28 June 2026 | 13:38 Ethereum is ending the second quarter of 2026 in a rough spot: two consecutive double-digit negative quarters, a market cap that has slipped out of the global top 100 assets, and a derivatives market where buyers are present but unable to push price higher.
Key Takeaways Ethereum is closing Q2 2026 with two straight double-digit negative quarters. Its market cap has fallen out of the global top 100 assets. Buyers are active in derivatives, but price isn’t responding. The only comparable back-to-back negative Q1 and Q2 were in 2022; 2018 remains the sharpest downside risk scenario for what follows. One of the most telling signals is in the order flow. The Taker Buy/Sell Ratio sits at 1.13, meaning aggressive buyers are outnumbering sellers on Binance. Normally that pushes price up. It isn’t. The Fund Price at $12.59 has been declining since April despite that buying pressure, and that combination is the problem.
What it points to is absorption: the sell orders are large enough to neutralize the incoming buy flow without price responding. When buying pressure exists but price stays flat or falls, the more likely explanation, as the analysis frames it, is distribution, larger holders using bounces to exit, rather than accumulation building a base. It’s worth being precise that order-flow data can’t name who is selling; what it shows is buying being absorbed, and distribution is the reading that best fits that behavior.
On-chain data confirms who is doing the selling. Crypto analyst Ali Charts wrote on X that large-scale holders offloaded roughly 550,000 ETH over the past week, injecting $880 million in sell-side supply into the market. That selling pressure pushed ETH below its immediate $1,633 support floor, with the market now testing critical volume support at $1,583. According to URPD data cited by Ali Charts, losing that level opens a path toward extended liquidations, with the next high-volume demand zones sitting at $1,237 and $1,089 if distribution continues into next week.
2026 in Historical Context The quarterly numbers put the weakness in perspective. Q1 2026 finished at -29.26% and Q2 at -24.75%. The only year in ETH’s recorded history with a comparable back-to-back negative Q1 and Q2 was 2022, which posted -10.75% and -67.34% respectively. 2018 had a positive Q2 (+15.29%) before collapsing in Q3 (-48.69%) and Q4 (-41.62%), making it the relevant downside risk scenario rather than a structural match. In every other year that opened with a negative Q1, ETH recovered in Q2. 2026 has not followed that pattern.
Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2018 -46.61% +15.29% -48.69% -41.62% 2022 -10.75% -67.34% +24.09% -9.94% 2026 -29.26% -24.75% — — That matters for what comes next. The historical Q3 average is +7.4% with a median of +8.19%, and Q3 has been positive in the majority of recorded years, which may normally be an encouraging base rate. But there is some exceptions: in 2018 for example, Q3 came in at -48.69%. So the historical record cuts both ways, the typical Q3 is positive, but still sometimes it was sharply negative.
The Top-100 Milestone ETH falling out of the global top 100 assets by market cap isn’t a separate event, it’s a direct consequence of the price decline. It’s a measure of how far Ethereum’s market cap has compressed relative to the full universe of global assets, equities, commodities, and everything else ranked by size. The milestone is symbolic rather than mechanical, but it captures how much ground the asset has given up.
🚨 WILD: Ethereum is no longer a top 100 asset ranked by market cap. pic.twitter.com/9IRIBJMkq6
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) June 27, 2026
Pulling it together: the order flow shows buyers active but unable to move price, which most plausibly reflects larger holders distributing into strength; the quarterly record shows a two-quarter decline matched structurally only by 2022, with 2018 providing the sharpest downside risk scenario for what follows; and the market-cap milestone underlines the scale of the compression. None of this predicts where ETH goes next. The data describes a market under real structural pressure, with a forward path that the history can frame but not settle.
The signal worth watching into July is straightforward: whether this absorption pattern breaks toward heavier selling, or whether the steady buyer flow finally overcomes the resistance that has been capping it. That probably could give a sign on which way the pressure is resolving.
Ethereum is trading for $1,570 at the time of writing after 6.7% drop for the past 7 days, according to CoinMarketCap data.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a professional before making investment decisions.
Author
Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.
Two consecutive mainnet outages hit Coinbase-incubated Layer 2 network Base on June 25 and 26, with the same sequencer block‑building bug responsible for both disruptions. The first lasted approximately 116 minutes; the second, 20 minutes. According to the official post‑mortem surfaced by WuBlockchain, stale journal state persisted after a failed transaction, producing a block with an invalid state transition that halted the chain. No user funds were affected.
Base’s team quickly fixed the bug and outlined improvements to fuzz testing, load testing, monitoring, and network recovery. Yet the episode does more than demonstrate normal software bugs: it exposes the fragility that still underpins a rollup handling significant DeFi volume and institutional attention.
The Bug That Took Base Offline Sequencers are the heartbeat of an optimistic rollup, ordering transactions and proposing blocks to the base layer. In Base’s case, the same flaw triggered both outages when a failed transaction left the internal journal in a stale state. The sequencer then built a new block using that outdated state, creating an invalid chain transition. Because the network relies on a single sequencer—currently operated by Coinbase—the invalid block propagated and forced a halt.
While base‑layer Ethereum would have simply orphaned a flawed block via consensus, L2s lack that distributed safeguard at the sequencer level. A bug in the ordering node can freeze the entire chain, as it did here. The fact that the same root cause struck twice within 24 hours suggests the initial patch may not have fully addressed the journal‑state logic.
The 136 total minutes of downtime are non‑trivial. For a platform that processes daily active addresses in the hundreds of thousands, any interruption ripples through DeFi protocols, perpetual exchanges, and NFT marketplaces that rely on Base for finality. Liquidations, oracle updates, and bridging transactions all pause, creating potential MEV and pricing distortions once the network resumes.
Sequencer Reliance and Centralization Risks Base’s architecture highlights a broader L2 design choice: centralized sequencers deliver fast block times and predictable MEV capture but introduce a single point of failure. Competitors like Arbitrum and Optimism have begun moving toward decentralized sequencer sets, but Base remains in a transitional phase. The outage is a stark reminder that until failover mechanisms are live, a single software bug can halt the entire chain.
Markets have largely priced in this risk, but the event may amplify calls for sequencer decentralization. The broader L2 ecosystem has seen teams like Arbitrum push updates with high developer activity, as tracked in recent rankings of top blockchains by developer activity. Base, despite its user growth, now faces fresh scrutiny on whether its infrastructure matches its ambitions.
Moreover, the timing coincides with an inflection point for on‑chain real‑world assets. Tokenized treasuries and private credit have crossed $20 billion in total value, as detailed in a recent tokenization roundup. While Base primarily serves crypto‑native use cases today, any L2 aiming to attract institutional settlement must demonstrate mainnet‑grade reliability. A 116‑minute hard stop would be unacceptable for securities settlement.
Base’s engineering response focuses on protocol‑level fuzz testing—feeding unexpected inputs to the sequencer to catch edge cases before they reach production—alongside expanded load testing and faster network recovery pathways. The team acknowledged the need to simulate failed‑transaction scenarios more aggressively. These are sensible stops, but they do not eliminate the risk inherent in a single‑sequencer design.
What remains uncertain is whether future upgrades will introduce a fallback sequencer or decentralized ordering layer. For now, the network’s uptime depends entirely on the robustness of Coinbase’s infrastructure and the thoroughness of its testing suite. Another similar bug that escapes detection could trigger longer outages or, in a worst case, a network halt requiring a manual reset.
The market impact was muted, partly because no funds were lost and the bug was transparently disclosed. Still, users and protocol developers may reconsider their contingency plans when operating on Base. Bridging delays, oracle freezes, and DeFi position liquidations during downtime are real tail risks that cannot be hedged away easily. As L2s absorb an ever‑larger share of on‑chain activity, such operational hiccups become less a technical footnote and more a market‑structure concern.
AUTHOR
Brenda is a writer with three years of experience specializing in cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. She graduated from the University of Mombasa with a degree in Psychology. She has worked at Cryptopolitan and Blockchain Reporter.
Institutional appetite for Ethereum [ETH] continues to weaken as investors reduce exposure to risk assets amid uncertain market conditions. U.S. spot ETH ETFs recently recorded another $12.85 million in net outflows, extending a broader slowdown in fund demand despite cumulative net inflows remaining near $11 billion.
With this reduction, there will be less institutional capital available to buy Ethereum to help stabilize prices as they continue to decline.
Source: SoSoValue As such, Ethereum now relies more heavily on staking demand, layer-2 activity, and natural organic spot buying to help stabilize prices. If Ethereum network demand increases, then it is possible that the markets can begin to absorb some excess supply.
However, if institutional demand does not increase, then we should expect longer-term consolidation and increased vulnerability to sentiment-driven price movements.
ETH bears retain control despite buying pressure Institutional demand has already weakened, and derivatives activity now suggests bearish conviction is strengthening. Market structure may be decisively bearish unless spot flows and leverage flows simultaneously turn positive again.
Meanwhile, the fund price has declined steadily from its April peak to 12.59. This dynamic reflects a fading appetite for leveraged long positions. Moreover, this divergence shows that buyers, though appearing more aggressive, are becoming less effective, leaving bears firmly in control of short‑term price action.
Source: Arkham Although moving assets to this new address does not necessarily indicate that the person behind the transaction is planning to sell their asset. Yet, previous instances of like-sized on-chain asset movements have occurred before liquidity events, making subsequent wallet activity the key signal to monitor.
If the funds remain in self-custody, the transfer will likely reflect routine wallet management. However, deposits to exchanges or OTC counterparties could reinforce existing bearish sentiment and increase expectations of additional selling pressure.
Final Summary Ethereum remained vulnerable as weakening institutional demand and bearish market structure continue limiting recovery momentum. ETH needs stronger spot demand to offset selling pressure and restore sustained bullish momentum.
Let me tell you about a warning that slipped under the radar this week, because while everyone was staring at Ethereum’s price, someone on the inside was quietly raising a flag about something more important.
But first, the price, since I know that is why you are here. ETH is sitting at $1,581, basically flat on the day but down a painful 8.4% on the week, the weakest of the major coins over the past seven days (live ETH price on CoinGecko). It is hovering near a support zone it has tested too many times for comfort. That is the surface story. Here is the one underneath.
The insider warning This week, a former member of the Ethereum Foundation, the nonprofit that has steered Ethereum’s development for years, went public with a concern. As the Foundation steps back from its traditional role and governance shifts to new structures, he warned that Ethereum needs to quickly build new funding institutions to fill the gap, or risk a shortfall in how core development gets paid for.
Think about what that means for a second. Ethereum is not run by a company. There is no CEO writing checks to developers. For years, the Foundation has been the entity making sure the people who build and maintain Ethereum get funded. Now that the Foundation is deliberately pulling back, the question becomes: who pays for the work? If new funding institutions do not stand up fast enough, you could get a gap, a period where critical development is underfunded right as Ethereum is trying to scale.
That is the warning. And it matters because it is structural, not about this week’s candle. It is about who keeps the lights on for the next few years.
Why I am not panicking about it Here is the balance, though, because I do not want to leave you with just the scary part. A funding gap warning is a call to action, not a death sentence, and Ethereum has navigated transitions before.
The on-chain reality is actually encouraging. Ethereum’s active addresses have hit cycle highs, meaning more people are using the network than at almost any point this cycle, even with the ugly price. Treasury companies are still buying ETH by the millions despite sitting on losses, betting on Ethereum as long-term infrastructure. And the Glamsterdam upgrade keeps hitting real performance milestones on its test networks. The technology and the usage are moving forward. The warning is about making sure the funding structure keeps pace, and now that it is out in the open, the community can actually address it.
So I read this less as “Ethereum is in trouble” and more as “an insider just told everyone what to fix.” That is healthy, even if it is uncomfortable.
The supply story is still quietly building One more thing worth your attention, because it keeps not getting priced in. The amount of ETH sitting on exchanges remains near record lows, and the share locked in staking is near record highs. Less ETH available to sell, more of it locked away. That is a supply squeeze building in the background while the price does the opposite.
In a calm market, that tightening would matter. Right now, fear from Bitcoin’s slide to a 20-month low is drowning it out, and ETH, which always moves harder than Bitcoin, is getting hit extra hard. But supply squeezes are patient. They wait. And when sentiment finally turns, a market this tightly wound can move fast.
The levels I am watching Below, the zone around $1,500 is the line. It has held repeatedly, but every test wears it down, so I would not treat it as bulletproof. If it goes, lower levels open up. Above, ETH needs to climb back over $1,700, then $1,800, and the real milestone is reclaiming $2,000, the level it lost on the way down. Get back above $2,000 and you can argue the supply squeeze is finally showing up where it counts.
Where this leaves us Ethereum at $1,581 looks weak, and the near-term trend genuinely is, dragged down by a fearful market and ETH’s habit of falling harder than the rest. I will not pretend otherwise.
But keep your ear to the ground. An insider just flagged a funding gap the community needs to solve, usage is at cycle highs, and a supply squeeze is quietly building that almost nobody is pricing in. Watch $1,500 below and $2,000 above. The price is loud and ugly right now, but the more interesting Ethereum story is the quiet one playing out underneath it.
FAQ What is the Ethereum price today?
Ethereum is trading around $1,581 on June 28, 2026, roughly flat on the day but down 8.4% on the week, the weakest major coin over the past seven days, hovering near the $1,500 support zone.
What is the Ethereum Foundation funding warning?
A former Ethereum Foundation member warned that as the Foundation steps back from its traditional role, Ethereum must quickly build new funding institutions to pay for core development, or risk a funding gap during the governance transition.
Why is Ethereum falling more than other coins?
Ethereum is a higher-beta asset that falls harder than Bitcoin in selloffs. With Bitcoin at a 20-month low and a fearful market, ETH took the worst weekly hit among majors, even as its on-chain usage hit cycle highs.
What are the key Ethereum levels to watch?
The key support is around $1,500, which has held repeatedly but weakens with each test. Above, ETH needs to reclaim $1,700, then $1,800, and the key $2,000 level it lost in the selloff.
Is Ethereum still a good long-term hold?
Ethereum’s usage is at cycle highs, treasury firms keep accumulating, and upgrades progress, but the funding-gap warning is a real structural question to watch. The supply squeeze is also building. This is not investment advice; assess your own risk tolerance.
AUTHOR
Simeon is a detail-driven editor who sharpens every piece with clarity and precision, ensuring clean, consistent, and professional content throughout.
The investigations into the 2026 exploits targeting the Kelp DAO and Humanity Protocol have taken on a new dimension as a result of the most recent on-chain activity.
ZachXBT, a blockchain analyst, noticed that money taken from the two different attacks had recently been mixed.
This suggests that assets from both exploits were moved through the same wallet or transaction flow. Interestingly, this also reveals a connection between the attackers.
How much of the stolen funds were moved? The Humanity Protocol attacker transferred 15,403 ETH, worth $23.6 million, to a relatively new Ethereum [ETH] address, according to Specter. After that, the money was transferred to the Bitcoin [BTC] network, where it was combined with earnings linked to the KelpDAO exploit.
As of now, over $8 million of the stolen money has been laundered by the Humanity Protocol attacker.
For context, the Lazarus Group uses this well-known tactic to combine the profits from various operations into one Bitcoin wallet before transferring them via mixers and over-the-counter desks.
That said, the Kelp DAO exploit drained about $292 million from its LayerZero bridge in April 2026.
Meanwhile, Humanity Protocol lost about $32 million in June. This happened when the hackers gained access to the deployer account and team-controlled wallets via a developer’s compromised device.
Is the exploit linked to the Lazarus Group? Until now, the Humanity Protocol hack had raised suspicions that insiders might have been involved in the attack.
However, the new combination with the Kelp DAO exploit’s laundering trail points to a shared external threat actor or closely related cybercriminal network.
Since the funds were associated with North Korea, the plaintiff argued, they were entitled to confiscate any funds belonging to North Korean-affiliated organizations as part of the money owed in unpaid judgments.
Plaintiffs currently own over $877 million in unpaid judgments against North Korea from U.S. courts.
The continuing risk in DeFi This commingling occurs at a time when MEV bots are also growing in power in on-chain markets.
While these automated systems have now made the market more efficient, the Jaredfromsubway.eth incident shows how skilled attackers can still manipulate even highly specialized trading infrastructure.
Together, these attacks highlight the rising security threats DeFi faces. While all this happens, ETH’s price also fell to an intraday low of $1,581.76 amid the wider market decline.
Final Summary Stolen funds from both Kelp DAO and the Humanity Protocol exploit have been reported to have been commingled. As of the last update, over $8 million of the stolen money has been laundered by the Humanity Protocol attacker.
Bitcoin briefly dipped below $60,000 during the final week of June before buyers stepped in, capping a turbulent seven days driven almost entirely by macroeconomic forces rather than anything crypto-native. As of the latest data, Bitcoin trades at $59,873, Ethereum at $1,564, XRP at $1.04, and Solana at $70.37.
What Drove the Selloff
Expectations of higher interest rates for longer, a stronger US dollar, continued ETF outflows, and broad deleveraging across derivatives markets combined to push the market lower. More than $1 billion in long liquidations amplified the move, a reminder of how leverage continues to magnify short-term price action.
Where Each Asset Landed
Bitcoin’s decline found buyers at levels historically associated with long-term accumulation zones, which Avinash Shekhar, Co-founder and CEO of Pi42, described as the more significant signal from the week. “What stands out is not the decline itself but where it found support,” he said in an interview with Coinpedia.
Ethereum underperformed the broader market, sliding 9.84% on the week to $1,564. XRP showed relative resilience, losing less ground than most major altcoins and ending the week at $1.04, supported by sustained institutional interest tied to spot ETF product growth. Solana held up comparatively well at $70.37, reflecting continued confidence in its ecosystem’s development activity. Dogecoin dropped but remained reactive, ending down 11.97% on the week at $0.073, consistent with its history of quick responses to sentiment shifts.
Capital Is Becoming Selective
Shekhar identified a broader structural shift in how money is moving through the market. “Capital is becoming increasingly selective,” he said. “Rather than moving uniformly across the market, investors are differentiating between assets based on liquidity, institutional participation and ecosystem fundamentals. This marks a notable shift from previous market cycles, where momentum alone often drove broad-based rallies.”
Bitcoin ETFs recorded $1.79 billion in weekly outflows, the second-largest weekly sell-off since their launch. Combined unrealised losses for Michael Saylor and Tom Lee reached $24.5 billion during the week, according to on-chain tracking.
What Comes Next
Shekhar said the next directional move for digital assets will likely be determined by institutional flow data, macroeconomic readings, and monetary policy signals. A recovery in ETF inflows, easing inflation, and improved global liquidity conditions could lay the foundation for renewed momentum. Until those conditions change, he expects markets to remain range-bound with heightened sensitivity to economic data.
“The broader picture, however, remains constructive,” Shekhar said. “Institutional adoption, blockchain infrastructure development and real-world use cases continue to expand despite near-term volatility. Periods of consolidation are increasingly becoming opportunities for stronger fundamentals to emerge.”
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Bitcoin briefly dipped below $60,000 over the weekend, logging a roughly 7% decline in the past week. As the second quarter draws to a close, Bitcoin is on track to post a roughly 12% quarterly drop, following a 22% fall in the first quarter, which would mark a rare back-to-back quarterly loss in its history. Meanwhile, altcoins have generally seen steeper declines than Bitcoin: Ethereum fell around 9.5% in the past week, Dogecoin dropped 11.7%, HYPE slipped 10.6%, XRP declined 8.7%, Solana fell 3.5%, and TRON saw a roughly 1.5% drop. Analysts attribute the market’s ongoing pressure to multiple factors, including sustained capital flows into AI-driven semiconductor and memory chip sectors, persistent outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, the Federal Reserve’s hawkish stance, and the U.S. Dollar Index staying at high levels. The market will watch closely for ETF capital flows and demand improvements in the third quarter to judge whether the crypto market can shake off its weak performance in the first half of the year.
Relevant content
Bank of America: There are three key thresholds for US stocks to trigger a full-scale risk-off move this summer; none of the conditions have been triggered yet, but relevant signals are accumulating.
Bank of America Securities chief strategist Hartnett outlined three triggers for a "full risk-off" environment this summer in his latest Fund Flow Report: Mag7 ETF falling below $60, USD/JPY dropping below 110, and the yield curve inverting again. None of these conditions have been met yet, but signals are building. U.S. equity funds have posted a net outflow of $8.5 billion, the first such outflow since March, following a historic $119.2 billion net inflow. The divergence where hyperscale cloud providers continue to underperform chip stocks has put the sustainability of AI capital expenditure at the center of market debate: Apple’s MacBook price hikes and Microsoft’s Xbox price increases are both directly tied to rising memory costs. Vera Rubin rack memory prices have surged 435% cumulatively, and Goldman Sachs projects AI capital expenditure could reach as high as $1.4 trillion by 2027. Hartnett’s core ongoing question is: How much further do cloud providers need to fall before the market begins pricing in capital expenditure cuts? U.S. equity funds have already shifted ahead of time; liquidity flowing out of tech giants is pouring into cyclical assets like semiconductors, small-caps, housing, and REITs, a move the market interprets as a front-run bet on policy shifting toward "affordability." At the asset class level, Hartnett believes gold still holds strong allocation value below $4,000, and going long on long-dated U.S. Treasuries is the most contrarian long-term trade right now. The U.S. dollar is only suitable for short-term holding rather than long-term allocation, and his strategic view is to go long on emerging markets over the long term. Since Fed Chair Waller took office on May 22, U.S. Treasuries have risen 3.2% cumulatively, while stocks have fallen 1.6%, with bonds significantly outperforming.
