Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

U.S. spot crypto exchange-traded products recorded about $70.7 million in combined net outflows during the Sep. 14–18 trading week, as withdrawals from Ether funds outweighed demand for Bitcoin, Solana, and Hyperliquid products.

Summary

Spot Bitcoin ETFs ended the week with a modest $6.1 million net inflow after attracting $433 million on Friday. Spot Ether ETFs lost about $140.6 million, extending their weaker flow trend despite a $143.7 million Friday rebound. Solana ETFs took in $60.7 million, led by $47.6 million entering Bitwise’s BSOL on Friday. Hyperliquid ETFs recorded $3.1 million in weekly net inflows after three positive sessions offset Tuesday’s withdrawals. The flows came during a volatile week in which the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 25 basis points, and Bitcoin later reclaimed $80,000. According to data from Farside Investors, the four U.S. crypto ETF categories tracked by the firm diverged sharply during the week. Bitcoin products recovered from $746.3 million of combined withdrawals on Tuesday and Wednesday, while Ether ETFs failed to erase their midweek losses.

Solana funds drew fresh capital in four of the five sessions, including their strongest day of the week on Friday. Hyperliquid products also finished positive, although their $3.1 million weekly gain remained small compared with flows into the larger crypto funds.

Bitcoin ETFs erase most weekly losses with $433M Friday inflow U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted a net inflow of $6.1 million for the week after two large redemption days nearly pushed the group to a steep weekly loss.

The funds began with a $159.9 million inflow on Monday before losing $450.4 million on Tuesday and $295.9 million on Wednesday. Investors returned on Thursday with $159.5 million, followed by $433 million on Friday, the largest daily inflow of the week.

BlackRock’s IBIT led the weekly rankings with $120.6 million in net inflows. Fidelity’s FBTC followed with $79.9 million after drawing $310.7 million on Friday, the biggest single-fund inflow recorded that day.

Morgan Stanley’s MSBT added $13.2 million, while Franklin Templeton’s EZBC received $4.6 million. The gains were partly offset by $141.9 million in withdrawals from ARK 21Shares’ ARKB and $62.3 million from Grayscale’s GBTC. Bitwise’s BITB lost $2.7 million, and VanEck’s HODL shed $5.3 million.

The late reversal coincided with Bitcoin’s return above $80,000 on Friday. The asset had come under pressure earlier in the week as the Federal Reserve raised its target rate by 25 basis points to 3.75%–4.00%, its first increase in more than three years. Bitcoin later rallied as oil prices eased and crypto-linked stocks recovered.

Ether ETFs post $140.6M weekly outflow U.S. spot Ether ETFs recorded approximately $140.6 million in net withdrawals, making Ether the weakest of the four crypto ETF categories covered by Farside.

The group attracted $121.1 million on Monday but lost $142 million on Tuesday, $224.1 million on Wednesday and $39.3 million on Thursday. A $143.7 million Friday inflow reduced the weekly deficit without fully reversing it.

BlackRock’s ETHA accounted for a net weekly outflow of $56.1 million despite taking in $114.3 million on Friday. Fidelity’s FETH lost $25.9 million, while Bitwise’s ETHW shed $33.1 million.

Grayscale’s ETHE posted $31.4 million in withdrawals. VanEck’s ETHV lost $10.3 million, 21Shares’ TETH shed $1.9 million, and Invesco’s QETH recorded a $5.4 million outflow.

BlackRock’s ETHB and Grayscale’s lower-fee ETH fund moved in the opposite direction, taking in $7 million and $16.2 million, respectively. Farside’s daily totals contain rounded fund-level figures, which can produce small differences when individual entries are added.

Ether’s negative weekly result widened the gap with Bitcoin products. Bitcoin ETFs recovered nearly all of their midweek redemptions, while the Friday demand for Ether funds covered only part of the $405.4 million withdrawn across the prior three sessions.

Solana ETFs draw $60.7M as BSOL leads Friday demand Farside’s Solana ETF data showed $60.7 million in net inflows for the week, the strongest total among the four tracked crypto assets.

Solana funds received $11 million on Monday, $1.3 million on Tuesday and $800,000 on Wednesday. Thursday ended with no net movement before Friday’s inflow reached $47.6 million.

Bitwise’s BSOL generated $58.7 million of the weekly total. Grayscale’s GSOL contributed a net $2 million after a $3.9 million Monday inflow was partly offset by a $1.9 million withdrawal on Wednesday.

The remaining Solana products reported no net flows during the week. Friday’s $47.6 million allocation went entirely to BSOL, giving the Bitwise fund almost 97% of the category’s weekly net intake.

Hyperliquid ETFs add $3.1M during mixed week Hyperliquid ETFs ended the week with $3.1 million in net inflows. The products recorded no movement on Monday, followed by a $3.9 million outflow from Bitwise’s BHYP on Tuesday.

Flows turned positive during the rest of the week. 21Shares’ HYPG received $1.7 million on Wednesday, while Thursday brought $1.9 million into BHYP and $2.4 million into 21Shares’ THYP. BHYP added another $1 million on Friday.

The combined weekly data left Bitcoin funds close to flat, Ether products in net redemptions and the two smaller altcoin categories positive. Across all four categories, approximately $70.7 million exited on a net basis, with the $140.6 million Ether outflow exceeding the combined inflows into Bitcoin, Solana and Hyperliquid funds.

11 minutes ago

According to HTX market data, HYPE has surged past $94, hitting a new all-time high of $94.43, with a 24-hour gain of 9.1% and a market cap of $20.996 billion. Below is a roundup of recent positive developments for Hyperliquid: · Payward, parent company of Kraken, announced plans to offer on-chain perpetual contracts based on Hyperliquid to U.S. clients. Bitnomial, a CFTC-regulated exchange and clearinghouse under Payward, acts as the HIP-3 deployer, responsible for creating, owning, managing markets, and clearing trades. NinjaTrader Clearing, a registered Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), will hold client accounts. · The U.S. SEC announced its "Innovation Exemption," granting conditional five-year exemptions to certain tokenized stock trading platforms, a boost for Hyperliquid’s expansion in the tokenized equity and real-world asset (RWA) space. · The HIP-3 market accounted for nearly 50% of the platform’s perpetual trading volume in summer 2026, up from around 2% at the start of the year. TradeXYZ’s stock market (including Nasdaq 100 and individual equities) remains dominant. Over the same period, total RWA perpetual trading volume across the market rose from ~$85 billion per month in January to ~$470 billion per month in June. · Hyperliquid’s perpetual contract trading volume over the past 30 days reached ~$240 billion, leading public chains/ecosystems (second-place Arbitrum recorded ~$47.2 billion, while Solana saw ~$46 billion). It holds a ~36% share of the Perp DEX market over the same period, with cumulative perpetual trading volume exceeding $5.3 trillion. · Hyperliquid recently launched the Manual Borrows feature, allowing users to borrow USDC or USDT using HYPE or BTC as collateral.

Scan the QR code

Download APP

Hyperliquid has rolled out manual lending functionality. Portfolio margin and manual borrowing on the platform utilize the same underlying HyperCore infrastructure. Users can use HYPE and BTC as collateral to borrow quoted assets USDC or USDT. Borrowed quoted assets accrue interest, while supplied quoted assets also earn interest, with rates determined by usage.

Relevant content

Grayscale's Zcash spot ETF (ticker: ZCSH) plans to implement a 3-for-1 share split.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the Zcash ETF (ticker: ZCSH) launched by Grayscale announced today that it plans to implement a 3-for-1 forward share split for the fund. The split will not alter the total value of shareholders' investments.

4 minutes ago

a16z Recommends US SEC Regulate Cryptocurrency Trading Platforms Using the ATS Framework

On September 14, a16z submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), proposing that a more flexible, market-adaptable regulatory framework for crypto trading platforms (CTPs) be established by drawing on the existing Alternative Trading System (ATS) regulatory framework. a16z argues that the U.S. crypto market remains in its early stages with high retail participation, so the regulatory framework should clarify regulatory boundaries while leaving room for market deepening and innovation. The firm recommends that crypto trading platforms register with the SEC via a notice-based registration process, and allow platforms to trade both non-securities asset pairs (such as bitcoin and stablecoins) and securities-non-securities asset pairs simultaneously to prevent further fragmentation of the crypto market. Additionally, for CTPs trading NMS (National Market System) stocks like tokenized equities, Form ATS-N public disclosure requirements should only apply once they meet the trading volume thresholds set under existing Regulation ATS; information below the threshold should be kept confidential from both the SEC and platform users. a16z also suggests that crypto trading platforms should be subject to record-keeping requirements similar to those for ATS, and allow relevant records to be stored on the blockchain under specific conditions. It further proposes that platforms be permitted to set differentiated access permissions, rights, and obligations for different user groups. The firm states that the SEC should leverage the flexibility and innovative nature of ATS to set clear regulatory parameters for crypto trading platforms, while allowing operators to innovate and experiment within this framework.

4 minutes ago

Dragonfly Partner Qureshi Urges Zcash Development Fund to Cease Operations After Its 2028 Expiry

Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at crypto-focused venture capital firm Dragonfly, proposed that the Zcash Development Fund cease operations after its 2028 expiration under current rules. Qureshi wrote in a post: "I believe this should be the last iteration of the development fund." He noted that the fund’s current size is sufficient to support Zcash’s remaining development work, and as its value approaches $100 million, it risks becoming "politicized" in the future. Per ZecStats data, as of press time, the Zcash Development Fund holds 63,962 ZEC, worth approximately $95 million. The remarks come amid growing industry debate over the development fund’s expanding size, which has surged in value amid recent ZEC price gains. Others argue that Zcash should retain the development fund. Paradigm founder Matt Huang said Wednesday that the fund is particularly important amid rising AI-powered cyberattack capabilities and rapid advances in quantum computing.

4 minutes ago

HYPE hits new all-time high, boosting its ecosystem; meme coin PURR surges over 20% in 24 hours.

According to HTX market data, as Hyperliquid’s token HYPE broke through $90 today to hit an all-time high, tokens in its ecosystem have rallied. Specifically, Hyperliquid ecosystem meme coin PURR is currently priced at $0.1284, with a 24-hour gain of 20.31%; Hyperliquid ecosystem meme coin JOFF trades at $0.01665, up 17.99% over the past 24 hours. Additionally, Hyperliquid Strategies Inc, a listed company associated with the HYPE treasury, saw its pre-market price rise by 7.01%, currently at $13.73.

4 minutes ago

Binance reiterates its commitment to long-term compliant operations under the EU's MiCA framework.

Binance said it will still seek authorization under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that a vice chairman of the Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) told Binance that European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde had asked the Greek Prime Minister not to approve Binance’s license application. Greek officials had informed the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in early June that the regulator planned to greenlight the application, according to reports. A Binance spokesperson stated: “We do not comment on speculation. In Europe, Binance remains committed to operating in a long-term, compliant manner and adhering to the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation.”

4 minutes ago

Zcash launches Q3 retroactive grant funding voting, with 37 proposals pending a vote.

Zcash has announced that voting for its Q3 retroactive grant program for Shielded ZEC holders is now open, and will run until 4:00 AM Beijing time on September 30. The ballot includes 37 proposals, each requiring a separate "yes/no" vote, with a quorum threshold of roughly 420,000 ZEC. To participate in the vote, users must update to Zodl 3.14.0 or later, the latest Vizor Wallet, or the latest Zkool.

4 minutes ago

Altcoins

17 September 2026 | 14:41 Virtune has listed its existing Hyperliquid ETP in Warsaw, giving Polish investors HYPE exposure through a PLN-traded security without requiring a crypto wallet.

