Russia’s central bank has officially approved Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether’s USDT for public retail access on domestic exchanges, while notably excluding XRP from the list. This decision is part of a broader framework under Russia’s new licensed crypto market regime, which imposes specific criteria for retail investors. These criteria include using approved intermediaries, passing a risk assessment test, and adhering to a 300,000-ruble annual cap per intermediary. The regulatory body cited factors such as market capitalization, daily volume, and history as key considerations for approving the cryptocurrencies. Although XRP has been integrated into Russia’s institutional offerings, including the Moscow Exchange’s XRP index, it remains unavailable for retail access.
Advertisement
Key Takeaways Russia’s approval of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT for retail access suggests these assets meet the country’s regulatory criteria, unlike XRP. Market participants appear to interpret the exclusion of XRP from retail access as indicative of ongoing regulatory challenges for the asset. Pricing in XRP-related markets, such as the likelihood of XRP reaching $3.00 in August, reflects decreased confidence, dropping to 0.5% from 1% in the past 24 hours. What to Watch Market observers will be closely monitoring any further regulatory developments in Russia that might impact XRP’s status. Key indicators could include changes in Russia’s regulatory approach or shifts in XRP’s market integration. Additionally, global regulatory actions, particularly from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, could influence XRP’s price trajectory. The market will also watch for any potential announcements from Ripple Labs that could alter XRP’s institutional and retail prospects.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h September 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → September 1 2026 2.1% — — View market → September 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → September 1 2026 5.1% — — View market → September 1 2026 8% — — View market →
Russia has enacted a regulatory framework allowing the use of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT, while excluding XRP from the list of approved assets. The new law, managed by the Bank of Russia, establishes licensed conditions for digital currencies, permitting their use for cross-border transactions but banning them as a domestic payment method. The absence of XRP from the approved list suggests a regulatory focus on assets with greater liquidity and established history, impacting perceptions of XRP’s accessibility in the market.
Advertisement
Key Takeaways Russia’s regulatory framework appears to support the use of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT under strict conditions, excluding XRP. Market activity suggests this exclusion may impact XRP’s price predictions, with expectations of decreased likelihood for significant price surges in August. XRP’s exclusion reflects a regulatory trend towards assets with established liquidity and records, potentially influencing its market positioning. What to Watch Markets will be closely monitoring any further regulatory developments in Russia that could impact XRP or other cryptocurrencies. The focus will be on any strategic moves by Ripple Labs to counteract this exclusion. Additionally, observers are watching for any shifts in U.S. regulatory attitudes that could affect XRP’s market outlook, particularly in relation to ongoing legal matters involving Ripple. These developments could provide insights into XRP’s potential performance in the coming months.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
What Price Will Xrp Hit In August 2026
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h September 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → September 1 2026 2.1% — — View market → September 1 2026 0.5% — — View market → September 1 2026 5.1% — — View market → September 1 2026 8% — — View market → Xrp All Time High
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h September 30, 2026 1% — — View market → December 31, 2026 6.8% — — View market →
Russia's central bank has taken a significant step toward formalising its cryptocurrency market, publishing a draft directive on August 11 that names $BTC, $ETH and Tether's $USDT as the first digital assets eligible for trading on regulated Russian exchanges.
How the three assets were selected The assets meet criteria including market capitalization, average daily trading volume and at least five years of price history on overseas markets. The proposal follows a new law, signed by President Vladimir Putin on August 4, that gives the Bank of Russia authority to determine which digital currencies can be admitted to organised trading and set related rules. The central bank has indicated it does not plan to expand the initial list beyond these three assets once the framework launches.
Who can trade, and under what conditions Under the draft rules, non-qualified investors could buy up to 300,000 rubles worth of eligible crypto each year through each intermediary, which could include brokers, crypto exchanges and asset managers. That cap equates to roughly $3,650 at current exchange rates. The restrictions are aimed at protecting retail investors from the sharp price fluctuations associated with crypto assets.
Under the proposal, qualified investors would be exempt from the purchase limit and could trade all cryptocurrencies available on exchange and over-the-counter markets. Starting September 1, both retail and professional investors will be required to pass a test before trading the three major cryptocurrencies. Retail investors make up around 98% of Russia's crypto market participants, according to the central bank.
The law legalises the trading of crypto assets through regulated exchanges, brokers and crypto exchanges, but maintains a ban on the use of cryptocurrencies as a means of payment within the country. A requirement for cryptocurrency transactions to use licensed subsidiaries will begin on July 1, 2027.
Several major Russian banks have already begun building infrastructure ahead of the launch. Alfa-Bank, Sberbank, T-Bank and VTB have investigated cryptocurrency offerings, with strategies encompassing digital wallets, custodial depositories, trading interfaces and crypto-to-ruble conversion systems.
The Bank of Russia is accepting comments and proposals on the draft rules until August 24, after which the regulator can determine the final requirements for crypto assets traded through regulated markets.
Sources:
CoinTelegraph: Bank of Russia Proposes 3 Crypto Assets for Exchange Trading
The Moscow Times: Russia's Central Bank Proposes Framework for Publicly Trading Major Cryptocurrencies
Crypto.news: Russia names Bitcoin, Ether and USDT for regulated crypto trading
Key TakeawaysBest Altcoins to Buy in August 20261. Bullski ($BULLSKI)2. Ethereum (ETH)3. XRP4. Cardano (ADA)5. Chainlink (LINK)6. Hedera (HBAR)The Numbers Bullski Fixes Before It ListsHow Altcoins Are Priced Against BitcoinStarting a Position at the Opening RungAltcoin Questions People AskWhich altcoin has the best chance in 2026?Are altcoins better than Bitcoin right now?What is the cheapest altcoin on this list?How many altcoins should someone hold?For More Information Ethereum and XRP are the two biggest altcoins on the list, worth about $226.0 billion and $63.7 billion on August 10, 2026. Bullski is the only one of the six not yet listed, so its price comes from a published stage rather than a chart. Its sale runs sixteen priced steps from $0.00001 up to a $0.0025 listing reference. Every coin here sits below its record high, some of them by a very wide margin. The best altcoins to buy in August 2026 fall into two groups. Five of the six here trade every second of the day. One does not.
Bullski ($BULLSKI) is still selling at a price the project sets, $0.00001 on stage 1, while the others carry whatever number the market handed them this morning. Before the list starts, you can open the Bullski presale page and see the live rung for yourself.
Bullski goes first because it is the one entry still priced by a schedule. The rest follow by market cap.
1. Bullski ($BULLSKI) Bullski takes the meme coin idea and puts a timetable on it. The token is an ERC-20 on Ethereum with 120 billion units and a hard cap. Its 16-stage sale is on the first rung right now, priced at $0.00001, with $0.000015 waiting at stage 2.
What a buyer gets here is a known cost. The last rung meets a $0.0025 listing reference, so the whole price path is written down in advance. Nothing on the rest of this list can offer that, because their prices are already discovered.
The trust checks are open to anyone with a browser. Etherscan lists the contract as verified, an audit is under way rather than finished, and the pool of liquidity gets locked at launch. Staking pays during the sale and referrals pay on top.
The plain drawback is that you cannot sell until it lists.
2. Ethereum (ETH) Ethereum traded at $1,872.98 on August 10, 2026, for a market cap of roughly $226.0 billion. Its record was $4,946.05 in August 2025. It is the settlement layer under most tokens, Bullski included, so demand for block space is real demand.
Cheaper rival chains remain its main squeeze.
3. XRP XRP sat at $1.02 that day for about $63.7 billion, against a $3.65 high in July 2025. Its niche is cross-border payments between institutions, which gives it a use most altcoins lack. Policy headlines still move it more than transaction volume does.
4. Cardano (ADA) Cardano was $0.195 for a $7.28 billion cap on the same date, far under the $3.09 it reached in September 2021. Its research-led build is careful and slow. That care is also why it lost ground to faster chains while it worked.
5. Chainlink (LINK) Chainlink traded at $8.26 for a cap near $6.18 billion, per CoinGecko, well below its $52.70 peak in May 2021. It feeds outside data to smart contracts, and plenty of large projects depend on it. Its problem is that this useful job does not always show up in the token price.
6. Hedera (HBAR) Hedera changed hands at $0.068 for roughly $2.98 billion, against $0.5692 in September 2021. Its council of large companies gives it an enterprise angle few chains have. The counterweight is that enterprise adoption arrives slowly and quietly.
The Numbers Bullski Fixes Before It Lists Three numbers are locked in already. The supply is capped, so dilution cannot happen later. The stage prices are published, so nobody pays a surprise figure.
The listing reference is stated, so the distance from entry to that mark is easy to read.
Add staking and referral rewards and the position does something during the sale instead of just sitting there. The full 16-stage price ladder is on the official site if you want to see each step in order.
Watch Out: Only buy through the official site. Copycat pages have shown up around this sale, and an independent review of the live presale is a sensible read before you send anything.
How Altcoins Are Priced Against Bitcoin Altcoins tend to move after Bitcoin, not with it. Money rotates down the size ladder once the largest coin steadies. August 2026 has been flat, with most of this list down about 1 to 2 percent in a day.
Flat stretches are when buyers set up, and our earlier note on the best crypto to invest in for 2026 made the same point in June.
Size decides how far a move travels. Ethereum at $226.0 billion has to attract enormous new money to double. Hedera at $2.98 billion needs a fraction of that.
Neither figure predicts anything on its own, but the arithmetic explains why buyers hold big names for stability and small ones for movement.
A presale sits outside that scale entirely. There is no cap to compare, because no coins have traded. What you can compare is the entry price against the stated listing reference, and both of those numbers are printed before you commit anything.
Altcoin
Price on August 10, 2026
Market cap
Distance from record high
Bullski ($BULLSKI)
$0.00001, stage 1 of 16
Not listed yet
No history, presale pricing
Ethereum (ETH)
$1,872.98
$226.0 billion
$4,946.05 in August 2025
XRP
$1.02
$63.7 billion
$3.65 in July 2025
Cardano (ADA)
$0.195
$7.28 billion
$3.09 in September 2021
Chainlink (LINK)
$8.26
$6.18 billion
$52.70 in May 2021
Hedera (HBAR)
$0.068
$2.98 billion
$0.5692 in September 2021
Starting a Position at the Opening Rung Anyone building an altcoin basket usually wants one slot that is not priced like the others. A sale still on its first step is exactly that shape.
The process is short. Load an Ethereum wallet with ETH or USDT, go to the official site, read the stage shown on the page, then pick up $BULLSKI while stage 1 is open. Stake it the same day if you want rewards running.
Keep the amount modest, because early-stage buying is the speculative end of any basket.
Altcoin Questions People Ask Which altcoin has the best chance in 2026? Ethereum has the strongest base of real usage among the traded names. For upside from a smaller start, buyers look at coins that have not been repriced yet, which is where the Bullski sale sits at $0.00001.
Are altcoins better than Bitcoin right now? They are different jobs. Bitcoin is the deepest and calmest market. Altcoins carry more risk and tend to move further in both directions once money rotates into them.
What is the cheapest altcoin on this list? Bullski, at $0.00001 in stage 1. That is not a market price though, it is the published price for the current rung of a sixteen-step sale.
How many altcoins should someone hold? A handful you can actually follow beats a long list you cannot. Most buyers keep two or three larger names and one or two early-stage positions.
For More Information Website: Visit the official Bullski website at bullski.io
Telegram: Join the Bullski Telegram channel at t.me/BullskiCoinOfficial
X (Twitter): Follow Bullski on X at x.com/bullskicoin
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) analyst Benjamin Cowen warns “crunch time” is approaching for crypto majors as Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) wallet activity hit its highest level since March.
Why Cowen Says Bitcoin Is Approaching Crunch TimeCowen said in a YouTube video that Bitcoin is following the same pattern it has in every prior midterm year.
A low forms in summer, volatility dies through August and September, then something happens in late fall that wakes the market up and starts the next bull run.
He puts social interest in perspective. Bitcoin’s social risk reading sits at 0.2 today, the same level it sat at in August 2018.
Four years ago at the same point in the cycle, that reading was double. To most people it feels like crypto is dying, but Cowen said this is exactly how prior bottoming phases have felt from the inside.
He expects one more leg down before the bull market begins, with October as the most likely month for the cycle low.
On-chain indicators like the MVRV Z-score have not yet reset to levels that historically mark major bottoms.
“It’s almost crunch time,” Cowen said. “I don’t think that event has happened yet, but I think it’s going to happen relatively soon,” he added.
Why Ethereum Wallet Activity ExplodedSantiment flagged on X that Ethereum saw 989,500 active addresses in 24 hours, its highest daily activity since March, while price holds steady near $1,870.
The firm pointed to three specific drivers:
ETF inflows have been improving. Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) Chain’s Ethereum-settled activity is adding a genuinely new, high-volume use case for ETH gas fees and app traffic. Stablecoins, real-world assets, and tokenized assets are pulling attention back to Ethereum as the primary settlement layer for on-chain dollar liquidity. Santiment described the move as existing wallets waking up, rotating capital, and testing rails again rather than entirely new users entering the market.
Bitcoin and Ethereum Analysis: Support and Resistance LevelsBTCETHSupport$62,200 — August low$1,883 — 20-day EMA, must holdResistance$65,000 — cup and handle breakout trigger$1,939 — 0.5 Fibonacci, next resistanceTechnical AnalysisImage: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Someone is loading up on Ethereum, and they’re not being subtle about it. Managed-money flows into ETH spot markets have surged to 7.2 times their normal rate ahead of the July Consumer Price Index report, according to on-chain analytics firm Nansen.
The CPI data, scheduled for release on August 12 at 8:30 a.m. ET by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has become the next major inflection point for risk assets. And crypto traders are placing their bets on both sides of the table.
The great ETH contradiction Here’s what makes this positioning so interesting: the same class of sophisticated market participants buying ETH hand over fist in spot markets are simultaneously holding net short positions in Ethereum and Bitcoin derivatives.
Advertisement
Ethereum last traded around $1,862, down roughly 0.9%. Bitcoin was hovering near $63,455, off about 1%.
The 7.2x acceleration in spot buying is significant because it suggests a certain category of investor, likely institutional or semi-institutional allocators captured under Nansen’s “managed money” classification, views current ETH prices as attractive enough to accumulate aggressively.
Why the CPI number matters so much The Consumer Price Index measures the average change in prices consumers pay for a basket of goods and services. It’s the single most-watched gauge of inflation in the US economy, and it directly influences Federal Reserve policy decisions on interest rates.
For crypto markets, the chain of causation is straightforward. Higher inflation typically means the Fed keeps rates elevated, or raises them further. Higher rates make risk-free assets like Treasury bonds more attractive relative to volatile assets like ETH and Bitcoin. The reverse is equally powerful: a softer-than-expected CPI reading would signal that inflation is cooling, potentially giving the Fed room to cut rates, reducing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets.
Reading between the positions By accumulating ETH in spot markets, these investors establish a long-term position at what they perceive as favorable prices. The short derivatives positions function as insurance: if inflation data surprises to the upside and triggers a sell-off, the gains on their short positions partially offset losses on their spot holdings.
The spot buying is running at 7.2 times the normal pace. That level of conviction on the accumulation side, paired with defensive positions in derivatives, suggests these traders lean bullish but are hedging against downside risk.
For Bitcoin specifically, BTC trading near $63,455 with net short derivatives positioning mirrors Ethereum’s pattern, though the ETH spot accumulation appears more pronounced.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
SharpLink reported a $394.3 million net loss for the second quarter of 2026, with the result driven largely by non-cash Ethereum revaluation losses and liquid staking token impairment charges.
The company’s filing shows $321.0 million in unrealized ETH losses and $76.1 million in impairment charges tied to liquid staking tokens. At the same time, staking operations generated $11.2 million of the company’s $11.5 million in revenue.
That creates a very particular kind of earnings story.
SharpLink’s operating activity is not the main reason for the headline loss. The loss is mainly an accounting effect from the changing value of its Ethereum-related holdings.
That distinction matters because crypto treasury earnings can look brutal on paper even when the underlying asset position is still intact.
For more details, visit the official Sec platform.
TL;DR SharpLink reported a $394.3 million Q2 net loss. The loss was driven largely by unrealized ETH losses and staking-token impairments. Staking generated $11.2 million of the company’s $11.5 million in revenue. Ethereum Treasury Accounting Can Be Harsh Crypto accounting is often difficult for public companies.
When a company holds large amounts of ETH, quarterly results can swing sharply based on market prices. If accounting rules require revaluation or impairment recognition, a falling ETH price can produce a large net loss even without a major cash outflow.
That appears to be the core issue in SharpLink’s Q2 result.
The company’s Ethereum-related holdings created a major accounting drag, but those losses should not automatically be read as realized cash losses. Unrealized losses reflect mark-to-market movement. Impairments reflect accounting treatment. They are not the same as selling ETH at a loss.
For investors, that nuance is essential.
Staking Revenue Tells A Different Story The revenue line looks very different from the net-loss line.
SharpLink generated $11.2 million from staking operations, out of $11.5 million in total revenue. That shows the company’s operating model is heavily tied to Ethereum staking yield.
The question is whether that revenue can scale enough to offset balance-sheet volatility.
Staking income can provide recurring revenue, but it is unlikely to fully neutralize large valuation swings when a company holds a huge ETH position. If ETH falls sharply, accounting losses can dwarf staking revenue in a single quarter.
That does not mean staking is useless. It means staking revenue and treasury revaluation operate on very different scales.
The ETH Position Still Grew The company’s ETH holdings reportedly increased despite the headline loss.
That is important because it changes how the market should read the result. A company can report a large accounting loss while still increasing its token count. For a treasury-focused investor, token accumulation may matter more than short-term GAAP volatility.
For a traditional equity investor, the net loss may matter more.
This is one of the tensions in crypto treasury stocks.
Are investors buying earnings, asset exposure, staking yield, or a leveraged ETH strategy? The answer may differ from shareholder to shareholder.