1 seconds ago
Samsung Electro-Mechanics plans to sign a 500 billion won large order for AI server MLCCs, and will partner with Sumitomo Chemical to develop glass substrate business.
Samsung Electro-Mechanics is in final negotiations with a major U.S. tech firm over a supply contract for MLCCs (multi-layer ceramic capacitors) for AI servers. Worth around 500 billion won, the deal equals 10% of its component division’s annual revenue last year, making it an extremely large-scale order. Industry sources speculate the client is a leading player with significant clout in the data center sector. Each AI server requires 15,000 to 25,000 MLCCs—over 10 times the number used in a smartphone—with a unit price more than triple that of smartphone-grade MLCCs, earning the component the nickname "golden rice of the AI industry". Samsung Electro-Mechanics currently holds the No.2 position in the global MLCC market with a 20%+ share. The contract is expected to significantly boost its standing in the AI server MLCC market. Industry observers note the deal essentially secures quality validation from a global "big buyer", which will prompt other major tech firms to follow suit. Turning to its glass substrate business, Samsung Electro-Mechanics will formally sign a joint venture agreement with Japan’s Sumitomo Chemical this week. The two firms will invest a combined 500 billion won to set up a glass substrate JV, with Samsung holding a majority stake and contributing around 300 billion won. The JV will be based at the Pyeongtaek plant of Sumitomo Chemical’s South Korean subsidiary Dongwoo Fine-Chem, with production scheduled to launch in early next year. Glass substrates, which offer superior heat resistance to traditional plastic substrates and can accommodate more HBM (high-bandwidth memory) and GPUs, are hailed as "rule changers" for AI semiconductor packaging. Samsung Electro-Mechanics aims to lock in a high-quality supply chain in advance for mass production, while Sumitomo Chemical is using this partnership to enter the next-generation packaging materials market.
1 seconds ago
Crypto KOL Ansem has continued pumping his eponymous meme coin, with ANSEM’s market cap briefly surging past $78 million.
According to GMGN data, Solana ecosystem meme coin ANSEM briefly hit a market cap of over $78 million before pulling back to $74 million. It has seen a 356x price surge in 24 hours, with 24-hour trading volume reaching $49.4 million. Today, crypto KOL Ansem announced on social media that, due to Pump.fun’s refusal to distribute airdrops, he is issuing a “stimmy” (stimulus fund) to “the trenches” — a term referring to on-chain meme coin traders. As of press time, Ansem has been posting buy calls continuously to stoke community sentiment. BlockBeats reminds users: Most meme coins lack real-world use cases and are highly volatile; please protect your assets and avoid FOMO.
1 seconds ago
Serenity: Automotive and robotics supply chains are converging, positioning Germany’s Schaeffler – a key player in core components – for a pricing revaluation.
Serenity has released an analysis on whether automotive and robotics supply chains are converging, taking Germany’s Schaeffler (market cap ~€7.47 billion) as a key case study. Schaeffler has partnered with 45 humanoid robot firms, with its product portfolio covering core components including bearings, gearboxes, sensors/ECUs, actuators, and power electronics. The company estimates its products make up roughly 50% of a humanoid robot’s bill of materials, and targets 10% of the segment’s market share. However, Schaeffler’s 2030 robotics revenue forecast is only in the hundreds of millions of euros—far lower than Elon Musk’s optimistic outlook for the market. Serenity dubs this a typical "sandbagging forecast," a deliberate understatement. Serenity also highlighted other notable targets, such as Nabtesco (focused on joint reducers) and Sanhua Intelligent Controls, which supplies components for Tesla’s Optimus robot. On the investment front, Serenity argues these traditional auto parts firms are currently undervalued due to drag from their core automotive businesses, while humanoid robots and AI-powered vehicles will serve as key growth vectors. The chairman of TSMC recently also cited AI vehicles as a growth vector. But a critical prerequisite is the emergence of killer apps and leading downstream players—similar to ChatGPT or Anthropic—to truly drive the entire upstream supply chain ecosystem. Currently, robotics business accounts for only ~1% of these firms’ total revenue, so the market remains focused on immediate bottlenecks like memory chips and MLCCs in the short term. Serenity predicts that as humanoid robots evolve along different architectural routes, future "unexpected supply chain bottleneck surprises"—akin to HBM or MLCC—will emerge, bringing pricing power and revaluation opportunities for early-positioned companies. In terms of timing, post-2027 is likely to act as a clear catalyst.
1 seconds ago
Jupiter’s Strategic Reserve Trust Fund has added approximately 177,500 JUP tokens, bringing the total value of its holdings to around $31.4 million.
Jupiter’s Strategic Reserve Trust Fund, nicknamed the Jupiter Litterbox Trust, added 177,570 JUP tokens yesterday, worth approximately $39,000. This month, the fund has accumulated 13,346,232 JUP in purchases, valued at around $2.93 million. As of press time, its total JUP purchases reach 142,703,464, worth roughly $31.4 million. The Jupiter Strategic Reserve Trust Fund is Jupiter’s official on-chain treasury, with 50% of the protocol’s revenue automatically allocated to it. It uses smart contracts to continuously buy and hold JUP tokens on the open market, earning the community’s "Litterbox Trust" moniker.
1 seconds ago
A crypto whale placed a single $5.455 million buy order for SK Hynix on Binance, briefly lifting its contract price to $1,830.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (@ai_9684xtpa), a whale made a single purchase of SK Hynix (ticker: SKHYNIX) worth $5.455 million on Binance. Market data shows that the SKHYNIX contract price on Binance briefly rose to $1,830 and has now fallen back to $1,786.
Ethereum has shown signs of recovery from recent lows, sparking a debate among analysts about whether this move signals a sustained upward trend or merely a temporary bounce ahead of another downturn. The split comes as the crypto market remains sensitive to technical signals and broader sentiment shifts.
Ethereum price recovers, cautious sentiment remainsAt the time of reporting, ETH is trading at $1,580.68, registering a 1.95% gain over the past 24 hours. Its daily trading volume stands at $19.35 billion, while the market capitalization has reached $190.76 billion—accounting for 9.17% of the total cryptocurrency market. As the largest blockchain for smart contracts and decentralized apps, Ethereum continues to be a central player in the digital asset ecosystem.
More Crypto Online, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), highlighted that Ethereum established a new low on Friday, suggesting a possible end to the third wave of its correction. The analyst argued that the current rebound could represent a fourth wave often seen before a fresh downturn. While some short-term improvement is evident, several experts remain skeptical about a major bullish reversal at this stage.
More Crypto Online emphasized that the recent rebound does not necessarily mark the end of Ethereum’s primary downward trend and currently appears to be a corrective move rather than a definitive turnaround.
According to this scenario, the first key resistance zone lies between $1,605 and $1,668. If buyers manage to push ETH above this range, the next targets are $1,823 and then $2,224. Nonetheless, many analysts view the current price movement as a technical correction rather than the onset of a strong rally.
Buyers step in on short-term structureOn the other hand, analysts using the Smart Money Concepts framework are painting a more constructive picture in the short term. They note that Ethereum dipped briefly below previous lows before bouncing sharply from the $1,670 to $1,690 demand zone. This price action is considered a “liquidity sweep” where selling pressure is absorbed and buyers regain control.
Glossary: The Smart Money Concepts approach is a technical analysis method that focuses on liquidity zones, supply-demand areas, and market structure, aiming to track activity from major market players.
Following the recent bounce, Ethereum has established a pattern of higher lows. Analysts suggest that if ETH can break through the $1,735 to $1,755 resistance zone, it would strengthen the bullish outlook. Short-term targets then become $1,750 and $1,800, with the primary target area seen between $1,830 and $1,850.
Support zone could be decisive for directionThe same analysis indicates that a previous long trade captured a move from $1,700 to $1,778—roughly an 780-point swing. However, the price has since pulled back and is now revisiting the $1,680 to $1,690 demand zone. Market watchers are closely monitoring whether this area will attract renewed buying interest in the near term.
If demand persists in this region, Ethereum could regain upward momentum, targeting the $1,830 to $1,850 band. Conversely, failure to surpass nearby resistance or a breakdown below key support could leave the recent rally as only a temporary reaction.
Ethereum’s price direction is significant not just for its own valuation, but for overall market sentiment. As the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, its performance has an outsized impact on the decentralized finance ecosystem, altcoins, and broader risk appetite across crypto markets.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
A prominent Ethereum MEV bot reportedly lost between $7.5 million and $15 million in a counter-MEV exploit. The attacker allegedly used fake token contracts to bait approvals and drain assets. The incident highlights approval hygiene risks for automated on-chain trading systems. Security Alert: The MEV bot JaredfromSubway.eth was exploited.
— BlockSec (@BlockSecTeam) June 26, 2026
Approval Hygiene And Automated On-Chain Agents: Why This Story Matters Top Ethereum MEV Bot JaredfromSubway.eth Drained of Up to $15M in Counter-MEV Honeypot Exploit has become one of the stronger weekend crypto stories because it sits at the intersection of price action, market structure, and the kind of narrative that traders tend to follow closely when the broader news cycle slows down.
The key point is not simply that jaredfromSubway.eth suffered losses estimated between $7.5 million and $15 million. It is that the development gives the market a fresh way to judge whether the current crypto environment is being driven by genuine network adoption, regulatory progress, liquidity shifts, or short-term speculation.
The Main Details According to the official source material, JaredfromSubway.eth suffered losses estimated between $7.5 million and $15 million. The report also notes that the exploit used fake token contracts and approval mechanics against the bot.
That distinction matters because crypto markets often move first on headlines and only later separate durable developments from short-lived momentum. In this case, the verified boundaries are especially important: Do not provide a step-by-step exploit replication guide.
Market Context For traders, the story arrives at a moment when crypto assets are still trying to define a clearer direction. Bitcoin remains the anchor for broader sentiment, but altcoin narratives are increasingly being judged on their own fundamentals, including usage, liquidity, compliance, treasury activity, and developer progress.
That makes this development relevant beyond a single token or company. If the underlying trend proves durable, it could help shape how investors evaluate Ethereum, MEV, Security, Exploit, BlockSec over the coming weeks. If it fades, however, it may become another example of a strong weekend narrative that struggled to translate into sustained market follow-through.
What To Watch Next The next important question is whether the market receives further confirmation from primary sources, dashboards, official announcements, or on-chain data. Follow-up disclosures, exchange data, governance updates, or wallet activity could all help clarify whether this is an isolated headline or the start of a broader theme.
Readers should also watch whether liquidity responds. In crypto, even fundamentally meaningful developments can fail to move prices if traders remain defensive, leverage is being unwound, or capital is rotating into other sectors. That is why this story should be read alongside broader market structure rather than in isolation.
This report is based on information from BlockSec.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
BitMine and BMNP Stocks Have Been in a Steep Sell-OffThe recently launched BitMine Immersion 9.5% Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock (BMNP) has dropped in the last 12 consecutive days. It ended the week at $81, down from record high of $92.97.
Investors have dumped these securities amid concerns that the parent companies may be forced to further dilute existing shareholders or sell portions of their cryptocurrency holdings to fund dividend payments.
BitMine is in a better position than Strategy. For one, it has already bought 5.6 million ETH coins and has about 400k coins to buy. If the trend continues, it will complete its acquisition in the next few months.
BitMine is also making money from its Ethereum holdings through staking program, which is earning about 3% in annual return.
Ethereum Price is at Risk of Further DownsideLee’s justification for Ethereum holdings is also facing challenges as its fundamentals deteriorate. Recent data shows that its network fees have plunged to just $90 million this year from the $523 million it made last year.
Its total value locked in the decentralized finance industry has plunged by over 60% from its peak last year, while the amount of tokenized assets has fallen by over 5% in the last 30 days. Demand for ETH ETFs has also waned, with outflows rising to over $1 billion this year.
Technicals also suggest that ETH price may drop further in the near term. It has remained below the 50-day moving average and formed an inverted cup-and-handle pattern. These technicals suggest that it may drop to as low as $1,000 in the near term, affecting BitMine’s holdings.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Analysis: Weak demand from U.S. institutions may keep Bitcoin under pressure and range-bound in the short term.
Bitfire Group stated in its latest market commentary that Bitcoin’s negative premium on Coinbase has continued to widen, signaling persistent weakness in U.S. institutional buying. Meanwhile, Strategy’s income preferred stock (ticker: STRC) briefly dipped below $84. Though there is no immediate liquidation risk, market concerns over whether the firm will need to sell Bitcoin continue to weigh on sentiment. From a technical perspective, Bitcoin remains trading below its 20-day and 50-day moving averages, with short-term MAs in a bearish alignment. The daily RSI stands at around 40—weak but not yet in oversold territory. The overall Bollinger Bands are sloping downward, with the middle band acting as strong resistance. Bitfire Group believes that with a lack of sustained bullish momentum and bears still holding the upper hand, Bitcoin will likely continue fluctuating below resistance levels in the short term, further testing actual buying demand on the downside. Key resistance levels are at $64,650, $66,900, and $69,800, while the main support level is at $63,500.
1 seconds ago
Chinese crypto figure Ma Ji sold 34 Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs recently to cover his positions, netting 326 ETH from the sale and incurring a loss of 399 ETH.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, renowned NFT collector Machi Big Brother recently allegedly sold Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs to fund his long ETH position on Hyperliquid. Data shows that over the past month, Machi has sold a total of 34 BAYC NFTs, raising 326 ETH (approximately $514,000), but incurring a total loss of 399 ETH (about $631,000). Bored Ape #6057 was his most loss-making transaction: the NFT was purchased four years ago for 76.84 ETH, and recently sold for only 7.65 ETH, representing a roughly 90% loss. Meanwhile, Machi’s long ETH position on Hyperliquid has been liquidated multiple times recently. Lookonchain noted that he was liquidated again approximately 3 hours ago, leaving his account balance at around $81,000.
1 seconds ago
Thailand has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of money laundering through illegal cryptocurrency mining.
Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of belonging to a criminal organization that allegedly uses illegal cryptocurrency mining to launder proceeds from fraud and online gambling. Wang, a former leader of the Thai-China Trade Association, is identified as a core figure in the involved Chinese investor group. Reuters’ 2023 investigative report, which centered on Wang, revealed that a U.S. blockchain analytics firm found fraud-related cryptocurrency wallets had sent millions of dollars to accounts under Wang’s name, while he actively cultivated ties with top Thai political and law enforcement officials at the time. A DSI spokesperson stated Wang was charged last November with theft and violations of the Computer Crime Act, adding that he is believed to have fled Thailand, and authorities are tracking his whereabouts in cooperation with international partners. Separately, Thai authorities have also issued arrest warrants for four unnamed Chinese nationals and four unnamed Myanmar nationals.
1 seconds ago
US-Iran conflict escalates for three consecutive days: Iran targets US military base in Kuwait with missiles and drones, Trump warns "Iran will cease to exist"
According to CNN, the situation has reversed sharply after the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal took effect, with military clashes breaking out for three consecutive days between the two sides, multiple Gulf countries drawn into the conflict, and the Strait of Hormuz facing renewed severe threats to navigation. In the latest development, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have struck U.S. military facilities in Kuwait and Bahrain with missiles and drones in retaliation for earlier U.S. airstrikes. Kuwaiti military confirmed its air defense systems are intercepting incoming targets, while Bahrain's Interior Ministry issued an alert urging residents to head to the nearest safe locations immediately. For the U.S. military, U.S. Central Command announced multiple rounds of strikes on Iran's missile and drone storage facilities, military surveillance infrastructure, communication systems, air defense positions and mine-laying capabilities, citing Iran's "continuous attacks on merchant ships". Trump immediately issued the sternest warning on social media, saying that if Iran does not stop the attacks, the U.S. military will be forced to "complete the tasks already initiated by military means", and that "the Islamic Republic of Iran will cease to exist". Iran responded firmly, with the IRGC stating that the U.S. airstrikes violated the ceasefire deal and "will lead to a complete halt of all diplomatic processes". Meanwhile, the Israeli military launched a drone attack in southern Lebanon just one day after a framework agreement was reached between Israel and Lebanon, further complicating the regional situation. The preliminary agreement signed by the U.S. and Iran this month aimed at restoring navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is facing the risk of complete collapse amid the continuous clashes, and market concerns over oil prices, safe-haven assets and global energy supplies are rising sharply.
1 seconds ago
Whale "sat0shi777" is trapped in both long and short positions simultaneously, with total unrealized losses exceeding $3 million on a combined position worth $102 million.
According to EmberCN’s monitoring, on-chain whale address "sat0shi777" recently executed a rare operation of being trapped in both long and short positions simultaneously. On June 24, the whale opened a long position of 468 BTC at an average price of $62,729, with a position size of approximately $29.38 million. Shortly after, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, and the long position currently has an unrealized loss of around $1.86 million. Yesterday morning, amid a downtrend, the whale added to a short position of 47,500 ETH at an average price of $1,536, with a position size of roughly $72.94 million. However, ETH did not continue to decline afterward, and the short position currently shows an unrealized loss of about $1.23 million. The combined market value of the two positions is approximately $102.32 million, with a total unrealized loss of over $3.09 million, leaving the whale in the red on both long and short sides.
1 seconds ago
A new crypto address has increased its holdings by 1,350 BTC, valued at approximately $81.87 million.
According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a newly created wallet address bc1q4m has withdrawn 1,350 BTC from Binance, worth approximately $81.87 million at current prices.
Analysis: Weak demand from U.S. institutions may keep Bitcoin under pressure and range-bound in the short term.
Bitfire Group stated in its latest market commentary that Bitcoin’s negative premium on Coinbase has continued to widen, signaling persistent weakness in U.S. institutional buying. Meanwhile, Strategy’s income preferred stock (ticker: STRC) briefly dipped below $84. Though there is no immediate liquidation risk, market concerns over whether the firm will need to sell Bitcoin continue to weigh on sentiment. From a technical perspective, Bitcoin remains trading below its 20-day and 50-day moving averages, with short-term MAs in a bearish alignment. The daily RSI stands at around 40—weak but not yet in oversold territory. The overall Bollinger Bands are sloping downward, with the middle band acting as strong resistance. Bitfire Group believes that with a lack of sustained bullish momentum and bears still holding the upper hand, Bitcoin will likely continue fluctuating below resistance levels in the short term, further testing actual buying demand on the downside. Key resistance levels are at $64,650, $66,900, and $69,800, while the main support level is at $63,500.
1 seconds ago
Chinese crypto figure Ma Ji sold 34 Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs recently to cover his positions, netting 326 ETH from the sale and incurring a loss of 399 ETH.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, renowned NFT collector Machi Big Brother recently allegedly sold Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs to fund his long ETH position on Hyperliquid. Data shows that over the past month, Machi has sold a total of 34 BAYC NFTs, raising 326 ETH (approximately $514,000), but incurring a total loss of 399 ETH (about $631,000). Bored Ape #6057 was his most loss-making transaction: the NFT was purchased four years ago for 76.84 ETH, and recently sold for only 7.65 ETH, representing a roughly 90% loss. Meanwhile, Machi’s long ETH position on Hyperliquid has been liquidated multiple times recently. Lookonchain noted that he was liquidated again approximately 3 hours ago, leaving his account balance at around $81,000.
1 seconds ago
Thailand has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of money laundering through illegal cryptocurrency mining.
Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of belonging to a criminal organization that allegedly uses illegal cryptocurrency mining to launder proceeds from fraud and online gambling. Wang, a former leader of the Thai-China Trade Association, is identified as a core figure in the involved Chinese investor group. Reuters’ 2023 investigative report, which centered on Wang, revealed that a U.S. blockchain analytics firm found fraud-related cryptocurrency wallets had sent millions of dollars to accounts under Wang’s name, while he actively cultivated ties with top Thai political and law enforcement officials at the time. A DSI spokesperson stated Wang was charged last November with theft and violations of the Computer Crime Act, adding that he is believed to have fled Thailand, and authorities are tracking his whereabouts in cooperation with international partners. Separately, Thai authorities have also issued arrest warrants for four unnamed Chinese nationals and four unnamed Myanmar nationals.
1 seconds ago
US-Iran conflict escalates for three consecutive days: Iran targets US military base in Kuwait with missiles and drones, Trump warns "Iran will cease to exist"
According to CNN, the situation has reversed sharply after the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal took effect, with military clashes breaking out for three consecutive days between the two sides, multiple Gulf countries drawn into the conflict, and the Strait of Hormuz facing renewed severe threats to navigation. In the latest development, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have struck U.S. military facilities in Kuwait and Bahrain with missiles and drones in retaliation for earlier U.S. airstrikes. Kuwaiti military confirmed its air defense systems are intercepting incoming targets, while Bahrain's Interior Ministry issued an alert urging residents to head to the nearest safe locations immediately. For the U.S. military, U.S. Central Command announced multiple rounds of strikes on Iran's missile and drone storage facilities, military surveillance infrastructure, communication systems, air defense positions and mine-laying capabilities, citing Iran's "continuous attacks on merchant ships". Trump immediately issued the sternest warning on social media, saying that if Iran does not stop the attacks, the U.S. military will be forced to "complete the tasks already initiated by military means", and that "the Islamic Republic of Iran will cease to exist". Iran responded firmly, with the IRGC stating that the U.S. airstrikes violated the ceasefire deal and "will lead to a complete halt of all diplomatic processes". Meanwhile, the Israeli military launched a drone attack in southern Lebanon just one day after a framework agreement was reached between Israel and Lebanon, further complicating the regional situation. The preliminary agreement signed by the U.S. and Iran this month aimed at restoring navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is facing the risk of complete collapse amid the continuous clashes, and market concerns over oil prices, safe-haven assets and global energy supplies are rising sharply.
