and sanctions enforcement, and blacklisting and clawback for court orders.

Most teams start with audited frameworks like OpenZeppelin’s ERC-20Upgradeable combined with Pausable, AccessControl, and UUPS proxy patterns for upgradeability. Some blockchains offer built-in compliance controls at the protocol level. Algorand, for instance, has native freeze and clawback functions that make it attractive for institutional issuers without requiring custom contract logic.

Advanced standards like Tempo’s TIP-20 (on their payments-first L1) add native protocol-level features: built-in mint/burn/transfer restrictions, RBAC, transfer memos for reconciliation, and native yield distribution, all without extra contract complexity.

Issuer backend system A secure, centralized system (typically API-driven) that authorizes minting and burning events. It verifies that fiat deposits arrived before instructing the smart contract to mint, and confirms burn events before releasing fiat for redemption. This is the operational core that ties on-chain activity to off-chain banking.

Custody and reserve layer Fiat and other reserve assets sit in custody accounts at regulated banks or trust companies. Qualified custodians provide regular attestations. Typical reserve composition includes cash, short-term U.S. Treasuries, repos, money market funds, and insured bank deposits. Increasingly, reserves also include tokenized Treasuries from providers like BlackRock, WisdomTree, and Superstate, which generate yield while maintaining liquidity. As a point of reference, Tether’s Q4 2025 attestation reported $141 billion in total U.S. Treasury exposure (direct holdings plus overnight reverse repos), making it one of the largest holders of U.S. sovereign debt globally.

Compliance and identity layer KYC/AML checks and transaction monitoring tools integrate with the issuance and redemption flow. Only verified users can mint or redeem. All on-chain activity gets screened for illicit finance. Blockchain analytics providers like Chainalysis and Blockaid are standard parts of the stack.

Fiat on/off-ramps The bridges between blockchain and traditional finance. Licensed money services businesses like Coinme provide the infrastructure to move funds between bank accounts, cards, and on-chain stablecoins.

Multichain deployment Most stablecoins in 2026 operate across multiple chains. You can deploy natively on each chain, use cross-chain bridges or interoperability protocols (Axelar, LayerZero, Circle’s CCTP), or issue on specialized payment-focused L1s. The choice depends on your target users and use cases.

Security Multiple independent audits are table stakes. Beyond that: timelocks on critical contract functions, multi-sig governance, invariant checks, and HSM or MPC-based key custody. Daily reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves is standard practice, along with monthly attestations.

Stablecoin-as-a-Service providers Most businesses in 2026 use a turnkey provider rather than building from scratch.

Paxos The most established player, operating since 2018. Paxos is the issuer behind PayPal’s PYUSD and has partnerships with Interactive Brokers and other large enterprises. They handle regulatory compliance, reserve custody, and minting/redeeming technology across multiple blockchains.

They’ve processed over $180B in activity and focus on enterprise partnerships. Expect enterprise-level pricing to match.

Circle Circle is first and foremost the issuer of USDC, the second-largest stablecoin. They don’t offer white-label issuance of fully custom-branded stablecoins the way Brale or Bridge do. What they do offer is programmable wallets, Circle Mint for institutional USDC access, and the Circle Payments Network (CPN) for connecting financial institutions. If you want to build payment products on top of an existing, highly regulated stablecoin rather than issuing your own, Circle’s stack is the natural choice.

Circle supports 20+ blockchains, offers API-based integration, and charges transaction-based fees. Their cross-chain transfer protocol (CCTP) is a real differentiator for multichain deployments. Circle also went public on the NYSE in 2025, adding another layer of transparency.

Brale A U.S.-regulated issuance platform that lets businesses create and manage their own fiat-backed stablecoins. Brale acts as the legal issuer under its money transmitter licenses, handling custody, reserve management, and compliance while providing APIs for minting and burning across 20+ blockchains.

Good option for organizations that want a custom-branded stablecoin without building the regulatory infrastructure themselves. Revenue-share pricing model.

