Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Reason to trust

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed

The highest standards in reporting and publishing

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.

According to the latest on-chain data, the Layer-1 network Solana has hit a significant milestone in terms of the transfer volume of stablecoins this month.

Solana Overtakes Tron In Stablecoin Transfer Volume Data from the blockchain analytics platform Artemis shows that the stablecoin transfer volume on Solana has already surpassed $300 billion in January. This is the largest transfer volume recorded by stablecoins on the Layer-1 blockchain in a single month.

To put this figure into context, the Solana network registered $297 billion in stablecoin volume in the entire December. Meanwhile, the blockchain’s stablecoin transfer volume was about $11.56 billion in January 2023, reflecting an over 2,500% growth in the past year.

Stablecoin transfer volume across various blockchains in the past year | Source: Artemis From the chart above, it is clear that Solana’s stablecoin activity has been on a steady rise since October, increasing by more than 650% in the past few months.  This growth has also impacted the network’s share in the stablecoin market, with Solana now boasting about 32% market share.

Unsurprisingly, Ethereum leads the market for stablecoins, with its transfer volume already reaching almost $317 billion in January. Meanwhile, the Tron network trails Solana in third place, with a stablecoin volume of roughly $240 billion.

On Thursday, January 18, Paxos revealed the launch of its regulated stablecoin, USDP, on the Solana network. According to DefiLlama data, USDC remains the dominant stablecoin on the Layer-1 network, with a market cap of over $1 billion.

Paxos is thrilled to share our regulated stablecoin USDP is now live on the @solana blockchain! This integration makes it easier for anyone to access and use the safest, most reliable stablecoins in the market. Learn more here: https://t.co/0j4Kj0yyPk pic.twitter.com/1doexKvVmY

— Paxos (@Paxos) January 18, 2024

SOL Price Overview Despite Solana’s burgeoning network activity, the price performance of its native token SOL has somewhat dampened in the past few weeks. As of this writing, the Solana token is valued at $92, reflecting a 0.6% decline in the last 24 hours.

This sluggish performance in the past day underscores the altcoin’s challenges since the turn of the year. After reaching a multi-month high of $124 at the end of 2023, the SOL price has largely struggled to hold above the $100 mark.

According to data from CoinGecko, the Solana token is down by more than 5% in the past week. Meanwhile, the coin has declined by about double that figure since the beginning of 2024.

Nevertheless, SOL maintains its position as the fifth-largest cryptocurrency in the sector, with a market capitalization of more than $40 billion.

Solana price faces downward pressure on the daily timeframe | Source: SOLUSDT chart on TradingView Featured image from Dreamstime/Aivaras Sakurovas, chart from TradingView

Disclaimer: The information found on NewsBTC is for educational purposes only. It does not represent the opinions of NewsBTC on whether to buy, sell or hold any investments and naturally investing carries risks. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use information provided on this website entirely at your own risk.

How to mine Bitcoin at home in 2025

What is the difference between TradFi (traditional finance) and DeFi (decentralized finance)? Proponents of each often see one or the other as inherently superior. Native crypto users tend to ride hard for decentralization over everything; those in web2 and banking often argue that DeFi simply replicates TradFi but worse. This guide gets into the nitty gritty, covering the strengths and weaknesses of TradFi vs. DeFi. Here’s what to know in 2026.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
➤ TradFi and DeFi offer fundamentally different architectures — one built on institutions and law, the other on code and decentralization.
➤In DeFi, liquidity is a programmable primitive, whereas in TradFi, it is controlled and distributed through siloed institutions.
➤ Both systems rely on different trust models: TradFi assumes institutional reliability; DeFi minimizes trust through transparency and incentives.
➤ Rather than replacing TradFi, DeFi reimagines its core functions with new assumptions about access, risk, and control.

In This Guide:

What is TradFi?What is DeFi?A brief history of financeTradFi vs. DeFiTradFi vs. DeFi: Which one is better?Finance is not a zero-sum gameFrequently asked questionsWhat is TradFi?TradFi is a combination of the words traditional and finance; it refers to the established financial system predating blockchain technology. Traditional finance encompasses all financial institutions, products, and services that operate within regulated frameworks, including:

Central banks Commercial banks Payment networks Money markets TradFi includes lending, investing, clearing, and settlement mechanisms and monetary policy, typically mediated by centralized entities such as banks, brokers, and regulatory bodies.

Some of the markets that collectively make up TradFi include equities (encompassing stocks, ETFs, options, futures, and swaps); fixed income (such as corporate bonds, sovereign debt, and municipal bonds); foreign exchange (FX); commodities (including energy, metals, and agricultural products); real estate; and interbank money markets.

What is DeFi?Decentralized finance (DeFi) refers to a system of financial services built on blockchains that operates without centralized intermediaries.

DeFi replicates functions of traditional finance, such as lending, borrowing, trading, asset issuance, and payments, using smart contracts and decentralized protocols.

Governance and operations are typically enforced through code and consensus mechanisms, rather than through centralized institutions or legal contracts.

At its core, DeFi mirrors the products and services of TradFi, but reimplements them using open-source software, transparent ledgers, and programmable logic. DeFi does not simply recreate financial primitives like borrowing or lending; it also reinvents TradFi’s more abstract or structural elements.

The total value locked (TVL) of DeFi often exceeds $100 billion.

A brief history of financeTradFi is a concept that exists in contrast to DeFi; its definition emerged retrospectively rather than from a single point of origin. Still, important historical developments in traditional finance laid the groundwork for DeFi’s rise.

The trajectory of TradFi — toward increasing abstraction, complexity, and dependence on centralized infrastructure — ultimately created the conditions for its alternative: DeFi. Each stage of TradFi’s development left a structural or philosophical gap that DeFi attempts to address through code and decentralization.

For this guide, we refer to TradFi’s history in relation to the rise of centralized banking (e.g., Bank of England, Bretton Woods, and the Federal Reserve). Centralized banking refers to a system where a single institution, known as a central bank, manages a country’s monetary policy and controls the money supply.

Central banking laid the foundation for the modern financial system. While there were many tradeoffs, the emergence of central banks helped:

Standardize monetary policy Stabilize currency issuance Introduce a baseline of safety to the system Simply put, this meant that people could use fiat currencies and procure loans with ease and safety. This shift made fiat broadly usable and bank deposits more trustworthy, which in turn led to the growth of institutional finance.

However, the same institutions that made modern finance possible also introduced new forms of risk and exclusion.

Centralization created single points of failure, opaque governance led to mistrust, and growing reliance on intermediaries concentrated power into the hands of a few.

The 2008 financial crisis was a turning point and made these vulnerabilities apparent, exposing how complex, interconnected systems built on trust and opacity could fail.