1 seconds ago
Whale "sat0shi777" is trapped in both long and short positions simultaneously, with total unrealized losses exceeding $3 million on a combined position worth $102 million.
According to EmberCN’s monitoring, on-chain whale address "sat0shi777" recently executed a rare operation of being trapped in both long and short positions simultaneously. On June 24, the whale opened a long position of 468 BTC at an average price of $62,729, with a position size of approximately $29.38 million. Shortly after, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, and the long position currently has an unrealized loss of around $1.86 million. Yesterday morning, amid a downtrend, the whale added to a short position of 47,500 ETH at an average price of $1,536, with a position size of roughly $72.94 million. However, ETH did not continue to decline afterward, and the short position currently shows an unrealized loss of about $1.23 million. The combined market value of the two positions is approximately $102.32 million, with a total unrealized loss of over $3.09 million, leaving the whale in the red on both long and short sides.
1 seconds ago
A new crypto address has increased its holdings by 1,350 BTC, valued at approximately $81.87 million.
According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a newly created wallet address bc1q4m has withdrawn 1,350 BTC from Binance, worth approximately $81.87 million at current prices.
Key Takeaways Ethereum has declined 23.5% in the past month, currently trading near $1,557 Large ETH holder groups are experiencing unrealized losses for the first time in five years Ethereum ETF products are approaching their seventh consecutive week of capital withdrawals A protocol developer highlights potential funding shortfall of approximately $30M annually in coming months Critical price levels: support zone at $1,500–$1,510; overhead resistance begins at $1,710 The world’s second-largest cryptocurrency has faced relentless downward pressure during June, sliding from levels above $2,000 to approximately $1,557 by June 26. This represents a monthly decline of 23.5%, with an additional 6.7% drawdown occurring over the past seven days alone.
Ethereum (ETH) Price In a symbolic shift, Tether’s total market capitalization has now surpassed Ethereum’s for the first time in history — $186.06 billion compared to $185.66 billion — underscoring ETH’s recent underperformance in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Market analyst Ted Pillows commented via social media that Ethereum “tapped the lows again” and observed that “momentum is still weak due to broader market correction.” He suggested that if ETH can successfully reclaim the $1,750 threshold, a potential relief bounce could materialize in the following month.
$ETH tapped the lows again.
The momentum is still weak due to broader market correction.
But if Ethereum manages to reclaim the $1,750 level from here, we could see a relief rally next month. pic.twitter.com/xuePKd79Le
— Ted (@TedPillows) June 26, 2026
Technical analysis of the daily timeframe reveals that ETH violated an ascending trendline established in February. Following this breakdown, the asset experienced rapid declines through the $1,900, $1,800, and ultimately into the $1,550 region.
Major Holder Groups Recording Rare Loss Scenario Data from CryptoQuant indicates that all significant Ethereum whale categories — including addresses controlling more than 100,000 ETH — are currently experiencing unrealized losses. This phenomenon has occurred only once previously, during 2019, which ultimately marked a long-term price floor for the cryptocurrency.
🚨 #Ethereum whales are underwater for the first time since 2019.
The chart shows all major whale cohorts sitting at unrealized losses—a rare event that has historically aligned with macro bottom zones.
Historically, capitulation among large holders has coincided with market bottoms rather than signaling further deterioration. While smaller whale categories have periodically entered loss territory, the participation of the largest stakeholders in this condition represents an exceptional occurrence.
The Estimated Leverage Ratio (ELR) metric has simultaneously contracted from 1.11 to 0.85 throughout the past three weeks. This movement indicates substantial closure or liquidation of leveraged trading positions, potentially alleviating additional downside risk.
Exchange-Traded Fund Withdrawals and Development Financing Concerns Ethereum spot ETF products are tracking toward seven straight weeks of net capital outflows, with the current period positioned to register the most significant withdrawals since January, based on SoSoValue analytics.
Trent Van Epps, Protocol Guild coordinator who recently departed the Ethereum Foundation following a five-year tenure, has issued a cautionary statement regarding core development financing challenges. He calculates that Ethereum’s essential development operations require approximately $30 million annually, an amount the Ethereum Foundation’s reserves may struggle to consistently provide.
Van Epps noted that Protocol Guild has allocated nearly $40 million to developers across four years, but emphasized this remains insufficient. He anticipates new institutional participants will need to emerge within the coming months to address the gap.
Primary technical levels to monitor: downside support positioned at $1,510 and the psychologically significant $1,500 level; upside resistance located at $1,710 and $1,774. The MACD indicator has returned to negative territory, with the signal line currently registering -78.35.
Amid the ongoing crypto weakness, Ethereum [ETH] remains underwater, down 20%-45% YTD. Despite this drawdown, the leading altcoin continues to draw institutional interest.
SharpLink resumed purchases after eight months, adding 5,000 ETH, worth roughly $7.88 million at an average price of $1,576, through FalconX.
Moments later, the crypto treasury reinforced the inflow with another 26.324K LSETH worth $45.54 million. These purchases pushed Sharplink’s total holdings to 876,285 ETH, including 22,102 staked tokens.
Source: Arkham Although the treasury holds nearly $1.71 billion in unrealized losses, accumulation suggests conviction in Ethereum’s long-term utility and staking income.
If broader institutions continue absorbing weakness, selling pressure could gradually ease. However, sustained recovery still depends on renewed network demand and improving market sentiment.
Whales increase Ethereum exposure That institutional conviction is no longer limited to corporate treasuries. Instead, whale wallets are beginning to mirror the same accumulation pattern despite lingering market uncertainty.
In the last nine days, a newly created wallet accumulated 18,361 ETH worth $28.9 million, alongside 152,986 Hyperliquid [HYPE] worth $9.73 million through FalconX.
Source: Arkham The consistent buildup of assets by this whale indicates that these larger whales are creating exposures for future price swings instead of trying to react to each day’s price movement.
At the same time, BlackRock moved 2,700 Bitcoin [BTC] and 41,996 ETH to Coinbase, totaling $226 million. These moves are usually related to either ETFs settling transactions, adjusting custodial services, or managing liquidity.
Source: Arkham However, they do not directly represent a sale. Whether whales continue to accumulate Ethereum or institutions become active will be key to determining the long-term outlook of Ethereum.
All in all, whale accumulation and institutional activity suggest confidence is gradually rebuilding, even as broader market demand still needs to strengthen.
ETF outflows cap Ethereum’s recovery Yet that rebuilding confidence has not translated into broader institutional demand. According to SosoValue data, Spot ETFs have experienced heavy outflow, recording a $12.85 million net withdrawal on June 26th.
Earlier inflows of $22.50 million and $9.59 million briefly suggested sentiment was stabilizing before sellers regained control. This divergence indicates that direct treasury buyers and ETF investors are responding to different market conditions.
This divergence by treasuries and ETF investors reflects differing market conditions. Although the huge amount of capital withdrawn from these accounts has resulted in cumulative net inflows being a high $10.90 billion.
Meanwhile, ETF issuers still hold over $8.38 billion, representing 4.42% of Ethereum’s market value, with a daily trading volume of $491.73 million, suggesting that institutions will continue to realign positions rather than abandon ETH entirely.
Final Summary Ethereum [ETH] treasury and whale buying continue despite weak prices, reinforcing long-term institutional conviction. Ethereum recovery still requires stronger ETF inflows to offset persistent institutional outflows.
Key Highlights An Ethereum wallet associated with Vitalik Buterin sent 7,000 ETH valued at $11.06 million to a fresh address This transaction followed approximately twelve months of wallet dormancy Blockchain intelligence suggests the transfer could precede a centralized exchange deposit This address had earlier transferred 1,300 ETH ($3.19 million) that subsequently landed on Paxos The originating wallet maintains a balance of 20,001 ETH, currently valued near $31.6 million On June 27, blockchain observers detected significant activity from wallet address 0xD04, which has connections to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin. The address initiated a transfer of 7,000 ETH to a previously unused wallet, representing approximately $11.06 million at prevailing market rates.
Blockchain surveillance platform Onchain Lens identified and reported the transaction. Notably, this wallet had remained inactive for nearly a full year prior to executing this significant transfer.
Experts analyzing blockchain data indicate the transferred assets will likely find their way to a centralized exchange platform, drawing this conclusion from the wallet’s established transaction patterns.
This recent activity isn’t unprecedented for this particular address. In a prior transaction, the wallet moved 1,300 ETH valued at roughly $3.19 million. Those digital assets ultimately were deposited with Paxos, a compliance-focused cryptocurrency infrastructure provider.
Historical Transaction Patterns Suggest Exchange Destination The consistent activity pattern exhibited by this wallet has prompted on-chain intelligence analysts to forecast that a centralized exchange deposit represents the probable destination for the recently transferred ETH.
Onchain Lens specializes in surveillance of prominent and publicly-identified cryptocurrency addresses for transactional movements. The platform detected and reported this transfer within moments of its confirmation on Ethereum’s distributed ledger.
As of publication, the receiving wallet had not initiated any outbound transactions with the transferred funds. Market participants and blockchain analysts continue monitoring the address for subsequent activity.
Following this substantial outflow, the 0xD04 wallet continues to hold 20,001 ETH, representing a dollar value of roughly $31.6 million. This indicates that the majority of the address’s digital asset holdings remain unaffected.
At the moment of transfer execution, Ethereum was changing hands at approximately $1,583, reflecting a modest 2% increase over the preceding 24-hour period.
Implications for Ethereum Market Observers Substantial cryptocurrency movements from prominent wallets consistently generate discussion within digital asset markets. Market participants frequently monitor transfers from influential addresses as potential indicators of distribution or selling pressure.
Nevertheless, relocating funds to a different wallet doesn’t necessarily confirm liquidation intent. Asset transfers may serve various purposes including enhanced security protocols, custodial reorganization, or administrative requirements without any disposition plans.
Vitalik Buterin has maintained public transparency regarding his ETH holdings and has executed numerous transactions throughout the years for philanthropic contributions and various other objectives.
Ethereum’s transparent blockchain architecture ensures that any transaction originating from addresses connected to prominent individuals becomes instantly observable to the broader public.
Blockchain analytics platforms such as Onchain Lens have democratized access to real-time wallet monitoring capabilities for the general public.
This 0xD04 address transaction represents another demonstration of how distributed ledger transparency provides market observers with immediate insight into the behavior of significant token holders.
Neither Vitalik Buterin nor any authorized representatives have issued public commentary explaining the rationale behind this particular transfer.
At the time of article publication, the receiving wallet had not forwarded the transferred assets to any cryptocurrency exchange platform.
Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs just posted their seventh straight day of net outflows. For an asset class that was supposed to open the floodgates for institutional capital, the persistence of the bleed is starting to raise uncomfortable questions. On June 26, Bitcoin ETFs shed $445 million and Ethereum counterparts lost $12.848 million, according to the original report from WuBlockchain citing SoSoValue data.
The weeklong run of redemptions strips away the gloss from the spot ETF narrative. Both products had been pitched as passive entry ramps for cautious institutions. Instead, the flow data suggests a market that is either taking profits or quietly repositioning ahead of potential headwinds. The Bitcoin figure dwarfs Ethereum’s, but the direction is the same—and the cumulative signal matters more than the daily size.
Investors Pull Back as Uncertainty Builds Seven days of outflows is not a blip. It reflects a shift in the behavior of the money that moves these products. ETF creation and redemption activity is driven by authorized participants and large traders, not retail nibbling. When that cohort steps back, it usually means the arbitrage or directional case has weakened. The timing aligns with a period when the broader macro backdrop is offering fewer easy cues, and the crypto-specific catalysts have turned thin.
What’s notable is that the outflows hit Bitcoin far harder than Ethereum. The gap—$445 million versus under $13 million—tells its own story. Bitcoin ETFs have deeper liquidity and a more mature institutional base, so they act as the fastest exit valve. Ethereum ETFs, still building their audience, are less responsive. But the steady Ethereum drain, even if small, suggests that the sentiment is not asset-specific. It’s a sector-wide cooling.
Parallel market signals reinforce the caution. The broader tokenization market attracted heavy institutional attention in the same period, with real-world asset deals moving billions. That contrast—outflows from pure crypto ETFs while tokenized traditional assets gain traction—hints at a rotation rather than a broad retreat. Institutions haven’t abandoned digital assets; they’re just repricing where and how they want exposure.
Regulatory Noise and a Bifurcated Market Another factor weighing on ETF demand is the mess in Washington. A high-stakes legislative battle is unfolding just days before a Senate vote on landmark crypto legislation. Banks are pushing for last-minute changes that could reshape how digital assets are regulated. For ETF investors who rely on clear rules of the road, the sight of eleventh-hour political maneuvering is not a buy signal. It adds a layer of binary risk that professional desks tend to discount by reducing exposure until the outcome is known.
Meanwhile, the altcoin market is ignoring the ETF gloom. Some altcoins logged triple-digit weekly gains, driven by project-specific catalysts and fresh liquidity flowing outside the ETF wrapper. That divergence shows the limits of reading broad market health from ETF flows alone. The spot products capture institutional sentiment, but a large part of the market still operates on different time horizons and risk appetites.
What Comes Next The immediate question is whether the outflows accelerate or stabilize. Historically, ETF flow streaks tend to cluster because redemption activity is often programmatic—if a key arbitrage spread closes or a risk limit is breached, the selling can feed on itself for days. The hope is that this is a tactical unwind rather than a structural exodus. But the longer the streak extends, the more it colors the narrative around institutional demand.
Market participants will now watch two things. First, whether Ethereum ETF flows start to catch up with Bitcoin’s, which would confirm a broad-based withdrawal. Second, whether any regulatory clarity or macro shift interrupts the pattern. Until then, the spot ETFs are telling a story that no one in the crypto market wanted to hear: the easiest institutional money might already be leaving.
AUTHOR
Peter Mwangi is an accomplished crypto news writer with over three years of experience. He is recognized for producing insightful, well-researched content across major crypto publications. As an expert in blockchain technology, digital assets, and decentralized finance, he can uniquely simplify complex topics into engaging, accessible narratives. His strong storytelling and analytical skills, combined with a passion for continuous learning and collaboration, make him a valuable asset to the BlockchainReporter team.
An Ethereum wallet identified as 0xD04, allegedly connected to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, made a notable transaction on June 27. This wallet transferred 7,000 ETH—valued at roughly $11.06 million at the time—to a previously unused address. The sizable move caught the attention of the crypto community, which closely follows any activity linked to major Ethereum stakeholders.
Wallet activity resumes after a yearThe blockchain analytics platform Onchain Lens detected the transaction moments after it was confirmed on the Ethereum network. According to Onchain Lens, the wallet in question had shown no significant activity for nearly 12 months prior to this transfer. As one of Ethereum’s founding figures, Vitalik Buterin’s on-chain movements continue to be of keen interest to both investors and analysts in the crypto space.
Onchain Lens reported that the address linked to Vitalik Buterin moved 7,000 ETH to a new wallet following a full year without notable activity, suggesting—based on similar past transactions—that the assets might ultimately end up on a centralized platform.
Analysts monitoring blockchain data believe the transfer could eventually lead to a deposit on a major exchange. This assessment comes from previous transaction patterns observed with this wallet address. However, as of the time of reporting, there has been no further movement from the newly funded wallet.
Past transactions show a similar patternPreviously, the same wallet transferred 1,300 ETH, which ultimately arrived at Paxos. Paxos is a well-known fintech company providing regulated digital asset custody, transfer, and stablecoin infrastructure.
Glossary: Paxos is a regulated financial technology company specializing in crypto asset custody, transfer, and stablecoin infrastructure. Its name frequently appears in on-chain flows directed toward centralized exchanges or institutional service providers.
This prior example has reinforced expectations that the latest 7,000 ETH transfer might follow a similar trajectory. Still, a movement between wallets alone does not necessarily signal an intent to sell. Large transfers can be made for reasons ranging from enhanced security to custodial or administrative requirements.
TransactionAmountApproximate valueStatusLatest transfer7,000 ETH$11.06 millionSent to a new walletPrevious transfer1,300 ETH$3.19 millionLater reached PaxosRemaining balance20,001 ETH$31.6 millionHeld in walletMarket closely watches the new addressFollowing this transaction, the 0xD04 wallet retained a balance of 20,001 ETH, with an estimated value of $31.6 million. In other words, a substantial portion of the assets tied to this address remains unmoved.
No outgoing transactions have been initiated from the new wallet, leaving the purpose of the transfer—whether for a sale, restructuring, or security—unclear at this stage.
During the transfer, the price of Ethereum hovered near $1,583, up about 2% over the previous 24 hours. While major moves by large wallets attract significant market attention, on-chain data alone is not always enough to reveal the underlying intention.
Neither Vitalik Buterin nor his representatives have provided public comments explaining the rationale behind the transfer. Blockchain analysts and market participants continue to monitor the recipient wallet’s next steps for clues regarding future actions.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ethereum is currently trading at around $1,579.52 following a modest 24-hour recovery. Despite the short-term uptick, technical indicators show persistent downward pressure. The price remains below several key thresholds, making analysts cautious about the near-term outlook. Failure to reclaim these critical levels signals continued market uncertainty for the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency.
Key resistance and short-term outlookAnalyst Ted Pillows notes that Ethereum has revisited its recent lows and momentum continues to be subdued. According to Pillows, the $1,750 level stands out as a primary resistance area. If Ethereum can break above and hold this zone, a relief rally toward the $1,980 to $2,000 range could develop. The next significant supply region is observed near $2,079, representing a further challenge for bullish traders.
Ted Pillows believes that reclaiming $1,750 as support could pave the way for Ethereum to recover toward the $1,980 to $2,000 band.
Conversely, if Ethereum fails to surpass $1,750, any upward movements may remain short-lived. In this scenario, the price could slide back to test $1,560, and if weakness continues, a further pullback to $1,500 or even $1,370 may occur.
Volume zone as a decision pointAli Charts, a well-known crypto analyst, highlights that Ethereum has been trading within a significant volume block between $1,584 and $1,683. Within this range, roughly 4 million ETH have changed hands, making it a major decision zone for the market’s next direction. Ali Charts, who is renowned for his on-chain and market-based analyses, emphasizes the importance of this price band.
If Ethereum manages to hold this volume zone as support, renewed upside potential could target the $1,980 and $2,079 marks. However, a dip below $1,584 and failure to reclaim that level would suggest a weakening structure, raising the possibility of renewed pressure toward the $1,500 and $1,370 support regions.
Data from large investors indicates continued pressureAn assessment shared by analyst Darkfost reveals that the unrealized profit ratios of large Ethereum wallets have turned negative. This shift suggests that major investors are now in loss territory, creating market stress similar to capitulation scenarios seen in previous cycles, such as in 2019.
The transition of large holders into losses does not necessarily mean a bottom is imminent for Ethereum, but it does highlight a significant area of stress for the market.
Within this framework, the $1,584 to $1,500 range remains important in the short term. Should selling pressure intensify, the wider range between $1,370 and $1,070 could emerge as the next major buy zone. While some analysts like Cyclop see strong demand building in this band, others believe close attention is warranted around the $1,300 to $1,200 levels over the longer term.
Overall outlook remains cautiousFor now, the most decisive bullish signal for Ethereum would be holding the $1,584 to $1,683 support zone, followed by a successful retest of $1,750. Until these milestones are reached, any rebound is likely to be fragile. To the downside, the $1,500 and $1,370 levels are crucial, while the $1,980 to $2,000 region remains the main focus for any sustained upward move.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
The same streak follows the Ethereum ETFs as mass withdrawals continue to dominate.
The spot exchange-traded funds tracking the two largest cryptocurrencies by market cap have continued their highly adverse streak, making it now seven consecutive weeks in the red.
The last five trading days were particularly painful as the spot BTC ETFs recorded their second-worst performance in terms of net flows since their inception two and a half years ago.
Spot BTC ETFs Bleed Hard CryptoPotato has repeatedly reported on the poor performance of the spot Bitcoin ETFs, but the two weeks before the one that ended on June 26 brought some glimmer of hope. Although both were still in the red, the actual withdrawals were more modest, $316 million and $227 million, respectively, down from the $1.72 billion during the first week of June.
However, investors stepped up on the withdrawal button hard once again, pulling out $1.79 billion in total from the funds. This made it the worst week in terms of net flows since late February 2025, when the number stood at $2.61 billion.
The cumulative total net inflows have dropped to $51.61 billion. Recall that the number stood at above $59.30 billion by the middle of May. This means that the ETFs have lost almost $8 billion in less than two months.
If we break the data down to daily net outflows, Thursday stands out as the most painful day with $696 million leaving the funds, followed by $469 million on Wednesday, $444.5 million on Friday, and a more modest $90.66 million on Monday and $68 million on Tuesday.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs Net Flows. Source: SoSoValue The continuous outflows from the ETFs are among the most evident reasons why the underlying asset’s price keeps struggling as it plunged to a new multi-year low of $58,000 a few days ago. Analysts are convinced that the flows have to stabilize before BTC has a chance of a more profound recovery.
You may also like: Bitcoin Didn’t Lose to Gold, the Rotation Story Is Wrong: Analyst Bitcoin Holds Key Price Floor Despite Weak Bullish Signals: Bitfinex Alpha Crypto Institutional Flows Turn Negative as $8B Exits in 30 Days ETH ETFs in Red, Too The landscape around the spot Ethereum ETFs is not that much different, just the scale is smaller. The funds have been in the red for seven consecutive weeks as well, and the net outflows from the past week were a lot higher than the previous two. More specifically, the ETFs bled $15 million during the second week of June and $10 million during the third. During the last one, though, investors took out $273.34 million.