Bridge (Stripe-acquired) Bridge offers an Open Issuance API to launch and manage a branded stablecoin with minimal code. They handle reserves, liquidity, compliance, and fiat on/off-ramps. Stripe’s acquisition gives Bridge access to an enormous merchant network.

Bridge has received preliminary approval to establish a national trust bank, which would let them offer regulated custody and reserve management under a federal framework.

Coinbase Custom Stablecoins Launched December 18, 2025, this is Coinbase’s “stablecoin-as-a-service” offering. It lets businesses create custom-branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by USDC and other USD-stablecoins, with Coinbase handling issuance, smart contracts, compliance, and custody. First partners include Flipcash, Solflare, and R2. Separately, Coinbase is also powering stablecoin-denominated institutional funding for Klarna via USDC.

Important nuance: at launch, Custom Stablecoins use USDC as the underlying collateral rather than direct fiat reserves. That means Coinbase is acting as an issuance layer on top of Circle’s stablecoin, not as a direct fiat-to-stablecoin issuer like Paxos or Brale. Coinbase has applied for an OCC national trust charter, which could eventually allow it to custody reserves directly.

Frax Finance Known for its hybrid stablecoin model, Frax now offers “GENIUS-compatible” white-label infrastructure. Per project announcements, Sonic Labs used Frax’s framework to launch a USSD stablecoin backed by tokenized Treasuries. Frax provides modular smart contract infrastructure with built-in composability through LayerZero.

The DeFi-native option, designed for teams comfortable with on-chain tooling.

Stably A primary partner for blockchain platforms like Algorand and Stacks. Stably provides a Stablecoin-as-a-Service suite including fiat on/off-ramps, multi-chain issuance, and compliance. They specialize in stablecoins pegged to various fiat currencies beyond the dollar.

M0 M0 is a programmable stablecoin issuance protocol that separates token logic from reserve custody. It lets businesses build “stablecoin extensions,” which are custom-branded tokens with their own compliance rules, yield mechanics, and access controls, all built on a shared liquidity and interoperability layer. M0 raised a $40M Series B and has over $779M in on-chain supply minted. Bridge (Stripe) uses M0’s protocol under the hood for stablecoin issuance, as confirmed when MetaMask launched mUSD. MoonPay’s PYUSDx framework also runs on M0 infrastructure.

Worth watching closely. M0’s approach of decoupling reserve management from token issuance could become the default pattern for application-specific stablecoins.

Other providers worth noting Agora offers regulated stablecoin issuance with a trust-based approach. Bastion takes a similar regulated trust posture. Anchorage Digital is primarily a federally chartered crypto bank providing qualified custody and regulated banking services. It’s not a full stablecoin issuance platform, but it plays a role in the custody and compliance layer that issuers need. Fireblocks provides infrastructure and custody tooling (MPC wallets, workflow automation, settlement) across 100+ chains. It processes roughly 15% of global stablecoin volume and is used by 300+ banks and payment providers, but it’s infrastructure plumbing, not a legal issuer of stablecoins. BitGo offers qualified custody infrastructure. Cobo provides full-suite payment operations, combining MPC custody, payment APIs, and Wallet-as-a-Service across 80+ chains. Tassat focuses on tokenized deposits and real-time settlement for institutional digital asset operations, including its Link platform for real-time collateral and settlement workflows.

The stablechains: purpose-built L1s for stablecoin payments This is probably the most interesting development in stablecoin infrastructure right now. Starting in 2025, a new category of “stablechains” appeared: Layer-1 blockchains built specifically for stablecoin payments and issuance. Instead of deploying on general-purpose chains like Ethereum or Solana, issuers can use infrastructure where stablecoins are first-class citizens rather than an afterthought.

Three projects lead this category: Tempo, Circle Arc, and Tether Plasma. All three are EVM-compatible, target sub-second finality, and aim to make stablecoin transactions competitive with Visa, ACH, and SWIFT. They differ in philosophy, ecosystem, and who they’re designed for.

