BitGo a Core Chain spouštějí framework pro tokenizaci reálných aktiv, včetně fyzického zlata, nemovitostí a výtvarného umění. Projekt staví na institucionální úschově a právním zajištění.
BitGo has partnered with Core Chain to introduce a tokenization framework for real-world assets, including physical gold, real estate, and fine art.
The move puts another institutional custody name into the fast-growing RWA market, where crypto infrastructure is being used to represent traditional assets on-chain. BitGo’s role is important because tokenization does not work on technology alone. The legal and custody layer matters just as much as the chain where the asset is issued.
That is especially true when the assets involved are physical.
Gold, property, and fine art are not like native crypto tokens. They require custody, documentation, valuation, legal rights, and rules around who can access or trade the tokenized version. BitGo’s involvement gives the Core Chain launch a stronger institutional angle than a simple token launch.
For more details, visit the official Blog platform.
TL;DR BitGo and Core Chain are launching a real-world asset tokenization framework. The assets named include physical gold, real estate, and fine art. The story is about custody-backed tokenization, not free global trading of physical assets. Why Tokenization Needs Custody Tokenizing a real-world asset sounds simple in theory.
Take an asset, create a token that represents it, and move that token on-chain. In practice, it is much harder. Someone has to hold or verify the asset. Someone has to define what token ownership means. Someone has to handle redemption, transfer rules, compliance, and disputes.
That is why custody sits at the center of serious RWA projects.
If the underlying asset is not properly held, protected, or documented, the token can become little more than a digital claim with weak backing. For physical gold, real estate, and fine art, that backing is the whole product.
BitGo’s participation points to that custody-first approach.
Core Chain Gets An Institutional RWA Push For Core Chain, the partnership adds another institutional use case beyond ordinary crypto trading.
RWA tokenization has become one of the more durable narratives in digital assets because it connects blockchain rails to assets investors already understand. Treasuries, credit, funds, commodities, property, and equities have all become part of that conversation.
Core Chain now wants a place in that market.
The partnership gives it a way to present itself as infrastructure for tokenized assets rather than only another blockchain competing for DeFi deposits and token speculation.
Physical Assets Are Different The asset mix is notable.
Tokenized gold is easier for many investors to understand because gold already trades through financial wrappers, vaulting arrangements, and custody systems. Real estate is more complex because ownership rights, local law, liquidity, and transfer restrictions can vary sharply. Fine art adds another challenge because valuation, authenticity, storage, and market access are all specialized.
That means the framework will need strong guardrails.
A tokenized version of a physical asset does not automatically give a holder the same rights as holding the asset directly. It depends on the structure.
That is the part investors need to read carefully.
RWA Demand Keeps Building The broader market backdrop is supportive.
Institutions are increasingly looking at tokenization as a way to improve settlement, collateral management, transparency, and distribution. Crypto-native users are looking for assets beyond volatile tokens. Networks are looking for real use cases that can survive outside speculative cycles.
RWA sits at that intersection.
It is not always exciting in the short term. But if it works, it can make blockchain infrastructure useful to traditional finance in a way that pure token speculation cannot.
The Balanced View BitGo and Core Chain’s RWA partnership is another sign that tokenization is moving into more serious territory.
The opportunity is clear: put traditional assets on programmable rails with institutional custody behind them. The risk is also clear: the legal and operational structure has to be strong enough for the token to mean something.
For now, the story is not that every gold bar, building, or artwork is suddenly liquid on-chain.
It is that institutional custody providers and blockchain networks are still building the rails that could make those markets more accessible over time.
This article draws on Core Chain’s announcement relating to its RWA partnership with BitGo.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Core DAO po škodlivém útoku na validátory pozastavil stakingové odměny ve všech produktech. Uživatelé mají do obnovení vyplácení odměn počítat s 0% APY.
Staking Rewards Paused Across All Core Products@Coredao_Org has suspended staking reward emissions following a malicious validator attack on its network. The suspension covers all forms of Core staking, including products offered through @b14g_network, specifically b14g, dualCORE, stCORE, and direct validator staking. Users should expect a temporary 0% APY with no additional rewards distributed until emissions resume.
According to @b14g_network, user funds remain 100% secure and no action is required from b14g depositors. The platform has committed to keeping users informed as the situation develops.
Core first disclosed the problem on August 31, when it said a small number of validators were accruing block rewards significantly above the amount intended under the protocol. Validator rewards had exceeded the protocol's intended levels for a small group of validators, and Core said it had identified the root cause and was working on mitigations.
Issue Contained, Emergency Hard Fork Planned Core has since confirmed the incident was contained and that malicious validators can no longer draw excess rewards. The planned network upgrade will be a forward-only fix and will not roll back or reverse any previously confirmed transactions.
$CORE has a hard cap of 2.1 billion tokens, with roughly 40% allocated to node mining rewards distributed over an 81-year emission schedule. Core has not disclosed how much additional CORE was issued, how long the exploit lasted, or whether any of the excess tokens entered circulation.
Several exchanges restricted $CORE transfers around the time of the incident. Coinbase paused sends and receives on the Core network, while Bithumb and Coinone suspended deposits and withdrawals, citing suspected or confirmed security concerns. Bitget also suspended CORE deposits and withdrawals, citing wallet maintenance, while LBank suspended deposits due to what it described as the project's requirements.
Core described the incident as limited to reward issuance, and said network security and custody were unaffected. By September 1, the team said the activity had been contained and moved to coordinate an emergency hard fork with its validator set. Core has not published an activation time for the upgrade or disclosed the technical vulnerability that allowed the excess rewards to be claimed. A full technical postmortem is expected to follow.
For now, @b14g_network users are advised to hold their positions and await further updates as @Coredao_Org works toward restoring normal staking emissions.
Sources:
Crypto Briefing: Core DAO Plans Emergency Hard Fork After Validators Draw Excess Rewards
CoinTelegraph: Core DAO Plans Hard Fork Over Excess Validator Rewards
CryptoSlate: Validator Reward Failure on Core DAO Triggers Exchange Transfer Blocks
Core Blockchain oznámil nečekaný problém, kvůli kterému malý počet validátorů dostává více odměn za bloky, než protokol zamýšlel. Tým uvedl, že síť ani uživatelské prostředky nejsou ohroženy a už začal s nápravou.
Core Blockchain (@Coredao_Org) has disclosed an unexpected issue in which a small number of validators are receiving more block rewards than the protocol intends, raising questions about its reward issuance mechanism even as the team moves quickly to contain the problem.
What Happened According to Core's network status update, the anomaly is confined to reward issuance and does not affect network security or user funds. The team says it has identified the root cause and has already begun mitigation measures. A full post-mortem will be published once the issue is resolved.
The excess rewards appear to be a protocol-level issuance problem rather than a validator security breach. That distinction matters: under Core's Satoshi Plus consensus, Any drift from those parameters in the issuance layer would directly cause some validators to receive outsized payouts.
How Core's Reward System Works Understanding the normal reward flow helps put the bug in context. A bug that breaks that symmetry, giving some validators more than their proportional share, would distort incentives across the network even if it leaves security intact.
Core has not specified how many validators are affected or the scale of the excess issuance. The network's commitment to a post-mortem suggests it plans to be transparent about both the root cause and any remediation steps, including whether over-issued rewards will be clawed back or otherwise accounted for.
The incident is a reminder that reward issuance logic, though often treated as routine bookkeeping, sits at the heart of a blockchain's economic design. Getting it wrong, even temporarily, can have lasting effects on validator behaviour and token supply.
Sources:
Core DAO Official Documentation: Validator Rewards in the Core Ecosystem
Core DAO Official Documentation: Validators on the Core Network
Core Lightning vyzval provozovatele uzlů, aby přepnuli do režimu –offline, pokud nemají aktualizaci s dosud nezveřejněnou opravou. Detaily zranitelností zůstanou dva týdny pod embargem.
Core Lightning’s maintainers told node operators to run –offline unless they upgrade to a release that has not been published, with the vulnerability details held back for two weeks.
Core Lightning Warns of Several Vulnerabilities
Posted August 27, 2026 at 6:27 am EST.
Core Lightning’s maintainers told node operators Sunday on Discord to restart with the –offline flag unless they upgrade to a release that has not been published. The instruction surfaced Wednesday through a repost on stacker.news. What the fix addresses will stay under embargo for two weeks.
The Discord message said the team has been validating AI-generated CVE reports arriving from multiple sources, and that it would publish binaries carrying fixes for many of the reported vulnerabilities before releasing the source code. Those binaries will carry maintainer signatures confirming reproducibility. Support for previous releases, including 26.04, has been withdrawn, while the scheduled 26.09 release remains planned for late September.
This story is an excerpt from the Unchained Daily newsletter.
Subscribe here to get these updates in your email for free
The Core Lightning team later confirmed the development in a post on X.
Nodes started with the –offline flag drop peer connections, so no payment routes in, out or through them, while the daemon keeps watching the chain and can still respond if a counterparty force-closes a channel. That is why the project told operators not to power down: a switched-off node cannot defend its channels.
Calle, the pseudonymous developer behind the Cashu ecash protocol, drew wider attention to the warning on X with sharper framing, telling users to shut nodes down immediately and calling the issue a critical vulnerability, language the project’s own message does not use.
The Core Lightning scare is the fourth Bitcoin infrastructure alarm in as many weeks. A 2021 Coldcard firmware bug that routed seed generation to a weak software randomizer has drained roughly $114 million in BTC since July 30. Swap bridge Boltz halted service indefinitely on Aug. 3, citing AI-assisted attacks. BTCPay Server told merchants on Aug. 7 to update or shut down over an actively exploited flaw. The common thread is AI-accelerated bug discovery, the so-called Bitcoin Red Team led by Calle earlier in the month reported 85 critical vulnerabilities across 390 projects.
Related Listen: The Chopping Block: ColdCard’s $100M RNG Hack, AI-Powered Security & Ethereum’s Staking Yield Taper
AI-assisted content: This article was produced with the assistance of AI tools and was reviewed, edited, and fact-checked by a member of the Unchained editorial team before publication.
