Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

A Solana-based KIMCHI memecoin has plunged more than 95% after a promotional post linked to crypto trader Kimchi’s X account disappeared, triggering allegations of suspicious trading and questions about Pump.fun co-founder Alon’s involvement in promoting the token.

Summary

A KIMCHI token promoted through a QR code linked to trader Kimchi’s X account crashed after the post disappeared.
Lookonchain reported that the token briefly reached a $14 million market capitalization before falling more than 95%.
Blockchain analysts flagged profitable early trading, while allegations of hacking and deliberate fraud remain unconfirmed.
Pump.fun’s daily revenue and active addresses declined during the same period, without evidence establishing a direct connection.

According to blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain, Kimchi’s account promoted a newly launched token after reportedly receiving 500 million KIMCHI tokens, while Alon reposted the announcement. Both posts subsequently disappeared, and the token’s market capitalization collapsed after briefly reaching approximately $14 million.

The controversy began when an AI-generated promotional image appeared on Kimchi’s X account, featuring a QR code directing users to a newly created token on Pump.fun. Traders quickly bought the token, while Alon’s repost drew further attention to the promotion.

Within minutes, KIMCHI reportedly climbed past a $10 million market capitalization before reaching roughly $14 million. Its subsequent decline exceeded 95%, with some market observations placing the drop closer to 99% after the promotional post disappeared.

Kimchi token crashe, source: Lookonchain/X
Market capitalization measures the estimated value of a token’s supply at the prevailing price. The reported $14 million peak therefore does not establish that investors collectively lost $14 million or that an equivalent amount of money entered the market.

Crypto trader Arez questioned the sequence, alleging that the QR code’s destination changed after the token attracted substantial trading. The trader said Alon subsequently withdrew his repost, while some buyers were left holding tokens purchased near the peak.

The incident followed recent attention surrounding Kimchi’s relationship with Pump.fun.

Lookonchain identifies over $385K in suspected trading profits
Lookonchain’s investigation identified several wallets that reportedly accumulated KIMCHI at relatively low prices before selling during the rally. The analytics firm estimated that the transactions generated more than $385,000 in combined profits.

Investigators identified three Solana addresses for examining the associated transfers. The wallet activity described by Lookonchain raises questions about trading patterns, but blockchain transfers alone do not establish who controlled the addresses or whether the traders had advance knowledge of the promotion.

A separate Bitquery investigation documented activity involving another KIMCHI launch around October 20. Its researchers identified three linked wallets that bought a newly issued token and quickly sold their holdings, generating approximately $104,000 in gains.

Bitquery explicitly stated that it could not connect those wallets to the deployer through direct transfers. Its findings concern a separately identified token and transaction sequence, so the reported profits should not be combined with Lookonchain’s estimate without matching the contracts and timestamps.

Traders demand answers over deleted KIMCHI promotion
Following the collapse, some traders accused the accounts involved of promoting an unsafe token. An X user known as tontheneko demanded refunds, arguing that Alon should have verified the promotion before sharing it with his followers.

Hello @a1lon9, I hope you immediately refund anyone who lost money on this coin.

You literally retweeted a rug pull and made hundreds of people lose money.

It was your responsibility as @Pumpfun founder to double check and confirm what you are posting with kimchi before… pic.twitter.com/3QNtkWSYA8

— ton (@tontheneko) October 22, 2026

Those accusations remain allegations, not established findings of fraud or misconduct. Neither the promotional repost nor subsequent deletion independently proves that Alon or Kimchi coordinated the trading or benefited financially from the token’s price movements.

A suspected account hack has been suggested as another explanation, although the available statements do not confirm unauthorized access. No verified refund arrangement or official finding assigning responsibility was identified.

The episode follows scrutiny of Pump.fun token survival rates, with an October Bitquery study finding that 79% of launches in its sample recorded no trading after their first day. That study covered a larger token sample and did not examine the latest KIMCHI promotion specifically.

Pump.fun revenue falls as activity declines
Meanwhile, Lookonchain highlighted a decline in activity on Pump.fun after Kimchi reportedly removed the platform’s name from his X biography. The researcher compared daily revenue of $1.61 million with $1.35 million two days later, representing a decline of approximately 16%.

Active addresses fell from 178,539 to 159,492 over the same comparison, a drop of roughly 11%. However, the timing does not demonstrate that the KIMCHI controversy caused either decline.

The DefiLlama protocol dashboard separately showed approximately $1.35 million in daily revenue and 159,492 active addresses. Its methodology distinguishes platform revenue from total fees paid by traders.

Recently, Pump.fun introduced perpetual futures trading through Hyperliquid, expanding its services beyond memecoin launches. Subsequently, the platform launched Pump Bridge to support cross-chain transactions, with its published performance figures based on testing conducted between September 28 and October 7.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

A new Solana memecoin has hard-coded its entire creator fee stream to a single wallet, permanently. The token is $KIMCHI, launched on Pump.fun, and the address receiving those fees cannot be changed.

Pump.fun’s own profile page labels that address “Kimchi.” That name belongs to a trader who had just been announced as a Pump.fun collaborator on creative direction.

How the launch unfolded
$KIMCHI went live on October 20, 2026, at approximately 23:00 UTC. The token also goes by a second name, “Aura Final Boss.”

The deployer used an anonymous wallet with a track record of launching similar tokens. In the very first transaction, that wallet scooped up about 79.3% of the one billion token supply.

The cost was roughly 87 SOL, worth somewhere between $9,000 and $9,300.

Minutes after launch, 750 million tokens, or 75% of the supply, landed in the address labeled “Kimchi.” At the same time, the deployer named that address the fixed, unchangeable recipient of every creator fee the coin generates.

Then came the rally. Promotion tied to the trader Kimchi helped push the token’s market cap to approximately $40 million within its first hour.

On-chain analysis indicated the deployer sold most of its remaining tokens after launch. Its estimated profit came to about $26,000. Early sniping wallets reportedly walked away with even more.

Why the fee setup matters
Creator fees are Pump.fun’s way of paying whoever launches a token. On the bonding curve, the creator fee sits at 0.30% of trading volume. Once a token graduates to a PumpSwap pool, the fee ranges from 0.05% to 0.95%, depending on which market-cap tier the token occupies.

What makes $KIMCHI unusual is the permanence. The deployer did not keep the fee stream or retain the option to redirect it later. Instead, every future fee flows to the one address, with no way to reassign it.

The arrangement concentrates both a large token balance and an ongoing revenue stream in a single wallet.

The influencer playbook on Solana
The address carries the Kimchi label on Pump.fun’s profile page. The source material does not establish whether the trader set up the token, endorsed it, or controls the wallet.

What this means for traders and the platform
One address holding 75% of supply can move the price dramatically if it ever decides to sell.

Fee recipients earn from activity, not from price direction. A wallet collecting a cut of every trade profits from volatility in both directions, which can sit awkwardly beside holders who only win when the price rises.

The deployer turned roughly $9,300 into an estimated $26,000 profit, and snipers reportedly did better. Those gains came from being first to a bonding curve.

Watch the Kimchi-labeled address closely. Its 750 million tokens and its permanent claim on creator fees make it the single most important wallet in the $KIMCHI economy.

Also watch whether the token graduates to a PumpSwap pool and which fee tier it lands in. That will determine how much the fixed recipient collects as trading continues.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Pump.fun, the Solana platform best known as a factory for meme coins, now sells trading card packs too.

On October 19, 2026, the app integrated Collector Crypt’s gacha pack-opening feature and its trading card game marketplace. Collector Crypt’s native token, CARDS, rose 19% after the news, according to CoinGecko data.

The early numbers suggest this was more than a novelty tab. Users opened approximately $2 million in packs on the first day. That came from around 1,700 new users who engaged with the feature.

What actually launched
The integration lets Pump.fun users buy randomized packs of tokenized, graded trading cards. The inventory spans Pokémon, One Piece and a range of sports cards.

The launch-day volume carried real weight inside Collector Crypt’s own business. Pump.fun’s users drove roughly 20% of Collector Crypt’s total daily gachapon volume on day one.

How the pack machine works
Collector Crypt’s model sits at the intersection of physical collectibles and onchain trading. Each digital pack is linked to physical trading cards.

Once a card is pulled, the owner has options. The card can be traded on the blockchain, or it can be redeemed for the physical item.

The randomness is handled by a verifiable random function. That’s a cryptographic method designed so anyone can check that a draw wasn’t rigged after the fact.

Collector Crypt also offers a buyback on pulled cards. Depending on the pack tier, it will repurchase cards at 85% to 93% of their insured value.

A strong year for Collector Crypt
The Pump.fun deal lands on top of an already busy 2026 for Collector Crypt. It has frequently ranked among the top revenue-generating decentralized applications on Solana. Collector Crypt has also posted strong growth in user engagement over the same stretch.

What this means for Pump.fun, Collector Crypt and CARDS holders
For CARDS holders, the 19% move reflects a simple bet: more distribution should mean more volume. If Pump.fun keeps routing a sizable share of gachapon activity, Collector Crypt’s revenue picture could benefit.

Around 1,700 users and approximately $2 million in packs is a strong opening, but the real test is whether those users come back next week. The more useful signal will be whether Pump.fun’s share of daily volume holds near that roughly 20% mark over time.

There are risks on the product side too. Gacha mechanics are, at their core, games of chance, and the buyback range means instant sellers absorb a 7% to 15% haircut on insured value.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Kaye Quema. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Pump.fun has rolled out a new fee setup for its mobile app and website. It pairs 0% trading fees on Solana trades through the mobile app with a fresh 0.45% platform fee on trades placed through the app or web.

The twist is where that 0.45% ends up. The Solana-based token launchpad says it will send all of the revenue from the fee back out through referral rewards, so none of it is booked as platform profit.

How the new structure works
The revamped structure takes effect on October 17, 2026. The referral program behind it was announced a day earlier, on October 16, 2026.

The mechanics are fairly simple. Users who arrive through a referral get a 10% discount on fees. They are also eligible for matching bonuses on deposits, capped at $50.

The people doing the referring get a perk as well. Pump.fun is running a limited-time 4x boost on referrer bonuses, which rewards anyone who brings new traders onto the app.

The fees that are not changing
Not everything is being reworked. Pump.fun’s existing bonding-curve fees stay in place at a combined 1.25%.

That 1.25% splits two ways. Token creators receive 0.30%, and the protocol keeps 0.95%.

A bonding curve is a pricing formula that sets a token’s price automatically based on how much of it has been bought. Early buyers pay less, and the price climbs as demand grows. It is how Pump.fun lets anyone launch a token without lining up liquidity first.

Once tokens move beyond that initial phase, they trade on PumpSwap, the platform’s decentralized exchange. PumpSwap carries its own set of graduated fees, which are also unaffected by this change.