Key Takeaways Warsaw is the ETP’s fourth exchange listing. Each unit represents approximately 0.1 HYPE. The annual management fee is 0.95%. Listing alone does not prove investor demand. Warsaw is the fourth listing, not a new product Virtune began trading its Hyperliquid ETP on the Warsaw Stock Exchange on September 17 under the ticker ETNVIRHYPE. It trades in Polish złoty and uses the same ISIN, SE0028425314, as the product’s other European listings.

A Polish investor can now place a PLN order through a broker that supports the Warsaw listing. Availability may differ between platforms, so the exchange debut does not guarantee that every local broker will offer it immediately.

The same ETP now trades on four exchanges

April 27 – Deutsche Börse Xetra
Ticker VRTH, traded in euros

July 7 – Nasdaq Stockholm
Ticker VIRHYPE, traded in Swedish kronor

July 7 – Nasdaq Helsinki
Ticker VIRHYPEE, traded in euros

September 17 – Warsaw Stock Exchange
Ticker ETNVIRHYPE, traded in złoty

The Polish listing is therefore an access expansion, not Europe’s first HYPE investment product. It also takes a different approach from Payward’s proposed regulated U.S. markets running on Hyperliquid, which concern derivatives infrastructure rather than ownership of this ETP.

Physically backed does not mean direct HYPE ownership According to the listing announcement, Virtune holds enough HYPE to cover the value of the outstanding securities. The assets are stored through Coinbase Custody and BitGo Europe, while a separate collateral agent represents investors.

The buyer receives a security in a brokerage account, not HYPE in a personal wallet. The position follows the token’s value, but it cannot be transferred to another blockchain address or used directly on Hyperliquid.

One unit currently represents about 0.1 HYPE “1:1 exposure” describes the backing and intended price relationship. It does not mean that one ETP unit contains one HYPE.

The official product page showed approximately 0.0996 HYPE per unit on September 16. The product had 200,000 units outstanding, net assets of around $1.56 million and a net asset value close to $7.80 per unit.

Virtune’s reported $320 million under management and more than 160,000 investors cover its entire business. Those figures should not be presented as assets or investors belonging to the Hyperliquid product.

A PLN 10,000 position costs about PLN 95 annually The ETP carries a 0.95% annual management fee. The charge is reflected in product performance rather than collected as a separate yearly payment.

PLN 10,000 × 0.95% = PLN 95
This is an illustration based on an unchanged position value. The actual fee effect varies as the ETP rises or falls.

Broker commission and the difference between buying and selling prices can add further costs. The product is not presented as a staking ETP, so investors should not expect HYPE staking rewards to offset the management fee.

Trading in złoty does not reduce HYPE volatility What the Warsaw listing changes
Investors can place orders in PLN through a compatible broker and hold the ETP beside conventional securities.

What it does not change
The position can still lose value when HYPE falls. A PLN quotation does not make the underlying token less volatile.

HYPE trades continuously, while the ETP follows Warsaw exchange hours. A large overnight or weekend move may therefore appear as a price gap when the market reopens. Virtune’s announcement does not describe a currency hedge, so PLN should be understood as the dealing currency rather than protection from currency movements.

Warsaw volume will provide the real answer The listing creates a route into the product, but Virtune has not disclosed Polish investor numbers, net inflows, trading volume or average spreads. Those figures will matter more than the number of exchanges displaying the same security.

Growth beyond the ETP’s current $1.56 million in assets would indicate new capital entering the product. Warsaw volume and spreads will show whether local investors can trade it efficiently. Until then, the product is easier to reach, but its Polish demand remains untested.

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Crypto ETPs can lose value, and investors should review the prospectus, fees and product risks before investing.

Author

Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.

Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ:PURR) jumped 8% Thursday after the SEC approved the Innovation Exemption, a temporary order allowing tokenized stock trading on-chain for the first time.

What the SEC Actually DidThe SEC announced Thursday that it issued the Innovation Exemption, granting temporary relief to Tokenized Securities Venues to trade tokenized U.S. stocks on public blockchains using automated market makers. 

The exemption also covers liquidity providers in those pools from the dealer definition under securities law.

“Today, the SEC is taking a significant step forward to bring America’s capital markets into the digital age,” SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said in a statement. 

The exemption runs five years and carries strict conditions:

TSVs must verify tokenized stocks carry the same rights as traditional shares, including dividends and voting rights Smart contracts must be auditable, public, and deployed on permissionless blockchains Issuers can object and block their stock from trading on a TSV Trading halts on the primary exchange automatically halt the tokenized version TSVs must be US persons and comply with OFAC sanctions Why PURR Is Moving on This NewsPURR climbed 8% Thursday, with the market reading the Innovation Exemption as directly bullish for Hyperliquid’s tokenization infrastructure play. 

The SEC order requires trading on public permissionless blockchains with auditable smart contracts, which sits squarely in Hyperliquid’s lane as a decentralized exchange built for high-speed on-chain trading.

Atkins framed Thursday’s move as a direct response to the CLARITY Act’s Senate defeat earlier this week, saying the SEC is stepping in to move markets on-chain within its existing authority while Congress works on permanent legislation.

What This Means for the Tokenization RaceThe Innovation Exemption is the clearest regulatory green light U.S. markets have seen for tokenized equities. 

It gives venues a legal path to offer on-chain stock trading today, without waiting for Congress, while the SEC uses the five-year window to build a permanent framework based on what it observes in the market.

As Benzinga reported, Bernstein analysts expected the SEC and CFTC to move “aggressive and swift” on rulemaking after the CLARITY Act failed to advance. Thursday’s Innovation Exemption is the first concrete proof that prediction is playing out.

Key levels for PURR: $14.14 — August high, key target above $11.09 — 20-day EMA, must hold as support Photo via Shutterstock

Read Next

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

Payward, Kraken’s parent company, plans to offer US clients onchain perpetual futures through Hyperliquid HIP-3* and its regulated derivatives infrastructure, the company said Wednesday.

HIP-3*, introduced by Hyperliquid’s co-founder Jeffrey Yan earlier this month, is a new optional feature set that would enable permissioned markets through deployer-controlled onchain allowlists.

The functionality would extend the existing HIP-3 framework with access-control capabilities without affecting markets already deployed under HIP-3.

Advertisement

The proposed offering would combine Hyperliquid’s onchain trading infrastructure with Payward’s existing regulated exchange, clearing and brokerage framework and would require regulatory approval, Payward stated.

Hyperliquid’s onchain order book would match and record the trades, while Bitnomial Exchange, a CFTC-regulated designated contract market operated by Payward, would deploy and administer the HIP-3* markets and handle clearing and settlement, the company noted.

NinjaTrader Clearing, a CFTC-registered futures commission merchant and NFA member, would hold the client accounts. Trading would be limited to accounts onboarded by NinjaTrader and placed on both firms’ allowlists, it added.

Payward, which has operated financial rails for clients in more than 190 countries and territories, said the move would make it the first US exchange or clearinghouse to deploy a market on Hyperliquid, where multiple venues already operate builder-deployed perpetuals.

Perpetual futures have been available outside the US since 2016 and generated more than $85 trillion in global volume in 2025, according to CoinGecko. Hyperliquid was the top onchain perpetuals venue that year, and Payward plans to use it as its first US venue for onchain perpetuals.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Table of contents

Quick Take 1. HYPE trades at $78.99, down 6.13% over the week, roughly 5.4% below the record $83.50 it set on August 25 and back under the round number.

2. The token released 14,175,778 HYPE on August 29, its largest monthly unlock, with 46.6% going to insiders and early investors rather than to a treasury.

3. It is the weakest weekly performer among the large caps on this tape, against Zcash at plus 1.13% and XRP at plus 0.41%.

Hyperliquid has given back its August advance. HYPE trades at $78.99, down 0.77% on the day and 6.13% on the week, making it the softest of the large caps on a session where the broader market was mixed and 27 of the QC 100 constituents advanced.

Live price data via CoinGecko. Total crypto market capitalization sits at $2.62 trillion with Bitcoin at $76,863.90, itself down 1.87% on the week.

What did this site say before the unlock? That this release was structurally different from the one three weeks earlier, and that August’s soft landing was not a template.

On August 28 we covered the upcoming release of 14,175,778 HYPE, worth roughly $1.2 billion, and focused on the recipient split rather than the headline size: 46.6% to insiders and early investors, 46.3% to the community, 7% to the Hyper Foundation.

The comparison mattered because we had covered the previous unlock differently. On August 7, after a release the market had feared as a $620 million event, we reported that the committed claim came to about $22.65 million and wrote that the shadow had been bigger than the monster. The caveat attached to that piece was explicit: soft landings are a pattern, not a promise.

We also published the historical base rate rather than a prediction: HYPE fell 14.1% after May’s release, gained 1% in June, and declined 7% in July. Three of four produced declines, none produced a collapse. The current 6.13% weekly decline sits inside that range.

Did the unlock cause this? Not provably, and saying otherwise would be reading a cause into a correlation.

Two boundaries belong on any claim here. Bitcoin is down 1.87% on the week itself, so part of HYPE’s decline is market beta rather than token-specific supply. And an unlock releases tokens rather than selling them; whether recipients distributed is visible on-chain through exchange inflows, which is the evidence that would settle the question and which this article does not have.

What can be said is narrower and still useful. The recipient split pointed toward more selling pressure than August’s release, the token has since underperformed both the market and its own sector, and the outcome is consistent with the framework rather than contradicting it. That is different from proof.

A token unlock is the scheduled release of previously locked tokens into circulation, and its price impact depends more on who receives them than on how many are released.

What happened to the catalysts? They have not gone away, and neither has produced anything concrete.

The rally into August’s record rested on two items. President Trump said the CFTC was working toward a compliant US pathway for Hyperliquid’s perpetual futures, and the protocol activated AQAv2, which directs USDC reserve yield into HYPE buybacks with a first payout scheduled for October.

The regulatory item remains a stated intention with no published timeline, and any formal action would appear on the CFTC’s own site before it appears anywhere else. The buyback has not made its first payout, so its projected figures remain forecasts rather than facts. October is when that number becomes checkable.

What is HYPE’s valuation now? Roughly 39 times annualized revenue at current prices, down from about 41 times at the record but still far above where this site first measured it.

On August 7, with HYPE at $55.83 and a market capitalization near $12.3 billion, we calculated roughly 24 times annualized protocol revenue using a daily revenue base of about $1.39 million. At $78.99 the capitalization is near $20 billion, which on the same revenue base implies approximately 39 times.

The boundary is unchanged from when we first published it: a multiple built on a single day’s revenue is a snapshot, and AQAv2’s contribution is projected rather than realized. Protocol fee data updates daily on DefiLlama for anyone wanting to recompute it.

What levels matter now? $80 above as the round number just lost, and the $74 to $76 zone below that buyers defended through the August advance.

Reclaiming $80 quickly would mark this as a routine post-unlock pullback inside an uptrend. Losing $74 would suggest the distribution is ongoing rather than finished, and would put the token’s entire August gain in question. The October AQAv2 payout is the next scheduled event capable of changing the picture.

Bottom line HYPE trades at $78.99, down 6.13% on the week, two weeks after an unlock this site flagged as structurally different because 46.6% went to insiders rather than to a treasury, and the decline sits within the range of its previous post-unlock moves.