The total net flows have dropped from $12.09 billion in mid-May to well under $11 billion as of Friday’s close. Tuesday and Thursday saw the most net withdrawals, with $82.35 million and $81.87 million, respectively.
22% And 17% Are The Magic NumbersA June survey by Pew Research Center shows that 22% of Republicans have invested, traded or used cryptocurrency, compared with 17% of Democrats.
This is compared to prior years when crypto ownership rates between the two groups were largely similar, CNBC reported on June 21.
Pew found Republican crypto adoption has climbed six percentage points since 2021, while Democratic participation has remained relatively unchanged.
Morning Consult data cited in the report showed the divide began emerging around mid-2023 and accelerated during the 2024 election cycle.
By Q2 of 2025, nearly 28% of Republicans had bought or sold crypto in the prior 12 months, compared with 17% of Democrats.
"It’s hard to de-couple the rise of GOP crypto adoption from the Trump family’s embrace of it," said Morning Consult analyst Eli Yokley.
"There’s no Obama coin," he added. "There are Trump coins and Melania coins."
Trump’s Crypto PivotThe shift coincides with President Trump’s transformation from crypto skeptic to one of the industry’s most visible advocates.
In 2019, Trump publicly criticized cryptocurrencies, calling them unregulated and linked to illicit activity.
His administration has also promoted policies aimed at making the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world," including efforts to expand banking access for digital asset firms.
Bigger Divide May Be GenderWhile politics has become a growing factor, experts argue gender remains the strongest predictor of crypto adoption.
Morning Consult data shows roughly 74% of crypto traders are men.
Among investors under age 45, men have traded cryptocurrencies at roughly double the rate of women over the past four years. Between 2022 and 2026, crypto participation among younger men ranged from 38% to 42%, compared with 13% to 16% for younger women.
Analysts attribute the gap to differences in risk tolerance and attitudes toward speculative investing in sports betting and prediction markets.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
A newly created wallet was reported as receiving 18,361 ETH, valued around $28.91 million in the supplied setup.The flow was linked to FalconX over a nine-day period in the supplied research pack.The setup remains market-analysis context. Do not state that this is guaranteed direct open-market buying; custody movement or broker balancing may be possible. https://x.com/EyeOnChain/status/2070701025640812635
Loading Tweet… View original post on X
Large institutional-style eth movement into a newly created wallet On-Chain Data Shows Newly Created Wallet Accumulates More Than $28 Million in Ethereum is one of the market setups traders are watching as crypto attempts to stabilize after recent volatility. The signal is useful because it points to a clear market level, flow, or positioning theme that can be checked against live data.
This setup surfaced through the X/social discovery lane, which is used as an idea sensor only. It should not be treated as a source of record on its own. The relevant data still needs to be checked against market charts, derivatives dashboards, or on-chain records before readers draw conclusions.
What the available data shows A newly created wallet was reported as receiving 18,361 ETH, valued around $28.91 million in the supplied setup. The flow was linked to FalconX over a nine-day period in the supplied research pack.
That matters because crypto markets often move around concentrated liquidity zones, wallet flows, exchange positioning, and broader macro pressure before those signals become obvious in price. The strongest version of this setup is one where the highlighted level or flow continues to hold after live validation.
Why traders are watching this setup The setup gives traders a defined framework rather than a vague bullish or bearish view. For Ethereum, the key question is whether the current signal reflects durable positioning or a short-lived reaction inside a volatile range.
Market structure remains fragile. Bitcoin direction, liquidity conditions, derivatives positioning, and macro volatility can still override otherwise clean technical or on-chain setups. That is why the signal is best understood as a watchpoint, not a prediction.
Risk and invalidation context Do not state that this is guaranteed direct open-market buying; custody movement or broker balancing may be possible. Spot ETH was checked at $1,581.56 in the supplied market validation.
If the highlighted level fails, if the wallet flow turns out to be internal custody movement, or if derivatives positioning flips quickly, the interpretation should change. The article should therefore be read as a current market snapshot rather than a guarantee of future price action.
What to verify next The next step is external confirmation. For this setup, the validation path is: Trace destination address 0x6437F4b66f1Da888C3714405CA2A2897715CF565 on Etherscan or Arkham. Until that confirmation is reviewed, the setup should remain market-analysis context rather than a confirmed directional forecast.
Traders should also watch liquidity, volume, and daily close structure. Those factors will decide whether this signal becomes a durable theme or another short-lived reaction inside a volatile crypto session.
This report is based on publicly available market and on-chain data.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
U.S.-listed ETFs have seen inflows exceeding $1 trillion so far this year, with full-year inflows expected to surpass $2 trillion, hitting a new all-time high.
The Kobeissi Letter stated that the U.S. is experiencing an unprecedented ETF boom. Data shows that year-to-date 2026, U.S.-listed ETFs have attracted over $1 trillion in inflows, and at the current pace, they are on track to exceed $2 trillion by year-end, setting a new all-time high. If annual ETF inflows surpass $2 trillion, this will mark the fourth consecutive year of growth in annual ETF inflows, 33% higher than the 2025 record, an increase of roughly $500 billion. Meanwhile, 700 ETFs have launched so far this year, also on pace for an annual record. June alone saw 186 ETFs listed, the highest monthly issuance figure in history. The ETF industry is expanding at a record pace.
1 hours ago
Base releases post-mortem report on network outage: User funds remain safe, root cause is a vulnerability in sequencer block construction logic.
Base engineering team released a post-mortem report on the June 25 block production outage, noting that Base mainnet suffered two separate block production interruptions on June 25 and June 26. The first incident occurred at 11:47 ET on June 25, lasting 116 minutes; the second took place at 11:28 ET on June 26, lasting 20 minutes. Both events shared the same root cause. Chain integrity remained unharmed, and all funds on Base are secure. Block production resumed safely after the team mitigated the issues. The root cause was a bug in the sequencer’s block construction logic: after a transaction validation failure, expired log states were not cleared. An invalid transaction was received by the block builder and failed as expected, but the system incorrectly retained log states including accessed accounts and storage slots. A subsequent valid transaction was processed before the log states could be properly cleared, leading to a gas fee calculation mismatch and a sequencer block containing invalid state transitions. Other nodes rejected this block, causing the entire chain to halt. During the outage, Base could not produce new L2 blocks, sequencer and validator nodes could not advance past the invalid block, and new transactions could not be posted on-chain. The team fixed the interruptions by deploying a patch to the sequencer to ensure proper log state updates during execution. Base stated it will strengthen protocol fuzz testing and load testing tools to more easily identify adversarial transaction patterns that could expose similar vulnerabilities, and will continue to improve operational and monitoring capabilities.
1 hours ago
Analysis: Retail investors appear to be shifting funds from gold and Bitcoin to semiconductor stocks.
The Kobeissi Letter stated that retail investors appear to be shifting away from gold and Bitcoin toward semiconductor stocks. Data shows that since April, U.S. gold ETFs and Bitcoin ETFs have recorded a combined net outflow of $12 billion; over the same timeframe, U.S. semiconductor ETFs have pulled in a total of $20 billion in inflows. This trend accelerated in mid-May, with outflows from gold and Bitcoin funds surging more than threefold, while inflows into semiconductor ETFs doubled. On the price front, GLD, the largest U.S. gold ETF, has declined 13% since early April, while IBIT, the largest Bitcoin ETF, has fallen 12% over the same period. By contrast, semiconductor ETFs SOXX and SMH have gained 81% and 60% respectively. Retail investors are driving the market in an unprecedented manner.
1 hours ago
Bloomberg: Sell-off in chip stocks drags U.S. stocks to end lower this week, as AI valuation concerns weigh on market performance.
U.S. stocks closed lower this week, weighed down by the ongoing slump in chip stocks, Bloomberg reported. While a University of Michigan survey showed long-term inflation expectations came in below forecasts, easing some concerns about interest rate hikes, that failed to offset selling pressure in chip stocks. Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, noted the S&P 500 briefly turned positive during the session before erasing gains quickly, mirroring multiple failed rebound attempts investors have seen this week. Worries over AI valuations have spread from Asian markets to U.S. trading. Two prominent Chinese hedge funds said AI stocks are in a bubble that could burst. Shares of Japan’s SoftBank Group fell after The New York Times reported OpenAI may delay its IPO until 2027. South Korea’s KOSPI index triggered a trading halt for the second time this week due to a sharp drop in chip stocks, later paring some of those losses. In the U.S., data from Bank of America showed investors pulled capital out of U.S. stocks for the first time in three months, with outflows hitting $8.5 billion. Cameron Dawson, chief investment officer at Newedge Wealth, said a key question is whether the market has the patience to wait for returns on investments from hyperscale cloud providers. Richard Reyle, chief investment officer at Questar Capital Partners, said he will not buy large-cap tech or AI stocks at current levels, as their dominance is weakening; the Magnificent Seven and Bitcoin peaked nine months ago and have yet to recover. Separately, crude oil prices extended declines as tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remained steady. Brian Jacobsen, chief economic strategist at Annex Wealth Management, said the peak in energy prices is behind us, leaving room for headline inflation to cool, though price pressures have not fully vanished.
1 hours ago
SYRUP rose over 31% in 24 hours, currently trading at $0.155.
According to HTX market data, Maple Finance (SYRUP) has surged over 31% in the past 24 hours, currently trading at $0.155.
1 hours ago
ECB Executive Board Member: Further Interest Rate Hikes Expected
European Central Bank (ECB) Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel warned that even if a U.S.-Iran peace deal reopens the Strait of Hormuz, price pressures could still run higher than expected. Speaking on Saturday, Schnabel said, "There are upside risks to inflation for food, goods and services," adding that energy price shocks could spill over into broader sectors. While she welcomed the recent decline in energy prices amid prospects of a U.S.-Iran peace deal, she cautioned that a ceasefire should not be a reason to lower guard. "Uncertainty remains high, but the announced peace deal reduces the likelihood of negative scenarios," she noted. Even so, oil prices are projected to stay elevated, as the Strait of Hormuz will only reopen gradually. Schnabel, considered the most hawkish member of the ECB Governing Council, reiterated that "the ECB will likely raise interest rates further to bring inflation back to the 2% target over the medium term." She added that consumer inflation expectations have risen, though there are no signs of wage pressures yet. (Jin10)
A proposal on Ethereum Research suggests redirecting part of staking rewards toward public goods funding. Supporters see sustainable decentralized funding, while critics warn of protocol-level overreach. The proposal is not approved and should be treated as an early governance debate. Staking Economics And Ethereum Governance: Why This Story Matters Ethereum Protocol Debate: Diverting Staking Rewards for Public Goods Funding Sparks Controversy has become one of the stronger weekend crypto stories because it sits at the intersection of price action, market structure, and the kind of narrative that traders tend to follow closely when the broader news cycle slows down.
The key point is not simply that the proposal was published on ethresear.ch. It is that the development gives the market a fresh way to judge whether the current crypto environment is being driven by genuine network adoption, regulatory progress, liquidity shifts, or short-term speculation.
The Main Details According to the official source material, the proposal was published on ethresear.ch. The report also notes that it suggests a protocol-level mechanism to redirect a portion of staking rewards to public goods funding.
That distinction matters because crypto markets often move first on headlines and only later separate durable developments from short-lived momentum. In this case, the verified boundaries are especially important: Do not claim this is approved or scheduled for a hard fork.
Market Context For traders, the story arrives at a moment when crypto assets are still trying to define a clearer direction. Bitcoin remains the anchor for broader sentiment, but altcoin narratives are increasingly being judged on their own fundamentals, including usage, liquidity, compliance, treasury activity, and developer progress.
That makes this development relevant beyond a single token or company. If the underlying trend proves durable, it could help shape how investors evaluate Ethereum, ETH, Staking, Governance, Public Goods over the coming weeks. If it fades, however, it may become another example of a strong weekend narrative that struggled to translate into sustained market follow-through.
What To Watch Next The next important question is whether the market receives further confirmation from primary sources, dashboards, official announcements, or on-chain data. Follow-up disclosures, exchange data, governance updates, or wallet activity could all help clarify whether this is an isolated headline or the start of a broader theme.
Readers should also watch whether liquidity responds. In crypto, even fundamentally meaningful developments can fail to move prices if traders remain defensive, leverage is being unwound, or capital is rotating into other sectors. That is why this story should be read alongside broader market structure rather than in isolation.
This report is based on information from Ethereum Research.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Is this a "massive opportunity" for accumulation or is there more to the story?
The world’s largest altcoin felt the pain of the overall market weakness over the past week, dropping to just over $1,500 for the first time in well over a year.
The asset remains below key support levels, including $1,800, which holds a particular significance in its long-term potential, according to popular analyst Michaël van de Poppe.
ETH Below $1.8K Means… The market observer believes ETH sliding below $1,800 is a “massive opportunity” and that day traders should avoid it, as it’s “not really attractive” here. The chart below paints a clear picture, showing that the asset has been in a clear downtrend for months. It peaked at almost $5,000 last summer, but it has plunged by nearly 70% since then to the current $1,600.
However, there’s finally light at the end of the tunnel as the asset is “making a potential strong bullish divergence on many levels that would indicate that ETH is going to follow Bitcoin.”
Perhaps the biggest catalyst for future price gains in the crypto market, especially for tokens like ETH, which some analysts believe would benefit more than BTC, is the CLARITY Act. The bill, expected to be signed into law in the US this year, should increase regulatory clarity on the entire market in the US.
Van de Poppe says ETH is currently following a classic “sell the rumor, buy the news” type of price action. He also named $1,505 and $1,385 as the next levels at which ETH would present a “tremendous buying opportunity” if it gets there. Overall, though, he believes markets are not eager to go down more, and he doubts ETH will drop to those levels.
“I much rather see a clear breakthrough at $1,800 and see these levels as strong opportunities to be accumulating more positions.”
ETHUSD: van de Poppe Chart on X 3 in a Row Ethereum’s native token is just days away from creating history but in a negative manner by ending a third consecutive quarter in the red. Despite its previous bear cycles, it has never done this but it would require nothing short of a miracle to avoid it now. It closed with a 28.28% drop in Q4 2025, another 29.26% decline in Q1 2026, and is down by more than 24% in Q2 as of press time.
You may also like: Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch 5 Reasons Why Bitcoin Just Crashed Below $63K as Liquidations Top $500M Bitmine Buys 52K ETH as Tom Lee Believes the Best Years for Crypto Are Still Ahead ETH Quarterly Returns. Source: CoinGlass With June almost gone, investors have focused on July now. Ted Pillows brought some hope for the bulls, indicating that ETH has historically seen a bounce back in July. This has been particularly true in 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2025. ETH has posted notable gains in those July, all of which followed a red June.
On-chain records in the supplied pack point to a trader opening high-leverage short exposure across Bitcoin and Ethereum.The reported short exposure includes around 912 BTC and 10,000 ETH, with a combined notional value near $70 million.The setup remains market-analysis context. Do not promote leverage or describe the trade as a strategy readers should copy. https://x.com/EyeOnChain/status/2070519940533350461
Loading Tweet… View original post on X
High-net-worth derivatives positioning as a sign of ongoing defensive sentiment Whale Activity Shows High-Leverage Short Positions Re-Opened on Bitcoin and Ethereum is one of the market setups traders are watching as crypto attempts to stabilize after recent volatility. The signal is useful because it points to a clear market level, flow, or positioning theme that can be checked against live data.
This setup surfaced through the X/social discovery lane, which is used as an idea sensor only. It should not be treated as a source of record on its own. The relevant data still needs to be checked against market charts, derivatives dashboards, or on-chain records before readers draw conclusions.
What the available data shows On-chain records in the supplied pack point to a trader opening high-leverage short exposure across Bitcoin and Ethereum. The reported short exposure includes around 912 BTC and 10,000 ETH, with a combined notional value near $70 million.
That matters because crypto markets often move around concentrated liquidity zones, wallet flows, exchange positioning, and broader macro pressure before those signals become obvious in price. The strongest version of this setup is one where the highlighted level or flow continues to hold after live validation.
Why traders are watching this setup The setup gives traders a defined framework rather than a vague bullish or bearish view. For Bitcoin, the key question is whether the current signal reflects durable positioning or a short-lived reaction inside a volatile range.
Market structure remains fragile. Bitcoin direction, liquidity conditions, derivatives positioning, and macro volatility can still override otherwise clean technical or on-chain setups. That is why the signal is best understood as a watchpoint, not a prediction.
Risk and invalidation context Do not promote leverage or describe the trade as a strategy readers should copy. The same trader was reported as recently locking in about $4.4 million in profit before reopening short positions.
If the highlighted level fails, if the wallet flow turns out to be internal custody movement, or if derivatives positioning flips quickly, the interpretation should change. The article should therefore be read as a current market snapshot rather than a guarantee of future price action.
What to verify next The next step is external confirmation. For this setup, the validation path is: Cross-check the wallet address 0xaeaab54bbf65bfd6efed7d2eb68372298e3c2416 on Arkham and derivatives data where available. Until that confirmation is reviewed, the setup should remain market-analysis context rather than a confirmed directional forecast.
Traders should also watch liquidity, volume, and daily close structure. Those factors will decide whether this signal becomes a durable theme or another short-lived reaction inside a volatile crypto session.
This report is based on publicly available market and on-chain data.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Blockchain intelligence firm AMLBot has confirmed the Polymarket supply-chain attack total at approximately $3.1 million in PUSD across 11 user wallets, with funds bridged from Polygon to Ethereum and converted to ETH. Polymarket has pledged full refunds but has not named the compromised vendor.
Blockchain intelligence firm AMLBot has fixed the total stolen in Thursday's Polymarket supply-chain attack at approximately $3.1 million in PUSD, providing the first forensically confirmed on-chain dollar figure and tracing the stolen assets from Polygon to Ethereum. On-chain investigator Specter, which published the first public alert, identified more than 11 victim wallets.
AMLBot posted the revised tally on Saturday, two days after on-chain investigators first flagged the drain. The figure revises earlier estimates upward and, for the first time, pins both the dollar amount to a single on-chain intelligence source. AMLBot said it continues to monitor affected accounts as the investigation proceeds.
From Front-End to BridgeThe attack, covered by The Defiant on Thursday, began when a compromised third-party vendor injected malicious JavaScript into Polymarket's website. The code targeted user transactions at the front-end layer; Polymarket's smart contracts on Polygon were untouched. Polymarket confirmed fewer than 15 accounts were affected, consistent with scope described by on-chain security researchers tracking the wallets in real time.
On-chain investigator Specter published the first public alert and identified the attacker's primary consolidation address on Ethereum: `0xe65b1C586757c5510B60F998Eebb14C1eF71E1eD`. PeckShield confirmed the stolen funds were bridged from Polygon to Ethereum and then swapped into roughly 1,893 ETH. Bubblemaps independently counted fewer than 15 affected accounts and estimated $3 million in losses being refunded.
PUSD is Polymarket's native collateral token, a Polygon-based ERC-20 minted 1:1 against USDC.e through the platform's on-chain collateral contracts. Deployed in April 2026 per on-chain records, PUSD operates exclusively within the platform and carries no external exchange listing, so the attacker had to convert it to ETH to exit. The token held its $1.00 peg throughout the incident, per PolygonScan data for the pUSD contract on Polygon.
Refund Commitment, Vendor Still UnnamedPolymarket posted on X Thursday morning saying it had contained the attack, removed the malicious dependency, and would refund impacted users in full. William LeGate confirmed the repayment would be total, adding in a second post that there were "no user 'losses.'" The platform has not publicly named the compromised vendor across any channel since the incident was disclosed.
Initial independent estimates put the theft at $2.94 million, based on on-chain wallet tallies by Specter Analyst, while PeckShield and other firms rounded to roughly $3 million. AMLBot's Saturday update lifts the confirmed total by approximately $160,000 from Specter's initial read.
TechCrunch reported that a Polymarket spokesperson confirmed the breach but declined to provide further detail. Security researchers at CyberInsider and BleepingComputer both classified the incident as a supply-chain attack, the type where a downstream dependency injects hostile code into a trusted application, rather than a direct protocol exploit.
Platform ContextThe platform currently holds $432 million in total value locked on Polygon, per DefiLlama. Security trackers cataloguing Q2 2026 DeFi incidents have counted the June 25 Polymarket attack among a sustained wave of supply-chain and front-end compromises targeting DeFi infrastructure in 2026.
Polymarket has committed to refunding affected users in full but has set no public timeline for completion and has not disclosed the identity of the third-party vendor whose compromise triggered the attack.
The crypto ecosystem is undergoing a deep structural transformation where yesterday’s certainties give way to new macroeconomic realities. Thus, although the community has historically speculated on Ethereum surpassing bitcoin, institutional analysts now turn to a scenario completely ignored by retail investors. The recent evolution of volumes and market capitalizations calls into question the established hierarchy, prompting experts to rethink the position of stablecoins relative to traditional cryptos.
In Brief Tether could dethrone Bitcoin to become the world’s largest crypto according to a Bloomberg Intelligence strategist. The rise of stablecoins challenges the historical dominance of Bitcoin and Ethereum in the crypto ecosystem. A Bitcoin at 10,000 dollars would be the key scenario allowing USDT to take the lead in the market. The tightening of macroeconomic conditions would strengthen the appeal of dollar-indexed assets versus more volatile cryptos. USDT on the path to becoming the world’s top crypto The announcement surprised bitcoin maximalists and DeFi enthusiasts. Tether (USDT) is well on its way to becoming the largest crypto in the world by market size, assures Mike McGlone, senior macroeconomic strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence.
