CLARITY Act, ABD’de kripto para sektörüne yönelik kapsamlı düzenleyici çerçeve oluşturmayı hedefleyen en önemli yasa tasarılarından biri olarak görülüyor. Ancak Senato‘nun yaz tatiline yaklaşmasıyla birlikte tasarının kısa vadede yasalaşma ihtimali önemli ölçüde zayıfladı. Sürecin uzaması, hem kripto para piyasası hem de kurumsal yatırımcılar tarafından yakından takip ediliyor.
Kripto sektörü, düzenlemenin 2026 yılı içinde tamamlanabilmesi açısından yaz dönemini kritik bir eşik olarak değerlendiriyordu. Son açıklamalar ise beklentilerin sonbahar aylarına kayabileceğine işaret ediyor.
CLARITY Act İçin Süreç Neden Yavaşladı? ABD Senatosu Çoğunluk Lideri John Thune, CLARITY Act’in yaz tatiline girilmeden önce nihai oylamaya sunulmasının zor göründüğünü ifade etti. Buna rağmen Thune, tasarının en azından Senato Genel Kurulu’nda görüşülmeye başlanmasını umut ettiğini belirtti.
Sektör temsilcileri daha önce 7 Ağustos tarihini kritik bir dönüm noktası olarak görüyordu. Ancak takvimin sonbahara sarkması halinde Kongre’nin daha sınırlı çalışma süresi nedeniyle düzenlemenin yıl sonuna kadar tamamlanması zorlaşabilir.
Bu nedenle yasa sürecindeki her gelişme, dijital varlık ekosistemi açısından büyük önem taşıyor.
Beyaz Saray Ve Senato Cephesinde Son Beklentiler Beyaz Saray’ın kripto danışmanlarından Patrick Witt, Senato’nun ağustos ayının ilk haftasında tasarıyla ilgili yeni adımlar atabileceğini düşünüyor. Buna karşın temmuz ayı içerisinde nihai oylamanın gerçekleşme olasılığını düşük görüyor.
Bu değerlendirme, piyasalarda kısa vadede kesin bir düzenleme beklentisinin zayıflamasına neden oldu. Özellikle kurumsal yatırımcılar ve sektörde faaliyet gösteren şirketler, yeni takvimin nasıl şekilleneceğini yakından izliyor.
ABD’de hazırlanacak kapsamlı düzenlemeler, yalnızca yerel piyasaları değil küresel kripto yatırımı ortamını da etkileyebilecek potansiyele sahip bulunuyor.
Taslakta Hangi Maddeler Tartışılıyor? Senatör Cynthia Lummis tarafından paylaşılan güncellenmiş CLARITY Act taslağında müşteri varlıklarının korunmasına yönelik daha güçlü düzenlemeler yer aldı. Bu değişiklikler yatırımcı güvenliğini artırmayı amaçlıyor.
Ancak bazı başlıklarda uzlaşma henüz sağlanabilmiş değil. Kamu görevlilerinin kripto faaliyetlerine ilişkin etik kurallar, stablecoin ödüllerine yönelik hükümler ve çeşitli düzenleyici maddeler üzerinde taraflar arasında görüş ayrılıkları devam ediyor.
Bu anlaşmazlıkların çözülmesi, tasarının Senato’dan geçiş sürecini doğrudan etkileyebilecek en önemli unsurlar arasında gösteriliyor.
CLARITY Act Kripto Para Piyasası İçin Neden Önemli? Galaxy Research Araştırma Başkanı Alex Thorn, Kongre’nin daralan çalışma takvimi nedeniyle CLARITY Act’in 2026 yılı içinde yasalaşma ihtimaline ilişkin tahminini yüzde 50’den yüzde 30’a düşürdüğünü açıkladı.
Bu değerlendirme, düzenlemenin beklenenden daha uzun sürebileceğine yönelik endişeleri artırdı. Yasanın kabul edilmesi halinde kripto para sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketler için daha net bir hukuki çerçeve oluşturulması bekleniyor. Ayrıca düzenleyici belirsizliğin azalması, uzun vadede kurumsal yatırımcı ilgisini destekleyebilecek gelişmeler arasında değerlendiriliyor.
Önümüzdeki haftalarda Senato’dan gelecek açıklamalar ve yasa takvimine ilişkin yeni gelişmeler, hem ABD finans piyasaları hem de küresel kripto ekosistemi açısından belirleyici olmaya devam edecek.
Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Crypto expert Dr Altcoin has alleged that Pi Network is facing a supply crisis tied to a wave of token unlocks scheduled for the second half of 2026.
According to the post, pioneers who locked their Pi for three years are now seeing large amounts of that supply released. Roughly 775.8 million Pi tokens are set to unlock between now and December 2026. That works out to an average of 129.3 million Pi tokens unlocked each month now. Dr Altcoin argued that a significant portion of this unlocked supply is likely to reach exchanges, adding further selling pressure to the market.
Calls for the Pi Core Team to respond
The post argued that no single announcement, ecosystem update, or exchange listing would be enough to stabilize price without the Pi Core Team directly addressing supply, demand, and liquidity concerns. It called for the team to publicly acknowledge the situation and discuss potential solutions with the community, framing continued silence as a failure of leadership.
Proposed steps, according to the post
Dr Altcoin outlined several measures that could be considered if the Core Team continues its current communication approach:
Burning a substantial portion of remaining supply, potentially as much as 50%, drawing a comparison to Stellar’s historical token burn.Allowing major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase, to list Pi.Introducing a transparent and verifiable buyback-and-burn mechanism.Price risk raised in the post
The post also warned that if Pi falls below $0.01, it could lose its position among the top 100 cryptocurrencies by market cap, and that a sustained price decline could pressure the project financially, potentially forcing spending cuts or restructuring.
Community reaction
Replies to the post were mixed. Some users voiced support for the criticism, while others questioned Dr Altcoin’s own past promotional activity around Pi. Several replies echoed concerns about token distribution, with some users arguing that a small number of wallets, including the Core Team’s own holdings, control a disproportionate share of total supply.
The Pi Core Team has not publicly responded to these specific allegations as of now. These claims reflect one crypto expert’s analysis and have not been independently verified.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
@BlackRock has crossed a threshold no investment firm has reached before. The world's largest asset manager ended the second quarter of 2026 with assets under management surpassing $15 trillion for the first time, reaching $15.34 trillion on the back of $192 billion in net client inflows.
Record Numbers Across the Board Adjusted earnings per share came in at $13.91, well above the analyst consensus of roughly $12.57, while revenue climbed 31% year over year to $7.08 billion, topping expectations of around $6.72 billion. BlackRock's 45.9% adjusted operating margin was the best in almost five years.
For the first half of 2026, the firm reported record net inflows of $321 billion. The results sent BlackRock shares up around 6% in premarket trading, reflecting investor enthusiasm for a quarter defined by record asset growth and accelerating inflows.
ETFs Driving the Growth Engine A significant portion of that momentum came from BlackRock's exchange-traded fund business. Digital asset products shed $3.1 billion during the quarter, while ETFs drew $177.9 billion in Q2 alone. Combined with the first quarter, the firm's ETF infrastructure captured approximately $178 billion in the first six months of the year.
BlackRock also continued expanding its higher-margin private markets and alternatives businesses, reporting 8% growth in organic base fees and marking the eighth consecutive quarter in which organic base fee growth exceeded 5%. The firm also raised its planned 2026 share buybacks to $2 billion, up from a previously announced $1.8 billion, signaling confidence in its cash generation.
CEO Larry Fink said: "The more clients we help participate in the markets, the more our own growth builds, higher organic growth, higher earnings growth, and more value for our shareholders."
Sources:
BlackRock Shares Jump After Crushing Quarterly Expectations, TradingPedia
BlackRock Rides to Record $15.3 Trillion in Assets on ETF and Alternatives Growth, InvestmentNews
BlackRock Hits $15 Trillion Record While Its Crypto Arm Shrinks 20%, BeInCrypto
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
A short message from Satoshi Nakamoto, sent exactly 16 years ago, unexpectedly exposed Wall Street's main dead end with Bitcoin today. On July 5, 2010, the creator of the original cryptocurrency, while discussing the technical release of beta version 0.3 on the BitcoinTalk forum and debating pricing, left a phrase that became prophetic for the entire financial world:
"Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard. There's nothing to relate it to."
Sixteen years later, this long-forgotten remark resonated with reality, as big business acknowledged that Bitcoin had finally outgrown familiar economic frameworks. Attempts to measure it through old categories — such as volatile "tech stocks" or classic defensive "digital gold" — repeatedly leads to a dead end.
HOT Stories
Satoshi Nakamoto's message on 5 July 2010 regarding the nature of Bitcoin, Source: BitcoinTalkIn particular, Michael Saylor, in his latest manifesto, refused to measure the asset by old templates and offered a new, concise definition — "digital capital".
In his original message, Nakamoto separately emphasized that Bitcoin's value could not be rigidly tied to the cost of electricity, as "It's not stable with respect to energy. It's not tied to the cost of energy."
Even then, the creator of the network indicated that the asset's final form would be shaped solely by market forces.
Why Bitcoin Should Be Measured Only by Its Own RulesToday, as Bitcoin holds near $63,000, Satoshi's 16-year-old definitional challenge has become a basic property of the market. The same uniqueness that made it difficult for Nakamoto to describe the code in simple words has become a practical reality for funds.
You Might Also Like
Instead of comparisons with Apple shares or gold bars, the market has moved to the pure mathematics of the protocol. Capital inflows are now calculated directly against the hard limit of 21 million coins, network stability is measured by record hashrate levels, and long-term value is judged by the issuance schedule embedded in the code — one that cannot be changed for the benefit of regulators.
In this context, Satoshi was right, and Bitcoin remains relevant because it has to play only by its own rules.
Key Highlights Privacy-focused Venice AI secured $65 million in Series A funding, achieving a $1 billion unicorn valuation Dragonfly spearheaded the investment round, with participation from Coinbase Ventures, Morgan Creek, F-Prime, and North Island Ventures The funding deal included 8.98% company equity, 1.5 million VVV token grants, and warrants for an additional 5 million tokens The platform provides access to over 200 AI models with privacy protections, boasting a user base of 3.5 million Capital will finance Venice’s proprietary data center construction and aggressive user acquisition strategy Venice AI, the privacy-centric artificial intelligence platform created by cryptocurrency pioneer Erik Voorhees, has successfully closed a $65 million Series A investment round. This landmark funding propels the startup to unicorn status with a $1 billion valuation, marking its inaugural external capital raise since its May 2024 debut.
Dragonfly served as the lead investor in this financing round. Additional participants included Coinbase Ventures, North Island Ventures, F-Prime, Archetype, Liquid2 Ventures, and Morgan Creek.
Investment Structure and Token Allocation The $65 million investment package granted backers an 8.98% ownership position in Venice AI. Investors also secured a vesting allocation of 1.5 million Venice (VVV) tokens. Additionally, they obtained warrants enabling them to purchase another 5 million VVV tokens during an eight-year window at approximately $66.5 million.
Both the token allocation and warrant instruments carry a one-year lock-up period, followed by a three-year vesting schedule.
Venice deliberately opted to sell company equity instead of directly offering its VVV tokens. Voorhees revealed that the company maintains a treasury of over 30 million VVV tokens, none of which have been liquidated despite the token’s impressive 700% price surge this year.
Privacy-First Philosophy Drives Platform Design Venice AI markets itself as a privacy-respecting counterpart to mainstream platforms like [[LINK_START_0]]ChatGPT[[LINK_END_0]]. The service implements a zero-storage policy for user queries and applies encryption to all requests before directing them through external proxy servers.
When utilizing models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, Venice masks users’ IP addresses and session information. Enhanced privacy features are accessible when using alternative models available through the platform.
The company reports a user community of 3.5 million and disclosed annualized revenue exceeding $70 million. According to Venice, the company achieved profitability during the first quarter of 2026.
This capital infusion arrives amid mounting concerns about AI privacy practices. A California class-action complaint targeted OpenAI for allegedly integrating Meta Pixel and Google Analytics into ChatGPT.com, purportedly transmitting user information to Meta and Google along with advertising cookies.
Earlier in the year, legal professionals cautioned that conversation histories from AI-powered legal advice tools could potentially be admitted as evidence in legal proceedings.
Strategic Allocation of Capital Voorhees outlined that the investment proceeds will primarily fund the construction of Venice’s inaugural data center, enabling the company to control its GPU infrastructure instead of relying on leased capacity.
Remaining funds will support customer base expansion, team recruitment, geographic market penetration, and strategic acquisitions of synergistic companies.
“We are making Venice a mass market consumer app for at least a few hundred million people and several billion AI agents,” Voorhees said.
The company’s VVV token appreciated 6% following the funding announcement.
Venice operates a dual-token ecosystem that includes DIEM. Platform users can stake VVV tokens to generate DIEM, with each DIEM token providing $1 worth of API credits for platform usage.
The MiCA deadline is here, which means the European market is now closed to unlicensed crypto exchanges and platforms targeting EU clients. MiCA is the biggest regulatory overhaul in digital asset history. The new framework has seen many giant exchanges like Binance exit the €10 billion market. However, some exchanges, like Gate, have successfully achieved this regulatory milestone.
So, what is the secret behind the MiCA success? The case of Gate, a crypto exchange with over 54 million global users, can provide some insight.
The MiCA Maze: A Challenge Worth Facing? MiCA has replaced Europe’s fragmented national crypto rules with a common framework for issuers and crypto-asset service providers. The regime puts authorisation, governance, client protection, operational controls, and market integrity at the centre of crypto activity in the EU.
Gate Europe enters this period with two important approvals in place. The company obtained a MiCA CASP license and a Payment Institution license at an early stage, giving its European business a regulated base for digital asset services, payment activity, and long-term regional expansion.
Platforms serving EU users now need stronger internal controls, compliance teams, reporting systems, and governance processes. Users and institutions are also placing greater focus on regulatory oversight when choosing where to trade, hold assets, or build partnerships.
The grace period closes on July 1, 2026. This period allowed crypto-asset service providers already active in the EU before MiCA’s main CASP rules applied on December 30, 2024, to continue operating temporarily while seeking authorization from their national regulator. After July 1, platforms without approval must complete their exit from the European market.
Individual users now have more information for evaluating platforms. A licensed provider operates under defined rules covering client assets, complaints, conflicts of interest, and business conduct. These standards give users a stronger basis for comparing platforms beyond fees, token coverage, and app design.
Institutional clients face an even higher bar. Banks, asset managers, fintech firms, and professional trading desks need crypto counterparties capable of passing compliance reviews, vendor checks, and legal assessments. MiCA gives these clients a common European benchmark for assessing regulated crypto service providers.
Gate’s Licensing Journey Was Eight Years in the Making Gate Europe’s compliance path began in 2018, years before MiCA became the central EU framework for crypto-asset service providers. The company describes its European regulatory work as a multi-year process built through early registrations, internal compliance development, and engagement with regional authorities.
Securing a MiCA license requires an application plus governance, risk controls, reporting procedures, operational oversight, and compliance systems capable of meeting financial supervision standards. These elements require investment across legal, product, security, finance, and management teams.
Gate Europe’s early preparation gave the company more time to build those capabilities before the final MiCA grace window. By the time authorization became central to EU market access, Gate Europe had already developed a regional compliance base designed for a supervised market.
The company’s MiCA license now supports regulated crypto-asset services across Europe, while its Payment Institution license strengthens the link between digital asset activity and payment services. Together, these approvals give Gate Europe a more complete regulatory foundation in the region.
“Europe is setting a high standard for digital asset regulation, and we view compliance as the foundation for sustainable growth in the region,” said Dr. Giovanni Cunti, CEO of Gate Europe. “We remain focused on building a secure and trusted platform for our users.”
The Licence is Only the Start Gate now faces the harder part of MiCA: maintaining the standard after approval. Authorisation gives the company market access, but supervision will test how well its controls work in practice.
That means keeping client assets properly protected, managing conflicts of interest, maintaining reliable reporting, strengthening complaint handling, and ensuring that governance decisions match regulatory expectations. It also means proving that growth across Europe does not weaken internal controls.
It’s 8-years of preparation and a head-start does give the exchange a competitive advantage that others have failed to achieve or sustain in this market.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
June 26, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC; Updated: June 26, 2026, 4:38 PM UTC
An Eleventh Circuit panel seemed skeptical Friday that criminal securities fraud-related judgments against two former financial technology executives should be reversed because their company’s cryptocurrency wasn’t actually a security.
Attorneys for Shane Hampton and Michael Kane told the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that Hydrogen Technology Corp.'s “utility” token wasn’t an investment contract under the developing body of law that seeks to apply a 1946 Supreme Court definition of securities to digital assets. The token was meant to be used for blockchain development and coding, according to the defendants.
“Why are people buying it if not for ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading: See Breaking News in Context Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber? Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
Crypto wallet and trading platform Abra recently enabled access to 17 Altcoins.Abra which is led by Bill Barhydt added native support to 17 altcoins including Digibyte (DGB), Dogecoin (DOGE), Dash (DASH), Basic Attention Token (BAT), Neo (NEO), 0x (ZEX), OmiseGo (OMG), Qtum (QTUM), Vertcoin (VTC), Zcash (ZEC), Golem (GNT), Stratis (STRAT), Augur (REP), Ethereum Classic (ETC), TRON (TRX), Lisk (LSK) and Status (SNT).