Liquid Staking Adds Another Layer Liquid staking tokens make the picture more complicated.
They can generate yield and improve liquidity compared with native staking, but they also introduce extra risks: smart contract risk, liquidity risk, depeg risk, custody risk, and accounting complexity.
An impairment charge tied to liquid staking tokens does not necessarily mean the staking strategy failed, but it does show that these instruments are not simple cash equivalents.
Public companies using liquid staking need to explain those risks clearly.
Investors should not treat “staked ETH” and “liquid staking token exposure” as interchangeable without understanding the mechanics.
What Investors Should Watch Next The next useful questions are straightforward.
Did SharpLink continue increasing ETH holdings after the quarter? Are staking yields stable? How much of the asset base is in native ETH versus liquid staking tokens? How much liquidity does the company have outside its crypto holdings? How will management communicate accounting volatility to investors?
For crypto-native investors, the Q2 result may look like a volatile but expected part of running an ETH treasury. For traditional investors, a $394.3 million net loss may be harder to look through.
Both reactions are understandable.
SharpLink’s earnings show how difficult it can be to translate an Ethereum treasury strategy into public-company financial statements.
The ETH may still be there. The accounting pain is real too.
This article is based on SharpLink’s Q2 2026 Form 10-Q filing.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Crypto analyst Joao Wedson said Ethereum has entered a historically significant valuation zone. Wedson noted that the simultaneous decline of two key long-term indicators to negative levels could signal undervaluation and an accumulation period for ETH.
Wedson noted that Ethereum’s MVRV Z-Score indicator has fallen to -0.14, indicating that ETH is trading at a suppressed valuation compared to its actual value. According to the analyst, periods when the MVRV Z-Score fell to negative levels in the past were mostly associated with intense market stress and valuations that were attractive for long-term investment.
Another indicator highlighted by Wedson, the Delta Growth Rate, has fallen to minus 0.07. This metric compares market capitalization growth with actual value growth over a 365-day average.
A negative trend in the indicator suggests that realized value is growing more strongly than market value. According to Wedson, this indicates that on-chain value accumulation is outpacing speculative price increases.
“The valuation structure for Ethereum is becoming increasingly attractive” Noting that both indicators were simultaneously in negative territory, Wedson said that in the past, similar conditions were more associated with periods of accumulation and undervaluation than with market euphoria.
The analyst added that this doesn’t mean Ethereum has reached its absolute bottom, stating that despite the weakness in prices, ETH’s valuation structure is becoming increasingly attractive.
Wedson said the market was still trending downwards, but fundamental valuation indicators were beginning to paint a different picture.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Coinglass data shows 78,008 traders were liquidated in the past 24 hours for $171.82 million. SoSoValue data shows net outflows of $144.7 million from spot Bitcoin ETFs on Monday. Spot Ethereum ETFs saw net outflows of $14.6 million. In the past 24 hours, top losers include Audiera, Virtuals Protocol and ether.fi. Notable Developments:
Bitcoin’s Biggest Rival Isn’t Ethereum. It’s the AI Trade Bitcoin Miner Riot Platforms Could Rally 80% as AI Deal Creates ‘Clear Scale Up Path:’ Bernstein Why Haven’t Bitcoin, Ethereum Moved in Weeks? Technical Analysis May Have the Answer Coinbase Exec Says Bitcoin’s Downturn Is Part of Its Adoption—But That Won’t Lift Price, Analysts Warn Robinhood Expands UK Crypto Ecosystem With Trading and AI Tools Arthur Hayes Backs Bitcoin, Says US Will Have to ‘Print Trillions’ to Save the Yen Trader Notes:
Swing trader Roman Trading suggests accumulating Bitcoin at current levels to spread risk. He argues buyers could be rewarded even if the bottom is not in and that shorting carries greater risk than going long.
Trader Cantonese Cat sees Bitcoin’s bullish divergence suggests the downtrend is losing momentum, potentially limiting further downside, though it does not guarantee a trend reversal.
Trader KillaXBT argues Bitcoin may avoid an “extreme bear” phase this cycle because the preceding bull market never reached overheated or euphoric conditions.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
According to the Russian news agency Interfax, the Central Bank of Russia has prepared a notable regulation for Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT).
The Central Bank of Russia has released a draft regulation that would include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT in the list of cryptocurrencies that can be publicly traded on exchanges. However, the regulation is still in draft form. Comments and suggestions on the draft will be accepted until August 24, 2026.
300,000 Ruble Limit on Cryptocurrency Purchases! According to the draft regulation, unqualified investors will be able to purchase designated crypto assets through each brokerage firm up to a maximum of 300,000 rubles per year.
The Central Bank stated that the aim of this restriction is to protect investors from sharp and unpredictable price movements that may occur in the cryptocurrency market.
The bank stated that only the most liquid cryptocurrencies would be offered to unqualified investors, with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether USDT being among the prominent assets in this regard.
No Limits for Qualified Investors! The statement noted that qualified investors would be able to purchase all cryptocurrencies traded on exchanges and over-the-counter markets without any quantity restrictions.
However, the Russian Central Bank reminded investors that, regardless of their status, they should undergo necessary tests and be informed about the risks of investing in crypto assets before engaging in cryptocurrency transactions.
“To protect unqualified investors from sharp and unpredictable fluctuations in cryptocurrency prices, they will only be offered the most liquid cryptocurrencies.”
According to the law, when selecting cryptocurrencies, market capitalization, average daily trading volume, and price history on foreign exchanges (which must be at least five years for such an asset) are taken into account.
Based on these criteria, the Central Bank of Russia has included Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether-USDT in the list of cryptocurrencies that can be publicly traded on exchanges. Qualified investors will be able to purchase all cryptocurrencies traded on exchanges and over-the-counter markets without restriction.
The bank has imposed limits on cryptocurrency purchases for unqualified investors. These investors will be able to purchase a maximum of 300,000 rubles worth of cryptocurrencies per year from each brokerage firm.
The Editing is Still in Draft Stage! The regulation announced by the Central Bank is not yet final. Comments and suggestions regarding the draft will be accepted until August 24, 2026.
Furthermore, Russia’s new comprehensive crypto regulation law was signed into law by Putin on August 4th and will generally come into effect on September 1st, 2026.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Russia’s central bank has proposed allowing Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT on regulated exchanges, with annual purchase limits for non-qualified investors and mandatory risk testing.
Bank of Russia Proposes Three Crypto Assets The Bank of Russia has proposed Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tether’s USDT for public trading on regulated exchanges. The proposal follows a new law that gives the central bank authority to decide which digital currencies can enter organized markets.
The regulator selected the three assets using market capitalization, average daily trading volume and price history on foreign exchanges. In addition, eligible assets must have at least five years of trading history in overseas markets.
Under the draft rules, non-qualified investors could buy up to 300,000 rubles worth of eligible crypto each year through each intermediary. These intermediaries could include brokers, crypto exchanges and asset managers.
Retail Investors Face Crypto Purchase Limits The proposed annual limit would apply separately to each intermediary used by a non-qualified investor. However, qualified investors would not face the same purchase restriction for cryptocurrencies available through exchange and over-the-counter markets.
At the same time, the Bank of Russia plans to require all investors to complete a test before trading crypto assets. Investors would also need to review the risks linked to cryptocurrency investments regardless of their qualification status.
The central bank said the measures aim to protect non-qualified investors from sharp and unpredictable cryptocurrency price movements. Moreover, the proposed framework would limit retail access to assets that meet the regulator’s liquidity and market-history requirements.
Russia Moves Toward Regulated Crypto Trading The proposal follows legislation signed by President Vladimir Putin on August 4. That law establishes rules for cryptocurrency circulation in Russia, including purchases through licensed intermediaries, exchange trading, clearing and digital asset depositories.
The law is scheduled to take effect on September 1, 2026, although some provisions have separate effective dates. Moreover, a requirement for cryptocurrency transactions to use licensed subsidiaries will begin on July 1, 2027.
The Bank of Russia is accepting comments and proposals on the draft rules until August 24. After reviewing submissions, the regulator can determine the final requirements for crypto assets traded through regulated markets.
If you want, the legislative shift aligns with the broader global trend toward stricter, legally compliant crypto exchanges under the MiCA framework.
TLDRBitcoin Secures Top Position in Russia’s Approved Cryptocurrency RosterEthereum Secures Approval Under Russia’s Organized Market StructureUSDT Gains Access to Russia’s Regulated Cryptocurrency Exchange Russian central bank approves Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT for public exchange access. Individual investors face annual purchase caps and must pass certification exams. Bitcoin qualifies through liquidity requirements, market depth and minimum five-year track record. Ethereum earns approval under Russia’s structured digital asset trading regulations. USDT stands as the sole stablecoin approved in Russia’s inaugural regulated cryptocurrency roster. Russia is establishing a regulated cryptocurrency trading environment featuring Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT for general market access. The central bank chose these digital assets based on criteria including liquidity metrics, market capitalization, trading activity, and historical price data. This initiative forms part of a comprehensive cryptocurrency regulatory system set to launch September 1.
Bitcoin Secures Top Position in Russia’s Approved Cryptocurrency Roster Bitcoin claims the leading spot on the authorization list by satisfying the central bank’s stringent liquidity and operational history criteria. Approved digital currencies must demonstrate substantial market capitalization, consistent daily trading volumes, and a minimum five-year foreign exchange pricing record. These benchmarks effectively limit public market participation to cryptocurrencies with established markets and extensive trading documentation.
Retail investors will encounter a 300,000-ruble yearly acquisition threshold through each authorized intermediary platform. Additionally, they must successfully complete a competency assessment before purchasing Bitcoin via licensed exchanges or broker services. Accredited investors gain Bitcoin access without purchase restrictions after fulfilling the mandatory certification requirements.
Russia signed the comprehensive digital currency legislation on August 4, granting supervisory powers to the central bank. The legislation maintains the prohibition on domestic cryptocurrency payments while enabling regulated investment channels under specific parameters. It simultaneously authorizes select cross-border cryptocurrency transactions between Russian citizens and international parties.
Ethereum Secures Approval Under Russia’s Organized Market Structure Ethereum earns qualification by meeting identical market capitalization, liquidity, and operational history benchmarks. The central bank examined market value, mean daily transaction volumes, and international pricing documentation when determining eligible cryptocurrencies. Ethereum’s proven market presence consequently justifies its addition alongside Bitcoin in the preliminary approved roster.
The Bank of Russia will collect public feedback on the proposed regulations until August 24. Following this consultation period, finalized rules will govern organized markets functioning under the emerging digital asset system. Market operators must adhere to protocols addressing trading operations, asset custody, financial reporting, and client eligibility.
The regulatory structure additionally establishes registration criteria for cryptocurrency exchange platforms serving Russian clients. Service providers must maintain minimum equity capital of 15 million rubles and affiliate with a recognized self-regulatory body. Current operators have until July 1, 2027, to achieve full registration compliance.
USDT Gains Access to Russia’s Regulated Cryptocurrency Exchange Tether’s USDT represents the exclusive stablecoin designated in Russia’s debut roster for public exchange operations. Its market capitalization, transaction volume, and documented pricing record fulfill the proposed qualification criteria. This authorization provides regulated platforms with a dollar-pegged digital asset complementing Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Russian financial institutions have already begun developing infrastructure for the emerging market, encompassing custody solutions and brokerage platforms. Alfa-Bank, Sberbank, T-Bank, and VTB have investigated cryptocurrency offerings ahead of complete regulatory activation. Their strategies encompass digital wallets, custodial depositories, trading interfaces, and crypto-to-ruble conversion systems.
Russia will continue prohibiting cryptocurrency transactions for standard consumer purchases, services, digital content, and intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, the new framework establishes official channels for regulated cryptocurrency trading and sanctioned cross-border settlement operations. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT constitute the initial proposed asset category within the regulated market architecture.
Oliver Dale
Editor-in-Chief of Blockonomi and founder of Kooc Media, A UK-Based Online Media Company. Believer in Open-Source Software, Blockchain Technology & a Free and Fair Internet for all. His writing has been quoted by Nasdaq, Dow Jones, Investopedia, The New Yorker, Forbes, Techcrunch & More. Contact [email protected]
In brief The Bank of Russia published a draft directive letting non-qualified investors buy crypto through brokers, capped at 300,000 rubles a year. Only Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tether's USDT made the approved list for public exchange trading. Qualified investors face no such limits; all investors must pass a risk test first. Russia's central bank has proposed its first framework for letting ordinary investors trade crypto on public markets.
The Bank of Russia published a draft directive on Aug. 11 that would let non-qualified investors buy digital assets through brokers, crypto exchanges or managers—within a strict annual ceiling.
"We're setting a limit on the purchase of cryptocurrencies for non-qualified investors," the central bank said in a separate notice. "Through each intermediary—a broker, crypto exchanger, or manager—they will be able to acquire such assets in the amount of 300 thousand rubles per year."
Which coins, and why only threeThe draft names exactly three tokens cleared for public exchange trading: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether’s USDT. The central bank tied the short list to a law signed this month. "The list of digital currencies that the trading organizer is entitled to admit for public circulation on organized trading platforms (hereinafter referred to as the ‘List’): Bitcoin (Bitcoin), Ethereum (Ethereum), Tether USDT (Tether USDT)." the notice reads.
The filter is liquidity and track record. Under the new federal law on digital currencies, a coin's market cap, average daily volume and at least five years of pricing history on foreign platforms decide if it qualifies. "To protect non-qualified investors from sharp and unpredictable fluctuations in cryptocurrency rates, only the most liquid of them will be available to them," the bank said.
The cap itself is written into the directive's operative text. "The maximum amount of the total value of digital currencies acquired through a broker during the calendar year amounts to 300 thousand rubles," Article 2 states.
XRP, the cryptocurrency created by the founders of payments company Ripple in 2012, has been left off the approved list for now. The token would seemingly qualify given the criteria, but XRP over the years has gone through regulatory troubles—stemming from a since-settled SEC lawsuit against Ripple—that caused the token to be delisted and then relisted on several exchanges, which could be playing a factor.
Retail gets a door; whales get the marketQualified investors—Russia's wealthier, accredited class—face none of these walls. "Qualified investors will be able to acquire all cryptocurrencies that will be traded on the exchange and over-the-counter markets, without restrictions," the notice says. Before any trade, though, everyone takes a test. "All investors, regardless of their status, will need to pass testing and familiarize themselves with the risks of investing in cryptoassets."
The move follows the central bank's earlier steps to open crypto to wealthy investors, and lands as Tether's role draws scrutiny—the stablecoin issuer has frozen millions in USDT tied to sanctioned Russian exchanges.
The Bank of Russia accepts comments until Aug. 24, and the directive takes effect 10 days after its official publication, signed by Governor Elvira Nabiullina.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Russia has approved Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the Tether USDT stablecoin for public trading on exchanges under new central bank trading rules. According to a new proposal by the Bank of Russia, the framework would allow both retail and qualified investors to trade crypto through regulated intermediaries, while imposing additional restrictions on non-qualified investors.
JUST IN: 🇷🇺 Russia approves Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT for public trading on exchanges.
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) August 11, 2026Russia has been moving quickly to establish new trading rules for cryptocurrency in the last month, looking to jump ahead in the crypto sector. The latest proposal follows legislation signed by President Vladimir Putin on August 4. That law establishes rules for cryptocurrency circulation in Russia, including purchases through licensed intermediaries, exchange trading, clearing and digital asset depositories.
The country’s Central Bank has identified Bitcoin, Ether and Tether as the assets targeted for access under the initial trading framework, based on liquidity and market characteristics. The broader law does not limit qualified investors to those three assets. Qualified investors would be able to trade other cryptocurrencies subject to the regulatory framework. Foreign stablecoins would generally be subject to the same regulatory requirements as other cryptocurrencies under the new framework.
Also Read: Goldman Sachs Hikes Amazon Stock Price Target
Furthermore, Russia has embraced the crypto industry in the last year, with private banks in the country beginning to offer crypto services. The move to legalize crypto trading would be a big change of tune for Russia, which had previously ruled Bitcoin and ETH as not real forms of currency. With the change of tune, Russia has quickly established itself as a premier crypto market in Eastern Europe, while offering a potential workaround to Western banking restrictions.
Kripto para piyasasında aylardır beklenen altcoin sezonu hâlâ başlamadı. Altcoin Season Index 45-50 bandında kalırken Bitcoin dominansı yaklaşık %59 seviyesinde seyrediyor. Geçmiş döngülerde Bitcoin’den çıkan sermaye Ethereum ve ardından altcoinlere yayılırken, bu kez aynı rotasyonun neden gerçekleşmediği yatırımcıların en çok merak ettiği sorulardan biri.
Peki 2017 ve 2021’de altcoinleri peş peşe yükselten sermaye rotasyonu bu döngüde neden aynı şekilde gerçekleşmiyor?
Asıl fark, yalnızca yatırımcıların ne aldığıyla ilgili değil. Kripto piyasasına giren sermayenin yapısı ve bu sermayenin piyasaya ulaşma kanalı değişti.
2017 ve 2021’de Altcoin Sezonunu Ne Tetikledi? 2017’de Ethereum ve ERC-20 standardı, yeni projelerin kendi tokenlarını çıkararak sermaye toplamasını kolaylaştırdı. ICO dalgası, Bitcoin dışındaki varlıklara yönelik yeni bir yatırım hikâyesi oluşturdu. Bitcoin dominansı 2017 boyunca sert şekilde gerilerken Ocak 2018’de yaklaşık %38 seviyelerine kadar indi.
2021’de ise sermaye akışını DeFi, NFT, GameFi ve yeni blockchain ağları genişletti. Bitcoin dominansı yılın başındaki %70’in üzerindeki seviyelerden yaklaşık %40’a kadar gerilerken, yatırımcı ilgisi farklı sektörlere yayıldı.
İki dönemin ortak noktası şuydu: Bitcoin’in ardından sermayenin gideceği yeni ve güçlü yatırım hikâyeleri ortaya çıktı.
