Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

SNT: Important update for Status users with assets on Blast

 Mint.io, a licensed iGaming platform built by a team with over 12 years of industry experience, announces the launch of its native utility token, $MNTD, on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). The launch introduces a token-powered rewards economy connecting player activity, staking, loyalty progression, and platform rewards within the MINT ecosystem.

The team behind MINT brings an established track record across the gaming industry, with over $20 billion in historical wagering volume, more than 10 billion plays, and over 5 million players served across its previous operations.

The launch marks the next phase of Mint’s “token-last” approach. Rather than introducing a token before establishing its product and player base, Mint first developed its gaming platform, progression systems, and seasonal leaderboards. With $MNTD entering circulation, these existing systems evolve into a token-powered loyalty and rewards economy.

Operated by Sage Shark Ltd under Anjouan gaming licence ALSI-202507035-FI2, Mint brings together gaming and sports betting experiences under a single account.

“We built the experience before introducing the token. Players have already spent months earning XP, climbing ranks, competing on leaderboards, and collecting rewards. With $MNTD, we’re taking that ecosystem further with a new layer of progression that rewards both participation and loyalty. We want players to benefit from their activity across MINT,” said a spokesperson for Mint.io.

Rewarding Players Before the Token Launch
Ahead of its launch, Mint introduced several campaigns rewarding early players with $MNTD allocations through activity directly on the platform.

The Season 1 Leaderboard Airdrop allocated $125,000 worth of $MNTD among eligible participants based on XP earned through qualifying gameplay. A 200% XP boost during the final pre-launch period gave players an opportunity to improve their standings ahead of the snapshot.

Alongside the leaderboard, the Daily $MNTD Drip rewarded eligible participants with 1,200 $MNTD for completing qualifying daily activity, with additional 1,500 $MNTD bonuses for five-day participation streaks. The campaign featured a maximum allocation of 750,000 $MNTD.

These campaigns marked the final chapter of Mint’s original 21-rank XP progression system. Players who participated ahead of launch are rewarded with $MNTD allocations based on their XP leaderboard standings and additional rewards accumulated through pre-TGE campaigns, as recorded at the final snapshot.

With $MNTD now live, the previous XP-based loyalty system gives way to MINT Status, a new seven-level progression system powered by $MNTD staking, offering enhanced reward rates, ongoing token earnings, and additional benefits as players advance.

Introducing MINT Status: Stake, Progress and Earn
The central utility of $MNTD is MINT Status, a token-powered loyalty system introducing seven progression levels: Noob, Ape, Wolf, Bull, Shadow, Alpha, and Minted.

Players progress through these levels based on the value of $MNTD committed through flexible staking, with thresholds ranging from $250 for Noob to $25,000 for Minted.

Each Status Level unlocks increasingly competitive reward rates and platform benefits, including enhanced rakeback, lossback, daily rewards, airdrops, and ongoing staking rewards.

Rakeback increases from 10% at Noob to 22% at Minted, while weekly lossback reaches up to 9%. Daily rewards and additional $MNTD airdrop opportunities unlock progressively as players advance through the Status Levels.

Beyond platform reward rates, higher Status Levels also increase staking reward weight, with multipliers ranging from 1.1× at Noob to 1.7× at Minted. This gives higher-level participants greater relative weight in the distribution of $MNTD staking rewards, which accrue over time and can be compounded.

Players can also choose optional staking lockups of 7, 30, or 90 days, boosting applicable platform reward rates by 10%, 20%, or 30%, respectively. At the highest Status Level, combined reward rates can reach up to approximately 45% with the maximum lock boost, subject to applicable reward conditions.

Unlike traditional loyalty programmes relying exclusively on gameplay, MINT Status connects token participation directly with platform benefits, creating an ongoing cycle of staking, progression, and rewards.

“The real utility of $MNTD starts with MINT Status. Players can use their tokens to unlock better reward rates, earn ongoing token rewards, and progress through a loyalty system that grows with their participation. We’re not introducing a token that sits separately from the platform. We’re integrating it into the rewards experience players already use every day,” added a spokesperson for Mint.io.

A Fixed-Supply Token Designed Around Platform Activity
$MNTD launches with a fixed maximum supply of 1 billion tokens, with allocations dedicated to community rewards, ecosystem growth, liquidity, airdrops, staking incentives, and long-term development.

Approximately 15.7% of the total token supply is allocated to staking incentives, with 9% specifically reserved for the MINT Status staking rewards pool. This represents 90 million $MNTD over four years, with 22.5 million tokens allocated annually to support ongoing staking rewards.

The remaining approximately 6.7% is reserved for additional staking initiatives and future ecosystem opportunities, providing flexibility to expand $MNTD utility beyond its initial applications.

The token has not been offered through a public token sale, with its initial community distribution focused on rewarding participation across Mint’s pre-launch campaigns.

The token economy combines activity-driven community rewards with defined allocations and vesting schedules. It also incorporates ecosystem-funded buybacks and burns, supported by activity across participating platforms and partners, with Mint.io serving as the first integrated platform.

These mechanisms are designed to connect long-term token utility with ecosystem usage and activity, rather than relying exclusively on predetermined reward distribution schedules.

$MNTD launches on Robinhood Chain, establishing the on-chain foundation for token transfers, staking infrastructure, and future Web3 integrations.

Expanding the $MNTD Economy
The launch marks the beginning of a broader expansion of Mint’s token-powered ecosystem, with additional seasonal campaigns, community incentives, and token utilities planned beyond TGE.

Through MINT Status, players can stake tokens, unlock enhanced platform benefits, and accumulate additional $MNTD through eligible activity. The roadmap also includes Web3-native staking opportunities through getminted.io, complementing the MINT Status system available on Mint.io.

By combining established gaming infrastructure with token-powered loyalty, progression, and on-chain participation, MINT aims to build an interconnected player rewards economy designed to grow alongside platform activity.

Mint.io’s gaming platform and free-to-play Telegram Mini App are already live, with $MNTD trading on decentralized exchanges from October 20, 2026.

ENDS

About Mint
Mint.io is a Web3-enabled iGaming platform combining gaming, sports betting, loyalty progression, and token-powered rewards. Built by a team with over 12 years of industry experience and a collective track record spanning more than $20 billion in historical wagering volume, 10 billion plays, and 5 million players, MINT brings established gaming expertise into a token-powered ecosystem.

Through its native utility token, $MNTD, players can unlock MINT Status Levels, access enhanced loyalty benefits, earn ongoing token rewards, and participate in seasonal campaigns and community incentives.

Mint.io also operates a free-to-play Telegram Mini App, extending its gaming and community experience beyond the main platform.

Mint.io is operated by Sage Shark Ltd under Anjouan gaming licence No. ALSI-202507035-FI2. Intended for adults aged 18 and over in jurisdictions where online gaming is permitted. Please play responsibly.

For more information, visit mint.io and getminted.io.

A May 2026 test identified Strategy, Metaplanet, and Yellow Cake as potential candidates for removal from MSCI's index.

Michael Saylor-led Strategy could face removal from major global stock indexes after MSCI approved new rules for companies it considers non-operating. The index provider announced this week that it would exclude these companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes.

The new rules will take effect at the close of November 30, 2026, as part of MSCI’s November index review.

Non-Operating Firms Targeted The move comes after MSCI previously considered excluding companies whose digital asset holdings made up at least 50% of their total assets. Strategy had opposed that proposal as well.

In its response to MSCI’s consultation, the BTC treasury company argued that the new rules target digital asset treasury firms under a different name. It also questioned MSCI’s definition of a non-operating company, while adding that the terminology has no basis in US GAAP, IFRS, or any recognized legal framework. Strategy maintained that its Bitcoin business qualifies as an operating segment under US accounting rules, consistent with discussions with SEC staff.

The company also asserted that MSCI’s proposal introduces policy judgments into index construction and could undermine the neutrality investors expect from the provider. Strategy asked MSCI to withdraw the proposal.

The new rules target companies that resemble investment funds and other passive investment vehicles, which are already excluded from its indexes. The process starts with a check for substantial operating assets. Companies that fail face a second test based on five financial ratios. These cover expenses, cash flow, changes in asset values, as well as reliance on outside financing. A company flagged on at least four ratios becomes ineligible.

Exclusion Impact “Overstated”? MSCI will also use safeguards to limit frequent index changes. Existing members must fail the test in two consecutive annual filing periods to face removal. A May 2026 test flagged Strategy, Metaplanet, and Yellow Cake for possible removal.