In addition to Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) users will soon be able to deposit and withdraw an additional 17 Crypto assets.
Native withdrawals for the other cryptocurrencies will be turned on in the coming days.
— Abra (@AbraGlobal) May 8, 2019
Abra is a non-custodial wallet meaning the private keys will not be held by the company but within the user’s device instead. The firm has also previously announced that it will enable users to buy synthetic equivalents of stocks and ETFs using Bitcoin smart contracts.
Abra Partners with Plaid to connect to “Thousands of banks”Abra has partnered with San Francisco based Fintech firm Plaid to connect user accounts to thousands of US banks. App users had to use bank transfers to deposit into their wallets, but with the new feature, they will able to connect to their bank accounts directly in-app using their API.
Bill Barhydt, CEO of Abra said:
“The addition of these new liquidity enhancements in our app gives users more ways to move between crypto and fiat. We’re particularly excited about our partnership with Plaid, which brings thousands of additional financial institutions into the Abra ecosystem for US customers.”
Discuss this news on our Telegram Community. Subscribe to us on Google news and do follow us on Twitter @Blockmanity
Did you like the news you just read? Please leave a feedback to help us serve you better
Disclaimer: Blockmanity is a news portal and does not provide any financial advice. Blockmanity's role is to inform the cryptocurrency and blockchain community about what's going on in this space. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment. Blockmanity won't be responsible for any loss of funds.
Author
Shrikar Parashar Shrikar is a Blockchain evangelist. He is a die-hard fan of security tokens. He follows the market closely but does not trade. He believes in Hodling.
Bullish QTUM price prediction for 2025 is $4.921 to $15.097. Qtum (QTUM) price might reach $16 soon. Bearish QTUM price prediction for 2025 is $0.781. In this Qtum (QTUM) price prediction 2025, 2026-2030, we will analyze the price patterns of QTUM by using accurate trader-friendly technical analysis indicators and predict the future movement of the cryptocurrency.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Qtum (QTUM) Current Market StatusWhat is Qtum (QTUM)?Qtum (QTUM) 24H TechnicalsQtum (QTUM) PRICE PREDICTION 2025
Qtum (QTUM) Support and Resistance LevelsQtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSIQtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVIComparison of QTM with BTC, ETHQtum (QTUM) PRICE PREDICTION 2026, 2027-2030CONCLUSIONFAQ Qtum (QTUM) Current Market Status Current Price $2.14 24 – Hour Price Change 4.52% Down 24 – Hour Trading Volume $88.69M Market Cap $226.39M Circulating Supply 105.71M QTUM All – Time High $106.88 ( On Jan 07, 2018) All – Time Low $0.77 (On March 13, 2020) QTUM Current Market Status (Source: CoinMarketCap) What is Qtum (QTUM)? TICKERQTUMBLOCKCHAINQtum CATEGORYPlatform token LAUNCHED ONMarch 2017UTILITIESGovernance, security, gas fees & rewards Qtum is a hybrid blockchain project that combines the best part of Bitcoin and Ethereum. It supports smart contracts on the Ethereum Virtual Machine. It uses Bitcoin’s UTXO model with a proof-of-stake consensus. It is known for its decentralized validation of transactions, which allows any individual to validate without particular “validators”.
Furthermore, the cryptocurrency launched in March 2017, runs on its own blockchain. The blockchain supports multiple token standards. In 2023, the prominent L1 ecosystem Tenet partnered with Qtum. However, recently, the project has not shown much activity until the recent day’s price surge.
Qtum (QTUM) 24H Technicals (Source: TradingView)
Qtum (QTUM) ranks 177nd on CoinMarketCap in terms of its market capitalization. The overview of the Qtum price prediction for 2025 is explained below with a daily time frame.
QTUM/USDT Horizontal Channel Pattern (Source: TradingView) In the above chart, Qtum (QTUM) laid out a horizontal channel pattern also known as the sideways trend. In general, the horizontal channel is formed during the price consolidation. In this pattern, the upper trendline, the line which connects the highs, and the lower trendline, the line which connects the lows, run horizontally parallel and the price action is contained within it.
A horizontal channel is often regarded as one of the suitable patterns for timing the market as the buying and selling points are in consolidation.
At the time of analysis, the price of Qtum (QTUM) was recorded at $2.14. If the pattern trend continues, then the price of QTUM might reach the resistance levels of $3.427, $5.869, and $17.216. If the trend reverses, then the price of QTUM may fall to the support of $1.992.
Qtum (QTUM) Resistance and Support Levels The chart given below elucidates the possible resistance and support levels of Qtum (QTUM) in 2025.
QTUM/USDT Resistance and Support Levels (Source: TradingView) From the above chart, we can analyze and identify the following as the resistance and support levels of Qtum (QTUM) for 2025.
Resistance Level 1$4.921Resistance Level 2$15.097Support Level 1$1.837Support Level 2$0.781QTUM Resistance & Support Levels Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI The technical analysis indicators such as Relative Volume (RVOL), Moving Average (MA), and Relative Strength Index (RSI) of Qtum (QTUM) are shown in the chart below.
From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the current Qtum (QTUM) market in 2025.
INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCE50-Day Moving Average (50MA)Nature of the current trend by comparing the average price over 50 days50 MA = $3.177
Price = $3.302
(50MA < Price)Bullish/Uptrend Relative Strength Index (RSI)Magnitude of price change;Analyzing oversold & overbought conditions52.552
<30 = Oversold
50-70 = Neutral
>70 = OverboughtNeutral Relative Volume (RVOL)Asset’s trading volume in relation to its recent average volumesBelow cutoff lineWeak Volume Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVI In the below chart, we analyze the strength and volatility of Qtum (QTUM) using the following technical analysis indicators — Average Directional Index (ADX) and Relative Volatility Index (RVI).
From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the price momentum of Qtum (QTUM).
INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCEAverage Directional Index (ADX)Strength of the trend momentum30.949Strong TrendRelative Volatility Index (RVI)Volatility over a specific period63.89<50 = Low
>50 = High
High Volatility Comparison of QTUM with BTC, ETH Let us now compare the price movements of Qtum (QTUM) with that of Bitcoin (BTC), and Ethereum (ETH).
BTC Vs ETH Vs QTUM Price Comparison (Source: TradingView) From the above chart, we can interpret that the price action of QTUM is similar to that of BTC and ETH. That is, when the price of BTC and ETH increases or decreases, the price of QTUM also increases or decreases respectively.
Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030 With the help of the aforementioned technical analysis indicators and trend patterns, let us predict the price of Qtum (QTUM) between 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030.
Year Bullish Price Bearish PriceQtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2026$17$0.6Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2027$18$0.5Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2028$19$0.4Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2029$20$0.3Qtum (QTUM) Price Prediction 2030$21$0.2 Conclusion If Qtum (QTUM) establishes itself as a good investment in 2025, this year would be favorable to the cryptocurrency. In conclusion, the bullish Qtum (QTUM) price prediction for 2025 is $15.097. Comparatively, the bearish Qtum (QTUM) price prediction for 2025 is $0.781.
If there is a positive elevation in the market momentum and investors’ sentiment, then Qtum (QTUM) might hit $16. Furthermore, with future upgrades and advancements in the Qtum ecosystem, QTUM might surpass its current all-time high (ATH) of $106.88 and mark its new ATH.
FAQ 1. What is Qtum (QTUM)? Qtum (QTUM) is the cryptocurrency of the hybrid blockchain project, Qtum. This project combines the best of Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains to support smart contracts on the Ethereum Virtual Machine.
2. Where can you buy Qtum (QTUM)? Traders can trade Qtum (QTUM) on the following cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance, Huobi Global, HBTC and Hydax Exchange .
3. Will Qtum (QTUM) record a new ATH soon? With the ongoing developments and upgrades within the Qtum platform, Qtum (QTUM) has a high possibility of reaching its ATH soon.
4. What is the current all-time high (ATH) of Qtum (QTUM)? Qtum (QTUM) hit its current all-time high (ATH) of $106.88 (On Jan 07, 2018).
5. What is the lowest price of Qtum (QTUM)? According to CoinMarketCap, QTUM hit its all-time low (ATL) of $0.77 on March 13, 2020.
6. Will Qtum (QTUM) hit $16? If Qtum (QTUM) becomes one of the active cryptocurrencies that majorly maintain a bullish trend, it might rally to hit $16 soon.
7. What will be the Qtum (QTUM) price by 2026? Qtum (QTUM) price might reach $17 by 2026.
8. What will be the Qtum (QTUM) price by 2027? Qtum (QTUM) price might reach $18 by 2027.
9. What will be the Qtum (QTUM) price by 2028? Qtum (QTUM) price might reach $19 by 2028.
10. What will be the Qtum (QTUM) price by 2029? Qtum (QTUM) price might reach $20 by 2029.
Top Crypto Predictions
FTX Token (FTT) Price Prediction
Pi (PI) Price Prediction
Litecoin (LTC) Price Prediction
Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in this chart is solely the author’s. It does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto team encourages all to do their own research before investing.
As promised, the leading US crypto exchange Coinbase has dramatically increased the number of coins supported on its platform. The company just added Stellar (XLM), a few weeks after the long-rumored debut of XRP.
So which coins will land the coveted Coinbase listing next?
Back in December, Coinbase revealed it’s taking a hard look at 31 additional cryptocurrencies. The platform now supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Stellar, Ethereum Classic, Zcash, 0x, Basic Attention Token and USD Coin.
That leaves 28 coins on Coinbase’s list of prospects.
Coinbase Pro, the company’s professional trading platform, already supports a handful of the coins on the list above: Civic, Dai, District0x, Golem, Loom, Decentraland and Zcash.
In March, NewsBTC sat down with Max Kordek, the founder of Lisk, to pick his brain about his project, the broader crypto and blockchain industry, and the future of Bitcoin.
Related Reading: HTC Exec: Facebook Coin is like the Intranet, Bitcoin is like the Internet The Latest On Lisk NewsBTC: Thanks for sitting down with us. For those who don’t know Lisk, can you give us a 30 second to a one-minute explanation of your project in general?
Max Kordek: Lisk is a blockchain application platform with its own crypto asset, LSK. We aim to enable devs and entrepreneurs to create their own blockchain, which is fully independent and customizable to a large degree. The second step will be interoperability, so that these independent blockchains become sidechains, which then interact with the mainchain and each other, becoming an independent part of the bigger internal ecosystem of Lisk. Our tools are based on JavaScript which taps into a fast evolving programming language, rich developer base, and open source culture. We’ve also recently diversified a section of our code to TypeScript, which will support larger application building.
NewsBTC: Cool. So why did Lisk decide to go with DPoS instead of PoW? Were there centralization risks?
Max: My journey in blockchain first began with the purchase of a Litecoin miner in 2012. Back then, I was living in this very small student apartment in Germany, which was only about 20 square meters. The small space made the miner run super hot, and after two months I had enough. Through this experience, I’ve started to develop a dislike against the kind of inefficiency and this waste of electricity that Proof of Work systems create. I then began to look into alternatives to mining. I stumbled across NXT, then Peercoin, the first viable Proof of Stake coin in existence, which I fell in love with. It was amazing to have a server, which cost $10 to $20 a month to maintain and run the network from. I got really active in that community. Eventually, Peercoin fell apart, mainly because they failed to establish an organization to actually push the technology forward.
After Peercoin, I found Crypti, which provided that central business pushing the protocol forward. It was also the first organization where I discovered the Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). However, Crypti also had its own issues with a very small team and even lower levels of funding. I decided to create something new with my partner Oliver Beddows. From the get-go, we knew it shouldn’t have anything to do with PoW. That’s how Lisk and Lightcurve came about. There are many benefits of our form of DPoS, but one of the main ones is that it is beneficial to what we specifically are building. If you want to create a blockchain platform where people can just spin up their own chains, DPoS is much easier to kickstart and safer to maintain than normal PoS. If you rely only on pure PoS, it may not be very secure, so it’s better to have delegates you can trust.
Max Kordek Delegates on the Lisk network know the codebase and the network through and through. Many of them build open source solutions and products, spot bugs on our Testnet, or migrate to critical releases in an extremely timely manner! It depends on what use case you want to implement, but having a secure network is what most of our stakeholders can agree on. As to centralization risks, there is a degree of fluidity to our network with some individuals entering and falling out of the delegated 101. We’ve also recently opened up the Lisk Improvement Proposals where both Lightcurve and community authors can submit their own proposals for how to make our consensus algorithm even better.
NewsBTC: With DPoS, EOS enlists 21 delegates and Ark, 51 delegates. So how did you come with the 101 delegate number?
Max: Dan Larimer runs EOS. Before EOS he ran Steemit and Bitshares, which utilized 101 delegates. We took the same number, which both he and Charles Hoskinson used back in the day, because it is a good balance between centralization and decentralization. 21 delegates are too few. Sure, the network is high-performance, but 21 entities controlling the network could be dangerous. 500 or 1,000, on the other hand, is too much, as such a number of delegates would cause too many inefficiencies in the network. So to put it simply, for us 101 delegates sits right in the sweet spot of the number of nodes necessary to move our blockchain forward, while the odd number gets rid of the ties by ensuring there’s always a majority on the network.
NewsBTC: What’s your vision for Lisk Academy? Do you guys want to spark adoption through education?
Max: Even after the bull market of 2017, only a few people on the street know what Bitcoin is, let alone the underlying technology of blockchain. We need to educate those who have the power to interact with blockchain, whether its building or investing. Right now, it’s not even about Lisk, but just blockchain as a technology. The next step is accessibility, meaning that we should ramp down the complexity of the blockchain ecosystem to aid the user experience. Once you educate people and they have access to the ecosystem, then you onboard them onto projects like Lisk and our SDK.
This is why we don’t attend as many conferences as Token2049 anymore. It sounds a bit bad, but we don’t want to constantly be in this kind of a crypto bubble. We need people from outside of the industry to enter. But they won’t enter without education. We just need to have a go-to place for people to learn about blockchain and Lisk. We also provide educational marketing content and documentation for developers wanting to take the next step and experiment with our technology.
Kordek’s Thoughts On The Crypto Industry NewsBTC: So do you think that education is the one thing holding back crypto adoption right now?
Max: I think many things are holding it back currently. One is definitely education. If we just don’t know or understand what it is, we won’t adopt it. Right now we need builders, who harness this technology to come up with viable use cases. And they, of course, need to know how this technology works. My mother doesn’t need to know about blockchain. But my developer colleagues who actually have the power to build need to know the ins and outs of not only blockchain technology, but also blockchain building and everything else needed to get them coding. Another problem is use cases. People still ask, ‘what can we really achieve with this technology?’ People have no clue yet. Building on Ethereum is tough right now, but it’s the best experience in the industry by far. It isn’t optimal, so we need much better tooling and use case inspiration for developers. That, in my opinion, is why adoption has been pretty much slow.
NewsBTC: What is your end vision for this ecosystem? Do you see a world where everything is based on these technologies?
Max: I don’t think that everything will be based on blockchain. Yesterday I was on a panel discussion covering a very interesting topic — Web 3.0. It was said that blockchain is one technological level above texting (Web 3.0 v.s. 2.0). The Internet as a whole still has Web 1.0 applications, including simple internet pages and so on. Those don’t go away. And why should they? We have Web 2.0 pages, like Facebook, Twitter, etc. They will not disappear because of blockchain. So not everything will be run on blockchain, but there are quite a few processes that can be optimized with this technology. I’m a strong advocate for sure, but I just don’t see it as the golden technology that will disrupt absolutely everything. Right now, we don’t even have one use case that has reached 100,000 daily active users. Facebook, on the other hand, has one billion active users. So in the end, I see a world where blockchain really helps people in very specific industries and solutions.
NewsBTC: So you’re saying that I guess there have been there’s been very little adoption right now, but what’s one application for one use case that you think has a lot of potential?
Max: Right now, we’re still heavy in the R&D regarding which use case will be most suitable for our technology. One industry we want to start off with is definitely gaming. That’s an obvious use case right there, given opportunities for tokenization and so forth. Governmental work like notarization or traveling documentation is a pain right now that could easily be improved by blockchain. These processes can be optimized with a digital identity system that automatically checks you and is stored on the blockchain for secure and cross-border access. There are many use cases out there. In the end, we are creating technology that is customizable and scalable enough to allow many of these to be explored.
NewsBTC: How has this bear market been compared to ones seen previously?
Max: The previous ones were much worse. Bitcoin went from like $1,000 to $150, and people were saying that you should pack your bags and say your goodbyes. At that time, there was no development happening. There weren’t these global conference chains with thousands of attendees. It was really dark on Reddit. And now, we’re potentially just coming out of another crypto winter, but there are 20 to 30 meetups happening in Hong Kong this week, even more across the world. If you go on our GitHub, subscribe to Crypto Twitter, or check out big crypto publications, you can see there’s a wide range of activity going on amongst the projects that survived this crash.
There’s so much that is happening. There’s seriously much more development than any other point in blockchain’s history. So for me, the ones before were much worse economics-wise, activity-wise, and sentiment-wise. The thing is, we are patient because we see a big future ahead of this technology. This is just part of normal market cycles. The companies are getting more serious, and the first iterations of products are beginning to pop up. For example, we’re about to release our Alpha SDK, the first version of our blockchain-building toolkit that will allow developers to create proof-of-concept applications aligned with our codebase.