A word of caution: this category is very early. As of March 2026, only Plasma has a live mainnet with real production volume. Tempo and Arc are on public testnet with mainnet launches expected later in 2026. Performance claims (TPS targets, finality times) are based on testnet data or design targets, not proven production metrics at scale. Partnership announcements reflect stated intentions and early pilots, not necessarily live integrations processing real money. That said, the backers (Stripe, Circle, Tether) have the resources and distribution to make these projects matter, which is why they’re worth tracking closely.

Tempo Incubated by Stripe and Paradigm with over $500M raised. Tempo is a payments-first L1 that takes a deliberately neutral approach. No native token. Gas fees can be paid in any stablecoin through an enshrined AMM that auto-swaps to validators. Issuers aren’t forced into any single stablecoin ecosystem.

Tempo’s native TIP-20 token standard includes built-in mint/burn restrictions, protocol-level compliance (TIP-403 Policies), delegatable RBAC with on-chain audit logs, transfer memos for off-chain reconciliation, and native yield distribution. Design targets include 100,000+ TPS and roughly 0.6-second deterministic finality (no re-orgs), though these are pre-mainnet projections, not production-verified metrics.

Other protocol primitives: a Fee AMM (pay gas in any stablecoin, creating structural demand), a native stablecoin DEX for on-chain liquidity and FX (on roadmap), dedicated payment lanes with guaranteed blockspace, and account abstraction with passkey support.

Per Tempo’s announcement materials, the ecosystem roster includes Stripe, Shopify, Nubank, Klarna, DoorDash, Deel, Revolut, Visa, Anthropic, and Deutsche Bank. These are announced partnerships, not necessarily confirmed live integrations. Klarna’s involvement is separately confirmed through its Coinbase stablecoin funding announcement.

Status: public testnet live, mainnet expected H1 2026.

Best for issuers who want maximum flexibility, multi-stablecoin support, and deep payments integration with minimal vendor lock-in. Contact: [email protected].

Circle Arc Circle’s own L1, announced August 2025. Arc makes USDC the native gas token, creating a fully dollar-denominated chain. It uses Malachite BFT consensus for sub-second finality (around 780ms) and targets over 50,000 TPS.

The defining feature is a built-in FX engine with on-chain RFQ and PvP settlement, which makes it attractive for cross-currency treasury operations. Arc deeply integrates Circle’s stack: CCTP, native mint/burn, Gateway, and on/off-ramps. It also offers opt-in privacy designed for compliance-ready institutional use.

Partners include BlackRock, Visa, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, HSBC, AWS, Coinbase, and OpenAI.

Status: public testnet with 100+ institutional participants, strong activity since October 2025. Mainnet expected 2026.

Best for institutions already in the USDC ecosystem, or those needing on-chain FX and capital markets infrastructure.

Tether Plasma The only stablechain with a fully live mainnet as of March 2026. Plasma is Tether’s chain, built around USDT with a zero-fee transfer model using a Paymaster contract. Sub-second finality at 1,000+ TPS. Over $373M raised.

Plasma supports 25+ stablecoins but is clearly USDT-centric. Per Tether’s communications, it has attracted significant deposits and become one of the larger USDT networks by balance. It includes a native Bitcoin bridge and optional confidential transactions. The ecosystem spans 100+ DeFi partners (including Aave) per project announcements.

Best for USDT-focused use cases, retail and emerging-market payments, and anyone who wants live production volume today.

How to choose between them The decision comes down to a few questions.

What’s your primary stablecoin? USDT points to Plasma. USDC points to Arc. Multi-stablecoin or custom-branded points to Tempo.

Who are your target users? Retail and emerging-market payments: Plasma. Enterprise and institutional capital markets: Arc. Fintechs, merchants, embedded finance: Tempo.

How much execution risk can you tolerate? Plasma is live but carries heavier regulatory scrutiny as a Tether-affiliated project. Tempo and Arc have strong backers but are pre-mainnet.

Many issuers are hedging by testing or launching on multiple chains simultaneously.

End-to-end launch stacks Several providers bundle token issuance, reserve management, compliance, and payment rails into a single integrated offering.