Shortly thereafter, the enigmatic figure Satoshi Nakomoto created Bitcoin in 2009. This marked the beginning of crpto and blockchain technology and created the technological primitives and philosophical principles upon which DeFi eventually built.

16 years ago, Satoshi encoded “Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks” into bitcoin's genesis block, at a time when “Eat Out from £5” was still a standard deal.

Each anniversary, this headline reminds us how bailout-driven monetary expansion erodes purchasing power. pic.twitter.com/27OQidXY0A

— Onramp (@OnrampBitcoin) January 3, 2025 TradFi vs. DeFiHow does DeFi organize and compose financial activity differently from TradFi? In the following sections, this guide covers how DeFi differs from TradFi in philosophy, core primitives, assets, and risk management.

PhilosophyAt their core, TradFi and DeFi are not just different in how they operate, they are built on different philosophies. In TradFi, rules are enforced through laws. Banks are audited, exchanges follow rules because of regulators, and contracts are enforced through courts.

On the other hand, DeFi is governed by protocols and economic incentives. It operates based on the principle of trust minimization (i.e., why trust when you can verify). In this scenario, trust is placed in code, cryptography, and math, and game theory becomes the mechanism for aligning interests.

DeFi’s ethos is rooted in open-source transparency, censorship resistance, and accessibility. Whereas TradFi asks users to trust institutions.

It is important to keep in mind that both philosophies have tradeoffs. TradFi offers legal recourse and protections but can selectively enforce rules. DeFi offers transparency, self-custody, and availability but introduces unique attack vectors.

Institutions vs. protocolsIn TradFi, financial activity revolves around institutions. Liquidity flows through a network of banks, exchanges, broker-dealers, and clearinghouses — each siloed and bound by trust. However, the core of DeFi is the decentralized exchange (DEX), specifically pools of liquidity.

DEXs were initially and solely created as peer-to-peer (P2P) marketplaces where users could trade crypto without needing an intermediary. Today, other protocols integrate with DEXs to source liquidity, manage collateral, and create new financial primitives.

In other words, they have evolved beyond their traditional role and now function more like modular liquidity infrastructure as opposed to mere trading venues.

Flow of liquidity in DeFi: BeInCryptoIn traditional finance, liquidity flows through banks, exchanges, shadow banks, and similar institutions. Each of these institutions are fragmented, requiring licenses, credit relationships, legal agreements, and intermediaries.

Flow of liquidity in TradFi: BeInCrypto In summary, the financial system is built around regulated entities. These institutions are the building blocks that hold and move capital. In DeFi, the liquidity itself is the primitive. As a result, DEXs become public, programmable liquidity layers that other protocols can plug into.

TradFiDeFiTraditional finance is institution-centricDecentralized finance is protocol-centricLiquidity is fragmented across multiple institutionsLiquidity is concentrated in liquidity poolsRequires institutional trust and contractual arrangementsAccess is open and permissionlessCoordination via legal infrastructureCoordination via programmable infrastructureAssetsTradFi and DeFi don’t just differ in architecture, they differ in the composition and trust assumptions of the assets that underpin their systems. In TradFi, the assets that make up the foundation of liquidity are composed of fiat currencies, sovereign debt, and credit instruments, backed by trust and legal enforcement.

USD, for, example, is a fiat currency that serves as a global settlement layer. It is backed by the economic activity of the U.S. (and its military).

Share of global reserve currencies: wolfstreet.comIn DeFi, the analogues to these assets emanate from protocol design. For example, ETH is a base currency of the Ethereum network (analogous to USD and the U.S.). However, it is also a yield-bearing asset through staking — similar in function to a sovereign bond, such as U.S. treasuries.

LP tokens are like claims on underlying capital and have similar functionality to equity or structured notes. Lending protocol receipt tokens, like aUSDC or cDAI, are on-chain debt instruments backed by collateral in smart contracts.

CategoryTradFiDeFiBase assetFiat currencies (USD, EUR, JPY)Native tokens (ETH, SOL, BTC)Risk-free yield Sovereign bonds (e.g., U.S. Treasuries)Staked ETH / LSTs (e.g., stETH)Credit instrumentsCorporate bonds, commercial paperLending protocol debt (e.g., aUSDC, cDAI), undercollateralized loans (Maple)Equity-likeStocks, ETFsProtocol tokens (e.g., UNI, AAVE), LP tokens (claim on revenue/yield)Collateral InstrumentsRepo securities, margin accountsLP tokens, vault shares, wrapped assets The big difference lies in the trust assumptions. TradFi relies on solvency of the nations and institutions issuing and custodying the assets; DeFi relies on code and incentive alignment.

StablecoinsStablecoins are somewhat of an anomaly, as they have ties to both worlds. They are the bridges between TradFi and DeFi. They allow DeFi protocols to price assets and settle trades, all while functioning on-chain.

Fiat-backed stablecoins (USDC and USDT) are on-chain liabilities of off-chain institutions, similar to how eurodollars are liabilities held in foreign banks. They rely on off-chain solvency, legal enforcement, and trust in the custodian. Because of this, fiat-backed stablecoins are more like a hybrid asset: neither fully DeFi nor TradFi.

Tell me without telling me you live in America.

Stablecoins have many use cases in the eurodollar system.

I have personally used them to pay for things in SE Asia and South America. They were preferred to local currency or bank dollars.

Walt is burying his head in the sand and… https://t.co/ZDPOYbxNlv

— Austin Campbell (@CampbellJAustin) December 13, 2024 Decentralized stablecoins (DAI and crvUSD), on the other hand, fit natively into DeFi’s trust model. They are backed by on-chain collateral, managed by smart contracts, and governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).

Risk management and designOne of the most important questions we must ask about every financial system is what happens when things go wrong? A financial system’s design addresses how it operates under both normal conditions and stress.

In traditional finance, a network of institutions and regulations manage risks. Banks have capital reserves, trading firms have margin requirements, so on and so forth. In this system, trust relies on legal enforcement and solvency.

Conversely, DeFi does not delegate risk management, it is resolved in real time. Protocols like Sky (formerly MakerDAO) and Aave mitigate credit risk through:

Over-collateralization Decentralized oracles Time weighted average prices (TWAP), Bots that execute liquidations automatically In this system there are no bailouts — just code and game theory.

Liquidation bot on Aave: app.blocksec.comOne of the tradeoffs of this design is that protocols and assets are more volatile in the short term, but resilient over time. On the other hand, TradFi buffers risk through institutional control. This design effectually hides risk until it reaches a breaking point.

one thing crypto has over tradfi is the high frequency of liquidations. liquidate early, liquidate often. accumulate data, improve at risk management, reduce systemic risk

tradfi does the opposite, putting the whole system at risk with just a couple days of bad price action

— juthica (@juthica) April 5, 2025 Both systems acknowledge that risk cannot be eliminated, only designed for. Each approach takes a different philosophy of control.