NewsBTC: Do you think that the crypto market is oversaturated at the moment?
Max: Well, I made my own altcoin, so it’s very hard to comment on that one. What I think is that the market overall regulates itself, especially when it feels oversaturated. You see crypto assets that are dropping lower and lower on CMC, as they have no activity, no trading volume, and that’s totally fine by me. That’s a sign that it’s oversaturated. And I assume that is why projects are dying as the market stabilizes and matures. There’s still potential for thousands and thousands more crypto assets and projects around them. I just want to see projects with an actual use case and a true focus on development. In our case, Lisk will be used for registering a sidechain. In Ethereum’s case, it can be used for smart contract execution. But why do all these other apps need a token? Status, for example, a messenger project, doesn’t really need a token. I have not looked into it in-depth, but that raises a question mark. So yeah, I think it’s saturated, but it’s regulating itself in time and legitimate technology with a good business backing stays afloat.
NewsBTC: How has the Lisk team been doing in this market cycle?
Max: Lisk is always progressing at a sustainable pace. The technology is going forward as I mentioned before with the upcoming release of our Alpha SDK. Things on the business side are playing support to the constant development – we were lucky enough to have a professionalized financial team to help us diversify our holdings. This gave us a healthy balance of fiat and crypto, which resulted in extra stability throughout this bear market. We’re also continuing to grow our business and fostering a global developer community. Our community members actually started physical developer spaces across the globe, including the Netherlands, Japan, and China. There’s a lot of activity happening on GitHub and real life!
The Future Of Bitcoin NewsBTC: How do you expect for the crypto market to play out over 2019?
Max: I really have no idea. It could go up or down. But right now, it seems to be stabilizing very slowly. Eventually, though, there could be another, let’s call it, wick lower. I assume personally that it will continue to go up towards the end of next year. In 1.5 years is the Bitcoin halving, so the market could go up because of that. But I don’t care really. It’s not only about the money.
NewsBTC: What do you see Bitcoin as? Is it an SoV, MoE, or anything else?
Max: I think of it mainly as a store of value with complete independence of any other market. That means you can just fill up your portfolio with 1% to 2% with it, and it can act as a secure investment next to gold. I also tend to see it as a means of exchange, I bought some stuff online with BTC recently. Yesterday, I went to the Lotus Bar in Hong Kong, which accepts Bitcoin. It’s a nice thing, but I’m not going to go there every time just to use BTC. So in end, it’s more of a store of value. It’s important to add that I also see it as a stepping stone for blockchain technology overall. It may not be the most scalable, but it’s inspiring. It may not be a world currency, but it should become a means of exchange in one way or another.
NewsBTC: What do you think of the whole JP Morgan Coin or FBCoin? Do you like what they bring to the table?
Max: I know many many people who hate Mark Zuckerberg in the industry, but it’s important to remember Facebook is a tech company at the end of the day. When your company grows as large as Facebook did, it’s hard to stay true to your original ethos. Many things can go wrong. And maybe Facebook had many things go wrong this year, but it isn’t the fault of Mark Zuckerberg alone. I still think Zuckerberg has the best things in mind. I see FBCoin as an interesting concept. I’m not too sure how scalable it will be, as WhatsApp or Facebook itself has billions of users. But why not? I think it will be pretty cool, no matter if it’s decentralized, centralized, etc. As long as it uses blockchain technology, that is exactly what we want and need. JP Morgan Coin, on the other hand, is something I hate. First, they say Bitcoin is a scam, then they were revealed to have participated in the Bitcoin market, and then they suddenly come up with their own coin. At the end of the day, JP Morgan isn’t a technology company, so they shouldn’t do that. This project is just for their monetary gain. They should stick with the old economy and do their crap there. They don’t really belong here.
NewsBTC: It’s my final question. Can crypto succeed without institutional involvement, like investments from those on Wall Street?
Max: Yeah definitely. I think people are more powerful than institutions. With blockchain and Bitcoin, we’re going towards true peer-to-peer transactions and exchanges. On a global scale, this will be much more powerful than any institution in the world. Still, financial institutions are great leverage, as they can give people the power to make this whole movement. We can utilize those institutions, but we don’t need them in the end.
Months ago, Binance announced its Binance US and began to accept deposits from US citizens on September 18, starting with Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Litecoin (LTC) and USDT.
Binance US later grew this number to 19 and according to a recently published blog post written by Binance US CEO Catherine Coley, the company is now considering adding another 18 tokens to those already listed.
In the post, the exchange suggests that its decision to expand its list of supported tokens is borne out of the need to have “the most diverse selection of high-quality digital assets, without high fees.”
This expansion is bound to ensure that all of the exchange’s customers are not denied access to the bigger market with a lot more tokens and competition, ensuring that customers can trade assets with “true utility.”
The tokens currently been considered are Celer Network (CELR), Decreed (DCR), Enjin Coin (ENJ), Fantom (FTM), Icon (ICX), IOST (IOST), Komodo (KMD), OmiseGo (OMG), Harmony (ONE), Ontology (ONT), Ren (REN), Status (SNT), Theta (THETA), TomoChain (TOMO), Tron (TRX), NEM (XEM), Tezos (XTZ), and Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR).
The announcement also adds a reminder that all new users will get a $15 bonus when they sign up and will be able to trade free of charge for 30 days as it has been doing since the launch. Because Binance US is unavailable in some US states, the announcement also intimates that the platform is working on expanding access to the states that do not have Binance US access.
On the issuance of these tokens, Coley suggests that the company will take whatever measures it deems fit, to protect against fraud:
“Binance.US recognizes that the ease of issuing blockchain tokens and the perceived lack of regulation could make these tokens targets for abuse. Binanace.US has both legal obligations and moral duties to shield our users from fraudulent blockchain projects and combat financial crimes.”
Coley then concludes by asking the public to do “digital homework” before any decisions are made suggesting that customers are to not only learn about the prospective assets but also about methods being used by Binance.
Today, the Kava Coalition welcomed an important update from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), which revised its Consumer Fact Sheet for Kava to clearly recognize traditionally prepared kava as a lawful single ingredient conventional food when steeped in water.
Following input by the Kava Coalition and ongoing dialogue with state regulators, CDPH updated its guidance to explicitly state that kava steeped solely in water and prepared as a single ingredient beverage is not regulated as a food additive. The updated Consumer Facts Kava 2026 document now reads: “Kava would generally not be regulated as a food additive if kava is steeped in only water to brew tea and consumed as a single ingredient conventional food.”
In addition to this clarification, CDPH materially revised the summary section of the fact sheet. While the earlier version referenced only the absence of regulatory limitations for kava as a dietary supplement, the updated document now states that “there are currently no regulatory limitations regarding the use of kava as a single ingredient conventional food or dietary supplement.” This change explicitly expands lawful use beyond supplements and directly affirms the legitimacy of traditional water-based kava preparation.
“This update provides long-needed clarity for consumers, businesses, and regulators alike,” said Douglas La Rose, Executive Director of the Kava Coalition. “For more than a year, the Kava Coalition has worked closely with kava bars across California to petition for clear guidance, and the state has now provided that clarity. We also consulted extensively with Pacific Islander communities who were deeply concerned about California’s position on kava as a conventional food. Traditional kava preparation has profound cultural significance and a long history of safe use, and we are encouraged to see California’s guidance now clearly reflect that reality.”
California is home to one of the largest Pacific Islander populations in the continental United States, including communities from Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, and other kava-producing cultures. For these communities, kava is not only a social beverage but a cornerstone of cultural practice, ceremony, and identity. The updated CDPH guidance provides meaningful cultural recognition while also supporting small businesses and community spaces that contribute to local economies throughout the state.
The Kava Coalition views this update as a significant step forward for public understanding, regulatory consistency, and cultural recognition in California. After a period of uncertainty, the revised guidance offers a more stable and accurate framework for how kava is prepared and consumed across the state.
The Coalition expressed appreciation for the engagement of CDPH staff and acknowledged the persistence and collaborative efforts of its members and partners who contributed to this outcome.
Copies of the prior and updated fact sheets are available upon request from CDPH.
About Kava Coalition
The Kava Coalition is an alliance of noble kava consumers, experts, and industry leaders committed to advancing kava education, advocacy, and choice. By promoting responsible consumption, market transparency, and cultural respect, the Coalition works to ensure that noble kava is widely recognized, accessible, and valued as a safe, pro-social beverage. For more information, visit www.kavacoalition.org.
EZNEWSWIRE: Kava Coalition Applauds Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Update Clarifying the Status of Traditional Preparation and Prepackaged Kava Sales
Several juggernauts of the crypto-industry were named in a class action lawsuit for the alleged sale of unregistered securities. Those mentioned include Binance, BitMEX, Tron, Block.one, Kyber Network, and KuCoin, among dozens of others.
Crypto’s Biggest Companies Face Class-Action Lawsuits According to OffShoreAlert, 11 class action lawsuits were filed against 42 defendants in the Southern District of New York Court on April 3 for the sale of unregistered securities. The lawsuits have separately named industry giants such as Binance, BitMEX operator HDR Global Trading, Tron, Civic, Block.one, Kyber Network, Status, Bibox, Quantstamp, and KuCoin.
Apart from companies, the lawsuit also named several of their executives. Changpeng Zhao of Binance, Brendan Blumer and Larimer of Block.one (EOS), Vinny Lingham of Civic, and Arthur Hayes of BitMEX, to name a few.
All of the lawsuits were brought by Roche Freedman LLP, a law firm based in New York and Miami. The law firm is famous in the crypto industry for representing the estate of Dave Kleiman in its lawsuit against Craig Wright.
Judgement Day for ICO Issuers? Since 2017, ICO investors have collectively lost hundreds of millions of dollars after their investments lost 80% or more of their value. Under law, U.S. investors are entitled to a certain degree of transparency through financial disclosures mandated by the Securities Exchange Commission.
Advertisement
During the mania, the crypto entrepreneurs who raised these millions often overlooked the legal implications. Cryptocurrency was an entirely new asset. Many played it fast and loose, and made off with huge sums of money with little accountability. A large number of these companies failed.
But, the handful that succeeded were wildly successful, and these are likely the ones worth suing. For these companies, their success might be catching up with them.
Legality of ICOs in Question The lawsuits were filed on behalf of several individuals, including Chase Williams, Alexander Clifford, Eric Lee, and William Zhang, but also include “all others similarly situated.” That is, other people who invested in these projects.
The plaintiffs have alleged that all of the 11 companies included in the lawsuit violated federal securities laws. These companies unlawfully created and issued securities, circumventing regulations through the use of tokens. Exchanges were also implicated for their role in selling these assets to investors in the United States.
What’s surprising is that it’s not just companies. The executives and directors of these industry juggernauts were also named. However, it’s expected that most of the companies included in the lawsuit will outright dismiss the assertions.
But, dismissing all the claims might be difficult. This case is not without precedent.
A judge in the Southern District of New York recently ruled that the tokens issued by Telegram were securities and should have been registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Commission itself has said many times in the past that most ICOs are assumed to be securities, until proven otherwise. The burden of proof rests on the issuers.
Nevertheless, this lawsuit will put U.S. courts to the test. The 42 defendants named in the case reside in 16 different countries, many of which are lightly regulated. To further complicate matters, some of these companies do not even have bank accounts or established offices, making enforcement a herculean task.
Decentralization is a tenet in the world of Bitcoin. As such, the courts in New York may find it difficult to pin these companies down if they are found culpable.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Priyeshu Garg. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Bullish ENJ price prediction for 2025 is $0.1188 to $0.1866. Enjin Coin (ENJ) price might reach $1 soon. Bearish ENJ price prediction for 2025 is $0.0355. In this Enjin Coin (ENJ) price prediction 2025, 2026-2030, we will analyze the price patterns of ENJ by using accurate trader-friendly technical analysis indicators and predict the future movement of the cryptocurrency.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Enjin Coin (ENJ) Current Market StatusWhat is Enjin Coin (ENJ)?Enjin Coin (ENJ) 24H TechnicalsENJIN COIN (ENJ) PRICE PREDICTION 2025
Enjin Coin (ENJ) Support and Resistance LevelsEnjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA & RSIEnjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVIComparison of ENJ with BTC, ETHENJIN COIN (ENJ) PRICE PREDICTION 2026, 2027-2030CONCLUSIONFAQ Enjin Coin (ENJ) Current Market Status Current Price $0.06680 24 – Hour Price Change 1.17% Down 24 – Hour Trading Volume $10.1M Market Cap $125.41M Circulating Supply 1.87B ENJ All – Time High $4.85 (On Nov 25, 2021) All – Time Low $0.01562 (On Nov 03, 2017) ENJ Current Market Status (Source: CoinMarketCap) What is Enjin Coin (ENJ) TICKERENJBLOCKCHAINEthereumCATEGORYERC-20 TokenLAUNCHED ONJune 2018UTILITIESGovernance, Fast Transactions, gas fees & rewards Enjin Coin (ENJ) is an ERC-20 token native to the Enjin platform, a gaming community platform. The transactions of ENJ are secured in the network by the proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism.
ENJ is used to buy, sell and trade NFTs in the Enjin ecosystem. Thus, these tokens serve primarily as utility tokens for backing NFTs. Users and developers can use Enjin (ENJ) to mint and create unique in-game NFTs. Along with ENJ, the Enjin ecosystem also has another token called Efinity token (EFI) which is the governance token of the native decentralized Enjin metaverse.
Enjin ecosystem enables users to utilize its native blockchain products to create unique NFTs for businesses, especially in the gaming industry.
Enjin Coin 24H Technicals
(Source: TradingView)
Enjin Coin (ENJ) ranks 307th on CoinMarketCap in terms of its market capitalization. The overview of the Enjin Coin price prediction for 2025 is explained below with a daily time frame.
In the above chart, Enjin (ENJ) laid out a descending channel pattern. Descending channel patterns are short-term bearish in that a stock moves lower within a descending channel, but they often form longer-term uptrends as continuation patterns. Higher prices often follow the descending channel pattern. But only after an upside penetration of the upper trend line. A descending channel is drawn by connecting the lower highs and lower lows of a security’s price with parallel trendlines to show a downward trend.
A trader could make a selling bet within a descending channel when the security price reaches its resistance trendline. An ascending channel is the opposite of a descending channel. Both ascending and descending channels are primary channels followed by technical analysts.
At the time of analysis, the price of Enjin Coin (ENJ) was recorded at $0.06680. If the pattern trend continues, then the price of ENJ might reach the resistance levels of $0.1203 and $0.1622. If the trend reverses, then the price of ENJ may fall to the support of $0.0862 and $0.0589.
Enjin Coin (ENJ) Resistance and Support Levels The chart given below elucidates the possible resistance and support levels of Enjin Coin (ENJ) in 2025.
ENJ/USDT Resistance and Support Levels (Source: TradingView)
From the above chart, we can analyze and identify the following as resistance and support levels of Enjin Coin (ENJ) for 2025.
Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI The technical analysis indicators, such as Relative Volume (RVOL), Moving Average (MA), and Relative Strength Index (RSI) of Bitcoin (ENJ), are shown in the chart below.
ENJ/USDT RVOL, MA, RSI (Source: TradingView)
From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the current Enjin Coin (ENJ) market in 2025.
INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCE50-Day Moving Average (50MA)Nature of the current trend by comparing the average price over 50 days50 MA = $0.0826Price = $0.0909
(50MA < Price)Bullish/UptrendRelative Strength Index (RSI)Magnitude of price change;Analyzing oversold & overbought conditions63.9425
<30 = Oversold
50-70 = Neutral>70 = OverboughtNeutralRelative Volume (RVOL)Asset’s trading volume in relation to its recent average volumesBelow cutoff lineWeak volume Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVI In the below chart, we analyze the strength and volatility of Enjin Coin (ENJ) using the following technical analysis indicators — Average Directional Index (ADX) and Relative Volatility Index (RVI).
ENJ/USDT ADX, RVI (Source: TradingView)
From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the price momentum of Enjin Coin (ENJ).
INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCEAverage Directional Index (ADX)Strength of the trend momentum58.6050Strong TrendRelative Volatility Index (RVI)Volatility over a specific period54.12<50 = Low
>50 = High
HIgh volatility Comparison of ENJ with BTC, ETH Let us now compare the price movements of Enjin Coin (ENJ) with those of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).
BTC Vs ETH Vs ENJ Price Comparison (Source: TradingView)
From the above chart, we can interpret that the price action of ENJ is similar to that of BTC and ETH. That is, when the price of BTC and ETH increases or decreases, the price of ENJ also increases or decreases respectively.
Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030 With the help of the aforementioned technical analysis indicators and trend patterns, let us predict the price of Enjin Coin (ENJ) between 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, and 2030.
Year Bullish Price Bearish PriceEnjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2026$3$0.03Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2027$5$0.02Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2028$6$0.01Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2029$9$0.009Enjin Coin (ENJ) Price Prediction 2030$10$0.008 Conclusion If Enjin Coin (ENJ) establishes itself as a good investment in 2025, this year would be favorable to the cryptocurrency. In conclusion, the bullish Enjin Coin (ENJ) price prediction for 2025 is $0.1866. Comparatively, if unfavorable sentiment is triggered, the bearish Enjin Coin (ENJ) price prediction for 2025 is $0.0355.