You may also like: Bitcoin Could Jump 50% If Developers Agree on Quantum Plan: Capriole CEO Coinbase Lays Out Post-Quantum Needs for Bitcoin Custody UK Judge Says Chinese Law Applies to Claims Over £4B Bitcoin Fraud JPMorgan analysts have estimated that index exclusion could trigger outflows of about $2.8 billion from MSTR stock. But market commentator Adrian Morris believes that this claim is “overstated.” While he doesn’t predict zero price impact, Morris added,

“Any forced selling will be into trading flow, around rebalances, etc. This will not be a market dump event. MSTR has the liquidity and turnover to absorb this selling with little issue IMO. This is a near term ripple to deal with, not an existential threat to MSTR.”

Tags:

The agency says existing exchange and trader duties would stay intact, while a separate rule excludes qualifying casino-style wagers.

Free newsletters

Good reporting. Delivered.Choose your coverage: crypto and DeFi, the future of finance, or both.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Download Status

Related articles

Can 12 Random Words Still Be Guessable? A seed phrase can look perfectly random while the randomness behind it isn't. $100M+ in Bitcoin was stolen, The COLDCARD incident showed why

Still using an older version of Status? Status v2.38 is Live! Bringing the Mobile Web Browser, real-time private mobile notifications, 8 new Ethereum L2 networks, a revamped chat input, a full

Status v2.38 is Live! Bringing the Mobile Web Browser, real-time private mobile notifications, 8 new Ethereum L2 networks, a revamped chat input, a full Activity Center, shorter login times,

TLDR Warner Bros. Discovery is being removed from the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 indexes following its merger completion. The company’s $81 billion acquisition of Paramount Skydance is set to finalize on October 6. Moderna will join the Nasdaq 100 index effective October 9. Twilio will enter the S&P 500 index effective October 6. Both replacement stocks saw gains in early Friday trading following the announcement. Warner Bros. Discovery is set to exit two of America’s most prominent stock market indexes as the entertainment giant completes its massive merger with Paramount Skydance. The index changes were announced by Nasdaq and S&P Dow Jones Indices in a late Thursday statement.

Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc., WBD

The acquisition carries an $81 billion price tag and is scheduled to finalize on October 6, according to statements from both corporations. Warner Bros. Discovery’s portfolio includes the HBO Max streaming platform and numerous prominent television networks.

Following the merger’s completion, Warner Bros. Discovery will cease operating as an independent publicly traded entity. This necessitates its removal from all major market indexes where it currently holds membership. Index administrators typically fill vacancies with new companies to maintain consistent index composition.

The Companies Taking Warner Bros. Discovery’s Spots Moderna will assume Warner Bros. Discovery’s position in the Nasdaq 100 index. This transition becomes official prior to market opening on October 9. Moderna is a biotechnology firm specializing in vaccines and pharmaceutical therapies.

Twilio will inherit Warner Bros. Discovery’s seat in the S&P 500 index. This adjustment goes into effect before the opening bell on October 6. Twilio operates as a cloud-based communications technology provider.

Both companies’ shares experienced upward movement during early Friday trading. Moderna’s stock price increased by 1.6%. Twilio’s shares advanced 1.5%. Index futures also showed positive momentum ahead of the September employment data release.

Index inclusion typically generates positive price action for stocks. This phenomenon occurs because passive investment funds tracking these indexes must purchase shares to maintain accurate replication. These funds are obligated to hold positions in every constituent security of their benchmark index.

Moderna’s Impressive Performance Moderna has delivered exceptional returns in the period preceding its index inclusion. According to Barron’s, the stock had surged 541% year-to-date through Thursday’s market close. Reuters noted that shares have multiplied more than six times in 2026, elevating Moderna’s market capitalization to approximately $75 billion.

The stock experienced a remarkable single-session rally in August, more than doubling in value. This explosive movement followed the release of Phase 3 clinical trial data by Moderna and Merck. The trial evaluated intismeran autogene, an experimental cancer vaccine candidate. Researchers characterized the findings as encouraging.

Warner Bros. Discovery faces removal from additional major index providers beyond S&P and Nasdaq. MSCI is among the organizations dropping the company from its benchmarks. All removals are directly connected to the merger transaction’s completion.

The Paramount Skydance acquisition has required nearly twelve months to reach fruition. Reuters characterized the timeline as involving extended delays spanning multiple months. The transaction is now approaching its final phase before next week’s scheduled closing.

Warner Bros. Discovery shares will cease trading in their present form upon deal completion. The Nasdaq 100 reconstitution becomes effective October 9. The S&P 500 adjustment takes effect October 6, coinciding with the anticipated merger closing date.

Bybit Launches Limited-Time "VIP Privilege Program," Users Can Upgrade to Top-Tier VIP with Other Exchanges' VIP Status

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

A Critical Week Begins for Altcoins: Experienced Analyst Assesses the Status of Ethereum (ETH), XRP, and SUI: What to Expect?

U.S. Democrats to hold a meeting on Tuesday to discuss AI legislative actions.

According to Bloomberg, U.S. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said House Democrats plan to hold a caucus meeting Tuesday morning to discuss legislative actions related to artificial intelligence, noting that addressing the challenges posed by AI is a "top priority" and requires urgent action. Jeffries added that Democrats are internally debating how to establish regulatory and safety "guardrails" in response to the industry’s rapid growth and potential risks.

2 hours ago

Data: If the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates by another 75 basis points, annual interest costs on short-term Treasuries alone will rise by approximately $500 billion.

The US currently has approximately $7 trillion in short-term Treasury securities outstanding, with around $6.1 trillion set to mature within one year. Including other maturing Treasury instruments, roughly $7.5 trillion in tradable US government debt will need refinancing in 2026, while another $4 trillion and $3.5 trillion will mature in 2027 and 2028 respectively. If the Federal Reserve raises interest rates by an additional 75 basis points, annual interest expenses on short-term Treasuries alone could rise by about $50 billion, equivalent to 0.15% of GDP. Additionally, most of these Treasuries will be refinanced at market rates higher than their original issuance rates, meaning the US is facing a round of far more expensive large-scale refinancing.

2 hours ago

Arthur Hayes: The AI-first endgame will inevitably lead to liquidity release, with risk assets set to benefit.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has stated that any gap in AI computing power demand will ultimately be covered by money printing. The current so-called "AI safety first" framework essentially boils down to two paths: The first is that the U.S. government steps in, taking over the roles of Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX as the primary buyer of computing power, and sustaining data center and chip orders. The second is that these buyers vanish, triggering a collapse in AI-linked debts—with insurance companies bearing the initial brunt, and if they cannot absorb the losses, the Federal Reserve will step in to bail them out via money printing. Hayes concludes that either path results in money printing: whether through fiscal or monetary channels, liquidity will be unleashed, and risk assets will ultimately benefit.

2 hours ago

Viewpoint: Bitcoin has not hit a new high in nearly a year, and the historical pattern of quickly rallying to new highs after halving is now failing.

CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost noted that Bitcoin has not hit a new all-time high in nearly a year. As of now, it has been roughly 342 days since the last all-time high, approaching a full year. In previous cycles, Bitcoin would reach a new all-time high shortly after a halving, but this cycle’s pace has slowed. The next halving is expected around April 2028. Additionally, the interval between the previous cycle’s peak and the next all-time high has been shrinking: 1,180 days between 2014–2017, 1,094 days between 2017–2020, and 849 days between 2021–2024. Based on this trend, Darkfost inferred that if the shortening trend continues, even though Bitcoin has taken a year to break its prior all-time high this cycle, the new high may arrive faster than in previous cycles—there is no need to wait until 2028 under the old template of hitting a new high immediately after a halving. The cycle template is becoming less relevant, but the interval between new highs is shrinking and a new high is inevitable.

2 hours ago

Arthur Hayes: The AI-first endgame will inevitably lead to liquidity release, with risk assets set to benefit.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has stated that if a gap in AI computing power demand emerges, the final resort will be money printing. The so-called "AI safety first" framework currently boils down to only two possible paths: The first is the U.S. government stepping in to take over the roles of Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX, continuing as a major purchaser of computing power to sustain data center and chip orders. The second is these buyers vanishing, triggering a blowup in AI-linked debt—with insurance companies absorbing the losses first, and if they cannot withstand the burden, the Federal Reserve will step in to bail them out via money printing. Hayes concludes that either path results in the same outcome: money printing is unavoidable, whether through fiscal or monetary channels, liquidity will be released, and risk assets will ultimately benefit.

2 hours ago

Lobster’s market cap briefly surged past $180 million to a new all-time high, up 12.7% in 24 hours.

According to GMGN market data, the Chinese Meme coin Lobster saw its market cap briefly surge past $180 million today, hitting an all-time high. It has a 24-hour price increase of 12.7%, with a current market cap of $146 million and 24-hour trading volume of $16.3 million. BlockBeats reminds users that related tokens are highly volatile, so investors should exercise caution.