Alon Cohen’s near-zero-fee vision
The direction did not come out of nowhere. Co-founder Alon Cohen endorsed a near-zero-fee trading vision for the app around September 29-30, 2026, framing it as a way to boost visibility and distribution.

Cohen’s emphasis has been on retention. His strategy leans on social and referral mechanics to keep users engaged rather than simply attracting them once.

What this means for traders and the platform
For everyday traders, the near-term math looks favorable. Solana trades on the mobile app carry no fee, referred users get a 10% discount, and deposit bonuses of up to $50 sweeten the onboarding.

For active recruiters, the 4x referrer boost turns the app into something closer to an affiliate program.

For creators, nothing changes. Their 0.30% cut of bonding-curve fees stays intact, so the economics of launching a token on Pump.fun hold steady.

By committing all of the 0.45% platform fee to referral rewards, the company is giving up a potential income stream in exchange for growth. That leaves the protocol’s 0.95% share of bonding-curve fees and its PumpSwap fees doing the heavy lifting on the revenue side.

Disclosure: This article was edited by John Chen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Pump.fun [PUMP] has corrected by 25.8% in the past nine days and has experienced a 12.68% decline in the past 24 hours as of writing. This decline came alongside a Bitcoin [BTC] price slide below $83k, but there were other factors affecting PUMP token sentiment.

Pump.fun faces 6.57M sandwich bot attacks Blockchain data provider Bitquery published data on the vast number of sandwich attacks on Solana [SOL]. Between the 30th of October, 2025, and the 7th of October, 2026, they counted 6.85 million sandwich attacks made by 2,545 bot wallets against 2,154,994 different wallets.

A sandwich bot profits by buying a token just before a user’s trade and selling immediately afterward, exploiting slippage to earn $29.7 million from traders’ worse execution prices.

Notably, 96% of the detected attacks were on the Pump.fun platform, where most new Solana memecoins start trading. The bots took 309,010 SOL, 39% of which was from other rival bots. The $29.8 million estimate was computed using the SOL price at the minute of the attack and does not measure net profit (since some attacks lose money after costs).

The findings likely damaged user trust and could have a bigger impact on PUMP token prices in the future.

PUMP remains inside a steady uptrend Source: PUMP/USDT on TradingView PUMP has been trending higher in recent weeks, starting in early August when the $0.00225 swing high was breached. The A/D indicator has been steadily rising since the second half of August.

The CMF also had a couple of weeks where the indicator’s values were consistently around +0.20 to signal heavy capital inflows. This demand helped the altcoin rally to $0.0054 and $0.0068.

The retracement in the past nine days was within this uptrend. The golden pocket between $0.0041 and $0.0047 could be a buying opportunity for swing traders and investors.

Final Summary Sandwich attacks on Solana measured over 11 months found $29.7 million in SOL extracted over 6.85 million sandwich attacks, 96% of which occurred on the Pump.fun platform. The PUMP token price was in a retracement over the past two weeks alongside the broader market selling pressure.

7h05 ▪ 3 min read ▪ by Ariela R.

Summarize this article with:

According to data published by DefiLlama on October 9, 2026, Pump.fun generated $18.64 million in crypto protocol revenue over seven days. Earlier, a study conducted by Coin Metrics reveals that 81% of memecoins have lost at least 90% of their value since their peak. The crypto token launch platform on Solana charges fees on every trade, whether the crypto asset rises or not. According to our calculations, it retains about one third of that.

In brief $18.64M in revenue over seven days, $60.7M in 30 days (DefiLlama, October 9, 2026). 81% of the 150 memecoins studied have lost at least 90% since their peak (Coin Metrics, October 6, 2026). $478M cumulative buybacks of the PUMP token, then burned (Pump.fun, October 6, 2026). Why does the crypto platform Pump.fun make money when memecoins fall? Because Pump.fun is paid on every crypto transaction, not on the token value. Over seven days, traders paid $52.5 million in fees. The protocol kept $18.64 million, or 36% (Cointribune calculation based on DefiLlama data).

Note that a crypto trader who sells a token at a loss to buy another generates new fees.

For its part, Pump.fun announces in a newsletter published on October 5, 2026, $16.32 million in protocol fees from September 28 to October 4. This represents a 20% increase in one week.

What does the Coin Metrics study reveal about memecoins? Recently published crypto data by Coin Metrics clearly show:

81% of the 150 memecoins analyzed have lost at least 90% from their all-time high; only 5 digital assets have recovered it. Recovery essentially does not occur.

However, beware! This figure does not measure losses of crypto traders nor all Pump.fun tokens. The sample only includes assets listed on centralized platforms, which overestimates a token launch’s lifespan.

Do memecoin holders benefit from gains of the crypto platform Pump.fun? Not automatically. Since September 12, new tokens can redistribute their fees to holders with more than $20, without guaranteeing compensation for a declining token. The Pump.fun crypto platform devotes 50% of its revenue to buybacks and burning of PUMP. A recent publication shows the protocol has actually been overtaken by a social trading app.

Even PUMP (like TRUMP and PENGU) is worth less than at its launch on crypto exchanges, according to Coin Metrics.

One thing is certain: Pump.fun’s revenues follow the rotation of crypto traders, not the rise of already launched tokens. The next dated test: Pump.fun’s weekly newsletter, expected around October 12, 2026. It will indicate if the $16.32 million for the week ending October 4 is confirmed.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Ariela R.

My name is Ariela, and I am 31 years old. I have been working in the field of web writing for 7 years now. I only discovered trading and cryptocurrency a few years ago, but it is a universe that greatly interests me. The topics covered on the platform allow me to learn more. A singer in my spare time, I also cultivate a great passion for music and reading (and animals!)

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

37 minutes ago

Pump.fun has announced an update to its Custom Pairs feature. Previously, new tokens could only be paired with tokenized stocks or whitelisted tokens, but now they can be paired with any token issued on the platform that is either still on a bonding curve or has graduated to PumpSwap. Tokens that have graduated to Raydium and are not on the whitelist are not currently supported, with exceptions for whitelisted projects like Fartcoin. The official stated that derivative trading of past popular tokens was siphoning attention and liquidity. Under the new mechanism, when purchasing a new token paired with an existing one, funds will first be converted into the paired token before buying the new token, thereby generating buy pressure and deeper liquidity for the original token pool. Currently, pairing depth is limited to one layer, and the pairing relationships of already listed tokens cannot be modified. The platform has also adjusted the fee calculation for multi-hop swaps to prevent fees from stacking up.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

Pump.fun’s revenue surge is reshaping the competition for protocol earnings, driven by renewed trading activity across its Solana launchpad. Over a 30-day time frame, Pump.fun earned $55.5 million, exceeding Hyperliquid’s $54.34 million, earning it third place in total earnings.

The large increase in revenue for Pump.fun will alter the competitive landscape of who receives earnings from protocols due to renewed levels of trading on all launchpads offered by Pump.fun on Solana.

This is important because Pump.fun [PUMP] earns money through rapid launching of tokens and their subsequent trading. On the other hand, Hyperliquid [HYPE] generates revenue through perpetual activity.

In addition, Pump.fun has shown upward momentum, generating $17.54 million over seven days. Therefore, this recent upward trend continues to be active.

Source: DeFiLlama Hyperliquid’s $11.19 million weekly revenue trails that pace, widening the short-term gap. As such, sustained memecoin trading may reinforce Pump.fun’s position relative to Hyperliquid and significantly increase PUMP’s economic relevance.

However, if the demand for trading declines rapidly, the order of the rankings will likely shift, and Hyperliquid would reclaim its spot.

Pump.fun’s trading volume surges Pump.fun’s trading volume went from approximately $5 million per day in July to over $40 million in October. Thus, it appears that demand is no longer limited to short-term or occasional spikes.

PUMP’s daily turnover was clearly rising in mid-August and accelerated into early September. This was as turnover frequently reached $30-$45 million per day and occasionally exceeded $60 million.

Why does this matter? Pump.fun generates revenue based on user activity such as launching, trading, and rotating through tokens. Thus, an increase in trading volume will expand pump.fun’s base of revenue-generating activities.

Source: X This trend also supports PUMP’s economic narrative. Sustained volume provides an additional foundation for continued revenue growth. However, a decline in volume would quickly reduce that support.

Whale accumulation strengthens PUMP Meanwhile, after an entire year with little to no movement, Netherlol made its comeback, purchasing 383.34 million PUMP valued at $2.4 million. Following this transaction, another wallet withdrew 189.22 million PUMP, valued at $1.18 million, from MEXC.

Together, these withdrawals remove a portion of the available tokens to be traded during periods when there has already been an increase in trading volume.

As long as these two whales hold onto the coins they have purchased or withdrawn, fewer tokens will be available to trade on exchanges. This can lead to tighter supplies of tokens, which will also allow buyers to have a greater impact on price movement.

Source: Arkham This will provide more substantial support to Pump.fun’s revenue, thus allowing for a stronger form of growth that is no longer solely dependent upon platform activity.

However, renewed deposits could reverse this effect, making whale movements important for confirming whether accumulation becomes a durable trend.

Final Summary Pump.fun leads Hyperliquid in 30-day revenue as volume and whale demand rise. PUMP could extend its lead if trading activity and whale accumulation persist.

Pump.fun [PUMP] recorded a rapid increase in platform activity as new token launches climbed more than 25,000% within 24 hours. The increased usage reinforced the buyback story as the platform revenue continued supporting direct PUMP buys.

At press time, Pump.fun had spent $466.25 million on buybacks, removing 16.84% of the total token supply. The robust platform usage, therefore, introduced a direct connection between ecosystem activity and the contracting circulating supply.

PUMP’s trading activity expanded alongside the recovery, with 24-hour spot volume rising 66.59% to $353.8 million and price jumping 20% over 24 hours.

Even so, the stronger fundamentals, however, did not prevent short-term price volatility as investors increased exposure around the recovery.

Source: Cumulative Buybacks on Pump.fun Leverage rushes back into Pump.fun Market players on the derivatives increased their exposure considerably as PUMP recovered from its September lows. Derivatives volume notably surged 198.47% to $1.11 billion, reflecting a steep expansion in the speculative participation.

Additionally, the Open Interest (OI) followed the advance, jumping 17.26% to $429.46 million. The rising OI implied traders added leveraged positions rather than closing the existing ones.

Additionally, liquidation data introduced another crucial element to the derivatives outlook. In particular, the long liquidations hit nearly $1.03 million, with the short liquidations totaling about $486,010 during the observed period.

The leveraged longs, therefore, absorbed substantially greater losses as PUMP faced renewed volatility. 

Furthermore, the imbalance also highlighted how quickly bullish positioning faced pressure during the rally exhaustion.