If the market momentum and investors’ sentiment positively elevate, then Enjin Coin (ENJ) might hit $1. Furthermore, with future upgrades and advancements in the Enjin Coin ecosystem, ENJ might surpass its current all-time high (ATH) of $4.85. and mark its new ATH.
FAQ 1. What is Enjin Coin (ENJ)? Enjin Coin (ENJ) is the native cryptocurrency of the Enjin Coin Network. It was launched as an ERC-20 token in 2017. It majorly is deployed in backing the NFTs in the gaming platform associated with Enjin.
2. Where can you purchase Enjin Coin (ENJ)? Enjin Coin (ENJ) has been listed on many crypto exchanges which include Binance, OKX, WEEX, Deepcoin, and Bybit.
3. Will Enjin Coin (ENJ) reach a new ATH soon? With the ongoing developments and upgrades within the Enjin platform, ENJ has a high possibility of reaching its ATH soon.
4. What is the current all-time high (ATH) of Enjin Coin (ENJ)? On November 25, 2021 Enjin Coin (ENJ) reached its new all-time high (ATH) of $4.82.
5. Is Enjin Coin (ENJ) a good investment in 2025? Enjin Coin (ENJ) seems to be one of the top-gaining cryptocurrencies this year. According to the recorded achievements of Enjin in the past few months, ENJ is considered a good investment in 2025.
6. Can Enjin Coin (ENJ) reach $1? Enjin Coin (ENJ) is one of the active cryptos that continues to maintain its bullish state. Eventually, if this bullish trend continues then Enjin Coin (ENJ) will hit $1 soon.
7. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2026? Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $3 by 2026.
8. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2027? Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $5 by 2027.
9. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2028? Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $6 by 2028.
10. What will be Enjin Coin (ENJ) price by 2029? Enjin Coin (ENJ) price is expected to reach $9 by 2029.
Top Crypto Predictions
Cardano (ADA) Price Prediction
Bitcoin SV (BSV) Price Prediction
Litecoin (LTC) Price Prediction
Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in this chart is solely the author’s. It does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto team encourages all to do their own research before investing.
The launch of a blockchain mainnet represents the transition from controlled testing to permanent production use. For Telcoin, that transition carries additional weight because the network is designed to operate inside regulated telecommunications environments while supporting public blockchain functionality. As such, investors, developers, mobile network operators, and regulators have all asked the same question. When will the Telcoin Network mainnet go live?
Based on public documentation from its roadmap, this article explains the Telcoin Network's current testnet status, security posture, regulatory design history, and the realistic timeline for mainnet launch.
Telcoin Network Roadmap OverviewThe Telcoin Network roadmap outlines a milestone-based path to a decentralized Layer-1 blockchain integrated with global telecom infrastructure. The roadmap avoids fixed calendar dates. Progress depends on completing security audits, performance validation, compliance reviews, and validator onboarding.
The roadmap currently spans two active stages:
The Adiri public testnet phase is ongoing. The mainnet release occurs only after all testnet milestones, security tracks, and audits are complete. Based on current progress, the earliest expected mainnet launch window remains no earlier than Q1 2026.
Two architectural principles guide the roadmap. First telecom-grade reliability aligned with GSMA standards. Second compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine to support smart contracts, tooling, and interoperability.
What is the Purpose and Scope of The Adiri Public Testnet?Adiri serves as the public testnet for the Telcoin Network. It allows developers, mobile network operators, ecosystem partners, validators plus community participants to interact with the network in a live environment without production risk.
Adiri exists for instability by design. Continuous upgrades, audits, refactors plus stress testing occur throughout the phase. This environment allows protocol components, governance logic, validator operations plus security assumptions to be tested under realistic conditions.
Adiri is the first point at which external validators, including mobile network operators, can provision nodes, observe network behavior, participate in governance, and prepare for future production roles upon the mainnet launch.
Adiri Phase Structure and Present StatusThe active Adiri testnet phase is divided into three sequential stabilization phases. Each phase builds toward operational readiness required for mainnet launch.
Adiri Release Phase snapshot showing all phases with status showing completed, In Progress, and in QueuePhase One Core Setup Plus Security BaselinePhase One, already completed, focuses on establishing a functional, secure foundation.
Key milestones, as shown in the snapshot, include:
Finalizing components for an open Cantina security competitionDeploying Telcoin Autonomous Organization-controlled validator nodesReleasing a public block explorerDemonstrating a proof-of-concept application.After achieving these milestones, a four-week security assessment was conducted. This includes penetration testing, vulnerability analysis plus remediation planning.
Phase Two Hardening Plus Performance ValidationPhase Two addresses issues identified during the initial audits and strengthens production readiness. Some milestones have already been completed, some are in progress, and a few are in the queue.
Completed milestones include patching security findings, enhancing test coverage, production-hardening the database read/write strategy, improving documentation, publishing the MiCA whitepaper, and improving async logging across all network nodes.
Phase Three Decentralization PreparationPhase Three focuses on final stabilization plus decentralization.
Here, Adiri integrates with the selected bridge solution, and Mobile network operators serve as validators. This step increases geographic distribution, regulatory alignment plus operational diversity across the validator set.
Completion of Phase Three signals readiness to transition toward mainnet security tracks.
Current Security StatusAs of the latest update, no outstanding security patches remain. No critical, high, medium, low, or informational issues exist across public-facing interfaces or internal validator peer categories.
This status reflects continuous remediation throughout Adiri rather than a single audit snapshot. Security posture remains subject to change as new audits commence.
Road to Mainnet TimelineThe road to mainnet includes completing all Adiri phases and all mainnet security tracks. Each independent audit cycle typically spans two to three months. Scheduling review, remediation, plus retesting contribute to duration.
The first major audit cycle is nearing completion, while reparations for the second cycle continue. However, launch timing depends on audit outcomes rather than predetermined dates. The guiding principle remains consistent, and launch occurs when security meets the required standards.
The Telcoin Network targets enterprise deployment across telecom, fintech, and adjacent sectors. By combining GSMA-aligned standards with EVM compatibility, the network supports scalable financial services delivered through mobile infrastructure.
Mobile network operators plus subsidiaries can deploy programmable financial services tailored to regional markets. Legacy telecom billing identity compliance systems integrate with blockchain execution layers. This approach supports payments, remittances, stablecoin issuance plus mobile financial products.
When Will Telcoin Mainnet Launch
Based on current progress, the Telcoin Network mainnet launch is expected no earlier than Q1 2026. This estimate reflects remaining audit cycles, security assessments, and infrastructure readiness, rather than marketing schedules.
The roadmap emphasizes security over speed. Many historical blockchain exploits resulted from rushed launches. Telcoin has adopted a milestone-based approach, with progress publicly visible in its development repositories.
ConclusionThe Telcoin Network roadmap reflects a methodical security-first approach to launching a telecom-integrated Layer 1 blockchain. Through the Adiri public testnet, the network validates validator operations, governance, security, and enterprise readiness under real-world conditions. Mainnet launch depends on a completed audit, hardened infrastructure, and onboarding of decentralized validators, rather than arbitrary deadlines.
As of early 2026, the network has resolved known security issues, completed major cryptographic components plus advanced infrastructure preparation. With remaining audit cycles underway, mainnet remains targeted for no earlier than Q1 2026. This timeline prioritizes reliability, compliance, and trust over speed.
Bullish LPT price prediction for 2025 is $14.3253 to $47.7815. Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $60 soon. Bearish LPT price prediction for 2025 is $1.0828. In this Livepeer (LPT) price prediction 2025, 2026-2030, we will analyze the price patterns of LPT by using accurate trader-friendly technical analysis indicators and predict the future movement of the cryptocurrency.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Livepeer (LPT) Current Market StatusWhat is Livepeer (LPT)? Livepeer (LPT) 24H Technicals LiIVEPEER PRICE PREDICTION 2025
Livepeer (LPT) Support and Resistance Levels Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVIComparison of Livepeer with BTC, ETH LPT PRICE PREDICTION 2026, 2027-2030CONCLUSIONFAQ Livepeer (LPT) Current Market Status Current Price $7.75 24 – Hour Price Change 9.07% Down 24 – Hour Trading Volume $233.19M Market Cap $319.96M Circulating Supply 41.22M LPT All – Time High $100.24 (On Nov 09, 2021) All – Time Low $0.4206 (On Mar 13, 2020 ) LPT Current Market Status (Source: CoinMarketCap) What is Livepeer (LPT) TICKERLPTBLOCKCHAINEthereumCATEGORYWeb3LAUNCHED ONMay 2018UTILITIESStaking, Governance, Transcoding, Incentivization, and Delegation Livepeer (LPT) is a decentralized video infrastructure protocol built on the Ethereum blockchain, designed to provide scalable and cost-efficient video streaming and transcoding services. It aims to disrupt traditional video delivery systems by enabling anyone to contribute computing power to process video, thereby reducing costs for developers and platforms. The native token, LPT, is used for staking and governance within the network. Token holders can delegate their tokens to orchestrators, who perform video transcoding and earn rewards in return. This staking mechanism helps secure the network and incentivizes participation. Livepeer has recently expanded into AI workloads, offering decentralized computing power for tasks like text-to-image generation and video inference. This strategic move diversifies its utility beyond video and positions Livepeer as a competitive infrastructure layer for Web3 media applications. With its open-source model and emphasis on decentralization, Livepeer offers a censorship-resistant, efficient, and community-driven alternative to traditional video streaming services.
Livepeer 24H Technicals
(Source: TradingView)
Livepeer (LPT) ranks 152nd on CoinMarketCap in terms of its market capitalization. The overview of the Livepeer price prediction for 2025 is explained below with a daily time frame.
In the above chart, Livepeer (LPT) laid out a Horizontal channel pattern. The Horizontal channel pattern is also known as the sideways trend. In general, the horizontal channel is formed during the price consolidation. In this pattern, the upper trendline, the line that connects the highs, and the lower trendline, the line that connects the lows, run horizontally parallel, and the price action is contained within it.
A horizontal channel is often regarded as one of the suitable patterns for timing the market, as the buying and selling points are in consolidation.
At the time of analysis, the price of Livepeer (LPT) was recorded at $7.75. If the pattern trend continues, then the price of LPT might reach the resistance levels of $9.63, $12.35, and $20.56. If the trend reverses, then the price of LPT may fall to the support of $0.5916 and $7.50.
Livepeer (LPT) Resistance and Support Levels The chart given below elucidates the possible resistance and support levels of Livepeer (LPT) in 2025.
LPT/USDT Resistance and Support Levels (Source: TradingView)
From the above chart, we can analyze and identify the following as resistance and support levels of Livepeer (LPT) for 2025.
Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — RVOL, MA, and RSI The technical analysis indicators such as Relative Volume (RVOL), Moving Average (MA), and Relative Strength Index (RSI) of Livepeer (LPT) are shown in the chart below.
LPT/USDT RVOL, MA, RSI (Source: TradingView)
From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the current Livepeer (LPT) market in 2025.
INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCE50-Day Moving Average (50MA)Nature of the current trend by comparing the average price over 50 days50 MA = $5.940Price = $7.706
(50MA < Price)Bearish/DowntrendRelative Strength Index (RSI)Magnitude of price change;Analyzing oversold & overbought conditions52.908
<30 = Oversold
50-70 = Neutral>70 = OverboughtNeutralRelative Volume (RVOL)Asset’s trading volume in relation to its recent average volumesBelow cutoff lineWeak Volume Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2025 — ADX, RVI In the below chart, we analyze the strength and volatility of Livepeer (LPT) using the following technical analysis indicators — Average Directional Index (ADX) and Relative Volatility Index (RVI).
LPT/USDT ADX, RVI (Source: TradingView)
From the readings on the chart above, we can make the following inferences regarding the price momentum of Livepeer (LPT).
INDICATORPURPOSEREADINGINFERENCEAverage Directional Index (ADX)Strength of the trend momentum54.742Strong TrendRelative Volatility Index (RVI)Volatility over a specific period24.57
<50 = Low
>50 = HighLow Volatility Comparison of LPT with BTC, ETH Let us now compare the price movements of Livepeer (LPT) with that of Bitcoin (BTC), and Ethereum (ETH).
BTC Vs ETH Vs LPT Price Comparison (Source: TradingView)
From the above chart, we can interpret that the price action of LPT is dissimilar to that of BTC and ETH. That is, when the price of BTC and ETH increases, the price of LPT decreases, if the price of BTC and ETH decreases, the price of LPT increases. .
Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030 With the help of the aforementioned technical analysis indicators and trend patterns, let us predict the price of Livepeer (LPT) between, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, and 2030.
Year Bullish Price Bearish PriceLivepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2026$75$1Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2027$89$0.9Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2028$101$0.8Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2029$115$0.7Livepeer (LPT) Price Prediction 2030$120$0.6 Conclusion If Livepeer (LPT) establishes itself as a good investment in 2025, this year would be favorable to the cryptocurrency. In conclusion, the bullish Livepeer (LPT) price prediction for 2025 is $47.7815. Comparatively, if unfavorable sentiment is triggered, the bearish Livepeer (LPT) price prediction for 2025 is $1.0828.
If the market momentum and investors’ sentiment positively elevates, then Livepeer (LPT) might hit $60. Furthermore, with future upgrades and advancements in the Livepeer ecosystem, LPT might surpass its current all-time high (ATH) of $100.24 and mark its new ATH.
FAQ 1. What is Livepeer (LPT)? Livepeer (LPT) is a decentralized video infrastructure protocol built on the Ethereum blockchain, designed to provide scalable and cost-efficient video streaming and transcoding services
2. Where can you buy Livepeer (LPT)? Traders can trade Livepeer (LPT) on the following cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance, MEXC Global, Gate.io, Kraken, Huobi, Bitget, Bilaxy, LBank, OrangeX, eToro.
3. Will Livepeer (LPT) record a new ATH soon? With the ongoing developments and upgrades within the Livepeer platform, Livepeer (LPT) has a high possibility of reaching its ATH soon.
4. What is the current all-time high (ATH) of Livepeer (LPT)? Livepeer (LPT) reached its current all-time high (ATH) of $100.24 on November 9, 2021.
5. What is the lowest price of Livepeer (LPT)? According to CoinMarketCap, LPT hit its all-time low (ATL) of $0.4206 on Mar 13, 2020.
6. Will Livepeer (LPT) hit $60? If Livepeer (LPT) becomes one of the active cryptocurrencies that majorly maintain a bullish trend, it might rally to hit $60 soon.
7. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2026? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $75 by 2026.
8. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2027? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $89 by 2027.
9. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2028? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $101 by 2028.
10. What will be the Livepeer (LPT) price by 2029? Livepeer (LPT) price might reach $115 by 2029.
Top Crypto Predictions
Pepe (PEPE) Price Prediction
Chainlink (LINK) Price Prediction
Solana (SOL) Price Prediction
Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in this article is solely the author’s. It does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto team encourages all to do their own research before investing.
We are excited to announce that Status Network has partnered with Aragon to deploy its pre-deposit vaults for mainnet, offering exciting benefits to those who get in early.
An OG in the crypto industry, Aragon powers protocols with products and services designed to manage capital allocation, governance, and ownership at scale.
As part of this partnership, Aragon’s open-source DAO infrastructure will underpin the secure pre-deposit vaults Status Network will make available ahead of its mainnet launch.
The first truly gasless L2 blockchain powered by the Linea zkEVM stack, Status Network features a native privacy layer as well as a reputation-based Karma system that aims to prevents spam while rewarding users for staking and participation.
Karma is a soulbound ERC-20 token that cannot be transferred or sold, only earned. Revenue generated by the network – from bridged yield and native apps fees – is gathered in a native funding pool and then allocated to the community through governance by Karma holders.
Before Status Network’s expected mainnet launch in Q1 2026, early adopters will be able to deposit SNT, ETH, LINEA, or stablecoins into their respective vaults. These assets will then be bridged to Status Network upon mainnet launch.
Each vault offers rewards for pre-depositors, including an amount of Karma at launch based on their deposit amount and points from core DeFi protocols on Status Network. As Karma cannot be purchased, pre-depositing is a great way to earn reputation and governance power early on.
Pre-Deposit Vaults TimelineThe pre-deposit campaign will roll out in several phases leading up to mainnet launch. Be the first to know when the vaults open by registering here.
The initial phase will open with the SNT and LINEA pre-deposit vaults. These vaults will remain available until mainnet goes live. As the core token of the Status community, pre-deposited SNT will receive the highest allocation of Karma at launch, set at 25 percent. After mainnet, SNT stakers will also receive 35 percent of the total weekly Karma issuance, making it the strongest long-term option for building reputation.
A subsequent phase will introduce the ETH pre-deposit vault, adding an additional pathway for early participation and yield redistribution.
The final phase will open the stablecoin vault, enabling early participants to redeem GUSD on the L2 at mainnet launch. GUSD is a new yield-generating meta-stablecoin backed by USDT, USDC, and USDS, created in partnership with Generic Protocol.
These pre-deposit vaults will remain open until the mainnet launch of Status Network in Q1 2026.
Remember, pre-depositing not only helps build liquidity and protocol resilience at launch, but it also earns you a corresponding amount of native app points and Karma, giving you a head start on building your reputation, your ability to help govern Status Network and other rewards.
“Through the Karma system, Status Network not only allows anyone to use the network without gas fees, but it also gives the community a way to benefit from the network’s revenue and vote on how it is run,” said Status Network lead Cyprien Grau.