Polygon’s Open Money Stack bundles blockchain settlement, enterprise-grade wallets, and regulated fiat on/off-ramps (via Coinme) into one API. Transactions settle in under 2 seconds at roughly $0.002 each. Institutions can move money from a bank account into a stablecoin, settle on-chain, and convert back to fiat without juggling multiple vendors.

Cobo combines MPC custody, payment APIs, and Wallet-as-a-Service for high-volume stablecoin operations. It supports 80+ chains and plugs into existing treasury systems.

Brale’s unified platform lets an enterprise launch a stablecoin and have it instantly provisioned with on/off-ramps, pricing, APIs, and reporting, all under Brale’s regulatory umbrella.

Step-by-step: how to issue a stablecoin in 2026 The practical sequence, from concept to production.

1. Define purpose and structure. What is the stablecoin for? Payments, treasury management, loyalty programs, embedded finance? Your answer determines which issuance model, platform, and chain make sense. Fiat-backed is the right choice for most use cases. Pick your platform early since switching later is expensive.

2. Secure banking and reserves. Partner with qualified custodians or banks. Set up segregated 1:1 reserve accounts holding cash, short-term Treasuries, repos, money market funds, or insured deposits. Diversify across custodians where possible. Stress-test your liquidity for redemption spikes. Turnkey providers like Brale or Paxos handle much of this, but you still need visibility into the reserve structure.

3. Develop or integrate the technology. If building custom: write and audit your smart contracts (start with OpenZeppelin frameworks), implement compliance controls (RBAC, pause, freeze, clawback), choose your target chains, and get multiple independent security audits. If using a platform: integrate via API (Bridge, Brale) or deploy using native token standards (TIP-20 on Tempo).

4. Set up issuance and redemption flows. Mint tokens when verified fiat deposits arrive. Burn tokens on redemption and release corresponding reserves. Build continuous reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves. Publish monthly attestations.

5. Ensure compliance and transparency. Obtain the necessary licenses (or confirm your turnkey provider holds them). Implement KYC/AML for all mint and redeem operations. Set up transaction monitoring. Publish reserve reports and audit results. Under the GENIUS Act, large issuers need monthly attestations and annual audits. MiCA requires full authorization by mid-2026.

6. Launch and distribute. Deploy on your target chain(s). Get listed on exchanges and DEXs. Provide initial liquidity. Monitor the peg continuously. Integrate into real payment flows: payroll via Deel on Tempo, merchant checkout through Stripe, remittance corridors.

7. Ongoing operations. This is where most of the work lives. Regular audits, risk monitoring, smart contract upgrades, regulatory reporting, and responding to compliance events (sanctions, court orders, suspicious activity). It never stops.