2026’da ise aynı mekanizma henüz oluşmuş değil.
2026 Döngüsünde Sermaye Neden Altcoinlere Gitmiyor? Bu döngünün en önemli farklarından biri, kurumsal sermayenin Bitcoin’e ulaşma biçimi.
ABD’de spot Bitcoin ETF‘lerinin kullanıma girmesi, büyük yatırımcıların Bitcoin’e doğrudan erişimini kolaylaştırdı. CoinMarketCap’in son değerlendirmesine göre ETF’ler, yeni dönemde büyük sermayenin Bitcoin’de yoğunlaşmasının temel nedenlerinden biri haline geldi. ETF üzerinden Bitcoin’e giren sermaye ise doğrudan altcoinlere aktarılamıyor.
Bu nedenle geçmişte görülen:
Bitcoin → Ethereum → altcoinler
şeklindeki klasik rotasyon bu döngüde daha yavaş ilerliyor.
Üstelik Bitcoin’den çıkan para da otomatik olarak altcoinlere gitmiyor. Sermaye zaman zaman stablecoinlerde bekliyor veya tamamen kripto piyasasının dışına çıkıyor.
Bu nedenle mevcut döngünün temel sorusu yalnızca “Bitcoin’den para çıkıyor mu?” değil.
Asıl soru, “Çıkan para nereye gidiyor?”
Piyasada Para Var Ama Altcoinlere Gitmiyor Kripto piyasasında dolar bazlı likiditenin tamamen ortadan kalktığını söylemek de doğru değil.
CoinGecko’nun ikinci çeyrek raporuna göre stablecoin piyasa değeri Haziran sonunda 305,1 milyar dolar seviyesindeydi. Ancak aynı dönemde stablecoin piyasası %1,6 küçüldü ve toplam kripto piyasası değeri %12,6 gerileyerek 2,1 trilyon dolara indi.
Dolayısıyla sorun yalnızca piyasada yeterli likiditenin bulunup bulunmaması değil.
Likiditenin hangi varlıklara yöneldiği daha önemli.
Stablecoin arzının büyümesi tek başına altcoin sezonunu başlatmıyor. Bu sermayenin daha yüksek riskli varlıklara yönelmesi ve işlem hacimlerinin piyasanın geneline yayılması gerekiyor.
Milyonlarca Token Sermayeyi Bölüyor Piyasanın yapısı da 2021’e göre önemli ölçüde değişti.
CoinMarketCap, bugün yatırımcıların çok daha geniş bir token havuzu arasında seçim yaptığını ve bunun aynı miktardaki sermayenin daha fazla varlık arasında bölünmesine yol açtığını belirtiyor. CoinMarketCap’in son analizine göre token sayısındaki patlama, geçmişteki gibi birkaç büyük projenin aynı anda piyasanın tamamını sürüklemesini zorlaştırıyor.
Bu nedenle birkaç altcoinin güçlü yükselmesi artık tek başına altcoin sezonu anlamına gelmiyor.
2026’da sermaye daha çok belirli temalar ve projeler arasında kısa süreli rotasyonlar yaparken, “her altcoin yükseliyor” şeklindeki geniş tabanlı hareket henüz ortaya çıkmış değil. CoinGecko’nun ikinci çeyrek raporu da piyasanın genel zayıflığına rağmen bazı altcoinlerde seçici talebin devam ettiğini gösteriyor.
Ethereum Neden Altcoin Sezonunun Anahtarı? Ethereum’un Bitcoin karşısındaki performansı da sermaye rotasyonunu anlamak için kritik göstergelerden biri.
CoinMarketCap verisinde ETH/BTC oranı Temmuz sonunda yaklaşık 0,03 seviyesindeydi. Bu oran, Ethereum’un Bitcoin karşısındaki değerini gösteriyor.
Geçmiş döngülerde Ethereum’un güçlenmesi, yatırımcıların Bitcoin dışındaki riskli varlıklara yönelmesiyle birlikte görüldü. CoinMarketCap de altcoin sezonlarının tipik akışında Bitcoin’deki yükselişin ardından Ethereum’un güçlendiğini ve daha sonra sermayenin farklı altcoin sektörlerine yayıldığını belirtiyor.
Bu nedenle ETH/BTC’deki kalıcı güçlenme, geniş tabanlı bir altcoin rotasyonunun önemli erken göstergelerinden biri olabilir.
Altcoin Sezonunun Başlaması İçin 7 Kritik Sinyal Altcoin sezonunu tek bir göstergeyle takip etmek yerine birkaç verinin aynı anda güçlenmesine bakmak gerekiyor.
1. Bitcoin Dominansı Kalıcı Olarak Gerilemeli BTC dominansının tek günlük düşüşü yeterli değil. Daha kalıcı bir düşüş trendi, sermayenin Bitcoin dışındaki varlıklara yayıldığına dair daha güçlü bir sinyal verebilir. CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin dominansını piyasa sermayesinin BTC ve diğer kripto varlıklar arasındaki dağılımını izlemek için kullanılan temel göstergelerden biri olarak tanımlıyor.
2. ETH/BTC Güçlenmeli Ethereum’un Bitcoin karşısında değer kazanması, sermayenin piyasanın daha yüksek riskli bölümüne ilerlediğine dair önemli bir işaret olabilir.
3. Altcoin Season Index 75’i Aşmalı CoinMarketCap’in metodolojisine göre ilk 100 kripto varlığın en az %75’i, son 90 günlük performansta Bitcoin’i geçtiğinde piyasa Altcoin Season olarak kabul ediliyor. Endeks günlük olarak yenileniyor.
Bu nedenle 75 seviyesi, geniş tabanlı altcoin performansının en net teyit noktalarından biri.
4. Stablecoin Likiditesi Riskli Varlıklara Yönelmeli Stablecoin piyasa değerinin yüksek olması tek başına yeterli değil. Likiditenin gerçekten altcoin piyasasına girmesi gerekiyor.
5. Altcoin İşlem Hacimleri Genişlemeli Birkaç büyük altcoin yükselirken piyasanın geri kalanı düşük hacimde kalıyorsa geniş tabanlı bir altseason oluştuğunu söylemek zor.
6. Bitcoin Sert Bir Satışa Değil, Dengeli Bir Piyasaya Dönüşmeli Bitcoin’in sert şekilde düşmesi otomatik olarak altcoinlere sermaye aktarmaz. Böyle bir hareket yatırımcıları stablecoinlere veya tamamen piyasa dışına yöneltebilir.
Bu nedenle sağlıklı bir rotasyon için Bitcoin’in güçlü bir yükselişin ardından daha dengeli hareket etmesi daha elverişli bir ortam yaratabilir.
7. Yeni ve Güçlü Bir Piyasa Anlatısı Ortaya Çıkmalı 2017’de ICO, 2021’de DeFi ve NFT gibi güçlü anlatılar yatırımcıları Bitcoin’in dışına çekti. Yeni döngüde de benzer ölçekte bir kullanım alanı veya yatırım hikâyesinin ortaya çıkması, sermayenin daha geniş bir altcoin grubuna yönelmesini kolaylaştırabilir.
Şu aşamada kesin bir tarih vermek mümkün değil.
CoinMarketCap’in son analizinde Altcoin Season Index 45-50 bandında bulunurken, şirketin güncel piyasa verisinde Bitcoin dominansı yaklaşık %59,2 seviyesinde. Bu iki gösterge birlikte değerlendirildiğinde geniş tabanlı bir altcoin sezonunun henüz teyit edilmediği görülüyor.
Ancak geçmiş döngülerden farklı bir piyasa yapısının oluşması, altcoin sezonunun hiç yaşanmayacağı anlamına gelmiyor.
Bitcoin dominansının kalıcı şekilde gerilemesi, ETH/BTC’nin güçlenmesi, stablecoin likiditesinin riskli varlıklara yönelmesi ve Altcoin Season Index’in 75 seviyesini aşması hâlinde tablo değişebilir.
Kısacası altcoin sezonu için takvimden çok koşullara bakmak gerekiyor. Şimdilik bu koşulların tamamı aynı anda oluşmuş değil.
Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Bitcoin slipped below $64,000 on Aug. 11 as traders cut risk ahead of fresh U.S. inflation data and rising oil prices revived concerns about the Federal Reserve’s rate path.
Summary
Bitcoin traded near $63,855, down 1.6%, after failing to establish support above $65,000 this week. Ether fell 2.2% and XRP lost 2.1%, while Hyperliquid and Chainlink advanced against broader weakness. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $144.6 million in net outflows Monday after five inflow sessions. Brent crude held near $88 as stalled U.S. Iran talks renewed inflation concerns before CPI. July CPI is scheduled Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. ET, leaving crypto exposed to macro volatility. BTC traded near $63,855 at the time of writing, down about 1.6% over 24 hours after making several unsuccessful attempts to establish support above $65,000.
The pullback follows a short recovery that took Bitcoin above $65,300 on Monday. As covered in Monday’s CPI preview, weaker U.S. employment data had previously helped BTC recover as traders reduced expectations for tighter monetary policy. The focus has now shifted to inflation and energy prices.
Bitcoin has tested the $65,000 area for four consecutive days without sustaining a move above it. Downside levels remain relevant. Recent short term holder analysis placed the average acquisition price for newer holders at $67,523, meaning BTC remains below a level where some investors could seek to exit near breakeven. Support has recently formed around $63,000 to $64,000.
Ether and XRP lead losses as altcoins split Large cap altcoins were mostly weaker alongside Bitcoin. Ether traded at about $1,871 at press time, down 2.8% over 24 hours. XRP traded near $1.00 after falling 3.1% and was down more than 6% over seven days. Solana declined about 1% to $75.78, while BNB slipped 1% to roughly $599.
Crypto market overview, source: QuantifyCrypto Performance was not uniformly negative. Hyperliquid rose about 2.4% to $55.25, Chainlink gained 2% to $8.43, TRX advanced 0.5% to $0.33 and Dogecoin added roughly 0.5% around $0.07. Among the top 100 assets shown, Internet Computer gained 8.3%, Lighter rose 7% and Mantle added 5.8%. Bitway fell 8.1%, Canton declined 6.5% and Cardano lost 4.8%.
The split suggests traders are still willing to take selective altcoin exposure despite weakness in Bitcoin, Ether and XRP. However, the broad market has yet to show the synchronized strength typically associated with a sustained risk rally.
U.S. CPI and oil become the next macro test Oil has returned as a major U.S. macro risk. Brent crude held around $87.81 on Tuesday after gaining more than 5% in the previous session as hopes for an agreement between Washington and Tehran weakened. Negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz remain unsettled, keeping energy supply risks elevated. Reuters provided the latest report.
Higher energy prices can feed into inflation expectations and affect the outlook for U.S. interest rates. The Bureau of Labor Statistics schedule confirms that July CPI will be released Wednesday, Aug. 12, at 8:30 a.m. ET. The release gives traders a fresh reading on inflation after softer June data had eased some pressure on risk assets.
U.S. Treasury markets are already reflecting some of that caution. The benchmark 10 year yield rose toward 4.7% alongside oil on Monday. Higher yields generally raise the return available on lower risk assets, creating another hurdle for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies ahead of the CPI release.
What happens next for Bitcoin and ETF flows Institutional flows offer a mixed signal. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded five consecutive positive sessions from Aug. 3 through Aug. 7, attracting $865.3 million according to Farside Investors. That streak ended Monday with $144.6 million in net withdrawals, including $53.6 million from BlackRock’s IBIT and $52 million from Grayscale’s GBTC. Farside’s latest data replaces earlier provisional estimates of Monday’s outflow.
The strong preceding week was examined in recent ETF inflow coverage, although that report used SoSoValue figures and therefore produced a slightly different weekly total. Both datasets showed the same broad pattern: five positive sessions followed by renewed withdrawals on Monday.
Washington also remains part of the market backdrop. The Senate pushed its CLARITY Act vote into September after lawmakers failed to resolve disagreements before the August recess, as detailed in earlier CLARITY Act coverage. That removed an anticipated August policy event while leaving market structure legislation unresolved.
Wednesday’s CPI release is now the nearest fixed catalyst. Bitcoin first needs to reclaim $65,000 before the $67,500 to $70,000 region becomes relevant again.
Bitcoin (BTC) price chart, source: crypto.news A move below the recent $63,000 area would instead put the market’s latest recovery under greater pressure. Neither direction has been confirmed, leaving inflation, Treasury yields and ETF flows as the clearest near term signals to watch.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
BitMine, a cryptocurrency company known for its Ethereum-focused treasury strategy, continues to increase its ETH holdings. According to a company statement, BitMine purchased an additional 7,391 ETH in the past week. With these new purchases, the company’s total Ethereum holdings have risen to 5,805,238 ETH.
BitMine’s holdings of ETH represent approximately 4.8% of Ethereum’s total supply. This further solidifies the company’s position as one of the world’s largest institutional Ethereum holders.
BitMine’s strategy includes not only buying ETH but also staking the acquired assets. The company has staked 5,067,309 ETH of its total Ethereum holdings. This amount represents approximately 87% of the company’s total ETH reserve.
Staking activities are expected to be a significant revenue stream for BitMine. The company anticipates generating approximately $257 million in annualized revenue from its current staking position. This aims to provide both long-term Ethereum holdings and a steady income stream.
BitMine also continued its share buybacks during the same period. The company announced last week that it repurchased 3 million shares. The total number of shares repurchased since July has reached 19.1 million.
The company’s simultaneous increase in its Ethereum reserves and continuation of share buybacks indicates a multifaceted strategy in capital management. In addition to the rise in ETH price, staking revenues are also expected to contribute to the company’s balance sheet.
BitMine’s Ethereum holdings, reaching approximately 4.8% of the total supply, stand out as a significant development indicating a strengthening trend among institutional investors to view ETH as a long-term treasury asset.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Tron ended the second quarter of 2026 with $87.9 billion in circulating $USDT, overtaking Ethereum to claim the top spot in the stablecoin supply race. The figures come from Messari's State of TRON Q2 2026 report, published this week.
Record Stablecoin Supply and Transfer Volume Tron closed Q2 with $87.9 billion in circulating USDT, surpassing Ethereum, while USDT accounted for 98.5% of Tron's stablecoin market, which grew 4.1% quarter-over-quarter to a record $89.2 billion. The network also posted a significant jump in transfer activity. Average daily USDT transfer volume returned to growth, rising 4.3% to $22.8 billion after declining in the first quarter. Across the full quarter, the network processed $2.1 trillion in USDT transfers.
Tron's dominance in USDT settlement has been building for several years. The network became the dominant chain for USDT circulation in 2022 and has held that position since, with low transaction fees and fast finality making it a preferred rail for USDT transfers, particularly in emerging markets.
Network Activity Hits New Highs The surge in stablecoin volume was matched by broader network growth. Tron averaged 11.8 million daily transactions during the quarter, up 8.7%, while average daily active addresses climbed 11.7% to 3.6 million. The network processed a record 14.6 million transactions on June 15, 2026, according to Messari.
Messari noted that Tron recorded all-time highs in stablecoin supply and network activity during the second quarter, though DeFi and decentralized exchange activity declined. That mixed picture suggests Tron's growth remains heavily concentrated in its core stablecoin use case, even as it pursues broader ecosystem expansion.
For context on Tron's wider competitive position, total fees on Tron reached $89 million in Q2, second only to Hyperliquid at $199 million and ahead of Ethereum at $52 million.
Sources:
CoinTelegraph: TRON USDT supply hits $87.9B as transfers reach $2.1T in Q2 (Messari)
Messari: State of TRON Q1 2026 (background and trend data)
BitKE: TRON Stablecoin Supply Hits Record High in Q2 2026
Bitcoin slipped below the $64,000 mark and Ethereum fell below $1,900 on Tuesday as crypto markets came under renewed pressure amid macroeconomic uncertainty and leveraged positioning, triggering another bout of volatility. Bitcoin was trading at $63,906, while Ethereum stood at $1,871.
In the past 24 hours, Bitcoin was down 1.64% and Ethereum was down 2.33%. Among the major altcoins, BNB, XRP, Solana, and Cardano fell upto 3.30% and Tron, Hyperliquid, and Dogecoin rallied upto 2.15%.
Also Read | NFO Insight: WhiteOak Capital Dividend Yield Fund opens for subscription. Can REITs and InvITs boost diversification and income?
Crypto Tracker
TOP COINS (₹)
95 (0.0%)
95 (0.0%)
57,164 (-0.8%)
6,094,703 (-1.9%)
178,433 (-2.6%)
Riya Sehgal, Research Analyst, Delta Exchange said Bitcoin was rejected from the $65,000–$65,500 region and slipped back toward $64,000, while Ether underperformed below $1,900 and long liquidations have amplified the move, although institutional demand through spot ETFs remains comparatively supportive.
Technically, Bitcoin needs to hold the $63,600–$63,800 area, while Ether has immediate support near $1,860, Sehgal further said.
The global crypto market capitalisation edged down 1.24% to $2.19 trillion, according to CoinMarketCap.
Vikram Subburaj, CEO, Giottus said that the trading volume reached $22.3 billion. The retreat followed another unsuccessful attempt to hold above $65,000, with the price turning lower after touching $65,300 on August 10.
Bitcoin’s failure to clear $65,400 suggests that the ETF demand is being met by sufficient selling elsewhere in the market and staggered allocations are preferable to concentrated entries, particularly before the inflation release. Leverage should be kept low while Bitcoin remains below $66,800, said Subburaj.
In the past week, Bitcoin and Ethereum were up 0.23% and 0.46% respectively. Among the major altcoins, BNB, Solana, Tron, Hyperliquid rallied upto 2.80% whereas XRP, Dogecoin, and Cardano corrected upto 3.74%.
Nischal Shetty, Founder, WazirX said BTC’s price recovered from early weakness near $63,860 and is consolidating around $64,000. ETH is trading near $1,876, around 0.23% up in 24 hours. Price rebounded from roughly $1,870 and has remained above the previous close of $1,871.81.