“This philosophy of democratic agency and robust decentralised governance is shared by Aragon, making them the ideal infrastructure partner to power our pre-deposit vaults as we prepare for mainnet.”
Stay tuned for more updates from Status Network:
X (Twitter): Follow @StatusL2 for the latest updatesTelegram: Join the Status Network Builders Chat
Stablecoins are blockchain tokens pegged 1:1 to a fiat currency, usually the U.S. dollar. They give you the programmability and speed of crypto without the price swings. That simple combination has turned them into plumbing for DeFi, cross-border payments, remittances, treasury management, and on-chain settlement.
The market crossed $250 billion in total supply by mid-2025 and has continued growing. As of early 2026, total stablecoin market capitalization is above $310 billion according to DefiLlama data. Tether’s USDT sits around $183-187B (roughly 60% of the market), Circle’s USDC around $74-76B. Growth has been driven by regulatory clarity in the U.S. and EU and a wave of institutional adoption.
This article is for anyone considering issuing a stablecoin, evaluating the infrastructure to do so, or trying to map the competitive field. It covers issuance models, regulatory frameworks, technical architecture, service providers, the new “stablechains,” step-by-step launch guidance, and the risks worth planning for.
How stablecoin issuance works Issuing a stablecoin means designing, launching, and operating a token where new units are minted only when equivalent reserves or collateral are locked up. Tokens can be burned (destroyed) when someone redeems. The issuer’s job is keeping that mint-burn cycle trustworthy, transparent, and compliant.
You can either build it yourself with custom smart contracts, banking partnerships, and compliance infrastructure, or use a turnkey platform (often called “Stablecoin-as-a-Service”). Most organizations in 2026 choose the turnkey route, at least to start. But understanding both matters. Even turnkey solutions force architectural decisions that stick with you for years.
Which issuance model fits? Every stablecoin starts with a model decision. Your choice determines capital requirements, regulatory burden, revenue mechanics, and risk profile.
Fiat-backed (custodial / off-chain reserves) The dominant model, accounting for over 90% of the market. Also the one regulators prefer.
Users or institutions deposit fiat (USD cash, Treasuries, repos, money market funds, or insured bank deposits) with the issuer or a qualified custodian. The issuer mints an equivalent number of tokens on-chain. When someone redeems, the tokens get burned and the reserves are released. Reserves sit in segregated, audited accounts.
The economics: issuers earn yield on reserves, primarily from short-term Treasuries. That’s how Circle, Tether, and Paxos make money.
The trade-off is centralization. You depend on banks and custodians, you need licenses, and you’re subject to ongoing audits. But for most businesses, this is the right starting point. USDC, USDT, PayPal’s PYUSD, and newer entrants like KlarnaUSD (issued via Bridge) all use this model.
Crypto-collateralized (on-chain, over-collateralized) Users deposit volatile crypto (typically ETH) into smart contracts at 120-200% collateralization ratios. Price oracles are central to this model. They’re external data feeds (Chainlink is the most widely used) that supply real-time asset prices to on-chain contracts. If oracle data is stale, manipulated, or delayed, liquidations can misfire or fail entirely, potentially threatening the peg. Oracle risk is one of the less-discussed but more dangerous failure modes in crypto-collateralized stablecoins. If the collateral ratio drops below a threshold, automatic liquidation kicks in. Minting and burning happen entirely through smart contracts.
This model is fully transparent and doesn’t need traditional banking relationships. The downside is capital inefficiency: you lock up significantly more value than you mint. Liquidation risk during volatile markets is real. MakerDAO’s DAI is the best-known example. Ethena’s USDe is a newer hybrid.
Revenue comes from stability fees and liquidation penalties rather than reserve yield.
Algorithmic / hybrid Pure algorithmic stablecoins use smart contracts to expand and contract supply through incentive mechanisms, with little or no collateral backing. After the TerraUSD collapse in 2022, this model is largely discredited. Most regulators have banned or restricted it. The EU’s MiCA framework prohibits purely algorithmic stablecoins outright.
Hybrids like FRAX combine partial reserves with algorithmic mechanisms, but adoption remains niche. Unless you have a very specific reason, avoid this model in 2026.
Tokenized deposits / bank-integrated Tokens represent direct claims on insured bank deposits or tokenized reserves on permissioned or public chains. JPMorgan’s JPM Coin (now JPMD) is the primary example. These stablecoins integrate directly with traditional banking rails.
The advantage is deposit insurance and the trust infrastructure of established banks. The downside is ecosystem lock-in and limited multichain reach. This model works best for large financial institutions that already have a banking charter and want to extend their rails onto blockchain.
Regulatory frameworks in 2026 Regulation is simultaneously the biggest barrier and biggest enabler of stablecoin issuance. If you don’t understand the regulatory environment, the rest of this article won’t matter much.
The global picture has converged around a few core requirements: 1:1 reserves in high-quality liquid assets, licensing, redemption rights at par, regular audits, and AML/KYC compliance. Most frameworks also restrict or prohibit yield payments directly to stablecoin holders, keeping the instrument classified as a payment tool rather than a security. But the specifics vary by jurisdiction, and the debate around yield-bearing stablecoins is active (the White House held closed-door meetings on this topic as recently as February 2026).
United States: the GENIUS Act and federal/state oversight The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created the first comprehensive federal framework for stablecoin issuance. Only “permitted” issuers can operate: FDIC-insured banks and their subsidiaries, or federally/state-qualified non-bank issuers.
An important structural detail: oversight is split between federal and state regulators depending on issuer type and size. Non-bank issuers with under $10B in circulation can be regulated at the state level under existing money transmitter frameworks. Larger issuers and bank-affiliated issuers fall under federal oversight via banking regulators, with the OCC playing a role for non-bank issuers at the federal level. It’s not a single-regulator model.
Requirements: 1:1 reserves in cash, Treasuries, repos, and insured deposits. Monthly attestations and annual audits for large issuers. Redeemable at par. No interest payments to holders under the current framework. Foreign issuers face restrictions unless their home jurisdiction has equivalence arrangements.
European Union: MiCA The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation took effect across 2024-2025 and creates two categories: e-money tokens (EMTs, pegged to a single currency) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs). Issuers must be EU credit institutions or authorized electronic money institutions. Reserves must be held in high-quality liquid assets at EU banks.
Pure algorithmic stablecoins are banned. Redemption at par is mandatory, often without fees. The ECB has oversight authority for systemically important stablecoins. Full authorization is required by July 1, 2026 for all issuers operating in the EU.
Other jurisdictions The UK is building its framework through FCA and Bank of England e-money rules, with caps for systemic stablecoins. Singapore requires a MAS license and full backing. Japan restricts issuance to banks and trust companies. Hong Kong has introduced HKMA licensing for HKD-pegged stablecoins.
The pattern across all of these: convergence on reserves, redemption rights, and licensing. Differences mainly come down to issuer eligibility and acceptable reserve assets. The U.S. favors Treasuries, the EU favors bank deposits.
Technical architecture: what a modern stablecoin stack looks like Whether you build or buy, you need to understand the components.
Core smart contracts Deployed on one or more blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Algorand, others), these handle minting, burning, and transfer logic. For 2026 compliance, your contracts need role-based access control (minter, burner, pauser, blacklister, clawback roles), pause and freeze functionality for AML and sanctions enforcement, and blacklisting and clawback for court orders.
Most teams start with audited frameworks like OpenZeppelin’s ERC-20Upgradeable combined with Pausable, AccessControl, and UUPS proxy patterns for upgradeability. Some blockchains offer built-in compliance controls at the protocol level. Algorand, for instance, has native freeze and clawback functions that make it attractive for institutional issuers without requiring custom contract logic.
Advanced standards like Tempo’s TIP-20 (on their payments-first L1) add native protocol-level features: built-in mint/burn/transfer restrictions, RBAC, transfer memos for reconciliation, and native yield distribution, all without extra contract complexity.
Issuer backend system A secure, centralized system (typically API-driven) that authorizes minting and burning events. It verifies that fiat deposits arrived before instructing the smart contract to mint, and confirms burn events before releasing fiat for redemption. This is the operational core that ties on-chain activity to off-chain banking.
Custody and reserve layer Fiat and other reserve assets sit in custody accounts at regulated banks or trust companies. Qualified custodians provide regular attestations. Typical reserve composition includes cash, short-term U.S. Treasuries, repos, money market funds, and insured bank deposits. Increasingly, reserves also include tokenized Treasuries from providers like BlackRock, WisdomTree, and Superstate, which generate yield while maintaining liquidity. As a point of reference, Tether’s Q4 2025 attestation reported $141 billion in total U.S. Treasury exposure (direct holdings plus overnight reverse repos), making it one of the largest holders of U.S. sovereign debt globally.
Compliance and identity layer KYC/AML checks and transaction monitoring tools integrate with the issuance and redemption flow. Only verified users can mint or redeem. All on-chain activity gets screened for illicit finance. Blockchain analytics providers like Chainalysis and Blockaid are standard parts of the stack.
Fiat on/off-ramps The bridges between blockchain and traditional finance. Licensed money services businesses like Coinme provide the infrastructure to move funds between bank accounts, cards, and on-chain stablecoins.
Multichain deployment Most stablecoins in 2026 operate across multiple chains. You can deploy natively on each chain, use cross-chain bridges or interoperability protocols (Axelar, LayerZero, Circle’s CCTP), or issue on specialized payment-focused L1s. The choice depends on your target users and use cases.
Security Multiple independent audits are table stakes. Beyond that: timelocks on critical contract functions, multi-sig governance, invariant checks, and HSM or MPC-based key custody. Daily reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves is standard practice, along with monthly attestations.
Stablecoin-as-a-Service providers Most businesses in 2026 use a turnkey provider rather than building from scratch.
Paxos The most established player, operating since 2018. Paxos is the issuer behind PayPal’s PYUSD and has partnerships with Interactive Brokers and other large enterprises. They handle regulatory compliance, reserve custody, and minting/redeeming technology across multiple blockchains.
They’ve processed over $180B in activity and focus on enterprise partnerships. Expect enterprise-level pricing to match.
Circle Circle is first and foremost the issuer of USDC, the second-largest stablecoin. They don’t offer white-label issuance of fully custom-branded stablecoins the way Brale or Bridge do. What they do offer is programmable wallets, Circle Mint for institutional USDC access, and the Circle Payments Network (CPN) for connecting financial institutions. If you want to build payment products on top of an existing, highly regulated stablecoin rather than issuing your own, Circle’s stack is the natural choice.
Circle supports 20+ blockchains, offers API-based integration, and charges transaction-based fees. Their cross-chain transfer protocol (CCTP) is a real differentiator for multichain deployments. Circle also went public on the NYSE in 2025, adding another layer of transparency.
Brale A U.S.-regulated issuance platform that lets businesses create and manage their own fiat-backed stablecoins. Brale acts as the legal issuer under its money transmitter licenses, handling custody, reserve management, and compliance while providing APIs for minting and burning across 20+ blockchains.
Good option for organizations that want a custom-branded stablecoin without building the regulatory infrastructure themselves. Revenue-share pricing model.
Bridge (Stripe-acquired) Bridge offers an Open Issuance API to launch and manage a branded stablecoin with minimal code. They handle reserves, liquidity, compliance, and fiat on/off-ramps. Stripe’s acquisition gives Bridge access to an enormous merchant network.
Bridge has received preliminary approval to establish a national trust bank, which would let them offer regulated custody and reserve management under a federal framework.
Coinbase Custom Stablecoins Launched December 18, 2025, this is Coinbase’s “stablecoin-as-a-service” offering. It lets businesses create custom-branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by USDC and other USD-stablecoins, with Coinbase handling issuance, smart contracts, compliance, and custody. First partners include Flipcash, Solflare, and R2. Separately, Coinbase is also powering stablecoin-denominated institutional funding for Klarna via USDC.
Important nuance: at launch, Custom Stablecoins use USDC as the underlying collateral rather than direct fiat reserves. That means Coinbase is acting as an issuance layer on top of Circle’s stablecoin, not as a direct fiat-to-stablecoin issuer like Paxos or Brale. Coinbase has applied for an OCC national trust charter, which could eventually allow it to custody reserves directly.
Frax Finance Known for its hybrid stablecoin model, Frax now offers “GENIUS-compatible” white-label infrastructure. Per project announcements, Sonic Labs used Frax’s framework to launch a USSD stablecoin backed by tokenized Treasuries. Frax provides modular smart contract infrastructure with built-in composability through LayerZero.
The DeFi-native option, designed for teams comfortable with on-chain tooling.
Stably A primary partner for blockchain platforms like Algorand and Stacks. Stably provides a Stablecoin-as-a-Service suite including fiat on/off-ramps, multi-chain issuance, and compliance. They specialize in stablecoins pegged to various fiat currencies beyond the dollar.
M0 M0 is a programmable stablecoin issuance protocol that separates token logic from reserve custody. It lets businesses build “stablecoin extensions,” which are custom-branded tokens with their own compliance rules, yield mechanics, and access controls, all built on a shared liquidity and interoperability layer. M0 raised a $40M Series B and has over $779M in on-chain supply minted. Bridge (Stripe) uses M0’s protocol under the hood for stablecoin issuance, as confirmed when MetaMask launched mUSD. MoonPay’s PYUSDx framework also runs on M0 infrastructure.
Worth watching closely. M0’s approach of decoupling reserve management from token issuance could become the default pattern for application-specific stablecoins.
Other providers worth noting Agora offers regulated stablecoin issuance with a trust-based approach. Bastion takes a similar regulated trust posture. Anchorage Digital is primarily a federally chartered crypto bank providing qualified custody and regulated banking services. It’s not a full stablecoin issuance platform, but it plays a role in the custody and compliance layer that issuers need. Fireblocks provides infrastructure and custody tooling (MPC wallets, workflow automation, settlement) across 100+ chains. It processes roughly 15% of global stablecoin volume and is used by 300+ banks and payment providers, but it’s infrastructure plumbing, not a legal issuer of stablecoins. BitGo offers qualified custody infrastructure. Cobo provides full-suite payment operations, combining MPC custody, payment APIs, and Wallet-as-a-Service across 80+ chains. Tassat focuses on tokenized deposits and real-time settlement for institutional digital asset operations, including its Link platform for real-time collateral and settlement workflows.
The stablechains: purpose-built L1s for stablecoin payments This is probably the most interesting development in stablecoin infrastructure right now. Starting in 2025, a new category of “stablechains” appeared: Layer-1 blockchains built specifically for stablecoin payments and issuance. Instead of deploying on general-purpose chains like Ethereum or Solana, issuers can use infrastructure where stablecoins are first-class citizens rather than an afterthought.
Three projects lead this category: Tempo, Circle Arc, and Tether Plasma. All three are EVM-compatible, target sub-second finality, and aim to make stablecoin transactions competitive with Visa, ACH, and SWIFT. They differ in philosophy, ecosystem, and who they’re designed for.
A word of caution: this category is very early. As of March 2026, only Plasma has a live mainnet with real production volume. Tempo and Arc are on public testnet with mainnet launches expected later in 2026. Performance claims (TPS targets, finality times) are based on testnet data or design targets, not proven production metrics at scale. Partnership announcements reflect stated intentions and early pilots, not necessarily live integrations processing real money. That said, the backers (Stripe, Circle, Tether) have the resources and distribution to make these projects matter, which is why they’re worth tracking closely.
Tempo Incubated by Stripe and Paradigm with over $500M raised. Tempo is a payments-first L1 that takes a deliberately neutral approach. No native token. Gas fees can be paid in any stablecoin through an enshrined AMM that auto-swaps to validators. Issuers aren’t forced into any single stablecoin ecosystem.
Tempo’s native TIP-20 token standard includes built-in mint/burn restrictions, protocol-level compliance (TIP-403 Policies), delegatable RBAC with on-chain audit logs, transfer memos for off-chain reconciliation, and native yield distribution. Design targets include 100,000+ TPS and roughly 0.6-second deterministic finality (no re-orgs), though these are pre-mainnet projections, not production-verified metrics.
Other protocol primitives: a Fee AMM (pay gas in any stablecoin, creating structural demand), a native stablecoin DEX for on-chain liquidity and FX (on roadmap), dedicated payment lanes with guaranteed blockspace, and account abstraction with passkey support.
Per Tempo’s announcement materials, the ecosystem roster includes Stripe, Shopify, Nubank, Klarna, DoorDash, Deel, Revolut, Visa, Anthropic, and Deutsche Bank. These are announced partnerships, not necessarily confirmed live integrations. Klarna’s involvement is separately confirmed through its Coinbase stablecoin funding announcement.
Status: public testnet live, mainnet expected H1 2026.
Best for issuers who want maximum flexibility, multi-stablecoin support, and deep payments integration with minimal vendor lock-in. Contact: [email protected].
Circle Arc Circle’s own L1, announced August 2025. Arc makes USDC the native gas token, creating a fully dollar-denominated chain. It uses Malachite BFT consensus for sub-second finality (around 780ms) and targets over 50,000 TPS.
The defining feature is a built-in FX engine with on-chain RFQ and PvP settlement, which makes it attractive for cross-currency treasury operations. Arc deeply integrates Circle’s stack: CCTP, native mint/burn, Gateway, and on/off-ramps. It also offers opt-in privacy designed for compliance-ready institutional use.