The August piece said the soft landing was a pattern rather than a promise, and this release tested that caveat. The framework held, which is a smaller claim than a prediction and a more honest one: unlock size tells you almost nothing, the recipient split tells you which way to lean, and the on-chain flow tells you whether you were right.

This article is for information only and is not investment advice. Crypto assets are extremely volatile and you can lose your entire stake. Always do your own research.

Photo: Rafael Minguet Delgado / Pexels

Zach Pandl from Grayscale has highlighted Hyperliquid’s significant growth, positioning it as a competitor to Binance in the perpetual futures market. Cointelegraph reports that Hyperliquid is now the third-largest crypto exchange by open interest, which has recently surpassed $11 billion. This development positions Hyperliquid as a key player in the on-chain derivatives market, challenging major centralized exchanges like Binance. The broader market appears to interpret this growth as a positive indicator for Hyperliquid’s future prospects, potentially influencing its price predictions.

Key Takeaways The report suggests Hyperliquid’s open interest has grown, surpassing $11 billion, which positions it as a major player in the market. Current market pricing for Hyperliquid’s future price reflects a mixed outlook, with a slight decrease in the probability of reaching $100 by the end of 2026. Hyperliquid’s competition with Binance and its growth trajectory may indicate further developments in the decentralized exchange space. What to Watch Market participants and observers will be closely monitoring Hyperliquid’s ongoing growth and its impact on the broader crypto market. Key developments, such as potential partnerships or changes in market share, could influence pricing scenarios. Additionally, any regulatory changes or technological advancements could play a significant role in shaping Hyperliquid’s future competitive position. Markets will likely react to any major announcements from Hyperliquid or its competitors that could further define its standing in the crypto exchange landscape.

Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.

Term Structure

Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31 49.5% +0.5¢ $76 View market → January 1 2027 3.8% +0.1¢ $29 View market → January 1 2027 2.6% 0.0¢ $244 View market → January 1 2027 4.5% 0.0¢ $93 View market → January 1 2027 3.9% -0.1¢ $29 View market → January 1 2027 72% +2¢ $102 View market → January 1 2027 9.5% -1¢ — View market → January 1 2027 6% +0.5¢ $65 View market → January 1 2027 6.5% 0.0¢ $29 View market → Updated 6min ago

Key Takeaways HYPE has climbed 4% over the last day, currently priced near $82 with year-to-date gains exceeding 220% Major whale investor purchased an additional $26M in HYPE tokens and committed them to staking, expanding total holdings to $322M The platform eliminated 32,770 HYPE tokens (approximately $2.65M) through burns within a single 24-hour period at $81 average pricing Platform open interest increased from $7.9B to $8.1B over the past week, though Bitcoin trading activity fell 79% during the same timeframe Technical analysts project $100 as the next price milestone, though some anticipate a potential retracement to $75 beforehand The HYPE token from Hyperliquid is currently positioned around the $82 mark, representing a remarkable year-to-date surge of more than 220%. This performance has elevated the asset to the 9th largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, commanding an $18.2 billion valuation.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price The token experienced a 4% uptick during the previous 24-hour trading cycle, partially attributed to Hyperliquid’s integration of USELESS, a Solana-based memecoin. Following the listing announcement, USELESS saw a 15% price increase alongside a 30% volume spike reaching $173 million.

A prominent whale investor has demonstrated continued aggressive accumulation of HYPE tokens. Data from blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain reveals that wallet 0x6436 acquired an additional 308,569 HYPE tokens—approximately $26 million worth—and immediately staked the entire amount. This transaction elevates the wallet’s complete holdings to 4.05 million HYPE, representing roughly $322 million in value, with all tokens currently staked.

🚨HYPE WHALE ADDS ANOTHER $26M!

Wallet 0x6436 bought another 308,569 $HYPE, about $26 million, and staked it. That takes itsstack to 4.05 million $HYPE, worth about $322 million, all staked, per @lookonchain.

The same address has been buying and staking since early summer,… pic.twitter.com/DvKCuadIfg

— Crypto Banter (@crypto_banter) September 10, 2026

Crypto Banter highlighted this activity on X (formerly Twitter), pointing out that this same wallet address has maintained a consistent buying and staking pattern since early summer, including a substantial 3.24 million HYPE acquisition just last week.

Regarding token supply dynamics, Hyperliquid executed a buyback and burn of 32,770 HYPE tokens—valued at approximately $2.65 million—within a single 24-hour window at an average cost of $81.01 per token, according to blockchain data shared by OnchainLens. The cumulative lifetime burn has now reached 48.57 million HYPE, representing roughly $3.82 billion in value at present market rates.

Technical Pattern Indicates $100 Target, Though Correction Remains Possible Platform open interest on Hyperliquid expanded from $7.9 billion to $8.1 billion throughout the current week, indicating that market participants continue to establish positions in anticipation of additional price appreciation.

Conversely, Bitcoin trading volumes on the platform experienced a dramatic contraction—plummeting from 3.08 million trades during the week of August 16 to merely 656,000 trades last week, representing a 79% decline. Additionally, a bearish divergence has emerged on the daily chart timeframe, suggesting potential momentum deterioration.

From a technical analysis perspective, a bull flag formation has developed following HYPE’s breakthrough above the $75 resistance level. Market analysts continue to support a $100 price objective but acknowledge the possibility of an intermediate pullback toward $75, which would constitute approximately a 13% decline from current trading levels.

Regulatory Challenges Present Primary Concern, According to Ran Neuner Ran Neuner, who founded Crypto Banter, participated in Cointelegraph’s Chain Reaction podcast where he identified regulatory oversight as the most significant challenge facing Hyperliquid. He noted that government authorities have already begun implementing regulations for centralized cryptocurrency exchanges and anticipates decentralized platforms will face similar scrutiny moving forward.

Despite this concern, Neuner emphasized that Hyperliquid’s established network effects provide substantial competitive advantages. “You can’t copy a network,” he explained, drawing parallels to Uber’s market position in the ride-sharing industry.

Regarding regulatory developments, President Trump announced in August that CFTC Chair Michael Selig was actively working to facilitate Hyperliquid’s entry into the United States market in a “fully compliant and legal fashion.” HYPE experienced approximately a 20% price surge following that announcement, trading near the $70 level at that time.

HYPE is presently trading at $82 with a fully diluted market valuation of approximately $78.4 billion.

Hyperliquid has taken a notably different approach to token listings. There is no committee, no back-channel negotiation, and no opaque approval process. Instead, the protocol runs a continuous Dutch auction every 31 hours, and whoever is willing to pay wins the right to deploy a spot token.

How the auction works The mechanism, governed by the HIP-1 standard, is straightforward.

What winning, and losing, the auction means Winning the auction is what grants a token a front-end listing and an order book on Hyperliquid. A token can exist on HyperEVM without going through the auction process, but it will not appear on the platform's interface or have a tradeable market. Per @HyperliquidX's documentation,

The HYPE paid in winning auctions is burned, permanently removing it from circulation.

The result is a self-correcting price discovery system: heavy demand pushes the next auction's starting price up, while weak demand pulls it back to the floor.

Sources:
Hyperliquid Official Wiki: Spot Deployments (HIP-1/HIP-2)
Hyperliquid Guide: Auctions Explained

BitGo clients can now access Hyperliquid perpetuals through existing self-custody hot wallets after a one-time activation, the company said in a Sept. 10 statement.

The capability allows eligible clients to connect their wallets to Hyperliquid through WalletConnect and manage perpetual positions without setting up a new wallet or approving each trading action through BitGo.

Advertisement

Once activated, clients can place, modify and close orders without providing a new BitGo wallet signature or making a separate onchain gas payment for each order, the team stated. BitGo’s existing approval requirements remain in place for deposits and withdrawals that require wallet transactions, including any multi-user approvals configured by the client.

The capability establishes a permissioned connection between BitGo and Hyperliquid without exposing private keys, according to the company. BitGo said the integration forms part of its effort to provide institutional digital asset infrastructure across networks and onchain applications.

Access is limited to eligible clients and is unavailable in jurisdictions including the US, UK and Canada where leveraged digital asset derivatives are restricted.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Kraken created a new Hyperliquid-backed token, kHYPE. The creation of KHYPE creates a direct link for users of Hyperliquid [HYPE] to use as collateral in decentralized financial transactions (DeFi) on the platform Ink.

Each kHYPE has the same value as a 1:1 ratio to HYPE, which is being kept in segregated accounts. This eliminates the possibility of an uncollateralized token issuance.

In addition, users are capable of verifying that each mint of kHYPE will remain fully collateralized through publicly verifiable reserve reporting.

Furthermore, since there is no fee associated with redeeming kHYPE, users may be encouraged to move their assets back and forth between Kraken and Ink. Therefore, this will further expand the liquidity existing outside the central marketplace.

Source: X However, once kHYPE has been redeemed, kHYPE cannot be utilized again for generating additional Kraken staking rewards. In turn, users are going to need to decide whether they want to earn income or create some type of DeFi-based utility with their holdings.

In that case, an increase in supply, holders, and transfers represents true adoptions of Kraken compared to short-term launch hype.

Still, growth in the total amount of Kraken-linked stakes will show if the integration leads to greater involvement by Hyperliquid in its broader ecosystem.

Whale locks up 1.89M HYPE Beyond Kraken’s larger hype support, whale 0x8e48 shows large investor conviction. The whale purchased an additional 116,427 HYPE tokens for approximately $9.91 million before transferring all the funds to staking.

This brings the total held HYPE tokens in 0x8e48’s wallets to 1.89 million HYPE tokens worth about $159 million at roughly $84 per token in 8 months.

Source: X Furthermore, by staking all the HYPE tokens, 0x8e48 effectively removed them from availability on the open market.

If demand were to increase in the future, there would be less supply of available tokens and potentially greater opportunities for upward movement in price. Still, despite that, a single account cannot influence the market.

If the account were to unstake some or all of its tokens, that would indicate that the long-term confidence that 0x8e48 has in Hype may be waning.

HYPE outflows challenge institutional demand While the whale kept adding HYPE, ETF flows showed whether regulated investors were following with similar demand too. The funds now hold $464.29 million in net assets.

Total inflows remain near $338 million, showing most ETF capital has stayed invested through recent price swings.

Source: SoSoValue Hence, this $5.29 million outflow, entirely from Bitwise’s BHYP fund, occurred after the late August HYPE rally. Simply, this indicates that some investors may have taken their profits near highs.

However, even though there was a sizeable amount of money withdrawn from the funds, they still maintain almost a historical high level of capital. Therefore, it does not appear to be immediately concerning.

Final Summary Hyperliquid’s demand strengthened through kHYPE utility and a whale’s fully staked 1.89 million-token position. HYPE ETF assets remain near $464 million, although further outflows could weaken broader institutional demand.

Hyperliquid’in yerel tokeni HYPE, yaklaşık 820 milyon dolar değerindeki planlı kilit açılımının ardından beklenen satış baskısına rağmen yükselişini koruyor. HYPE, 9 Eylül’de 81,82 dolara kadar geriledikten sonra yeniden yükselerek 86 doların üzerine çıktı. Token, böylece 89 dolarlık rekor seviyesine yaklaştı.

HYPE’taki bu hareket dikkat çekici çünkü 6 Eylül’de yaklaşık 9,92 milyon HYPE’ın kilidinin açılması planlanıyordu. O tarihte tokenlerin toplam değeri yaklaşık 820 milyon dolar seviyesindeydi. Buna rağmen piyasada büyük bir satış dalgası oluşmadı.

Peki yüz milyonlarca dolarlık potansiyel arz piyasaya girmişken HYPE neden hâlâ güçlü?