2 hours ago

Table of contents

Canada’s federal banking regulator has formally clarified that tokenized and other digitally represented deposits are not legally distinct from traditional deposits, removing a key source of uncertainty for financial institutions exploring blockchain-based deposit products.

A technology-neutral legal position The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published the statement on September 10, laying out what it called a “technology-neutral stance” toward the permitted activities of federally regulated financial institutions. The regulator said the underlying technology of a financial product or service does not determine its legal nature.

“Tokenized deposits are, for example, not legally distinct from traditional deposits,” OSFI wrote. “We focus on what the product or service is, not how it is built or delivered.”

The clarification applies to institutions governed by federal statutes including the Bank Act, the Trust and Loan Companies Act, and the Insurance Companies Act. OSFI said it supports innovation and competition within a strong and resilient Canadian financial system, and that advances in digital financial technology are enabling institutions and their third parties to develop new products such as tokenized deposits.

Compliance expectations for banks The clarification does not relax existing obligations. OSFI said financial institutions remain responsible for ensuring that innovative activities — including those performed by third parties on an institution’s behalf — comply with applicable laws and regulations.

The regulator pointed to two existing guidance documents: B-13 on technology and cyber risk management, and B-10 on third-party risk management. It also expects institutions to engage with their lead supervisors in advance of launching any novel product or service, and encouraged them to seek legal advice where appropriate. The statement therefore provides legal clarity without loosening the supervisory expectations already in force.

What it means for tokenization in Canada The statement gives Canadian banks clearer legal footing to pursue tokenized deposit initiatives at a time when lenders in other markets are already running pilots. U.S. Bank recently completed a live stablecoin pilot on Stellar, while Singapore has moved to license stablecoin issuers under a framework backed by full reserves.

By confirming that tokenized deposits are subject to the same legal framework as conventional deposits, OSFI signals it will regulate the substance of these products rather than the technology used to deliver them — a position that could accelerate adoption among institutions that had been waiting for regulatory clarity.

AUTHOR

With over five years of experience in crypto, blockchain, and tech content, Ishtiyaq makes complex topics easy to understand. He simplifies blockchain and digital currency concepts for a wide audience, ensuring that beginners and experts alike can grasp key ideas. His clear and engaging writing helps readers stay informed about the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the crypto space. Whether explaining blockchain technology, digital assets, or DeFi, Ishtiyaq breaks down complicated ideas into simple, digestible content. His goal is to help people navigate the fast-changing world of cryptocurrency with confidence, clarity, and a deeper understanding.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

BitGo has secured VASP registration acceptance in South Korea just as the country is raising the bar for crypto firms. The approval gives BitGo Korea a local path to serve institutions, while its direct entry could also show how global crypto companies are preparing for stricter rules in one of Asia’s biggest digital asset markets.

South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit has accepted BitGo Korea’s VASP registration, allowing the company to provide crypto custody and transfer services to institutional and enterprise clients.

What makes the move different is how BitGo entered the market. While competitors like Binance and OKX entered South Korea by purchasing stakes in existing local exchanges (Gopax and Coinone).

Instead of buying an existing Korean VASP, the company created BitGo Korea and built its local compliance and security systems from the start.

🇰🇷 한국, 안녕하세요!

BitGo Korea has received acceptance of its VASP registration from the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit.

We are excited to be the first newly established Korean entity of a global digital asset company to achieve this milestone, establishing a local,… pic.twitter.com/y5gQuIWzM9

— BitGo (@BitGo) August 20, 2026 This makes it the first newly established local subsidiary of a global digital asset firm to secure a VASP license directly from regulatory authorities rather than acquiring an existing licensed business

BitGo Korea is also backed by two major Korean companies, Hana Financial Group and SK Telecom. Their involvement gives BitGo more than a local office. It connects the company’s global crypto infrastructure with Korean financial and technology networks.

BitGo plans to focus on banks, asset managers, companies, public-sector groups and other institutional clients rather than mainly targeting retail traders.

Approval Comes as Korea Tightens Crypto RulesThe timing of the approval is also important. From August 20, South Korea is introducing stronger VASP registration and anti-money laundering rules. The new rules will bring closer checks on major shareholders, financial health, management, staff and internal controls.

With the new registration, BitGo Korea can now officially offer crypto custody and transfer services to corporate clients, asset managers and financial institutions.

BitGo CEO Mike Belshe welcomed the approval from KoFIU, saying the company is

“Excited and proud to announce BitGo Korea!  2 yrs in the making – bringing regulated, cold storage to market.”

BitGo already operates regulated businesses in major markets, including the U.S., Singapore, Germany and Dubai. The Korean approval now adds another key market to its global network.

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

XRP Ledger ile Coreum’u birbirine bağlayan köprü, yaklaşık 200 bin XRP’nin çalındığı bir saldırıyla karşı karşıya kaldı. Saldırgan, gerçek bir XRP yatırımı yapmadan köprünün doğrulama sistemini kandırarak sahte bir yatırımı gerçekmiş gibi gösterdi. Daha sonra karşılığında gerçek XRP çekildi.

Olayın ardından köprü durdurulurken, geliştirici ekip açığın XRP Ledger’dan değil, Coreum tarafındaki yazılımdan kaynaklandığını açıkladı. Zincir üstü incelemelere göre saldırganın elde ettiği 198.715,88 XRP, ETH’ye çevrildi, THORChain üzerinden yönlendirildi ve sonrasında Tornado Cash’e gönderildi.

XRP Köprüsüne Saldırı Nasıl Gerçekleşti? Saldırgan, XRP Ledger’ın kendisini doğrudan ele geçirmek yerine köprünün para yatırma doğrulamasındaki açığı kullandı.

Teknik incelemeye göre saldırgan, köprünün ihraç ettiği wrapped token’ları kendi kontrolündeki iki cüzdan arasında transfer etti. İşleme ayrıca normal bir köprü yatırımı gibi görünmesini sağlayan bir deposit memo eklendi.

Sorun tam burada ortaya çıktı. Köprü yazılımı, kendi ihraç ettiği tokenın işlem geçmişinde görünmesini gerçek bir XRP yatırımı olarak değerlendirdi. Oysa saldırgan bu sırada köprüye herhangi bir gerçek XRP göndermemişti.

Relayer’lar sahte yatırımı onayladı. Bunun ardından sistem, XRP ile desteklenmeyen yeni varlıkların Coreum tarafında üretilmesine izin verdi.

Saldırgan da oluşturulan bu karşılıksız varlıkları kullanarak köprüden gerçek XRP çekti.

Daha sonraki zincir üstü incelemede, aynı sahte yatırımı 21 ayrı Coreum relayer’ının doğruladığı ortaya çıktı. Saldırgan yöntemi daha büyük miktarlarla tekrarladı ve toplamda 198.715,88 XRP elde etti.

Çalınan XRP daha sonra ETH’ye çevrildi, THORChain üzerinden yönlendirildi ve sonunda Tornado Cash’e gönderildi.

Sorun XRP Ledger’da mı? Hayır.

Saldırıya ilişkin ilk uyarı, playa adlı traderın köprüye ait XRPL hesabındaki bakiyenin birkaç dakika içinde 93.700 XRP’den 77.200 XRP’ye gerilediğini fark etmesiyle geldi. Ancak bu ilk gözlem, daha sonra 97 dakika sürdüğü belirlenen saldırının yalnızca 11 dakikalık bölümünü kapsıyordu. İlk etapta DefaultRipple ayarından şüphelenilse de sonraki incelemeler asıl sorunun Coreum köprüsündeki yazılım açığı olduğunu ortaya koydu.

Ancak işlem verileri incelendikten sonra bu açıklamanın saldırının gerçek mekanizmasını açıklamadığı ortaya çıktı. Native XRP’nin kendisi bu şekilde bir trust line üzerinden aktarılmıyor. Söz konusu ayar, köprünün ihraç ettiği tokenlarla ilgili.

Köprü operatörü tx, yazılımın gerçekte XRP göndermeyen işlemleri yanlış biçimde kaydettiğini doğruladı.

Bu nedenle saldırının temelinde XRP Ledger’ın kendisinden ziyade köprünün Coreum tarafındaki doğrulama mantığının bulunduğu belirtiliyor.

hey @CoreumOfficial your xrpl bridge issuer rxXXXeMX8Gy5YvibvGLnQJ1XKKD7UswM1 is leaking. defaultripple is on and two wallets are draining native xrp through it via partial-payment loops. balance went 93.7k → 77.2k in minutes, ~1.65k xrp per cycle, every 30s.

this isn't…

— playa (@playaxrpl) August 9, 2026

XRP Köprüsü Şimdi Ne Durumda? Saldırının ardından köprü durduruldu.

tx ekibi açığın tespit edildiğini ve sistem üzerinde çalışıldığını açıkladı. Ayrıca olayla ilgili FBI’ın Internet Crime Complaint Center’ına (IC3) rapor sunuldu.