Provider comparison Provider Core capability Target customers Supported chains Complexity / cost Paxos Regulated issuance, custody, proven at scale Large enterprises, fintechs Ethereum, others Medium. High cost (enterprise contracts) Circle USDC issuer, programmable wallets, CPN, high liquidity Startups to enterprises 20+ chains Low. Transaction-based fees Brale Full-stack issuance, acts as legal issuer, multi-chain Startups to enterprises 20+ chains Low. Revenue-share pricing Bridge (Stripe) Open Issuance API, fiat on/off-ramps, Stripe distribution Enterprises, fintechs Multiple chains + Tempo Low. Transaction-based fees M0 Programmable issuance protocol, shared liquidity layer Developers, fintechs, wallets Ethereum, multi-chain Low-medium. Protocol-based Coinbase Custom Stablecoins Stablecoin-as-a-service, USDC-collateralized branded tokens Enterprises, fintechs Base, Ethereum (expanding) Low. Revenue-share Frax White-label modular infrastructure, RWA backing Blockchain networks, protocols EVM-compatible via LayerZero Medium. Variable cost Polygon End-to-end “Open Money Stack” Institutions, payment companies Polygon, multi-chain via Agglayer Low. Volume-based pricing Cobo Enterprise payments, MPC custody, treasury automation High-volume institutions 80+ chains Medium. Institutional pricing Fireblocks Infrastructure/custody tooling, MPC wallets, settlement (not an issuer) Large institutions 100+ chains Medium. Institutional licensing Stablechains comparison Aspect Tempo Circle Arc Tether Plasma Backing Stripe + Paradigm ($500M+) Circle Tether/Bitfinex ($373M+) Status (March 2026) Public testnet, mainnet H1 2026 Public testnet, mainnet 2026 Mainnet live Performance 100k+ TPS target (unverified), ~0.6s finality (design) 50k+ TPS target, ~780ms finality (testnet) 1k+ TPS, sub-second finality (production) Gas model Any stablecoin (no native token) Native USDC USDT-native + Paymaster (zero-fee USDT) Stablecoin focus Issuer-agnostic, multi-stablecoin USDC-centric USDT-centric (25+ supported) Key primitives Stable DEX, payment memos, dedicated lanes, TIP-20 FX engine, opt-in privacy, CCTP integration Zero-fee USDT, Bitcoin bridge, confidential txs Target users Fintechs, merchants, embedded finance Institutions, capital markets Retail, emerging markets, DeFi Real-world examples A few cases that show how this infrastructure comes together in practice. Note: some of these are announced projects or early-stage deployments, not fully scaled production systems. Where possible, I’ve verified against public announcements and press coverage.

MetaMask USD (mUSD) on M0/Bridge. Announced August 2025 by Consensys, MetaMask’s native stablecoin is the first issued by a self-custodial wallet. It uses Bridge for issuance and reserve management with M0’s protocol for the on-chain infrastructure. Planned to launch on Ethereum and Linea, with spending via MetaMask Card at Mastercard merchants.

Klarna’s stablecoin initiatives. Klarna partnered with Coinbase in December 2025 for USDC-denominated institutional funding. Separately, Tempo’s announcement materials list Klarna as an ecosystem partner launching “KlarnaUSD” via Bridge on Tempo, but public documentation of that specific deployment is limited beyond Tempo’s own communications. Worth monitoring but not yet a confirmed live product.

Sonic Labs’ USSD via Frax. Per Frax and Sonic project communications, Sonic used Frax’s white-label infrastructure and backed USSD with tokenized Treasuries. Independent documentation is thin, but it illustrates the modular approach: a blockchain network launching a native stablecoin by composing existing infrastructure rather than building from scratch.

Stablecorp’s QCAD. A Canadian dollar stablecoin that uses VersaBank as federally regulated custodian for reserves through VersaBank’s VersaVault platform. Stablecorp manages issuance and compliance while leaning on established banking infrastructure for credibility.

Stable Sea with BitGo. A B2B infrastructure platform that partners with BitGo for regulated custody and trading. Newer platforms can assemble best-in-class services from existing providers rather than building everything internally.

Risks worth planning for Good infrastructure reduces risk. It doesn’t eliminate it. Here’s what actually goes wrong.

Depegging. Market shocks, collateral liquidation cascades, or loss of confidence can push a stablecoin off its peg. Even fiat-backed stablecoins aren’t immune. USDC briefly lost its peg in March 2023 when Silicon Valley Bank failed with a portion of Circle’s reserves held there.

Custody and banking failures. Your stablecoin is only as safe as your custodian. Diversify where possible and understand the insolvency protections (or lack thereof) for your reserve accounts.

Smart contract bugs. A vulnerability in your minting or burning logic can be catastrophic. Multiple independent audits are the minimum. Timelocks, multi-sig controls, and bug bounty programs add layers of defense.

Regulatory changes. The GENIUS Act and MiCA are still relatively new. Rules will evolve. Non-compliance carries real consequences: fines, loss of license, blocked market access. Build compliance into the product from day one, not as an afterthought.

Sanctions and illicit finance exposure. Stablecoins are tools, and bad actors use them. You need transaction monitoring and the ability to freeze or clawback assets when legally required.