Also Read |Nifty Smallcap 250 hits 52-week high. Should smallcap mutual fund investors continue SIPs or book profits?
Here is what other analyst say
Prateek Gupta, Head of Business, Mudrex: Bitcoin has slipped from an August high near $65,400 to about $64,000 after oil surged 5% to $81.80 a barrel as the odds of the Strait of Hormuz oil route reopening appeared to fade. With inflation data due later this week, Bitcoin is likely to remain range-bound between $63,000 and $65,000 in the near term.
CoinSwitch Markets Desk: BTC is holding just above the $65,000 mark, changing hands around $64,950–$65,000 in early trade after opening at $64,849 (down a marginal 0.1% from Sunday) and edging up roughly +0.1% on the day. Bitcoin has now closed above $65,000 for four consecutive sessions, but each attempt to extend higher has been met with selling near the level, keeping price pinned in a tight range rather than breaking out.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
TLDR: Ethereum’s Binance NUPL has dropped near -0.35, a level historically tied to major bottoms. The metric shows exchange-held ETH supply carrying unrealized losses near 35% of its value. Past -0.35 readings coincided with the 2019, 2020, 2022, and 2025 ETH bottoming phases too. Ethereum traded near $1,866.93, down 3.01% daily despite a 0.38% weekly price gain overall. Ethereum’s exchange-level Net Unrealized Profit and Loss reading on Binance has slipped into a historic bottoming zone.
The metric, known as NUPL, now sits near negative 0.35. That level appeared during the 2019 lows, the March 2020 crash, and both 2022 bottoming phases. It also showed up in the 2025 correction.
Ethereum traded at $1,866.93 at the time of writing. The asset fell 3.01% over the past 24 hours despite a 0.38% gain across the week.
Reading the Binance NUPL Level NUPL measures the gap between unrealized profits and unrealized losses held by a given supply cohort. A positive reading means that the cohort holds an aggregate paper profit. A negative reading means the same supply sits underwater against its estimated cost basis.
This particular calculation covers only ETH held on Binance rather than the full Ethereum holder base. That distinction matters because exchange-based supply tends to be more available for immediate trading. It offers a narrower but more reactive view of market stress.
A reading near negative 0.35 signals considerable financial stress among that group. The tracked supply is carrying unrealized losses equal to roughly 35% of its current market value. This level has not appeared often across Ethereum’s trading history.
Cryptoquant Analyst @MorenoDV_ noted that “Ethereum’s exchange-level NUPL on Binance has returned to a region that has historically appeared near important price floors.”
Past occurrences of this threshold coincided with several of Ethereum’s most notable market bottoms. Those episodes span both the 2019 and 2020 lows.
The −0.35 Signal: Why ETH May Be Approaching Another Bottom
“Ethereum’s exchange-level NUPL on Binance has returned to a region that has historically appeared near important price floors.” – By @MorenoDV_ pic.twitter.com/RaSltW469r
— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) August 11, 2026
What The Pattern Suggests About ETH As weaker holders capitulate near this threshold, the remaining exchange supply grows less willing to sell at depressed prices. Once the most loss-sensitive sellers have exited, further declines may generate less additional supply pressure.
That dynamic can allow even modest buying demand to stabilize price levels over time. Traders often watch for this shift as an early signal of a possible trend reversal.
Previous cycles show mixed outcomes after the first breach of this zone. In some cases, price found support quickly. In others, a retest or a final lower low preceded the eventual recovery.
A move back above the negative 0.35 threshold while ETH holds its recent low would strengthen the bottoming case. Continued NUPL deterioration alongside fresh price lows would instead suggest that capitulation remains incomplete.
Ethereum’s price action over the coming weeks will likely determine which outcome plays out this cycle. Traders watching on-chain metrics will look for confirmation through price stabilization and a corresponding recovery in the NUPL reading.
Until that confirmation arrives, the current reading remains a signal worth monitoring rather than a guaranteed floor for Ethereum’s price.
On-chain observers typically treat the metric as one input among several. Spot volume, funding rates, and broader macro conditions also shape the outlook.
Institutional demand for Ethereum [ETH] eased slightly ahead of U.S. inflation data and rising oil prices. The U.S. spot ETH ETFs saw $14.59 million in daily net outflows on the 10th of August. This broke its recent four days of consecutive outflows.
Source: SoSo Value Will selling pressure keep ETH stuck below $2K? Besides the slow institutional appetite, there was a broader uptick in selling pressure across exchanges. According to CryptoQuant data, the weekly Exchange Netflow has been climbing higher in August.
The metric tracks the net difference between ETH entering exchanges and ETH being moved out.
A positive and rising number implies increasing selling pressure across spot exchanges. On the contrary, a negative reading (or downslope on the chart) suggests more ETH is being withdrawn, a bullish signal.
Source: CryptoQuant After slowing in July, the metric’s continued rise in August meant increased selling pressure. On the 10th of August, the metric spiked higher again. This coincided with ETH’s sharp 3% price drop as the altcoin slipped from $1920 to $1875.
Ethereum price vs. CPI data That said, traders have been using the $1800-$1960 price range for opportunities. Notably, there is scheduled U.S. inflation data (CPI) on the 12th of August. The price range could still be exploited for potential trading opportunities ahead of the data.
Source: ETH/USDT, TradingView Cooler inflation data could raise the odds of another Fed rate cut. However, higher inflation figures would reinforce the ongoing Fed rate hike fears. This may send markets lower, including ETH.
Currently, the market is 50/50 on the Fed’s next move. This makes Wednesday’s inflation data a crucial catalyst that could sway the odds and directly affect market sentiment.
Source: CME That said, the Options market positioning leaned more toward a potential extension of the Q3 sideways structure.
Notably, institutional players were betting on a possible move towards $2K by the end of August or September (green bars tracking bullish calls). Moreover, there was considerable hedging against downside moves towards $1700 and $1650.
Source: Arkham ETH’s overall selling pressure has remained elevated despite the improved institutional demand in the past few days. Still, the price could be impacted by Wednesday’s inflation data. The $1800 and $1700 could be lower targets if the data is negative for ETH.
Otherwise, if inflation cools, ETH price may reclaim $1900, and eye the $2000 psychological level.
Final Summary ETH has seen rising selling pressure across exchanges in August. Whether the Q3 price range of $1800-$1960 holds or extends may partly be influenced by Fed rate expectations.
The second quarter of 2026 reveals the accounting cost of SharpLink’s bet on Ethereum. Despite strong revenue growth, the company reported a net loss of $394.3 million. This underperformance mainly stems from the decline in the ETH price and its impact on the book value of held assets. However, revenues are increasing thanks to staking, despite this exposure to digital assets. The company also continues its Ether purchases and share buybacks.
In brief SharpLink reports a net loss of $394.3 million in the second quarter of 2026. Depreciations related to ETH explain most of this heavy accounting loss. Revenues jump to $11.5 million, including $11.2 million from ETH staking. SharpLink continues to accumulate ETH despite a 6% drop in its SBET share price. SharpLink recorded a net loss of $394.3 million in the second quarter. The main factor is a latent loss of $321 million on its Ether holdings. The decline of the ETH price during the quarter reduced the book value of these assets under US GAAP rules. Additionally, there is a depreciation of $76.1 million on two liquid staking tokens, LsETH and weETH.
These accounting adjustments do not correspond to a direct cash outflow. The company also states in its press release that a later market recovery does not offset these depreciations in its accounts. However, they do not reduce the number of tokens held by SharpLink. Gains made therefore helped mitigate part of the negative impact recorded in the quarter.
The loss remains higher than the $103.4 million recorded a year earlier. However, it marks an improvement compared to the first quarter of 2026. The company then posted a loss of $685.6 million, following a stronger drop in the ETH price. The second quarter thus shows strong accounting pressure, but less severe than the previous quarter.
Revenues Strongly Increase Despite Losses Despite this loss, SharpLink generated $11.5 million in revenue between April and June. A year earlier, the figure was only $0.7 million. Rewards from ETH staking represent $11.2 million of this revenue. This growth reflects the active treasury management strategy launched on June 2, 2025.
This strategy mainly had its effect over a full quarter, compared to a few weeks earlier. Meanwhile, expenses have risen sharply. Selling, general and administrative expenses reached $9.1 million, compared to $2.4 million a year earlier. The company bears notably higher costs related to personnel, custody, insurance, legal, and accounting.
The gap between revenues and costs remains a central element of the published results. The revenue increase is not enough to absorb the additional charges. However, revenues from staking now contribute much more substantially. This development directly supports the increase in Ethereum assets held by the company.
SharpLink Continues its ETH Accumulation Latent losses have not interrupted Ether purchases. SharpLink held about 886,881 ETH at the end of June, then about 888,938 ETH on August 3. At the end of the quarter, this reserve represented about $1.4 billion according to GAAP standards. The company thus continues to strengthen its Ethereum exposure despite the pressure on its accounts.
On June 23, the company finalized a direct offering of $75 million. It sold just over 10 million shares with subscription warrants at $7.49 per unit. Part of the funds was used to buy about 10,000 ETH at an average price of $1,611. In addition, share buybacks continue with about 2.1 million shares during the quarter.
Since the buybacks started in August 2025, the company has canceled 4,071,223 shares for about $41.7 million. In June, Russell also included the stock in its 2000 and 3000 indices. Following the results, the SBET share price dropped 6% to $6.05. Finally, SharpLink and Galaxy Digital launched an on-chain yield fund with $125 million.
This development extends the strategy around Ethereum assets. The company contributes $100 million from its treasury in staking, while Galaxy Digital provides $25 million and manages the fund. In the short term, upcoming quarterly financial results will measure the effect of ETH price changes on the accounts and staking’s ability to support revenues.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Ghiles A.
Journaliste et rédacteur web passionné par l’univers des cryptomonnaies et des technologies Web3. J’y traite les dernières tendances et actualités afin de proposer un contenu de haute qualité à un large public du secteur.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
TLDR Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin analyzed differences between the network’s 2023 roadmap and its 2026 Strawmap, showcasing significant priority changes Privacy protection has emerged as a fundamental protocol requirement, with new mechanisms like privacy pools and wormholes now under development Quantum resistance has been elevated to a critical near-term concern requiring dedicated protocol-level solutions Native rollup integration, previously not considered due to technological limitations, now features prominently as ZK technology has advanced Formal verification powered by AI and STARK proof systems are expected to enhance security across all network components On August 10, Ethereum’s co-founder Vitalik Buterin shared a side-by-side analysis comparing the blockchain’s 2023 roadmap with its latest Strawmap, illustrating substantial changes in the project’s technical focus over a three-year period.
I updated my 2023 roadmap diagram to overlay where the items that were there sit in the current Strawmap ( https://t.co/9deLIQWG24 ).
In general, a lot of overlap, but:
* Some things got reshuffled in order (eg. quantum safety up-prioritized)
* Some things deprioritized (eg.… pic.twitter.com/XLdIt4kAgT
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) August 10, 2026
The Strawmap functions as a collaborative planning document outlining potential protocol improvements extending through 2029. Rather than serving as a definitive timeline, it represents a dynamic framework that core developers can adjust as technological research advances.
Privacy Elevated to Foundational Protocol Layer While completely absent from Ethereum’s 2023 strategic plan, privacy protection has now been elevated to a core architectural principle, positioned alongside fundamental values like censorship resistance and network security.
Buterin identified multiple privacy-enhancing mechanisms currently being evaluated by developers, including keyed nonces, recent roots, lean privacy pools, and wormhole technology. These innovations aim to minimize the transaction metadata visible to external analysts and observers.
Portions of FOCIL (Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists) also feature in the privacy enhancement category. FOCIL aims to strengthen transaction inclusion guarantees against potential censorship by block builders, and represents a major component of Ethereum’s anticipated Hegota network upgrade.
Quantum Resistance Elevated on Strategic Timeline Quantum computing threats received minimal attention in the 2023 roadmap. The technology now occupies a prominent position in Ethereum’s strategic planning horizon.
Ethereum presently relies on cryptographic algorithms that could face compromise if sufficiently powerful quantum computers emerge. Transitioning to quantum-resistant alternatives while maintaining reasonable signature sizes and transaction costs represents a substantial technical hurdle.
The updated roadmap explores LeanSPHINCS signature schemes, signature aggregation techniques, and zkzk frameworks as potential components of quantum-resistant infrastructure. Previous research from an Ethereum core developer indicated that implementing wallet-level quantum protection might cost approximately $0.07 per user account.
Native Rollup Integration Enters Development Scope Native rollups received no consideration in the 2023 roadmap due to insufficient maturity of zero-knowledge cryptographic systems at that time.
Current rollup implementations function as independent layer-2 architectures, executing transactions off Ethereum’s main chain and posting validity proofs back to the base layer. Native rollup technology would integrate portions of this verification logic directly into Ethereum’s core protocol.
Buterin indicated that the network is transitioning away from pursuing a single universal scaling solution. Future development may favor specialized, highly optimized systems tailored for particular applications such as token transfers, decentralized exchange operations, and privacy-preserving transactions.
Blob and gas futures markets represent another novel concept. These instruments could enable users or layer-2 protocols to secure guaranteed future access to Ethereum’s data availability or computational resources.
Buterin noted that artificial intelligence could facilitate comprehensive formal verification of protocol components. Recursive STARK proof systems may ultimately span Ethereum’s execution, consensus, and data availability layers.
The network’s virtual machine architecture could also undergo transformation, with leanISA and RISC-V listed as potential successors, though Buterin cautioned these possibilities remain premature for the current Strawmap iteration.
At press time, Ether was trading around $1,875, reflecting a decline of approximately 2.6% from the prior 24-hour period.
Ethereum‘s Net Unrealized Profit and Loss (NUPL) reading on Binance has declined to negative 0.35, a level that has previously signaled market bottoms during past crypto cycles.
Binance NUPL metric hits key thresholdNUPL gauges the difference between unrealized profits and losses across a specific cohort of token holders. When the metric is negative, it indicates that assets in that group hold more unrealized losses than profits. For Ethereum held on Binance, NUPL now stands near -0.35, meaning the supply held on the exchange is, on average, carrying unrealized losses equal to 35% of its cost basis.
Historically, this negative -0.35 level has coincided with major price floors for Ethereum. Data points from 2019, the March 2020 crash, the 2022 low, and even the 2025 correction all recorded similar NUPL readings at or close to significant market bottoms.
As of the latest figures, Ethereum is trading at $1,866.93, reflecting a 3.01% daily decline but maintaining a modest 0.38% overall gain for the week.
Cryptoquant Analyst @MorenoDV_ emphasized that Ethereum’s exchange-level NUPL on Binance has returned to a range historically seen near important price floors, drawing parallels with prior bottoming phases.
The metric only considers Ethereum currently held on Binance, rather than the entire circulating supply. Exchange-based supply is typically more reactive to shifting sentiment, offering a focused view of market stress.
Capitulation risk and market signalsWhen NUPL approaches these deeply negative zones, it often suggests capitulation among weaker holders. During such periods, most loss-sensitive traders may have already sold, reducing the likelihood of further selling pressure at lower prices.
Historically, after this level was reached, Ethereum’s price sometimes stabilized rapidly, but further declines or additional retests occasionally occurred before a longer-term bottom took shape.
If Ethereum’s price recovers while NUPL rises back above the -0.35 threshold, analysts may view this as a potential validation of a market bottom. However, if losses among Binance-held ETH continue to deepen, it could signal ongoing capitulation and further downside risk remains.
Analysts observe that previous cycles provided mixed signals: in some instances, price support emerged quickly at these levels, while other times the market endured further declines before turning around.
Traders are closely monitoring both on-chain metrics and price movements for confirmation of a developing trend reversal. While this signal increases attention on Ethereum’s next move, confirmation may require stabilization in spot volume and improvement in NUPL itself.
Alternative tools for risk managementThe NUPL reading is typically considered alongside other indicators, such as funding rates, spot trading volumes, and larger macroeconomic trends, to build a more comprehensive view of market sentiment.
In addition to tracking on-chain signals, some market participants seek alternative platforms that streamline access to diversified financial assets. By integrating traditional assets with blockchain-based solutions, traders may gain flexibility to respond to dynamic crypto market conditions.
For example, 1stepSwap removes barriers between traditional finance and crypto by enabling direct blockchain-based access to real-world assets such as major U.S. company shares, as well as commodities including gold and silver. The platform automatically searches for the best available price and allows instant trading, providing an efficient way to diversify portfolios without intermediaries or complex procedures.
As ETH’s market structure evolves, the combination of on-chain analytics, alternative access to RWAs, and diligent monitoring of price action remains central to proactive risk management.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.
Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.
Multiple South Korean securities firms have lowered the target prices of Samsung and SK Hynix, with the biggest cut exceeding 30%.
According to South Korea’s JoongAng Ilbo, Kiwoom Securities has also lowered its target stock prices for Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. Recently, market concerns that the general memory chip industry has reached its peak (peak-out) have intensified, prompting an increasing number of securities firms to cut their target price expectations for South Korea’s two leading stocks: Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. Per South Korea’s financial investment industry sources on the 11th, Kiwoom Securities the previous day reduced Samsung Electronics’ target price from 390,000 won to 350,000 won, and SK Hynix’s target price from 2.2 million won to 2.1 million won, while maintaining a "buy" rating for both stocks. The report notes that this trend of target price cuts in South Korea’s securities industry has been visible since the end of last month. At that time, amid debates over the semiconductor industry’s peak cycle and SK Hynix’s Q2 earnings release, major brokerages including Mirae Asset Securities, Shinhan Investment Securities, and Samsung Securities had already successively cut the target prices of both stocks by around 30%.