The spot flow, however, offered a different perspective on the underlying supply around PUMP.

Source: PUMP Spot Netflows on CoinGlass Spot outflows counter the leverage shakeout At the time of writing, PUMP had recorded roughly $2.32 million in net spot outflows, implying that outflows exceeded inflows during the measured  24-hour period.

Notably, the withdrawals contrasted with the liquidation pressure affecting the leveraged traders. In fact, while the derivatives longs suffered heavier liquidations, spot participants, on the other hand, continued removing Pump.fun from exchanges.

This divergence, therefore, reinforced the broader supply story surrounding Pump.fun’s buyback activity. The buybacks had already reduced circulating supply, while spot outflows further limited immediately available tokens on exchanges.

Even so, these outflows alone, however, did not validate a continued upside after PUMP hit a key technical barrier. On the charts, the price action had already encountered selling pressure around the upper resistance area.

Source: Long/Short Liquidation Chart on CoinGlass Correction tests PUMP’s recovery structure During the rapid price expansion, PUMP reached the $0.005287 price level before sellers forced a pullback, pushing the token back to $0.004881. Notably, the most recent daily candle had declined 5.32% as the correction emerged.

More importantly, the price retracement followed a roughly 20.51% daily advance from the $0.004500 region towards the resistance. That earlier price uptick left the $0.004500 level as the nearest key support beneath the prevailing market value.

Meanwhile, volatility also started rising again, with the 14-day ATR pushing towards 0.000475, suggesting wider price swings as PUMP retreated from resistance. 

Additionally, the RSI indicator also cooled to 60.77 after touching the 65.73 area as of writing, confirming weaker buying pressure during the rejection. However, the technical indicator remained above its 54.70 moving average as the Pump.fun price retreated.

Ultimately, a successful defense of the $0.004500 region could protect the broader recovery and support another challenge of the $0.005287 supply zone. 

Alternatively, losing that key level, however, could expose the deeper $0.003834 support zone.

Source: PUMP/USDT Daily Chart on TradingView Final Summary Pump.fun buybacks and spot outflows continued reducing available PUMP supply. PUMP’s correction puts $0.0045 support in focus before another potential recovery.

Pump.fun has transferred another 47,994 SOL worth approximately $5.83 million to Kraken as on-chain trackers continue monitoring the launchpad’s treasury movements.

Summary

Pump.fun moved 47,994 SOL worth roughly $5.83 million to Kraken, according to Lookonchain data today. Lookonchain estimates Pump.fun has sold 5.236 million SOL worth $848 million since platform operations began. Pump.fun’s official dashboard shows $463.5 million spent on PUMP buybacks and burns through late September. Solana traded near $121 after the transfer, gaining roughly 1% over the previous 24 hours. Earlier Pump.fun transfers to Kraken have repeatedly preceded or accompanied treasury conversions tracked on-chain publicly. Lookonchain reported on Sept. 27 that the Solana-based platform moved the tokens to the centralized exchange roughly two hours before its update. The analytics service classified the transaction as another sale and estimated Pump.fun’s cumulative SOL sales at 5,236,623 tokens worth around $848 million.

At an estimated average price of $162 per SOL, the cumulative figure extends a pattern of large transfers from Pump.fun-linked wallets to Kraken. The latest blockchain movement confirms that the assets reached the exchange, although an exchange deposit by itself does not establish whether every token was sold after arrival.

SOL was trading near $121 on Sept. 27, according to CoinGecko market data, up roughly 1% over 24 hours and 11.6% over seven days.

Pump.fun SOL transfers to Kraken continue long-running pattern Pump.fun has periodically moved large batches of SOL generated through its platform to Kraken, with on-chain analysts tracking the transactions since 2024.

In May, Lookonchain reported that the platform had sold around 4.47 million SOL for approximately $780 million at an average price near $175. The tracker said 4.20 million SOL had been deposited into Kraken, while 264,373 SOL had been sold directly on-chain for about $41.6 million in USDC.

As crypto.news previously reported on Pump.fun’s SOL activity, the May activity included another 100,628 SOL valued at $8.32 million. The report separated tokens deposited into Kraken from the smaller amount visibly exchanged on-chain.

A similar pattern appeared in June 2025. Pump.fun transferred 132,180 SOL worth around $20.87 million to Kraken, pushing cumulative exchange deposits at the time to more than 2.47 million SOL for that year.

Pump.fun deposits to Kraken had crossed $660 million by June 2025 when earlier transfers were included. The available blockchain data did not establish that every deposit represented an immediate market sale.

Another February 2025 transaction involved 65,122 SOL worth approximately $11 million. In related coverage, crypto.news tracked Pump.fun’s earlier Kraken transfers as Lookonchain estimated cumulative deposits near 2.35 million SOL.

The Sept. 27 estimate of 5.236 million SOL therefore combines a longer series of treasury movements that Lookonchain categorizes as sales. The total value of $848 million represents the analytics firm’s cumulative calculation rather than a financial figure disclosed directly by Pump.fun.

Solana trades above $120 after the latest transfer SOL remained above $120 after the latest Kraken transfer, showing no immediate sharp market reaction tied solely to the transaction.

CoinGecko data placed Solana near $121.38, with roughly $2.83 billion in 24-hour trading volume and a market capitalization above $71 billion. The token had gained about 11.6% during the previous seven days.

Earlier in September, SOL had traded closer to $100. Crypto.news reported on Solana’s recovery from the $98 area as traders watched resistance between roughly $103 and $106.

By Sept. 18, SOL had risen above $105. In another market update, Solana was testing its upper Bollinger Band as price momentum improved.

No evidence currently links Pump.fun’s Sept. 27 Kraken transfer to a measurable drop in SOL. The transaction represents less than $6 million against Solana’s multibillion-dollar daily spot volume.

Pump.fun continues PUMP buybacks while moving SOL Pump.fun’s treasury activity now operates alongside an established PUMP token buyback and burn program.

The platform’s official PUMP dashboard showed approximately $463.5 million had been used to purchase and burn 167.91 billion PUMP tokens as of Sept. 25. Pump.fun reported annualized protocol revenue of about $504 million based on its 90-day average.

Its current framework allocates around 50% of platform revenue toward PUMP purchases and burns. On Sept. 25 alone, the platform spent approximately 7,100 SOL, worth $838,200, to purchase 208.9 million PUMP.

One day earlier, Pump.fun used roughly 7,200 SOL worth $832,400 to buy 211.8 million PUMP. Daily buybacks during Sept. 16-25 generally involved between about 6,800 and 8,700 SOL.

Pump.fun’s recurring PUMP buybacks after another large purchase used more than 8,300 SOL to acquire hundreds of millions of PUMP tokens.

Pump.fun states on its dashboard that purchased tokens are permanently burned. The platform said 16.79% of the original one trillion PUMP supply had been removed through the program by Sept. 25.

The company cautions that past purchases should not be treated as a commitment to future discretionary activity beyond amounts covered by its programmed allocation.

Kraken deposits do not confirm an executed sale Exchange deposits are often monitored because they can make assets available for trading, but the blockchain transaction ends when the tokens reach an exchange-controlled address.

Kraken does not publicly disclose how individual Pump.fun deposits are subsequently handled. Transactions executed within a centralized exchange generally occur on internal ledgers and cannot be reconstructed directly from the original Solana transfer.

Earlier Pump.fun reporting shows why the distinction matters. Lookonchain separately tracked millions of SOL sent to Kraken and 264,373 SOL visibly sold on-chain for $41.64 million in USDC.

Another crypto.news report covered a $22 million Pump.fun SOL transfer to Kraken and noted the project’s recurring treasury-processing pattern.

Lookonchain currently estimates cumulative activity at 5,236,623 SOL worth $848 million and an average price near $162. Its Sept. 27 update categorizes the fresh 47,994 SOL movement as another sale.

Pump.fun, a Solana-based token creation and trading platform, may be preparing to expand its reach beyond memecoins. On-chain data indicates the addition of new trading pairs linked to stocks on the Pump.fun platform.

According to shared data, stock-linked currency pairs have started appearing on the platform. Since Pump.fun has not yet made a comprehensive official statement on the matter, it remains unclear whether these products are directly tokenized stocks or different types of blockchain-based assets that reference stock prices.

The development comes at a time when interest in tokenized shares is rapidly increasing in the crypto sector. Robinhood is offering tokenized share products in Europe, while Kraken-linked xStocks is also growing in this area. The London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) recently announced plans to develop blockchain-based representations of UK shares in collaboration with Payward.

Following these developments, increased volatility was observed in the PUMP token:

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad, surpassed Hyperliquid in monthly protocol revenue on August 9, 2026, the first time it has held that title since April 2025.

According to DeFiLlama data, Pump.fun generated $33.73 million in revenue over the preceding 30 days, nudging past Hyperliquid’s $32.73 million.

The numbers behind the milestone Pump.fun collected $84.35 million in total fees during the same 30-day window, compared to Hyperliquid’s $47.14 million.

Hyperliquid’s net revenue retention margin sits at 73%, versus Pump.fun’s 41%.

Hyperliquid holds over $6 billion in total value locked. Pump.fun sits at roughly $251 million.

By late August 2026, Pump.fun’s cumulative lifetime revenue had climbed into the $1.23 to $1.26 billion range, putting it past Hyperliquid’s lifetime total of approximately $1.19 billion. That makes Pump.fun the first Solana application to surpass $1 billion in lifetime revenue.

Mid-August also saw Pump.fun’s weekly protocol fees clear $10 million for the first time.

What is driving Pump.fun’s resurgence Pump.fun’s model is straightforward. Tokens launch on a bonding curve, meaning price rises automatically as buyers pile in. Once a token hits a certain market cap threshold, liquidity migrates to a decentralized exchange. The platform collects fees at each stage, and a meaningful portion of those fees flows into buybacks and burns of the $PUMP token.

The $PUMP token climbed roughly 12% to approximately $0.0027 following the announcement, pushing its market cap to around $1.055 billion.

Pump.fun’s April 2025 lead was short-lived the first time around, and Hyperliquid reclaimed its position quickly.

What this means for Solana and the broader DeFi landscape A 73% net revenue margin on $32.73 million is a different quality of income than a 41% margin on $33.73 million. Investors in protocol tokens need to weigh gross revenue against what actually accrues to the protocol and, ultimately, to token holders.

Pump.fun’s aggressive buyback-and-burn strategy is designed to close that value-accrual gap by reducing $PUMP supply over time.

The two platforms represent a useful proxy for a broader debate in DeFi: high-volume, low-margin consumer activity versus lower-volume, high-margin institutional-adjacent activity. Both models are generating real revenue.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

When a tenant starts making more money than the landlord, something interesting is happening. Pump.fun, the memecoin launchpad that has become Solana’s most profitable application, now generates more than twice the monthly revenue of Solana itself, a milestone that reframes how the industry thinks about where value actually accrues in a blockchain ecosystem.