Moonwell has halted new borrowing across its Core Markets on Base after an apparent MAMO collateral price manipulation exploit drained about $8.7 million from the decentralized lending protocol.
Summary
Moonwell has restricted new borrowing across its Base Core Markets after an apparent MAMO collateral price manipulation exploit drained about $8.7 million. CertiK said the attacker manipulated the relatively illiquid MAMO token’s collateral price before borrowing real cbBTC from Moonwell’s mCBTC market. Moonwell lowered all Base Core Market borrow caps to 1 wei and also set MAMO and WELL supply caps to 1 wei while it investigates the incident. PeckShield estimated losses at roughly $8.7 million and said the attacker consolidated the stolen funds into DAI at a single address. Moonwell said in an Aug. 27 post on X that it was investigating an issue affecting the MAMO Core Market and had lowered borrow caps across all Core Markets on Base to 1 wei as a precaution, effectively preventing users from opening new borrowing positions while the investigation continues.
“As a precaution, borrow caps for all Core Markets on Base have been set to 1 wei, preventing new borrowing and limiting the potential for further impact,” Moonwell said.
Supply caps for MAMO and WELL were also reduced to 1 wei, while supply limits for other assets were left unchanged, according to the protocol. Moonwell said it would provide further updates once more information became available.
Blockchain security firms PeckShield and CertiK separately estimated that approximately $8.7 million had been taken, while Blockaid traced the apparent attack to manipulation of the MAMO token’s collateral price.
Moonwell exploit used MAMO collateral price to borrow cbBTC According to CertiK, the attacker manipulated the collateral value of MAMO, a relatively illiquid token, before using the inflated collateral to borrow real cbBTC from Moonwell’s mCBTC market.
Blockaid identified the same mechanism, initially reporting that 50.6 cbBTC worth more than $4 million had been drained as it monitored the transactions. PeckShield later estimated total losses at about $8.7 million and said the attacker had consolidated the proceeds into DAI at a single address.
The use of a thinly traded asset as collateral was central to the attack described by the security firms. By changing MAMO’s market price, the attacker was able to increase the value assigned to the collateral position before borrowing assets with deeper liquidity.
MAMO has previously experienced sharp price swings. The token fell after its Coinbase debut in August 2025 after gaining more than 120% during the preceding week. At the time, crypto.news reported that MAMO had reached an all-time high of $0.227 before losing nearly 20% as selling activity increased.
Price pressure returned following Thursday’s security incident. Moonwell’s WELL token was down about 13% over the preceding 24 hours, according to CoinGecko data cited in the initial report, while MAMO had fallen roughly 9% over the same period, according to DEX Screener.
The restrictions imposed by Moonwell cover borrowing across its Base Core Markets, not only the MAMO market where the issue was identified. Existing supply caps for assets other than MAMO and WELL remained unchanged while the team investigated the incident.
Moonwell has faced previous oracle and governance problems Thursday’s incident follows other security problems at Moonwell during 2026, including a pricing failure that left its lending markets with about $1.78 million in bad debt.
In February, an oracle calculation error mispriced Coinbase Wrapped ETH, or cbETH, at roughly $1.12 when the asset was trading near $2,200. The incorrect price allowed liquidators and automated bots to repay positions at the distorted valuation and seize cbETH collateral, according to the protocol’s disclosure cited by crypto.news.
The faulty oracle logic reportedly included code generated with Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 model. Moonwell said at the time that an incorrect scaling factor in the calculation caused the large difference between the oracle value and the market price.
Another Moonwell security issue surfaced the following month when an unknown party acquired about $1,800 worth of MFAM tokens and used the holdings to push a malicious governance proposal through quorum on the protocol’s Moonriver deployment.
The March proposal sought control of seven lending markets, Moonwell’s comptroller and its oracle through an attacker-controlled contract, putting about $1.08 million of assets at risk. Moonwell’s Break Glass Guardian multisig provided an emergency mechanism capable of stopping the proposal before execution, while subsequent votes moved against it.
Unlike the February pricing failure, security firms assessing the Aug. 27 incident have described the latest attack as active manipulation of the market price used for MAMO collateral. Moonwell has not yet published a detailed post-mortem identifying the exact contracts, oracle structure or transaction sequence involved.
DeFi exploits have remained elevated since April The Moonwell exploit comes after a series of large DeFi attacks during the second quarter of 2026, with April accounting for several of the year’s biggest losses.
CertiK warned in April that AI misuse and infrastructure weaknesses were becoming significant parts of crypto security risk. The firm said attackers were using social engineering, infrastructure vulnerabilities and more advanced automated tools, including AI-assisted phishing, deepfakes and exploit techniques.
By April 18, crypto protocols had lost more than $606 million across at least 12 incidents during the month, according to DefiLlama data cited by crypto.news. The total exceeded losses recorded during the entire first quarter of 2026.
Kelp DAO accounted for one of the largest incidents after attackers drained roughly 116,500 rsETH worth about $292 million from its cross-chain setup on April 18.
LayerZero later said the Kelp DAO exploit involved compromised RPC infrastructure used by its decentralized verifier network and affected Kelp DAO’s single-DVN rsETH configuration. The company said preliminary evidence pointed to North Korea-linked TraderTraitor, which it associated with the Lazarus Group.
The incident also affected lending markets holding rsETH. Aave experienced large withdrawals and was left with substantial bad debt after stolen rsETH was used as collateral to borrow other assets, while SparkLend and Fluid restricted affected markets.
In June, Binance Research said April’s DeFi exploits had contributed to about $13 billion in total value locked outflows from on-chain protocols. Its May market report put DeFi TVL at $82.7 billion at the end of April, down 10.7% from the previous month, while exploit losses for the month totaled $635.24 million.
Moonwell has not yet disclosed whether the $8.7 million estimate represents its final loss from the MAMO Core Market incident or whether any of the affected assets can be recovered. The protocol said its investigation remains active and that further information will be released when available.
Core Scientific uzavřela potenciální dlouhodobé kontrakty v hodnotě přes 24 miliard USD díky přestavbě bývalých bitcoinových těžebních lokalit na datová centra pro CoreWeave a AMD. Firma tak těží z nedostatku energetické kapacity, ne z návratu Bitcoinu.
A company that filed for Chapter 11 with about $4 million in cash in December 2022 now trades as a $7 billion AI infrastructure business. According to the original report, Core Scientific has accumulated more than $24 billion in potential long-term contract revenue by converting former Bitcoin mining sites into high-density data center capacity for customers including CoreWeave and AMD.
The repricing is not simply a Bitcoin recovery story. It is a revaluation of power, land, and grid access at a moment when energized capacity is scarce and slow to build. Core Scientific shares have climbed about 533% from their first-day close after relisting in January 2024.
Bankruptcy Preserved the Assets That Would Eventually Reprice Core Scientific’s 2022 failure was not caused by worthless infrastructure. The company had expanded with debt just as Bitcoin fell from its 2021 high, network difficulty rose, and power prices tightened. Celsius’s collapse added counterparty pressure, with Core Scientific citing roughly $7 million in unpaid hosting charges.
Chapter 11 allowed the company to keep operating while restructuring. By the time it emerged in January 2024, it had cut about $400 million in debt and preserved roughly 724 MW of operational capacity, plus land, substations, and grid connections across several states. Those physical assets became the foundation for a different business.
A 12-Year Hosting Contract Changed the Financial Model The CoreWeave agreement in June 2024 changed how investors valued the company. Hash rate and Bitcoin holdings stopped being the primary lens. The market began tracking contracted megawatts, billable capacity, and delivery timelines. The initial 200 MW deal was expanded repeatedly to roughly 590 MW, carrying a potential cumulative value of about $10.2 billion over 12-year terms.
CoreWeave also tried twice to acquire the company. A $5.75-per-share cash offer in 2024 was rejected. The July 2025 all-stock deal was valued at roughly $9 billion when announced, but the fixed-exchange structure lost value as CoreWeave’s stock declined, and Core Scientific shareholders voted the merger down in October 2025. The failed transaction still gave the market a new valuation anchor. That shift fits a broader market move toward infrastructure and developer traction over simple token output, as tracked in recent developer activity rankings.
AMD Widens the Customer Base, but Leverage Is Rising The AMD partnership marked a second phase. Signed 15-year agreements covering approximately 529 MW could generate more than $14 billion in base contract revenue, with reservation rights for up to about 2.5 GW. AMD also received warrants tied to Core Scientific’s equity, with an exercise price of $23.47 per share.
The accounting picture remains uneven. In the second quarter of 2026, high-density colocation generated about $136.7 million of the company’s $164.2 million in total revenue and an $80 million gross profit. Self-mining lost money at a gross margin of about -56%. A $1.155 billion net loss was mostly non-cash warrant and contingent value right charges, but the company still recorded a GAAP operating loss of roughly $78.5 million.
Capital spending has scaled up with the contracts. Core Scientific spent about $954 million on property, plant, and equipment in the first half of 2026 and another $233 million on land and development rights. Long-term debt rose to roughly $4.3 billion by June 30, up from $1.06 billion at the
AUTHOR
Jide Idowu is a skilled freelance writer with expertise in blockchain technology, cryptocurrency, and digital finance. Known for his ability to break down complex topics into clear, engaging content, Jide crafts articles, blog posts, and analyses that resonate with both beginners and seasoned professionals. His work spans a wide range of subjects, from emerging crypto trends to in-depth explorations of blockchain innovations. With a keen eye for detail and a passion for educating readers, Jide is a reliable voice in the rapidly evolving world of digital assets.
Akcionáři Core Scientific odmítli prodej za 9 miliard USD, zatímco firma oznámila partnerství s AMD na více než 500 MW kapacity pro AI datacentra od roku 2027.
Core Scientific shareholders said no to $9 billion. Turns out, they may have been right.
The Bitcoin mining and data center company saw its investors reject an all-stock acquisition by CoreWeave last October, a deal that would have valued the firm at roughly $9B and paid 0.1235 CoreWeave shares for each CORZ share. Seven months later, Core Scientific announced a sweeping infrastructure partnership with AMD that makes the rejected buyout look like it would have sold the company short.