According to the specialist, the rise of tokens indexed to the greenback disrupts the sector’s value order. The expert bases his conclusions on several key observations of market dynamics :
The threat to the historical duopoly : the analyst states bluntly that it “could be just a matter of time before the dollar-backed token surpasses bitcoin, unless the crypto’s most enduring trend reverses: Tether’s assets under management surpassing everything”. He adds that in this race, “only two remain: bitcoin and Ether” ; The power of dollar indexing : he highlights the inherent power of the stablecoin’s technical architecture, explaining that “the technology is impressive, and it has adopted the dollar as a base layer”, implicitly addressing the movement advocating for global dedollarization ; The fragility of alternative protocols : McGlone directly questions the sustainability and fundamental viability of speculative tokens flooding wallets. He wonders what could stop the uncontrolled proliferation of protocols where billions of dollars accumulate on assets backed by no source of actual revenue or financial flows. Recent movements partly confirm this thesis since Tether briefly snatched the second spot from Ethereum in the overall ranking following the general panic. On this subject, the Bloomberg strategist specifies that this precise historic change “could be lasting this time”.
The crash hypothesis : a bitcoin at 10,000 dollars to validate the prophecy For this macroeconomic prediction to become reality, a complete revaluation of current values would be required, which would depend on a historic drop in crypto yields. Mike McGlone firmly holds his bearish forecasts, stating that bitcoin is heading towards a major correction likely to bring it back to the 10,000 dollar level. The technical explanation lies in the emergence conditions of the first crypto.
It developed at a breakneck speed during an exceptional period marked by zero interest rates and massive liquidity injections from central banks. The current monetary tightening imposes on markets an inevitable deleveraging process, which hits assets considered highly speculative.
The gloomy outlook developed by Bloomberg Intelligence is not limited to the blockchain universe but fits into a recession affecting global commodities and traditional stock indices. McGlone notably anticipates a collapse of WTI crude oil around 40 dollars a barrel, triggered by a global correction of U.S. stock markets in the second half. In this systemic purge framework, the on-chain safe haven par excellence mechanically becomes digitized dollar, whose global capitalization remains stable or rises, while volatile assets see their capitalization shrink under massive selling pressure.
Market redefinition: towards a paradigm shift for decentralized finance This institutional reading reveals a major market divide between purely speculative yield seeking and the fundamental need for stability during systemic crises. While the scenario of a bitcoin at 10,000 dollars is still seen by many market operators as extreme, it nevertheless reminds that an asset’s capitalization depends above all on its real liquidity and transactional utility.
In the long term, the transformation of stablecoins into main vectors of value transfer could relegate first-generation assets to a secondary role, thereby redefining the future of digital investments.
The hypothesis of Tether’s dominance invites the community to reconsider the very foundations of decentralization. If the sector’s most powerful token becomes a centralized currency dependent on the U.S. dollar, the original ideal of resistance to censorship and financial sovereignty championed by Satoshi Nakamoto would be deeply altered.
However, other analysts moderate this view, arguing that bitcoin will maintain its status as digital gold thanks to its programmed scarcity, resisting any monetary printing policies. The future will depend on how investors manage to reconcile the security urgency offered by USDT and the long-term value promise carried by bitcoin.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Luc Jose A.
Diplômé de Sciences Po Toulouse et titulaire d'une certification consultant blockchain délivrée par Alyra, j'ai rejoint l'aventure Cointribune en 2019. Convaincu du potentiel de la blockchain pour transformer de nombreux secteurs de l'économie, j'ai pris l'engagement de sensibiliser et d'informer le grand public sur cet écosystème en constante évolution. Mon objectif est de permettre à chacun de mieux comprendre la blockchain et de saisir les opportunités qu'elle offre. Je m'efforce chaque jour de fournir une analyse objective de l'actualité, de décrypter les tendances du marché, de relayer les dernières innovations technologiques et de mettre en perspective les enjeux économiques et sociétaux de cette révolution en marche.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Ethereum has struggled under sustained selling pressure throughout June, plummeting from levels above $2,000 to around $1,557 as of June 26. This marks a monthly loss of 23.5 percent, while the past week alone saw ETH shed 6.7 percent of its value.
Market dynamics reveal weaknessesA key threshold has been crossed in the overall market cap rankings. Tether’s total market capitalization rose to $186.06 billion, surpassing Ethereum, which stands at $185.66 billion. For the first time in history, Tether has overtaken Ethereum by market value.
Market analyst Ted Pillows noted that Ethereum is once again testing bottom levels, and the momentum remains weak due to a broader market correction. According to Pillows, if ETH can reclaim the $1,750 mark, investors could see a short-term rebound in the coming month.
Ted Pillows remarked that the wider market correction has sapped momentum from Ethereum, but if ETH can break back above $1,750, a short-lived relief rally might be possible next month.
The technical outlook on the daily chart supports this pressure. After breaking below the upward trendline formed in February, ETH fell beneath the $1,900 and $1,800 supports, reaching as low as the $1,550 region.
Major investor groups fall into lossesData from CryptoQuant reveals that all major Ethereum investor groups, including wallets holding more than 100,000 ETH, are now sitting on unrealized losses. The last time this scenario occurred was back in 2019, which coincided with a long-term bottom for ETH. CryptoQuant, a widely-followed on-chain analytics provider, monitors this data across the crypto industry.
For the first time since 2019, large Ethereum investors as a group have fallen into collective unrealized losses.
Historically, collective capitulation by large holders has more often signaled proximity to market bottoms rather than deeper declines. While smaller whale groups occasionally slip into losses, it is rare for the largest wallets to dip into negative territory at the same time.
Meanwhile, the Estimated Leverage Ratio indicator has dropped from 1.11 to 0.85 over the past three weeks. This decline points to a significant number of leveraged positions being closed or liquidated, which could help limit some of the downside risk for ETH.
ETF outflows and funding concernsEthereum spot ETFs are on track for their seventh straight week of net outflows. According to SoSoValue, the current week may mark the heaviest capital flight from spot ETH ETFs since January.
Protocol Guild coordinator Trent Van Epps has also raised concerns about core development funding. After five years with the Ethereum Foundation, Van Epps emphasized that approximately $30 million per year is needed to sustain essential development activities, warning that current reserves may not reliably cover emerging needs. Protocol Guild is recognized for its role in funding core Ethereum developers.
Van Epps highlighted that Protocol Guild has distributed around $40 million to developers over the past four years, but he stressed that this is not sufficient. He suggested that new institutional participation may be required in the coming months to bridge the funding gap.
On the technical side, the key support levels for ETH are now at $1,510 and $1,500, while resistance sits at $1,710 and $1,774. The MACD indicator has turned negative once again, with the signal line currently at negative 78.35.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
1024EX, an on-chain crypto trading platform, has announced support for $USDC deposits on two more networks. 1024EX now supports $USDC deposits on Ethereum and Base blockchain networks. As per 1024EX’s official social media announcement, these deposits are live now. Moreover, $USDC withdrawals on Base, Solana, and Ethereum are already live. The update highlights 1024EX’s plan to make stablecoin transfers less fragmented and more rapid.
1024EX now supports USDC deposits via Base and Ethereum.
Withdrawals are available via Base, Ethereum, and Solana.
Coming soon: TRON support.
More chains. Smoother deposits. Easier withdrawals.
— 1024EX (@1024EX) June 27, 2026 Supporting USDC deposits on Ethereum and Base is highly important for any crypto platform and its users. It improves user experience, boosts platform competitiveness, and supports broader stablecoin adoption.
How USDC Deposits on Base and Ethereum Can Improve User Experience The launch of the $USDC deposits on Base and Ethereum permits 1024EX to improve the user experience. Base enables fast finality as well as low-fee transactions. At the same time, Ethereum provides comprehensive liquidity as well as wide wallet compatibility. Keeping this in view, the rollout provides traders with two additional ways for account funding via $USDC without depending on a single blockchain. Additionally, the $USDC deposit support minimizes congestion risk when it comes to increased network activity.
Coming to withdrawals, 1024EX users are permitted to withdraw capital via Solana, Base, and Ethereum. Withdrawals support on Solana is of great importance because Solana delivers a high-throughput option for minimal fees and sub-second settlement. This benefits consumers who look for funds transfers to other platforms, DeFi protocols, or wallets quickly.
1024EX Targets TRON as Next Integration for Wider Access In addition to this, the platform has also unveiled plans to support the TRON network to further facilitate its users. The potential inclusion of TRON would broaden 1024EX’s access to consumers who focus on minimal network fees in the case of $USDC transactions. Ultimately, this development gives consumers more control over $USDC withdrawals and deposits.
To sum up, 1024EX considers this 3-chain withdrawal framework as a key move to let consumers pick ecosystem compatibility, cost, or speed in line with their individual requirements.
AUTHOR
Umair Younas is a cryptocurrency-related content writer linked with this work since 2019. Here, at Blockchainreporter, he serves as a news and article writer. He is a crypto, blockchain, NFTs, DeFi, and FinTech enthusiast. He has strong command over writing authentic reviews about brokers and exchanges and he has collaborated with our education team to write educational content as well. He has a dream to raise awareness among people about digital currencies. His works are well-researched and brimmed with information hence they provide fresh insights. Stay tuned to his posts if you want to stay up-to-date with the crypto-verse.
Bitcoin is the largest pool of value in crypto, but on its own, it cannot touch Ethereum’s world of lending, borrowing, and yield. Wrapped Bitcoin is the bridge. This guide explains how WBTC works, the mint-and-burn model behind it, the alternatives, and the custodial risks that set it apart from holding real BTC.
Summary
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is an ERC-20 token on Ethereum backed 1:1 by real Bitcoin held in reserve by a custodian, letting Bitcoin’s value be used inside Ethereum’s decentralized finance ecosystem. It exists because native Bitcoin cannot operate inside Ethereum smart contracts, so WBTC bridges the largest pool of crypto value into the largest arena for DeFi. WBTC works through a mint-and-burn model run by three parties: custodians who hold the Bitcoin, merchants who handle verification and distribution, and users, all overseen by the WBTC DAO. WBTC tracks Bitcoin’s price and can be used for lending, borrowing, yield farming, and as collateral, but it is not the same as holding native BTC because it adds custodial, smart contract, and bridge risks. Alternatives such as Coinbase’s cbBTC and the more decentralized tBTC offer different custody models, and the choice among them comes down to which trust assumptions you are comfortable with. Table of Contents
Why Bitcoin needs wrappingHow the mint-and-burn model worksWho governs WBTC, and why it mattersA worked example: putting Bitcoin to workWBTC versus native Bitcoin and the alternativesRisks and what to check before wrappingFrequently Asked Questions Wrapped Bitcoin, known by its ticker WBTC, is an ERC-20 token that runs on the Ethereum blockchain and is backed 1:1 by real Bitcoin held in reserve, so that one WBTC is always meant to equal one Bitcoin. Its entire purpose is to solve a fundamental incompatibility in crypto: Bitcoin, the largest and most valuable cryptocurrency, lives on its own blockchain and cannot natively participate in the decentralized finance applications built on Ethereum, because those applications run on smart contracts that Bitcoin’s design does not support.
An enormous amount of crypto wealth sits in Bitcoin, while an enormous amount of programmable financial activity happens on Ethereum, and for years, there was no way to bring the two together. Wrapped Bitcoin is the bridge. By locking real Bitcoin with a custodian and issuing an equivalent Ethereum token against it, WBTC lets Bitcoin holders put their Bitcoin’s value to work inside Ethereum’s ecosystem, lending it, borrowing against it, trading it, supplying it to liquidity pools, and using it as collateral, all without selling their Bitcoin exposure. It was the first widely adopted way to do this, and it remains one of the most integrated.
The idea is simple, but the details are where the important nuances live, and they are worth understanding before using WBTC, because the convenience comes with trade-offs that holding plain Bitcoin does not have. A wrapped token introduces extra parties and extra trust assumptions, and the question of who holds the underlying Bitcoin, and whether you can always get it back, sits at the center of the whole arrangement.
This guide explains what WBTC is, why it is needed, exactly how the mint-and-burn mechanism works, who the custodians and merchants are, and why they matter, a concrete example of using WBTC in practice, how it compares to native Bitcoin and to newer alternatives like cbBTC and tBTC, and the specific risks that come with holding a wrapped asset rather than the real thing. The aim is to let you decide whether wrapped Bitcoin fits your needs or whether plain Bitcoin is the cleaner choice.
Why Bitcoin needs wrapping To understand why WBTC exists, you have to understand a basic limitation of Bitcoin. Bitcoin was designed as a secure, decentralized system for holding and transferring value, and it does that job extremely well, but its scripting language is deliberately limited and is not built to run the complex, self-executing programs known as smart contracts.
Ethereum, by contrast, was built specifically to run smart contracts, and decentralized finance, the ecosystem of lending protocols, decentralized exchanges, and yield platforms, is constructed almost entirely on Ethereum and similar smart-contract blockchains.
The consequence is that Bitcoin, despite being the largest store of value in crypto, simply cannot plug into these applications directly. A Bitcoin holder who wanted to earn yield or use their holdings as collateral in DeFi had no native way to do so.
This is the gap wrapping fills. The core problem is one of interoperability, the ability to use an asset from one blockchain on another, and wrapping is one of the earliest and most widely used solutions to it. By representing Bitcoin as a token that conforms to Ethereum’s technical standards, specifically the ERC-20 standard that Ethereum applications are built to recognize, wrapped Bitcoin makes Bitcoin-linked value fully usable inside the Ethereum environment.
The ERC-20 standard is a set of rules that makes a token fully compatible and interchangeable across Ethereum’s smart contracts, so a wrapped Bitcoin token can be lent, borrowed, swapped, and used as collateral exactly like any other Ethereum token.
Wrapping, therefore, reduces the fragmentation between Bitcoin’s huge liquidity and Ethereum’s rich application layer, turning Bitcoin from an asset that sits outside DeFi into one that can be put to work within it. That is the entire reason wrapped Bitcoin was created, and why it found immediate demand.
How the mint-and-burn model works The mechanism that keeps wrapped Bitcoin backed 1:1 by real Bitcoin is called mint and burn, and it relies on a three-party system of custodians, merchants, and users.
The custodian is a regulated entity that holds the actual Bitcoin in secure reserve; for WBTC, this role has been played by the digital-asset custody firm BitGo. The merchant is an intermediary, such as an exchange or crypto business, that interacts with users, performs the necessary identity and compliance checks, and distributes the wrapped tokens. The user is the person who wants to convert between Bitcoin and wrapped Bitcoin. These three parties, coordinated by a set of smart contracts, keep the supply of WBTC matched to the Bitcoin held in reserve.
The process works in two directions. To create, or mint, wrapped Bitcoin, a user requests WBTC from a merchant, who carries out know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering checks to verify the user’s identity. The merchant then sends the corresponding Bitcoin to the custodian, who holds it in reserve and mints an equal amount of WBTC on Ethereum, which makes its way to the user.
To reverse the process, or burn the tokens, a user who wants their Bitcoin back submits a redemption request, the WBTC is destroyed in what is called a burn transaction, and the custodian releases the equivalent Bitcoin from reserve. Because every WBTC in existence is meant to correspond to a Bitcoin locked with the custodian, the token maintains its 1:1 peg, and its price tracks Bitcoin’s price closely.
Importantly, both the minting and the burning are recorded publicly on the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains, so anyone can verify the activity, and the system is periodically subjected to proof-of-reserve checks that confirm the Bitcoin backing actually exists. This transparency is meant to give holders confidence that the wrapped tokens are genuinely backed, though, as the risks section explains, it does not remove the reliance on the custodian.
Who governs WBTC, and why it matters A wrapped token raises an obvious question: who controls the system, decides which custodians and merchants are trusted, and can change how it works. For WBTC, the answer is a decentralized autonomous organization known as the WBTC DAO, a governing body made up of a group of stakeholders that has included prominent names in the crypto space.
The DAO operates through a multi-signature wallet, meaning that changes require the agreement of multiple keyholders rather than any single party, and its members can vote to add or remove custodians and merchants and to make changes to the smart contracts on which the system runs. This governance structure exists specifically to reduce the centralization risk that would come from a single company controlling the entire arrangement, spreading authority across a set of stakeholders instead.
Why this matters became vivid in 2024, in what served as the clearest real-world stress test of WBTC’s governance. The custodian BitGo announced a change to its custody arrangements involving a partnership with another firm, and that change sparked significant concern across decentralized finance because of the new partner’s perceived links to a controversial figure and ecosystem.
The episode mattered because it went to the heart of the trust assumption underlying WBTC: holders were trusting that the Bitcoin backing their tokens was held safely and by parties they considered reliable, and a change in who effectively controlled that custody was enough to shake confidence and prompt many users and protocols to reconsider. It also accelerated the rise of alternative wrapped Bitcoin products with different custody models.
The lesson is that the governance and custody arrangements of a wrapped token are not background details; they are central to its safety, because the whole value of WBTC rests on the Bitcoin being there and being controlled by trustworthy parties. Who governs the system, and how, is therefore something a prospective holder should actually look into rather than take for granted.
A worked example: putting Bitcoin to work A concrete example shows why someone would bother wrapping their Bitcoin in the first place. Imagine a person named Ezra who holds $2,000 worth of Bitcoin and believes in it as a long-term holding, but who also wants to earn a return on that value instead of letting it sit idle. The problem is that the lending protocol Ezra wants to use, which would pay interest on deposited assets, runs on Ethereum, and Ezra’s Bitcoin cannot be deposited there directly because it lives on a different blockchain that the protocol cannot interact with. Without wrapping, Ezra’s only options would be to sell the Bitcoin for an Ethereum-native asset, giving up his Bitcoin exposure, or to leave it earning nothing.
Wrapping solves this. Ezra converts his Bitcoin into wrapped Bitcoin, either by going through a merchant to mint it directly or, more commonly for an ordinary user, by simply swapping his Bitcoin for WBTC on an exchange or decentralized exchange, which avoids the need to interact with the custodians himself. Now holding WBTC, which is an Ethereum token tracking Bitcoin’s price 1:1, Ezra can deposit it into the lending protocol and earn interest, all while his position still rises and falls with the price of Bitcoin. He has kept his Bitcoin exposure and put it to work at the same time. Beyond lending, WBTC opens the same doors that any Ethereum token enjoys: Ezra could supply it to a liquidity pool on a decentralized exchange to earn trading fees, use it as collateral to borrow other assets, or deposit it into yield strategies.
A further practical benefit is speed, since transactions in WBTC settle on Ethereum, which produces blocks far more frequently than Bitcoin, so moving wrapped Bitcoin between Ethereum wallets and applications is quicker than moving native Bitcoin. This is the everyday appeal of wrapped Bitcoin: it lets Bitcoin holders participate in the full range of Ethereum-based finance without selling the Bitcoin they want to keep.
WBTC versus native Bitcoin and the alternatives It is essential to be clear that wrapped Bitcoin is not the same as holding native Bitcoin, even though the two share a price.
With native Bitcoin, the only real question about safety is whether you control your own private keys; if you do, the Bitcoin is yours, secured by the Bitcoin network itself. With WBTC, the question expands considerably, because you are now also relying on the custodian to actually hold the backing Bitcoin, on the integrity of the reserves, on the governance of the system, and on the redemption process working when you want to convert back.
You may hold the WBTC token in your own wallet, but the wrapped asset still depends on institutional actors operating correctly behind the scenes. WBTC tracks Bitcoin’s market value, but it does not inherit Bitcoin’s trust model, and that difference is the single most important thing to understand about it. If your only goal is to hold Bitcoin for the long term and you have no interest in DeFi, native Bitcoin is the cleaner and simpler choice.
The 2024 custody controversy spurred the growth of alternative tokenized Bitcoin products, and they are worth knowing because they offer different trade-offs. One prominent alternative is cbBTC, issued by the exchange Coinbase, which appeals to users who already trust Coinbase’s custody and operate within its ecosystem. Another is tBTC, built by the Threshold Network, which is designed to avoid reliance on a single custodian in favor of a more decentralized model, appealing to users for whom minimizing custodial trust matters more than convenience.
There are others as well, and the broader point is that the tokenized Bitcoin market has become fragmented, offering distinct choices for different priorities. The decision among them is fundamentally about trust model and use case instead of price, since they all track Bitcoin: choose WBTC for the deepest liquidity and the widest integration across established DeFi protocols, choose cbBTC if you prefer Coinbase’s custody, choose tBTC if avoiding a single custodian is your priority, and choose native Bitcoin if you do not need DeFi at all. Wrapped Bitcoin products are tools for a specific purpose, not upgrades to Bitcoin.
Risks and what to check before wrapping The risks of wrapped Bitcoin all stem from the fact that it adds layers of trust on top of simply holding Bitcoin, and understanding them is essential before wrapping any meaningful amount. The primary risk is custodial centralization. Because the wrapped token is only as good as the Bitcoin held in reserve, the failure of the custodian, whether through a hack, insolvency, mismanagement, or loss of access, could impair the backing and leave holders with tokens that no longer correspond to real Bitcoin.
This is not a theoretical concern: history offers cautionary examples of wrapped or bridged Bitcoin products that became impossible to redeem after the entity backing them failed, turning Bitcoin-backed tokens supposedly into worthless or stranded assets. The custody arrangement is the foundation, and if it fails, everything built on it fails with it.