As of late August 2026, Pump.fun’s trailing 30-day revenue sits between $42M and $51M, with weekly figures peaking at $14M, the highest weekly number recorded since February 2026. Annualized, that puts the platform on a run rate somewhere between $460M and $500M per year from a single application built on top of someone else’s network.

How a memecoin factory became a billion-dollar business Pump.fun launched on January 19, 2024, with a simple value proposition: make it trivially easy to create and trade memecoins, then take a small cut of every transaction.

Since launch, the platform has crossed $1.259B in cumulative revenue, making it the first application on Solana to clear the $1B mark and one of the highest-earning protocols in all of crypto. That figure, earned across roughly 19 months, reflects consistent, high-volume trading activity over a sustained period.

Advertisement

Revenue comes from multiple sources. Token creation fees, trading activity routed through PumpSwap, the platform’s native automated market maker, and ancillary service charges all feed into the total.

Roughly half of all fees collected are funneled directly into automated buybacks and burns of the PUMP token. Total buybacks have exceeded $429M, which has eliminated approximately 28.6% of the circulating supply.

Outpacing Hyperliquid and expanding beyond Solana Pump.fun’s revenue lead isn’t limited to Solana comparisons. In certain 7-day and 30-day windows, the platform has also outpaced Hyperliquid, the perpetuals exchange that has itself been celebrated as one of crypto’s most impressive fee-generating protocols.

The platform has also begun reducing its dependence on any single chain. Smaller deployments now operate on Base, Binance Smart Chain, and Ethereum. In August 2026, the platform rolled out a feature called Callout Rewards and cut trading fees, moves designed to deepen user engagement and lower the cost of participating in the ecosystem.

What the revenue gap between app and chain actually means The fact that Pump.fun generates more than twice Solana’s monthly revenue is a reasonable outcome in a maturing ecosystem. Solana collects fees at the base layer, which are structurally lower than application-layer fees because validators compete on cost to attract transactions. Applications, by contrast, can charge whatever the market will bear for their specific product.

The PUMP token buyback program adds another layer to watch. With $429M already burned and the platform still operating at peak revenue, the deflationary pressure on supply is compounding.

Callout Rewards, the new engagement feature introduced in August 2026, also represents a bet on community stickiness. Platforms that tie financial incentives to social participation tend to generate retention loops that are hard to break, even when market conditions cool.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Pump.fun has crossed a threshold that would have seemed improbable even a year ago. The Solana-based memecoin launchpad generated more than $10 million in protocol fees during the week of August 3-9, 2026, the first time it has cleared that mark in a single week, according to DefiLlama data.

That puts its 7-day revenue at roughly $12 million as of mid-August, ranking it third among all tracked protocols, behind only stablecoin giants Tether and Circle. Hyperliquid, the perpetuals-focused decentralized exchange and Layer 1 chain that has dominated DeFi revenue conversations, finished the same period below Pump.fun’s mark.

The numbers behind the rivalry The 30-day picture tells a cleaner story. Pump.fun posted $35.67 million in 30-day revenue for August 2026, compared to Hyperliquid’s $32.46 million over the same window. That gap followed a 13-day streak in late July through August where Pump.fun led the 30-day revenue ranking, with its peak hitting $42.3 million against Hyperliquid’s $28.5 million during that run.

At the daily level, Pump.fun co-founder Sapijiju pointed to July 23 as a clear benchmark: the platform earned $1.21 million that day versus Hyperliquid’s $1.03 million.

Since its 2024 launch, Pump.fun has now generated more than $1.2 billion in cumulative revenue.

Worth flagging: revenue definitions are not uniform across platforms. Pump.fun’s figures reflect fees generated from bonding-curve trades and its PumpSwap product. Hyperliquid’s revenue reflects trading fees from its perpetuals exchange.

How Pump.fun is built to be deflationary Half of every dollar Pump.fun earns goes directly toward PUMP token buybacks and burns, executed automatically via smart contracts. Weekly burns have exceeded $5 million in value during peak periods, and hundreds of millions of tokens have already been removed from circulation.

Where Hyperliquid still has the edge Hyperliquid holds approximately $6 billion in Total Value Locked, compared to Pump.fun’s roughly $250 million. Hyperliquid appeals primarily to institutional and semi-professional traders who want high-volume leveraged exposure with deep liquidity. Pump.fun’s strength is the opposite: a massive retail base generating high-frequency, low-to-mid ticket transactions that aggregate into substantial fee revenue during speculative trading surges.

For PUMP token holders, the buyback and burn program creates a direct link between platform revenue and token value, making Pump.fun’s fee performance a more relevant data point than it might be for a protocol without that mechanism.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

2 hours ago

PUMP has been rallying steadily since hitting a low of $0.001 at the end of June. It gained roughly 19% in the past 24 hours, approaching $0.004; 36% over seven days, 98% in 30 days, and around 116% over 90 days. The broader crypto market has warmed up in recent days, with Bitcoin briefly breaking above $79,000. Some meme coins like PEOPLE, NEIRO, and BOME topped Binance’s gainers list, aligning with the common pattern of “market recovery first, meme coins leading.” However, PUMP’s rally started significantly earlier than the current market upswing, launching roughly two months ahead of this cycle. The strong price movement is driven by its fundamentals: Pump.fun is forming a positive feedback loop of “revenue – buybacks – traffic.” On-chain data shows the platform’s fees totaled around $38.15 million over the past 30 days, with revenue of $29.19 million—second only to Tether, Circle, and Canton, and surpassing protocols like Hyperliquid, Polymarket, GMGN, and Tron. The window where the golden cross appeared coincided with a reacceleration in revenue, ongoing PUMP buybacks and burns, and a return of trading users to the platform. Pump.fun allocates 50% of its revenue to buy and burn PUMP tokens. Recent weekly fee revenue has exceeded $10 million—one of the strongest levels since January—translating to potential buyback pressure of around $5 million. The platform recently launched Callout Rewards, cut Solana trading fees to 0% and cross-chain fees to 0.1%, using its revenue advantage to subsidize traffic and compete for users with entry products like GMGN and Fomo. If weekly and daily active trading users continue to hit new highs, PUMP’s market narrative could shift from a pure “meme platform token” to more of a “trading entry with strong cash flow.” Overall, this rally is driven by both technical signals and fundamental positive feedback, with revenue scale and the buyback mechanism serving as core supporting factors.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

According to monitoring by EmberCN, the monthly unlock of tokens held by the Pump.fun team and investors was completed 5 hours ago, releasing a total of 4.94 billion PUMP tokens valued at approximately $13.6 million. Data shows the unlocked tokens were subsequently distributed to 125 wallet addresses. It remains unclear whether the related wallets will sell the tokens on the market, but large-scale unlocks typically increase short-term circulating supply pressure, and the market will closely monitor subsequent fund movements.

Relevant content

ABFinance officially announced it will shut down in approximately five months and is currently initiating an orderly liquidation.

Crypto finance platform ABFinance, founded by former Bybit co-CEO Helen Liu, announced it will not proceed with its planned launch and is now in the process of orderly shutdown. ABFinance stated on social media that it thanks all team members, community users, and partners involved in its development, adding: "Thank you for your trust, support, and belief along the way." In March this year, after leaving Bybit, Helen Liu announced the launch of her startup ABFinance, which aimed to build a one-stop financial platform connecting fiat and crypto assets, integrating functions such as deposits, yields, trading, and payments, and emphasized that it would be built under the U.S. compliance license framework from day one. According to prior reports, Bybit announced that Helen Liu would step down on April 30, 2026, to embark on her personal entrepreneurial journey. However, just about five months after ABFinance unveiled its project plan, the platform announced it would halt its launch and enter the shutdown process. The specific reason for the shutdown has not been disclosed by officials so far.

21 minutes ago

Morgan Stanley’s holdings of Circle surged nearly sixfold, but the firm cut its rating on the crypto firm to "Underweight" and lowered its target price to $38.

Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle (CRCL) stock rating from "Hold" to "Underweight" on August 3, slashing its price target from $106 to $38. Analysts attributed the rating cut primarily to the contraction in USDC circulation, which exposed Circle’s high sensitivity to reserve-related revenue. Meanwhile, the company’s business structure is shifting toward a transaction-based revenue model with lower profit margins. The report also cut Circle’s USDC size forecasts for 2027 and 2028 by approximately 33% and 44% respectively, and projected the company’s GAAP earnings per share (EPS) to be about 3% and 20% lower than market consensus. However, Morgan Stanley’s latest filed 13F document shows that as of June 30, its holdings of Circle shares surged from around 1.46 million to 8.32 million, marking a clear position increase in the second quarter. This means that while Morgan Stanley publicly downgraded Circle’s rating and price target in early August, signaling a cautious outlook, its disclosed holdings as of the end of Q2 showed a significant position increase. It should be noted that 13F filings reflect holdings as of June 30, and cannot reflect whether positions were adjusted before or after the August rating cut. The market’s focus centers on the stark contrast between the institutional research view and the historical holdings disclosure.

21 minutes ago

Binance Research: Gen Z Prefers ETFs, With Lower Trading Frequency and Leverage Usage Than Other Age Groups

Binance Research data shows that Gen Z investors are gradually shifting to long-term asset allocation tools like ETFs, with lower trading frequency and weaker leverage preference compared to Millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers. In early August, ETFs accounted for 25% of Gen Z's stock trading volume. In July, ETFs made up 21.9% of Gen Z's net inflows into stocks, up from 18.5% in June; over the same period, the share of individual stock investments dropped from 77% to 74.2%. Binance Research analyzed trading activities including direct stocks, tokenized stocks, and traditional financial perpetual contracts. The data shows Gen Z's trading activity across these three asset classes is lower than that of other working-age groups. Specifically, Gen Z's traditional financial perpetual contract accounts average 13 trades per month, lower than Millennials' 17 and Gen X's 16.5. Among direct stock accounts, 22% of Gen Z users have never sold any stocks, higher than Gen X's 19% and Baby Boomers' 9%. For Gen Z accounts where stocks were purchased but never sold, the top assets by cumulative purchase amount include Broadcom, Tesla, and the Charles Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF. In terms of leveraged products, Gen Z exhibits a lower risk appetite. Data shows 88.2% of Gen Z's traditional financial perpetual contract accounts have never traded leveraged or inverse ETFs, higher than Millennials' 84.5% and Gen X's 85.9%. Additionally, the tokenized stock market continues to expand. Data shows Binance's bStocks recently briefly surpassed Kraken's xStocks to become the world's second-largest tokenized stock issuance platform. As of the latest data, Ondo Finance ranks first with approximately $972 million in tokenized stock value, while xStocks and bStocks stand at around $611 million and $580 million respectively.