3 minutes ago
Kalshi to Enhance Trading Surveillance by Adopting Nasdaq’s Market Surveillance Tools
According to Reuters, Kalshi will adopt Nasdaq’s market surveillance tools to enhance monitoring of trades on its platform. The firm plans to integrate Nasdaq’s market surveillance platform in phases. Kalshi stated that integrating Nasdaq’s 24/7 surveillance platform with its own trading infrastructure will help detect market abuse, manipulation, and insider trading in real time, and support the submission of trade data in the format required by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
3 minutes ago
International oil prices give back some of their gains, as progress in talks between Oman and Iran eases supply concerns.
Brent and U.S. crude oil futures have given back some of their earlier gains, as markets closely monitor developments in the Middle East. A spokesperson for Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated: “Negotiations between Oman and Iran have now entered an ‘advanced stage’. We have received positive feedback from both countries, and the talks are at a critical juncture. We support all de-escalation efforts. As a mediator, we hope to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as soon as possible. Qatar backs any plan that ensures the security of the Strait of Hormuz and freedom of navigation, and prevents it from becoming a tool for political pressure.”
3 minutes ago
Intel is down 1% in pre-market trading after announcing it expanded its stock offering size and priced the offering.
According to BIT (Bit.com) market data, Intel (INTC.O) shares fell 1% in pre-market trading. Earlier, the company announced an increase in the size of its stock offering and completed the relevant pricing.
According to official announcements, KuCoin has obtained ISO 22301:2019 Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) certification, further enhancing its global operational resilience and service continuity capabilities. As an internationally recognized standard for business continuity management, ISO 22301 is designed to help enterprises identify operational risks, improve business continuity mechanisms, and enhance the ability to maintain and recover critical services amid sudden disruptions. This certification, along with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II, forms the three pillars of KuCoin’s trust framework, covering information security, operational reliability, and business continuity. The three international standards and certifications complement each other, reflecting KuCoin’s long-term commitment to continuously improving its global operations and security systems, ensuring stable operation of critical services, and delivering secure, reliable digital asset services to users worldwide.
3 minutes ago
The Jaredfromsubway exploiter is really bad at trading—buying high and selling low again! 4 days ago, he bought back ...
The Jaredfromsubway exploiter is really bad at trading—buying high and selling low again! 4 days ago, he bought back 2,063 $ETH ($3.94M) at $1,912. Today, he sold 2,167 $ETH ($4.05M) at $1,872.
Crypto prices moved lower on Tuesday as investors reduced risk before United States inflation data. The global market value fell 1.57% within 24 hours, reaching $2.18 trillion.
Bitcoin price dropped below $64,000 after failing to maintain Monday’s advance above $65,000. The BTC price was trading at around 63,993 and it fell by approximately 1.8 per cent in the session.
Ether price also fell below $1,900, whereas XRP price hovered close to $1 and was battered down. Losses across major altcoins reflected Bitcoin’s reversal and cautious market sentiment.
Coin360 Crypto Prices Fall Ahead of US Inflation Data Other crypto prices like SOL, DOGE, BNB, and Cardano have seen a slight correction over the past 24-hours after a week of recovery.
Key US crypto market events this week include Wednesday’s CPI report and Thursday’s PPI, jobless claims, and two Fed speeches. Retail sales and consumer sentiment data are released on Friday, and core CPI is the largest market-moving release.
Key Events This Week:
1. July Existing Home Sales data – Tuesday
2. OPEC Monthly Report – Wednesday
3. July CPI Inflation data – Wednesday
4. July PPI Inflation data – Thursday
5. July Retail Sales data – Friday
6. August MI Consumer Sentiment data – Friday
It’s a big week…
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) August 9, 2026
A decline in inflation might favor stocks, gold and crypto, and better data may boost Treasury yields and strain risk assets.
Rising oil prices created inflation concerns before Wednesday’s United States consumer price report. Higher energy costs could keep inflation elevated and complicate the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate outlook.
Recent weak employment figures had supported expectations for less restrictive Federal Reserve policy. However, investors now await inflation figures before increasing exposure to Bitcoin and crypto prices.
Strategy’s Bitcoin Sale and Regulatory Delays Pressure Sentiment Strategy’s latest Bitcoin sale also unsettled the market and added pressure to prices. The company sold 1,690 Bitcoin for $108.6 million during the previous week.
The sale was the fourth week of Bitcoin sales by Strategy. Its fluctuating treasury action alarmed merchants since the company had been an epitome of stable institutional demand.
In the meantime, the larger cryptocurrency bill is still pending Senate approval until lawmakers resume their recess. That lag has restrained the zeal to have better regulations on exchanges, issuers, and decentralized finance platforms.
Bitcoin price now faces support around $63,500, followed by the important $63,000 level. A decisive break may open up the market to increased selling and greater losses in the August Bitcoin outlook.
According to CoinGape prediction data, Bitcoin has a 36% chance of dipping to $60,000 in August 2026, while 64% expect it to remain above that level during the month overall.
Coingape prediction data The resistance is around $65,000, and Bitcoin has failed to maintain gains at that point. Inflation data, oil prices, and institutional flows will be followed as the next direction of the market by traders.
US Bitcoin ETFs Record $145 Million Outflow as Ether Funds Lose $14.6 Million The U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market recorded $145 million in net outflows on August 10. Meanwhile, spot Ethereum ETFs posted $14.59 million in net withdrawals.
U.S. Bitcoin ETFs See $145 Million Outflow; Ether Funds Lose $14.6 Million
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $145 million in net outflows on Aug. 10, while spot Ethereum ETFs posted $14.59 million in net outflows, according to SoSoValue. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC) bucked… pic.twitter.com/J9KlJ1vQgF
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) August 11, 2026
According to SoSoValue figures, there was mixed activity among funds in the trading session. The Bitcoin Mini Trust by Grayscale was the top daily Bitcoin inflows of $37.06 million. Its Ethereum Mini Trust topped Ether products after attracting $8.59 million.
Coinbase has announced the launch of futures, perpetuals, and crypto options for professional investors in the United Kingdom. This expansion is facilitated through the Coinbase International Exchange and is geared towards professional clients rather than the general retail market. The offering includes over 170 contracts covering various asset classes, with specific options for crypto limited to calls, puts, and multi-leg strategies. This move comes after Coinbase received regulatory authorization in the UK to offer investment services and derivatives, indicating a strategic push to enhance its presence in the UK derivatives market.
Advertisement
The launch is expected to influence market dynamics, with potential implications for Ethereum pricing. The introduction of derivatives could indicate increased market activity and demand, especially in the Ethereum segment, which might affect its future price trajectory. Current market activity reflects low probability estimates for Ethereum reaching notable price points by the end of 2026, suggesting cautious market sentiment despite this development.
Key Takeaways Coinbase’s new offering appears consistent with increased activity and demand in the UK derivatives market, potentially impacting Ethereum. Current market pricing suggests a cautious outlook on Ethereum reaching higher price thresholds by the end of 2026. The launch reflects Coinbase’s strategic expansion under UK regulatory oversight, covering a wide range of asset contracts. What to Watch Market participants will monitor how this expansion affects Ethereum pricing and overall market liquidity in the derivatives segment. Key developments include potential regulatory impacts as the UK’s cryptoasset regime evolves by October 2027. Observers should also watch for any shifts in institutional interest or volume that could indicate broader market reactions to Coinbase’s enhanced offerings.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31, 2026 1.4% — — View market → December 31, 2026 2.5% — — View market → December 31, 2026 2.7% — — View market → December 31, 2026 4% — — View market → December 31, 2026 4.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 11% — — View market → January 1 2027 12% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.1% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 3.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 3.8% — — View market → January 1 2027 6.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 42.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 7.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 39.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 21% — — View market → January 1 2027 17.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 85% — — View market → January 1 2027 54.5% — — View market →
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
CryptoQuant says large holders are accumulating BTC, ETH, and XRP despite market weakness, while EiCrypto highlights cloud mining for diversified crypto income.
Summary
CryptoQuant says whale accumulation of BTC, ETH and XRP may signal that the market is approaching a potential bottom. EiCrypto promotes cloud mining as a way for crypto holders to access computing power without buying or maintaining mining hardware. Large investors continue adding major cryptocurrencies as EiCrypto offers automated cloud mining services across multiple digital assets. Analytics firm CryptoQuant notes that despite recent market weakness, large holders of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP have continued to increase their positions, reflecting a significant rise in confidence among long-term investors regarding major digital assets.
In its latest weekly report, titled “Buying Opportunities in a Bear Market: Signals of a Market Bottoming Out,” the company analyzes the recent trend of large investors continuously increasing their holdings. The report suggests that this trend may indicate some large investors are positioning themselves early, potentially signaling that the market is gradually entering the late stage of the bear market.
As digital assets continue to gain global momentum, cryptocurrency cloud mining — centered on network-based computing infrastructure — is increasingly attracting the attention of a wide range of holders. For retail investors, relying solely on market price appreciation is no longer sufficient; the pressing challenge now lies in establishing diversified asset management strategies, enhancing asset utilization, and generating stable daily passive income.
To meet this demand, cloud mining platforms — exemplified by EiCrypto — have garnered significant market attention. Users can access cloud mining services for major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, XRP, and ETH via smartphones or computers, eliminating the need to purchase expensive mining hardware or bear operational costs such as maintenance, electricity, facility rental, and cooling. This offers a simpler, more efficient way to generate passive income through cloud mining.
How to join EiCrypto and start earning passive income
Register an Account: Sign up here to receive a $15 new-user bonus.
Deposit Methods: EiCrypto supports a wide range of mainstream digital assets; users can deposit major cryptocurrencies such as BTC, USDT, ETH, LTC, USDC, XRP, SOL, and BNB.
Select a Contract: Choose a cloud mining contract that suits a particular budget and timeframe; the system will then operate automatically.
Popular Contract Recommendations:
Entry-level Contract: $100 — 2 days — Total Profit: Approx. $108 Basic Contract: $500 — 5 days — Total Profit: Approx. $532 Basic Contract: $1500 — 10 days — Total Profit: Approx. $1705 Stable Contract: $5500 — 20 days — Total Profit: Approx. $7050 Stable Contract: $10000 — 30 days — Total Profit: Approx. $14475 Advanced Contract: $50000 — 35 days — Total Profit: Approx. $79750 Click here to view more contract details.
Once the contract is activated, earnings will be automatically settled to an account after 24 hours. Users can choose to withdraw their earnings or reinvest them, thereby achieving long-term, compound growth of their digital assets.
Key Features of the EiCrypto Platform
Automated Daily Settlement: The platform utilizes an automated settlement system, allowing users to view account data and earnings at any time. Low Barrier to Entry: No need to purchase mining hardware or bear additional costs such as electricity, maintenance, and equipment management. Green Energy Powered: The platform employs advanced ASIC hardware supported by renewable energy sources — including hydroelectric, wind, and solar power — to drive its computing network. Support for Major Digital Assets: Supports a wide range of digital currencies — including BTC, XRP, ETH, DOGE, USDT, USDC, SOL, LTC, and BCH — to meet diverse user needs. Comprehensive Security Measures: Features SSL encryption, DDoS protection systems, and real-time data monitoring, enabling users to stay informed about the platform’s operational status. Global Remote Access: Users can access the platform anytime via the EiCrypto app or web interface — without the need for hardware configuration — and benefit from 24/7 technical support. About EiCrypto Headquartered in the UK, EiCrypto operates in compliance with relevant UK and European regulatory frameworks. By aligning with standards such as MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) and MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive), the company continuously enhances its transparency, operational standards, and user protection mechanisms. Currently, the platform serves over 7.5 million users across more than 100 countries and regions, supported by a global network of over 160 professional mining facilities.
In conclusion Signs of continued accumulation by large holders of BTC, ETH, and XRP indicate that market holdings are increasingly concentrating in the hands of major investors. This suggests that some long-term capital may be positioning itself early, potentially signaling that the market is nearing the latter stages of the bear cycle.
For investors, generating stable daily passive income is the key to a sustainable strategy. EiCrypto Cloud Mining is an expert in this field; with the right approach, users can maximize wealth accumulation in the shortest possible time. The platform offers ease of use — requiring no prior experience — and allows them to unlock the full potential of their assets through cloud mining.
FOr those who don’t want their assets sitting idle either, join EiCrypto to easily earn $10,000, or learn more details.
For more information, visit the official website, and download the mobile app.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Leading cryptocurrencies traded in the red alongside stocks on Monday as uncertainty on Iran negotiations kept risk appetite in check.
Cryptocurrency24-Hour Gains +/-Price (Recorded at 9:17 p.m. EDT)Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC)-1.56%$63,976.86
Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH)
-2.13%$1,874.37XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) -1.89%$1.01Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) -1.01%$75.86Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) +0.33%$0.06992Crypto Market Sells OffBitcoin faced intense selling pressure as 24-hour trading volume surged 56%, pushing its price down toward $63,000. Ethereum’s trading volume jumped 70%, while the second-largest cryptocurrency slipped below $1,900.
Cryptocurrency-related stocks also fell, with Strategy Inc. (NASDAQ:MSTR) and Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc. (NYSE:BMNR) closing down 2.68% and 3.83%, respectively.
Over $200 million was liquidated from the cryptocurrency market in the last 24 hours, predominantly in bullish long positions, according to Coinglass data.
Bitcoin’s open interest fell 0.40% over the last 24 hours, aligning with the drop in spot price. Meanwhile, retail and whale derivatives traders on Binance increased their BTC long exposure after the price drop.
Top Gainers (24 Hours)
Cryptocurrency (Market Cap>$100 M)Gains +/-Price (Recorded at 9:17 p.m. EDT)Cysic (CYS) +32.25% $1.32Nexus (NEX) +19.75% $0.000001717Ribbita by Virtuals (TIBBIR) +14.86% $0.1362The global cryptocurrency market capitalization stood at $2.18 trillion, following a dip of 1.35% over the last 24 hours.
Read Next
Stocks Lag Amid Iran DeadlockStocks kicked off the week with losses. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 60.95 points, or 0.11%, to close at 53,975.98. The S&P 500 slid 0.06% to close at 7,753.11, while the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.32% to settle at 26,605.36.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reportedly called for a deal with the U.S. over the Strait of Hormuz, adding that the war “has to be brought to an end at some point.”
Meanwhile, claims circulated on social media that Iran had "flatly" ruled out negotiations with President Donald Trump and planned to wait out his term until 2029. However, there was no official confirmation from Tehran.
A Bullish Fluctuation Incoming?Blockchain research firm Santiment highlighted Bitcoin’s elite wallets, i.e, those holding at least 10,000 BTC, jumped to a 6-month high, with a 7% increase over the last two months.
“Smaller holders are losing share, while the largest wallets are gaining presence again,” Santiment added. “Supply is rotating toward stronger hands before the next major market fluctuation, and this usually increases the likelihood of that fluctuation being a bullish one.”
On-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant stated that Bitcoin may be approaching an acute “top formation phase,” with downside risk increasing as prices climb. The firm also saw limited chances of a sustainable breakout into a “stable uptrend.”
“Given the elevated risk and weak data, larger buys should be held back for now. Stronger cyclical entries become attractive near $51,000,” CryptoQuant added.
Read Next
Photo Courtesy: Marc Bruxelle on Shutterstock.com
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Ethereum can process roughly 15 transactions per second. That is less than a single Starbucks checkout line. Rollups are the technology that lets Ethereum handle thousands of transactions per second without sacrificing the security that makes it valuable in the first place. They work by executing transactions off chain and posting compressed proofs back to Ethereum, turning the base layer into a settlement court rather than a transaction processor.
Summary
The standard narrative says that rollups make Ethereum faster. This is technically true but misleading. Ethereum itself does not get faster. It still produces a block every 12 seconds. It still processes roughly 15 transactions per second on the base layer. Nothing about Ethereum’s consensus or execution changes when a rollup deploys.
What changes is where the work happens. Rollups move transaction execution off the Ethereum mainnet and onto a separate chain that can process transactions much faster because it does not need thousands of validators to agree on every state change. The rollup then compresses the results and posts them back to Ethereum, where they are verified and made permanent.
The analogy that most explanations use is a court system: the rollup handles the day to day transactions (the cases), and Ethereum serves as the court of final appeal (the judge). This analogy is useful but incomplete. The more precise framing is that rollups convert Ethereum from a transaction processor into a data availability and verification layer. The base chain stops doing the work and starts checking the work.
Understanding why this matters requires understanding what makes Ethereum slow in the first place, and why the obvious solutions do not work.
Why Ethereum cannot simply increase its throughput Ethereum processes approximately 15 transactions per second. The intuitive fix is to increase the block size or reduce the block time, allowing more transactions per block or more blocks per unit of time. Every first generation blockchain project that tried this approach discovered the same problem: larger blocks require more powerful hardware to validate, which prices out smaller node operators, which concentrates validation among fewer entities, which undermines decentralization.
This is the blockchain trilemma. You can optimize for any two of three properties (security, decentralization, throughput) but improving the third requires sacrificing one of the others. Increasing Ethereum’s block size would improve throughput at the cost of decentralization. Reducing the validator count would improve throughput at the cost of security.
Rollups sidestep the trilemma by separating execution from verification. The rollup chain handles execution with a small number of operators, achieving high throughput. Ethereum handles verification and data availability with its full validator set, maintaining security and decentralization. Neither chain compromises, because each is optimized for a different function.
This is not a theoretical argument. Solana, which chose to optimize for throughput over accessibility, requires validators to run hardware costing thousands of dollars and processes blocks that are hundreds of megabytes. Ethereum validators can run on a consumer laptop. The rollup architecture lets Ethereum achieve Solana’s throughput without Solana’s hardware requirements by moving execution to a separate layer.
How optimistic rollups work Optimistic rollups are named for their core assumption: transactions are assumed to be valid unless proven otherwise.
The process starts with a sequencer, a node operated by the rollup team that collects user transactions, orders them, and executes them in batches. The sequencer produces a new rollup state after each batch, just as Ethereum produces a new state after each block.
Instead of requiring every validator to re-execute every transaction, the optimistic rollup posts the batch data to Ethereum and publishes a state root (a cryptographic hash of the rollup’s state after executing the batch). This state root is accepted as correct unless someone challenges it.