HYPE Kilit Açılımından Neden Etkilenmedi? İlk bakılması gereken nokta, “kilit açıldı” ile “tokenların tamamı satıldı” ifadesinin aynı şey olmaması.

6 Eylül’deki 9,92 milyon HYPE’lık miktar, çekirdek katkıcılar için planlanan token dilimini temsil ediyor. Tokenlerin tamamının aynı anda borsalara gönderilip satılması gerekmiyor. Geçmiş veriler de bu ayrımı destekliyor.

Mart ayındaki benzer 9,92 milyon HYPE’lık dilimin yalnızca 173.217 adedi, yani %1,75’i talep edilmişti.

Bu nedenle 820 milyon dolarlık rakamı doğrudan piyasaya giren satış miktarı olarak değerlendirmek yanıltıcı olabilir.

Hyperliquid’de HYPE Talebi Nereden Geliyor? HYPE fiyatının dirençli kalmasında Hyperliquid üzerindeki işlem faaliyetleri önemli bir rol oynuyor.

Platformdaki toplam açık pozisyon miktarı 14,3 milyar dolara ulaşarak rekor seviyeye yaklaştı. Bu verinin önemli bölümünü Hyperliquid’in temel sürekli vadeli işlem piyasaları oluşturuyor.

Açık pozisyon, vadeli işlemlerde hâlâ kapanmamış toplam pozisyon miktarını gösteriyor. Bu rakamın yükselmesi, platformdaki işlem faaliyetinin ve pozisyonların büyüdüğünü ortaya koyuyor.

Dolayısıyla HYPE üzerindeki potansiyel satış baskısının karşısında, protokolün kendi işlem faaliyetlerinden doğan güçlü bir talep bulunuyor.

Hyperliquid HYPE Yakmaya Devam Ediyor Platformun gelirleri de HYPE üzerinde doğrudan bir mekanizma oluşturuyor.

Son 24 saatlik dönemde Hyperliquid, ortalama 86,17 dolar fiyatla 15.350 HYPE satın alarak yaktı. Bu işlemin değeri yaklaşık 1,32 milyon dolar.

Toplam yakılan HYPE miktarı da 48,45 milyona ulaştı. Bu miktar maksimum arzın yaklaşık %4,84’üne denk geliyor.

Böylece platformdaki işlem faaliyetlerinden elde edilen gelirlerin bir bölümü HYPE alımlarına ve yakım mekanizmasına dönüşüyor.

HYPE İçin 90 Dolar Neden Önemli? HYPE’ın önündeki en önemli teknik bölge 88-90 dolar aralığında bulunuyor.

Token bu bölgede daha önce satış baskısıyla karşılaşırken, 90 dolar üzerinde günlük kapanış gelmesi halinde 95 dolar ve ardından 100 dolar seviyeleri gündeme gelebilir.

Aşağıda ise 82-83 dolar aralığı ilk destek bölgesi olarak izleniyor. 83 doların altında dört saatlik kapanış gelmesi halinde 81,82 dolarlık son dip yeniden test edilebilir.

Dolayısıyla kilit açılımının yarattığı arz baskısının gerçekten güçlenip güçlenmediğini anlamak için fiyatın özellikle bu destek ve direnç bölgelerindeki davranışı önem taşıyor.

820 Milyon Dolarlık HYPE Arzı Piyasaya Gelecek mi? HYPE’ın son hareketi, token kilit açılımlarında yalnızca takvimdeki rakama bakmanın yeterli olmadığını gösteriyor.

9,92 milyon HYPE’lık dilimin teorik değeri yaklaşık 820 milyon dolar olsa da geçmişte benzer miktarların tamamı piyasaya sürülmedi. Aynı zamanda Hyperliquid’deki işlem faaliyetleri ve devam eden HYPE alım-yakımları arz baskısını dengeleyebiliyor.

Bu nedenle HYPE açısından bundan sonraki gelişmelerde piyasaya gerçekten kaç tokenın gireceği, ne kadarının borsalara taşınacağı ve alıcıların bu arzı karşılayıp karşılayamayacağı izlenecek.

Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.

Key Takeaways HYPE token has surged to a new all-time high of $88, marking a 50%+ gain throughout September 2026 Open interest on the Hyperliquid platform has climbed to an unprecedented $14.3 billion, representing a $3.57 billion monthly increase Mid-August integration with Coinbase’s Base App brought new users to the Hyperliquid platform The platform successfully absorbed a $820 million token unlock event on September 6 without significant downward pressure Token burn totals have exceeded 48.45 million HYPE, accounting for 4.84% of the total maximum supply The Hyperliquid native token HYPE has climbed to a fresh all-time high of $88, pushing its market capitalization close to the $20 billion threshold. This represents a remarkable surge of more than 50% over the current month.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Total open interest throughout the Hyperliquid ecosystem has reached an all-time peak of $14.3 billion. This level stands just 3% below the $14.7 billion milestone achieved prior to the October 10, 2025 market collapse, when open interest plummeted 56% to $6.5 billion within 24 hours.

The platform’s resurgence occurred in two distinct waves. Initially, HIP-3, Hyperliquid’s builder framework, spearheaded the comeback. Between March 2026 and August, HIP-3’s proportion of aggregate open interest expanded from 18% to beyond 34%, with these markets registering $4.44 billion in OI.

Source: Coinglass The second phase has seen momentum transfer to Hyperliquid’s primary cryptocurrency perpetual trading markets. During the last 30 days, aggregate open interest increased by $3.57 billion, while HIP-3 markets experienced a $119 million decline.

Core Perpetuals Growth Drives HYPE Value The transition toward core perpetual markets carries significant implications for HYPE valuation. These primary markets channel approximately 97% of generated fees directly into HYPE token buyback programs. Conversely, HIP-3 builders retain the option to keep as much as 50% of fees generated within their respective markets.

During the most recent 24-hour period, Hyperliquid executed buybacks and burns of 15,350 HYPE tokens valued at roughly $1.32 million, with an average acquisition price of $86.17. Aggregate burns have now reached 48.45 million HYPE tokens, equivalent to 4.84% of the protocol’s maximum supply.

Two significant developments contributed to the recent open interest explosion. Coinbase initiated routing of Base App users toward Hyperliquid during mid-August. Additionally, President Trump announced that the CFTC is actively pursuing a framework to bring Hyperliquid operations onshore under regulatory oversight.

Major Unlock Event Failed to Halt Momentum A predetermined unlock of 9.92 million HYPE tokens—valued at approximately $820 million—occurred on September 6. Contrary to market apprehensions, the price maintained its upward trajectory toward $89. Analysis of previous unlock events revealed that only minimal quantities of released tokens historically made their way to centralized exchanges.

This is the picture we've been waiting for on $HYPE

Point of control at $82 has now lined up perfectly with the ascending support trendline, the volume shelf and the trend are holding as one. Every dip into this zone keeps getting bought.

Price is getting batted down at the… pic.twitter.com/GVK0XkXRRx

— MB.hl (@MBxxvv) September 8, 2026

Market analyst MB.hl provided detailed technical analysis via X, highlighting that the $82 point of control has converged with an ascending support trendline and a substantial volume shelf. The analyst emphasized that sophisticated traders maintain heavily skewed long positions at $74 million compared to just $15 million in shorts, with institutional players and prominent figures uniformly positioned bullishly. MB.hl expressed confidence that HYPE will mount another attempt at surpassing its all-time high.

Examining the daily timeframe, HYPE has rebounded from an intraday low of $81.82 to currently trade at $86.05. Critical resistance levels are positioned at $88–$90. A decisive close above the $90 threshold could establish a pathway toward $95, with $100 representing the subsequent target.

Renzo Protocol, best known for its liquid restaking infrastructure on EigenLayer, is branching into automated yield strategies with a new product called Renzo Basis. The tool will execute delta-neutral basis trades on Hyperliquid, the on-chain perpetual futures exchange that has quietly become one of the highest-volume trading venues in crypto.

The product will initially support two pairs: Bitcoin and HYPE, Hyperliquid’s native token. The pitch is straightforward: earn yield from funding rate payments without having to bet on which direction the market moves next.

How Renzo Basis actually works In crypto terms, a basis trade involves purchasing an asset on the spot market while simultaneously opening a short position on a perpetual futures contract for the same asset. When the futures market is trading at a premium to spot, which happens frequently because leveraged traders tend to be long-biased, the short position collects funding rate payments from those long traders.

The “delta-neutral” part means the two positions cancel each other out directionally. If Bitcoin rises 5%, your spot position gains value while your short loses roughly the same amount. The net effect on your principal is close to zero, but you keep collecting the funding payments.

What Renzo is doing with Basis is automating this entire process. Rather than requiring users to manually manage positions across spot and perpetual markets, the protocol handles the execution, rebalancing, and funding rate collection. This is not a brand new concept for Renzo. The protocol has previously operated managed vaults with basis and carry strategies, and it collaborated with Superstate on funds that utilized CME futures contracts. Renzo Basis represents a natural extension of that work, just ported onto a decentralized venue.

Why Hyperliquid makes sense as the venue Choosing Hyperliquid as the execution layer is a calculated move. The platform has emerged as one of the most active perpetual futures exchanges in the entire crypto ecosystem, with daily trading volumes measured in the hundreds of billions of dollars. That kind of liquidity is essential for basis trades because thin order books can introduce slippage that eats into the funding rate yield.

Hyperliquid also runs its own economic flywheel. The platform generates substantial fee revenue, a portion of which funds regular buybacks of the HYPE token. That creates an interesting dynamic for Renzo Basis users trading the HYPE pair: the token they are collecting yield on has a built-in demand mechanism from the exchange’s own profits.

The bigger picture for DeFi yield There are real risks worth noting. Funding rates are not guaranteed to stay positive. During bearish periods or market dislocations, funding can flip negative, meaning short positions pay long positions instead. When that happens, a basis trade bleeds money rather than generating it. How Renzo manages those periods, whether it unwinds positions, hedges further, or simply waits, will be a critical test of the product’s design.

Smart contract risk is another consideration. Automating trades across spot and perpetual markets on-chain introduces additional attack surfaces compared to a simple staking vault. Any exploit in the vault logic or in Hyperliquid’s infrastructure could put deposited funds at risk.

Fee structures and risk parameters for Renzo Basis have not yet been disclosed. For yield-hungry depositors, the math will ultimately come down to whether the funding rate income, after fees and accounting for periods of negative funding, justifies the smart contract risk and opportunity cost of locking capital in the product.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Abraxas Capital has bought another 13,000 ETH worth $32.39 million in the spot market to hedge part of a 141,180 ETH short position on Hyperliquid valued at $353.27 million.

Summary

Abraxas Capital bought another 13,000 ETH worth $32.39 million in the spot market, according to Lookonchain. The purchase was made to hedge a 141,180 ETH short position on Hyperliquid valued at $353.27 million. The latest spot purchase covers just over 9% of the short when measured by the number of ETH. Abraxas previously accumulated more than 211,000 ETH worth over $477 million during a six day buying run in May 2025. Lookonchain said on Sept. 8 that Abraxas Capital purchased the additional Ether while keeping its much larger short position open on the decentralized derivatives platform. The blockchain analytics account described the transaction as another spot purchase made specifically to hedge the short.

At the values provided by Lookonchain, the latest purchase was made at an implied price of roughly $2,491 per ETH. The 13,000 ETH position equals just over 9% of the firm’s 141,180 ETH short when measured by the number of tokens.