21 minutes ago

Serenity responds to "going to zero" rumors by sharing a screenshot, with its year-to-date return standing at 2411.84%.

Serenity released a statement accompanied by photos to address recent market rumors that his trading account has "gone to zero", calling the claims "too exaggerated". He added that despite the sharp correction in the AI sector in July, his year-to-date (YTD) return still stands at 2411.84%. Earlier, Serenity had publicly stated that the slump in AI-related stocks in July led to a roughly 49.4% drawdown in his portfolio at one time, with his positions mainly concentrated in key segments of AI infrastructure—including high-volatility sectors such as storage, optical communications, robotics, and upstream semiconductors. Serenity has long focused on "bottleneck segments" within the AI industrial chain, has conducted multiple researches on memory, photonics, CPO, and semiconductor supply chains, and has drawn market attention for his bets on AI infrastructure-related assets.

21 minutes ago

Talks between Stripe and Advent to acquire PayPal are heating up, with the potential deal valued at up to $53 billion.

Payment giant PayPal’s acquisition talks with Stripe and private equity firm Advent Global Opportunities are heating up, with a potential deal to be finalized in the coming weeks. Back in July, Stripe and Advent proposed acquiring PayPal at $60.50 per share, valuing the deal at roughly $53 billion, but PayPal rejected the offer at the time. However, sources familiar with the matter revealed that negotiations have not broken off and are still ongoing. Neither PayPal nor Stripe has confirmed the reports. PayPal declined to comment, while Stripe said it does not respond to market rumors or speculation. The potential sale comes as PayPal seeks to reverse its growth struggles. Since PayPal CEO Enrique Lores took office in March this year, he has rolled out a restructuring plan splitting the business into three segments: checkout and PayPal core services, consumer financial services (including Venmo), and payment services and crypto operations. Lores has stated that PayPal will return to its identity as a technology company and strengthen its core payment capabilities. Meanwhile, the company plans to boost efficiency through cost cuts, with an estimated 20% workforce reduction over the next two to three years. Founded in 1998, PayPal’s founding team includes Silicon Valley figures such as Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Max Levchin. The company grew rapidly during the pandemic due to the e-commerce boom, but has faced challenges including slowing growth and downward pressure on its stock price in recent years. If the deal is completed, it will be one of the largest acquisitions in the fintech industry in recent years.

21 minutes ago

Duan Yongping has bet on SpaceX for about 20 days, with paper gains exceeding $5.4 million.

According to public information from Xueqiu platform, Duan Yongping recently participated in SpaceX (SPCX) via two transactions: options and common stock. On July 24, he sold 1,000 SPCX put options expiring on December 18, 2026, with a strike price of $115, at a transaction price of approximately $23.26, corresponding to a premium of about $2.326 million. Then, on August 5, Duan Yongping bought 100,000 SPCX shares at a cost of roughly $108.68 per share. Based on SpaceX’s latest closing price of $140, this long stock position has an unrealized gain of around $3.132 million. Combined, Duan Yongping’s round of SpaceX trades has generated an unrealized profit of approximately $5.458 million in about 20 days. However, it should be noted that although the premium from selling the put option has been credited, the option has not yet expired. If SPCX subsequently falls below $115 and is exercised, he will still be obligated to take delivery of the shares at the strike price. SPCX has been highly volatile recently: after its June listing, the stock once surged to above $200, then dropped back to around $105. In August, as the impact of the first batch of restricted stock unlocks was weaker than expected and market risk appetite recovered, the stock price rebounded to the $140 level. As a result, Duan Yongping’s current trade has evolved from "selling puts to collect premiums" to a staged high-probability trade.

21 minutes ago

Pump.fun Rolls Out Callout Rewards Program@Pumpfun has launched Callout Rewards, a decentralized incentives program designed to pay users directly for the trading volume they help generate on the platform. The program tracks volume attributed to individual user activity, including push notifications and home feed discoveries, then distributes payouts from internal liquidity pools on a pro-rata basis.

The structure is automated and intended to run over the long term. Crucially, @Pumpfun says no additional fees will be introduced to fund it. The platform's existing zero-fee trading on $SOL trades remains in place, and its 0.2% fee on cross-chain transactions is unchanged.

The launch builds on a broader push by @Pumpfun to deepen user engagement through social and discovery tools. Callout Rewards now adds a financial layer to that mechanic, giving users a direct economic stake in the volume their alerts generate.

PUMP Token Climbs More Than 90% in 30 DaysThe feature launch coincides with a sharp rally in solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn, which has surged over 90% in the past 30 days.

The Callout Rewards program signals that @Pumpfun is leaning into social-driven volume as a core growth lever, rewarding the users who surface tokens to the widest audiences rather than just the creators who launch them.

Sources
Cryptonews: Pump.fun Launches Callouts Feature | Crypto Times: PUMP Surges 14% as Buybacks Fuel Demand | CoinMarketCap: Pump.fun Latest Updates

Two launchpads on Robinhood Chain cut pump.fun's share of launchpad fees from 80% to 27% in two weeks. Pump.fun's fees are up 30% over 30 days anyway, because the category grew 77% around it. Memecoin prices did not participate.

A wave of launchpads on Robinhood Chain took most of pump.fun's share of the token-launch business in the first two weeks of July. Still, pump.fun is now earning more per week than before they arrived.

The launchpad business grew faster than pump.fun lost ground in it. Weekly fees across the launchpads DefiLlama reports went from about $7 million in late June to roughly $18 million by mid-July and have stayed there, while pump.fun's own weekly take climbed to a 90-day high. Growth in the memecoin space came almost entirely from Robinhood Chain, whose mainnet opened six weeks ago, and it has since begun to reverse.

Fees Nearly DoubledLaunchpads collected $75.39 million in fees over the 30 days to Aug. 11, against $42.53 million in the 30 days before that, June 13 to July 12, a 77% increase, according to The Defiant's calculation from DefiLlama's daily fee data. The comparison covers all 125 launchpads for which DefiLlama reports fees.

Pump.fun took $31.83 million of the July 13 to Aug. 11 total, against $24.45 million in the June 13 to July 12 window, a 30% increase. Its share of the category fell to 42.2% from 57.5%.

The weekly series is sharper. In the week to June 30, pump.fun collected $5.63 million of the category's $7.10 million, or 79.4%. In the week to July 14, it collected $5 million of $18.71 million — 26.7%. In the week to Aug. 11 it collected $9.21 million of $17.83 million, or 51.7%, its largest weekly haul in 90 days.

Two products caused the July collapse in share.

The first was NOXA, a launchpad and DEX that reached Robinhood Chain before the chain reached the public. Its Robinhood Chain factory went live on June 16, two weeks before the chain's public mainnet, and earned a few hundred to a few thousand dollars a day through the end of the month. Fees crossed $99,000 on July 1, ran between $24,000 and $71,000 for the next week, then jumped to $2.22 million on July 8. They peaked at $2.33 million on July 11. NOXA charged a 1% swap fee, so that implies roughly $233 million of trading in a day on a chain then 10 days old.

That day NOXA switched its own launchpad off, and said the reason was that too many people were using it. On July 11, nine seconds after the last token launched through it, the deployer wallet dev.noxa.eth called setLaunchEnabled(false) on the launch factory, according to Robinhood Chain's Blockscout explorer. About a minute later its account posted: "you folks have been vocal about the constant new token spam, vamps, and we identified some bots spamming and copying new tokens every hour." It called the shutdown temporary. "we are finding a workaround for this issue and we have decided to temporarily disable new launches while we work."

Every launch attempted since has reverted.

The second was Pons. Ozzy, the developer who posts as @MEADGod, deployed its first factory on July 13, two days after NOXA stopped accepting launches. "I built a launchpad for Robinhood Chain because the existing ones were extracting without taking care of their communities," he wrote 10 minutes before the second deployment.

Pons charges the same 1% pool fee NOXA charged, plus a 0.0005 ETH launch fee, and splits the pool fee 70% to the creator and 30% to the protocol for tokens launched through the current factory, per its documentation. The 11 hours of launches that went through the first factory keep a 90/10 split in the creator's favor. Eighty percent of the protocol's share funds a PONS buyback and burn. Pons has produced $19.80 million in fees across its two versions in 30 days, more than every launchpad except pump.fun.

Pons Peaked In JulyPons' first version peaked at $1.54 million of fees on July 21 and took about $340,000 on Aug. 11, a decline of 78%. It has generated $18.89 million all-time and $5.03 million of protocol revenue, per DefiLlama.

Ozzy deployed a second version on Aug. 3, and it began recording fees the next day. Contract reads against the PonsV2LaunchFactory return a 1% curve fee, a 1% post-graduation fee, a 30% protocol share, an optional creator tax capped at 10%, and a 99% opening buy tax that decays over three seconds. Version two spends 50% of the creator's residual buying back the launched token rather than PONS, and vests what it buys over five years instead of burning it. It took about $148,000 in fees on Aug. 12.

Uniswap Takes No CutUniswap Labs opened pools.trade on Aug. 5 on the same chain, with no launchpad fee at all. Each token opens a Uniswap v4 pool with a 0.25% LP fee that autocompounds into a position the creator cannot withdraw; creators can switch on a cut of 0.05% of those 25 basis points. Uniswap's announcement calls that "a fraction of the standard ~1% on other launchpads."

Pump.fun's own fee schedule is the standard Uniswap is pricing against: 1.25% on the bonding curve, split 0.95% to the protocol and 0.300% to the creator. Creating a coin is free; graduating one to PumpSwap costs 0.015 SOL, after which a tiered schedule takes over and the total fee falls as the token's market capitalization rises.

Pools took $266,668 in fees on launch day, its highest since. By Aug. 11 that was $36,390, down 86%. Its 30-day total is $806,000, against $19.80 million for Pons. On Aug. 11 the first version of Pons alone took $343,432, nine times what Pools did. DefiLlama has recorded fees for the Pools contracts since July 31, five days before the interface opened. The Defiant reported that Pools out-launched Pons on its first day with 10,506 tokens against 7,210, and that Pools’ flagship token FRONG was minted six days before the product opened.

PONS has risen 160% in the week since. It traded at $0.05072 at 17:20 UTC on Aug. 12, with a market capitalization of $36.9 million, up 19.3% over 24 hours and 23.6% below its July 27 record, according to CoinGecko. UNI traded at $3.52, down 14.5% on the week.

Four days before launching a competitor on Robinhood Chain, Uniswap's account replied to Pons' with "Powered by Uniswap". Neither Ozzy nor the Pons account has posted about pools.trade.