Şu ana kadar diğer köprülenmiş varlıkların etkilenmediği belirtildi. Kullanıcıların zararlarının nasıl karşılanacağına ilişkin plan ise henüz netleşmiş değil.

XRP Fiyatı Saldırıdan Etkilendi mi? Saldırı, XRP’nin zaten zayıf seyrettiği bir dönemde gerçekleşti.

XRP yaklaşık 1,02 dolar seviyesinde işlem görürken son yedi günde yaklaşık %4,4 değer kaybetmiş durumda. Aynı süreçte Bitcoin yaklaşık 64 bin dolara gerilerken, kripto piyasasının toplam değerinden yaklaşık 40 milyar dolar silindi.

Bu nedenle XRP’deki düşüşün tamamını köprü saldırısına bağlamak mümkün değil. Saldırı, tokenın zaten baskı altında olduğu bir döneme denk geldi.

XRP Yatırımcıları İçin Asıl Risk Ne? Bu saldırıda dikkat çeken nokta, XRP Ledger’ın doğrudan ele geçirilmemiş olması.

Saldırgan, köprü yazılımındaki doğrulama açığını kullanarak gerçekte var olmayan bir yatırımı gerçekmiş gibi gösterdi. Ardından köprünün kendi doğrulama mekanizması üzerinden gerçek Ripple XRP çekti.

Bu olay, zincirler arası köprülerde yalnızca blockchain’in güvenliğinin değil, varlıkların yatırıldığını doğrulayan yazılım ve relayer sistemlerinin de kritik olduğunu gösteriyor.

Köprü yeniden açılmadan önce açığın tamamen giderilip giderilmediği ve kullanıcı zararlarının nasıl karşılanacağı XRP yatırımcılarının yakından izleyeceği başlıklar arasında olacak.

Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Menu

Edited by

StatusCore contributors identified a critical vulnerability affecting the V5 Alpha proving system on 27 July 2026 through internal AI-assisted auditing.

V5 remains Alpha software. Critical findings can arise during this phase, and the audit process exists to identify them before broader deployment. This finding places V5 funds, applications, and contract state at risk.

Treat funds and applications on V5 as exposed to a protocol-level failure until contributors complete incident response work and operators carry out the required network actions.

‍

What we are disclosingAn attacker may be able to exploit a flaw in the current V5 proving system by constructing a proof that passes verification for a transaction the network should reject. If accepted, that transaction could produce a state transition outside the rules V5 intends to enforce.

Contributors cannot determine whether anyone exploited the flaw before this finding. The affected system lacks the information needed to distinguish ordinary accepted transactions from transactions accepted through the flawed proving path. Historical chain activity cannot establish whether exploitation occurred or quantify its impact.

‍

Application safeguardsWe expect application teams to prepare safeguards in the coming weeks.

Those safeguards may include changes to application controls, deployment procedures, user flows, and migration plans. We expect each team to assess its contracts and determine which protections fit its architecture and users.

We expect teams planning a V5 deployment to pause that work until contributors publish further guidance. We expect teams with live contracts to review their ability to limit user exposure, isolate affected functionality, and move users to fresh deployments if needed.

We expect applications that maintain administrative or emergency controls to assess whether those controls can reduce user risk during the incident timeframe.

‍

Next stepsCore contributors are working with operators, application teams, and bridge operators as applications add security guards around affected flows.

The findings from this incident will inform the V6 release, including circuit updates that prevent the network from accepting proofs tied to an affected proving system.

V5 launched as Alpha software, with V6 planned for later in 2026. Contributors will publish a security roadmap covering the remaining work and release path.

‍

Known vulnerability statusReviewers have not identified other high-severity or critical V5 Alpha vulnerabilities at this time.

Internal and external human audits have completed, and contributors continue AI-assisted auditing. Alpha is the period for identifying faults before production deployment.

‍

Read more

Community

Community

4 Aug

•

xx min read

Dark Forest Aztec Game Goes LiveDark Forest is a real-time strategy game played across a procedurally generated universe where most of the map is hidden. You cannot see rival players, their planets, or their fleets. You only know what you have explored. Everyone shares one universe, and nobody has the full picture.

In most onchain games, every position and every move is public, because the chain is public. Dark Forest used zero-knowledge proofs to break that assumption: players prove their moves are valid without revealing where those moves came from. The result is a game of hidden information running on a public network.

Dark Forest Aztec ports the original Dark Forest 0.6 to Aztec. It keeps the gameplay from the original and rebuilds the privacy layer on Aztec's programmable privacy.

A note before diving in: this is early, experimental software on Aztec Alpha V5. Treat it as an alpha and play accordingly.

The universe you cannot seeYou start on a single home planet with almost the entire map dark. To find anything you mine the universe, running a client that explores coordinates and reveals what sits there: unclaimed planets, resources, and eventually the edges of other players' territory.

You are never handed a view of the board. You earn it one region at a time, and everyone else works under the same fog.

What is hidden on AztecYour home coordinates and your fleet movements are private state, expressed as first-class private notes on Aztec. Your location and where you send energy stay hidden, enforced in the contracts by zero-knowledge cryptography.

What sits onchain is a set of cryptographic commitments. Instead of storing every planet's full details in the open, the contracts store Poseidon2 hashes of entity state. When you make a move, your client supplies the full state, the contract checks it against the stored hash, applies the change under zero-knowledge constraints, and writes a new hash back. Full game state lives offchain and gets rebuilt from public logs by an indexer, which is what renders your map without exposing every player's position.

So you can prove you made a legal move from a planet you own without revealing where that planet is. Aztec applies the same principle to private payments and private contracts.

How you playFour actions carry the game.

Explore. Your explorer sits in the bottom left. Set it running and it uncovers the map around you, surfacing planets, resources, and other players.

Send energy. Most planets produce energy. Click and drag from a planet you own toward a target to capture or weaken it.

Route silver. Asteroid fields produce silver. Move it to your planets and spend it on upgrades, or send it to a Spacetime Rip to convert it into score.

Hunt artifacts. Some planets hold artifacts. Your Gear ship discovers them. Once harvested, you deposit them on planets to boost stats.

Four stats drive most decisions.

Energy is the core resource. Planets generate it over time up to a capacity, and you spend it on everything: claiming planets, reinforcing your own, attacking rivals. Two details matter. Moves are taxed, so a flat percentage of a planet's total capacity burns every time you send energy, which discourages small frequent moves. And energy decays over distance, so send it too far and almost nothing arrives. A common rule of thumb is to let a planet fill to about 75%, then send it down to about 25%.

Defense reduces the damage incoming energy does when it lands. Higher-level planets often have lower defense, but they hold much more energy, so they still take more to capture. Defense matters most on front lines.

Range sets how far a planet can send energy. It governs how fast you expand and how efficiently you move energy inside your own empire, since shorter relative distances mean less decay. Good range also lets you strike deep into an opponent's territory.

Speed sets how quickly a move arrives. Usually secondary, though a fast strike can land before a rival reacts, and some playstyles reward capturing many nearby planets quickly.

Planets can also be upgraded with silver and enhanced with artifacts. Space types carry different multipliers, from mild Nebula to punishing Dead Space, so where a planet sits changes how it plays.

How scoring worksThere is a scoreboard, and territory alone does not win it. This round scores two activities: discovering artifacts with your Gear ship, and withdrawing silver through Spacetime Rips.

Point values from the in-game help page:

Each unit of silver withdrawn: 1Common artifact: 2,000Rare: 10,000Epic: 200,000Legendary: 3,000,000Mythic: 20,000,000Silver accrues one point at a time. A single Mythic artifact is worth twenty million of them, so artifact hunting decides rounds and silver withdrawal sets your floor.

Silver has two competing uses. Spend it on upgrades and your planets get stronger, extending range and hardening defense. Withdraw it through a Spacetime Rip and it becomes scored points, but it is gone. Every unit is a choice between building the empire and banking points.

Upgrades tend to win early, since a stronger empire reaches more asteroid fields and finds more artifacts. Late in a round that calculation flips, because a planet you never use is worth less than points already scored.

Artifacts do both jobs at once. They score on discovery, and once deposited they boost a planet's stats, which makes the next expedition easier.

Why you exploreNothing happens until you find something to act on. Your explorer turns dark space into planets you can capture, asteroid fields you can mine, and artifact-bearing planets you can raid. Sitting still means no new energy, no silver, no score.

Exploring also buys information. The map you have uncovered is an advantage nobody else holds. Knowing where high-level planets sit, which asteroid fields are unclaimed, and where space types shift lets you plan further ahead than someone still working through their starting region.