Abraxas therefore remains heavily net short based solely on the positions disclosed by Lookonchain. Subtracting the latest 13,000 ETH spot hedge from the 141,180 ETH short leaves 128,180 ETH of net short exposure before considering any other holdings or positions controlled by the firm.

Abraxas Capital keeps $353 million ETH short open Lookonchain valued the Hyperliquid short at approximately $353.27 million at the time of its post, compared with $32.39 million for the latest spot purchase.

The hedge gives Abraxas exposure to ETH in opposite directions. The short position benefits from a decline in Ether’s price, while the spot ETH gains value when the token rises. Lookonchain specifically characterized the latest purchase as a hedge, rather than a closure or reduction of the underlying short position.

Large leveraged positions have become common on Hyperliquid, where whale accounts have carried several billion dollars in combined positions this year.

In May, crypto.news previously reported that Hyperliquid whale positions had reached $4.039 billion. Long exposure stood at $1.981 billion, while shorts accounted for $2.058 billion, producing a long-to-short ratio of 0.96.

Both sides of the whale book were underwater at the time. Long positions carried roughly $30.8 million in aggregate unrealized losses, compared with approximately $14.6 million in losses on short positions.

One of the largest individual trades in the May snapshot involved an ETH whale using 15x leverage. The account held roughly $87 million in Ether exposure from an entry near $2,265 and was sitting on more than $3.6 million in unrealized losses.

A separate reading five days earlier placed Hyperliquid whale exposure at $4.236 billion. Long positions totaled $2.099 billion, or 49.55% of the total, against $2.137 billion in shorts.

The split produced a long-to-short ratio of 0.98, leaving large traders almost evenly positioned between bullish and bearish bets.

Abraxas has made large Ethereum purchases before The latest transaction is not Abraxas Capital’s first large on-chain move involving Ether.

In May 2025, the investment manager withdrew 138,511 ETH valued at roughly $297 million from centralized exchanges over two days, according to Lookonchain. The transfers occurred during a sharp ETH rally that pushed the token above $2,300.

Abraxas then increased its holdings with another 33,482 ETH purchase worth $84.7 million.

Lookonchain data cited at the time showed that the firm had accumulated 211,030 ETH over six days, worth more than $477 million. The purchases followed the earlier withdrawal of approximately $297 million in ETH from exchanges.

The 2025 accumulation occurred under different market conditions and does not establish the purpose of the firm’s current positions. Lookonchain has specifically described the Sept. 8 spot transaction as a hedge against the Hyperliquid short.

Hyperliquid whale positioning has changed considerably at different points this year. In April, large trader positions totaled $3.4 billion, consisting of $1.737 billion in longs and $1.663 billion in shorts.

Long positions were carrying approximately $153 million in aggregate unrealized losses at the time, while shorts were sitting on roughly $161 million in unrealized profits.

An ETH whale tracked in the same dataset held a 15x leveraged long from around $2,148.70 and was down approximately $8.6 million.

Ethereum trades close to $2,500 Abraxas made its latest hedge while Ether remained close to the $2,500 level following a recovery from early September lows.

On Sept. 7, Ethereum traded near $2,493 after moving between approximately $2,475 and $2,537 during the session.

ETH had repeatedly failed to hold above $2,500, while its daily relative strength index had eased to 63.62 after the August rally.

Liquidation data cited in the report showed notable leveraged positions clustered around $2,430 below the market and between $2,540 and $2,600 above it. The nearest support zone was concentrated between roughly $2,423 and $2,475.

Ether had been trading considerably lower less than a week earlier. On Sept. 2, the token fell to an intraday low of $2,356 after failing to clear resistance close to $2,550.

Approximately $94.2 million in ETH futures positions were liquidated over 24 hours during the decline, while Ethereum fell below $2,400.

ETH remained above several medium-term moving averages at the time, including its 20-day simple moving average near $2,299 and its 50-day, 100-day and 200-day averages near $2,054, $1,903 and $2,030, respectively.

The token later recovered toward the $2,500 area, putting Abraxas’ latest 13,000 ETH spot purchase close to the same price zone.

Institutional demand for spot Ether has remained active during the recovery. U.S. spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds recorded $225.8 million in net inflows on Aug. 28, extending a nine-session buying streak to $1.42 billion.

BlackRock’s ETHA accounted for $1.02 billion, or roughly 72%, of the nine-day ETF inflows. Fidelity’s FETH recorded $56.2 million on Aug. 28, while BlackRock’s staked ETHB product added $20.7 million.

Lookonchain’s Sept. 8 figures put Abraxas Capital’s latest spot hedge at 13,000 ETH worth $32.39 million, while the firm’s Hyperliquid short remained at 141,180 ETH with a notional value of $353.27 million.

Wallets tied to North Korea’s sanctioned Lazarus Group have been routing tens of millions of dollars through Hyperliquid, according to on-chain work first published by Arkham analyst Emmett Gallic.

The finding lands just as the Trump administration is trying to pull the same derivatives venue into the regulated US market.Gallic reported that addresses linked to the OFAC-designated group moved more than $30 million through Hyperliquid’s HyperUnit bridge as recently as August 30.

Investigator ZachXBT had already tied those same addresses in 2024 to about $61 million in stolen bitcoin.

In the latest flow, funds arrived as bitcoin, were swapped into ether and solana, then bridged out to Tron, Solana, and Ethereum.

From there they reached KuCoin, LBank, Kraken, and several unlabeled Tron services.

Gallic split the activity into two clusters: one of about $30 million that traces to wallets already labeled Lazarus, and another of about $5 million that shows similar dormancy, address style, and counterparties.

That pattern is not a claim that Hyperliquid itself was breached.

It is a claim that a permissionless venue can be used to convert and hop stolen coins before they hit centralized exchanges.

Public ledgers show the path. They do not by themselves show whether those exchanges later froze accounts, filed reports, or blocked further withdrawals.

The policy backdrop makes the tracing more than a crime-lab footnote.

At a White House gathering in mid-August, President Donald Trump said CFTC Chairman Michael Selig was working to bring Hyperliquid into the United States “in a fully compliant and legal fashion.”

Separate reporting has described advanced talks between Hyperliquid Labs and Payward, Kraken’s parent, about offering some perpetual futures to American traders through Bitnomial, a CFTC-regulated exchange and clearinghouse.

An onshore product would still have to satisfy derivatives rules, customer-protection standards, market surveillance, and sanctions screening—requirements that sit uneasily next to wallet-to-wallet trading with no traditional KYC gate.

Hyperliquid grew into the largest decentralized home for perpetual futures by letting users trade from a wallet rather than a brokerage account.

That design helped it process trillions of dollars in cumulative volume.

It also leaves developers unable to force identity checks on every address that touches the chain.

Product filings for HYPE-linked funds have already listed that gap as a sanctions risk.

Lazarus-linked wallets were flagged on the platform as early as late 2024, when earlier suspected DPRK activity helped spark a large one-day outflow even though the protocol said no user funds were taken.

US agencies have long argued that North Korean cyber units steal crypto to finance weapons programs.

Analytics firms put 2025 DPRK-linked theft near $2 billion. Converting bitcoin on a high-liquidity perps venue, then bridging into other networks before cash-out, matches a familiar layering playbook.

Addresses linked to OFAC Sanctioned Lazarus Group (North Korea) have been actively moving $30M+ through Hyperliquid (HyperUnit) as recent as yesterday.@zachxbt identified these addresses as Lazarus Group in 2024 linked to $61M in stolen fundshttps://t.co/RNJ4NMBrxA pic.twitter.com/CvivPLVnEL

— Emmett Gallic (@emmettgallic) August 31, 2026

None of that proves an intent to sabotage Hyperliquid’s US ambitions.

It does give regulators a concrete case when they ask how a permissionless global book can be walled off from a compliant American offering.

The open questions are practical.

Who controls the deposit accounts at the centralized exchanges? Which of those firms acted after the coins arrived? And can an onshore Hyperliquid product be designed so that sanctioned clusters on the open protocol do not bleed into U.S. order flow?

Until those answers are public, the $30 million trail is less a verdict on Hyperliquid than a stress test of whether DeFi can enter US markets without importing the same sanctions problem that thrives in wallet-native trading.

After months of anticipation, Bulk, an emerging Solana perpetual futures trading venue, has finally opened the doors to its invite-only mainnet beta launch.

Much to the delight of over 15,000 pre-depositors, Bulk’s launch hit Solana’s perps race with a bang, reportedly netting over $22M in Day 1 trading volume and outpacing the giants who came before it.

However, despite palpable excitement, it wasn’t all smooth sailing for the venue. Concentrated, aggressive trading caused a temporary price dislocation, triggering large liquidations and ADL.

Bulk Records $22M in Day 1 Trading After first launching its testnet in March 2026, and amassing peak TVL of $40M in pre-deposits, Bulk is finally live in mainnet beta. An estimated 15,000 wallets are eligible for the invite-only soft launch, with access being periodically rolled out to other users over the coming weeks.

According to Bulk CEO Kobie McGlashan, Bulk processed over $22M in day one volume, surpassing the traffic witnessed by market leaders like Hyperliquid and Lighter on their respective debuts.

Comparatively, Bulk’s $22M launch would’ve placed it in fourth position in Solana’s perp DEX volume rankings, trailing GMTrade, Pacifica, and Jupiter.  While an impressive start for the emerging venue, it’s important to note that some of Bulk’s volume may be driven by mercenary capital. 

Bulk is expected to deliver one of Solana DeFi’s most anticipated future airdrops, prompting traders to generate volume on the platform in exchange for AURA, or points. 

Debut Marred by Temporary Price Dislocation While Bulk’s maiden voyage attracted plenty of volume and demonstrated strong demand from traders, market data shows that some users took advantage of the venue’s Day One liquidity to force a price dislocation and trigger liquidations.

According to co-founder & CTO Junaid Peel’s public statement, one wallet traded aggressively through the venue’s Day One liquidity, rebuilding a large short position while undergoing partial liquidations.

The trader’s behaviour ultimately caused a market-wide price dislocation, triggering liquidations across several positions and causing cascading auto-deleveraging. Bulk has communicated that affected users will be reimbursed following incident review.

Despite the growing pains, McGlashan has asserted that targeted market manipulation practices are commonplace in the crypto industry. Challenges like what Bulk faced on Saturday are particularly common for new and emerging venues, and even established venues can fall victim to sophisticated attacks. 

In March 2026, a malicious actor forced a self-liquidation by manipulating the price of $JELLYJELLY, effectively passing a toxic position to the HLP, causing several million in losses and threatening to liquidate the entire vault at certain price thresholds.

While unsettling in the short term, incidents like the above only help to make perpetual trading venues more resilient in the long term, enabling stronger and more efficient markets and safer trading for users.

Read More on SolanaFloor The memes are coming home

Solana Reclaims Memecoin Flows as Stonk.fun Flips Pump, Hyperliquid in Daily Revenue

Is Robinhood a worthy challenger?

Every HYPE unlock triggers the same panic cycle. Every time, the sellers never show up. The September batch will probably be no different, and the data from previous unlocks explains exactly why.