Several other risks compound the custodial one. Smart contract risk means that bugs or vulnerabilities in the Ethereum-side code, or errors in governance, could affect the token. Bridge risk arises when wrapped Bitcoin is moved onto other networks, such as Ethereum layer-two chains, through additional bridges, since each bridging layer adds another set of trust assumptions and another potential point of failure, and you may encounter bridged representations that wrap an already-wrapped token, compounding the risk further. Governance risk means that the parties controlling the system could make decisions, such as the contested custody change, that holders dislike or distrust. And regulatory risk means that official actions could affect redemptions or lead to address restrictions.
The practical advice that follows from all this is to verify before you wrap: check which specific wrapped token and contract you are holding, understand its custody model and who controls the reserves, confirm that proof-of-reserve attestations are current, and make sure you understand the redemption path back to native Bitcoin.
Reviewing the custodian’s transparency, the governance records, and any reputable audits or incident reports before committing meaningful funds is simply prudent. Wrapped Bitcoin is a useful tool that fills a real gap, but it should never be treated as identical to the Bitcoin it represents, because the trust model behind it is fundamentally different.
Frequently Asked Questions What is Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) in simple terms? Wrapped Bitcoin is an Ethereum token backed one-to-one by real Bitcoin held in reserve by a custodian, so one WBTC is meant to always equal one Bitcoin. It exists because native Bitcoin cannot be used inside Ethereum’s decentralized finance applications, which run on smart contracts that Bitcoin does not support. By locking real Bitcoin and issuing an equivalent Ethereum token against it, WBTC lets Bitcoin holders use their Bitcoin’s value for lending, borrowing, trading, and collateral within Ethereum’s ecosystem, without selling their Bitcoin exposure. It tracks Bitcoin’s price closely because every WBTC corresponds to a Bitcoin in reserve.
How does Wrapped Bitcoin work? It works through a mint-and-burn model involving three parties: custodians who hold the Bitcoin, merchants who handle verification and distribution, and users. To create WBTC, a user requests it from a merchant who performs identity checks, the corresponding Bitcoin is sent to the custodian, and an equal amount of WBTC is minted on Ethereum. To convert back, the user submits a redemption request, the WBTC is burned, and the custodian releases the Bitcoin. Both minting and burning are recorded publicly on both blockchains, and proof-of-reserve checks confirm the backing exists. The whole system is overseen by the WBTC DAO.
Is Wrapped Bitcoin the same as Bitcoin? No, and this distinction is crucial. WBTC tracks Bitcoin’s price and can be redeemed one-to-one for Bitcoin, but it is not the same as holding native Bitcoin. With native Bitcoin, your only real concern is controlling your private keys. With WBTC, you also depend on the custodian actually holding the backing Bitcoin, on the reserves being intact, on the governance functioning, and on redemption working. WBTC shares Bitcoin’s price but not its trust model. If you only want to hold Bitcoin long term and do not need decentralized finance, native Bitcoin is the cleaner, simpler choice.
What can you do with Wrapped Bitcoin? WBTC opens up the full range of Ethereum-based decentralized finance to Bitcoin’s value. Because it behaves like any Ethereum token, it can be lent out to earn interest, used as collateral to borrow other assets, supplied to liquidity pools on decentralized exchanges to earn trading fees, and deposited into yield strategies. This lets a Bitcoin holder earn returns or access liquidity while keeping their Bitcoin exposure, instead of selling. WBTC transactions also settle on Ethereum, which produces blocks far more frequently than Bitcoin, so moving wrapped Bitcoin between Ethereum wallets and applications is faster than moving native Bitcoin.
What are the alternatives to WBTC? The main alternatives are other tokenized Bitcoin products with different custody models. cbBTC, issued by Coinbase, suits users who trust Coinbase’s custody and ecosystem. tBTC, built by the Threshold Network, is designed to avoid reliance on a single custodian in favor of a more decentralized model, appealing to those who prioritize minimizing custodial trust. The tokenized Bitcoin market is fragmented, and the choice among options comes down to trust model and use case instead of price. WBTC offers the deepest liquidity and widest DeFi integration, cbBTC offers Coinbase custody, tBTC offers more decentralization, and native Bitcoin is best if you do not need DeFi.
What are the risks of Wrapped Bitcoin? The main risk is custodial centralization: because WBTC is only as good as the Bitcoin held in reserve, the failure of the custodian through a hack, insolvency, or loss of access could impair the backing, and history includes wrapped Bitcoin products that became unredeemable after their backers failed. Additional risks include smart contract vulnerabilities, bridge risk when WBTC is moved to other networks, governance decisions that holders may distrust, and regulatory actions affecting redemption. Before wrapping, verify which token and contract you hold, understand the custody model and reserves, confirm proof-of-reserve attestations, and make sure you understand the redemption path back to native Bitcoin.
This article is educational information, not financial advice. Wrapped Bitcoin and decentralized finance involve significant risks, including custodial failure, smart contract vulnerabilities, and loss of funds. Details of custodians, governance, and alternatives reflect information available as of June 26, 2026, and can change. Verify the current custody model, reserves, and redemption process of any wrapped token from primary sources, and consider your own circumstances before making any decision.
Ethereum trades around its 200-day moving average near $1,668, the line that has separated its bull markets from its bear markets for years. Above it lies a path back toward $3,000. Below it lies an accumulation zone, the charts put as low as $600. The strangest part is that Ethereum’s fundamentals have never been stronger.
Summary
Ethereum trades around $1,650, hovering at its 200-day moving average near $1,668, a level that has historically divided its bull markets from its bear markets. The price is roughly 55-65% below its $4,953 August 2025 all-time high, in a year-long downtrend, even as Ethereum’s fundamentals reach record highs. About 35.8 million ETH, near 30% of supply, is staked, spot ETFs have drawn around $11.6 billion in cumulative inflows, and corporate treasuries hold over 6.2 million ETH, yet none of it has lifted the price. The $1,668 line is the pivot: holding above it keeps a recovery toward $2,300 to $3,000 alive, while losing the $1,580 to $1,600 floor opens a path toward a deep $1,039 to $603 accumulation zone. The catalyst that could flip the line is the Glamsterdam upgrade and a reversal in ETF and treasury flows, but until the macro tide turns, the strongest fundamentals in Ethereum’s history have not been enough. Ethereum is trading around $1,650, which places it almost exactly on the one line that, more than any other, has historically decided whether it is in a bull market or a bear market: its 200-day moving average, currently near $1,668.
For years, this long-term trend line has acted as the dividing line for Ethereum, with sustained periods above it coinciding with recoveries and rallies, and breaks below it preceding extended downtrends.
Right now, Ethereum sits on the knife’s edge of that line, and the direction it breaks will go a long way toward determining its path through the rest of 2026. What makes the moment genuinely strange, and what separates this prediction from a simple chart reading, is the backdrop against which the line is being tested.
Ethereum’s price is down roughly 55-65% from its all-time high near $4,950 set in August 2025, and it has spent the better part of a year grinding lower, yet by almost every fundamental measure, the network has never been in better shape.
More ether is staked than ever, more institutional money has flowed into Ethereum products than ever, and corporate treasuries are accumulating it at a scale that did not exist a year ago. The result is one of the sharpest contrasts in the market: the strongest fundamentals in Ethereum’s history paired with some of its weakest price action since 2022.
This piece is organized around that contrast and around the line that sits at its center. The reason to build an Ethereum prediction this way, rather than as a list of targets, is that Ethereum’s situation is fundamentally a question about whether fundamentals will eventually matter, and the 200-day moving average is where that question gets answered in real time.
If Ethereum holds the line and reclaims the levels above it, the case that its record fundamentals will reassert themselves gains force, and a path back toward $3,000 opens. If it loses the floor beneath the line, the chart points toward a deep accumulation zone far below, and the fundamentals will have failed, for now, to matter.
What follows traces how Ethereum reached this point, why the $1,668 line carries so much weight, the genuinely record-setting fundamentals on one side of the ledger, the bearish forces that have overwhelmed them on the other, the catalysts that could tip the balance, and concrete bull, base, and bear scenarios tied to the line itself.
One line, two futures Begin with why a single moving average deserves to anchor an entire prediction, because for Ethereum, the 200-day moving average has earned its significance. A moving average is simply the average price over a trailing period, in this case 200 days, and it smooths out short-term noise to reveal the underlying trend.
For Ethereum, the 200-day line has historically functioned as the boundary between bull and bear regimes: when the price trades and holds above it, Ethereum has tended to be in recovery or rally mode, and when it breaks decisively below it, extended downtrends have usually followed. That history is why traders treat this level with such respect, and why Ethereum, sitting right on it, near $1,668, is such a charged situation. The price is balanced precisely at the line that separates its two possible futures.
The levels around the line sharpen the stakes. Immediately below the current price, the $1,600-$1,650 area has held as the floor for 2026, the zone buyers have repeatedly defended, and a brief dip toward $1,580 during the June selloff was bought back. Above, the first resistance sits in the $1,700-$1,800 range, with a more significant barrier near $2,000 and the major structural hurdle at $3,000, where Ethereum would reclaim its long-term trend.
The asymmetry that worries bears is what lies beneath the floor. Technical analysts who map the downside warn that a decisive break below the $1,580 area and the broader monthly support could open a much deeper decline toward an accumulation zone they place between roughly $1,600, a drop of another 30-60% from current levels.
Ethereum daily price chart | Source: crypto.news So the line is not merely a number; it is the hinge between a recovery path toward $3,000 and an abyss toward $600, which is what makes holding or losing it the central question for Ethereum in 2026.
How ETH got here To understand why Ethereum is testing this line at all, you have to trace the decline from its peak, because the fall has been long and grinding rather than a single crash. Ethereum reached its all-time high near $4,950 in August 2025, lifted by enthusiasm around its newly launched exchange-traded funds and growing staking participation.
From that peak, the descent was relentless, with Ethereum closing out a long streak of red months, its worst such run in years, and sliding through the second half of 2025 and into 2026.
By early 2026, it had fallen below $3,000, and the weakness continued through the spring, with the price working steadily lower in a descending channel of lower highs and lower lows that defined the year.
The June selloff that brought Ethereum to its current levels near $1,600 was the latest leg of this extended downtrend, not a sudden break from an otherwise healthy trend.
The causes were a convergence of pressures rather than any single shock. Broader risk-off sentiment across crypto, driven by macroeconomic uncertainty and concerns about the path of interest rates, weighed on Ethereum as a high-risk asset. Persistent outflows from spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds removed a key source of demand and, during the worst stretches, became active selling pressure.
Selling attributed to Ethereum’s own co-founder added to the bearish narrative. And Ethereum’s tendency to amplify Bitcoin’s moves meant that as Bitcoin slid toward $60,000, Ethereum fell harder, because it typically rises faster in bull conditions and declines more sharply in risk-off periods.
The cumulative effect was a year-long erosion that has left Ethereum testing the line that separates recovery from a deeper bear market, with the price having given back the majority of its gains from the prior cycle. That is the chart context. The fundamental context, remarkably, points the other way.
Why $1,668 matters so much It is worth dwelling on the significance of the line itself, because the entire technical case for Ethereum hinges on it, and the reasoning is not arbitrary. The 200-day moving average works as a regime indicator precisely because it filters out short-term volatility and captures the medium-to-long-term trend, which is why both technical traders and the algorithms that drive a large share of market activity pay close attention to it.
For Ethereum specifically, the historical record shows that this line has repeatedly marked the transition between bull and bear phases, so a sustained position above it tends to attract trend-following buyers and signal strength, while a decisive break below it tends to trigger trend-following selling and signal weakness. The line becomes partly self-fulfilling because so many participants treat it as meaningful that their collective behavior reinforces its importance.
Right now, the line is doing something subtle and worrying beneath the surface: even as the price hovers around it, the 200-day average itself has begun to slope downward, which technicians read as a sign of underlying long-term weakness instead of strength. A price clinging to a falling long-term average is in a more precarious position than one riding a rising average, because the trend line that is supposed to provide support is itself drifting lower.
This is why the current test is so consequential. If Ethereum can hold above the line, stabilize, and push back through the resistance levels above it, the long-term average can flatten and turn up, flipping the regime back toward recovery. If it loses the line and the floor beneath it, the falling average becomes overhead resistance, and the path of least resistance points toward the deep accumulation zone the bears identify.
The $1,668 line, in other words, is not just where the price happens to be; it is the level at which Ethereum’s medium-term fate is being decided.
The strongest fundamentals in Ethereum’s history Here is the contrast that makes Ethereum’s situation so unusual, and it deserves to be laid out fully, because on fundamentals, the network is arguably in the best shape it has ever been.
Start with staking, the mechanism by which holders lock up ether to help secure the network and earn a yield. As of early 2026, roughly 35.8 million ether, close to 30% of the entire circulating supply, is staked, secured by around one point one million validators, with a staking yield in the range of 2.8-3.5% annually.
That staked proportion has nearly tripled since early 2023, when about 11% of supply was staked, reflecting steadily growing confidence and the popularity of liquid staking and restaking. A large and rising share of supply locked in staking reduces the ether available to sell on the open market, a structurally supportive dynamic.
The institutional picture is equally striking. Spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds have attracted roughly 11.6 billion dollars in cumulative net inflows since launching, with the largest single product holding well over $6 billion in assets, giving traditional investors regulated access to ether and, through the staking yield increasingly available, a competitive income component.
Beyond the funds, corporate treasuries have embraced ether as a reserve asset at a scale that did not exist a year earlier, collectively holding over 6.2 million ether, up from under 1 million in mid-2025, led by a treasury company that alone holds several million ether, a meaningful slice of the total supply.
Layered on top is an accelerating upgrade cadence, with major protocol improvements deployed in 2025 and a twice-yearly schedule of further upgrades designed to scale the network.
By every one of these measures, more staked, more institutional capital, more corporate adoption, more frequent upgrades, Ethereum’s fundamentals are at or near record strength. And none of it has stopped the price from falling, which is the puzzle the rest of the prediction has to confront.
The bear case: why the fundamentals have not mattered The hard truth for Ethereum bulls is that strong fundamentals have, so far, been no match for the forces pushing the price down, and understanding why is essential to any honest prediction.
The first and most powerful force is the macro environment and Ethereum’s nature as a high-beta risk asset. Ethereum tends to amplify the broader market’s moves, so in a period of risk aversion, tightening financial conditions, and a sliding Bitcoin, Ethereum falls harder regardless of how strong its network fundamentals are, because the selling is driven by macro flows that do not care about staking ratios or upgrade schedules. When capital is fleeing risk, the quality of Ethereum’s fundamentals offers little protection.
The second force is the reversal of the very institutional demand that forms part of the bull case. The exchange-traded funds that brought billions into Ethereum have, during the downturn, seen persistent outflows, turning a source of demand into a source of selling and showing that institutional money can flee as readily as it arrived.
The third is a structural tension within Ethereum’s own design: the growth of layer-two networks, which handle transactions more cheaply by settling on Ethereum, expands the ecosystem’s usage but also reduces the fee pressure on the main chain, complicating the link between network activity and ether’s value.
The fourth is competition from other blockchains vying for the same developers, users, and capital, which caps the premium the market is willing to pay.
And the fifth is simply sentiment and narrative: with the price in a year-long downtrend and a co-founder seen selling, the story around Ethereum has soured, and narrative drives crypto prices more than fundamentals over any given stretch.
The bears’ summary is blunt: the ether trade may be structurally broken, with the token failing to capture the value its thriving network creates, and until the macro tide turns, the record fundamentals are a reason to watch instead of a reason the price must rise.
The catalysts that could flip the line For the fundamentals to start mattering, something has to change the flow of money and the narrative, and several potential catalysts could do exactly that, which is where the bull case regains its footing.
The most specific is the network’s continued upgrade path. A major scaling upgrade expected in the first half of 2026, followed by another in the second half, is designed to deliver measurable improvements to the main chain, and a successful, well-received upgrade could refresh the narrative around Ethereum, reminding the market of the network’s technical leadership and giving institutional and retail buyers a concrete reason to re-engage.
Upgrades have historically been catalysts for Ethereum when they land well, and the twice-yearly cadence means there are regular opportunities for a positive surprise.
The second catalyst is a reversal in the institutional flows. The exchange-traded fund outflows have been a primary drag, so a durable shift back to sustained inflows, perhaps helped by the staking yield making the funds more competitive against fixed-income products, would remove that selling pressure and could turn the funds back into the demand engine the bull case envisions.
The continued accumulation by corporate treasuries is a related signal; if treasuries keep buying through the weakness and the whale wallets that have been adding to positions during the dip prove to be the leading edge of renewed institutional conviction, the resulting supply squeeze, with so much ether staked and locked, could lift the price sharply once demand returns.
The third catalyst is macro: a shift toward easier monetary policy or a broader return of risk appetite would lift high-beta assets like Ethereum, and given how much it has fallen, the rebound could be substantial. The honest framing is that Ethereum has loaded the spring, with record fundamentals and locked supply, and the catalysts above are what could release it, but each depends on forces, especially the macro backdrop, that are not yet in place.
The bull, base, and bear cases for 2026 Tying the scenarios to the line and the catalysts makes them concrete. These are conditional ranges, not predictions, and each hinges on whether Ethereum holds its pivotal level and whether the catalysts arrive.
Bull case: Ethereum holds the $1,668 line, a well-received scaling upgrade refreshes the narrative, exchange-traded fund flows reverse back to sustained inflows, and a friendlier macro backdrop returns risk appetite. The locked supply from record staking amplifies the move as demand returns, and Ethereum recovers through resistance toward the $2,300-$3,000 zone, with the most bullish institutional targets pointing well above that over a longer horizon as the fundamentals finally reassert themselves Base case: Ethereum chops around the line for an extended period, holding the $1,580-$1,700 range as treasury accumulation offsets continued fund outflows, with the strong fundamentals preventing a collapse but the weak macro preventing a breakout. In this scenario, Ethereum grinds sideways near current levels, waiting for a catalyst, with direction deferred to the second half of the year. Bear case: Ethereum loses the $1,668 line and the $1,580 floor decisively, fund outflows continue, Bitcoin drags the market lower, and the falling long-term average becomes overhead resistance. The chart’s deep accumulation zone comes into play, and Ethereum declines toward the $1,000-$1,600 region the bears identify, with the record fundamentals failing, for this cycle, to matter against the macro tide. What to watch For anyone tracking whether Ethereum’s fundamentals will finally translate into price, the analysis points to a focused watchlist, and the first item is the line itself. Whether Ethereum holds the $1,668 200-day moving average and the $1,580 floor beneath it, or loses them decisively, is the single clearest signal of which scenario is unfolding, because that level marks the boundary between the recovery path and the deep-accumulation path.
A sustained reclaim of the resistance above the line would be powerfully bullish; a decisive break of the floor would be powerfully bearish. Everything else feeds into that binary.
The second item is the flow data. The exchange-traded fund outflows have been the primary drag, so a durable reversal to net inflows would be among the strongest possible signals that institutional demand is returning, while continued outflows would confirm the bearish reading. The behavior of corporate treasuries and large accumulating wallets matters alongside the funds; sustained buying through weakness supports the bull case, and any sign of treasuries slowing or selling would be a serious warning given how much of the supply-squeeze thesis rests on them.
The third item is the upgrade path and its reception, since a well-received scaling upgrade is the most concrete near-term catalyst that could refresh the narrative. And the fourth, as always, is the macro environment, because Ethereum’s high-beta nature means a shift in monetary policy or risk appetite would move it more than almost any network development.
The honest synthesis is that Ethereum is a coiled spring of record fundamentals and locked supply held down by a hostile macro tape, and the 200-day line is where the contest between the two is being decided.
Watch the line, watch the flows, and resist the temptation to assume that strong fundamentals must win quickly, because Ethereum’s entire recent history is a reminder that they have not.
Frequently Asked Questions Why is the $1,668 level so important for Ethereum? Because it is Ethereum’s 200-day moving average, a long-term trend line that has historically divided its bull markets from its bear markets. When Ethereum trades and holds above it, the network has tended to be in recovery or rally mode; when it breaks decisively below, extended downtrends have usually followed. Many traders and automated strategies treat the line as a regime indicator, which makes it partly self-fulfilling. With Ethereum sitting right on the line, the direction it breaks will signal whether a recovery toward $3,000 or a deeper decline toward the chart’s accumulation zone is more likely.
Why is Ethereum’s price falling when its fundamentals are so strong? Because macro forces and Ethereum’s nature as a high-risk asset have overwhelmed the fundamentals. Ethereum amplifies the broader market’s moves, so in a period of risk aversion, tightening conditions, and a sliding Bitcoin, it falls hard regardless of staking ratios or upgrades. The exchange-traded funds that had bought billions in inflows have seen persistent outflows, turning demand into selling. Layer-two growth complicates the link between network usage and ether’s value, competition caps the premium, and a soured narrative drives sentiment. Over any given stretch, flows and narrative move crypto prices more than fundamentals, which is why record fundamentals have not lifted the price.
How strong are Ethereum’s fundamentals right now? By most measures, the strongest in its history. Roughly thirty-five point eight million ether, near 30% of the supply, is staked, nearly triple the proportion of early 2023, which locks up supply. Spot exchange-traded funds have drawn around $11.6 billion in cumulative inflows, with the largest product holding over $6 billion. Corporate treasuries hold over 6.2 million ether, up from under 1 million in mid-2025. And the network is on an accelerating upgrade schedule. The contrast between these record fundamentals and the weak price is precisely what makes Ethereum’s current situation so unusual.