Partners include BlackRock, Visa, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, HSBC, AWS, Coinbase, and OpenAI.
Status: public testnet with 100+ institutional participants, strong activity since October 2025. Mainnet expected 2026.
Best for institutions already in the USDC ecosystem, or those needing on-chain FX and capital markets infrastructure.
Tether Plasma The only stablechain with a fully live mainnet as of March 2026. Plasma is Tether’s chain, built around USDT with a zero-fee transfer model using a Paymaster contract. Sub-second finality at 1,000+ TPS. Over $373M raised.
Plasma supports 25+ stablecoins but is clearly USDT-centric. Per Tether’s communications, it has attracted significant deposits and become one of the larger USDT networks by balance. It includes a native Bitcoin bridge and optional confidential transactions. The ecosystem spans 100+ DeFi partners (including Aave) per project announcements.
Best for USDT-focused use cases, retail and emerging-market payments, and anyone who wants live production volume today.
How to choose between them The decision comes down to a few questions.
What’s your primary stablecoin? USDT points to Plasma. USDC points to Arc. Multi-stablecoin or custom-branded points to Tempo.
Who are your target users? Retail and emerging-market payments: Plasma. Enterprise and institutional capital markets: Arc. Fintechs, merchants, embedded finance: Tempo.
How much execution risk can you tolerate? Plasma is live but carries heavier regulatory scrutiny as a Tether-affiliated project. Tempo and Arc have strong backers but are pre-mainnet.
Many issuers are hedging by testing or launching on multiple chains simultaneously.
End-to-end launch stacks Several providers bundle token issuance, reserve management, compliance, and payment rails into a single integrated offering.
Polygon’s Open Money Stack bundles blockchain settlement, enterprise-grade wallets, and regulated fiat on/off-ramps (via Coinme) into one API. Transactions settle in under 2 seconds at roughly $0.002 each. Institutions can move money from a bank account into a stablecoin, settle on-chain, and convert back to fiat without juggling multiple vendors.
Cobo combines MPC custody, payment APIs, and Wallet-as-a-Service for high-volume stablecoin operations. It supports 80+ chains and plugs into existing treasury systems.
Brale’s unified platform lets an enterprise launch a stablecoin and have it instantly provisioned with on/off-ramps, pricing, APIs, and reporting, all under Brale’s regulatory umbrella.
Step-by-step: how to issue a stablecoin in 2026 The practical sequence, from concept to production.
1. Define purpose and structure. What is the stablecoin for? Payments, treasury management, loyalty programs, embedded finance? Your answer determines which issuance model, platform, and chain make sense. Fiat-backed is the right choice for most use cases. Pick your platform early since switching later is expensive.
2. Secure banking and reserves. Partner with qualified custodians or banks. Set up segregated 1:1 reserve accounts holding cash, short-term Treasuries, repos, money market funds, or insured deposits. Diversify across custodians where possible. Stress-test your liquidity for redemption spikes. Turnkey providers like Brale or Paxos handle much of this, but you still need visibility into the reserve structure.
3. Develop or integrate the technology. If building custom: write and audit your smart contracts (start with OpenZeppelin frameworks), implement compliance controls (RBAC, pause, freeze, clawback), choose your target chains, and get multiple independent security audits. If using a platform: integrate via API (Bridge, Brale) or deploy using native token standards (TIP-20 on Tempo).
4. Set up issuance and redemption flows. Mint tokens when verified fiat deposits arrive. Burn tokens on redemption and release corresponding reserves. Build continuous reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves. Publish monthly attestations.
5. Ensure compliance and transparency. Obtain the necessary licenses (or confirm your turnkey provider holds them). Implement KYC/AML for all mint and redeem operations. Set up transaction monitoring. Publish reserve reports and audit results. Under the GENIUS Act, large issuers need monthly attestations and annual audits. MiCA requires full authorization by mid-2026.
6. Launch and distribute. Deploy on your target chain(s). Get listed on exchanges and DEXs. Provide initial liquidity. Monitor the peg continuously. Integrate into real payment flows: payroll via Deel on Tempo, merchant checkout through Stripe, remittance corridors.
7. Ongoing operations. This is where most of the work lives. Regular audits, risk monitoring, smart contract upgrades, regulatory reporting, and responding to compliance events (sanctions, court orders, suspicious activity). It never stops.
Provider comparison Provider Core capability Target customers Supported chains Complexity / cost Paxos Regulated issuance, custody, proven at scale Large enterprises, fintechs Ethereum, others Medium. High cost (enterprise contracts) Circle USDC issuer, programmable wallets, CPN, high liquidity Startups to enterprises 20+ chains Low. Transaction-based fees Brale Full-stack issuance, acts as legal issuer, multi-chain Startups to enterprises 20+ chains Low. Revenue-share pricing Bridge (Stripe) Open Issuance API, fiat on/off-ramps, Stripe distribution Enterprises, fintechs Multiple chains + Tempo Low. Transaction-based fees M0 Programmable issuance protocol, shared liquidity layer Developers, fintechs, wallets Ethereum, multi-chain Low-medium. Protocol-based Coinbase Custom Stablecoins Stablecoin-as-a-service, USDC-collateralized branded tokens Enterprises, fintechs Base, Ethereum (expanding) Low. Revenue-share Frax White-label modular infrastructure, RWA backing Blockchain networks, protocols EVM-compatible via LayerZero Medium. Variable cost Polygon End-to-end “Open Money Stack” Institutions, payment companies Polygon, multi-chain via Agglayer Low. Volume-based pricing Cobo Enterprise payments, MPC custody, treasury automation High-volume institutions 80+ chains Medium. Institutional pricing Fireblocks Infrastructure/custody tooling, MPC wallets, settlement (not an issuer) Large institutions 100+ chains Medium. Institutional licensing Stablechains comparison Aspect Tempo Circle Arc Tether Plasma Backing Stripe + Paradigm ($500M+) Circle Tether/Bitfinex ($373M+) Status (March 2026) Public testnet, mainnet H1 2026 Public testnet, mainnet 2026 Mainnet live Performance 100k+ TPS target (unverified), ~0.6s finality (design) 50k+ TPS target, ~780ms finality (testnet) 1k+ TPS, sub-second finality (production) Gas model Any stablecoin (no native token) Native USDC USDT-native + Paymaster (zero-fee USDT) Stablecoin focus Issuer-agnostic, multi-stablecoin USDC-centric USDT-centric (25+ supported) Key primitives Stable DEX, payment memos, dedicated lanes, TIP-20 FX engine, opt-in privacy, CCTP integration Zero-fee USDT, Bitcoin bridge, confidential txs Target users Fintechs, merchants, embedded finance Institutions, capital markets Retail, emerging markets, DeFi Real-world examples A few cases that show how this infrastructure comes together in practice. Note: some of these are announced projects or early-stage deployments, not fully scaled production systems. Where possible, I’ve verified against public announcements and press coverage.
MetaMask USD (mUSD) on M0/Bridge. Announced August 2025 by Consensys, MetaMask’s native stablecoin is the first issued by a self-custodial wallet. It uses Bridge for issuance and reserve management with M0’s protocol for the on-chain infrastructure. Planned to launch on Ethereum and Linea, with spending via MetaMask Card at Mastercard merchants.
Klarna’s stablecoin initiatives. Klarna partnered with Coinbase in December 2025 for USDC-denominated institutional funding. Separately, Tempo’s announcement materials list Klarna as an ecosystem partner launching “KlarnaUSD” via Bridge on Tempo, but public documentation of that specific deployment is limited beyond Tempo’s own communications. Worth monitoring but not yet a confirmed live product.
Sonic Labs’ USSD via Frax. Per Frax and Sonic project communications, Sonic used Frax’s white-label infrastructure and backed USSD with tokenized Treasuries. Independent documentation is thin, but it illustrates the modular approach: a blockchain network launching a native stablecoin by composing existing infrastructure rather than building from scratch.
Stablecorp’s QCAD. A Canadian dollar stablecoin that uses VersaBank as federally regulated custodian for reserves through VersaBank’s VersaVault platform. Stablecorp manages issuance and compliance while leaning on established banking infrastructure for credibility.
Stable Sea with BitGo. A B2B infrastructure platform that partners with BitGo for regulated custody and trading. Newer platforms can assemble best-in-class services from existing providers rather than building everything internally.
Risks worth planning for Good infrastructure reduces risk. It doesn’t eliminate it. Here’s what actually goes wrong.
Depegging. Market shocks, collateral liquidation cascades, or loss of confidence can push a stablecoin off its peg. Even fiat-backed stablecoins aren’t immune. USDC briefly lost its peg in March 2023 when Silicon Valley Bank failed with a portion of Circle’s reserves held there.
Custody and banking failures. Your stablecoin is only as safe as your custodian. Diversify where possible and understand the insolvency protections (or lack thereof) for your reserve accounts.
Smart contract bugs. A vulnerability in your minting or burning logic can be catastrophic. Multiple independent audits are the minimum. Timelocks, multi-sig controls, and bug bounty programs add layers of defense.
Regulatory changes. The GENIUS Act and MiCA are still relatively new. Rules will evolve. Non-compliance carries real consequences: fines, loss of license, blocked market access. Build compliance into the product from day one, not as an afterthought.
Sanctions and illicit finance exposure. Stablecoins are tools, and bad actors use them. You need transaction monitoring and the ability to freeze or clawback assets when legally required.
Operational risk. Stablecoin operations run around the clock. Reconciliation errors, oracle failures (for crypto-collateralized models), and infrastructure outages compound quickly.
Algorithmic model risk. If you’re considering an algorithmic or lightly collateralized design, this carries the highest systemic risk. The TerraUSD collapse proved that incentive mechanisms alone can’t maintain a peg under stress.
Best practices for 2026 issuers Automate reconciliation between on-chain supply and off-chain reserves. Manual processes break at scale.
Use bankruptcy-remote structures for reserve accounts. If your company has financial trouble, the reserves should be legally protected for token holders.
Build compliance into the product. Freeze, clawback, and blacklisting capabilities aren’t just regulatory checkboxes. They’re what institutional customers and regulators look for before working with you.
Partner with blockchain analytics providers from day one. Chainalysis, Blockaid, and similar firms provide transaction monitoring that regulators expect.
Publish clear redemption policies. Specify timelines, fees (if any), minimum amounts, and the process for large redemptions. Ambiguity erodes trust.
Start with a USD peg for maximum liquidity and market access. Non-USD pegs have their place, but infrastructure, liquidity, and regulatory clarity are all strongest for dollar stablecoins.
Plan for multichain or dedicated-chain deployment from the start. Retrofitting cross-chain support later is painful.
Consider starting on a turnkey platform or specialized L1 for speed, then evaluate custom infrastructure as you scale.
Where this is heading The infrastructure to launch a compliant stablecoin in 2026 exists. You can go from concept to live product in weeks through turnkey providers and purpose-built L1s. That speed would have been absurd even two years ago.
The decisions you face: which issuance model fits (fiat-backed for almost everyone), which platform or chain to deploy on (determined by your target users and stablecoin preference), and how much infrastructure to own versus rent.
White-label platforms like Bridge, Paxos, Brale, and Coinbase, issuance protocols like M0, or payments-optimized L1s like Tempo, offer the lowest barrier for most businesses. Custom builds still make sense for large institutions that need complete control and have the engineering team to maintain it.
One thing I’d flag: the temptation to over-engineer early is strong, especially for technical teams. The businesses actually getting stablecoins into production in 2026 are the ones that started with a turnkey provider, shipped, and iterated from there. The fundamentals, robust reserves, transparent operations, and clear redemption policies, matter more than the specific technology stack underneath.
Aimed at boosting the Ethereum ecosystem in Bulgaria and promoting Sofia as a thriving Web3 hub, ETHSofia is gearing up for its inaugural edition on October 17-19 at Sofia Tech Park.
Carrying out its mission to unify all crypto developers, investors, and enthusiasts alike, the ETHSofia team now presents the first installment of speakers and partners.
The ETHSofia conference will fascinate its over 600 expected attendees with inspiring talks by Zahary Karadjov, BlockSense CEO and ex-Status Nimbus Team Lead, Vesselin Velichkov, a ZK Cryptography Researcher at OpenZeppelin, Andrei Duma, Head of DeFi at LI.FI, Mikael Lazarev, co-founder and CTO of Gearbox, Darren Camas, CEO of IPOR Labs, Diana Tlupova, Head of Compliance at NexeraID, TokenBrice, strategist at The DeFi Collective and advisor at Maverick Protocol, Lion Dapplion, Ethereum consensus core developer at Lighthouse Sigma Prime, and Vyara Savova, Senior Policy Expert with the European Crypto Initiative (EUCi).
Moreover, several of the most innovative Web3 companies will contribute to the success of the event. Namely, digital assets institution Nexo joins ETHSofia as a top-tier sponsor, along with web3 self-custodial wallet Ambire, fixed-rate lending and borrowing protocol IPOR, and bridge and DEX aggregator LI.FI as well.
ZK rollup BlockSense will be a platinum sponsor of the ETHSofia hackathon, with DeFi market maker Raven DAO sponsoring too, whereas DoraHacks will offer operations support. Generous bounties for the winning programming contestants are also to be expected, so developers and hackers are invited to promptly apply here.
The ETHSofia team has also presented Philip Matov from Belayer, ex-Consensys and Matter Labs, and Lyuben Belov from Daedalus and LaunchHub, as advisors.
“We got inspired by Vitalik Buterin’s appeal to make Ethereum cypherpunk again, and set up ETHSofia as an attempt to showcase and enhance the next generation of Ethereum innovation. We invite everyone working toward or advocating for privacy, trustlessness, and decentralization to join us and help us deliver a world-class event!”, Vlad Dramaliev said.
The Super Early Bird tickets are set to go on sale very soon, so follow the ETHSofia social media channels on X, LinkedIn, or Telegram, or subscribe to their newsletter to stay in the loop.
About ETHSofia Conference & HackathonCrafted as the brainchild of devoted blockchain professionals and enthusiasts, ETHSofia is set to welcome a vanguard of thought leaders and builders innovating in ZK proofs, account abstraction, AI, L2s, security, and decentralized infrastructure. The goal? Design a global, scalable free market built on open-source blockchain technology.
Micron's earnings report lifts SK Hynix's stock price 11%, trader 'yixie' expands their unrealized profit to $1.3 million.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron’s Q3 financial results exceeded all expectations, driving peer SK Hynix’s stock to rally nearly 11% from its recent low. On the Hyperliquid platform, SKHYNIX is currently trading at $1,821, up 6.2% in the past 24 hours. Prominent trader yixie (X: @yixie10) nearly doubled his principal during this rally; he is now holding a 2x long position of 2,289 SKHYNIX contracts at an average entry price of ~$1,239.9. Fueled by the rally, the position’s unrealized profit has expanded to $1.37 million, a 96% gain. As of press time, the trader boasts an 85% win rate in semiconductor storage stock trades since opening positions this year, with total historical profits of $6.68 million, including $4.25 million from Micron Technology trades. Address: 0xa65ce1d604fa901c13aa29f2126a57d9032e412b – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permission) to automatically sync on-chain news.
2 minutes ago
STRC drops to near $80, marking another new all-time low.
According to Bitget market data, Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has dropped to a low of $80.26, hitting a new all-time low since its listing. Calculated based on a $100 par value, the current discount has reached 20%.
2 minutes ago
OKX will launch CARDS spot trading today.
According to an official announcement, OKX will launch spot trading for CARDS (Collector Crypt) today. CARDS deposits will open at 18:00 UTC+8 on June 25, pre-ordering for the CARDS/USDT trading pair will run from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC+8, spot trading will officially commence at 20:00 UTC+8, and withdrawal functions will be available at 22:00 UTC+8.
2 minutes ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps warned that any vessels using the Strait of Hormuz route without Tehran's approval will be targeted.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning to international shipping on Wednesday, stating that any new shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz established without coordination with Tehran is unacceptable and dangerous, and threatening to take direct action against vessels that ignore its orders. The IRGC declared that vessels can only safely transit the Strait of Hormuz via routes designated by Iran. The IRGC Navy added that all vessels seeking to transit the strait must coordinate with the Iranian military via International Maritime Distress and Safety Frequency Channel 16, a requirement that effectively places Iranian military approval at the core of all commercial shipping transiting this key chokepoint. (Jinshi)
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions has an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, a whale holding 120,000 ETH in long positions added $8 million in margin in the early hours. Currently, the total unrealized loss on its ETH long positions across four linked addresses stands at approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the significant paper losses, there remains a large buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC is still held on-chain to replenish margin, resulting in low short-term liquidation risk.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions is sitting on an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, the whale holding a long position of 120,000 ETH added $8 million in margin again in the early hours. Currently, the ETH long positions across its four associated addresses have accumulated an unrealized loss of approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the massive unrealized loss, there is still a significant buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC are still held on-chain to supplement margin, leading to low short-term liquidation risk.
The shares began trading at well above the expected $135 price.
SpaceX’s IPO on Thursday broke Saudi Aramco’s record by becoming the largest in history as the company raised $75 billion. Shares were expected to start trading today at $135, but they actually opened at $150 under the SPCX ticker.
More volatility ensued in the initial trading minutes, with the newly listed asset going toward $170, where it was stopped, and now sits below $160.