Summary

Hyperliquid released approximately 9.92 million HYPE tokens on September 6, valued at roughly $820 million at the prevailing market price of $82.60 per token. Historical data from HYPE unlocks shows that the vast majority of newly unlocked tokens are not sold. After the March 2026 unlock, on-chain data indicated that only about 1.75% of unlocked supply reached exchanges within the first 30 days. HYPE has gained more than 50% since its mid-August breakout from the $55 to $60 range, reaching an all-time high of $88.06, with price holding above $80 through multiple unlock events in recent months. The Assistance Fund has burned 48.42 million HYPE through automated buybacks funded by 99% of eligible trading fees, permanently removing 4.84% of maximum supply. Hyperliquid Strategies, the Nasdaq-listed treasury company, held 29.3 million HYPE worth $1.9 billion as of June 30 and expanded its equity facility to $2.5 billion for potential additional purchases. Crypto Twitter lit up on September 6. The headline was irresistible: Hyperliquid just unlocked $820 million worth of HYPE tokens, adding nearly 10 million tokens to the available supply in a single batch. On paper, that sounds like a wall of sell pressure about to crush the price. Traders who have been burned by unlock dumps on other tokens immediately started hedging, opening short positions, and posting dire warnings about what comes next.

They are almost certainly wrong. And the reason they are wrong tells you something important about how HYPE actually works, how token unlocks function in practice, and why the market keeps getting smarter about separating real supply pressure from headline noise.

The $820 million number is technically correct and practically meaningless The September 6 unlock released 9.92 million HYPE tokens from their vesting contracts. At the time, HYPE was trading around $82.60, which puts the theoretical market value of those tokens at roughly $820 million. That is the number that landed in every headline and every panicked tweet.

But theoretical value and actual sell pressure are wildly different things.

An unlock does not mean that 9.92 million tokens hit the open market. It means those tokens become claimable by their holders. The people receiving vested HYPE are not random speculators looking to dump at the first opportunity. They are core contributors, early team members, and ecosystem participants who have been building on Hyperliquid for years. Most of them have strong reasons to hold.

Think about it from their perspective. They received HYPE allocations when the token was worth single digits. They have watched it climb to $82. They are sitting on life-changing gains. But they also know the protocol is growing faster than almost anything else in DeFi. Hyperliquid processes more than $4 billion in daily trading volume. The Assistance Fund is burning tokens worth $1 million per day. A Nasdaq-listed company is spending hundreds of millions to accumulate their token. Why would they sell now?

The data says they do not.

What actually happened after previous unlocks The best predictor of unlock behavior is unlock behavior. And HYPE has given us enough data points to see a clear pattern.

After the March 2026 unlock, which released a comparable batch of tokens, blockchain analysts tracked the movement of newly unlocked HYPE for 30 days. According to on-chain data aggregated by Arkham Intelligence and independent researchers, approximately 1.75% of the unlocked tokens moved to exchange deposit addresses within the first month.

Read that number again. 1.75%.

Out of hundreds of millions of dollars in theoretical unlock value, the actual sell pressure amounted to a tiny fraction. Most recipients left their tokens untouched. Some staked them. Some moved them to new wallets for tax or security reasons. But the panic-inducing “massive supply dump” that the headlines predicted simply did not happen.

The August 29 unlock provided even more recent evidence. That batch was larger, releasing approximately 14.18 million HYPE tokens valued at roughly $1.2 billion near the all-time high of $86.71. The immediate price reaction was a pullback to around $81, which is exactly the kind of dip that gets called a “crash” in breathless Twitter threads. Within days, HYPE was trading back above $85. The pullback represented normal profit-taking in a token that had just rallied 50% in a month, not a structural supply crisis.

This pattern repeats across the entire unlock history. Each time, the headlines scream about billions in new supply. Each time, the actual selling is minimal. Each time, the price recovers.

Why unlock panic consistently overstates the real impact The gap between perceived and actual unlock impact comes down to three factors that most market commentary ignores.

First, vesting recipients are not the same as traders. When a centralized exchange lists a new token and airdrop recipients rush to sell, that creates genuine supply pressure because those holders were never committed to the project. Vesting recipients are different. They earned their tokens through years of work or early commitment. Their time preference is fundamentally different from someone who received a free airdrop.

Second, HYPE has structural demand that absorbs new supply before it can create meaningful price impact. The Assistance Fund buyback mechanism runs continuously, spending approximately $1 million per day on open-market HYPE purchases. That is $30 million per month in automated buying pressure that does not stop for unlocks, does not get scared by headlines, and does not negotiate its entry price. The buyback alone could absorb a substantial portion of any actual selling from unlock recipients.

Third, the market has learned. The first few HYPE unlocks may have caused genuine uncertainty, but after multiple cycles where the feared dump failed to materialize, sophisticated traders and market makers now treat unlock events as potential buying opportunities rather than sell signals. The informational content of an unlock event in HYPE is close to zero because the pattern has been so consistent.

This is not unique to HYPE. Research across the broader crypto market shows that large-cap tokens with strong fundamentals tend to absorb unlock supply more efficiently over time. The difference is that HYPE has one of the most aggressive built-in demand mechanisms in the industry, which narrows the window for any sell pressure to have lasting impact.

The Assistance Fund is the real story here While traders obsess over token unlocks, the Assistance Fund quietly does the opposite of an unlock every single day.

Hyperliquid’s protocol directs 99% of eligible trading fees into the Assistance Fund, which uses those fees to buy HYPE on the open market. The purchased tokens are then burned, permanently removed from supply. No one can ever sell those tokens again. They are gone.

The numbers are staggering. By September 6, cumulative burns had reached 48.42 million HYPE tokens. That is 4.84% of the original maximum supply of 1 billion tokens, permanently erased. At current prices, the burned supply would be worth more than $4 billion.

To put that in perspective, the September 6 unlock released 9.92 million tokens. The Assistance Fund has removed 48.42 million tokens. The net effect of the buyback program outweighs this unlock by nearly five to one.

And the burn rate is accelerating. When Hyperliquid was processing lower volumes in early 2025, daily buybacks ran around $500,000. By mid-2026, they had doubled to roughly $1 million per day. In peak weeks, single-day buybacks have reached $3.97 million. The mechanism scales directly with trading volume, and Hyperliquid dominates crypto buyback activity, accounting for nearly 90% of all tracked token repurchases in 2026 alongside Pump.fun.

The annualized buyback rate runs near 7% of HYPE’s market capitalization. Compare that to Ethereum’s burn rate, BNB’s quarterly burns at roughly 20% of profits, or Solana’s 50% priority fee burn. HYPE’s ratio is four to five times higher than any comparable large-cap crypto asset.

This is the number that matters far more than any unlock. The protocol is eating its own supply faster than vesting events can replenish it.

Token unlocks across crypto: the pattern is clear HYPE is not the only token that survives unlock events better than expected, but it is one of the clearest examples.

Look at Solana. SOL went through massive unlock periods in 2021 and 2022, with billions of dollars in tokens becoming available. The short-term price action was choppy, but the long-term trend was determined by network adoption and ecosystem growth, not by unlock schedules. SOL went from under $20 to over $250 because people built useful things on it, not because its vesting schedule was perfectly smooth.

Arbitrum saw similar dynamics. ARB experienced large unlock events that triggered temporary volatility, but the tokens that actually reached exchanges represented a small fraction of the theoretical total. Optimism’s OP token followed the same pattern. The market has a remarkably consistent response to unlocks: brief uncertainty, minimal actual selling, and a return to the prevailing trend within days or weeks.

The tokens that get destroyed by unlocks tend to share specific characteristics. They lack genuine revenue or usage. Their holders received tokens through airdrops or speculative farming rather than long-term vesting. Their unlock schedules release huge percentages of total supply at once. And they have no structural demand mechanism to absorb new supply.

HYPE has none of those weaknesses. The protocol generates real revenue. The holders are long-term committed. The unlock percentages are manageable. And the Assistance Fund provides constant demand.

Hyperliquid Strategies adds another layer of demand Beyond the Assistance Fund, there is an entirely separate source of HYPE demand that most unlock analysis ignores.

Hyperliquid Strategies, the Nasdaq-listed company that operates as a corporate treasury vehicle for HYPE, held 29.3 million tokens worth $1.9 billion as of June 30, 2026. Since its business combination closed in December 2025, the company has spent $773.4 million buying approximately 16.5 million HYPE at an average price of $46.77.

On September 1, Hyperliquid Strategies expanded its equity facility with Chardan Capital Markets from $1 billion to $2.5 billion. The facility allows the company to sell PURR shares and use the proceeds for general corporate purposes, including HYPE purchases. CEO David Schamis said the company was approaching the original $1 billion limit and needed additional capacity.

This means there is a publicly traded company with $2.5 billion in potential firepower that has explicitly stated its intention to buy more HYPE. That company is already one of the largest identified holders. Its validator is the third largest on the network excluding Hyper Foundation wallets. Its shares are owned by institutional investors including Duquesne Family Office, Stanley Druckenmiller’s firm, which disclosed a $23 million PURR position.

The existence of Hyperliquid Strategies creates an asymmetric dynamic around unlock events. If newly unlocked tokens hit the market and push the price down, Hyperliquid Strategies has both the mandate and the capital to buy the dip. Unlock sellers are selling into a bid from a company with billions in available capacity. That is not a fair fight.

The institutional momentum keeps building The unlock narrative misses the forest for the trees. While headline writers count newly released tokens, the actual trajectory of Hyperliquid is pointing sharply upward.

In the past month alone, several developments have reinforced the institutional case for HYPE. Hyperliquid Labs and Kraken parent Payward entered advanced talks to offer HYPE-linked perpetual futures to U.S. traders through CFTC-regulated exchange Bitnomial, according to Bloomberg. CME Group launched crypto indexes that include HYPE alongside BNB, XRP, and Solana. The Hyperliquid Policy Center asked the SEC and CFTC to create a framework for equity perpetuals, the first formal step toward bringing an entirely new asset class under regulatory oversight.

President Trump himself said during an August 19 White House meeting that the CFTC was working to bring Hyperliquid into the United States in a compliant fashion. A former SEC senior counsel estimated the regulatory process could take 10 to 12 months but noted that the path appeared genuinely underway.

None of this is priced into the unlock math. An unlock analysis that looks only at new supply without considering the demand from a Nasdaq-listed treasury company, a potential U.S. regulated futures listing, and CME-level institutional recognition is measuring one side of the equation and ignoring the other.

The HIP-3 equity perpetuals markets processed more than $480 billion in cumulative notional volume during their first 10 months. HIP-4 outcome markets tripled their volume after opening to outside deployers. Hyperliquid is building genuine product-market fit across multiple verticals while the market argues about whether a 9.92 million token unlock will crash the price.

How the vesting schedule actually works Understanding why unlocks have minimal impact requires understanding the mechanics of HYPE vesting.

HYPE’s maximum supply is 1 billion tokens. The initial distribution allocated 31% to a genesis airdrop in November 2024, with the remainder split among future emissions, core contributors, and the Hyper Foundation. Core contributor tokens vest over multiple years with periodic cliff unlocks rather than daily linear vesting.

This structure means tokens do not trickle into the market continuously. They become available in discrete batches at scheduled intervals, which is what creates the headline-generating moments. But the batch structure also means that holders who want to sell have to make a conscious decision to claim and transfer their tokens. Passive holders, which is most of them, simply leave tokens unclaimed.

The September 6 batch of 9.92 million tokens represents approximately 0.99% of maximum supply. In a token with $19.2 billion in circulating market capitalization and $865 million in 24-hour trading volume, a 1% supply increase is manageable even if every single token were sold immediately. And they will not be sold immediately.

The vesting schedule will continue producing periodic unlocks for years. Each one will generate the same headlines. And each one will likely produce the same result: a brief moment of uncertainty, minimal actual selling, and a return to the underlying trend determined by protocol fundamentals.

What to watch There are legitimate risks around token unlocks, and anyone holding HYPE should track them honestly rather than dismissing all supply concerns.