The deal that died CoreWeave first pitched the acquisition in July 2025, framing it as a natural consolidation play in the AI infrastructure space. The all-stock structure meant CORZ holders would be taking on CoreWeave’s risk profile rather than receiving cash. Questions about valuation and the acquisition process piled up. By October 30, 2025, the deal was dead.
Advertisement
AMD steps in with a bigger vision On July 28, 2026, Core Scientific and AMD announced a partnership to deliver over 500 megawatts of AI-ready data center capacity starting in 2027, with the potential to scale up to 2.5 gigawatts.
The deal goes beyond a simple landlord-tenant arrangement. AMD and Core Scientific will collaborate on deploying AMD’s technologies across these facilities, turning them into purpose-built environments for AI and high-performance computing workloads. The partnership also includes a warrant component, giving AMD the option to purchase Core Scientific common stock at market prices under specific commercial conditions.
From mining rigs to AI racks Core Scientific’s transformation has been one of the more dramatic pivots in the crypto-adjacent space. The company once derived the bulk of its revenue from Bitcoin mining, operating one of the largest mining fleets in North America before filing for bankruptcy in late 2022.
Post-emergence, the company began repositioning its massive portfolio of data center infrastructure toward high-density colocation, the kind of power-hungry, cooling-intensive facility space that AI model training and inference demand. Today, most of Core Scientific’s revenue comes from these colocation services rather than from mining digital assets.
The company still maintains some Bitcoin mining operations, but they’ve become a secondary business line. Core Scientific reported a notable net loss in Q2 2026.
What the AMD deal means for investors By partnering with AMD rather than selling to CoreWeave, Core Scientific retains optionality. The 500-megawatt initial commitment, with a pathway to 2.5 gigawatts, suggests AMD views this as a long-term relationship, not a one-off deal.
The warrant structure adds another layer. If AMD exercises those warrants as the commercial relationship deepens, it would become a significant shareholder in Core Scientific, further cementing the alignment between the two companies.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Pi Network přechází na Protocol 26 na mainnetu a všichni provozovatelé node musí upgrade dokončit do 11. srpna 2026. Kdo deadline nesplní, bude okamžitě odpojen od sítě.
August 11 Deadline Set for All Node Operators@PiCoreTeam has announced the transition to Protocol 26 on its mainnet, requiring all node operators to complete the technical upgrade before August 11, 2026. Any node that fails to meet the deadline will be disconnected from the Pi mainnet immediately, cutting off its ability to validate transactions and participate in network consensus.
The upgrade is not an isolated event. Pi Network has been moving through a sequential infrastructure overhaul that represents its most significant technical transformation since launch. Every protocol upgrade in Pi Network's sequential rollout builds directly on the previous one, creating a strict dependency chain. Nodes cannot skip versions, meaning all operators must have followed each prior step in order to be eligible for the Protocol 26 transition.
Protocol 26 as a Gateway to Protocol 27According to @PiCoreTeam, Protocol 26 serves as the final precursor to Protocol 27, described as the terminal technical shift in the network's 2026 roadmap. The team has indicated the network is prioritizing high reliability standards as it enters this final phase of ecosystem development.
Protocol v26.0 finalizes a structured series of technical upgrades focused on security and scalability, with the broader goal of transitioning the network from an enclosed state to a fully open, interoperable blockchain ecosystem. The overarching aim of this upgrade wave is to enhance the blockchain's technical foundation, with a focus on security, decentralization, performance, and scalability to prepare for broader Web3 adoption.
Every step in the upgrade sequence has been completed successfully and on schedule, a track record that reflects positively on both Pi's technical execution and its node operator community's reliability. With Protocol 26 now mandated on mainnet and Protocol 27 on the horizon, the network appears to be closing in on the end of its multi-year infrastructure build-out.
Sources:
Coinfomania: Pi Network Sets June 18 Deadline for Protocol 25 Node Upgrade
KuCoin: Pi Network Node Operators Must Upgrade to Protocol 25.2 by June 18, 2026
CoinMarketCap: Latest Pi Network News and Market Insights
Core Scientific uzavřela s AMD patnáctileté partnerství za více než 14 miliard USD a přesouvá se z těžby Bitcoinu do datových center pro AI. První nasazení mají začít v roce 2027.
Core Scientific has revealed a landmark 15-year partnership with Advanced Micro Devices valued at more than $14 billion, marking a strategic shift from bitcoin mining to artificial intelligence-focused data centers.
Core Scientific’s largest expansion to dateUnder the agreement, Core Scientific will lease AMD 529 megawatts (MW) of AI infrastructure capacity across the United States. The deal includes an option for AMD to reserve up to an additional 1,925 MW by December 28, 2028, potentially increasing the total partnership capacity to approximately 2.5 gigawatts (GW).
PartyLeased CapacityLocationAMD377 MWPecos, Hunt County (Texas), Muskogee (Oklahoma)Cloud provider (unnamed)152 MWAuburn (Alabama), Dalton (Georgia)Total under agreement529 MW (with AMD rights up to 2.5 GW)United StatesAccording to Core Scientific, the 529 MW of leased capacity supports initial customer deployments starting in 2027. The company reported that the arrangement could deliver more than $14 billion in base contracted revenue.
AMD, a global leader in semiconductor solutions, will collaborate with Core Scientific on data center design and the deployment of its Instinct graphics processing units, EPYC processors, and ROCm software platform.
An unnamed cloud provider has also signed leases, supported by AMD, for an additional 152 MW at sites in Alabama and Georgia, increasing customer diversification.
Mini dictionary: ROCm is an open software platform developed by AMD to support high-performance computing and AI applications across its GPU and CPU lineup, providing developers with tools for optimized machine learning and data science workloads.
Financials and strategic transitionThe company also disclosed that AMD received warrants to purchase up to 30 million shares of Core Scientific stock at $23.47 per share. The initial leases triggered the vesting of around 6.5 million warrants, with additional warrants to vest as more capacity is contracted.
Colocation accounted for $136.7 million, or 83% of Core Scientific’s $164.2 million in second-quarter revenue, while revenue from its self-mining operation fell 66% to $21.5 million.
With the new agreements, Core Scientific’s total leased customer capacity reaches roughly 1.1 GW, and the company estimates potential contracted revenue from these leases at over $24 billion. As of mid-July, Core Scientific billed customers for 437 MW, translating to about $635 million in annualized colocation revenue.
This partnership underscores Core Scientific’s ongoing shift away from bitcoin mining. The company recently terminated its agreement to purchase 3-nanometer bitcoin-mining chips designed by Block, recording a $41.9 million impairment charge on its books. The cancelled agreement would have supplied around 15 exahash per second (EH/s) of hashrate capacity.
As of June 30, Core Scientific held 848 BTC valued at $49.7 million, up from 547 BTC in the previous quarter. It reported sales of 2,385 BTC for $208.2 million in the first quarter of the year.
Market reactionFollowing the announcement, Core Scientific’s shares rose 5.6% in pre-market trading. However, shares of AMD fell 4% as broader chip sector stocks declined.
The agreements provide AMD with significant access to U.S. AI data center infrastructure, while positioning Core Scientific as a key player in the growing AI hosting market.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Core Scientific has added 301 BTC to its balance sheet, bringing its total Bitcoin holdings to 848 BTC. The purchase is a curious move for a company that spent the first quarter of this year doing the exact opposite: selling nearly every coin it had.
For context, Core Scientific held 2,537 BTC at the end of 2025. By March 31, 2026, that figure had cratered to just 547 BTC. The company sold roughly 1,900 BTC in January alone for $175 million, averaging about $92,100 per coin. The stated goal was straightforward: convert digital assets into cash to bankroll a pivot toward AI and high-performance computing data centers.
From sell-off to re-accumulation A company that loudly declared it would dispose of “nearly all” its remaining Bitcoin in 2026, per its own 10-K filing, just bought 301 coins.
Advertisement
The new total of 848 BTC represents a significant jump from the 547 BTC the company reported holding at the end of Q1.
Core Scientific isn’t a small operation. As of Q1 2026, the company was sitting on $1.01 billion in cash equivalents. Its digital assets at that point were valued at roughly $37.3 million.
The AI pivot remains the main story Core Scientific’s broader strategy hasn’t changed. The company is transforming itself from a pure-play Bitcoin miner into a hybrid operation that also provides high-density data center infrastructure for AI workloads.
That pivot has attracted serious institutional backing. Morgan Stanley extended a financing agreement worth up to $1 billion, designed to help Core Scientific scale its contracted power capacity.
What this means for investors For shareholders, the signal is mixed but potentially constructive. A company with $1.01 billion in cash buying 301 BTC isn’t making a bet-the-farm wager on Bitcoin.
The risk for investors is execution. Running world-class AI data centers requires different expertise than running mining rigs. The financing is in place, the cash is abundant, but the competitive landscape for AI infrastructure includes players like Equinix and Digital Realty that have been doing this for decades. Core Scientific’s advantage is its existing power infrastructure and cooling capabilities, which translate well to AI workloads.
Traders should watch whether Core Scientific continues accumulating Bitcoin in the coming quarters. If the 848 BTC figure climbs further, it would represent a definitive strategic reversal from the liquidation playbook outlined in the company’s 2025 annual filing.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Pi Network čeká do konce roku 2026 odemknutí asi 775,8 milionu PI, což může zvýšit nabídku na trhu a vyvíjet tlak na cenu. V příštích 30 dnech se má odemknout 127,5 milionu PI.
Pi Network is entering a major supply transition, with around 775.8 million PI tokens expected to unlock by the end of 2026, according to data shared from PiScan. These unlocks are based on claimable balances, including user-locked balances and tokens distributed by the Pi Core Team.
The upcoming unlocks could increase the amount of Pi available to holders, potentially affecting market supply. However, token unlocks do not automatically mean immediate selling, as some users may continue holding, locking, or using Pi within the ecosystem.