You find other players as a byproduct. There is no player list. You explore outward until your revealed region touches territory someone already owns: a planet in another player's colors, sitting where you were about to expand. Their home coordinates stay private, so you learn something narrow. Someone is here, roughly this direction, holding this much. You infer the rest, and you have no way of knowing whether they found you first.

What happens when you run into someoneYou have three broad options.

Stay quiet and keep growing. Nothing forces you to engage. Keep exploring elsewhere, keep routing silver, keep upgrading. Your positions stay private, so silence costs you only time, which is what you want if they are stronger. The risk is that they are doing the same thing faster.

Fortify the border. If the contact sits somewhere you cannot lose, spend energy hardening the planets facing them. Defense is worth most where an attack will actually land. This keeps the option to fight without committing to one.

Attack. Send enough energy to overwhelm the target's defense and the planet becomes yours, along with its production and its position as a staging post. Higher-level planets are the prize and take proportionally more to crack.

Attacking costs more than energy. A move that lands tells your rival where you strike from, and that you are close enough to be worth answering. Retaliation can then come from directions you have not explored, launched from planets you cannot see.

Multiplayer in practiceEveryone plays one shared universe in real time. No turns, no lobbies. Energy regenerates whether you are watching or not, moves stay in flight while you sleep, and rivals expand while you are away from the screen.

Most strategy games let you watch a threat approach. Here you tend to see the consequences: a planet you owned this morning in someone else's colors, an incoming move you notice once it is already close.

That produces a particular kind of paranoia. You are trying to find everyone else while avoiding being found, and every expansion is a strategic bet that the space ahead is empty.

Information becomes tradeable, because it is scarce. Players compare notes, warn each other about aggressive neighbors, and agree who expands where, then break those agreements when the scoreboard makes it worth breaking.

Why it matters beyond the gameA fully onchain game where players cannot see each other's positions is hard to build, and building it well says something about the platform underneath.

Hidden state, private notes, and client-side proving are the same building blocks behind private applications across Aztec. Dark Forest is a way to watch them work.

Getting startedDark Forest Aztec is playable now as an alpha. Expect a learning curve; the original was famous for it. DFArchon maintains onboarding material and a community for new players. Round One is live. The universe is dark, and everyone else is out there somewhere. Go find them, quietly.

Play Now‍

Follow the BuildersDFArchon on X‍

Source and docs

Aztec Network

Aztec Network

22 Jul

•

xx min read

How Gas Works on AztecGas on AztecGas on Aztec is known as Fee Juice and is used to pay for transaction costs. This is the same as $ETH on Ethereum. Some apps will handle transaction costs for you under the hood, but if you are using a browser extension wallet, you will not be able to send transactions without it. Fee Juice can be obtained by bridging the $AZTEC token on Ethereum to the Aztec Network L2. This means that under the hood, all activity that happens on Aztec is underpinned by the $AZTEC token bridged into the network. Some bridges like Shield (by human.tech) handle this for you, allowing you to allocate a portion of your bridged transaction to convert into Fee Juice and land in your wallet automatically.

Public vs Private AssetsAssets and transactions on the Aztec Network can be either public or private. If you bridge publicly, your tokens will arrive as public, traceable tokens visible to all. Privately bridging, on the other hand, will give you private assets that are visible only to you. These assets can then be sent privately to another user or wallet without ever revealing who you are, what tokens were sent, how many, or who the recipient is.

Public vs Private GasLike tokens on the Aztec Network, Fee Juice (gas) can also be public or private. The reason for this is that even if what you are sending is private, the gas you spend to execute that transaction could still be visible if you are using public Fee Juice, potentially revealing transaction patterns and activity. Private Fee Juice keeps your entire transaction footprint hidden. When you send a private transaction, you can use private Fee Juice, and when you send a public transaction, you can use public Fee Juice, which means your transaction costs are always aligned with the type of transaction you're making.

Fee Juice in AppsAztec has native fee abstraction, which means apps could let you pay for transactions in any token you want, or cover your fees entirely. Apps like Nyx may choose to cover part or all of a user's transaction costs, or allow you to pay in tokens that are convenient for you. This means you will most likely never see Fee Juice in an app; instead, you'll pay in whatever makes sense for what you're doing, on your terms. Similarly, you might never even see an Aztec wallet at all, because the app itself becomes your interface that you connect to using your MetaMask wallet.

Fee Juice in Browser WalletsIf you're using a browser extension like Azguard, you'll manage Fee Juice directly in your wallet alongside your private and public balances, converting between tokens as needed to cover transaction costs.

When you bridge tokens in, you'll need enough Fee Juice to cover the cost of your first transaction, then you'll need to monitor how much Fee Juice you have available to make transactions. Browser wallets will allow you to send either publicly or privately to other users and will default to using either public or private Fee Juice depending on the type of transaction. Both private Fee Juice and public Fee Juice will appear by default in your token list.

Wrapping upHow you handle Fee Juice depends on where you're transacting: apps can abstract it away entirely and let you pay in any token, while a browser wallet like Azguard puts it in your hands to manage across public and private balances. Match your gas to your transaction, keep private activity private down to the fee, and you move on your terms.

Aztec Network

Aztec Network

21 Jul

•

xx min read

Introducing Alpha V5The Aztec Network today activated Alpha V5, a major protocol upgrade passed by token-holder governance and executed onchain. Alpha V5 reduces private-transaction proving times by more than 2x compared to the previous version, lowers the cost of a fully private transaction by roughly 50%, resolves the critical issues found in V4, and sees the first wave of apps go live. Users can now send private transactions and earn yield on Aave simply by connecting their Ethereum wallets on Nyx, bridge from Ethereum to Aztec using Shield or TRAIN, privately collect NFTs on RavenHouse, or play Dark Forest Aztec, a hidden-information strategy game in a universe that lives entirely onchain. 

"Alpha V5 continues Aztec's work at the frontier of client-side proving, with cryptographic breakthroughs that cut proving times by more than half this release," said Zac Williamson, Co-founder, Aztec Foundation. "We believe Aztec is now the fastest system in the world for proving a fully private transaction entirely on a user's own device, and every release moves the industry closer to private transactions at public transaction speeds."

As the only decentralized privacy L2, Aztec is the credibly neutral privacy layer for Ethereum. Aztec allows anyone to write smart contracts that include both private and public aspects – every private transaction is proven on the user's own device, so no operator, sequencer, or intermediary can see the data. The Alpha V5 proving improvements come from cryptographic advances that make this client-side proving faster than any prior release. The network remains in alpha, but with V5 it is ready for teams to begin building and deploying applications.

Performance - 2.5 second fully private transactions Making private transactions practical comes down to how quickly a proof can be generated on a user's own device, without offloading that work to a server that would learn what the user is doing. On Alpha V5, proving a private token transfer natively now takes approximately 2.5 seconds on a consumer laptop, down from 5.2 seconds on V4, and about 6.8 seconds in a browser, down from 12.5 seconds. Across every measured transaction flow, client-side proving times improved by approximately 2x compared with V4.

‍

Bench machine: an M2 MacBook (12 cores, throttled to 8). "Native" runs Aztec's C++ proving binary; "WASM" runs the same prover in a browser engine (Node on V8).‍

Alpha V5 lowers ECDSA signature-verification cost by approximately 2x, speeds up Poseidon2 hashing by approximately 3x, and reduces the protocol circuit gate count by approximately 50% (gate count is the number of individual operations a proving circuit must perform, and it is the main driver of how long a proof takes to generate). Each of these lowers the amount of work a device performs to prove a transaction, and the reduction in gate count in particular compounds across every proof the network generates.

Apps - send, receive, and earn privately on EthereumAlpha V5 launches the first wave of apps on a network where privacy is built into the protocol rather than managed by an operator. On other networks that claim privacy, transactions still pass through an operator or node that reads them in plaintext, or depend on a viewing key that a third party holds, so users rely on someone else to protect their data and to decide when it gets disclosed. On Aztec, every private transaction is proven on the user's own device, so the app, the sequencer, and any operator never need to see the underlying data. Nyx is one of these apps, allowing users to privately send transactions and privately earn yield on Aave. 

"On Ethereum, everything you do is public. That's why we built Nyx: a private account governed by your Ethereum wallet", said Nikhil, Co-founder of Nyx. "Now you can send, receive and earn in private. Nyx was the first app live on the Aztec Alpha, and we're excited to expand participation to more users with the added stability of Alpha V5."

Other apps on Alpha V5 include Azguard and Nethermind (wallets), Shield, TRAIN, and RavenHouse (bridges), and the Aztecscan block explorers. Also launching is Dark Forest Aztec, a game where users explore a universe, control planets, manage planetary energy, expand territory, and launch attacks through strategic play with private state and hidden actions.