How low could Ethereum go? If it loses the $1,668 line and the $1,580 floor decisively, technical analysts who map the downside identify a deep accumulation zone between roughly $1,600, which would be another 30-60% below current levels. This is the bear scenario, not a forecast, and it depends on continued fund outflows, a falling long-term average turning into resistance, and Bitcoin dragging the market lower. The bull scenario, in which Ethereum holds the line and recovers toward $3,000, is equally coherent. Which path unfolds depends on the line, the flows, the upgrades, and the macro environment.
What could turn Ethereum’s price around? Several catalysts could flip the trend. A well-received scaling upgrade could refresh the narrative and give buyers a concrete reason to re-engage. A durable reversal of exchange-traded fund outflows back to sustained inflows would remove the primary drag and restore demand. Continued accumulation by corporate treasuries and large wallets, combined with the locked supply from record staking, could create a supply squeeze that lifts the price sharply once demand returns. And a shift toward easier monetary policy or renewed risk appetite would lift high-beta Ethereum substantially. Each depends on forces, especially the macro backdrop, that are not yet fully in place.
Is the “ETH trade” broken? That is the bears’ core argument: that Ether, the token, is failing to capture the value its thriving network creates, because layer-two growth reduces main-chain fee pressure, institutional flows have reversed, and the price has fallen for a year despite record fundamentals. The bull rebuttal is that the fundamentals have built a coiled spring of locked supply and structural demand that will release once the macro tide turns and a catalyst arrives, and that the current weakness is macro-driven instead of a permanent break. The honest position is that the question is unresolved, and the 200-day line is where the market is deciding it.
This article is information, not investment advice. The scenarios described are conditional ranges that depend on unresolved questions, not predictions, and Ethereum is highly volatile. Prices, flows, staking figures, and fundamentals reflect reporting available as of June 26, 2026, and can change quickly. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Verify current data from primary sources and consider your own circumstances before making any decision
USDT temporarily flipped ETH to become the second-biggest cryptocurrency.
Almost every major altcoin has taken a beating in recent months, and Ethereum is no exception, with its price plunging to a 14-month bottom.
Analysts now warn that it could be on the verge of a further slump, with some floating the idea of a crash to a multi-year low of around $1,000.
The Red Days Aren’t Over? The prolonged bear market hasn’t been the only thing suppressing ETH’s valuation lately. As CryptoPotato reported, Hsiao-Wei Wang stepped down as the Ethereum Foundation’s co-executive director and board member, while shortly after, the entity reduced its workforce by 20%.
Following the combination of the numerous negative developments, ETH’s price nosedived to just north of $1,500, while its market capitalization briefly tumbled below $183 billion. This means that for a moment, Tether’s USDT flipped Ethereum to become the second-largest cryptocurrency. ETH has reclaimed its prestigious spot, albeit leading by a slim margin.
According to Ali Martinez, the asset has been trading inside a crucial volume block between $1,584 and $1,683, where nearly 4 million coins have changed hands. He claimed that securing this “specific area” as support can open the door to the next major supply clusters at $1,980 and $2,079.
At the same time, the analyst warned that losing this baseline (as it happened just hours ago) might result in a deeper plunge to $1,237 and even $1,089.
X user Ryker also shared their outlook, predicting a drop to $1,260 before a potential rally above $3K. Merlijn The Trader highlighted the forecast, noting that Ryker is the only trader followed by Changpeng Zhao (CZ) on X.
You may also like: Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch 5 Reasons Why Bitcoin Just Crashed Below $63K as Liquidations Top $500M Bitmine Buys 52K ETH as Tom Lee Believes the Best Years for Crypto Are Still Ahead Previous Predictions Earlier this month, X user Ted opined that ETH is more likely to reach its cycle bottom before Bitcoin (BTC). Back then, he claimed that most of the downside liquidity has been taken out, projecting a downfall to $1,300-$1,400. For their part, Niels envisioned a drop to $1,200 sometime this year.
Recent whale activity reinforces the bearish outlook. X user Max Crypto revealed that one large investor opened a $68 million short position on ETH with 23x leverage, while Justin Wu outlined that four OG wallets have started dumping their holdings.
Whales are known as experienced market participants who may have inside information about upcoming events that could influence the price. That’s why their efforts are closely monitored by retail investors who could panic and cash out as well.
PANews June 27 news, according to SoSoValue data, yesterday (U.S. Eastern Time June 26) Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $12.848 million.
The Ethereum spot ETF with the largest single-day net outflow yesterday was BlackRock's ETF ETHA, which recorded a single-day net outflow of $12.848 million. ETHA's historical total net inflow currently stands at $11.08 billion.
As of press time, the total net asset value of Ethereum spot ETFs is $8.379 billion, the ETF net asset ratio (market value as a percentage of Ethereum's total market value) reaches 4.42%, and the historical cumulative net inflow has reached $10.903 billion.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have jointly called for public comment on their approach to harmonizing regulatory frameworks for crypto futures. The proposed public comment on the SEC CFTC framework comes amid the recent approval of crypto perpetual futures in the U.S.
Calls For Public Comment On SEC CFTC Framework In a press release, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint request for public comment on potential approaches to further harmonize regulatory frameworks applicable to portfolio margining across securities, security-based swaps, futures, swaps, and related positions. The public comment period will remain open for 60 days after the publication in the Federal Register. This is significant as the CFTC notably regulates prediction markets, which trade swaps.
Furthermore, this follows the launch of crypto perpetual futures in the U.S., with Kalshi securing CFTC approval to offer BTC, ETH, XRP, and HYPE futures. The request for public comment on the SEC CFTC framework also comes amid the rise in tokenized securities, with platforms such as Hyperliquid offering perpetuals for these securities.
The SEC and CFTC noted that the request for comment will assist them in evaluating whether greater coordination or alignment in portfolio margining requirements may improve risk management efficiency, reduce unnecessary market fragmentation, and enhance consumer protections.
Meanwhile, this marks the latest coordination between the SEC and CFTC towards providing clear frameworks that boost the crypto and financial markets. As CoinGape reported, the SEC and CFTC are pushing to clarify the definitions of derivative products, including definitions of swaps and security-based swaps, and how to treat them.
A Move To Further Promote Innovation SEC Chair Paul Atkins noted that further harmonizing the SEC CFTC framework will ensure that jurisdictional overlap does not stifle innovation and efficiency. “Cross-margining offers a clear opportunity to unlock liquidity that remains frozen in separate accounts, and we encourage market participants to provide feedback on ideas that will help improve coordination between both agencies,” he said.
Commenting on this move, CFTC Chair Michael Selig said that fostering enhanced cooperation between the two agencies on portfolio margining promises to unlock untapped capital while ensuring a more robust risk management framework and market protections. The CFTC is currently facing a lawsuit from the CME over its approval of crypto futures.
The CME argues that crypto perpetuals are swaps, not futures contracts, and that the regulator approved these products the wrong way. These crypto futures are already seeing significant demand, with Kalshi’s products recording over $1 billion in trading volume in under two weeks after they launched.
Bitcoin and altcoins continue to experience sharp declines due to ongoing ETF outflows, a more hawkish Fed, and a stronger dollar.
As Bitcoin fell to levels as low as $58,000 in the recent decline, expectations for June on the forecasting market Polymarket were also reshaped.
At this point, investors are expecting a decline, especially for Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum, and XRP.
According to Polymarket data, the price expectations for BTC, ETH, and XRP in June were as follows.
1. Bitcoin (BTC): Predictions titled “What Price Will Bitcoin Reach in June?” indicate that a decline in BTC prices is the dominant expectation.
A drop below $57,500 is the most likely scenario, with a 49% probability. This is followed by a 37% probability of Bitcoin rising above $62,500. This is followed by a 19% probability of Bitcoin falling below $55,000. Finally, the possibility of Bitcoin rising above $65,000 only covers about 10% of the target. 2. Ethereum (ETH): In predictions titled “What Will Ethereum’s Price Be in June?”, bearish forecasts for Ethereum are also prominent.
The most dominant scenario is a drop below $1,500, with a 66% probability priced in. A drop below $1,400 is priced in with a 22% probability. The probability of Ethereum surpassing $2,000 is priced at only 1%. 3.XRP: In predictions titled “What will the price of XRP be in June?”, bearish forecasts for XRP are prominent.
The most likely scenario is a drop below $1, with a 70% probability of the price being priced in. Secondly, a drop below $0.8 is priced in with a 2% probability. In contrast, a move above $1.4 is priced in with only a 1% probability. *This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Bitcoin and altcoins continue to experience sharp declines due to ongoing ETF outflows, a more hawkish Fed, and a stronger dollar.
As Bitcoin fell to levels as low as $58,000 in the recent decline, expectations for June on the forecasting market Polymarket were also reshaped.
At this point, investors are expecting a decline, especially for Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum, and XRP.
According to Polymarket data, the price expectations for BTC, ETH, and XRP in June were as follows.
1. Bitcoin (BTC): Predictions titled “What Price Will Bitcoin Reach in June?” indicate that a decline in BTC prices is the dominant expectation.
A drop below $57,500 is the most likely scenario, with a 49% probability. This is followed by a 37% probability of Bitcoin rising above $62,500. This is followed by a 19% probability of Bitcoin falling below $55,000. Finally, the possibility of Bitcoin rising above $65,000 only covers about 10% of the target. 2. Ethereum (ETH): In predictions titled “What Will Ethereum’s Price Be in June?”, bearish forecasts for Ethereum are also prominent.
The most dominant scenario is a drop below $1,500, with a 66% probability priced in. A drop below $1,400 is priced in with a 22% probability. The probability of Ethereum surpassing $2,000 is priced at only 1%. 3.XRP: In predictions titled “What will the price of XRP be in June?”, bearish forecasts for XRP are prominent.
The most likely scenario is a drop below $1, with a 70% probability of the price being priced in. Secondly, a drop below $0.8 is priced in with a 2% probability. In contrast, a move above $1.4 is priced in with only a 1% probability. *This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
SharpLink, the Nasdaq-listed company that has quietly built one of the largest corporate Ethereum treasuries in existence, started buying again on June 26. The firm scooped up 5,000 ETH worth approximately $7.85 million through crypto brokerage FalconX, its first purchase since October 2025.
That eight-month silence had started to raise eyebrows. Now, with total holdings sitting at 876,285 ETH, SharpLink trails only the Ethereum Foundation itself among corporate holders. For a company nursing an unrealized loss north of $1.7 billion, the decision to resume buying says something about conviction, or at least about the strategy they’re committed to riding out.
The numbers behind the buy On-chain analysts at EmberCN and Arkham Intelligence confirmed the transaction independently. The 5,000 ETH acquisition is modest by SharpLink’s historical standards, but the signal matters more than the size.
SharpLink’s last purchase came in October 2025, when it acquired roughly 19,270 ETH. Before that, the company had executed far larger capital-raise-funded buys, including transactions exceeding 100,000 ETH during 2025 alone.
Advertisement
The company’s average purchase price across its entire position lands around $3,609 per ETH. With Ether trading well below that level, the math is uncomfortable: SharpLink’s unrealized loss sits somewhere between $1.71 billion and $1.8 billion.
During the eight months it wasn’t buying, SharpLink generated approximately 22,102 ETH through staking rewards alone. That’s roughly $34.6 million in ETH at current prices, earned simply by locking up tokens to help secure the Ethereum network.
From gaming affiliate to Ethereum whale SharpLink’s journey to becoming crypto’s second-largest corporate ETH holder is one of the more dramatic pivots in recent market history. The company, which trades under the ticker SBET, originally operated as a sports betting and gaming affiliate business. Around mid-2025, it shifted its entire corporate identity toward Ethereum treasury accumulation.
The leadership roster tells you this wasn’t a casual decision. Joseph Chalom, a former BlackRock executive, sits in a key role. Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin is also involved.
SharpLink has funded its accumulation through equity issuances and institutional partnerships, including a notable relationship with Galaxy. The company has also emphasized transparency, publishing detailed dashboards of its holdings.
What this means for investors For ETH holders and traders, SharpLink has financial incentive to support Ethereum’s value through continued accumulation and staking. Every ETH it stakes generates more ETH, compounding its position regardless of price action.
SharpLink’s entire corporate value proposition is tied to a single asset. Investors buying SBET shares aren’t getting diversified crypto exposure. They’re getting levered ETH exposure with a corporate wrapper.
The staking yield component does provide a buffer that pure Bitcoin treasury companies don’t have. SharpLink’s 22,102 ETH in staking rewards during its buying pause demonstrates that the treasury generates income even when the company isn’t actively deploying capital.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
An Ethereum whale who shorted Ether (ETH) during the October 2025 crypto crash has returned after eight months of silence.
Key takeaways:
Ethereum whale opens a $19.72 million 20x ETH short near the $1,500 support zone.ETH’s bear flag setup hints at a decline toward $1,375, which may earn the whale roughly $2.39 million in profits.Ethereum whale opens 20x short after eight-month hiatusOn Friday, wallet '0xf83f...6728' opened a 20x-leveraged ETH short worth $19.72 million as Ether reached the $1,500 support zone after dropping 18.25% over the last two weeks.
The position was opened at an average price of around $1,565, according to data resource Hyperbot. As of this press time, the whale had earned nearly $106,500 in unrealized profits as the ETH price dropped around the $1,550 area.
Ethereum whale's $19.72M position status as of Friday. Source: Hyperbot
The downside sentiment in the Ethereum market has tracked a broader tech-led risk selloff, with traders cutting exposure to speculative assets as Nasdaq and chip stocks came under pressure.
Ethereum-specific sentiment has weakened further amid renewed scrutiny of the Ethereum Foundation, following reports of budget cuts, staff reductions and a wave of senior departures that have raised questions about the organization’s leadership stability.
Ether is eyeing a decline toward the $1,375 level if it continues the breakdown out of its prevailing bear flag pattern.
ETH/USD daily price chart tracking the bear flag breakdown setup. Source: TradingView
If ETH falls to $1,375, the whale’s unrealized profit would rise to roughly $2.39 million before fees and funding, based on the position’s approximate $1,565 entry price.
Same whale shorted ETH near October 2025 crash topThe wallet’s latest move stands out because of its trading history.
Transaction logs show that wallet '0xf83f...6728' last became active on Oct. 27, 2025, when it opened an ETH short near $4,172 as volatility from the October crypto crash was easing.
The trader later closed the position near $4,133, booking $41,693 in net profit after $5,263 in exchange fees.
Ethereum whale's filled ETH orders from October 2025. Source: Hyperbot
The whale's current strategy appears similar: short ETH into weakness, use high leverage, and lean into downside momentum. The scale has changed sharply, however, since the current position carries nearly $20 million in notional exposure, making it far larger than the whale’s October 2025 trade.
ETH double bottom could threaten the whale’s shortThe whale’s bearish bet is not without risk.
As of Friday, Ether’s daily chart showed a potential double bottom near the $1,500–$1,512 support area, where buyers stepped in twice in June. The setup remains unconfirmed, but a strong rebound from this zone could shift short-term momentum back toward the bulls.
The key level to watch is the neckline near $1,850. A decisive daily close above that level would confirm the double bottom pattern and open the door to a measured rebound toward roughly $2,190, based on the distance between the neckline and the $1,512 bottom.
That would put ETH close to the whale’s liquidation zone near $2,150, meaning a confirmed bullish reversal could pressure or even wipe out the short position if the trader does not add collateral or reduce exposure.
This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph's Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research.
Ethereum is on the road to the abyss, but it has not lost its allure in the eyes of the boldest investors. No question for the whales to remain unmoved in the face of such an opportunity. Sharplink understood from the start and jumps on the occasion like a predator on its prey. One question arises here: when fear dominates, should reason buy without hesitation?
In brief Sharplink bought 5,000 ETH at the lowest point of 2026 after eight months of pause. The company holds 876,285 ETH with a latent loss of 1.71 billion dollars. CEO Joseph Chalom is betting on the CLARITY Act and the growth of tokenized RWAs. Sharplink joins the Russell indices, which could broaden its shareholder base. Sharplink scoops up 5,000 ETH at the year’s low Sharplink resumed its Ethereum purchases after eight long months of complete strategic silence. The company bought 5,000 ETH for about 7.85 million dollars via FalconX. The operation took place as Ethereum hit its lowest level of the year at 1,537 dollars.
CEO Joseph Chalom had identified three catalysts for the rise of ETH. The CLARITY Act, the return of risk appetite, and the growth of tokenized RWAs. Some are beginning to progressively materialize in financial markets.
I see a real conviction of institutional accumulation that remains strong despite low prices.
Source: Andri Fauzan Adziima, Bitrue Research Institute, Cointelegraph, June 26, 2026. The company acts as a conviction investor in the crypto market.
$1.7 billion in losses: a strategy under maximum pressure The contradiction is harsh and challenges all crypto and Ethereum market observers. Sharplink now holds 876,285 ETH with an average purchase price of 3,609 dollars. The latent loss reaches 1.71 billion dollars at the current Ethereum price.
The company buys at the lowest, but it also buys amid a dizzying price plunge. Analysts are deeply divided on this risky and controversial strategy. Some see it as a strong and admirable institutional conviction in Ethereum. Others see a dangerous strategy that could cost shareholders dearly.
The purchase of 5,000 ETH remains modest, but the signal is powerful for crypto markets. The company is betting everything on the long-term recovery of Ethereum.
We believe we are in the early stages of the crypto spring.
Source: Tom Lee, Bitmine, Cointelegraph, June 26, 2026. Sharplink’s bet is colossal and deeply divides experts.
Ethereum treasury firms play the waiting game on the crypto market Sharplink is not alone in this strategy of massive accumulation on Ethereum and crypto markets. Bitmine holds 5.67 million ETH, more than six times Sharplink’s holdings. Ethereum treasury companies continue to accumulate despite massive ETF outflows.
Sharplink’s inclusion in the Russell 2000 and 3000 indices could broaden its shareholder base. The catalysts identified by Chalom could raise Ethereum’s price in crypto markets. SBET stock rose 0.22% after hours following the announcement.
The path to recovery remains long and fraught with pitfalls for Ethereum and the crypto market. Institutional conviction in Ethereum remains intact, despite appearances and doubts.
This massive accumulation raises questions about the deep nature of value in the crypto universe. Philosophy teaches us that the greatest wealth is often built in adversity.
Key figures of Sharplink 5,000 ETH bought at 1,537 dollars; 876,285 ETH held in total; 1.71 billion dollars in latent loss; 22,102 ETH earned by staking; ETH price at 1,578 dollars at the time of writing. Sharplink resumed its Ethereum purchases at the lowest point of the year, despite colossal latent losses. The Ethereum treasury company strategy remains unchanged: accumulate, whatever happens. Some analysts predict three consecutive quarters of decline for Ethereum. A bleak scenario that could severely test the patience of the most convinced investors.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Mikaia A.
La révolution blockchain et crypto est en marche ! Et le jour où les impacts se feront ressentir sur l’économie la plus vulnérable de ce Monde, contre toute espérance, je dirai que j’y étais pour quelque chose
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Polymarket traders assign a 76% probability that Ethereum will reach $1,500 before the end of 2026, reflecting near-total conviction in further downside from current levels. U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded 17 consecutive days of net outflows totaling $401 million in May 2026, setting the longest institutional withdrawal streak in ETH history. A confirmed death cross on the daily chart, where the 50-day EMA crossed below the 200-day EMA, preceded months of further decline in both prior Ethereum bear markets. The Glamsterdam protocol upgrade, originally targeting June 2026, has been delayed to Q3 2026, removing the primary near-term catalyst that bulls had used to anchor support. Ethereum trades below its 20-day, 50-day, and 100-day exponential moving averages, all clustered between $1,740 and $2,050, creating a dense resistance wall above current price action. Ethereum traded near $1,670 on June 25, 2026, holding just above a support zone that has protected every major low since the 2022 bear market bottom. The $1,500 level has drawn $3.9 million in total volume on Polymarket prediction markets alone, where traders now price a 76% chance that ETH reaches that threshold before year-end.
That conviction stems from a convergence of signals: record ETF outflows, a confirmed death cross, and a delayed protocol upgrade that had been the last remaining bullish catalyst for Q2.
This article examines the technical, fundamental, and on-chain data behind the growing consensus that $1,500 is no longer a floor but a destination, and what that shift means for positioning.
Record ETF Outflows Signal Institutional Retreat U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs logged 17 consecutive trading days of net outflows in May, totaling $401 million and setting a record for the longest institutional withdrawal streak Ethereum has experienced.
On June 23 alone, ETH ETFs recorded $82 million in net outflows, marking the fourth straight day of withdrawals as market caution grew amid U.S.-Iran tensions and shifting interest rate expectations. The institutional retreat contrasts sharply with the accumulation thesis that dominated late 2025.
When spot ETH ETFs launched, proponents argued that regulated institutional vehicles would create a persistent demand floor.
That thesis has not survived contact with a 65% drawdown from the approximately $4,950 all-time high reached in August 2025. Funding rates have turned negative and open interest has declined sharply, suggesting a leverage flush rather than a fresh uptrend, according to data reviewed by Cryptopolitan analysts.
Death Cross and Descending Channel Frame the Technical Picture A death cross confirmed on the daily chart when the 50-day exponential moving average crossed below the 200-day EMA. In Ethereum’s prior bear markets of 2018 and 2022, this signal preceded months of further decline before any sustained recovery began.
ETH currently trades below its 20-day, 50-day, and 100-day EMAs, all clustered between $1,740 and $2,050. That alignment creates a dense resistance wall. Analyst Ardi stated on X that ETH has one responsibility over the next four months: do not start closing below $1,500.