Current Unlock Data Shows More Supply Entering the MarketAccording to PiScan data:
Total locked Pi: 6.17 billion PiUnlocks over the next 30 days: 127.5 million PiEstimated value of upcoming unlocks: Around $10.5 millionAverage daily unlock: Around 4.25 million PiHighest daily unlock in the tracked period: Around 103 million PiThe unlock schedule can change as more balances become claimable, so future release estimates may continue to adjust.
Token unlocks are important because they increase circulating supply. If new supply enters the market faster than demand grows, prices can face additional pressure.
Crypto analyst Travladd has warned that Pi’s long-term unlock schedule could create selling pressure. He estimates that around $505 million worth of Pi could unlock between now and June 2029, including approximately $1713 million over the next 12 months. His view is that higher prices could increase the dollar value of future unlocks, which may encourage some holders to sell.
Meanwhile, another analyst sees improving technical momentum. He noted that PI is forming a rising wedge pattern after recovering from recent lows $0.0751, with buyers defending support levels $0.07. A breakout above $0.0834 resistance with stronger trading volume could improve the short-term outlook.
$PI$PI is forming a rising wedge 👀 Price is squeezing into the apex after a steady recovery, showing buyers are still active, but resistance is getting tighter and momentum is nearing a decision point.
Buyers are defending support aggressively, and a strong move above the… pic.twitter.com/zEaWYgqqxu
— Crypto With Gopal (@cryptowithgopal) July 27, 2026 Price Levels Traders Are WatchingTrader Ography pointed out that the upcoming 127.5 million Pi unlock over the next 30 days is an event the market is closely monitoring. According to the trader, the key support zone to watch is around $0.075–$0.078.
If buyers continue defending this level, sentiment could stabilize. However, a breakdown below this area could increase selling pressure and lead to higher volatility. The focus, according to the analysis, remains on price action and trading volume rather than short-term market emotions.
What Could Decide Pi’s Next Move?The supply pressure is arriving alongside Pi Network’s latest technology upgrade. Protocol v25, deployed in July 2026, strengthens network infrastructure and adds support for privacy-preserving smart-contract functionality, potentially improving the network’s long-term appeal to developers.
This creates a direct battle between new supply and new utility. If ecosystem usage expands, the market may be able to absorb more unlocked PI. If demand remains weak, the scheduled releases could continue to weigh on price.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Lido spustilo Core upgrade s Curated Module v2, který zavádí nativní podporu validátorů typu 0x02, bondy a penalizace i jednodušší governance. Současně se mění Community Staking Module a Simple DVT Module se 72 regular clustery se postupně ukončuje.
TLDR:Lido Core continues to evolve alongside Ethereum. This upgrade introduces major improvements across its staking modules, strengthening protocol health and sustainability, improving alignment with Ethereum's roadmap, while advancing decentralization that benefits both Lido and the broader ecosystem.
Curated Module v2 introduces native support for 0x02 validators, bonding and penalty mechanisms, operator classification, and streamlined governance. It will gradually replace the legacy Curated Module as stake migrates to the new module.Community Staking Module expands permissionless participation with the new Identified DVT Cluster (IDVTC) operator type, alongside technical improvements that make the module more reliable and operator-friendly.Simple DVT Module refines to improve its long-term economic and operational sustainability. No action is required from stakers. The upgrade is handled entirely at the protocol level.
About Lido CoreLido Core is the main liquid staking infrastructure of the Lido protocol, where user-deposited ETH is algorithmically allocated to validators run by a diverse set of both permissioned and permissionless Node Operators (NO) through various Staking Modules. The term was established to distinguish the protocol’s foundational architectureーa single pooled modelーfrom new modular staking primitives (stVaults) launched as a part of Lido V3.
Isidoros Passadis, Chief of Staking at Lido Labs Foundation Curated Module v2: Evolving the Largest Lido Staking ModuleThe Curated Module has been the cornerstone of the Lido validator set since the protocol launched in 2020, securing around 90% of all staked ETH in Lido Core as at July 2026. As Ethereum staking continues to evolve, Lido contributors continue advancing the modules to keep Lido Core aligned with Ethereum's roadmap while ensuring long-term protocol sustainability.
Curated Module v2 (CMv2) is the next major step in that evolution, introducing the market-driven operator economics framework, streamlined operations, new mechanisms and dedicated Node Operator types that empower operators to strengthen Ethereum's decentralization.
To ensure smooth adoption the new module will be introduced in two phases:
Phase 1: Core structural changes, including native 0x02 validators support, operator classification and improved incentive alignment, bond-based security and penalty mechanisms, and lower governance friction. Phase 2: Flexible stake distribution mechanism, custom fees, and a strike system. 0x02 Native SupportThe Pectra upgrade introduced 0x02 Withdrawal Credentials (WC) and consolidations, enabling validators to increase their maximum effective balance from 32 ETH to 2,048 ETH. The Lido protocol initially introduced 0x02 with the launch of stVaults in December 2025. Learn more about this novel modular staking primitive here.
Now, Curated Module v2 brings that capability to Lido Core largest staking module. This enables the migration of more than 265,000 existing Curated Module validators from legacy 0x01 WC to 0x02 through validator consolidations.
Curated validator migration will nearly double the share of ETH secured by compounding validators, increasing it from 32.06% to 52.21%. At the same time, it will reduce the total number of validators across the Ethereum network by roughly one third, from approximately 880,000 at the time of writing to ~628,000 post consolidations (not accounting for new validators that may join the network, or other consolidations).
By reducing the number of validators, this migration is expected to meaningfully lower network congestion and Consensus Layer overhead specifically, while further aligning the Lido protocol with Ethereum's roadmap. Once completed, it should bring down the number of attestation messages across the network by approximately 29% each epoch.
Node Operator TypesRather than applying a one-size-fits-all model, CMv2 introduces operator classification that better reflects the diversity of Curated Node Operators.
The new Node Operator Type Framework enables recognition of different levels of contribution to protocol growth, infrastructure resilience, Ethereum public goods and decentralization.
These types include:
Decentralization Operators — entities that run Ethereum nodes across underrepresented geographies and diverse infrastructure and client combinations;Extra Effort Operators — operators contributing additional value to the protocol beyond validator operations: through capital participation, service roles (such as the Lido Oracle or Deposit Security Committee), and governance alignment through LDO holdings and voting activity.Public Good Operators — entities meaningfully involved in building and maintaining core Ethereum Consensus and Execution Layers (CL and EL) client software. These contributions are now reflected in the Curated Module v2 incentive structure, helping ensure that both the Lido protocol and Ethereum continue to thrive together.
This framework formalizes an approach Lido DAO has been following for years, supporting Ethereum client teams and public-good builders through participation in the Curated Module and LEGO grants. To help sustain development of CL and EL clients, seven client teams were onboarded as Curated Node Operators. As of July 1, 2026, they have collectively received 8,710 stETH (~$21 million) in cumulative rewards for operating validators on behalf of Lido stakers.
Beyond CL and EL development support, improving client, geographic, and infrastructure diversity has remained a sustained focus for contributors and Node Operators since the Merge. Coordinated efforts have steadily reduced the protocol’s reliance on any single client, geographic region, or cloud provider, contributing to a more resilient and decentralized Ethereum network.
By fostering balanced usage, Lido continues to strengthen Ethereum’s overall health and network resilience. Explore the Validator and Node Operator Metrics (VaNOM) dashboard, which provides a detailed view of the progress made over the past five years.
Bonding And Penalty MechanismsThe legacy Curated Module was built on trust, relying on operator reputation as a primary guarantee of alignment and reliability. Curated Node Operators were expected to perform to a high standard and compensate stakers and the protocol if losses arose.
As the staking ecosystem matures, Curated Module v2 advances this alignment by introducing ETH-backed bonding and Penalty Framework that enable coverage in cases of operator underperformance, operational downtime, slashing, or EL rewards violations.
Rather than replacing the existing reputation-based model, CMv2 complements it with new bond-based security and accountability mechanisms, better aligning operators’ behavior with stakers and strengthening Lido Core robustness.
Streamlined Governance And Simplified NO ManagementThe current CM design requires on-chain votes even for routine administrative changes, such as updating an operator address. This increases operational overhead and can delay responses to time-sensitive matters.
Curated Module v2 streamlines governance by permissioning routine operational updates and administrative tasks to Node Operators and the Curated Module Committee (CMC) respectively. The DAO retains authority over the composition of the Node Operator set and parameters related to Node Operators and can override or veto changes when necessary.
This approach reduces DAO overhead and reliance on off-chain coordination, while maintaining the security and oversight.
Aleksandra Gusakova, Lido Core Product Lead at Lido Labs Foundation Lido CSM v3Following 1.5 years of real-world battle-testing, the Community Staking Module has proven itself as a highly scalable and reliable permissionless staking avenue. Today, it stands as the largest alternative to vanilla solo staking in the ecosystem, securing over 770,000 staked ETH across estimated 335 active operators, representing roughly 8.5% of Lido TVL and 1.9% of the total network stake.
However, the evolution of Lido’s permissionless staking continues. As part of the Lido Core upgrade, CSM is evolving to become even more resilient and operator-friendly. Alongside several under-the-hood technical optimizations, here are the primary new features that CSM v3 brings to permissionless operators:
Identified DVT Clusters (IDVTC): This new Node Operator type creates a third pathway alongside the default and Identified Community Staker (ICS) options to utilize CSM. IDVTC empowers independent community stakers to run distributed validators via Obol or SSV using the most optimized parameters available in CSM to date:Bond Requirements: A low 1.5 - 0.5 ETH bond per key.Estimated Capital Efficiency: Up to 3.1x compared to solo staking. To learn more about IDVTC and compare all available options, check out lido.fi/csm.
Native Node Operator Reward Splitting: Node Operators can now configure multiple destination addresses to receive rewards, each with customized proportions. This native splitter provides a seamless experience for operators who need to distribute rewards across various individuals or entities. For example, a group running validators as an IDVTC can now manage reward allocations to individual cluster members directly via the CSM widget.Agile Governance for Permissionless Staking Share Limit: To allow the protocol to promptly react to market demand and scale permissionless staking capacity, traditional Aragon governance has been replaced with Easy Track. This enables faster increases to the module’s staking share limit. Simple DVT Module: What's ChangingFollowing the recent Snapshot vote, the 72 regular clusters in the Simple DVT Module (SDVTM) have been wound down.