GFC vs. Terra-Luna and Celsius contagionThe Great (or Global) Financial Crisis (GFC) is an event that began in 2007 and peaked in 2008. It was a financial crisis that originated in the U.S., spread to other countries, and became widely recognized as the most significant economic downturn since the Great Depression.

The GFC exposed how interdependence and the lack of transparency can allow risk to accumulate quietly and spread systemically. Bailouts and quantitative easing ensured that the system remained operational. However, this also taught the world an important lesson: in TradFi, risk is socialized.

Much like the GFC spread to global financial markets, the Terra-Luna collapse was the catalyst for widespread contagion in crypto markets. This led to the collapse of Celsius, Voyager, Three Arrows Capital, and many other CeFi platforms.

The contagion revealed the systemic risks of centralized lending platforms operating under the banner of DeFi. Though this event spread throughout the crypto markets, leading to a collapse in asset prices, actual DeFi platforms remained operational.

TradFi vs. DeFi: Which one is better?Rather than question whether DeFi or TradFi is better, it’s smarter to consider what each system is designed for. TradFi is more mature and deeply embedded into the global economy. It supports everything from insurance, banking, real estate, and more. Entire industries rely on TradFi.

By contrast, DeFi is nascent, experimental, and narrow in practical application. Most of its activity centers around trading and lending. Its adoption is still niche and real-world application is still in its early phases.

However, DeFi reimagines core functions of the financial system. It is not meant to replace it entirely. TradFi builds around institutions and laws, whereas DeFi builds around protocols and minimized trust. It encodes rules on the blockchain, opens access to anyone, and allows users to hold and trade assets without intermediaries.

TradFi dominates in stability in scale, while DeFi is structurally more egalitarian. The real question is how will they influence each other in the future.

CategoryTradFiDeFiMaturityMature EmergingScopeBroadNarrowSystem designInstitution-centricProtocol-centricAccessPermissionedPermissionlessTransparencyOpaque systems, private ledgersFully transparent, real-time, on-chain dataRisk managementCentralized oversightOn-chain risk mitigationPhilosophyTrust in institutions and legal frameworksTrust minimized through open-source code and cryptographyValue propositionStability, scale, and economic integrationTransparency, composability, and financial inclusivityFinance is not a zero-sum gameTradFi and DeFi have two fundamentally different approaches to organizing and managing financial systems — one built on trust, the other on code. DeFi is still early but has introduced new possibilities. Conversely, TradFi is essential to global economies but subject to human error. The outcome of TradFi vs. DeFi is not a zero-sum game. The future of finance may not be one or the other but a marriage of both; something evidenced in the recent institutional adoption of crypto and popularity of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

Frequently asked questions Both TradFi and DeFi have tradeoffs. While DeFi is better for transparency, TradFi is better for real world use. Both have strengths and weaknesses, however, TradFi is the more widely used of the two.

TradFi is the established financial system that predates DeFi. The term was created retrospectively as the alternative to DeFi. It comprises multiple institutions, such as banks, insurance, equities, real estate, and more.

DeFi is the collection of financial services on the blockchain. It replicates the function of traditional finance, such as lending, borrowing, trading, payments, and more. What separates DeFi from traditional finance is the decentralization of the systems that are built out from blockchain protocols.

Yes, it is possible to make money in DeFi. There are many protocols that replicate familiar products and services in traditional finance. Some of these include lending, borrrowing, and trading.

If you’re thinking of launching your own token on Solana, Raydium LaunchLab could be a name to know. The platform promises simple no-code token creation with real DeFi juice. Whether you’re building a meme coin, a serious utility project, or just experimenting, LaunchLab aims to give you the tools (and curves) to make it happen. So, is it as good as it looks from the outside? Here’s what to know in 2026.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
➤ Raydium LaunchLab provides customizable token launches with features like bonding curves, vesting schedules, and integration with Raydium’s AMM.
➤ Unlike platforms such as Pump.fun and Pompom, LaunchLab supports multiple quote tokens (SOL, USDC, USDT, jitoSOL).
➤ LaunchLab enhances the Solana ecosystem by enabling token creation and liquidity integration.

In this guide:

What is LaunchLab?How does LaunchLab work?What are LaunchLab’s key features?Is there a LaunchLab airdrop?How is LaunchLab different from Pump.fun and Pompom?Why LaunchLab matters for SolanaWhat is LaunchLab?Built into the Raydium ecosystem, LaunchLab is a no-code, permissionless token launchpad that lets anyone create and launch a token in minutes.

LAUNCHLAB REWARD POOL IS GROWING 🪂

Throughout the past 2 weeks, we have allocated a total of 400,000 RAY to eligible LaunchLab users

Another 50,000 in RAY rewards is now available, this time with even more token creator rewards 🪂 pic.twitter.com/PdsjZZIG4z

— Raydium (@RaydiumProtocol) April 30, 2025 ​​Think of it as a vending machine for tokens: you plug in your details, pick your bonding curve, set a few parameters, and your token goes live.

Did you know? A bonding curve is a mathematical pricing formula that determines how a token’s price increases as more of it gets bought. With LaunchLab, you can choose curves like linear, exponential, or logarithmic, meaning you control how price and demand interact right from the start.

It’s not just about launching. Once your token hits certain thresholds, LaunchLab connects it to real liquidity via Raydium’s AMM (automated market maker). That means your token can be bought and sold directly on Raydium, just like any major coin, without manual listings or middlemen.

Why was LaunchLab created?Before LaunchLab, launching a token meant losing sleep over smart contracts, begging for AMM listings, and hoping your liquidity pool didn’t get drained by snipers. It was technical, slow, and mostly built for developers, not creators.

Raydium built LaunchLab to change that and give every creator a chance to launch with full control, smart liquidity flows, and pricing curves to match their project’s vibe.

Raydium LaunchLab interface: RaydiumWhether you’re testing an idea or building a movement, Raydium LaunchLab makes it feel native — because that’s what it is.

How does LaunchLab work?So, how does Raydium LaunchLab actually work behind the scenes? The good news is that you don’t need to be a dev. Here’s a quick example of the token creation process.

To create a token on LaunchLab you must:
• Pick a launch mode
• Enter token details
• Hit launch

Step 1: Pick your launch modeYou’ll start by choosing between two modes:

JustSendIt – for folks who want to go live now, with minimal fuss. LaunchLab Mode – for those who want customization: bonding curve shape, token supply, fees, vesting, etc. Token creation method one: LaunchLabStep 2: Enter your token detailsThis is your token’s bio. You name it, assign a symbol, upload a logo if you like, and set the total supply. Then, you decide what % you want to sell to the public.

There’s a minimum raise target (e.g., 30 SOL), and you decide the bonding curve logic.