On-chain claim rates in the first 72 hours. The 1.75% claim rate after the March unlock is the benchmark. If September’s claim rate jumps to 5% or higher, that would signal a genuine change in holder behavior and warrant closer attention.

Assistance Fund buyback volume. The Fund’s daily purchases act as a natural floor under the price. If protocol revenue drops and daily buybacks fall below $500,000, the absorption capacity weakens. Track the Onchain Lens data for the Assistance Fund wallet.

Hyperliquid Strategies purchasing activity. The company’s SEC filings disclose HYPE acquisitions. If Hyperliquid Strategies pauses buying or signals a change in strategy, the institutional demand pillar weakens.

Exchange deposit flows from unlock wallets. Arkham Intelligence and similar platforms track whether newly unlocked tokens move to exchange deposit addresses. This is the single best real-time indicator of actual sell intent.

Broader market conditions. HYPE does not trade in a vacuum. If Bitcoin enters a sharp correction and risk assets sell off broadly, unlock sellers could amplify the downside. The unlock itself is not the risk. The unlock coinciding with external pressure is.

Daily trading volume relative to unlock size. With $865 million in daily volume, the market can absorb significant selling. If volume drops while unlock supply rises, the ratio shifts unfavorably.

Disclaimer:** This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only. Crypto assets are volatile and carry risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Published September 7, 2026.

What was the September 6, 2026, HYPE token unlock? Hyperliquid released approximately 9.92 million HYPE tokens from vesting contracts on September 6, 2026. At the market price of roughly $82.60, the batch was valued at approximately $820 million. The tokens became claimable by core contributors and ecosystem participants who had been subject to vesting schedules since the network’s launch.

Does a token unlock mean all those tokens will be sold? No. A token unlock makes previously locked tokens claimable, but it does not force holders to sell. After the March 2026 HYPE unlock, on-chain tracking showed that only about 1.75% of unlocked tokens reached exchanges within 30 days. Most recipients left their tokens untouched, staked them, or moved them to new wallets without selling.

Why does HYPE typically go up after token unlocks? HYPE has shown resilience during unlock events because of structural demand from the Assistance Fund buyback mechanism, accumulation by Hyperliquid Strategies, and the tendency of vesting recipients to hold rather than sell. When actual selling pressure is minimal and automated buying continues, the net effect of an unlock can be neutral or even slightly positive as uncertainty clears.

What is the Assistance Fund and how does it affect HYPE supply? The Assistance Fund is an automated protocol mechanism that uses 99% of eligible Hyperliquid trading fees to buy HYPE on the open market. Purchased tokens are permanently burned. By September 6, 2026, the Fund had burned 48.42 million HYPE, equal to 4.84% of maximum supply. At roughly $1 million in daily purchases, the Fund creates constant buying pressure that offsets unlock-related supply increases.

How does HYPE’s unlock impact compare to other major tokens? Large-cap tokens with strong fundamentals, including Solana, Arbitrum, and Optimism, have generally absorbed unlock supply without lasting price damage. Tokens that suffer from unlock dumps typically lack real revenue, have mostly airdrop-based holder bases, or release disproportionately large percentages of supply. HYPE’s combination of revenue-funded buybacks, committed long-term holders, and manageable unlock sizes places it among the more resilient tokens during vesting events.

What is Hyperliquid Strategies and why does it matter for unlocks? Hyperliquid Strategies is a Nasdaq-listed company that holds HYPE as its primary treasury asset. It held 29.3 million HYPE worth $1.9 billion as of June 30, 2026, and has a $2.5 billion equity facility for potential additional purchases. Its presence creates a large, well-capitalized buyer that can absorb any unlock-related selling pressure, effectively putting a floor under the token during vesting events.

How much HYPE has been permanently burned? The Assistance Fund had burned approximately 48.42 million HYPE tokens by September 6, 2026, representing 4.84% of the original 1 billion maximum supply. At a price of $85.50, that burned supply would carry a theoretical market value exceeding $4 billion. CoinGecko reflected this by listing HYPE’s fully diluted supply near 955 million tokens rather than the original 1 billion.

Should I buy or sell HYPE based on unlock events? Token unlocks are one factor among many that affect price. This article examines the historical pattern of HYPE unlock behavior and the structural mechanisms that influence supply and demand. Past performance during unlock events does not guarantee future results. Individual investment decisions should account for personal risk tolerance, portfolio allocation, and overall market conditions. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.

Should I buy or sell HYPE based on unlock events? Token unlocks are one factor among many that affect price. This article examines the historical pattern of HYPE unlock behavior and the structural mechanisms that influence supply and demand. Past performance during unlock events does not guarantee future results. Individual investment decisions should account for personal risk tolerance, portfolio allocation, and overall market conditions. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.

TLDR: HYPE price holds near $85.45 after BHYP added $10.5 million in tokens, ending a four-day pause in purchases by Bitwise clients. Bitwise has accumulated $166.3 million in HYPE since BHYP launched, making the fund the largest HYPE ETF by reported size. Hyperliquid bought and burned 9,730 HYPE worth about $829,500 in one day, extending lifetime burns to 48.42 million tokens. The ETF purchase adds regulated spot demand, while fee-funded burns permanently shrink supply and leave $88.06 as nearby resistance. HYPE price traded near $85.45 as Bitwise clients resumed purchases through the BHYP fund. The product added $10.5 million in HYPE on Friday after recording no purchases for four consecutive days. Arkham data identifies the transaction as BHYP’s largest daily addition since a $23.2 million purchase on August 27.

Total acquisitions have now reached $166.3 million since launch, placing BHYP above rival HYPE products by size. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid bought and burned 9,730 HYPE worth about $829,500 within 24 hours. The two flows pair renewed regulated demand with a steady reduction in the token’s available supply during market strength.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price HYPE Price Finds Support From Bitwise ETF Accumulation BHYP’s renewed activity ends a brief pause that followed several weeks of institutional accumulation. Friday’s $10.5 million purchase represents about 123,000 HYPE at prices near $85.27. The estimate shows the scale of demand entering through one regulated product.

Bitwise launched the spot Hyperliquid ETF in May, offering investors indirect exposure to the Hyperliquid token. The fund also stakes a large portion of its holdings through Bitwise’s internal infrastructure. Staking can add token rewards, although the structure carries operational, liquidity and slashing risks.

Arkham’s figures place cumulative purchases at $166.3 million since launch. That total makes BHYP the largest HYPE ETF by reported size. It also signals that the four-day buying gap did not mark a clear end to client demand.

BITWISE IS BUYING HYPE AGAIN

Bitwise’s BHYP clients didn’t buy any HYPE for 4 days straight. On Friday they bought $10.5M, the biggest day for BHYP since buying $23.2M on August 27.

Bitwise has now bought $166.3M since launch, making it the LARGEST HYPE ETF. pic.twitter.com/l8J01rwinf

— Arkham (@arkham) September 5, 2026

The purchase came while HYPE price held near the upper end of its recent range. Market data placed HYPE price near $85.45, up about 1.5% over 24 hours. HYPE also traded roughly 3% below its $88.06 record, reached on September 3.

Friday’s session ranged from about $83.73 to $86.15. Buyers therefore absorbed weakness below $84 before lifting the token back above $85. Immediate resistance sits near $86.15, followed by the record zone between $87.66 and $88.06.

A sustained move above that area would establish fresh price discovery. Conversely, weakness below $83.70 could expose the September 2 area near $80.25. The ETF purchase offers measurable spot demand, but HYPE price direction still depends on broader trading flows.

Hyperliquid Burns $830,000 While Token Supply Contracts Onchain Lens data shows Hyperliquid acquired and burned 9,730 HYPE during the latest 24-hour period. The tokens carried an average purchase price of $85.27 and a combined value near $829,500. Network documentation states that the assistance fund permanently removes all HYPE from both circulating and total supply.

Lifetime burns have reached 48.42 million HYPE, based on the tracker. At the current HYPE price, those tokens would carry a market value near $4.14 billion. The removed amount equals about 4.84% of the original one-billion-token maximum supply.

HYPERLIQUID BURNS $830K HYPE IN 24 HOURS

Hyperliquid bought and burned 9.73K $HYPE (~$829.5K) over the past 24 hours at an $85.27 average price.

Lifetime:

· 48.42M $HYPE burned
· ~$4.14B at current value
· 4.84% of max supply permanently removed pic.twitter.com/SsqxWR2wRt

— Onchain Lens (@OnchainLens) September 6, 2026

This mechanism links activity on Hyperliquid with recurring market purchases. Trading fees support assistance-fund buying, while each burn reduces the number of issued tokens. Higher platform activity can therefore increase the pace of purchases without creating a fixed schedule.

The latest daily burn is small beside the token’s circulating supply. Still, repeated removals can matter over longer market periods, particularly when ETF demand absorbs additional coins. Friday’s BHYP purchase was almost 13 times larger than the reported 24-hour burn in dollar terms.

The current setup shows two verifiable flows operating together. BHYP provides regulated accumulation, while Hyperliquid’s fee mechanism removes token supply permanently.

The latest burn alone does not automatically raise market valuation because demand, liquidity and broader risk appetite also shape trading. BHYP shares also differ from direct token ownership and carry product-specific fees and risks.

HYPE price now sits between nearby support and its recent record. A break above $88.06 would confirm that buyers have cleared the latest supply area. Holding above $83.70 would preserve the short-term rebound structure established after Friday’s intraday decline.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] is heading into a major supply event, with core contributors set to receive another large chunk of HYPE tokens.

According to the Tokenomist data, on the 6th of September, contributors released just 0.19%, worth $36.56 million, far below the intended 2.32% scheduled allocation.

This gap matters because Hyperliquid faces another 9.92 million HYPE release on the 6th of October, valued near $860 million, representing nearly 3.9–4.5% of the circulating supply.

Needless to say, this creates a substantial risk of dilution if contributors claim and sell heavily.

Source: Tokenomist Moreover, the price of these new tokens is significantly larger than the average daily spot volume. Essentially, this means heavy distributions could cause a tremendous decrease in market liquidity, ultimately putting downward pressure on the price.

However, the September scheduled supply may not reach markets immediately. Therefore, contributor wallet activity will help determine if the 6th of October token distribution causes true selling pressure or another small token distribution.

Bitwise adds $10.5M in HYPE demand While October introduces a potential supply increase, institutional demand is already building another side of HYPE’s liquidity equation. After four days without purchases, Bitwise’s BHYP clients bought $10.5 million in HYPE on on the 4th of September.

With each purchase averaging approximately $85 per token, this totals approximately 123,500 HYPE. Cumulative purchases by the BHYP investor base total $166.3 million.

As such, however, the $10.5 million spent on HYPE by BHYP investors on Friday equates to less than one percent of the 9.92 million tokens set to be unlocked as part of Hype’s October schedule.

Source: Arkham The difference here illustrates how BHYP cannot handle the headline unlock by itself should heavy contributions from participants occur. However, continued institutional demand will likely create softer incremental selling rather than eliminating it.

Furthermore, BHYP inflows would strengthen that buffer, while stalled purchases would leave market liquidity carrying more of the burden.

HYPE burns add another layer of demand The demand supporting HYPE extends beyond outside buyers. This is because Hyperliquid’s trading activity also creates continuous token purchases.

In the last 24 hours, $859,500 in fees generated $823,800 in HYPE-directed revenue as of writing. In turn, this funded purchases of 9,730 tokens.

Those tokens, worth $829,500, were bought near $85.27 before being permanently burned. This mechanism matters because every burn removes purchased HYPE rather than simply shifting tokens between holders.