The Simple DVT Module played a pivotal role in advancing Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) adoption across both Lido and the broader Ethereum ecosystem. It allowed significant expansion of the number of participating Node Operators in Lido Core by more than 300, making Lido's validator set substantially more diverse and decentralized.
Operators from the wound-down clusters have a pathway to continue validating through Lido through the Community Staking Module (CSM) in one of three ways:
Default permissionless path.ICS: Existing SDVTM solo and community stakers are eligible to claim ICS status if they choose to continue as solo operators.IDVTC: Regular cluster participants, wishing to continue running DVT, can form new clusters. Compared with the Simple DVT cluster model, this approach allows operators to self-organize, and, in certain configurations, receive more favorable economic incentives than other CSM operator types. On top of this, the Lido DAO approved a grant framework to recognize the contributions of operators that participated within the Simple DVT regular clusters. Grant details can be found in the Research Forum post.
Super ClustersSuper Clusters, which consist of Advanced Node Operators and members of the Curated Module running larger validator sets, are not affected by this change. They continue operating as planned until the originally approved wind-down date.
Their longer-term future, including a potential migration to another staking module or an earlier wind-down, will be evaluated separately based on market conditions and future governance decisions.
What's NextThe new Curated Module v2 is now live, and the stake migration from the legacy Curated Module will start soon. Given the current Ethereum activation queue of more than 40 days, this process will take time. The CM will remain available as a fallback and will gradually be wound down as stake migrates to CMv2.
The Identified DVT Clusters operator type is also live, and the first eligible operators can claim the type. Applications for the next IDVTC assessment round close on September 21, while applications for the Identified Community Staker status close on September 7, giving prospective operators time to prepare their applications and cluster formation. Apply for ICS and IDVTC here. For all upcoming application deadlines through the end of 2026, see the full assessment calendar on the Research Forum.
Looking AheadCurated Module v2: Phase 2. With the foundations now in place, Lido contributors will continue preparing the second phase of CMv2. It will introduce mechanisms that move Lido closer to a market-driven staking model, where stake can flow dynamically between Node Operators based on transparent parameters such as fees, performance, and contributions to the ecosystem. Follow the discussion on the Research Forum to stay up to date with the latest proposals and development progress.0x02 CSM. While this specific upgrade does not introduce permissionless 0x02 validator support within the current iteration of the CSM, the v3 codebase natively supports the credential type. The Lido DAO has approved the launch of a dedicated module (0x02 CSM), targeted for Q4 2026, designed specifically to enable permissionless node operators using 0x02 withdrawal credentials. This new module will run alongside the existing CSM instance, offering operators full flexibility to choose their preference. To dive deeper into the solution, read the full 0x02 CSM Landscape.
Lido DAO schválilo Core Upgrade a po úspěšných testech směřuje na mainnet. Upgrade má zlepšit škálovatelnost, bezpečnost i správu protokolu bez jakékoli akce od držitelů stETH.
Lido’s Core Upgrade is officially heading to mainnet. The Lido DAO approved the sweeping protocol overhaul on or around July 23, 2026, after clearing every required governance hurdle, including a clean pass through Dual Governance with no vetoes from any stakeholder.
For context, Dual Governance is Lido’s highest-level approval mechanism, designed so that even a well-organized dissenting faction can pump the brakes on a proposal.
What actually changed The Core Upgrade bundles two major components: the Community Staking Module updated to version 3, and the brand-new Curated Module v2.
The Community Staking Module, or CSM, is Lido’s permissionless entry point for node operators. Version 3 pushes that flexibility further, making it easier for new operators to participate at scale.
Advertisement
Curated Module v2 introduces bond-based security mechanisms, which means node operators post collateral as a performance guarantee rather than relying solely on governance-managed reputation. The practical effect is less governance overhead per operator.
Together, the two modules are designed to improve scalability, tighten security, and reduce governance friction.
Existing stakers do not need to do anything. The upgrade operates entirely at the protocol layer, meaning stETH holders wake up on mainnet deployment day with the same holdings and no migration steps required.
The road to mainnet The upgrade did not arrive overnight. Lido ran the components through thorough testnet phases before the DAO vote opened, and multiple independent security audits assessed the smart contracts and governance logic specifically.
Lido has been a dominant player in Ethereum’s liquid staking landscape since liquid staking became a category worth talking about. Its stETH token, which represents a staker’s ETH position plus accruing rewards, became one of the most widely integrated assets in DeFi. That deep integration means upgrades to Lido’s core infrastructure have downstream effects across a substantial portion of the Ethereum ecosystem, not just for direct Lido users.
The bond-based security model in Curated Module v2 changes the economic incentives for node operators. When operators have skin in the game through posted collateral, the protocol’s alignment with good validator behavior becomes structural rather than reputational.
What it means for the market For stETH holders, the most immediate takeaway is that Lido’s infrastructure is getting more robust without requiring any action on their part.
Lido controls a significant share of the total staked ETH on Ethereum. Upgrades that make the protocol more secure and scalable directly affect confidence in stETH as a collateral asset across lending protocols, liquidity pools, and structured products that have integrated it.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Allbridge, the company behind cross-chain stablecoin bridge Allbridge Core, said it has paused the protocol as a precaution after a “security incident” that reportedly saw $1.65 million drained on Sunday.
The incident affected Allbridge Core’s Solana deployment, with the attacker having already bridged the stolen funds from Solana to Ethereum before moving them into privacy pools.
“Allbridge Core is experiencing a security incident,” it said in a post on X on Sunday. “We have paused the protocol as a precaution while we investigate. If you have liquidity in affected pools, please withdraw now.”
The Allbridge Core exploit is at least the sixth attack targeting a cross-chain bridge since May. Bridges are attractive targets for attackers because they often hold large pools of funds that back bridged assets on the destination blockchain.
Source: Lookonchain
Onchain Lens reported the attacker made a $1.12 million USDC (USDC) flash loan from Kamino, before rapid USDC/USDT swaps that distorted the Allbridge Core stablecoin pool’s exchange rate.
The attacker then withdrew liquidity at manipulated rates, repaying the $1.12 million USDC loan and keeping the difference.
“The resulting pool imbalance created a temporary positive arbitrage window. If you took advantage of it, please consider returning funds… this will go directly toward compensating affected LPs,” it added.
This wasn’t the first time Allbridge Core was hit by a flash loan attack.
In April 2023, Allbridge was exploited for $573,000 through a flash loan attack on Allbridge’s pool on the BNB Chain. The attacker acted as both liquidity provider and swapper, and exploited a flaw in a smart contract that allowed them to manipulate swap prices, which led to $289,900 drained in Binance USD (BUSD) and $290,900 in USDt (USDT).
Warning posted to the Allbridge Core website. Source: Allbridge Core
Cross-chain bridges targeted since May In June, Taiko, an Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, urged its users to withdraw assets from the network’s bridges after attackers exploited one of its bridge protocols and stole $1.7 million.
Taiko reopened its bridge 11 days later after completing a four-step recovery plan.
Weeks before the Taiko incident, Secret Network was exploited through an “infinite mint” bug on a vulnerable smart contract, which created unbacked versions of Axelar-wrapped assets, resulting in a $4.67 million exploit.
Other recent bridge exploits included the Gravity Bridge, Verus Bridge and the Butter Network.
Magazine: The British Virgin Islands are a top crypto hub no one ever talks about: Here’s why
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
Těžaři Bitcoinu masivně přecházejí k AI infrastruktuře, aby kompenzovali tlak na ziskovost po halvingu. Zároveň rostou otázky kolem správy a řízení společnosti kvůli insider prodejům akcií.
Facing profitability under pressure since the last halving in April 2024, bitcoin mining companies have made a strategic pivot towards AI. Enough to excite Wall Street. However, a report from Blocksbridge Consulting published on July 9, 2026, paints an alarming reality. It highlights massive stock sales by executives and board members of some companies. More details in the following paragraphs!
In Brief Bitcoin miners accelerate their diversification towards AI infrastructures to offset the drop in mining profitability after the halving. Several mining company executives sold shares after the rise in BTC prices. The current situation fuels questions about corporate governance and investor confidence. An industrial pivot forced by the realities of the Bitcoin network At the end of 2025, the global Bitcoin network hashrate had reached a historic peak of 1,160 EH/s. This intensified competition. According to sector reports from CoinShares, the weighted average cost to validate a single BTC was about $80,000 in Q4 2025 for publicly listed entities. Result: 15 to 20% of the global fleet of obsolete ASIC machines were forced to operate at a loss.
To improve their cash flows, major players in bitcoin mining chose to convert their energy capacities to power supercomputers. A striking example: the signing of a 20-year lease contract between TeraWulf and Anthropic. The deal is valued at nearly $19 billion.
For many, this diversification attests to the transformation of the BTC mining industry’s business model. Some analysts nonetheless raise a fundamental point: this requires significant capital. This explains why many firms have had to liquidate their own bitcoin reserves. This is notably the case for Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA), which sold more than 15,000 BTC from its institutional treasury. The latest bitcoin sale dates back to April 2026.
Bitcoin and insider sales: the TeraWulf case closely scrutinized by crypto investors On June 29, Beowulf E&D Holdings, an entity managed by CEO Paul Prager, declared the sale of 275,000 TeraWulf shares. The weighted average price stands at $26.596. This represents about $7.3 million in gross proceeds. This operation attracts particular attention as it occurs one week before the announcement of a 20-year lease with Anthropic for AI infrastructure.
According to data, Prager and his entity have sold a total of about 1.59 million bitcoin-linked shares since the end of March. This equals approximately $32.7 million, with an average price of about $20.55.
On July 6, TeraWulf confirms its lease with Anthropic. According to the official press release, it is expected to generate nearly $19 billion in contractual revenue on 401 megawatts of critical load. At the same time, the company sold its 50.1% stake in the Abernathy joint venture for about $450 million.