You can choose from the following bonding curve logics:

Linear: Price rises steadily. Exponential: Starts low, then shoots up — great for rewarding early buyers. Logarithmic: Price climbs fast early, then slows — good for smoothing late entries Note: This curve becomes your token’s pricing engine during the launch window.

Token creation method two: LaunchLabStep 3: Hit launch, and optionally, be firstOnce you hit launch, anyone can start buying tokens along the curve. But LaunchLab gives you a cool option: you can make the first buy yourself. That stops bots and snipers from messing up your initial momentum.

Step 4: Automatic liquidity kick-inOnce the raise hits your predefined goal (let’s say 85 SOL), LaunchLab automatically pushes your token and the collected SOL into a liquidity pool on Raydium’s AMM. It even burns the LP tokens, so the liquidity is locked. You can’t pull it, and neither can anyone else.

Step 5: Earn from trading feesHere’s the kicker. If you enable creator fee share, you earn 10% of all LP trading fees from that pool. You get an NFT (“fee key”) that proves you’re the creator, and yep, that NFT is the key to claiming those earnings.

That’s it. From token creation to price logic and real, functioning liquidity in one smooth workflow.

Additional token creation details: LaunchLabWhat are LaunchLab’s key features?You’ve seen the workflow. Now let’s talk about what makes Raydium LaunchLab not just functional, but also powerful.

These features are designed to help you launch like a pro, even if it’s your first time deploying a token.

Full customization with Bonding curves & capsYou’re not locked into one-size-fits-all logic. LaunchLab lets you shape how your token behaves, starting with your bonding curve (linear, exponential, or logarithmic) and ending with your raise cap. So whether you’re rewarding early buyers or trying to maintain price stability, you get to call the shots.

Built-in liquidity via Raydium’s AMMOnce your raise completes, LaunchLab pushes your token and funds into Raydium’s AMM automatically, something we mentioned earlier while discussing the platform’s modus operandi. 

Did you know? Many launch platforms rely on manual liquidity adds or third-party DEX listings. LaunchLab skips that entirely by integrating with Raydium, one of Solana’s top AMMs.

Enable Creator Fee Share, and you earn 10% of all trading fees from your token’s AMM pool. You’ll receive a unique Fee Key NFT, which acts like a revenue pass. As long as it’s in your wallet, you can earn from every trade your community makes.

Support for multiple quote tokensYou’re not limited to SOL. With Raydium LaunchLab, you can set your raise in SOL, USDC, USDT, or jitoSOL, depending on what fits your strategy or audience best.

Did you know? jitoSOL is a liquid staking token built on Solana by Jito Labs. Jito Labs, the team behind jitoSOL, is one of the key players in Solana’s infrastructure scene. The team is known for building tools that optimize staking, validator performance, and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) solutions — basically helping Solana run faster, fairer, and more efficiently.

Vesting & token unlock optionsIf your project isn’t just a meme (and you’re thinking long-term), LaunchLab has you covered. You can set up vesting schedules, delayed unlocks, and custom distribution plans — all without writing a single line of code.

JustSendIt mode for one-click launchesWant to skip all the custom options? Use JustSendIt Mode, set the basics, and go live in minutes. Perfect for meme coins, experiments, or fast-moving trends.

Is there a LaunchLab airdrop?Be honest; you were hoping for some alpha here, right? So far, there’s no official LaunchLab token, but there have been whispers.

The Raydium team recently dropped a tweet with an airdrop emoji, and the community’s been speculating ever since. So, while there’s nothing confirmed, if you’re interacting with Raydium LaunchLab now, you might be early.

RAY REWARDS FOR TRADERS AND CREATORS 🪂

Traded OR launched a LaunchLab or @bonk_fun token?
Rewards are claimable for eligible participants

More trades AND more tokens launched = better odds 🪂

And yes, another 50,000 $RAY has been added to the prize pool.
Run it back! pic.twitter.com/8dDjYRRyff

— Raydium (@RaydiumProtocol) April 29, 2025 It’s also worth noting that there’s already a referral rewards program tied to LaunchLab launches. Share a project and if someone swaps through your link, you get 0.1% of that volume airdropped directly in SOL. Not a massive bag — but it’s clean, real, and instant. So, no token drop (yet), but definitely a few perks floating around.

How is LaunchLab different from Pump.fun and Pompom?At first glance, all three might look like token launch platforms riding the same meme wave. But dig a little deeper, and it’s clear that Raydium LaunchLab plays a different game. Here is a quick comparison table to validate that notion.

FeatureRaydium LaunchLabPump.funPompomCustomization levelHigh: bonding curves, vesting, multiple token pairsLow: one-click, minimal setupMinima: meme-first, visual-firstLiquidity handlingAuto-migrated to Raydium AMM with LP burnInitially Raydium, now uses PumpSwapNo direct AMM integrationSupported quote tokensSOL, USDC, USDT, jitoSOLSOL onlyMostly SOLPost-launch toolsFee share via NFT, locked liquidityNone (highly experimental)Basic trading, no fee-sharingIdeal forBuilders, long-term projects, serious launchesFast meme coins, viral dropsMeme vibes, visual discovery, and rapid spin-upsWhy LaunchLab matters for SolanaRaydium LaunchLab isn’t just another Solana token launch platform; it’s an infrastructure layer that makes token creation, liquidity, and discovery feel native. By combining deep AMM integration with permissionless tools and bonding curve logic, it helps creators and strengthens Solana’s DeFi flywheel. Whether you’re shipping a meme or a serious project, LaunchLab brings long-term mechanics to what used to be short-term hype.

While it might just be the right time to start exploring it in depth, it’s important to proceed with caution, particularly if you’re looking at investing in LaunchLab-made meme coins. Be wary of scams and fishing links and prioritize safety whenever interacting in such new, decentralized spaces. 

Exclusive: Genie founder raises $5M for social trading app Share

DeFi Development Corp. has announced a strategic collaboration with Gauntlet. The firm, known for its expertise in vault curation and risk management, will provide DeFi Development Corp. with advanced yield strategies deployed through the Solana-based platform Drift. This move makes DeFi Development Corp. the first public Solana Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) to leverage a curator for complex onchain activity.

The company’s goal is to maximize its $SOL Per Share (SPS), a metric that tracks how much Solana each shareholder effectively holds. By moving beyond traditional staking and into risk-adjusted yield generation, DeFi Development Corp. aims to deliver superior capital efficiency across its treasury.

Leveraging Liquid Staking with $dfdvSOL At the heart of this initiative is $dfdvSOL, a liquid staking token adopted by DeFi Development Corp. in May 2025. This token enables treasury assets to remain liquid while being deployed into yield-generating strategies across Solana’s DeFi ecosystem. Unlike conventional staking, which historically yields about 7% annually, the strategies curated by Gauntlet target returns in the 10 to 20 percent range through hedged liquidity provision.