Source: OnChain Lens According to OnChain Lens, lifetime removals of HYPE have reached 48.42 million HYPE. This accounts for only 4.84% of the 1 billion max HYPE token limit. Although current burns cannot match major unlocks anytime soon, they do continually lower the available pool of HYPE tokens over time.

Thus, increasing trade volume could provide a faster way for HYPE to continue growing internal demand by institutions.

Final Summary Hyperliquid [HYPE] faces a 9.92 million-token October unlock, with actual contributor claims determining the scale of supply pressure. Bitwise demand and Hyperliquid burns provide absorption but remain too small to offset heavy contributor distribution alone.

The Hyperliquid (HYPE) token continues to gain traction, with bullish sentiment strengthening as institutional interest, staking activity, and significant whale accumulation lend support to the price action. At press time, HYPE trades at $85.36 with a 24-hour trading volume of $793.73 million and a market capitalization of $21.47 billion, having risen 1.36% within the last day.

Whale accumulation and staking activityA large investor known for operating the wallet “0x6436” has recently acquired 343,000 HYPE tokens valued at approximately $29.09 million, according to on-chain data shared by the market watcher Lookonchain. This move increases the whale’s position to 3.24 million HYPE tokens, collectively worth around $252 million.

Lookonchain added that this wallet has staked its entire HYPE holdings, indicating a long-term commitment to the project rather than seeking short-term gains. The ongoing accumulation by this major holder has drawn attention among traders, raising confidence in the token’s outlook.

Lookonchain emphasized that the magnitude of accumulation reflects substantial belief in HYPE’s long-term prospects, particularly since the tokens are now held in staking rather than entering the market for sale.

Mini dictionary: Lookonchain is a cryptocurrency analytics platform that tracks large transactions, whale holdings, and on-chain activity to provide insights into market dynamics.

Technical indicators and analyst outlookTechnical analysis on TradingView reveals an ongoing uptrend for HYPE, which climbed to $85.66 after recovering from a low near $50.00. The token is currently supported by a bullish alignment of exponential moving averages, with the 20 EMA at $78.29, the 50 EMA at $70.24, the 100 EMA at $64.14, and the 200 EMA at $56.11. This sequence signals continued positive momentum in the near term.

The MACD technical indicator shows a reading of 6.07, slightly above the signal line at 6.06, with green histogram bars indicating ongoing buyer strength. The price remains above all key moving averages, reinforcing the bullish trend.

Moving AverageLevel20 EMA$78.2950 EMA$70.24100 EMA$64.14200 EMA$56.11Crypto analyst Hov has underlined that the HYPE token’s rally produced notable gains for various entry points. Early buyers at $26 have seen approximately 240% returns, while positions taken near $55 are up over 50%.

ETF inclusion and institutional exposureRecent data from Hyperliquid Daily shows that HYPE has debuted in the Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF, managed by Hashdex, a crypto asset management firm. This marks HYPE’s first inclusion in a US-listed crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF).

With a 3.4% allocation, HYPE is now the fifth largest holding in the fund, following Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana. The addition comes as the fund adjusts its holdings composition, reflecting a decreased weighting for Bitcoin and the inclusion of new assets as they grow in size and liquidity.

For Hyperliquid, the appearance in such a product could signal rising credibility and broader visibility among institutional and traditional investors. The project, initially focused on decentralized perpetual markets, now expands its presence as more investment vehicles take note.

Future changes in HYPE’s ETF allocation are likely to depend on continued growth and liquidity development in the protocol itself.

Inclusion in the Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF positions HYPE closer to established cryptocurrencies as institutional interest accelerates.

The next directional move for the HYPE price will depend on buyers’ ability to sustain gains above key resistance points. While signs point to continued bullish momentum, profit-taking and volatility may follow after the recent sharp advance. If buyers maintain support, a breakout could drive prices toward the $105 target noted in technical setups.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

TLD: Tokenized gold regained crypto-market attention as XAUT activity expanded across decentralized exchanges, lending platforms, and leveraged futures markets. XAUT and PAXG remain leading gold-backed assets on decentralized exchanges, while Uniswap liquidity and collateral integrations widened trading access. Hyperliquid gold open interest returned near $750 million, with whale positioning leaning long as traders reacted to inflation and geopolitical uncertainty. Antalpha-linked wallets accumulated large XAUT positions, while holder growth and rising activity across Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Monad broadened adoption. Tokenized gold has returned to the center of crypto trading after a strong August revival. Traders are using blockchain-based gold for hedging, collateral, and leveraged speculation across decentralized markets. Tether Gold, known as XAUT, remains the largest focus of this renewed activity. CoinGecko shows XAUT trading near $4,430 after gold pulled back from recent highs. 

Trading volumes also remain elevated compared with earlier periods this year. PAXG continues to attract decentralized liquidity alongside it. The shift reflects growing demand for assets linked to inflation protection. Crypto traders also seek new opportunities beyond Bitcoin and altcoins during uncertain global markets.

Gold XAUT Price Tokenized Gold Demand Builds Across DEX and Lending Markets XAUT has led the latest expansion in tokenized gold activity across decentralized finance. Tether increased supply during recent months as demand strengthened among traders and larger wallets.

Market activity accelerated in August, when trading volumes moved close to their 2026 highs. The token also became more useful inside lending platforms and collateral markets.

About $2.39 million in XAUT liquidity was trading through Uniswap V3 during the reported period. That activity helped deepen decentralized access beyond centralized exchanges.

XAUT and PAXG now rank among the most actively traded gold-backed assets on decentralized exchanges. Their liquidity gives crypto traders direct exposure without leaving blockchain markets.

Lighter also added XAUT as collateral, connecting gold exposure with perpetual futures trading. That integration widened the token’s role beyond simple spot ownership.

Holder activity expanded as well. RWA.xyz data showed XAUT reaching 84,756 wallets, representing growth above 16% over 30 days.

More than $4.6 billion in value moved on-chain globally during August. Active addresses topped 53,000 as demand spread across several networks.

Ethereum still hosts most of the token supply. However, BNB Chain and Monad gained more supply recently, suggesting broader use across newer decentralized applications.

Tokenized Gold Gains Momentum in Perpetual Futures Trading Gold also returned as a major perpetual futures market on Hyperliquid through HIP-3. Open interest climbed back toward $750 million, while daily trading reached about $299 million.

Source: Dune Analytics Large traders were mostly positioned on the long side. The biggest tracked long carried more than $273,000 in unrealized gains.

Short sellers faced heavier pressure. The largest reported short position showed unrealized losses near $2.2 million on September 4.

The renewed interest followed stronger demand for defensive assets during inflation concerns and geopolitical uncertainty. Gold also benefited from traders seeking alternatives to semiconductor-linked positions.

Tokenized gold gives those traders a familiar macro asset with crypto-native settlement. It also allows faster movement between collateral, spot trading, and leveraged markets.

A large wallet linked with high probability to Antalpha also attracted attention. The wallet accumulated repeated 1,000 unit tranches while gold traded closer to $4,000.

By September 4, that wallet held about 16,120 XAUT, worth more than $71 million. The wallet showed inflows without visible cash-out activity.

Another Antalpha-linked wallet held more than 33,000 units alongside other assets. Some related wallets actively traded gold and transferred funds toward Bitfinex.

Part of those holdings also moved into custody through Cobo.com. The activity suggests professional investors are using several routes for storage and execution.

The accumulation stands out because repeated purchases appeared during gold’s earlier climb. Those positions gained value as prices advanced through August.

XAUT remains the main tokenized gold asset driving crypto-market interest. Its expanding collateral role, DEX liquidity, and whale ownership are creating more trading paths.

The market is also becoming less dependent on centralized exchanges as decentralized liquidity improves across major chains. That shift may help tokenized gold compete more directly with stablecoins and other real-world assets used as trading collateral.

Abraxas Capital, a London-based digital asset firm managing over $4 billion, just scooped up 16,554 ETH worth roughly $39 million. At the same time, the firm is sitting on 120,178 ETH in short positions on Hyperliquid, the decentralized perpetual futures exchange.

The two-sided trade The firm’s short exposure on the platform has frequently exceeded $700 to $900 million in gross positions across ETH, Bitcoin, and Solana. Of that, Ethereum consistently accounts for the largest single-asset chunk, with ETH shorts ranging between $120 million and $194 million depending on the day.

Earlier in August, Abraxas withdrew 73,872 ETH from Binance over a four-day stretch, a haul worth approximately $173 million. The latest 16,554 ETH purchase adds to that accumulation pattern.

Advertisement

Abraxas is collecting ETH at spot prices while using short positions to earn funding rates and hedge against downside risk. When the market pays you to hold shorts (because long traders are paying a premium), you can accumulate the underlying asset while your short positions generate yield.

Profits in the hundreds of millions On August 29, Abraxas posted a $21 million profit in a single 24-hour window, generated from a portfolio containing $472 million in short positions. That kind of daily return, roughly 4.4% on the short book alone, illustrates why the firm keeps scaling into this approach.

The total short exposure has at times ballooned to between $598 million and $783 million across all assets on Hyperliquid. On-chain analysts have been tracking Abraxas’s wallets closely, and the firm frequently ranks among the platform’s top traders by volume.

Why Hyperliquid matters here Hyperliquid operates on its own Layer-1 blockchain and has carved out a niche as the go-to venue for on-chain perpetual futures trading. Its native token, HYPE, has attracted attention partly because institutional players like Abraxas are generating enormous volume on the platform.

What this means for the ETH market The dual approach of accumulating spot ETH while maintaining enormous short positions suggests Abraxas is positioning for multiple scenarios. If ETH drops, the shorts profit. If ETH rises, the spot holdings appreciate. And regardless of direction, funding rates from perpetual futures provide a steady income stream.

A sudden ETH rally would generate unrealized losses on the shorts that need to be managed carefully, even if the spot book offsets some of that pain. Abraxas has faced unrealized losses during volatile stretches, though cumulative profits have remained positive.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Multicoin Capital has now sold roughly another 10% of its HYPE position, according to blockchain intelligence platform Arkham.

The latest sale leaves the investment firm with approximately $90.5 million worth of HYPE.

This is its largest on-chain holding despite continued sales. 

HOT Stories

Multicoin accumulated roughly 4 million HYPE during February and March, when its position reached a peak. Its current holdings stand at slightly more than one-quarter of that amount. The firm has now sold nearly 75% of its peak position.

In July, Multicoin also made a decision to make a direct investment into the Hyperliquid ecosystem. 

On July 16, Multicoin invested $1.75 million in Trasia Labs, an Asia-focused perpetual futures platform built on Hyperliquid. 

Multicoin was the sole investor in the seed round. This makes the deal notable given the firm’s large HYPE position.

card

And in February, co-founder Kyle Samani stepped back from Multicoin after nearly a decade. He remained chairman of Forward Industries.

HYPE's continued momentum HYPE recently made a debut within Hashdex’s Nasdaq CME Crypto Index ETF (NCIQ). HYPE was added with a roughly 3.4% weighting. 

This is the fund’s fifth-largest holding behind Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP and Solana. This is the first reported inclusion of HYPE in a U.S.-listed crypto index ETF.

HYPE is now also more accessible to U.S. investors. Coinbase currently lists Hyperliquid for trading and offers HYPE-related derivatives, including cash-settled futures. 

There are also some important developments on the institutional side.  Grayscale’s Hyperliquid Staking ETF, HYPG, continues to make the case for HYPE around the token’s economics and Hyperliquid’s growth.