Dark Forest Aztec private universe-building gameplayLower costs, higher security Transaction fees on Aztec come from two main sources: the cost of proving a transaction and the cost of verifying the rollup proof on Ethereum. Alpha V5 reduces both. It lowers the network's proving-cost parameter by 50%, and it reduces the L1 gas required to verify a rollup proof by approximately 40%. Because rollup proofs are verified on Ethereum and that cost is shared across all transactions in a batch, the L1 reduction lowers fees for every user, while the lower proving-cost parameter reduces the per-transaction proving fee directly. Together, these bring the average cost of a fully private token transfer to under a $0.05 transaction cost.

Alpha V5 also hardens the network on several fronts. It resolves critical vulnerabilities found in Alpha V4 along with additional bugs discovered since launch. Aztec's bug bounty program on Cantina also drew more than 234 security researchers to participate. The network remains in alpha, and further bugs may surface as usage grows, but each release has closed the issues found in the last and strengthened the protocol against new ones. With the critical V4 issues resolved and these safeguards in place, Alpha V5 is stable enough for teams to begin building and deploying applications.

AvailabilityAlpha V5 is live now, view the Alpha V5 landing page for a full list of features, performance updates, and live apps to explore. 

About AztecAztec is the only decentralized, privacy-first Layer 2 on Ethereum. Developers write private and public logic in the same smart contract, and private functions are executed and proven on the user's own device, so no operator sees the underlying data. The protocol is upgraded through onchain governance, and the network settles to Ethereum. For more information, visit aztec.network.

Aztec Network

Aztec Network

30 Jun

•

xx min read

Inside an Aztec TransactionOn Ethereum today, each transaction reveals everything publicly. The token you moved, the size, the timing, the wallet it came from, every action you take. Given the limitations of this type of transparent network, the industry is now focusing on bringing privacy onchain as a top priority. The response to this has mostly been to enable private transactions that shield transfers in various ways. But when we look at how privacy works on Web2, it’s clear that users and developers need granular privacy controls: the ability to decide what is public or private and who is able to see different types of data.

Aztec was built so that one transaction can carry two halves. A private half that runs on your own device and never leaves it, and a public half that the network runs in the open. Apps can choose which aspects are private or public, and users can choose what they want to reveal and when.

This article will follow an example transaction on Aztec: a vote in an onchain election built on Aztec, where who you are and which candidate you chose stay private, while the running tally for each candidate stays public for anyone to verify.

Public and private in one movePicture the vote you cast in our example as two aspects that seamlessly weave together. In the first step, you act in private: an app records your vote on your device and hands the network a proof that the vote is valid without revealing it. In the second, the network acts in public: it checks that proof, then adds one to the chosen candidate's public tally. It is one transaction: one part stays with you, one part goes to the network. Both parts end up recorded onchain, in two separate state trees, one private and one public. The walkthrough below follows how these two aspects work together and what this means for how your transaction lands onchain. 

It starts on your deviceYou open the voting app and connect an Aztec wallet. That first step looks like any onchain app. The difference is inside the wallet. An Aztec wallet carries a private execution environment, the PXE, pronounced "pixie", which runs on your phone or in your browser. The PXE is where the private half of your transaction executes, and where the proof of that work gets made, on your hardware, under your exclusive control.

Every account on Aztec is a smart contract rather than a bare key. That design, account abstraction, allows a wallet to authorize a transaction however its owner chooses without writing an identity onto the network for everyone to read. The wallet is the front door, and on Aztec you can decide if the door is open or closed, who you share your information with. 

The private half runs on your deviceThe voting app is a smart contract with two kinds of functions. The private functions run first, and they run inside your PXE. Your identity and the candidate you picked are the private inputs, and they stay on your device.

The only thing to leave your device is a proof confirming the legitimacy of your vote. Aztec's client-side proving system, Chonk, takes the private execution and produces a zero-knowledge proof: a compact cryptographic receipt that your vote followed the rules, that you are eligible, and have not voted before, while revealing nothing about who you are or who you voted for. Think of it as a sealed ballot the network can confirm is valid without opening it. The network learns only that a legitimate vote happened. It does not learn how you voted, or even which account voted. 

This is the part that used to be too slow to be practical. Generating a proof on a phone was the bottleneck every privacy app hit. Aztec’s Chonk is purpose-built for fast proving on low-memory devices, both natively and in the browser, so the private half runs on the device in your hand instead of on someone else's server.

The public half runs in the openSome elements of a vote should be public. The tally is shared infrastructure, the number everyone relies on to trust the result. Thanks to programmable privacy on Aztec, the app marks that part public. Public functions live on the network and run in the open, the way functions do on Ethereum.

On Aztec, private and public logic live in the same contract, and the developer decides which is which, function by function and variable by variable. Programmable privacy is a dimmer, not a switch. The voting app turns it up on the individual ballot and turns it down on the running tally. That boundary is a design decision written into the contract, and it is the thing no transparent chain and no fixed-privacy chain can offer.

The network checks the proof and runs the public partYour vote leaves your device as a bundle: the zero-knowledge proof of the private half, plus the call to the public function that updates the count. It goes to Aztec's sequencers, a decentralized set of thousands of independent operators, with more than 3,500 of them running the network today.

The sequencers do two jobs at once. They verify the proof of your private vote, confirming it is valid and eligible without seeing the choice behind it, and they run the public function that adds one to the chosen candidate and updates the public tally. Your ballot stays sealed. The count goes up by one for everyone to see. The same proof guarantees you cannot vote twice, even though no one learns which ballot is yours.

Two state trees, both onchainAztec has two main state trees, and both live onchain. One holds private state, the other holds public state, so the full record of what happened sits on the network rather than on any one person's laptop. The two trees store each record in two different ways depending on if it needs to be private or public. 

The private tree uses a UTXO model, the same note-based design used by Zcash. In this model, state is written as commitments: each entry is a sealed record that a valid vote was cast, with the voter and the choice kept private. Just like with Zcash or Bitcoin, you do not edit a private entry in place. You write a new one, and the design stops the same vote from being cast twice (old state is nullified). The vote stays private, and the record of a legitimate vote happening is onchain for the network to check.

The public tree uses an account-based model, the same shape Ethereum uses: values that update in place, readable by anyone. This is where each candidate's tally lives.

One transaction wrote information to both trees. The private tree recorded that you voted, sealed. The public tree recorded the new totals, in the open. Everything is onchain. The difference between the two trees is how much each one reveals.

Every private app on Aztec writes into that same private tree. A vote, a payment, and a payroll run all land in one shared record of activity, so each user's privacy grows stronger as the network grows, instead of splitting into a separate pool for every app.

A block is proposed, and Ethereum records itAztec is an L2 on Ethereum, so everything settles to Ethereum L1. A sequencer on Aztec gathers transactions into a proposed block. Other sequencers validate it before it goes to Ethereum's pending chain. At that point the block sits on Ethereum, ordered and recorded, waiting for its proof. The network has agreed on what happened and the proposed block is just waiting a final proof. 

Anyone can prove itProving a block is its own job, and on Aztec, it belongs to no one in particular. A decentralized, permissionless set of provers competes to take a full epoch, a 32-block stretch of the chain, and compresses it into a single zero-knowledge proof of the entire epoch. Anyone with the hardware can run a prover and bid for the work. There is no privileged operator, no committee you have to trust, no outside network holding a key.

That openness is the whole point of a privacy layer. A system that protects your data but routes it through one trusted server has only moved the exposure rather than removed it. Aztec keeps proving permissionless and your private inputs on your device, thereby avoiding any exposure.

The economics land in the voter's favor too. As an L2 network, Aztec spreads the cost of that one L1 proof across thousands of transactions in the rollup, so a vote costs pennies, not the millions of gas a private proof would cost verified alone on Ethereum.

‍

Settled on Ethereum, verifiable by anyoneA prover then posts the epoch proof to Ethereum's proven chain, and the Aztec state is final. Ethereum verifies one proof and inherits the correctness of everything inside it. Aztec extends Ethereum and settles to Ethereum, so your hybrid transaction carries Ethereum's security without carrying Ethereum's enforced transparency.

Anyone can now verify that the result is valid and that every counted vote was legitimate. No one can see how any individual voted. The tally is on the shared ledger where it belongs, and your ballot stayed yours the whole way through.

What this unlocksFor the voter, their ballot was never a broadcast. The candidate you chose stayed yours, with no record tying your wallet to a name for anyone to read later, and you can still check that your vote was counted and the result is honest. You took part without your choice becoming data for systems built to act on it.

For a founder, the election app in this walkthrough is easy to implement without needing to build extensive custom code. Secret ballots with a public, verifiable count, in one contract, is a product category that opens up only because the boundary is programmable. You can build governance, elections, and polls where people vote without fear and the result still proves itself. And of course you can build anything that requires both public and private state to work seamlessly together. 