The strategy involves four key steps. First, users (including DeFi Development Corp.) deposit $dfdvSOL into a Gauntlet-curated Drift vault called dfdvSOL Plus. Second, the vault uses $dfdvSOL as collateral to borrow $USDC through Drift Lend. Third, the borrowed funds are deployed into a basis trade across Drift and Jupiter DEX, and the yield generated is converted back into dfdvSOL. Finally, Gauntlet’s optimization engine actively monitors and adjusts the positions to maintain efficiency and manage risks.

Beyond Staking: Capital Efficiency as a Differentiator “Our mandate is clear: to be the most innovative and effective Solana treasury. This partnership with Gauntlet is a direct execution of that mission. We are not passive holders; we are focused on productive, onchain activity that leverages the full power of the Solana ecosystem. By allocating capital to sophisticated, risk-managed strategies like those curated by Gauntlet on Drift, we are actively working to compound our $SOL holdings and create a durable competitive advantage.” - Joseph Onorati, CEO of DeFi Development Corp.

Gauntlet’s Head of Institutional Partnerships, Rahul Goyal, echoed this view. He remarked, “Gauntlet’s purpose is to make DeFi more efficient for institutions within strict risk parameters. DFDV is a true innovator, and their forward-thinking approach to treasury management is a perfect match for our capabilities.”

Traditional staking has long provided a straightforward but limited means of earning yield. By contrast, DeFi Development Corp.’s integration of Gauntlet strategies reflects a shift toward maximizing capital efficiency. This hands-on treasury management sets the company apart from competing DATs and from alternatives such as Solana ETFs, which typically rely on simple staking or accumulation strategies.

SPS as a Central Metric $SOL Per Share (SPS) remains the key measure of value for DeFi Development Corp. In July, the company projected 261 percent growth in SPS by mid-2026, with a target of one $SOL per share by 2028. At that time, SPS stood at 0.0457. The metric has since risen to 0.0816, representing a 94 percent increase over the past three months.

Interestingly, the company’s compensation framework for executives and the core treasury strategy team directly ties bonus outcomes to growth in $SOL per Share, aiming to align management incentives closely with long-term shareholder value. The first bonus target, set at 0.085 SPS, is already within reach.

What Has DeFi Dev Corp. Been Up To? The Gauntlet partnership builds on a series of significant moves by DeFi Development Corp. In September, the company acquired over 250,000 $SOL, bringing its total treasury to 2.1 million $SOL, valued at approximately $411 million. This ranks the firm as the entity with the third-largest Solana treasury, according to Strategic Solana Reserve data.

The company has also expanded internationally. It launched Britain’s first $SOL DAT through DFDV UK and recently entered the Korean market by partnering with Fragmetic, a Solana restaking protocol, to launch Korea’s first publicly traded $SOL DAT. In addition, DeFi Development Corp. authorized an expansion of its stock repurchase program from $1 million to $100 million earlier this week.

Read More on SolanaFloor Solana Seeker Season: Top Boosts and Perks

New Day, New DAT: Brera Holdings Rebrands to SolMate Alongside $300M PIPE Deal

Can $SOL Reach $500 by 2026?

The U.S. SEC has suspended trading in the QMMM stock following a nearly 1,000% increase in just three weeks. The spike happened after the company announced its Solana treasury allocation in its crypto treasury. The commission’s move suggests that market manipulation may have taken place. 

SEC Flags Concerns Over QMMM Rally After Solana Treasury Allocation According to Bloomberg, the SEC has halted trading in the QMMM stock after it rallied by 959% upon the announcement of its pivot into digital assets through a Solana treasury strategy and blockchain-driven analytics. 

The company had revealed plans to build a $100 million portfolio targeting Solana, Bitcoin, and Ethereum,  while also investing in long-term Web3 infrastructure projects. The news immediately triggered a reaction. 

The QMMM shares soared by nearly 1,000%, reaching a high of $207 before retreating to $88 in after-hours trading. 

The regulator cited “recommendations on social media by unknown persons” as possible drivers of the surge. This suggests the rally cannot be based solely on the crypto treasury announcement.. This suggests market manipulation could be at play. 

QMMM was not alone. The SEC also suspended Smart Digital Group Ltd. for similar reasons. This extends the crackdown on small-cap firms that have leveraged crypto narratives to draw investor attention.

The company’s announcement of a Solana treasury holding was previously hinted at as the main driver behind the rally. By including the Solana treasury allocation alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum, the firm positioned itself among the growing trend of crypto treasury companies diversifying assets.

However, the commission’s move highlights the dangers of overly linking stock prices to speculative crypto treasury announcements, like this Solana treasury allocation announcement.  Regulators remain cautious of overstated claims or artificially inflated demand, despite such tactics becoming increasingly popular.

Yahoo Finance reports that QMMM stock was trading at $119.40 before the freeze was implemented.

Source: Yahoo Finance; QMMM Price Daily Chart Wider SEC Scrutiny Amid Market Manipulation Fears The suspension move from the SEC fits into a broader enforcement trend. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have targeted social media-driven touting schemes in digital assets. 

More recently, Paul S. Atkins, SEC Chair, announced a Task Force to investigate pump-and-dump activities across crypto markets. This illustrates the agency’s increased attention to detail.

This task force comes amid a backdrop of questionable trading activity in the digital asset space. For example, analysts shared that MYX Finance’s price was manipulated after it surged 270% in just 24 hours.

Similarly, speculation has swirled around a top crypto exchange. Coinbase fell out of XRP’s Top 10 exchanges in terms of reserves. Critics suggested the platform may have reduced exposure to avoid liquidity risks during XRP’s all-time highs.

These events show the regulator’s concern that traded assets and speculative hype could encourage manipulative environments.

David Schwartz has announced that he will step down as Ripple's chief technology officer at the end of the year after more than 13 years at the company. 

"The time has come for me to step back from my day-to-day duties as Ripple CTO at the end of this year. I’m really looking forward to spending more time with the kids and grandkids and going back to the hobbies I set aside," he said. 

Schwartz was appointed as the company's CTO back in July 2018. Before him, this role was held by Coil CEO Stefan Thomas and Ripple/Stellar co-founder Jed McCaleb. 

HOT Stories

In his statement, Schwartz stressed his appreciation for the company and the community, describing his time at Ripple as "one of the greatest honors and experiences of his life." 

As happens in one’s life, I’ve been taking stock of my last 40 years. It’s been a wild ride. I’ve gone from consulting for the NSA to watching the early stages of Bitcoin. Then, I met Arthur, Jed, and Chris and worked on coding the XRP Ledger. Now, I’ve spent more than 13 years…

— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) September 30, 2025 He has also expressed his gratitude to Ripple's leadership (CEO Brad Garlinghouse and President Monica Long), co-founders Chris Larsen and Arthur Britto, as well as the RippleX team. 