The TeraWulf case is not isolated in the bitcoin miners universe engaged in AI CEO of Cipher Digital, Tyler Page, filed a transfer request for 112,500 shares worth $2.38 million on July 8. This action is part of a Rule 10b5-1 plan adopted in December 2025.
At Riot Platforms, CEO Jason Les sold:
175,000 shares for $4.2 million in May; an additional 250,000 shares for $7.03 million on June 22. As for Core Scientific, its legal officer sold 140,000 shares for $3 million on July 6. This brings his total sales to about 260,000 shares and $5.9 million.
That’s not all! At Hut 8, a director also sold 20,000 shares on May 21 for about $2 million. Admittedly, these transactions were executed under pre-established plans, but they still fuel doubt about the alignment between bitcoin mining executives and public shareholders.
The bitcoin mining sector faces another major challenge An analysis by VanEck published on June 16 estimates the short-term funding deficit at about $50 billion. However, this figure could rise to $221 billion to cover all future AI infrastructure needs.
Source: VanEck Research To bridge this gap, bitcoin miners have three options:
dilute shareholders through new share issuances; incur debt in a still high interest rate environment; sell part of their bitcoin reserves. Some have already started liquidating positions. If projections hold, AI could represent up to 70% of some bitcoin miners’ revenues by the end of 2026. Raising questions about the future role of BTC mining in their business model.
Bitcoin and governance: the IREN case and the question of stock tokens On June 30, the board of the former bitcoin miner turned AI cloud actor IREN approved the grant of over 18 million free shares in total to its two co-CEOs, William and Daniel Roberts, over a combined lock-up period of six years. The company assures that no other grants will be made before 2031.
The decision is not unanimous within the crypto community. Many point to the extent of dilution for bitcoin mining shareholders. Yet, IREN’s AI strategy has not yet proven sustainable profitability. Result: the stock price has fallen considerably.
What consequences for investors? For holders of shares linked to bitcoin mining, three points deserve particular attention:
the recurrence of insider sales during uptrends, an indicator of confidence; the method chosen to bridge the funding gap identified by VanEck; the real economics of signed contracts, beyond announcement figures. Dilution, debt or bitcoin sale? Each option will have a different impact on shareholder value.
Tether, for example, reduced its exposure to Bitdeer after increasing it during a market dip. This illustrates growing caution among strategic investors regarding AI-version bitcoin. If miners continue selling their reserves to finance AI infrastructure, this would indeed remove a historical buying pressure source from the bitcoin market.
Anyway, the technological transformation of bitcoin mining companies towards artificial intelligence is redefining industry standards. The current debate on governance and gain allocation could extend throughout the AI-backed crypto ecosystem.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Ariela R.
My name is Ariela, and I am 31 years old. I have been working in the field of web writing for 7 years now. I only discovered trading and cryptocurrency a few years ago, but it is a universe that greatly interests me. The topics covered on the platform allow me to learn more. A singer in my spare time, I also cultivate a great passion for music and reading (and animals!)
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
Bitcoin Core 31.1 opravuje kritickou chybu, která mohla při použití -privatebroadcast odhalovat IP adresu uzlů. Aktualizace zároveň řeší problémy s databází a diskovou zátěží.
Bitcoin developers have rolled out Bitcoin Core version 31.1, a maintenance release that contains bug fixes and performance enhancements.
The new software notably addresses a significant privacy vulnerability that risked exposing node operators' network data.
Plugging the privacy leakA security vulnerability within the platform's privacy configurations is the most notable patch that has been delivered with the new release. Specifically, the update delivers a fix for an IP address leakage issue.
HOT Stories
The software "fixes an IP address leak when using the -privatebroadcast feature."
The privacy mechanism was failing to route data securely under certain conditions.
You Might Also Like
However, the update now ensures that node operators can remain anonymous without inadvertently revealing their clearnet IP addresses.
Fixing disk overload and wallet tweaksOn top of the security patch, Bitcoin Core v31.1 also resolves a flaw within its database engine that was causing hardware strain. The release contains fixes for the "-privatebroadcast IP address leak as well as leveldb causing excessive disk operations."
This version specifically "fixes an issue where the chainstate database would repeatedly rewrite large portions of itself, causing excessive disk reads and writes during normal operation."
The wallet infrastructure also received important maintenance. Under the designated wallet changes, the development team integrated pull request o "check the final BDB page LSN during migration" alongside a fix to "use outpoint when estimating input size."
Node operators have to promptly update their systems to benefit from the security and database improvements. Users have to shut down their active node entirely before installing the new binaries.
Dogecoin Core 1.14.8 přináší kritické bezpečnostní záplaty a opravy zranitelností včetně vzdáleného spuštění kódu. Pro provozovatele uzlů jde hlavně o důležitou údržbu a vyšší stabilitu sítě.
Dogecoin does not always get taken seriously when the market is in meme mode, but infrastructure updates are where the joke stops and the network starts. Core 1.14.8 is one of those releases that matters because it focuses on security and stability, not sentiment.
That makes it relevant even for traders who never run a node. Healthy networks are built on boring work done properly.
For more details, visit the official GitHub platform.
TL;DR Dogecoin developers released Core 1.14.8 with critical security patches.The release addresses vulnerabilities referenced in the project notes, including remote code execution fixes.For node operators and the network, this is less hype story and more maintenance that genuinely matters. A Reminder That Maintenance Matters The GitHub notes make clear that the new version includes critical security patches. That alone should be enough to get the attention of node operators and anyone responsible for infrastructure around DOGE.
Crypto markets often reward spectacle, but security updates are the difference between a network that looks active and a network that can actually be trusted. For Dogecoin, that means the conversation should be about resilience rather than memes.
What It Means For The Ecosystem Releases like this also help reinforce that Dogecoin is still maintained code, not just a ticker powered by online culture. That distinction matters whenever the asset is discussed as if it exists only on social momentum.
The immediate market impact may be limited, but the underlying point is straightforward: networks that keep patching, updating, and hardening themselves give holders and service providers more confidence over time.
This report is based on the Dogecoin GitHub release notes.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
PYTH za týden vzrostl o více než 25 % před upgradem Pyth Core 31. července, který ukončí bezplatný přístup k price feedům a nasměruje předplatné do buybacků PYTH.
PYTH gained more than 25% over the past week, outperforming most large-cap altcoins. The Pyth Core upgrade on July 31 ends free, permissionless access to the network’s price feeds. All subscription revenue flows to the Pyth DAO, which funds monthly open-market token buybacks. Santiment ranks Pyth among the top three Solana ecosystem projects by development activity. Pyth Network’s native token has climbed more than 25% over the past seven days, trading around $0.045 with a market capitalization of $355 million, according to CoinMarketCap data. The rally comes three weeks before the Pyth Core upgrade goes live on July 31, a structural overhaul that ends the network’s free price data model and replaces it with paid subscriptions whose revenue feeds directly into PYTH buybacks. he timing invites an obvious reading – traders positioning before the deadline – though the move also coincides with a broader altcoin rotation, so the upgrade cannot claim sole credit. What the pace does show is acceleration: 12% of the gain arrived in the past 24 hours alone.
The end of free data Any developer has been able to pull Pyth’s price data free of charge since 2021, an arrangement that ends this month. According to the official Pyth Network blog, accessing any Price Feeds API after July 31 will require an active paid plan and an API key managed through the Pyth Terminal.
Pricing follows a tiered structure: the entry-level Starter Plan covers crypto prices, NAV data, redemption rates and indices, traditional asset classes sit in separate brackets, and institutions that want everything pay a flat monthly rate at the top of the scale.
Plan Coverage Monthly price Starter Crypto, NAV, redemption rates, indices $500 Individual asset classes US equities, futures or FX, per bracket $2,500 – $6,500 Full access All asset classes $10,000 The team stresses that API endpoints stay identical, so protocols built on Pyth since 2021 will not face broken integrations. The infrastructure serving those endpoints is another matter. Core feeds merge into the same scaling technology that powers Pyth Pro, which the project says reduces latency, improves price accuracy and expands symbol coverage well beyond the current catalog.
Three moving averages down, one barrier left The 4-hour PYTH/USDT chart from TradingView, based on Binance data, shows the token cutting cleanly through its 50, 100 and 200-period simple moving averages during the latest leg up. Those averages now sit clustered between $0.0361 and $0.0389, well below the current price near $0.0452. When a price trades above all three of these lines, it usually signals that short, medium and longer-term momentum have aligned in the same direction, something PYTH has not managed since its early May local top above $0.062.
The same chart carries a warning for anyone entering at current levels. The Relative Strength Index, an indicator that measures how fast and how far a price has moved, briefly pushed above 80 before settling near 72. Readings above 70 typically describe an overbought market, meaning the asset has risen quickly enough that a pause or pullback becomes more likely in the short term. The candle that tagged $0.048 on July 7 already met sellers, and the price has since retreated about 2%.
Metric Value Price $0.04512 24h change +12.01% 7d change +25.39% Market cap $355.35M 50 / 100 / 200-period SMA $0.0389 / $0.0369 / $0.0362 RSI 72 For traders watching levels, the former resistance band around $0.042, where the price stalled twice in early July, now acts as the first area of potential support. A deeper retracement would bring the moving average cluster near $0.038 back into focus. On the upside, $0.048 remains the barrier that rejected the latest push.
A buyback engine tied to real revenue Every dollar of subscription revenue flows to the Pyth DAO. From there, the Pyth Reserve spends one third of its accumulated treasury balance each month on open-market PYTH purchases, creating a direct link between commercial adoption and buying pressure on the token.
The scale of what becomes billable is not trivial. The network entered 2026 with more than 2,850 active price feeds serving over 650 onchain applications, usage that until now generated no recurring revenue. If even a fraction of those integrations convert into paying subscribers, the DAO treasury grows, and with it the monthly buyback budget.