The challenge mechanism is the fraud proof system. During a challenge window, typically seven days, anyone can examine the batch data posted to Ethereum, re-execute the transactions locally, and compare their result to the published state root. If the results differ, the challenger submits a fraud proof to a smart contract on Ethereum, which re-executes the disputed transaction on chain and determines who is correct.
If the fraud proof shows that the sequencer published an incorrect state root, the sequencer’s staked collateral is slashed, the incorrect state root is reverted, and the challenger receives a reward. If no one challenges the state root within the challenge window, it is finalized on Ethereum and becomes the canonical state of the rollup.
This design is elegant because it moves the expensive work (re-execution and verification) off the critical path. In the normal case, where the sequencer is honest, no on chain re-execution happens at all. The cost of operating the rollup reduces to posting compressed batch data to Ethereum, which is dramatically cheaper than executing every transaction on the base layer.
Arbitrum and Optimism are the two largest optimistic rollups. Arbitrum uses an interactive dispute resolution protocol that narrows the disputed computation down to a single instruction before re-executing it on chain, minimizing the on chain gas cost of fraud proofs. Optimism uses a non-interactive fraud proof system where the entire disputed transaction is re-executed in a single on chain step.
Base, built by Coinbase using the OP Stack (Optimism’s open source framework), has become the fastest growing rollup by transaction volume, driven by consumer applications and the integration with Coinbase’s user base.
How ZK rollups work ZK rollups take the opposite approach: they prove correctness up front rather than assuming it.
After the sequencer executes a batch of transactions, a prover generates a cryptographic validity proof (typically a zk-SNARK or zk-STARK) that mathematically demonstrates the batch was executed correctly. This proof, along with the batch data, is posted to a verifier contract on Ethereum. The verifier checks the proof, which is computationally cheap and takes constant time regardless of how many transactions the batch contains.
The advantage is finality. There is no seven day challenge window. As soon as the proof is verified on Ethereum, the batch is finalized. Users can withdraw assets from a ZK rollup to Ethereum in minutes rather than waiting a week.
The disadvantage is cost. Generating a validity proof for a complex batch of transactions requires significant computational resources. ZK proof generation is a mathematically intensive process that can take minutes for large batches and requires specialized hardware. This cost is amortized across all transactions in the batch, but it adds a per-batch overhead that optimistic rollups avoid.
ZK rollups are also more difficult to build. Optimistic rollups can support the same virtual machine as Ethereum (the EVM) with relatively minor modifications, which means existing Solidity smart contracts work with little or no changes. ZK rollups historically required developers to write contracts in specialized languages like Cairo (used by StarkNet) because the EVM’s instruction set was not designed for efficient zero-knowledge proof generation.
This gap is closing. zkSync Era and Polygon zkEVM have implemented EVM-compatible ZK rollups that can execute standard Solidity contracts, though with varying degrees of compatibility. Scroll, another ZK rollup, aims for full EVM equivalence, meaning contracts deployed on Ethereum can be deployed on Scroll without any modification.
Blobs and the Dencun upgrade: the economics shift Before March 2024, rollups posted their batch data as calldata in Ethereum transactions. Calldata is stored permanently by every Ethereum node, which makes it expensive. A typical rollup batch cost $500 to $2,000 in calldata fees during periods of high Ethereum congestion.
The Dencun upgrade introduced EIP-4844, which created a new data type called blobs. Blobs are large chunks of data (approximately 128 KB each) that are attached to Ethereum transactions but are only stored temporarily, for approximately 18 days, rather than permanently. This makes them dramatically cheaper than calldata.
The impact was immediate and measurable. Transaction fees on Arbitrum dropped from an average of $0.25 to under $0.01. Fees on Base dropped to fractions of a cent. The cost of posting a rollup batch to Ethereum fell by more than 90%.
This matters because it changes the economic equation for rollup adoption. When layer 2 transactions cost $0.25, only users with transactions above a certain value threshold would choose the rollup over a competing chain with lower base fees. When layer 2 transactions cost $0.001, the cost advantage of competing chains largely disappears, and the security advantage of Ethereum settlement becomes the deciding factor.
Blobs are the first step toward full danksharding, a future upgrade that will increase the number of blobs per block from the current target of three to 64 or more. Each step in this progression further reduces rollup costs and increases the data throughput available for layer 2 settlement on Ethereum.
The sequencer centralization problem Almost every major rollup today runs a single sequencer operated by the rollup team. Arbitrum’s sequencer is run by Offchain Labs. Optimism’s sequencer is run by OP Labs. Base’s sequencer is run by Coinbase.
This centralization creates several risks. If the sequencer goes down, the rollup halts. If the sequencer censors certain transactions, users cannot interact with the rollup normally. If the sequencer reorders transactions to extract MEV, users pay a hidden tax.
Rollup teams defend this centralization as a temporary measure. Decentralizing the sequencer, by introducing a rotating set of sequencers or using a shared sequencing layer, is on every major rollup’s roadmap. But roadmaps are not deployments.
The mitigation is forced inclusion. Most rollups include a mechanism that allows users to submit transactions directly to the Ethereum base layer, bypassing the sequencer entirely. If the sequencer censors your transaction, you can force it through the rollup’s on chain contract. This process is slower and more expensive than going through the sequencer, but it prevents permanent censorship.
The degree to which forced inclusion actually works in practice, under the time constraints and gas costs of real world usage, is a meaningful differentiator between rollups. L2BEAT, the primary independent tracker of rollup security properties, rates each rollup on the maturity of its forced inclusion mechanism along with several other security criteria.
The fragmentation problem Ethereum’s rollup strategy has succeeded in creating scalable execution environments. It has also created a fragmentation problem that did not exist before rollups.
A user with assets on Arbitrum cannot directly use them on Base. A DeFi protocol on Optimism has separate liquidity from the same protocol on zkSync. An NFT minted on StarkNet cannot be sold on a marketplace running on Scroll.
Each rollup is its own chain with its own state, its own bridge to Ethereum, and its own ecosystem of applications. Moving assets between rollups requires bridging, which introduces delay (seven days for optimistic rollup withdrawals to Ethereum), cost (gas fees on both the source and destination chains), and risk (bridge smart contract vulnerabilities).
This is not merely an inconvenience. It is a structural problem that undermines the network effects that make Ethereum valuable. If liquidity is split across 30 rollups, no single rollup has the depth of liquidity that Ethereum mainnet had when it was the primary execution environment.
Solutions are being developed. Shared sequencing layers like Espresso aim to coordinate transaction ordering across multiple rollups, enabling atomic cross-rollup transactions. Interoperability protocols like Chainlink CCIP and LayerZero provide messaging layers that let rollups communicate. ERC-7683, a cross-chain intent standard, aims to standardize how users express cross-rollup transfers.
None of these solutions are mature enough to eliminate fragmentation today. Whether the rollup ecosystem converges on a small number of dominant chains or remains fragmented across dozens is an open question with significant implications for where users, developers, and liquidity settle.
The security model differs in more subtle ways as well. In an optimistic rollup, security depends on at least one honest verifier watching the chain and submitting fraud proofs when needed. If every verifier is offline or colluding, invalid state transitions could be finalized after the challenge window closes. In practice, multiple independent verifiers monitor every major optimistic rollup, and the economic incentive to catch fraud (the challenger receives slashed collateral) makes this attack expensive to sustain. But the theoretical requirement is weaker than a ZK rollup, where the mathematical proof itself guarantees correctness regardless of who is watching.
The user experience implications of rollup choice extend beyond fees and finality. Wallet support, token availability, and application deployment all vary across rollups. A user who bridges assets to a rollup with limited DeFi protocol deployment may find their capital stranded in an ecosystem with few productive uses. The interoperability problem compounds this: moving assets back to Ethereum or to a different rollup incurs additional bridging fees and time delays that can negate the cost savings that attracted the user to the rollup in the first place.
What this does not cover This article does not cover the internal architecture of specific rollup virtual machines. The differences between Arbitrum Nitro, the OP Stack, and StarkNet’s Cairo VM are significant and affect developer experience, performance, and security properties. Each deserves dedicated analysis.
This article does not cover validiums and volitions, which are rollup variants that post data to a separate data availability layer rather than to Ethereum. These systems trade some of Ethereum’s security guarantee for lower costs, and the tradeoffs are nuanced.
This article does not address the token economics of rollup governance. ARB, OP, STRK, and ZK tokens each have different governance, staking, and incentive structures. Whether rollup tokens accrue value to holders or function primarily as governance instruments is an active debate with implications for investment decisions.
Practical checks before choosing a rollup Check the rollup’s security stage on L2BEAT. L2BEAT classifies rollups into three stages based on the maturity of their proof systems, upgrade mechanisms, and governance. Stage 0 rollups rely heavily on trust in the rollup team. Stage 1 rollups have functional proof systems but retain upgrade keys. Stage 2 rollups have fully trustless proof systems with minimal centralized control. Most major rollups are still at Stage 0 or Stage 1 as of mid 2026.
Understand the withdrawal time. Optimistic rollup withdrawals to Ethereum take approximately seven days due to the fraud proof challenge window. Fast bridge services can accelerate this by fronting the funds, but they charge a fee and introduce counterparty risk. ZK rollup withdrawals can complete in minutes once the validity proof is verified. This difference matters if you need rapid access to your assets on Ethereum mainnet.
Verify the forced inclusion mechanism. If the sequencer goes down or censors your transaction, can you force your transaction through the on chain contract? Check whether the rollup has a functioning forced inclusion mechanism and how long the delay is. A rollup without forced inclusion is a centralized chain with Ethereum branding.
Compare actual transaction costs. Rollup fees vary based on the rollup’s compression efficiency, batch frequency, and the current price of Ethereum blob space. Use a rollup fee tracker to compare the actual cost of common operations (token transfer, swap, contract deployment) across rollups at the time you plan to use them, rather than relying on historical averages.
Check the ecosystem. The cheapest rollup is not useful if the application you need is on a different rollup. Verify that the DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, or wallet infrastructure you plan to use are deployed and liquid on the rollup you choose.
What is a blockchain rollup? A rollup is a layer 2 scaling solution that executes transactions on a separate chain and posts the transaction data or a cryptographic proof back to a layer 1 blockchain like Ethereum. This allows the rollup to process thousands of transactions per second while relying on Ethereum for security and data availability. The term rollup refers to the way many transactions are rolled up into a single batch before being submitted to the base layer.
What is the difference between optimistic and ZK rollups? Optimistic rollups assume transactions are valid and allow a challenge period (usually seven days) during which anyone can submit a fraud proof if they find an error. ZK rollups generate a mathematical proof that verifies the entire batch was executed correctly before it is accepted on Ethereum. The practical difference is that optimistic rollups have longer withdrawal times but are easier to build, while ZK rollups offer faster finality but require more computational resources for proof generation.
Why do optimistic rollup withdrawals take seven days? The seven day window exists to give fraud provers enough time to detect and challenge an invalid state root submitted by the sequencer. If withdrawals were instant, a malicious sequencer could submit a fake state root, withdraw funds to Ethereum, and disappear before anyone could prove the fraud. The seven day delay ensures there is enough time for the verification game to play out. Fast bridge services can provide instant withdrawals by fronting the funds, but they charge a fee for this service.
What are blobs and how did they reduce rollup costs? Blobs are a new data type introduced by Ethereum’s Dencun upgrade (EIP-4844) in March 2024. Before blobs, rollups posted batch data as calldata, which is stored permanently by every Ethereum node and is expensive. Blobs are stored temporarily (approximately 18 days) and have their own fee market separate from regular Ethereum transactions. This reduced rollup transaction costs by over 90% because the data storage, which is the primary cost of operating a rollup, became dramatically cheaper.
Is using a rollup as safe as using Ethereum directly? A rollup inherits Ethereum’s security for the data it posts to the base layer, but additional trust assumptions apply. The sequencer is typically a single centralized operator that could censor transactions or go offline. The rollup’s smart contracts on Ethereum may have upgrade keys controlled by the team. The fraud proof or validity proof system may still be under development. L2BEAT’s stage classification system rates these properties. A Stage 2 rollup with a fully decentralized proof system approaches Ethereum’s security level. Most rollups today are not at Stage 2.
What happens if a rollup’s sequencer goes offline? If the sequencer goes offline, new transactions on the rollup cannot be processed through the normal channel. However, most rollups include a forced inclusion mechanism that allows users to submit transactions directly to the rollup’s smart contract on Ethereum, bypassing the sequencer. This is slower and more expensive than normal operation, but it prevents the sequencer outage from permanently locking user funds. The quality and accessibility of forced inclusion mechanisms varies significantly between rollups.
Why are there so many different rollups? The rollup framework is modular and open source, which makes it relatively easy to launch a new rollup. The OP Stack (from Optimism) and Arbitrum Orbit both allow developers to deploy custom rollups with pre-built infrastructure. Different rollups optimize for different use cases: some target DeFi, others target gaming, others target enterprise applications. However, the proliferation of rollups has created fragmentation problems including split liquidity, bridging complexity, and user confusion.
Which rollup should I use? The best rollup depends on what you want to do. For DeFi with the deepest liquidity, Arbitrum currently leads. For consumer applications integrated with Coinbase, Base is dominant. For applications that prioritize fast finality and do not want seven day withdrawal delays, ZK rollups like zkSync Era or StarkNet are worth considering. Compare current transaction costs, check that the applications you need are deployed, and verify the rollup’s security stage on L2BEAT before committing significant assets.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile and carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
Kripto piyasası, küresel risk iştahındaki zayıflamanın etkisiyle güne sert satışlarla başladı. Toplam kripto para piyasası değeri yüzde 1,40 gerileyerek 2,18 trilyon dolara düşerken Bitcoin de yüzde 1,66 değer kaybederek 63.959 dolara indi.
Ethereum yüzde 2,42 düşüşle 1.874 dolara gerilerken altcoin tarafında da benzer bir tablo ortaya çıktı. XRP yüzde 2,03 kayıpla 1,01 dolara, Solana ise yüzde 0,98 düşüşle 75,81 dolara çekildi.
Bitcoin Neden 64 Bin Doların Altına Geriledi? Piyasadaki satışların arkasında kripto para piyasasına özgü tek bir gelişme bulunmuyor. Küresel risk iştahındaki bozulma, dijital varlıklar üzerindeki baskının temel nedenlerinden biri olarak öne çıkıyor.
ABD ile İran arasında Hürmüz Boğazı’nın yeniden tam kapasiteyle açılmasına yönelik beklentilerin zayıflaması da piyasalardaki belirsizliği artırdı. Bu gelişme petrol fiyatlarını sert biçimde yukarı taşırken, artan enerji maliyetlerinin enflasyon üzerindeki olası etkileri yatırımcıların risk algısını olumsuz etkiledi.
Bu nedenle Bitcoin’deki geri çekilmeyi değerlendirirken yalnızca kripto piyasasına değil, küresel makroekonomik tabloya da bakmak gerekiyor.
ABD Enflasyonu Kripto Piyasasını Nasıl Etkileyecek? Yatırımcıların odağında şimdi ABD’nin temmuz ayı enflasyon verileri bulunuyor. Tüketici Fiyat Endeksi (TÜFE) 12 Ağustos Çarşamba günü, Üretici Fiyat Endeksi (ÜFE) ise 13 Ağustos Perşembe günü açıklanacak.
Söz konusu veriler, Federal Rezerv’in faiz politikasına ilişkin beklentilerin şekillenmesinde önemli rol oynayacak. Geçtiğimiz hafta açıklanan zayıf temmuz istihdam verisi sonrasında piyasalar, Fed’in eylül ayında faiz artıracağı beklentisini aşağı çekmişti.
Ancak petrol fiyatlarındaki yükseliş, enflasyon görünümüne ilişkin yeni soru işaretleri yaratıyor. Fed, temmuz toplantısında faiz oranlarını sabit tutarken üç yetkili faiz artışından yana görüş bildirmişti.
Yüksek Enflasyon Bitcoin İçin Risk Mi? Temmuz TÜFE ve ÜFE verilerinin beklentilerin üzerinde gerçekleşmesi, daha sıkı para politikası ihtimalini güçlendirebilir. Böyle bir senaryoda faiz artışı beklentilerinin yeniden yükselmesi, riskli varlıklar üzerinde ek satış baskısı oluşturabilir.
Buna karşılık enflasyonun beklentilerin altında kalması, Fed’in faiz artırma ihtimalini daha da azaltabilir. Daha gevşek para politikası beklentisi, yatırımcıların risk iştahını destekleyerek kripto para piyasası açısından daha olumlu bir ortam yaratabilir.
Dolayısıyla açıklanacak verilerin yalnızca enflasyon oranını değil, Fed’in sonraki adımlarına ilişkin beklentileri nasıl değiştireceğini de takip etmek gerekiyor.
Bitcoin ETF Çıkışları Ne Anlatıyor? Kurumsal yatırımcı tarafındaki görünüm de piyasadaki zayıflığı destekledi. 10 Ağustos’ta spot Bitcoin ETF’lerinden 144,67 milyon dolarlık net çıkış gerçekleşirken spot Ethereum ETF’lerinde 14,59 milyon dolarlık net çıkış kaydedildi.
Altcoin ETF’lerinde ise daha sınırlı ve farklı yönlü hareketler görüldü. Solana ETF’lerine 8,83 milyon dolar, HYPE ETF’lerine 2,74 milyon dolar, LINK ETF’lerine 150,31 bin dolar ve HBAR ETF’lerine 462,06 bin dolar net giriş oldu.
Buna karşılık XRP, DOGE, BNB, LTC, AVAX ve DOT ETF’lerinde herhangi bir net fon akışı gerçekleşmedi. Bu tablo, kurumsal tarafta risk iştahının özellikle Bitcoin ve Ethereum’da zayıfladığını gösteriyor.