He noted the level has held every major low since the 2022 bottom, and losing it would force a reconsideration of bullish assumptions, Ardi wrote on June 24. Immediate support sits at $1,585, with a deeper floor at $1,468 if the current level fails.
Glamsterdam Delay Removes the Last Bullish Catalyst The Glamsterdam upgrade represents Ethereum’s most significant protocol change since the Merge. Originally targeting June 2026, the upgrade has been officially delayed to Q3 2026, removing the primary catalyst that bulls had been using to anchor a price floor for the current quarter.
Glamsterdam’s two headline components are Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS) and Block-Level Access Lists (BALs). The ePBS feature removes reliance on third-party MEV relays to match block builders with validators.
BALs enable parallel transaction execution by requiring each block to declare upfront which accounts it will read and write. A confirmed 200-million-gas limit floor was set at the Soldøgn Interop in April 2026, representing a 233% increase from the current limit.
Analysis: The delay matters because price catalysts derive their power from proximity. A Q2 upgrade creates a tradable event in the present quarter; a Q3 timeline pushes it into seasonal low-volume months, reducing the probability that institutional capital will front-run the event.
Prediction Markets Quantify the Downside Consensus Polymarket now prices a 76% chance that ETH hits $1,500 before year-end, while Kalshi shows 73%. That level of convergence across two independent prediction platforms is unusual.
The $1,500 zone aligns with a high-footprint anchored volume profile, according to Coinpedia analysis, meaning significant historical volume traded at that price, which can act as either support or a magnet for price.
Analyst James Easton compared Ethereum’s current weekly chart to the Russell 2000 index. The Russell 2000 has broken above its resistance near 2,500, but Ethereum remains below its equivalent zone near $4,300 to $5,100.
A confirmed move above approximately $5,100 could place Ethereum in price discovery, Easton noted, though that requires a reversal of the current downtrend as a prerequisite.
Regulatory Implications The SEC has not issued new guidance on spot Ethereum ETFs during the current drawdown. If outflows continue at the current pace, issuers may face pressure to reduce fees or restructure fund terms to stem redemptions.
The delayed Glamsterdam upgrade also raises questions about whether the SEC’s classification framework for ETH could shift if staking mechanics change significantly post-upgrade.
What’s Next? The immediate test is whether ETH can hold above $1,585 and reclaim $1,685 on a daily close. The Glamsterdam upgrade timeline in Q3 2026 provides the next fundamental catalyst. Prediction market pricing currently embeds an assumption that the $1,500 test is a matter of when, not if.
FAQs What does the Ethereum death cross mean for price?
A death cross occurs when the 50-day EMA crosses below the 200-day EMA, signaling medium-term momentum has turned negative relative to the long-term trend.
How many consecutive days of ETH ETF outflows occurred?
U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded 17 consecutive days of net outflows in May 2026, totaling $401 million and setting a record for institutional ETH withdrawal streaks.
What is the Glamsterdam upgrade for Ethereum?
Glamsterdam is Ethereum’s next major protocol upgrade, featuring Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation and Block-Level Access Lists, now delayed from June to Q3 2026 release.
What probability do prediction markets assign to ETH hitting $1,500?
Polymarket prices a 76% chance, and Kalshi shows 73% probability that ETH will reach $1,500 before the end of the 2026 calendar year.
Where is the next major Ethereum support level?
Immediate support sits at $1,585 with a deeper floor at $1,468, and the $1,500 level aligns with anchored volume profile data from prior cycles.
What caused the Ethereum price decline in 2026?
A combination of record ETF outflows, a confirmed death cross, the Glamsterdam upgrade delay, and broader macro risk-off sentiment drove ETH below $1,700.
Can Ethereum recover above $5,000 from current levels?
Analyst James Easton noted a confirmed move above $5,100 could place ETH in price discovery, but the current descending channel must reverse first.
References TechTimes: Ethereum Price Prediction 2026: 17-Day ETF Outflow Record Targets $1,500 Support Analytics Insight: Ethereum Price Today: ETH Holds Critical $1,500 Support Coinpaper: Ethereum Price Prediction: Can $1,500 Support Unlock $5,100? Coinpedia: Ethereum Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030
After remaining untouched for nearly eight years, four Ethereum wallets have suddenly reactivated and executed large-scale sales. On-chain data reveals that these wallets collectively offloaded 33,623 ETH within just four hours, at an average price of $1,560 per ETH.
Wallets awakened after years of inactivityThese four wallets originally accumulated a total of 37,602 ETH in 2018, buying in at an average price of around $830 per token. In the latest transactions, most of these holdings were transferred to exchanges and sold off. According to available information, the total proceeds from the sales reached $52.5 million.
Mini glossary: Lookonchain is an on-chain analytics account that tracks blockchain transfers and large wallet movements. Arkham is a blockchain data platform renowned for tracing wallet activity and associating addresses.
Movements tracked by Lookonchain and cross-checked with Arkham data point to a realized profit of approximately $27.4 million based on entry costs. The article shares the wallet addresses involved and notes that these remained largely dormant since their initial accumulation period.
In its post, Lookonchain highlighted that the ETH had been held for eight years before finally being sold, yet even after all that time, the wallets did not benefit from previous, higher market valuations.
While these sales demonstrate that long-term investors can still lock in gains despite weakened market conditions, the profits remain limited compared to what could have been achieved during peak market rallies.
Profits fall short of all-time highsData shows that on paper, these wallets’ holdings once exceeded $150 million during past bull cycles. However, the owners did not sell during the major surges of 2021 and 2025, passing on peak exit opportunities.
Ethereum reached its all-time high of about $4,946 in August 2025. At that level, the wallets in question were worth exponentially more than the recent selling prices. Instead, the most recent sales occurred with ETH trading around $1,560.
ItemDataInitial amount purchased37,602 ETHAverage entry price$830Amount sold33,623 ETHAverage selling price$1,560Total proceeds$52.5 millionRealized profit$27.4 millionAnalysts point out that the divergence between potential peak value and realized profit exposes missed opportunities during past booms. The rapid completion of these recent sales also underscores a trend of long-term Ethereum holders now liquidating some of their positions.
Available data show that these wallets, after years of dormancy, executed sizable sales in a brief period. This pattern resembles recent behavior among other long-standing Ethereum holders.
Similar moves witnessed beforeThis string of transactions marks the latest example of early Ethereum investors reducing their holdings after years on the sidelines. In March, another early adopter sold roughly $31 million worth of Ethereum.
April likewise saw an ICO participant transfer 10,000 ETH, valued at approximately $23 million, after years of inactivity. With these latest moves, the reactivation of previously idle wallets is under close watch by market observers.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Ethereum runs as a global, decentralised computer in which every full node stores the network’s complete state, including account balances, smart contract code, contract storage, and everything else needed to verify the chain’s current condition. That design maximises security and verifiability, but it carries a structural cost, because the state only grows.
Transaction history can be pruned or archived, yet the active state has to stay immediately accessible for block validation and execution. Every new wave of DeFi positions, NFTs, gaming contracts, and other on-chain activity adds to a working set that nodes must keep on hand indefinitely. Heavier state means steeper hardware requirements for node operators, and steeper requirements quietly push the network toward fewer, larger, better-resourced participants. State expiry has become one of Ethereum’s most discussed long-term scaling ideas because it attacks that growth directly while trying to preserve the chain’s security guarantees and everyday usability.
Key Takeaways Ethereum’s active state grows without limit because every node must store all accounts and contract storage, unlike prunable transaction history. The root problem is economic: users pay once to write data, but nodes store it forever, raising hardware costs and straining decentralisation. State expiry retires long-untouched data from the active state without deleting it, leaving it recoverable through a cryptographic proof. A leaner state means faster syncs, cheaper nodes, and a lower barrier to participation. It is still research-stage and tied to the move toward stateless clients and binary state trees, which replaced the earlier Verkle tree plan. Ethereum’s State Bloat Is an Economic Mismatch, Not Just a Storage Limit The active state is made up of every account and contract storage slot that nodes must maintain, and once a contract writes data on-chain that data stays in the working set indefinitely unless something explicitly removes it.
Underneath the storage question sits a pricing mismatch. Users pay a one-time gas fee to write data, while node operators carry the cost of storing and serving it for as long as the network exists. The chain therefore accumulates state that may never be touched again but still consumes memory, disk, and bandwidth on every node.
The consequences reach well past raw storage, because a larger state lengthens sync times for new nodes, strains hardware, and raises the price of running validating infrastructure. If that price keeps climbing, the pool of people able to run a node shrinks toward a handful of infrastructure providers. Ethereum’s developers treat this as a long-term priority, folding state work into the network’s 2026 upgrade roadmap. Rollups, for all their impact on fees and throughput, do nothing to slow this. They scale execution but do not shrink the base-layer state that every node still has to hold.
State Expiry Archives Inactive Ethereum Data State expiry starts from a single premise, that data left untouched for long enough does not need to sit in the active working set every node keeps ready for immediate execution. Under such a scheme, accounts and contract storage that have not been accessed within a defined window, often discussed as roughly a year, would be marked expired and dropped from the active state that validators and full nodes maintain.
Expiry is not deletion, and that distinction is the whole point. The data still exists in Ethereum’s history and in archival or distributed storage, so responsibility for holding rarely used state shifts off every node and onto archival nodes, dedicated providers, or networks such as the Portal Network, the same goal driving Ethereum’s push toward stateless verification.
Reviving expired state would mean supplying a cryptographic proof, known as a witness, that demonstrates the account or contract’s prior condition, after which it can be restored for use. The leading designs lean on periodic state trees, where a fresh tree is created each period, alongside changes such as extending address formats so the protocol can track which period an address belongs to. The cleanest mental model is an archive folder, where files you rarely open move out of active memory but stay retrievable, keeping the system light without losing anything permanently.
A Smaller Active State Lowers the Hardware Bar The central benefit is a sustainable storage model in place of open-ended growth, with practical ceilings on how much active data a node must carry. Early proposals from Vitalik Buterin floated trimming the state every node holds to a flat range in the tens of gigabytes instead of letting it climb without limit.
A leaner active state improves node operation across the board, because new nodes sync faster, validators need less storage, and the barrier to running a node drops. Ethereum is pitching that lower barrier to institutional node operatorswho want to verify the chain on standard hardware.
State expiry also realigns cost with consumption, since anyone who wants data to stay instantly available may eventually have to renew or maintain it instead of paying once and relying on the network forever. It complements the rest of Ethereum’s scaling work, where rollups, data availability sampling, and statelessness target throughput and verification while state expiry addresses the storage layer those upgrades leave untouched.
State Expiry’s Hardest Problems The benefits come with real friction, starting with user experience, because developers and users expect accounts and contracts to be reachable at any moment, so any revival step adds complexity to wallets and applications that have never had to account for it.
Proof generation and verification raise a second hurdle, because restoring expired state securely depends on efficient cryptographic proofs and reliable access to historical data, which in turn demands mature infrastructure and careful protocol design. Backwards compatibility may be the thorniest issue, as millions of existing contracts were written on the assumption of permanent, instant availability, and introducing expiry without breaking them is a heavy engineering and coordination task.
Even the basic parameters remain unsettled, since too short an expiry window inconveniences users while too long blunts the benefit, and researchers are still testing where the line should sit. Buterin himself has pushed back on the most aggressive version of the idea, arguing against enforcing state expiry at the consensus layer on the grounds that hard protocol-level changes could introduce security and cross-application risks. He has pointed instead toward lighter options such as optional partial nodes that reduce storage without forcing expiry on the whole network.
The proposal also has to slot into the rest of the roadmap, particularly the move toward stateless clients, and that target has shifted. Verkle trees were for years the planned replacement for Ethereum’s current state structure, prized for the small witnesses they produce, but concerns that their elliptic-curve cryptography is vulnerable to quantum computers pushed them out of favour from mid-2024. Ethereum’s current direction, set out in the Foundation’s 2026 protocol priorities, points toward a binary Merkle state tree paired with STARK-friendly hash functions such as Blake3 or Poseidon, which aim to deliver the same compact proofs on a more future-proof foundation.
Why State Expiry Still Matters for Ethereum’s Long-Term Scalability State expiry remains a research-stage proposal, with the Ethereum Foundation grouping it alongside history expiry and statelessness as work expected to land years out, not in the next upgrade. What keeps it on the agenda is that it addresses a problem the transaction-scaling stack cannot reach. As Ethereum settles more value and hosts more applications, the size of the active state bears directly on whether running a node stays accessible, which in turn bears on how decentralised the network remains.
Paired with statelessness and the shift to binary state trees, state expiry is one piece of a broader effort to keep Ethereum verifiable on modest hardware as it grows. Whether it ships in mandatory form, in optional form, or is partly superseded by alternatives such as optional partial nodes remains an open question among the network’s developers.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is Ethereum state expiry?
It removes accounts and contract storage untouched for a set period from the active state, cutting what every node must store. It deletes nothing.
Does state expiry delete my tokens or contracts?
No. Expired data stays recoverable from archival storage and can be revived with a cryptographic proof of its prior state.
How would I access an expired account?
You submit a witness, a proof of the account’s prior condition, and the protocol restores it. Block explorers and providers are expected to help generate these proofs.
Is state expiry live on Ethereum yet?
No. It is still in research, grouped with history expiry and statelessness, and is not part of the 2026 Glamsterdam or Hegota upgrades.
How does it relate to statelessness and Verkle trees?
State expiry shrinks the active state; statelessness lets nodes verify blocks without storing it. Verkle trees were the planned tool for small proofs, but quantum concerns shifted Ethereum to a binary Merkle tree with STARK-friendly hashing.
Ethereum treasury company SharpLink has resumed accumulating Ether after an eight-month hiatus, adding 5,000 ETH to its balance sheet as the cryptocurrency trades near its lowest level of 2026. The purchase reinforces the company’s long-term conviction in Ethereum despite sitting on billions of dollars in unrealized losses and a prolonged market downturn.
Blockchain intelligence platform Arkham first flagged the transaction, while on-chain analysts, including EmberCN and Lookonchain, reported that SharpLink received 5,000 ETH worth approximately $7.85 million from digital asset prime broker FalconX. The transfer marks its first Ether acquisition since October 2025, ending an eight-month pause in active accumulation.
After 8 months, SharpLink(@Sharplink) is buying $ETH again!
6 hours ago, #SharpLink received 5,000 $ETH($7.85M) from #FalconX.#SharpLink now holds 876,285 $ETH(1.4B), including 22,102 ETH earned from staking.
Its average purchase price is ~$3,609, and now sitting on an… pic.twitter.com/mr6gQxjNua
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) June 26, 2026
SharpLink Is Buying Again Despite Heavy Paper Losses The latest ETH purchase increases SharpLink’s treasury to 876,285 ETH, cementing its position as the second-largest publicly traded corporate holder of Ethereum, behind BitMine Immersion. The balance includes more than 22,000 ETH earned through staking rewards, highlighting that the company continued generating yield even while it paused new purchases.
The renewed buying comes at a challenging time for Ethereum. The second-largest cryptocurrency briefly fell to around $1,537, its lowest price of the year, and has declined roughly 25% over the past month, underperforming Bitcoin during the same period.
Based on current market prices, SharpLink’s average acquisition cost of approximately $3,609 per ETH leaves the company with an estimated $1.7–1.8 billion in unrealized losses.
Yet the company appears to be treating lower prices as an accumulation opportunity rather than a reason to scale back exposure.
Corporate Conviction in Ethereum Remains Intact Another reason the purchase is significant is that it suggests institutional appetite for Ethereum has not disappeared despite weak price performance.
Commenting on the transaction, Andri Fauzan Adziima, Research Lead at Bitrue Research Institute, told Cointelegraph:
“I’m seeing genuine corporate accumulation conviction holding strong amid subdued price action.” The purchase also aligns with comments previously made by SharpLink CEO Joseph Chalom, who identified three catalysts that could improve Ethereum’s outlook over the medium term: passage of the CLARITY Act in the United States, a broader return in market risk appetite as geopolitical tensions ease, and continued growth in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.
While those catalysts have yet to fully materialize, SharpLink’s decision to resume buying suggests management remains confident in Ethereum’s long-term investment case.
The company has increasingly positioned itself as an Ethereum treasury business rather than a traditional gaming affiliate platform. Since pivoting toward a crypto treasury strategy, SharpLink has focused on accumulating ETH, staking its holdings for additional yield, and supporting broader Ethereum ecosystem initiatives.
Earlier this month, the company also backed the launch of EthLabs, a nonprofit founded by former Ethereum Foundation researchers to accelerate institutional adoption of the Ethereum network.
These moves are part of a wider trend of publicly listed companies adopting digital asset treasury strategies. Whether that conviction proves well-timed will depend on Ethereum’s ability to recover in the coming months.
Latest developments: Trent Van Epps says Ethereum's long-term decentralization strategy is entering a critical transition phase.
Van Epps said he left the Ethereum Foundation after it became clear the organization would accelerate its "subtraction" philosophy of pushing authority and legitimacy into the broader ecosystem.He described the Ethereum Foundation as intentionally reducing its central role rather than consolidating power, arguing that multiple independent institutions should eventually coordinate the ecosystem.The comments come after recent Ethereum Foundation leadership changes and workforce reductions, which have fueled questions about Ethereum's future governance.Van Epps joined CoinDesk's Jennifer Sanasie on Markets Outlook.What this means: Van Epps argues Ethereum faces a practical funding challenge rather than an existential crisis.
He estimated core protocol development requires roughly $30 million annually, even as the Ethereum Foundation's treasury gradually declines over time.According to Van Epps, the issue is not shrinking technical needs but identifying new organizations willing to finance public goods that keep the network reliable and secure.He said his Protocol Guild initiative has distributed nearly $40 million to Ethereum core developers over roughly four years but is not sufficient on its own to replace broader ecosystem funding.Reading between the lines: Van Epps remains bullish on Ethereum despite the funding concerns.
He argued Ethereum continues to lead in decentralized finance, stablecoin settlement and EVM adoption, saying those network effects remain difficult for competitors to match.While acknowledging near-term coordination challenges, he said he is optimistic new institutions and major stakeholders will emerge to help finance Ethereum's shared infrastructure.He also pointed to the "free rider" problem, where firms benefit from shared infrastructure without contributing to its maintenance, as a key obstacle to solving the funding gap.What comes next: Van Epps believes Ethereum's governance will become more distributed over the next decade.
He expects the Ethereum Foundation to continue operating in a narrower role alongside newer organizations focused on research, commercialization and ecosystem growth.He argued Ethereum also needs stronger advocacy around ETH as an asset and a clearer narrative connecting the token to the network's expanding on-chain economy.Long term, Van Epps said success should be measured by broad adoption, with billions of users ultimately accessing Ethereum and its Layer 2 ecosystem.AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.
12345678910
Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison
Equities on Crypto Rails: A Platform Comparison
US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale.
13 hours ago
US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale.
Why it matters:
US equities on crypto rails: access is easy, on-chain composability is the real test. Only Binance and Backpack deliver both - and only Binance at scale.
Canton Network, the privacy-enabled institutional blockchain built by Digital Asset, generated $60.2 million in fees over the trailing 30 days, outpacing Tron's $27.6 million and Ethereum's $11.3 million by a wide margin, according to DefiLlama data.
Canton Network, the privacy-enabled institutional blockchain built by Digital Asset, generated $60.2 million in fees over the trailing 30 days, placing it ahead of Tron and far above Ethereum by that measure, according to DefiLlama data.
The DefiLlama fee-tracking dashboard logs Canton's 30-day total at $60.2 million, compared with $27.6 million for Tron and $11.3 million for Ethereum over the same window. Digital Asset co-founder and CEO Yuval Rooz noted the milestone on X earlier this month: "$CC today processes the highest fees of any institutional blockchain network."
Trailing 30-day fees as of June 26, 2026: Canton $60.2M, Tron $27.6M, Ethereum $11.3M. Source: DefiLlama. Methodology: gas fees paid by users.Fee MethodologyDefiLlama tracks Canton fees as gas paid by network participants, a methodology consistent with how it measures fees on Ethereum and Tron. Canton is a permissioned, privacy-preserving network used primarily by financial institutions for settlement and asset tokenization. Transaction volumes there trace to institutional workflows rather than retail DeFi activity, which shapes how the fee comparison reads.
Canton's 30-day fee figure places it fourth overall on the DefiLlama leaderboard among all protocols, behind Tether, Circle's USDC, and Hyperliquid's perpetual exchange. Its all-time cumulative fees reached $488.9 million. The trailing 24-hour figure stood at $1.84 million at time of publication.
Institutional BackdropThe numbers follow significant capital formation around Digital Asset. The company closed a $355 million funding round led by a16z crypto in June, with HSBC, Apollo, BNP Paribas, CME, Tradeweb and more than 20 other institutional names joining. Visa and stablecoin issuer Brale piloted stablecoin settlement on the network using SBC, a US dollar-backed stablecoin. South Korea's Bithumb listed Canton Coin in its KRW market on June 23.
Canton is among the eight blockchains integrated into Mastercard's card-settlement network, per earlier Defiant coverage. The Canton Foundation was also registered under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act on June 22.
Ethereum GapEthereum's fees have stayed compressed since the Dencun upgrade reduced Layer 2 settlement costs. Over the trailing 30-day window, Canton's $60.2 million compares with Ethereum's $11.3 million, a ratio of more than five to one. The contrast reflects how differently the two networks generate fee activity: Canton's throughput comes from institutional settlement workflows with fixed participants, while Ethereum's comes from a broader but currently less fee-intensive base of applications.
Canton has made no public statement on when or whether the fee ranking will be updated or reported as a recurring metric.