The supply side makes the rally more notable than the percentage alone suggests. On May 19, Pyth released roughly 2.13 billion tokens from vesting, an unlock worth around $92 million that expanded the circulating supply by more than a third, according to data from Tokenomist. Cliffs of that size usually cap price action for months while the market digests the new float. PYTH instead spent seven weeks basing near its yearly lows and is now climbing into the upgrade with that overhang already behind it.
Some rough arithmetic shows what is at stake. If just 200 of those 650 integrations take the $500 Starter Plan, that is $1.2 million in annual recurring revenue reaching the DAO – modest against PYTH’s $355 million market cap, but recurring. The bull case requires institutional brackets: fifty clients on full access would mean $6 million a year, and a third of the growing treasury converting into monthly market buys. Neither scenario is confirmed, and that is precisely why the first revenue disclosure matters more than the upgrade date itself.
The upgrade also retires older parts of the network. Pyth is deprecating its original Pythnet appchain and winding down Oracle Integrity Staking emissions as data delivery migrates to the newer Pyth Lazer pipeline. Fewer emissions combined with recurring buybacks tilt the token’s supply dynamics toward scarcity, provided the subscription business actually generates meaningful revenue. That remains the open question, and the Core tier has no revenue history yet to test it against – the only disclosed figures so far come from Pyth Pro’s institutional side, which crossed $1 million in annual recurring revenue with a few dozen subscribers.
A hard deadline for builders Teams running infrastructure on Pyth face a hard deadline. Anyone using the standalone Price Pusher to manage on-chain updates must upgrade to version 10.5.0 or later and attach a Hermes access token obtained through the Pyth Terminal, otherwise automated price updates will start failing on July 31, according to the network’s developer documentation. The DAO will handle major contract switches automatically, but new integrations should fetch the updated contract addresses from the Pyth Developer Hub rather than relying on legacy references.
Development data gives the rally support that is independent of the upgrade itself. Santiment Intelligence placed Pyth third among all Solana ecosystem projects by development activity in its latest monthly ranking, behind only Chainlink and Solana itself, based on enhanced GitHub event data. Sustained developer output during a commercial pivot is not a given, and Pyth holding that position suggests the engineering side is keeping pace with the business restructuring.
Broader market rotation is working in the token’s favor too: CoinMarketCap’s Altcoin Season Index has climbed to 49, and capital moving into mid-cap tokens has lifted several oracle and infrastructure names this week. The next real test comes after July 31, when the first subscription figures will show whether the buyback program has meaningful funding behind it or whether the market front-ran a mechanism that still needs paying customers.
Filecoin Public Goods Funding (ProPGF) Batch 2 rozdělil 3,22 mil. USD mezi 16 projektů, přičemž přes 60 % šlo na core infrastrukturu. Z 102 žádostí uspělo 15,7 %.
PLFIF is excited to announce the results of Filecoin Public Goods Funding (ProPGF) Batch 2 - General Track, with $3,220,200 allocated across 16 projects supporting critical infrastructure, developer tooling, ecosystem growth, and coordination within the Filecoin network.
Batch 2 reflects a maturing funding strategy: more selective, more capital disciplined, and strongly aligned with long-term network resilience.
🌱 About ProPGF Protocol Labs’ Filecoin Public Goods Funding (PGF) programs support projects that strengthen the Filecoin ecosystem and broader open-source infrastructure.
Funding is distributed through:
ProPGF - Prospective funding for forward-looking initiatives RetroPGF - Retroactive rewards for demonstrated impact While RetroPGF evaluates past impact, ProPGF is designed to strategically allocate capital toward future ecosystem priorities through milestone-based funding and structured review.
ProPGF runs in recurring cycles and continues to evolve as Filecoin’s capital formation layer matures.
📊 Batch 2 at a Glance 102 total applications 53 shortlisted 42 advanced to final review 16 projects funded $3,220,200 allocated The majority of grants are structured over 6 months, with select soft commitments extending toward 12 months This represents a 15.7% acceptance rate, reflecting the rigor of the review process and the competitive nature of the round.
🧮 Capital Discipline & Negotiation
Across the 16 selected projects:
Total requested: $4,632,800 Total approved: $3,220,200 Note: Batch 2 reflects a more capital-disciplined approach: of the $4.63M requested across selected proposals, $3.22M was approved. This reflects a selective funding approach - prioritizing scope clarity, milestone alignment, and long-term ecosystem impact.
The committee conducted structured negotiations across scope, milestones, and budget sizing to ensure:
Capital efficiency Alignment with ecosystem priorities Clear accountability through milestone gating Average grant size: $201,262 Median grant size: $129,000
This reflects a portfolio approach — balancing large, high-leverage infrastructure bets with smaller, targeted interventions.
🏗 Funding Allocation by Category Batch 2 demonstrates a clear prioritization of core network stability and dependencies.
Capital Distribution:
Infra & Core Dependencies: 62.4% Tooling & Developer Ecosystem: 16.1% Ecosystem Growth: 16.3% Coordination: 3.1% Integrations: 2.0% Over 60% of capital was allocated toward core infrastructure — nodes, maintenance, retrieval systems, indexing, and protocol-level dependencies — signaling strong emphasis on network robustness.
🚀 Meet the Funded Projects 🏗 Infra & Core Dependencies Filecoin Infrastructure Services by ChainSafe Team – $138,000 The project aims to increase independent operator diversity on Filecoin’s Calibnet test network by running a long-lived, production-like storage miner using Curio. Forest: Efficient and lightweight Filecoin node implementation by ChainSafe Team – $504,000 Forest is a lightweight Filecoin node implementation that makes running network infrastructure cheaper and more reliable. This grant supports its continued maintenance and protocol upgrade readiness. IPNI by IPNI Team - $288,000 IPNI is the indexing service that helps applications discover where data is stored across Filecoin and IPFS. This funding ensures it remains reliable, scalable, and sustainably operated as network usage grows. Enhancing the visibility and verifiability of Filecoin Onchain Cloud within the Filecoin ecosystem through the Filfox explorer by 6Block Team – $30,000 This project enhances the Filfox explorer to improve the visibility and verifiability of FOC, PDP, and Filecoin Pay activity, helping developers, providers, and integrators better understand and troubleshoot onchain service behavior. Curio Storage by Curio Team – $500,000 Curio Storage is building core software and infrastructure that helps Filecoin Storage Providers (SPs) deliver paid deals. This grant funds continued development of “Market 2.0” deal interfaces, plus ongoing support and calibration network stability work that operators rely on. Lotus Miner + Boost Maintenance by Storswift Team – $50,000 This project funds ongoing maintenance of Lotus Miner and Boost, two core components that many Storage Providers rely on for storage and deal operations. The work ensures these systems remain secure, upgrade-compatible, and stable. Calib Network Miner by Storswift Team – $28,000 This project adds a production-grade, independent miner to the Calibration Network to improve upgrade testing, operator diversity, and overall network resilience. Venus Maintenance by IPFS Team – $300,000 Venus maintains and upgrades the second-largest Filecoin client implementation, ensuring continued client diversity and network resilience. This grant supports four network upgrades, zero-day compatibility, and ongoing maintenance of Filscan and FIPs.cc to improve transparency and governance clarity across the ecosystem. Drand by Drand Team – $120,000 This grant funds the continued operation and maintenance of drand - the public randomness service that underpins Filecoin’s block production and network liveness. OpenModel by 6Block Team – $50,000 OpenModel is building a decentralized AI model distribution and compute infrastructure on Filecoin, enabling fast, verifiable model downloads and pay-as-you-go access using Filecoin Pay. 🛠 Tooling & Developer Ecosystem Filecoin Developer Experience & FEVM Development by FIL-B Team – $420,000 FIL-B is building and running the developer experience layer for Filecoin in 2026, partnering with the FOC pod to drive builder adoption (docs, integrations, activations) while also improving core FEVM and Filecoin DX. ProbeLab Gauge for FOC and Retrieval Testing by ProbeLab Team – $100,000 ProbeLab will build retrieval testing tooling and live dashboards to measure Filecoin’s retrieval success rate and Filecoin Onchain Cloud (FOC) performance. This provides transparent, real-time metrics and SLAs to help developers, Storage Providers, and protocol teams monitor and improve network reliability. 🌍 Ecosystem Growth Secured Finance by Secured Finance Team – $225,000 Secured Finance maintains and expands USDFC, a FIL-collateralized stablecoin designed as native financial infrastructure for Filecoin. This grant supports interoperable payment rails, improved user interfaces, and audited onchain vaults to enable stable-value transactions and capital retention within the Filecoin ecosystem. FilPonto by FILPonto Team – $300,000 FilPonto supports core Filecoin infrastructure and ecosystem coordination, sustained FOC developer contributions, and a flexible grants pool for high-impact integrations and experimentation. This grant funds advanced JS contributions to FOC, and responsive technical support across the ecosystem. 🤝 Coordination Filecoin Foundation Infrastructure & Coordination Stewardship by SEAD Team – $101,200 This project provides ongoing stewardship and governance of the Filecoin Foundation’s core coordination infrastructure, including shared systems such as Slack, Google Workspace, and GitHub. The grant ensures secure access management, clear ownership boundaries, and operational continuity across organizational lines to reduce systemic risk and support ecosystem execution. 🔗 Integrations Oku Trade by Oku Team – $66,000 Oku Trade provides Filecoin’s primary decentralized exchange interface and meta-aggregator, enabling fee-less swaps, bridging, and liquidity provision via Uniswap v3 infrastructure. This grant supports ongoing hosting and indexing to ensure reliable DEX access and liquidity flows across EVM networks into Filecoin. 📈 What Batch 2 Signals Compared to earlier cycles, Batch 2 reflects:
Stronger selectivity (16 out of 102 funded) Greater capital concentration into core infrastructure Clear negotiation discipline Emphasis on long-term network sustainability This was not a broad experimentation round. It was a stability and resilience round.
📉 For Teams Not Selected We recognize the high quality of many proposals that were not funded in this cycle.
ProPGF operates within a defined capital envelope and prioritizes strategic alignment, scope readiness, and budget feasibility.