Nevertheless, SpaceX quickly entered the top 10 global assets by market capitalization of over $2 trillion. It sits at the 9th spot as of press time, above Broadcom’s $1.8 trillion and below TSMC’s $2.2 trillion.
The company’s public listing and official valuation into the trillions of dollars has skyrocketed Elon Musk’s paper fortune, as the Tesla CEO has also become the world’s first trillionaire.
BREAKING: Elon Musk officially becomes the world’s first trillionaire as SpaceX, $SPCX, stock begins trading. pic.twitter.com/oSmBxDYuIz
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) June 12, 2026
The spaceflight, telecommunications, and AI company, founded in 2002, sold 556 million shares yesterday at an initial price of $135 per share. Individual investors were able to request shares from five brokerages: Charles Schwab, Fidelity, SoFi, Morgan Stanley’s E*Trade, and Robinhood.
“All eligible clients who completed the affirmation process received at least a portion of their requested order,” a Charles Schwab spokesperson said to CNN.
Tags:
About the author
Jordan got into crypto in 2016 by trading and investing. He began writing about blockchain technology in 2017 and now serves as CryptoPotato's Assistant Editor-in-Chief. He has managed numerous crypto-related projects and is passionate about all things blockchain.
Dogecoin price was among the top gainers today as the crypto market witnessed a rebound. Bitcoin price also crossed the brief $64k support, which many experts have attributed to the SpaceX IPO buzz.
In addition, the successful debut of the SpaceX IPO has also crowned “DOGE Father” Elon Musk as the first-ever trillionaire in the world. Having said that, investors are keeping a close track of whether DOGE price can continue its upward momentum ahead.
DOGE Father Elon Musk Becomes First Trillionaire Dogecoin price has recorded a significant jump today as Elon Musk, long dubbed as ‘DOGE Father,’ cemented his place in financial history following the blockbuster public debut of SpaceX. Meanwhile, shares of SpaceX opened at $150, an 11% jump from its IPO price of $135, before climbing further to $163.
Source: Yahoo Finance The rally pushed the company’s valuation beyond $2.1 trillion, marking one of the most significant market debuts in recent history. Besides, the listing instantly elevated Elon Musk to the world’s first trillionaire, underscoring his outsized influence across both traditional markets and digital assets.
The impact of the SpaceX debut in the US market was also felt in the crypto space. The broader crypto market, including Bitcoin price, has wiped off some of its recent losses.
In addition, Dogecoin, which has long traded in tandem with Musk’s public endorsements, spiked as investors reacted to the milestone. Notably, Elon Musk has endorsed the dog-themed meme coin on social media platforms earlier, which has also caused a spike in DOGE price.
Can Dogecoin Rally Sustain? The market pundits remain divided on whether the Dogecoin rally can sustain or is just a hype due to Elon Musk achieving the trillionaire milestone. Some expect the hype to fade gradually, which might turn the investors cautious.
In addition, a flurry of experts have also predicted Bitcoin to further decline ahead, which might also impact the broader crypto market. For context, in a recent report, Galaxy Digital said that BTC price may crash to as low as $30,000, calling that the bottom is far from over currently.
However, despite that, the impact of the SpaceX IPO was seen on Dogecoin price. At the time of writing, DOGE price was up over 5% and traded near $0.089, after touching a daily high of $0.091.
Key Highlights DOGE price jumped 7.6% on June 12, 2026, reaching an intraday peak of $0.091 SpaceX launched its IPO at $150 per share, driving the company’s market cap beyond $2.1 trillion Elon Musk became the first individual in history to achieve trillionaire status, lifting crypto market sentiment Bitcoin simultaneously bounced back above the $64,000 threshold Market experts remain divided on DOGE’s momentum sustainability, noting early profit-taking activity Dogecoin posted impressive gains of up to 7.6% on June 12, reaching a session high of $0.091 before retracing to approximately $0.087. The rally coincided precisely with SpaceX’s highly anticipated public market launch on U.S. exchanges.
Dogecoin (DOGE) Price SpaceX stock began trading at $150 per share, representing an 11% jump from its $135 IPO pricing. The shares subsequently surged to $176 during peak trading before stabilizing around $161. This performance elevated SpaceX’s market capitalization beyond the $2.1 trillion mark.
With his substantial equity position in the aerospace company, Elon Musk’s personal wealth surpassed $1 trillion—an unprecedented achievement that marked him as humanity’s first trillionaire.
Digital asset markets responded favorably to this development. Bitcoin reclaimed the $64,000 level following recent downward pressure, while numerous altcoins recovered portions of their previous losses during the same trading period.
Dogecoin emerged as one of the session’s top performers. The meme coin has consistently demonstrated sensitivity to Musk-related developments, reflecting his ongoing public endorsement of the cryptocurrency.
Chart Analysis Reveals Bullish Momentum Building Examining the four-hour timeframe, DOGE successfully breached a downward-sloping trendline that had restricted upward movement for more than a week. The digital asset also reclaimed territory above the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement at approximately $0.0867, a level traders are monitoring as potential short-term support.
Source: TradingView The MACD histogram has flipped to positive territory, with the MACD line crossing above its signal line. This technical configuration suggests intensifying bullish momentum following the bounce from the June 6 bottom near $0.0776.
The Supertrend indicator continues to display resistance around the $0.088 mark. Should DOGE maintain prices above this threshold, subsequent Fibonacci resistance targets emerge at $0.0896 and $0.0924.
A breakdown below current levels could push prices back toward $0.0827 or challenge the recent support zone.
Market Watchers Question Rally Durability Cryptocurrency analyst AltcoinSherpa expressed skepticism on X regarding the rally’s longevity. The analyst indicated the price action seems primarily fueled by enthusiasm surrounding Musk’s wealth achievement rather than meaningful improvements in Dogecoin’s underlying value proposition.
$DOGE: Crypto is often a game of relationships and relative comps. Elon = Doge pump, something I didn't think about (but in hindsight makes a lot of sense). Good move today but probably a better scalp opportunity vs. swing play pic.twitter.com/fOb4JIDAph
— Altcoin Sherpa (@AltcoinSherpa) June 12, 2026
Additional market commentators highlighted another potential headwind. Galaxy Digital recently issued a forecast suggesting Bitcoin might decline to approximately $30,000 before establishing a sustainable bottom. Such a significant downturn would almost certainly create downward pressure on speculative cryptocurrencies including DOGE.
At the time of writing, DOGE was changing hands near $0.087, having surrendered some of its daily advance. The token’s inability to maintain its $0.091 intraday peak indicates profit-taking among traders as initial enthusiasm moderated.
Investors increasingly appear to be willing to prioritize growth opportunities over defensive positioning.
Bitcoin (BTC) and gold are the only two major asset classes in the red so far in 2026, posting year-to-date losses of 27% and 3%, respectively, according to market analyst Charlie Bilello.
What makes it unusual is not just the losses themselves but the combination, with both assets never having finished as the two worst performers among the majors in a calendar year, going back to 2011.
Rotation Showing Up Across Markets The backdrop makes the situation harder to explain, as Bilello pointed out in a recent market report. Data he shared showed the S&P 500 was up around 9% on the year, and small-cap stocks had gained 19% in the same period. Furthermore, he noted that value stocks have jumped 15%, and emerging market equities were outperforming expectations.
Basically, everything is in positive territory except for gold and BTC, the two assets most commonly associated with protection against uncertain times as well as monetary debasement.
The analyst’s chart, which has tracked annual returns for the last 15 years, showed just how out of character this performance is for both assets. Gold posted gains of 63.7% in 2025 and 26.7% in 2024, while Bitcoin returned 121% in 2024 and had one of its best showings in 2013 when total returns hit 5,500%.
Looking at the long-run numbers, they’re also quite impressive, with BTC’s cumulative returns since 2011 sitting at 21,000,000%, annualized at 121.6%, while gold has returned 179% in total over the same period. And while the current drawdown doesn’t erase that history, it’s certainly raising questions about what role these assets are playing in 2026.
According to Bilello, part of what’s happening is down to rotation, with the tech sector seeing a 28% outperformance vs. the S&P 500 off the March lows, which he says is the largest such move ever recorded, being even bigger than the 1999-2000 dot-com run.
You may also like: Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch Saylor Should Stop Buying Bitcoin, Says CryptoQuant Bitcoin Holds Key Price Floor Despite Weak Bullish Signals: Bitfinex Alpha Tech now accounts for close to 40% of the S&P 500, some way above the 35% peak seen at the height of the dot-com bubble, and in such an environment, the market observer says capital has opted to move to assets with earnings momentum rather than staying on stores of value with little to no yield.
Price Action in Gold and BTC At the time of writing, the world’s foremost cryptocurrency was trading above $66,000, having touched $67,000 for the first time in two weeks earlier in the day. That uptick followed news that the United States and Iran were due to sign a peace deal later in the week in Switzerland, which briefly lifted sentiment across risk assets.
Gold, meanwhile, is trading around $4,300 per troy ounce, with a weekly range between $4,025 and $4,340, and a 3% year-to-date dip that looks modest when compared to the cryptocurrency’s, even though it still represents an unusual reversal for an asset that spent much of the last two years at or near record highs.
Micron's earnings report lifts SK Hynix's stock price 11%, trader 'yixie' expands their unrealized profit to $1.3 million.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron’s Q3 financial results exceeded all expectations, driving peer SK Hynix’s stock to rally nearly 11% from its recent low. On the Hyperliquid platform, SKHYNIX is currently trading at $1,821, up 6.2% in the past 24 hours. Prominent trader yixie (X: @yixie10) nearly doubled his principal during this rally; he is now holding a 2x long position of 2,289 SKHYNIX contracts at an average entry price of ~$1,239.9. Fueled by the rally, the position’s unrealized profit has expanded to $1.37 million, a 96% gain. As of press time, the trader boasts an 85% win rate in semiconductor storage stock trades since opening positions this year, with total historical profits of $6.68 million, including $4.25 million from Micron Technology trades. Address: 0xa65ce1d604fa901c13aa29f2126a57d9032e412b – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permission) to automatically sync on-chain news.
2 minutes ago
STRC drops to near $80, marking another new all-time low.
According to Bitget market data, Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has dropped to a low of $80.26, hitting a new all-time low since its listing. Calculated based on a $100 par value, the current discount has reached 20%.
2 minutes ago
OKX will launch CARDS spot trading today.
According to an official announcement, OKX will launch spot trading for CARDS (Collector Crypt) today. CARDS deposits will open at 18:00 UTC+8 on June 25, pre-ordering for the CARDS/USDT trading pair will run from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC+8, spot trading will officially commence at 20:00 UTC+8, and withdrawal functions will be available at 22:00 UTC+8.
2 minutes ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps warned that any vessels using the Strait of Hormuz route without Tehran's approval will be targeted.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning to international shipping on Wednesday, stating that any new shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz established without coordination with Tehran is unacceptable and dangerous, and threatening to take direct action against vessels that ignore its orders. The IRGC declared that vessels can only safely transit the Strait of Hormuz via routes designated by Iran. The IRGC Navy added that all vessels seeking to transit the strait must coordinate with the Iranian military via International Maritime Distress and Safety Frequency Channel 16, a requirement that effectively places Iranian military approval at the core of all commercial shipping transiting this key chokepoint. (Jinshi)
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions has an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, a whale holding 120,000 ETH in long positions added $8 million in margin in the early hours. Currently, the total unrealized loss on its ETH long positions across four linked addresses stands at approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the significant paper losses, there remains a large buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC is still held on-chain to replenish margin, resulting in low short-term liquidation risk.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions is sitting on an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, the whale holding a long position of 120,000 ETH added $8 million in margin again in the early hours. Currently, the ETH long positions across its four associated addresses have accumulated an unrealized loss of approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the massive unrealized loss, there is still a significant buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC are still held on-chain to supplement margin, leading to low short-term liquidation risk.
Micron's earnings report lifts SK Hynix's stock price 11%, trader 'yixie' expands their unrealized profit to $1.3 million.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron’s Q3 financial results exceeded all expectations, driving peer SK Hynix’s stock to rally nearly 11% from its recent low. On the Hyperliquid platform, SKHYNIX is currently trading at $1,821, up 6.2% in the past 24 hours. Prominent trader yixie (X: @yixie10) nearly doubled his principal during this rally; he is now holding a 2x long position of 2,289 SKHYNIX contracts at an average entry price of ~$1,239.9. Fueled by the rally, the position’s unrealized profit has expanded to $1.37 million, a 96% gain. As of press time, the trader boasts an 85% win rate in semiconductor storage stock trades since opening positions this year, with total historical profits of $6.68 million, including $4.25 million from Micron Technology trades. Address: 0xa65ce1d604fa901c13aa29f2126a57d9032e412b – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permission) to automatically sync on-chain news.
2 minutes ago
STRC drops to near $80, marking another new all-time low.
According to Bitget market data, Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has dropped to a low of $80.26, hitting a new all-time low since its listing. Calculated based on a $100 par value, the current discount has reached 20%.
2 minutes ago
OKX will launch CARDS spot trading today.
According to an official announcement, OKX will launch spot trading for CARDS (Collector Crypt) today. CARDS deposits will open at 18:00 UTC+8 on June 25, pre-ordering for the CARDS/USDT trading pair will run from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC+8, spot trading will officially commence at 20:00 UTC+8, and withdrawal functions will be available at 22:00 UTC+8.
2 minutes ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps warned that any vessels using the Strait of Hormuz route without Tehran's approval will be targeted.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning to international shipping on Wednesday, stating that any new shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz established without coordination with Tehran is unacceptable and dangerous, and threatening to take direct action against vessels that ignore its orders. The IRGC declared that vessels can only safely transit the Strait of Hormuz via routes designated by Iran. The IRGC Navy added that all vessels seeking to transit the strait must coordinate with the Iranian military via International Maritime Distress and Safety Frequency Channel 16, a requirement that effectively places Iranian military approval at the core of all commercial shipping transiting this key chokepoint. (Jinshi)
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions has an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, a whale holding 120,000 ETH in long positions added $8 million in margin in the early hours. Currently, the total unrealized loss on its ETH long positions across four linked addresses stands at approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the significant paper losses, there remains a large buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC is still held on-chain to replenish margin, resulting in low short-term liquidation risk.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions is sitting on an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, the whale holding a long position of 120,000 ETH added $8 million in margin again in the early hours. Currently, the ETH long positions across its four associated addresses have accumulated an unrealized loss of approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the massive unrealized loss, there is still a significant buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC are still held on-chain to supplement margin, leading to low short-term liquidation risk.
Quick Answer: XRP is trading at $1.17 on June 18, 2026, down 2.52% as the post-FOMC selloff continues. The defining XRP news this week is legislative: the CLARITY Act cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15-9 in May and has been placed on the Senate floor legislative calendar on June 1 — meaning a full Senate vote can happen at any time. Polymarket prices 2026 passage at 72%. If the bill passes before the July 4 target set by the White House, XRP’s digital commodity status becomes permanent federal law — a classification that no future administration can reverse with a memo. Standard Chartered and JPMorgan both project $4–8 billion in XRP ETF inflows under that scenario, three to six times the $1.44 billion accumulated to date. XRP exchange reserves have fallen to a 7-year low of 1.6 billion tokens. Whale wallets holding 10M+ XRP now control 68.5% of circulating supply — the highest concentration since May 2018.
Key Takeaways
CLARITY Act is on the Senate floor legislative calendar — a full Senate vote can now happen at any time, with the White House targeting July 4 signing The bill cleared Senate Banking Committee 15-9 in May, with all 13 Republicans voting yes after Sen. John Kennedy committed his support — the bipartisan vote was cleaner than feared XRP exchange reserves at a 7-year low of 1.6 billion tokens — 50% below the October 2025 peak of 3.76 billion, compressing available sell-side liquidity to multi-year lows RLUSD reached $1.7B market cap, ranking as the 8th-largest stablecoin globally — Mastercard added RLUSD to its 24/7 settlement network on June 3; Ripple is pursuing a Federal Reserve master account Post-FOMC pressure is the dominant short-term headwind: hawkish dot plot (9 Fed members projecting hike) outweighs XRP-specific positives in the near term — but the structural setup has rarely been this clean XRP Price Today: $1.17, Absorbing FOMC Hawkishness XRP is at $1.17 on June 18, down 2.52% with a market cap of $73.02 billion and 24-hour volume of $1.91 billion — up 14%. Of the 100 billion maximum supply, 62.05 billion circulate across 535,830 holders. Fully diluted valuation is $117.68 billion.
Today’s move is entirely macro-driven. Yesterday’s FOMC dot plot — 9 of 18 members projecting a rate hike by year-end, PCE revised to 3.6% — reset rate expectations across all risk assets. XRP is not immune to that. But what separates XRP from most assets in the current environment is the independence of its primary catalyst: the CLARITY Act moves on legislative, not monetary, logic.
The SEC case against Ripple concluded in August 2025 with a joint dismissal of appeals, confirming XRP is not a security when sold on public exchanges. Ripple paid a reduced $50 million penalty with $75 million returned as part of the settlement. Both the SEC and CFTC currently view XRP as a digital commodity, but that classification has not been written into law. An executive agency classification can be reversed by the next administration with a memo. A statute cannot. The CLARITY Act changes that permanently.