For an infrastructure provider, the same machinery serves clients who need a result they can stand behind without exposing the people who produced it. Selective disclosure lets a client prove exactly what a counterparty needs to see, the count and the integrity of the process, and protect everything else, on their own terms. That is a guarantee a transparent chain cannot make.

A real vote needs two things at once: a secret ballot and a count anyone can check. A transparent chain makes you give up the first to get the second. On Aztec, you get both. The tally settled on Ethereum for anyone to verify, and how you voted stayed yours. The infrastructure is in place, what will you create with it? 
‍

->Review the Aztec Basics ->Head to the docs and start building today
‍

Gümüş ne kadar sorusu, hem emtia hem de kripto para piyasası yatırımcılarının yakından takip ettiği başlıklar arasında yer alıyor. Orta Doğu’da jeopolitik tansiyonun düşmesine yönelik gelişmeler ve petrol fiyatlarında yaşanan sert gerileme, gümüş fiyatlarını destekleyen önemli unsurlar oldu. Aynı zamanda yatırımcıların gözü yaklaşan Fed toplantısına çevrilirken, faiz beklentilerindeki değişim de değerli metaller üzerinde etkisini sürdürüyor.

Gümüş Fiyatlarında Son Durum Ne? Güncel verilere göre ons gümüş 59,30 dolar seviyesinden işlem görüyor. Ons fiyatı günlük bazda %2,09 yükselirken, aylık performansı ise %1,50 artış gösterdi.

Yurt içinde ise gram gümüş 90,45 TL seviyesine ulaştı. Küresel piyasalarda yaşanan gelişmelerin yanı sıra döviz kuru hareketleri de gram gümüş fiyatlarının şekillenmesinde önemli rol oynuyor.

Değerli metallerde görülen bu hareketlilik, yalnızca emtia yatırımcılarının değil, portföy çeşitlendirmesi yapmak isteyen yatırımcıların da ilgisini çekmeye devam ediyor.

Petrol Fiyatları Gümüşü Nasıl Destekledi? Son günlerde gümüş fiyatlarına en fazla katkı sağlayan gelişmelerden biri petrol piyasasında yaşandı. Orta Doğu’da gerilimin azalabileceğine yönelik açıklamalar enerji fiyatlarını aşağı çekti.

Reuters’a konuşan üst düzey bir İranlı yetkili, ABD’nin saldırıları durdurması halinde İran’ın da askeri operasyonlarını askıya alabileceğini ifade etti. ABD tarafında ise Başkan Donald Trump’ın danışmanlarının operasyonların büyük ölçüde tamamlandığını ve mühimmat stoklarına ilişkin endişelerin arttığını belirtmesinin ardından bombardıman faaliyetlerine ara verildi.

Jeopolitik risklerin azalmasıyla birlikte petrol fiyatları gün içerisinde %4’ün üzerinde geriledi. Enerji maliyetlerindeki bu düşüş, enflasyon baskısının hafiflemesine katkı sağlayarak gümüş fiyatlarını destekleyen önemli bir unsur haline geldi.

Enflasyon Beklentileri Neden Değişti? Yılın ilk aylarından itibaren devam eden bölgesel çatışmalar petrol fiyatlarını yukarı taşımış, bu durum da küresel enflasyon beklentilerini artırmıştı. Artan enflasyon endişeleri ise merkez bankalarının daha uzun süre yüksek faiz politikası uygulayabileceği beklentisini güçlendirmişti.

Ancak petrol fiyatlarında görülen son geri çekilme, piyasalarda enflasyon baskısının azalabileceği yönünde yeni beklentiler oluşturdu. Faiz baskısının hafiflemesi, gümüş gibi değerli metallere olan ilgiyi yeniden artırırken yatırımcıların piyasa analizi süreçlerinde de önemli bir değişime işaret ediyor.

Fed Toplantısı Gümüş İçin Neden Kritik? Piyasaların bir diğer önemli gündem maddesi ise 28-29 Temmuz tarihlerinde gerçekleştirilecek Fed toplantısı olacak. Yatırımcılar, ABD Merkez Bankası’nın bu toplantıda politika faizini sabit bırakmasını bekliyor.

Bununla birlikte CME FedWatch Tool verilerine göre piyasalar, eylül ayında faiz artırımı ihtimalini %76 seviyesinde fiyatlamaya devam ediyor. Bu beklenti, önümüzdeki dönemde hem değerli metaller hem de kripto yatırımı yapan yatırımcılar açısından yakından takip ediliyor.

Fed’in faiz kararı ve toplantı sonrasında yapılacak açıklamalar, gümüş fiyatlarının kısa vadeli yönü üzerinde belirleyici olabilir.

Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Bitcoin Course at Risk in El Salvador? 2027 Election Rivals Challenge Nayib Bukele

CLARITY Act, ABD’de kripto para sektörüne yönelik kapsamlı düzenleyici çerçeve oluşturmayı hedefleyen en önemli yasa tasarılarından biri olarak görülüyor. Ancak Senato‘nun yaz tatiline yaklaşmasıyla birlikte tasarının kısa vadede yasalaşma ihtimali önemli ölçüde zayıfladı. Sürecin uzaması, hem kripto para piyasası hem de kurumsal yatırımcılar tarafından yakından takip ediliyor.

Kripto sektörü, düzenlemenin 2026 yılı içinde tamamlanabilmesi açısından yaz dönemini kritik bir eşik olarak değerlendiriyordu. Son açıklamalar ise beklentilerin sonbahar aylarına kayabileceğine işaret ediyor.

CLARITY Act İçin Süreç Neden Yavaşladı? ABD Senatosu Çoğunluk Lideri John Thune, CLARITY Act’in yaz tatiline girilmeden önce nihai oylamaya sunulmasının zor göründüğünü ifade etti. Buna rağmen Thune, tasarının en azından Senato Genel Kurulu’nda görüşülmeye başlanmasını umut ettiğini belirtti.

Sektör temsilcileri daha önce 7 Ağustos tarihini kritik bir dönüm noktası olarak görüyordu. Ancak takvimin sonbahara sarkması halinde Kongre’nin daha sınırlı çalışma süresi nedeniyle düzenlemenin yıl sonuna kadar tamamlanması zorlaşabilir.

Bu nedenle yasa sürecindeki her gelişme, dijital varlık ekosistemi açısından büyük önem taşıyor.

Beyaz Saray Ve Senato Cephesinde Son Beklentiler Beyaz Saray’ın kripto danışmanlarından Patrick Witt, Senato’nun ağustos ayının ilk haftasında tasarıyla ilgili yeni adımlar atabileceğini düşünüyor. Buna karşın temmuz ayı içerisinde nihai oylamanın gerçekleşme olasılığını düşük görüyor.

Bu değerlendirme, piyasalarda kısa vadede kesin bir düzenleme beklentisinin zayıflamasına neden oldu. Özellikle kurumsal yatırımcılar ve sektörde faaliyet gösteren şirketler, yeni takvimin nasıl şekilleneceğini yakından izliyor.

ABD’de hazırlanacak kapsamlı düzenlemeler, yalnızca yerel piyasaları değil küresel kripto yatırımı ortamını da etkileyebilecek potansiyele sahip bulunuyor.

Taslakta Hangi Maddeler Tartışılıyor? Senatör Cynthia Lummis tarafından paylaşılan güncellenmiş CLARITY Act taslağında müşteri varlıklarının korunmasına yönelik daha güçlü düzenlemeler yer aldı. Bu değişiklikler yatırımcı güvenliğini artırmayı amaçlıyor.

Ancak bazı başlıklarda uzlaşma henüz sağlanabilmiş değil. Kamu görevlilerinin kripto faaliyetlerine ilişkin etik kurallar, stablecoin ödüllerine yönelik hükümler ve çeşitli düzenleyici maddeler üzerinde taraflar arasında görüş ayrılıkları devam ediyor.

Bu anlaşmazlıkların çözülmesi, tasarının Senato’dan geçiş sürecini doğrudan etkileyebilecek en önemli unsurlar arasında gösteriliyor.

CLARITY Act Kripto Para Piyasası İçin Neden Önemli? Galaxy Research Araştırma Başkanı Alex Thorn, Kongre’nin daralan çalışma takvimi nedeniyle CLARITY Act’in 2026 yılı içinde yasalaşma ihtimaline ilişkin tahminini yüzde 50’den yüzde 30’a düşürdüğünü açıkladı.

Bu değerlendirme, düzenlemenin beklenenden daha uzun sürebileceğine yönelik endişeleri artırdı. Yasanın kabul edilmesi halinde kripto para sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketler için daha net bir hukuki çerçeve oluşturulması bekleniyor. Ayrıca düzenleyici belirsizliğin azalması, uzun vadede kurumsal yatırımcı ilgisini destekleyebilecek gelişmeler arasında değerlendiriliyor.