Joining board of directorsSchwartz has confirmed that he is not breaking ties with Ripple. In fact, he will be joining the company's board of directors. He will also remain involved as CTO Emeritus. 

"I look forward to seeing the rest of you at XRP community events around the world," he said in a statement. 

"You are my boss now?" Ripple's leadership has already reacted to Schwartz's upcoming exit. Garlinghouse has described Schwartz as "the smartest (and maybe the funniest) person" he personally knows. "A true OG in crypto with the conviction and vision to see what others couldn’t - you are a legend," he added. 

He has also jokingly suggested that Schwartz will be his boss after joining the company's board of directors. 

The smartest (and maybe the funniest) person I know. A true OG in crypto with the conviction and vision to see what others couldn’t - you are a legend. Thank you David for everything you’ve done for the industry, for Ripple and for the XRP Ledger. We are all forever grateful…… https://t.co/tt4uX4JlkV

— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) September 30, 2025 Long has acknowledged that the "mighty community" would not have existed without Schwartz. "I deeply respect your ingenuity, integrity, humor, and humility, which you demonstrate daily..." Long said. 

Despite Losing Share to Aster, Hyperliquid Still ‘Most Investible,’ Analyst Says

Cardano (ADA), the tenth largest blockchain by market capitalization, invites its enthusiasts to share their insights on ecosystem initiatives, developer experience, engineering tooling and so on. The survey launches for the fourth time as Cardano (ADA) DeFi TVL is growing.

2025 Cardano developer ecosystem survey kicks offAccording to the official announcement by Cardano Foundation, a nonprofit organization that oversees the Cardano (ADA) ecosystem, its traditional annual survey just opened. Every Cardano (ADA) community participant can share their take on the progress, developer relations, tooling and adoption workloads for Cardano (ADA) and associated solutions.

Developers, we need your voice. 🛠️

The 2025 Cardano Developer Ecosystem survey is live. 10–15 minutes of your time helps to improve the tools, libraries, and docs you use every day.

Your feedback → better infrastructure for all Cardano builders.https://t.co/4V4SuO6j1V pic.twitter.com/9Gj9MKa7WF

— Cardano Foundation (@Cardano_CF) October 3, 2025 The survey launched today, on Oct. 3, 2025. According to the organizers, the completion of the survey will take 10-15 minutes.

In particular, participants are invited to focus on developer tools, libraries and documentations for various Cardano (ADA) services and instruments.

HOT Stories

Commenting on the launch of the survey, the Cardanians proposed to add more language localizations to documentation portals and enhance Cardano Signer, an open-source multifunctional tool that can sign and verify data, with the Command Line Interface.

As covered by U.Today, Cardano's (ADA) Charles Hoskinson values the new partnership between his blockchain and NEAR Protocol.

You Might Also Like

The two teams will work together on AI-native instruments for data and other use cases at the intersection of AI and Web3.

Cardano (ADA) DeFi TVL adds 37% in three monthsWhile the global cryptocurrency markets are back to surging, so is the Cardano (ADA) DeFi ecosystem. In just three months, its aggregated total value locked (TVL) surged from $256 million to over $350 million, DeFiLlama data says.

Image via DeFiLlamaIn total, Cardano (ADA) is a tech basis for over 50 DeFi protocols: decentralized stablecoins, DEXes, lending protocols and so on.

Lending protocol Liqwid is responsible for over 30% of Cardano (ADA) DeFi TVL, while MinSwap, Indigo and Splash Protocol also demonstrate notable traction.

We reached out to some of the crypto's leading platforms and projects and asked their top executives to provide unfiltered takes on the industry's most interesting narratives and topics. The submissions we received were broad, ranging from unparalleled insights into crypto ecosystems, to the future of social media and RWAs. Here's what they sent us...

The Creator Economy Doesn’t Exist Yet. But It Can.[Alexandru Iulian Florea, Founder and CEO of Ice Open Network]

If the news from this summer is anything to go by, the creator economy is shooting into the stratosphere — and the Big Tech boys all want you to believe they’re lifting it up.

TikTok raised its creator payouts in August, promising $0.40–$1.00+ per 1,000 views for long-form video. X tweaked its ad revenue sharing and subscriptions. And eMarketer says US creators will move more than $10.5 billion in brand deals this year. Globally, the creator economy is projected to hit $191.55 billion in 2025 and surpass $528 billion by 2030.

The numbers are breathtaking. They look like proof that creators are finally in charge, that they’re an economy in their own right. But let’s not kid ourselves: scale doesn’t equal sovereignty.

We’ve all heard the cliché that creators are building on borrowed land. The reality is harsher. It’s not borrowed — it’s a walled garden where the digital landlord holds the keys. What we call the creator economy is, at best, a subdivision of the digital landlord economy. Platforms own the ground. Creators pay the rent. That’s not empowerment — it’s tenancy.

And not even the kind of tenancy you get with real property, where contracts, notice periods, and tenant rights give you some protection. In the digital landlord economy, the rules change overnight. Algorithms shift. Payout formulas vanish into black boxes. Your entire audience can disappear without warning. These are landlords with monopoly power — and they’re the worst kind of landlord.

Bigger checks don’t fix the foundation. As long as creators are tenants, the wealth they generate — in engagement, data, and cultural capital — will always flow back to the landlords.

The real next step isn’t higher payouts. It’s ownership — of identity, of data, of community, of digital footprint. That’s what makes a true creator economy.

That’s the premise of Online+: the decentralized social layer where creators own the ground they build on. Rewards are transparent. Value flows directly to the people who generate it. Community belongs to its members, not to a landlord’s servers.

Because even the biggest of castles, when built on shaky foundations, will collapse. What the world needs is a creator economy that stands on its own soil — not as a tenant of the digital landlord economy, but as a free, sovereign ecosystem.

The shift won’t come from gimmicks or payout tweaks. It will come from decentralization — from platforms that put creators in control.

The creator economy doesn’t exist yet. But it can. And if you’re a creator, it’s time to stop renting your future.

Can blockchain restore trust in digital advertising?[Olena Buyan, Chief Product Officer (CPO) at Verasity]

Trust has always been the currency of digital advertising. Advertisers need to know their budgets are reaching real human audiences and publishers need confidence that they’re being fairly compensated for the genuine attention their content generates. Yet in today’s digital ecosystem, that trust has eroded. Black-box platforms, opaque reporting, and the perpetual rise of ad fraud have left both sides second-guessing the numbers on their dashboards.