Operational risk. Stablecoin operations run around the clock. Reconciliation errors, oracle failures (for crypto-collateralized models), and infrastructure outages compound quickly.

Algorithmic model risk. If you’re considering an algorithmic or lightly collateralized design, this carries the highest systemic risk. The TerraUSD collapse proved that incentive mechanisms alone can’t maintain a peg under stress.

Best practices for 2026 issuers Automate reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves. Manual processes break at scale.

Use bankruptcy-remote structures for reserve accounts. If your company has financial trouble, the reserves should be legally protected for token holders.

Build compliance into the product. Freeze, clawback, and blacklisting capabilities aren’t just regulatory checkboxes. They’re what institutional customers and regulators look for before working with you.

Partner with blockchain analytics providers from day one. Chainalysis, Blockaid, and similar firms provide transaction monitoring that regulators expect.

Publish clear redemption policies. Specify timelines, fees (if any), minimum amounts, and the process for large redemptions. Ambiguity erodes trust.

Start with a USD peg for maximum liquidity and market access. Non-USD pegs have their place, but infrastructure, liquidity, and regulatory clarity are all strongest for dollar stablecoins.

Plan for multichain or dedicated-chain deployment from the start. Retrofitting cross-chain support later is painful.

Consider starting on a turnkey platform or specialized L1 for speed, then evaluate custom infrastructure as you scale.

Where this is heading The infrastructure to launch a compliant stablecoin in 2026 exists. You can go from concept to live product in weeks through turnkey providers and purpose-built L1s. That speed would have been absurd even two years ago.

The decisions you face: which issuance model fits (fiat-backed for almost everyone), which platform or chain to deploy on (determined by your target users and stablecoin preference), and how much infrastructure to own versus rent.

White-label platforms like Bridge, Paxos, Brale, and Coinbase, issuance protocols like M0, or payments-optimized L1s like Tempo, offer the lowest barrier for most businesses. Custom builds still make sense for large institutions that need complete control and have the engineering team to maintain it.

One thing I’d flag: the temptation to over-engineer early is strong, especially for technical teams. The businesses actually getting stablecoins into production in 2026 are the ones that started with a turnkey provider, shipped, and iterated from there. The fundamentals, robust reserves, transparent operations, and clear redemption policies, matter more than the specific technology stack underneath.

Top AI IPOs To Watch in 2026: OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX, and More

SNT: Status v2.38: Mobile Browser, Private Notifications, New L2 Networks, and a Faster App Experience

The shares began trading at well above the expected $135 price.

SpaceX’s IPO on Thursday broke Saudi Aramco’s record by becoming the largest in history as the company raised $75 billion. Shares were expected to start trading today at $135, but they actually opened at $150 under the SPCX ticker.

More volatility ensued in the initial trading minutes, with the newly listed asset going toward $170, where it was stopped, and now sits below $160.

Nevertheless, SpaceX quickly entered the top 10 global assets by market capitalization of over $2 trillion. It sits at the 9th spot as of press time, above Broadcom’s $1.8 trillion and below TSMC’s $2.2 trillion.

The company’s public listing and official valuation into the trillions of dollars has skyrocketed Elon Musk’s paper fortune, as the Tesla CEO has also become the world’s first trillionaire.

BREAKING: Elon Musk officially becomes the world’s first trillionaire as SpaceX, $SPCX, stock begins trading. pic.twitter.com/oSmBxDYuIz

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) June 12, 2026

The spaceflight, telecommunications, and AI company, founded in 2002, sold 556 million shares yesterday at an initial price of $135 per share. Individual investors were able to request shares from five brokerages: Charles Schwab, Fidelity, SoFi, Morgan Stanley’s E*Trade, and Robinhood.

“All eligible clients who completed the affirmation process received at least a portion of their requested order,” a Charles Schwab spokesperson said to CNN.

Tags:

About the author

Jordan got into crypto in 2016 by trading and investing. He began writing about blockchain technology in 2017 and now serves as CryptoPotato's Assistant Editor-in-Chief. He has managed numerous crypto-related projects and is passionate about all things blockchain.