Key levels:
Resistance: $1.20 (psychological), then $1.28–$1.30 (June 15 high) Support: $1.10 (critical), then $1.00 (psychological floor) The CLARITY Act: Where It Stands Right Now The CLARITY Act was officially added to the Senate legislative calendar on June 1, after clearing the Senate Banking Committee. The next step is a full Senate vote, after which it will be sent to President Trump for signing.
The CLARITY Act passed the House 294 to 134 and cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15 to 9. The Senate floor vote is the decisive gate. The bill needs 60 votes to clear the filibuster — meaning at least 7 Democrats must cross over. The committee vote passed 15-9 with some bipartisan support, which is the baseline Democrats need to replicate on the floor.
Why 60 votes matters: The Senate has 53 Republicans. A 60-vote threshold requires 7 Democrats. The senators to watch are Warner and Cortez Masto — those votes are the hardest part of getting to 60. The Reed stablecoin amendment that nearly derailed the committee markup was defeated, keeping the bipartisan compromise language intact — a positive signal for floor vote prospects.
Prediction markets have priced 2026 signing odds around 72%. The White House has set a July 4 signing target. Senate floor time between now and July 4 is limited — the bill needs to be scheduled and voted before the Independence Day recess.
What passage does for XRP specifically: A clear commodity classification removes listing hesitancy. Exchanges that stayed cautious during the legal fight could deepen XRP support, tightening spreads and improving liquidity. Institutions need regulatory certainty before allocating. Clear rules strengthen the case for more XRP ETF products and larger inflows, building on the spot ETFs already live.
The Supply Story: Exchange Reserves at 7-Year Lows XRP exchange reserves fell to a 7-year low of 1.6 billion tokens this year, a 50% drop from October 2025’s 3.76 billion peak, compressing sell-side liquidity to multi-year lows.
This is one of the most consequential structural developments for XRP’s price setup. When exchange reserves fall this sharply, the coins leaving exchanges are going to private custody — not being sold. The implication: the supply available for large sell orders on exchanges is structurally thinner than at any point in seven years.
The number of wallets holding 10,000 or more XRP has hit an all-time high of 332,230. The millionaire tier — wallets holding over one million XRP — added 42 new addresses since January and accumulated 1.2 billion tokens in Q1 alone, the heaviest quarterly accumulation since 2023. Mega whale wallets holding 10 million or more XRP now control approximately 45.83 billion tokens, representing 68.5% of circulating supply — the highest concentration since May 2018.
The mechanism: when 68.5% of supply is controlled by conviction holders who are actively accumulating, and exchange reserves are at 7-year lows, even moderate institutional buying pressure produces outsized price moves. The float is thin. The buyers are patient. The catalyst — CLARITY Act — is binary and approaching.
RLUSD and ODL: The Utility Case Strengthening Independently While the CLARITY Act is the legislative catalyst, Ripple’s on-chain infrastructure has been strengthening independently in June 2026.
RLUSD has grown to approximately $1.7 billion in market cap, ranking as the eighth-largest stablecoin globally and live across more than 40 networks. On June 3, Mastercard added RLUSD to its 24/7 on-chain settlement network alongside USDC and PYUSD.
Ripple is also pursuing a Federal Reserve master account, a process currently paused until end of 2026. A Fed master account would allow Ripple to settle transactions directly with the Federal Reserve’s payment system — removing commercial bank intermediaries and dramatically reducing the cost of ODL corridor transactions. It is potentially the most significant operational milestone in Ripple’s history, but it is a 2027 story at the earliest.
Ripple, JPMorgan, Mastercard, and Ondo Finance completed a live cross-border tokenized US Treasury settlement on the XRP Ledger that finalized in under five seconds. This is not speculative — it is a completed transaction by the largest financial institutions in the world, settling real assets on Ripple’s infrastructure. The XRPL’s real-world asset capabilities are being validated in production, not just theory.
Price Scenarios: What CLARITY Act Means in Dollar Terms From around $1.17 where XRP trades now, the key scenarios are: a failed Senate vote points back toward the $0.80–$1.00 range; passage near the recess supports a re-rating to $1.60–$2.20; and passage plus renewed ETF inflows and a softer Fed opens up the $2.50–$3.50 price range.
Standard Chartered projected $4 billion to $8 billion in cumulative XRP ETF inflows by year-end if the bill passes. With flows of such volume, XRP would most likely break the current resistance, retest its 200-day moving average at $1.80, and have the runway to push toward higher targets like $3–5 by late 2026.
The bear case: If Tim Scott doesn’t schedule the markup before Memorial Day recess on May 21, or if the markup happens but Republicans can’t unify the committee vote, the bill will most likely be shelved until 2030. That deadline has now passed — the committee vote cleared 15-9. The next hard deadline is the July 4 recess. If the Senate floor vote does not happen before July 4, the next viable legislative window is after the November 2026 midterms.
For context on the current macro environment affecting all crypto assets, see our daily market update for June 18.
ETF Flows: $1.44 Billion, UBS and Bank of America Positioned US spot XRP ETFs have accumulated $1.44 billion in cumulative net inflows since their November 2025 launch across seven products. May 2026 was the strongest single month with $132 million. UBS and Bank of America took first-time XRP ETF stakes in May — the first tier-1 global banks to allocate directly to XRP products. Goldman Sachs allocated $154 million in Q1 2026.
Some of that CLARITY Act move may already be in the price, because the market has watched this bill advance for months. So the real question is not whether clarity helps XRP, but how much of the waiting money actually moves once the bill is law, and how much already has.
The honest assessment: the ETF bid is real and growing. The question of how much is already priced is legitimate. What is not priced is the pension fund and sovereign wealth fund allocation tier — those institutional buyers legally cannot allocate under agency guidance. They need a statute. The CLARITY Act is that statute.
Track real-time XRP ETF flows at SoSoValue.
Where to Buy XRP Binance — world’s largest exchange by volume, deep XRP/USDT liquidity, RLUSD trading pairs available.
Coinbase — US-regulated, XRP available for spot purchase with insured custody.
Kraken — established 2011, competitive XRP fees and strong security record.
This article does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile. Always conduct independent research before making investment decisions.
Micron's earnings report lifts SK Hynix's stock price 11%, trader 'yixie' expands their unrealized profit to $1.3 million.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron’s Q3 financial results exceeded all expectations, driving peer SK Hynix’s stock to rally nearly 11% from its recent low. On the Hyperliquid platform, SKHYNIX is currently trading at $1,821, up 6.2% in the past 24 hours. Prominent trader yixie (X: @yixie10) nearly doubled his principal during this rally; he is now holding a 2x long position of 2,289 SKHYNIX contracts at an average entry price of ~$1,239.9. Fueled by the rally, the position’s unrealized profit has expanded to $1.37 million, a 96% gain. As of press time, the trader boasts an 85% win rate in semiconductor storage stock trades since opening positions this year, with total historical profits of $6.68 million, including $4.25 million from Micron Technology trades. Address: 0xa65ce1d604fa901c13aa29f2126a57d9032e412b – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permission) to automatically sync on-chain news.
2 minutes ago
STRC drops to near $80, marking another new all-time low.
According to Bitget market data, Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has dropped to a low of $80.26, hitting a new all-time low since its listing. Calculated based on a $100 par value, the current discount has reached 20%.
2 minutes ago
OKX will launch CARDS spot trading today.
According to an official announcement, OKX will launch spot trading for CARDS (Collector Crypt) today. CARDS deposits will open at 18:00 UTC+8 on June 25, pre-ordering for the CARDS/USDT trading pair will run from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC+8, spot trading will officially commence at 20:00 UTC+8, and withdrawal functions will be available at 22:00 UTC+8.
2 minutes ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps warned that any vessels using the Strait of Hormuz route without Tehran's approval will be targeted.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning to international shipping on Wednesday, stating that any new shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz established without coordination with Tehran is unacceptable and dangerous, and threatening to take direct action against vessels that ignore its orders. The IRGC declared that vessels can only safely transit the Strait of Hormuz via routes designated by Iran. The IRGC Navy added that all vessels seeking to transit the strait must coordinate with the Iranian military via International Maritime Distress and Safety Frequency Channel 16, a requirement that effectively places Iranian military approval at the core of all commercial shipping transiting this key chokepoint. (Jinshi)
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions has an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, a whale holding 120,000 ETH in long positions added $8 million in margin in the early hours. Currently, the total unrealized loss on its ETH long positions across four linked addresses stands at approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the significant paper losses, there remains a large buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC is still held on-chain to replenish margin, resulting in low short-term liquidation risk.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions is sitting on an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, the whale holding a long position of 120,000 ETH added $8 million in margin again in the early hours. Currently, the ETH long positions across its four associated addresses have accumulated an unrealized loss of approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the massive unrealized loss, there is still a significant buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC are still held on-chain to supplement margin, leading to low short-term liquidation risk.
Gram Network ($GRM) has recently issued a clarification concerning the connection it has with the TON network. In this respect, Gram Network has addressed the recent discussions as well as speculation spread across the Web3 community. As per Gram Network’s official social media announcement, it has never claimed to be developed by, backed by, or have a partnership with the TON Foundation, Dogs, or Notcoin. Additionally, the platform has stressed it serves as an autonomous project developing its network on top of the TON blockchain because of the ecosystem’s advanced technology and scalability.
Draft Announcement GRM!
Official Clarification Regarding Our Network & TON Ecosystem
We want to address a recent discussion within the Web3 community regarding our project's relationship with the TON Foundation.
To be absolutely clear: We have never claimed to be partnered…
— Gram Network (@GRMNetwork_M) June 20, 2026 Gram Network Denies TON Foundation Partnership, Stresses Autonomous Development In its declaration, Gram Network has attempted to eliminate the confusion surrounding the platform’s status in the expanding TON network. In addition to the clarification, it has also cautioned consumers about the growing scam attempts that focus on the $GRM community participants. Thus, the platform declared that its decision to go live on the TON blockchain is not a reflection of any formal collaboration or support from any well-known projects like TON Foundation.
The platform also mentioned that its approach to the TON network is that of an autonomous developer with a clear commitment to establishing its ecosystem responsibly. This clarification comes at a time when Web3 consumers are engaging in different discussions, especially in the areas where the project has become attractive, taking into account Nigeria and Africa. Gram Network pointed out that the purpose of this declaration is to prevent misconceptions regarding its affiliations and guarantee transparency.
At the same time, Gram Network also admitted the endeavors of TON network builders and several key opinion leaders (KOLs) who collaborate to enhance security and community awareness. Additionally, the platform elaborated that its technical connection with TON builds on the deployment of its network as well as its token on the blockchain framework.
Warning Against Fake Airdrops, Account Cloning, and Fraudulent $GRM Channels According to Gram Network, along with addressing network-related apprehensions, it has released a security alert, warning its community participants. It cautions consumers about scammers who attempt to exploit $GRM’s popularity by developing fake channels, misleading airdrop links, and clone accounts. Overall, the Gram Network’s team reiterated being committed to establishing a transparent network while promoting consumers to stay cautious against false activities.
AUTHOR
Umair Younas is a cryptocurrency-related content writer linked with this work since 2019. Here, at Blockchainreporter, he serves as a news and article writer. He is a crypto, blockchain, NFTs, DeFi, and FinTech enthusiast. He has strong command over writing authentic reviews about brokers and exchanges and he has collaborated with our education team to write educational content as well. He has a dream to raise awareness among people about digital currencies. His works are well-researched and brimmed with information hence they provide fresh insights. Stay tuned to his posts if you want to stay up-to-date with the crypto-verse.
Micron's earnings report lifts SK Hynix's stock price 11%, trader 'yixie' expands their unrealized profit to $1.3 million.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron’s Q3 financial results exceeded all expectations, driving peer SK Hynix’s stock to rally nearly 11% from its recent low. On the Hyperliquid platform, SKHYNIX is currently trading at $1,821, up 6.2% in the past 24 hours. Prominent trader yixie (X: @yixie10) nearly doubled his principal during this rally; he is now holding a 2x long position of 2,289 SKHYNIX contracts at an average entry price of ~$1,239.9. Fueled by the rally, the position’s unrealized profit has expanded to $1.37 million, a 96% gain. As of press time, the trader boasts an 85% win rate in semiconductor storage stock trades since opening positions this year, with total historical profits of $6.68 million, including $4.25 million from Micron Technology trades. Address: 0xa65ce1d604fa901c13aa29f2126a57d9032e412b – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permission) to automatically sync on-chain news.
2 minutes ago
STRC drops to near $80, marking another new all-time low.
According to Bitget market data, Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has dropped to a low of $80.26, hitting a new all-time low since its listing. Calculated based on a $100 par value, the current discount has reached 20%.
2 minutes ago
OKX will launch CARDS spot trading today.
According to an official announcement, OKX will launch spot trading for CARDS (Collector Crypt) today. CARDS deposits will open at 18:00 UTC+8 on June 25, pre-ordering for the CARDS/USDT trading pair will run from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC+8, spot trading will officially commence at 20:00 UTC+8, and withdrawal functions will be available at 22:00 UTC+8.
2 minutes ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps warned that any vessels using the Strait of Hormuz route without Tehran's approval will be targeted.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning to international shipping on Wednesday, stating that any new shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz established without coordination with Tehran is unacceptable and dangerous, and threatening to take direct action against vessels that ignore its orders. The IRGC declared that vessels can only safely transit the Strait of Hormuz via routes designated by Iran. The IRGC Navy added that all vessels seeking to transit the strait must coordinate with the Iranian military via International Maritime Distress and Safety Frequency Channel 16, a requirement that effectively places Iranian military approval at the core of all commercial shipping transiting this key chokepoint. (Jinshi)
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions has an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, a whale holding 120,000 ETH in long positions added $8 million in margin in the early hours. Currently, the total unrealized loss on its ETH long positions across four linked addresses stands at approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the significant paper losses, there remains a large buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC is still held on-chain to replenish margin, resulting in low short-term liquidation risk.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions is sitting on an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, the whale holding a long position of 120,000 ETH added $8 million in margin again in the early hours. Currently, the ETH long positions across its four associated addresses have accumulated an unrealized loss of approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the massive unrealized loss, there is still a significant buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC are still held on-chain to supplement margin, leading to low short-term liquidation risk.
Micron's earnings report lifts SK Hynix's stock price 11%, trader 'yixie' expands their unrealized profit to $1.3 million.
According to Hyperinsight monitoring, Micron’s Q3 financial results exceeded all expectations, driving peer SK Hynix’s stock to rally nearly 11% from its recent low. On the Hyperliquid platform, SKHYNIX is currently trading at $1,821, up 6.2% in the past 24 hours. Prominent trader yixie (X: @yixie10) nearly doubled his principal during this rally; he is now holding a 2x long position of 2,289 SKHYNIX contracts at an average entry price of ~$1,239.9. Fueled by the rally, the position’s unrealized profit has expanded to $1.37 million, a 96% gain. As of press time, the trader boasts an 85% win rate in semiconductor storage stock trades since opening positions this year, with total historical profits of $6.68 million, including $4.25 million from Micron Technology trades. Address: 0xa65ce1d604fa901c13aa29f2126a57d9032e412b – HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group and set it as an admin (enable message sending permission) to automatically sync on-chain news.
2 minutes ago
STRC drops to near $80, marking another new all-time low.
According to Bitget market data, Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has dropped to a low of $80.26, hitting a new all-time low since its listing. Calculated based on a $100 par value, the current discount has reached 20%.
2 minutes ago
OKX will launch CARDS spot trading today.
According to an official announcement, OKX will launch spot trading for CARDS (Collector Crypt) today. CARDS deposits will open at 18:00 UTC+8 on June 25, pre-ordering for the CARDS/USDT trading pair will run from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC+8, spot trading will officially commence at 20:00 UTC+8, and withdrawal functions will be available at 22:00 UTC+8.
2 minutes ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps warned that any vessels using the Strait of Hormuz route without Tehran's approval will be targeted.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning to international shipping on Wednesday, stating that any new shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz established without coordination with Tehran is unacceptable and dangerous, and threatening to take direct action against vessels that ignore its orders. The IRGC declared that vessels can only safely transit the Strait of Hormuz via routes designated by Iran. The IRGC Navy added that all vessels seeking to transit the strait must coordinate with the Iranian military via International Maritime Distress and Safety Frequency Channel 16, a requirement that effectively places Iranian military approval at the core of all commercial shipping transiting this key chokepoint. (Jinshi)
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions has an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, a whale holding 120,000 ETH in long positions added $8 million in margin in the early hours. Currently, the total unrealized loss on its ETH long positions across four linked addresses stands at approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the significant paper losses, there remains a large buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC is still held on-chain to replenish margin, resulting in low short-term liquidation risk.
2 minutes ago
A crypto whale holding 120,000 ETH long positions is sitting on an unrealized loss of over $77 million, and added $8 million in margin in the early hours.
According to on-chain analyst ai_9684xtpa’s monitoring, the whale holding a long position of 120,000 ETH added $8 million in margin again in the early hours. Currently, the ETH long positions across its four associated addresses have accumulated an unrealized loss of approximately $77.047 million, with an average entry price of around $2,265. Data shows the liquidation prices for the four addresses are $1,174.6, $1,059.1, $1,064.7, and $1,143.6 respectively. Despite the massive unrealized loss, there is still a significant buffer before liquidation, and over 6 million USDC are still held on-chain to supplement margin, leading to low short-term liquidation risk.