Every Solana Rival ShrankSolana-based launchpads competing with pump.fun are smaller now than they were a month ago. Trading fees paid by users fell 65% on Bags, 56% on Meteora's Dynamic Bonding Curve, 44% on BONK.fun and 85% on EasyA Kickstart. Four.meme on BNB Chain fell 23%. Each falls by within a point of the same amount measured on protocol revenue instead, and SOL and BNB were flat between the two windows, so the declines are activity rather than price.

Their launch counts fell with them. Over the 30 days to Aug. 10, Bags created 923 tokens, down 78.5%; LetsBonk 4,039, down 34.3%; Jupiter Studio 347, down 45.5%, according to Dune data published by The Block. Pump.fun created 872,202, up 3%, and 99.3% of all tokens launched on Solana.

Growth outside pump.fun came from chains pump.fun does not operate on. Flap.sh on BNB Chain grew 209% to $5.51 million. The o1 Launchpad, which runs mostly on Base, grew from $12,698 to $982,481 after its July 3 launch. The four largest new entrants of the period — Pons, StonkBrokers, LetsCash and Uniswap Pools — all launched on Robinhood Chain.

Robinhood Chain Caught SolanaLaunchpad fees on Solana and on Robinhood Chain over the 30 days to Aug. 11 were $33.61 million and $33.49 million. Solana's grew 18%; Robinhood Chain's grew 236% against a prior 30 days in which it had produced $9.97 million, its own first month. BNB Chain took $6.62 million, up 88%. Base took $1.44 million.

Robinhood Chain's weekly launchpad fees peaked at $11.95 million in the week to July 14 and were $7.07 million in the week to Aug. 11. Solana's ran to $9.59 million, its highest of the 90-day window. On the narrow measure of who is taking money from token launches, Solana is winning again.

Robinhood Chain generated $100.2 million in application fees over 30 days against Solana's $233 million and Base's $39.6 million, per DefiLlama. Over the 30 days to Aug. 12 it did $16.58 billion in DEX volume against $4.49 billion the month before. Solana did $46.41 billion over the same window, down 25%. The Defiant reported in July that Robinhood Chain overtook Base on daily active users three weeks after launch.

The Fight For The TraderOne of the fastest-growing competitors for pump.fun's users on Solana does not launch tokens at all.

FOMO, a social trading app built by FOMO Labs, took $9.76 million in fees over the 30 days to Aug. 11, up 172% from $3.58 million in the 30 days before that. Its revenue over the seven days to Aug. 11 was $3.01 million, more than double the $1.34 million it made in the week to July 11, and above Phantom's $1.51 million and Jupiter's $0.96 million over the same week. Its daily revenue record, $544,444, was set on Aug. 6.

FOMO charges "a minimum fee of 0.50% per transaction (subject to a minimum fee of $0.95 per transaction)," according to its terms of service. It sells copy-trading, a leaderboard, and Apple Pay onboarding. It raised a $75 million Series B led by Index Ventures in June, and says more than 625,000 people have joined and traded over $4 billion. It has no token and no launchpad.

The competition pump.fun faces on Solana is now for the trade rather than the mint, and pump.fun has answered by widening its own app. On July 8 it made Robinhood Chain tokens tradable inside the pump.fun app with no bridging, which The Defiant covered as CASHCAT trading built. Alon Cohen, the pump.fun co-founder who posts as @a1lon9, wrote that "the pump fun app is not just for pump fun coins, it covers all of your crosschain trading."

Fewer Coins, Better OddsThe share of pump.fun tokens that graduate from the bonding curve averaged 2.82% in the first 11 days of August and 2.55% in July, against 0.86% in June and 0.62% in September 2025, per Dune data published by The Block. Launches rose over the same stretch, ruling out a shrinking denominator.

Pump.fun has taken $1.17 billion in fees and $1.083 billion in revenue since March 2024. In April it committed half of revenue to buying back and burning PUMP for a year, after burning roughly $370 million of previously repurchased tokens, about 36% of circulating supply at the time. DefiLlama has attributed $17.9 million of revenue to holders over the past 30 days.

Memecoins Did Not Come BackNone of this reached memecoin prices.

The memecoin sector was worth $25.15 billion on Aug. 12, according to CoinGecko, or 1.11% of the $2.27 trillion crypto market. CoinGecko's own research puts the sector's peak at $150.6 billion in December 2024. The sector is 83% below that. It is roughly flat over 30 days and down about a third over 90, by The Defiant's calculation from CoinGecko market-cap history for the category's 16 largest constituents, which hold 80% of its value.

Of the 20 largest memecoins excluding wrapped duplicates, seven are up over 30 days. BONK is down 42%, SPX6900 down 15%, FLOKI down 7%, TRUMP down 7%, WIF down 7%, FARTCOIN down 6%, DOGE down 2%. Across the 5,774 memecoins CoinGecko prices with a market capitalization, 34% are higher than a month ago and the median one sits 99% below its record, by The Defiant's count.

The exception is PUMP, up 83% over 30 days to $0.00273 and a $1.07 billion market capitalization, per CoinGecko. It remains 69% below its September 2025 high. It is the token of the business this story is about, with buybacks funded from that business's revenue.

The launch business is bigger, better-monetized and more contested than it was in June. The sector its output belongs to is worth 83% less than at its peak.

Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that turned degeneracy into a business model, is staring down a token unlock that has investors doing some uncomfortable math. Approximately 6.875 billion PUMP tokens are scheduled to hit the market on August 12, 2026, split between the development team and early investors.

The unlock represents roughly 0.69% of PUMP’s total fixed supply of 1 trillion tokens, valued somewhere between $10 million and $16 million at current price levels.

The unlock mechanics and what’s behind them Of the 6.875 billion tokens set to unlock, approximately 4.17 billion are allocated to the development team and nearly 2.71 billion to existing investors. The release follows a structured vesting schedule that includes a 12-month cliff period ending in July 2026, after which tokens begin flowing on a three-year linear release cycle.

Advertisement

This August unlock is actually a follow-up act to a much larger event. In July 2026, roughly 82.5 billion PUMP tokens are slated for distribution among team members and investors. That’s more than ten times the size of the August tranche, meaning the market will have already digested a substantial supply increase before this next batch arrives.

The revenue model that’s losing its shine Pump.fun generates revenue primarily through two channels: a roughly 1% fee on bonding-curve trades and fees charged when tokens “graduate” from the platform’s launch mechanism to open trading. This revenue has historically been substantial, with the platform reporting figures in the hundreds of millions annually and cumulative buybacks exceeding $350 million to date.

Those buybacks have been a critical pillar of PUMP’s value proposition. By using revenue to purchase and burn tokens, Pump.fun effectively reduces circulating supply, creating a deflationary pressure that supports the token’s price.

But here’s where things get complicated. The platform recently shifted its revenue allocation policy, moving from a model that heavily favored buybacks and burns to a 50/50 split: half of net revenue now goes toward buybacks and burns, with the other half directed to operational needs.

What to watch heading into August The $10 million to $16 million valuation range on the unlock is relatively modest in scale. The July 2026 unlock of 82.5 billion tokens will serve as an important preview of how the market absorbs supply increases before August’s smaller release arrives.

The more important variable to track is Pump.fun’s revenue trajectory. With cumulative buybacks already past $350 million, the platform has demonstrated it can generate real cash flow. The question is whether the new 50/50 revenue split provides enough firepower to absorb selling pressure from newly unlocked tokens while simultaneously funding operations.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Pump.fun extended its recovery after gaining 13.42% in the past 24 hours, while trading volume climbed 82.92% to $156.5 million, reflecting stronger market participation. 

The advance coincided with the protocol’s revenue-funded buyback program, which repurchased 332 million PUMP tokens at an average price of $0.00225. 

The platform allocated roughly $747,000 for the purchases from $1.49 million in daily revenue, steadily reducing liquid supply. 

Meanwhile, a dormant wallet withdrew 73.95 million PUMP worth about $156,000 from exchanges instead of adding tokens to exchange reserves. 

That withdrawal complemented the buyback activity because both developments reduced immediately available supply.

As a result, buyers retained control of the recent advance, while the combined supply reduction strengthened the case behind PUMP’s latest rally.

Fresh leveraged bets backed the breakout Derivatives traders increased their exposure as Open Interest rose 18.10% to $211.31 million, reflecting fresh capital entering the market alongside the price recovery. 

The increase accompanied the spot rally instead of diverging from it, suggesting traders opened new positions rather than simply closing existing ones. 

Higher Open Interest alongside expanding trading volume usually reflected growing conviction behind an ongoing move, and PUMP displayed both conditions during the latest session. 

However, leverage also raised the likelihood of sharper price swings if sentiment shifted quickly. 

Buyers maintained control throughout the move, yet the expanding derivatives exposure indicated that volatility would likely remain elevated. 

However, the growing participation aligned with the protocol’s buyback activity and reinforced the broader accumulation narrative surrounding PUMP.

Source: CoinGlass Bears paid the price for fading conviction Liquidation data revealed that bearish traders absorbed the larger losses during the latest rally. 

Short liquidations reached approximately $153,260, while long liquidations totaled about $58,290. This shows that sellers were forced out of positions at a much faster pace. ‘

That imbalance supported the ongoing advance because forced short covering added additional buying pressure as prices climbed. 

Unlike a rally driven purely by speculation, the squeeze developed alongside stronger spot activity, rising Open Interest, and the protocol’s supply-reduction efforts. 

However, the liquidation imbalance also suggested that much of the immediate bearish pressure had already eased.

If fresh short positions fail to emerge, future gains would likely require continued spot demand instead of relying primarily on liquidation-driven buying.

Source: CoinGlass Can PUMP extend its breakout above resistance? PUMP broke above the key $0.002133 resistance before advancing toward the next major barrier at $0.002556, confirming that buyers regained control of the broader trend. 

The breakout also held above the rising trendline that had supported price since July, preserving the existing bullish structure. 

MACD strengthened throughout the advance as the MACD line remained above the signal line and the positive histogram expanded. This reflect increasing buying strength instead of fading interest. 

Price also established a series of higher highs and higher lows after completing a double-bottom reversal earlier in the trend. 

If buyers defend the former breakout zone near $0.002133, PUMP could challenge $0.002556 next. 

However, losing that support would expose the trendline and increase the probability of a deeper pullback before another advance.

Source: TradingView Final Summary PUMP buybacks and whale withdrawals reduced liquid supply, supporting the recent price breakout. Rising Open Interest and heavy short liquidations reinforced bullish sentiment toward the $0.002556 resistance.