Kripto Piyasası İçin Hangi Veriler İzlenmeli? Bitcoin’in 63.959 dolara gerilemesiyle birlikte kripto piyasasında kısa vadeli yön arayışı güçlendi. Önümüzdeki süreçte yatırımcıların özellikle ABD TÜFE ve ÜFE verilerini, petrol fiyatlarını, Fed faiz beklentilerini ve ETF akışlarını birlikte değerlendirmesi gerekiyor.
Küresel gelişmelerin risk iştahını zayıflatmaya devam etmesi halinde satış baskısı sürebilir. Buna karşılık daha düşük enflasyon ve azalan faiz artışı beklentileri, dijital varlıklar için yeniden destekleyici bir zemin oluşturabilir.
Bu içerik kesinlikle yatırım tavsiyesi niteliği taşımamaktadır. Piyasalar yüksek risk içermektedir ve yatırım kararlarınızı almadan önce kendi araştırmanızı yapmanız önemlidir.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
PANews, August 11 news: According to SoSoValue data, crypto market sectors pulled back broadly, with the NFT sector dropping 25.62% in 24 hours — among which Audiera (BEAT) plunged 55.02%. Bitcoin (BTC) declined 1.85%, breaking below $65,000; Ethereum (ETH) fell 2.44%, breaking below $1,900.
Only DeFi and Layer2 sectors remained relatively resilient, gaining 1.11% and 2.01% respectively. Within the DeFi sector, Hyperliquid (HYPE) rose 1.76%, and Ethena (ENA) climbed 3.56%; within the Layer2 sector, Arbitrum (ARB) advanced 3.44%, and Mantle (MNT) jumped 5.48%.
As for other sectors, the Layer1 sector dipped 0.54%, with Cardano (ADA) down 3.19%; the CeFi sector slipped 0.63%, though Bitget Token (BGB) gained 1.65%; the PayFi sector fell 1.53%, with Telcoin (TEL) dropping 6.77%; the Meme sector lost 1.98%, while Pump.fun (PUMP) bucked the trend to surge 4.74%.
Usage Jumps to Levels Not Seen Since MarchEthereum's on-chain activity has surged to its highest point in five months. According to @SantimentData, the @ethereum network logged 989.5K active addresses within a single 24-hour window, a daily count it has not reached since March. The reading comes after a sharp single-day climb: Ethereum's active-address count rose 147% in a single day, from 377,381 on 8 August to 932,847 on 9 August, with the figure climbing further to nearly 989.5K by 10 August per Santiment.
The spike stands out in an otherwise mixed week for the broader market. Token valuations rose on every chain with a reported market-cap figure between 3 and 9 August 2026, while decentralised-exchange volume fell on every chain with a reported figure. Ethereum's address surge was one of the few metrics to buck that pattern.
Price Holds Steady While Activity LeadsDespite the jump in network usage, $ETH has held near $1,870 through the spike, meaning on-chain activity is running well ahead of any corresponding move in the token's price. That divergence is not unusual: the daily active addresses metric shows the number of unique Ethereum addresses involved in transactions each day and is a key indicator of network health and user activity, where a rise suggests increased network usage and can signal a price uptrend. Whether the current surge translates into price momentum remains to be seen.
A few caveats are worth noting. The daily active addresses metric counts the number of distinct addresses that participated in a transfer for a given asset in any given day, with each address counted only once, and includes both senders and receivers. That means the figure reflects wallet activity rather than distinct human users, and one person can control multiple addresses. No single application or catalyst has been publicly identified as the driver of the August surge.
Still, the scale of the move is notable. Ethereum's mainnet active-address count topping 989K in a day places it among the network's busiest sessions of the year and signals that demand to transact on the base layer remains robust even as layer-2 networks continue to absorb a growing share of overall activity.
Sources
Santiment Academy: Daily Active Addresses metric explained
Etherscan: Daily Active Ethereum Address chart
Ethereum Active Addresses Surge 147% Amid Weekly Crypto Market Shifts
Ethereum staking has reached a record 41.7 million ETH, locking more than one-third of the cryptocurrency’s circulating supply despite a sharp decline in its market price.
Summary
41.7 million ETH is now staked, according to a CryptoQuant chart shared by Bitfinex. Staked ETH has increased by about 5.5 million ETH since January. ETH has fallen from approximately $3,400 to $1,900 during the same period. Ethereum developers are debating EIP-8363, which would reduce issuance as staking grows. Ethereum staking climbs despite price decline A CryptoQuant chart shared by cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex on Aug. 10 showed that the amount of Ethereum (ETH) committed to staking had reached an all-time high of 41.7 million ETH.
Staked $ETH has climbed to a record 41.7 million, a third of all ETH in existence, while price fell from $3,400 in January to $1,900.
As the amount staked grows, the rewards do not run out, which is why the pile keeps growing. pic.twitter.com/m5AU9GQ4eB
— Bitfinex (@bitfinex) August 10, 2026 The figure represents roughly one-third of Ethereum’s circulating supply. CoinMarketCap data places the asset’s supply near 120.7 million ETH, meaning approximately 34.5% is now staked.
“Staked ETH has climbed to a record 41.7 million, a third of all ETH in existence, while price fell from $3,400 in January to $1,900,” Bitfinex wrote.
The chart shows that staking deposits remained near 36 million ETH through late 2025 before beginning a sustained increase in February. Growth continued through the second quarter and accelerated again between June and August.
The increase comes despite ETH losing about 44% of its value from its January level. Ethereum traded near $1,900 when Bitfinex published the chart, showing that validators and long-term holders continued locking tokens even as spot-market conditions weakened.
crypto.news reported in January that 36.2 million ETH, or nearly 30% of the supply, had been staked. The latest figure represents an increase of approximately 5.5 million ETH in less than seven months.
Reinvested rewards keep staked ETH growing Ethereum validators receive newly issued ETH for proposing blocks, attesting to transactions, and supporting network consensus. They may also collect priority fees and maximal extractable value.
Part of that income can be returned to staking, creating a compounding effect even when ETH’s dollar price falls. However, returns decline as more validators join because Ethereum distributes issuance across a larger staked balance.
Corporate treasury companies have become a major part of this trend. BitMine had approximately 4.9 million ETH staked as of July 12, equal to about 85% of its Ethereum holdings.
The company generated $45.7 million from staking and validation during the quarter ended May 31. Chairman Tom Lee projected that annual rewards could reach $284 million if BitMine stakes its entire ETH treasury, although returns depend on yields and validator conditions.
SharpLink has also committed most of its Ethereum treasury to staking. Its strategy continued generating ETH rewards even as lower market prices contributed to a $394.3 million second-quarter loss.
Record staking renews Ethereum issuance debate The continued increase has renewed questions about how much ETH should be committed to network security and whether Ethereum’s reward curve encourages excessive staking.
EIP-8363, known as Tapered Issuance Burn, would burn a growing share of consensus-layer rewards as the staking ratio rises. The mechanism would remove issuance-based rewards when approximately half of Ethereum’s supply is staked.
As crypto.news previously reported, the proposal’s authors argue that the current system continues rewarding additional deposits even after they provide limited security benefits. EIP-8363 remains under review and has not been approved for an Ethereum upgrade.
SharpLink CEO Joseph Chalom has opposed the plan, arguing that native yield supports Ethereum’s institutional appeal and acts as a benchmark for returns across decentralized finance.
US institutions expand access to ETH yield Staking has also become more accessible through regulated investment products in the United States. Grayscale distributed about $9.4 million in ETH staking proceeds to eligible ETHE shareholders in January, marking the first such payout by a U.S.-listed Ethereum product.
Morgan Stanley has also added staking provisions to its proposed Ethereum ETF. Its filing showed that 3.64 million ETH was waiting to enter validation as of May 18, implying an activation delay of approximately 63 days.
Continued institutional participation could remove more ETH from liquid markets. However, staking does not guarantee price appreciation, and the divergence between record deposits and ETH’s decline shows that supply constraints can be outweighed by broader selling pressure.
Robinhood Chain generated roughly $3.6 million in transaction fees in its first month of operation, making it the top revenue-producing Layer-2 network across the entire Ethereum ecosystem. That figure accounted for approximately 38% of the estimated $6.3 million in total fees collected across major L2 networks during July.
Robinhood Chain launched its public mainnet on July 1, 2026.
Advertisement
How a brokerage outpaced crypto-native L2s Robinhood Chain is built on Arbitrum’s technology, making it an Ethereum-compatible rollup. The network supports 24/7 trading of tokenized stocks and decentralized finance applications. Reports indicate daily trading volumes reaching into the hundreds of millions of dollars shortly after launch, with tens of millions of individual transactions processed within the first two weeks alone.
Some estimates suggest its share of total L2 fees may have been as high as 56%, depending on which networks are included in the denominator.
Under the Arbitrum Expansion Program, Robinhood allocates 10% of its net protocol revenue back to the Arbitrum ecosystem. Of that 10%, 8% goes to support ARB token holders and 2% flows to ecosystem developers. The remaining 90% is retained by Robinhood.
The Ethereum revenue problem, amplified In the early days following Robinhood Chain’s launch, Ethereum’s mainnet received only a few thousand dollars in fee transfers from the new L2.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Robinhood’s Ethereum Layer-2 network has crossed 200 million cumulative transactions roughly one month after its July 1 mainnet launch, a pace that puts it among the fastest-growing rollups ever deployed. To put that in perspective, the chain hit 38.7 million transactions in its first 10 days alone.
Daily transaction counts have peaked between 10 million and 13.3 million, volumes that at times have eclipsed Base, Coinbase’s own Layer-2 network.
What’s actually happening on the chain Robinhood Chain is built on Arbitrum’s infrastructure, uses ETH as its gas token, and runs block times of roughly 0.1 seconds. Sub-second finality is what makes it practical to trade tokenized real-world assets like US stocks on-chain without the lag that plagues slower networks.
The platform has landed integrations with several DeFi protocols. Uniswap provides automated market-making infrastructure. Chainlink supplies oracle data feeds. Alchemy handles developer tooling.
Advertisement
Total Value Locked has climbed to somewhere between $300 million and $800 million since launch. The chain’s stablecoin supply continues to set records, which typically signals real usage rather than speculative inflows, since stablecoins tend to serve as working capital for trading and lending rather than directional bets.
Average trade sizes have declined since the initial launch spike, as early adopters testing with larger positions have been joined by a broadening user base pulling the average down.
The tokenized stocks play Robinhood Chain is positioning itself as a bridge between traditional finance and on-chain infrastructure, with tokenized US stocks as the centerpiece. The brokerage already serves users in over 120 countries through its traditional platform, and bringing those assets on-chain could unlock 24/7 trading, fractional ownership, and composability with DeFi lending markets.
The absence of a native token is a deliberate choice. By using ETH for gas and avoiding a governance or utility token launch, Robinhood sidesteps regulatory exposure and ensures the chain’s growth metrics aren’t inflated by token-farming incentives.
Where this fits in the Layer-2 wars What separates Robinhood Chain from most Layer-2 competitors is the built-in connection to a regulated brokerage with millions of existing customers who have already been KYC’d and onboarded, a distribution advantage that crypto-native chains must build from scratch.
For the broader Ethereum ecosystem, Robinhood Chain’s rapid growth contributes to ETH demand through gas consumption and settlement fees, as every transaction on the chain ultimately settles back to Ethereum’s base layer.
Robinhood has faced regulatory scrutiny before, most memorably during the 2021 GameStop saga when it restricted trading on certain stocks. Whether that history gives users pause about relying on a Robinhood-operated chain for their on-chain activity is a relevant consideration given the concentration risk of a single brokerage controlling a dominant L2 gateway for tokenized stock trading.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
TLDR: SharpLink reported a $394.3 million net loss in Q2 2026 despite $11.5 million total revenue. Unrealized ETH losses of $321 million and $76.1 million in impairments drove the quarterly loss. SharpLink’s ETH holdings rose to approximately 888,938 tokens as of August 3, 2026. The company launched a $125 million Galaxy SharpLink Onchain Yield Fund after Q2 ended. SharpLink, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBET), one of the largest publicly traded Ethereum treasury companies, reported total revenue of $11.5 million for the second quarter of 2026.
The company posted a net loss of $394.3 million for the period. Staking revenue reached $11.2 million, reflecting the company’s actively managed Ethereum treasury strategy.
SharpLink held approximately 886,881 ETH as of June 30, 2026, with holdings rising to about 888,938 ETH by August 3, 2026.
Second Quarter Financial Performance SharpLink’s total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026, grew significantly from $0.7 million in the same period last year.
The increase stemmed largely from the company’s ETH treasury strategy, which launched in June 2025.
Selling, general and administrative expenses rose to $9.1 million, compared with $2.4 million a year earlier.
SharpLink Reports $394M Q2 Loss as ETH Staking Revenue Reaches $11.2M
SharpLink, the second-largest publicly traded Ethereum treasury company, reported Q2 revenue of $11.5 million, including $11.2 million from ETH staking, and a net loss of $394.3 million. The loss included… pic.twitter.com/wWT5eBsWhC
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) August 10, 2026
The company’s net loss of $394.3 million compares with a net loss of $103.4 million in the second quarter of 2025. This increase was driven primarily by non-cash unrealized losses and impairment charges.
SharpLink recorded an unrealized loss of $321.0 million tied to Ethereum market conditions during the quarter.
Additionally, the company recorded a $76.1 million impairment charge on its LsETH and weETH holdings.
SharpLink noted these charges are non-cash accounting adjustments that do not reduce actual token holdings.
However, impairment charges lower the carrying value of these assets under U.S. GAAP and are not reversed later.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $56.2 million as of June 30, 2026. This figure compares with $28.5 million reported at the end of December 2025. Crypto assets totaled approximately $1.4 billion on a GAAP basis at quarter’s end.
Treasury Management and Ecosystem Investments On June 23, 2026, SharpLink completed a $75.0 million registered direct offering. The transaction included 10,013,351 shares of common stock alongside accompanying warrants. Proceeds from the offering helped fund the purchase of roughly 10,000 additional ETH tokens.
SharpLink also repurchased about 2.1 million shares during the quarter, spending approximately $10.0 million.
Since starting its buyback program in August 2025, the company has repurchased 4,071,223 shares. The total cost of these repurchases has reached approximately $41.7 million to date.
Chief Executive Officer Joseph Chalom said the company remained “highly active across both treasury management and Ethereum ecosystem development” during the quarter.
He pointed to accelerating institutional adoption and expanding onchain activity as signs of broader momentum building across the network.
Beyond treasury management, SharpLink announced anchor funding for three ecosystem organizations. EthLabs focuses on core protocol development and scaling for institutional adoption.
Ethereum Institutional serves as a front door connecting banks and asset managers to Ethereum, while EthSystems develops privacy and compliance infrastructure for regulated institutions.
Chairman Joseph Lubin, also Consensys CEO and an Ethereum co-founder, said the network is “moving from an era of proving the technology to putting it to work” as financial infrastructure.
SharpLink also joined the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes during June’s reconstitution. After the quarter closed, the company launched the Galaxy SharpLink Onchain Yield Fund.
The fund carries $125.0 million in committed capital, split between SharpLink and Galaxy Digital.
BitMine’s crypto treasury company reaches a new milestone with the continuous accumulation of Ethereum. The company bought 7,391 ETH over the past week for about 14 million dollars. Its holdings now reach 5,805,238 ETH, after a new series of weekly purchases. This progress comes as the total value of its crypto assets, cash, and high-risk investments rises to 11.6 billion dollars. At the same time, its cash reserve continues to decline.
In brief BitMine bought 7,391 ETH this week, bringing its holdings to 5.8 million ETH, or 4.8% of the total supply. Staking now accounts for 87% of its reserves, with 5.07 million ETH and an estimated annualized income of 257 million dollars. The company repurchased 3 million shares, bringing the total to 19.1 million since July 1, under a 4 billion dollar authorization. Its available cash has dropped 78% in one month, going from 482 to 104 million dollars, while the 5% target remains at 229,800 ETH. A new Ethereum acquisition BitMine continues its ETH purchases by adding 7,391 tokens to its portfolio this week, after buying 10,399 ETH the previous week. This accumulation brings its reserves to 5,805,238 ETH Friday evening according to the company announcement. ETH’s value also increased by 2.6% over the week, reaching 1,928 dollars. This rise added about 280 million dollars to the portfolio’s value, compared to only 14 million related to new purchases.
In total, BitMine now claims 11.6 billion dollars in cryptocurrencies, cash, and high-risk investments. The amount was 11.3 billion dollars a week earlier. The increase mainly comes from ETH appreciation rather than the amount invested during the period. Meanwhile, the company holds 209 bitcoins, as well as stakes valued at 180 million dollars in Beast Industries and 69 million in Eightco Holdings.
BitMine accelerates staking of its ETH Staking is taking a growing role in BitMine’s strategy. The company has placed 5,067,309 ETH in staking, or 87% of its holdings, compared to 85% a week earlier. Tom Lee estimates this activity could generate 257 million dollars in annualized revenue. This projection is based on a 2.63% yield calculated over seven days.
The company thus holds 4.8% of the total Ethereum supply, estimated at 120.7 million ETH. It remains at 96% of its “Alchemy of 5%” target, a level maintained for the fifth consecutive week. To reach this threshold, about 229,800 additional ETH would be needed. At the pace of purchases made this week, this effort would represent about 31 more weeks.
BitMine also continued its share buyback program. It repurchased 3 million shares this week, compared to 4.5 million the previous week. Since July 1, the total reaches 19.1 million shares under a 4 billion dollar authorization. Tom Lee still considers the common shares undervalued and presents this program as the largest ever carried out by a crypto treasury company.
This policy comes despite cash and marketable securities decreasing sharply. BitMine now has 104 million dollars, down from 173 million a week earlier and 482 million on July 12. The decline thus reaches 78% in one month. Since launching its strategy on June 30, 2025, the company buys ETH every week, with varying amounts depending on the periods.