Legacy (Web2) ad tech has long tried to plug these gaps with layers of intermediaries and proprietary verification tools. Ironically, these tools are often controlled by the very same platforms they are meant to audit, leaving advertisers and publishers with no choice but to trust the platforms' own data and reporting — with little external accountability.

Blockchain flips this dynamic by making verification a neutral, tamper-proof part of the infrastructure itself. By design, blockchain technology is immutable and transparent, qualities that make it ideally suited for verifying impressions. Instead of relying on third-party reports or walled-garden metrics, every impression can be independently recorded and checked on an open ledger. Advertisers gain the assurance that their spend is being directed toward real engagement, while publishers can prove the true value of their audiences.

What this really delivers is a shared source of truth. Instead of advertisers and publishers relying on separate dashboards and conflicting reports, both sides can align on a single, verifiable record. This not only reduces disputes, but also opens the door to fairer pricing models, stronger partnerships, and ultimately, a healthier digital ad economy.

At Verasity, we’ve built our advertising infrastructure with this principle at its core. Trusted by partners across global markets, our AI, ML, and blockchain-powered fraud detection ad tech provides an auditable record of every ad view. For advertisers, that means budgets that reach real verified audiences. For publishers, it means higher CPMs. Most importantly, it means moving the digital advertising industry closer to what it has always needed: trust.

Core's Most Important Milestones[Dan Edlebeck, Marketing Contributor at Core DAO]

Core is cementing its lead in Bitcoin DeFi with $317M TVL, the highest among Bitcoin-powered chains. Network security is also at record levels - 248.8M CORE and 5,153 BTC staked, with 98% of Bitcoin blocks delegated in the past week.

Accessibility is expanding fast: the Ledger app now supports BTC timelocking and CORE staking (~5% APY) from hardware wallets, Garden Finance enables native BTC -> Core bridging, and BitGo is integrating Core into institutional custody and compliance flows.

A major milestone landed this month, the first Bitcoin Staking ETP on the London Stock Exchange went live, powered by Core and Valour - bringing regulated, yield-bearing Bitcoin exposure to one of the world’s top financial markets. This validates Core’s infrastructure as the bridge for institutional Bitcoin adoption.

Ecosystem launches are reinforcing Core’s identity as the Bitcoin Everything Chain. Molten Finance established itself as the flagship DEX with $5M+ in its first Mission campaign. Volta Market expanded into derivatives with BTC/CORE perps with up to 250x leverage, while BITS Financial and AUSD are delivering native Bitcoin yield and stablecoin infrastructure. Taicho, an AI Agent from Akka Finance, also debuted - letting users swap, lend, stake, or farm on Core simply by typing their intent.

Yield opportunities are multiplying - from Colend’s boosted stCORE promos to Vault Layer × ASX RWA strategies (~24.9% APY), users now have multiple ways to put BTC and CORE to work. b14g’s new WBTC Vault adds to this momentum, offering ~8.7% APY, one of the highest BTC yields in DeFi.

For builders, the Core Commit Program (Cohort 2 now open) provides mentorship, visibility, and incubation pathways. Alongside it, the Core Builder Sprint rewards consistent, high-quality contributions from developers of all levels, strengthening the pipeline of innovation on Core.

With upcoming showcases like Bitcoin Fusion at TOKEN2049 Singapore, Core is proving it’s not just leading in TVL - it’s building the infrastructure for Bitcoin to shift from passive capital into an active, yield-generating asset class.

Why Real-World Asset Investments in DeFi Need Both Liquidity and Yield[Ben Antes, Co-Founder of ASX]

As real-world assets (RWAs) make their way into decentralized finance (DeFi), the promise is compelling: investors can earn attractive yields on tokenized assets like bonds, real estate loans, or private credit while enjoying the transparency and speed of blockchain. But there’s a hidden tension here that many projects are struggling to solve: how to deliver high yields from long-term investments while also providing liquidity so investors can exit when they want.

Traditional finance faces the same issue. A bank lends out money in illiquid loans but promises depositors instant withdrawals. In DeFi, the problem is magnified: investors expect both the higher returns of private credit and the quick exit options of crypto trading that they are used to. But every dollar tied up in a long-term, yield-bearing loan or real world asset is a dollar that can’t instantly be returned to someone cashing out. 

When too much capital is locked in illiquid assets, redemption requests can create stress, forcing projects to either pause withdrawals or sell assets at a loss. On the other hand, holding too much cash or low-yield collateral to meet redemptions eats into returns, making the investment less attractive. There is no reason to supply liquidity to a market for a fundamentally inferior yield. 

This “liquidity versus yield” trade-off has already tripped up some RWA protocols. Many have learned that low secondary market trading for RWA tokens leaves investors stuck, even if the underlying asset is performing well. Others have been hit by timing mismatches, where loans pay out quarterly, but investors want monthly liquidity.

Ultimately, for RWAs to thrive in DeFi, projects must engineer systems that let investors earn the attractive yields of long-term assets without feeling locked in. Striking the right balance between yield and liquidity isn’t just a technical challenge—it’s the key to making tokenized real-world assets a mainstream financial reality.

Solving this problem on-chain can create the holy grail of yield bearing real world assets.

[Disclaimer: The content in this newsletter was provided by third parties and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of BSCN. Cryptocurrency is always risky. You should always do you own research before interacting with any crypto platform or asset. For feedback or to be featured in BSCN's next opinion article, please reach out to [email protected]]

Ethereum’s treasury stocks are starting to exhibit early signs of a potential market reversal, sparking renewed optimism across the cryptocurrency landscape. This movement among treasuries often serves as a leading signal of shifting sentiment within the broader ETH ecosystem.

A Look At The Data Behind Ethereum On-Chain Recovery In a subtle shift that suggests the broader market may be stabilizing, Ethereum treasury stocks are beginning to flash early signs of reversal. Despite these encouraging signals, Ethereum remains well below its all-time high (ATH). Investor Ted Pillows pointed out on X that the institutional interest will only return once the charts show sustained momentum over several weeks. 

Ted believes that for ETH to reclaim its ATH and hinges on capital inflow, it requires the same kind of large-scale liquidity injection the network experienced in July and August, which are critical to fueling the next leg higher.

SharpLink Gaming Inc., a prominent corporate holder of ETH, has reported strong compounding returns from its treasury strategy asset. In the past week alone, the company generated 451 ETH in staking rewards, which is utilized through both liquid and native staking. Since the launch of its ETH treasury strategy on June 2, 2025, SharpLink’s total cumulative ETH staking rewards have now reached an impressive 4,723 ETH.

Source: Chart from Ted Pillows on X According to the company, 100% continuous generation of yield is the amount of its ETH treasury, which is currently generating approximately $370,000 worth of ETH every day, showcasing ETH’s unique ability to generate yield while maintaining liquidity. SharpLink highlighted this as the reason the altcoin stands out as a superior treasury asset, which is productive, yield-bearing, and constantly compounding in value.