Importantly, we are currently working on a separate grant initiative outside of ProPGF, designed to support projects that may be better suited for a different funding structure or scope.
Our team will be reaching out directly to selected applicants as this program takes shape.
We strongly encourage teams to remain engaged and apply in future cycles.
💸 What Happens Next Agreements and KYB completion Milestone tracking via Karma Grantee Slack onboarding Structured reporting and transparency Initial disbursements begin shortly.
🔭 Looking Ahead As Filecoin continues to mature, so too does its capital allocation strategy.
ProPGF is evolving toward:
Greater funding transparency Stronger milestone accountability Better capital efficiency Alignment with long-term network KPIs Batch 2 marks another step toward building sustainable capital infrastructure around Filecoin.
We’re excited to support this cohort and look forward to sharing more about the long-term roadmap for ProPGF in upcoming posts.
📣 Stay Engaged If you’d like to explore the scope of funded work and follow progress updates from Batch 2 teams, please visit filpgf.io and navigate to the ProPGF Batch 2 → Approved Projects section. All funded projects will be reporting milestone updates there.
For applicants: you should be able to access your full application details directly via filpgf.io. If you encounter any issues or have questions regarding agreements, KYB, or payouts, please reach out to [email protected].
We appreciate the continued engagement from the ecosystem and look forward to building the next phase of Filecoin infrastructure together.
Po aktualizaci XRP Ledger xrpld 3.2.0 komunita hlásí řadu chyb, včetně problémů se synchronizací uzlů a pádu při parsování konfigurace. Zatím nebyl hlášen žádný výpadek celé sítě.
After the release of version 3.2.0 of the XRP Ledger core server software “xrpld,” the community has noted a number of issues. The update, which was released on June 15, added performance enhancements, memory optimizations, and security improvements. The most important update was that it renamed the server software as “xrpld” from “rippled.”
Developers Report Bugs On XRP Ledger v3.2.0 The XRP Ledger update was supposed to be a performance improvement and a memory reduction. However, it has already caused some problems for some developers and memory usage concerns for some operators in the project’s GitHub repository.
One of the most significant reports was an operator of nodes who reported that “xrpld” version 3.2.0 had failed to sync with the network. The software continues to be in a “connected” server state and would not have downloaded any ledger data even though the same machine was able to sync when using version 3.1.3, the issue report states. The issue was posted on June 18 and is still pending.
Another bug report came in shortly after release saying that configuration files with inline comments might cause the server to crash when it tries to parse them, which was determined to be a “BadLexicalCast” error. The report indicated that it was the legacy configuration parser that did not succeed in removing comments from some areas containing single value, which resulted in unexpected failures.
The GitHub issue tracker also lists some open bug reports on XRP Ledger that were reported within a few days of the release. These include peer communication issues, resource charging rules, message parsing policies, message compression, consensus-related routing rules, and amendment processing. Project maintainers classified many of the issues as bugs and triaged them.
Other Flaws On The Network In addition to the synchronization and configuration parser problems, node operators detected other bugs in the main server software. XRP Ledger developers reported a transaction relay calculation flaw that can cause transactions to be under-relayed to peers.
Moreover, they spotted a resource charging mechanism that only tracks the highest fee and discards previous fees. It also includes a validator list distribution issue, which sends validator information only to inbound peers, excluding outbound peers.
They also flagged risks of unsigned integer overflow during ledger sequence validation. The XRP Ledger members also saw potential inconsistencies in routing flags for transactions and broken nodes’ ID for proposals linked to ephemeral keys.
Further, they highlighted holes in the logic of ledger tracking that can leave nodes in an unknown state for an indefinite period of time. Some of these have been classified as bugs and are still to be reviewed by maintainers.
The reports have come despite hopes that the June 15 upgrade would actually bring some real improvements in performance. Prior to the launch, community conversations had resounded with the expected 30% to 40% memory usage reduction along with other general code optimizations and fixes.
The XRP Ledger Foundation and its contributors are ongoing with reviewing reported issues via the open source development process. There are no reported bugs that cause network-wide disruption as of this writing, and the issue or issues are still being investigated on their project’s GitHub repository. Currently, 26% nodes have been upgraded on the network.
For those looking for decentralized futures trading, visit our page on Perp DEXs.
Venus Protocol na BNB Chain poprvé přidal tokenizované akcie bStocks jako kolaterál v Core Poolu. Uživatelé si mohou proti TSLAB, NVDAB a SPCXB půjčit aktiva bez prodeje svých pozic.
TLDR: Venus Core Pool now accepts TSLAB, NVDAB, and SPCXB as collateral for borrowing assets. Users keep stock price exposure while unlocking liquidity without selling their holdings. Binance, PancakeSwap, and Trust Wallet support the tokenization and transfer pathway. Rollout follows conservative risk parameters set through Venus governance procedures. Venus Protocol has launched tokenized stocks as collateral for the first time, introducing bStocks to its Core Pool on BNB Chain.
The integration lets users borrow against tokenized stock positions without selling their holdings. This marks the first tokenized stock collateral market available on the platform.
bStocks Enter Venus Core Pool Venus Core Pool now supports TSLAB, NVDAB, and SPCXB as eligible collateral assets. These bStocks represent tokenized versions of Tesla, Nvidia, and SpaceX-linked stock exposure.
Users supplying bStocks retain price exposure to the underlying equities. At the same time, they unlock borrowing power within the protocol.
Borrowers can access supported assets in Venus Core Pool using bStocks as backing. This includes stablecoins like USDT, USDC, and U.
Other listed tokens on the platform are also available for borrowing. The structure allows holders to keep their stock exposure while accessing liquidity.
Venus Core Pool remains the largest decentralized lending market on BNB Chain. bStocks now sit alongside BTC, ETH, BNB, and major stablecoins in the pool.
This places tokenized equities within the same liquidity infrastructure backing billions in active lending. Venus describes the addition as part of its core financial stack rather than a separate offering.
The bStocks launch follows earlier tokenized commodity listings on Venus, including XAUm. Those markets showed demand for real-world asset exposure within decentralized finance.
Venus is now extending that approach from commodities into equities. This broadens the categories of tokenized assets usable as on-chain collateral.
Ecosystem Collaboration Powers the Rollout The launch involved coordination across multiple platforms within the BNB Chain ecosystem. Binance supplies the tokenization infrastructure behind bStocks.
Users can convert existing Direct Stock holdings into bStocks without fees. Alternatively, bStocks can be purchased directly through Binance Spot.
PancakeSwap and Trust Wallet provide secondary market access for bStocks once tokenized. Holders can move tokens into self-custody wallets through these platforms.
From there, bStocks can be supplied directly to Venus Core Pool. This completes the path from tokenization to active collateral use in DeFi.
Venus Protocol’s Head of BD, Leon, said tokenized assets are turning into a genuine bridge between traditional finance and on-chain systems.
He described the development as a working product rather than a concept, adding that allowing users to borrow against tokenized stock positions without selling expands the meaning of collateral on BNB Chain.
The initial rollout includes a limited set of bStocks under conservative risk parameters. These parameters were set through Venus governance processes.
Any future expansion to additional tokenized stocks will require governance approval. Collateral markets operate continuously, allowing borrowers to access credit at any time.
Capital remains at risk throughout participation in these markets. Tokenized stock values depend on third-party issuers and available liquidity.
Borrowing positions may face automatic liquidation if collateral values decline. Users should review all disclosures before participating in these markets.
Bývalý přispěvatel Ethereum Foundation varuje před pomalou finanční tísní u core vývoje ETH, která může přijít během 3 až 9 měsíců. Podle něj je na udržení více než deseti týmů potřeba asi 30 milionů USD ročně.
A former Ethereum Foundation contributor has raised alarms about a possible shortfall in support for the network’s foundational development efforts, warning that it could materialize within the next three to nine months. Trent Van Epps, who spent five years at the Foundation until April 2026 coordinating core protocol activities and related funding initiatives, outlined these concerns in a detailed essay published on June 18, 2026.
Van Epps described the situation as a “slow-burning funding crisis” rather than an abrupt cliff.
He pointed to two primary pressures: the recent conclusion of a multi-year client support program and ongoing adjustments to the Foundation’s treasury management strategy.
The Client Incentive Program, which had channeled resources to teams maintaining Ethereum’s execution and consensus clients over four years, wrapped up in April 2026 without a designated successor mechanism in place.
At the same time, the Foundation has been reducing its annual spending rate.
A treasury plan announced in 2025 set a glide path toward lowering outflows from roughly 15 percent of assets per year down to a more sustainable 5 percent endowment-style baseline by 2030.
This shift aims to preserve long-term solvency after years of using treasury holdings to bootstrap the broader ecosystem.
Van Epps estimated that maintaining adequate capacity across more than ten client teams, research groups, and coordination roles requires consistent annual funding in the range of $30 million.
He noted that current and near-term sources for this level of support appear increasingly limited, based on conversations across the core development community.
Without steady resources, he warned of risks including the departure of experienced contributors who hold deep institutional knowledge, delays in tackling complex challenges such as scalability improvements and future-proofing measures, and potential impacts on the network’s track record of reliability.
The former contributor situated the warning within the Foundation’s long-standing “subtraction” philosophy.
This approach deliberately seeks to limit organizational growth inside the Foundation itself and instead encourage value creation and responsibility across the wider Ethereum ecosystem.
While intended to promote decentralization and maturity, Van Epps argued that executing this transition effectively requires proactive planning for new stewardship structures.
He referenced comments from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, who has noted that the Foundation’s original scope—focused on early-stage software development through major upgrades—was largely completed years ago and was never designed as a permanent central authority.
Van Epps called for renewed discussion around updated social, political, and economic arrangements among stakeholders to support ongoing protocol maintenance through more scalable and neutral funding channels.
The concerns come amid reports of staff transitions at the Ethereum Foundation and broader debates about sustainable resourcing for public goods in the Ethereum ecosystem. Van Epps emphasized that underinvestment in continuity could prove costly to reverse if symptoms appear 12–18 months from now, and he urged collective attention to building durable mechanisms that match the project’s long-term goals and objectives.