The trajectory will now depend on continued purchases and ETH value evolution. With 4.8% of the supply held, the 5% target remains close but still requires 229,800 ETH. Staking could also strengthen expected revenues, while available cash continues to contract. Finally, Tom Lee also monitors the US monetary environment after lowering the probability of a rate hike in September to 40%, from 75% two weeks earlier. This probability then rose back to 46% according to CME FedWatch. The pace of acquisitions will therefore remain a key indicator to measure progress toward this goal.
BitMine thus pursues an ambitious strategy around Ethereum while managing tighter financial margins. The valuation of its assets will now depend more on market conditions. Between staking yields, share buybacks, and increasing exposure to ETH, the coming months will mainly serve to measure the robustness of this model against crypto market fluctuations.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Ghiles A.
Journaliste et rédacteur web passionné par l’univers des cryptomonnaies et des technologies Web3. J’y traite les dernières tendances et actualités afin de proposer un contenu de haute qualité à un large public du secteur.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Ethereumu2019s price has barely budged from $1,870, but underneath that surface calm, wallet-level activity has exploded. Onchain data from the Santiment update on August 10 showed 989,500 daily active addresses moving on Ethereum u2014 the highest single-day tally since March. The sudden spike contrasts sharply with the lack of immediate price momentum, suggesting that capital is being redeployed across the network rather than fleeing it.
The climb in user activity isnu2019t happening in a vacuum. Spot ETH ETF demand has been slowly rebuilding after weeks of tepid flows, and Robinhood Chainu2019s Ethereum-settled operations have added a new high-velocity use case. Instead of retail traders blindly aping, this spike looks more like existing wallets waking up to re-route funds, test execution rails, and position for what comes next.
More Than Just a Numbkey Count A raw address count can be noisy, but Santiment pushed a sharper thesis: ETF flows, Robinhoodu2019s clearing efficiency, and the gravitational pull of stablecoin and RWA settlement are pulling real traffic back to the layer-1. Tokenized Treasuries and other real-world assets now form a multi-billion dollar segment that Ethereum still dominates, as chronicled in the latest tokenization roundup. That dollar liquidity doesnu2019t just sit idle u2014 it drives gas consumption, validator yield, and ultimately, ETH demand if the usage sticks.
Lower gas fees and better L2 throughput help. When mainnet costs drop, small- and mid-sized wallets u2014 the cohort that typically vanishes during fee spikes u2014 can migrate back. Combined with improved bridging infrastructure, it creates conditions where protocol interaction, stablecoin transfers, and NFT/DeFi activity become economically feasible again for a wider set of users.
What the Market May Be Watching Thereu2019s still an open question: is this a durable shift in onchain behavior or a temporary reshuffling of funds? The Santiment note flagged that many of the active addresses appear to be older wallets rotating positions, not new entrants. That matters. If the spike is concentrated among existing cohort wallets testing the waters, then a sustained rise in active addresses might require fresh capital from outside the system. Without that, elevated activity could deflate just as quickly as it appeared.
Ethereumu2019s ability to retain and grow its developer base also plays a supporting role. It still leads blockchains in weekly developer activity, a signal that new tooling and applications are being built even as competitive pressure from other L1s increases, as recent developer activity rankings have shown. That underlying construction work can provide a floor for usage, even when speculation cools.
Meanwhile, the U.S. regulatory backdrop continues to evolve. While the spike in addresses wasnu2019t directly triggered by policy, market-structure progress in Washington u2014 including the contentious crypto bill still being debated u2014 has kept institutions focused on regulated on-chain finance. Any further clarity could tilt more capital toward Ethereumu2019s settlement layer as a compliant venue for digital dollar flows, adding weight to the current address uptick.
AUTHOR
Freelance writer and crypto enthusiast with a focus on Web3, delivering clear and engaging articles. Known for his well-researched articles and insightful analysis, Shayan covers a broad range of topics including market trends, blockchain technology, decentralized finance (DeFi), and emerging crypto projects. His writing aims to educate both beginners and experts, providing clear, engaging content that helps readers stay informed about the fast-evolving crypto space. Shayan's expertise and dedication make him a trusted voice in the blockchain community.
Ethereum’s updated roadmap adds native rollups, stronger privacy, and post-quantum scaling as advances in cryptography and AI reshape the network’s long-term technical priorities, according to co-founder Vitalik Buterin.
Summary
Quantum security has moved higher in Ethereum’s priorities compared with its 2023 roadmap. New areas include native rollups, stronger privacy, and blob and gas futures. Ethereum may use specialized scaling mechanisms for transfers, trading, and privacy applications. STARKs and AI-assisted formal verification could support upgrades across all three protocol layers. Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin compared the network’s 2023 roadmap with its current Strawmap in an Aug. 10 X post, identifying several technologies that have gained, lost, or changed priority over the past three years.
I updated my 2023 roadmap diagram to overlay where the items that were there sit in the current Strawmap ( https://t.co/9deLIQWG24 ).
In general, a lot of overlap, but:
* Some things got reshuffled in order (eg. quantum safety up-prioritized)
* Some things deprioritized (eg.… pic.twitter.com/XLdIt4kAgT
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) August 10, 2026 Buterin said the two plans retain substantial overlap, but the order and implementation of several goals have changed. Quantum security has moved closer to the front of the roadmap, while verifiable delay functions and some proposed Ethereum Virtual Machine improvements have received less attention.
Older technical designs have also been replaced as Ethereum researchers identified alternatives. Plans involving Verkle trees shifted toward a unified binary tree and later a PBT design, while state expiry evolved into a broader proposal for new state types.
The biggest difference, according to Buterin, comes from the areas that did not appear in the 2023 roadmap. These include native privacy, post-quantum scaling, simpler specifications for formal verification, markets for future blob and gas capacity, native rollups, and a wider range of possible replacements or modifications for the EVM.
Ethereum privacy and quantum security move forward Native privacy is one of the clearest additions to Ethereum’s long-term direction. Buterin listed keyed nonces, recent roots, parts of FOCIL, lean privacy pools, and wormholes among the mechanisms now being explored.
Keyed nonces could make it harder for observers to connect a user’s transactions, while recent-root mechanisms may allow private applications to verify recent blockchain states without revealing a complete history. FOCIL, meanwhile, is intended to make transaction inclusion more resistant to censorship by block builders.
The changes build on Buterin’s three-step Ethereum privacy plan released in May. That proposal combined account abstraction with FOCIL, keyed nonces, and changes at the wallet and access layers to reduce metadata leaks.
Post-quantum scaling has also become a separate priority. Ethereum currently depends on cryptographic systems that could eventually become vulnerable if sufficiently powerful quantum computers emerge. Replacing them without sharply increasing signature sizes, verification costs, or network bandwidth presents an additional scaling problem.
The current roadmap considers LeanSPHINCS signatures, signature aggregation, and “zkzk frames” as potential parts of the solution. Crypto.news previously reported that an Ethereum researcher demonstrated account-level post-quantum protection at an estimated cost of $0.07 per account, showing that wallet-level preparation may begin before a full protocol upgrade.
Ethereum’s Strawmap is not a finalized schedule. It is a coordination document covering proposed upgrades through 2029, with individual changes still requiring research, testing, and agreement among developers before they can reach the network.
Native rollups enter Ethereum’s design space Native rollups were not included in the 2023 roadmap because zero-knowledge proof systems were not mature enough for developers to seriously consider integrating them into Ethereum’s base protocol, Buterin said.
Rollups currently operate as separate layer-2 systems. They process transactions outside Ethereum’s main execution layer and submit proofs or transaction data to the base network. Each rollup generally maintains its own contracts, proof system, upgrade controls, and security assumptions.
A native rollup would move part of that verification process into Ethereum itself. The base protocol could provide a standardized mechanism for checking state transitions, potentially reducing the amount of custom infrastructure each rollup must maintain.
Such a change could simplify the relationship between Ethereum and its layer-2 networks, though the exact design remains unsettled. Developers would still need to decide what functions should become native, how different virtual machines would be supported, and whether protocol-level verification could avoid creating new complexity.
The proposal arrives as Ethereum’s broader scaling approach changes. Buterin said the network is moving away from trying to scale every type of activity through one general mechanism. Instead, developers may build highly scalable but more restricted systems for common use cases such as token transfers, decentralized exchange trades, and privacy protocols.
This approach could allow Ethereum to process specific high-volume activities more efficiently without requiring every node or application to support the same expanded execution environment.
Blob and gas futures are another addition that did not exist as a developed roadmap concept in 2023. Such markets could allow users or layer-2 networks to lock in future access to Ethereum’s data or execution capacity, reducing uncertainty over costs during periods of heavy demand.
AI could make Ethereum easier to verify Ethereum’s updated roadmap also places more weight on simplifying the protocol specification so developers can formally verify its behavior.
Formal verification uses mathematical proofs to determine whether software follows its intended rules. Applying it to an entire blockchain protocol has historically required substantial time and specialist work, particularly when the protocol includes multiple clients, cryptographic systems, and interacting layers.
Buterin argued that advances in artificial intelligence are making large-scale verification more practical. He previously said AI-assisted formal verification could become the “final form” of software development, allowing developers to combine optimized code with machine-checkable evidence that it works correctly.
That work is closely tied to Ethereum’s use of STARK proofs. Recursive STARKs allow one proof to verify another, producing compact evidence for increasingly large batches of computation.
Buterin said the same underlying verification method could eventually operate across Ethereum’s execution, consensus, and data layers. However, using a common proof system throughout the protocol would make the security of its implementation especially important, increasing the need for formal verification and independent testing.
Ethereum’s virtual machine may also change as these systems develop. Buterin said zkzk frames could require the protocol to expose an instruction set other than the EVM, with leanISA and RISC-V among the possible candidates.
Under one potential model, the EVM could continue serving developers and existing applications while operating as an intermediate representation above a simpler underlying instruction set. Buterin cautioned that this part of the design remains too early even for inclusion in the current Strawmap.
Roadmap remains a long-term coordination plan Buterin’s comparison provides additional detail on Ethereum’s proposed Lean rebuild, which seeks to make the protocol quantum-safe, private, censorship-resistant, and easier to verify over the coming years.
The direction could eventually affect U.S. wallet providers, exchanges, institutional stakers, and layer-2 operators that rely on Ethereum. However, the post announced no immediate software release, hard fork, or mandatory action for users.
Each major proposal must still move through Ethereum’s research and governance process. Native rollups, alternative instruction sets, and post-quantum signatures remain technical directions rather than confirmed features with fixed activation dates.
Ethereum (ETH) showed no clear positive reaction to the roadmap update. ETH traded near $1,875 at the time of writing, down about 2.6% over the previous 24 hours as the broader crypto market weakened.
The latest comparison nevertheless shows how Ethereum’s development priorities have widened since 2023. Scaling remains central, but privacy, quantum resistance, and verifiable protocol design now carry more weight in determining how the network could operate through the end of the decade.
In brief Vitalik Buterin says Ethereum has elevated quantum security and privacy since its 2023 roadmap. Ethereum researchers are increasingly relying on STARKs and AI-assisted formal verification. The roadmap also includes native rollups and explores a future beyond the EVM. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says quantum resistance, privacy, and AI-assisted security have become greater priorities for Ethereum since he published his 2023 roadmap.
In a post on X on Monday, Buterin said he updated his 2023 roadmap to compare its original goals with Ethereum’s current “Strawmap”—a working outline of the network’s long-term technical priorities.
“What's most striking, however, is that some completely new things are in the strawmap that are not in this diagram, because they were not in the 2023 roadmap at all,” Buterin wrote. “These reflect changing priorities.”
Among those priorities are stronger privacy and scaling designed for a post-quantum world, alongside efforts to push the “lean-ification of the spec,” or simplify Ethereum’s technical specifications.
“A common theme in scaling, found in both state types and zkzk frames (both new ideas), is that instead of trying to maximally scale all Ethereum activity,” Buterin wrote. “We try to create specialized mechanisms that have more restrictive properties that make them more scaling-friendly, while supporting the heaviest loads incurred by users and applications today (eg. token transfers, swaps) and tomorrow (eg. privacy protocols).”
According to Buterin, advances in AI are making it practical to apply the technique more extensively to Ethereum.
Buterin said Ethereum is increasingly relying on STARKs, a cryptographic technology used to verify computations, and AI-assisted verification, to check that the protocol works as intended.
“This can only be safe with formal verification, which is itself only feasible with modern AI tools,” he wrote.
Buterin’s post comes as Ethereum has accelerated preparations for “Q-Day” and the potential threat posed by quantum computers.
In January, Buterin urged developers to adopt quantum-resistant cryptography before the threat becomes immediate, and the Ethereum Foundation formed a dedicated post-quantum team. In February, Buterin outlined a phased plan to replace four potentially vulnerable components of Ethereum’s cryptographic architecture.
In July, Buterin put quantum safety and privacy at the center of his proposed “Lean Ethereum” overhaul, which calls for replacing quantum-vulnerable cryptography with quantum-safe alternatives.
“Ethereum will be quantum-safe. Ethereum will put users' privacy first. Ethereum will be secure,” Buterin wrote. “Ethereum will be censorship-resistant. Ethereum will be highly performant and scalable while satisfying the above. And Ethereum will be Lean.”
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
In brief Vitalik Buterin says Ethereum has elevated quantum security and privacy since its 2023 roadmap. Ethereum researchers are increasingly relying on STARKs and AI-assisted formal verification. The roadmap also includes native rollups and explores a future beyond the EVM. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says quantum resistance, privacy, and AI-assisted security have become greater priorities for Ethereum since he published his 2023 roadmap.
In a post on X on Monday, Buterin said he updated his 2023 roadmap to compare its original goals with Ethereum’s current “Strawmap”—a working outline of the network’s long-term technical priorities.
“What's most striking, however, is that some completely new things are in the strawmap that are not in this diagram, because they were not in the 2023 roadmap at all,” Buterin wrote. “These reflect changing priorities.”
Among those priorities are stronger privacy and scaling designed for a post-quantum world, alongside efforts to push the “lean-ification of the spec,” or simplify Ethereum’s technical specifications.
“A common theme in scaling, found in both state types and zkzk frames (both new ideas), is that instead of trying to maximally scale all Ethereum activity,” Buterin wrote. “We try to create specialized mechanisms that have more restrictive properties that make them more scaling-friendly, while supporting the heaviest loads incurred by users and applications today (eg. token transfers, swaps) and tomorrow (eg. privacy protocols).”
According to Buterin, advances in AI are making it practical to apply the technique more extensively to Ethereum.
Buterin said Ethereum is increasingly relying on STARKs, a cryptographic technology used to verify computations, and AI-assisted verification, to check that the protocol works as intended.
“This can only be safe with formal verification, which is itself only feasible with modern AI tools,” he wrote.
Buterin’s post comes as Ethereum has accelerated preparations for “Q-Day” and the potential threat posed by quantum computers.
In January, Buterin urged developers to adopt quantum-resistant cryptography before the threat becomes immediate, and the Ethereum Foundation formed a dedicated post-quantum team. In February, Buterin outlined a phased plan to replace four potentially vulnerable components of Ethereum’s cryptographic architecture.
In July, Buterin put quantum safety and privacy at the center of his proposed “Lean Ethereum” overhaul, which calls for replacing quantum-vulnerable cryptography with quantum-safe alternatives.
“Ethereum will be quantum-safe. Ethereum will put users' privacy first. Ethereum will be secure,” Buterin wrote. “Ethereum will be censorship-resistant. Ethereum will be highly performant and scalable while satisfying the above. And Ethereum will be Lean.”
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Tokenized U.S. Treasuries are expanding rapidly across blockchains, but capital continues to concentrate heavily on Ethereum [ETH]. The sector now holds $15.2 billion, after accelerating sharply through 2025 and 2026.
According to Tokenterminal data, Ethereum accounts for $6.6 billion, translating to roughly 43% of the market despite growing competition. Trailing closely is BNB Chain with $4.8 billion, while Stellar [XLM], Solana [SOL], and Avalanche [AVAX] collectively add nearly $2.8 billion.
Source: TokenTerminal This distribution shows institutions are adopting multiple settlement networks rather than relying on one chain. Nevertheless, Ethereum still maintains an important advantage. This is because Treasury liquidity sits alongside $162.4 billion in stablecoins and $578.8 million in euro stablecoins.
Together, that combination creates deeper liquidity for moving between tokenized cash and yield-bearing assets. As a result, Ethereum can support settlement across several financial products within one ecosystem.
Its upper hand, therefore, depends increasingly on liquidity depth, even as competing chains capture meaningful Treasury flows.
Ethereum leads as rivals gain liquidity Ethereum’s lead in tokenized Treasuries forms only part of its wider position across on-chain finance. Euro stablecoins reinforce that advantage, with Ethereum holding $578.8 million from an $826.3 million market.
Yet the distribution also shows where competition is beginning to emerge. Solana has grown to $122.6 million, placing it clearly ahead of Base at $57.9 million. This matters because competing chains are gaining scale in different liquidity segments.
Source: TokenTerminal TRON, for instance, already holds $91.3 billion in stablecoins, while BNB Chain controls $4.8 billion in tokenized Treasuries. Rather than one network directly replacing Ethereum, liquidity is becoming more specialized across chains.
Ethereum therefore retains the broadest reach, while rivals increasingly establish meaningful positions within individual markets.
That wider spread of liquidity does not necessarily mean the dominant altcoin is losing capital to rival networks. Instead, tokenized finance is expanding across more chains. Ethereum still holds $162.4 billion in stablecoins, compared with $91.3 billion on Tron and $14.8 billion on Solana.
Source: Token Terminal HyperEVM has also crossed $5 billion, showing newer networks are attracting meaningful capital. Yet Ethereum’s balances continue rising as competitors expand, pointing toward new issuance rather than direct migration. Its percentage share can therefore fall even while its liquidity base grows.
For now, that keeps Ethereum’s moat intact despite stronger competition. A genuine shift would require rivals to grow while Ethereum’s absolute balances decline, confirming that liquidity is leaving rather than simply expanding elsewhere.