Summary PUMP reclaimed both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages during a 30% weekly rally The move stalled at the 0.618 Fibonacci level near $0.0025 with RSI in overbought territory A 6.87 billion token unlock is scheduled between August 11 and 13 Allegations that Pump.fun fired staff before their tokens vested have stirred community backlash PUMP, the token tied to Solana memecoin factory Pump.fun, traded near $0.002495 on August 5 after a seven-day run that added more than 30% and carried it back above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages. The climb pushed price into a technical resistance band at the same moment the token’s supply schedule shifts into a stretch of monthly unlocks, with the next release due within a week.

Price reclaimed both moving averages before they could cross The chart reads far cleaner than the six months of grinding that came before it. PUMP topped near $0.00336 in late January, bled lower through spring, and found a floor around $0.00116 in mid-June. Buyers spent July building a base between $0.0013 and $0.0016, and the past week turned that quiet accumulation into a near-vertical push toward $0.00251.

PUMP/USD daily chart. Chart analysis by Alexander Stefanov The reclaim is the part that carries weight. Price now sits above the 50-day simple moving average at $0.00168 and the 200-day at $0.00187, and the 50-day has curled upward after months of pointing down. A moving average is the running average of closing prices over a set window, and price holding above a rising average is the clearest sign that short-term momentum has flipped. The 50-day still trades below the 200-day, so the two lines have not crossed yet. Price is leading and the averages are trailing, which is normal at the start of a turn but leaves the bullish structure short of full confirmation.

The 0.618 fib near $0.0025 is where the rally meets friction The current candle is testing the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement at roughly $0.0025. Traders draw these levels off the distance between a swing high and swing low, and the 0.618 marks the point where a large share of the prior drop has been recovered. Rebounds tend to stall there, which makes the spot PUMP is testing a level where buyers and sellers have clashed before.

Momentum readings reinforce the caution. The Relative Strength Index sits at 73. Any reading above 70 flags a move that has run hot, and levels that high often show up right before price pauses to cool off. RSI is also holding above its own signal line at 62, so the trend still points up even as it stretches. After a climb this steep with no real pullback, that setup usually resolves one of two ways: a clean break above $0.00251 that opens the road to the 0.786 fib at $0.00289, or a rejection here that sends price back down to work off the gains.

Levels worth watching on the next move The reversal thesis holds or breaks around a short list of prices. The band between the 0.382 fib near $0.00200 and the reclaimed 200-day average at $0.00187 is the confluence that needs to hold to keep the recovery intact.

Resistance above

$0.00251

0.618 fib · price is here now

$0.00289

0.786 fib · next target on a break

$0.00336

January swing high

Support below

$0.00226

0.5 fib · first cushion

$0.00200

0.382 fib · near 200-day at $0.00187

$0.00168

0.236 fib · break here breaks the bounce 

The next unlock arrives within a week of the rally PUMP’s supply calendar moves against the price action. Between August 11 and 13, roughly 6.87 billion tokens worth about $15.28 million unlock, split between 4.167 billion for the team and 2.708 billion for early investors. Around 67.9% of the one-trillion total supply already circulates, which leaves 32.1% locked across 35 monthly releases that run to June 2029.

An unlock moves tokens from a locked contract to their holders, and it does not force those coins onto the market. Recipients can sit on freshly vested tokens for months. Unlocks still weigh on price because the market tends to front-run them, pricing in the risk of selling a few days ahead of each date, which is why trading often softens going into an unlock even when no coins actually change hands.

The 57 billion token cliff and the firings that followed The August release is the second act of a much larger event. Between July 12 and 15, PUMP’s one-year cliff expired and unlocked 57.279 billion tokens worth roughly $86.49 million, spread across 121 insider wallets. That single release ended the initial 12-month lock-up and started a 36-month schedule that drips team and early-backer allocations into circulation month by month. In late July, reports surfaced alleging Pump.fun had cut more than 40 employees across two rounds shortly before their one-year token grants were set to vest, a move that would have denied those staff seven-figure payouts, though the investigation that surfaced the claims could not independently confirm the July round, which rests on former employees’ accounts. The allegations drew heavy criticism across the token’s community. PUMP now trades more than 75% below its 2025 peak, with unlock pressure and the personnel row both feeding the discount.

Steady monthly supply changes how traders read PUMP from here The switch from one-time cliffs to steady monthly releases changes how traders read PUMP from here. Each of the 35 remaining unlocks through June 2029 adds a recurring supply event to the calendar, so the sharp dilution shocks of July give way to a slower and more predictable drip. That steadier cadence can work in the token’s favor if demand keeps pace, since the market can plan around fixed dates that are easier to absorb than the surprise floods of a cliff. Supply has not moved in one direction only. Pump.fun burned roughly $370 million of PUMP it had bought back over the prior nine months in late April, taking about 36% of the circulating supply off the table and partly offsetting the dilution the unlock schedule adds.

The near-term test is narrower. A daily close that holds above $0.00251 would confirm the break and put the 0.786 at $0.00289 within reach, while a slip back into the $0.00226 to $0.00200 support band would show whether buyers defend the reversal or let it unwind. The August 11 unlock arrives right inside that decision window, which sets up the first real read on whether recovering price action can take on fresh supply.

Table of contents

Meme coin trading has a new volume leader. Robinhood Chain’s suite of launchpads processed $1.23 billion in trading volume over the past seven days, edging out PumpSwap’s roughly $1.22 billion, according to the original report from WuBlockchain. The numbers appeared in on-chain data tracked by @Adam_Tehc.

Robinhood Chain Overtakes PumpSwap in Weekly Meme Coin Volume The flip is a milestone for Robinhood’s attempt to build a native on-chain ecosystem, but the more telling signal is what didn’t happen. The surge in Robinhood Chain activity did not leach volume from Pump.fun, the Solana-based meme coin factory. Instead, total meme coin trading activity across both venues appears to have grown. That suggests two platforms can coexist without an immediate zero-sum dynamic.

Robinhood Chain’s launchpad infrastructure includes a range of interfaces designed to lower the barrier for new token launches. While Pump.fun popularized the one-click fair-launch model on Solana, Robinhood is replicating the concept inside its own ecosystem, leveraging an existing user base of tens of millions of retail accounts. The shift from a traditional brokerage app to a first-party blockchain with native token creation tools marks one of the more aggressive moves by a U.S.-regulated entity into permissionless DeFi primitives.

Market participants have been watching these volumes closely because they test how far retail demand for speculative tokens can stretch across multiple chains. A year ago, Pump.fun alone frequently drove north of $1 billion in weekly volume, particularly during peaks of political meme coin hysteria. Now Robinhood Chain is matching those numbers, adding a second major distribution channel. The net expansion implies that appetite for low-liquidity, high-volatility tokens isn’t waning, even as traditional crypto majors consolidate.

Why Robinhood’s Growth Isn’t Hurting Pump.fun The lack of cannibalization also raises questions about market structure. Pump.fun remains dominant on Solana, a chain that continues to lead developer activity across all smart contract platforms, as seen in recent rankings covering Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon in Top 10 Blockchains by Developer Activity This Week. Solana’s low fees and high throughput made it the natural home for meme coin speculation. Robinhood Chain, by contrast, is an Ethereum layer-2 built on Arbitrum Orbit, which means it brings a different technical profile and compliance layer to the game.

That compliance layer could matter for sustainability. Unlike anonymous deployers on Pump.fun, Robinhood’s launchpads are likely to enforce guardrails that limit extreme pump-and-dump mechanics or at least provide a pathway for regulatory engagement. How that tension plays out remains uncertain. If Robinhood Chain can offer fast token creation while giving the platform legal cover, it could attract a different class of token issuers—ones who are unwilling to deploy on completely unmoderated venues. The risk, however, is that meme coin trading is fundamentally about frictionless, anonymous speculation, and any KYC or gatekeeping dilutes the appeal.

Can Robinhood Sustain Its Meme Coin Momentum? The broader meme coin market is seeing frequent rotations, with tokens like $TON, $SIREN, and $VVV leading weekly gainer charts, as covered in Top Crypto Gainers of the Week. That rotation underscores the short-lived, narrative-driven nature of these assets. For a platform like Robinhood Chain, capturing even a fraction of that rolling liquidity in a regulated wrapper could be a long-term wedge into on-chain retail finance.

Yet the volumes tell only part of the story. On-chain data doesn’t always distinguish between organic user volume and wash trading or incentive-driven activity. Robinhood may be subsidizing activity through token rewards or fee rebates, and the sustainability of that model is unknown. PumpSwap’s numbers, meanwhile, are largely organic, though not immune to bot activity. When dollar figures are this close—just $10 million separating the two—any analysis should carry a margin of caution.

For now, the takeaway is that Robinhood has successfully bootstrapped a competitive meme coin launchpad environment within its chain, and the broader meme coin economy isn’t shrinking. That may embolden other centralized platforms to push deeper into permissionless token launches, blurring the lines between regulated apps and open DeFi even further. Whether regulators will treat a launchpad operating under a broker-dealer umbrella differently from a crypto-native protocol is the open question hanging over these numbers.

AUTHOR

Nicholas Otieno is a fintech writer specializing in cryptocurrency markets. Since 2019, he has written articles to educate readers about cryptocurrency and its substantial positive impact on global prosperity. Nicholas is a Bitcoin holder, believing firmly in its fundamentals. His work has been featured in publications such as Finance Magnates, Blockchain.News, Bitcoin Magazine, Coincub, and among others. When he's not writing, Nicholas enjoys performing domestic tasks, spending time with friends, listening to music, and watching football.

Key Highlights PUMP token has climbed approximately 50% from its recent bottom, reaching the $0.0020 level The project’s most significant token unlock event to date was successfully absorbed by market demand without causing a price collapse A new “BOOST mode” feature was introduced, channeling trapped liquidity into buy-and-burn mechanics for newly launched tokens Despite upward price movement, Open Interest has been falling, indicating spot market activity rather than leveraged speculation Critical price resistance zone identified between $0.00210 and $0.00215, which bulls must overcome to validate a sustained reversal The Pump.fun (PUMP) token has experienced a dramatic recovery, climbing nearly 50% from its recent bottom near $0.0013 to current levels around $0.0020. The upward momentum occurred despite market concerns surrounding the project’s largest token distribution event since inception.

Pump.fun (PUMP) Price In mid-July, a substantial quantity of tokens became available for circulation: 32.5 billion PUMP from investor allocations (representing 25% of that pool) and 50 billion PUMP from team allocations (also 25% of that category). The balance of these locked tokens will be released gradually throughout a 36-month period. Historically, significant unlock events tend to create selling pressure. However, PUMP defied this pattern.

Market participants successfully absorbed the newly released tokens while simultaneously driving prices toward a significant long-term descending trendline resistance. This development has reframed the conversation from supply concerns to whether the current momentum can sustain itself.