Önümüzdeki haftalarda Senato’dan gelecek açıklamalar ve yasa takvimine ilişkin yeni gelişmeler, hem ABD finans piyasaları hem de küresel kripto ekosistemi açısından belirleyici olmaya devam edecek.

Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Crypto expert Dr Altcoin has alleged that Pi Network is facing a supply crisis tied to a wave of token unlocks scheduled for the second half of 2026.

According to the post, pioneers who locked their Pi for three years are now seeing large amounts of that supply released. Roughly 775.8 million Pi tokens are set to unlock between now and December 2026. That works out to an average of 129.3 million Pi tokens unlocked each month now. Dr Altcoin argued that a significant portion of this unlocked supply is likely to reach exchanges, adding further selling pressure to the market.

Calls for the Pi Core Team to respond

The post argued that no single announcement, ecosystem update, or exchange listing would be enough to stabilize price without the Pi Core Team directly addressing supply, demand, and liquidity concerns. It called for the team to publicly acknowledge the situation and discuss potential solutions with the community, framing continued silence as a failure of leadership.

Proposed steps, according to the post

Dr Altcoin outlined several measures that could be considered if the Core Team continues its current communication approach:

Burning a substantial portion of remaining supply, potentially as much as 50%, drawing a comparison to Stellar’s historical token burn.Allowing major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase, to list Pi.Introducing a transparent and verifiable buyback-and-burn mechanism.Price risk raised in the post

The post also warned that if Pi falls below $0.01, it could lose its position among the top 100 cryptocurrencies by market cap, and that a sustained price decline could pressure the project financially, potentially forcing spending cuts or restructuring.

Community reaction

Replies to the post were mixed. Some users voiced support for the criticism, while others questioned Dr Altcoin’s own past promotional activity around Pi. Several replies echoed concerns about token distribution, with some users arguing that a small number of wallets, including the Core Team’s own holdings, control a disproportionate share of total supply.

The Pi Core Team has not publicly responded to these specific allegations as of now. These claims reflect one crypto expert’s analysis and have not been independently verified.

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

Back to top button

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Key Highlights Privacy-focused Venice AI secured $65 million in Series A funding, achieving a $1 billion unicorn valuation Dragonfly spearheaded the investment round, with participation from Coinbase Ventures, Morgan Creek, F-Prime, and North Island Ventures The funding deal included 8.98% company equity, 1.5 million VVV token grants, and warrants for an additional 5 million tokens The platform provides access to over 200 AI models with privacy protections, boasting a user base of 3.5 million Capital will finance Venice’s proprietary data center construction and aggressive user acquisition strategy Venice AI, the privacy-centric artificial intelligence platform created by cryptocurrency pioneer Erik Voorhees, has successfully closed a $65 million Series A investment round. This landmark funding propels the startup to unicorn status with a $1 billion valuation, marking its inaugural external capital raise since its May 2024 debut.

https://twitter.com/ErikVoorhees/status/2072336114950545755?s=20

Dragonfly served as the lead investor in this financing round. Additional participants included Coinbase Ventures, North Island Ventures, F-Prime, Archetype, Liquid2 Ventures, and Morgan Creek.

Investment Structure and Token Allocation The $65 million investment package granted backers an 8.98% ownership position in Venice AI. Investors also secured a vesting allocation of 1.5 million Venice (VVV) tokens. Additionally, they obtained warrants enabling them to purchase another 5 million VVV tokens during an eight-year window at approximately $66.5 million.

Both the token allocation and warrant instruments carry a one-year lock-up period, followed by a three-year vesting schedule.

Venice deliberately opted to sell company equity instead of directly offering its VVV tokens. Voorhees revealed that the company maintains a treasury of over 30 million VVV tokens, none of which have been liquidated despite the token’s impressive 700% price surge this year.

Privacy-First Philosophy Drives Platform Design Venice AI markets itself as a privacy-respecting counterpart to mainstream platforms like [[LINK_START_0]]ChatGPT[[LINK_END_0]]. The service implements a zero-storage policy for user queries and applies encryption to all requests before directing them through external proxy servers.

When utilizing models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, Venice masks users’ IP addresses and session information. Enhanced privacy features are accessible when using alternative models available through the platform.

The company reports a user community of 3.5 million and disclosed annualized revenue exceeding $70 million. According to Venice, the company achieved profitability during the first quarter of 2026.

This capital infusion arrives amid mounting concerns about AI privacy practices. A California class-action complaint targeted OpenAI for allegedly integrating Meta Pixel and Google Analytics into ChatGPT.com, purportedly transmitting user information to Meta and Google along with advertising cookies.

Earlier in the year, legal professionals cautioned that conversation histories from AI-powered legal advice tools could potentially be admitted as evidence in legal proceedings.

Strategic Allocation of Capital Voorhees outlined that the investment proceeds will primarily fund the construction of Venice’s inaugural data center, enabling the company to control its GPU infrastructure instead of relying on leased capacity.

Remaining funds will support customer base expansion, team recruitment, geographic market penetration, and strategic acquisitions of synergistic companies.

“We are making Venice a mass market consumer app for at least a few hundred million people and several billion AI agents,” Voorhees said.

The company’s VVV token appreciated 6% following the funding announcement.

Venice operates a dual-token ecosystem that includes DIEM. Platform users can stake VVV tokens to generate DIEM, with each DIEM token providing $1 worth of API credits for platform usage.

Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Shrikar Parashar Posted On May 11, 2019

Crypto wallet and trading platform Abra recently enabled access to 17 Altcoins.Abra which is led by Bill Barhydt added native support to 17 altcoins including Digibyte (DGB), Dogecoin (DOGE), Dash (DASH), Basic Attention Token (BAT), Neo (NEO), 0x (ZEX), OmiseGo (OMG), Qtum (QTUM), Vertcoin (VTC), Zcash (ZEC), Golem (GNT), Stratis (STRAT), Augur (REP), Ethereum Classic (ETC), TRON (TRX), Lisk (LSK) and Status (SNT).

In addition to Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) users will soon be able to deposit and withdraw an additional 17 Crypto assets.

Native withdrawals for the other cryptocurrencies will be turned on in the coming days.

— Abra (@AbraGlobal) May 8, 2019

Abra is a non-custodial wallet meaning the private keys will not be held by the company but within the user’s device instead. The firm has also previously announced that it will enable users to buy synthetic equivalents of stocks and ETFs using Bitcoin smart contracts.

Abra Partners with Plaid to connect to “Thousands of banks”Abra has partnered with San Francisco based Fintech firm Plaid to connect user accounts to thousands of US banks. App users had to use bank transfers to deposit into their wallets, but with the new feature, they will able to connect to their bank accounts directly in-app using their API.

Bill Barhydt, CEO of Abra said:

“The addition of these new liquidity enhancements in our app gives users more ways to move between crypto and fiat. We’re particularly excited about our partnership with Plaid, which brings thousands of additional financial institutions into the Abra ecosystem for US customers.”

Discuss this news on our Telegram Community. Subscribe to us on Google news and do follow us on Twitter @Blockmanity

Did you like the news you just read? Please leave a feedback to help us serve you better

Disclaimer: Blockmanity is a news portal and does not provide any financial advice. Blockmanity's role is to inform the cryptocurrency and blockchain community about what's going on in this space. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment. Blockmanity won't be responsible for any loss of funds.

Author

Shrikar Parashar Shrikar is a Blockchain evangelist. He is a die-hard fan of security tokens. He follows the market closely but does not trade. He believes in Hodling.

Trending NowYou may also like

[the_ad id=”36860″]

As promised, the leading US crypto exchange Coinbase has dramatically increased the number of coins supported on its platform. The company just added Stellar (XLM), a few weeks after the long-rumored debut of XRP.

So which coins will land the coveted Coinbase listing next?

Back in December, Coinbase revealed it’s taking a hard look at 31 additional cryptocurrencies. The platform now supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Stellar, Ethereum Classic, Zcash, 0x, Basic Attention Token and USD Coin.

That leaves 28 coins on Coinbase’s list of prospects.

• Cardano
• Aeternity
• Aragon
• Bread Wallet
• Civic
• Dai
• District0x
• Enjin Coin
• EOS
• Golem
• IOST
• KIN
• Kyber Network
• ChainLink
• Loom Network
• Loopring
• Decentraland
• Mainframe
• Maker
• NEO
• OmiseGo
• Po.et
• QuarkChain
• Augur
• Request Network
• Status
• Storj
• Tezos

Coinbase Pro, the company’s professional trading platform, already supports a handful of the coins on the list above: Civic, Dai, District0x, Golem, Loom, Decentraland and Zcash.

[the_ad id=”36860″][the_ad id="42537"] [the_ad id="42536"]