Despite the strong performance, the firm confirmed there were no new ETH purchases or stock buybacks over the past week, which means there won’t be a new press release for now. The company’s focus remains clear: “the asset is ETH, and the ticker is SBET,” SharpLink noted.

Ethereum Market Share Is Moving Exactly As Scripted Technical analyst Umair Crypto has noted that Ethereum dominance is currently at a critical juncture, having completed the first half of a projected move and now setting the stage for the second half. 

This view anticipates a rejection from the current resistance area on the dominance chart toward the lower level for ETH Dominance, which will likely lead to a price correction where the next bounce for ETH will form. Umair concluded that the altcoin itself could experience a short-term correction once the move unfolds before reclaiming momentum for the next leg higher.

ETH trading at $4,488 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com

JUST IN: Bitcoin-Focused Metaplanet Suspends Share Rights to Rethink Strategy

Oct 10, 2025, 12:54 p.m.

2 min read

Metaplanet Share Price (TradingView)Summary

Metaplanet announced a suspension of the 20th to 22nd series of Moving Strike Warrants that will run from October 20 to November 17.Shares have fallen 70% from June highs, with valuation now at 1.05x NAV, the lowest since launching its bitcoin strategy.Metaplanet (MTPLF) has announced it will suspend the exercise of its 20th to 22nd series of stock acquisition rights, also known as Moving Strike Warrants, from Oct. 20 to Nov. 17. The suspension, which applies to warrants issued through a third-party allotment to Evo Fund, will pause the exercise of all remaining rights for a 20-day trading period.

What it meansMetaplanet is essentially halting, for now, the sale of common stock to fund additional bitcoin purchases. The company is doing this after a months-long collapse in its stock has left the share valuation at just barely above the value of the bitcoin on its balance sheet. Additional share sales would thus potentially be dilutive to shareholders.

Metaplanet isn't alone. Even as bitcoin has risen throughout the year and trades within sight of record highs, shares in bitcoin treasury companies — most of which were quickly formed in attempt to mimic the success of Michael Saylor's Strategy (MSTR) — have plunged.

Among them are KindlyMD (NAKA) and Strive (ASST), both of which recently closed SPAC merger deals only to see their share prices quickly lose 80% or more as investors question to need to pay any premium to the value of the bitcoin on their balance sheet.

Metaplanet, which holds 30,823 BTC and ranks as the fourth largest corporate bitcoin holder globally, said the suspension is a strategic move to manage capital formation amid evolving market conditions.
The company said will continue to maximize flexibility, strengthen its financial foundation, and support shareholder value. It also plans to continue developing new financial instruments and enhancing its capital policy.

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

12345678910

Meme Coin Snipers’ Secrets to Making Millions Revealed

Singapore — WEEX Exchange, an industry leader in cryptocurrency trading, proudly announces its latest WEEX WE-Launch event, featuring the disruptive and forward-thinking Bad Idea AI (BAD) project. This initiative not only includes an enormous 840,000,000,000 BAD token airdrop but also offers participants a chance to engage in a “Share 2 Earn” program, where they can win a share of 2,000 USDT by promoting the project on social media.

Understanding Bad Idea AI (BAD): A Bold Step into the Future

Bad Idea AI ($BAD) is an experimental project that seamlessly integrates Blockchain technology, Artificial Intelligence, and Decentralization. This project is designed to explore the limits of AI’s potential and poses a critical question: Can AI be trusted to guide humanity’s future, or is it a recipe for disaster?

The $BAD project decentralizes control, placing decision-making power in the hands of AI and the global community. This structure creates a unique environment where the outcomes are uncertain, reflecting the high-risk nature of the project. $BAD is more than just a digital asset; it’s an exploration of how far we can push AI and what it could mean for our collective future.

Participation Guide: How to Get Involved with Bad Idea AI (BAD)

Participants in the WEEX WE-Launch event can commit WEEX Tokens (WXT) to earn BAD tokens. The event’s reward pool consists of 840 billion BAD tokens, which will be distributed based on each participant’s Effective Commit. This commit is calculated using the actual WXT committed and a multiplier based on the participant’s tier, ensuring that those who commit more, especially in higher tiers, are rewarded accordingly.

Details of the WEEX WXT Committing Pool:

Total Reward Pool: 840,000,000,000 BAD tokens Minimum Commitment: 1,000 WXT Maximum Commitment: 500,000 WXT Reward Calculation: Your Effective Commit / Total Effective Commit of All Users × Total Reward Pool One of the unique aspects of this event is that the WXT committed by participants remains accessible, allowing users to engage in multiple projects at once without any staking or lock-in requirements. This feature maximizes the potential for earnings and participation across different initiatives within the WEEX ecosystem.

In addition to earning BAD tokens, participants can take part in the “Share 2 Earn” program, which rewards users for spreading the word about Bad Idea AI on social media. To participate, users need to:

Repost the official announcement on X (formerly Twitter). Sign up on WEEX during the event period. Complete the registration form provided by WEEX. The first participants to complete these steps will be eligible for a share of the 2,000 USDT prize pool, which is distributed on a first-come, first-served basis.

About WEEX Exchange: Pioneering the Future of Cryptocurrency Trading

Since its founding in 2018, WEEX has grown to become one of the most trusted cryptocurrency exchanges, known for its robust security protocols and commitment to regulatory compliance. With over 400 trading pairs and new additions regularly, WEEX provides users with access to a wide array of digital assets, making it a preferred platform for traders and investors alike.

The platform’s native token, WXT, offers users significant advantages, including a 30% discount on futures trading fees and exclusive access to VIP events. Through the WEEX WE-Launch platform, WXT holders can participate in airdrops and other special events, such as the current Bad Idea AI launch, keeping them at the forefront of the digital asset landscape.

In partnership with Shibarium, WEEX serves as the primary platform for launching new projects within the Shiba Inu ecosystem. This collaboration underscores WEEX’s role as a leader in the crypto industry, continually providing its users with access to innovative and rewarding projects.

Be Part of the Future: Join the WEEX WE-Launch and Engage with Bad Idea AI (BAD)

This WEEX WE-Launch event is a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of AI, blockchain, and decentralization. By committing WXT and participating in the “Share 2 Earn” campaign, users can engage with a groundbreaking project and earn valuable rewards in the process.

Contact Information:

Sign up: https://www.weex.com/register Website: https://www.weex.com/ Media Email: [email protected] Customer Support: [email protected] For more information on how to participate in the WE-Launch event and to learn more about Bad Idea AI (BAD), visit the WEEX Support page. Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

TON Hacker House Bangkok Draws 300+ Global Developers and 70+ Demo Submissions, Highlight the TON Ecosystem at Devcon Thailand, Powered by TONX