Cryptocurrency analyst Ansem (@blknoiz06) weighed in on the platform X, highlighting that PUMP consistently generates $1 million in daily revenue even during sluggish on-chain market conditions. He described it as “one of the few stories in crypto where the issue is actually the narrative and sentiment instead of the actual fundamentals.” His analysis suggested that renewed activity on Solana could propel PUMP to new all-time highs, while noting that HYPE commands a 15x higher market valuation despite comparable two-year revenue figures.

$PUMP thesis + trade setup from stream last week

$1M a day with worst onchain conditions is notable, one of the few stories in crypto where the issue is actually the narrative & sentiment instead of the actual fundamentals of the business

if $SOL onchain picks back up this hits… pic.twitter.com/Dy15jW6hd5

— Ansem 🐂🀄️ (@blknoiz06) July 26, 2026

Introduction of BOOST Mode Creates Additional Tailwind The platform recently unveiled “BOOST mode,” an innovative feature designed to recover liquidity that becomes inaccessible when tokens migrate from bonding curves to automated market maker pools. This mechanism redirects that otherwise-lost capital into a buy-and-burn process executed over approximately five minutes. According to platform estimates, more than $100 million in liquidity is permanently lost each year through this migration process. BOOST captures a portion of this value, reportedly increasing effective liquidity by roughly 20% for each newly graduated token.

Although BOOST primarily affects newly created tokens rather than PUMP itself, the mechanism enhances the overall ecosystem economics that PUMP represents as the platform’s native asset. The feature’s launch aligned with PUMP posting weekly gains exceeding 30%.

On July 20, PUMP experienced a dramatic single-day surge of 20-22%, accompanied by a more than 500% spike in 24-hour trading volume, which reached approximately $131 million. Open Interest expanded from roughly 100 million to 163 million contracts during this initial breakout phase.

Chart Analysis Shows Mixed Signals at Critical Junction Technical indicators present a nuanced picture. The Supertrend indicator has shifted to a bullish configuration and price action is maintaining position above the Guppy EMA array. Despite this, Open Interest has declined as price has advanced. This divergence points to spot market buying rather than leveraged futures trading as the primary force behind the rally.

On-chain monitoring services have identified multiple modest but significant PUMP accumulation transactions from large holders in recent trading sessions. Additionally, the token’s built-in buyback-and-burn mechanism is removing approximately 0.1% of circulating supply each day, creating consistent deflationary pressure that compounds with the BOOST feature.

The primary resistance barrier is positioned at $0.00210–$0.00215. Near-term support can be found at $0.00185–$0.00190, while the recent swing low at $0.0013 represents the critical level that bulls must protect to maintain the current bullish structure.

Key Highlights PUMP has surged more than 30% over the last seven days, currently trading around $0.001983 Trading volume exploded by over 500%, exceeding $164 million in daily activity Crypto influencer Ansem revealed a $1.5 million investment in PUMP, triggering a buying wave The platform has deployed approximately $410 million toward token buybacks, eliminating over 151 billion PUMP tokens Crypto analyst BATMAN identified renewed meme coin momentum as a critical catalyst for platform growth The PUMP token from Pump.fun has experienced remarkable momentum recently. Over the past seven days, the price has advanced more than 30%, with single-day gains reaching approximately 18%. At press time, PUMP was changing hands near $0.001983, with its market capitalization hovering around $779.88 million.

Pump.Fun (PUMP) Price Trading volume data reinforces this bullish narrative. Daily volume spiked more than 512%, climbing to $164 million within a 24-hour period. This dramatic increase suggests substantial buying interest rather than thin-market volatility.

A major catalyst behind this price action was crypto influencer Ansem’s public disclosure of his $1.5 million PUMP token acquisition. According to CoinGecko, the token’s value jumped over 23% following Ansem’s published investment rationale. Previously, analyst Kaff had suggested that PUMP’s fundamental metrics alone — including approximately $1–2 million in daily revenue and a price-to-earnings ratio around 1 — were insufficient to drive significant market movement independently.

ANSEM DIDN’T RANDOMLY WAKE UP BULLISH ON $PUMP

WATCH HOW THE ENTIRE INFLUENCER CAMPAIGN WAS BUILT IN REVERSE

June 16:

Ansem creates his first https://t.co/cWm0VDS47g profile and links his identity directly to a wallet

he immediately says he is “not endorsing any microcaps”… https://t.co/fmMhWoqYRw

— Jam (@jellysmithrave) July 20, 2026

On July 20, cryptocurrency analyst BATMAN observed that meme coin sector interest has been resurfacing after multiple weeks of subdued activity. BATMAN highlighted that PUMP had successfully reclaimed a critical support threshold and emphasized that heightened meme coin creation directly correlates with increased platform engagement and revenue generation for Pump.fun.

Recently, meme coins have been gaining traction and massive attention once again.

Because of that, $PUMP is finally looking interesting, with a recent breakout reclaiming a key support level.

More trading activity and coin launches means more revenue for… pic.twitter.com/KZWdb987MF

— BATMAN ⚡ (@CryptosBatman) July 20, 2026

Strategic Buyback Program Counters Unlock Pressure Pump.fun has implemented a substantial token buyback initiative. The platform has allocated approximately $410 million to repurchase PUMP tokens and has permanently removed 151.1 billion tokens from circulation through burning, effectively eliminating more than 15% of the initial supply.

The platform maintains a daily buyback pace of roughly $400,000, translating to approximately $12.85 million monthly. This figure closely aligns with projected team and investor token releases, estimated at around $12 million per month.

Analyst Ali Charts highlighted on X that approximately 82.5 billion PUMP tokens entered their initial significant insider unlock phase during July. Following a one-year vesting cliff, tokens allocated to team members and early investors — valued at roughly $125 million — became eligible for sale. The ongoing buyback initiative has effectively offset considerable portions of this selling pressure.

Around 82.5 billion $PUMP tokens are set to enter their first major insider unlock in July.

After a one-year cliff, team and early-investor tokens worth roughly $125 million became available to sell.

Given the size of the unlock relative to the circulating supply and average… https://t.co/RwFbzzoACb pic.twitter.com/ubfeR9i5xQ

— Ali Charts (@alicharts) July 21, 2026

Technical Analysis Outlook PUMP successfully escaped a multi-week consolidation zone bounded by $0.00140 and $0.00170. The price briefly exceeded $0.0020 before experiencing a modest retracement.

Currently, the token is positioned comfortably above its 20-day simple moving average of $0.00159 and its 50-day simple moving average of $0.00153. The Relative Strength Index registers 68.30, nearing but not yet entering overbought conditions.

Platform virality has contributed additional momentum. Jimothy the Raccoon (JIMOTHY) experienced a 186% surge and produced over $36 million in trading volume, amplifying overall engagement throughout the Pump.fun ecosystem.

Cumulatively, Pump.fun has produced approximately $1.2 billion in total revenue and facilitated over $800 million in SOL token sales through its launchpad infrastructure.

Pump.fun has transferred 81,712 SOL to Kraken, adding fresh pressure to the Solana market at a time when memecoin trading activity has cooled from earlier highs.

The transfer, worth roughly $6.15 million based on the available on-chain data, came from the Pump.fun fee account and was visible on Solscan. On-chain analyst EmberCN has also tracked broader Pump.fun selling, with cumulative converted SOL reportedly reaching 4.81 million tokens.

That makes this more than a routine wallet movement.

Pump.fun has been one of the most important fee-generating platforms in the Solana ecosystem, largely because of the memecoin launch cycle. When a platform like that moves SOL to an exchange, traders naturally ask whether it represents selling pressure, treasury management, or a broader sign that memecoin momentum is slowing.

Reference: Solscan

TL;DR Pump.fun transferred 81,712 SOL to Kraken. The movement was traced from the platform’s fee account on Solscan. The transfer comes as Solana memecoin trading activity cools, raising questions about selling pressure. Why This Transfer Matters Not every exchange transfer is a confirmed sale, but large movements to centralized exchanges usually get traders’ attention.

When funds move from an ecosystem-linked wallet to an exchange like Kraken, the market often reads it as potential supply. The funds may be sold, rebalanced, held for liquidity, or moved for operational reasons. But because exchanges are where tokens can be sold quickly, the transfer becomes part of the price conversation.

That is especially true for Solana.

SOL has been one of the strongest ecosystem assets of the cycle, helped by low fees, fast settlement, meme-token activity, and retail-friendly apps. Pump.fun has sat right inside that story. Its role in launching memecoins made it one of the clearest examples of how speculative activity can drive real on-chain revenue.

So when the platform’s fee account moves a large SOL balance, traders watch.

The 81,712 SOL transfer is not large enough by itself to define Solana’s trend, but it lands in a sensitive part of the market. Memecoin volume has cooled, SOL has been testing important levels, and traders are already looking for signs of whether ecosystem demand is weakening.

Pump.fun Shows The Strength And Risk Of Solana’s Retail Cycle Pump.fun became important because it captured the simplest version of Solana’s appeal: low-cost, fast, high-volume experimentation.

Anyone could launch a token. Traders could rotate quickly. The platform generated fees as speculative demand surged. That activity helped Solana stand out from slower or more expensive networks.

But the same model also creates cyclical pressure.

When memecoin demand is strong, platforms like Pump.fun can generate huge activity and accumulate significant SOL-denominated revenue. When the cycle cools, those accumulated tokens can become a source of selling pressure if they are moved to exchanges and converted.

That does not mean Pump.fun is doing anything unusual. Platforms need to manage treasuries, expenses, and liquidity. The market reaction comes from timing and visibility.

On-chain transparency makes the movement impossible to ignore.

What It Means For SOL For SOL traders, the key issue is whether this transfer becomes part of a larger pattern.

A single transfer can be absorbed if market demand is strong. But repeated exchange deposits from ecosystem fee accounts can weigh on sentiment, especially when trading volumes are already cooling.

That is why EmberCN’s broader tracking matters. If Pump.fun has converted millions of SOL over time, traders may start treating the platform as a recurring source of supply. That does not erase Solana’s ecosystem strength, but it complicates the short-term market picture.

Solana bulls will argue that the network remains active, widely used, and central to retail crypto trading. That is fair. A cooling memecoin cycle does not mean the chain has failed. It may simply mean speculative activity is normalising after an intense period.

Bears will focus on the exchange flows. If one of the largest Solana fee engines is moving tokens to Kraken while memecoin activity slows, they may see that as confirmation that the easiest part of the cycle has passed.

The truth is probably somewhere between those views.

Solana remains one of the most important networks in crypto, but the market is becoming more selective. It wants to know which activity is durable and which activity was mostly speculative heat.

Pump.fun’s transfer gives traders another data point in that debate. The next signal will come from whether SOL can absorb the flow without losing support, and whether memecoin activity stabilises or continues to fade.

This article is based on Solscan data and on-chain tracking from EmberCN.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.